e424b1
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
File Number 333-144363
800,000 Shares
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. All of the shares of common
stock are being sold by the Company.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price per share is
$8.00. Our common stock has been approved for listing on the
American Stock Exchange under the symbol GIA.
See Risk Factors on page 8 to read about
factors you should consider before buying shares of the common
stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the accuracy of this prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
6,400,000
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
512,000
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Gulfstream
|
|
$
|
7.36
|
|
|
$
|
5,888,000
|
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more than
800,000 shares of common stock, the underwriters have a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 120,000 shares from
the Company at the initial public offering price less the
underwriting discount.
The underwriters are offering the shares on a firm commitment
basis and expect to deliver the shares against payment in
New York, New York on December 19, 2007.
Taglich Brothers,
Inc.
Prospectus dated December 14, 2007.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not, and
the underwriters have not, authorized anyone else to provide you
with different or additional information. This prospectus may
only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer
to buy securities in any circumstances in which the offer or
solicitation is unlawful. The information in this prospectus may
only be accurate on the date of this prospectus and is subject
to change after such date.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
Through and including January 8, 2008 (the 25th day
after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting
transactions in these securities, whether or not participating
in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This
is in addition to a dealers obligation to deliver a
prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to an
unsold allotment or subscription.
i
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you
should consider before buying shares in this offering. You
should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the
sections entitled Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our financial
statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus, before making an investment decision. Unless
indicated otherwise, the information contained in this
prospectus: (i) assumes an offering price of $8.00 per
share; (ii) reflects a
2-for-1
stock split of our common stock effected in May 2007;
(iii) does not reflect any exercise of outstanding common
stock warrants into shares of our common stock, which is
described under Description of Capital Stock
Warrants; (iv) does not reflect any exercise of
common stock warrants issuable to designees of the underwriters
in connection with this offering which is described under
Description of Capital Stock
Underwriters Warrants; and (v) assumes that the
underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option to
purchase up to 120,000 additional shares in the offering.
Gulfstream
International Group, Inc.
We are a holding company that operates two independent
subsidiaries: Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc.
(Gulfstream) and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc.
(the Academy).
Gulfstream is a Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based commercial
airline currently operating more than 200 scheduled flights
per day, serving eleven destinations in Florida and ten
destinations in the Bahamas. Our fleet consists of 27 Beechcraft
1900D, 19-seat, turbo-prop aircraft (B1900Ds) and
eight Embraer Brasilia
EMB-120,
30-seat,
turbo-prop aircraft
(EMB-120s).
We operate under a number of cooperative marketing relationships
with major airlines through agreements known as code share
agreements. Our primary agreement is with Continental Airlines
(Continental). We are also party to code share
agreements with United Airlines (United),
Northwest Airlines (Northwest) and Copa Airlines of
Panama. In addition to the daily scheduled flights, Gulfstream
also offers frequent charter flights within our geographic
operating region, including flights to Cuba.
The Academy provides flight training services to licensed
commercial pilots. The Academys principal program is our
First Officer Program, which allows participants to receive a
Second-In-Command
type rating in approximately four months. Having a
Second-In-Command type rating allows pilots to fly as first
officers on commercial flights. Following receipt of this
rating, pilots typically spend up to 250 hours flying as a
first officer at Gulfstream. By attending the Academy, pilots
are able to enhance their ability to secure a permanent position
with a commercial airline. The Academys graduates are
typically hired by various regional airlines, including
Gulfstream. In 2006, 78 students entered the First Officer
Program.
Our business started with the formation of Gulfstream in 1988.
Gulfstream began as an airline offering on-demand charter
service. In 1990, Gulfstream initiated scheduled commercial
service by offering flights from Miami to several locations in
the Bahamas. Following the introduction of turbo-prop air
service in 1994, Gulfstream signed several code share agreements
with major carriers, including one with Continental, which is
our principal alliance partner.
In December 2005, the Company was formed by a group of investors
to acquire Gulfstream and the Academy. In March 2006, we
acquired approximately 89% of G-Air Holding, Inc.
(G-Air), which owned approximately 95% of Gulfstream
at that time, and 100% of the Academy, which held the remaining
5% of Gulfstream. We subsequently acquired the remaining shares
of G-Air. Prior to our acquisition of Gulfstream, Continental
Airlines assisted Gulfstream from time to time with financial
transactions and aircraft acquisitions, and today holds a
warrant to purchase 10% of Gulfstreams outstanding shares.
For our fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, our pro forma
revenue and net income were $105.1 million and
$1.0 million, respectively. Airline passenger revenue
accounted for approximately 94% of our revenue for this period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our pro forma
revenue and net income were $86.7 million and
$1.9 million, respectively. Pro forma revenue and net
income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007
are not indicative of our full-year operations because our
full-year operations are impacted by seasonality fluctuations.
Our strongest seasonal period is from February to June. Revenue
and net
1
income amounts for 2006 are derived from our pro forma financial
data as set forth in Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Statements.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We attribute our success to the following competitive strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Long-standing code share agreements with multiple major
airlines. Gulfstream has long-standing code share
agreements with Continental, United and Northwest. We believe
that utilizing such agreements enhances our ability to generate
revenue from both local and connecting traffic. We also believe
that through our alliances, we are able to control costs by
contracting for reservations, ground handling and other services
at lower costs.
|
|
|
|
Well positioned in the Bahamas market. We are
a leading carrier to the Bahamas and serve more destinations in
the Bahamas than any other U.S. airline. We believe that our
focus on the Bahamian market allows us to identify new market
opportunities and develop those opportunities more efficiently
than new market entrants.
|
|
|
|
Diverse route network and utilization of small
aircraft. We have connecting hubs in several key
Florida cities, which enable us to establish multiple flight
crew and maintenance bases that reduce costs and enhance
reliability. In addition, our mix of 19-seat and 30-seat
aircraft and mix of business and leisure passengers enhances our
ability to align aircraft capacity with market demand, while
maintaining our ability to provide competitive flight
frequencies.
|
|
|
|
We offer reliable, quality service. We are
consistently among the highest-ranked regional airlines in the
U.S. in terms of reliability and have received the FAAs
highest level of recognition for maintenance training, the
Diamond Award, for seven consecutive years.
|
|
|
|
The Academy has a unique first officer
program. We believe the Academy has established a
strong reputation for quality instruction. In addition, the
Academy provides Gulfstream with a reliable and cost-effective
source of first officers and pilots.
|
Our
Strategy
Our business strategy is to utilize small-capacity aircraft to
target markets that are unserved or underserved by competing
airlines. Small capacity aircraft allow for lower costs per
flight, and enable us to operate profitably with fewer
passengers per flight than airlines operating larger equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
Utilize turboprop aircraft to selectively expand the number
of markets we serve. We use 19- and
30-passenger
turboprop aircraft that have substantially lower acquisition
costs and operating costs and offer greater operational
flexibility than other types of commercial aircraft. We intend
to profitably grow our route system by adding unserved or
underserved short haul city pairs with low passenger volume
utilizing this type of aircraft. We are actively seeking
opportunities to grow by adding new routes, aircraft, alliance
partners, or by acquiring other regional airlines. These
opportunities will likely include operating in areas away from
our current Florida base.
|
|
|
|
Use of code share agreements. By having code
share agreements with multiple major airlines and other
airlines, we are able to increase our revenue per flight by
accessing several sources of connecting passengers relative to
what would be available within a single code share partnership
arrangement. Our code share agreements also provide the
opportunity to contract for services at lower costs, as well as
to gain access to airport and other facilities, relative to what
we would be able to do independently.
|
|
|
|
Increase enrollment at the Academy. We seek to
increase enrollment at the Academy through implementation of
various marketing initiatives, including increasing cooperation
with other regional airlines and primary flight training
centers, developing closer integration with accredited higher
education institutions offering two- and four-year degrees and
offering training services to other regional airlines operating
similar aircraft types.
|
2
We face risks in operating our business, including risks that
may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or that
may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
operating results. You should consider these risks before
investing in our company. Risks relating to our business include:
|
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to compete successfully in the highly
competitive airline industry, which is characterized by low
profit margins and high fixed costs,
|
|
|
|
we are highly dependent on the Bahamas market and a decrease in
demand for air travel to the Bahamas would adversely impact our
business,
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to maintain our code share relationships with
Continental and our other code share partners,
|
|
|
|
we rely on B1900D and EMB-120 turboprop aircraft and our
operations would be adversely affected if the expense of
maintaining or operating either type of aircraft type increased
materially or if the FAA grounded either type of aircraft,
|
|
|
|
aircraft fuel constitutes approximately 23-24% of our operating
expenses and our profits may decline due to an increase in the
price of aircraft fuel,
|
|
|
|
the loss of key personnel could adversely impact our business,
and
|
|
|
|
we may not successfully implement our plans to expand our
operations beyond the Florida and Bahamas markets.
|
For a discussion of the significant risks associated with our
business, our industry and investing in our common stock, you
should read the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 8 of this prospectus.
Company
Information
We were incorporated in Delaware in December 2005. Our principal
executive offices are located at 3201 Griffin Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312, and our telephone number is
(954) 985-1500.
Our website address is www.gulfstreamair.com. Information
contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into
and does not form any part of this prospectus. As used in this
prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, references to
the Company and Group refer to
Gulfstream International Group, Inc.; references to
Gulfstream refer to Gulfstream International
Airlines, Inc.; references to the Academy refer to
Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc.; references to
G-Air refer to G-Air Holdings Corp., Inc., the
former parent company of Gulfstream, which was merged into GIA
Holdings Corp., Inc. in March 2007; references to
GIA refer to GIA Holdings Corp, Inc., the parent
company of Gulfstream and references to we,
our and us, refer to Gulfstream
International Group, Inc. and either or both of Gulfstream or
the Academy.
Certain monetary amounts, percentages and other figures included
in this prospectus have been subject to rounding adjustments.
Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not
be the arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them,
and figures expressed as percentages in the text may not total
100% or, as applicable, when aggregated may not be the
arithmetic aggregation of the percentages that precede them.
This prospectus may refer to trademarks and trade names of other
organizations, including those of our code share partners.
3
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered
|
|
800,000 Shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after the offering
|
|
2,839,460 Shares |
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $4,388,000, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. We
expect to use the net proceeds from this offering to fully
redeem our 12% subordinated debentures totaling $3,320,000.
The remaining proceeds will be used to acquire additional
aircraft, to refinance existing aircraft, or for general working
capital purposes. See Use of Proceeds on
page 21. |
|
Risk factors
|
|
See Risk Factors and other information included in
this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully
consider before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock |
|
Dividend policy
|
|
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future. |
|
American Stock Exchange Symbol
|
|
GIA |
The number of shares of our common stock referred to above that
will be outstanding immediately after completion of this
offering is based on 2,039,460 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of September 30, 2007. This number does not
include, as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
46,480 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants, at an exercise price of $5.00 per share;
|
|
|
|
210,324 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options at an exercise price equal to $5.00 per share;
|
|
|
|
up to an additional 139,676 shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
64,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrants to be issued to designees of the managing underwriter
in connection with this offering at an exercise price equal to
120% of the public offering price of this offering.
|
We have agreed to issue an additional 120,000 shares if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, which
we describe in Underwriting beginning on
page 94. If the underwriters exercise this option in full,
2,959,460 shares of common stock will be outstanding after
this offering.
4
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The results of operations presented herein for all periods
prior to our acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy are
referred to as the results of operations of the
predecessor. The results of operations presented
herein for all periods subsequent to the acquisition are
referred to as the results of operations of the
successor. As a result of the acquisition, the
results of operations of the predecessor are not comparable to
the results of operations of the successor.
The following table sets forth summary financial data for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2007. The
summary financial data as of and for the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 are unaudited. The
unaudited pro forma summary data for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 is based on the historical financial
statements of the Company and our predecessor. The summary
financial data as of and for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 have been adjusted to give
effect to the following transactions:
1. The acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy, which
was closed on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
2. The sale of 1,640,000 shares of common stock
issued as part of the financing for the acquisition, which
occurred on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
3. The Company plans on redeeming the $3.32 million
subordinated debentures issued as part of the financing of the
acquisition with proceeds from the offering. The issuance of
605,287 shares of common stock needed to redeem the
subordinated debentures was given effect as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006. The number of shares to be issued gives
effect to the underwriting discount and estimated other offering
costs (approximately $2.52 per share).
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable. The pro forma data does not purport to represent
what our results would actually have been had the sale in fact
occurred as of January 1, 2006. See Unaudited Pro
forma Financial Statements at
page P-1
for pro forma adjustments and explanations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
55,871
|
|
|
$
|
76,135
|
|
|
$
|
81,246
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
59,200
|
|
|
|
80,567
|
|
|
|
86,675
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
9,651
|
|
|
|
11,020
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
13,535
|
|
|
|
17,738
|
|
|
|
18,933
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
Aircraft rental
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
11,846
|
|
|
|
15,689
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
12,102
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
%
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
57,019
|
|
|
|
76,911
|
|
|
|
83,241
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
%
|
)
|
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
%
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
%
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
%
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
2,604,666
|
|
|
|
2,639,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the predecessors summary
historical data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005
and 2006. The unaudited pro forma summary data for the year
ended December 31, 2006 is based on the Companys
summary financial data from March 15, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and those of our predecessor from
January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006.
The summary financial data as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 has been adjusted to give effect to the
following transactions:
1. The acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy, which
was closed on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
2. The sale of 1,640,000 shares of common stock
issued as part of the financing for the acquisition, which
occurred on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
3. The Company plans on redeeming the $3.32 million
subordinated debentures issued as part of the financing of the
acquisition with proceeds from the offering. The issuance of
605,287 shares of common stock needed to redeem the
subordinated debentures was given effect as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006. The number of shares to be issued gives
effect to the underwriting discount and estimated other offering
costs (approximately $2.52 per share).
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable. The pro forma data does not purport to represent
what our results would actually have been had the sale in fact
occurred as of January 1, 2006. See Unaudited Pro
forma Financial Statements at
page P-1
for pro forma adjustments and explanations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
66,274
|
|
|
$
|
87,983
|
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
78,290
|
|
|
$
|
98,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
6,063
|
|
|
|
4,022
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
72,337
|
|
|
|
92,005
|
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
83,690
|
|
|
|
105,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
8,881
|
|
|
|
11,169
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
11,115
|
|
|
|
20,544
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
19,356
|
|
|
|
23,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acraft rent
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
6,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
14,668
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
16,597
|
|
|
|
20,390
|
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
7,530
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
70,306
|
|
|
|
90,596
|
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
82,589
|
|
|
|
102,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,843
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
1,680,480
|
|
|
|
2,611,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,268
|
|
|
$
|
4,369
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
38,912
|
|
|
|
40,012
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
11,721
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
Engine return liability, including current portion
|
|
|
3,956
|
|
|
|
3,956
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
|
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted to give effect to this offering and the application of
the proceeds assuming net proceeds of approximately
$4.4 million, of which approximately $3.3 million is
used to fully redeem our 12% subordinated debentures and the
remainder is used for general working capital purposes. For
further information, see Use of Proceeds on
page 21. |
7
An investment in our common stock is risky. You should
carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other
information contained in this prospectus, before investing. If
any of the following risks actually occurs, our business,
business prospects, financial condition, cash flow and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In
this case, the trading price of our common stock could decline,
and you might lose part or all of your investment.
Risks
Related To Our Industry
The
airline industry is unpredictable.
The airline industry has experienced tremendous challenges in
recent years and will likely remain volatile for the foreseeable
future. Among other factors, the financial challenges faced by
major carriers, including Delta Airlines, United Airlines and
Northwest Airlines, and increased hostilities in the Middle East
and other regions have significantly affected, and are likely to
continue to affect, the U.S. airline industry. These
conditions have resulted in declines and shifts in passenger
demand, increased insurance costs, volatile fuel prices,
increased government regulations and tightened credit markets,
all of which have affected, and will continue to affect, the
operations and financial condition of participants in the
industry, including us, major carriers (including our code share
partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers. These
industry developments raise substantial risks and uncertainties
which will affect us, major carriers (including our code share
partners), competitors and aircraft manufacturers in ways that
we currently are unable to predict.
The
airline industry is subject to the impact of terrorist
activities or warnings.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and their
aftermath negatively impacted the airline industry in general,
including our operations. In particular, the primary effects
experienced by the airline industry included a substantial loss
of passenger traffic and revenue. While airline passenger
traffic and revenue have recovered since the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, additional terrorist attacks could
have a similar or even more pronounced effect. Even if
additional terrorist attacks are not launched against the
airline industry, there will be lasting consequences of the
September 11, 2001 attacks, including increased security
and insurance costs, increased concerns about future terrorist
attacks, increased government regulation and airport delays due
to heightened security. Additional terrorist attacks or warnings
of such attacks, and increased hostilities or prolonged military
involvement in the Middle East or other regions, could
negatively impact the airline industry, and result in decreased
passenger traffic and yields, increased flight delays or
cancellations associated with new government mandates, as well
as increased security, fuel and other costs. There can be no
assurance that these events will not harm the airline industry
generally or our operations or financial condition in particular.
Our
operations may be adversely impacted by increased security
measures mandated by regulatory authorities.
Because of significantly higher security and other costs
incurred by airports since September 11, 2001, many
airports significantly increased their rates and charges to air
carriers, including us, and may do so again in the future. On
November 19, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed, and the
President signed into law, the Aviation and Transportation
Security Act, also referred to as the Aviation Security Act.
This law federalized substantially all aspects of civil aviation
security and created the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) to which the security responsibilities
previously held by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) were transitioned. The TSA is an agency of the
Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Homeland
Security and the TSA and other agencies within the Department of
Homeland Security have implemented numerous security measures,
including the passing of the Aviation Security Act, that affect
airline operations and costs, and are likely to implement
additional measures in the future. The Department of Homeland
Security has announced greater use of passenger data for
evaluating security measures to be taken with respect to
individual passengers, expanded use of federal air marshals on
flights (thus displacing revenue passengers), investigating a
requirement to install aircraft security systems (such as active
devices on
8
commercial aircraft as countermeasures against portable surface
to air missiles) and expanded cargo and baggage screening.
Funding for airline and airport security required under the
Aviation Security Act is provided in part by a $2.50 per segment
passenger security fee for flights departing from the U.S.,
subject to a $10 per roundtrip cap; however, airlines are
responsible for costs incurred to meet security requirements
beyond those provided by the TSA. There is no assurance this fee
will not be raised in the future as the TSAs costs exceed
the revenue it receives from these fees. Similarly, we could be
adversely affected by any implementation of stricter security
measures by the Bahamian government. We cannot provide assurance
that additional security requirements or security-related fees
enacted in the future will not adversely affect us financially.
The
airline industry is heavily regulated.
All interstate airlines are subject to regulation by the
Department of Transportation (the DOT), the FAA and
other governmental agencies. Regulations promulgated by the DOT
primarily relate to economic aspects of air service. The FAA
requires operating, air worthiness and other certificates;
approval of personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or
operation activities; record keeping procedures in accordance
with FAA requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and
retraining programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able
to comply with all present and future laws, rules, regulations
and certification requirements or that the cost of continued
compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our
operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our
certifications and otherwise complying with the laws, rules and
regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the FAA to
ground, or require time-consuming inspections of or maintenance
on, all or any of our aircraft for any reason may have a
material adverse effect on our operations. In addition to state
and federal regulation, airports and municipalities enact rules
and regulations that affect our operations. From time to time,
various airports throughout the country have considered limiting
the use of smaller aircraft, such as our aircraft, at such
airports. The imposition of any limits on the use of our
aircraft at any airport at which we operate could have a
material adverse effect on our operations. Because we operate
only two types of aircraft and have our operations centered at
Fort Lauderdale Airport, we are particularly susceptible to
any such limitations.
The
FAA may change its method of collecting revenues.
The FAA funds its operations largely through a tax levied on all
users of the system based on ticket sales as well as a tax on
fuel. As the airline industry changes, the trust fund that
provides funding for the FAAs capital accounts and all or
some portion of its operations has experienced an increase in
its costs without a corresponding rise in its revenue such that
in its fiscal 2004, the FAAs costs exceeded its revenues
by more than $4 billion. Further, the existing authority
for the current FAA taxing system expired on September 30,
2007. As a result, the FAA has discussed eliminating or amending
the current tax system and implementing user fees that could
cause us to incur potentially significant additional expenses.
If the FAA implements a user fee or otherwise increases its tax
rate, we may not be able to pass this increased expense on to
our customers. Such an expense could have a material adverse
impact on our ability to conduct business.
A Senate draft version of the FAA Reauthorization Bill has
proposed a $25 per-flight fee be charged on all flights,
regardless of aircraft size. The recently passed House version
of the Bill does not include such a fee. There can be no
assurance that the final version of the Reauthorization Bill
would exempt small commercial aircraft such as those operated by
Gulfstream from these new charges.
The
airline industry is characterized by low profit margins and high
fixed costs.
The airline industry is characterized generally by low profit
margins and high fixed costs, primarily for personnel, debt
service and rent. The expenses of an aircraft flight do not vary
significantly with the number of passengers carried and, as a
result, a relatively small change in the number of passengers or
in pricing could have a disproportionate effect on an
airlines operating and financial results. Accordingly, a
minor shortfall in our expected revenue levels could harm our
business.
9
The
airline industry is highly competitive.
In general, the airline industry is highly competitive.
Gulfstream not only competes with other regional airlines, some
of which are owned by or operated as code share partners of
major airlines, but we also face competition from low cost
carriers and network airlines on many of our routes. One of our
primary competitors in the Bahamas market, Bahamasair, is owned
by the government of the Bahamas and receives substantial
subsidies to fund operating losses. The receipt of these
subsidies may reduce the airlines requirement to take
necessary actions to improve profitability, including raising
prices to offset fuel costs. Gulfstream also competes with
alternative forms of transportation, such as charter aircraft,
automobiles, commercial and private boats and trains.
Barriers to entry in most of Gulfstreams markets are
limited, and some of Gulfstreams competitors are larger
and have significantly greater financial and other resources.
Moreover, federal deregulation of the industry allows
competitors to rapidly enter markets and to quickly discount and
restructure fares. The airline industry is particularly
susceptible to price discounting because airlines incur only
nominal costs to provide service to passengers occupying
otherwise unsold seats.
Risks
Related To Our Business
We
will have substantial fixed obligations.
As of September 30, 2007, we had $11.7 million of
debt. In addition, we have annual lease payments of
approximately $6.7 million per year on our fleet of 27
B1900D aircraft as well as a liability for the return of engines
borrowed from the lessor of $4.3 million over the next
several years. We believe we have sufficient cash to fund our
operations for the next twelve months, excluding our seasonal
cash requirements. Our weakest seasonal period typically occurs
between August and December each year. In fact, recently, we
estimated that if the net proceeds anticipated by this offering
were not available to us by approximately November 15, 2007, we
would be required to secure additional short-term financing to
cover our additional cash requirements during this seasonally
weak period. Although this ultimately proved unnecessary, there
can be no assurance that our operations will generate sufficient
cash flow to service our debt and lease obligations on a
longer-term basis. The size of our debt and lease obligations
could negatively affect our financial condition, results of
operations and the price of our common stock.
We
would be adversely affected by the loss of key
personnel.
Our success is dependent upon the continued services of our
management team. Our executives have substantial experience and
expertise in our business and have made significant
contributions to our growth and success. The loss of one of our
executives or any other key employees (including the senior
management team of Gulfstream and the Academy) could adversely
affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on our
management team.
We may
experience difficulty finding, training and retaining
employees.
Gulfstream and the Academy are labor-intensive businesses. The
airline industry has from time to time experienced a shortage of
qualified personnel, specifically pilots and maintenance
technicians. Should the turnover of employees, particularly
pilots and maintenance technicians, sharply increase, the result
will be significantly higher training costs than otherwise would
be necessary. Recently, it has become increasingly difficult to
attract and retain employees in our industry in South Florida.
There can be no assurance that Gulfstream or the Academy will be
able to recruit, train and retain the qualified employees that
we need from time to time. In addition, Gulfstream has been
dependent on the Academy as a source of new pilots.
Gulfstreams flights are operated by a pilot and a first
officer. A substantial portion of the first officers employed by
Gulfstream are supplied by the Academy. Should there be a
shortage of new pilots from the Academy, Gulfstream would likely
incur significantly higher training costs and labor expenses.
10
Expansion
of operations could result in operating losses.
We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new
routes, aircraft, alliance partners, or by acquiring other
regional airlines. These opportunities will likely include
operating in areas away from our current Florida base. A
material increase in the scope or scale of our operations could
lead to integration difficulties, which could result in short-
and/or
long-term operating losses.
We
will incur significant costs as a result of operating as a
public company.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the requirements
applicable to listing on the American Stock Exchange, have
required changes in corporate governance practices of public
companies. We expect these regulations and requirements to
increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as
a result of being a public company, we will be required to
create additional board committees. We will incur additional
costs associated with our public company reporting requirements.
As a public company, we also expect that it will be more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits
and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the
same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult
for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on
our board of directors or as executive officers. If we are
unable to effectively adjust our cost structure to address a
significant increase in our legal, accounting and other
expenses, our sales level and profitability could be harmed and
our operations could be materially adversely affected.
If we
fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we
may not be able to accurately report our financial results or
prevent fraud and, as a result, our business could be harmed and
current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in us,
which could cause our stock price to fall.
We will be performing the system and process evaluation and
testing (and any necessary remediation) required to comply with
the management certification and auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which we expect will first apply to us for our fiscal year
ending December 31, 2008. As a result, we expect to incur
substantial additional expenses and diversion of
managements time. We cannot be certain as to the timing of
completion of our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or
their effect on our operations since there is presently no
precedent available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If
we are not able to implement the requirements of
Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance,
we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or
prevent fraud and might be subject to sanctions or investigation
by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or the American Stock
Exchange. Any such action could harm our business or
investors confidence in us, and could cause our stock
price to fall.
Risks
Related To Gulfstream
Gulfstream
is dependent on our code share relationships.
Gulfstream depends on relationships created by code share
agreements with Continental, United and Northwest for a
significant portion of our revenues. Currently, passengers that
have connected from Continental, United and Northwest account
for approximately 22%, 8% and 7% of our passenger revenue,
respectively. Additionally, virtually all of our
local, or non-connecting, traffic is booked through
Continentals reservation system. Any material modification
to, or termination of, our code share agreements with any of
these partners could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and the results of operations. Each of the
code share agreements contains a number of grounds for
termination by our partners, including failure to meet specified
performance levels. Further, these agreements limit our ability
to enter into code share agreements with other airlines.
Gulfstreams code share partners may expand their direct
operation of regional jets, thus limiting the expansion of our
relationships with them. A decision by any of Gulfstreams
code share partners to phase out Gulfstreams
contract-based code share relationships or enter into similar
agreements with one or more of
11
Gulfstreams competitors could have a material adverse
effect on Gulfstreams business, financial condition or
results of operations.
Also, our code share partners may be restricted in increasing
the level of business that they conduct with Gulfstream, thereby
limiting our growth. Union scope clauses at major airlines may
limit or prohibit certain types of code share operations,
including those by Gulfstream.
Gulfstream
is dependent on the financial strength of our code share
partners.
Gulfstream is directly affected by the financial and operating
strength of its code share partners. In the event of a decrease
in the financial or operational strength of any of the code
share partners, such partner may be unable to make the payments
due to Gulfstream under the code share agreement. It is possible
that if any of the code share partners file for bankruptcy,
Gulfstreams code share agreement with such partner may not
be assumed in bankruptcy and could be modified or terminated.
Two of our code share partners, United Airlines and
Northwest Airlines, have recently emerged from Chapter 11
reorganization.
We
operate our code share relationships as revenue-sharing
arrangements.
Under the revenue sharing, or pro rate, arrangements that we
have in place with our code share partners, we bear
substantially all costs associated with our flights. Because we
are responsible for such costs, factors such as rising fuel
costs, increases in operating expenses and decreases in ticket
prices or passenger loads could cause our profits to decrease
and could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations.
The
availability of additional and/or replacement code share
partners is limited and airline strategic consolidations could
have an impact on operations in ways yet to be
determined.
The airline industry has undergone substantial consolidation,
and it may in the future undergo additional consolidation. Other
developments include domestic and international code share
alliances between major carriers, such as the SkyTeam
Alliance, that includes Delta Airlines, Continental and
Northwest, among others. Any additional consolidation or
significant alliance activity within the airline industry could
limit the number of potential partners with whom Gulfstream
could enter into code share relationships and materially
adversely affect our relationship with our current code share
partners.
There is no assurance that our relationship with our code share
partners would survive in the event that any such code share
partner merges with another airline.
Similarly, the bankruptcy or reorganization of one or more of
our competitors may result in rapid changes to the identity of
our competitors in particular markets, a substantial reduction
in the operating costs of our competitors or the entry of new
competitors into some or all of the markets we serve. We are
unable to predict exactly what effect, if any, changes in the
strategic landscape might have on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
There
are constraints on our ability to establish new operations to
provide airline service to major airlines other than our code
share partners.
Our code share agreement with Continental requires that we seek
their consent prior to establishing new code share agreements,
subject to limited exceptions, as well as prior to acquiring
another regional carrier. In the absence of such consent, we
would have to establish a new operating subsidiary, separate
from Gulfstream, which would require a substantial expenditure
of management time and Company resources.
Additionally, pursuant to our code share agreement with
Northwest, we may only provide airline service to other major
airlines using aircraft certificated as having (1) less
than 60 seats and (2) a maximum gross takeoff weight
of less than 70,000 pounds (or such greater seat or weight
limits as may be established under Northwests collective
bargaining agreement with its pilots).
12
Fluctuations
in fuel costs could adversely affect our operating expenses and
results.
Aircraft fuel constitutes a significant portion of our total
operating expenses (approximately 23% for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and approximately 24% for the year ended
December 31, 2006). The price of aircraft fuel is
unpredictable and has increased significantly in recent periods
based on events outside of our control, including geopolitical
developments, regional production patterns and environmental
concerns. Because of the effect of these events on the price and
availability of aircraft fuel, the cost and future availability
of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. We
cannot assure you increases in the price of fuel can be offset
by higher revenue. We carry limited fuel inventory and we rely
heavily on our fuel suppliers. We cannot assure you we will
always have access to adequate supplies of fuel in the event of
shortages or other disruptions in the fuel supply. Price
escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel will
increase our operating expenses and could cause our operating
results and net income to decline. Additionally, price
escalations or reductions in the supply of aircraft fuel could
result in the curtailment of our service. Some of our
competitors may be better positioned to obtain fuel in the event
of a shortage.
Our
business is subject to substantial seasonal and cyclical
volatility.
Gulfstreams business is subject to substantial
seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel
patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. We experience the
strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand
from August to October, during which period we typically suffer
operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a
quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for an entire year, and historical operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our
results of operations generally reflect this seasonality. Our
operating results are also impacted by numerous other cycles and
factors that are not necessarily seasonal. These factors include
the extent and nature of fare changes and competition from other
airlines, changing levels of operations, national and
international events, fuel prices and general economic
conditions, including inflation. Because a substantial portion
of both personal and business airline travel is discretionary,
the industry tends to experience adverse financial results in
general economic downturns.
Any
inability to acquire and maintain additional compatible aircraft
or engines would increase our operating costs and could harm our
profitability.
Our fleet currently consists of B1900D turboprop aircraft and
EMB-120 turboprop aircraft, each equipped with two engines.
Although our management believes there is an adequate supply of
such aircraft and engines available at reasonable prices and
terms to meet our current needs, we are unable to predict how
long these conditions will continue. Any increase in demand for
these aircraft or engines could restrict our ability to obtain
additional aircraft, engines and spare parts. Because neither of
the aircraft we operate are in active production, we may be
unable to obtain additional suitable aircraft, engines or spare
parts on satisfactory terms or at the time needed for our
operations or for the implementation of our growth plan.
Further, as fuel costs increase or remain at elevated levels,
the demand for highly fuel-efficient turboprop aircraft may also
increase. This increase in demand could cause a shortage in the
supply of reasonably priced turboprop aircraft. Such a decrease
could adversely affect our ability to expand our fleet or to
replace outdated aircraft, which in turn could hinder our growth
or reduce our revenues.
Maintenance
expenses for Gulfstreams fleet could
increase.
Gulfstreams fleet consists of aircraft that were delivered
from 1990 to 1996. As the age of our aircraft increases,
additional resources may be required to sustain their
reliablility levels. There can be no assurance that such
additional resources will not be material.
Any
inability to extend the lease terms of our existing aircraft or
obtain financing for additional aircraft could adversely affect
our operations.
We finance our aircraft through either operating lease financing
or secured debt. Most of our existing fleet of B1900Ds are
leased from the manufacturer pursuant to a lease agreement that
expires in 2010. We
13
have the option to extend the leases for up to 15 aircraft from
six to 24 months after the expiration period; however,
there can be no assurance that this lease agreement can be
extended further on reasonable terms. If we are unable to extend
these leases, we also have the option to purchase up to 21 of
these aircraft; however, we may not be able to secure financing
on acceptable terms, if at all. Further, neither the B1900D nor
the EMB-120 is currently produced by their manufacturers and
there is currently a limited supply of these aircraft. If we are
unable to obtain replacement aircraft on economically reasonable
terms, our business could be materially adversely affected.
The
airline industry has been subject to a number of strikes which
could adversely affect our business.
The airline industry has been negatively impacted by a number of
labor strikes. Any new collective bargaining agreement entered
into by other regional carriers may result in higher industry
wages and add increased pressure on Gulfstream to increase the
wages and benefits of our employees. Furthermore, since each of
Gulfstreams code share partners is a significant source of
revenue, any labor disruption or labor strike by the employees
of any one of Gulfstreams code share partners could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Competitors
or new market entrants may introduce smaller aircraft or direct
hub flights, which could reduce our competitive
advantage.
We operate relatively small aircraft on short flight routes,
which enables us to maintain a low cost structure, giving us a
competitive advantage over other airlines. If new market
entrants or existing competitors were to introduce smaller
aircraft into the marketplace, their costs may be lower than
ours, allowing them to gain a competitive advantage. In
addition, competitors could introduce new direct flights from
their hubs to our key cities which could reduce the
competiveness of our Florida connecting points.
Several aircraft manufacturers have developed a new line of very
light jets, commonly referred to as VLJs, which cost
substantially less than existing corporate aircraft. New
companies, including DayJet Corporation, which is also based in
South Florida, have ordered hundreds of VLJs with the goal
of developing a new industry segment of air taxis that offer
services at a low cost to passengers. DayJet has announced that
it will be targeting many of the cities served by Gulfstream. If
DayJet launches this air taxi segment, or if others implement
similar business models, Gulfstream could experience a loss of
passengers and a resulting decline in revenues. Gulfstream could
also be forced to lower prices to compete with DayJet and others
and could suffer economic losses as a result.
Gulfstream
flies and depends upon only two aircraft types, and would be
adversely affected if the FAA were to ground either of our
fleets.
Gulfstreams fleet consists of 27 B1900D turboprop aircraft
and eight EMB-120 turboprop aircraft. The FAA requires
operating, air worthiness and other certificates; approval of
personnel who may engage in flight, maintenance or operation
activities; record keeping procedures in accordance with FAA
requirements; and FAA approval of flight training and retraining
programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to comply
with all present and future laws, rules, regulations and
certification requirements or that the cost of continued
compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our
operations. We incur substantial costs in maintaining our
current certifications and otherwise complying with the laws,
rules and regulations to which we are subject. A decision by the
FAA to ground or require additional time-consuming inspections
of or maintenance on either the B1900D or EMB-120 or any of our
aircraft for any reason may have a material adverse effect on
the operations of Gulfstream.
Gulfstream
is at risk of losses and adverse publicity stemming from any
accident involving our aircraft.
While Gulfstream has never had a fatal crash over our history,
it is possible that one or more of our aircraft may crash or be
involved in an accident in the future, causing death or injury
to individual air travelers and our employees and destroying the
aircraft. An accident or incident involving one of
Gulfstreams aircraft could involve significant potential
claims of injured passengers and others, as well as repair or
replacement of a damaged aircraft and our consequential
temporary or permanent loss of service. In the event of an
accident, our liability insurance may not be adequate to offset
the exposure to potential claims and we may be forced to
14
bear substantial losses from the accident. Substantial claims
resulting from an accident in excess of related insurance
coverage would harm our operational and financial results.
Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident, even if fully
insured, could cause a public perception that Gulfstreams
operations are less safe or reliable than other airlines, which
could result in a material reduction in passenger revenues.
If
Gulfstream is forced to relocate our Fort Lauderdale
maintenance base, we may not be able to operate as
successfully.
The lease for Gulfstreams principal maintenance facility,
located at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale International Airport,
expires at the end of May 2008, but may be extended by Broward
County for periods of one year each, not to exceed a total of
two years. Broward County is considering an improvement to the
Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale International Airport that could
result in a teardown of Gulfstreams maintenance hangar.
Gulfstream is currently in negotiations regarding an extension
of the lease and a subsequent alternative location for a
successor maintenance hangar on the airfield. If Gulfstream is
forced to relocate its Fort Lauderdale maintenance
operations, it may be prohibitively expensive to relocate
and/or
construct a maintenance hangar. Gulfstream may not be able to
operate as efficiently or successfully from any other location.
In addition, it is possible that Gulfstream would be unable to
secure a suitable alternative location for our maintenance
hangar. Were this to occur, we may be forced to outsource our
airplane maintenance for a period of time, which would
substantially increase our maintenance costs and cause us
significant operational disruptions.
Hurricanes
and other adverse weather conditions could adversely affect
Gulfstreams business.
Our routes in Florida and the Bahamas are particularly
susceptible to the impact of hurricanes. In the event that a
hurricane were to threaten one of our departure locations, we
may be forced to cancel flights
and/or
relocate our fleet, either of which would cause us to lose
revenues. Related storm damage could also affect
telecommunications capability, causing interruptions to our
operations. A hurricane could cause markets such as the Florida
Keys and the Bahamas to sustain severe damage to their tourist
destinations and thus cause a longer-term decrease in the number
of persons traveling on our routes.
Additionally, during periods of fog, ice, low temperatures,
hurricanes, storms or other adverse weather conditions, flights
may be cancelled or significantly delayed. A significant
interruption or disruption in service due to adverse weather or
otherwise, could result in the cancellation or delay of a
significant portion of Gulfstreams flights and, as a
result, could have a severe impact on our business, operations
and financial performance.
Gulfstream
may experience labor disruptions or an increase in labor
costs.
All of Gulfstreams permanent pilots are represented by
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Airline
Division Local 747, commonly known as the Teamsters. Our
collective bargaining agreement with our pilots expires in 2009.
In addition, our flight attendants have voted to be represented
by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers (IAM), and we are currently engaged in
negotiations with IAM. Although we have never had a work
interruption or stoppage and we believe our relations with our
union and non-union employees are generally good, Gulfstream is
subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage
and/or may
incur additional administrative expenses associated with union
representation of our employees. Any sustained work stoppages
could adversely affect Gulfstreams ability to fulfill our
obligations under our code share agreements and could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Additionally, labor costs constitute a significant percentage of
our total operating costs. Our labor costs normally constitute
approximately 23% of our total operating costs. Any new
collective bargaining agreements entered into by other airlines
may also result in higher industry wages and increased pressure
on us to increase the wages and benefits of our employees.
Future agreements with our employees unions may be on
terms that are not economically as attractive as our current
agreements nor comparable to agreements entered into by our
competitors. Any future agreements may increase our labor costs
or otherwise adversely affect us. Additionally, we cannot assure
you that the compensation rates that we have assumed will
correctly reflect the market
15
for our non-union employees, or that there will not be future
unionization of our currently nonunionized groups, which could
adversely affect our costs.
Our
business is heavily dependent on the Bahamas markets and a
reduction in demand for air travel to this market would harm our
business.
