UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC.

Delaware		76-0475815
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of August 4, 2008 the registrant had 417,381,134 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.

 

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)

		June 30,				December 31,
		2008				2007
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,652.4			$	1,841.8
Receivables, net			3,015.0				2,099.8
Inventories, net			3,484.1				2,574.7
Costs in excess of billings			605.0				643.5
Deferred income taxes			207.7				131.5
Prepaid and other current assets			438.0				302.5
Total current assets			9,402.2				7,593.8
Property, plant and equipment, net			1,750.9				1,197.3
Deferred income taxes			69.0				55.6
Goodwill			5,081.3				2,445.1
Intangibles, net			4,693.3				774.1
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate			205.3				—
Other assets			69.5				49.0
Total assets		$	21,271.5			$	12,114.9
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	772.5			$	604.0
Accrued liabilities			2,155.1				1,761.4
Billings in excess of costs			1,951.6				1,396.1
Current portion of long-term debt and short-term borrowings			320.8				152.8
Accrued income taxes			552.3				112.4
Total current liabilities			5,752.3				4,026.7
Long-term debt			1,392.7				737.9
Deferred income taxes			2,078.6				564.3
Other liabilities			79.4				61.8
Total liabilities			9,303.0				5,390.7
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interest			92.7				62.8
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock — par value $.01; 417,082,516 and 356,867,498 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007			4.2				3.6
Additional paid-in capital			7,954.2				3,617.2
Accumulated other comprehensive income			254.0				195.0
Retained earnings			3,663.4				2,845.6
Total stockholders’ equity			11,875.8				6,661.4
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	21,271.5			$	12,114.9

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In millions, except per share data)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Revenue		$	3,324.2			$	2,384.9			$	6,009.6			$	4,550.6
Cost of revenue			2,342.7				1,701.1				4,231.5				3,251.8
Gross profit			981.5				683.8				1,778.1				1,298.8
Selling, general, and administrative			273.4				186.6				501.5				374.5
Transaction costs			16.4				—				16.4				—
Operating profit			691.7				497.2				1,260.2				924.3
Interest and financial costs			(24.2	)			(13.1	)			(34.2	)			(25.4	)
Interest income			10.5				10.0				26.2				19.1
Equity income in unconsolidated affiliate			17.1				—				17.1				—
Other income (expense), net			(14.6	)			(0.8	)			(1.1	)			(3.7	)
Income before income taxes and minority interest			680.5				493.3				1,268.2				914.3
Provision for income taxes			254.9				172.0				443.0				312.7
Income before minority interest			425.6				321.3				825.2				601.6
Minority interest in income of consolidated subsidiaries			3.9				2.8				5.9				7.2
Net income		$	421.7			$	318.5			$	819.3			$	594.4
Net income per share:
Basic		$	1.05			$	0.90			$	2.16			$	1.68
Diluted		$	1.04			$	0.89			$	2.15			$	1.68
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic			401.7				354.4				378.9				353.1
Diluted			404.0				356.3				380.7				354.3

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In millions)

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2008				2007
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income		$	819.3			$	594.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			167.9				99.2
Equity income in unconsolidated affiliate			(17.1	)			—
Dividend from unconsolidated affiliate			112.7				—
Other			13.3				1.6
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Receivables			(507.4	)			(264.0	)
Inventories			(297.0	)			(410.3	)
Costs in excess of billings			38.5				(131.5	)
Prepaid and other current assets			74.0				(76.8	)
Accounts payable			21.6				78.1
Billings in excess of costs			555.6				255.4
Other assets/liabilities, net			375.4				169.0
Net cash provided by operating activities			1,356.8				315.1
Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment			(160.4	)			(121.6	)
Businesses acquisitions, net of cash acquired			(2,944.5	)			(237.4	)
Business divestitures, net of cash disposed			783.9				—
Other			(0.5	)			0.6
Net cash used by investing activities			(2,321.5	)			(358.4	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Borrowing against lines of credit and other debt			2,576.7				1.6
Payments against lines of credit and other debt			(1,928.4	)			(6.4	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised			76.8				75.3
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options			36.4				16.4
Net cash provided by financing activities			761.5				86.9
Effect of exchange rates on cash			13.8				31.7
Increase (decrease) in cash equivalents			(189.4	)			75.3
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			1,841.8				957.4
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	1,652.4			$	1,032.7
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash payments during the period for:
Interest		$	30.0			$	27.6
Income taxes		$	376.1			$	353.0

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported and contingent amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements present information in accordance with GAAP in the United States for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable rules of Regulation S-X. They do not include all information or footnotes required by GAAP in the United States for complete consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, all of which are of a normal, recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. Effective January 1, 2008, we changed the functional currency of our Rig Technology and Distribution segments in Norway from the Norwegian Kroner to the U.S. dollar to more appropriately reflect the primary economic environment in which they operate. This change was precipitated by significant changes in the economic facts and circumstances including, the increased order rate for large drilling rigs and components technology denominated in U.S. dollars, the use of our Norway unit as our preferred project manager of these projects, increasing revenue and cost base in U.S. dollars, and the implementation of an international cash pool to finance these operations in U.S. dollars. See Note 11.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s products and services are sold based upon purchase orders or contracts with the customer that include fixed or determinable prices and that do not generally include right of return or other similar provisions or other significant post delivery obligations. Except for certain construction contracts and drill pipe sales described below, the Company records revenue at the time its manufacturing process is complete, the customer has been provided with all proper inspection and other required documentation, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, collectibility is reasonably assured and the product has been delivered. Customer advances or deposits are deferred and recognized as revenue when the Company has completed all of its performance obligations related to the sale. The Company also recognizes revenue as services are performed. The amounts billed for shipping and handling cost are included in revenue and related costs are included in costs of sales.

Revenue Recognition under Long-term Construction Contracts

The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method to account for certain long-term construction contracts in the Rig Technology segment. These long-term construction contracts include the following characteristics:

	•		the contracts include custom designs for customer specific applications;
	•		the structural design is unique and requires significant engineering efforts; and
	•		construction projects often have progress payments.

This method requires the Company to make estimates regarding the total costs of the project, progress against the project schedule and the estimated completion date, all of which impact the amount of revenue and gross margin the Company recognizes in each reporting period. The Company prepares detailed cost estimates at the beginning of each project. Significant projects and their related costs and profit margins are updated and reviewed at least quarterly by senior management. Factors that may affect future project costs and margins include shipyard access, weather, production efficiencies, availability and costs of labor, materials and subcomponents and other factors. These factors can impact the accuracy of the Company’s estimates and materially impact the Company’s current and future reported earnings.

The asset, “Costs in excess of billings,” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “Billings in excess of costs,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Drill Pipe Sales

For drill pipe sales, if requested in writing by the customer, delivery may be satisfied through delivery to the Company’s customer storage location or to a third-party storage facility. For sales transactions where title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer but the supporting documentation does not meet the criteria for revenue recognition prior to the products being in the physical possession of the customer, the recognition of the revenues and related inventory costs from these transactions are deferred until the customer takes physical possession.

2. Grant Prideco Merger and Other Acquisitions

Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Grant Prideco, Inc. (“Grant Prideco”) (the “Merger”), a Delaware Corporation, effective December 16, 2007 (the “Agreement Date”), the Company issued .4498 shares of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. common stock and $23.20 in cash (Exchange Ratio) for each Grant Prideco common share outstanding on April 21, 2008 (the “Merger Date”) totaling approximately 56.9 million shares and $2.9 billion in cash. The Company has included the financial results of Grant Prideco in its consolidated financial statements beginning on the Merger Date, the date Grant Prideco common shares were exchanged for National Oilwell Varco common shares and cash. The Grant Prideco operations are included in the Petroleum Services & Supplies segment.

Grant Prideco is a world leader in drill stem technology development and drill pipe manufacturing, sales and service; a global leader in drill bit and specialty tools, manufacturing, sales and service; and a leading provider of high-performance engineered connections and premium tubular products and services. The Company believes the Merger with Grant Prideco will advance its strategic goal of providing more products and services to its customers and that Grant Prideco’s product range will add new growth opportunities to the Company and benefit its customers’ needs worldwide.

The Merger has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of April 21, 2008. The total preliminary purchase price is $7,197.5 million, including Grant Prideco stock options assumed and estimated acquisition related transaction costs and is comprised of (in millions):

Consideration given to acquire the outstanding common stock of Grant Prideco:
Shares issued totaled approximately 56.9 million shares at $72.74 per share		$	4,135.3
Cash paid at $23.20 per share			2,932.3
Grant Prideco stock options assumed			55.4
Merger related transaction costs			74.5
Total preliminary purchase price		$	7,197.5

The fair value of shares issued was determined using an average price of $72.74, which represents the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for a five-day period beginning two available trading days before the public announcement of the transaction. For all stock options and restricted stock granted prior to 2008, vesting was accelerated under the terms of the stock option and restricted stock agreements; therefore, there was no modification of the awards as defined under SFAS 123(R). For stock options and restricted stock granted by Grant Prideco in 2008, 320,500 Grant Prideco stock options and 388,000 shares of restricted stock were replaced with 250,402 National Oilwell Varco stock options and 303,212 National Oilwell Varco restricted stock, respectively. For the 2008 Grant Prideco grants, vesting was not accelerated in connection with the Merger, under the terms of the stock option and restricted stock agreements, except for certain recipients of the 2008 Grant Prideco restricted stock grant.

