UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 1-12991

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.

(662) 680-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last year)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o

As of May 4, 2005, the Registrant had outstanding 78,279,756 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share.

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.
CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Report may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period(s) or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “intend,” “could,” “would” or “plan,” or future or conditional verb tenses, and variations or negatives of such terms. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to BancorpSouth’s financial products and services, liquidity and liquidity strategies, asset quality, cost controls, noninterest revenue, noninterest expense, net interest margin, net interest revenue, mortgage servicing rights, life insurance premium revenue, mortgage loans, consumer loans, provision for credit losses, allowance for credit losses, deposits, indirect automobile sales financing, the lack of significant loan growth, future acquisitions, the effect of certain legal claims, the impact of federal and state regulatory requirements for capital, the impact of certain tax assessments and administrative appeals, additional share repurchases under BancorpSouth’s stock repurchase program, interest rate sensitivity, prepayment of BancorpSouth’s junior subordinated debt securities, off-balance sheet commitments and other arrangements to extend credit and BancorpSouth’s future growth and profitability. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this Report, in that actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in BancorpSouth’s operating or expansion strategy, changes in economic conditions, the ability to maintain asset and credit quality, prevailing interest rates and government fiscal and monetary policies, effectiveness of BancorpSouth’s interest rate hedging strategies, the ability of BancorpSouth’s borrowers to repay loans, changes in laws and regulations affecting financial institutions, the ability of BancorpSouth to identify and integrate acquisitions and investment opportunities, the ability of BancorpSouth to manage its growth and effectively serve an expanding customer and market base, geographic concentrations of assets, availability of, costs associated with and timing for obtaining adequate sources of liquidity, competition from other financial services companies, the ability of BancorpSouth to repurchase its common stock on favorable terms, the ability of BancorpSouth to compete aggressively within its markets, the effect of pending or future legislation, possible adverse rulings, judgments, settlements and other outcomes of pending or threatened litigation, other factors generally understood to affect the financial condition or results of financial services companies and other factors detailed from time to time in BancorpSouth’s press releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this Report.

2

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

4

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.

See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.

5

BANCORPSOUTH, INC.

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements of BancorpSouth, Inc. (the “Company”), have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated condensed financial statements have been included and all such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain 2004 amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2005 presentation.

The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, BancorpSouth Bank (the “Bank”) and Risk Advantage, Inc., and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, Century Credit Life Insurance Company, Personal Finance Corporation, BancorpSouth Insurance Services, Inc., BancorpSouth Investment Services, Inc. and BancorpSouth Municipal Development Corporation.

Key employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries have been granted stock options under the Company’s stock incentive plans. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

6

NOTE 2 – LOANS AND LEASES

The composition of the loan and lease portfolio by collateral type as of the dates indicated was as follows:

The following table presents information concerning non-performing loans as of the dates indicated:

NOTE 3 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated:

7

NOTE 4 – PER SHARE DATA

The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The computation of diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the shares resulting from the assumed exercise of all outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the periods shown:

NOTE 5 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income and the related tax effects allocated to each component for the periods indicated:

NOTE 6 – JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT SECURITIES

In 2002, the Company issued $128,866,000 in 8.15% Junior Subordinated Debt Securities to BancorpSouth Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), a business trust. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of five million shares of 8.15% trust preferred securities, $25 face value per share, to acquire the 8.15% Junior Subordinated Debt Securities. Both the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities mature on January 28, 2032 and are callable at the option of the Company after January 28, 2007.

8

Pursuant to the merger with Business Holding Corporation on December 31, 2004, the Company assumed the liability for $6,186,000 in Junior Subordinated Debt Securities issued to Business Holding Company Trust I, a statutory trust. Business Holding Company Trust I used the proceeds from the issuance of 6,000 shares of trust preferred securities to acquire the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities. Both the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities mature on April 7, 2034, and are callable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, on any January 7, April 7, July 7, or October 7 on or after April 7, 2009. The Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities pay a per annum rate of interest, reset quarterly, equal to the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.80% from January 30, 2004 to April 7, 2009 and thereafter at LIBOR plus 2.85%.

