e424b3
|
|
|
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NO. 7
|
|
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) |
(To Prospectus dated May 1, 2006)
|
|
Registration No. 333-133072 |
UROPLASTY, INC.
1,918,809 Shares of Common Stock
and
1,180,928 Shares of Common Stock
Issuable Upon Exercise of Warrants
This prospectus supplement relates to shares of our common stock that may be sold at various times
by certain selling shareholders. You should read this prospectus
supplement no. 7, the prior
prospectus supplements and the prospectus dated May 1, 2006, which are to be delivered with this
prospectus supplement. Our May 1, 2006 prospectus is a combined prospectus under Rule 429(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with our prior prospectus dated July 29, 2005 and
supplements thereto (See Registration No. 333-126737 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 20, 2005 and declared effective on July 29, 2005).
This prospectus supplement contains our Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB for the first quarter of
fiscal 2007 ended June 30, 2006. This report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on August 14, 2006. The attached information supplements and supersedes, in part, the information
contained in the prospectus.
Our common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol UPI. On August 11,
2006, the closing price of our common stock on the American Stock Exchange was $2.06 per share.
This investment is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. See Risk Factors on page 6 of
the prospectus to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of the common stock.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or
passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2006
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
Quarterly Report Under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
Commission File No. 000-20989
UROPLASTY, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota, U.S.A.
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
41-1719250
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
5420 Feltl Road
Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55343
(Address of principal executive offices)
(912) 426-6140
(Issuers telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common
Stock, $.01 par value (Title of class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act:
YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers only class of common stock on July 31, 2006 was
6,965,206.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:
YES o NO þ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,394,306 |
|
|
$ |
1,563,433 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137,647 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
936,816 |
|
|
|
716,587 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
170,290 |
|
|
|
270,934 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
731,663 |
|
|
|
757,062 |
|
Other |
|
|
415,107 |
|
|
|
353,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,648,182 |
|
|
|
4,798,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
1,445,778 |
|
|
|
1,079,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
385,067 |
|
|
|
411,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
139,505 |
|
|
|
111,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,618,532 |
|
|
$ |
6,401,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Page 2
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities long-term debt |
|
$ |
43,998 |
|
|
$ |
41,658 |
|
Current maturities deferred rent |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
185,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
552,704 |
|
|
|
506,793 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
632,197 |
|
|
|
917,981 |
|
Warrant liability |
|
|
337,624 |
|
|
|
665,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,786,949 |
|
|
|
2,131,788 |
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities |
|
|
400,101 |
|
|
|
389,241 |
|
Deferred rent less current maturities |
|
|
239,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension liability |
|
|
573,267 |
|
|
|
473,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,999,750 |
|
|
|
2,994,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value; 20,000,000
shares authorized, 6,965,206 and 6,937,786
shares issued and outstanding at June 30 and
March 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
69,652 |
|
|
|
69,378 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
15,199,298 |
|
|
|
14,831,787 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(12,275,339 |
) |
|
|
(11,034,100 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(374,829 |
) |
|
|
(460,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,618,782 |
|
|
|
3,407,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,618,532 |
|
|
$ |
6,401,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,764,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,645,653 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
555,516 |
|
|
|
420,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,208,694 |
|
|
|
1,224,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
884,109 |
|
|
|
690,564 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
674,954 |
|
|
|
630,598 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
1,232,587 |
|
|
|
664,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791,650 |
|
|
|
1,985,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,582,956 |
) |
|
|
(760,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
19,507 |
|
|
|
27,380 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,982 |
) |
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
Warrant benefit (expense) |
|
|
327,732 |
|
|
|
(686,295 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
26,411 |
|
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,468 |
|
|
|
(664,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,210,488 |
) |
|
|
(1,425,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
30,751 |
|
|
|
37,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,462,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
6,952,167 |
|
|
|
6,351,245 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Three months ended June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Other
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
6,937,786 |
|
|
$ |
69,378 |
|
|
$ |
14,831,787 |
|
|
$ |
(11,034,100 |
) |
|
|
$(460,015 |
) |
|
$ |
3,407,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options |
|
|
9,666 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
12,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Retirement
Savings Plan
Contribution |
|
|
17,754 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
44,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional pension
liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,156,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
6,965,206 |
|
|
$ |
69,652 |
|
|
$ |
15,199,298 |
|
|
$ |
(12,275,339 |
) |
|
|
($ 374,829 |
) |
|
$ |
2,618,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,462,313 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
78,295 |
|
|
|
54,319 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(4,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Warrant expense (benefit) |
|
|
(327,732 |
) |
|
|
686,295 |
|
Stock-based consulting expense |
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
299,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(21,495 |
) |
|
|
7,453 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
(5,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(178,338 |
) |
|
|
(37,436 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
76,937 |
|
|
|
(222,364 |
) |
Other current assets and income tax receivable |
|
|
59,400 |
|
|
|
(92,228 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
35,354 |
|
|
|
11,650 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
274,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(207,912 |
) |
|
|
165,265 |
|
Accrued pension liability |
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
|
19,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,125,303 |
) |
|
|
(869,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,103,402 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
1,137,647 |
|
|
|
87,359 |
|
Payments for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(371,825 |
) |
|
|
(129,474 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
770,622 |
|
|
|
(2,412,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from financing obligations |
|
|
210,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term obligations |
|
|
(36,374 |
) |
|
|
(10,819 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
6,824,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
187,423 |
|
|
|
6,813,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
(81,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(169,127 |
) |
|
|
3,449,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,563,433 |
|
|
|
1,405,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,394,306 |
|
|
$ |
4,854,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
$ |
5,056 |
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
|
23,121 |
|
|
|
15,281 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for 401(k) plan profit sharing contribution |
|
$ |
44,408 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions funded by lessor allowance and
classified as deferred rent |
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements.