Merger related costs of $74.5 million include severance and other external costs directly related to the Merger.

Transaction costs of $16.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were comprised of $6.0 million for accelerated vesting of stock-based compensation, $4.0 million for bridge loan fees, $5.8 million related to transaction costs for the disposition of certain tubular businesses of Grant Prideco in May 2008 (see below for further discussion) and $0.6 million of other costs.

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

Under the purchase method of accounting, the total preliminary purchase price was allocated to Grant Prideco’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of April 21, 2008 as set forth below (in millions). The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon preliminary valuations and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change upon the receipt and management’s review of the final valuations. The primary areas of the purchase price allocation, which are not yet finalized, relate to identifiable intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, investment in unconsolidated affiliate, goodwill and certain preacquisition contingencies. In addition, upon the finalization of the combined company’s legal entity structure, additional adjustments to deferred taxes may be required. The final valuation of net assets is expected to be completed as soon as possible, but no later than one year from the acquisition date in accordance with GAAP.

Cash and cash equivalents		$	171.3
Receivables			405.7
Assets held for sale, net			783.9
Inventories			616.8
Prepaid and other current assets			209.6
Property, plant and equipment			443.5
Goodwill			2,886.1
Intangibles			3,980.3
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate			300.0
Other assets			42.6
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(313.7	)
Accrued income taxes			(622.9	)
Long-term debt			(176.4	)
Deferred income taxes			(1485.0	)
Minority interest			(24.8	)
Other liabilities			(19.5	)
Total preliminary purchase price		$	7,197.5

Under purchase accounting, a fair value step up adjustment of $89.1 million was made to inventory and is being charged to “Cost of revenue” as the applicable inventory is sold. Cost of revenue includes $46.1 million of these inventory charges for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

Additionally, the Company identified other intangible assets associated with trade names, patents, and customer relationships and the preliminary fair values assigned were $1.2 billion, $0.4 billion, and $2.4 billion, respectively. Of these amounts, $1.2 billion has been initially identified as having an indefinite life.

Disposition of Certain Grant Prideco Businesses

Prior to the Merger, Grant Prideco had entered into a definitive Purchase and Sale Agreement with Vallourec S.A and Vallourec & Mannesman Holdings, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Vallourec”) to sell four of its tubular businesses for $800 million in cash, subject to final working capital adjustments and standard closing conditions (including regulatory approval). The transaction closed May 16, 2008. The amount included in “Assets held for sale, net” included in the preliminary purchase price allocation above relates to this disposition. Additionally, $273.6 million is included in “Accrued income taxes” for taxes related to the disposition.

Pro Forma Financial Information

The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of National Oilwell Varco and Grant Prideco, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of each of the periods presented. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the Merger had taken place at the beginning of each of the periods presented. The pro forma financial information for all periods presented includes the business combination accounting effect on historical Grant Prideco revenues, adjustments to depreciation on acquired property, amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, financing costs on new debt in connection with the Merger and related tax effects.

The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 combines the historical results for National Oilwell Varco for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the historical results for Grant Prideco for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions):

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Total revenues		$	3,444.7			$	2,845.4			$	6,613.3			$	5,467.2
Net income		$	446.0			$	382.7			$	897.6			$	729.4
Basic net income per share		$	1.08			$	0.93			$	2.17			$	1.78
Diluted net income per share		$	1.07			$	0.93			$	2.16			$	1.77

3. Inventories, net

Inventories consist of (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2008				2007
Raw materials and supplies		$	674.1			$	420.4
Work in process			1,194.2				939.2
Finished goods and purchased products			1,615.8				1,215.1
Total		$	3,484.1			$	2,574.7

4. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2008				2007
Compensation		$	191.2			$	214.7
Customer prepayments			730.1				500.3
Warranty			113.1				91.5
Interest			17.1				13.8
Taxes (non income)			62.2				47.3
Insurance			49.7				42.4
Accrued purchase orders			648.7				582.5
Fair value of derivatives			70.6				111.3
Other			272.4				157.6
Total		$	2,155.1			$	1,761.4

5. Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts

Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2008				2007
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts		$	3,646.6			$	3,167.0
Estimated earnings			1,591.2				1,208.3
			5,237.8				4,375.5
Less: Billings to date			6,584.4				5,128.1
		$	(1,346.6	)		$	(752.6	)
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		$	605.0			$	643.5
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts			(1,951.6	)			(1,396.1	)
		$	(1,346.6	)		$	(752.6	)

6. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Net income		$	421.7			$	318.5			$	819.3			$	594.4
Currency translation adjustments			11.0				66.7				38.1				89.8
Derivative financial instruments			0.3				3.3				21.2				3.3
Change in defined benefit plans			—				—				(0.3	)			(9.0	)
Comprehensive income		$	433.0			$	388.5			$	878.3			$	678.5

7. Business Segments

Operating results by segment are as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Revenue:
Rig Technology		$	1,911.1			$	1,409.2			$	3,514.0			$	2,629.0
Petroleum Services & Supplies			1,123.8				746.1				1,953.6				1,437.9
Distribution Services			425.6				344.8				791.3				696.7
Elimination			(136.3	)			(115.2	)			(249.3	)			(213.0	)
Total Revenue		$	3,324.2			$	2,384.9			$	6,009.6			$	4,550.6
Operating Profit:
Rig Technology		$	506.4			$	340.8			$	912.4			$	609.6
Petroleum Services & Supplies (a)			221.1				177.8				416.3				348.8
Distribution Services			24.8				23.1				43.6				48.0
Unallocated expenses and eliminations			(44.2	)			(44.5	)			(95.7	)			(82.1	)
Transaction costs			(16.4	)			—				(16.4	)			—
Total Operating Profit		$	691.7			$	497.2			$	1,260.2			$	924.3
Operating Profit %:
Rig Technology			26.5	%			24.2	%			26.0	%			23.2	%
Petroleum Services & Supplies (a)			19.7	%			23.8	%			21.3	%			24.3	%
Distribution Services			5.8	%			6.7	%			5.5	%			6.9	%
Total Operating Profit %			20.8	%			20.8	%			21.0	%			20.3	%

The Company’s 2008 financial statements include Grant Prideco from April 21, 2008, the Merger Date, which includes additional amortization and depreciation of $31.6 million from the step up to fair market value of Grant Prideco’s assets and liabilities. Following a FAS 131 review, the Company determined that the Grant Prideco product lines, which includes the results of operations and all assets and liabilities, will be reported within the Petroleum Services & Supplies segment.

8. Debt

Debt consists of (in millions):

		June 30,				December 31,
		2008				2007
Revolving credit facilities		$	800.0			$	—
$100.0 million Senior Notes, interest at 7.5% payable semiannually, principal due on February 15, 2008			—				100.2
$150.0 million Senior Notes, interest at 6.5% payable semiannually, principal due on March 15, 2011			150.0				150.0
$200.0 million Senior Notes, interest at 7.25% payable semiannually, principal due on May 1, 2011			210.0				211.7
$200.0 million Senior Notes, interest at 5.65% payable semiannually, principal due on November 15, 2012			200.0				200.0
$150.0 million Senior Notes, interest at 5.5% payable semiannually, principal due on November 19, 2012			151.2				151.3
Senior Notes, interest at 6.125% payable semiannually, principal due on August 15, 2015			174.6				—
Other			27.7				77.5
Total debt			1,713.5				890.7
Less current portion			320.8				152.8
Long-term debt		$	1,392.7			$	737.9

Senior Notes

In connection with the Merger of Grant Prideco, the Company completed an exchange offer relative to the $174.6 million of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2015 previously issued by Grant Prideco. On April 21, 2008, $150.8 million of Grant Prideco Senior Notes were exchanged for National Oilwell Varco Senior Notes. The National Oilwell Varco Senior Notes have the same interest rate, interest payment dates, redemption terms and maturity as the Grant Prideco Senior Notes.

Revolving Credit Facilities

On April 21, 2008, the Company replaced its existing $500.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with an aggregate of $3.0 billion of unsecured credit facilities and borrowed $2.0 billion to finance the cash portion of the Grant Prideco acquisition. These facilities consist of a $2.0 billion, five-year revolving credit facility and a $1.0 billion, 364-day revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008, there were $800.0 million borrowed against these facilities, and there were $338.4 million in outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $1,861.6 million of funds available under this revolving credit facility. Interest under this multicurrency facility is based upon LIBOR, NIBOR or EURIBOR plus 0.26-0.28% subject to a ratings-based grid, or the prime rate.