Pursuant to the merger with Premier Bancorp, Inc. on December 31, 2004, the Company assumed the liability for $3,093,000 in Junior Subordinated Debt Securities issued to Premier Bancorp Capital Trust I, a statutory trust. Premier Bancorp Capital Trust I used the proceeds from the issuance of 3,000 shares of trust preferred securities to acquire the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities. Both the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities mature on November 7, 2032, and are callable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, on any February 7, May 7, August 7 or November 7 on or after November 7, 2007. The Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities pay a per annum rate of interest, reset quarterly, equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 3.45%.

NOTE 7 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were as follows:

9

The following tables present information regarding the components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets for the dates indicated:

At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, aggregate impairment for mortgage servicing rights was approximately $4,939,000 and approximately $11,457,000, respectively.

The following table presents information regarding estimated amortization expense on the Company’s amortizable identifiable intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2005, and the succeeding four years:

NOTE 8 – PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost for the periods indicated:

10

NOTE 9 – RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

No recently issued accounting pronouncements were adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2005.

NOTE 10 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

On December 31, 2004, Premier Bancorp, Inc. (“Premier”), a bank holding company with approximately $160 million in assets headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, merged with and into the Company. Pursuant to the merger, Premier’s subsidiary, Premier Bank of Brentwood, merged into the Bank. Consideration paid to complete this transaction consisted of 669,891 shares of the Company’s common stock in addition to cash paid to the Premier shareholders in the aggregate amount of $14,794,000. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase. This acquisition was not material to the financial position and had no impact on the results of operations of the Company in 2004.

On December 31, 2004, Business Holding Corporation (“BHC”), a bank holding company with approximately $170 million in assets headquartered in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, merged with and into the Company. Pursuant to the merger, BHC’s subsidiary, The Business Bank, merged into the Bank. Consideration paid to complete this transaction consisted of 762,978 shares of the Company’s common stock in addition to cash paid to the BHC shareholders in the aggregate amount of $16,696,000. This transaction was accounted for as a purchase. This acquisition was not material to the financial position and had no impact on the results of operations of the Company in 2004.

The impact on the results of operations from these acquisitions were not material to the results of operations of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 and therefore no pro forma presentation for the 2004 periods presented herein have been made.

NOTE 11 — SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s principal activity is community banking, which includes providing a full range of deposit products, commercial loans and consumer loans. The general corporate and other operating segment includes leasing, mortgage lending, trust services, credit card activities, insurance services, investment services and other activities not allocated to community banking.

Results of operations and selected financial information by operating segment for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

11

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The State Tax Commission of the State of Mississippi completed its audit of the Bank’s state income tax return for the tax years 1998 through 2001 in the second quarter of 2004. As a result of this audit, the State Tax Commission assessed the Bank additional taxes of approximately $5.4 million along with interest and penalties totaling approximately $3.8 million. Based on the advice of legal counsel, management believes that there is no substantial basis for the position taken by the Mississippi State Tax Commission and that the Company has meritorious defenses to dispute this assessment of additional taxes. The Company is in the midst of the administrative appeals process and a final decision has not been rendered by the State Tax Commission. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in having the assessment reduced on appeal. The Company’s potential exposure with regard to this assessment will be the additional tax, interest and penalties assessed in May 2004 plus interest that will continue to accrue from May 2004 through the appeals process and legal costs associated with the appeal. Management does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, although any significant additional assessment could materially adversely affect earnings in the period in which it is recorded.

12

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

OVERVIEW

BancorpSouth, Inc. (the “Company”) is a regional financial holding company with approximately $10.8 billion in assets and is headquartered in Tupelo, Mississippi. BancorpSouth Bank (the “Bank”), the Company’s wholly-owned banking subsidiary, has commercial banking operations in Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Texas and Louisiana. The Bank and its consumer finance, credit insurance, insurance agency and brokerage subsidiaries provide commercial banking, leasing, mortgage origination and servicing, insurance, brokerage and trust services to corporate customers, local governments, individuals and other financial institutions through an extensive network of branches and offices.

