e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ     Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2006.
 
o     Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from ___to ___
   
Commission file number  
001-13790
   
         
 
  HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.    
 
 
  (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)    
 
       
 
  Delaware   76-0336636
 
 
  (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
       
 
  13403 Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas   77040-6094
 
 
  (Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
 
       
 
  (713) 690-7300    
 
 
  (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
     
Yes þ
  No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
         
Large accelerated filer þ
  Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
     
Yes o
  No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
On November 30, 2006, there were approximately 111.7 million shares of common stock, $1.00 par value issued and outstanding.
 
 

1


 

HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
                 
            Page
Part I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION        
 
               
 
  Item 1.   Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (unaudited)     5  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings — Nine months and three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (As restated) (unaudited)     6  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity — Nine months ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited)     7  
 
               
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine months and three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (As restated) (unaudited)     8  
 
               
 
      Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)     9  
 
               
 
  Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     32  
 
               
 
  Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     47  
 
               
 
  Item 4.   Controls and Procedures     48  
 
               
Part II.   OTHER INFORMATION        
 
               
 
  Item 1.   Legal Proceedings     50  
 
               
 
  Item 1A.   Risk Factors     50  
 
               
 
  Item 6.   Exhibits     50  
 
               
Signatures     51  
 Consent of Independent Public Accountants
 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
 Certification with Respect to Quarterly Report

2


Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE — LATE FILING OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
A Special Committee of our Board of Directors conducted an investigation of our past stock option granting practices and announced its findings on November 17, 2006. Because we did not know the financial impact of the Special Committee’s investigation, we were not able to timely file our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for our third quarter ended September 30, 2006. We have completed calculating the financial effect utilizing the results of the investigation and are now filing this Form 10-Q for our third quarter. See Note 2 “Restatement of Financial Statements” of the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Restatement of Financial Statements” for more information on the investigation and its financial effects.
This report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by those laws. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as growth of our business and operations, business strategy, competitive strengths, acquisitions, capital expenditures, goals, plans and references to future successes may be considered forward-looking statements. Also, when we use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “probably” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
Many risks and uncertainties may impact the matters addressed in these forward-looking statements, which could affect our future financial results and performance, including, among other things:
    the effects of catastrophic losses;
 
    the cyclical nature of the insurance business;
 
    inherent uncertainties in the loss estimation process, which can adversely impact the adequacy of loss reserves;
 
    the effects of emerging claim and coverage issues;
 
    the effects of extensive governmental regulation of the insurance industry;
 
    potential credit risk with brokers;
 
    our increased retention of risk, which could expose us to greater potential losses;
 
    the adequacy of reinsurance protection;
 
    the ability or willingness of reinsurers to pay balances due us;
 
    the occurrence of terrorist activities;
 
    our ability to maintain our competitive position;
 
    changes in our assigned financial strength ratings;
 
    our ability to raise capital in the future;
 
    attraction and retention of qualified employees;
 
    fluctuations in the fixed income securities market, which may reduce the value of our investment assets;
 
    our ability to successfully expand our business through the acquisition of insurance-related companies;
 
    our ability to receive dividends from our insurance company subsidiaries in needed amounts;
 
    fluctuations in foreign exchange rates;
 
    failures of our information technology systems, which could adversely affect our business;

3


Table of Contents

    developments in the SEC’s informal inquiry related to our past practices in connection with grants of stock options;
 
    potential issues related to the effects of Sections 409A and 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and any expenses associated therewith;
 
    changes to improve our internal controls related to the process of granting, documenting and accounting for stock option awards;
 
    additional expenses and taxes associated with our stock option investigation and related matters;
 
    potential litigation that could result from our stock option investigation;
 
    the ability of our Executive Officers to define and implement a strategic business plan; and
 
    our ability to cure all defaults or events of default under our outstanding loan agreements.
These events or factors could cause our results or performance to differ materially from those we express in our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions, and, therefore, also the forward-looking statements based on these assumptions, could themselves prove to be inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements which are included in this report, our inclusion of this information is not a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Our forward-looking statements speak only at the date made and we will not update these forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, any forward-looking events discussed in this report may not occur.

4


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, in thousands except per share data)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
ASSETS
               
 
               
Investments:
               
Fixed income securities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2006 — $2,840,047; 2005 — $2,277,139)
  $ 2,840,610     $ 2,268,624  
Short-term investments, at cost, which approximates fair value
    673,406       839,581  
Other investments, at fair value (cost: 2006 - $275,644; 2005 - $144,897)
    290,363       149,223  
 
           
Total investments
    3,804,379       3,257,428  
Cash
    59,638       73,935  
Restricted cash and cash investments
    171,501       170,978  
Premium, claims and other receivables
    867,127       884,654  
Reinsurance recoverables
    1,305,952       1,361,983  
Ceded unearned premium
    244,003       239,416  
Ceded life and annuity benefits
    72,429       73,415  
Deferred policy acquisition costs
    181,111       156,253  
Goodwill
    554,430       532,947  
Other assets
    283,669       277,791  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 7,544,239     $ 7,028,800  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES
               
 
               
Loss and loss adjustment expense payable
  $ 2,907,626     $ 2,813,720  
Life and annuity policy benefits
    72,429       73,415  
Reinsurance balances payable
    139,384       176,954  
Unearned premium
    924,518       807,109  
Deferred ceding commissions
    67,231       67,886  
Premium and claims payable
    684,660       753,859  
Notes payable
    393,167       309,543  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    394,016       335,879  
 
           
Total liabilities
    5,583,031       5,338,365  
 
               
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 250.0 million shares authorized (shares issued and outstanding: 2006 — 111,491; 2005 — 110,803)
    111,491       110,803  
Additional paid-in capital
    786,759       762,170  
Retained earnings
    1,029,318       798,388  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    33,640       19,074  
 
           
 
               
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,961,208       1,690,435  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 7,544,239     $ 7,028,800  
 
           
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(unaudited, in thousands except per share data)
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
REVENUE
                               
Net earned premium
  $ 1,204,941     $ 995,901     $ 421,050     $ 338,058  
Fee and commission income
    104,409       100,999       38,862       32,073  
Net investment income
    108,959       70,039       36,205       24,998  
Net realized investment gain (loss)
    (1,193 )     2,038       304       38  
Other operating income
    59,071       26,116       20,276       16,864  
 
                       
Total revenue
    1,476,187       1,195,093       516,697       412,031  
 
                       
 
                               
EXPENSE
                               
Loss and loss adjustment expense, net
    689,122       679,932       236,030       295,768  
Policy acquisition costs, net
    231,012       187,696       78,203       65,708  
Other operating expense
    156,279       137,077       59,277       41,206  
Interest expense
    7,912       5,848       3,475       2,070  
 
                       
Total expense
    1,084,325       1,010,553       376,985       404,752  
 
                       
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense
    391,862       184,540       139,712       7,279  
Income tax expense on continuing operations
    130,319       59,091       46,455       574  
 
                       
Earnings from continuing operations
    261,543       125,449       93,257       6,705  
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense
          707             707  
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 261,543     $ 126,156     $ 93,257     $ 7,412  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic earnings per share data:
                               
Earnings from continuing operations
  $ 2.35     $ 1.20     $ 0.84     $ 0.06  
Earnings from discontinued operations
          0.01             0.01  
 
                       
Net earnings per share
  $ 2.35     $ 1.21     $ 0.84     $ 0.07  
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding
    111,198       104,617       111,359       105,623  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted earnings per share data:
                               
Earnings from continuing operations
  $ 2.24     $ 1.16     $ 0.80     $ 0.06  
Earnings from discontinued operations
          0.01             0.01  
 
                       
Net earnings per share
  $ 2.24     $ 1.17     $ 0.80     $ 0.07  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding
    116,986       108,003       117,003       109,818  
 
                       
 
                               
Cash dividends declared, per share
  $ 0.275     $ 0.207     $ 0.100     $ 0.075  
 
                       
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
(unaudited, in thousands except per share data)
                                         
                            Accumulated        
            Additional             other     Total  
    Common     paid-in     Retained     comprehensive     shareholders'  
    stock     capital     earnings     income     equity  
Balance at December 31, 2005
  $ 110,803     $ 762,170     $ 798,388     $ 19,074     $ 1,690,435  
Net earnings
                261,543             261,543  
Other comprehensive income
                      14,566       14,566  
 
                                     
Comprehensive income
                            276,109  
Issuance of 688 shares for exercise of options, including tax benefit of $3,291
    688       14,285                   14,973  
Stock-based compensation
          10,304                   10,304  
Cash dividends declared, $0.275 per share
                (30,613 )           (30,613 )
 
                             
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 111,491     $ 786,759     $ 1,029,318     $ 33,640     $ 1,961,208  
 
                             
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, in thousands)
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
Cash flows from operating activities:
                               
Net earnings
  $ 261,543     $ 126,156     $ 93,257     $ 7,412  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
                               
Change in premium, claims and other receivables
    36,626       (74,007 )     46,924       16,604  
Change in reinsurance recoverables
    56,031       (145,305 )     47,336       (126,291 )
Change in ceded unearned premium
    (4,587 )     60,509       (5,722 )     14,648  
Change in loss and loss adjustment expense payable
    93,906       521,365       (10,815 )     396,478  
Change in reinsurance balances payable
    (37,509 )     (23,906 )     (14,803 )     15,744  
Change in unearned premium
    113,638       42,994       10,559       17,458  
Change in premium and claims payable, net of restricted cash
    (78,293 )     30,585       (61,071 )     15,049  
Change in trading portfolio
    (99,193 )     (54,654 )     (14,702 )     (16,600 )
Depreciation and amortization expense
    12,242       11,063       4,598       3,703  
Stock-based compensation expense
    9,463       1,920       3,373       750  
Other, net
    (4,161 )     (43,466 )     831       (10,538 )
 
                       
Cash provided by operating activities
    359,706       453,254       99,765       334,417  
 
                       
Cash flows from investing activities:
                               
Sales of fixed income securities
    184,175       163,841       20,078       49,071  
Maturity or call of fixed income securities
    174,758       133,391       57,060       34,923  
Cost of securities acquired
    (958,822 )     (733,400 )     (167,437 )     (235,256 )
Change in short-term investments
    171,198       36,234       (47,658 )     (145,482 )
Sale of strategic investment
    40,354       7,758       22,991       7,758  
Payments for purchase of subsidiaries, net of cash received
    (55,290 )     (44,288 )     (17,833 )     (9,407 )
Sale of subsidiary
          10,448             10,448  
Other, net
    (8,612 )     (14,627 )     (3,515 )     (3,249 )
 
                       
Cash used by investing activities
    (452,239 )     (440,643 )     (136,314 )     (291,194 )
 
                       
Cash flows from financing activities:
                               
Issuance of notes payable
    140,000       36,000       101,000       3,000  
Payments on notes payable
    (56,346 )     (37,554 )     (45,097 )     (23,089 )
Sale of common stock
    14,973       32,684       5,313       3,847  
Dividends paid
    (27,774 )     (19,606 )     (11,126 )     (7,890 )
Other
    7,383       (3,814 )     1,755        
 
                       
Cash provided (used) by financing activities
    78,236       7,710       51,845       (24,132 )
 
                       
Net increase (decrease) in cash
    (14,297 )     20,321       15,296       19,091  
Cash at beginning of period
    73,935       69,933       44,342       71,163  
 
                       
Cash at end of period
  $ 59,638     $ 90,254     $ 59,638     $ 90,254  
 
                       
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

8


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
(1)   GENERAL INFORMATION
 
    HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us or our) include domestic and foreign property and casualty and life insurance companies, underwriting agencies and reinsurance brokers. We provide specialized property and casualty, surety, and group life, accident and health insurance coverages and related agency and reinsurance brokerage services to commercial customers and individuals. We market our products both directly to customers and through a network of independent brokers, producers and agents. Our lines of business include diversified financial products (which includes directors’ and officers’ liability, professional indemnity, employment practices liability and surety); group life, accident and health; aviation; London market account (which includes energy, marine, property, and accident and health); and other specialty lines of insurance. We operate primarily in the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain and Bermuda, although some of our operations have a broader international scope.
 