The Company also had $2.3 billion of additional outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2008, mainly in Norway, that are primarily under various bilateral committed letter of credit facilities. The $1.0 billion increase in letters of credit since December 31, 2007 is the result of significant down payments from our customers, which in turn require our issuing to our customers advance payment guarantees in the form of letters of credit. Other letters of credit are issued as bid bonds and performance bonds.

The Senior Notes contain reporting covenants and the credit facility contains a financial covenant regarding maximum debt to capitalization. We were in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2008.

Other

Other debt includes approximately $21.2 million in promissory notes due to former owners of businesses acquired who remain employed by the Company.

9. Tax

The effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was 37.5% and 34.9%, respectively, compared to 34.9% and 34.2% for the same periods in 2007. The higher 2008 rates reflect additional tax provisions related to the Company’s decision to repatriate earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries during the three month period ended June 30, 2008. This was partially offset by increasing benefits in the U.S. from the tax incentive for manufacturing activities and a net incremental benefit resulting from the movement in exchange rates after the change of the functional currency to the U.S. dollar for our operations in Norway. This net benefit included a tax benefit in Norway of $3.7 million and $26.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, resulting from realized foreign exchange losses on U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities and a $1.5 million and $15.1 million loss for the same respective periods, which was reported as income tax expense, from the remeasurement into U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated deferred tax assets and liabilities in the balance sheet.

The difference between the effective tax rate reflected in the provision for income taxes and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% was as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Federal income tax at U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0%		$	238.2			$	172.7			$	443.9			$	320.0
Foreign income tax rate differential			(23.2	)			(17.3	)			(43.4	)			(28.9	)
State income tax, net of federal benefit			10.7				5.4				16.7				10.1
Foreign dividends, net of foreign tax credits			32.3				6.1				34.5				7.9
Other			(3.1	)			5.1				(8.7	)			3.6
Provision for income taxes		$	254.9			$	172.0			$	443.0			$	312.7

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position, in management’s opinion, on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has a less than 50% likelihood of being sustained.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $51.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including associated interest and penalties. This represents the tax benefits associated with various tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on domestic and international tax returns that have not been recognized in our financial statements due to uncertainty regarding their resolution. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized an increase of $10.9 million and $11.3 million, respectively, in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $10.4 million was obtained from its acquisition of Grant Prideco. The Company does not anticipate that the total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to the settlement of audits or the expiration of statutes of limitation within 12 months of this reporting date.

To the extent penalties and interest would be assessed on any underpayment of income tax, such accrued amounts have been classified as a component of income tax expense in the financial statements. This is an accounting policy election made by the Company that is a continuation of the Company’s historical policy and will continue to be consistently applied in the future.

10. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan known as the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the granting of stock options, performance-based share awards, restricted stock, phantom shares, stock payments and stock appreciation rights. The number of shares authorized under the Plan is 15 million. As of June 30, 2008, there remain 5,252,584 shares available for future grants under the Plan, all of which are available for grants of stock options, performance-based share awards, restricted stock, phantom shares, stock payments and stock appreciation rights. Total stock-based compensation for all share-based compensation arrangements under the Plan was $35.3 million and $21.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in the $35.3 million of compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is $6.0 million of compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting for certain restricted stock awards as a result of the merger with Grant Prideco, which is included in ‘Transaction costs’ in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income for all stock-based compensation arrangements under the Plan was $11.4 million (of which $2.2 million related to the accelerated vesting for certain restricted stock awards as a result of the Merger) and $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted 1,368,900 stock options, 334,057 restricted stock awards and 185,000 performance-based restricted stock awards. The grant of 1,368,900 stock options by the Company is as follows: 1,340,900 stock options were granted February 19, 2008 with an exercise price of $64.16 and 28,000 stock options were granted on May 14, 2008 with an exercise price of $73.98. Additionally 250,402 stock options were assumed as part of the Company’s merger with Grant Prideco on April 21, 2008. These options generally vest over a three-year period from the grant date. The grant of 334,057 restricted stock awards made by the Company is as follows: 325,300 restricted stock awards were granted February 19, 2008 and 8,757 restricted stock awards were granted May 14, 2008. Additionally 303,212 restricted stock awards were assumed as part of the Company’s merger with Grant Prideco on April 21, 2008. The restricted stock awards granted February 19, 2008 vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock awards granted May 14, 2008 vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period from the date of grant. The restricted stock awards assumed as part of the Company’s merger with Grant Prideco vest on the second anniversary of the date of grant. The performance-based restricted stock awards were granted February 19, 2008. The performance-based restricted stock awards granted will be 100% vested 36 months from date of grant, with a performance condition of the Company’s average operating income growth, measured on a percentage basis, from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010 exceeding the median operating income level growth of a designated peer group over the same period.

11. Derivative Financial Instruments

Except for certain foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements discussed below, all derivative financial instruments we hold are designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges and are highly effective in offsetting movements in the underlying risks. Accordingly, gains and losses from changes in the fair value of designated derivative financial instruments are deferred and recognized in earnings as revenues or costs of sales as the underlying transactions occur. Any ineffective portion of the change in the fair value is recorded in earnings as incurred.

We use foreign currency forward contracts and options to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on recognized nonfunctional currency monetary accounts, forecasted transactions and firm sale and purchase commitments to better match the local currency cost components of nonfunctional currency transactions. Such arrangements typically have terms between two and 30 months, but may have longer terms depending on the project and our backlog. We may also use interest rate contracts to mitigate our exposure to changes in interest rates on anticipated long-term debt issuances. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

At June 30, 2008, we had entered into foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $2,768.5 million designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies. These exposures arise when local currency operating expenses are not in balance with local currency revenue collections. Based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2008 for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates, we have recorded a gain of $37.4 million, net of tax of $14.7 million, to adjust these foreign currency forward contracts to their fair market values. This gain is included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. It is expected that $16.1 million of this gain will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. The Company currently has cash flow hedges in place through

the fourth quarter of 2010. Ineffectiveness was not material on these foreign currency forward contracts for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2008.

At June 30, 2008, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $171.0 million designated and qualifying as fair value hedges to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies. Based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2008 for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates, we recorded a gain of $3.7 million to adjust these foreign currency forward contracts to their fair market values. This gain is offset by designated losses on firm commitments resulting in no impact on current earnings. The Company currently has fair value hedges in place through the fourth quarter of 2010. Ineffectiveness was not material on these foreign currency forward contracts for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2008.

At June 30, 2008, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $694.4 million to offset exposures to currency fluctuation of nonfunctional currency balance sheet accounts, primarily consisting of accounts receivable and accounts payable and are not designated as hedges. Therefore, changes in the fair values of these contracts are recorded each period in current earnings.

We assess the functional currencies of our operating units to ensure that the appropriate currencies are utilized in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation". Effective January 1, 2008, we changed the functional currency of our Rig Technology unit in Norway from the Norwegian Kroner to the U.S. dollar to more appropriately reflect the primary economic environment in which they operate. This change was precipitated by significant changes in the economic facts and circumstances, including: the increased order rate for large drilling rigs and components technology denominated in U.S. dollars, the use of our Norway unit as our preferred project manager of these projects, increasing revenue and cost base in U.S. dollars, and the implementation of an international cash pool to finance these operations in U.S. dollars. As a Norwegian Kroner functional unit, Norway was subject to increasing foreign currency exchange risk as a result of these changes in its economic environment and was dependent upon significant hedging transactions to offset its nonfunctional currency positions.

At December 31, 2007, our Norway operations had derivatives with $2,550.5 million in notional value with a fair value of $91.3 million to mitigate foreign currency exchange risk against the U.S. dollar, our reporting currency. Effective with the change in the functional currency, the Company terminated these hedges. The related net gain position of $108.8 million associated with the terminated hedges will be recognized into earnings in the future period(s) the forecasted transactions affect earnings, of which $38.8 million has been recognized into earnings at June 30, 2008. The Company has subsequent to January 1, 2008, entered into new hedges to cover the exposures as a result of the changes to U.S. dollar functional.