Management’s discussion and analysis provides a narrative discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations of the Company. For a complete understanding of the following discussion, you should refer to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 found in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this report. This discussion and analysis is based on reported financial information, and certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current financial statement presentation. The information that follows is provided to enhance comparability of financial information between periods and to provide a better understanding of the Company’s operations.

As a financial holding company, the financial condition and operating results of the Company are heavily influenced by economic trends nationally and in the specific markets in which the Company’s subsidiaries provide financial services. Most of the revenue of the Company is derived from the operation of its principal operating subsidiary, the Bank. The financial condition and operating results of the Bank are affected by the level and volatility of interest rates on loans, investment securities, deposits and other borrowed funds, and the impact of economic downturns on loan demand and creditworthiness of existing borrowers. The financial services industry is highly competitive and heavily regulated. The Company’s success depends on its ability to compete aggressively within its markets while maintaining sufficient asset quality and cost controls to generate net income.

The table below summarizes the Company’s net income, net income per share, return on average assets and return on average shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Management believes these amounts and ratios are key indicators of the Company’s financial performance.

The increase in net income for the first quarter of 2005 when compared to the first quarter of 2004 is attributable to several factors. The Company’s primary source of revenue is the amount of net interest revenue earned by the Bank. Net interest revenue is the difference between interest earned on loans and investments and interest paid on deposits and other obligations. The Company’s net interest revenue was positively impacted by the improvement in the interest rate environment as well as the increased loan demand resulting from a stronger economic environment. These factors combined to increase the Company’s net interest revenue to $87.13 million for the first quarter of 2005, a $3.65 million, or 4.37%, increase from $83.48 million for the first quarter of 2004. In recent years, the Company has taken steps to diversify its revenue stream by increasing its noninterest revenue from mortgage lending activities, insurance agency activities, brokerage and securities activities, and other bank related fees. These

13

diversification efforts allowed the Company to realize a 17.11% increase in noninterest revenue for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004. While significant growth in loans resulted in an increase in the provision for credit losses of 19.23% to $4.79 million for the first quarter of 2005 from $4.02 million for the first quarter of 2004, improved asset quality allowed annualized net charge-offs to fall to 0.22% of average loans for the first quarter of 2005 from 0.31% for the first quarter of 2004. Noninterest expense totaled $89.69 million for the first quarter of 2005 compared to $86.01 million for the first quarter of 2004, an increase of $3.68 million, or 4.28%. The increase in noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2005 resulted primarily from the impact of costs related to the integration and operation of Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Business Holding Corporation that were acquired on December 31, 2004 as well as increased costs related to additional locations and facilities added since the first quarter of 2004. The major components of net income are discussed in more detail in the various sections that follow.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there was no significant change in the Company’s critical accounting policies and no significant change in the application of critical accounting policies as presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net Interest Revenue

Net interest revenue is the difference between interest revenue earned on assets, such as loans, leases and securities, and interest expense paid on liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, and continues to provide the Company with its principal source of revenue. Net interest revenue is affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in interest rates and by changes in the amount and composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The Company’s long-term objective is to manage those assets and liabilities to maximize net interest revenue, while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity and capital risks. For purposes of the following discussion, revenue from tax-exempt loans and investment securities has been adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent basis, using an effective tax rate of 35%.

Net interest revenue was $89.44 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $85.91 million for the same period in 2004, representing an increase of $3.53 million, or 4.11%. The increase in net interest revenue for the first quarter of 2005 is related to the combination of growth in loans during a rising interest rate environment and the Company’s continued focus on funding this growth with maturing investment securities and lower-cost liabilities.

Interest revenue increased $8.81 million, or 7.01%, to $134.42 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $125.61 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in interest revenue is attributable to a $279.91 million, or 2.89%, increase in average interest earning assets to $9.95 billion for the first quarter of 2005 from $9.67 billion for the first quarter of 2004 and an increase in the yield of those assets of 26 basis points to 5.48% for the first quarter of 2005 from 5.22% for the first quarter of 2004.

