(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Service Corporation International

Proxy Statement and 2005 Annual Meeting Notice

2005 Annual Meeting

Date: Thursday, May 12, 2005

Time: 10:00 a.m. Houston time

Place: Newmark Group Auditorium

American Funeral Service Training Center

415 Barren Springs Drive

Houston, Texas 77090

Service Corporation International

1929 Allen Parkway, P.O. Box 130548

Dear Shareholder,

As the owner of shares of Service Corporation International, please accept my invitation to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting. It is scheduled for Thursday, May 12, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. Houston time in the auditorium of the American Funeral Service Training Center, 415 Barren Springs Drive, Houston, Texas. During the meeting, we will report on how our Company performed for its shareholders during 2004 and share with you our plans for the future. You will have an opportunity to ask questions, express your views, and meet members of SCI’s executive team and Board of Directors.

As we approach this year’s annual meeting, I would like to pay special tribute to Jack Finkelstein and James H. Greer, two valued members of our Board of Directors who are retiring as their latest terms of service come to a close. Jack Finkelstein has been associated with SCI from the earliest days of our founding, and his friendship and guidance have been invaluable to the Company’s growth and development. Jim Greer has been a respected member of the Board since 1978, and we have benefited greatly from his ongoing wisdom and counsel. I know that their colleagues on the Board join me in thanking them for their many years of participation, and we wish them well in all of their future endeavors.

I would also like to add my deep personal appreciation for the contribution of B.D. Hunter who, although he has retired from the Board, will stay involved with SCI on a consulting basis. Bud has been involved with the Company in numerous capacities since the 1960s, has served on the Board since the 1980s, and has provided invaluable support and expertise over the past few years in the role of Vice Chairman. We will continue to rely on his vision and talent as we move forward.

On behalf of the Board and our employees, I would like to express our appreciation for your continuing support. I look forward to greeting in person all shareholders who are able to attend our annual meeting.

Sincerely,

R. L. Waltrip

Chairman of the Board

Service Corporation International

1929 Allen Parkway, P.O. Box 130548

Houston, Texas 77219-0548

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 12, 2005

To Our Shareholders:

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Service Corporation International (“SCI” or the “Company”) will be held in the Newmark Group Auditorium, American Funeral Service Training Center, 415 Barren Springs Drive, Houston, Texas at 10:00 a.m. Houston time on May 12, 2005 for the following purposes:

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 22, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote is required for a quorum.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting regardless of the size of your holdings. Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we urge you to vote your shares at your earliest convenience in order to ensure a quorum at the meeting. You can vote by signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the enclosed stamped envelope for which no additional postage is required if mailed in the United States. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares at the meeting if you desire to do so, as your proxy is revocable at your option.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

James M. Shelger

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Houston, Texas

April 18, 2005

(SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL(R) LOGO)

Service Corporation International

1929 Allen Parkway

P.O. Box 130548

Houston, Texas 77219-0548

PROXY STATEMENT

Proxy Voting: Questions & Answers

Q: Who is entitled to vote?

A: Shareholders of record who held common stock of SCI at the close of business on March 22, 2005 are entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on that date, there were outstanding 310,161,861 shares of SCI common stock, $1.00 par value (“Common Stock”).

Q: What are shareholders being asked to vote on?

A: Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following items at the 2005 Annual Meeting:

The Company will also transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the total shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2005 Annual Meeting is required for approval of each of the proposals.

Q: How do I vote my shares?

A: If you held Common Stock as a registered shareholder at the close of business on March 22, 2005, you can either vote by mail or in person at the Annual Meeting.

Q: What if I want to vote in person at the Annual Meeting?

A: The Notice of Meeting provides details of the date, time and place of the 2005 Annual Meeting, if you wish to vote in person.

Q: What if I’d rather vote by mail?

A: If you wish to vote by mail, simply sign and date the enclosed proxy and return it in the pre-stamped envelope provided. Each valid proxy received by the close of business on May 11, 2005 will be voted at the Annual Meeting by the persons named on the proxy card and in accordance with your instructions. If you complete and submit a proxy card without giving voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Q: How does the Board of Directors recommend voting?