Page 6
UROPLASTY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
We have prepared our condensed interim consolidated financial statements included in this Form
10-QSB, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations.
The consolidated results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of
results for a full year. These condensed interim consolidated statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006.
The condensed interim consolidated financial statements presented herein as of June 30, 2006 and
for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 reflect, in the opinion of management, all
material adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
interim periods.
We have identified certain accounting policies that we consider particularly important for the
portrayal of our results of operations and financial position and which may require the application
of a higher level of judgment by our management, and as a result are subject to an inherent level
of uncertainty. These are characterized as critical accounting policies and address revenue
recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, foreign currency translation and transactions,
impairment of long-lived assets, share-based compensation and income taxes, each of which is more
fully described in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006. Based upon
our review, we have determined that these policies remain our most critical accounting policies for
the three-month period ended June 30, 2006, and we have made no changes to these policies during
fiscal 2007.
2. Nature of Business, Sales of Common Stock and Corporate Liquidity
The majority of our products are sold primarily outside of the United States. The 510(k) premarket
clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was received in August 2005 for our
I-STOPTM Mid-Urethral Sling, a biocompatible, tension-free sling used to treat female
urinary incontinence. In October 2005 and July 2006, we received the 510(K) premarket clearances
for, respectively, the original and enhanced versions of our Urgent® PC Neurostimulation System, a
proprietary, minimally invasive nerve stimulation device designed for office-based treatment of
overactive bladder symptoms of urge incontinence, urinary urgency and urinary frequency. We have
established a sales force in the United States to commercialize these products and anticipate
increasing our sales and marketing organization. We continue to pursue regulatory approvals to
market other products in the United States. The FDA approval process can be costly, lengthy and
uncertain.
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including among
other things, the timing and cost of obtaining FDA approval for the Macroplastique premarket
approval application (PMA) and expanding the sales, marketing and distribution capabilities in the
U.S. market. We will need to raise additional debt or equity financing to continue funding for
product development and continued expansion of our sales and marketing activities for beyond fiscal
2007, and ultimately, we will need to achieve profitability and generate positive cash flows from
operations. Aside from the recently established credit lines indicated below and proceeds from a
private placement (see Note 15), we have no committed resources of, or other arrangements with
respect to, additional financing.
In May 2006 we entered into a business loan agreement with Venture Bank. The agreement provides
for a credit line of up to $1 million secured by substantially all of our assets. We may borrow
up to 50% of the value of the inventory on hand in the U.S. and 75% of the U.S. accounts receivable
value; provided however, we cannot borrow any amount if our consolidated shareholders equity
declines below $0.5 million. We may borrow the maximum $1 million only if our consolidated
shareholders equity is not less than $1 million. For consolidated shareholders equity in excess
of $0.5 million but less than $1 million, the maximum that we can borrow is $250,000. The bank
charges us interest on the loan at the rate of 1 percentage point over the prime rate (8.25% at
June 30, 2006) subject to a minimum interest rate of 7% per annum.
In June 2006, we entered into a $100,000 3-year, term loan agreement with Venture Bank, at an
interest rate of 8.25% per annum. In addition, Uroplasty BV, one of our subsidiaries entered into
an arrangement with Rabobank of The Netherlands for a 200,000 (approximately $258,500) credit
line.
Page 7
At June 30, 2006, we had no borrowings against any of our credit lines.
3. Short-term Investments
At March 31, 2006, short-term investments consisted of certificates of deposit that matured in the
first quarter of fiscal 2007.
4. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (net realizable
value) and consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
345,110 |
|
|
$ |
379,685 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
67,950 |
|
|
|
26,183 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
418,408 |
|
|
|
453,633 |
|
Reserve |
|
|
(99,805 |
) |
|
|
(102,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
731,663 |
|
|
$ |
757,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are comprised of patents, trademarks and licensed technology which are amortized
on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or contractual terms, whichever is less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lives (Years) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net value |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
501,290 |
|
|
$ |
136,028 |
|
|
$ |
365,262 |
|
Patents and inventions |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
237,900 |
|
|
|
218,095 |
|
|
|
19,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
739,190 |
|
|
$ |
354,123 |
|
|
$ |
385,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Licensed technology |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
501,290 |
|
|
$ |
111,183 |
|
|
$ |
390,107 |
|
Patents and inventions |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
237,900 |
|
|
|
216,403 |
|
|
|
21,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
739,190 |
|
|
$ |
327,586 |
|
|
$ |
411,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual amortization for these assets for the fiscal years ended March 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2007 |
|
$ |
77,000 |
|
2008 |
|
|
100,800 |
|
2009 |
|
|
100,700 |
|
2010 |
|
|
98,400 |
|
2011 |
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
385,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss consists of net loss, translation adjustments and additional pension liability
as follows:
Page 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,462,313 |
) |
Items of other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
|
96,589 |
|
|
|
(208,159 |
) |
Additional pension liability |
|
|
(11,403 |
) |
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,156,053 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,666,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Options and Warrants
The following options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 2005 to purchase shares of
common stock were excluded from diluted loss per common share because of their anti-dilutive
effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Range of Exercise |
|
|
|
Options/Warrants |
|
|
Prices |
|
For the three months ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
4,038,460 |
|
|
$0.90 to $10.50 |
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
3,706,338 |
|
|
$0.90 to $10.50 |
8. Shareholders Equity
Warrants
As a result of the suspension of the exercise of the 706,218 warrants we originally issued in July
2002, we granted a like number of new common stock purchase warrants to the holders of the expired
warrants in April 2005. The new warrants are exercisable at $2.00 per share for 90 days after the
effective date of a registration statement covering the shares underlying these warrants. As of
June 30, 2006, such a registration statement had been filed, however, the Securities and Exchange
Commission had not declared it effective. In April 2005, we recognized a liability and a charge to
equity of approximately $1.4 million associated with the grant of these new warrants. We
determined the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We have
since reduced the reported liability by approximately $1,062,000 due to the decrease in the fair
value of these warrants from their date of issuance through June 30, 2006. We recorded a warrant
benefit of $328,000 in the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and a warrant expense of $686,000 in
the three-months ended June 30, 2005. We will continue to remeasure the value of this liability in
relation to its fair value and adjust accordingly until such time as the warrants are exercised or
expire.