Interest expense increased $5.28 million, or 13.30%, to $44.98 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $39.70 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in interest expense is attributable to a $180.87 million, or 2.20%, increase in average interest bearing liabilities to $8.41 billion for the first quarter of 2005 from $8.23 billion for the first quarter of 2004 and an increase in the average rate paid on those liabilities of 23 basis points to 2.17% for the first quarter of 2005 from 1.94% for the first quarter of 2004.

The relative performance of the Company’s lending and deposit-raising functions is frequently measured by two calculations – net interest margin and net interest rate spread. Net interest margin is determined by dividing fully taxable equivalent net interest revenue by average earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average fully taxable equivalent yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is generally greater than the net interest rate spread because of the additional income earned on those assets funded by noninterest bearing liabilities.

14

Net interest margin for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 was 3.64% and 3.57%, respectively, representing a increase of 7 basis points. Net interest margin increased from the comparable prior-year quarter for the first time since the third quarter of 2002. Net interest rate spread for the first quarter of 2005 was 3.31%, an increase of 3 basis points from 3.28% for the same period of 2004. The increase in net interest margin and net interest rate spread was primarily a result of the larger increase in the average rate earned on interest earning assets, from 5.22% for the first quarter of 2004 to 5.48% for the first quarter of 2005, than the increase in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities from 1.94% for the first quarter of 2004 to 2.17% for the first quarter of 2005. The earning asset yield increase for the first quarter of 2005 was a result of the stronger economic environment driving increased interest rates as well as stronger loan demand. The Company has also maintained a conservative stance in the average maturity of its investment assets mitigating the Company’s liability-sensitivity as interest rates have increased.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The interest rate sensitivity gap is the difference between the maturity or repricing opportunities of interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities for a given period of time. A prime objective of asset/liability management is to maximize net interest margin while maintaining a reasonable mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities. The following table presents the Company’s interest rate sensitivity at March 31, 2005:

15

Provision for Credit Losses and Allowance for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses is the annual cost of providing an allowance or reserve for estimated probable losses on loans and leases. The Bank employs a systematic methodology for determining its allowance for credit losses that considers both qualitative and quantitative factors and requires that management make material estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to significant change. Some of the quantitative factors considered by the Bank include loan and lease growth, changes in nonperforming and past due loans and leases, historical loan and lease loss experience, delinquencies, management’s assessment of loan and lease portfolio quality, the value of collateral and concentrations of loans and leases to specific borrowers or industries. Some of the qualitative factors that the Bank considers include existing general economic conditions and the inherent risks of individual loans and leases.

The allowance for credit losses is based principally upon the Bank’s loan and lease classification system, delinquencies and historic loss rates. The Bank has a disciplined approach for assigning credit ratings and classifications to individual credits. Each credit is assigned a grade by the appropriate loan officer, which serves as a basis for the credit analysis of the entire portfolio. The assigned grade reflects the borrower’s creditworthiness, collateral values, cash flows and other factors. An independent loan review department is responsible for reviewing the credit rating and classification of individual credits and assessing trends in the portfolio, adherence to internal credit policies and procedures and other factors that may affect the overall adequacy of the allowance. The work of the loan review department is supplemented by governmental regulatory agencies during their periodic examinations of the Bank. This provides an additional independent level of review. The loss factors assigned to each classification are based upon the attributes of the loans and leases typically assigned to each grade (such as loan to collateral values and borrower creditworthiness). Management periodically reviews the loss factors assigned in light of the general economic environment and overall condition of the loan and lease portfolio and modifies the loss factors assigned to each classification as it deems appropriate. The overall allowance generally includes a component representing the results of other analyses intended to ensure that the allowance is adequate to cover other probable losses inherent in the portfolio. This component considers analyses of changes in credit risk resulting from the differing underwriting criteria in acquired loan and lease portfolios, industry concentrations, changes in the mix of loans and leases originated, overall credit criteria and other economic indicators.