    Basis of Presentation
 
    Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) and include the accounts of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We have made all adjustments that, in our opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of results of the interim periods, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
 
    Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our financial statements and in disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Ultimate results could differ from those estimates. We have reclassified certain amounts in our 2005 condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation. The reclassifications included the elimination of certain intercompany premium receivable and premium payable balances and reclassification of the corresponding lines in our 2005 condensed statements of cash flows. None of these reclassifications had an effect on our consolidated net earnings, shareholders’ equity or cash flows.
 
    During 2006 and 2005, we completed several acquisitions. The results of operations of the acquired entities are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements beginning on the effective date of each acquisition. Thus, our condensed consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 do not contain any operations of the entities acquired in 2006 or 2005 prior to their acquisition date.
 
    Large Loss Events
 
    During the third quarter of 2005, catastrophic events occurred related to two major hurricanes, Katrina and Rita, and two minor ones (collectively, the 2005 hurricanes). We recognized a pre-tax loss, after reinsurance, of $74.4 million in our insurance company segment in that quarter with respect to the 2005 hurricanes. This loss included $53.7 million recorded in loss and loss adjustment expense and $20.7 million for premiums to reinstate our excess of loss reinsurance protection, which reduced net earned premium. Net earnings were reduced $48.3 million, or $0.45 per diluted share.

9


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    Also during the third quarter of 2005, we reached agreements with various reinsurers to commute certain reinsurance recoverables related to our discontinued accident and health line of business. The reinsurers paid us $119.6 million of cash, which was less than the related recoverables, in consideration for discounting the recoverables and reassuming the associated loss reserves. We recorded a pre-tax loss of $26.0 million, which was included in loss and loss adjustment expense in our insurance company segment. Net earnings were reduced $16.9 million, or $0.16 per diluted share.
 
    Income Tax
 
    For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the income tax provision was calculated based on an estimated effective tax rate for each fiscal year. Our effective tax rate differs from the United States Federal statutory rate primarily due to tax-exempt municipal bond interest, state income taxes and a special $2.1 million U.S. repatriation tax benefit in 2005.
 
    Recent Accounting Change
 
    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Effective January 1, 2007, FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain income tax positions. We are currently reviewing the requirements of FIN 48 to determine the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements.
 
    The FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”), which clarified the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 will be effective for us on January 1, 2008. We are currently assessing whether the adoption of SFAS 157 will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
    The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 establishes a standard approach for quantifying the materiality of errors to current and prior period financial statements. SAB 108’s guidelines must be applied in the fourth quarter, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded either by restating prior year financial statements or recording a cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2006. We believe the requirements of SAB 108 will have no effect on our consolidated financial statements.

10


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
(2)   RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
    In light of published reports concerning the pricing of stock options and the timing of stock option grants at numerous other companies, in the second quarter of 2006 we undertook a voluntary internal review of our past practices related to grants of stock options. The voluntary review by our management concluded that the actual accounting measurement dates for certain past stock option grants differed from the originally stated grant dates, which were also utilized as the measurement dates for such awards. In August 2006, our Board of Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. The Special Committee was composed of the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Special Committee retained the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP as its independent legal counsel and LECG as forensic accountants to aid in the investigation.
 
    On November 17, 2006, we announced that the Special Committee had made certain determinations as a result of its review of our past stock option granting practices. The Special Committee found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates for stock option grants covering a significant number of employees and members of our Board of Directors during the period 1997 through 2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced. Additionally, at the direction of the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option granting practices from 1992, the year of our initial public stock offering, through 1994 and in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due to retroactive pricing were used in 2006. In substantially all of these instances, the price on the actual measurement date was higher than the price on the stated grant date; thus recipients of the options could exercise at a strike price lower than the actual measurement date price. To determine the actual measurement dates, the Special Committee utilized the following sources of information:
    The dates on documentation such as e-mails, regulatory form filings, acquisition agreements and other correspondence;
 
    The date that the relevant stock option grant was entered into Equity Edge, our stock option tracking and accounting system;
 
    Requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations; and
 
    Guidance from the Office of Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in a letter dated September 19, 2006.

11


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
     The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together with certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special Committee found that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options, that he should have known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock option plans and public statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock option granting process with our stock option plans and public statements. Although finding his actions were inconsistent with the duties and obligations of a chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company, the Special Committee also found that Mr. Way’s motivation appeared to be the attraction and retention of talent and to provide employees with the best option price. The Special Committee also concluded that Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, was aware that options were being retroactively priced in a manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures memoranda that he had prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and that he did not properly document our Compensation Committee’s informal delegation of authority to Mr. Way. The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.
 
    Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results of the investigation, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it would be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both tendered on November 17, 2006. Mr. Way will remain a director of HCC and serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and has entered into a consulting agreement with us to assist in the transition of leadership and to provide strategic guidance. We have entered into agreements with Mr. Way and Mr. Martin which, among other things, require them to disgorge an amount equal to the difference between the actual measurement date prices determined by HCC and the prices at which these individuals exercised mis-priced options since 1997.
 
    As a result of the determinations of the Special Committee and because the resulting cumulative charge would be material to the second quarter and full year 2006 consolidated net earnings, we concluded that we needed to amend our 2005 Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K and our first quarter 2006 quarterly report filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, to restate our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. However, the impact of the restatement in any of the restated periods is not material. The amended Forms 10-K/A and 10-Q/A have been filed with the SEC. We made the restatement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to record the following:
    Non-cash compensation expense for the difference between the stock price on the stated grant date and the actual measurement date and for the fluctuations in stock price in certain instances where variable accounting should have been applied.
 
    Other adjustments that were not recorded in the originally filed financial statements due to their immateriality. These minor adjustments primarily relate to fee and commission income, loss and loss adjustment expense, policy acquisition costs and other operating expense. In addition, balance sheet reclassifications have been recorded to appropriately present certain reinsurance recoverables and payables.
 
    Related tax effects associated with the recognition of non-cash compensation expense and other adjustments as well as additional taxes that may be due and payable.
    We have not amended any of our other previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement other than noted above. For this reason, the consolidated financial statements and related financial information contained in such previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.

12


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    We were unable to timely file our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, primarily due to not knowing the financial impact of the Special Committee’s investigation. We have also restated the June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective 2006 quarters.
 
    Based on the determinations of the Special Committee and our voluntary internal review, we identified a number of occasions during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 on which we used an incorrect measurement date for financial accounting and reporting purposes for options granted. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded compensation expense related to these options for the excess of the market price of our stock on the actual measurement date over the exercise price of the option. For periods commencing January 1, 2006, compensation expense is being recognized in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) (revised), Share-Based Payment. However, we determined an incremental amount related to the mis-priced options must be recorded.
 
    The types of errors identified were as follows:
    We determined that many block grants to employees during the period 1997 through 2005 were subject to a retroactive look-back period. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the end of the look-back period, which was generally 30 days or less, was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
 
    In addition to being subject to the retroactive pricing discussed above, we determined that the strike price of block grants in 1999, 2002 and 2005 was determined prior to the final determination of the identity of the employee and/or the number of options to be granted. Further, proper approval, in most cases, had not been given until after the grant date. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the time when all required determinations were final and proper approval had been obtained was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date. The time lag between the stated grant date and the finalization of the awards was typically 30-45 days, except in the case of the 2002 grant which was finalized several months subsequent to the stated grant date.
 
    For the period from 1997 to 2005 and into 2006, we determined that there was a regular practice of granting options to newly hired employees and existing employees being promoted after the end of a 30-45 day period following the hire or promotion date. This practice included the use of the 30-45 day period as a look-back period during which the date with the lowest price during that period was selected as the stated grant date.
 
    In several instances, grants to senior executives were determined at a date subsequent to the stated grant date. In most cases, this resulted from extended negotiations of employment agreements and, in some cases, administrative delays. In virtually all cases, the price of our stock at the time the grants were made and properly approved was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
 
    In a few cases, options were granted and then repriced downward. As a result, variable accounting should have been applied to these options.
 
    We lacked timely or adequate documentation to support the stated grant date in the case of certain of the above errors.
    The gross compensation expense recorded to correct the above errors was a non-cash charge and had no impact on our reported net revenue, cash, cash flow or shareholders’ equity.

13


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    In connection with the investigation, we determined that a number of executive officers received in-the-money options. If such options are ultimately determined to be in-the-money grants for tax purposes, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and, if in the year of exercise the officers’ compensation, including proceeds from options exercised, exceeded $1.0 million, we would not be entitled to a tax deduction for any amount in excess of such $1.0 million for officers covered by Section 162(m). We estimate the tax effect of the deduction was $4.6 million, substantially all of which was recorded as a reduction to shareholders’ equity.
 
    There were immaterial adjustments that were not made in the originally filed consolidated financial statements. We have taken the opportunity presented by this restatement to record these adjustments, which amounted to a net $2.4 million increase in earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense, for the years 2001 through 2005.
 
    The increase (decrease) on net earnings of each type of adjustment was as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
            Non-cash                              
    Net earnings     stock option                              
    as previously     compensation                     Total     Net earnings  
    reported     expense     Other     Tax effect     adjustments     as restated  
Nine months ended September 30, 2005
  $ 129,326     $ (2,193 )   $ (2,453 )   $ 1,476     $ (3,170 )   $ 126,156  
Three months ended September 30, 2005
  $ 7,950     $ (803 )   $     $ 265     $ (538 )   $ 7,412  
    The restatement adjustments reduced previously reported diluted net earnings per share by $0.03 and $0.00 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.
 
    Enacted October 22, 2004, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code significantly changed the rules for nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Section 409A imposes certain restrictions and taxes on stock awards that constitute deferred compensation. Section 409A relates specifically to the personal tax liabilities of our employees that have received discounted options. We are currently reviewing the implications of Section 409A on grants awarded with intrinsic value that vested after December 31, 2004 and modifications made to existing grants after October 3, 2004 along with potential remedial actions.
 
    As of December 15, 2006, we have paid direct costs of approximately $6.0 million, of which $2.5 million was incurred through September 30, 2006, for costs associated with the Special Committee’s investigation and additional related professional services and consulting fees associated with the restatement effort.