In connection with our April 2005 private placement, we issued 1,180,928 warrants to purchase
shares of common stock and registered the public resale the underlying shares for the security
holders. The warrants are exercisable for five years at an exercise price of $4.75.
As part of a consulting agreement with CCRI Corporation, we issued a warrant to purchase 50,000
shares of common stock at a price of $3.00 per share on April 1, 2003, and an additional warrant to
purchase 50,000 shares at a price of $5.00 on November 2, 2003. At June 30, 2006, all of these
warrants were outstanding and expire five years from the date of issue.
9. Share-based Compensation
As of June 30, 2006, we had one active plan (2006 Stock and Incentive Plan) for share-based
compensation awards. Under the plan, if we have a change in control, all outstanding awards,
including those subject to vesting or other performance targets, fully vest
immediately. We have reserved 1,200,000 shares of our common stock for stock-based awards under
this plan, and as of June 30, 2006, we had granted awards for 38,000 options. We generally grant
option awards with an exercise price equal to the market price of our stock at the date of the
grant.
Page 9
On April 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based
PaymentRevised 2004 (SFAS No. 123(R)), using the modified prospective transition method. Prior
to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we accounted for stock option grants in accordance with APB
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (the intrinsic value method), and
accordingly, recognized no compensation expense for stock option grants.
Under the modified prospective method, we recognize share-based employee compensation cost using
the fair-value based method for all new awards granted after April 1, 2006 and to awards
outstanding on April 1, 2006 that we subsequently modify, repurchase or cancel. We recognize
compensation costs for unvested stock options and awards that are outstanding as of the April 1,
2006 adoption date, over the remaining requisite service period based on the grant-date fair value
of those options and awards as previously calculated under the pro-forma disclosures pursuant to
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123). We were not required to restate prior periods to reflect the impact of adopting
the new standard. We incurred a total of $310,602 in compensation expense in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007 as a result of our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), for the three months ended June 30, 2006, our loss before
taxes, net loss, and basic and diluted loss per share were higher than if we had continued to
account for stock-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 for our stock option grants (see
chart below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma Under |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
APB 25 |
|
Loss before taxes |
|
$ |
(1,210,488 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,210,488 |
) |
Add back compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted loss before taxes |
|
|
(1,210,488 |
) |
|
|
(899,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
30,751 |
|
|
|
30,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(930,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and
diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $12,798 for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Page 10
The following table illustrates the effect on operating results and per share information had the
Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) for the three
months ended June 30, 2005, and reported compensation expense of $433,431. We intend to show
similar pro forma information in our future fiscal 2007 reports because we believe this
presentation facilitates a quarter-to-quarter understanding of the effect of SFAS No. 123(R) on our
fiscal 2007 results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net loss As reported |
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,426,313 |
) |
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair
value-based method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss Pro forma |
|
$ |
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,895,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share As reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share Pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.30 |
) |
We determined the fair value of our option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We
used the following weighted-average assumptions to value the options granted during the first
quarter of fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life in years |
|
|
8.97 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
100.26 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
|
Weighted-average fair value |
|
|
2.177 |
|
The expected life selected for options granted during the quarter represents the period of time
that we expect our options to be outstanding based on historical data of option holder exercise and
termination behavior for similar grants. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life at the
time of grant. Expected volatilities are based upon historical volatility of our stock.
As of June 30, 2006, we had approximately $ 644,461 of unrecognized compensation cost related
to share-based payments that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.75 years.
Page 11
The following table summarizes activity related to our stock options during the three months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contract Life |
|
Options outstanding at beginning of
period |
|
|
1,888,327 |
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
358,000 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(9,666 |
) |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options surrendered |
|
|
(22,267 |
) |
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at end of period |
|
|
2,214,394 |
|
|
$ |
3.59 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,820,310 |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
10. Savings and Retirement Plans
We sponsor various plans for eligible employees in the United States, the United Kingdom (UK), and
The Netherlands. Our retirement savings plan in the United States conforms to Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code and participation is available to substantially all employees. We may
also make discretionary contributions ratably to all eligible employees. We made no discretionary
contributions in association with these plans in the United States for the quarters ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
Our international subsidiaries have defined benefit retirement plans for eligible employees. These
plans provide benefits based on each employees years of service and compensation during the years
immediately preceding retirement, termination, disability, or death, as defined in the plans. We
invest pension plan assets in insurance contracts. We closed the defined benefit plan in The
Netherlands for new employees effective April 2005. As of that date, our Dutch subsidiary
established a defined contribution plan. We froze our UK subsidiarys defined benefit plan on
December 31, 2004. On March 10, 2005, our UK subsidiary established a defined contribution plan.