The provision for credit losses, the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans and leases outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 2004, net charge-offs and net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are shown in the following table:

Net charge-offs decreased during the first quarter of 2005 when compared to the first quarter of 2004, reflecting the continued improvement in the credit quality of the Bank’s loans and leases at March 31, 2005. This improvement was further evidenced by the significant decrease in non-performing loans, down 19.54% when compared to non-performing loans at March 31, 2004. Also, improved credit quality was reflected by the Bank’s loan and lease classification system at March 31, 2005.

The allocation of the allowance by loan and lease category is based, in part, on evaluations of specific loans’ and leases’ past histories and on economic conditions within specific industries or geographical areas. Accordingly,

16

since all of these conditions are subject to change, the allocation is not necessarily indicative of the breakdown of any future allowance or losses. The following table presents (a) the allocation of the allowance for credit losses by loan and lease category and (b) the percentage of each category in the loan and lease portfolio to total loans and leases for the dates indicated:

The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated:

17

Noninterest Revenue

The components of noninterest revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the percentage changes are shown in the following table:

The Company’s revenue from mortgage lending increased 593.25% during the first quarter of 2005 when compared to the first quarter of 2004. The Company’s revenue from mortgage lending typically fluctuates as mortgage interest rates change and is primarily attributable to two activities, origination of new mortgage loans and servicing mortgage loans. The Company’s normal practice is to generate mortgage loans, sell them in the secondary market and retain the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) to the loans sold.

The mortgage origination process generates loan origination fees and net gains or losses from the sale of the mortgage loans originated, which is also referred to as secondary marketing. These activities produced revenue of $1.29 million and $1.71 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Of the revenue from the origination process, the sale of mortgage loans resulted in net losses of $427,000 and $258,000 for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively. Historically, origination volumes have varied as mortgage interest rates have changed. Rising mortgage interest rates generally have resulted in a decrease in the volume of originations, while falling mortgage interest rates generally have resulted in an increased volume of originations. The Company originated mortgage loans totaling $121.61 million during the first quarter of 2005, a decrease of 18.81% from $149.78 million for the first quarter of 2004. This decrease reflects lower levels of mortage loan refinance volume due to interest rate increases since March 31, 2004.

Revenue from the servicing process includes fees from the actual servicing of loans and the recognition of changes in the valuation of the Company’s MSRs. MSRs are carried as an asset at the lower of the capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or fair value. MSRs are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated net servicing income. This amortization is recognized as a reduction of servicing revenue. MSRs are also periodically evaluated for impairment based on the excess of the carrying amount of the mortgage servicing rights over their fair value. If temporary impairment exists, a valuation allowance is established for any excess of amortized cost over the current fair value through a charge to servicing revenue. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to servicing revenue. If permanent impairment exists, an other-than-temporary charge to income would be made during the quarter in which it is identified. During the first quarter of 2005, an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $2.40 million was recorded which permanently reduced the carrying amount of the mortgage servicing rights.

The Company does not hedge the value of its MSRs and is susceptible to significant fluctuations in its value in changing interest rate environments. When mortgage interest rates decline, refinancing of home mortgages typically accelerates and the value of the Company’s MSRs typically declines as the expected lives of the underlying mortgages shorten. When mortgage interest rates are rising, refinancing of home mortgages typically declines and the value of the Company’s MSRs typically increases as the expected lives of the underlying

18

mortgages lengthen. The servicing process generated a gain of $4.33 million for the first quarter of 2005, while the servicing process generated a loss of $2.85 million for the first quarter of 2004. The fluctuation in servicing revenue is primarily due to changes in the valuation of capitalized MSRs. Changing mortgage interest rates during the periods resulted in a recovery of previously recorded impairment expense of $4.12 million for the first quarter of 2005 and impairment expense of $2.31 million for the first quarter of 2004.

Service charges on deposit accounts remained relatively static overall for the first quarter of 2005 when compared to the first quarter of 2004. Trust income increased 12.04% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004 as a result of increases in the value of assets under care (either managed or in custody).