14


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
    The following table sets forth the impact of the above adjustments and the related tax effects on our historical statements of earnings for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005.
                                                 
    Nine Months ended September 30, 2005     Three Months ended September 30, 2005  
    As previously                     As previously              
    reported     Adjustments     As restated     reported     Adjustments     As restated  
REVENUE
                                               
Net earned premium
  $ 995,901     $     $ 995,901     $ 338,058     $     $ 338,058  
Fee and commission income
    102,452       (1,453 )     100,999       32,073             32,073  
Net investment income
    70,039             70,039       24,998             24,998  
Net realized investment gain
    2,038             2,038       38             38  
Other operating income
    26,116             26,116       16,864             16,864  
 
                                   
Total revenue
    1,196,546       (1,453 )     1,195,093       412,031             412,031  
 
                                   
 
                                               
EXPENSE
                                               
Loss and loss adjustment expense, net
    679,932             679,932       295,768             295,768  
Policy acquisition costs, net
    185,696       2,000       187,696       65,708             65,708  
Other operating expense
    135,884       1,193       137,077       40,403       803       41,206  
Interest expense
    5,848             5,848       2,070             2,070  
 
                                   
Total expense
    1,007,360       3,193       1,010,553       403,949       803       404,752  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense
    189,186       (4,646 )     184,540       8,082       (803 )     7,279  
Income tax expense on continuing operations
    60,567       (1,476 )     59,091       839       (265 )     574  
 
                                   
Earnings from continuing operations
    128,619       (3,170 )     125,449       7,243       (538 )     6,705  
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
    707             707       707             707  
 
                                   
Net earnings
  $ 129,326     $ (3,170 )   $ 126,156     $ 7,950     $ (538 )   $ 7,412  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Basic earnings per share data:
                                               
 
                                               
Earnings from continuing operations
  $ 1.23     $ (0.03 )   $ 1.20     $ 0.07     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.06  
Earnings from discontinued operations
    0.01             0.01       0.01             0.01  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Net earnings
  $ 1.24     $ (0.03 )   $ 1.21     $ 0.08     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.07  
 
                                   
Weighted average shares outstanding
    104,617             104,617       105,623             105,623  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Diluted earnings per share data:
                                               
 
                                               
Earnings from continuing operations
  $ 1.19     $ (0.03 )   $ 1.16     $ 0.06     $     $ 0.06  
Earnings from discontinued operations
    0.01             0.01       0.01             0.01  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Net earnings
  $ 1.20     $ (0.03 )   $ 1.17     $ 0.07     $     $ 0.07  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Weighted average shares outstanding
    108,003             108,003       109,818             109,818  
 
                                   

15


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
    The restatement did not impact our net cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities. However, certain items within net cash provided by operating activities were affected by the restatement adjustments. The following table shows the effect of the restatement on our previously reported cash flows:
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30, 2005     September 30, 2005  
    As previously             As previously        
    reported     As restated     reported     As restated  
Net earnings
  $ 129,326     $ 126,156     $ 7,950     $ 7,412  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
                               
Change in premium, claims and other receivables
    (37,538 )     (74,007 )     39,121       16,604  
Change in reinsurance recoverables
    (156,477 )     (145,305 )     (138,947 )     (126,291 )
Change in ceded unearned premium
    65,591       60,509       14,648       14,648  
Change in reinsurance balances payable
    (34,966 )     (23,906 )     15,744       15,744  
Change in premium and claims payable, net of restricted cash
    3,728       30,585       5,188       15,049  
Stock-based compensation expense
          1,920             750  
Other, net
    (37,178 )     (43,466 )     (10,326 )     (10,538 )
In connection with the preparation of our restated financial statements, we also determined that the pro forma disclosures for stock-based compensation expense for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005 required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation included in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, were incorrect. Specifically, the errors related to the effect on the consolidated financial statements resulting from the improper application of APB No. 25 to certain stock option transactions and the use of assumptions for determining the fair value of our stock options on the date of grant. We have corrected these errors in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. These corrections do not affect our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of earnings or consolidated statements of cash flows for any period.
The following table presents the effect of these corrections on our pro forma calculation of our net income and earnings per share for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2005:
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30, 2005     September 30, 2005  
    As previously             As previously        
    reported     As restated     reported     As restated  
Reported net earnings
  $ 129,326     $ 126,156     $ 7,950     $ 7,412  
Stock-based compensation included in reported net earnings, net of income taxes
          1,576             538  
Stock-based compensation using fair value method, net of income taxes
    (4,617 )     (5,585 )     (1,927 )     (2,247 )
 
                       
Pro forma net earnings
  $ 124,709     $ 122,147     $ 6,023     $ 5,703  
 
                       
Reported basic earnings per share
  $ 1.24     $ 1.21     $ 0.08     $ 0.07  
Fair value stock-based compensation
    (0.05 )     (0.04 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Pro forma basic earnings per share
  $ 1.19     $ 1.17     $ 0.06     $ 0.05  
 
                       
Reported diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.20     $ 1.17     $ 0.07     $ 0.07  
Fair value stock-based compensation
    (0.05 )     (0.04 )     (0.02 )     (0.02 )
 
                       
Pro forma diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.15     $ 1.13     $ 0.05     $ 0.05  
 
                       

16


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(3)   STOCK OPTIONS
 
    Our stock option plans, the 2004 Flexible Incentive Plan and 2001 Flexible Incentive Plan, are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options granted under these plans may be used to purchase one share of our common stock. The plans require that all options be granted at fixed exercise prices at the market price of our common stock on the grant date and do not allow repricing of options. Options vest over a period of up to seven years, which is the requisite service period, and expire four to ten years after grant date.
 
    Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires companies to charge the fair value of stock-based compensation to earnings. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. We are recognizing compensation expense in 2006 and thereafter based on our unvested stock options granted before January 1, 2006 and all options granted after that date. We use the Black-Scholes single option pricing model to determine the fair value of an option on its grant date and expense that value on a straight-line basis over the option’s vesting period. We made no modifications to our stock option plans in conjunction with our adoption of SFAS 123(R). In 2005, we accounted for stock options granted to employees in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The 2005 and prior period financial statements were not restated to reflect the implementation of SFAS 123(R).
 
    In the first nine months of 2006, we expensed $9.5 million ($6.8 million after-tax or $0.06 per diluted share) of stock-based compensation, after the effect of the deferral and amortization of related policy acquisition costs. We expensed $3.4 million ($2.4 million after-tax or $0.02 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2006. At September 30, 2006, there was approximately $33.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. In 2006, we expect to recognize $12.9 million of expense, including the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, related to stock-based compensation for options currently outstanding.

17


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    The table below shows the weighted-average fair value of options granted and the related weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that most closely approximates each option’s expected term. We based our expected volatility on the historical volatility of our stock over a period matching each option’s expected term. Our dividend yield is based on an average of our historical dividend payments divided by the stock price. We used historical exercise patterns by grant type to estimate the expected option life.
                                 
    Nine months ended September 30,     Three months ended September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
Fair value of options granted
  $ 7.05     $ 8.86     $ 6.74     $ 9.11  
Risk free interest rate
    4.7 %     4.0 %     5.1 %     4.1 %
Expected volatility
    21.9 %     32.0 %     21.4 %     32.0 %
Expected dividend yield
    1.1 %     1.1 %     1.3 %     1.2 %
Expected option life
  3.7 years   4.8 years   4.1 years   4.8 years
    The following table details our stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
                                 
            Weighted-     Weighted-        
            average     average     Aggregate  
    Number     exercise     contractual     intrinsic  
    of shares     price     life     value  
Outstanding, beginning of year
    8,219     $ 20.71                  
Granted
    748       31.66                  
Exercised
    (690 )     16.97                  
Forfeited and expired
    (145 )     20.89                  
 
                             
Outstanding, end of period
    8,132       22.03     3.9 years   $ 88,305  
 
                             
Exercisable, end of period
    2,458       19.55     3.1 years     32,750  
 
                             
    The aggregate intrinsic value (the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price) of options exercised during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was $10.4 million and $21.9 million, respectively. At September 30, 2006, 11.8 million shares of our common stock were authorized and reserved for the exercise of options, of which 8.1 million shares were reserved for options previously granted and 3.7 million shares were reserved for future issuance.

18


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    Exercise of options during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 resulted in cash receipts of $11.7 million and $32.7 million, respectively. We generally recognize a tax benefit when our employees exercise options. SFAS 123(R) requires that we report the tax benefit related to the excess of the tax deductible amount over the recognized compensation expense as financing cash flow, rather than as operating cash flow under APB 25. We recorded a $3.3 million benefit as financing cash flow in the first nine months of 2006 and $3.4 million as operating cash flow in the first nine months of 2005.
 
    Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Under APB Opinion No. 25, compensation cost was measured as of the date the number of shares and exercise price became fixed. The terms of an award were generally fixed on the date of grant, requiring the stock option to be accounted for as a fixed award. For fixed awards, compensation expense was measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the option granted. Compensation expense for fixed awards, if any, was recognized ratably over the vesting period using the straight-line single option method.
 
    If the number of shares or exercise price was not fixed upon the date of grant, the award was accounted for as a variable award until the number of shares or the exercise price became fixed, or until the award was exercised, canceled, or expired unexercised. For variable awards, intrinsic value was remeasured each period and was equal to the fair market value of our stock as of the end of the reporting period less the grant exercise price. As a result, the amount of compensation expense or benefit to be recognized each period fluctuated based on changes in our closing price from the end of the previous reporting period to the end of the current reporting period. In cases when our closing stock price did not exceed the recipient’s exercise price, no compensation expense resulted. Compensation expense for variable awards, if any, was recognized in accordance with FIN No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plan, An Interpretation of APB Opinions No. 15 and 25.

19


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    We accounted for modifications to stock options under APB No. 25, as subsequently interpreted by FIN No. 44. Modifications included, but were not limited to, acceleration of vesting, extension of the exercise period following termination of employment and/or continued vesting while not providing substantive services. Compensation expense for modified awards was recorded in the period of modification for the intrinsic value of the vested portion of the award, including vesting that occurred while not providing substantive services, after the date of modification. The intrinsic value of the award was the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the date of modification and the recipient’s exercise price.
 
    Stock options issued to non-employees were accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees was valued using the Black-Scholes model and was amortized over the vesting period in accordance with FIN No. 28.
 
    Prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R), we were required to disclose the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if we had used the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to value stock options. The effect on our consolidated financial results in 2005 if we had valued our options using the fair value method under SFAS 123 and the assumptions listed above is as follows:
                 
    Nine months     Three months  
    ended September 30,     ended September 30,  
    2005     2005  
    (As restated)     (As restated)  
Reported net earnings
  $ 126,156     $ 7,412  
Stock-based compensation included in reported net earnings, net of income taxes
    1,576       538  
Stock-based compensation using fair value method, net of income taxes
    (5,585 )     (2,247 )
 
           
Pro forma net earnings
  $ 122,147     $ 5,703  
 
           
Reported basic earnings per share
  $ 1.21     $ 0.07  
Fair value stock-based compensation
    (0.04 )     (0.02 )
 
           
Pro forma basic earnings per share
  $ 1.17     $ 0.05  
 
           
 
               
Reported diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.17     $ 0.07  
Fair value stock-based compensation
    (0.04 )     (0.02 )
 
           
Pro forma diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.13     $ 0.05  
 
           

20


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
(4)   REINSURANCE
 
    In the normal course of business, our insurance companies cede a portion of their premium to domestic and foreign reinsurers through treaty and facultative reinsurance agreements. Although ceding for reinsurance purposes does not discharge the primary insurer from liability to its policyholder, our insurance companies participate in such agreements in order to limit their loss exposure, protect them against catastrophic loss and diversify their business. The following table presents the effect of such reinsurance transactions on our premium and loss and loss adjustment expense.
                         
                    Loss and loss  
    Written     Earned     adjustment  
    premium     premium     expense  
                    (As restated)  
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
                       
 
                       
Primary business
  $ 1,399,831     $ 1,326,392     $ 756,316  
Reinsurance assumed
    228,382       205,139       112,321  
Reinsurance ceded
    (329,099 )     (326,590 )     (179,515 )
 
                 
Net amounts
  $ 1,299,114     $ 1,204,941     $ 689,122  
 
                 
 
                       
Nine months ended September 30, 2005
                       
 
                       
Primary business
  $ 1,322,105     $ 1,260,309     $ 977,749  
Reinsurance assumed
    217,897       225,010       202,306  
Reinsurance ceded
    (432,559 )     (489,418 )     (500,123 )
 
                 
Net amounts
  $ 1,107,443     $ 995,901     $ 679,932  
 
                 
 
                       
Three months ended September 30, 2006
                       
 
                       
Primary business
  $ 467,499     $ 459,826     $ 280,133  
Reinsurance assumed
    68,602       69,543       29,198  
Reinsurance ceded
    (113,520 )     (108,319 )     (73,301 )
 
                 
Net amounts
  $ 422,581     $ 421,050     $ 236,030  
 
                 
 
                       
Three months ended September 30, 2005
                       
 
                       
Primary business
  $ 458,029     $ 431,573     $ 513,382  
Reinsurance assumed
    67,418       74,146       103,473  
Reinsurance ceded
    (153,749 )     (167,661 )     (321,087 )
 
                 
Net amounts
  $ 371,698     $ 338,058     $ 295,768  
 
                 

21


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    Ceding commissions netted with policy acquisition costs in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings were $35.1 million in the first nine months of 2006 and $80.6 million in the first nine months of 2005.
 