The cost for our defined benefit retirement plans in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom
includes the following components for the periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross service cost |
|
$ |
50,542 |
|
|
$ |
44,861 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
30,413 |
|
|
|
25,835 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(17,444 |
) |
|
|
(14,911 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
10,431 |
|
|
|
7,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic retirement cost |
|
$ |
73,942 |
|
|
$ |
63,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 12
Major assumptions used in the above calculations include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Discount rate |
|
|
4.25-5.50 |
% |
|
|
4.50-5.25 |
% |
Expected return on assets |
|
|
4.00-5.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00-5.00 |
% |
Expected rate of increase in future
compensation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Individual |
|
|
0%-3 |
% |
|
|
0%-3 |
% |
11. Foreign Currency Translation
We translate all assets and liabilities using period-end exchange rates. We translate statements
of operations items using average exchange rates for the period. We record the resulting
translation adjustment within accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of
shareholders equity. We recognize foreign currency transaction gains and losses in our
consolidated statements of operations, including unrealized gains and losses on short-term
intercompany obligations using period-end exchange rates. We recognize unrealized gains and losses
on long-term intercompany obligations within accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate
component of shareholders equity.
We recognize exchange gains and losses primarily as a result of fluctuations in currency rates
between the U.S. dollar (the functional reporting currency) and the euro and British pound
(currencies of our subsidiaries), as well as their effect on the dollar denominated intercompany
obligations between us and our foreign subsidiaries. All intercompany balances are revolving in
nature and we do not deem them to be long-term balances. For the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, we recognized foreign currency gain (loss) of $26,411 and $(1,199), respectively.
12. Income Tax Expense
During the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, our Dutch subsidiaries recorded income tax
expense of $30,751 and $37,020, respectively. We cannot use our U.S. net operating loss carry
forwards to offset taxable income in foreign jurisdictions.
13. Business Segment and Geographic Information
We sell proprietary products for the treatment of voiding dysfunctions. Our current primary
product is Macroplastique®, a soft tissue bulking material used for the treatment of urinary
incontinence and vesicoureteral reflux. In addition, we market soft tissue bulking material for
additional indications, including the treatment of vocal cord rehabilitation, fecal incontinence
and soft tissue dermal augmentation. At this time, all sales for the tissue bulking agent products
are outside the United States. The Macroplastique product line accounted for 59% and 70%,
respectively, of total net sales for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The 510(k) premarket clearance from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the I-STOP
polypropylene, tension-free, mid-urethral sling for the treatment of female urinary incontinence
was received in August 2005. We have exclusive distribution rights for this product in the United
States and the United Kingdom. In October 2005, we received U.S. FDA 510(k) premarket clearance
for our Urgent® PC Neuromodulation System, a minimally invasive nerve stimulation device designed
for office-based treatment of overactive bladder symptoms of urge incontinence, urinary urgency and
urinary frequency. We started selling the Urgent PC device in November 2005 in the United States
and in December 2005 in Europe and Canada. The Urgent PC is also indicated for the treatment of
fecal incontinence outside the United States. In July 2006, we received U.S. FDA 510(k) premarket
clearance for our enhanced version of the Urgent PC. In addition, we are a distributor of
specialized wound care products in The Netherlands and United Kingdom.
Based upon the above, we operate in only one reportable segment consisting of medical products
primarily for the urology market.
Page 13
Information regarding operations in different geographies for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
United |
|
The |
|
United |
|
and |
|
|
|
|
States |
|
Netherlands |
|
Kingdom |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Fiscal 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, three months
ended June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
298,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,163,129 |
|
|
$ |
529,437 |
|
|
$ |
(226,656 |
) |
|
$ |
1,764,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense,
three months ended
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss),
three months ended
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(1,347,945 |
) |
|
|
107,927 |
|
|
|
(57,675 |
) |
|
|
56,454 |
|
|
|
(1,241,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,079,198 |
|
|
|
747,365 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,830,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, three months
ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
140,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,601 |
|
|
$ |
457,770 |
|
|
$ |
(290,539 |
) |
|
$ |
1,645,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense,
three months ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss),
three months ended
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
(1,656,475 |
) |
|
|
(12,104 |
) |
|
|
44,414 |
|
|
|
161,852 |
|
|
|
(1,462,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets
at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
619,125 |
|
|
|
741,071 |
|
|
|
7,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367,594 |
|
14. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan
Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
tax positions. This Interpretation provides that the tax effects from an uncertain tax position can
be recognized in our financial statements, only if the position is more likely than not of being
sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are
effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2008, with the cumulative effect of the change in
accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We are currently
evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting FIN 48 on our consolidated financial statements.
15. Subsequent Event
In August 2006, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors pursuant to
which we sold 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $1.50 per share, together with warrants to
purchase 695,000 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate proceeds of $2.1 million. After
offset for our estimated costs of $183,000, we received net proceeds of $1.9 million. The
warrants are exercisable for 5 years (but commencing 181 days after closing) at an exercise price
of $2.50 per share.
Page 14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We recommend that you read this Report on Form 10-QSB in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006.
Forward-looking Statements
We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including our
statements contained in this filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in our reports
to stockholders, as well as elsewhere. Forward-looking statements are statements such as those
contained in projections, plans, objectives, estimates, statements of future economic performance,
and assumptions related to any of the foregoing, and may be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology, such as may, expect, anticipate, estimate, goal, continue,
or other comparable terminology. By their very nature, forward-looking statements are subject to
known and unknown risks and uncertainties relating to our future performance that may cause our
actual results, performance, or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in any such forward-looking statements. Any such statement is qualified by
reference to the following cautionary statements.
Our business operates in highly competitive markets and is subject to changes in general economic
conditions, competition, customer and market preferences, government regulation, the impact of tax
regulation, foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the degree of market acceptance of products, the
uncertainties of potential litigation, as well as other risks and uncertainties detailed elsewhere
herein and from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
In this filing, the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements. Various factors and risks (not all
of which are identifiable at this time) could cause our results, performance, or achievements to
differ materially from that contained in our forward-looking statements, and investors are
cautioned that any forward-looking statement contained herein or elsewhere is qualified by and
subject to the warnings and cautionary statements contained above and in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
We do not undertake, nor assume obligation, to update any forward-looking statement that we may
make from time to time.