A: The Board of Directors recommends voting:

Although the Board of Directors does not contemplate that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve, if such a situation arises, the proxies that do not withhold authority to vote for directors will be voted for a substitute nominee(s) chosen by the Board.

Q: If I give my proxy, how will my stock be voted on other business brought up at the Annual Meeting?

A: By submitting your proxy card, you authorize the persons named on the proxy card to use their discretion in voting on any other matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting. At the date hereof, SCI does not know of any other business to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

Q: Why is it important to send in my proxy card so that it is received on or before May 11, 2005?

A: The Company cannot conduct business at the Annual Meeting unless a quorum is present. A quorum will only be present if a majority of the outstanding shares of SCI common stock as of March 22, 2005 is present at the meeting in person or by proxy. It is for this reason that we urge you to send in your completed proxy card(s) as soon as possible, so that your shares can be voted even if you cannot attend the meeting.

Q: Can I revoke my proxy once I have given it?

A: Yes. The enclosed proxy, even though executed and returned, may be revoked any time prior to the time that it is voted at the Annual Meeting by a later-dated proxy or by written notice of revocation filed with the Secretary, James M. Shelger. Alternatively, you can attend the Annual Meeting, revoke your proxy in person, and vote at the meeting itself.

Q: How will the votes be counted?

A: Each properly executed proxy received in time for the 2005 Annual Meeting will be voted as specified therein, or if a shareholder does not specify how the shares represented by his or her proxy are to be voted, such shares shall be voted for the nominees listed therein (or for other nominees as provided above), and for approval of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants. Holders of SCI common stock are entitled to one vote per share on each matter considered at the Annual Meeting. In the election of directors, a shareholder has the right to vote the number of his or her shares for as many persons as there are to be elected as directors. Shareholders do not have the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. Abstentions are counted towards the calculation of a quorum. An abstention has the same effect as a vote against a proposal, or in the case of the election of directors, as shares to which voting power has been withheld.

Q: What if my SCI shares are held through a bank or broker?

A: If your shares are held through a broker or bank, you will receive voting instructions from your bank or broker describing how to vote your stock. A “broker non-vote” refers to a proxy that votes on one matter, but indicates that the holder does not have the authority to vote on other matters. Broker non-votes will have the following effects at our Annual Meeting: for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, a broker non-vote is deemed to be present at the meeting; for purposes of the election of directors and other matters to be voted on at the meeting, a broker non-vote will not be counted.

Q: How does a shareholder communicate with the Board of Directors, committees or individual directors?

A: Any shareholder may communicate with the Board of Directors, any committee of the Board, the non-management directors as a group or any director, by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors of Service Corporation International, a Board committee or such individual director or directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Service Corporation International, 1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, TX 77019. All communications will be compiled by the Secretary of the Company and submitted to the Board of Directors (or other addressee) at the next regular Board meeting.

Q: What is the Company’s Web address?

A: The SCI home page is www.sci-corp.com. At the website, the following information is available for viewing. This information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it.

This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the enclosed proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders beginning on or about April 18, 2005.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

After the 2005 Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors will consist of eleven members and will be divided into three classes, each with a staggered term of three years. Messrs. Jack Finkelstein and James H. Greer are retiring from the Board at the 2005 Annual Meeting and Mr. B. D. Hunter retired from the Board in February 2005. At this year’s Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect four directors to the Board. These Directors will be elected for three-year terms expiring in 2008. Set forth below are profiles for each of the four candidates nominated by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors for election by shareholders at this year’s Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING NOMINEES.

⁽¹⁾ Details are provided in the footnotes to the table of director and officer shareholdings listed under “Voting Securities and Principal Holders”.

⁽²⁾ Includes 543,332 shares which may be acquired by Mr. Ryan upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 22, 2005.

⁽¹⁾ Details are provided in the footnotes to the table of director and officer shareholdings listed under “Voting Securities and Principal Holders”.

⁽²⁾ Includes 410,000 shares which may be acquired by Mr. W. Blair Waltrip upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 22, 2005.