Almost half of our scheduled flights have the Bahamas as either
their destination or origin and our revenue is linked primarily
to the number of tourists and other passengers traveling to and
from the Bahamas. Bahamian tourism levels are affected by, among
other things, the political and economic climate in the
Bahamas main tourism markets, the availability of hotel
accommodations, promotional spending by competing destinations,
the popularity of the Bahamas as a tourist destination relative
to other vacation options, and other global factors, including
natural disasters or negative publicity due to safety and
security. No assurance can be given that the level of passenger
traffic to the Bahamas will not decline in the future. A decline
in the level of Bahamas passenger traffic could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
New
passport requirements may cause a decrease in the number of
travelers from the U.S. to the Bahamas.
In 2005, the United States issued a proposed Western Hemisphere
Travel Initiative which would require United States citizens to
have a passport or other accepted identity document to travel to
or from certain countries or areas that were previously exempt,
such as the Caribbean, including the Bahamas. The proposal was
implemented in January 2007 for all United States citizens
traveling to or from these destinations by air and sea and is
expected to be implemented as of December 31, 2007 for all
travel by land border crossings. If our United States passengers
visiting the Bahamas do not have passports, these regulations
could have a negative impact on our bookings; however, to date,
the actual impact on the Companys revenues is unclear.
The
current regulation of travel to Cuba is subject to political
conditions and a change in the current restrictions could impair
our ability to provide flights or minimize our competitive
advantage.
Pursuant to a services agreement that we have entered into with
Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. (GAC), we provide the
use of our aircraft, flight crews and other services to GAC for
its operation of charter flights to Cuba, in exchange for which
we receive 75% of the income generated by such charter flights.
GACs flights to Cuba depend on political conditions
prevailing from time to time in Cuba and the United States.
Currently, GAC is one of a limited number of operators who
provide flights from the United States to Cuba. If relations
between the United States and Cuba worsen, these flights may be
prohibited entirely and we may lose significant revenues due to
GACs inability to operate these flights. Conversely, if
relations between the United States and Cuba significantly
improve, demand for access to Cuba could increase dramatically,
causing the market for flights from the United States to Cuba to
be flooded with new entrants. In either scenario, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and negatively affected.
Cubas
status as a state sponsor of terrorism could impact the
sustainability and growth of the Companys flights to
Cuba.
Cuba is listed as a state sponsor of terrorism by the
U.S. Department of State, and as such, GACs flights
to Cuba are subject to any restrictions that may be imposed as a
result of such designation. GAC could be subjected to
regulations and requirements that could increase its costs of
operating flights to Cuba, restrict the number or manner of
flights it operates to Cuba or prohibit such flights entirely.
The Companys business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and negatively affected by
further restrictions, or prohibitions, on doing business in Cuba
as a country designated as a state sponsor of terrorism.
16
We
rely on third parties to provide us with facilities and services
that are integral to our business and can be withdrawn on short
notice.
We have entered into agreements with third-party contractors,
including other airlines, to provide certain facilities and
services required for our operations, such as certain
maintenance, ground handling, baggage services and ticket
counter space. We will likely need to enter into similar
agreements in any new markets we decide to serve. All of these
agreements are subject to termination upon short notice. The
loss or expiration of these contracts, the loss of FAA
certification by our outside maintenance providers or any
inability to renew our contracts or negotiate contracts with
other providers at comparable rates could harm our business. Our
reliance upon others to provide essential services on our behalf
also gives us less control over costs and over the efficiency,
timeliness and quality of contract services.
Aviation
insurance is a critical safeguard of our financial condition and
it might become difficult to obtain adequate insurance at a
reasonable rate in the future.
We believe that our insurance policies are of types customary in
the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate to protect
us against material loss. It is possible, however, that the
amount of insurance we carry will not be sufficient to protect
us from material loss. Some aviation insurance could become
unavailable, available only for reduced amounts of coverage, or
available only at substantially higher rates, which could result
in our failing to comply with the levels of insurance coverage
required by our code share agreements, our other contractual
agreements or applicable government regulations. Additionally,
war risk coverage or other insurance might cease to be available
to our vendors or might only be available for reduced amounts of
coverage.
Risks
Related To the Academy
A
decrease in demand for regional airline pilots could adversely
impact the Academys ability to attract and retain
students.
We believe that the employment of our graduates is essential to
our ability to attract and retain students. In the event that
regional airline industry demand for pilots decreases
significantly, it would have a detrimental impact on the ability
of our graduates to gain employment, which could have an adverse
effect on enrollment.
The
value of the Academy could be diminished if other airlines lower
their required minimum flight hours.
Academy students are pilots who hold commercial, multi-engine
and instrument ratings who are qualified to operate commercial
flights but who seek to enhance their marketability by logging
additional training and flight hours. The Academy offers pilots
the opportunity to log flight hours more quickly than the
traditional time-building method of flight instructing. If the
airlines who hire Academy graduates were to reduce the number of
logged hours that they require new pilots to have, the value of
the Academy could be diminished and the Academy could suffer
decreased enrollment and a loss of revenues.
The
inability to finance tuition costs could adversely affect the
Academys enrollment.
Most of our students depend upon some form of third-party
financing to finance part or all of the cost of tuition. This
type of financing is only available from limited sources. The
inability of prospective students to obtain third-party
financing could adversely affect our ability to attract and
retain students.
Workplace
error by graduates of the Academy could expose us to legal
action.
Many of the pilots that graduate from the Academy are ultimately
employed by airlines other than Gulfstream. In the event of an
accident caused by one of the graduates of the Academy, it is
possible that the Academy could be named as a defendant in any
lawsuit that may arise. There can be no assurance that our
insurance policy will be adequate to cover the potential losses
from any such claims.
17
Risks
Related To Our Common Stock
We do
not pay cash dividends on our capital stock, and we do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
future.
We have never paid cash dividends on our capital stock and do
not have current plans to do so. Instead, we will likely retain
our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our
business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our
common stock will likely be your sole source of gain for the
foreseeable future.
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and Delaware law
contain provisions that could discourage a
takeover.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law
contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a
takeover. As described in Description of Capital
Stock Anti-Takeover Provisions of Delaware Law and
Charter Provisions, these provisions may:
|
|
|
|
|
discourage, delay or prevent a change in the control of our
company or a change in our management;
|
|
|
|
adversely affect the voting power of holders of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the
future for shares of our common stock.
|
Sales
of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the
public market after this offering, or the perception that they
may occur, may depress the market price of our common
stock.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market following this offering, or the perception that
substantial sales may be made, could cause the market price of
our common stock to decline. These sales might also make it more
difficult for us to sell equity securities at a time and price
that we deem appropriate. The
lock-up
agreements delivered by our executive officers, directors and
some of our stockholders who beneficially own more than 5% of
our common stock provide that Taglich Brothers, Inc., in its
sole discretion, may release those parties, at any time or from
time to time and without notice, from their obligation not to
dispose of shares of common stock for a period of 180 days
after the date of this prospectus. Taglich Brothers, Inc. has no
pre-established conditions to waiving the terms of the
lock-up
agreements, and any decision by it to waive those conditions
would depend on a number of factors, which may include market
conditions, the performance of the common stock in the market
and our financial condition at that time.
After this offering, we will have outstanding
2,839,460 shares of common stock, based upon shares of
common stock outstanding as of December 7, 2007, which
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and no exercise of outstanding options or warrants. This
includes the shares we are selling in this offering, which may
be resold in the public market immediately. The remaining 71.9%,
or 2,039,460 shares, of our total outstanding shares will
become available for resale in the public market as shown in the
chart below. As restrictions on resale end, the market price
could drop significantly if the holders of these restricted
shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to
sell them.
|
|
|
Number of Shares/%
|
|
|
of Total Outstanding
|
|
Date of Availability for Resale into Public Market
|
|
1,205,460/42.5%
|
|
90 days after the effective date of this prospectus due to
the requirements of the federal securities laws.
|
834,000/29.4%
|
|
180 days after the date of this prospectus due to an
agreement these stockholders have with the underwriters.
|
However, the underwriters can waive this restriction and allow
these stockholders to sell their shares at any time. For a more
detailed description, see Shares Eligible for Future
Sale.
18
New
investors in our common stock will experience immediate and
substantial book value dilution after this
offering.
The initial public offering price of our common stock will be
substantially higher than the pro forma net tangible book value
per share of the outstanding common stock immediately after the
offering. Based on our net tangible book value as of
September 30, 2007, if you purchase our common stock in
this offering you will pay more for your shares than the amounts
paid by existing stockholders for their shares and you will
suffer immediate dilution of approximately $6.57 per share in
pro forma net tangible book value. In the past, we have issued
warrants to acquire common stock at prices significantly below
the initial public offering price. As of December 7, 2007,
46,480 shares of our common stock were issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants, at an exercise price of $5.00
per share, and 210,324 shares of common stock were issuable
upon exercise of stock options outstanding as of
December 7, 2007, at an exercise price of $5.00 per share
and up to an additional 139,676 shares of our common stock
were reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan. As a
result of this dilution, investors purchasing stock in this
offering may receive significantly less than the full purchase
price that they paid for the shares purchased in this offering
in the event of a liquidation. See Dilution for a
detailed discussion of the dilution new investors will incur in
this offering.
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
to register the shares reserved for issuance under our Stock
Incentive Plan. The registration statement will become effective
when filed, and, subject to applicable
lock-up
agreements, these shares may be resold without restriction in
the public marketplace. See Shares Eligible For Future
Sale.
Our
future operating results may be below securities analysts
or investors expectations, which could cause our stock
price to decline.
We may be unable to generate significant revenues or grow at the
rate expected by securities analysts or investors. In addition,
our costs may be higher than we, securities analysts or
investors expect. If we fail to generate sufficient revenues or
our costs are higher than we expect, our results of operations
will suffer, which in turn could cause our stock price to
decline.
Our operating results in any particular period may not be a
reliable indication of our future performance. In some future
quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of
securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, the price of
our common stock will likely decline.
Potential
investors could be prohibited from investing, or choose not to
invest, in our common stock because we provide services to a
company that operates flights to Cuba.
Cuba has been identified as a state sponsor of terrorism by the
U.S. Department of State. Some potential investors,
including certain state sponsored pension funds or trust funds,
may be prohibited from investing, or may choose not to invest,
in companies that do business with or in countries designated as
sponsors of terrorism. Additionally, unrestricted potential
investors may choose not to invest in our common stock based
solely or in part on the fact that we provide services to GAC, a
company that operates flights to Cuba. The exclusion of such
investors may limit the market for shares of our common stock or
negatively impact the development of an active trading market
for our common stock.
Our
common stock has not been publicly traded, and the price of our
common stock could fluctuate substantially.
Before this offering, there has been no public market for shares
of our common stock. An active public trading market may not
develop after completion of this offering or, if developed, may
not be sustained. The price of the shares of common stock sold
in this offering will not necessarily reflect the market price
of the common stock after this offering. The market price for
the common stock after this offering will be affected by a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations or
those of our competitors;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities
analysts or our failure to achieve analysts earnings estimates;
and
|
|
|
|
developments in our industry.
|
The
liability of our officers and directors is
limited.
Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of
directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law.
Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not
be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their
fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities
arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect
the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief
or rescission.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that we
will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents for
damages arising in connection with their actions in such
capacities, subject to certain limitations as set forth in the
bylaws.
There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of
our directors, officers, employees or agents where
indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware
of any pending or threatened litigation or proceeding that might
result in a claim for indemnification.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements. These
statements relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
our business strategy;
|
|
|
|
our value proposition;
|
|
|
|
the market opportunity for our services, including expected
demand for our services;
|
|
|
|
information regarding the replacement, deployment, acquisition
and financing of certain numbers and types of aircraft, and
projected expenses associated therewith;
|
|
|
|
costs of compliance with FAA regulations, Department of Homeland
Security regulations and other rules and acts of Congress;
|
|
|
|
the ability to pass taxes, fuel costs, inflation, and various
expenses to our customers;
|
|
|
|
certain projected financial obligations;
|
|
|
|
our estimates regarding our capital requirements; and
|
|
|
|
any of our other plans, objectives, expectations and intentions
contained in this prospectus that are not historical facts.
|
These statements, in addition to statements made in conjunction
with the words expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, believe,
seek, estimate and similar expressions,
are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to
future events or our future financial performance and only
reflect managements
20
expectations and estimates. The following is a list of factors,
among others, that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
changing external competitive, business conditions or budgeting
in certain market segments and industries;
|
|
|
|
changes in our code share relationships;
|
|
|
|
an increase in competition along the routes we operate;
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of funds for financing new aircraft;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to profitably manage our turbo-prop fleet;
|
|
|
|
adverse reaction and publicity that might result from any
accidents;
|
|
|
|
changes in general
and/or
regional economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in fuel price or fuel supplies;
|
|
|
|
our relationship with employees;
|
|
|
|
the impact of current or future laws;
|
|
|
|
additional terrorist attacks;
|
|
|
|
Congressional investigations and governmental regulations
affecting the airline industry and our operations; and
|
|
|
|
consumer unwillingness to incur greater costs for flights.
|
You should read this prospectus completely and with the
understanding that our actual results may be materially
different from what we expect. We undertake no duty to update
these forward-looking statements after the date of this
prospectus, even though our situation may change in the future.
We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these
cautionary statements.
Some of the market and industry data and other statistical
information used throughout this prospectus are based on
independent industry publications, government publications or
other published independent sources, including the Department of
Transportation, the FAA and the Regional Airline Association.
Some data are also based on our good faith estimates, which are
derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as the
independent sources referred to above.
We estimate the net proceeds from the sale of the shares of
common stock we are offering will be approximately
$4.4 million. If the underwriters fully exercise the
over-allotment option, the net proceeds will be approximately
$5.3 million. Net proceeds are what we expect
to receive after we pay the underwriting discount and other
estimated expenses of this offering.
We plan to use approximately $3.3 million of the proceeds
to fully redeem our 12% subordinated debentures, which mature on
March 14, 2009. The remaining proceeds from this offering
will be used for general working capital purposes, which may
include the acquisition of additional aircraft or the
refinancing of existing aircraft.
Pending our use of the proceeds, we intend to invest the net
proceeds of this offering primarily in short-term, investment
grade, interest-bearing instruments.
21
Since our formation, we have not paid cash dividends on our
capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain any
earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and
development of our business. Additionally, we are party to
several agreements that limit our ability to pay dividends.
Under our credit facilities, we are prohibited from declaring
dividends without the prior consent of our lender. Gulfstream is
permitted under its primary aircraft lease agreement to pay
dividends only if its average cash position after paying the
dividend would equal or exceed $4,000,000 over the prior twelve
month period. In addition, in the event that Gulfstream declares
a dividend, Gulfstream has an obligation under the warrant held
by Continental to pay Continental cash in an amount equal to
what Continental would have been entitled to had it exercised
its warrant immediately prior to such dividend. Any future
determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at
the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a
number of factors, including future earnings, capital
requirements, financial conditions, future prospects and other
factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.
22
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis reflecting the sale of
800,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering
price of $8.00 per share, after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
as Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Short term debt, including current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
12% Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term debt
|
|
|
9,568
|
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, shares authorized
15,000,000, issued 2,039,460 actual; 2,839,460 as adjusted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
12,311
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
|
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization
|
|
$
|
21,597
|
|
|
$
|
22,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted to give effect to this offering and the application of
the proceeds, as described in Use of Proceeds on
page 21. |
The table above does not include:
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 shares of our common stock subject to the
underwriters over-allotment option;
|
|
|
|
46,480 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2007,
at an exercise price of $5.00 per share;
|
|
|
|
210,324 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at an
exercise price of $5.00 per share;
|
|
|
|
up to an additional 139,676 shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
64,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants to be issued to designees of the underwriters in
connection with this offering, at an exercise price equal to
120% of the public offering price of this offering.
|
23
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
immediately to the extent of the difference between the public
offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma
net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this
offering. Our historical net tangible book value as of
September 30, 2007 was ($333,071), or ($0.16) per share,
based on 2,039,460 shares of common stock outstanding as of
September 30, 2007. Historical net tangible book value per
share represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced
by the amount of our total liabilities and divided by the actual
number of shares of common stock outstanding.
After giving effect to our sale of 800,000 shares of common
stock offered by this prospectus at a public offering price of
$8.00 per share and after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our
pro forma net tangible book value will be $4,054,929, or
$1.43 per share. This represents an immediate increase in
pro forma net tangible book value of $1.59 per share to
existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma net
tangible book value of $6.57 per share to new investors.
Dilution in historical net tangible book value per share
represents the difference between the amount per share paid by
purchasers of shares of our common stock in this offering and
the net tangible book value per share of our common stock
immediately afterwards. The following table illustrates this per
share dilution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
Net tangible book value before this offering
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to new investors
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.57
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option to
purchase additional shares in this offering in full, our pro
forma net tangible book value after the offering will be
$4,938,129, or $1.67 per share, representing an immediate
increase in pro forma net tangible book value of $1.83 per
share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in
pro forma net tangible book value of $6.33 per share to new
investors purchasing shares in this offering.
The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2007,
the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the
total consideration paid and average price per share paid by
existing stockholders and by the new investors, before deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, using a public offering price of $8.00
per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
2,039,460
|
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,517,300
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
4.18
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
6,400,000
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,839,460
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,917,300
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, our existing stockholders would own 68.9% and our new
investors would own 31.1% of the total number of shares of our
common stock outstanding after this offering.
The tables above are based on 2,039,460 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding as of December 7, 2007. These
tables do not include:
|
|
|
|
|
120,000 shares of our common stock subject to the
underwriters over-allotment option;
|
|
|
|
46,480 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2007 at an
exercise price of $5.00 per share;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
210,324 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2007, at an
exercise price of $5.00 per share;
|
|
|
|
up to an additional 139,676 shares of our common stock
reserved for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan; and
|
|
|
|
64,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
warrants to be issued to designees of the underwriters in
connection with this offering, at an exercise price equal to
120% of the public offering price of this offering.
|
Assuming exercise of all of our outstanding warrants and options
but excluding warrants to be issued to designees of the
underwriters (which are anti-dilutive), the pro forma net
tangible book value per share after this offering and excluding
the underwriters over-allotment option, would be increased
to $1.72 per share and the dilution per share to new
investors would be $6.28 per share, the number of shares
purchased by existing stockholders would be increased to
2,296,264, or 74.2% of total shares purchased, and the total
consideration would be increased to $9,801,320, or 60.5% of
total consideration.
In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital due to
market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe
we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating
plans. To the extent that additional capital is raised through
the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance
of these securities could result in further dilution to our
stockholders.
25
SELECTED
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected historical and pro forma financial data
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations following this section and our financial
statements and related notes included in the back of this
prospectus. The results of operations presented herein for all
periods subsequent to the acquisition are referred to as the
results of operations of the successor. As a result
of the acquisition, the results of operations of the predecessor
are not comparable to the results of operations of the successor.
The following table sets forth selected financial data as of and
for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and
2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004,
2005 and 2006. The selected financial data as of and for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 and
the pro forma year ended December 31, 2006 are unaudited.
The selected financial data as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005, the period from January 1 through
March 14, 2006 and the period from March 15, 2006
through December 31, 2006 were derived from the
predecessors and our audited financial statements. The
selected financial data as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003 are unaudited. Gulfstream and
the Academy, as they existed prior to their acquisition by us,
are collectively referred to as the predecessor. The
consolidated financial information of Gulfstream, the Academy
and us as we existed on and after March 15, 2006 is
referred to as the successor. The predecessor audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the
period from January 1, 2006 through March 14, 2006 and
our audited financial statements as of December 31, 2006
and for the period from March 15, 2006 through
December 31, 2006 are included in the back of this
prospectus. The historical results are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results to be expected in any future
period.
The summary financial data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007 and the pro forma year ended
December 31, 2006 has been adjusted to give effect to the
following transactions:
1. The acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy, which was
closed on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
2. The sale of 1,640,000 shares of common stock issued
as part of the financing for the acquisition, which occurred on
March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on January 1, 2006.
3. The Company plans on redeeming the $3.32 million
subordinated debentures issued as part of the financing of the
acquisition with proceeds from the offering. The issuance of
605,287 shares of common stock needed to redeem the
subordinated debentures was given effect as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006. The number of shares to be issued gives
effect to the underwriting discount and estimated other offering
costs (approximately $2.52 per share).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
21,367
|
|
|
$
|
59,200
|
|
|
$
|
80,567
|
|
|
$
|
86,675
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
57,019
|
|
|
|
76,911
|
|
|
|
83,241
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
%)
|
Non-Operating income and (expense)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
(18.8
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
%)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
%)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
2,604,666
|
|
|
|
2,639,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat miles (000s)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,504
|
|
|
|
222,063
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Revenue passenger miles (000s)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,319
|
|
|
|
133,086
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Passenger load factor(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
|
59.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.589
|
|
|
$
|
0.610
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Average passenger fare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.77
|
|
|
$
|
120.66
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Passenger seats available multiplied by miles flown. |
|
(2) |
|
The number of revenue miles flown by passengers. |
|
(3) |
|
Revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles. |
|
(4) |
|
The average amount one passenger pays to fly one mile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
59,052
|
|
|
$
|
61,015
|
|
|
$
|
72,337
|
|
|
$
|
92,005
|
|
|
$
|
21,367
|
|
|
$
|
83,690
|
|
|
|
105,057
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
62,196
|
|
|
|
58,681
|
|
|
|
70,306
|
|
|
|
90,596
|
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
82,589
|
|
|
|
102,481
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(3,144
|
)
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
%)
|
|
|
82.8
|
%
|
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
(3,124
|
)
|
|
|
(2,414
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
2561.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
(6,268
|
)
|
|
|
36,877
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(53.8
|
%)
|
|
|
118.4
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
217.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
(3,909
|
)
|
|
|
36,627
|
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
%)
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,909
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,627
|
|
|
$
|
1,843
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
%)
|
|
|
85.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Forma
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,680,480
|
|
|
|
2,611,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Operating Statistics (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat miles (000s)
|
|
|
180,713
|
|
|
|
180,217
|
|
|
|
202,662
|
|
|
|
280,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,161
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Revenue passenger miles (000s)
|
|
|
111,403
|
|
|
|
105,713
|
|
|
|
122,852
|
|
|
|
160,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,939
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Passenger load factor
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
|
|
58.7
|
%
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
|
|
(5.4
|
%)
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile
|
|
$
|
0.508
|
|
|
$
|
0.535
|
|
|
$
|
0.539
|
|
|
$
|
0.547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.583
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Average passenger fare
|
|
$
|
86.99
|
|
|
$
|
96.72
|
|
|
$
|
100.27
|
|
|
$
|
105.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.13
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Working Capital Deficit
|
|
$
|
(21,153
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,822
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,742
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,222
|
)
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
8,113
|
|
|
|
9,910
|
|
|
|
14,542
|
|
|
|
18,017
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
11,328
|
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
|
|
19,975
|
|
|
|
23,601
|
|
|
|
36,980
|
|
|
|
38,912
|
|
Long-Term Debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
28,179
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
7,492
|
|
|
|
9,523
|
|
|
|
9,568
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
(42,252
|
)
|
|
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
|
(2,178
|
)
|
|
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
8,020
|
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,268
|
|
|
$
|
4,369
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
38,912
|
|
|
|
40,012
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
11,721
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
Engine return liability, including current portion
|
|
|
3,956
|
|
|
|
3,956
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
|
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjusted to give effect to this offering and the application of
the proceeds, as described in Use of Proceeds on
page 21. |
28
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion of our financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and the notes to those statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. The discussion and
analysis throughout this report contains certain forward-looking
terminology such as believes,
anticipates, will, and
intends or comparable terminology. Such statements
are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those projected.
Potential purchasers of the Companys securities are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements, which are qualified in their entirety by the
cautions and risks described herein. See Forward-Looking
Statements at the front of this report. You should
specifically consider the various risk factors identified in
this prospectus that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements.
Overview
The Company operates a scheduled airline, schedule and on-demand
charter services and a flight training academy for commercial
pilots.
The Companys most significant market opportunity relates
to the fact that it currently operates in and has targeted
future expansion in unserved and underserved short haul markets,
which is a growing opportunity for two principal reasons. Many
smaller markets are being abandoned by major carriers, as they
shift their focus increasingly to international markets and away
from domestic markets and hubs. In addition, many smaller
markets are also being abandoned by regional airlines, as they
continue to gravitate toward larger jet aircraft in the
70-100 seat
range, and away from smaller turboprop aircraft. As a result,
the Company will continue to seek opportunities to grow in the
expanding number of smaller underserved or unserved markets that
are suitable for its fleet of small-capacity aircraft.
One of the Companys most significant challenges relates to
pilot availability within a very competitive environment. The
Academys strong reputation for quality instruction assists
Gulfstream to compete effectively for pilots by providing a
reliable and cost-effective source of pilots and first officers.
Other significant challenges and risks relate to securing
cost-effective maintenance resources, as the average age of the
Companys aircraft fleet increases, as well as increases
and volatility in the price of aircraft fuel, which accounts for
23-24% of
our operating expenses.
Each of the Companys business components is described
below.
Airline
We began providing air charter service in 1988, and have
provided scheduled passenger service in Florida and the Bahamas
since 1990. We signed our first major code share agreement with
United Airlines in 1994. In 1997, Gulfstream entered into a
cooperative alliance and code share agreement with Continental
and has since operated as a Continental Connection carrier. We
also have code share agreements with United, Northwest, and Copa
Airlines. We estimate that over 60% of our revenue is derived
from local point to point traffic within Florida and
the Bahamas, with connecting traffic from our code-share
partners and other carriers destined primarily for the Bahamas
making up the balance. Continental is our largest connecting
partner, with passengers connecting to and from Continental
flights providing approximately 22% of our revenue.
The financial arrangements between regional airlines and their
code share partners typically involve either a fixed-fee per
departure or revenue pro-rate arrangement. All of our code share
agreements provide for pro-rate revenue sharing, while most
other publicly traded regional airlines operate either primarily
or exclusively under fixed fee agreements.
Under a typical revenue pro-rate agreement, such as those we
have in place, the two airlines negotiate a specific proration
formula, which allocates a total ticket value between the two
carriers, generally based on factors such as weighted mileage,
relative published fares or fixed rates per passenger depending
on fare class.
29
In such a revenue sharing arrangement, increased profits are
realized as ticket prices and passenger loads increase and,
correspondingly, decreased profits are realized as ticket prices
and passenger loads decrease.
Revenue generated by the airline is classified in our statement
of operations as Airline Passenger Revenue.
Cuba and
Other Charter Revenue
Cuba Operations. Gulfstream Air
Charter, Inc. (GAC), a related company which is
owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates charter flights between
Miami and Havana. GAC is licensed by the Office of Foreign
Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury as a
carrier and travel service provider for charter air
transportation between designated U.S. and Cuban airports.
Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC
dated August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006,
Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the
Gulfstream name, insurance, and service personnel, including
passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative.
Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC.
Pursuant to the March 14, 2006 amended agreement,
Gulfstream receives 75% of the income generated by GACs
Cuban charter operation. Prior to March 14, 2006,
Gulfstream received all of the income generated up to a
cumulative total of $1 million, and then 75% thereafter.
Income provided under the service agreement is reported in the
statement of operations as Academy, charter and other revenue,
and amounted to $888,887 for 2006 and $530,772 for the first
nine months of 2007. The Company considered the applicability of
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003).
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
(FIN 46) to the accounting by the Company of
the services agreement between its
wholly-owned
subsidiary, GIA, and the Cuba charter business (Cuba
Charter) operated by GAC. The Company concluded that
compliance with the consolidation or disclosure requirements of
FIN 46 as it relates to Cuba Charter would not materially
impact the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Therefore, the Company concluded that further consideration of
FIN 46 was unnecessary. However, the Company will review
the applicability of FIN 46 at each reporting period.
In addition to the Cuba revenue described above, our charter
revenues are principally derived from on-demand charter
services, sub-service flying for other scheduled airlines and a
15-year
agreement with a government subcontractor, subject to two-year
renewals, to operate daily flights between West Palm Beach and
Andros Town, Bahamas. Revenue and related expenses associated
with Gulfstreams charter activity are reported gross as
charter revenue and within the appropriate expense category of
the Companys statement of operations.
Academy
The Academy offers training programs for pilots holding
commercial multi-engine instrument certifications and at least
190 hours of flying time. Pilots with these ratings are
qualified to fly commercial airplanes, but are often unable to
find positions with airlines without additional training and
flying time. The Academy enhances its students career
prospects by providing them with the training and experience
necessary to obtain pilot positions with commercial airlines.
Traditionally, pilots have worked as flight instructors for up
to two years to gain this additional training and flying time.
The Academy offers an alternative to this traditional means of
gathering additional experience. By enrolling in one of the
Academys programs, students are able to more quickly
accumulate the qualifications demanded by the commercial
airlines. The Academy graduates have also experienced a high
success rate in completing training at airlines, which
translates into cost savings for the airlines.
The Academy enrolled 78 students in 2006, virtually all of whom
were hired by airlines after graduation, including those hired
by Gulfstream.
The Academys training facility in Fort Lauderdale has
several ground school classrooms, a series of flight training
devices used for procedural training and cockpit
familiarization, as well as two non-motion
30
flight simulators, one of which is a Beechcraft 1900. The
Academy contracts for full-motion flight simulators at
facilities in Atlanta, Georgia and Orlando, Florida, which are
needed for full FAA certification of the pilots.
The Academys revenues are included as other revenue in our
results of operations, and its expenses are included in general
and administrative expenses.
Results
of Operations
The results of operations presented herein for all periods prior
to our acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy on
March 14, 2006 are referred to as the results of operations
of the predecessor. The results of operations
presented herein for all periods subsequent to the acquisition
are referred to as the results of operations of the
successor. Pro forma financial results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and the year
ended December 31, 2006 include our results for the periods
from March 15, 2006 to September 30, 2006 and to
December 31, 2006, respectively, combined with the results
of our predecessor from January 1, 2006 to March 14,
2006, adjusted to give effect to our March 14, 2006
acquisition as though it had occurred on January 1, 2006.
See Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements at
page P-1
for pro forma adjustments and explanations. As a result of the
acquisition, the results of operations of the predecessor are
not comparable to the results of operations of the successor.
Such presentation does not comply with generally accepted
accounting principles and is being made solely to explain
changes in the results of operations for the periods presented
in the financial statements.
31
Comparative
Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2007 and
2006
The following table sets forth the Companys financial
results for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
55,871
|
|
|
$
|
76,135
|
|
|
$
|
81,246
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
59,200
|
|
|
|
80,567
|
|
|
|
86,675
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
9,651
|
|
|
|
11,020
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
13,535
|
|
|
|
17,738
|
|
|
|
18,933
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Aircraft rental
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
11,846
|
|
|
|
15,689
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
12,102
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
%)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
57,019
|
|
|
|
76,911
|
|
|
|
83,241
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
%)
|
Non-Operating Income and (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
%)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
%)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
%)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Operating Statistics. The following
table sets forth our major operational statistics and the
percentage-of-change for the periods identified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Statistics (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat miles (000s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,504
|
|
|
|
222,063
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Revenue passenger miles (000s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,319
|
|
|
|
133,086
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Revenue passengers carried
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,395
|
|
|
|
673,365
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Departures flown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,486
|
|
|
|
53,710
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Passenger load factor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
%
|
|
|
59.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.589
|
|
|
$
|
0.610
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Revenue per available seat miles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.350
|
|
|
$
|
0.366
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Operating costs per available seat mile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.354
|
|
|
$
|
0.379
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Average passenger fare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.77
|
|
|
$
|
120.66
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Average passenger trip length (miles)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Aircraft in service (end of period)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Net Income. The Companys
consolidated net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $1.9 million compared to net
income of $2.1 million for the same period of 2006. Factors
relating to the change in net income are discussed below.
Operating Income. The following table
identifies the respective operating profit contribution from
each of our operating components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline and charter
|
|
$
|
1,877
|
|
|
$
|
3,467
|
|
|
$
|
5,175
|
|
|
$
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
Academy
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(99.7
|
%)
|
Cuba charter, net
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
(27.1
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from operations
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
4,183
|
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
|
|
6,858
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
(2,626
|
)
|
|
|
(3,424
|
)
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
3,656
|
|
|
$
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
(6.1
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $3.4 million compared to
$3.7 million for the same period of 2006. The decrease in
operating income was primarily the result of reduced profits
from the Academy and Cuban charter, and increased general and
administrative expenses, partially offset by increased operating
income from our airline operations. The increase in operating
income in our airline operations was due to higher passenger
fares and the addition of new charter operations, offset by
increased expenses for flight operations and maintenance.
Operating Revenues. Consolidated
revenues increased to $86.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 from $80.6 million for the
same period of 2006. This represented an increase of 7.5%
33
over the prior year. The following table identifies the
respective revenue contribution from each of our operating
components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
55,871
|
|
|
$
|
76,135
|
|
|
$
|
81,246
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Charter and other revenue
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
4,334
|
|
|
|
79.5
|
%
|
Cuba charter, net
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
(27.1
|
%)
|
Academy
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Intercompany revenue elimination
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
(68.3
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
21,367
|
|
|
$
|
59,200
|
|
|
$
|
80,567
|
|
|
$
|
86,145
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline Passenger Revenue. Passenger
revenue increased 6.7% to $81.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 from $76.1 million for the
same period of 2006. This increase was primarily driven by a
3.7% increase in yield per revenue passenger mile and an
increase of 2.1% in available seat miles. The increase in yield
per revenue passenger mile reflected an industry-wide
improvement in the pricing environment, which we believe was
largely in response to substantially higher fuel prices.
Charter, Cuba Operations and Other
Revenue. Revenues from charter, Cuba
operations and other operations increased 54.8% to
$4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $3.1 million for the same period of 2006 due
principally to our commencement of a new charter service for a
government subcontractor. Under our agreement with this
subcontractor, we operate approximately two daily round-trip
flights between West Palm Beach and Andros Town, Bahamas with
two B1900Ds we have leased to support the operation. We
initiated service under this contract in June 2006, and this
contract generated $1.0 million of incremental charter
revenue through September 2007 compared to the same period
last year.
Academy Revenue. Revenue from the
Academy increased 6.8% to $2.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 from $2.6 million for the
same period last year. The year-over-year revenue increase marks
a turn-around from revenue declines experienced for the past
eighteen months. These declines began in late 2005 as reductions
in minimum flight hours required for pilot applicants by several
regional airlines made pilot applicant recruiting more
difficult, and the sales and marketing activities within the
Academy were reduced. In January 2006, a former salesman of the
Academy formed a business that the Company believes competes
directly with the Academy for student pilots. Thereafter, the
former President of the Academy resigned his position and the
Company believes he became affiliated with the alleged competing
business. As a result, enrollment at the Academy declined
significantly throughout 2006 and continued during the first
quarter of 2007. The Academy has initiated a lawsuit against
these former employees, alleging violation of non-competition
and fiduciary obligations. The defendants, including the
Academys former President, subsequently filed a
counterclaim against the Academy based upon lost earnings and
breach of contract.
34
Airline Operating Expenses. The
following table presents Gulfstream Airline operating expenses
for the
nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percentage of Airline Revenue
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
|
$
|
7,189
|
|
|
$
|
9,651
|
|
|
$
|
11,020
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
13,535
|
|
|
|
17,738
|
|
|
|
18,933
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Aircraft rental
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
11,846
|
|
|
|
15,689
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
12,102
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
(3.0
|
%)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,670
|
|
|
$
|
54,536
|
|
|
$
|
73,375
|
|
|
$
|
79,254
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
|
|
97.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight Operations. Major components of
flight operations expense include salaries for pilots,
instructors, flight attendants and other operations personnel.
Flight operations expenses increased to $11.0 million, or
13.6% of airline revenue, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 from $9.7 million, or 12.7% of
airline passenger revenue, for the same period last year. The
increase in flight operations expenses as a percentage of
airline revenue was primarily due to increased salaries and
wages, which increased to 9.3% of airline revenue during the
first nine months of 2007 compared to 8.5% for the same period
in 2006.
Salaries and wages were higher in 2007 due to several factors:
the year-over-year impact of a new collective bargaining
agreement in the second quarter of 2006; recent inefficient
flight schedules combined with maintenance related delays and
cancellations, which led to a decrease in the efficiency of our
flight crews during the second quarter of 2007, our peak
seasonal period; and overtime, training and related costs
resulting from increased pilot attrition.
We have recently improved the efficiency of our flight
schedules. We have also overlapped the June 2006 anniversary of
the collective bargaining related pay increases. As a result,
year-over-year increases in our flight operations expenses as a
percentage of revenue lessened significantly beginning in the
second half of 2007.
Aircraft Fuel. Aircraft fuel expenses
increased to $18.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 from $17.7 million for the same
period last year, principally due to an increase in aircraft
hours flown.
Aircraft Rent. Aircraft rent is related
to the lease costs associated with the rental of our 27 B-1900D
aircraft. Aircraft rent expense increased as the result of
leasing two additional B-1900D aircraft, offset by the
absorption of aircraft rent expense within charter operations as
a result of increased charter flying. The improvement as a
percent of airline revenue reflects the fixed nature of this
expense in the context of the improving revenue environment that
existed during the first nine months of 2007.
Maintenance and repairs expense. Major
components of maintenance and repairs expense include salaries
and wages, materials and expenses incurred from third party
service providers required to maintain our aircraft. Maintenance
increased to $17.9 million, or 22.0% of airline revenue,
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from
$15.7 million, or 20.6% of airline revenue for the same
period last year. Total maintenance cost per flight hour
increased by 9.0% to $363 in 2007 from $333 in 2006. The Company
has increased compensation rates to improve retention of
maintenance personnel, increased the number of
35
maintenance personnel, and opened a new maintenance facility in
West Palm Beach, Florida, to ensure continued fleet reliability.
Passenger Service. Major components of
passenger service expense include ground handling services,
airport counter and gate rentals, wages paid to our airport
employees, passenger liability insurance, security and
miscellaneous passenger-related expenses. Passenger service
expense increased 5.5% to $17.8 million, or 21.9% of
airline revenue, for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 from $16.9 million, or 22.2% of airline revenue, for
the same period last year. Decreased passenger service expense
as a percentage of airline revenue was due to the leveraging
effect on our expenses that resulted from capacity additions and
increases in revenue yield during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Promotion and Sales. Major components
of promotion and sales expense include credit card commissions,
travel agent commissions and reservation system fees. Promotion
and sales expense decreased 3.0% to $6.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $6.2 million
for the same period last year. Promotion and sales expense
decreased as a percentage of airline revenue to 7.4% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 from 8.1% of airline
revenue for the same period last year. Most of this improvement
as a percentage of airline revenue was due to the impact of
higher average fares.
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Depreciation and amortization
expense increased 9.8% to $2.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 from $2.6 million for the
same period last year. The increase in the first nine months of
2007 was due primarily to the additional depreciation resulting
from the increased cost of engine overhaul events related to our
owned EMB-120 aircraft. The increased cost of the engine
overhauls are depreciated based on actual engine hours flown.
General and Administrative and Academy Operating
Expense. Our consolidated general and
administrative expenses include the expenses of the Academy, as
set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
March 15,
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
2,002
|
|
|
$
|
2,626
|
|
|
$
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Academy operating expense
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
Intercompany expense elimination
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,062
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
(20.5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
2,483
|
|
|
$
|
3,536
|
|
|
$
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses, excluding Academy expenses,
increased to $2.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 from $2.6 million for the same
period last year. Most of the increase in the first nine months
of 2007 was attributable to corporate expenses related to the
acquisition of the predecessor companies in March 2006,
including consulting expenses, board of directors fees and
share-based compensation expense.
Academy expenses increased to $2.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 from $2.2 million for
the same period last year. Almost half of this increase was due
to fixed rentals of flight simulators to expand our training
capability. The remainder was primarily due to increased
advertising expenses incurred to reinvigorate our business
growth, which was significantly impacted by the resignation of
the former President of the Academy and certain sales personnel
in late 2005 and early 2006.