Overview
We are a medical device company that develops, manufactures and markets innovative, proprietary
products for the treatment of voiding dysfunctions. We have developed, and are developing,
minimally invasive products primarily for the treatment of urinary and fecal incontinence and
overactive bladder symptoms. All products we currently sell are CE marked for European Union
clearance. In the U.S. we have received 510(k) clearance for two of our products (I-STOP and
Urgent PC). Our Macroplastique and other implantable tissue bulking products have not been cleared
for marketing in the United States. We are pursuing FDA pre-market approval (PMA) for our
Macroplastique product. We sell our products in approximately 40 countries.
Our goal is to develop and commercialize a portfolio of minimally invasive products for the
treatment of voiding dysfunctions. We believe that, with a suite of innovative products, we can
increasingly garner the attention of key physicians and distributors and enhance market acceptance
of our products. The key elements of our strategy are to:
|
|
|
Pursue regulatory approval in the U.S. for our Macroplastique products. |
|
|
|
|
Expand our U.S. marketing and sales organization, using a combination of direct and independent reps; |
|
|
|
|
Conduct multi-center, prospective, post-market clinical trials for the Urgent PC; |
|
|
|
|
Expand distribution of our products outside of the U.S.; and |
|
|
|
|
Acquire or license complimentary products if appropriate opportunities arise. |
We concluded a multi-center human clinical trial using Macroplastique Implants in a minimally
invasive, office-based procedure for treating adult female stress urinary incontinence resulting
from intrinsic sphincter deficiency, a weakening of the muscles that control the flow of urine from
the bladder. In December 2004, the FDA accepted for filing our pre-market approval submission with
respect to Macroplastique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. This submission
is under review by the FDA and we continue to expect, as we indicated in July 2005, the possible
approval by the FDA in 2007. We will incur substantial expenses in connection with these regulatory activities. Even if we obtain regulatory approval, it may be only
for limited uses with specific classes of patients, which may limit the market for our product.
Page 15
In the United States, we recently staffed our sales organization, consisting of a direct field
sales management team and independent sales representatives, and a marketing organization to market
our products directly to our customers. We anticipate further increasing, as needed, our sales and
marketing organization in the United States to support our sales growth. Outside of the United
States, we sell our products primarily through a direct and independent sales organization in the
United Kingdom and primarily through distributors in other markets. Our sales and marketing
activities require significant ongoing expenditures.
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, which require us to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances
that affect amounts reported. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, we have made
our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. We
believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are particularly important to
the portrayal of our results of operations and financial position. They may require the
application of a higher level of judgment by Uroplasty management, and as a result are subject to
an inherent degree of uncertainty.
Revenue Recognition. The Securities and Exchange Commissions Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.
104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, provides guidance on the application of
generally accepted accounting principles to selected revenue recognition issues. We believe our
revenue recognition policies comply with SAB 104. We market and distribute our products primarily
through our direct and independent sales organization in the United States and the United Kingdom,
and primarily through distributors in our other markets. We recognize revenue upon shipment of
product to our distributors and direct customers. We have no customer acceptance provisions or
installation obligations. Our sales terms to our distributors and customers provide no right of
return outside of our standard warranty, and payment terms consistent with industry standards
apply. Sales terms and pricing to our distributors are governed by the respective distribution
agreements. Our distribution partners purchase the Uroplasty products to meet sales demand of
their end-user customers as well as to fulfill their internal requirements associated with the
sales process and, if applicable, contractual purchase requirements under the respective
distribution agreements. Internal and other requirements include purchases of products for
training, demonstration and evaluation purposes, clinical evaluations, product support,
establishing inventories, and meeting minimum purchase commitments. As a result, the level of our
net sales during any period is not necessarily indicative of our distributors sales to end-user
customers during that period, which we estimate are not substantially different than our sales to
those distributors in each of the last two years. Our distributors level of inventories of our
products, their sales to end-user customers and their internal product requirements may impact our
future revenue growth.
Accounts Receivable. We carry our accounts receivable at the original invoice amount less an
estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a periodic review of all outstanding amounts. We
determine the allowance for doubtful accounts based on customer health, and both historical and
expected credit loss experience. We write off our accounts receivable when we deem them
uncollectible. We record recoveries of accounts receivable previously written off when received.
Inventories. We state inventories at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
method. We provide lower of cost or market reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories based
upon current and expected future product sales and the expected impact of product transitions or
modifications. While we expect our sales to grow, a reduction in sales could reduce the demand for
our products and may require additional inventory reserves.
Foreign Currency Translation/Transactions. The financial statements of our foreign
subsidiaries were translated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 52 Foreign Currency
Translation. Under this Statement, we translate all assets and liabilities using period-end
exchange rates, and we translate statements of operations items using average exchange rates for
the period. We record the resulting translation adjustment within accumulated other comprehensive
loss, a separate component of shareholders equity. We recognize foreign currency transaction
gains and losses in the statement of operations, including unrealized gains and losses on
short-term intercompany obligations using period-end exchange rates, resulting in an increase in
the volatility of our consolidated statements of operations. We recognize unrealized gains and
losses on long-term intercompany obligations within accumulated other comprehensive loss, a
separate component of shareholders equity.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets at June 30, 2006 consist of property, plant and
equipment and intangible assets. We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We
measure the recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of
an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If we
consider such assets impaired, we measure the impairment to be recognized by the amount by which
the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We report assets to be
disposed of at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Page 16
Share-Based Compensation. In December 2004, FASB published Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R) or the Statement). SFAS 123(R) requires that we recognize
the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions, including grants of employee
stock options, in our financial statements. We must measure that cost based on the fair value of
the equity or liability instruments issued. SFAS 123(R) covers a wide range of share-based
compensation arrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. SFAS 123(R) is a replacement
of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB 25, and its
related interpretive guidance.