12. Net Income Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of weighted average basic and diluted shares outstanding (in millions, except per share data):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Numerator:
Net income		$	421.7			$	318.5			$	819.3			$	594.4
Denominator:
Basic—weighted average common shares outstanding			401.7				354.4				378.9				353.1
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and other unvested stock awards			2.3				1.9				1.8				1.2
Diluted outstanding shares			404.0				356.3				380.7				354.3
Basic earnings per share		$	1.05			$	0.90			$	2.16			$	1.68
Diluted earnings per share		$	1.04			$	0.89			$	2.15			$	1.68

13. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008. The Company has determined that our financial assets and liabilities (primarily currency related derivatives) are level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2008, the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts discussed in Note 11 totaled $20.9 million. There was no significant impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the adoption of SFAS 157. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the application of SFAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires employers to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 158 recognizing the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position and recognized changes in the funded status in the year in which they occurred through comprehensive income effective December 31, 2006 with no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of its fiscal year end resulting in a $1.5 million charge to retained earnings.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides entities with an option to measure many financial assets and liabilities and certain other items at fair value as determined on an instrument by instrument basis. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159 and elected not to measure any of its currently eligible assets and liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also expands required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects that this new standard will impact certain aspects of its accounting for business combinations on a prospective basis, including the determination of fair values assigned to certain purchased assets and liabilities.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (previously called minority interests) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities, with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial statements. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after

November 15, 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact, if any, this standard might have on the Company’s disclosures to its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) SFAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP SFAS 142-3”). FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". The objective of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations", and other U.S. GAAP principles. FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact, if any, this standard might have on the Company’s disclosures to its consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (the “Company”) is a worldwide leader in the design, manufacture and sale of equipment and components used in oil and gas drilling and production, the provision of oilfield services, and supply chain integration services to the upstream oil and gas industry. The following describes our business segments:

Rig Technology

Our Rig Technology segment designs, manufactures, sells and services complete systems for the drilling, completion, and servicing of oil and gas wells. The segment offers a comprehensive line of highly-engineered equipment that automates complex well construction and management operations, such as offshore and onshore drilling rigs; derricks; pipe lifting, racking, rotating and assembly systems; rig instrumentation systems; coiled tubing equipment and pressure pumping units; well workover rigs; wireline winches; and cranes. Demand for Rig Technology products is primarily dependent on capital spending plans by drilling contractors, oilfield service companies, and oil and gas companies, and secondarily on the overall level of oilfield drilling activity, which drives demand for spare parts for the segment’s large installed base of equipment. We have made strategic acquisitions and other investments during the past several years in an effort to expand our product offering and our global manufacturing capabilities, including adding additional operations in the United States, Canada, Norway, the United Kingdom, China, Belarus, and India.

Petroleum Services & Supplies

Our Petroleum Services & Supplies segment provides a variety of consumable goods and services used to drill, complete, remediate and workover oil and gas wells and service pipelines, flowlines and other oilfield tubular goods. The segment manufactures, rents and sells a variety of products and equipment used to perform drilling operations, including drill pipe, transfer pumps, solids control systems, drilling motors, drill bits, reamers and other downhole tools, and mud pump consumables. Demand for these services and supplies is determined principally by the level of oilfield drilling and workover activity by drilling contractors, major and independent oil and gas companies, and national oil companies. Oilfield tubular services include the provision of inspection and internal coating services and equipment for drill pipe, line pipe, tubing, casing and pipelines; and the design, manufacture and sale of coiled tubing pipe and advanced composite pipe for application in highly corrosive environments. The segment sells its tubular goods and services to oil and gas companies; drilling contractors; pipe distributors, processors and manufacturers; and pipeline operators. This segment has benefited from several strategic acquisitions and other investments completed during the past few years, including adding additional operations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, China, Kazakhstan, Mexico, Russia, Argentina, India, Bolivia, the Netherlands, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the United Arab Emirates.

Distribution Services

Our Distribution Services segment provides maintenance, repair and operating supplies and spare parts to drill site and production locations worldwide. In addition to its comprehensive network of field locations supporting land drilling operations throughout North America, the segment supports major offshore drilling contractors through locations in Mexico, the Middle East, Europe, Southeast Asia and South America. Distribution Services employs advanced information technologies to provide complete procurement, inventory management and logistics services to its customers around the globe. Demand for the segment’s services are determined primarily by the level of drilling, servicing, and oil and gas production activities.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we identified our most critical accounting policies. In preparing the financial statements, we make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported. We periodically evaluate our estimates and judgments that are most critical in nature which are related to revenue recognition under drill pipe sales and long-term construction contracts; allowance for doubtful accounts; inventory reserves; impairments of long-lived assets (excluding goodwill); goodwill impairment and income taxes. Our estimates are based on historical experience and on our future expectations that we believe are reasonable. The combination of these factors forms the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of

assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results are likely to differ from our current estimates and those differences may be material.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s products and services are sold based upon purchase orders or contracts with the customer that include fixed or determinable prices and that do not generally include right of return or other similar provisions or other significant post delivery obligations. Except for certain construction contracts and drill pipe sales described below, the Company records revenue at the time its manufacturing process is complete, the customer has been provided with all proper inspection and other required documentation, title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, collectibility is reasonably assured and the product has been delivered. Customer advances or deposits are deferred and recognized as revenue when the Company has completed all of its performance obligations related to the sale. The Company also recognizes revenue as services are performed. The amounts billed for shipping and handling cost are included in revenue and related costs are included in costs of sales.

Revenue Recognition under Long-term Construction Contracts

The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method to account for certain long-term construction contracts in the Rig Technology segment. These long-term construction contracts include the following characteristics:

	•		the contracts include custom designs for customer specific applications;
	•		the structural design is unique and requires significant engineering efforts; and
	•		construction projects often have progress payments.

This method requires the Company to make estimates regarding the total costs of the project, progress against the project schedule and the estimated completion date, all of which impact the amount of revenue and gross margin the Company recognizes in each reporting period. The Company prepares detailed cost estimates at the beginning of each project. Significant projects and their related costs and profit margins are updated and reviewed at least quarterly by senior management. Factors that may affect future project costs and margins include shipyard access, weather, production efficiencies, availability and costs of labor, materials and subcomponents and other factors. These factors can impact the accuracy of the Company’s estimates and materially impact the Company’s current and future reported earnings.

The asset, “Costs in excess of billings,” represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed. The liability, “Billings in excess of costs,” represents billings in excess of revenues recognized.

Drill Pipe Sales

For drill pipe sales, if requested in writing by the customer, delivery may be satisfied through delivery to the Company’s customer storage location or to a third-party storage facility. For sales transactions where title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer but the supporting documentation does not meet the criteria for revenue recognition prior to the products being in the physical possession of the customer, the recognition of the revenues and related inventory costs from these transactions are deferred until the customer takes physical possession.

Executive Summary

National Oilwell Varco generated earnings of $421.7 million or $1.04 per fully diluted share in its second quarter ended June 30, 2008, on revenues of $3.3 billion. Operating income was $691.7 million or 20.8 percent of sales for the second quarter. Compared to the second quarter of 2007 both revenues and operating profit improved 39 percent during the second quarter of 2008.

Grant Prideco Acquisition

On April 21, 2008 the Company completed its acquisition of Grant Prideco for a combination of approximately $3.0 billion in cash (includes acquisition costs of $0.1 billion) and the issuance of 56.9 million shares of National Oilwell Varco common stock. The Grant Prideco merger further strengthened National Oilwell Varco’s position as manufacturer to the oilfield. Its drill bits and reamers are being integrated into the Company’s offering of drilling motors, non-magnetic drill collars, jars and shock tools, to complement its comprehensive package of bottomhole assembly tools used to drill complex wellpaths. Additionally, Grant Prideco’s drill pipe products are purchased and consumed by the Company’s existing drilling contractor customer base. The Company believes that consumption of drill pipe has been increasing due to the rising complexity of wellpath designs. Overall, the acquisition better positioned National Oilwell Varco to capitalize on continued growth in horizontal, directional and extended-reach drilling, through both drill pipe and drill bit product sales.

Integration of the business is proceeding well. The Company is introducing new drill pipe tracking products, and expanding OEM drill pipe repair and maintenance offerings through its worldwide network of pipe service operations. The Company is also consolidating a number of bit and downhole tool sales facilities worldwide, and leveraging combined manufacturing capabilities to improve lead times and reduce costs. The Company achieved savings of $6.0 million pre-tax during the second quarter, mostly on overhead cost reductions, and expects this amount to increase to $9.7 million in each of the third and fourth quarters, and to rise to approximately $11.0 million per quarter beginning in 2009. This is expected to result in an annual savings rate slightly higher than the $40 million per year rate in forecasted synergies at the time of the announcement of the transaction.

During the second quarter, National Oilwell Varco recognized $46.1 million of pre-tax inventory charges charged to “Cost of revenue” as the applicable stepped-up inventory was sold and transaction-related charges totaling $16.4 million pre-tax or $0.10 per share on a combined basis after tax, and additional tax provisions associated with financing the transaction of $29.0 million or $0.07 per share. The $16.4 million of transaction-related charges are comprised of $6.0 million for accelerated vesting of stock-based compensation, $4.0 million for bridge loan fees, $5.8 million related to transaction costs for the disposition of certain tubular businesses of Grant Prideco in May 2008 and $0.6 million of other costs. Additionally the Company generated $7.2 million pre-tax or $0.01 per share after tax in earnings from Grant Prideco operations later sold during the quarter. Excluding these items, earnings were $1.20 per fully diluted share. We expect additional transaction costs of approximately $30 million in the third quarter and $16 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The Company’s consolidated second quarter financial statements include results from the last 70 days of Grant Prideco operations in the quarter, including additional pro-rata amortization and depreciation of $31.6 million from the step up to fair market value of Grant Prideco’s assets and liabilities. Following a FAS131 review the Company determined that the Grant Prideco product lines will be reported within the Petroleum Services & Supplies segment. Additionally, the Company began to report rig instrumentation products in the Rig Technology segment (revenues of $71 million during the second quarter) and artificial lift and industrial products in the Distribution Services segment (revenues of $27 million in the second quarter), that had previously been reported in Petroleum Services & Supplies. These changes were made to reflect a realignment of management responsibilities as of April 21, 2008 related to the Grant Prideco acquisition.