Non-Operating Income and Expense. Pro
forma interest expense decreased to $500,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 from $605,000 for the same period
last year. Interest expense associated with the 12% subordinated
debentures of $3.32 million was excluded from interest expense
for both periods by pro forma adjustments to give retroactive
effect to the intended repayment of the subordinated debentures
from proceeds of this offering. Interest expense and related
debt discount and issue costs related to the subordinated
debentures that was reversed for pro forma purposes for the nine
months ended September 30,
36
2006 and 2007 amounted to $266,000 and $383,000, respectively.
Excluding these pro forma adjustments, interest expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 was $871,000
and $883,000, respectively.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax
rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 37.9%
compared to 34.7% for the same period in 2006. The lower
effective income tax rate for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 was due primarily to the fact that the
Academy was an S corporation prior to its acquisition on
March 14, 2006 and not subject to corporate income taxes.
Comparative
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
The following table sets forth the Companys financial
results for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
66,274
|
|
|
$
|
87,983
|
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
78,290
|
|
|
$
|
98,554
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
6,063
|
|
|
|
4,022
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)%
|
|
|
61.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
72,337
|
|
|
|
92,005
|
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
83,690
|
|
|
|
105,057
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
8,881
|
|
|
|
11,169
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
11,115
|
|
|
|
20,544
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
19,356
|
|
|
|
23,559
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Aircraft rent
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
6.191
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
14,668
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
16,597
|
|
|
|
20,390
|
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
7,530
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
385.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
70,306
|
|
|
|
90,596
|
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
82,589
|
|
|
|
102,481
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
82.8
|
%
|
Non-Operating Income and(Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
356.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Other income
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
%
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(53.8
|
)%
|
|
|
118.4
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
217.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)%
|
|
|
86.0
|
%
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,843
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)%
|
|
|
85.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Operating Statistics. The following
table sets forth our major operational statistics and the
percentage-of-change for the years identified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Annual Operating Statistics (unaudited, scheduled service
only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat miles (000s)
|
|
|
202,662
|
|
|
|
280,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,161
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Revenue passenger miles (000s)
|
|
|
122,852
|
|
|
|
160,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,939
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Revenue passengers carried
|
|
|
660,956
|
|
|
|
837,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863,556
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Departures flown
|
|
|
57,725
|
|
|
|
69,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,922
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Passenger load factor
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
|
|
57.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Average yield per revenue passenger mile
|
|
$
|
0.539
|
|
|
$
|
0.547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.583
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Revenue per available seat miles
|
|
$
|
0.327
|
|
|
$
|
0.314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.340
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Operating costs per available seat mile
|
|
$
|
0.329
|
|
|
$
|
0.314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.341
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Average passenger fare
|
|
$
|
100.27
|
|
|
$
|
105.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.13
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Average passenger trip length (miles)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Aircraft in service (end of period)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Fuel cost per gallon (incl taxes & fees)
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
42.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Net Income. The Companys
consolidated net income for the year ended December 31,
2006 was $1.3 million compared to $700,000 for 2005 and
$1.8 million for 2004. Factors relating to the changes in
net income are discussed below.
Operating Income. Consolidated
operating income for 2006 was $2.6 million compared to
$1.4 million for 2005 and $2.0 million for 2004. The
most significant factor contributing to the increase in 2006 was
improved results from our airline and charter operations. The
improvement in our airline operations was attributable to the
maturation of capacity additions introduced in 2005, which more
than offset a significant increase in the price of jet fuel. The
decrease in operating income in 2005 was primarily the result of
reduced profits from the Academy, which we were unable to offset
by improvements at the airline. The following table identifies
the respective operating profit contribution from each of our
operating components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Airline and charter
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
|
$
|
3,140
|
|
|
$
|
1,877
|
|
|
$
|
2,609
|
|
|
$
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
Academy
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(67.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
Cuba charter, net
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
105.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from operations
|
|
|
4,462
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
3,596
|
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(2,431
|
)
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,495
|
)
|
|
|
(3,119
|
)
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
2,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
1,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,101
|
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
(30.6
|
)%
|
|
|
82.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Operating Revenues. The Company has
grown rapidly in recent years by adding additional, principally
larger-capacity, aircraft to service new destinations in both
Florida and the Bahamas and by increasing frequency through
additional flights to its existing destinations. Consolidated
revenues increased to $105.1 million in 2006 from
$92.0 million in 2005 and from $72.3 million in 2004.
This represented increases of 14.2% and 27.2% over the prior
year for each of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The following
table identifies the respective revenue contribution from each
of our operating components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
66,274
|
|
|
$
|
87,983
|
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
78,290
|
|
|
$
|
98,554
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Charter and other revenue
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
187.3
|
%
|
Cuba charter, net
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
105.8
|
%
|
Academy
|
|
|
6,593
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
3,633
|
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)%
|
Intercompany revenue elimination
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
(2,610
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,189
|
)
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
|
|
(44.6
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
72,337
|
|
|
$
|
92,005
|
|
|
$
|
21,367
|
|
|
$
|
83,690
|
|
|
$
|
105,057
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline Passenger Revenue. Passenger
revenue increased 12.0% to $98.6 million in 2006 from
$88.0 million in 2005. This increase was primarily driven
by an increase of almost one percentage point in our passenger
load factor, a 6.7% increase in yield per revenue passenger mile
and a modest increase of 3.4% in available seat miles. The
increase in passenger load factor was largely due to increased
recognition and utilization in new markets we established in the
previous year. The increase in yield per revenue passenger mile
reflected an industry-wide improvement in the pricing
environment, which we believe was largely in response to
substantially higher fuel prices.
Passenger revenue increased 32.8% to $88.0 million in 2005
from $66.3 million in 2004. This increase was primarily
attributable to a 38.4% increase in available seat miles,
resulting from our acquisition in late 2004 and early 2005 of
eleven aircraft, seven of which were higher-capacity 30-seat
EMB-120s. The additional aircraft allowed us to add destinations
and increase frequency of flights to existing destinations. As
capacity increased, we did not realize a commensurate increase
in passenger revenue despite an increase in our average fare,
because capacity utilization, or passenger load factor, declined
to 57.3% in 2005 from 60.6% in 2004. We believe this decline was
due to the time required to fully utilize our expanded capacity.
Charter, Cuba Operations and Other
Revenue. Revenues from general charter, Cuba
operations and other operations increased 166.3% to
$4.3 million in 2006 from $1.6 million in 2005 due
principally to our commencement of a new charter service for a
government subcontractor and growth in our Cuba charter
operations. Between the time of its inception in June 2006 and
the end of the year, this contract generated $1.2 million
of incremental charter revenue. Other charter and other revenues
increased 22.7% to $1.6 million in 2005 from
$1.3 million in 2004 due to an increased number of charter
flights operated. During 2006, charter revenue from the Cuban
charter operation, net of expenses, increased to $889,000
compared to $432,000 in 2005. This increase was primarily due to
our operation of additional flights and use of higher-capacity
aircraft.
Academy Revenue. Revenue declined to
$3.6 million in 2006 from $5.0 million in 2005 and
from $6.6 million in 2004. This represented decreases of
27.4% and 24.1% for 2006 and 2005, respectively, compared to the
prior years. The decline in 2005 was primarily due to the
termination of our Fast-Track Captain program, whereby a student
could complete all FAA requirements and become a captain in an
abbreviated time. We discontinued this program after determining
that it could conflict with our collective bargaining agreement
with our pilots. The decline continued in 2006 after the former
President of the
39
Academy and certain sales personnel resigned their positions and
formed a new company that competed directly with the Academy for
student pilots. As a result, enrollment at the Academy declined
significantly.
Airline Operating Expenses. The
following table presents Gulfstreams operating expenses
for the years ended December 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Operating Costs
|
|
|
Percentage of Airline Revenue
|
|
|
Percentage Change
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2004 to 2005
|
|
|
2005 to 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
$
|
8,881
|
|
|
$
|
11,169
|
|
|
$
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
11,115
|
|
|
|
20,544
|
|
|
|
23,559
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
Aircraft rent
|
|
|
6,470
|
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
6,191
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
14,668
|
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
17.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
Passenger service
|
|
|
16,597
|
|
|
|
20,390
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Promotion & sales
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
7,530
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
385.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
64,650
|
|
|
|
86,035
|
|
|
$
|
97,665
|
|
|
|
97.5
|
%
|
|
|
97.8
|
%
|
|
|
99.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight Operations. Flight operations
expenses increased to $13.2 million in 2006 from
$11.2 million in 2005 and $8.9 million in 2004. This
represented increases of 18.1% and 25.8% over the prior year for
each of 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the same periods,
airline revenue increased by 12.0% and 32.8%. As a result,
flight operations expense as a percent of airline revenue
declined from 13.4% in 2004 to 12.7% in 2005. This improvement
occurred principally as a result of the addition of larger,
30-seat aircraft, which generate a higher amount of revenue per
flight hour. Flight operations expense as a percent of airline
revenue increased to 13.4% in 2006 as the result of a new
collective bargaining agreement in the second quarter of 2006.
Aircraft Fuel. Fuel costs have
increased during the past three years from $1.33 per gallon in
2004 to $1.89 per gallon in 2005 and to $2.18 per gallon in
2006. As a result, fuel costs have increased as a percent of
airline revenue from 16.8% in 2004 to 23.3% in 2005 and to 23.9%
in 2006.
Aircraft Rent. Aircraft rent increased
5.5% from 2004 to 2005 as a result of leasing additional B-1900D
aircraft. Aircraft rent was lower in 2006 due to the
renegotiation of lease rates with the Companys principal
aircraft lessor. As a percentage of revenue, aircraft rent
decreased from 9.8% in 2004 to 6.3% in 2006, primarily due to
the addition of our fleet of seven EMB-120 aircraft which were
purchased, rather than leased.
Maintenance and repairs
expense. Maintenance increased to
$21.2 million in 2006 from $17.2 million in 2005 and
$14.7 million in 2004. This represented increases of 23.3%
and 17.4% over the prior year for each of 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Total maintenance cost per flight hour decreased
from $294 in 2004 to $275 in 2005 and increased to $329 in 2006.
During 2006, our maintenance costs increased as a result of a
new Beechcraft 1900D engine overhaul contract requiring higher
hourly payments, increased materials costs for our EMB-120
fleet, expenses required to comply with an EMB-120 airworthiness
directive and higher hourly labor rates. The reduction in hourly
cost in 2005 was principally due to a substantial increase in
the number of hours flown from recently acquired aircraft and
the effect of slower growth in fixed costs relative to the
increase in flight hours.
Passenger Service. Passenger service
expense increased 8.7% to $22.2 million in 2006 from
$20.4 million in 2005 and 4.8% on a per-departure basis for
the same period. This increase was largely attributable to an
increase in expenses for airport rentals at certain airports, as
well as an overall increase in wage rates provided to our
airport employees. These increases were offset by a reduction in
our rates for passenger liability insurance, interrupted trip
expenses and the leveraging effect on certain fixed expenses
that resulted from capacity additions and increases in revenue
yield over the past two years.
40
Passenger service expense increased 22.9% to $20.4 million
in 2005 from $16.6 million and 1.4% on a per-departure
basis for the same period. The increase in expenses was
primarily attributable to the higher level of capacity in 2005
and, to a lesser extent, the impact of adding larger aircraft to
our fleet.
Promotion and Sales. Promotion and
sales expense increased to $7.9 million in 2006 from
$7.5 million in 2005 and from $6.4 million in 2004.
This represented increases of 5.2% and 17.0% for 2006 and 2005,
respectively, compared to the prior years. Promotion and sales
expense declined as a percent of airline revenue from 9.7% in
2004 to 8.6% and 8.0% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Most of
this improvement has resulted from favorable trends in marketing
and distribution costs as well as the impact of higher average
fares.
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Depreciation and amortization
expense increased to $3.2 million in 2006 from
$2.4 million in 2005 and $0.5 million in 2004. This
represented increases of 37.1% and 385.6% over the prior year
for each of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in both
2005 and 2006 was primarily due to the purchase of seven EMB-120
aircraft in late 2004 and early 2005. The increase in 2006 was
also due to the additional depreciation resulting from both the
$4.7 million valuation increase attributable to those
aircraft and increased amortization of intangible assets
resulting from the purchase price allocation related to our
acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy in March 2006.
General and Administrative and Academy Operating
Expense. Our consolidated general and
administrative expenses include the expenses of the Academy, as
set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 to
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2004 to
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
2,431
|
|
|
$
|
2,658
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
2,494
|
|
|
$
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Academy expenses
|
|
|
5,079
|
|
|
|
4,512
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(30.3
|
)%
|
Intercompany elimination
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
(2,609
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
|
|
(44.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated general and administrative
|
|
$
|
5,656
|
|
|
$
|
4,561
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
3,763
|
|
|
$
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses, excluding Academy expenses,
increased to $3.1 million in 2006 from $2.7 million in
2005 and from $2.4 million in 2004. This represented
increases of 15.7% and 9.3% over the prior year for each of 2006
and 2005, respectively.
Most of the increase in 2006 was attributable to corporate
expenses related to the acquisition of the predecessor companies
in March 2006, including consulting expenses, board of directors
fees and share-based compensation expense.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total
revenue, excluding Academy expenses, declined to 2.9% in 2005
from 3.4% in 2004, while total revenue increased 27.2% from 2004
to 2005. The decline in general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of total revenue for 2005 reflects the beneficial
leveraging effect of rapid revenue growth combined with the
fixed nature of many of our general and administrative expenses.
Academy expenses declined to $3.1 million in 2006 from
$4.5 million in 2005 and from $5.1 million in 2004.
This represented decreases of 30.3% and 11.2% for 2006 and 2005,
respectively, compared to the prior years. These decreases were
due to and consistent with Academy revenue declines in both
years of 27.4% and 24.1% in 2006 and 2005, respectively, when
compared to the respective prior years. The reasons for the
revenue declines were discussed above. Because a high percentage
of the expenses of the Academy are variable, total expenses tend
to decrease proportionately with significant changes in revenue.
41
Non-Operating Income and
Expense. Interest expense increased from
$153,000 in 2004 to $699,000 in 2005 and $720,000 in 2006. These
increases were due to debt incurred in 2005 to finance our new
fleet of seven Embraer EMB-120s.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax
rate was 8.4% in 2004, 24.7% in 2005 and 35.9% in 2006. The
lower effective rates in 2004 and 2005 were primarily due to the
fact that the Academy was an S corporation prior to its
acquisition on March 14, 2006 and not subject to corporate
income taxes.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity refers to the liquid financial assets available to
fund our business operations and pay for near-term obligations.
These liquid financial assets consist of cash as well as short
term investments. Our primary uses of cash are for working
capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. We
rely primarily on operating cash flows to fund our cash
requirements. We also have a $750,000 line of credit, which was
fully accessed as of September 30, 2007. We believe we have
sufficient cash to fund our operations for the next twelve
months.
As of September 30, 2007, our cash and cash equivalents
balance was $3.3 million and we had a negative working
capital of $10.2 million. Our business is quite seasonal,
and our cash and cash equivalents and working capital positions
are typically at their lowest levels between September and March
of each year.
The following table summarizes key cash flow information for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
March 15
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
to March 14,
|
|
|
to September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
(447
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,178
|
|
|
$
|
5,731
|
|
|
$
|
5,191
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
(9,872
|
)
|
|
|
(10,843
|
)
|
|
|
(4,874
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
8,983
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(1,669
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,289
|
|
|
$
|
3,620
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities. Cash provided by
operating activities was $5.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to $5.7 million in
2006. The decrease in the first nine months of 2007 was
primarily due to $1.6 million of payments associated with
the engine return liability, an increase in expendable parts,
and an increase in other assets.
Investing activities. Cash used in investing
activities was $4.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to $10.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. Cash used in
investing activities during the first nine months of 2007
primarily consisted of capital expenditures related to the
purchase of equipment for our airline business. The cash used in
investing activities in the first nine months of 2006 primarily
represented the acquisition of the predecessors on
March 14, 2006 totaling $8.8 million, and
$1.1 million for capital expenditures.
Financing activities. Cash provided by (used
in) financing activities was ($192,000) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to $8.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Cash used in
financing activities for the first nine months of 2007 was
due to repayments of debt, offset by accessing our revolving
credit line in the amount of $750,000. Cash provided by
financing activities for the
42
first nine months of 2006 included the issuance of common stock
and subordinated debentures totaling $10.9 million to
finance the acquisition of the predecessor companies, offset by
repayments of debt and payment of loan fees.
As of December 31, 2006, our cash and cash equivalents
balance was $3.1 million and we had negative working
capital of $7.7 million.
The following table summarizes key cash flow information for the
comparative years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Full Year
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
5,120
|
|
|
$
|
4,227
|
|
|
$
|
(447
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,125
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,949
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
(10,758
|
)
|
|
|
(11,729
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(2,846
|
)
|
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
8,777
|
|
|
|
8,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
(1,669
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
|
$
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities. Cash provided by
operating activities increased to $4.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to $4.2 million in
2005. The increase was primarily due to higher income before non
cash charges in 2006.
Investing activities. Cash used in investing
activities was $11.7 million for 2006 compared to
$1.4 million in 2005 and $1.9 million in 2004. The
significant increase in cash used in investing activities in
2006 represented the acquisition of the predecessors on
March 14, 2006. Cash used in investing activities during
2004 and 2005 primarily consisted of capital expenditures
related to the purchase of equipment for our airline business.
Financing activities. Cash provided by
financing activities was $8.5 million for 2006 that
included the issuance of common stock and subordinated
debentures for a total of $10.9 million to finance the
acquisition of the predecessor companies, offset by repayments
of debt and payment of loan fees. Cash used in financing
activities in 2004 and 2005 were comprised mostly of repayments
of debt, payment of loan fees, dividend payments and the
re-acquisition from a third-party vendor of warrants to purchase
common stock of GIA.
Debt and
Other Contractual Obligations
We maintain a $750,000 revolving line of credit from Wachovia
Bank, N.A., that expires on October 31, 2008, to fund our
cash requirements during our weakest seasonal period, which
typically occurs between August and December each year. As of
September 30, 2007, we accessed this line of credit for a
total amount of $750,000. Recently, we estimated that if the net
proceeds anticipated by this offering were not available to us
by approximately November 15, 2007, we would be required to
secure additional short-term financing to cover our additional
cash requirements during this seasonally weak period. The
estimated cash flow shortfall was expected to be short-lived and
was driven primarily by recent capital expenditures associated
with upgrading and refurbishing an eighth EMB-120 aircraft we
recently purchased. The estimated cash flow projections proved
to be conservative, and we no longer believe that additional
short-term financing will be required. Borrowings under the
Wachovia credit line bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.75%,
which was 8.08% at December 31, 2006. There were no
borrowings under this line as of December 31, 2006. Our
revolving credit agreement with Wachovia Bank, N.A. requires
that we maintain a debt to EBITDA ratio of not more than 3.00 to
1.00, and that we maintain our primary depository account with
Wachovia Bank, N.A. The Company was in compliance with its
financial covenants as of October 31, 2007. For purposes of
this loan agreement, EBITDA is defined as the sum of earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
43
In December 2005, we entered into a term loan agreement with
Irwin Union Bank pursuant to which we borrowed $8.6 million
to refinance our fleet of seven EMB-120 aircraft, which we
originally financed from the seller, Atlantic Southeast
Airlines, Inc. (a subsidiary of SkyWest, Inc.). This term loan
bears interest at 6.95% per annum, and is payable in 59 equal
installments of principal and interest totaling $145,488 per
month, with a balloon payment of $1.88 million due in
December 2010. The principal balance of this term loan was
$7.5 million at December 31, 2006. The term loan is
secured by our EMB-120 fleet and is guaranteed by SkyWest, Inc.
The term loan agreement requires that we maintain a ratio of
greater than 1.00 to 1.00 of: (1) the sum of each of the
four previous calendar quarters earnings before
depreciation, interest, and operating lease expense, to
(2) the sum of interest expense, operating leases and
current maturities of long term debt. The Company was in
compliance with its financial covenants as of July 31, 2007.
In March 2006, we issued a total of 3,320 units at a
purchase price of $1,000 per unit to 23 investors, for an
aggregate cash consideration of $3.32 million. Each unit
consisted of (1) a 12% subordinated debenture in the
principal amount of $1,000 due March 14, 2009, and
(2) a warrant to purchase 14 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $5.00 per share, exercisable at the option
of the holder for a period of five years. The debentures bear
interest of 12% per annum, payable quarterly. At
December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal balance on
these debentures was $3.32 million.
On March 22, 2007, we entered into a loan agreement with
Wachovia Bank in the principal amount of $1,150,000 to finance
our acquisition of one EMB-120 aircraft. The loan is payable in
59 monthly principal installments of $7,858.33 and a final
balloon payment of $686,358 and bears interest monthly, payable
on the unpaid principal balance at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75%.
As of October 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all
financial covenants under our credit agreements.
We have significant obligations for aircraft that are classified
as operating leases and therefore are not reflected on our
balance sheet. The 27 Beechcraft 1990Ds in our total fleet of 35
aircraft are subject to individual operating leases that expire
between 2008 and 2010. We also lease our hangar and corporate
office facilities in Fort Lauderdale, Florida under various
operating leases that expire from 2009 to 2025.
In June 2003, the Company entered into a tri-party Pooling and
Engine Services Agreement with its aircraft vendor and engine
maintenance contractor that allowed the Company to exchange 16
of its engines requiring overhaul for mid-life engines owned by
its aircraft vendor that had time remaining before overhaul. The
future overhaul costs of the mid-life engines were shared
proportionately, with the Companys portion based on engine
hours flown until the next overhaul. Accordingly, based on
engine hours flown since June 2003, the Company incurred a
liability of $5.55 million, representing its contractual
obligation for its share of the overhaul costs by recognizing
engine maintenance expense of $1,604,367, $1,766,042, $1,748,733
and $430,685 in 2003, 2004, 2005 and Interim 2006, respectively.
The 16 engines are expected to be returned to the aircraft
vendor during the 24 months beginning January 2007. Two
engines were returned between January 1 and February 28,
2007 for a total cost of approximately $600,000, which was
charged to the engine return liability account.
In March 2007, the Company signed a new engine services
agreement providing for a fixed rate per hour for engine
overhaul services. Included in that agreement, and in
conjunction with this return requirement, the Company has
secured the commitment of its new engine maintenance vendor to
perform engine overhaul services beginning March 1, 2007 at
a pace that will allow the remaining fourteen mid-life engines
to be returned to the aircraft vendor in accordance with
contractual specifications. In return, the Company has agreed to
make fixed monthly payments of $166,667 to the engine
maintenance vendor beginning March 31, 2007 and continuing
for 24 months. In addition, the Company expects to pay
approximately $800,000 for work not covered by the engine
services agreement. See Note (9) Engine Return Liability.
We perform our airplane maintenance and repairs primarily at our
maintenance hangar located at Hollywood-Fort Lauderdale
Airport. The lease on our Fort Lauderdale facility is
renewed for one year terms and is currently set to expire on
May 31, 2008. If this lease were not renewed, we would
likely incur an increase in our lease and related costs of up to
$100,000 per year. Our current lease cost is approximately
$220,000 per year.
We believe we have sufficient cash to fund our operations for
the next twelve months and to satisfy our fixed obligations on
an ongoing basis.
44
Commitments
and Contractual Obligations
The following table discloses aggregate information about our
contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2006 and
the periods in which payments are due (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1 to 3
|
|
|
3 to 5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
10,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
|
$
|
3,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Executive compensation
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
30,019
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
14,412
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
Engine return liability
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future payments on contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
47,047
|
|
|
$
|
12,555
|
|
|
$
|
23,240
|
|
|
$
|
7,826
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Such amounts do not include interest. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Seasonality
Gulfstreams business is subject to substantial
seasonality, primarily due to leisure and holiday travel
patterns, particularly in the Bahamas. We experience the
strongest demand from February to July, and the weakest demand
from August to December, during which period we typically suffer
operating losses. As a result, our operating results for a
quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for an entire year, and historical operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Our
results of operations generally reflect this seasonality.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risks relate primarily to changes in aircraft fuel
costs and in interest rates.
Aircraft Fuel. In the past, we have not
experienced difficulties with fuel availability and we currently
expect to be able to obtain fuel at prevailing market prices in
quantities sufficient to meet our future needs. Pursuant to our
contract flying arrangements with our code share partners, we
will bear the economic risk of fuel price fluctuations.
We typically do not enter into, and are currently not a party
to, any derivative or other arrangement designed to hedge
against or manage the risk of an increase in fuel prices.
Accordingly, our statement of income and our cash flows are and
will continue to be affected by changes in the price and
availability of fuel.
Interest Rates. Both our senior term loan and
subordinated debentures carry fixed rates of interest and are
not tied to market indices. Therefore, our statement of income
and our cash flows are not exposed to changes in interest rates.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
45
Revenue
Recognition
Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is provided.
Over 95% of the passenger tickets for travel on the
Companys airline are off-line ticket sales (sold by
another airline and used on GIA) and are settled through
interline clearing-houses. The majority of these tickets are
sold by Continental as a result of our alliance agreement with
them. The Company receives the sales proceeds from these ticket
sales by monthly settlements with selling carriers through
interline clearing-houses when travel has been completed. Since
these are off-line ticket sales with respect to the Company,
refunds and exchanges are the responsibility of and completed by
the airline that sold the ticket.
Less than 5% of the passenger tickets for travel on the
Companys airline are on-line ticket sales (sold by an
airline and used on that airline) sold directly by the Company.
Passenger revenue associated with these tickets is recognized
when transportation is provided or when the ticket expires
unused, rather than when a ticket is sold. These tickets expire
one year from the date of issue. We are required to charge
certain taxes and fees on our passenger tickets. These taxes and
fees include U.S. federal transportation taxes, federal
security charges, airport passenger facility charges and foreign
arrival and departure taxes. These taxes and fees are legal
assessments on the customer. As we have a legal obligation to
act as a collection agent with respect to these taxes and fees,
we do not include such amounts in passenger revenue. We record a
liability when the amounts are collected and relieve the
liability when payments are made to the applicable government
agency or operating carrier.
The amounts associated with passenger tickets sold by the
Company are included in our consolidated balance sheet as air
traffic liability. We maintain specific identification of
passenger tickets used each period, which are included in
results of operations for the periods in which travel is
completed. Tickets purchased but not yet used are included in
air traffic liability.
Charter revenue, excess baggage fees, and miscellaneous revenue
are recognized when transportation service is provided.
Enrollment fee revenue is based upon actual training hours used
by the students of our pilot training academy. The remaining
unused hours represent deferred tuition revenue.
Frequent
Flyer Awards
In conjunction with its several code share agreements, GIA
participates in the respective frequent flyer programs of its
code share partners. However, our code share partners are
responsible for the overall administration and costs of their
programs.
Passengers on our airline, who are also participants in the
frequent flyer programs of our code share partners, can earn
mileage credits in those programs for travel on our airline. GIA
incurs costs from its code share partners for mileage credit
earned by these passengers in accordance with rates specified in
the respective code share agreements.
In addition, participants in these frequent flyer programs may
use mileage accumulated in those programs to obtain free trips
on one of GIAs flights. GIA receives revenue from its code
share partners for travel awards redeemed by its participants on
GIAs flight segments in accordance with rates specified in
the respective code share agreements.
Maintenance
and Repair Costs
Gulfstream operates under an FAA-approved continuous inspection
and maintenance program. Routine maintenance and repairs are
charged to operations as incurred. The Company accounts for
major engine maintenance activities for its Beechcraft 1900D
leased aircraft on the direct expense method. Under this method,
major engine maintenance is performed under a long-term contract
with a third party vendor, whereby set monthly payments are made
on the basis of hours flown and are charged to expense as paid.
Major engine maintenance for our EMB-120 owned aircraft, which
were purchased in 2004 and 2005, is based on the built-in
overhaul method. The built-in overhaul method is based on
segregation of the aircraft
46
costs into those that should be depreciated over the useful life
of the aircraft and those that require overhaul at periodic
intervals. Thus, the estimated cost of the overhaul component
included in the purchase price was set up separately from the
cost of the airframe and is amortized to the date of the initial
overhaul. The cost of the initial overhaul is then capitalized
and amortized to the next overhaul, at which time the process is
repeated.
Impairment
of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
accounting and disclosure provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which
requires that new, modified and unvested share based payment
transactions with employees, such as stock options and
restricted stock, be measured at fair value on the grant date
and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
The fair value of the underlying common stock was determined by
the Company to be $5.00, which was based on the value paid by
investors when the Company was acquired on March 14, 2006.
The Company did not secure an independent valuation, because it
concluded that an independent valuation would not result in a
more meaningful or accurate determination of fair value in the
circumstances. The Companys business fundamentals had not
changed appreciably between the acquisition date and the date on
which the options were granted, which occurred on May 31,
2006 and January 26, 2007. In addition, as of the time of
the option grants the Company had engaged new auditors to review
its accounting policies and complete audits of its historical
financial statements, it was in the process of adopting a new
accounting pronouncement (FSP No. AUG
AIR-1) to
account for engine maintenance on its owned airplanes, and it
was negotiating a new engine maintenance agreement for leased
airplanes, all of which may have had an undetermined but
potentially significant impact on its financial statements. As a
result, the Company concluded that the value paid by investors
when the Company was acquired on March 14, 2006 was the
most accurate indicator of fair value, given the uncertainty of
the circumstances.
The increase from the $5.00 per share fair value as of each
stock option grant date (i.e. May 31, 2006 and
January 26, 2007) to the IPO valuation of $8.00 per
share is largely attributable to two principal factors:
|
|
|
|
|
The first factor is the liquidity-driven valuation premium
inherently available to a company as it transitions from
privately-held to publicly-traded status.
|
|
|
|
The second factor relates to the Companys growth
prospects, which have improved since the beginning of 2007.
Market dynamics, competitive forces and record-high fuel prices
have combined to create growing market opportunities for
cost-efficient, small-capacity turboprop carriers like
Gulfstream.
|
See Note (13) Stock Options in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Companys audited
financial statements for more information regarding our Stock
Incentive Plan and stock options granted during 2006.
47
Overview
of the Passenger Airline Industry
According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Department
of Transportation, the number of total paying passengers in the
United States that traveled on scheduled air service, commonly
referred to as total revenue passenger enplanements, was
744 million in 2006, up slightly from 739 million in
2005.
The airline industry in the United States has traditionally been
dominated by major airlines, which include carriers
such as American Airlines, Continental, Delta Air Lines,
Northwest and United. The major airlines offer scheduled flights
to many major cities within the United States and often
throughout all or part of the rest of the world while also
serving numerous smaller cities. The major airlines benefit from
wide name recognition and long operating histories.
Most major airlines have adopted the hub and spoke
system. This system concentrates most of an airlines
operations in a limited number of hub cities, serving most other
destinations in the system by providing one-stop or connecting
service through the hub between destinations on the spokes. Such
an arrangement permits travelers to fly from a point of origin
to more destinations without switching airlines. Hub airports
permit carriers to transport passengers between large numbers of
destinations with substantially more frequent service than if
each route were served directly. The hub and spoke system also
allows the airline to add service to new destinations from a
large number of cities using only one or a limited number of
aircraft.
Low-cost airlines, such as Southwest Airlines,
JetBlue Airways, AirTran Airways and Frontier Airlines
frequently offer fewer service level options to travelers and
have lower cost structures than major airlines, thus permitting
them to offer flights to many of the same markets as the major
airlines, but at lower prices. Some low-cost airlines utilize a
hub and spoke strategy, while others, such as Southwest
Airlines, offer predominantly point-to-point service between
designated city pairs. In addition, major carriers such as Delta
Airlines and United Airlines have developed Song and Ted,
respectively, as lower-cost subsidiaries. These carriers, which
are typically point-to-point, also offer fewer levels of service
to travelers but permit the airlines to offer flights at lower
prices. The reduction, withdrawal or historical absence of both
major and low-cost airlines on shorter haul routes has provided
increased opportunities for regional airlines to develop these
markets.
Regional airlines, such as American Eagle, Express
Jet, Comair, Gulfstream, Horizon Airlines, Mesa Airlines, Mesaba
Airlines, Pinnacle Airlines and SkyWest Airlines, typically
operate smaller aircraft on lower-volume routes than major and
low-cost airlines. Several regional airlines, including American
Eagle, Comair and Horizon Airlines, are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of major airlines. In contrast to low-cost
airlines, regional airlines generally do not try to establish an
independent route system to compete with the major airlines.
Rather, regional airlines typically enter into cooperative
marketing relationships with one or more major airlines under
which the regional airline agrees to use its smaller, lower-cost
aircraft to carry passengers booked and ticketed by the major
airline between a city served by a major airline and a smaller
outlying location. In exchange for such services, the regional
airline is either paid a fixed-fee per flight by the major
airline or receives a pro-rata portion of the total fare
generated in a given market.
Growth of
the Regional Airline Industry
Regional airlines have experienced significant growth over the
past decade. According to the RAA 2006 Annual Report, in 2005
the regional airline industry in the United States experienced a
16.6% increase in revenue passenger miles as compared to 2004.
Also in 2005, the number of passengers flown by regional
airlines increased 11.9% year over year surpassing
150 million passengers. According to the FAA Aerospace
Forecasts Fiscal Years 2007-2020, the FAA forecasted regional
U.S. revenue passenger miles to grow at an average annual
rate of over 5% over the
14-year
period ending 2020, from 68 billion in 2006 to
139 billion in 2020, and the number of passengers flown to
grow by an average annual rate of 3.1% during the same
14-year
period, reaching a total of 233.5 million passengers by
2020.
48
We believe that the growth of the number of passengers using
regional airlines and the revenues of regional airlines during
the last decade is attributable to a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Regional airlines work with, and often benefit from the strength
of, the major airlines. Since many major airlines are
increasingly using regional airlines as part of their growth
strategies, many regional airlines have expanded, and may
continue to expand, with the major airlines they serve.
|
|
|
|
Regional airlines tend to have a more favorable cost structure
and greater operating flexibility than many major airlines. Many
regional airlines were founded in the midst of the highly
competitive market that developed following deregulation of the
airline industry in 1978.
|
|
|
|
Many major airlines have determined that an effective method for
retaining customer loyalty and maximizing system revenue, while
lowering costs, is to utilize more cost-efficient regional
airlines flying under the major airlines flight designator
code and brand name to serve shorter, low-volume routes.
|
Relationship
of Regional and Major Airlines
Regional airlines generally enter into code share agreements
with major airlines, pursuant to which the regional airline is
authorized to use the major airlines two-letter flight
designator code to identify the regional airlines flights
and fares in the central reservation systems, to paint its
aircraft with the colors
and/or logos
of its code share partner and to market and advertise its status
as a carrier for the code share partner. In addition, the major
airline generally provides reservation services, ticket stock,
certain ticketing services, ground support services, airport
landing slots and gate access to the regional airline, and both
partners often coordinate marketing, advertising and other
promotional efforts. In exchange, the regional airline provides
a designated number of low capacity flights between larger
airports served by the major airline and surrounding locations,
usually lower-volume markets.
The financial arrangements between the regional airlines and
their code share partners usually involve either a fixed-fee or
revenue sharing arrangement. We utilize revenue sharing
arrangements with our code share partners, rather than fixed-fee
arrangements. We also set our own prices for local,
point-to-point flights.
Fixed-Fee Capacity Purchase Agreements. Under
a fixed-fee arrangement, the major airline generally pays the
regional airline a fixed fee per flight, with additional
incentives based on completion of flights, on-time performance
and correct baggage handling. In addition, the major and
regional airline often enter into an arrangement pursuant to
which the major airline bears the risk of changes in the price
of fuel and other costs not directly controllable by the
regional airlines such as landing fees, liability insurance and
aircraft property taxes. Regional airlines benefit from a
fixed-fee arrangement because they are sheltered from many of
the elements that cause volatility in airline earnings, such as
variations in ticket prices, passenger loads and fuel prices.
However, regional airlines in fixed-fee arrangements do not
benefit from a positive trend in ticket prices, passenger loads
or fuel prices and, because the major airlines absorb most of
the risks, the margin between the per-flight fixed-fee and
expected per-flight costs tends to be lower than the profit
margins associated with revenue sharing arrangements under good
economic conditions. The major airline can benefit from
fixed-fee capacity purchase agreements because under such
arrangements it is better able to control its entire network of
flights and to serve strategic routes that otherwise might be
uneconomical to a regional carrier under a revenue sharing
arrangement.
Revenue Sharing Arrangements. Under a revenue
sharing, or pro rate, arrangement such as those we have in
place, the major airline and regional airline negotiate a
proration formula, pursuant to which the regional airline
receives a percentage of the ticket revenues for those
passengers traveling for one portion of their trip on the
regional airline and the other portion of their trip on the
major airline. Substantially all costs associated with the
regional airline flight are borne by the regional airline. In
such a revenue sharing arrangement, the regional airline
realizes increased profits as ticket prices and passenger loads
increase or operating costs decrease. Conversely, the regional
airline realizes decreased profits as ticket prices and
passenger loads decrease or operating costs increase.
In addition to using revenue sharing arrangements rather than
fixed-fee arrangements, we focus on short, low-volume routes,
which permits us flexibility in scheduling and allows us to
operate in otherwise unserved or underserved city pairs.
49
Overview
of Our Business
We are a holding company that operates two independent
subsidiaries: Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc.
(Gulfstream) and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc.
(the Academy).
Gulfstream is a commercial airline currently operating more than
200 scheduled flights per day, serving 11 destinations in
Florida and ten destinations in the Bahamas. Our fleet consists
of 27 B1900D, 19-seat, turbo-prop aircraft and eight EMB-120,
30-seat, turbo-prop aircraft. Operating from our headquarters in
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Gulfstream was the sixteenth
largest regional airline group in the U.S. in 2005 in terms
of number of passengers flown, according to the Regional Airline
Association. We operate under a principal code share and
alliance agreement with Continental. We are also party to code
share agreements with United, Northwest and Copa Airlines of
Panama. In addition to the daily scheduled flights, Gulfstream
also offers frequent charter flights within our geographic
operating region, including flights to Cuba.
The Academy provides flight training services to licensed
commercial pilots. The Academys principal program is our
First Officer Program, which allows participants to obtain a
Second-In-Command
type rating in approximately four months. Following receipt of
this rating, pilots spend up to 400 hours flying as a first
officer at Gulfstream. By attending the Academy, pilots are able
to enhance their ability to secure a permanent position with a
commercial airline. The Academys graduates are typically
hired by various regional airlines, including Gulfstream. In
2006, 78 pilots entered the First Officer Program.
History
Our business was started by Thomas L. Cooper with the formation
of Gulfstream in 1988. Gulfstream began as an airline offering
on-demand charter service utilizing nine-passenger,
piston-powered aircraft. In 1990, we initiated scheduled
commercial service by offering flights from Miami to several
locations in the Bahamas. In 1994, after introducing turbo-prop
aircraft, we signed our first code share agreement with United
Airlines and expanded our routes in both Florida and the
Bahamas. Since 1994, we have signed a series of code share
agreements with our current code share partners.
Gulfstream first entered into a code share and alliance
agreement with Continental, our principal alliance partner, in
1997. Gulfstream and Continental have amended the agreement on
several occasions, most recently in March of 2006, which
amendment included an extension of the term to 2012. Prior to
our acquisition of Gulfstream, Continental assisted Gulfstream
from time to time with financial transactions and aircraft
acquisitions, and today holds a warrant to purchase 10% of
Gulfstreams outstanding shares.
In December 2005, we were formed by a group of investors to
acquire Gulfstream and the Academy. In March 2006, we acquired
approximately 89% of G-Air, which owned approximately 95% of
Gulfstream at that time, and 100% of the Academy, which held the
remaining 5% of Gulfstream. Subsequently, we acquired the
remaining 11% of G-Air, which has been merged with and into our
wholly-owned subsidiary, GIA. Following these transactions, we
are the sole owner of Gulfstream and the Academy, subject to
Continentals warrant to purchase 10% of the outstanding
shares of Gulfstreams common stock.