This Statement requires us to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock
options based on the grant-date fair value of the award, and to recognize the cost over the period
we require our employee to provide services for the award. FAS 123(R) permits us to use any
option-pricing model that meets the fair value objective in the Statement. We adopted FAS 123(R)
for the first time in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. FAS 123(R) allows two methods for
determining the effects of the transition: the modified prospective and the modified retrospective.
We have adopted the modified prospective transition method beginning April 1, 2006. We calculated
the pro forma compensation costs presented previously and in our prior filings using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. These compensation costs may not be indicative of amounts
which we will incur in future years.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates we expect to apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect to recover
or settle those temporary differences. We have generated approximately $15,423,000 in U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards that we cannot use to offset taxable income in foreign jurisdictions.
We recognize a valuation allowance when we determine it is more likely than not that we will not
realize a portion of the deferred tax asset. We have established a valuation allowance for U.S. and
certain foreign deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty that we will generate enough income in
those taxing jurisdictions to utilize the assets.
In addition, U.S. tax rules impose limitations on the use of net operating loss following certain
changes in ownership. Such a change in ownership may limit the amount of these benefits that would
be available to offset future taxable income each year, starting with the year of ownership change.
Set forth below is managements discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of
operations for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Results of Operations
Three-month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to three-month period ended June 30, 2005
Net Sales: In the first quarter ended June 30, 2006, net sales were $1.8 million, representing an
$119,000 or 7% increase when compared to net sales of $1.6 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2005. Excluding the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, sales increased by
approximately 4%. A 9% decline in sales of Macroplastique products was more than offset by sales
of the Urgent PC and an increase in sales of the I-STOP. In the first quarter ended June 30, 2005,
we had no sales of the Urgent PC and had minimal sales of the
I-STOP.
We attribute the decline in sales of the Macroplastique products primarily due to adverse changes
in the reimbursement policies of the insurers and the increase in pricing competition. We expect
this to adversely impact our future sales in those markets. In response, we have implemented
targeted volume price reductions, have stepped up training workshops targeted to our sales
personnel, distributors and key incontinence surgeons, and are sponsoring scientific podium
presentations and seminars at key international incontinence congresses. We cannot assure that
these initiatives will increase Macroplastique sales.
Gross Profit: Gross profit was $1.2 million for both quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, or 69%
and 74% of net sales in the respective periods. We attribute the decline in gross profit percent
primarily to lower manufacturing capacity utilization due to decline in Macroplastique sales,
duplicate manufacturing facilities in the U.S. pending completion of our relocation to our new
corporate headquarters, higher costs for our new facility and an increase in personnel-related
costs. We expect to relocate the remaining operations to our new corporate headquarters in the
third quarter of our current fiscal year after quality and regulatory qualifications of our new
manufacturing facility.
General and Administrative Expenses (G&A): G&A expenses increased from $691,000 during the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 to $884,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Included in the fiscal
2007 first quarter is a $266,000 non-cash, SFAS 123(R) charge for share-based employee
compensation. Excluding this charge, G&A expenses declined by $73,000, primarily because fiscal
2005 first quarter contained certain charges related to the installation of our new information
system.
Page 17
Research and Development Expenses (R&D): R&D expenses increased from $631,000 during the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 to $675,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Included in the fiscal
2007 first quarter is an $11,000 non-cash, SFAS 123(R) charge for share-based employee
compensation. Excluding this charge, R&D expenses increased by $33,000. We attribute the increase
primarily to the increase in spending for clinical trials and testing.
Selling and Marketing Expenses (S&M): S&M expenses increased from $664,000 during the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 to $1,233,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2007. Included in the
fiscal 2007 first quarter is a $22,000 non-cash, SFAS 123(R) charge for share-based employee
compensation. Excluding this charge, S&M expenses increased by $547,000. We attribute the
increase to the $360,000 increase in compensation-related costs, primarily for our U.S. direct
sales force and marketing organization, $110,000 for increase in travel-related costs and an
increase in other costs to support our expanded organization and marketing activities.
Other Income (Expense): Other income (expense) includes interest income, interest expense, warrant
expense or benefit, foreign currency exchange gains and losses and other non-operating costs when
incurred. Our financial results are subject to material fluctuations based on changes in currency
exchange rates. Other income (expense) was $372,000 and $(665,000) for the first quarters ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
As a result of the suspension of the exercise of the 706,218 warrants we originally issued in July
2002, we granted a like number of new common stock purchase warrants to the holders of the expired
warrants in April 2005. The new warrants will be exercisable at $2.00 per share for 90 days after
the effective date of a registration statement covering the shares underlying these warrants. As
of June 30, 2006, such a registration statement had been filed, however, the Securities and
Exchange Commission had not declared it effective. In April 2005, we recognized a liability and a
charge to equity of approximately $1.4 million associated with the grant of these new warrants. The
Company determined the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
We have since reduced the reported liability by approximately $1,062,000 due to the decrease in the
fair value of these warrants from their date of issuance through June 30, 2006. We recorded a
warrant benefit of $328,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and a warrant expense of
$686,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. We will continue to remeasure the value of this
liability in relation to its fair value and adjust accordingly until such time as the warrants are
exercised or expire.