Net securities gains of approximately $70,000 were reported in the first quarter of 2005 compared to net securities gains of approximately $618,000 for the first quarter of 2004. Net securities gains in the first quarter of 2005 were primarily from the call of securities that had been purchased at a discount. Net securities gains in the first quarter of 2004 were primarily from the sale of available-for-sale securities pursuant to our efforts to manage the interest rate sensitivity of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Insurance commissions grew 10.20% to $15.93 million for the first quarter of 2005. The increase in insurance commissions is primarily due to the increase in policies written and the addition of experienced producers since March 31, 2004. The Company plans to continue to expand the products and services offered by its insurance agencies.

Other noninterest revenue for the first quarter of 2005 included a gain of $2.49 million from the sale of student loans originated by the Company compared to a $2.37 million gain for such sales in the first quarter of 2004. Other noninterest revenue for the first quarter of 2005 also included a $1.7 million gain on the sale of the Company’s membership in the PULSE Network, an electronic banking network to which the Company retains access. Other noninterest revenue for the first quarter of 2004 included $3.15 million in insurance proceeds as partial reimbursement for prior litigation settlements and related costs and expenses.

Noninterest Expense

The components of noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the percentage changes are shown in the following table:

Salaries and employee benefits expense for the first quarter of 2005 increased when compared to the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of salaries and employee benefits and commissions of employees of Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Business Holding Corporation acquired on December 31, 2004. Occupancy expense also increased on a comparable three-month period basis primarily because of additional locations and facilities opened since March 31, 2004 including these two acquisitions. Equipment expense remained relatively static for the first three months of 2005 when compared to the first three months of 2004 as the Company continues to focus on controlling these expenses. Other noninterest expense also remained relatively static for the first three months of 2005 when compared to the first three months of 2004.

Income Tax

Income tax expense was $14.83 million and $12.34 million for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively, representing an increase of 20.21%. The increase in income tax expense in the first quarter of 2005 when compared

19

to the first quarter of 2004 is due to the increase of net income before tax. The effective tax rates for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 were 31.84% and 31.23%, respectively.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Earning Assets

The percentage of earning assets to total assets measures the effectiveness of management’s efforts to invest available funds into the most efficient and profitable uses. Earning assets at March 31, 2005 were $9.88 billion, or 91.25% of total assets, compared with $9.94 billion, or 91.67% of total assets, at December 31, 2004.

The securities portfolio is used to make various term investments, to provide a source of liquidity and to serve as collateral to secure certain types of deposits. Held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2005 were $1.20 billion, compared with $1.27 billion at December 31, 2004, a 5.57% decrease. Available-for-sale securities were $1.62 billion at March 31, 2005, compared to $1.68 billion at December 31, 2004, a 3.54% decrease.

The Bank’s loan and lease portfolio makes up the single largest component of the Company’s earning assets. The Bank’s lending activities include both commercial and consumer loans and leases. Loan and lease originations are derived from a number of sources, including direct solicitation by the Bank’s loan officers, real estate broker referrals, mortgage loan companies, current savers and borrowers, builders, attorneys, walk-in customers and, in some instances, other lenders. The Bank has established disciplined and systematic procedures for approving and monitoring loans and leases that vary depending on the size and nature of the loan or lease. Loans and leases, net of unearned interest, totaled $6.91 billion at March 31, 2005, which represents a 1.03% increase from the December 31, 2004 total of $6.84 billion.

At March 31, 2005, the Company did not have any concentrations of loans in excess of 10% of total loans outstanding. Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities, which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. However, the Company does conduct business in a geographically concentrated area. The ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay loans is to some extent dependent upon the economic conditions prevailing in the Company’s market areas.

In the normal course of business, management becomes aware of possible credit problems in which borrowers exhibit potential for the inability to comply with the contractual terms of their loans, but which do not currently meet the criteria for disclosure as non-performing loans. Historically, some of these loans are ultimately restructured or placed in non-accrual status. At March 31, 2005, no loans of material significance were known to be potential non-performing loans.

Collateral for some of the Company’s loans is subject to fair value evaluations that fluctuate with market conditions and other external factors. In addition, while the Company has certain underwriting obligations related to such evaluations from a review standpoint, evaluations of some real property and other collateral are dependent upon third party independent appraisers employed either by the Company’s customers or as independent contractors of the Company.