During the second quarter the completion of the sale of Grant Prideco’s Tubular Technology & Services businesses yielded approximately $784 million in cash pre-tax. Later this year the Company will pay $274 million in tax on the realized gain. Also certain litigation pursued by Grant Prideco relating to infringement of drill bit manufacturing technology was settled for a net amount of $127 million, which was recorded as a reduction of goodwill.

Oil & Gas Equipment and Services Market

Oil and gas prices have increased significantly over the past five years and remain near historic highs, which have led to high levels of exploration and development drilling in many oil and gas basins around the globe. The count of rigs actively drilling during the second quarter of 2008 as measured by Baker Hughes (a good measure of the level of oilfield activity and spending) increased eight percent from the second quarter of 2007. Commodity prices also increased, with West Texas Intermediate crude trading up 91 percent, and North American gas up 51 percent from the second quarter of 2007.

The level of drilling activity underway is the highest seen since the early 1980’s, which is fueling high demand for oilfield services. Much of the new incremental drilling activity is occurring in harsh environments, and employs increasingly sophisticated technology to find and produce reserves. Higher utilization of drilling rigs has tested the capability of the world’s fleet of rigs, much of which is old and of limited capability. Technology has advanced significantly since most of the existing rig fleet was built. The industry invested little during the late 1980’s and 1990’s on new drilling equipment, but drilling technology progressed steadily nonetheless, as the Company and its competitors continued to invest in new and better ways of drilling. As a consequence, the safety, reliability, and efficiency of new, modern rigs surpass the performance of most of the older rigs at work today.

The rise in demand for drilling rigs has driven rig dayrates higher over the past few years, which has increased cash flows and available financing to drilling contractors. Many have invested in new rigs or placed older rigs back into service. The Company has played an important role in providing both new rigs as well as the equipment, consumables and services needed to reactivate many older rigs. Oil and gas producers demand top performance from drilling rigs, particularly at the premium dayrates that are being paid today. As a result of this trend, the Company has benefited from incremental demand for new products (such as our small iron roughnecks for land rigs, our top drives, our LXT BOP’s, and our pump liner systems, among others) to upgrade certain rig functions to make them safer and more efficient.

Drilling rigs are now being pushed to drill deeper wells, more complex wells, highly deviated wells and horizontal wells, tasks which require larger rigs with more capabilities. Higher dayrates magnify the opportunity cost of rig downtime, and rigs are being pushed to maximize revenue days for their drilling contractor owners. The drilling process effectively consumes the mechanical components of a rig, which wear out and need periodic repair or replacement. This process has been accelerated by very high rig utilization and wellbore complexity. Drilling consumes rigs; more complex and challenging drilling consumes rigs faster.

Changing methods of drilling have further benefited the Company’s business. Increasingly, hydraulic power — in addition to conventional mechanical rotary power — is being used to apply torque to the drill bit. This is done using downhole drilling motors powered by drilling fluids. We are a major provider of downhole drilling motors, and we have seen demand for this application of our drilling motors increase over the last few years. This trend has also increased demand for our high pressure mud pumps, which create the hydraulic power in the drilling fluids which drives the drilling motors.

While the increasingly efficient equipment provided by us has mitigated the effect, high activity levels have increased demand for personnel in the oilfield. Consequently, the Company, its customers and its suppliers have experienced wage inflation in certain markets. Hiring experienced drilling crews has been challenging for the drilling industry; however, we believe crews generally prefer working on newer, more modern rigs. Our products which save labor and increase efficiency (such as its automatic slips and pipe handling equipment) also make the rig crew’s jobs easier, and make the rig a more desirable place to work.

The world is actively building many new offshore rigs, and schedules call for 91 new floating rigs and 81 new jack-up rigs to be delivered into the fleet by the end of 2012. The offshore rig fleet they will join is old: 130 of the existing 220 floating rigs (59 percent) and 324 of the existing 428 jack-up rigs (76 percent) are more than 25 years old. The existing fleet was engineered and constructed prior to many technical advancements, and we believe that the newer rigs offer considerably higher efficiency, safety, and capability, and that many will effectively replace a portion of the existing fleet. Additionally, the large number of floating rig construction projects will add new capacity required to press exploration into new deepwater frontiers.

Land rig inquiries, both international and domestic, are up sharply, and our backlog for land equipment increased 18 percent from the first quarter of 2008 to the second quarter, driven mostly by strong domestic demand. Customer enthusiasm for modern, AC-powered, electronically controlled rigs appears to continue to build as outlook for North

America has improved, due to substantially higher gas prices in the U.S. and Canada. Inquiries for rig equipment and oilfield services for North America, particularly for shale plays, have increased. We believe the retooling of the U.S. land rig market will continue as favorable operator experience with higher technology rigs vis-a-vis old mechanical rigs will continue to “pull” more of these into the marketplace.

Overall we expect to continue to sell into three important trends in the rig fleet worldwide: the buildout of additional deepwater capabilities, the retooling of the jack-up fleet with newer, more capable rigs, and the replacement of older land rigs with improved technology.

Segment Performance

Rig Technology generated $1,911.1 million in revenue and $506.4 million in operating profit in the second quarter, yielding an operating margin of 26.5%. The group generated 33 percent operating leverage or flowthrough (the increase in operating profit divided by the increase in revenue) on 19 percent revenue growth from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2008, and 33 percent flowthrough on 36 percent revenue growth from the second quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2008. Revenue out of backlog increased 18 percent sequentially to $1.3 billion, and non-backlog revenue increased 22 percent sequentially, due to new instrumentation products sales and sharply higher spare parts sales, partially offset by lower sales of handling tools. Our June 30, 2008 backlog for capital equipment sales from this segment was a record $10.8 billion, an increase of nine percent sequentially due to a record level of orders of $2.2 billion received during the second quarter. Seven floating rig packages, higher demand for land rigs both domestically and overseas, and steady demand for jack-up equipment fueled the higher orders and backlog. Equipment for international markets was 91 percent and offshore was 87 percent of the ending backlog, and the scheduled outflow of revenue from backlog is expected to be in the range of $3 billion for the remainder of 2008, approximately $5 billion in 2009, and approximately $3 billion thereafter.

The Petroleum Services & Supplies segment generated revenues of $1,123.8 million in the second quarter, up 35 percent from the first quarter of 2008 and up 51 percent from the second quarter of 2007. The 70 days of contribution from Grant Prideco operations acquired during the quarter totaled $370.5 million in revenue and drove most of the increase. Excluding the $46.1 million of inventory charges for inventory step up related to the Merger, operating profit was $267.2 million or 23.8 percent of sales. Operating profit flowthrough was 24 percent sequentially, and 24 percent year-over-year. Revenues in Canada declined $59 million from the first quarter to the second due to the annual spring breakup (transport restrictions on heavy rig movements by the authorities to prevent damage to roads during the spring thaw). Activity and outlook in Canada are both rising following the lifting of these bans several weeks ago. Fortunately the seasonal Canadian declines were offset by strong results overall in most of our other businesses, which benefited from rising activity associated with shale gas plays in the U.S., and steadily rising activity overseas. Increased rig construction and reactivations are fueling demand for the pumps, liners, solids control and waste management equipment. The Company’s pipe inspection operation is benefitting from sharply higher mill and processor activity in response to tight OCTG inventories and higher pricing, and expansion of its drill pipe repair and maintenance operations. Overseas demand for fiberglass pipe for large projects began to increase during the quarter, and demand for drilling motors, non-mag drill collars, and fishing tools in the Middle East continued to push higher following the opening of our new facility in Dubai late last year.

Distribution Services segment revenues were $425.6 million in the second quarter, up 16 percent from the first quarter of 2008 and up 23 percent from the second quarter of 2007. Operating profit was $24.8 million or 5.8 percent of sales, and operating profit flowthrough was ten percent sequentially. Domestic revenues achieved record levels during the second quarter due to high demand for operating supplies for rigs moving into emerging shale plays, and high demand from service companies due to higher service activity. Margins improved on line pipe sales this quarter, but bidding pressures remained fierce in many mature regions. Canada sales declined sequentially due to seasonal breakup, which was partly offset by rising demand in southeast Saskatchewan and high shale activity in British Columbia. International sales improved as a number of overseas locations posted increased revenue, notably in the Middle East, Africa and Norway.

Outlook

We believe that the outlook for the Company for the remainder of 2008 remains positive, as historically high commodity prices are expected to keep overall oil and gas activity high, and as the Company enters the second half of 2008 with a record level of backlog for capital equipment for its Rig Technology group.