The following are profiles of the other continuing directors currently serving on the Board of SCI:

⁽¹⁾ Details are provided in the footnotes to the table of director and officer shareholdings listed under “Voting Securities and Principal Holders”.

⁽²⁾ Includes 8,487,003 shares which may be acquired by Mr. R. L. Waltrip upon exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 22, 2005.

⁽¹⁾ Details are provided in the footnotes to the table of director and officer shareholdings listed under “Voting Securities and Principal Holders”.

Board Composition and Meetings

The Board of SCI is comprised of a majority of independent directors. The Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of the Board are all comprised entirely of directors who are independent within the meaning of Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Board of Directors held six meetings in 2004. Each Board member attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Board committees on which he served. Although the Board does not have a policy on director attendance at annual meetings, thirteen Board members attended the Company’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as management and shareholders. The Committee may also retain a third-party executive search firm to identify candidates. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board should notify the Company’s Corporate Secretary in writing with whatever supporting material the shareholder considers appropriate. To be considered, the written recommendation from a shareholder must be received by the Company’s Corporate Secretary at least 120 calendar days prior to the date of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the prior year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a prospective nominee, the Committee will consider the available information concerning the nominee, including the Committee’s own knowledge of the prospective nominee, and may seek additional information or an interview. If the Committee determines that further consideration is warranted, the Committee will then evaluate the prospective nominee against the standards and qualifications set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

The Committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board, the balance of management and independent directors, the need for Audit Committee expertise and the evaluations of other prospective nominees. After completing this process, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Committee.

In August 2003, the Board adopted its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Guidelines incorporate the director independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The portion of the Guidelines addressing director independence is as follows:

Pursuant to the Guidelines, the Board undertook a review of director independence in February 2005. For this review, the Board considered the findings and recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board and the Committee considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his immediate family and the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Transactions” below.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that all of the directors are independent of the Company and its management under the standards set forth in the Guidelines, with the exception of R. L. Waltrip, Thomas L. Ryan and W. Blair Waltrip. Messrs. R. L. Waltrip and Ryan are considered inside directors because of their employment as senior executives of the Company. Mr. W. Blair Waltrip is considered a non-independent director because he is the son of an executive officer, Mr. R. L. Waltrip.

Board Committees

Board Committees (cont’d)

Board Committees (cont’d)

Board Committees (cont’d)

Board Committees (cont’d)

Director Compensation

In May 2003, the Board of Directors acted upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and eliminated the payment of director fees to employee directors. For 2004, directors who are not employees (outside directors) received the fees discussed below.

All outside directors receive an annual retainer of $70,000, which is paid either in Common Stock of SCI or, at each director’s option, deferred Common Stock equivalents. Common Stock is issued once a year on the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such that the amount of Common Stock or Common Stock equivalents issued on that day is equivalent to the cash value of the annual retainer. Accordingly, each outside director received 9,798 shares of Common Stock or deferred Common Stock equivalents in May 2004.

In addition to the Annual Retainer, all outside directors receive $10,000 for each Board meeting attended and receive a further attendance fee for each Committee meeting attended as follows: Audit Committee Chair $6,000, each other committee chair $5,000, Audit Committee members $4,000, and each other committee member $3,000. Directors may elect to defer all or any of these fees.

Effective January 1, 2001, the Non-Employee Directors’ Retirement Plan was amended such that only years of service prior to 2001 will be considered for vesting purposes. Non-employee directors who served on the Board prior to that time and were participants in the plan are entitled to receive annual retirement benefits of $42,500 per year for ten years, subject to a vesting schedule, based on their years of Board service. Retirement benefits vest in 25% increments at the end of five, eight, eleven and fifteen years of credited service, except that the benefits vest completely in the event of death while the participant is still a member of the Board or in the event of a change of control of SCI (as defined in the plan).

Each outside director is allowed to make personal use of two aircraft leased by the Company under cancelable operating leases for a maximum of 25 flight hours per year. The director must reimburse the Company for any such usage at an hourly rate pursuant to a time-sharing agreement governed by Federal Aviation Regulations. The Company also values such usage on the basis of IRS guidelines. To the extent that the IRS valuation exceeds the amount reimbursed to the Company by the director, the difference is treated as income imputed to the director, which for 2004 amounted to: $38,130 for Mr. Buckwalter, $10,955 for Mr. Coelho, $2,152 for Mr. Foyt, $14,135 for Mr. Greer, $9,858 for Mr. Lund, $15,555 for Mr. Mecom, $6,863 for Mr. Morris and $12,220 for Mr. W. Blair Waltrip.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph presents the Company’s cumulative shareholder return over the period from December 31, 1999 to December 31, 2004. The Common Stock of the Company is compared to the S&P 500 Index and to a peer group selected by the Company (the “Peer Group”). The graph assumes $100 is invested on December 31, 1999 in the Common Stock of the Company, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group Index. Investment is weighted on the basis of market capitalization. Total return data assumes the reinvestment of dividends.

The data source for the following graph is Standard & Poor’s.

Comparison of Cumulative Shareholder Return

1999-2004

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS

The Peer Group is comprised of Alderwoods Group, Inc., Carriage Services Inc., Hillenbrand Industries, Inc., Matthews International Corp., Rock of Ages Corporation and Stewart Enterprises, Inc. Alderwoods Group, Inc. is included from January 1, 2002, when it emerged from bankruptcy.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

SCI’s compensation philosophy, and that of the Compensation Committee, is that all compensation programs should serve to:

Components of the compensation program for SCI executives include base salaries, annual performance-based incentives and long-term incentives, details of which are outlined below. In 2004, SCI’s executive compensation program focused on cash-based incentive awards linked to key performance measures and equity-based incentives linked to share price growth and implementation of strategic Company objectives.

Base Salaries

Base salaries of executive officers listed in the summary compensation table in this proxy statement (the “Named Executive Officers”) were not increased in 2004 other than in situations where an officer’s base salary was judged to need adjustment to move closer to market levels. The two Named Executive Officers receiving such an adjustment were Messrs. Ryan and Webb.

Base salaries of SCI’s Named Executive Officers, as well as other officers, were reviewed by means of comparisons with published survey data representing companies of similar size to SCI (by revenues) across various industries (the “Comparison Group”). Regression analysis was used to derive compensation data from over 700 participating companies in the published survey. The Comparison Group used for compensation review purposes differs from the peer group used in the Performance Graph in this proxy statement. This is because the peer group companies all operate within SCI’s industry but are either much smaller than SCI or are conglomerates with varied business units, making direct comparisons for compensation purposes impractical. While there is some overlap between these groups, there has been no attempt to link them.

Based on this review, it was determined that the current salary levels of incumbent Named Executive Officers fall between the 50th and 75th percentile levels of salaries of the Comparison Group. As this level of pay is consistent with the Committee’s target base salary levels for compensation for all SCI executives, including the Named Executive Officers, we felt that there was no need to adjust current salary levels other than in instances where the executive’s base salary needed to be raised to the approximate 50th percentile of the Comparison Group.

In determining salary increases for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee considers market salary data and annual salary increases for executives with comparable positions within the Comparison Group. In addition, we consider individual performance of the Named Executive Officers. These criteria are assessed in a non-formula fashion and are not weighted.

All of the Named Executive Officers have employment agreements with SCI (see “Executive Employment Agreements”). These agreements provide that the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers cannot be decreased, but give the Committee the sole discretion to determine any salary increases.

Annual Performance-Based Incentive Compensation

Annual incentive opportunities are linked to the achievement of key financial and operational objectives for SCI on a consolidated basis. The objective of this policy is to focus SCI’s executive officers on objectives that the Committee believes are primary determinants of share price over time.

Target award levels for 2004 were set at approximately the 50th percentile level of the Comparison Group for the Named Executive Officers as a group. As such, if SCI achieved performance against the key measures at target levels, executive officers would receive incentive awards at this level. Actual awards are proportionately decreased or increased on the basis of SCI’s performance relative to the targets, subject to maximum award amounts.

For 2004, two performance measures were used for the Named Executive Officers: free cash flow and earnings per share, in each case as defined in the plan. Each of these measures was weighted equally at target levels and assessed relative to SCI’s 2004 business plan. Performance targets based on these measures were established by the Committee during the first quarter of 2004 for the performance period of January 1 through December 31, 2004. For operating officers, the two performance measures used were operating profit (75% weighting) and free cash flow (25% weighting).