We recognize exchange gains and losses primarily as a result of fluctuations in currency rates
between the U.S. dollar (the functional reporting currency) and the euro and British pound
(currencies of our subsidiaries), as well as their effect on the dollar denominated short-term
intercompany obligations between us and our foreign subsidiaries. We recognized foreign currency
gains (losses) of $26,000 and $(1,000) for the first quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Income Tax Expense: Our Dutch subsidiaries recorded income tax expense of $31,000 and $37,000 for
the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For fiscal 2007, the Dutch income tax rate
is 25.5% for 22,689 (approximately $29,000) of profit and 29.6% for amounts above 22,689
compared to 27% and 31.5% in fiscal 2006, respectively.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In addition to disclosing financial results calculated in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), our discussion of the results of
operations above contains non-GAAP financial measures that exclude the effects of share-based
compensation and the requirements of FAS 123(R). The non-GAAP financial measures used by
management and disclosed by us exclude the income statement effects of share-based compensation and
the effects of FAS 123(R). The non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by us should not be
considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP,
and the consolidated financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations to
those financial statements should be carefully evaluated. We may calculate our non-GAAP financial
measures differently from similarly titled measures used by other companies. Therefore, our
non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to those used by other companies. We have
described the reconciliations of each of our non-GAAP financial measures above to the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measures.
Because we excluded FAS 123(R) compensation expense in some of our discussion above, these
financial measures are treated as a non-GAAP financial measure under Securities and Exchange
Commission rules. Management uses our non-GAAP financial measures for internal managerial
purposes, including as a means to compare period-to-period results on a consolidated basis and as a
means to evaluate our results on a consolidated basis compared to those of other companies.
We disclose this information to the public to enable investors who wish to more easily assess our
performance on the same basis applied by management and to ease comparison on both a GAAP and
non-GAAP basis among peer companies.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows. As of June 30, 2006, our cash and cash equivalents balances totalling $1.4 million.
At June 30, 2006, we had working capital of approximately $1.9 million. During the three months
ended of fiscal 2007, we used $1.1 million of cash in operating activities, compared to $870,000 of
cash used in the same period of fiscal 2006. The usage of cash over the three months was primarily attributable to the net loss incurred of $1.2 million and
fluctuations in accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses,
due to the timing of payments and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
Page 18
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, weak economic conditions in foreign markets where
we sell and distribute our products, changes in regulatory environment and changes in third-party
reimbursement polices could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The effects of these conditions could include reduced unit sales and reduced sales in dollars when
converted from foreign currency amounts and material gains and losses on transactions denominated
in foreign currencies. Furthermore, because our U.S. operations are funded by sales denominated in
foreign currency, strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and/or the British pound could
have an adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
Sources of Liquidity. In April 2005, we conducted a private placement in which we sold 2,147,142
shares of our common stock at a price per share of $3.50, together with warrants to purchase
1,180,928 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7.5
million. The stock sale proceeds are offset by costs of approximately $935,000, resulting in net
proceeds of approximately $6.6 million. The warrants are exercisable for five years at an exercise
price of $4.75 per share.
In May 2006 we entered into a business loan agreement with Venture Bank. The agreement provides
for a credit line of up to $1 million secured by our assets. We may borrow up to 50% of the value
of the inventory on hand in the U.S. and 75% of the U.S. accounts receivable value; provided
however, we cannot borrow any amount if our consolidated equity declines below $0.5 million. We
may borrow the maximum $1 million only if our consolidated equity is not less than $1 million. For
consolidated equity in excess of $0.5 million but less than $1 million, the maximum that can be
borrowed is $250,000. The bank charges interest on the loan at the rate of 1 percentage point over
the prime rate, subject to a minimum interest rate of 7% per annum. In addition, Uroplasty BV, one
of our subsidiaries entered into an arrangement with Rabobank of The Netherlands for a 200,000
(approximately $258,500) credit line. At June 30, 2006, we had no borrowings under any of our
credit lines.
In May 2006, we also entered into a $100,000 3-year, term loan agreement with Venture Bank, at an
interest rate of 8.25% per annum. The amount is used for certain capital expenditures relating to
the relocation of our facility to our Minnetonka, Minnesota location.
In August 2006, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors pursuant to
which we sold approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $1.50 per share, together
with warrants to purchase 695,000 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate proceeds of
approximately $2.1 million. After offset for our estimated costs of $183,000, we received net
proceeds of $1.9 million. The warrants are exercisable for 5 years (but commencing 181 days after
closing) at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.
Commitments and Contingencies. We believe that our current resources, funds generated from sale of
our products, proceeds from the August 2006 private placement together with the credit facilities
will be adequate to meet our cash flow needs, including regulatory activities associated with
existing products, through the end of the fiscal year. We will need to raise additional debt or
equity financing to continue funding for product development and continued expansion of our sales
and marketing activities for beyond fiscal 2007, and ultimately, we will need to achieve
profitability and generate positive cash flows from operations to fund our operations and grow our
business. As such we will need to raise additional equity capital, but there can be no guarantee
that we will be successful.
We expect to continue to incur significant costs for regulatory activities associated with
obtaining regulatory approval in the United States for Macroplastique. For fiscal 2007, we expect
to incur significant research and development expenses, including those in connection with the
regulatory approval activities for Macroplastique and clinical trials for the Urgent PC. We also
expect that during fiscal 2007, we will continue to incur significant expenses as we expand our
selling and marketing organization in the U.S. to market our products. In addition, we expect
general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2007 to increase as we increasingly prepare to
implement the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In April 2005, we entered into an exclusive manufacturing and distribution agreement with
CystoMedix for the Urgent PC product. The agreement required us to pay CystoMedix an initial
payment of $225,000 and an additional payment of $250,000 in 12 monthly installments of $20,833,
with the last installment payment made in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. We capitalized the
aggregate amount as licensed technology and are amortizing it over the term of the agreement. We
will also pay CystoMedix a 7% royalty on product sales. However, the 7% royalty is first offset
against the monthly royalty installments. Currently we do not project making any additional
royalty payments to CystoMedix in fiscal 2007.
CystoMedix has also granted us an exclusive option to acquire its assets. The purchase price is
$3,485,000, reduced by up to $50,000 of liabilities assumed by us. However, the $3,485,000 amount
used to compute the purchase price will increase at a rate of 10% per year after April 2007. The
purchase price is payable in shares of our common stock valued at the average of the closing bid
price of our shares for the 20 trading days prior to our exercise of the option. We may exercise
the option until June 2008. If we exercise the option, we will also assume up to $1.4 million of
bridge loan advances made to CystoMedix by its Chairman. We would repay up to $1.1 million of the
bridge loan advances at closing and would issue our common stock for the balance of the bridge loan
based on the above option price. We also have certain rights of first refusal to acquire CystoMedixs assets in
the event CystoMedix receives a third party offer in advance of any exercise of our option. We
will need to raise additional equity or debt funds in order to consummate the CystoMedix
acquisition, should we elect to do so.
Page 19
We have two exclusive distribution agreements with CL Medical allowing us to market and sell the
I-STOP urethral sling: effective February 2006, a six-year agreement, with a right to renew it for
successive five-year terms, for distribution in the United States and, effective May 2005, a
one-year agreement with automatic renewal for up to two years, for distribution in the United
Kingdom. Under the agreements, we are required to purchase a minimum of $630,000 of units in the
first 12-month period following January 1, 2006, increasing to $2.6 million of units in the fifth
year of the agreement, for an aggregate commitment of approximately $6.7 million of units over the
five-year period, subject to periodic adjustment based on the value of the euro.
We are obligated to pay royalties of 5% of net sales of Macroplastique products in the U.S. with a
minimum of $50,000 per year. The duration of this royalty agreement is through May 1, 2006. Under
another royalty agreement we pay royalties, in the aggregate, of three to five percent of net sales
of Macroplastique, Bioplastique, and PTQ Implants subject to a monthly minimum of $4,500. The
royalties payable under this agreement will continue until the patent referenced in the agreement
expires in 2010. Under a license agreement for the Macroplastique Implantation System, we pay a
royalty of 10 British pounds for each unit sold during the life of the patent.
We have a pension plan covering 16 employees in The Netherlands, reported as a defined benefit
plan. We pay premiums to an insurance company to fund annuities for these employees. However, we
are responsible for funding additional annuities based on continued service and future salary
increases. We closed this defined benefit plan for new employees in April 2005. As of that date,
the Dutch subsidiary established a defined contribution plan that now covers new employees. We also
closed our UK subsidiarys defined benefit plan to further accrual for all employees effective
December 31, 2004. In March 2005, the UK subsidiary established a defined contribution plan that
now covers new employees.
In January 2006, we entered into a long-term lease with Liberty Property Limited Partnership for an
18,258 square foot facility for our U.S. headquarters located at 5420 Feltl Road, Minnetonka,
Minnesota. The lease effective date was May 1, 2006, has a term of 96 months, requires average
annual minimum rent payments of approximately $140,000 and requires payments for operating expenses
estimated to be approximately $82,000 in the first 12 months.
Page 20
Repayments of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2006, consisting of royalties, notes
payable (inclusive of interest), and operating leases, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Fiscal |
|
|
2008 and |
|
|
2010 and |
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
thereafter |
|
Minimum royalty payments |
|
$ |
234,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,500 |
|
|
$ |
108,000 |
|
|
$ |
85,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Minimum purchase agreement |
|
|
6,996,482 |
|
|
|
721,696 |
|
|
|
2,129,973 |
|
|
|
4,144,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
756,607 |
|
|
|
165,980 |
|
|
|
193,478 |
|
|
|
107,869 |
|
|
|
289,280 |
|
Operating lease commitments |
|
|
1,367,331 |
|
|
|
242,763 |
|
|
|
401,668 |
|
|
|
285,773 |
|
|
|
437,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
9,264,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,081,301 |
|
|
$ |
2,833,119 |
|
|
$ |
4,623,955 |
|
|
$ |
726,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, our
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15b under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this evaluation, these officers
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms.
Internal Control Matters. We also maintain a system of internal accounting controls designed to
provide reasonable assurance that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions and
that our policies and procedures are followed. There have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, or thereafter, that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Any control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. The design of a control
system inherently has limitations, and the benefits of controls must be weighed against their
costs. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Therefore, no evaluation
of a cost-effective system of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, will be detected.
Page 21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Except as indicated below, none of the items contained in PART II of Form 10-QSB are applicable to
us for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On May 3, 2006, we held a special meeting of our shareholders. At the meeting, the shareholders
approved our 2006 stock and incentive plan. A summary of the voting is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstentions and |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Withheld |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
3,133,014 |
|
998,270 |
|
|
|
2,185,763 |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
(a) Exhibits
31.1 Certifications by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certifications by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (this Exhibit is furnished pursuant to SEC rules,
but is deemed not filed)
Page 22
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UROPLASTY, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by:
|
|
/s/ DAVID B. KAYSEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 14, 2006 |
|
David B. Kaysen |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 14, 2006
|
|
by:
|
|
/s/ MAHEDI A. JIWANI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mahedi A. Jiwani |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Page 23
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, David B. Kaysen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 of
Uroplasty, Inc. (the Registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ DAVID B. KAYSEN
David B. Kaysen, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mahedi A. Jiwani, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 of
Uroplasty, Inc. (the Registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ MAHEDI A. JIWANI
Mahedi A. Jiwani, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Kaysen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ DAVID B. KAYSEN
David B. Kaysen
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: August 14, 2006
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Mahedi A. Jiwani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
/s/ MAHEDI A. JIWANI
Mahedi A. Jiwani
Chief Financial Officer
Dated: August 14, 2006