Oil prices and supply remains subject to significant political risk in many international regions. The growth of China and other emerging economies has added significant demand to the oil markets, and new sources of supply continue to prove challenging to find and produce economically. The Company expects the sharply higher oil prices that have resulted to sustain high levels of oilfield activity in 2008, provided the world’s major economies remain reasonably strong. High commodity prices, drilling activity levels, and drilling rig dayrates are expected to continue to fuel demand for the Company’s Rig Technology group. The supply of offshore rigs remains tight in many markets, and quotation activity for the Rig Technology group remains brisk. In particular, the Company expects recent deepwater lease awards and announcements of discoveries in Brazil to continue to fuel a high level of interest in floating drilling rig construction projects. Additionally, interest in new international land rigs remains very high, and inquiries regarding domestic rig construction have risen very recently. Demand for pressure pumping equipment softened during the second quarter, and is expected to remain lower for at least the next few months. The segment continues to wrestle with rising costs, particularly steel, utilities, logistics and foreign currency-related costs, but efficiency initiatives, broader outsourcing, our wide manufacturing footprint, and modest price improvements appear to be maintaining margins, which have remained stable on newly won projects.

Our outlook for the Company’s Petroleum Services & Supplies segment remains good, given continuation of high levels of drilling across the U.S., Middle East, North Africa, the Far East, Latin America and the North Sea. While Canadian activity remains slow, we believe the outlook there has improved as the region emerges from its seasonal second quarter breakup period, due to higher gas prices. Inflationary pressures, particularly steel, labor, and fuel, continue to pressure margins, but recent modest price increases, higher volumes, acquisition-related cost reductions and a continued focus on efficiency have generally permitted the segment to maintain margins.

The Company’s Distribution Services segment continues to target international growth initiatives underpinned by new strategic customer alliances in certain regions, including acting on several inquiries by drilling contractors for stores on new build offshore rigs. The group currently has three stores physically located on offshore rigs, staffed by Company personnel. Cost reductions in Canada over the past several quarters have improved margins there despite generally weaker market conditions. In the third quarter the Distribution Services segment expects to open a handful of new locations to improve coverage of emerging shale plays in the U.S.

The Company’s results are dependent on, among other things, the level of worldwide oil and gas drilling, well remediation activity, the prices of crude oil and natural gas, capital spending by other oilfield service companies and drilling contractors, pipeline maintenance activity, and worldwide oil and gas inventory levels. Key industry indicators for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, and the first quarter of 2008 include the following:

														%				%
														2Q08 v				2Q08 v
		2Q08*				2Q07*				1Q08*				2Q07				1Q08
Active Drilling Rigs:
U.S.			1,864				1,756				1,771				6.2	%			5.3	%
Canada			169				139				507				21.6	%			(66.7	)%
International			1,084				1,002				1,046				8.2	%			3.6	%
Worldwide			3,117				2,897				3,324				7.6	%			(6.2	)%
West Texas Intermediate		$	124.05			$	64.99			$	97.87				90.9	%			26.7	%
Crude Prices (per barrel)
Natural Gas Prices ($/mmbtu)		$	11.38			$	7.52			$	8.64				51.3	%			31.7	%

The following table details the U.S., Canadian, and international rig activity and West Texas Intermediate Oil prices for the past nine quarters ended June 30, 2008 on a quarterly basis:

Source: Rig count: Baker Hughes, Inc. (www.bakerhughes.com); West Texas Intermediate Crude Price: Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (www.eia.doe.gov).

The worldwide and U.S. quarterly average rig count increased 7.6% (from 2,897 to 3,117) and 6.2% (from 1,756 to 1,864), respectively, in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. The average per barrel price of West Texas Intermediate Crude increased 90.9% (from $64.99 per barrel to $124.05 per barrel) and natural

gas prices increased 51.3% (from $7.52 per mmbtu to $11.38 per mmbtu) in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007.

U.S. rig activity at July 25, 2008 was 1,957 rigs compared to the second quarter average of 1,864 rigs. The price for West Texas Intermediate Crude was at $122.59 per barrel as of July 25, 2008. The Company believes that current industry projections are forecasting commodity prices to remain strong. However, numerous events could significantly alter these projections including political tensions in the Middle East, the acceleration or deceleration of the U.S. and world economies, a build up in world oil inventory levels, or numerous other events or circumstances.

Results of Operations

Operating results by segment are as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Revenue:
Rig Technology		$	1,911.1			$	1,409.2			$	3,514.0			$	2,629.0
Petroleum Services & Supplies			1,123.8				746.1				1,953.6				1,437.9
Distribution Services			425.6				344.8				791.3				696.7
Elimination			(136.3	)			(115.2	)			(249.3	)			(213.0	)
Total Revenue		$	3,324.2			$	2,384.9			$	6,009.6			$	4,550.6
Operating Profit:
Rig Technology		$	506.4			$	340.8			$	912.4			$	609.6
Petroleum Services & Supplies (a)			221.1				177.8				416.3				348.8
Distribution Services			24.8				23.1				43.6				48.0
Unallocated expenses and eliminations			(44.2	)			(44.5	)			(95.7	)			(82.1	)
Transaction costs			(16.4	)			—				(16.4	)			—
Total Operating Profit		$	691.7			$	497.2			$	1,260.2			$	924.3
Operating Profit %:
Rig Technology			26.5	%			24.2	%			26.0	%			23.2	%
Petroleum Services & Supplies (a)			19.7	%			23.8	%			21.3	%			24.3	%
Distribution Services			5.8	%			6.7	%			5.5	%			6.9	%
Total Operating Profit %			20.8	%			20.8	%			21.0	%			20.3	%

Rig Technology

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Rig Technology revenue in the second quarter of 2008 was $1,911.1 million, an increase of $501.9 million (36%) compared to the same period of 2007. Backlog rose to $10.8 billion, up 50% from the same period last year. Backlog and non-backlog revenue increased 40% and 27%, respectively, from the prior year periods reflecting the rise in demand for new rigs as well as the equipment, consumables and services needed to reactivate and/or refurbish many older rigs due to higher oil and gas prices.

Operating profit from Rig Technology was $506.4 million for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $165.6 million (49%) over the same period of 2007. Operating profit % increased to 26.5%, up from 24.2% for the same prior year period. Despite rising costs, particularly related to steel and utilities, margins improved due primarily to manufacturing, engineering, and operational efficiency initiatives, favorable product mix and higher production volumes resulting in greater overhead absorption.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Revenue for the first half of 2008 was $3,514.0 million, an increase of $885.0 million (34%) compared to the same period of 2007. Backlog and non-backlog revenue increased 41% and 18%, respectively, reflecting a rise in demand for new rigs and products and services to reactivate and/or refurbish many older rigs due to higher oil and gas prices as discussed above.

Operating profit for the first six months of 2008 was $912.4 million, an increase of $302.8 million (50%) compared to 2007. Operating profit % increased to 26.0%, up from 23.2% for the same prior year period. These increases reflect operational efficiency initiatives mentioned above, favorable product mix and higher production volumes resulting in greater overhead absorption.

Petroleum Services & Supplies

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Revenue from Petroleum Services & Supplies was $1,123.8 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $746.1 million for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $377.7 million (51%). The increase was primarily attributable to incremental revenues from the acquisition of Grant Prideco on April 21, 2008, which is included in this segment from the acquisition date.

Additionally, this segment benefited from revenue increases in this segment’s Mission business unit due to increased rig construction and reactivations fueling demand for pumps and liners and increased solids control and waste management technologies from this segment’s Brandt business. Revenues also increased at this segment’s Tuboscope business due to higher mill and processor activity in response to increased OCTG inventories and higher pricing.

Operating profit from Petroleum Services & Supplies was $221.1 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to $177.8 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $43.3 million (24%), and operating profit percentage decreased to 19.7%, down from 23.8% for the same period, which includes the $46.1 million charge related to a fair value step up adjustment to inventory included in the Grant Prideco acquisition, mentioned above. Excluding the inventory adjustment, operating profit increased due to the increase in revenue (see discussion above) and operating profit percentage remained relatively flat year-over-year.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Revenue from Petroleum Services & Supplies was $1,953.6 million for the first six months of 2008 compared to $1,437.9 million for the first six months of 2007, an increase of $515.7 million (36%). The increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Grant Prideco in April 2008 coupled with increases in virtually all of this segment’s products and services.

Operating profit from Petroleum Services & Supplies was $416.3 million for the first six months of 2008 compared to $348.8 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $67.5 million (19%), and operating profit percentage decreased to 21.3%, down from 24.3% for the same period, which includes the $46.1 million charge related to a fair value step up adjustment to inventory included in the Grant Prideco acquisition, mentioned above. Excluding the inventory adjustment, the increase in operating profit was due to the increase in revenue (see discussion above). Additionally, operating profit percentage was negatively affected due to inflationary pressures increasing costs on steel, labor, and fuel; however, these increases were mostly offset by recent price increases and a strong focus on efficiency initiatives.

Distribution Services

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Revenue from Distribution Services was $425.6 million, an increase of $80.8 million (23%) during the second quarter of 2008 over the comparable 2007 period with increases across all geographic regions, but primarily in the international markets and Canada, reflecting rig count increases of 8.2% and 21.6%, respectively.