Our
Competitive Strengths
|
|
|
|
|
Long-standing code share agreements with multiple major
airlines. Gulfstream has code share agreements
with Continental, United and Northwest. We have been a partner
with each of these airlines for more than five years. Recently,
our code share agreement with Continental was extended through
2012. We believe that utilizing such agreements enhances our
ability to generate revenue from both local and connecting
traffic. We also believe that through our alliances, we are able
to control costs by contracting for reservations, ground
handling and other services at lower costs. In addition, these
code share relationships allow us to offer our passengers easy
booking through reservation systems maintained by our code share
partners and the benefits of associated frequent flier programs.
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Well positioned in the Bahamas market. We are
a leading carrier to the Bahamas and serve more destinations in
the Bahamas than any other U.S. airline. We maintain our
own facilities and employees at all ten of our destinations in
the Bahamas and we enjoy a close cooperative relationship with
Bahamian business and tourism officials. We believe that our
focus on the Bahamian market allows us to identify new market
opportunities and develop those opportunities more efficiently
than new market entrants.
|
|
|
|
Diverse route network and utilization of small
aircraft. We have connecting hubs in several key
Florida cities, as well as daily charter flights to Cuba, which
enable us to establish multiple flight crew and maintenance
bases that reduce overall operating costs and enhance
operational reliability. In addition, our mix of 19-seat and
30-seat aircraft and mix of business and leisure passengers
enhances our ability to align aircraft capacity with market
demand, while maintaining our ability to provide competitive
flight frequencies. The size and scale of this operation create
practical barriers to entry for new entrants and increase our
ability to shift capacity according to seasonal and
business-versus-leisure demand patterns. Additionally, the
relatively small size and efficiency of our turboprop aircraft
combine to produce trip costs that are substantially lower than
operators flying larger and more expensive jet aircraft.
|
|
|
|
We offer reliable, quality service. We are
consistently among the highest-ranked regional airlines in the
country in terms of reliability. For 2006, our on-time
performance was 85.1%, compared to the 75.4% average on-time
performance reported by the Department of Transportation for all
reporting airlines. Gulfstream has received the FAA Diamond
Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance
training, for seven consecutive years.
|
|
|
|
The Academy has a unique first officer
program. We believe the Academy has established a
strong reputation for quality instruction. We offer our students
the opportunity to accumulate flight hours with an airline
regulated under Part 121 of the FAA regulations, sometimes
referred to as Part 121 flight hours. Many airlines require
pilot applicants to have a certain number of Part 121
flight hours or equivalent experience and so our students
enhance their hiring prospects with regional airlines through
our first officer program. In addition, the Academy provides
Gulfstream with a reliable and cost-effective source of first
officers and pilots.
|
Our
Strategy
Our business strategy is to utilize small-capacity aircraft to
target markets that are unserved or underserved by competing
airlines. Small capacity aircraft allow for lower costs per
flight, and enable us to operate profitably with fewer
passengers per flight than airlines operating larger equipment.
|
|
|
|
|
Utilize turboprop aircraft to selectively expand the number
of markets we serve. We use 19- and
30-passenger
turboprop aircraft. Turboprop aircraft offer substantially lower
acquisition costs than regional jet aircraft and, in addition,
tend to be more fuel efficient than other aircraft. We believe
this allows us to provide service on short, lower volume routes
and achieve attractive margins, in contrast to airlines that
have focused their fleets on larger regional jet aircraft,
increasingly in the 70- to 90-seat category. The efficiencies
associated with turboprop aircraft are more pronounced on short
haul routes such as ours. Additionally, turboprop aircraft have
the ability to operate out of airports with runways that are too
short for certain regional jets.
|
We are actively seeking opportunities to grow by adding new
routes, aircraft, alliance partners, or the acquisition of other
regional airlines. We look for unserved or underserved short
haul city pairs that have a high degree of potential for
long-term profitability. These opportunities will likely include
operating in new geographic areas outside our current Florida
base. We have held discussions with various parties concerning
new code share arrangements, additional turboprop aircraft as
well as the acquisition of regional airlines. Any potential
transaction involving a new code share partner or acquisition
would require Continentals prior consent. There is no
assurance that we will be able to reach acceptable terms with
regard to any potential transaction and if we are able to do so,
that Continental would consent to such a transaction.
51
|
|
|
|
|
Use of alliance and code share
agreements. Utilizing our alliance and code share
agreements enhances our ability to generate revenue for both
local and connecting traffic. By having multiple code share
partners, we are able to increase our revenue per flight by
accessing several sources of connecting passengers relative to
what would be available within a single code share partnership
arrangement. This is particularly true given that our main
connecting airports are not hubs for any of our code share
partners. These agreements also provide the opportunity to
contract for services at lower costs, as well as to gain access
to airport and other facilities, relative to what we would be
able to do independently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further, we believe that by providing high quality service under
our code share partnerships with multiple airlines in existing
markets, our opportunities for expanding the scope of our
relationship with those carriers may be greater.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase enrollment at the Academy. We seek to
increase enrollment at the Academy through implementation of
various marketing initiatives. We believe we can enhance
enrollment by increasing cooperation with other regional
airlines and primary flight training centers in order to produce
higher levels of applicant referrals. We also encourage
enrollment by developing closer integration with accredited
higher education institutions offering two- and four-year
degrees. Additionally, we seek to attract prospective First
Officer candidates from different sources by offering training
services to other regional air carriers operating similar
aircraft types. We also continuously seek to assist prospective
candidates in obtaining tuition financing from third party
sources.
|
52
Gulfstream
International Airlines
Markets
Served
Gulfstream serves a number of short distance, low volume routes
in Florida and the Bahamas. We offer more Bahamian destinations
with more scheduled daily flights than any other
U.S. carrier. Further, Gulfstream is the sole provider of
scheduled service on a number of our routes. Gulfstreams
current route map is depicted below.
As of November 1, 2007, we provide non-stop service in 37
city pairs. We believe that we are the highest-frequency service
provider in 30 of these 37 city pairs. We tailor our flight
schedules to individual market demands in order to optimize both
profitability and the number of connecting passengers to and
from our code share partners. In 2006, our average fare was $114
and our average flight length was 196 miles.
53
All of our flights are marketed as Continental. In addition,
certain flights are also marketed through our other code share
partners. We estimate that over 60% of our revenue is derived
from local point to point traffic within Florida and
the Bahamas. The balance of our revenue is derived from
connecting traffic from our code-share partners and other
carriers destined primarily for the Bahamas. Continental is our
largest connecting partner, with passengers connecting to and
from Continental flights providing approximately 20% of our
revenue.
Gulfstream currently operates four to five daily round trips
under charter agreements associated with our Cuba operations and
two to three daily round trip flights to Andros Island under an
agreement with a government subcontractor. In addition,
Gulfstream operates on-demand charters for various customers
throughout the year.
Code
Share Agreements
Continental
Code Share Agreement
Our primary alliance partner is Continental. Pursuant to an
amended and restated alliance agreement with Continental dated
December 30, 1999, as amended, which we refer to as the
Continental code share agreement, Gulfstream displays the
Continental CO designator code on all of our flights
marketed to the public. Our customers may participate in
Continentals One Pass frequent flyer program.
Under this agreement, we pay Continental for various services,
including ticketing, reservations, revenue accounting, and
various levels of airport services. We also incur fees for
computerized reservation system transactions and participation
in Continentals frequent flyer program.
Gulfstream receives all of the revenue generated by
local, or non-connecting, passengers flown, and a
portion of the total revenue from passengers connecting to or
from Continental. Continental sets all prices for connecting
markets, and Gulfstream sets prices on our local markets.
Approximately 22% of our passenger revenue is derived from
passengers connecting from Continental flights.
The term of this agreement will continue through at least
May 3, 2012, unless earlier terminated for cause. Cause is
defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
breach of any material provision of the agreement that is not
cured within a
60-day
period;
|
|
|
|
suspension or revocation of our authority to operate as an
airline, either in whole or with respect to the CO-designated
flights;
|
|
|
|
citation by any government authority for significant
noncompliance with any material marketing or operation law, rule
or regulation with respect to a CO-designated flight;
|
|
|
|
the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or against us;
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain required insurance coverage;
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain any of our aircraft in an airworthy
condition;
|
|
|
|
our failure to conduct operations in accordance with standards,
rules and regulations promulgated by any government
authority; or
|
|
|
|
except as otherwise agreed by us and Continental, a completion
factor by us of less than 95% during any 21 day period or
50% during any three day period with respect to Continental
flights operated by us (including in such calculations all
flights canceled less than one week prior to the date of its
scheduled operation and excluding flights not completed due to
weather or ATC).
|
In addition, Continental may terminate the agreement immediately
if there is a change of control, as defined in the agreement, of
Gulfstream without Continentals prior written consent.
Continental has the right to appoint an individual to our
Gulfstream subsidiarys board of directors or the right to
observe its board meetings. Continental may also receive our
audited financial statements, inspect our books, accounts and
records and audit our operational procedures.
54
Gulfstream and Continental have agreed to indemnify each other
for any damages arising out of either partys acts or
omissions related to the agreement. Specifically, Gulfstream has
agreed to indemnify Continental for any losses arising from our
possession and use of Continentals tickets, boarding
passes and other materials, including, but not limited, to lost
or forged tickets.
With certain exceptions, we are required to obtain
Continentals consent to enter into additional airline code
share agreements. We have also agreed to limit utilization of
the United Airlines designator code to specific numbers of
flights and between specific cities.
In addition to our long-term principal alliance with
Continental, we have the following code share agreements:
United
Airlines Code Share Agreement
We entered into a code share agreement with United in 1994,
which has been amended several times, most recently in October
of 2006. We provide code share operations with United to and
from Tampa, Miami, Key West, Ft. Lauderdale, Orlando, Grand
Bahama Island and Nassau, Bahamas. Approximately 8% of our
passenger revenue is derived from passengers connecting from
Uniteds flights. The agreement may be cancelled upon
180 days written notice, unless either party breaches
the agreement, in which case it may be terminated upon shorter
notice.
Revenue sharing formulas for proration of revenue are set forth
in a separate prorate agreement, which is amended or replaced
annually. Our passengers may also participate in the United
frequent flyer program.
Northwest
Airlines Code Share Agreement
Gulfstream has entered into a code share agreement and related
prorate agreement, each dated February 11, 2000, with
Northwest, which permits us to use the NW designator
code to identify certain Gulfstream regional flights. Currently,
we operate NW-designated code share flights to and from Tampa,
Miami, Key West, Ft. Lauderdale and Nassau, Bahamas.
Revenue from NW-designated flights is allocated pursuant to the
prorate agreement. Approximately 7% of our passenger revenue is
derived from passengers connecting from Northwests flights.
The agreement is terminable upon 180 days notice
without cause, but may be terminated immediately for cause.
Cause, as defined in the agreement, includes the
failure to maintain specified levels of operational reliability,
bankruptcy, loss of airline licensing or dissolution.
Additionally, Northwest may terminate immediately if we or one
of our affiliates begins operating any aircraft with 60 or more
seats and a takeoff weight of 70,000 pounds or more.
We have agreed to provide Northwest with 30 days
prior written notice before entering into any code share or
frequent flyer agreement with another major airline serving the
cities where we provide
NW-designated
flights. Additionally, our customers may participate in the
Northwest frequent flier program.
Copa Code
Share Agreement
We entered into a code share agreement on July 1, 2005 with
Copa Airlines, to permit us to use the CM designator
code on Gulfstream flights from Miami to Orlando, Tampa, Key
West, Gainesville, Nassau and Freeport. The agreement requires
us to provide certain minimal operational standards. Copa
Airlines, a Continental alliance partner, handles reservation
services for passengers of CM-designated flights, as it would
for all other Copa Airlines flights, through the Continental
reservation system and provides check-in and ticketing services.
We receive a standard prorated amount for each passenger we fly
on a CM-designated flight. To date, this has not been a material
source of our revenue.
55
Marketing
Under our code share agreement, Continental provides all
reservations and related services for sales and marketing for
CO-designated flights. Northwest, United and Copa Airlines are
responsible for reservations of connecting passengers marketed
under their respective codes.
We are responsible for the scheduling of all of our flights and
are also responsible for setting prices and managing revenue for
our local passengers. Local passengers are passengers whose
itinerary is not constructed using a single fare over multiple
flight segments. Our code share partners are responsible for
setting prices and managing revenue for our connecting
passengers. We retain all of the revenue associated with our
local passengers and a portion of the revenue associated with
connecting passengers pursuant to revenue sharing agreements
with our code share partners.
Flight
Equipment
Our fleet currently consists of B1900D and EMB-120 aircraft. The
average age of our B1900D fleet is 12 years. The B1900D
aircraft is a 19-seat, twin engine turbo prop that has a
pressurized,
stand-up
cabin, and cruises at 300 miles per hour. It is ideal for
short trips, and its lower operating costs make it much more
economical than larger mid-sized aircraft for the frequent,
short flights that we operate. We lease 27 B1900Ds under
agreements that expire between 2008 and 2010; however, at our
option, we can extend 15 of these leases. We also have the
option to purchase up to 21 of these aircraft.
In December 2004, we purchased seven EMB-120 aircraft from
Atlantic Southeast Airlines. In March of 2007, we purchased an
additional EMB-120 with plans to enter the aircraft into revenue
service during the second half of 2007. The average age of our
EMB-120 aircraft is 15 years. The EMB-120 is a larger,
30-seat,
pressurized aircraft that is equipped with advanced avionics.
Passenger comforts include
stand-up
headroom, a lavatory, overhead baggage compartments and flight
attendant service. It offers a
330-mile
per hour cruising speed with a range of 750 miles.
We believe that our fleet is well suited for the markets we
serve. Our turbo-prop aircraft allow us to operate short
distance sectors efficiently and achieve break-even revenues at
lower levels than larger jet aircraft. This allows us to operate
more flights per day and target smaller markets, which we
believe provides us with a key advantage at non-hub airports. In
addition, by operating only two aircraft types, we are able to
simplify our maintenance training and parts inventory and
achieve lower overall operating costs. These aircraft are no
longer being manufactured and there is a limited supply of used
aircraft of this type.
Training
and Aircraft Maintenance
Airframe maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided
into two general categories: line maintenance and heavy
maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled
maintenance checks, including pre-flight, daily and overnight
checks, and any diagnostics and routine repairs. Heavy
maintenance consists of more complex inspections and overhauls,
and servicing of the aircraft. Most of our line maintenance and
heavy maintenance is performed by our own highly experienced
technicians at our hangar in Fort Lauderdale. Parts and
supply inventories are primarily maintained in
Fort Lauderdale and, in smaller amounts, at our locations
in Miami, Tampa and West Palm Beach. Some line maintenance is
also carried out at other locations in Florida by employees or
third-party contractors. Maintenance checks are performed in
accordance with the guidelines established by the aircraft
manufacturer. These checks are based on the number of hours or
calendar months flown by each individual aircraft.
We employ over 100 maintenance professionals, including
engineers, supervisors, technicians and mechanics, who perform
airframe maintenance in accordance with maintenance programs
that are established by the manufacturer and approved and
certified by international aviation authorities. Every mechanic
is trained in manufacturer-specified procedures and goes through
our rigorous in-house training program. Each of our mechanics is
licensed by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA).
Our safety and maintenance procedures are reviewed and
periodically audited by the FAA. We have received the FAA
Diamond Award, the highest level of recognition for maintenance
training, for seven consecutive years.
56
We have agreements for maintaining our engines, propellers,
landing gears and avionics with third-party contractors. Our
engines are maintained under a long-term agreement with a third
party provider, which provides for engine maintenance under a
fleet management program.
Pricing
and Revenue Management
We believe effective revenue management, particularly during
peak periods, contributes to our strong operating performance.
We are responsible for setting prices in local markets and our
code share partners are responsible for setting prices in
connecting markets. We try to maximize the overall revenue of
our flights by utilizing certain revenue management policies.
Our revenue management systems and procedures enable us to
understand markets, anticipate customer demand and respond
quickly to revenue enhancement opportunities.
The number of seats offered at each fare is established through
a continual process of forecasting and analysis. Generally, past
booking history and seasonal trends are used to forecast
anticipated demand. These historical forecasts are combined with
current bookings, upcoming events, competitive pressures and
other factors to establish a mix of fares designed to maximize
revenue. This allows us to balance loads and capture more
revenue from existing capacity.
Seasonality
Our business is subject to substantial seasonality, primarily
due to leisure and holiday travel patterns, particularly in the
Bahamas. We experience the strongest demand from February to
July, and the weakest demand from August to October, during
which period we typically suffer operating losses. As a result,
our operating results for a quarterly period are not necessarily
indicative of operating results for an entire year, and
historical operating results are not necessarily indicative of
future operating results. Our results of operations generally
reflect this seasonality. Our operating results are also
impacted by numerous other cycles and factors that are not
necessarily seasonal.
Government
Regulation
All interstate air carriers, including Gulfstream, are subject
to regulation by the Department of Transportation
(DOT), the FAA and other governmental agencies.
Regulations promulgated by the DOT primarily relate to economic
aspects of air service. The FAA requires operating, air
worthiness and other certificates and certain record-keeping
procedures. FAA approval is required for personnel who engage in
flight, maintenance or operating activities and flight training
and retraining programs. Generally, governmental agencies
enforce their regulations through certifications, which are
necessary for the continued operations of Gulfstream, and
proceedings, which can result in civil or criminal penalties or
revocation of operating authority. The FAA can also issue
maintenance directives and other mandatory orders relating to,
among other things, grounding of aircraft, inspection of
aircraft, installation of new safety-related items and the
mandatory removal and replacement of aircraft parts.
We believe Gulfstream is operating in compliance with FAA
regulations and holds all necessary operating and airworthiness
certificates and licenses. We incur substantial costs in
maintaining current certifications and otherwise complying with
the laws, rules and regulations to which Gulfstream is subject.
Our flight operations, maintenance programs, record keeping and
training programs are conducted under FAA-approved procedures.
We do not operate at any airports where the FAA has restricted
landing slots.
All air carriers are required to comply with federal laws and
regulations pertaining to noise abatement and engine emissions.
All air carriers are also subject to certain provisions of the
Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, because of their
extensive use of radio and other communication facilities.
Gulfstream is also subject to certain other federal and state
laws relating to protection of the environment, labor relations
and equal employment opportunity. We believe that Gulfstream is
in compliance in all material respects with these laws and
regulations.
57
Safety
and Security
We are committed to the safety and security of our passengers
and employees. Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks, Gulfstream has taken many steps, both voluntarily and
as mandated by governmental agencies, to increase the safety and
security of our operations. Some of the safety and security
measures we have taken, along with our code share partners,
include: aircraft security and surveillance, positive bag
matching procedures and enhanced passenger and baggage screening
and search procedures. We are committed to complying with future
safety and security requirements.
Charter
Services
GAC, a company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, operates
charter flights between Miami and Havana. GAC is licensed by the
Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of
the Treasury as a carrier and travel service provider for
charter air transportation between designated U.S. and
Cuban airports.
Pursuant to a services agreement between Gulfstream and GAC,
Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the
Gulfstream name, insurance, and service personnel, including
passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative.
Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC.
Gulfstream receives 75% of the income generated by GACs
Cuban charter operation.
In June 2006, Gulfstream began services under a long-term
subcontract with Computer Sciences Corporation to operate daily
flights between West Palm Beach and Andros Town, Bahamas. This
contract provides for approximately two to three daily round
trips and has an initial period of 21 months from
inception, with extensions up to an additional 12 years.
The contract is structured as a fixed-fee arrangement, with
adjustments for market fuel prices. It further specifies
performance standards, as well as bonus payments for exceeding
those standards. As part of this agreement, Gulfstream leased
two B1900D aircraft to support the operation.
In preparation for this operation, Gulfstream obtained
certification from the Commercial Airline Review Board of the
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Having this
certification could have the effect of increasing the number of
opportunities for Gulfstream to provide additional charter
flights to the DOD.
Gulfstream also provides on-demand passenger charter services
based on aircraft availability.
The
Academy
The Academy offers training programs for pilots holding
commercial, multi-engine, and instrument certifications. Pilots
with these ratings are qualified to fly commercial aircraft but
seek to improve their marketability by accumulating additional
training and flying time. The Academy enhances our
students career prospects by providing them with the
training and experience necessary to obtain pilot positions with
commercial airlines.
Traditionally, pilots can work as flight instructors for up to
two years to gain this additional training and flying time. The
Academy offers an alternative to this traditional means of
gathering additional flight experience. By enrolling in one of
the Academys programs, students are able to more quickly
accumulate the qualifications demanded by the commercial
airlines. A number of U.S. airlines accept Academy
graduates with a lower total flight time than these airlines
require of other newly hired pilots, reflecting the value they
place on the Academys training. The Academy graduates have
also experienced a high success rate in completing training at
airlines, which translates into cost savings for the airlines.
The Academy employs approximately six full-time flight and
ground instructors. The Academys instructors have, on
average, been providing training for approximately 15 years
each and have cumulatively amassed in excess of 63,000 actual
flight hours. The Academy enrolled 78 students in 2006, and
estimates that 99% were or will be hired by airlines after
graduation, including those hired by Gulfstream.
The Academy does not make loans to our students, but we do have
arrangements with several financial institutions to facilitate
the financing of students tuition.
58
The Academys training facility in Fort Lauderdale has
several ground school classrooms, a series of flight training
devices used for procedural training and cockpit
familiarization, as well as two non-motion flight simulators,
one of which is for B1900D aircraft training. The Academy
contracts for full-motion flight simulators at facilities in
Atlanta, Georgia, Orlando, Florida, and Fort Pierce,
Florida.
The Academy offers two principal programs: the First
Officer Program and the CRJ Jet Transition Course.
First
Officer Program
The First Officer Program is a comprehensive program designed to
prepare pilots for their commercial airline careers. The program
entails a train to proficiency concept, typically
resulting in well over 500 hours of training time,
including ground school, simulator time and observation flights.
This first portion of the program can be completed in three
months. The second portion of the program involves up to
400 hours of FAA Regulation Part 121 commercial
airline flight hours as a First Officer at Gulfstream. FAA
Regulation Part 121 established operating standards
and is the principal operating regulation applicable to all
major US airlines. Gulfstream relies on the Academy as its
preferred source of pilots, and nearly all of our permanent
pilots are graduates of the First Officer Program.
CRJ
Jet Transition Program
For students who have completed the First Officer Program or
have comparable prior experience and who wish to enhance their
prospects to fly a regional jet, the Academy has developed the
CRJ Jet Transition Program, which we began to offer in 2007.
Under this two week program, our students receive extensive
ground school instruction as well as simulator training for
regional jets.
In addition to our two programs, the Academy provides training
services to Gulfstream. While the Academy holds an FAA
Part 142 certificate, enabling us to operate a flight
training center on behalf of other airlines, we presently do not
provide any training services to other airlines.
Properties
Our corporate headquarters, as well as the Academy, are located
approximately two miles from
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
International Airport. We lease three floors, consisting of
approximately 12,600 square feet, from EYW Holdings, Inc.,
an entity controlled by Thomas L. Cooper and Thomas P.
Cooper under a
20-year
lease with an initial base rate of approximately $26,000 per
month. Gulfstream occupies two floors and the Academy occupies
one floor of the building. Additionally, the Academy leases
approximately 3,750 square feet of office space in an
adjacent building under a five-year lease at a base rent of
approximately $7,150.
We lease approximately 249,000 square feet of land, hangar
and ramp space at
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
International Airport. The lease agreement for this space
expired in May 2007, but was extended to May 2008. We lease
approximately 4,000 square feet of warehouse and storage
space near the
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood
International Airport. This lease agreement expired in December
2005 and we are currently operating on a month-to-month basis.
We are currently in negotiations regarding an extension of the
lease.
We sublease approximately 54,500 square feet of hangar and
ramp space at West Palm Beach International Airport. Our West
Palm Beach facility is leased under a sublease which terminates
in March 2008, with an option to extend the lease for four
successive periods of three years each.
We lease approximately 1,050 square feet of office space
located near Miami International Airport for our Cuba operation.
This lease expires July 31, 2007; however, we expect to
enter into an extension for the office space.
We lease ticket counter space, gate space and operations space
at various airports throughout our system. At Tampa
International Airport, we have a long-term lease for gate space,
expiring in September 2009. None of our space at other airports
is leased under long-term agreements.
59
Ground
Operations
In the Bahamas, we lease ticket counters, check-in and boarding
and other facilities and Gulfstream employees provide
substantially all of the operations services.
In Key West and Gainesville, Florida, we lease our facilities
and Gulfstream employees provide operations services. At all
other Florida airports, Gulfstream contracts out all or a
portion of our ground operations. From time to time, Gulfstream
reviews these arrangements and evaluates the most economical
operations structure.
Insurance
We maintain insurance policies that we believe are of types
customary in the industry and in amounts we believe are adequate
to protect against material loss. These policies principally
provide coverage for public liability, passenger liability,
baggage and cargo liability, property damage, including
coverages for loss or damage to our flight equipment, and
workers compensation insurance. We cannot assure, however,
that the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to
protect us from material loss.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws
and regulations relating to environmental protection matters.
These laws and regulations govern such matters as environmental
reporting, storage and disposal of materials and chemicals and
aircraft noise. We are, and expect in the future to be, involved
in environmental matters and conditions at, or related to, our
properties, but we do not expect the resolution of any such
matters to have a material adverse effect on the Companys
operations. We are not currently subject to any environmental
cleanup orders or actions imposed by regulatory authorities. We
are not aware of any active material environmental
investigations related to our assets or properties.
Raw
Materials and Energy
Fuel costs are a major component of our operating expenses. We
contract with World Fuel Services to provide approximately half
of our fuel, principally for international destinations. Most of
our domestic fuel consumption is provided by Continental. The
following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gallons consumed, in thousands
|
|
|
7,398
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
Total cost, in thousands(1)
|
|
$
|
11,115
|
|
|
$
|
20,544
|
|
|
$
|
24,378
|
|
Average price per gallon(2)
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
2.18
|
|
Percent of operating expenses
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
(1) Total cost includes into-plane service fees.
(2) Average price per gallon excludes into-plane service fees.
Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many
global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither
control nor accurately predict. On a purchase-order basis with
World Fuel Services, we purchase bonded fuel for our
international flights, which are exempt from federal excise
taxes. Therefore, our fuel costs may not be directly comparable
to costs incurred by other airlines. Gulfstream has, from time
to time, implemented limited fuel cost management programs in
the form of pre-ordering of specific quantities of fuel at
specific locations at then-market rates. These cost management
programs have not had a material impact on our financial
results. Significant increases in fuel costs would have a
material adverse effect on our operating results.
60
Trademarks
and Trade Names
Our flights are operated under the names of our code share
partners, including Continental, United Airlines, Northwest
Airlines, and Copa Airlines. Because we do not operate scheduled
flights under our trade names, we have not registered any
trademarks or trade names.
Employee
and Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 629 full time
employees, of which 618 were employed by Gulfstream and 11 were
employed by the Academy. Of the 618 employees of
Gulfstream, 201 are union employees.
As of December 31, 2006, Gulfstream employs the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
Classification
|
|
2006
|
|
Pilots
|
|
|
181
|
|
Station personnel
|
|
|
251
|
|
Maintenance personnel
|
|
|
101
|
|
Administrative and clerical personnel
|
|
|
15
|
|
Flight attendants
|
|
|
20
|
|
Management
|
|
|
27
|
|
Other flight operations
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employees
|
|
|
618
|
|
Gulfstreams tenured pilots are represented under
collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters union. A new
agreement was ratified by the members in June 2006 and continues
through June 2009. Our flight attendants voted for
representation by the International Aerospace Workers, or IAM,
in July 2006. We are currently in the process of negotiating an
agreement with the IAM. At this point, no other employees are
represented by unions. We have never experienced a work stoppage
and no labor disputes, strikes or labor disturbances are
currently pending or threatened against us. We believe we have
good relations with our union employees at each of our
facilities.
As of December 31, 2006, the Academy employed five
administrative employees and six full-time flight and ground
instructors. None of our Academy employees are represented by
labor unions.
Legal
Proceedings
In January 2006, a former salesman of the Academy formed a
business that the Company believes competes directly with the
Academy for student pilots. Thereafter, the former President of
the Academy resigned his position at the Academy and the Company
believes he became affiliated with the alleged competing
business. The Academy has initiated a lawsuit against these
former employees, alleging violation of
non-competition
and fiduciary obligations. The defendants, including the
Academys former President, subsequently filed a
counterclaim against the Academy based upon lost earnings and
breach of contract.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation relating to
claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of
business. As of the date of this prospectus, we were not engaged
in any other legal proceedings which are expected, individually
or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on us.
61
Executive
Officers and Directors
Set forth below is the name, age as of December 7, 2007,
position and a brief account of the business experience of each
of the Companys executive officers and directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Thomas A. McFall
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Senior Executive Officer
|
David F. Hackett
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President, Director
|
Daniel H. Abramowitz
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Director
|
Gary P. Arnold
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director
|
Douglas E. Hailey
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
Barry S. Lutin
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Richard R. Schreiber
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Director
|
Robert M. Brown
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Paul Stagias
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
President, Academy
|
Thomas
A. McFall, 53, Chairman of the Board and Senior Executive
Officer
Mr. McFall has served as Chairman of our board of directors
and senior executive officer since March 2006. Mr. McFall
is currently an affiliate of Weatherly Group LLC.
Mr. McFall has served as an executive and on the board of
directors of numerous companies, including Weatherstar Aviation.
Weatherstar was a New Jersey based aviation operator providing
both regularly scheduled and on demand charter flights under an
FAA Part 135 certificate. Mr. McFall was President and CEO of
Weatherstar from its inception in 1987 until its sale in 1995.
He is currently Chairman of Aladdin Food Management Services,
Cattron Group International and Boston Ship Repair, Inc.
David
F. Hackett, 46, Chief Executive Officer and President,
Director
Mr. Hackett has been Chief Executive Officer and President
of the Company since March 2006. Since June 2003,
Mr. Hackett has served as President of Gulfstream. From
January 2002 to June 2003, he was a financial and strategic
consultant to Newgate Associates, LLC. Mr. Hackett has over
20 years experience in the airline industry, beginning with
Continental in 1985, where he eventually served as Director,
Financial Planning and Analysis.
Daniel
H. Abramowitz, 43, Director
Mr. Abramowitz has been a director since March 2006.
Mr. Abramowitz is the founder and has been the President of
Hillson Financial Management, Inc, a Rockville, Maryland
investment firm focused on small to mid-sized companies, since
1990. Previously, Mr. Abramowitz was the Portfolio Manager
for a real estate developer and investor. Mr. Abramowitz
has also served as a director of two publicly traded companies,
DMI Furniture, Inc. and TransTechnology Corporation.
Mr. Abramowitz graduated cum laude from the University of
Massachusetts at Amherst with a B.A. degree in Economics.
Gary
P. Arnold, 66, Director
Mr. Arnold has been a director since November 2007. He has
significant international and domestic experience in the
electronics industry in the areas of finance, strategic planning
and operations, and has been involved in numerous capital market
transactions. He spearheaded the turnaround at Tektronix Corp.
where he was chief financial officer from 1990 to 1992, and
later served as Chairman and CEO of Analogy, Inc., a provider of
design automation software used in the automotive industry from
1993 to 2000. Since 2000, Mr. Arnold has been a private
investor and currently serves on the boards of directors of
National Semiconductor Corp. (NYSE: NSM) and Orchids Paper
Products Company (AMEX: TIS). Mr. Arnold is a
62
certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree in
Accounting from East Tennessee State University and a JD degree
from the University of Tennessee School of Law.
Douglas
E. Hailey, 45, Director
Mr. Hailey has been a director since March 2006.
Mr. Hailey is a Managing Director of Taglich Brothers and
has been with Taglich Brothers since 1994 and a principal of
Weatherly Group, LLC. Mr. Hailey heads the investment
banking division at Taglich Brothers, specializing in private
placements and public offerings for small public companies.
Mr. Hailey is a director of Orchids Paper Products Company
(AMEX: TIS) and Williams Controls, Inc. (Nasdaq: WMCO).
Mr. Hailey received a bachelors degree in Business
Administration from Eastern New Mexico University and an MBA in
Finance from the University of Texas.
Barry
S. Lutin, 62, Director
Mr. Lutin has been a director since November 2007. He has
been involved in the aviation industry for more than forty
years, serving in various senior positions responsible for
certification, operations and financial management for scheduled
air carrier operators. Since December 2006, Mr. Lutin has
been a Managing Director of Helion Procopter Industries, a
subsidiary of Anham Trading and Contracting, LLC of Dubai and,
since April 2002, Mr. Lutin has been President and CEO of
Capitol Rising, LLC. Between 1992 and 2002, Mr. Lutin
served as a management consultant and as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Shuttle America Corporation. From 1972 to
1992, Mr. Lutin served as Chairman and CEO of Corporate
Air, Inc., an FAA part 135 scheduled cargo carrier.
Currently, he serves as Chairman and director of Safe Passage
International, a
U.S.-based
security training software development company. Mr. Lutin
is a licensed air transport pilot with more than six thousand
hours of flight experience.
Richard
R. Schreiber, 52, Director
Mr. Schreiber has been a director since March 2006.
Mr. Schreiber has been a Partner with Dimeling,
Schreiber & Park, an investment firm in Philadelphia,
since 1982. He has been on the board of directors of numerous
private companies (including New Piper Aircraft and McCall
Pattern Company) and public companies (including Wiser Oil
Company and Chief Consolidated Mining). Mr. Schreiber was
previously a director of Business Express Airlines (a large
Part 121 commuter airline), Aeris (a French airline) and
Rocky Mountain Helicopters (a large Part 135 operation).
Mr. Schreiber received a B.A. degree in Finance from the
Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Robert
M. Brown, 59, Chief Financial Officer
Robert M. Brown has been the chief financial officer of the
Company since January 2007. From April 2005 to November 2006,
Mr. Brown served as the Secretary, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc., an online retailer in
the United States of brand name baby, toddler, maternity and
furniture products that is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
From November 2002 to April 2005, Mr. Brown was a private
investor. Mr. Brown was the Chief Financial Officer of Uno
Restaurant Corporation from 1987 to 1997, and served as its
Executive Vice President-Development from 1997 to 2002. Uno
Restaurant Corporation is the operator and franchisor of a
nationwide chain of casual-dining restaurants and was
publicly-traded on the New York Stock Exchange through 2001.
Mr. Brown held several accounting positions prior to 1987
with each of SCA Services, Inc., The Stanley Works, Saab-Scania,
Inc. and Price Waterhouse. Mr. Brown is a CPA certified in
the State of Connecticut and earned a B.S. degree in Accounting
at Fairfield University.
Paul
A. Stagias, 41, President The Academy
Mr. Stagias has been President of the Academy since April
2006. From 2004 to 2006, he was a flight instructor at Falcon
Flight Sanford in Florida and a commercial pilot for Nelson
Aerial Photography. From 1998 to 2003, he was a Senior Sales
Specialist with Pfizer Corporation.
63
Executive
Officers
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors consists of seven directors. Our board of
directors has determined that Messrs. Abramowitz, Arnold, Lutin
and Schreiber are independent under the applicable securities
law requirements and American Stock Exchange standards.
Board
Committees
We have established an audit committee consisting of Messrs.
Arnold, Schreiber and Lutin, all of whom we believe qualify as
independent directors under the American Stock
Exchange rules. The American Stock Exchange listing standards
define financially literate as being able to read
and understand financial statements, including a companys
balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. The
audit committee is governed by a written charter which must be
reviewed, and amended if necessary, on an annual basis. Under
the charter, the audit committee is required to meet at least
four times a year and is responsible for reviewing the
independence, qualifications and quality control procedures of
our independent auditors, and is responsible for recommending
the initial or continued retention, or a change in, our
independent auditors. In addition, the audit committee is
required to review and discuss with our management and
independent auditors our financial statements and our annual and
quarterly reports, as well as the quality and effectiveness of
our internal control procedures and critical accounting
policies. The audit committees charter requires the audit
committee to review potential conflict of interest situations,
including transactions with related parties and to discuss with
our management other matters related to our external and
internal audit procedures. The audit committee will adopt a
pre-approval policy for the provision of audit and non-audit
services performed by our independent auditors. We believe Mr.
Arnold is a financial expert as defined under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and as required by the
American Stock Exchange.
We have also established a compensation committee consisting of
Messrs. Abramowitz, Schreiber and Lutin. The compensation
committee is responsible for making recommendations to the board
of directors regarding compensation arrangements for our
executive officers, including annual bonus compensation, and
consults with our management regarding compensation policies and
practices. The compensation committee also makes recommendations
concerning the adoption of any compensation plans in which
management is eligible to participate, including the granting of
stock options or other benefits under those plans.
We have also established a nominating and corporate governance
committee consisting of Messrs. Arnold, Abramowitz and Lutin,
all of whom we believe will qualify as independent
directors under the American Stock Exchange rules. The
nominating and corporate governance committee submits to the
board of directors a proposed slate of directors for submission
to the stockholders at our annual meeting, recommends director
candidates in view of pending additions, resignations or
retirements, develops criteria for the selection of directors,
reviews suggested nominees received from stockholders and
reviews corporate governance policies and recommends changes to
the full board of directors.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This section provides information regarding the compensation
programs in place for the Companys President and Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
President, Legal Affairs, the Academys President and
Gulfstreams former Chief Executive Officer, who we refer
to collectively as the named executive officers. In 2006,
Mr. Hackett, our President and Chief Executive Officer,
also served as our Chief Financial Officer. This section
includes information regarding the overall objectives of our
compensation programs and each element of compensation that we
provide.
The compensation of our named executive officers is composed
principally of a base salary, a quarterly bonus in some
instances, a discretionary annual bonus and equity awards in the
form of stock options. In
64
addition, our named executive officers are entitled to matching
contributions to our 401(k) plan and certain perquisites.
Compensation decisions are made by the board of directors, with
significant input from Mr. Hackett for compensation of his
direct reports, including Mr. Thomas P. Cooper,
Mr. Stagias and Mr. Thomas L. Cooper. In connection
with the acquisition in March 2006, we adopted our Stock
Incentive Plan and entered into new employment agreements with
Mr. Hackett and Mr. Thomas L. Cooper.
Prior to consummating the Offering, our board of directors
intends to form a compensation committee (the
Committee) consisting of three directors who are
determined to be independent under the rules of the American
Stock Exchange. The Committee will have responsibility for
establishing and overseeing our compensation programs for our
named executive officers.
Objective
of Compensation
Our primary goals with respect to executive compensation are:
|
|
|
|
|
to attract and retain the most talented and dedicated executives
possible;
|
|
|
|
to acknowledge and reward individual contributions to the
Company; and
|
|
|
|
to encourage long-term value creation by aligning
executives interests with stockholders interests.
|
To achieve these goals, the board of directors intends to
implement and maintain compensation plans that tie a substantial
portion of our named executive officers overall
compensation to revenue growth and equity appreciation. All of
our named executive officers have entered into employment
agreements and their compensation is based on the contractual
obligations under those agreements. In addition, we evaluate
compensation on an ongoing basis and make adjustments as we
believe are necessary to fairly compensate our executives and to
retain their services.
We do not benchmark our compensation against that of others in
our industry and we do not engage compensation consultants to
assist us in developing our compensation arrangements.