The Company’s policy provides that loans, other than installment loans, are generally placed in non-accrual status if, in management’s opinion, payment in full of principal or interest is not expected or payment of principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Non-performing loans were 0.46% of loans and leases, net of unearned interest, at March 31, 2005 and 0.50% of loans and leases, net of unearned interest, at December 31, 2004.

Deposits and Other Interest Bearing Liabilities

Deposits originating within the communities served by the Bank continue to be the Company’s primary source of funding its earning assets. The Company has been able to effectively compete for deposits in its primary market

20

areas, while continuing to manage the exposure to rising interest rates. Deposits totaled $9.08 billion at March 31, 2005 as compared to $9.06 billion at December 31, 2004, representing a 0.22% increase. Noninterest bearing demand deposits increased by $61.46 million, or 4.26%, to $1.50 billion at March 31, 2005 from $1.44 billion at December 31, 2004, while interest bearing demand, savings and time deposits decreased $41.14 million, or 0.54%, to $7.58 billion at March 31, 2005 from $7.62 billion at December 31, 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

One of the Company’s goals is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan demand or any potential increase in the normal level of deposit withdrawals. This goal is accomplished primarily by generating cash from the Bank’s operating activities and maintaining sufficient short-term liquid assets. These sources, coupled with a stable deposit base and a strong reputation in the capital markets, allow the Company to fund earning assets and maintain the availability of funds. Management believes that the Bank’s traditional sources of maturing loans and investment securities, sales of loans held for sale, cash from operating activities and a strong base of core deposits are adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for normal operations over both the short-term and the long-term.

To provide additional liquidity, the Company utilizes short-term financing through the purchase of federal funds and securities lending arrangements. Further, the Company maintains a borrowing relationship with the Federal Home Loan Bank which provides liquidity to fund term loans with borrowings of matched or longer maturities.

If the Company’s traditional sources of liquidity were constrained, the Company would be forced to pursue avenues of funding not typically used and the Company’s net interest margin could be impacted negatively. The Company utilizes, among other tools, maturity gap tables, interest rate shock scenarios and an active asset and liability management committee to analyze, manage and plan asset growth and to assist in managing the Company’s net interest margin and overall level of liquidity. The Company’s approach to providing adequate liquidity has been successful in the past and management does not anticipate any near- or long-term changes to its liquidity strategies.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various off-balance sheet commitments and other arrangements to extend credit that are not reflected in the consolidated condensed balance sheets of the Company. The business purpose of these off-balance sheet commitments is the routine extension of credit. While most of the commitments to extend credit are made at variable rates, included in these commitments are forward commitments to fund individual fixed-rate mortgage loans. Fixed-rate lending commitments expose the Company to risks associated with increases in interest rates. As a method to manage these risks, the Company also enters into forward commitments to sell individual fixed-rate mortgage loans. The Company also faces the risk of deteriorating credit quality of borrowers to whom a commitment to extend credit has been made; however, no significant credit losses are expected from these commitments and arrangements.

Regulatory Requirements for Capital

The Company is required to comply with the risk-based capital guidelines established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. These guidelines apply a variety of weighting factors that vary according to the level of risk associated with the assets. Capital is measured in two “Tiers”: Tier I consists of common shareholders’ equity and qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets; and Tier II consists of general allowance for losses on loans and leases, “hybrid” debt capital instruments and all or a portion of other subordinated capital debt, depending upon remaining term to maturity. Total capital is the sum of Tier I and Tier II capital. The Company’s Tier I capital and total capital, as a percentage of total risk-adjusted assets, was 12.22% and 13.46%, respectively, at March 31, 2005. Both ratios exceeded the required minimum levels for these ratios of 4% and 8%, respectively, at March 31, 2005. In addition, the Company’s Tier I leverage capital ratio (Tier I capital divided by total assets, less goodwill) was 8.67% at March 31, 2005, compared to the required minimum leverage capital ratio of 4%.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s capital-based supervisory system for insured financial institutions categorizes the capital position for banks into five categories, ranging from well capitalized to critically

21

undercapitalized. For a bank to classify as “well capitalized,” the Tier I capital, total capital and leverage capital ratios must be at least 6%, 10% and 5%, respectively. The Bank met the criteria for the “well capitalized” category at March 31, 2005 as its Tier I capital, total capital and leverage capital ratios were 12.14%, 13.40%, and 8.23%, respectively.

There are various legal and regulatory limits on the extent to which the Bank may pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to the Company. In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies have the authority to prevent a bank or bank holding company from paying a dividend or engaging in any other activity that, in the opinion of the agency, would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The Company does not expect these limitations to cause a material adverse effect with regard to its ability to meet its cash obligations.

Uses of Capital

The Company may pursue acquisition transactions of depository institutions and businesses closely related to banking which further the Company’s business strategies. The Company anticipates that consideration for any such transactions would be shares of the Company’s common stock, cash or a combination thereof. For example, mergers with Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Business Holding Corporation were completed on December 31, 2004, and the consideration in each transaction was a combination of shares of the Company’s common stock and cash.

On April 23, 2003, the Company announced a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could acquire up to 3.9 million shares of its common stock. At the time of the expiration of this plan on April 30, 2005, the Company had repurchased 2,238,108 shares of the 3.9 million shares authorized under this plan. On April 27, 2005, the Company announced a new stock repurchase program whereby the Company may acquire up to 3.0 million shares of its common stock in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions during the period from May 1, 2005 through April 30, 2007. The extent and timing of any repurchases will depend on market conditions and other corporate considerations. Repurchased shares will be held as authorized but unissued shares. These authorized but unissued shares will be available for use in connection with the Company’s stock option plans, other compensation programs, other transactions or for other corporate purposes as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company conducts its stock repurchase program by using funds received in the ordinary course of business. The Company has not experienced, and does not expect to experience, a material adverse effect on its capital resources or liquidity in connection with its current stock repurchase program during the terms of the program. See Part II, Item 2 of this report (“Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds”) for information about the Company’s repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

From January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2005, the Company had repurchased approximately 10.5 million shares of its common stock under various approved repurchase plans.

In 2002, the Company issued $128,866,000 in 8.15% in Junior Subordinated Debt Securities to BancorpSouth Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), a business trust. The Trust used the proceeds from the issuance of 5.0 million shares of 8.15% trust preferred securities, $25 face value per share, to acquire the 8.15% Junior Subordinated Debt Securities. Both the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the trust preferred securities mature on January 28, 2032, and are callable at the option of the Company after January 28, 2007. The $125 million in trust preferred securities issued by the Trust qualifies as Tier I capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. The Company may prepay the Junior Subordinated Debt Securities, and in turn the trust preferred securities, at a prepayment price of 100% of the principal amount of these securities within 90 days of a determination by the Federal Reserve Board that trust preferred securities will no longer qualify as Tier I capital.

The Company assumed $9.3 million in Junior Subordinated Debt Securities and the related $9.0 million in trust preferred securities pursuant to the mergers on December 31, 2004 with Premier Bancorp, Inc. and Business Holding Corporation (see Notes 2 and 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements). The $9.0 million in trust preferred securities qualifies as Tier I capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines.

22

Certain Litigation Contingencies

The nature of the business of the Company’s subsidiaries results in legal proceedings, including claims against entities to which the Company or one of its subsidiaries are successors as a result of business combinations. The Company and/or its subsidiaries are involved in various pending or threatened legal proceedings, all of which are considered ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business. Litigation is, however, inherently uncertain and the Company cannot make assurances that it will prevail in any of these legal proceedings, nor can it estimate with reasonable certainty the amount of damages that it or any of its subsidiaries might incur if the Company or its subsidiaries do not prevail. In the opinion of management, however, the liabilities, if any, arising from these proceedings will not in the aggregate have a materially adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there were no significant changes to the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The Company, with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation and as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to information required to be disclosed in its reports that the Company files or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

23

PART II

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

The Company made the following purchases of its common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2005:

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

25

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

26