Operating profit of $24.8 million in the second quarter of 2008 increased $1.7 million over the second quarter of 2007. Operating profit % decreased to 5.8%, down from 6.7% for the same prior year period. Operating profit increased due to higher revenue; however, operating profit % decreased slightly due to competitive pricing pressures in the U.S. due to lower drilling rig day rates, inflationary pressures increasing costs for steel and fuel coupled with costs related to further expansion into international markets, notably in the Middle East.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Revenue from Distribution Services increased $94.6 million (14%) in the first half of 2008 to $791.3 million when compared to the first six months of 2007 with increases across all geographic regions reflecting higher rig counts year-over-year.

Operating profit in the first half of 2008 of $43.6 million decreased by $4.4 million (9%) and operating profit % decreased from 6.9% to 5.5% compared to the comparable period in 2007. These decreases reflect competitive pricing pressures in the U.S. due to lower drilling rig day rates coupled with increases in certain costs as discussed above.

Unallocated expenses and eliminations

Unallocated expenses and eliminations were $44.2 and $95.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $44.5 million and $82.1 million for the same periods in 2007. The increase in unallocated expenses and eliminations was primarily due to greater inter-segment profit eliminations.

Transaction costs

Transaction costs of $16.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were comprised of $6.0 million for accelerated vesting of stock-based compensation, $4.0 million for bridge loan fees, $5.8 million related to transaction costs for the disposition of certain tubular businesses of Grant Prideco in May 2008 and $0.6 million of other costs.

Interest and financial costs

Interest and financial costs were $24.2 million and $34.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $13.1 million and $25.4 million for the respective periods in 2007. The increase in interest and financial costs was primarily due to debt incurred to finance the acquisition of Grant Prideco.

Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), net was an expense of $14.6 million and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to expense of $0.8 million and $3.7 million for the same periods in 2007, respectively. The increase in expense was primarily due to a net foreign exchange gain (loss) of $(8.4) million and $6.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to a net foreign exchange gain of $1.5 million and $0.2 million for the respective period in 2007. Our exposure to the Canadian, Euro and Norwegian currencies as remeasured against the U.S. dollar were the leading contributors to the foreign exchange movement in 2008. Additionally, bank charges were $4.7 million and $7.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $2.4 million and $4.4 million for the same periods in 2007, respectively.

Provision for income taxes

The effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were 37.5% and 34.9%, respectively, compared to 34.9% and 34.2% for the same periods in 2007. The higher 2008 rates reflect additional tax provisions related to the Company’s decision to repatriate earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries during the three month period ended June 30, 2008. This was partially offset by increasing benefits in the U.S. from the tax incentive for manufacturing activities and a net incremental benefit resulting from the movement in exchange rates after the change of the functional currency to the U.S. dollar for our operations in Norway. This net benefit included a tax benefit in Norway of $3.7 million and $26.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, resulting from realized foreign exchange losses on U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities and a $1.5 million and $15.1 million loss for the same respective periods, which was reported as income tax expense, from the remeasurement into U.S. dollars of foreign currency denominated deferred tax assets and liabilities in the balance sheet.

The difference between the effective tax rate reflected in the provision for income taxes and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% was as follows (in millions):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2008				2007				2008				2007
Federal income tax at U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0%		$	238.2			$	172.7			$	443.9			$	320.0
Foreign income tax rate differential			(23.2	)			(17.3	)			(43.4	)			(28.9	)
State income tax, net of federal benefit			10.7				5.4				16.7				10.1
Foreign dividends, net of foreign tax credits			32.3				6.1				34.5				7.9
Other			(3.1	)			5.1				(8.7	)			3.6
Provision for income taxes		$	254.9			$	172.0			$	443.0			$	312.7

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2008, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,652.4 million, and total debt of $1,713.5 million. At December 31, 2007, cash and cash equivalents were $1,841.8 million and total debt was $890.7 million. The Company’s outstanding debt at June 30, 2008 consisted of $800.0 million related to our new revolving credit facilities, $200.0 million of 5.65% Senior Notes due 2012, $200.0 million of 7.25% Senior Notes due 2011, $150.0 million of 6.5% Senior Notes due 2011, $150.0 million of 5.5% Senior Notes due 2012, $174.6 million of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2015, and other debt of $38.9 million.

On April 21, 2008, the Company replaced its existing $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with an aggregate of $3.0 billion of unsecured credit facilities and borrowed $2.0 billion to finance the cash portion of the Grant Prideco acquisition. These facilities consist of a $2.0 billion, five-year revolving credit facility and a $1.0 billion, 364-day revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008, there were $800.0 million borrowed against these facilities, and there were $338.4 million in outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $1,861.6 million of funds available under this revolving credit facility. Interest under this multicurrency facility is based upon LIBOR, NIBOR or EURIBOR plus 0.26-0.28% subject to a ratings-based grid, or the prime rate.

In connection with the Merger of Grant Prideco, the Company completed an exchange offer relative to the $174.6 million of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2015 previously issued by Grant Prideco. On April 21, 2008, $150.8 million of Grant Prideco Senior Notes were exchanged for National Oilwell Varco Senior Notes. The National Oilwell Varco Senior Notes have the same interest rate, interest payment dates, redemption terms and maturity as the Grant Prideco Senior Notes.

For the first six months of 2008, cash provided by operating activities was $1,356.8 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $315.1 million in the same period of 2007. Cash was provided by operations primarily through net income of $819.3 million plus non-cash charges of $167.9 million, dividends received in the second quarter of 2008 of $112.7 million offset by equity income from our equity method affiliate of approximately $17.1 million, increases in prepaid and other current assets of $74.0 million, increases in costs in excess of billings of $38.5 million, increases in billings in excess of costs of $555.6 million and increases in other assets/liabilities, net of $375.4 million. The increase in billings in excess of costs and increases in other assets/liabilities were mainly due to increases in customer deposits and customer prepayments on rig construction projects. These positive cash flows were offset by increases in receivables of $507.4 million and increases in inventories of $297.0 million. Receivables increased due to greater revenue in the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, while inventory increased due to growing backlog orders.

For the first six months of 2008, cash used by investing activities was $2,321.5 million compared to cash used of $358.4 million for the same period of 2007. The Company used $2,994.5 million for acquisitions in the first six months of 2008, including the business and operating assets of Grant Prideco. The Company received approximately $783.9 million related to the disposition of certain Grant Prideco tubular businesses. Capital expenditures totaled approximately $160.4 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily related to expansion of Rig Technology operations and the Petroleum Services & Supplies service and rental businesses.

For the first six months of 2008, cash provided by financing activities was $761.5 million compared to cash provided of $86.9 million for the same period of 2007. During the first six months of 2008, the Company borrowed $2,576.7 million, primarily to finance the cash portion of the Grant Prideco Inc. acquisition, from financial institutions and has repaid $1,928.4 million. Cash proceeds from exercised stock options were $76.8 million for the first six months of 2008.

The effect of the change in exchange rates on cash flows was a positive $13.8 million and $31.7 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The 2007 positive cash flow from exchange rate changes was primarily due to cash holdings in the Norwegian Kroner as a result of customer prepayments on contracts in that country, and the strengthening of the Norwegian Kroner to the U.S. dollar by approximately 5.4% during the first six months of 2007.

The Company’s cash balance as of June 30, 2008 was $1,652.4 million. We believe that cash on hand, cash generated from operations and amounts available under the credit facilities and from other sources of debt will be sufficient to fund operations, working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements and financing obligations. We also believe any significant increases in capital expenditures caused by any need to increase manufacturing capacity can be funded from operations or through debt financing.

We intend to pursue additional acquisition candidates, but the timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the related potential capital commitments cannot be predicted. We expect to fund future cash acquisitions primarily with cash flow from operations and borrowings, including the unborrowed portion of the credit facility or new debt issuances, but may also issue additional equity either directly or in connection with acquisitions. There can be no assurance that additional financing for acquisitions will be available at terms acceptable to us.