    The table below shows the components of reinsurance recoverables in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
            (As restated)  
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses
  $ 164,681     $ 93,837  
Reinsurance recoverable on outstanding losses
    615,486       636,225  
Reinsurance recoverable on incurred but not reported losses
    540,178       644,062  
Reserve for uncollectible reinsurance
    (14,393 )     (12,141 )
 
           
Total reinsurance recoverables
  $ 1,305,952     $ 1,361,983  
 
           
    Our reserve for uncollectible reinsurance covers potential collectibility issues, including disputed amounts and associated expenses. While we believe the reserve is adequate based on information currently available, conditions may change or additional information might be obtained which may require us to change the reserve in the future. We periodically review our financial exposure to the reinsurance market and the level of our reserve and continue to take actions in an attempt to mitigate our exposure to possible loss.
 
    We limit the liquidity exposure related to our reinsurance recoverables by holding funds, letters of credit or other security, such that net balances due are significantly less than the gross balances shown in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, our U.S. domiciled insurance companies require their reinsurers not authorized by the respective states of domicile of our insurance companies to collateralize their reinsurance obligations due to us. The table below shows the amounts of letters of credit and cash deposits held by us as collateral, plus other credits available for potential offset.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Payables to reinsurers
  $ 254,530     $ 291,826  
Letters of credit
    348,103       350,135  
Cash deposits
    58,985       64,150  
 
           
Total credits
  $ 661,618     $ 706,111  
 
           

22


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    The tables below present the calculation of net reserves, net unearned premium and net deferred policy acquisition costs.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
            (As restated)  
Loss and loss adjustment expense payable
  $ 2,907,626     $ 2,813,720  
Reinsurance recoverable on outstanding losses
    (615,486 )     (636,225 )
Reinsurance recoverable on incurred but not reported losses
    (540,178 )     (644,062 )
 
           
Net reserves
  $ 1,751,962     $ 1,533,433  
 
           
Unearned premium
  $ 924,518     $ 807,109  
Ceded unearned premium
    (244,003 )     (239,416 )
 
           
Net unearned premium
  $ 680,515     $ 567,693  
 
           
Deferred policy acquisition costs
  $ 181,111     $ 156,253  
Deferred ceding commissions
    (67,231 )     (67,886 )
 
           
Net deferred policy acquisition costs
  $ 113,880     $ 88,367  
 
           
(5)   EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
    The following table details the numerator and denominator used in the earnings per share calculations.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
Net earnings
  $ 261,543     $ 126,156     $ 93,257     $ 7,412  
 
                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    111,198       104,617       111,359       105,623  
Dilutive effect of outstanding options (determined using the treasury stock method)
    1,558       1,584       1,511       1,636  
Dilutive effect of convertible debt (determined using the treasury stock method)
    4,230       1,802       4,133       2,559  
 
                       
Weighted average common shares and potential common shares outstanding
    116,986       108,003       117,003       109,818  
 
                       
Anti-dilutive stock options not included in treasury stock method computation
    2,823       680       1,803       13  
 
                       

23


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
(6)   SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
 
    The performance of each segment is evaluated by our management based on net earnings. Net earnings is calculated after tax and after all corporate expense allocations, interest expense on debt incurred at the purchase date, and intercompany eliminations have been charged or credited to our individual segments. All stock-based compensation is included in the corporate segment since it is not included in management’s evaluation of the other segments. The following tables show information by business segment and geographic location. Geographic location is determined by physical location of our offices and does not represent the location of insureds or reinsureds from whom the business was generated. Effective April 1, 2006 and January 1, 2005, we consolidated two underwriting agencies into two insurance companies and all operations after those dates have been reported in our insurance company segment.
                                         
    Insurance             Other              
    Company     Agency     Operations     Corporate     Total  
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
                                       
 
                                       
Revenue:
                                       
Domestic
  $ 1,077,065     $ 49,256     $ 57,792     $ 4,413     $ 1,188,526  
Foreign
    260,526       27,135                   287,661  
Inter-segment
    19       54,473                   54,492  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment revenue
  $ 1,337,610     $ 130,864     $ 57,792     $ 4,413       1,530,679  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    (54,492 )
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated total revenue
                                  $ 1,476,187  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Net earnings (loss):
                                       
Domestic
  $ 159,617     $ 21,858     $ 37,336     $ (13,909 )   $ 204,902  
Foreign
    48,625       6,939                   55,564  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment net earnings (loss)
  $ 208,242     $ 28,797     $ 37,336     $ (13,909 )     260,466  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    1,077  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated net earnings
                                  $ 261,543  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Other items:
                                       
Net investment income
  $ 98,492     $ 6,916     $ 1,839     $ 1,712     $ 108,959  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,425       6,792       381       1,644       12,242  
Interest expense (benefit)
    838       8,875       423       (2,224 )     7,912  
Capital expenditures
    2,837       1,629       498       4,681       9,645  
 
                                       
Income tax expense (benefit)
    97,240       20,607       18,459       (6,629 )     129,677  
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    642  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated income tax expense
                                  $ 130,319  
 
                                     

24


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
                                         
    Insurance             Other              
    Company     Agency     Operations     Corporate     Total  
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 (As restated)
                                       
Revenue:
                                       
Domestic
  $ 891,726     $ 46,532     $ 22,067     $ 1,974     $ 962,299  
Foreign
    203,278       29,516                   232,794  
Inter-segment
    153       65,789                   65,942  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment revenue
  $ 1,095,157     $ 141,837     $ 22,067     $ 1,974       1,261,035  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    (65,942 )
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated total revenue
                                  $ 1,195,093  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Net earnings:
                                       
Domestic
  $ 75,805     $ 20,592     $ 13,716     $ (198 )   $ 109,915  
Foreign
    9,466       4,245                   13,711  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment net earnings
  $ 85,271 (1)   $ 24,837     $ 13,716     $ (198 )     123,626  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    1,823  
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
                                    707  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated net earnings
                                  $ 126,156  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Other items:
                                       
Net investment income
  $ 63,222     $ 4,820     $ 767     $ 1,230     $ 70,039  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,500       5,603       343       1,617       11,063  
Interest expense (benefit)
    313       6,859       564       (1,888 )     5,848  
Capital expenditures
    1,520       2,745       249       2,038       6,552  
 
                                       
Income tax expense
    33,681       17,950       6,524       9       58,164  
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    927  
 
                                     
Consolidated income tax expense on continuing operations
                                  $ 59,091  
 
                                     
(1)   Includes $48.3 million after-tax loss due to the 2005 hurricanes and $16.9 million after-tax loss due to commutations.

25


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
                                         
    Insurance             Other              
    Company     Agency     Operations     Corporate     Total  
Three months ended September 30, 2006
                                       
 
                                       
Revenue:
                                       
Domestic
  $ 373,463     $ 19,581     $ 18,898     $ 1,899     $ 413,841  
Foreign
    95,527       7,329                   102,856  
Inter-segment
    6       17,304                   17,310  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment revenue
  $ 468,996     $ 44,214     $ 18,898     $ 1,899       534,007  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    (17,310 )
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated total revenue
                                  $ 516,697  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Net earnings (loss):
                                       
Domestic
  $ 54,922     $ 8,485     $ 12,221     $ (7,865 )   $ 67,763  
Foreign
    23,827       695                   24,522  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment net earnings (loss)
  $ 78,749     $ 9,180     $ 12,221     $ (7,865 )     92,285  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    972  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated net earnings
                                  $ 93,257  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Other items:
                                       
Net investment income (loss)
  $ 33,111     $ 2,340     $ (39 )   $ 793     $ 36,205  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,154       2,755       127       562       4,598  
Interest expense
    118       3,007       159       191       3,475  
Capital expenditures
    1,658       440       3       1,414       3,515  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    36,783       6,530       6,000       (3,338 )     45,975  
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    480  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated income tax expense
                                  $ 46,455  
 
                                     

26


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
                                         
    Insurance             Other              
    Company     Agency     Operations     Corporate     Total  
Three months ended September 30, 2005 (As restated)
                                       
 
                                       
Revenue:
                                       
Domestic
  $ 312,271     $ 16,668     $ 15,682     $ 769     $ 345,390  
Foreign
    58,253       8,388                   66,641  
Inter-segment
    12       21,065                   21,077  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment revenue
  $ 370,536     $ 46,121     $ 15,682     $ 769       433,108  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    (21,077 )
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated total revenue
                                  $ 412,031  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Net earnings (loss):
                                       
Domestic
  $ 2,276     $ 4,049     $ 9,821     $ 3,056     $ 19,202  
Foreign
    (13,162 )     659                   (12,503 )
 
                             
 
                                       
Total segment net earnings (loss)
  $ (10,886 )(1)   $ 4,708     $ 9,821     $ 3,056       6,699  
 
                               
 
                                       
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    6  
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
                                    707  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Consolidated net earnings
                                  $ 7,412  
 
                                     
Other items:
                                       
Net investment income
  $ 22,607     $ 1,924     $ 79     $ 388     $ 24,998  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,164       1,708       128       703       3,703  
Interest expense (benefit)
    47       2,514       186       (677 )     2,070  
Capital expenditures
    757       1,211       172       1,119       3,259  
 
                                       
Income tax expense (benefit)
    (9,875 )     3,937       5,174       1,477       713  
Inter-segment eliminations
                                    (139 )
 
                                     
Consolidated income tax expense on continuing operations
                                  $ 574  
 
                                     
(1)   Includes $48.3 million after-tax loss due to the 2005 hurricanes and $16.9 million after-tax loss due to commutations.

27


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    The following tables present selected revenue items by line of business.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)                  
Diversified financial products
  $ 538,063     $ 371,414     $ 189,744     $ 143,084  
Group life, accident and health
    385,257       380,681       129,234       125,079  
Aviation
    112,661       101,817       40,430       35,008  
London market account
    80,455       66,402       31,590       8,784  
Other specialty lines
    88,569       69,574       30,033       25,023  
Discontinued lines
    (64 )     6,013       19       1,080  
 
                       
 
                               
Net earned premium
  $ 1,204,941     $ 995,901     $ 421,050     $ 338,058  
 
                       
 
                               
Property and casualty
  $ 86,016     $ 85,684     $ 32,565     $ 26,813  
Accident and health
    18,393       15,315       6,297       5,260  
 
                       
 
                               
Fee and commission income
  $ 104,409     $ 100,999     $ 38,862     $ 32,073  
 
                       
(6)   SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
 
    Supplemental information was as follows.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
Cash received from commutations
  $ 12,750     $ 154,078     $ 12,750     $ 119,621  
Income taxes paid
    125,228       63,138       50,354       13,579  
Interest paid
    7,044       5,756       3,556       3,140  
Comprehensive income (loss)
    276,109       108,161       132,891       (5,185 )

28


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
(7)   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
    Litigation
 
    We are party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business. Many of such lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings involve claims under policies that we underwrite as an insurer or reinsurer, the liabilities for which, we believe, have been adequately included in our loss reserves. Also, from time to time, we are a party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that relate to disputes over contractual relationships with third parties, or that involve alleged errors and omissions on the part of our subsidiaries. We have provided accruals for these items to the extent we deem the losses probable and reasonably estimable.
 
    We have been engaged in litigation initiated by the appointed liquidator of a former reinsurer concerning payments made to us prior to the date of appointment of the liquidator. The disputed payments, totaling $10.3 million, were made by the now insolvent reinsurer in connection with a commutation agreement. We reached an agreement in principle with the liquidator to resolve this matter and are in the process of finalizing the agreements. The expected resolution will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
    In April 2006, we were named as a defendant in a complaint related to insurance marketing and producer compensation practices. The lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in Georgia by a number of corporate plaintiffs against approximately 100 insurance entity defendants. The suit has been transferred to the multi-district litigation proceeding pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings with suits previously transferred that appear to the court to involve common questions of fact. The complaint alleges violations of Federal antitrust law, the Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organization Act and various state anti-fraud laws. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. We are vigorously contesting this action.
 
    Although the ultimate outcome of the matters mentioned above cannot be determined at this time, based on present information, the availability of insurance coverage and advice received from our outside legal counsel, we believe the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

29


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    Indemnifications
 
    In conjunction with the sales of business assets and subsidiaries, we have provided indemnifications to the buyers. Certain indemnifications cover typical representations and warranties related to our responsibilities to perform under the sales contracts. We cannot quantify the maximum potential exposure covered by all of our indemnifications because the indemnifications cover a variety of matters, operations and scenarios. Certain of these indemnifications have no time limit. For those with a time limit, the longest such indemnification expires on December 31, 2009.
 
    We accrue a loss related to our indemnifications when a valid claim is made by a buyer and we believe we have potential exposure. We currently have several claims under indemnifications that cover certain net losses incurred in periods prior to our sale of certain subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2006, we have recorded a liability of $13.9 million and have provided $5.2 million of letters of credit to cover our obligations or anticipated payments under these indemnifications.
 
    Stock Option Investigation Matters
 
    Based on the Special Committee’s voluntary independent investigation of our past practices related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement date for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 did not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants were retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm that was not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has commenced an informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document request from the SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are unable to predict the outcome of or the future costs related to the informal inquiry.
 
(8)   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
    On October 30, 2006, we received a registered letter from U.S. Bank, as trustee for the holders of our 2.00% Convertible Notes due 2021, 1.30% Convertible Notes due 2023 and 2.00% Convertible Exchange Notes due 2021, stating that U.S. Bank, as trustee, had not received our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. If we do not file our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 with the SEC and deliver the report to the trustee within sixty days from the date notice was received from the trustee, such failure to file and deliver will be considered an “Event of Default” under the indenture governing the notes. If an “Event of Default” were to occur under the indentures for any series of the notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% of the aggregate principal of such series then outstanding could declare all the unpaid principal on such series of notes then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. Likewise, we have not timely delivered our Form 10-Q’s for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2006 as required by the terms of our Revolving Loan Facility agreement. The banks that are a party to the agreement waived certain “Defaults” or “Events of Default” until January 31, 2007. In addition, our restatement of our prior year financial statements might be considered an “Event of Default” which has been waived until January 31, 2007. Our failure to comply with the covenants in the indentures for our convertible notes and our Revolving Loan Facility loan agreement in the future could have a material adverse effect on our stock price, business and financial condition if we would not have available funds at that time to repay any defaulted debt. A default and acceleration under the indentures for our convertible notes and loan agreement may also trigger cross-acceleration under our other debt instruments.
 
    In December 2006, our existing Revolving Loan Facility was increased by $100.0 million to $300.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company can borrow up to $25 million in addition to what is currently borrowed for working capital purposes. However, the full unfunded amount of the facility would be available to pay any potential convertible note conversion or put.

30


Table of Contents

HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands except per share data)
    On August 3, 2006, we reached an agreement to acquire the assets of the Health Products Division (the Division) of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America for cash consideration of $140.0 million and to assume the Division’s outstanding loss reserves. The Division’s operations include medical stop loss insurance for self-insured corporations and groups; excess insurance for HMOs; provider excess insurance for integrated delivery systems; excess medical reinsurance to small and regional insurance carriers; and Life Trac, a network for providing organ and bone marrow transplants. The Division currently writes more than $300.0 million in annual gross premium. We plan to integrate the Division’s operations into HCC Life Insurance Company, within our insurance company segment. Internal funds were utilized to make the acquisition, which was consummated on October 2, 2006.

31


Table of Contents

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto.
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In light of published reports concerning the pricing of stock options and the timing of stock option grants at numerous other companies, in the second quarter of 2006 we undertook a voluntary internal review of our past practices related to grants of stock options. The voluntary review by our management concluded that the actual accounting measurement dates for certain past stock option grants differed from the originally stated grant dates, which were also utilized as the measurement dates for such awards. In August 2006, our Board of Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. The Special Committee was composed of the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Special Committee retained the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP as its independent legal counsel and LECG as forensic accountants to aid in the investigation.
On November 17, 2006, we announced that the Special Committee had made certain determinations as a result of its review of our past stock option granting practices. The Special Committee found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates for stock option grants covering a significant number of employees and members of our Board of Directors during the period 1997 through 2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced. Additionally, at the direction of the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option granting practices from 1992, the year of our initial public stock offering, through 1994 and in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due to retroactive pricing were used in 2006. In substantially all of these instances, the price on the actual measurement date was higher than the price on the stated grant date; thus recipients of the options could exercise at a strike price lower than the actual measurement date price. To determine the actual measurement dates, the Special Committee utilized the following sources of information:
     The dates on documentation such as e-mails, regulatory form filings, acquisition agreements and other correspondence;
     The date that the relevant stock option grant was entered into Equity Edge, our stock option tracking and accounting system;
     Requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations; and
     Guidance from the Office of Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained in a letter dated September 19, 2006.
The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together with certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special Committee found that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options, that he should have known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock option plans and public statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock option granting process with our stock option plans and public statements. Although finding his actions were inconsistent with the duties and obligations of a chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company, the Special Committee also found that Mr. Way’s motivation appeared to be the attraction and retention of talent and to provide employees with the best option price. The Special Committee also concluded that Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, was aware that options were being retroactively priced in a manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures memoranda that he had prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and that he did not properly document our Compensation Committee’s informal delegation of authority to Mr. Way. The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.

32


Table of Contents

Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results of the investigation, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it would be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both tendered on November 17, 2006. Mr. Way will remain a director of HCC and serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and has entered into a consulting agreement with us to assist in the transition of leadership and to provide strategic guidance. We have entered into agreements with Mr. Way and Mr. Martin which, among other things, require them to disgorge an amount equal to the difference between the actual measurement date prices determined by HCC and the prices at which these individuals exercised mis-priced options since 1997.
As a result of the determinations of the Special Committee and because the resulting cumulative charge would be material to the second quarter and full year 2006 consolidated net earnings, we concluded that we needed to amend our 2005 Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K and our first quarter 2006 quarterly report filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, to restate our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. The amended Forms 10-K/A and 10-Q/A have been filed with the SEC. We made the restatement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to record the following:
    Non-cash compensation expense for the difference between the stock price on the stated grant date and the actual measurement date and for the fluctuations in stock price in certain instances where variable accounting should have been applied;
 
    Other minor adjustments that were not recorded in the originally filed financial statements due to their immateriality; and
 
    Related tax effects for all items.
We have not amended any of our other previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement other than noted above. For this reason, the consolidated financial statements and related financial information contained in such previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.
We were unable to timely file our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, primarily due to not knowing the financial impact of the Special Committee’s investigation. We have also restated the June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective 2006 quarters.
Based on the determinations of the Special Committee and our voluntary internal review, we identified a number of occasions during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 on which we used an incorrect measurement date for financial accounting and reporting purposes for options granted. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded compensation expense related to these options for the excess of the market price of our stock on the actual measurement date over the exercise price of the option. For periods commencing January 1, 2006, compensation expense is being recognized in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) (revised), Share-Based Payment. However, we determined an incremental amount related to the mis-priced options must be recorded.

33


Table of Contents

The types of errors identified were as follows:
     We determined that many block grants to employees during the period 1997 through 2005 were subject to a retroactive look-back period. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the end of the look-back period, which was generally 30 days or less, was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
     In addition to being subject to the retroactive pricing discussed above, we determined that the strike price of block grants in 1999, 2002 and 2005 was determined prior to the final determination of the identity of the employee and/or the number of options to be granted. Further, proper approval, in most cases, had not been given until after the grant date. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the time when all required determinations were final and proper approval had been obtained was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date. The time lag between the stated grant date and the finalization of the awards was typically 30-45 days, except in the case of the 2002 grant which was finalized several months subsequent to the stated grant date.
     For the period from 1997 to 2005 and into 2006, we determined that there was a regular practice of granting options to newly hired employees and existing employees being promoted after the end of a 30-45 day period following the hire or promotion date. This practice included the use of the 30-45 day period as a look-back period during which the date with the lowest price during that period was selected as the stated grant date.
     In several instances, grants to senior executives were determined at a date subsequent to the stated grant date. In most cases, this resulted from extended negotiations of employment agreements and, in some cases, administrative delays. In virtually all cases, the price of our stock at the time the grants were made and properly approved was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
     In a few cases, options were granted and then repriced downward. As a result, variable accounting should have been applied to these options.
     We lacked timely or adequate documentation to support the stated grant date in the case of certain of the above errors.
The gross compensation expense recorded to correct the above errors was a non-cash charge and had no impact on our reported net revenue, cash, cash flow or shareholders’ equity.
In connection with the investigation, we determined that a number of executive officers received in-the-money options. If such options are ultimately determined to be in-the-money grants for tax purposes, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and, if in the year of exercise the officers’ compensation, including proceeds from options exercised, exceeded $1.0 million, we would not be entitled to a tax deduction for any amount in excess of such $1.0 million for officers covered by Section 162(m). We estimate the tax effect of the deduction was $4.6 million, substantially all of which was recorded as a reduction to shareholders’ equity.
There were immaterial adjustments that were not made in the originally filed consolidated financial statements. We have taken the opportunity presented by this restatement to record these adjustments, which amounted to a net $2.4 million increase in earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense, for the years 2001 through 2005.