Establishing
Executive Compensation
Role of the Board of Directors. The board of
directors is responsible for the compensation of the named
executive officers. Its role is to review and approve our
compensation programs, policies and practices with respect to
the named executive officers. In consultation with the Chief
Executive Officer, the board of directors evaluates the
performance of the executive officers following the end of each
fiscal year. In connection with their evaluation, the board of
directors reviews the recommendation of the Chief Executive
Officer in order to determine the base compensation for the
executive officers for the upcoming fiscal year in light of the
objectives of our compensation programs. In November 2007, the
board of directors constituted a compensation committee and
delegated to the compensation committee responsibility for
setting named executive officer compensation.
Role of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief
Executive Officer assists the board of directors in reaching
compensation decisions by developing recommended compensation
for the named executive officers other than himself. The Chief
Executive Officer meets with each named executive officer
formally on an annual basis to review past performance and to
discuss performance objectives for the following year. In
connection with developing his recommendations for named
executive officer compensation, the Chief Executive Officer
evaluates the totality of each compensation package with
consideration of a variety of factors, including the executive
officers performance, our financial performance and his
sense of the market for executive talent developed through his
personal experience, contacts in the airline industry and in the
south Florida region, publicly available information and our
compensation goals. The Chief Executive Officer may also consult
informally with the board of directors and, in particular, the
Chairman, prior to presenting his recommendations to the board
of directors for their review and discussion to ensure that his
recommendations will best reflect our compensation objectives.
By the time the Chief Executive Officer presents his
recommendations to the board of directors, the board of
directors has already provided informal feedback and therefore
65
the board of directors generally only makes minor adjustments to
the Chief Executive Officers recommendations.
Role of Employment Agreements. We consider
employment agreements to be an important part of recruiting and
retaining qualified executive officers. All of the named
executive officers have entered into employment agreements with
us. Our employment agreements with the named executive officers
establish the named executive officers initial base
compensation and on-going annual cash bonus as a percentage of a
relevant financial metric. Employment agreement terms also
include severance and
change-in-control
provisions. The board of directors judgment is that
employment agreements are beneficial for us. These employment
agreements are described in further detail under
Agreements with Named Executive Officers.
Elements
of Compensation
In connection with the acquisition on March 14, 2006, we
entered into employment agreements with Mr. Hackett and
Mr. Thomas L. Cooper addressing specific compensation
arrangements in order to retain those executive officers. Our
employment agreement with Mr. Thomas P. Cooper predates the
acquisition and was left unchanged and our employment agreement
with Mr. Stagias was entered into after the acquisition.
The terms of these employment agreements were individually
developed based on a number of factors, including the particular
executives position, his scope of duties, his experience,
his past performance, our compensation goals and the market for
executive talent.
We do not benchmark our overall compensation arrangements, or
any of the individual elements of compensation, against the
compensation arrangements of any other company or group of
companies. However, based on the knowledge and experience of
Mr. Hackett and the board of directors, we do consider the
market for executive talent in our industry and in our region as
a way to improve our ability to attract and retain talented
executive officers.
Executive compensation consists of the following elements:
Base Salary. All of our named executive
officers are entitled to a minimum base salary pursuant to their
employment agreements, which can be increased at the discretion
of the board of directors. We initially set base salaries to
attract talented executive officers to the Company. The base
salaries of existing named executive officers are reviewed on an
ongoing basis, and adjusted from time to time to realign
salaries with market levels after taking into account individual
responsibilities, performance and experience.
The board of directors alone determines the Chief Executive
Officers base salary. At the outset of fiscal 2006,
Mr. Hacketts base salary was $108,000 per year. On
March 14, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Hackett which increased his base salary to
$132,000 per year, subject to annual adjustment based on
increases in the consumer price index. The increase in
Mr. Hacketts base salary reflects the board of
directors recognition of his increased importance to our
success after the completion of the acquisition and the desire
to ensure the retention of Mr. Hacketts services.
The base salary for each of the other named executive officers
is recommended by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by
the board of directors. In determining appropriate levels of
base compensation for the named executive officers other than
the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Executive Officer
develops specific recommendations to review with the board of
directors. The Chief Executive Officer considers the named
executive officers individual performance. The board of
directors annually reviews the recommendations of the Chief
Executive Officer. Typically, the board of directors considered
two types of potential increases to the base salary of the named
executive officers: (1) merit increases based
upon the named executive officers individual performance,
and (2) market adjustments based upon the board
of directors opinion of the base compensation for similar
executives. In fiscal 2006, the board of directors evaluated the
base salary for each named executive officer at the time of the
acquisition and made any adjustments it deemed appropriate at
that time.
Mr. Thomas P. Coopers base salary in fiscal 2006 was
$90,000, subject to annual adjustment based on increases in the
consumer price index. On February 27, 2007, the board of
directors, at the
66
recommendation of Mr. Hackett, reviewed Mr. Thomas P.
Coopers base salary and determined that his base salary
should be increased to $100,000 in light of his extensive
responsibilities and the length of time since the last increase
of his base salary.
Mr. Stagias was hired by us in April 2006 as President of
the Academy and his base salary was set at $85,000 per year.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Stagias was a flight instructor
and his base salary reflects a balance between his limited
experience as an executive officer and his considerable
responsibilities.
Mr. Thomas L. Cooper served as the Chief Executive Officer
of Gulfstream until March 13, 2006 and received a base
salary of $125,000 during this time. On March 14, 2006, in
connection with the acquisition, Mr. Thomas L. Cooper
entered into a new employment agreement with us. Under the terms
of this employment agreement, Mr. Thomas L. Cooper is
entitled to receive a base salary of $100,000. The reduction in
Mr. Thomas L. Coopers base salary reflects his
reduced responsibilities.
Performance Bonus. We use two types of
bonuses. The first are non-discretionary bonuses based on the
financial performance of the Company or one of its businesses.
The board of directors believes that tying a bonus payment
primarily to financial metrics provides appropriate incentive to
the named executive officers to contributed to the financial
success of the Company.
Mr. Hackett and Mr. Thomas P. Cooper are entitled to
receive quarterly bonuses equal to 1.75% and 1.0%, respectively,
of the Companys operating income, excluding nonrecurring
gains and losses, pursuant to the terms of their employment
agreements. For fiscal 2008, Mr. Hacketts bonus will
increase to 2.25% of the Companys operating income,
excluding nonrecurring gains and losses. Mr. Stagias is
entitled to receive a quarterly bonus equal to 0.5% of the
Academys gross student revenue plus 1.5% of the
Academys operating income, excluding nonrecurring gains
and losses, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
In addition, Mr. Stagias was eligible to receive a fixed
bonus of $3,000 if the Academy has $420,000 of gross income and
$13,742 of operating income during the second quarter of fiscal
2006. Mr. Thomas L. Cooper is not entitled to a bonus under
the terms of his employment agreement. In 2006, Mr. Hackett
received $39,200, Mr. Thomas P. Cooper received $22,460 and
Mr. Stagias received $3,000 in aggregate non-discretionary
bonus payments.
The second type of bonuses are discretionary bonuses, which the
board of directors has the authority to award to any of our
named executive officers. Discretionary bonuses are intended to
allow the board of directors to reward named executive officers
for individual performance over the course of the previous
fiscal year independent of the Companys financial
performance and to reward named executive officers who do not
have a right to non-discretionary bonuses. The actual amount of
discretionary bonus will be determined following a review of
each executives individual performance and contribution to
our strategic goals conducted after the end of each fiscal year.
Our discretionary bonus is paid in cash in a single installment
in the first quarter following the completion of a given fiscal
year. The board of directors has not fixed a maximum payout for
any executive officers discretionary bonus. In 2006, we
did not award any discretionary bonuses.
Equity Compensation. We believe that positive
long-term performance is achieved through an ownership culture
that encourages such performance by our named executive officers
through the use of stock and stock-based awards. Our Stock
Incentive Plan was established in March 2006 to provide certain
of our employees, including our named executive officers, with
incentives to help align those employees interests with
the interests of stockholders. The Stock Incentive Plan permits
the issuance of a variety of equity-based awards, including tax
qualified incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock
units, and other stock-based awards.
The board of directors believes that the use of stock and
stock-based awards offers the best approach to achieving our
compensation goal of aligning the interests of our named
executive officers with those of our stockholders. We have not
adopted stock ownership guidelines, and our Stock Incentive Plan
has provided an important method for our named executive
officers to acquire equity or equity-linked interests in our
Company. Through the growth we hope to achieve and the size of
our equity awards, we expect to
67
provide a significant portion of total compensation to our named
executive officers through our Stock Incentive Plan. Our board
of directors is the administrator of the Stock Incentive Plan.
Although our Stock Incentive Plan permits us to issue a variety
of different equity-based awards, since adopting the Stock
Incentive Plan, we have only granted tax qualified incentive
stock options. Stock option grants reflect our desire to provide
a meaningful equity incentive for named executive officers to
help us succeed over the long term. Stock options provide for
financial gain derived from the potential appreciation in our
stock price from the date the option is granted until the date
that the option is exercised. Our long term performance
ultimately determines the value of stock options, because gains
recognized from stock option exercises are entirely dependent on
the long-term appreciation of our stock price. We expect stock
options to continue as a significant component of executive
compensation arrangements. In addition to the named executive
officers, stock options have been granted to our other
executives who are in positions that are key to our long-term
success.
Stock option grants are made at various times including at the
commencement of employment and, occasionally, following a
significant change in job responsibilities or to meet other
special retention or performance objectives. The board of
directors reviews and approves stock option awards to named
executive officers based upon its assessment of individual
performance, consideration of each executives existing
long-term incentives, and retention considerations. Periodic
stock option grants are made at the discretion of the board of
directors to eligible employees and, in appropriate
circumstances, the board of directors considers the
recommendations of Mr. Hackett, our Chief Executive
Officer, for grants to his direct reports.
In fiscal 2006, the board of directors awarded Mr. Hackett
an option to purchase 104,324 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The board of directors
felt that it was critical to the Company that a significant
portion of Mr. Hacketts compensation be tied to the
long term value of our stock both to ensure the retention of his
services and to incent him to increase long term shareholder
value. In January 2007, the board of directors awarded
Mr. Thomas P. Cooper an option to purchase
5,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$5.00 per share. The board of directors believed that
Mr. Thomas P. Cooper made valuable contributions to the
Company in fiscal 2006 and before and that a portion of his
compensation should be tied to the long term value of our stock.
Other named executive officers did not receive options because
they did not have a significant change in job responsibilities
and their compensation was considered to be fair without an
additional option grant.
Perquisites
and Other Compensation.
Employee benefits offered to named executive officers are
designed to meet current and future health and security needs
for the named executive officers and their families. Executive
benefits are the same as those offered to all employees, except
that we pay medical insurance premiums in full for the named
executive officers enrolled in our medical benefit plan. The
employee benefits offered to all eligible employees include
medical, dental and life insurance benefits, short-term
disability pay, long-term disability insurance, flexible
spending accounts for medical expense reimbursements, and a
401(k) retirement savings plan that, starting on July 1,
2006, include a partial Company match.
The 401(k) retirement savings plan is a defined contribution
plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Employees may make pre-tax contributions into the plan,
expressed as a percentage of compensation, up to prescribed IRS
annual limits. Starting on July 1, 2006, we provide an
employer matching contribution of 25% on the first 4% of
employee pay contributed.
Upon retirement, each named executive officer is entitled to
medical, dental and life insurance plan continuation for
18 months under the federal and state COBRA provisions at
his or her election. In addition, the executive is entitled to
elect to receive distributions from our 401(k) retirement plan,
under the terms of that plan. Under our Stock Incentive Plan,
any vested but unexercised stock options may be exercised for a
period of 60 days and three months, respectively, after
retirement.
68
Other
Compensation.
Our named executive officers who were parties to employment
agreements prior to this offering will continue, following this
offering, to be parties to such employment agreements in their
current form until such time as the board of directors
determines in its discretion that revisions to such employment
agreements are advisable. In addition, consistent with our
compensation philosophy, we intend to continue to maintain our
current benefits and perquisites for our named executive
officers; however, the board of directors in its discretion may
revise, amend or add to the officers executive benefits
and perquisites if it deems it advisable. We currently have no
plans to change either the employment agreements (except as
required by law or as required to clarify the benefits to which
our named executive officers are entitled as set forth herein)
or levels of benefits and perquisites provided thereunder.
Report
of the Board of Directors for Fiscal Year 2007.
The board of directors has reviewed and discussed the above
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K
with management and, based on such review and discussions, the
board of directors recommends that the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis be included in this prospectus.
July 5, 2007
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David F. Hackett
Daniel H. Abramowitz
Douglas E. Hailey
Thomas A. McFall
Richard R. Schreiber
69
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
the compensation of our chief executive officer and each of our
other most highly compensated executive officers whose aggregate
cash compensation exceeded $100,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2006. In 2006 and until January 29, 2007,
when we hired Mr. Brown, Mr. Hackett served as our
Chief Financial Officer. We refer to these persons as the
named executive officers elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Name and principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)(1)
|
|
Bonus ($)(2)
|
|
Awards ($)(3)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Compensation ($)(4)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
David F. Hackett,
Chief Executive
Officer and
President
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
126,300
|
|
|
$
|
39,200
|
|
|
$
|
77,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,398
|
|
|
$
|
254,410
|
|
Thomas P. Cooper,
Senior Vice President,
Legal Affairs and
Secretary
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,714
|
|
|
$
|
123,174
|
|
Paul A. Stagias,
President, Gulfstream
Training Academy
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
59,827
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,569
|
|
|
$
|
66,396
|
|
Thomas L. Cooper,
Chief Executive
Officer, Gulfstream
International Airlines
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
105,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,586
|
|
|
$
|
119,086
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The base salary for Mr. Hackett reflects his current base
salary of $132,000 pro rated from March 14, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 plus his prior base salary of $108,000
pro rated from January 1, 2006 to March 13, 2006. The
base salary for Mr. Stagias reflects his current base
salary of $85,000 pro rated from his date of hire, April 6,
2006. The base salary for Mr. Thomas L. Cooper reflects his
current base salary of $100,000 pro rated from March 14,
2006 to December 31, 2006 plus his prior base salary of
$125,000 pro rated from January 1, 2006 to March 13,
2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Hackett received aggregate quarterly bonus payments of
$39,200 in 2006 or 1.75% of our operating income, excluding
nonrecurring gains and losses, on a trailing twelve-month basis.
Mr. Thomas P. Cooper received aggregate quarterly bonus
payments of $22,460 in 2006 or 1.00% of our operating income,
excluding nonrecurring gains and losses, on a trailing
twelve-month basis. Mr. Stagias received aggregate
quarterly bonus payments of $3,000 in 2006 as a result of the
Academy achieving at least $420,000 of gross income and $13,742
of operating income during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.
Mr. Thomas L. Cooper received aggregate quarterly bonus
payments of $5,700 in 2006 or 2.25% of our operating income,
excluding nonrecurring gains and losses, on a trailing
twelve-month basis, pro rated through March 14, 2006, as
provided for in his employment agreement that terminated on
March 14, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects options awarded under our Stock Incentive Plan. These
options vest and become exercisable in 20% increments starting
on the grant date and 20% on each anniversary of the grant date.
These amounts represent the financial reporting expense
recognized by the Company in 2006 in accordance with
SFAS 123R, and not the amounts that may be eventually
realized by the named executive officers. |
|
(4) |
|
The All Other Compensation column consists of items not properly
reported in the other columns of this table, and for each named
executive officer includes perquisites and other personal
benefits. Mr. Hacketts 2006 compensation includes
health insurance premiums of $10,400, 401(k) matching
contributions, life insurance premiums and reserved parking at
the Company headquarters. Mr. Thomas P. Coopers 2006
compensation includes health insurance premiums of $10,080,
401(k) matching contributions, life insurance premiums and
reserved parking at the Company headquarters.
Mr. Stagias 2006 compensation includes health
insurance premiums, life insurance premiums and reserved parking
at the Company |
70
|
|
|
|
|
headquarters. Mr. Thomas L. Coopers 2006 compensation
includes health insurance premiums, life insurance premiums and
reserved parking at the Company headquarters. |
|
(5) |
|
Thomas L. Cooper currently serves as Chairman Emeritus of
Gulfstream and manages our Cuban flight operations. |
Agreements
with Named Executive Officers
David
F. Hackett
On March 14, 2006, Mr. Hackett and Gulfstream entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which, among
other things, Mr. Hackett is to serve as President of
Gulfstream for an initial term of two years, subject to
automatic one-year extensions absent mutual amendment of the
terms or termination by either party as set forth therein.
Mr. Hackett is entitled to a base salary of $132,000 (as
increased to reflect increases in the consumer price index and
at the discretion of the board of directors) and a quarterly
bonus equal to 1.75% during the first year of the initial term
and 2.25% for subsequent years of Gulfstreams annual
pre-tax income which amount is paid quarterly on a trailing
twelve month basis, as determined by the board of directors and
excluding non-recurring gains and losses. In the event of
Mr. Hacketts death during the term of the agreement,
Mr. Hacketts salary and incentive bonus will be paid
to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal
representative for six months following his death. In the event
of Mr. Hacketts disability during the term of the
agreement, Mr. Hackett will be entitled to receive no less
than six months salary and incentive bonus following such
disability. This disability payment is in addition to other
long-term disability benefits provided by us to
Mr. Hackett. For the purposes of this agreement,
disability is deemed to have occurred if
Mr. Hackett is unable by reason of sickness, disease or
accident to substantially perform his duties under the agreement
for an aggregate of six months in any one-year period, or if he
has a guardian of his person or estate appointed by a court.
Upon termination of the agreement without cause by
Gulfstream, Mr. Hackett will be entitled to benefits for
the remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of the
agreement and compensation in the form of base salary and
incentive bonus payments for one year thereafter. For the
purposes of this agreement, cause is defined as
(i) repeated failure or refusal to reasonably cooperate
with a governmental investigation of Gulfstream;
(ii) willfully committing or participating in any act or
omission which constitutes willful misconduct, fraud,
misrepresentation, embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially
injurious to Gulfstream; (iii) committing or participating
in any other act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or
in a manner which was grossly negligent that is materially
injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise;
(iv) engaging in a criminal enterprise involving moral
turpitude; (v) any crime resulting in a conviction, which
constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved (other than a
motor vehicle felony that does not result in his incarceration;
(vi) any loss of any state or federal license required for
Mr. Hackett to perform his material duties or
responsibilities for Gulfstream; or (vii) any material
breach of the employment agreement by Mr. Hackett.
Mr. Hackett has the right to terminate the agreement upon
30 days notice for a year after any change in control. Our
obligations to make payments to Mr. Hackett following such
a termination are described more fully in Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control. Pursuant
to this employment agreement, Mr. Hackett agrees to a
covenant not to compete during the term of the agreement and for
a period of one year thereafter in the territory of Florida, the
Bahamas and portions of Cuba. Mr. Hackett also agrees to
maintain the confidentiality of certain Gulfstream information
in certain circumstances.
Thomas
P. Cooper
On August 7, 2003, Mr. Thomas P. Cooper and Gulfstream
entered into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to
which, among other things, Mr. Cooper serves as Senior Vice
President, Legal Affairs, or such other position as the board of
directors of Gulfstream determines, for an initial term of three
years, subject to automatic one-year extensions absent mutual
amendment of the terms or termination by either party as set
forth therein. Mr. Cooper is entitled to a base salary of
$90,000 (as increased to reflect increases in the consumer price
index or at the discretion of the board of directors of
Gulfstream) and to a bonus equal to 1% of Gulfstreams
annual pre-tax income which amount is paid quarterly on a
trailing twelve month basis,
71
excluding non-recurring gains and losses. In the event of
Mr. Coopers death during the term of the agreement;
Mr. Coopers salary and incentive bonus will be paid
to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal
representative for six months following his death. In the event
of Mr. Coopers disability during the term of the
agreement, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to receive no less
than six months salary following such disability. This
disability payment is in addition to other long-term disability
benefits provided by us to Mr. Cooper. For the purposes of
this agreement, disability is deemed to have
occurred if Mr. Cooper is unable by reason of sickness,
disease or accident to substantially perform his duties under
the agreement for an aggregate of six months in any one-year
period, or if he has a guardian of his person or estate
appointed by a court.
Upon termination of the agreement without cause by
Gulfstream, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to benefits for the
remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of the
agreement and base salary for one year plus one month for each
year of service with Gulfstream. For the purposes of this
agreement, cause is defined as (i) willfully
committing or participating in any act or omission which
constitutes willful misconduct, fraud, misrepresentation,
embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially injurious to
Gulfstream; (ii) committing or participating in any other
act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or in a manner
which was grossly negligent that is materially injurious to the
company, monetarily or otherwise; (iii) engaging in a
criminal enterprise involving moral turpitude; (iv) any
crime resulting in a conviction, which constitutes a felony in
the jurisdiction involved (other than a motor vehicle felony
that does not result in his incarceration; (v) any loss of
any state or federal license required for Mr. Cooper to
perform his material duties or responsibilities for Gulfstream;
or (vi) any material breach of the employment agreement by
Mr. Cooper.
Mr. Cooper has the right to terminate the agreement upon
30 days notice for a year after any change in control. Our
obligations to make payments to Mr. Cooper following such a
termination are described more fully in Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change In Control. Pursuant to this
employment agreement, Mr. Cooper agrees to a covenant not
to compete during the term of the agreement and for a period of
six months thereafter in the territory of Florida and the
Bahamas (unless terminated without cause by the Gulfstream, in
which case the noncompetition obligations of Mr. Cooper
will end upon his termination). Mr. Cooper also agrees to
maintain the confidentiality of certain of Gulfstreams
information in certain circumstances.
Paul
Stagias
On April 6, 2006, Mr. Stagias and the Academy entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which, among
other things, Mr. Stagias serves as President of the
Academy. The agreement has an initial term of two years,
followed by automatic one-year extensions, unless otherwise
terminated by either party. Mr. Stagias is entitled to a
base salary of $85,000 and a quarterly bonus equal to 0.5% of
the Academys gross student revenue plus 1.5% of operating
income of the Academy. Subject to limited exceptions, this bonus
is payable only if gross revenues of the Academy are equal to or
greater than $800,000 dollars per quarter. In the event of
Mr. Stagiass death during the term of the agreement;
Mr. Stagiass salary and incentive bonus will be paid
to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal
representative for two months following his death.
Upon termination of the agreement by the Academy without
cause, Mr. Stagias will be entitled to benefits
for the remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of
the agreement and compensation for three months. For the
purposes of this agreement, cause is defined as
(i) willfully committing or participating in any act or
omission which constitutes willful misconduct, fraud,
misrepresentation, embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially
injurious to the Academy; (ii) committing or participating
in any other act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or
in a manner which was grossly negligent that is materially
injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise;
(iii) engaging in a criminal enterprise involving moral
turpitude; (iv) any crime resulting in a conviction, which
constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved (other than a
motor vehicle felony that does not result in his incarceration;
(v) any loss of any state or federal license required for
Mr. Stagias to perform his material duties or
responsibilities for the Academy; or (vi) any material
breach of the employment agreement by Mr. Stagias. Pursuant
to this employment agreement, Mr. Stagias agrees to a
covenant not to compete and non-disclosure provisions in certain
circumstances.
72
Thomas
L. Cooper
On March 14, 2006, Thomas L. Cooper and Gulfstream entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which, among
other things, Mr. Cooper served as Chief Executive Officer
of Gulfstream for an initial term of one year and currently
serves as Chairman Emeritus of Gulfstream. Mr. Cooper
consults with us, upon our request, about certain operational
matters involving Gulfstream and manages our Cuban operation.
His agreement is subject to automatic one-year extensions absent
mutual amendment of the terms or termination by either party as
set forth therein. Mr. Cooper is entitled to a base salary
of $100,000 (as increased to reflect increases in the consumer
price index or at the discretion of the Gulfstream board of
directors). In the event of Mr. Coopers death during
the term of the agreement, Mr. Coopers salary will be
paid to his designated beneficiary, estate or other legal
representative for six months following his death. In the event
of Mr. Coopers disability during the term of the
agreement, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to receive no less
than six months salary following such disability. This
disability payment is in addition to other long-term disability
benefits provided by us to Mr. Cooper. For the purposes of
this agreement, disability is deemed to have
occurred if Mr. Cooper is unable by reason of sickness,
disease or accident to substantially perform his duties under
the agreement for an aggregate of six months in any one-year
period, or if he has a guardian of his person or estate
appointed by a court.
Upon termination of the agreement without cause by
Gulfstream, Mr. Cooper will be entitled to benefits for the
remainder of the initial or then-current renewal term of the
agreement and base salary for six months thereafter. For the
purposes of this agreement, cause is defined as
(i) repeated failure or refusal to reasonably cooperate
with a governmental investigation of Gulfstream;
(ii) willfully committing or participating in any act or
omission which constitutes willful misconduct, fraud,
misrepresentation, embezzlement or dishonesty that is materially
injurious to Gulfstream; (iii) committing or participating
in any other act or omission wantonly, willfully, recklessly or
in a manner which was grossly negligent that is materially
injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise;
(iv) engaging in a criminal enterprise involving moral
turpitude; (v) any crime resulting in a conviction, which
constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved (other than a
motor vehicle felony that does not result in his incarceration;
(vi) any loss of any state or federal license required for
Mr. Cooper to perform his material duties or
responsibilities for Gulfstream; or (vii) any material
breach of the employment agreement by Mr. Cooper.
Mr. Cooper has the right to terminate the agreement upon
30 days notice for a year after any change in control. Our
obligations to make payments to Mr. Cooper following such a
termination are described more fully in Potential Payments
Upon Termination or Change In Control. Pursuant to this
employment agreement, Mr. Cooper agrees to a covenant not
to compete during the term of the agreement and for a period of
three years thereafter in the territory of Florida, the Bahamas
and portions of Cuba (unless terminated without cause by the
Gulfstream, in which case the noncompetition obligations of
Mr. Cooper pursuant to the employment agreement will end
upon his termination). Mr. Cooper also agrees to maintain
the confidentiality of certain of Gulfstreams information
in certain circumstances.
Subsequent
Events
On January 29, 2007, we hired Mr. Robert M. Brown as
our Chief Financial Officer. He is employed by Gulfstream at an
annual salary of $150,000. We have not entered into a written
employment agreement with Mr. Brown. Under the terms of
Mr. Browns employment with us, he is entitled to
medical and vacation benefits, free and reduced-rate air travel
benefits, and participation in the Companys 401(k)
program. Mr. Brown is also entitled to participate in our
Stock Incentive Plan. Upon commencement of his employment with
us, Mr. Brown received a cash signing bonus of $10,000 and
the option to purchase 30,000 shares of our
73
common stock, 20% of which vested immediately upon issuance, and
20% of which shall vest each of the following four years.
Grants Of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Securities
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Base Price
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
Stocks or
|
|
Options
|
|
of Option
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Threshold ($)
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
Maximum ($)
|
|
Threshold ($)
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
Maximum($)
|
|
Units (#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Awards ($/Sh)
|
|
Awards
|
|
David F. Hackett
|
|
May 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
$
|
5.00/Sh
|
|
|
$
|
256,790
|
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
Stock Incentive Plan. Our Stock Incentive Plan
was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our
stockholders in 2006. Our plan provides for the granting of
incentive stock options, non-incentive stock options, SARs,
cash-based awards, or other stock-based awards to those of our
employees, directors or consultants who are selected by our
board of directors. The plan authorizes 350,000 shares of
our common stock to be issued under the plan. As of the date of
this prospectus, we have awarded options to certain of our
officers for an aggregate of 210,324 shares of our common
stock. The board of directors administers the plan, however, the
board of directors intends to form a compensation committee
prior to the Offering and to delegate responsibility for
administering the plan to the Committee.
On the date of the grant, the exercise price must equal at least
100% of the fair market value in the case of incentive stock
options, or 110% of the fair market value with respect to
optionees who own at least 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of stock. The fair market value is
determined by computing the arithmetic mean of our high and low
stock prices on a given determination date if our stock is
publicly traded or, if our stock is not publicly traded, by the
administrator in good faith. The exercise price on the date of
grant is determined from time to time by the board of directors
in the case of non-qualified stock options. This price needs not
be uniform for all recipients of non-qualified stock options and
must not be less than 100% of the fair market value.
SARs granted under the plan are subject to the same terms and
restrictions as the option grants and may be granted independent
of, or in connection with, the grant of options. The board of
directors determines the exercise price of SARs. A SAR granted
independent of an option entitles the participant to payment in
an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a
share of our common stock on the exercise date over the exercise
price per share, times the number of SARs exercised. A SAR
granted in connection with an option entitles the participant to
surrender an unexercised option and to receive in exchange an
amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of a share
of our common stock over the exercise price per share for the
option, times the number of shares covered by the option which
is surrendered. Fair market value is determined in the same
manner as it is determined for options.
The board of directors may also grant awards of stock,
restricted stock and other awards valued in whole or in part by
reference to the fair market value of our common stock. These
stock-based awards, in the discretion of the board of directors,
may be, among other things, subject to completion of a specified
period of service, the occurrence of an event or the attainment
of performance objectives. Additionally, the board of directors
may grant awards of cash, in values to be determined by the
board of directors. If any awards are in excess of $1,000,000
such that Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
applies, the board of directors must alter its compensation
practices to ensure that compensation deductions are permitted.
Awards granted under the plan are generally not transferable by
the participant except by will or the laws of descent and
distribution, and each award is exercisable, during the lifetime
of the participant, only by the participant or his or her
guardian or legal representative, unless permitted by the board
of directors. Additionally, any shares of our common stock
received pursuant to an award granted under the plan are subject
to our right of first refusal prior to certain transfers by the
participant and our buy-back rights upon
74
termination of the participants employment. The right of
first refusal and buy-back rights terminate upon consummation of
an initial public offering.
Options granted under the plan will vest as provided by the
board of directors at the time of the grant. The board of
directors may provide for accelerated vesting or termination in
exchange for cash of any outstanding awards or the issuance of
substitute awards upon consummation of a change in control, as
defined in the plan. The currently outstanding options vest 20%
on the date of grant and then ratable at 20% per year over the
next four years. The options expire on the date determined by
the board of directors but may not extend more than ten years
from the grant date. Incentive stock options also include
certain other terms necessary to assure compliance with the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
For the purposes of the plan, a change in control is
defined as (i) the purchase or other acquisition (other
than from the Company) by any person, entity or group of
persons, within the meaning of § 13(d) or
§ 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) (excluding, for this
purpose, the Company or its subsidiaries or any employee benefit
plan of the Company or its subsidiaries), of beneficial
ownership (within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 51% or more of either the
outstanding shares of our common stock or the combined voting
power our outstanding voting securities entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors, each as of the time the
Stock Incentive Plan was entered into; or (ii) individuals
who constituted the board of directors at the time the Stock
Incentive Plan was entered into cease for any reason to
constitute at least a majority of the board of directors, except
for the election of any person who becomes a director subsequent
to such date whose election, or nomination for election by our
stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of
the directors then comprising the incumbent board of directors
(other than an individual whose initial assumption of office is
in connection with an actual or threatened election contest
relating to the election of directors); or (iii) approval
by our stockholders of a reorganization, merger or
consolidation, in each case with respect to which persons who
were the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such
reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately
thereafter, own more than 50% of, respectively, the common stock
and the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated
corporations then outstanding voting securities, or of a
liquidation or dissolution of the Company or of the sale of all
or substantially all of the assets of the Company.
The plan may be amended, altered, suspended or terminated by the
administrator at any time. We may not alter the rights and
obligations under any award granted before amendment of the plan
without the consent of the affected participant. Unless
terminated sooner, the plan will terminate automatically in 2016.
401(k) Plan. We established a 401(k)
retirement savings plan in 1996. Each of our participating
employees may contribute to the 401(k) plan, through payroll
deductions, up to 50% on a pre-tax basis of his or her
compensation, subject to limits imposed by federal law.
Beginning in July 1, 2006, we matched 25% of the first 4%
contributed by participants. We may make additional
contributions to the 401(k) plan in amounts determined by our
board of directors. Employees may elect to invest their
contributions in various established mutual funds. All amounts
contributed by employee participants are fully vested at all
times. The amounts matched by the Company are vested 25% in the
first year of employment, 50% in the second year of employment,
75% in the third year of employment, and 100% in and after the
fourth year of employment. For the years ended December 31,
2004, 2005 and 2006, administrative expenses paid to our
third-party provider related to the 401(k) plan were $5,428,
$5,658 and $5,445, respectively.
75
Outstanding
Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Payout
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Unearned Shares,
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Unearned Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Not Vested
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
David F. Hackett
|
|
|
104,324
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
Payments Upon Termination Or
Change-In-Control
The amount of compensation payable to each named executive
officer upon voluntary termination, early retirement,
involuntary not-for-cause termination, termination following a
change of control and in the event of disability or death of the
executive is shown below. The amounts shown assume that such
termination was effective as of December 31, 2006, and thus
includes amounts earned through such time and are estimates of
the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon their
termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be
determined at the time of such executives separation from
the Company.
The board of directors provides payments to named executive
officers upon termination or change of control in order to give
them some degree of financial protection in the event of certain
events occurring. The payments to which each named executive
officer is eligible is roughly proportionate to such named
executive officers level of total compensation.
Payments
Made Upon Termination
In the event that a named executive officers employment
terminates for reasons of voluntary termination, early
retirement, involuntary not-for-cause termination, termination
following a change of control of the Company and in the event of
disability or death of the executive, he is entitled to receive
amounts earned during his term of employment. Such amounts
include:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly bonus earned for any completed fiscal quarter for
Mr. Hackett and Mr. Thomas P. Cooper;
|
|
|
|
vested options awarded under our Stock Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
vested amounts contributed under our 401(k) plan; and
|
|
|
|
pay in lieu of unused vacation.
|
Payments
Made Upon Death or Disability
In the event of the death or disability of a named executive
officer, each named executive officer is entitled to certain
benefits as described in their employment agreements described
in Agreements with Named Executive Officers. The
Company does not maintain a disability plan.
Payments
Made Upon a Change in Control
Change in
Control of the Company
In the event of a change in control of the Company, the board of
directors or a committee thereof may provide for accelerated
vesting or termination of any outstanding stock options issued
under the Stock Incentive Plan in exchange for a cash payment,
or the issuance of substitute awards to substantially preserve
the terms of any option awards previously granted under the
Stock Incentive Plan. A description of the events giving rise to
a change in control for purposes of the Stock
Incentive Plan is set forth in Executive
Compensation Employee Benefit Plans
Stock Incentive Plan.
76
Change in
Control of Gulfstream
Pursuant to the employment agreements between the Company and
each named executive officer, we are obligated to make certain
payments to such executive if his employment is terminated
following a change in control of Gulfstream (as defined below)
(other than termination by Gulfstream for cause or by reason of
death or disability) or if he terminates his employment within
one year after the occurrence of a change in control of
Gulfstream, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued payment of base salary and incentive bonus payments,
in the case of Mr. Hackett one year following termination
of the executives employment, in the case of
Mr. Thomas L. Cooper six months following termination of
the executives employment and in the case of
Mr. Thomas P. Cooper; one year following termination of
executives employment plus one-additional month for each
year of service to the Company; and
|
|
|
|
Continued medical and life insurance benefits for the balance of
the initial term of the applicable employment agreement.
|
Generally, pursuant to the agreements, a change in
control of Gulfstream means a change in control
(A) as set forth in Section 280G of the Internal
Revenue Code; or (B) of a nature that would be required to
be reported in response to Item 2.01 of a current report on
Form 8-K
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act, as in effect on the date of the relevant agreement,
including upon any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
any person (as such term is used in
Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) other than the
executive is or becomes the beneficial owner (as
defined in
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities
of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the
combined voting power of the Companys outstanding
securities then having the right to vote as elections of
directors; or
|
|
|
|
the individuals who at the effective date of the applicable
employment agreement constitute the board of directors cease for
any reason to constitute a majority thereof, unless the
election, or nomination for election, of each new director was
approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors
then in office who were directors at the effective date of the
applicable employment agreement; or
|
|
|
|
there is a failure to elect a majority of the board of directors
from candidates nominated by management of the Company to the
board of directors; or
|
|
|
|
the business of Gulfstream for which the executives
services are principally performed is disposed of by Gulfstream
pursuant to a partial or complete liquidation of Gulfstream, a
sale of assets (including stock of a subsidiary of Gulfstream)
or otherwise.
|
A change in control is deemed not to have occurred on either of
the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
where all or any portion of the stock of Gulfstream is offered
through an initial or subsequent public offering; and/or
|
|
|
|
where the executive gives his explicit written waiver stating
that for the purposes of the relevant portions of his employment
agreement, a change in control shall not be deemed to have
occurred.
|
In the event that the executives employment is terminated
for any reason other than cause within one year following an
attempted change in control, the executive shall be
entitled to the same benefits and compensation as though he was
terminated in the year following a change in control. An
attempted change in control is deemed to have
occurred if any substantial attempt, accompanied by significant
work efforts and expenditures of money, is made to accomplish a
change in control, whether or not such attempt is made with the
approval of a majority of the board of directors.
77
David
F. Hackett
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or a change of control of the Company or Gulfstream
for David Hackett, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not For
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Cause
|
|
For Cause
|
|
Connection with a
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Termination or
|
|
Termination
|
|
Termination
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
Death
|
and Benefits upon
|
|
Retirement on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
Separation
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
$132,000
|
|
|
|
$132,000
|
|
$66,000
|
|
$66,000
|
|
|
|
|
1.75% of annual
|
|
|
|
1.75% of annual
|
|
1.75% of annual
|
|
1.75% of annual
|
Incentive Bonus
|
|
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
pre-tax income
|
Payment
|
|
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
|
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
|
through 6/30/07
|
|
through 6/30/07
|
Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$179,276
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits
|
|
|
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
$10,500
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
$7,615(1)
|
|
|
|
$7,615(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other consists of accrued vacation. |
Thomas
P. Cooper
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or a change of control of the Company or Gulfstream
for Thomas P. Cooper, our Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs
and Secretary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
Not For Cause
|
|
For Cause
|
|
Connection with a
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Termination or
|
|
Termination
|
|
Termination
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
Disability
|
|
Death
|
and Benefits upon
|
|
Retirement on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
|
on
|
Separation
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
$90,000
|
|
|
|
$90,000
|
|
$45,000
|
|
$45,000
|
|
|
|
|
1% of annual
|
|
|
|
1% of annual
|
|
1% of annual
|
|
1% of annual
|
Incentive Bonus
|
|
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
pre-tax income
|
|
pre-tax income
|
Payment
|
|
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
|
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
|
through 12/31/07
|
Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits
|
|
|
|
$10,100
|
|
|
|
$10,100
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
$80,190(1)
|
|
|
|
$80,190(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other includes $5,190 for accrued vacation and $75,000
representing one month of salary for each year of service to the
Company. |
78
Paul
Stagias
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or a change of control of the Company for Paul
Stagias, the President of the Academy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Connection with a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
Cause Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
and Benefits upon
|
|
Retirement on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
Separation
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,166
|
|
Incentive Bonus Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,904
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,904
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other consists of accrued vacation. |
Thomas
L. Cooper
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or a change of control of the Company for Thomas L.
Cooper, the former Chief Executive Officer of Gulfstream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Involuntary Not For
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Connection with a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Payments
|
|
Termination or
|
|
|
Cause Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
and Benefits upon
|
|
Retirement on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
on
|
|
Separation
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Incentive Bonus Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,770
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on a bonus computation of an employment agreement prior to
March 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Other consists of accrued vacation. |
Director
Compensation
The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive
compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve
on the board of directors. In setting director compensation, the
Company considers the significant amount of time that Directors
expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the
skill level required by the Company with respect to members of
the board of directors.
79
Compensation for our directors in 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash ($)
|
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Awards ($)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Earnings ($)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Thomas A. McFall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Daniel H. Abramowitz
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
David F. Hackett(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Douglas E. Hailey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Richard R. Schreiber
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Hackett is not compensated for his service as a
director. Our compensation of Mr. Hackett as President and
Chief Executive Officer is disclosed in the Summary Compensation
Table above. |
Following the offering, we intend to pay our independent
directors an annual fee of $20,000. Each director receives
$5,000 for each committee on which he serves as Chairman per
year. Each director receives $3,000 for each committee on which
he serves as a member (but not as Chairman) per year. Each
director also receives $500 for each meeting such director
attends that is not in conjunction with a regularly scheduled
meeting of the board of directors. We reimburse members of our
board of directors for travel related expenditures related to
their services to us. Each director will also be entitled to
participate in our Stock Incentive Plan. New directors are
granted options on the date that they begin service exercisable
at the then-current market value.
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification
Our bylaws provide that we have the power to indemnify our
directors, officers and employees against claims arising in
connection with their actions in such capacities. We currently
have a directors and officers liability insurance
policy that insures such persons against the costs of defense,
settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances.
We believe that these indemnification and liability provisions
are essential to attracting and retaining qualified persons as
officers and directors.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that the
liability of our directors for monetary damages relating to
breach of fiduciary duty will be eliminated to the fullest
extent permissible under the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware. Each director will continue to be subject to
liability for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty
to us, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving
intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law, for
unlawful stock purchases or redemptions and for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
This provision does not affect a directors
responsibilities under any other laws, such as the federal
securities laws or state or federal environmental laws.
We intend to enter into separate indemnification agreements with
each of our directors and officers which may be broader than the
specific indemnification provision contained in our bylaws.
Under these agreements, we will be required to indemnify them
against all expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other
amounts actually and reasonably incurred, in connection with any
actual, or any threatened, proceeding if any of them may be made
a party because he or she is or was one of our directors or
officers. We will be obligated to pay these amounts only if the
officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner that he
or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best
interests. With respect to any criminal proceeding, we will be
obligated to pay these amounts only if the officer or director
had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was
unlawful. The indemnification agreements also set forth
procedures that will apply in the event of a claim for
indemnification under such agreements.
80
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following tables set forth certain information known to us
with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock as of
December 7, 2007 and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the
shares offered, by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our
outstanding common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
each named executive officer; and
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power
over securities. The table below includes the number of shares
underlying options and warrants that are currently exercisable
or exercisable within 60 days of December 7, 2007. It
is therefore based on 2,039,460 shares of common stock
outstanding before this offering and 2,839,460 shares of
common stock outstanding immediately after this offering, based
on the number of shares outstanding as of December 7, 2007.
Shares of common stock subject to options and warrants that are
currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
December 7, 2007 are considered outstanding and
beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants
for the purposes of computing beneficial ownership of that
person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person. To our
knowledge, except as set forth in the footnotes to this table
and subject to applicable community property laws where
applicable, each person named in the table has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite
such persons name. Except as otherwise indicated, the
address of each of the persons in this table is as follows:
c/o Gulfstream
International Group, Inc., 3201 Griffin Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Owned
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Before this
|
|
After this
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
Offering
|
|
Offering
|
|
Five percent stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel H. Abramowitz(1)
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
David F. Hackett(2)
|
|
|
170,324
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Michael N. Taglich
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
Robert F. Taglich
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 40,000 shares of common stock held by Hillson
Private Partners II LP, 210,000 shares of common stock
held by Hillson Partners Limited Partnership, 35,000 shares
of common stock issuable under a warrant held by Hillson
Partners Limited Partnership and 2,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the
Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Abramowitz. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes 104,324 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan
held by Mr. Hackett. |
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Owned
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Before this
|
|
After this
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Owned
|
|
Offering
|
|
Offering
|
|
Directors and named executive officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas A. McFall
|
|
|
89,300
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
David F. Hackett(1)
|
|
|
170,324
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Robert M. Brown(2)
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul A. Stagias
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Daniel H. Abramowitz(3)
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Gary P. Arnold
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
Douglas E. Hailey
|
|
|
68,700
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Barry S. Lutin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Richard R. Schreiber(4)
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
703,324
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicates ownership of less than 1%. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes 104,324 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options granted under the Stock Incentive Plan
held by Mr. Hackett. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Brown. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 40,000 shares of common stock held by Hillson
Private Partners II LP, 210,000 shares of common stock
held by Hillson Partners Limited Partnership, 35,000 shares
of common stock issuable under a warrant held by Hillson
Partners Limited Partnership and 2,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the
Stock Incentive Plan held by Mr. Abramowitz. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
granted under the Stock Incentive Plan held by
Mr. Schreiber. |
82
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Since January 1, 2004, there has not been, nor is there
currently planned, any transaction or series of similar
transactions to which we were or are a party in which the amount
involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any director, executive
officer or holder of more than 5% of our common stock or any
member of such persons immediate families had or will have a
direct or indirect material interest other than agreements which
are described under the caption Management and the
transactions described below.
Prior to consummating the Offering, our board of directors
intends to form a nominating and corporate governance committee
(the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee)
consisting of three directors who are determined to be
independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will have
responsibility for establishing and maintaining guidelines
relating to any related party transactions between the Company
and any of its officers or directors. Under the Companys
Code of Ethics, any conflict of interest between a director or
officer and the Company must be referred to the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee for approval. The Company intends
to adopt written guidelines for the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee which will set forth the requirements for
review and approval of any related party transactions.
The transactions reported in the following sections
Transactions Relating to Our Acquisition of
Gulfstream and the Academy, Property
Lease, Cuba Operations,
Indemnification and Employment
Agreements, Stock Option Grants
and Other Transactions were not entered
into pursuant to a formal policy of the Company regarding
related party transactions.
Transactions
Relating to Our Acquisition of Gulfstream and the
Academy
We were formed by Taglich Brothers Inc. and Weatherly Group LLC
exclusively for the purpose of effecting the acquisition of
Gulfstream and the Academy. In March 2006, we acquired
approximately 89% of G-Air, which owned approximately 95% of
Gulfstream at that time, and 100% of the Academy, which held the
remaining 5% of Gulfstream. Subsequently, we acquired the
remaining 11% of G-Air, which has been merged with and into our
wholly-owned subsidiary, GIA.
Since 1999, Taglich Brothers and Weatherly Group have jointly
pursued the sourcing and sponsoring of management buyouts of
small private companies. The acquisition of Gulfstream and the
Academy was their fourth such transaction. Thomas A. McFall, the
Chairman of our board of directors, is an affiliate of Weatherly
Group and Douglas E. Hailey, a director, is an employee of
Taglich Brothers and an affiliate of Weatherly Group.
The transactions relating to our acquisition of Gulfstream and
the Academy are further described below.
Issuances of Founders Stock. Certain
principals and employees of Weatherly Group and Taglich
Brothers, along with certain members of our management,
purchased shares of founders stock in us in advance of our
acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy. To finance part of
the acquisition, we issued shares of our common stock and
subordinated debentures with common stock warrants to
principals, employees and clients of Taglich Brothers and
certain members of our management.
In December 2005, the following executive officers, directors
and affiliates purchased an aggregate of 284,000 shares of
common stock in the amount set forth opposite his name at a
purchase price of $0.20 per share. The remaining
66,000 shares were purchased by employees of Taglich
Brothers.
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Thomas A. McFall(1)
|
|
|
69,300
|
|
David F. Hackett(2)
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
Michael N. Taglich(3)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Robert F. Taglich(4)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Douglas E. Hailey(5)
|
|
|
48,700
|
|
83
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. McFall is the Chairman of our board of directors, a
senior executive of the Company and a principal of Weatherly
Group. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Hackett is a director and the President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company. |
|
(3) |
|
Michael Taglich is a holder of more than 5% of our common stock
and a principal in Taglich Brothers, one of the underwriters for
this offering. Michael Taglich is the brother of Robert Taglich. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 20,000 shares beneficially owned by Robert
Taglich, which are held of record in an individual retirement
account. Robert Taglich is a holder of more than 5% of our
common stock and a principal in Taglich Brothers, Inc., one of
the underwriters for this offering. Robert Taglich is the
brother of Michael Taglich. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Hailey is a director of the Company and a principal of
Weatherly Group and an employee of Taglich Brothers, one of the
underwriters for this offering. |
At the time of the issuance of founders stock of the
Company, the Company had virtually no assets and had raised no
capital. Although we cannot provide assurances that the prices
paid for the founders stock were at least as favorable as
would have been paid as part of an arms length transaction
with an unrelated third party, the Company attempted to set a
reasonable price for its founders stock, given the
circumstances and nature of the transaction.
Issuances of Units Consisting of Subordinated Debentures and
Common Stock Purchase Warrants. On March 14,
2006, we issued units consisting of 12% subordinated
debentures and common stock purchase warrants exercisable at a
price of $5.00 per share. The following executive officers,
directors and affiliates purchased units in the amount set
opposite his name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Amount of
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
Subordinated Debentures
|
|
Warrant Shares
|
|
Daniel H. Abramowitz(1)
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Held by Hillson Partners Limited Partnership, of which
Mr. Abramowitz is a partner. Mr. Abramowitz is a
director of the Company. |
The prices paid for the 12% subordinated debentures and
common stock purchase warrants by our director
Mr. Abramowitz were the same as those paid by unrelated
third parties as part of the overall private placement
transaction.
Fees Associated with our Acquisition of Gulfstream and the
Academy. On March 14, 2006, in connection
with our acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy, we paid an
advisory fee of $450,000 to Taglich Brothers, one of the
underwriters in this offering, and $300,000 to Weatherly Group,
LLC. Douglas E. Hailey, a director, is an affiliate of Weatherly
Group and an employee of Taglich Brothers and Thomas A. McFall,
a senior executive of the Company and the Chairman of our board
of directors, is an affiliate of Weatherly Group. At such time,
the seller paid to David Hackett, a director and our President
and Chief Executive Officer, the sum of $225,000 from the
proceeds of the purchase price paid to the seller.
We believe that the fees we paid in connection with our
acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy were normal and
customary. However, because we did not attempt to negotiate with
any unrelated third party to provide such advisory services, we
can provide no assurances that these fees were at least as
favorable as those we could have negotiated with an unrelated
third party in an arms length transaction.
Management Services Agreement. On
March 14, 2006, we entered into a management services
agreement with Weatherly Group. Under this agreement, these
parties agreed to provide advisory and management services to us
in consideration of an annual management fee of $200,000,
payable monthly, and financial advisory fees based on a formula
if we merge with or acquire another company. The agreement
expires on March 13, 2011. Pursuant to this agreement, we
pay $16,667 per month in management fees.
We believe that the management service fees we have negotiated
are normal and customary. However, because we did not attempt to
negotiate with any unrelated third party to provide such
management services,
84
we can provide no assurances that these fees are at least as
favorable as those we could have negotiated with an unrelated
third party in an arms length transaction.
Property
Lease
We lease the Gulfstream and Academy headquarters from EYW
Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled in part by Thomas L.
Cooper, the former Chief Executive Officer and current Chairman
Emeritus of Gulfstream, and Thomas P. Cooper, an officer of
Gulfstream, for a combined rent of approximately
$33,000 per month. This corresponds to a price per square
foot of approximately $24,29, which was consistent with lease
rates for comparable commercial space at the time this
arrangement was entered into.
Cuba
Operations
GAC, a related company which is owned by Thomas L. Cooper, the
former Chief Executive Officer and current Chairman Emeritus of
Gulfstream, operates charter flights between Miami and Havana.
Pursuant to a services between Gulfstream and GAC dated
August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006,
Gulfstream provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the
Gulfstream name, insurance, and service personnel, including
passenger, ground handling, security, and administrative.
Gulfstream also maintains the financial records for GAC.
Pursuant to the March 14, 2006 amended agreement,
Gulfstream receives 75% of the net income generated by
GACs Cuban charter operation. Prior to March 14,
2006, Gulfstream received all of the net income generated up to
a cumulative total of $1 million, and then 75% thereafter.
Income provided under the service agreement amounted to
$381,872, $432,270 and $888,887 for 2004, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006, GAC owed Gulfstream
$606,438 pursuant to the services agreement.
This profit-sharing arrangement resulted from arms length
negotiations with the principal selling stockholder in
connection with our acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy.
Other
Services
We lease equipment and obtain consulting services from entities
controlled by Thomas L. Cooper and Thomas P. Cooper,
our Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs and Secretary. The
amounts paid for 2004, 2005 and 2006 were approximately $60,000,
$60,000 and $63,000, respectively.
Indemnification
and Employment Agreements
Our bylaws provide that we may indemnify our directors, officers
and employees against claims arising in connection with their
actions in such capacities. We intend to purchase a
directors and officers liability insurance policy
that insures such persons against the costs of defense,
settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances.
We believe that these indemnification and liability provisions
are essential to attracting and retaining qualified persons as
officers and directors. We have also entered into employment
agreements with our named executive officers. See
Management Agreements with Named Executive
Officers.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our
directors and executive officers. Under these agreements, we are
required to indemnify them against all expenses, judgments,
fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably
incurred, in connection with any actual, or any threatened,
proceeding if any of them may be made a party because he or she
is or was one of our directors or officers. We are obligated to
pay these amounts only if the officer or director acted in good
faith and in a manner that he or she reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to our best interests. With respect to any
criminal proceeding, we are obligated to pay these amounts only
if the officer or director had no reasonable cause to believe
that his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification
agreements also set forth procedures that will apply in the
event of a claim for indemnification under such agreements.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that the
liability of our directors for monetary damages will be
eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Each director will
continue to be subject to liability for any breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to us, for acts or omissions not
in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing
violations of law,
85
for unlawful stock purchases or redemptions and for any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit. This provision also does not affect a directors
responsibilities under any other laws, such as the federal
securities laws or state or federal environmental laws.
Stock
Option Grants
We have granted stock options to purchase shares of our common
stock to our executive officers and directors. See
Principal Stockholders and Employee Benefit
Plans Stock Incentive Plan.
Other
Transactions
We reimburse members of the board of directors for travel
related expenditures related to their services to us.
Following the offering, we intend to pay our independent
directors an annual fee of $20,000. The directors will also be
entitled to participate in our Stock Incentive Plan.
DESCRIPTION
OF INDEBTEDNESS
The following information describes our material outstanding
indebtedness. This description is only a summary. You should
also refer to the relevant agreements which have been filed with
the SEC as exhibits to our registration statement, of which this
prospectus forms a part.
Credit
Facility
On August 15, 2006, Gulfstream entered into a loan
agreement with Wachovia Bank for a $750,000 credit facility to
finance short term and seasonal working capital needs. Advances
under the line bear interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus
2.75%. The credit facility is payable in monthly payments of
interest only and is due and payable in full on demand. We
currently have $750,000 outstanding under this credit facility.
Loan
Agreements
On December 29, 2005, Gulfstream entered into a loan
agreement with Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company to
finance our acquisition of seven EMB-120 aircraft. The loan
bears interest at 6.95% per annum, and is payable in monthly
principal and interest payments of $145,488, with a final
balloon payment of the full remaining unpaid balance on
December 29, 2010.
On March 22, 2007, Gulfstream entered into a loan agreement
with Wachovia Bank in the principal amount of $1,150,000 to
finance our acquisition of one EMB-120 aircraft. The loan is
payable in 59 monthly principal installments of $7,858.33
and a final balloon payment of $686,358 and bears interest
monthly, payable on the unpaid principal balance at the rate of
LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Subordinated
Debentures
On March 14, 2006, we sold units consisting of $3,320,000
principal amount of subordinated debentures and common stock
warrants to help finance our acquisition of Gulfstream and the
Academy. The subordinated debentures were sold in units of
$1,000 bearing interest at 12% per year, payable quarterly, with
each note including a warrant to purchase fourteen shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The
debentures mature on March 14, 2009. We have the right to
prepay, without premium or penalty, any unpaid principal on the
subordinated debentures. The subordinated debentures are
expressly subordinated to the prior payment in full of amounts
owed under all our other indebtedness. The subordinated
debentures contain customary covenants and events of default.
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following information describes our common stock, as well as
options and warrants to purchase our common stock, and
provisions of our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws.
This description is only a summary. You should also refer to our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws which have been filed
with the SEC as exhibits to our registration statement, of which
this prospectus forms a part.
We are authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
86
Common
Stock
As of the date of this prospectus, there were
2,039,460 shares of common stock outstanding that were held
of record by approximately 145 stockholders. There will be
2,839,460 shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option and no
exercise of outstanding options or warrants, after giving effect
to the sale of common stock offered in this offering.
The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the
stockholders. Our stockholders do not have cumulative voting
rights in the election of directors. Accordingly, holders of a
majority of the shares voting are able to elect all of the
directors. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive
ratably only those dividends as may be declared by the board of
directors out of funds legally available therefor, as well as
any distributions to the stockholders. See Dividend
Policy. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, holders of common stock are entitled to share
ratably in all of our assets remaining after we pay our
liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or other
subscription or conversion rights. There are no redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.
Treasury
Stock
We have no shares of treasury stock.
Warrants
As of the date of this prospectus, there were warrants
outstanding to purchase 46,480 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share which are
exercisable at any time on or prior to March 14, 2011. The
exercise price and the number of shares that may be purchased
upon exercise of the warrants are subject to adjustment in the
event of stock dividends and stock splits or combinations. In
the event of any reorganization, reclassification,
consolidation, merger or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets, the holders of the warrants are entitled to receive the
consideration they would have received if they would have
exercised the warrants prior to such event.
Continental
Warrant
Continental holds a warrant to purchase 10% of Gulfstream
International Airlines, Inc.s common stock. The warrants
are exercisable until December 31, 2015 at a price per
share of $0.001, subject to adjustments for reclassification,
consolidation, merger, dividends and distributions. Under the
warrant, if Gulfstream pays a cash dividend, Continental is
entitled to receive cash equal to the cash dividend Continental
would have been entitled to receive if Continental had exercised
its warrant immediately prior to such dividend. Gulfstream has
the right to call the warrant and has a right of first offer
upon the sale of the warrant or shares issued upon exercise of
the warrant. The warrant does not include a right to convert
into the stock of the Company.
We have had discussions with Continental regarding a potential
repurchase or conversion of its warrant into common stock of
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. or a warrant to purchase
common stock of Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
Any proposed conversion would take into account the market price
of Gulfstream International Group, Inc. common stock as it
related to a negotiated value of Gulfstreams common stock.
There can be no assurance that we will reach agreement with
Continental to convert its warrants.
Underwriters
Warrants
We have agreed to issue warrants to the managing underwriter to
purchase from us up to 64,000 shares of our common stock.
These warrants are exercisable during the four-year period
commencing one year from this offering at a price per share
equal to 120% of the public offering price per share in this
offering and will allow for cashless exercise. The warrants will
provide for registration rights, including unlimited piggyback
registration rights, and customary anti-dilution provisions for
stock dividends and splits and recapitalizations consistent with
the NASD Rules of Fair Practice. The exercise price was
negotiated between us and the underwriters as part of the
underwriters compensation in this offering.
87
Options
Pursuant to our Stock Incentive Plan, options to purchase a
total of 350,000 shares of our common stock are available
for issuance, of which 210,324 have been granted. Any shares
issued upon exercise of these options will be immediately
available for sale in the public market upon our filing, after
the offering, of a registration statement relating to the
options, subject to the terms of
lock-up
agreements entered into between certain of our option holders
and the underwriters.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions of Delaware Law and Charter Provisions
Interested Stockholder Transactions. We are
subject to Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware, which prohibits a Delaware corporation
from engaging in any business combination with any
interested stockholder for a period of three years
after the date that such stockholder became an interested
stockholder, with the following exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
before such date, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested holder;
|
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction began,
excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares
outstanding those shares owned by persons who are directors and
also officers and by employee stock plans in which employee
participants do not have the right to determine confidentially
whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a
tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
on or after such date, the business combination is approved by
the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special
meeting of the stockholders, and not by written consent, by the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Section 203 defines business combination to
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more
of the assets of the corporation involving the interested
stockholder;
|
|
|
|
subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in
the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the
corporation to the interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of
increasing the proportionate share of the stock or any class or
series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested
stockholder; or
|
|
|
|
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any
loss, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits
by or through the corporation.
|
In general, Section 203 defines interested
stockholder as an entity or person beneficially owning 15%
or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation or
any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or
controlled by such entity or person.
In addition, some provisions of our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may
delay or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a
stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those
attempts that might result in a premium over the market price
for the shares held by stockholders.
Cumulative Voting. Our certificate of
incorporation does not permit stockholders cumulative voting in
the election of directors.
Special Meeting of Stockholders. Our bylaws
provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called
only by the chairman of our board of directors, our president,
the chief executive officer, or such other persons as our board
of directors may designate or by stockholders representing at
least 10% of our outstanding voting stock.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. Our authorized
but unissued shares of common stock will be available for future
issuance without stockholder approval. These additional shares
may be utilized for a variety of
88
corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise
additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common
stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to
obtain control of Gulfstream by means of a proxy contest, tender
offer, merger or otherwise.
Amendments. Our bylaws provide that they may
be altered or repealed by our board of directors. However, our
bylaws also provide that our stockholders may make additional
bylaws and may alter or repeal any bylaw, whether or not adopted
by our stockholders. The Delaware General Corporation Law
provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares entitled to vote on any matter is required to amend a
corporations certificate of incorporation or bylaws,
unless either a corporations certificate of incorporation
or bylaws require a greater percentage.
American
Stock Exchange Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbol GIA.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. Its address is
59 Maiden Lane, New York, New York 10038, and its telephone
number is
1-800-937-5449.
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock, and there can be no assurance that a significant
public market for the common stock will develop or be sustained
after this offering. Future sales of substantial amounts of our
common stock, including shares issued upon exercise of
outstanding options and warrants, in the public market following
this offering could adversely affect market prices prevailing
from time to time and could impair our ability to raise capital
through the sale of our equity securities.
Upon completion of this offering and based on shares outstanding
as of December 7, 2007, we will have an aggregate of
2,839,460 shares of common stock outstanding. Of these
shares, the 800,000 shares sold in this offering, plus any
shares issued upon exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional shares from us, will be freely tradable
without restriction under the Securities Act, unless purchased
by us or our affiliates as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Shares of the Company
not registered by this registration statement and shares of the
Company acquired by our affiliates after this
offering constitute restricted securities within the
meaning of Rule 144 and may not be offered or sold in the
open market after the offering, except subject to the applicable
requirements of Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the
Securities Act, which are described below, or another available
exemption from registration under the Securities Act.
The remaining 2,039,460 shares sold by us in reliance on
exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act are restricted securities within the meaning of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act and become eligible for
sale in the public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus,
1,205,460 shares will become eligible for sale subject to
the provisions of Rules 144 and 701; and
|
|
|
|
beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus,
834,000 additional shares will become eligible for sale, subject
to the provisions of Rule 144, Rule 144(k) or
Rule 701, upon the expiration of agreements not to sell
such shares entered into between the underwriters and such
stockholders.
|
Our directors, officers and some of our stockholders who
beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock have entered
into lock-up
agreements with the underwriters of this offering generally
providing that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell or
grant any option to purchase or otherwise dispose of our shares
of common stock or any securities exercisable for or convertible
into our common stock owned by them prior to this offering for a
period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus
without the prior written consent of Taglich Brothers. As a
result of these contractual restrictions, notwithstanding
possible earlier eligibility for sale under the provisions of
Rules 144, 144(k) and 701, shares subject to
lock-up
agreements may not be sold until such agreements expire or are
waived by Taglich Brothers. Based on shares outstanding as of
December 7,
89
2007, taking into account the
lock-up
agreements, and assuming Taglich Brothers does not release
stockholders from these agreements prior to the expiration of
the 180-day
lock-up
period, the following shares will be eligible for sale in the
public market at the following times:
|
|
|
|
|
beginning on the date of this prospectus, the
800,000 shares sold in this offering will be immediately
available for sale in the public market;
|
|
|
|
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus,
1,205,460 additional shares will become eligible for sale under
Rule 144 or 701, subject to volume restrictions as described
below;
|
|
|
|
beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus,
834,000 additional shares will become eligible for sale under
Rule 144 or 701, subject to volume restrictions as
described below; and
|
|
|
|
the remainder of the restricted securities will be eligible for
sale from time to time thereafter, subject in some cases to
compliance with Rule 144.
|
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one
year, including the holding period of any prior owner except an
affiliate, would be entitled to sell within any three-month
period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding,
which will equal approximately 32,395 shares immediately
after this offering; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice of the
sale is filed.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner of
sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability
of current public information about us. Under Rule 144(k),
a person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of us at
any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has
beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least
two years, including the holding period of any prior owner
except an affiliate, is entitled to sell such shares without
complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144. Therefore,
unless otherwise restricted pursuant to the
lock-up
agreements or otherwise, those shares may be sold immediately
upon the completion of this offering.
Any of our employees, officers, directors or consultants who
purchased his or her shares before the date of completion of
this offering or who holds vested options as of that date
pursuant to a written compensatory plan or contract is entitled
to rely on the resale provisions of Rule 701. Rule 701
permits non-affiliates to sell their Rule 701 shares
without complying with the public-information, holding-period,
volume-limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144 and
permits affiliates to sell their Rule 701 shares
without having to comply with Rule 144s
holding-period restrictions, in each case commencing
90 days after the date of completion of this offering,
subject, however, to the
lock-up
agreements. See Underwriting for a description of
the lock-up
agreements.
No precise prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that
market sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale
will have on the market price of our common stock following this
offering. We are unable to estimate the number of our shares
that may be sold in the public market pursuant to Rule 144
or Rule 701 because this will depend on the market price of
our common stock, the personal circumstances of the sellers and
other factors. See Risk Factors Risks Related
To Our Common Stock Sales of a substantial number of
shares of our common stock in the public market after this
offering, or the perception that they may occur, may depress the
market price of our common stock.
Following the effectiveness of this offering, we intend to file
a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act to register shares of common stock
subject to outstanding options or reserved for issuance under
our Stock Incentive Plan thus permitting the resale of such
shares by non-affiliates in the public market without
restriction under the Securities Act, subject to any applicable
lock-up
agreements. Such registration statements will become effective
immediately upon filing.
90
UNITED
STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO
NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
This is a summary of U.S. federal income tax consequences
of the ownership and disposition of our common stock applicable
to
non-U.S. holders,
as defined below. This summary is based on the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 as amended, or the Code, Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder, administrative pronouncements and
judicial decisions, changes to any of which subsequent to the
date of the registration statement may affect the tax
consequences described herein. We undertake no obligation to
update this tax summary in the future. This summary applies only
to
non-U.S. holders
that will hold our common stock as capital assets (generally, an
asset held for investment purposes). This summary does not
address the tax consequences arising under the laws of any
foreign, state or local jurisdiction. In addition, this summary
does not address tax consequences applicable to an
investors particular circumstances or to investors that
may be subject to special tax rules including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
Banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
Persons subject to alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
Dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
Traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method
of accounting for their securities holdings;
|
|
|
|
Partnerships or other pass-through entities;
|
|
|
|
Controlled foreign corporations, passive
foreign corporations, foreign personal holding
companies and corporations that accumulate earnings to
avoid U.S. federal income tax;
|
|
|
|
U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the
United States;
|
|
|
|
Persons who hold our common stock as a position in a hedging
transaction, straddle, conversion
transaction or other risk reduction transaction; or
|
|
|
|
Persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive
sale provisions of the Code.
|
In addition, if a partnership holds our common stock, the tax
treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of
the partner and upon the activities of the partnership.
Accordingly, partnerships that hold our common stock and
partners in such partnerships should consult their tax advisors.
This discussion is for general information only and is not
tax advice. You are urged to consult your tax advisor with
respect to the application of the U.S. federal income tax
laws to your particular situation, as well as any tax
consequences of the ownership and disposition of our common
stock arising under the U.S. federal estate or gift tax
rules or under the laws of any foreign, state or local taxing
jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.
Non-U.S.
Holder Defined
For purposes of this summary, you are a
non-U.S. holder,
if you are a holder that, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, is other than:
|
|
|
|
|
An individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
A corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or of any state therein
or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
An estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
A trust, if a court within the U.S. is able to exercise
primary jurisdiction over its administration and one or more
U.S. persons have authority to control all of its
substantial decisions, or if the trust has a valid election in
effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person.
|
91
Taxation
of Dividends and Dispositions
Dividends on Common Stock. In general, if
distributions are made on shares of our common stock, such
distributions will be treated as dividends for U.S. tax
purposes to the extent paid from our current and accumulated
earnings and profits as determined under the Code. Any portion
of a distribution that exceeds our current and accumulated
earnings and profits will constitute a return of capital and
will first reduce your basis in our common stock, but not below
zero. To the extent such portion exceeds your basis, the excess
will be treated as gain from the disposition of our common
stock, the tax treatment of which is discussed below under
Dispositions of Common Stock.
Any dividend paid to you generally will be subject to the
U.S. withholding tax at either a rate of 30% of the gross
amount of the dividend or such lower rate as may be specified by
an applicable treaty. In order to receive a reduced treaty rate,
you must provide us with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
or other appropriate version of IRS
Form W-8
certifying qualification for the reduced rate. Dividends
received by you that are effectively connected with your conduct
of a U.S. trade or business (and, where a tax treaty
applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment
maintained by you) are exempt from such withholding tax. In
order to obtain this exemption, you must provide us with IRS
Form W-8ECI
properly certifying such exemption. Such effectively connected
dividends, although not subject to withholding tax, are taxed at
the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. persons, net of
any allowable deductions and credits. In addition, if you are a
corporate
non-U.S. holder,
dividends you receive that are effectively connected with your
conduct of a U.S. trade or business may also be subject to
a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may
be specified by an applicable treaty.
Dispositions of Common Stock. You generally
will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect
to gain recognized upon the disposition of our common stock
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
you are an individual who is present in the United States for a
period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the
taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met;
|
|
|
|
such gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a
U.S. trade or business (and, where a tax treaty applies, is
attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained
by you); or
|
|
|
|
our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest
by reason of our status as a United States real property
holding corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (USRPHC) at any time within the shorter of
the five-year period preceding the disposition or your holding
period for our common stock.
|
We believe that we are not currently and will not become a
USRPHC. However, because the determination of whether we are a
USRPHC depends on the fair market value of our U.S. real
property relative to the fair market value of our other business
assets, there can be no assurance that we will not become a
USRPHC in the future. Even if we become a USRPHC, however, as
long as our common stock is regularly traded on an established
securities market, such common stock will be treated as
U.S. real property interests only if you actually or
constructively hold more than 5% of our common stock.
If you are an individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet above, you will be required to pay
a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which tax may
be offset by U.S. source capital losses. If you are a
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet above, you will be required to
pay tax on the net gain derived from the sale under regular
graduated U.S. federal income tax rates, and corporate
non-U.S. holders
described in the second bullet above may be subject to branch
profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty. You should consult any
applicable income tax treaties that may provide for different
results.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Information Reporting. Generally, we must
report annually to the IRS and to you the amount of dividends
paid to you and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect
to those payments. These information reporting requirements
apply even if withholding is not required. Pursuant to tax
treaties or other
92
agreements, the IRS may make such information available to tax
authorities in your country of residence. The payment of
proceeds from the sale of common stock by a broker to a
non-U.S. holder
is generally not subject to information reporting if:
|
|
|
|
|
you certify your
non-U.S. status
under penalties of perjury by providing a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN,
or otherwise establishes an exemption; or
|
|
|
|
the sale of the common stock is effected outside the
U.S. by a foreign office of a broker, unless the broker is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. person;
|
|
|
|
a foreign person that derives 50% or more of its gross income
for certain periods from activities that are effectively
connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.;
|
|
|
|
a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes; or
|
|
|
|
a foreign partnership more than 50% of the capital or profits
interest of which is owned by one or more U.S. persons or
which engages in a U.S. trade or business.
|
Backup Withholding. Backup withholding
(currently at a rate of 28%) is only required on payments that
are subject to the information reporting requirements, discussed
above, and if other requirements are satisfied. Even if the
payment of proceeds from the sale of our common stock is subject
to the information reporting requirements, the payment of sale
proceeds from a sale outside the U.S. will not be subject
to backup withholding unless either we or our paying agent has
actual knowledge, or reason to know, that you are a
U.S. person. Backup withholding does not apply when any
other provision of the Code requires withholding. For example,
if dividends are subject to the withholding tax described above
under Dividends on Common Stock, backup withholding
will not also be imposed. Thus, backup withholding may be
required on payments subject to information reporting, but not
otherwise subject to withholding.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amount withheld
under these rules will be allowed as a credit against your
U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle you to a
refund, provided that the required information is furnished
timely to the IRS.
93
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated December 13, 2007, we have
agreed to sell to the underwriters named below, for whom Taglich
Brothers, Inc. is acting as representative, shares of our common
stock offered through this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Taglich Brothers, Inc.
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maxim Group LLC
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering terminated.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have granted to Taglich Brothers a
30-day
option to purchase up to 120,000 additional shares from us
at the initial public offering price less the underwriting
discounts and commissions. The option may be exercised only to
cover any over-allotments of common stock.
Underwriting
Discounts and Offering Expenses
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $0.32 per share. After the initial public
offering, the underwriters may change the public offering price
and concession and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With Full
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
allotment
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
6,400,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,360,000
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
512,000
|
|
|
$
|
588,800
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses to us
|
|
$
|
7.76
|
|
|
$
|
5,888,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,771,200
|
|
The expenses of this offering, not including the underwriting
discount, are estimated at $1,500,000 and are payable by us.
This includes accountable expenses payable to the underwriters
in the estimated amount of $25,000.
We have agreed to issue warrants to the managing underwriter,
Taglich Brothers, Inc., to purchase from us up to
64,000 shares of our common stock. These warrants are
exercisable during the four-year period commencing one year from
this offering at a price per share equal to 120% of the public
offering price per share in this offering and will allow for
cashless exercise. The warrants will provide for registration
rights, including a one-time demand registration right and
unlimited piggyback registration rights, and customary
anti-dilution provisions for stock dividends and splits and
recapitalizations consistent with the NASD Rules of Fair
Practice. The exercise price was negotiated between us and the
underwriters as part of the underwriters compensation in
this offering. These warrants are subject to a
lock-up
agreement for a period of 180 days after the date of this
prospectus pursuant to NASD rule 2710(g)(1).
Determination
of Offering Price
This offering is being conducted in accordance with applicable
provisions of Rule 2720 of the Conduct Rules of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. because
affiliates of Taglich Brothers, one of the
94
underwriters, beneficially own 10% or more of our common stock.
In addition, Douglas E. Hailey, a member of our board of
directors, is an affiliate of Taglich Brothers, Inc.
Rule 2720 requires that the public offering price of the
shares of common stock not be higher than that recommended by a
qualified independent underwriter meeting certain
standards. Accordingly, SMH Capital Inc. is assuming the
responsibilities of acting as the qualified independent
underwriter in pricing this offering and conducting due
diligence. The public offering price of the shares of common
stock is no higher than the price recommended by SMH Capital
Inc. We have agreed to indemnify SMH Capital Inc. for any
liability it incurs as a result of its service as the qualified
independent underwriter in connection with the offering. We have
also agreed to pay SMH Capital Inc. a fee of $150,000 and
reimburse them for any fees and expenses incurred in this
capacity, which fees and expenses will be less than $10,000.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price for our common
stock will be determined through negotiations between us and the
underwriters. A pricing committee of our board of directors will
approve the initial public offering price following such
negotiations. Principal factors we expect to be considered in
these negotiations include:
|
|
|
|
|
the information presented in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
the history of and the prospects for our industry;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our management;
|
|
|
|
our past and present operations;
|
|
|
|
our historical results of operations;
|
|
|
|
our prospects for future operational results;
|
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
this offering; and
|
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and demand for, publicly traded
common stock of comparable companies.
|
The estimated initial public offering price range set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus is subject to change as a
result of market conditions and other factors. We cannot be sure
that the initial public offering price will correspond to the
price at which the common stock will trade in the public market
following this offering or that an active trading market for the
common stock will develop and continue after this offering.
Listing
Our common stock has been approved for listing on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbol GIA.
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be
required to make in that respect.
Lock-up
Agreements
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of
our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable
or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge,
disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of
Taglich Brothers, Inc., for a period of 180 days after the
date of this prospectus, except issuances pursuant to the
exercise of employee stock options outstanding on the date of
this prospectus.
All of our officers and directors and our stockholders who
beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock have agreed
that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or
otherwise dispose of, directly or
95
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge
or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or
other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written
consent of Taglich Brothers, Inc. for a period of 180 days
after the date of this prospectus. Pursuant to the terms of the
lock-up
agreement, Taglich Brothers, Inc. may waive the
lock-up
restrictions, but has informed us that it intends to do so only
in extraordinary circumstances such as death, divorce or
financial necessity.
Stabilization,
Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The underwriters may engage in over-allotment transactions,
stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions, and
penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or
maintaining the price of the common stock, in accordance with
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a short position. The short position may
be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In
a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by
the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares that
they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short
position, the number of shares involved is greater than the
number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters
may close out any covered short position by either exercising
its over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result,
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the American Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
our common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the
underwriters makes any representation that the underwriter will
engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
96
Other
Taglich Brothers, Inc. and its affiliates have from time to time
performed, and may in the future perform, various financial
advisory, commercial banking, and investment banking services
for us and our affiliates in the ordinary course of business,
for which they received, or will receive, customary fees.
The validity of the common stock offered hereby will be passed
upon for us by Bryan Cave LLP. Bryan Cave LLP has in the past
performed legal services for Taglich Brothers, Inc. and may do
so again in the future. Baker & McKenzie LLP will pass
on certain matters for the underwriters.
Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger &
Guttilla, P.C., independent registered public accounting
firm, have audited our financial statements as of
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, as set forth in their
reports. We have included our financial statements in the
prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in
reliance on Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger &
Guttilla, P.C.s report, given on their authority as
experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
(including exhibits, schedules and amendments) under the
Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock to be
sold in this offering. This prospectus does not contain all the
information set forth in the registration statement. For further
information with respect to us and the shares of common stock to
be sold in this offering, reference is made to the registration
statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the
contents of any contract, agreement or other document referred
to are not necessarily complete. Whenever a reference is made in
this prospectus to any contract or other document of ours, the
reference may not be complete, and you should refer to the
exhibits that are a part of the registration statement for a
copy of the contract or document.
You may read and copy all or any portion of the registration
statement or any other information that we file at the
SECs public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these
documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the
SEC. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
rooms. Our SEC filings, including the registration statement,
are also available to you on the SECs web site
(http://www.sec.gov).
As a result of this offering, we will become subject to the
information and reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and, in accordance with those
requirements, will file periodic reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. This prospectus includes
statistical data that were obtained or derived from independent
industry publications, government publications, reports by
market research firms or other published independent sources.
Some data are also based on our good faith estimates, which are
derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as the
independent sources referred to above.
97
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The unaudited pro forma financial statement should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes, and other financial information appearing
elsewhere in this Prospectus, including Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Selected Financial Data.
The unaudited pro forma statements of income and the related
earnings per share calculations give effect to the following
transactions:
1. The acquisition of Gulfstream and the Academy, which was
closed on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006.
2. The sale of 1,640,000 shares of common stock issued
as part of the financing for the acquisition, which occurred on
March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on January 1, 2006.
3. The Company plans on redeeming the $3.32 million
subordinated debentures issued as part of the financing of the
acquisition with proceeds from the offering. The issuance of
605,287 shares of common stock needed to redeem the
subordinated debentures was given effect as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006. The number of shares to be issued gives
effect to the underwriting discount and estimated other offering
costs (approximately $2.52 per share).
The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is for
informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or
be indicative of the consolidated results of operations or
financial position that would have been reported had the
acquisitions been completed as of the dates presented, and
should not be taken as representative of our future consolidated
results of operations or financial position.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate
purchase price based on the estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition,
March 14, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
7,702,409
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
15,089,309
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliation Agreement
|
|
|
1,718,598
|
|
Operating Certificate
|
|
|
2,383,162
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
680,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,855,871
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,114,605
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,383,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
35,927,472
|
|
Less total liabilities
|
|
|
25,197,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
10,729,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The property and equipment was recorded at fair value resulting
in a $4.7 million increase in the book value of seven owned
Embraer EMB120 Brasilia aircraft, based upon an independent
appraisal. The intangible assets (Note (6) Intangible
Assets) relate to GIAs Affiliation Agreement with
Continental, its FAA FAR 121 Operating Certificate, and the
Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. trade name, and the fair value
of each asset was determined based upon an independent appraisal.
P-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPO and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
55,871
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
76,135
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
59,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
7,965
|
|
|
|
24,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,070
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
11,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,689
|
|
Passenger and traffic service
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
12,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
Promotion and sales
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
42
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
169
|
(2)(3)
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
57,019
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
76,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
Non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
|
|
266
|
(4)
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
21
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604,666
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the effect of the management services fee of $200,000
payable annually to Weatherly Group LLC for the period from
January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents depreciation expense of $111,000 applicable to the
period from January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006 related
to the $4.665 million increase in fair value associated
with aircraft. The depreciation expense is based on a 20%
residual value and a seven-year (7) useful life. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents amortization expense of $58,000 applicable to the
period from January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006 related
to the $1.719 million increase in fair value associated
with the Affiliation Agreement. The amortization expense is
based on a useful life of seventy-four (74) months. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the reversal of interest expense of $216,000 on the
12% subordinated debentures of $3.32 million, which
were redeemed for pro forma purposes on January 1, 2006,
amortization of deferred debt costs of $41,000 and amortization
of debt discount of $9,000 for the period March 15, 2006
through September 30, 2006. Deferred debt costs and debt
discount totaling $367,000 were being amortized over the
three-year term of the debt on the interest method. |
P-2
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments at an
effective tax rate of 38%. |
|
(6) |
|
Earnings per share were calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
Effect of GIA warrants
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
943
|
|
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
1,999,379
|
(a)
|
Shares issued for the redemption of subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
2,604,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
(a) Pro forma weighted average of shares outstanding
include the effect of the sale of 1,640,000 shares of
common stock issued as part of the financing for the
acquisition, which occurred on March 14, 2006, as if it
occurred on January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
For The Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPO and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,264
|
|
|
$
|
78,290
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,554
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
21,367
|
|
|
|
83,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
10,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
Aircraft fuel
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
19,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,559
|
|
Aircraft rent
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,191
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,237
|
|
Passenger and traffic service
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
17,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,171
|
|
Promotion and sales
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
6,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
42
|
(1)
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
169
|
(2)(3)
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
19,681
|
|
|
|
82,589
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
102,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
Non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(954
|
)
|
|
|
392
|
(4)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)(5)
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
For The Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPO and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share(6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,680,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611,303
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the effect of the management services fee of $200,000
payable annually to Weatherly Group LLC for the period from
January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents depreciation expense of $111,000 applicable to the
period from January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006 related
to the $4.665 million increase in fair value associated
with aircraft. The depreciation expense is based on a 20%
residual value and a seven-year (7) useful life. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents amortization expense of $58,000 applicable to the
period from January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006 related
to the $1.719 million increase in fair value associated
with the Affiliation Agreement. The amortization expense is
based on a useful life of seventy-four (74) months. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the reversal of interest expense of $315,000 on the
12% subordinated debentures of $3.32 million, which
were redeemed for pro forma purposes on January 1, 2006,
amortization of deferred debt costs of $62,000 and amortization
of debt discount of $15,000 for the period March 15, 2006
through December 31, 2006. Deferred debt costs and debt
discount totaling $367,000 were being amortized over the
three-year term of the debt on the interest method. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments at an
effective tax rate of 38%. |
|
(6) |
|
Earnings per share were calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
Effect of GIA warrants
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,680,840
|
|
|
|
2,006,016
|
(a)
|
Shares issued for the redemption of subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
1,680,480
|
|
|
|
2,611,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pro forma weighted average of shares outstanding include the
effect of the sale of 1,640,000 shares of common stock
issued as part of the financing for the acquisition, which
occurred on March 14, 2006, as if it occurred on
January 1, 2006. |
P-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Income for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPO and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
81,246
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,246
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
86,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
34,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,788
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
Passenger and traffic service
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,830
|
|
Promotion and sales
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,987
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
83,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
Non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
(1)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Other Income (expense), net
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
146
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
Shares used in calculating earnings per common share(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639,839
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents interest expense of $299,000 on the
12% subordinated debentures of $3.32 million,
amortization of deferred debt costs of $71,000 and amortization
of debt discount of $13,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Deferred debt costs and debt discount
totaling $367,000 are being amortized over the three year term
of the debt on the interest method. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the tax effect of the pro forma adjustments at an
effective tax rate of 38%. |
|
(3) |
|
Earnings per common share were calculated as follows: |
P-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
Effect of GIA warrants
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
1,473
|
|
|
$
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
Shares issued for redemption of subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
|
|
2,639,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
P-6
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
F-1
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER
31, 2006 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,143,015
|
|
|
$
|
3,268,337
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
3,384,445
|
|
|
|
1,665,428
|
|
Due from related entity
|
|
|
606,438
|
|
|
|
734,017
|
|
Expendable parts, net of reserve for obsolescence
|
|
|
1,548,459
|
|
|
|
2,169,200
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
516,929
|
|
|
|
251,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
9,199,286
|
|
|
|
8,088,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment
|
|
|
19,664,682
|
|
|
|
24,151,920
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
4,203,282
|
|
|
|
4,661,655
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(9,326,367
|
)
|
|
|
(10,796,690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
14,541,597
|
|
|
|
18,016,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
4,563,773
|
|
|
|
4,352,656
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,855,871
|
|
|
|
5,857,118
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,023,304
|
|
|
|
347,310
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,796,410
|
|
|
|
2,249,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
36,980,241
|
|
|
$
|
38,911,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
10,976,933
|
|
|
$
|
11,591,291
|
|
Long-term debt current portion
|
|
|
1,273,416
|
|
|
|
2,152,428
|
|
Engine return liability current portion
|
|
|
3,060,417
|
|
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
1,350,420
|
|
|
|
1,356,824
|
|
Deferred tuition revenue
|
|
|
280,660
|
|
|
|
410,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
16,941,846
|
|
|
|
18,310,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
6,250,391
|
|
|
|
6,280,882
|
|
Subordinated debentures, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
3,272,815
|
|
|
|
3,287,303
|
|
Engine return liability, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,489,410
|
|
|
|
1,156,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
28,954,462
|
|
|
|
29,035,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
20,294
|
|
|
|
20,394
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,754,600
|
|
|
|
7,930,830
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
184,463
|
|
|
|
1,864,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
8,020,439
|
|
|
|
9,876,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
36,980,241
|
|
|
$
|
38,911,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
to March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
20,263,834
|
|
|
$
|
55,871,432
|
|
|
$
|
81,246,073
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
1,103,000
|
|
|
|
3,328,799
|
|
|
|
5,428,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
21,366,834
|
|
|
|
59,200,231
|
|
|
|
86,675,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
7,964,882
|
|
|
|
24,105,290
|
|
|
|
34,787,989
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
3,842,500
|
|
|
|
11,845,691
|
|
|
|
17,856,572
|
|
Passenger and traffic service
|
|
|
4,797,441
|
|
|
|
12,102,367
|
|
|
|
17,829,813
|
|
Promotion and sales
|
|
|
1,560,947
|
|
|
|
4,602,759
|
|
|
|
5,977,353
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,010,126
|
|
|
|
2,482,635
|
|
|
|
3,987,794
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
504,926
|
|
|
|
1,880,593
|
|
|
|
2,801,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
19,680,822
|
|
|
|
57,019,335
|
|
|
|
83,241,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,686,012
|
|
|
|
2,180,896
|
|
|
|
3,433,766
|
|
Non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(157,603
|
)
|
|
|
(713,082
|
)
|
|
|
(883,379
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(4,780
|
)
|
|
|
185,150
|
|
|
|
155,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority
interest
|
|
|
1,523,629
|
|
|
|
1,652,964
|
|
|
|
2,705,564
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
523,359
|
|
|
|
577,237
|
|
|
|
1,025,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
|
1,075,727
|
|
|
|
1,679,934
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,653
|
|
|
$
|
1,679,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PREDECESSOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005 (Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,821
|
|
|
$
|
6,658,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,829,550
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,155,945
|
)
|
Net Income, January 1 to March 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 14, 2006 (Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,821
|
|
|
$
|
6,658,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,882,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,208,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUCCESSOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
66,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock to private investors
|
|
|
1,662,000
|
|
|
|
16,620
|
|
|
|
7,523,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,540,080
|
|
Valuation of warrants issued with subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,395
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,012,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,120
|
|
|
$
|
7,654,355
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
$
|
61,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,613
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,800,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 (Restated)
|
|
|
2,029,460
|
|
|
$
|
20,294
|
|
|
$
|
7,754,600
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
$
|
61,082
|
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,020,439
|
|
Issuance of common stock to private investors
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
49,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,330
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,039,460
|
|
|
$
|
20,394
|
|
|
$
|
7,930,830
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
$
|
61,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,397
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,876,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
to March 14,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,679,934
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
504,926
|
|
|
|
2,064,472
|
|
|
|
2,996,390
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
494,879
|
|
|
|
(46,257
|
)
|
|
|
675,994
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,395
|
|
|
|
126,330
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
|
|
|
(5,340
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables
|
|
|
(1,191,416
|
)
|
|
|
2,301,462
|
|
|
|
1,719,017
|
|
Decrease (increase) in expendable parts
|
|
|
124,399
|
|
|
|
(124,517
|
)
|
|
|
(620,741
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expense
|
|
|
32,026
|
|
|
|
(13,045
|
)
|
|
|
265,135
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from affiliates
|
|
|
(27,531
|
)
|
|
|
(242,548
|
)
|
|
|
(209,256
|
)
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(17,654
|
)
|
|
|
(70,777
|
)
|
|
|
(593,132
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,856,290
|
)
|
|
|
1,428,981
|
|
|
|
614,358
|
|
Increase in deferred revenue and refundable deposits
|
|
|
58,664
|
|
|
|
(259,810
|
)
|
|
|
136,037
|
|
Increase (decrease) in engine return liability
|
|
|
430,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(447,042
|
)
|
|
|
6,178,083
|
|
|
|
5,190,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(970,872
|
)
|
|
|
(1,060,042
|
)
|
|
|
(4,873,910
|
)
|
Cash acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,729,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(970,872
|
)
|
|
|
(9,872,600
|
)
|
|
|
(4,873,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
3,320,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(206,553
|
)
|
|
|
(1,631,600
|
)
|
|
|
(990,497
|
)
|
Payment of loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,540,080
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Proceeds from collections of stock subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of minority stockholders of a subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(250,816
|
)
|
|
|
8,983,292
|
|
|
|
(191,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,668,730
|
)
|
|
|
5,288,775
|
|
|
|
125,322
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
3,585,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,917,265
|
|
|
$
|
5,288,775
|
|
|
$
|
3,268,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 and 2007
(Unaudited)
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
Nine
|
|
Nine
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
to March 14,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
150,036
|
|
|
$
|
397,361
|
|
|
$
|
688,401
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
During the period January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006,
GIA acquired vehicles by the issuance of notes payable totalling
$44,082.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the
Company issued warrants with its subordinated debentures valued
at $61,082.
On March 22, 2007, the Company issued a promissory note for
$1,150,000 for the acquisition of an EMB-120 aircraft.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2007
|
|
(1)
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (GIG) was
incorporated in Delaware in December 2005 as Gulfstream
Acquisition Group, Inc., and changed its name to Gulfstream
International Group, Inc. on June 13, 2007. GIG was formed
for the purpose of acquiring Gulfstream International Airlines,
Inc. (GIA or Airline), a wholly-owned
subsidiary G-Air Holdings Corp., Inc.
(G-Air),
and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. (GTA or
Academy), collectively referred to as the
Company or Successor. On March 14,
2006, GIG closed the sale of its equity and debt securities and
immediately thereafter acquired 89.2% of the stock of
G-Air and
100% of the stock of GTA. As of June 30, 2007, GIG had
acquired 100% of
G-Air. The
Successor period includes the accounts of GIG and the
consolidated accounts of
G-Air and
GTA subsequent to the acquisition on March 14, 2006.
Prior to the acquisition, the consolidated financial statements
include the consolidated accounts of
G-Air and
GIA and the combined accounts of GTA. These consolidated
financial statements are labeled as Predecessor and
cover the period from January 1, 2006 to March 14,
2006 (Interim 2006).
The merger of
G-Air
Holdings Corp., a Florida corporation, and GIA Holdings Corp,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, was completed as of March 26,
2007. The surviving entity is GIA Holdings Corp., Inc.
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in the combined consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(2)
|
Restatement
of Consolidated Financial Statements
|
The Company restated its consolidated financial statements for
the following matters:
A. Subsequent to the original issuance of the
Companys consolidated financial statements on July 5,
2007, the Predecessor determined that it should accrue an
additional $800,000 relating to maintenance work not covered by
the new engine services agreement it signed in March 2007. As a
result, maintenance expense increased by $230,000 in 2003,
$260,000 in 2004, $250,000 in 2005 and $60,000 for the period
January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006. The Predecessor
increased its engine return liability by $740,000 at
December 31, 2005 and $800,000 at March 14, 2006 and
the Successor increased its engine return liability by $800,000
at December 31, 2006. As a result of the accrual, the
Predecessor reduced its income tax expense and increased its
deferred tax assets by $86,549 in 2003, $97,838 in 2004, $94,075
in 2005 and $22,578 for the period January 1, 2006 to
March 14, 2006.
B. The Predecessor corrected the income tax calculation as
of January 1, 2003. The Predecessor had incorrectly
calculated its net operating loss carry forward. As a result,
the Predecessor increased its deferred tax assets by $101,724.
The total change to deferred tax assets resulting from this
correction and the changes described in Item A at
December 31, 2005 amounted to $380,186. In addition, the
Predecessor increased its income tax payable (reflected in
accounts payable and accrued expenses) by $11,224.
C. The Successor corrected its income tax calculations for
2006. As a result, the Successor decreased deferred tax assets
by $139,488, increased income tax receivable (reflected in
prepaid expenses) by $75,551, decreased income taxes payable
(reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses) by $49,601
and increased income tax expense by $14,336.
D. The Predecessor revalued certain warrants issued as part
of its debt restructuring in 2003. The Predecessor initially
valued the warrants at $11 million based upon call options
to repurchase the warrants prior to their expiration. The
Predecessor has now determined that the value of the warrants
should have been $2 million based upon a third party
transaction. At December 31, 2004 and 2005, and at
March 14,
F-7
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2006, the revaluation resulted in the decrease in additional
paid-in capital and a decrease in accumulated deficit of
$9 million.
E. The Successor segregated amounts owed by a related
entity from accounts receivable. As a result, accounts
receivable was reduced by $606,438 at December 31, 2006.
The result of these restatements was to decrease the net income
of the Predecessor by $37,422 for the period January 1,
2006 to March 14, 2006 and to increase stockholders
deficit at December 31, 2005 by $371,038 and $408,460 at
March 14, 2006. The restatements decreased
stockholders equity of the Successor by $14,336 at
December 31, 2006.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the
Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information
and footnote disclosures, normally included in annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, have been condensed
or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. However, the
Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make
the information presented not misleading when read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes
thereto included in this Prospectus. Management believes that
the financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a
fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.
All adjustments made were of a normal, recurring nature. The
results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year.
|
|
(3)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
On March 22, 2007, the Company purchased for the sum of
$1,150,000 one (1) 1990 Embraer 120
EMB-120ER
twin engine aircraft consisting of an airframe, including all
avionics, instruments and other equipment associated with said
aircraft, together with two (2) installed Pratt &
Whitney Canada
PW-118 engines
and two Hamilton Standard
14 RF-9
propellers.
The purchase was financed by the issuance of a promissory note
to a financial institution for the same amount. The aircraft
will be refurbished as necessary and is expected to be placed in
service before the end of 2007.
Major engine maintenance for our Embraer 120 Brasilia owned
aircraft, which were purchased in 2004 and 2005, is based on the
built-in overhaul method. In accordance with this method, when
major overhaul expenses are incurred, any unamortized balances
are charged to expense currently, the fully-depreciated asset
and related accumulated depreciation accounts are eliminated,
and the cost of the new overhaul is capitalized and amortized in
the same manner. For the nine months ended September 30,
2007, the Company retired fully-depreciated engine overhaul
assets by reducing both flight equipment and accumulated
depreciation by $1,101,971.
In conjunction with the purchase of the aircraft described in
Note (2), the Company issued on March 22, 2007 a promissory
note for $1,150,000 to a financial institution, secured by the
aircraft. The note is payable in 59 monthly principal
installments of $7,858.33 and a final balloon payment of
$686,358 and bears interest monthly, payable on the unpaid
principal balance at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75%.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)). Prior to
January 1, 2006, there were no stock options outstanding.
On January 26, 2007, the Company granted 102,000 stock
options to employees under the Companys Stock Incentive
Plan (Plan) at an exercise price of $5.00 per share.
The options vests at the following rate 20% at grant
date and 20% annually thereafter. The options expire on
January 26, 2017. In addition, the Company
F-8
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
granted 4,000 stock options to two directors under the Plan at
an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The options vested
immediately and expire on January 26, 2017. The fair value
of the stock options has been estimated as of the grant date
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following
table shows the assumptions used and weighted average fair value
for the grants in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Expected annual dividend rate
|
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.66 - 4.76%
|
Average expected life (years)
|
|
5.9
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
|
41.8%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
0.0%
|
Weighted average fair value of option grants
|
|
$2.38
|
The fair value of the underlying common stock was determined by
the Company to be $5.00, which was based on the value paid by
investors when the Company was acquired on March 14, 2006.
The Company did not secure an independent valuation, because it
concluded that an independent valuation would not result in a
more meaningful or accurate determination of fair value in the
circumstances. The Companys business fundamentals had not
changed appreciably between the acquisition date and the date on
which the options were granted, January 26, 2007. In
addition, as of the time of the option grant the Company had
engaged new auditors to review its accounting policies and
complete audits of its historical financial statements, it was
in the process of adopting a new accounting pronouncement (FSP
No. AUG AIR-1) to account for engine maintenance on its
owned airplanes, and it was negotiating a new engine maintenance
agreement for leased airplanes, all of which may have had an
undetermined but potentially significant impact on its financial
statements. As a result, the Company concluded that the value
paid by investors when the Company was acquired on
March 14, 2006 was the most accurate indicator of fair
value, given the uncertainty of the circumstances.
As required by SFAS 123(R), the Company records share-based
compensation expense only for those options that are expected to
vest. The estimated fair value of the stock options is amortized
over the vesting period of the respective stock option grants.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the
Company recorded compensation expense of $126,330.
The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period presented. Diluted net income per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur from common stock issuable
through stock based compensation including stock options,
restricted stock awards, warrants and other convertible
securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,064,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,679,934
|
|
Effect of GIA warrants
|
|
|
(122,421
|
)
|
|
|
(207,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income-diluted
|
|
$
|
942,192
|
|
|
$
|
1,472,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding basic
and diluted
|
|
|
1,564,621
|
|
|
|
2,034,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
F-9
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Gulfstream International Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (the Successor
Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the period from December 20,
2005 (date of inception) to December 31, 2005. We have also
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of G-Air
Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary and Affiliate (the
Predecessor Company) as of December 31, 2005
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows for the period
January 1, 2006 to March 14, 2006 and the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes accessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Successor Company as of December 31, 2006
and 2005 and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the period
from December 20, 2005 (date of inception) to
December 31, 2005, and the financial position of the
Predecessor Company as of December 31, 2005 and the results
of operations and its cash flows for the period January 1,
2006 to March 14, 2006 and the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1, the Company restated its
consolidated financial statements to reflect corrections for
(a) the accrual of additional engine return liabilities and
the related tax effects; (b) deferred tax assets from 2003;
(c) the income tax calculations for 2006; (d) the
revaluation of certain warrants; (e) the adjustment of
deferred tax assets and goodwill relating to its acquisition;
and (f) the classification of amounts due from a related
entity. These changes resulted in a decrease of net income of
the Predecessor Company of $162,162 for 2004, $155,925 for 2005,
$37,422 for Interim 2006, a decrease in net income of the
Successor Company of $14,336 for 2006 (less than $0.01 per
share) and to increase the stockholders deficit at
December 31, 2005 of the Predecessor Company by $371,038
and to decrease the stockholders equity of the Successor
Company by $14,336.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Successor Company acquired the Predecessor
Company on March 14, 2006 in a transaction accounted for in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations.
/s/ Rotenberg
Meril Solomon Bertiger &
Guttilla, P.C.
Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C.
Saddle Brook, NJ
November 2, 2007
F-10
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2005 and 2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,585,995
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,143,015
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
2,361,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,384,445
|
|
Due from related entity
|
|
|
464,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,438
|
|
Stock subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expendable parts, net of reserve for obsolescence
|
|
|
1,640,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548,459
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
235,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
8,288,720
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
9,199,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment
|
|
|
12,096,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,664,682
|
|
Other property and equipment
|
|
|
3,805,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,203,282
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,992,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,326,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
9,909,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,541,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,563,773
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,855,871
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,011,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023,304
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,390,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
23,600,650
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
36,980,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
10,245,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,976,933
|
|
Long-term debt current portion
|
|
|
2,119,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,273,416
|
|
Engine return liability current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,060,417
|
|
Air traffic liability
|
|
|
1,211,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,350,420
|
|
Deferred tuition revenue
|
|
|
567,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
14,144,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,941,846
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
7,492,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,250,391
|
|
Subordinated debentures, net of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,272,815
|
|
Engine return liability, net of current portion
|
|
|
5,119,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,489,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
26,756,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,954,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
14,821
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
20,294
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
6,658,784
|
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
|
|
7,754,600
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
(3,829,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,463
|
|
Less treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
(3,155,945
|
)
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
8,020,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
$
|
23,600,650
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
36,980,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-11
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years
ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2005 (Inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger revenue
|
|
$
|
66,274,210
|
|
|
$
|
87,983,355
|
|
|
$
|
20,263,834
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
78,289,809
|
|
Academy, charter and other revenue
|
|
|
6,063,160
|
|
|
|
4,021,882
|
|
|
|
1,103,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
72,337,370
|
|
|
|
92,005,237
|
|
|
|
21,366,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,690,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight operations
|
|
|
26,465,790
|
|
|
|
38,539,947
|
|
|
|
7,964,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,973,714
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
14,668,051
|
|
|
|
17,220,059
|
|
|
|
3,842,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,394,138
|
|
Passenger and traffic service
|
|
|
16,596,647
|
|
|
|
20,390,418
|
|
|
|
4,797,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,373,459
|
|
Promotion and sales
|
|
|
6,434,225
|
|
|
|
7,530,361
|
|
|
|
1,560,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,358,630
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,656,579
|
|
|
|
4,561,159
|
|
|
|
1,010,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,763,947
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
485,457
|
|
|
|
2,354,803
|
|
|
|
504,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,725,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
70,306,749
|
|
|
|
90,596,747
|
|
|
|
19,680,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,589,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,030,621
|
|
|
|
1,408,490
|
|
|
|
1,686,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(153,087
|
)
|
|
|
(699,387
|
)
|
|
|
(157,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(953,610
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
61,691
|
|
|
|
48,348
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,968
|
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
|
90,692
|
|
|
|
133,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(16,569
|
)
|
|
|
39,827
|
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating (expense) income
|
|
|
(17,273
|
)
|
|
|
(477,966
|
)
|
|
|
(162,383
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
2,013,348
|
|
|
|
930,524
|
|
|
|
1,523,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,073
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
170,241
|
|
|
|
229,528
|
|
|
|
523,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest
|
|
|
1,843,107
|
|
|
|
700,996
|
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,803
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,843,107
|
|
|
$
|
700,996
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Shares used in calculating net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,680,840
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-12
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Years
ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Common Stock Warrants
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Predecessor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,821
|
|
|
$
|
8,512,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,134,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,606,614
|
)
|
Net Income, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,843,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,843,107
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414,845
|
)
|
Acquisition of warrants in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,821
|
|
|
|
7,512,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,705,957
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,178,352
|
)
|
Net Income, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,996
|
|
Capital contribution adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824,589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824,589
|
)
|
Acquisition of stock in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,821
|
|
|
|
6,658,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,829,550
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,155,945
|
)
|
Net Income, January 1 to March 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,270
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,821
|
|
|
$
|
6,658,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,882,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,208,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to founders
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
66,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock to private investors
|
|
|
1,679,460
|
|
|
|
16,794
|
|
|
|
7,610,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,627,380
|
|
Warrants issued with subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,082
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,514
|
|
Net Income, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,463
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
184,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,029,460
|
|
|
$
|
20,294
|
|
|
$
|
7,754,600
|
|
|
|
46,480
|
|
|
$
|
61,082
|
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,020,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-13
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2005 (Inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,843,107
|
|
|
$
|
700,996
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
485,457
|
|
|
|
2,354,803
|
|
|
|
504,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,903,594
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
170,241
|
|
|
|
189,639
|
|
|
|
494,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,301
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,514
|
|
Forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
Gain on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
(90,692
|
)
|
|
|
(133,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables
|
|
|
1,255,936
|
|
|
|
(676,209
|
)
|
|
|
(1,191,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,168
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in expendable parts
|
|
|
(324,942
|
)
|
|
|
(965,871
|
)
|
|
|
124,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,885
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expense
|
|
|
(45,860
|
)
|
|
|
(49,461
|
)
|
|
|
32,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302,011
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in due from affiliates
|
|
|
239,846
|
|
|
|
43,876
|
|
|
|
(27,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,237
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
(324,182
|
)
|
|
|
327,959
|
|
|
|
(17,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(285,032
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,311,451
|
)
|
|
|
872,899
|
|
|
|
(1,856,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,758,680
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue and refundable deposits
|
|
|
1,456,099
|
|
|
|
(203,153
|
)
|
|
|
58,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207,185
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in engine return liability
|
|
|
1,766,042
|
|
|
|
1,748,733
|
|
|
|
430,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
5,119,601
|
|
|
|
4,227,435
|
|
|
|
(447,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,124,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,591,227
|
)
|
|
|
(1,525,382
|
)
|
|
|
(970,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,945,870
|
)
|
Loans to affiliates
|
|
|
(650,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collection of notes receivable
|
|
|
292,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917,265
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,729,823
|
)
|
Repayment of loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,948,697
|
)
|
|
|
(1,434,382
|
)
|
|
|
(970,872
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,758,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
1,122,443
|
|
|
|
2,420,936
|
|
|
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320,000
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(3,033,649
|
)
|
|
|
(2,838,699
|
)
|
|
|
(206,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,934,797
|
)
|
Payment of loan fees
|
|
|
(20,267
|
)
|
|
|
(559,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,988
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,627,380
|
|
Proceeds from collections of stock subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Acquisition of warrants
|
|
|
(500,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(414,845
|
)
|
|
|
(824,589
|
)
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(2,846,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,802,010
|
)
|
|
|
(250,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,776,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
324,586
|
|
|
|
991,043
|
|
|
|
(1,668,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143,015
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,270,366
|
|
|
|
2,594,952
|
|
|
|
3,585,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
2,594,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,585,995
|
|
|
$
|
1,917,265
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,143,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-14
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
Years
ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
(Restated)
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
December 20,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2006
|
|
|
2005 (Inception)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
153,087
|
|
|
$
|
685,209
|
|
|
$
|
150,036
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
665,182
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
|
36,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,611
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
Cash paid for acquisition during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
(1,917,265
|
)
|
Current assets
|
|
|
(5,785,144
|
)
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(15,089,309
|
)
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliation Agreement
|
|
|
(1,718,598
|
)
|
Operating Certificate
|
|
|
(2,383,162
|
)
|
Tradename
|
|
|
(680,000
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(5,855,871
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(1,114,605
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,383,518
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
25,197,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisition
|
|
$
|
(10,729,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004 and 2005, Gulfstream International Airlines, Inc.
(GIA) acquired airframes that were seller financed.
The amount of the airframes and the seller financing was
$5,763,349 and $2,452,704, respectively.
In December 2004, Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc.
(GTA) purchased warrants to acquire common stock of
GIA for a price of $1,000,000. The Company paid cash of $500,000
and issued a note for $500,000.
During 2005, GTA acquired 1,000,000 shares of GIA at a cost
of $850,000. GTA satisfied an outstanding note receivable of
$700,000 and issued a note payable for $150,000.
During 2005, additional
paid-in-capital
of GIA was reduced by offsetting a loan receivable from a
stockholder in the amount of $4,000.
During the period ended March 14, 2006, GIA acquired
vehicles by the issuance of notes payable totalling $44,082.
During 2006, the Company issued warrants with its subordinated
debentures valued at $61,082.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-15
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Restated)
|
|
(1)
|
Nature of
Operations and Sumfmary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
Gulfstream International Group, Inc. (GIG) was
incorporated in Delaware in December 2005 as Gulfstream
Acquisition Group, Inc., and changed its name to Gulfstream
International Group, Inc. on June 13, 2007. GIG was formed
for the purpose of acquiring Gulfstream International Airlines,
Inc. (GIA or Airline), a wholly-owned
subsidiary
G-Air
Holdings Corp., Inc.
(G-Air),
and Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. (GTA or
Academy), collectively referred to as the
Company or Successor. On March 14,
2006, GIG closed the sale of its equity and debt securities and
immediately thereafter acquired 89.2% of the stock of
G-Air and
100% of the stock of GTA (Note (2) Acquisition). As
of December 31, 2006, GIG had acquired 98.6% of
G-Air and is
currently in the process of acquiring the remaining shares. The
Successor period includes the accounts of GIG for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the consolidated accounts of
G-Air and
GIA for the period March 15, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
Prior to the acquisition, the consolidated financial statements
include the consolidated accounts of
G-Air and
GIA and the combined accounts of GTA. These consolidated
financial statements are labeled as Predecessor and
cover the years ended December 31, 2004 (2004)
and 2005 (2005) and the period from January 1,
2006 to March 15, 2006 (Interim 2006).
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Company
Operations
The Airline is a Florida-based regional air carrier providing
scheduled passenger service to numerous destinations in Florida
and the Bahamas. As of December 31, 2006, the Airline
operated a fleet of twenty-seven 19-seat Beechcraft 1900
Turboprop passenger aircraft and seven 30-seat Embraer
120 Turboprop passenger aircraft, from multiple hubs
in Florida. GIA was incorporated in the state of Florida in
November of 1988, and operated initially as an
on-demand charter airline serving the South Florida
area, Cuba and the Bahamas. Following the Department of
Transportations (DOT) approval, the Airline
began scheduled flight service in December of 1990.
In January of 1997, GIA signed a comprehensive five-year
Alliance Agreement with Continental Airlines
(Continental) to act as their Continental
Connection in Florida and the Bahamas effective
April 6, 1997. Under the terms of this agreement,
Continental handles all reservations, ticketing and collections
for GIA and all flights appear as Continental flight numbers.
GIA receives passengers connecting from Continental hubs in
Newark, Cleveland and Houston. The agreement with Continental
was amended and extended in December 1999, August 2003 and March
2006. The March 14, 2006 amendment provides that the term
will expire no sooner than November 3, 2011. After such
date, the Company or Continental may terminate the agreement,
with or without cause, upon one hundred eighty (180) days
written notice. GIA also has alliance agreements with Northwest
Airlines, United Airlines and Copa Airlines.
GTA was incorporated on March 4, 1997, under the laws of
the State of Florida and operates as a flight training academy
in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The Academy provides flight
training services to licensed commercial pilots. GTAs
principal program is its First Officer Program, which allows
participants to qualify as a FAA Regulations Part 121
airline pilot in four months. Following qualification, students
spend 250 hours flying line as a FAA Regulations
Part 121 first officer at the Airline. By attending the
Academy, students are able to enhance their ability to secure a
permanent position with a commercial airline. The Academys
graduates are typically hired by various regional airlines,
including GIA.
F-16
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a
purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of a money market account.
At various times during the year, the Company maintains cash
balances in excess of the amount insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation ($100,000). The exposure to the Company is
solely dependent upon daily bank balances and the respective
strength of the financial institutions. At December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2006, amounts in excess of FDIC
limits totaled approximately $4.8 million and
$3.4 million, respectively.
The Companys policy is to deduct outstanding check
balances from its cash and cash equivalents balance in its
financial statements. In determining exposure to FDIC limits,
the Company believes it is appropriate to include outstanding
check balances. As a result, the exposures cited exceed the cash
and cash equivalent balances.
Accounts
Receivable
Trade receivables and other receivables are carried at their
estimated collectible amounts. Trade credit is generally
extended on a short-term basis; thus trade receivables do not
bear interest. Trade accounts receivable are periodically
evaluated for collectibility based on past credit history with
customers and their current financial position.
Expendable
Parts and Fuel
Flight equipment expendable parts and aircraft fuel are carried
at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
method. An allowance for obsolescence is provided for flight
equipment expendable parts currently identified obsolete or
excess. Expendable parts are charged to expense as they are used.
Property
and Equipment
Flight equipment and other property and equipment are stated at
cost. Depreciation is being provided on the straight-line or
accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets as follows: Airframes seven years;
aircraft rotable parts five years; flight
simulator seven years; baggage handling, ground
support, etc. five to seven years; office equipment,
fixtures and equipment five years; computer
equipment and software three years; leasehold
improvements five years; and vehicles
three to five years.
Residual values estimated for airframes and aircraft rotable
parts are 20 percent of cost.
Impairment
of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the related carrying amount may be impaired. Under the
provisions of SFAS no. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment of Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company
records an
F-17
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
impairment loss if the undiscounted future cash flows are found
to be less than the carrying amount of the asset. If an
impairment loss has occurred, a change is recorded to reduce the
carrying amount of the asset to fair value. Long-Lived assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or
fair value less cost to sell.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximate fair value as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, as
a result of the relatively short maturity. The Company believes
its carrying amount of its long-term senior and subordinated
debt approximate fair value based upon the interest rates for
these instruments being near current market rates.
Maintenance
and Repair Costs
In September 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. AUG
AIR-1,
Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities. The
FSP prohibits the use of the accrual method of accounting for
planned major maintenance activities in annual and interim
reporting periods. It does continue to permit the application of
the other three alternative methods: direct expense, built-in
overhaul and deferral. This pronouncement is effective for the
first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006 and is
to be applied retrospectively for all financial statements
presented unless doing so is impracticable. Earlier adoption is
permitted as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year.
The FSP requires disclosure of the method of accounting for
planned major maintenance activities selected, as well as
information related to the change from the accrual method to
another method. The Company accounts for major overhaul costs
using the direct expense method for leased aircraft and the
built-in overhaul method for owned aircraft purchased in 2004
and 2005
Major engine maintenance for our Embraer 120 Brasilia owned
aircraft, which were purchased in 2004 and 2005, is based on the
built-in overhaul method. The built-in overhaul method is based
on segregation of the aircraft costs into those that should be
depreciated over the useful life of the aircraft and those that
require overhaul at periodic intervals. Thus, the estimated cost
of the overhaul component included in the purchase price was
allocated separately from the cost of the airframe. The initial
overhaul component was determined based on estimated flying
hours remaining to overhaul. These capitalized overhaul
components are being amortized based on the ratio of monthly
hours flown to estimated hours remaining to overhaul.
When major overhaul expenses are incurred, any unamortized
balances are charged to expense currently and the cost of the
new overhaul is capitalized and amortized in the same manner.
Stock
Split
On May 9, 2007, the Company amended its certificate of
incorporation to change its name and to increase the authorized
number of shares of its common stock to 15,000,000. In May 2007,
the Companys board of directors authorized a
2-for-1
split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Companys
common stock. All common and per share amounts of the successor
have been restated to reflect the
2-for-1
stock split.
Revenue
Recognition
Passenger revenue is recognized when transportation is provided.
Over 95% of the passenger tickets for travel on the
Companys airline are off-line ticket sales (sold by
another airline and used on GIA) and are settled through
interline clearing-houses. The majority of these tickets are
sold by Continental as a result of our alliance agreement with
them. The Company receives the sales proceeds from these ticket
sales by monthly settlements with selling carriers through
interline clearing-houses when travel has been completed.
F-18
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Since these are off-line ticket sales with respect to the
Company, refunds and exchanges are the responsibility of and
completed by the airline that sold the ticket.
Less than 5% of the passenger tickets for travel on the
Companys airline are on-line ticket sales (sold by an
airline and used on that airline) sold directly by the Company.
Passenger revenue associated with these tickets is recognized
when transportation is provided or when the ticket expires
unused, rather than when a ticket is sold. These tickets expire
one year from the date of issue. We are required to charge
certain taxes and fees on our passenger tickets. These taxes and
fees include U.S. federal transportation taxes, federal
security charges, airport passenger facility charges and foreign
arrival and departure taxes. These taxes and fees are legal
assessments on the customer. As we have a legal obligation to
act as a collection agent with respect to these taxes and fees,
we do not include such amounts in passenger revenue. We record a
liability when the amounts are collected and relieve the
liability when payments are made to the applicable government
agency or operating carrier.
The amounts associated with passenger tickets sold by the
Company are included in our consolidated balance sheet as air
traffic liability. We maintain specific identification of
passenger tickets used each period, which are included in
results of operations for the periods in which travel is
completed. Tickets purchased but not yet used are included in
air traffic liability.
Charter revenue, excess baggage fees, and miscellaneous revenue
are recognized when transportation service is provided.
Enrollment fee revenue is based upon actual training hours used
by the students of our pilot training academy. The remaining
unused hours represent deferred tuition revenue.
Frequent
Flyer Awards
In conjunction with its several code share agreements, GIA
participates in the respective frequent flyer programs of its
code share partners. However, our code share partners are
responsible for the overall administration and costs of their
programs.
Passengers on our airline, who are also participants in the
frequent flyer programs of our code share partners, can earn
mileage credits in those programs for travel on our airline. GIA
incurs costs from its code share partners for mileage credit
earned by these passengers in accordance with rates specified in
the respective code share agreements.
In addition, participants in these frequent flyer programs may
use mileage accumulated in those programs to obtain free trips
on one of GIAs flights. GIA receives revenue from its code
share partners for travel awards redeemed by its participants on
GIAs flight segments in accordance with rates specified in
the respective code share agreements.
Debt
Issue Expenses and Discounts
Debt issue expenses and discounts are amortized over the terms
of the notes using the effective interest method.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). Federal, state and local
income taxes are calculated and recorded on the current
periods activity in accordance with the tax laws and
regulations that are in effect. In addition,
SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences
of events that have been included in the consolidated financial
statements or
F-19
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
tax return. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The differences relate
primarily to reserve or provisional accounts, depreciation and
amortization, and deferred revenues.
A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is established when it
is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. The net deferred income tax
assets, after reducing the deferred tax assets by the valuation
allowance, represent the income tax benefits that are expected
to be realized.
Earnings
Per Share
The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period presented. Diluted net income per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur from common stock issuable
through stock based compensation including stock options,
restricted stock awards, warrants and other convertible
securities as well as warrants issued by GIA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
Effect of GIA warrants
|
|
|
(52,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted
|
|
$
|
131,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of shares outstanding basic and
diluted
|
|
|
1,680,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
accounting and disclosure provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
which requires that new, modified and unvested share based
payment transactions with employees, such as stock options and
restricted stock, be measured at fair value on the grant date
and recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
Our Stock Incentive Plan was adopted by our board of directors
and it was approved by our stockholders in 2006. Prior to 2006,
there were no stock options outstanding. See
Note (13) Stock Options for a description of
the Companys Stock Incentive Plan, and information
regarding stock options granted during 2006.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 140. This Statement amends FASB
Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This
Statement
F-20
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation
Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. This
Statement:
a. Permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid
financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that
otherwise would require bifurcation
b. Clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133
c. Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in
securitized financial assets to identify interests that are
freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial
instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring
bifurcation
d. Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form
of subordination are not embedded derivatives
e. Amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition
on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative
financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest
other than another derivative financial instrument.
This Statement is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.
Management does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 155 to
have a material impact, if any, on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
issued
EITF 06-3,
How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to
Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the income
statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation) to
clarify diversity in practice on the presentation of different
types of taxes in the financial statements. The Task Force
concluded that, for taxes within the scope of the issue, a
company may adopt a policy of presenting taxes either gross
within revenue or net. That is, it may include charges to
customers for taxes within revenues and the charge for the taxes
from the taxing authority within cost of sales, or,
alternatively, it may net the charge to the customer and the
charge from the taxing authority. If taxes subject to
EITF 06-3
are significant, a company is required to disclose its
accounting policy for presenting taxes and the amounts of such
taxes that are recognized on a gross basis. The guidance in this
consensus is effective for the first interim reporting period
beginning after December 15, 2006 (the first quarter of our
fiscal year 2007). Management does not expect the adoption of
EITF 06-3
will have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations, financial position or cash flow.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This
Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. Earlier application of the provisions of this
Interpretation is encouraged if the enterprise has not yet
issued financial statements, including interim financial
statements, in the period this Interpretation is adopted.
Management does not expect adoption of Interpretation
No. 48 to have a material impact, if any, on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, which defines the fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is encouraged,
provided that we have not
F-21
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including
any financial statements for an interim period within that
fiscal year. Management is currently evaluating the impact
SFAS 157 may have on our consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
In September 2006, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). This SAB provides guidance on the
consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in
quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a
materiality assessment. SAB 108 establishes an approach
that requires quantification of financial statement errors based
on the effects of each of the companys balance sheet and
statement of operations and the related financial statement
disclosures. The SAB permits existing public companies to record
the cumulative effect of initially applying this approach in the
first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording the
necessary correcting adjustments to the carrying values of
assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the
offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of
retained earnings. Additionally, the use of the cumulative
effect transition method requires detailed disclosure of the
nature and amount of each individual error being corrected
through the cumulative adjustment and how and when it arose.
Management has evaluated the potential impact of SAB 108
and has determined that it has no material impact on the
Companys financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This
Statement improves financial reporting by requiring an employer
to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as
an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and
to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which
the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business
entity or changes in unrestricted net assets of a not-for-profit
organization. This Statement also improves financial reporting
by requiring an employer to measure the funded status of a plan
as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position,
with limited exceptions. An employer with publicly traded equity
securities is required to initially recognize the funded status
of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the
required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending
after December 15, 2006. Earlier application of the
recognition or measurement date provisions is encouraged;
however, early application must be for all of an employers
benefit plans. Retrospective application of this Statement is
not permitted. Management does not expect adoption of
SFAS No. 158 to have a material impact, if any, on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by
providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility
in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the
use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the
Boards long-term measurement objectives for accounting for
financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the
beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of
the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before
November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply
the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. Management is currently evaluating the impact
SFAS No. 159 may have to our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
F-22
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Restatement
of Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company restated its consolidated financial statements for
the following matters:
A. Subsequent to the original issuance of the
Companys consolidated financial statements on July 5,
2007, the Predecessor determined that it should accrue an
additional $800,000 relating to maintenance work not covered by
the new engine services agreement it signed in March 2007. As a
result, maintenance expense increased by $230,000 in 2003,
$260,000 in 2004, $250,000 in 2005 and $60,000 in Interim 2006.
The Predecessor increased its engine return liability by
$740,000 at December 31, 2005 and $800,000 at
March 14, 2006 and the Successor increased its engine
return liability by $800,000 at December 31, 2006 (Note
(9) Engine Return Liability). As a result of the
accrual, the Predecessor reduced its income tax expense and
increased its deferred tax assets by $86,549 in 2003, $97,838 in
2004, $94,075 in 2005 and $22,578 in interim 2006 (Note
(15) Income Taxes).
B. The Predecessor corrected the income tax calculation as
of January 1, 2003. The Predecessor had incorrectly
calculated its net operating loss carry forward. As a result,
the Predecessor increased its deferred tax assets by $101,724.
The total change to deferred tax assets resulting from this
correction and the changes described in Item A at
December 31, 2005 amounted to $380,186. In addition, the
Predecessor increased its income tax payable (reflected in
accounts payable and accrued expenses) by $11,224.
C. The Successor reviewed its allocation of the purchase
price in the acquisition which included the effects of the
changes made to the Predecessor periods described above as well
as recalculated its deferred tax assets and goodwill. As a
result, in 2006, deferred tax assets were increased by $402,763
and goodwill was increased by $397,237 (Note
(2) Acquisition).
D. The Successor corrected its income tax calculations for
2006. As a result, in 2006, the Successor decreased deferred tax
assets by $139,488, increased income tax receivable (reflected
in prepaid expenses) by $75,551, decreased income taxes payable
(reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses) by $49,601
and increased income tax expense by $14,336 (Note
(15) Income Taxes).
E. The Predecessor revalued certain warrants issued as part
of its debt restructuring in 2003. The Predecessor initially
valued the warrants at $11 million based upon call options
to repurchase the warrants prior to their expiration. The
Predecessor has now determined that the value of the warrants
should have been $2 million based upon a third party
transaction. At December 31, 2004 and 2005, and at
March 14, 2006, the revaluation resulted in the decrease in
additional paid-in capital and a decrease in accumulated deficit
of $9 million.
F. The Predecessor and Successor segregated amounts owed by
a related entity from accounts receivable. As a result, accounts
receivable was reduced by $464,635 and $606,438 at
December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
The result of these restatements was to decrease the net income
of the Predecessor by $162,162 for 2004, $155,925 for 2005 and
$37,422 for Interim 2006 and increase its stockholders
deficit by $215,113 at December 31, 2004, $371,038 at
December 31, 2005 and $408,460 at March 14, 2006. The
restatements decreased the net income of the Successor by
$14,336 for 2006 (less than $0.01 per share) and decreased
stockholders equity by $14,336.
On March 14, 2006, GIG closed the sale of its equity and
debt securities and immediately thereafter acquired 89.2% of the
stock of
G-Air and
100% of the stock of GTA (See Note (12) Capital
Transactions). As
F-23
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
of December 31, 2006, GIG had acquired 98.6% of
G-Air, and
was in the process of continuing to acquire the remaining shares.
GIA was the
20th
largest regional airline in the country in 2006, and has been
consistently profitable since a debt restructuring in 2003. Its
current market is comprised of a complementary mix of
high-volume leisure traffic, service to the Bahamas Out-Islands,
and intra-state service to Florida business markets. Its
principal code-share partner is Continental Airlines, and it
also has code-share arrangements with United Airlines and
Northwest Airlines.
GIAs prospects for continued growth are favorable, because
its growth is focused on unserved and under-served short-haul
markets using 19 and 30-seat turboprop aircraft. The number of
potential opportunities in unserved and under-served markets
continue to increase as other regional carriers gravitate from
50-seat to 70 to 90-seat jet aircraft. Increased market
opportunities are also due to reductions in service to, or
abandonment of smaller markets as major airlines expand
international service and reduce domestic service at certain
hubs, or eliminate certain hubs entirely.
At various times in the past, Continental has assisted GIA with
financial transactions and aircraft acquisitions. As a result of
those transactions, Continental had received a warrant to
acquire 20% of GIA common stock. Simultaneous with the
acquisition of the stock of
G-Air and
GTA, GIG paid $2 million to Continental in return for a
reduction from 20% to 10% in the percentage of GIA common stock
it could purchase based on exercise of the warrant and for a
five year extension of the code share agreement.
The aggregate purchase price paid by GIG in cash for these
entities, inclusive of the $2 million payment to
Continental, was $10.5 million. Subsequent to the
acquisition date, GIG acquired additional shares of
G-Air either
by cash or by exchange of
G-Air stock
for GIG stock. The terms of these transactions were the same as
those of the March 14 transaction. As a result, the
aggregate purchase price increased by $229,823. As of
December 31, 2006, 1.4% of the common stock of
G-Air was
not acquired.
The difference between the purchase price of $10,729,823 and the
fair value of the acquired net assets of
G-Air and
GTA amounted to $5,855,871 and was recorded as goodwill
(Note (5) Goodwill). The following table summarizes
the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition, March 14, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
7,702,409
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
15,089,309
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliation Agreement
|
|
|
1,718,598
|
|
Operating Certificate
|
|
|
2,383,162
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
680,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,855,871
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,114,605
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,383,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
35,927,472
|
|
Less total liabilities
|
|
|
25,197,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
10,729,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The property and equipment was recorded at fair value resulting
in a $4.7 million increase in the book value of seven owned
Embraer EMB120 Brasilia aircraft. The intangible assets
(Note (6) Intangible Assets) relate to GIAs
Affiliation Agreement with Continental, its FAA FAR 121
Operating Certificate, and the
F-24
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Gulfstream Training Academy, Inc. trade name. The fair values
for the tangible and intangible assets were established based on
independent appraisals.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma summary represents
consolidated results of operations for the Companys
predecessor as if the acquisition had been consummated on
January 1, 2006. Accordingly, the following pro forma
adjustments were reflected in consolidated results of
operations, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense associated with $4,664,590 increase in fair
value of seven aircraft owned by the Company, an estimated
useful life of seven years and a 20% residual value
|
|
$
|
111,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Affiliation Agreement with Continental with a
fair value of $1,718,598 and an estimated useful life of
74 months
|
|
$
|
58,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to subordinated debentures
|
|
$
|
(391,677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting expenses related to Management Services Agreement
|
|
$
|
41,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma information presented in the table below does not
necessarily reflect the actual results that would have been
achieved, nor is it necessarily indicative of future
consolidated results of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
105,057,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,296,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
2,478,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma weighted average basic common shares outstanding
used to calculate basic earnings per common share represent
common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2006. The pro
forma weighted average diluted common shares outstanding used to
calculate diluted earnings per common share represent
incremental shares calculated for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The pro forma effective tax rate used
for 2005 is 38.0%, which is the same effective tax rate
applicable to 2006.
At December 31, 2005 and 2006, receivables consisted
primarily of ticket sales. These amounts are reflected on the
balance sheet, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0
at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively.
As a result of the code sharing agreements disclosed in
Note 1, GIA has a significant concentration of its revenue
and receivables with Continental. Accounts receivable from
Continental as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 amounted to
$847,346 and $1,017,877, or 35.9% and 30.1% of our total
accounts receivable, respectively. Management estimates that
revenue attributable to Continental connecting passengers
amounted to approximately 21% of our passenger revenue in 2004,
2005, Interim 2006 and 2006.
F-25
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
|
|
(4)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following at
December 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
$
|
4,645,270
|
|
|
$
|
9,684,860
|
|
Engine overhauls
|
|
|
4,098,961
|
|
|
|
5,533,240
|
|
Aircraft rotable parts
|
|
|
1,605,110
|
|
|
|
2,348,557
|
|
Flight equipment
|
|
|
1,747,411
|
|
|
|
2,098,025
|
|
Ground equipment
|
|
|
1,267,763
|
|
|
|
1,434,519
|
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
|
641,928
|
|
|
|
652,699
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
698,762
|
|
|
|
731,662
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,017,065
|
|
|
|
1,109,321
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
179,961
|
|
|
|
275,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,902,231
|
|
|
|
23,867,964
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
5,992,638
|
|
|
|
9,326,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
9,909,593
|
|
|
$
|
14,541,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization amounted to $445,195, $2,314,625,
$499,828 and $2,493,582 for 2004, 2005, Interim 2006 and 2006,
respectively.
Goodwill consists of the excess of cost over net assets
acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested at least
annually for impairment, or if circumstances change that will
more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit
below its carrying amount.
The following table sets forth goodwill, net, as of
December 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition /
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gulfstream Airlines acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
761,412
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
761,412
|
|
Gulfstream Training Academy acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,855,871
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,855,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reviews for the impairment of identifiable
intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets.
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-line method over the period of expected benefit, unless
they were determined to have indefinite lives.
F-26
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
The Company has deemed the operating certificate to have an
indefinite useful life. An airline must have an operating
certificate to provide air service of any kind. GIAs
certificate was issued under Part 121 of Federal Air
Regulations (FARs) as written and enforced by
the FAA. Once a certificate is issued, it is kept indefinitely
as long as the airline maintains various FAA standards including
crew training and rest requirements, maintenance and inspection
programs, safety equipment, security procedures, etc. It is
GIAs intent to maintain such FAA standards in order to
keep its certificate.
The Company has also deemed the trademark to have an indefinite
useful life. GTA has been in business since 1997 and it is the
Companys intent to continue in this business and to
protect the tradename if necessary. GTAs operations have
historically been profitable and management believes that this
will continue indefinitely.
The following table sets forth the components of intangible
assets as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
GIA Affiliation Agreement with Continental
|
|
|
74 months
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,718,598
|
|
|
$
|
(217,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,500,611
|
|
GIA FAR 121 Operating Certificate
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,383,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,383,162
|
|
Gulfstream Training Academy Tradename
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,781,760
|
|
|
$
|
(217,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,563,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for 2006 was $217,987. Estimated
amortization expense for the years ending December 31, is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
278,692
|
|
2008
|
|
|
278,692
|
|
2009
|
|
|
278,692
|
|
2010
|
|
|
278,692
|
|
2011
|
|
|
278,692
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
107,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets at December 31, 2005 and 2006 are comprised of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Prepaid loan fees, net
|
|
$
|
559,658
|
|
|
$
|
691,332
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
466,310
|
|
|
|
515,634
|
|
Licenses and operating rights
|
|
|
356,447
|
|
|
|
331,875
|
|
Deferred public offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,958
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,611
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
1,390,859
|
|
|
$
|
1,796,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
|
|
(8)
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31,
2005 and 2006 are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,948,012
|
|
|
$
|
5,819,320
|
|
Accrued payroll and payroll burden
|
|
|
875,250
|
|
|
|
989,083
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
|
643,393
|
|
|
|
666,682
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
692,874
|
|
|
|
538,032
|
|
Accrued fuel
|
|
|
1,204,017
|
|
|
|
1,169,128
|
|
Accrued leases
|
|
|
357,677
|
|
|
|
341,419
|
|
Accrued workers compensation
|
|
|
135,897
|
|
|
|
88,171
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
147,526
|
|
Accrued legal fees
|
|
|
120,543
|
|
|
|
34,567
|
|
Accrued regulatory expenses
|
|
|
160,293
|
|
|
|
106,862
|
|
Accrued customer reservation system fees
|
|
|
368,622
|
|
|
|
367,272
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
735,936
|
|
|
|
708,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
10,245,514
|
|
|
$
|
10,976,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Engine
Return Liability
|
In June 2003, the Company entered into a tri-party Pooling and
Engine Services Agreement with its aircraft vendor and engine
maintenance contractor that allowed the Company to exchange
sixteen (16) of its engines requiring overhaul for mid-life
engines owned by its aircraft vendor that had time remaining
before overhaul. The future overhaul costs of the mid-life
engines were shared proportionately, with the Companys
portion based on engine hours flown until the next overhaul.
Accordingly, based on engine hours flown since June 2003, the
Company incurred a liability of $5.55 million representing
its contractual obligation for its share of the overhaul costs
by recognizing engine maintenance expense of $1,604,367,
$1,766,042, $1,748,733 and $430,685 in 2003, 2004, 2005 and
Interim 2006, respectively. The sixteen engines are expected to
be returned to the aircraft vendor during the 24 months
beginning January 2007. Two engines were returned between
January 1 and February 28, 2007 for a total cost of
approximately $600,000, which was charged to the engine return
liability account.
In March 2007, the Company signed a new engine services
agreement providing for a fixed rate per hour for engine
overhaul services. Included in that agreement, and in
conjunction with this return requirement, the Company has
secured the commitment of its new engine maintenance vendor to
perform engine overhaul services beginning March 1, 2007 at
a pace that will allow the remaining fourteen mid-life engines
to be returned to the aircraft vendor in accordance with
contractual specifications. In return, the Company has agreed to
make fixed monthly payments of $166,667 to the engine
maintenance vendor beginning March 31, 2007 and continuing
for twenty four months. In addition, the Company expects to pay
approximately $800,000 for work not covered by the engine
services agreement.
The $800,000 increase in the engine return liability resulted
from notification by our new engine maintenance vendor in August
2007 that certain major engine components were missing and
replacement of the components was not covered by our engine
services agreement. The missing components were determined to
have been used by our prior engine maintenance vendor from 2003
through March 2006, resulting in lower maintenance expenses
during those periods. As a result, the additional cost
associated with the missing components was based on an estimate
provided by our new engine maintenance vendor. The additional
cost was charged to the periods that had originally benefited
from use of the engines.
F-28
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
At December 31, 2005 and 2006, senior debt consisted of the
following:
Senior
debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Note payable to institution; secured by aircraft; interest at
6.95% per annum; 59 monthly principal and interest payments
of $145,488 in arrears, plus a balloon payment due
December 29, 2010
|
|
$
|
8,568,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,491,720
|
|
Revolving line of credit for working capital; $1,000,000 and
$750,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively;
secured by personal property of the Company; interest per annum
based on one-month LIBOR plus 2.75%; interest-only payments due
monthly
|
|
|
998,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes payable to vendor for software license, non-interest
bearing, with final payment due in 2005
|
|
|
43,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various other notes payable secured by vehicles
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
32,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,612,338
|
|
|
|
7,523,807
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
2,119,854
|
|
|
|
1,273,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Debt
|
|
$
|
7,492,484
|
|
|
$
|
6,250,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated
Debentures
The 12% subordinated debentures in the gross amount of
$3,320,000 were issued to partially finance the acquisition
(Note (2) Acquisition). Interest is payable
quarterly and the principal balance is due on March 14,
2009. The debentures stipulate that principal payments are
subordinated to the prior payment in full of the debt
obligations to Irwin Union Bank and Wachovia Bank. Debentures
totaling $2.5 million were issued to a limited partnership,
one of whose partners is a director of the Company.
For financial reporting purposes, the Company recorded a
discount of $61,082 to reflect the value of warrants issued
(Note (12) Capital Transactions). The discount is
being amortized over the life of the debentures utilizing the
effective interest method. The Company recorded $13,187 as
interest expense related to amortization of the discount in
2006. At December 31, 2006, subordinated debentures net of
discount amounted to $3,272,815.
The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the date of
issuance using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate
of 4.57%; expected dividend yield of 0%; expected lives of
5 years; and estimated volatility of 34.7%.
The principal maturities on the senior debt and subordinated
debentures for the next five years and in the aggregate, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
1,273,416
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,273,416
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,365,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,365,456
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,450,195
|
|
|
|
3,320,000
|
|
|
|
4,770,195
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,434,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,434,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,523,807
|
|
|
$
|
3,320,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,843,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Aircraft
Leases
GIA leases twenty-seven (27) aircraft under various
non-cancelable operating lease agreements that require monthly
payments ranging from $17,000 to $21,000. Lease agreements for
four (4) of the aircraft are for five year terms that expire at
various dates through February 2010. Two (2) aircraft are
related to a 15-year agreement with a government subcontractor,
subject to two-year renewals, to operate daily flights between
West Palm Beach and Andros Town, Bahamas.
Lease agreements for twenty-one (21) of the aircraft expire in
July 2010. GIA has the option to extend each of these individual
lease agreements for an additional term of at least six (6)
months, but no more than twenty-four (24) months. GIA is limited
to extending no more than fifteen (15) leases for a duration of
more than twelve (12) months. GIA is required to make contingent
payments to the lessor beginning August 1, 2006, and ending
on the earlier of the end of the lease terms or at a time when
the cumulative contingent payments equal $315,000. The
contingent payments are computed based upon fuel costs per
gallon being below specified amounts. To date, fuel costs have
remained well above the minimum threshold, and no contingent
payments have been made by GIA.
Facility
Leases
GIA leases office and hangar space for its headquarters, airport
facilities and certain other equipment under non-cancelable
operating leases expiring at various dates through
September 30, 2009.
During August 2005, GIA and GTA entered into building facility
lease agreements with a related corporation controlled by the
major stockholders of G-Air. The agreements called for both
companies to occupy their facilities beginning January 1,
2006 and ending December 31, 2025. Rental payments made in
2006 were $247,605 and $95,341 by GIA and GTA, respectively.
Equipment
Leases
GTA is a party to a flight simulator operating lease. The lease
calls for a rental of $16,000 per month through
December 31, 2007.
At December 31, 2006, the total future minimum rental
commitments under all the above operating leases are
approximately as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
7,789,944
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7,290,457
|
|
2009
|
|
|
7,121,474
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,060,761
|
|
2011
|
|
|
330,604
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,426,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required
|
|
$
|
30,019,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2004, 2005, Interim 2006 and 2006, lease expense on real
property under these operating leases was $9,066,622,
$9,464,671, $1,951,162, and $8,790,475, respectively.
F-30
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
|
|
(12)
|
Capital
Transactions
|
Predecessor
Common stock of the predecessor companies,
G-Air and
GTA, consisted of the following at March 14, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
G-Air has
40 million shares common stock authorized, $.001 par
value per share, 14,811,179 shares issued and 13,611,179
outstanding.
|
|
|
|
GTA has 100 shares of common stock, $.10 par value,
authorized, issued and outstanding.
|
|
|
|
GIA has 100 million shares of common stock authorized,
$.001 par value per share, 19,575,327 issued and
outstanding. 18,575,327 shares were owned by
G-Air, and
1,000,000 shares were owned by GTA.
|
On August 8, 2003, GIA issued a warrant to Continental to
acquire 20% of GIA common stock at a cost of $.001 per
share. The warrant expires on December 31, 2015.
Simultaneous with the acquisition of the stock of
G-Air and
GTA on March 14, 2006, GIG paid $2 million to
Continental in return for a reduction from 20% to 10% in the
percentage of GIA common stock it could purchase based on
exercise of the warrant.
The warrant contains certain anti-dilution and cash dividend
provisions that would be effected as if the warrant had been
previously exercised by Continental. The warrant also provides
for net issue exercise by Continental in lieu of cash payment,
as well as providing a call option to GIA to repurchase the
warrant prior to expiration at aggregate purchase prices ranging
between $5.5 million and $7.5 million. We accounted
for the subsidiary warrants in accordance with the guidance in
EITF Issue 00-19. The subsidiary warrants meet the requirements
of EITF Issue 00-19 to be accounted for as equity warrants.
Accordingly, the fair value of the warrants at the date of issue
is included in additional paid-in capital in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
The Company did not obtain an independent valuation to establish
the fair value of the warrant issued to Continental. On
August 8, 2003, the Company issued a warrant with similar
terms to a vendor to acquire approximately 20% of GIA common
stock. In December 2004, GTA purchased the warrant from the
vendor for $1 million. The Company determined that the fair
value of the Continental warrant approximated the price paid for
the purchase of the warrant.
Successor
GIG was formed in December 2005 for the purpose of acquiring
GIA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
G-Air, and
GTA. GIG was initially capitalized by the issuance of an
aggregate of 350,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase
price of $0.20 per share to a group of outside investors,
including an individual who is a director and executive officer
of the Company. At December 31, 2005, stock subscription
receivable amounted to $70,000. Most of the payments associated
with the receivable were received by GIG in February 2006, and
the remainder was paid in April 2006 and October 2006. At
December 31, 2006, 15 million shares of GIG common
stock, par value $.01, were authorized, and
2,029,460 shares were issued and outstanding.
As a part of the financing for the acquisition of
G-Air and
GTA on March 14, 2006, GIG sold 1,640,000 shares of
its common stock and 3,320 Units at a price of $5.00 per share.
Each Unit was comprised of (1) a subordinated debenture in
the principal amount of $1,000, bearing interest payable
quarterly at 12% per annum, due March 14, 2009
(Note (10) Long-Term Debt), and (2) a warrant
to purchase 14 shares of the Companys common stock at
$5.00 per share, exercisable at the option of the holder for a
period of five years.
In September and October 2006, GIG sold 39,460 shares of
its common stock to nine of its executives at a purchase price
of $5.00 per share. The Company did not obtain an independent
valuation of the purchase price of the shares. As these
purchases occurred approximately six months after the
Companys private
F-31
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
placement, the Company determined that the value of the shares
purchased by the executives would approximate the value of the
shares sold through its private placement.
Our Stock Incentive Plan (Plan) was adopted by the
board of directors of GIG, the successor company, and approved
by our stockholders in 2006. Our Plan provides for the granting
of incentive stock options, non-incentive stock options, stock
appreciation rights, or other stock-based awards to those of our
employees, directors or consultants who are selected by members
of a committee comprised of members of our compensation
committee (the Committee). On the date of the grant,
the exercise price must equal at least 100% of the fair market
value in the case of incentive stock options, or 110% of the
fair market value with respect to optionees who own at least 10%
of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock. The
plan authorizes 350,000 shares of our common stock to be
issued under the plan. The Committee will administer the plan.
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the
date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Company uses an estimated forfeiture rate of 0% due to
limited experience with historical employee forfeitures. The
Black-Scholes option pricing model also requires assumptions for
risk free interest rates, dividend rate, stock volatility and
expected life of an option grant. The risk free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury Bill rate with a maturity based
on the expected life of the options. Dividend rates are based on
the Companys dividend history. The stock volatility factor
is based on the American Stock Exchange Airline Stock Index.
Expected life is determined using the simplified
method permitted by Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, since the Company does not have sufficient
historical expected life experience. The fair value of each
option grant is recognized as compensation expense over the
vesting period of the option on a straight line basis.
On May 31, 2006, the Company granted options to purchase
104,364 shares of our common stock to David Hackett, our
Chief Executive Officer, at an exercise price of $5.00 per
share. The options vest at the following rate 20% at
grant date and 20% annually thereafter. The options expire on
May 31, 2016.
The fair value of the underlying common stock was determined by
the Company to be $5.00, which was based on the value paid by
investors when the Company was acquired on March 14, 2006.
The Company did not secure an independent valuation, because it
concluded that an independent valuation would not result in a
more meaningful or accurate determination of fair value in the
circumstances. The Companys business fundamentals had not
changed appreciably between the acquisition date and the date on
which the options were granted, May 31, 2006.
There were no other stock options granted in 2006. Prior to
2006, there were no stock options outstanding.
The following table shows the assumptions used and weighted
average fair value for grants in the year ended
December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected annual dividend rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.73 - 4.97
|
%
|
Average expected life (years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected volatility of common stock
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Weighted average fair value of option grants
|
|
|
$2.46
|
|
F-32
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
The following table summarizes information about stock option
transactions for the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at End of Year
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
There were no options exercised during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
The following table summarizes information about non-vested
stock options as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested shares at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(20,864
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares at end of year
|
|
|
83,460
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
at 9/30/06
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
$0.01 to 10.00
|
|
|
104,324
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
20,864
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
The Company recorded $77,514 of compensation expense for
employee stock options during the year ended December 31,
2006. At December 31, 2006 there was a total of $179,278 of
unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested
stock-based compensation arrangements under the Plan. The cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
3.5 years.
As of December 31, 2006, an aggregate of
350,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance
under the Plan. Stock option grants were outstanding for an
aggregate of 104,324 shares of stock, and
245,676 shares remained available for grant. Shares issued
pursuant to the Plan will be newly-issued and authorized shares
of common stock, or treasury shares.
F-33
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
GIA sponsors a tax deferred savings plan with a discretionary
profit sharing component which qualifies under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan
covers all employees with completion of
1/4
year of service. The plan allows for matching by the Company of
up to 5% of the eligible participants compensation. The
eligible participants will always be 100% vested in their
contributions to the plan, and will vest in Company
contributions 25% with less than one year of total service, 50%
after two years, 75% after three years, and 100% after four
years of total service.
The Company did not make any contributions to the pension plan
prior to 2006. During 2006, the Company elected to make matching
contributions totaling $16,145.
Income before taxes and the current and deferred tax provisions
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
$
|
2,013,348
|
|
|
$
|
930,524
|
|
|
$
|
1,523,629
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
327,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,370
|
|
Federal AMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,889
|
|
|
|
28,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,889
|
|
|
|
28,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
154,324
|
|
|
$
|
171,908
|
|
|
|
448,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,765
|
|
State
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
46,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax
|
|
|
170,241
|
|
|
|
189,639
|
|
|
|
494,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax provision
|
|
$
|
170,241
|
|
|
$
|
229,528
|
|
|
$
|
523,359
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation between the federal statutory
rate of 34% and the effective rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed expected provision at federal statutory rates
|
|
$
|
684,538
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
316,378
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
518,034
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,205
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Increases (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible items
|
|
|
12,173
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
85,901
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
28,815
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,193
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
State tax net of federal effect
|
|
|
73,085
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
33,778
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,872
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Income attributable to S-Corporation
|
|
|
(599,555
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
%)
|
|
|
(206,529
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
%)
|
|
|
(78,797
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,241
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
$
|
229,528
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
523,359
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,270
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant elements of deferred tax assets and liabilities are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
January 1 to
|
|
|
Inception to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
March 14,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
5,959,555
|
|
|
$
|
5,188,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,639,892
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,638,530
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,301
|
|
Accrued reserves
|
|
|
1,230,655
|
|
|
|
2,007,373
|
|
|
|
2,169,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,235,671
|
|
Compensation differences
|
|
|
195,939
|
|
|
|
242,109
|
|
|
|
242,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,041
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,919,715
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919,715
|
)
|
|
|
(2,919,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,466,434
|
|
|
|
4,517,942
|
|
|
|
4,142,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,166,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
265,317
|
|
|
|
506,464
|
|
|
|
625,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023,990
|
|
Aircraft basis difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554,569
|
|
Affiliation Agreement basis difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
265,317
|
|
|
|
506,464
|
|
|
|
625,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
4,201,117
|
|
|
$
|
4,011,478
|
|
|
$
|
3,516,599
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,023,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance offsets the net deferred tax assets for
which recovery is not considered more likely than not. The
valuation allowance is evaluated considering positive and
negative evidence about whether the deferred tax assets will be
realized. At the time of evaluation, the allowance can be either
increased or reduced. A reduction could result in the complete
elimination of the allowance if positive evidence indicates that
the value of the deferred tax assets is no longer impaired and
the allowance is no longer required.
The Predecessors net operating losses for the periods
ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, and March 14, 2006,
were $15,837,243, $13,787,335, and $12,330,297, respectively. A
valuation allowance on these net operating loss carryforwards
was provided as the Predecessor did not anticipate that the full
benefit would be realized in the future. A valuation allowance
was not provided for the other deferred tax assets as the
Predecessor determined that it would more likely than not
realize the full benefit of such assets.
At December 31, 2006, the Successor had available
$12,113,326 of net operating loss carryforwards which expire in
years through 2022. However, due to changes in stock ownership
of G-Air,
the use of the net operating loss carryforwards is severely
limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code
pertaining to changes in stock ownership. As such, $7,759,008 of
these net operating loss carryforwards will expire as worthless.
The Successors net operating loss, net of amounts limited
by statute, total $4,354,318. The statute limits the annual
amount of net operating loss to be utilized. The limit for the
Successor has been determined to be $272,145. The Successor has
not provided a valuation allowance on its net operating loss
carryforwards or the other deferred tax assets as it believes
that it is more likely than not that those amounts will be
realized in the future.
F-35
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
As a result of the acquisition, the Successor recorded certain
assets at fair market value. As a result, the Aircraft and
Affiliation Agreement have book bases higher than tax bases of
$4,664,590 and $1,718,598, respectively. Accordingly, a deferred
tax liability has been provided. These assets will be
depreciated and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
The basis difference in the Aircraft has created a
built-in gain for the Successor. This could result
in additional net operating losses being available if the
Aircraft are sold up to five years after the acquisition date.
The gross amount of the built-in gain is equal to the basis
difference of $4,664,590. This difference has been allocated to
the Successors Aircraft. The Company views it as highly
unlikely that any of the Aircraft will be sold during the
statutory time period to utilize the tax benefit of the built-in
gain. Accordingly, the Successor has not included the built-in
gain in its net operating loss carryforward nor has it included
it as a deferred tax asset.
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising in
the ordinary course of business. While it is not feasible to
predict or determine the outcome of these proceedings, in the
opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with
respect to legal proceedings and claims will not materially
affect the results of operations or the financial position of
the Company.
|
|
(17)
|
Related-Party
Transactions
|
Fees Associated with the Acquisition of Gulfstream and the
Academy. GIG was formed by Taglich Brothers Inc.
and Weatherly Group LLC exclusively for the purpose of effecting
the acquisition of GIA and GTA. On March 14, 2006, in
connection with the acquisition of GIA and GTA, an advisory fee
of $450,000 was paid to Taglich Brothers, one of the
underwriters in this offering, and $300,000 to Weatherly Group,
LLC. Douglas E. Hailey, a director, is a principal of Weatherly
Group and an employee of Taglich Brothers and Thomas A. McFall,
a senior executive of the Company and the Chairman of our board
of directors, is a principal of Weatherly Group.
Management Services Agreement. On
March 14, 2006, the Company entered into a management
services agreement with Weatherly Group and Taglich Brothers.
Under this agreement, these parties agreed to provide advisory
and management services to us in consideration of an annual
management fee of $200,000, payable monthly, and financial
advisory fees based on a formula if the Company merges with or
acquires another company. The agreement expires on
March 13, 2011. Pursuant to this agreement, management fees
total $16,667 per month. Expenses incurred pursuant to the
management services agreement were $158,333 in 2006, and no
balance was owed as of December 31, 2006
Building lease. Beginning in 2006, we lease
our headquarters for GIA and GTA from EYW Holdings, Inc., an
entity controlled in part by Thomas L. Cooper, the President of
GIA, and Thomas P. Cooper, an officer of GIA. The total amount
of rent expense incurred for our headquarters offices during
2006 was $386,496, and the amount of rent payable to EYW
Holdings, Inc. at December 31, 2006 was $43,548.
Cuba Operations. Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc.
(GAC), a related company which is owned by Thomas L.
Cooper, operates charter flights between Miami and Havana. GAC
is licensed by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the
U.S. Department of the Treasury as a carrier and travel
service provider for charter air transportation between
designated U.S. and Cuban airports.
Pursuant to a services agreement between GIA and GAC dated
August 8, 2003 and amended on March 14, 2006, GIA
provides use of its aircraft, flight crews, the Gulfstream name,
insurance, and service personnel, including passenger, ground
handling, security, and administrative. GIA also maintains the
financial records for GAC. Pursuant to the March 14, 2006
amended agreement, GIA receives 75% of the income generated by
F-36
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
GACs Cuban charter operation. Prior to March 14,
2006, GIA received all of the income generated up to a
cumulative total of $1 million, and then 75% thereafter.
The Company considered the applicability of FASB Interpretation
No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, (FIN 46) to the
accounting by the Company of the services agreement between its
wholly-owned subsidiary, GIA, and the Cuba charter business
(Cuba Charter) operated by GAC. The Company
concluded that compliance with the consolidation or disclosure
requirements of FIN 46 as it relates to Cuba Charter would
not materially impact the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. Therefore, the Company concluded that further
consideration of FIN 46 was unnecessary. However, the
Company will review the applicability of FIN 46 at each
reporting period.
Income provided under the service agreement is reported in the
statement of operations as academy, charter and other revenue,
and amounted to $381,872, $432,270, $172,296, and $716,591, for
2004, 2005, Interim 2006 and 2006, respectively. As of
December 31, 2005 and 2006, GAC owed GIA $464,635 and
$606,438, respectively, pursuant to the services agreement.
Transactions with related parties and
affiliates. The Company rents equipment and
obtains consulting services from entities controlled by Thomas
L. Cooper and Thomas P. Cooper. The amounts paid for 2004, 2005,
Interim 2006 and 2006, were approximately $60,000, $60,000,
$12,500 and $50,200, respectively.
Interest income on notes receivable from related parties in
2004, 2005, Interim 2006 and 2006 were $53,109, $23,498, $0 and
$0, respectively. At December 31, 2005 and 2006, there were
no balances owed on the notes.
The Company has two reportable segments: the airline and charter
operation (GIA) and the flight academy (GTA). The accounting
policies of the business segments are the same as those
described in Note (1). Although the reportable segments are
business units that offer different services and are managed
separately, their activities are highly integrated.
Specifically, GTA provides substantial services to GIA as a
source of, and in the training of, GTAs flight crews.
These intercompany revenues account for approximately 34% of GTA
total revenue. Since inter-segment revenue and expenses have
been eliminated for segment reporting, substantial operating
expenses remain in GTAs segment income from operations,
and correspondingly, significant airline training expenses have
been eliminated from the airline segment operating expenses
Virtually all of the Companys consolidated capital
expenditures, depreciation and amortization, and interest
expense are attributable to Airline and Charter business segment.
F-37
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
Financial information for 2004, 2005 Interim 2006 and 2006 by
business segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline and
|
|
|
Flight
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Charter
|
|
|
Academy
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
66,633,648
|
|
|
$
|
5,703,722
|
|
|
$
|
72,337,370
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
66,192,119
|
|
|
|
4,114,630
|
|
|
|
70,306,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
441,529
|
|
|
$
|
1,589,092
|
|
|
$
|
2,030,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
187,056
|
|
|
$
|
1,656,051
|
|
|
$
|
1,843,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
465,203
|
|
|
$
|
20,254
|
|
|
$
|
485,457
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
153,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,087
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
|
|
56,378
|
|
|
|
61,691
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
268,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,079
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
7,339,586
|
|
|
|
14,990
|
|
|
|
7,354,576
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
18,784,545
|
|
|
|
1,190,278
|
|
|
|
19,974,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline and
|
|
|
Flight
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Charter
|
|
|
Academy
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
88,244,487
|
|
|
$
|
3,760,750
|
|
|
$
|
92,005,237
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
87,439,884
|
|
|
|
3,156,863
|
|
|
|
90,596,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
804,603
|
|
|
$
|
603,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
34,740
|
|
|
$
|
666,256
|
|
|
$
|
700,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
2,346,219
|
|
|
$
|
8,584
|
|
|
$
|
2,354,803
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
693,413
|
|
|
|
5,974
|
|
|
|
699,387
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
42,116
|
|
|
|
48,348
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
323,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,603
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,976,285
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
3,978,086
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
23,470,288
|
|
|
|
130,362
|
|
|
|
23,600,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline and
|
|
|
Flight
|
|
|
|
|
Interim 2006
|
|
Charter
|
|
|
Academy
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
20,656,774
|
|
|
$
|
710,060
|
|
|
$
|
21,366,834
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
19,052,948
|
|
|
|
627,874
|
|
|
|
19,680,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
1,603,826
|
|
|
$
|
82,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,686,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
918,084
|
|
|
$
|
82,186
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
503,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,747
|
|
|
$
|
504,926
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
157,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,603
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
545,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,937
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,010,259
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
1,014,954
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
22,818,046
|
|
|
|
209,199
|
|
|
|
23,027,245
|
|
F-38
GULFSTREAM
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airline and
|
|
|
Flight
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Charter
|
|
|
Academy
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
82,011,475
|
|
|
$
|
1,679,043
|
|
|
$
|
83,690,518
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
80,274,843
|
|
|
|
2,314,960
|
|
|
|
82,589,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
1,736,632
|
|
|
$
|
(635,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,100,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
820,380
|
|
|
$
|
(635,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
184,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
2,719,112
|
|
|
$
|
6,803
|
|
|
$
|
2,725,915
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
953,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953,610
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
170,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,968
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
122,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,934
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,918,172
|
|
|
|
27,698
|
|
|
|
1,945,870
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
30,941,333
|
|
|
|
6,038,908
|
|
|
|
36,980,241
|
|
F-39
800,000 Shares
Gulfstream
International Group, Inc.
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Taglich
Brothers, Inc.
December 14, 2007