Inflation has not had a material impact on our operating results or financial condition in recent years. We believe that the higher costs for labor, energy, steel and other commodities experienced in 2007 and 2008 have largely been mitigated by increased prices and component surcharges for the products we sell. However, higher steel, energy or other commodity prices may adversely impact future periods.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008. The Company has determined that our financial assets and liabilities (primarily currency related derivatives) are level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. At June 30, 2008, the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts discussed in Note 11 totaled $20.9 million. There was no significant impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the adoption of SFAS 157. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the application of SFAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires employers to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 158 recognizing the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position and recognized changes in the funded status in the year in which they occurred through comprehensive income effective December 31, 2006 with no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of its fiscal year end resulting in a $1.5 million charge to retained earnings.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides entities with an option to measure many financial assets and liabilities and certain other items at fair value as determined on an instrument by instrument basis. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159 and elected not to measure any of its currently eligible assets and liabilities at fair value.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R provides revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also expands required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company expects that this new standard will impact certain aspects of its accounting for business combinations on a prospective basis, including the determination of fair values assigned to certain purchased assets and liabilities.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (previously called minority interests) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. SFAS 160

is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities, with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial statements. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact, if any, this standard might have on the Company’s disclosures to its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) SFAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP SFAS 142-3”). FSP SFAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". The objective of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, “Business Combinations", and other U.S. GAAP principles. FSP SFAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet evaluated the impact, if any, this standard might have on the Company’s disclosures to its consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the information in this document contains, or has incorporated by reference, forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. All statements herein regarding expected merger synergies are forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from results anticipated in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in oil and gas prices, customer demand for our products, difficulties encountered in integrating mergers and acquisitions, and worldwide economic activity. You should also consider carefully the statements under “Risk Factors,” as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which address additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, current or prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any such factors or forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Additional information concerning each of these matters follows:

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

We have extensive operations in foreign countries. The net assets and liabilities of these operations are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, although such fluctuations generally do not affect income since their functional currency is typically the local currency. These operations also have net assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency, which exposes us to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that do impact income. We recorded a foreign exchange gain in our income statement of approximately $6.9 million in the first six months of 2008, compared to a $0.2 million loss in the same period of the prior year. The gain/losses are primarily due to exchange rate fluctuations related to monetary asset balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Further strengthening of currencies against the U.S. dollar may create losses in future periods to the extent we maintain net assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency of the countries using the local currency as their functional currency.

Some of our revenues in foreign countries are denominated in U.S. dollars, and therefore, changes in foreign currency exchange rates impact our earnings to the extent that costs associated with those U.S. dollar revenues are denominated in the local currency. Similarly some of our revenues are denominated in foreign currencies, but have associated U.S. dollar costs, which also gives rise to foreign currency exchange rate exposure. In order to mitigate that risk, we may utilize foreign currency forward contracts to better match the currency of our revenues and associated costs. We do not use foreign currency forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes.

At June 30, 2008, we had entered into foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $2,768.5 million to hedge cash flow exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies. These exposures arise when local currency operating expenses are not in balance with local currency revenue collections. Based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates, we have recorded a gain of $37.4 million and $4.3 million, respectively, to adjust these foreign currency forward contracts to their fair market value. This gain is included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated balance sheet. It is expected that $16.1 million of the 2008 gain will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. The Company currently has cash flow hedges in place through the fourth quarter of 2010. Ineffectiveness was not material on these foreign currency forward contracts for the first six months of 2008.

At June 30, 2008, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $171.0 million designated and qualifying as fair value hedges to hedge exposure to currency fluctuations in various foreign currencies. Based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 for contracts with similar terms and maturity dates, we recorded a gain of $3.7 million and $57.5 million, respectively, to adjust these foreign currency forward contracts to their fair market value. This gain is offset by designated losses on the firm commitments. The Company currently has fair value hedges in place through the fourth quarter of 2010. Ineffectiveness was not material on these foreign currency forward contracts for the first six months of 2008.

At June 30, 2008, the Company had foreign currency forward contracts with notional amounts aggregating $694.4 million to offset exposures to the currency fluctuation of nonfunctional currency balance sheet accounts, primarily consisting of account receivables and account payables, and are not designated as hedges. Therefore, changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded each period in current earnings.

The maturity of the above forward contracts by currency is (in millions):

Hedge Classification		Currency				2008				2009				2010				Total
Cash Flow
		DKK				$	37.5			$	10.0			$	—			$	47.5
		EUR					634.1				106.9				1.2				742.2
		GBP					48.0				13.4				—				61.4
		NOK					925.9				658.3				179.7				1,763.9
		SEK					1.8				2.8				0.8				5.4
		USD					91.5				56.6				—				148.1
						$	1,738.8			$	848.0			$	181.7			$	2,768.5
Fair Value
		EUR				$	5.8			$	2.8			$	—			$	8.6
		KRW					0.4				0.2				—				0.6
		USD					87.9				70.5				3.4				161.8
						$	94.1			$	73.5			$	3.4			$	171.0
Balance Sheet
		CNY				$	10.0			$	—			$	—			$	10.0
		DKK					8.4				—				—				8.4
		EUR					60.6				4.1				—				64.7
		GBP					2.0				—				—				2.0
		NOK					159.9				0.4				0.5				160.8
		SEK					0.5				0.4				—				0.9
		USD					447.6				—				—				447.6
						$	689.0			$	4.9			$	0.5			$	694.4
Total						$	2,521.9			$	926.4			$	185.6			$	3,633.9

The Company had other financial market risk sensitive instruments denominated in foreign currencies totaling $176.6 million as of June 30, 2008 excluding trade receivables and payables, which approximate fair value. These market risk sensitive instruments consisted of cash balances and overdraft facilities. The Company estimates that a hypothetical 10% movement of all applicable foreign currency exchange rates on these other financial market risk sensitive instruments could affect net income by $11.5 million.

The counterparties to forward contracts are major financial institutions. The credit ratings and concentration of risk of these financial institutions are monitored on a continuing basis. In the unlikely event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of a foreign currency contract, our exposure is limited to the foreign currency rate differential.

Interest Rate Risk

At June 30, 2008 our long term borrowings consisted of $150 million in 6.5% Senior Notes, $200 million in 7.25% Senior Notes, $200 million in 5.65% Senior Notes, $150 million in 5.5% Senior Notes, $174.6 million in 6.125% Senior Notes, and $800 million in borrowing under our revolving credit facility. We occasionally have borrowings under our other credit facilities, and a portion of these borrowings could be denominated in multiple currencies which could expose us to market risk with exchange rate movements. These instruments carry interest at a pre-agreed upon percentage point spread from either LIBOR, NIBOR or EURIBOR, or at the prime interest rate. Under our credit facilities, we may, at our option, fix the interest rate for certain borrowings based on a spread over LIBOR, NIBOR or EURIBOR for 30 days to 6 months. Our objective is to maintain a portion of our debt in variable rate borrowings for the flexibility obtained regarding early repayment without penalties and lower overall cost as compared with fixed-rate borrowings.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report at a reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

On April 21, 2008, the Company acquired Grant Prideco. For purposes of determining the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, as disclosed in this report, management has excluded Grant Prideco from its evaluation of these matters. The acquired business represented approximately 36.3% of our consolidated total assets at June 30, 2008 and 3.7% of our consolidated operating profit including related transaction costs for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 14, 2008. Stockholders elected two directors nominated by the board of directors for terms expiring in 2011 by the following votes: Robert E. Beauchamp — 307,565,601 votes for, 5,069,472 votes against and 2,900,641 votes abstaining, and Jeffery A. Smisek — 306,528,596 votes for, 6,089,637 votes against and 2,917,476 votes abstaining. There were no nominees to office other than the directors elected.

A proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was voted on by the stockholders as follows: 302,616,047 votes for, 9,701,632 votes against and 3,218,033 votes abstaining.

A proposal to approve the National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Annual Cash Incentive Plan for Executive Officers was voted on by the stockholders as follows: 301,059,456 votes for, 11,513,233 votes against and 2,963,014 votes abstaining.

Item 6. Exhibits

Reference is hereby made to the Exhibit Index commencing on Page 35.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

2.1		Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, effective as of August 11, between National-Oilwell, Inc. and Varco International, Inc. (4).
2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger, effective as of December 16, 2007, between National Oilwell Varco, Inc., NOV Sub, Inc., and Grant Prideco, Inc. (8)
3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of National-Oilwell, Inc. (Exhibit 3.1) (1).
3.2		Amended and Restated By-laws of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (Exhibit 3.1) (9).
10.1		Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 between Merrill A. Miller, Jr. and National Oilwell. (Exhibit 10.1) (2).
10.2		Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 between Dwight W. Rettig and National Oilwell, with similar agreement with Mark A. Reese. (Exhibit 10.2) (2).
10.3		Form of Amended and Restated Executive Agreement of Clay C. Williams. (Exhibit 10.12) (3).
10.4		National Oilwell Varco Long-Term Incentive Plan (5)*.
10.5		Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.1) (6)
10.6		Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement (Exhibit 10.2) (6).
10.7		Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock (18 Month) Agreement (Exhibit 10.1) (7).
10.8		Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock (36 Month) Agreement (Exhibit 10.2) (7).
10.9		Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, among National Oilwell Varco, Inc., the financial institutions signatory thereto, including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in their capacities as Administrative Agent, Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, DnB Nor Bank ASA, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Fortis Capital Corp., The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Bank of Tokyo — Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents. (10).
10.10		364-Day Credit Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2008, among National Oilwell Varco, Inc., the financial institutions signatory thereto, including Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in their capacities as Administrative Agent, Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, DnB Nor Bank ASA, as Co-Lead Arranger and Joint Book Runner, and Fortis Capital Corp., The Bank of Nova Scotia and The Bank of Tokyo — Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents. (10).
31.1		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14a and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended
31.2		Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14a and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended
32.1		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii), to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith.