1

                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (RULE 14A-101)
                    INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
          PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
                     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.  )

     Filed by the registrant [X]

     Filed by a party other than the registrant [ ]

     Check the appropriate box:

     [ ] Preliminary proxy statement        [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
                                                Commission Only (as permitted by
                                                Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

     [ ] Definitive proxy statement

     [X] Definitive additional materials

     [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12

                        Entertainment Properties Trust
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):

     [X] No fee required.

     [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.

     (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined):

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (5) Total fee paid:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

     (1) Amount previously paid:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) Form, schedule or registration statement no.:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (3) Filing party:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (4) Date filed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   2

                                [EPR LETTERHEAD]

                 ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES RECEIVES KEY SUPPORT
                       FOR ITS TRUSTEE NOMINEE SCOTT WARD

                                                                  April 27, 2001

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

     Thank you for your patience, attention and support during this election
contest. As you know, this past year has been an exciting one for our company.
ONCE AGAIN, WE ACHIEVED RECORD REVENUES, RECORD PROFITS, AND RECORD DIVIDENDS,
all while keeping our expense ratio to under 3.4% -- one of the lowest in our
industry. As you probably also know, our stock recently hit a new 52-week high.

     Despite our success, BRT Realty continues to make allegations and armchair
quarterback our decisions in an effort to elect its own candidate. In supporting
our candidate and rejecting BRT Realty's candidate, we urge you to consider the
following key facts:

     ISS SUPPORTS SCOTT WARD. Thanks in part to our record, which has been
called "stellar" by Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS"), the nation's
largest independent proxy advisory firm, ISS endorsed EPR's trustee nominee,
Scott Ward, and advised our shareholders to "stay the course" and continue to
support current management. Importantly, ISS also noted that "there is no
compelling evidence to suggest that management is entrenched or not working
towards the best interests of all shareholders."

     WALL STREET ANALYST SUPPORTS SCOTT WARD. Noted REIT analyst Anthony Paolone
of CIBC World Markets has also supported our position on the election and the
partial tender offer. As Mr. Paolone recently stated in Real Estate Securities
Weekly, "It is not in the best interests of all shareholders to elect Gould.
BRT's offer is not for all the shares and attached to it are very big
contingencies." (emphasis added)

     KEY TENANT SUPPORTS SCOTT WARD. One of our company's movie exhibition
tenants based in Florida, Muvico, has also supported our candidate. Muvico
stated to us, "Not only has the current board, including Mr. Ward, built EPR
into the premier company that it is, but also by serving the needs of its
tenants as well as it does, the board and Mr. Ward have helped to ensure the
continuing success of EPR."

     NOMINATING COMMITTEE SUPPORTS SCOTT WARD. Our nominating committee
considered the records of our candidate and BRT Realty's candidate, and
unanimously recommended Scott Ward and determined that the election of Mr. Gould
is not in the best interests of our company and our shareholders.
   3

     All of these parties had the opportunity to consider Mr. Gould's
complaints, to evaluate his arguments for his own candidacy, and to take a
position. THE RESULT: SOLID SUPPORT FOR SCOTT WARD.

     We believe that all this support confirms our view that Scott Ward is the
right candidate and Mr. Gould is the wrong candidate for our company. Our board
has also rejected his company's partial tender offer based on the significant
risks to our company that we believe it presents. In fact, as ISS stated in its
independent report following meetings with both sides, "Mr. Gould, himself, also
admitted to ISS that it is highly unlikely that his tender offer will
materialize." FOR THESE AND THE MANY OTHER REASONS WE HAVE PROVIDED YOU, WE
STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU DO NOT TENDER ANY SHARES TO BRT REALTY.

     We fully support having qualified independent trustees with experience that
will benefit our shareholders, as indicated by the makeup of our board. We are
also prepared to support any transaction that benefits all our shareholders. WE
OPPOSE MR. GOULD SERVING AS A TRUSTEE AND ENTERING INTO OR SUPPORTING
TRANSACTIONS, SUCH AS THE PARTIAL TENDER OFFER, THAT WOULD BENEFIT HIS COMPANY
WHILE PRESENTING SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND PROVIDING LITTLE OR NO BENEFIT TO OUR
COMPANY.

     YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT SO PLEASE ACT PROMPTLY. PLEASE INDICATE YOUR SUPPORT
FOR OUR TRUSTEES, AND OUR CANDIDATE SCOTT WARD, BY RETURNING THE BLUE PROXY CARD
TODAY AND IGNORING ANY FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE FROM BRT REALTY OR MR. GOULD.

     We look forward to receiving your votes and seeing you at our 2001 Annual
Meeting at 10:00 A.M. on Tuesday May 9, 2001 at the Leawood Town Center Theatre,
in Leawood, Kansas.

     Our trustees and management thank you once again for your continued
support.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          /s/ David Brain
                                          David Brain
                                          President & CEO

                         [MacKENZIE PARTNERS INC LOGO]
                         (212) 929-5500 (call collect)
                                       or
                            TOLL-FREE (800) 322-2885