34


Table of Contents

The increase (decrease) on net earnings of each type of adjustment was as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
            Non-cash                            
            stock option                            
    Net earnings as   compensation                           Net earnings
    previously reported   expense   Other   Tax effect   Total adjustments   as restated
Nine months ended September 30, 2005
  $ 129,326     $ (2,193 )   $ (2,453 )   $ 1,476     $ (3,170 )   $ 126,156  
Three months ended September 30, 2005
  $ 7,950     $ (803 )   $     $ 265     $ (538 )   $ 7,412  
The restatement adjustments reduced previously reported diluted net earnings per share by $0.03 and $0.00 for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.
Enacted October 22, 2004, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code significantly changed the rules for nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Section 409A imposes certain restrictions and taxes on stock awards that constitute deferred compensation. Section 409A relates specifically to the personal tax liabilities of our employees that have received discounted options. We are currently reviewing the implications of Section 409A on grants awarded with intrinsic value that vested after December 31, 2004 and modifications made to existing grants after October 3, 2004 along with potential remedial actions.
As of December 15, 2006, we have paid direct costs of approximately $6.0 million, of which $2.5 million was incurred through September 30, 2006, for costs associated with the Special Committee’s investigation and additional related professional services and consulting fees associated with the restatement effort. We expect to pay up to several million dollars of additional expense in the next few months associated with the conclusion of the investigation and restatement of our consolidated financial statements.
Overview
We are a specialty insurance group with offices in the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain and Bermuda transacting business in more than 50 countries. Our group consists of insurance companies, underwriting agencies and reinsurance brokers. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange and had a market capitalization of $3.7 billion at September 30, 2006. We earned $261.5 million or $2.24 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $126.2 million or $1.17 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2005, and $93.3 million or $0.80 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2006 compared to $7.4 million or $0.07 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2005. The 2005 year-to-date and quarterly periods include a $48.3 million ($0.45 per diluted share) after-tax loss due to hurricanes and $16.9 million ($0.16 per diluted share) after-tax loss due to commutations. The 2006 per share amounts include the effect of dilution from a $150.0 million common stock offering in November 2005. Shareholders’ equity increased 33% from a year ago to $2.0 billion at September 30, 2006, principally from a combination of net earnings and the 2005 equity offering.
We underwrite a variety of specialty lines of business identified as diversified financial products; group life, accident and health; aviation; London market account; and other specialty lines of business. Products in each line are marketed by our insurance companies and agencies, either through a network of independent agents and brokers or directly to customers. With the exception of our public company directors’ and officers’ liability business, certain international aviation risks and our London market business, we focus on lower limit, smaller premium business that is less susceptible to price competition, severity of loss or catastrophe risk. Our principal insurance companies are rated “AA (Very Strong)” by Standard & Poor’s Corporation and “A+ (Superior)” by A.M. Best Company, Inc.
We generate our revenue from five primary sources: 1) risk-bearing earned premium produced by our insurance company operations, 2) non-risk-bearing fee and commission income received by our underwriting agency and intermediary operations, 3) ceding commissions in excess of policy acquisition costs earned by our insurance company operations, 4) investment income earned by all of our operations and 5) other operating income. We produced $1.5 billion of revenue in the first nine months of 2006, an increase of 24% over the same period in 2005. Net earned premium increased due to greater retentions, predominantly in our diversified financial products line of business, organic growth in certain lines of business, acquisitions and payment of reinstatement

35


Table of Contents

premium in 2005, which reduced net written and net earned premium. Investment income increased due to a 29% growth in total investments and an increase in interest rates. Other operating income increased due to activity in our strategic investments and trading portfolio.
During the past several years, we substantially increased our shareholders’ equity by retaining most of our earnings and issuing additional shares of common stock. With this additional equity, we increased the underwriting capacity of our insurance companies and made strategic acquisitions, adding new lines of business or expanding those with favorable underwriting characteristics.
Our 2006 and 2005 acquisitions are listed below. Net earnings and cash flows from each acquired entity are included in our operations beginning on the effective date of each transaction.
         
Company   Segment   Effective date acquired
Allianz Life Insurance Company Health Products Division
  Insurance company   October 2, 2006
G.B. Kenrick & Associates, Inc.
  Agency   July 1, 2006
Novia Underwriters, Inc.
  Agency   June 30, 2006
Illium Insurance Group
  Agency   December 31, 2005
Perico Ltd.
  Agency   December 1, 2005
Perico Life Insurance Company
  Insurance company   November 30, 2005
HCC International Insurance Company
  Insurance company   July 1, 2005
United States Surety Company
  Insurance company   March 1, 2005
The following section discusses our key operating results. The reasons for any significant variations between the quarters ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are the same as those discussed below for the respective nine month periods, unless otherwise noted. Amounts in the following tables are in thousands, except for earnings per share, percentages, ratios and number of employees.
Results of Operations
Net earnings increased to $261.6 million ($2.24 per diluted share) in the first nine months of 2006 from $126.2 million ($1.17 per diluted share) in the same period of 2005. Net earnings increased to $93.3 million ($0.80 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2006 from $7.0 million ($0.07 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2005. The 2005 year-to-date and quarterly periods include a $48.3 million ($0.45 per diluted share) after-tax loss due to hurricanes and $16.9 million ($0.16 per diluted share) after-tax loss due to commutations. Growth in underwriting profits, net investment income and other operating income contributed to the increase in 2006 earnings.

36


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the relationships of certain income statement items as a percent of total revenue.
                                 
    Nine months ended   Three months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2006   2005   2006   2005
            (As restated)           (As restated)
Net earned premium
    81.6 %     83.3 %     81.5 %     82.0 %
Fee and commission income
    7.1       8.4       7.5       7.8  
Net investment income
    7.4       5.9       7.0       6.1  
Net realized investment gain (loss)
    (0.1 )     0.2       0.1        
Other operating income
    4.0       2.2       3.9       4.1  
 
                               
Total revenue
    100.0       100.0       100.0       100.0  
Loss and loss adjustment expense, net
    46.7       56.9       45.7       71.8  
Policy acquisition costs, net
    15.7       15.7       15.1       15.9  
Other operating expense
    10.6       11.5       11.5       10.0  
Interest expense
    0.5       0.5       0.7       0.5  
 
                               
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax expense
    26.5       15.4       27.0       1.8  
Income tax expense
    8.8       4.9       9.0       0.2  
 
                               
Earnings from continuing operations
    17.7 %     10.5 %     18.0 %     1.6 %
 
                               
Total revenue increased 24% to $1.5 billion in 2006, driven by growth in net earned premium, investment income and other operating income. We expect total revenue to continue to grow in the fourth quarter.
Gross written premium, net written premium and net earned premium are detailed below. Gross written premium increased from organic growth in certain lines of business and from acquisitions. Increased retentions, particularly in our diversified financial products line of business, and the payment of reinstatement premiums in the third quarter of 2005 contributed to the growth in net written and earned premium. In addition, following an increase in our retentions at the renewal of certain reinsurance programs of our aviation line, a transfer of in force business from reinsurers resulted in increased net written premium and net earned premium in 2006. See the Insurance Company Segment section below for further discussion of the changes in premium revenue.
                                 
    Nine months ended   Three months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2006   2005   2006   2005
Gross written premium
  $ 1,628,213     $ 1,540,002     $ 536,101     $ 525,447  
 
                               
Net written premium
    1,299,114       1,107,443       422,581       371,698  
 
                               
Net earned premium
    1,204,941       995,901       421,052       338,058  

37


Table of Contents

Fee and commission income are shown in the table below. Fee and commission income increased as a result of profit commissions from reinsurers, which were triggered by reserve releases in the second and third quarter of 2006. Partially offsetting this increase was the effect of insurance company subsidiaries ceding less insurance, thereby reducing ceding commissions earned by them and reinsurance commissions earned by our reinsurance intermediaries.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)                  
Agency
  $ 70,712     $ 71,680     $ 24,781     $ 23,533  
Insurance companies
    33,697       29,319       14,081       8,540  
 
                       
 
                               
Fee and commission income
  $ 104,409     $ 100,999     $ 38,862     $ 32,073  
 
                       
The sources of net investment income are detailed below.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Fixed income securities
  $ 81,349     $ 56,017     $ 29,858     $ 19,855  
Short-term investments
    21,817       13,899       7,792       5,468  
Other investments
    9,870       2,891       (382 )     482  
 
                       
Total investment income
    113,036       72,807       37,268       25,805  
Investment expense
    (4,077 )     (2,768 )     (1,063 )     (807 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net investment income
  $ 108,959     $ 70,039     $ 36,205     $ 24,998  
 
                       
Net investment income increased 56% in the first nine months of 2006 and 45% in the third quarter of 2006, compared to the prior year periods. The increase was primarily due to higher investment assets, which increased to $3.8 billion at September 30, 2006 compared to $3.0 billion at September 30, 2005, and increasing interest rates. The growth in investment assets resulted from: 1) higher net earnings, 2) higher retentions, 3) commutations of reinsurance recoverables in late 2005, 4) our public offering of common stock in 2005 and 5) the increase in net loss reserves particularly from our diversified financial products line of business, which generally have a longer time period between occurrence and payment of claims. We continue to invest our funds primarily in fixed income securities, with a duration of 4.8 years at September 30, 2006. We expect investment assets and investment income to continue to increase through year-end.
At September 30, 2006, our unrealized gain on fixed income securities was $0.6 million, compared to an unrealized loss of $54.1 million at June 30, 2006 and $8.5 million at December 31, 2005, due to decreases in market interest rates. The change in the unrealized gain or loss, net of the related income tax effect, is recorded in other comprehensive income and fluctuates with changes in market interest rates. Our general policy has been to hold our fixed income securities, which are classified as available for sale, through periods of fluctuating interest rates and to not realize significant gains or losses from their sale. The unrealized gain on our fixed income securities increased to $19.8 million at November 30, 2006.

38


Table of Contents

Information about our portfolio of fixed income securities is as follows:
                                 
    Nine months ended   Three months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2006   2005   2006   2005
Average yield
    4.2 %     3.9 %     4.3 %     3.9 %
Average tax equivalent yield
    5.2 %     4.8 %     5.1 %     4.8 %
Weighted average maturity
  7.0 years     7.6 years                  
Weighted average duration
  4.8 years     4.8 years                  
The average yield on our short-term investments increased from 2.7% in 2005 to 4.2% in 2006.
Other operating income increased in 2006 compared to the prior year, primarily due to net gains from trading securities and gains from the partial sale of a strategic investment. Period to period comparisons of other operating income may vary substantially depending on market values of trading securities and other financial instruments and on income from strategic investments or dispositions of such investments. The following table details the sources of other operating income.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Strategic investments
  $ 28,057     $ 10,085     $ 15,308     $ 6,872  
Trading securities
    24,161       9,210       2,307       7,783  
Financial instruments
    3,265       3,250       1,273       603  
Other
    3,588       3,571       1,388       1,606  
 
                       
 
                               
Other operating income
  $ 59,071     $ 26,116     $ 20,276     $ 16,864  
 
                       
Loss and loss adjustment expense increased 1% (15% excluding losses related to the hurricanes and commutations) and policy acquisition costs increased 23% over the prior year nine-month amounts primarily due to the growth in net earned premium. See the Insurance Company Segment section below for further discussion of the changes in loss and loss adjustment expense and policy acquisition costs.
Other operating expense, which includes compensation expense, increased 14% compared to the 2005 year-to-date period and 44% quarter over quarter. The 2006 amounts increased for stock option expense under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), a higher provision for reinsurance, higher professional and legal costs, and operating expenses of subsidiaries acquired in the second half of 2005. We had 1,547 employees at September 30, 2006 compared to 1,373 a year earlier, with the increase due to acquisitions. See the Recent Accounting Changes section below for further discussion of our adoption of SFAS 123(R) in 2006. The first nine months of 2005 included expense related to an indemnification claim.
Our effective income tax rate was 33.3% for 2006, compared to 32.0% for 2005. We recorded a special $2.1 million U.S. repatriation tax benefit in 2005.
At September 30, 2006, book value per share was $17.59 up from $15.26, total assets were $7.5 billion up from $7.0 billion, and shareholders’ equity was $2.0 billion up from $1.7 billion, all compared to December 31, 2005.

39


Table of Contents

Segments
Insurance Company Segment
Net earnings of our insurance company segment increased to $208.2 million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $85.3 million in the same period of 2005. The 2005 period included $65.2 million of after-tax losses related to commutations and hurricanes. The growth in segment net earnings was driven by an increase in underwriting income, increased investment income and the operations of acquired subsidiaries. Even though there is some pricing competition in certain of our markets, our margins remain at an acceptable level of profitability due to our underwriting expertise and discipline. We expect net earnings from our insurance companies to continue to grow in the fourth quarter.
Premium
Gross written premium increased 6% to $1.6 billion in the first nine months of 2006 compared to 2005. Net written premium increased 17% to $1.3 billion and net earned premium increased 21% to $1.2 billion for the same period. The increase in gross written premium was due to higher writings in the energy sector of our London market account, diversified financial products and other specialty lines of business, partially offset by the non-renewal of a book of accident and health business that was 100% reinsured. The increases in net written and net earned premium were primarily due to higher retention levels on non-catastrophe business and growth in the energy sector, although our retention percentage on this line was reduced in 2006 to spread the risk. The overall percentage of retained premium increased to 80% in 2006 from 72% in 2005.
Gross written, net written and net earned premium increased 2%, 14% and 25%, respectively, quarter over quarter. We had reduced writings of international directors and officers insurance in 2006. In addition, the 2005 net written and net earned premium were reduced by $20.7 million for premium to reinstate our excess of loss reinsurance protection following the 2005 hurricanes. Net written and net earned premium are expected to continue to grow in the fourth quarter of 2006.

40


Table of Contents

The following tables provide premium information by line of business.
                                 
    Gross     Net     NWP as     Net  
    written     written     % of     earned  
    premium     premium     GWP     premium  
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
                               
 
                               
Diversified financial products
  $ 690,779     $ 574,098       83 %   $ 538,063  
Group life, accident and health
    415,215       388,895       94       385,257  
Aviation
    166,072       128,810       78       112,661  
London market account
    202,964       111,278       55       80,455  
Other specialty lines
    152,960       96,056       63       88,569  
Discontinued lines
    223       (23 )   nm       (64 )
 
                       
Totals
  $ 1,628,213     $ 1,299,114       80 %   $ 1,204,941  
 
                       
                                 
Nine months ended September 30, 2005
                               
 
                               
Diversified financial products
  $ 665,400     $ 480,405       72 %   $ 371,414  
Group life, accident and health
    453,558       381,367       84       380,681  
Aviation
    159,446       99,879       63       101,817  
London market account
    124,134       64,938       52       66,402  
Other specialty lines
    133,766       78,542       59       69,574  
Discontinued lines
    3,698       2,312     nm       6,013  
 
                       
Totals
  $ 1,540,002     $ 1,107,443       72 %   $ 995,901  
 
                       
                                 
Three months ended September 30, 2006
                               
 
                               
Diversified financial products
  $ 240,046     $ 200,333       83 %   $ 189,744  
Group life, accident and health
    142,457       130,007       91       129,234  
Aviation
    50,976       38,446       75       40,430  
London market account
    44,799       20,761       46       31,590  
Other specialty lines
    57,837       32,963       57       30,033  
Discontinued lines
    (14 )     71     nm       19  
 
                       
Totals
  $ 536,101     $ 422,581       79 %   $ 421,050  
 
                       
                                 
Three months ended September 30, 2005
                               
 
                               
Diversified financial products
  $ 241,781     $ 184,931       76 %   $ 143,084  
Group life, accident and health
    147,236       124,358       84       125,079  
Aviation
    53,090       31,597       60       35,008  
London market account
    32,366       (370 )   nm       8,784  
Other specialty lines
    49,991       30,220       60       25,023  
Discontinued lines
    983       962     nm       1,080  
 
                       
Totals
  $ 525,447     $ 371,698       71 %   $ 338,058  
 
                       
 
nm — Not meaningful comparison
The changes in premium volume and retention levels between years resulted principally from the following factors:
    Diversified financial products — Growth in our surety and credit products was strong from both organic growth and our 2005 acquisitions. The growth in net written and net earned premium was due to increased retentions resulting from a reduction in proportional reinsurance.
 
    Group life, accident and health — Gross written premium declined primarily because we non-

41


Table of Contents

      renewed a book of business which was 100% reinsured. Profit margins remain at acceptable levels despite competition from the fully insured market.
    Aviation — The growth in net written and net earned premium was due to the effect of recapture of ceded unearned premium from a transfer of in force business in the second quarter of 2006. In addition, retentions increased from a reduction in proportional reinsurance.
 
    London market account — Gross written premium increased due to the substantial increase in rates in the energy sector as a result of the 2005 hurricane losses, more than offsetting a reduction in our property sector premium. Net written premium increased for the same reason and will be reflected in increases in our net earned premium later in 2006 and into 2007. In 2006, to increase our capacity and spread our risk in the energy sector, we entered into a new quota share reinsurance agreement. Although the cost of our 2006 excess of loss reinsurance increased, our potential profitability is greater on the increased gross written premium. Our aggregate exposure in Florida and the Gulf of Mexico is lower in 2006 than it was in 2005. Net written premium and net earned premium were reduced in 2005 by additional excess of loss premium to reinstate catastrophe reinsurance coverage, which distorts the retention percentages.
 
    Other specialty lines — We experienced organic growth in our other specialty lines of business from increased writings in several products. The mix of products affected the retention percentages. Rates in this line have been relatively stable.
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The net redundancy relating to prior year losses included in our net incurred loss and loss adjustment expense was $6.0 million in the first nine months of 2006, compared to a net deficiency of $27.5 million (including $26.0 million due to commutations) in the first nine months of 2005. We had a net redundancy of $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2006 and a net deficiency of $25.2 million (including $26.0 million due to commutations) in the third quarter of 2005. During the third quarter of 2006, following a review of ultimate loss ratios, we reduced our net loss reserves by $4.8 million, primarily related to aviation and by $1.9 million related to one large 2005 hurricane claim that was settled for an amount less than reserved. During the second quarter of 2005, we reduced our net loss reserves on the 2004 hurricanes by $5.8 million to reflect revised estimates of our remaining liabilities. This reduction was offset by reserve increases in our London market account and group life, accident and health lines of business. Deficiencies and redundancies in reserves occur as a result of our continuing review and as losses are finally settled or claims exposures change. We have no material exposure to environmental or asbestos losses and believe we have provided for all material net incurred losses.

42


Table of Contents

Our gross loss ratio was 56.7% in the first nine months of 2006 and 79.4% (including 19.9% related to the 2005 hurricanes) in the same period of 2005. The following table provides comparative net loss ratios, by line of business, which reflect better than expected aviation underwriting results in 2006 and the effects of hurricanes and commutations in 2005. The net loss ratios excluding hurricanes and commutations were 59.0% and 60.2% in the nine months and third quarter of 2005, respectively.
                                                                 
    Nine months ended September 30,     Three months ended September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
    Net     Net     Net     Net     Net     Net     Net     Net  
    earned     loss     earned     loss     earned     loss     earned     loss  
    premium     ratio     premium     ratio     premium     ratio     premium     ratio  
                            (As restated)                                  
Diversified financial products
  $ 538,063       49.0 %   $ 371,414       48.1 %   $ 189,744       46.5 %   $ 143,084       48.5 %
Group life, accident and health
    385,257       71.3       380,681       73.0       129,234       73.7       125,079       78.9  
Aviation
    112,661       55.9       101,817       73.3       40,430       55.0       35,008       100.0  
London market account
    80,455       44.5       66,402       95.1       31,590       42.9       8,784       424.3  
Other specialty lines
    88,569       58.1       69,574       76.1       30,033       55.2       25,023       111.2  
Discontinued lines
    (64 )   nm       6,013     nm       19     nm       1,080     nm  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Totals
  $ 1,204,941       57.2 %   $ 995,901       68.3 %   $ 421,050       56.1 %   $ 338,058       87.5 %
 
                                                       
 
                                                               
Expense ratio
            25.7               26.2               24.5               25.3  
 
                                                       
 
                                                               
Combined ratio
            82.9 %             94.5 %             80.6 %             112.8 %
 
                                                       
 
nm — Not meaningful comparison
Comments on significant changes in net loss ratios by line of business follow:
    Aviation — Underwriting results have been better than expected in 2006. The 2005 hurricanes increased the loss ratios 8.2% and 24.1% for the nine months and third quarter of 2005, respectively.
 
    London market account — The 2005 hurricanes increased the loss ratios 54.9% and 393.3% for the nine months and third quarter of 2005, respectively. The London market account line of business can have relatively high quarter-to-quarter volatility due to catastrophe exposure.
 
    Other specialty lines — The 2005 hurricanes increased the net loss ratios 18.6% and 51.8% for the nine months and third quarter of 2005, respectively.
 
    Discontinued lines — The 2005 commutation losses primarily affected this line of business.
Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, which are net of the related portion of commissions on reinsurance ceded, increased to $231.0 million in the first nine months of 2006 from $187.7 million in the first nine months of 2005. Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net earned premium increased to 19.2% in 2006 from 18.8% in 2005 due to changes in the mix of business. The expense ratio was lower than 2005 due to the higher level of net earned premium in 2006 and the effect of reinstatement premiums in 2005.

43


Table of Contents

Agency Segment
Revenue from our agency segment decreased to $130.9 million in the first nine months of 2006 from $141.8 million in the first nine months of 2005, primarily due to less business produced in certain lines and the overall effect of ceding less insurance. In addition, we consolidated two underwriting agencies into insurance companies in 2005 and 2006. However, segment net earnings increased in 2006 to $28.8 million from $24.8 million in 2005 due to higher foreign earnings from brokering directors’ and officers’ liability business. While increased retentions result in less fee and commission income to our agency segment, they generate increased insurance company revenue and net earnings.
Other Operations Segment
Revenue and net earnings from our other operations segment increased to $57.8 million and $37.3 million, respectively, in the first nine months of 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to net gains from trading securities and the partial sale of a strategic investment. Results of this segment may vary substantially period to period depending on our investment in or disposition of strategic investments and activity in our trading portfolio.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We receive substantial cash from premiums, reinsurance recoverables, commutations, fee and commission income, proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments and investment income. Our principal cash outflows are for the payment of claims and loss adjustment expenses, premium payments to reinsurers, purchases of investments, debt service, policy acquisition costs, operating expenses, taxes and dividends.
Cash provided by operating activities can fluctuate due to timing differences in the collection of premiums and reinsurance recoverables and the payment of losses and premium and reinsurance balances payable, the completion of commutations and activity in our trading portfolio. Our cash provided by operating activities has been strong in recent years due to: 1) our increasing net earnings, 2) growth in net written premium and net loss reserves due to organic growth, acquisitions and increased retentions, 3) commutations of selected reinsurance agreements and 4) expansion of our diversified financial products line of business, where we retain premium longer due to the longer duration of claims liabilities.

44


Table of Contents

The components of our net operating cash flows are detailed in the following table.
                                 
    Nine months ended     Three months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
            (As restated)             (As restated)  
Net earnings
  $ 261,543     $ 126,156     $ 93,257     $ 7,412  
Change in premium, claims and other receivables, net of reinsurance, other payables and restricted cash
    (79,176 )     (67,328 )     (28,950 )     47,397  
Change in unearned premium, net
    109,051       103,503       4,837       32,106  
Change in loss and loss adjustment expense payable, net of reinsurance recoverables
    149,937       376,060       36,521       270,187  
Change in trading portfolio
    (99,193 )     (54,654 )     (14,702 )     (16,600 )
Other, net
    17,544       (30,483 )     8,802       (6,085 )
 
                       
 
                               
Cash provided by operating activities
  $ 359,706     $ 453,254     $ 99,765     $ 334,417  
 
                       
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $93.5 million in the first nine months of 2006 and $234.7 million quarter over quarter. Cash received from commutations, included in cash provided by operating activities, totaled $12.8 million in 2006 and $154.1 million in 2005 ($119.6 million in third quarter 2005). Cash flow from operations decreased in 2006 primarily due to payment of 2005 hurricane claims in 2006, the timing of receipt of receivables and payment of related payables, and commutations, partially offset by an increase in net earnings.
Our combined cash and investment portfolio increased by $532.7 million during 2006 to a total of $3.9 billion at September 30, 2006. We maintain a substantial level of cash and liquid short-term investments to meet anticipated payment obligations.
In 2006, we paid $32.3 million, which had been accrued at December 31, 2005, related to earnout consideration based on the terms of prior acquisition agreements. In June and July 2006, we acquired Novia Underwriters, Inc. and G.B. Kenrick and Associates, Inc. for a cash consideration.
Our $200.0 million Revolving Loan Facility allows us to borrow up to the maximum allowed by the facility on a revolving basis until the facility expires on November 30, 2009. We had borrowings of $84.0 million as of September 30, 2006. We have a commitment for a new $300.0 million facility with more favorable terms, which will replace our current facility.
In the second quarter of 2006, we filed a “Universal Shelf” registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which replaced our previously filed registration statements and provides for the issuance of an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our securities. These securities may be debt securities, equity securities, trust preferred securities, or a combination thereof.
As a result of our common stock trading at specified price levels in the third quarter of 2006, holders may elect to surrender our 1.30% Convertible Notes and 2.00% Convertible Exchange Notes (Notes) in the fourth quarter for cash equal to the principal amount of the Notes ($297.3 million at September 30, 2006) and common stock for the value of the conversion premium. We expect to use operating cash flow and the Revolving Loan Facility to fund any Notes surrendered, which have been minimal to date. Assuming an average price of $33.00 for our stock, we would issue approximately 4.6 million shares of common stock should all Note holders elect conversion. The dilutive effect of these shares is included in the calculation of our diluted earnings per share. Our common stock must meet the specified price levels in each subsequent quarter in order for the Notes to be eligible for conversion in the following quarter.
As a result of our delayed filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September

45


Table of Contents

30, 2006, we are ineligible to register our securities on Form S-3 or use our previously filed shelf registration statement for sale of our securities by us or resale of our securities by others until we have timely filed all periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for one year. We may use Form S-1 to raise capital and borrow money utilizing public debt or complete acquisitions of other companies, which could increase transaction costs and adversely impact our ability to raise capital and borrow money or complete acquisitions in a timely manner. In addition, the financial strength ratings of our insurance companies and our debt ratings, which A.M. Best placed under review with negative implications and Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor’s affirmed with a stable outlook, if reduced, might significantly impede our ability to raise capital and borrow money.
On October 30, 2006, we received a registered letter from U.S. Bank, as trustee for the holders of our 2.00% Convertible Notes due 2021, 1.30% Convertible Notes due 2023 and 2.00% Convertible Exchange Notes due 2021, stating that U.S. Bank, as trustee, had not received our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. If we do not file our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 with the SEC and deliver the report to the trustee within sixty days from the date notice was received from the trustee, such failure to file and deliver will be considered an “Event of Default” under the indenture governing the notes. If an “Event of Default” were to occur under the indentures for any series of the notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% of the aggregate principal of such series then outstanding could declare all the unpaid principal on such series of notes then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. Likewise, we have not timely delivered our Form 10-Q’s for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2006 as required by the terms of our Revolving Loan Facility agreement. The banks that are a party to the agreement waived certain “Defaults” or “Events of Default” until January 31, 2007. In addition, our restatement of our prior year financial statements might be considered an “Event of Default” which has been waived until January 31, 2007. Our failure to comply with the covenants in the indentures for our convertible notes and our Revolving Loan Facility loan agreement in the future could have a material adverse effect on our stock price, business and financial condition if we would not have available funds at that time to repay any defaulted debt. A default and acceleration under the indentures for our convertible notes and loan agreement may also trigger cross-acceleration under our other debt instruments.
In December 2006, our existing Revolving Loan Facility was increased by $100.0 million to $300.0 million. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company can borrow up to $25 million in addition to what is currently borrowed for working capital purposes. However, the full unfunded amount of the facility would be available to pay any potential convertible note conversion or put.
Based on the Special Committee’s voluntary independent investigation of our past practices related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement date for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 did not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants were retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm that was not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has commenced an informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document request from the SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are unable to predict the outcome of or the future costs related to the informal investigation.
Our debt to total capital ratio was 16.7% at September 30, 2006 and 15.5% at December 31, 2005.

46


Table of Contents

On October 2, 2006, we completed our acquisition of the assets of Allianz Life Insurance Company’s Health Products Division for cash consideration of $140.0 million and assumption of $151.5 million of loss reserves. The transaction was completed using existing capital resources and without incurring any additional debt.
We believe that our operating cash flows, investments, Revolving Loan Facility and other sources of liquidity will provide sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our current operating needs for the foreseeable future.
Recent Accounting Changes
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective method. In 2006 and thereafter, we will expense the fair value of our unvested stock options granted before January 1, 2006 and all options granted after that date. Prior to adoption, we accounted for our stock options in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and did not recognize compensation expense for options granted. Under the modified prospective method of SFAS 123(R), the 2005 and prior period financial statements were not restated when we adopted SFAS 123(R). We made no modifications to our stock option plans in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
In the first nine months of 2006, we expensed $9.5 million ($6.8 million after-tax or $0.06 per diluted share) of stock-based compensation, after the effect of the deferral and amortization of related policy acquisition costs. We expensed $3.4 million ($2.4 million after-tax or $0.02 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2006. At September 30, 2006, there was approximately $33.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three years. In 2006, we expect to recognize $12.9 million of expense, including the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, related to stock-based compensation for options currently outstanding. In accordance with the requirements of APB Opinion No. 25, we recorded $2.2 million and $0.8 million of stock-based compensation in the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, respectively.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Effective January 1, 2007, FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain income tax positions. We are currently reviewing the requirements of FIN 48 to determine the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which clarified the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 will be effective for us on January 1, 2008. We are currently assessing whether the adoption of SFAS 157 will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 establishes a standard approach for quantifying the materiality of errors to current and prior period financial statements. SAB 108’s guidelines must be applied in the fourth quarter, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded either by restating prior year financial statements or recording a cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2006. We believe the requirements of SAB 108 will have no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have made no changes in our methods of application of our critical accounting policies from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.

47


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Background of Restatement
As disclosed in Explanatory Note — Late Filing of Quarterly Report on page 3 of this Form 10-Q and in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in August 2006, our Board of Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. On November 17, 2006, we announced that the Special Committee found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates for stock option grants covering a significant number of employees and members of our Board of Directors during the period 1997 through 2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced. Additionally, at the direction of the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option granting practices from 1992, the year of our initial public stock offering, through 1994 and in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due to retroactive pricing were used in 2006. In substantially all of these instances, the price on the actual measurement date was higher than the price on the stated grant date.
The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together with certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special Committee found that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options, that he should have known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock option plans and public statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock option granting process with our stock option plans and public statements. Although finding his actions were inconsistent with the duties and obligations of a chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company, the Special Committee also found that Mr. Way’s motivation appeared to be the attraction and retention of talent and to provide employees with the best option price. The Special Committee also concluded that Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, was aware that options were being retroactively priced in a manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures memoranda that he had prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and that he did not properly document our Compensation Committee’s informal delegation of authority to Mr. Way. The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.
Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results of the investigation, the chairman of our Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it would be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both tendered on November 17, 2006.
We determined that, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded compensation expense related to these mis-priced options for the excess of the market price of our stock on the actual accounting measurement date over the exercise price of the option. As a result, we concluded that we needed to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 to restate our consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and all quarters for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and to record an adjustment to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006. In addition, as discussed below, we concluded that we had a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006.
As part of the restatement process, we recorded other adjustments in the period 2000 through 2005 that were not recorded in the originally filed financial statements due to their immateriality. We evaluated the control deficiencies that resulted in these adjustments and concluded that these immaterial errors were the result of control deficiencies that did not constitute a material weakness, individually or in the aggregate, in our internal control over financial reporting.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act)) that are designed to ensure that required information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required timeframe, as specified in rules set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of September 30, 2006, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us to comply with our disclosure obligations under the Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by us within the timeframes specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to comply with our disclosure obligations under the Act because of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below. Notwithstanding this material weakness, our current management has concluded that our consolidated financial statements for the periods covered by and included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each of the periods presented herein.

48


Table of Contents

Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Our current management identified the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006.
We did not maintain an effective control environment based on the criteria established in the COSO framework. We did not maintain adequate controls to prevent or detect management override by certain former members of senior management related to our stock option granting practices and procedures. This lack of an effective control environment permitted certain former members of senior management to override controls and retroactively price stock option grants, resulting in ineffective controls over our stock option granting practices and procedures. Effective controls, including monitoring and adequate communication, were not maintained to ensure the accuracy, valuation and presentation of activity related to our stock option granting practices and procedures. This control deficiency resulted in misstatement of our stock-based compensation expense, additional paid-in capital and related income tax accounts and related disclosures, and in the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and all quarters for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the adjustment of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006. This control deficiency could result in misstatement of the aforementioned accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has determined this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

49


Table of Contents

Remediation Plans
We are committed to remediating the material weakness identified above by implementing changes to our internal control over financial reporting to enhance our control environment. During 2006, we implemented or are in the process of implementing new policies and controls related to our stock option granting practices and procedures, as follows:
    Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results of the investigation, the Chairman of our Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, our Board of Directors determined that it would be appropriate to accept the resignations of our former CEO and General Counsel, which both tendered on November 17, 2006. Our Board of Directors has appointed a new Chairman of our Compensation Committee and a new CEO who, together with other members of our senior management, are committed to achieving transparency through effective corporate governance, a strong control environment, application of business standards reflected in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and completeness and integrity of our financial reporting and disclosure.
 
    We have changed our option granting approval policies and procedures to require Compensation Committee approval of all new option grants on the day of each Compensation Committee meeting preceding the regularly scheduled quarterly Board of Directors meeting. All grants will be appropriately approved and documented in minutes of the meeting, taken contemporaneously with the meeting. All grants will be priced at the market closing price on the day of each such Compensation Committee meeting. We have established processes and procedures to increase the level of communication between the Compensation Committee, senior management and our financial reporting and accounting personnel regarding stock option grants.
We are actively engaged in the implementation of other remediation efforts to address the material weakness identified in our internal control over financial reporting. Although we have not fully remediated the material weakness as of the date of this Form 10-Q filing, we believe we have made substantial progress.
Part II — Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K/A, based on the Special Committee’s voluntary independent investigation of our past practices related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement date for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 did not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants were retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm that was not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has commenced an informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document request from the SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are unable to predict the outcome of or the future costs related to the informal investigation.
We are party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business. Many of such lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings involve claims under policies that we underwrite as an insurer or reinsurer, the liabilities for which, we believe, have been adequately included in our loss reserves. Also, from time to time, we are a party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that relate to disputes over contractual relationships with third parties, or that involve alleged errors and omissions on the part of our subsidiaries. We have provided accruals for these items to the extent we deem the losses probable and reasonably estimable.
In April 2006, we were named as a defendant in a complaint related to insurance marketing and producer compensation practices. The lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in Georgia by a number of corporate plaintiffs against approximately 100 insurance entity defendants. The suit has been transferred to the multi-district litigation proceeding pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings with suits previously transferred that appear to the court to involve common questions of fact. The complaint alleges violations of Federal antitrust law, the Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organization Act and various state anti-fraud laws. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. We are vigorously contesting this action.
Although the ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined at this time, based on present information, the availability of insurance coverage and advice received from our outside legal counsel, we believe the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 6. Exhibits
         
a.   Exhibits
    23     
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated December 22, 2006
    31.1  
Certification by Chief Executive Officer
    31.2  
Certification by Chief Financial Officer
    32.1  
Certification with Respect to Quarterly Report

50


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 
   
    HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
     
    (Registrant)
     
December 26, 2006   /s/ Frank J. Bramanti
     
(Date)   Frank J. Bramanti, Chief Executive Officer
     
December 26, 2006   /s/ Edward H. Ellis, Jr.
     
(Date)   Edward H. Ellis, Jr., Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

51


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
         
  23    
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated December 22, 2006
  31.1    
Certification by Chief Executive Officer
  31.2    
Certification by Chief Financial Officer
  32.1    
Certification with Respect to Quarterly Report