For 2004, SCI’s actual performance on the performance measures was below target for earnings per share and slightly below target for free cash flow. Therefore, the actual bonuses shown in the summary compensation table were below target.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In 2004, we modified the long-term incentive compensation program to provide a greater balance and focus for the Named Executive Officers. The program consists of equal value delivered for long-term incentives in the form of stock options, restricted stock and performance units to ensure appropriate focus is given to (i) driving the Company’s stock price appreciation, (ii) managing the ongoing operations and strategy implementation and (iii) outperforming the total shareholder return of the Value Line’s Diversified Industry Classification, a measurement utilized in our performance units.

To more timely communicate to shareholders the most recent grants to the Named Executive Officers, we have included the February 2005 grants of stock options, restricted stock and/ or performance units in the 2004 Summary Compensation Table, the Stock Options Granted table, the Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and December 31, 2004 Option Values table and the Long-Term Incentive Plan: Performance Units table. The following charts represent the most recent grants in 2005 and 2004 to Named Executive Officers, consistent with the balanced approach to long-term incentive awards as detailed above.

The actual awards for the total 2005 grants ranged from approximately the 40th to the 50th percentile of the Comparison Group. The actual awards for the total 2004 grants were made at approximately the 50th percentile of the Comparison Group.

The options were granted at exercise prices equal to 100% of the fair market value of SCI Common Stock on the grant date. They vest at a rate of one-third per year and have an eight year term. The restricted stock grants vest at a rate of one-third per year. Our performance unit plan provides for units that are payable in cash at the end of the three year performance period beginning in the year granted. Each performance unit is valued at $1.00 and the actual payout may vary by a range of up to 200% of the amounts shown in the tables.

Retention of Compensation Consultants

From time to time, we work with compensation consultants who assist in the design of various compensation plans and in the review of compensation levels and programs. Any compensation consultants retained for this purpose report directly to the Committee, which has the authority to approve the consultants’ fees and any other terms of engagement.

Limitation of Tax Deduction for Executive Compensation

Subject to certain exceptions, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (“OBRA”) prohibits publicly traded companies from receiving a tax deduction on compensation paid to Named Executive Officers in excess of $1,000,000 annually. The Committee has not adopted a specific policy relating to OBRA. We consider the OBRA restrictions when structuring executive compensation programs. However, we believe that tax deductibility should not be the sole consideration in setting appropriate compensation for SCI’s senior management and maintaining management’s focus on the goal of increasing shareholder value. As such, we view OBRA as one of a number of factors that we consider in making compensation decisions.

2004 Chief Executive Officer Compensation

Mr. R. L. Waltrip received no base salary increase in 2004. The slight increase in salary for 2004 reflected in the Summary Compensation Table results from an extra payroll period occurring in 2004.

Mr. Waltrip received an annual incentive for 2004 of $492,860, which was 64.8% of the target established by the Committee. The award was determined using the same factors used to award annual incentives for other Named Executive Officers, as described above. Mr. Waltrip’s target annual incentive was set slightly below the 50th percentile of target annual incentives of the Comparison Group.

In February 2005, Mr. Waltrip received long-term incentive awards for 2004 performance as follows: 72,000 shares of restricted stock, stock options for 150,200 shares and 562,500 performance units. In February 2004, Mr. Waltrip received long-term incentive awards for 2003 performance as follows: 88,000 shares of restricted stock, stock options for 102,000 shares and 626,000 performance units. For each year, his target awards were established at approximately the Comparison Group 50th percentile.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Alan R. Buckwalter, III (Chair)

Anthony L. Coelho

James H. Greer

John W. Mecom, Jr.

CERTAIN INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Cash Compensation

The following table sets forth information for the three years ended December 31, 2004 with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company. The determination as to which executive officers were most highly compensated was made with reference to the amounts required to be disclosed under the “Salary” and “Bonus” columns in the table.

Summary Compensation Table

Stock Options Granted

The following table sets forth stock options granted in February 2005 for 2004 performance and in February 2004 for 2003 performance.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and December 31, 2004 Option Values

Long-Term Incentive Plan: Performance Units

The following table shows information regarding cash performance units awarded the Named Executive Officers in February 2005 for 2004 performance, in February 2004 for 2003 performance and in February 2003 for 2002 performance.

Retirement Plans

The SCI Cash Balance Plan is a defined benefit plan which was amended effective January 1, 2001 such that the Company would not make any further contributions under the plan after 2000. Each participant in the plan has an account which, until December 31, 2000, was credited each year that a participant qualified with a Company contribution (based on annual compensation and years of benefit service) and interest. Plan accounts continue to accrue interest and, for 2004, interest for each account was credited at the annual rate of 2.31%.

At retirement or termination, the participant may elect to receive his or her vested benefit as a lump sum distribution, a monthly payout or a rollover to an IRA or other tax qualified plan. Normal Retirement Age is defined in the SCI Cash Balance Plan as (1) the date upon which a member attains age 65 or (2) in the case of an employee who becomes a member of the SCI Cash Balance Plan after the age of 60, it will be the fifth anniversary of the date that such member became a participant.

In 2000, the Company amended the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers (“SERP for Senior Officers”) effective January 1, 2001. Under the amendment, no additional benefits will accrue and no employees shall become eligible to participate in the plan after 2000.

The SERP for Senior Officers is a non-qualified plan which covers executive officers and certain regional operating officers, including the Named Executive Officers. Benefits under the SERP for Senior Officers do not consist of compensation deferred at the election of participants. The amounts of benefits under the plan were previously set by the Compensation Committee from time to time. The Compensation Committee previously set guidelines such that the annual benefits would generally equal a percentage (75% for the CEO and lesser percentages for the other officers) of a participant’s 1997 annual base salary and target bonus, with the benefits being reduced to the extent of the participant’s benefits under Social Security and the SCI Cash Balance Plan. The participant will be entitled at age 60 to the annual payment of the full amount of his benefit; if his employment terminates earlier than age 60, he will be entitled to the annual payment of the amount of his benefit multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is the participant’s years of service and the denominator is the number of years from the participant’s hire date until he reaches age 60.

Benefit payments will be made in the form of 180 monthly installments commencing at the later of severance of employment or the attainment of age 55. Prior to retirement, if a participant dies or in the event of a change of control of the Company (as defined in the SERP for Senior Officers), the Company will promptly pay to each beneficiary or participant a lump sum equal to the present value of the benefit that the participant would have been entitled to receive if he had continued to accrue benefit service from the date of death or the date of the change of control to the date of his 65th birthday. Participants may elect to begin receiving monthly benefits at age 55, while still employed, provided the participant gives written notice at least twelve months prior to the attainment of age 55. Such installments will be reduced for early commencement to reasonably reflect the time value of money.

The table below sets forth benefits for the Named Executive Officers.

Annual Benefits under SERP for Senior Officers

The Compensation Committee is considering the addition of a supplemental retirement and deferred compensation plan for the Named Executive Officers and other officers for the purpose of providing a more competitive compensation package to be used for retention and recruitment of executive level talent. We anticipate that the plan will include annual contributions by the Company as well as allow for individual deferrals.

Executive Employment Agreements

The Company has an executive employment agreement with Mr. R. L. Waltrip which expires December 31, 2006. The agreement provides for a base salary, which cannot be decreased but may be increased by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. As of March 22, 2005, the base salary for Mr. R. L. Waltrip was $950,000. The terms of the agreement also provide that Mr. R. L. Waltrip shall have the right to participate in bonus and other compensation and benefit arrangements.

In the event of termination of employment due to disability or death, Mr. R. L. Waltrip or his estate will be entitled to receive any accrued and unpaid salary or other compensation, a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the year elapsed at the date of termination) of the highest bonus he received in the preceding three years and continuation of welfare plan benefits for five years. If he is terminated without cause or he voluntarily terminates for specified reasons generally relating to a failure by the Company to honor the terms of the employment agreement (“Good Reason”), he will be entitled to continuation of compensation and certain other benefits for the remaining term of his employment agreement. In the event of a change of control of the Company (as defined in the agreement), Mr. R. L. Waltrip will be entitled to terminate his employment for Good Reason, or without any reason during the 30-day period beginning one year after the change of control (the “Window Period”), and receive a lump-sum payment equal to (a) any accrued and unpaid salary or other compensation plus (b) a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the year elapsed at the date of termination) of the highest bonus he received in the preceding three years plus (c) an amount equal to five times his base salary plus his highest recent bonus; further, he will be entitled to
continuation of welfare plan benefits for the remaining term of his employment agreement. Upon termination of Mr. R. L. Waltrip’s employment, he will be subject to a 10 year non-competition obligation; however, the Company will not be required to make any further payments to Mr. Waltrip for the non-competition obligation. If any payments under the executive employment agreement or under the benefit plans of the Company would subject Mr. R. L. Waltrip to any excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, he will also be entitled to receive an additional payment in an amount such that, after the payment of all taxes (income and excise), he will be in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax had been imposed.

The Company also has employment agreements with Messrs. Thomas L. Ryan, Michael R. Webb and Jeffrey E. Curtiss. These agreements have current terms expiring December 31, 2005. Annually, the Company may extend each agreement for an additional year unless notice of nonrenewal is given by either party. If such notice of nonrenewal is given by the Company or if notice is not given of the Company’s decision to authorize renewal, the employment agreement will not be extended.

These agreements provide for base salaries, which cannot be decreased but may be increased by the Compensation Committee, and the right to participate in bonus and other compensation and benefit arrangements. As of March 22, 2005, the base salaries for Messrs. Ryan, Webb and Curtiss were $800,000, $575,000 and $400,000, respectively.

In the event of termination of employment due to disability or death, the executive or his estate will be entitled to receive (i) his salary through the end of his employment term, and (ii) a pro rata portion (based on the portion of the year elapsed at the date of termination) of the bonus the executive would have received if he had remained an employee through his employment term (“Pro Rated Bonus”). In the event of termination by the Company without cause, the executive will be entitled to receive two years salary, Pro Rated Bonus and continuation of health benefits for two years. In the event of a change of control of the Company (as defined in

the agreements), the executive will be entitled to terminate his employment for certain specified reasons during the two years following the change of control, and receive (i) a lump-sum payment equal to three times the sum of his annual salary plus his target bonus, (ii) a prorated target bonus, and (iii) continuation of health benefits for three years. If any payments under the employment agreement or under the benefit plans of the Company would subject the executive to any excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code, the executive will also be entitled to receive an additional payment in an amount such that, after the payment of all taxes (income and excise), he will be in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax had been imposed.

Upon termination of his employment, each executive will be subject, at the Company’s option, to a non-competition obligation for a period of one year which the Company may extend for one additional year. If the Company elects to have the non-competition provisions apply, the Company will make payments to the executive during the non-competition period at a rate equal to his base salary at the time of termination, unless such termination was for cause or the executive terminates his employment (other than within twenty-four months after a change of control for certain specified reasons), in which case the executive will be bound by the non-competition provisions without the Company making the corresponding payments.

At the date of his resignation as an officer and director on February 9, 2005, Mr. B. D. Hunter had an employment agreement containing the terms outlined above. In connection with the resignation, Company subsidiaries, Mr. Hunter and a company of which Mr. Hunter is a principal (the Hunter company) agreed, among other things, that (i) his employment agreement was terminated, (ii) his stock options would continue in accordance with their terms, (iii) his restricted stock grant became vested in accordance with its terms, (iv) his units under the Company’s 2003 and 2004 performance unit plans became vested on a pro rata basis in accordance with their terms, and (v) he remained a participant in the Company cash bonus incentive plan for 2004. In addition, it was agreed, among other things, that the Hunter company will provide Mr. Hunter’s consulting services for a five year term during which the Hunter company will be paid $91,667 per month during the first thirty-six months and $50,000 per month during the remaining twenty-four months. In the last twenty-four month period, Mr. Hunter is not required to devote more that 20 hours per week performing consulting services. The consulting period may be extended up to three additional one-year periods at the option of the Company. During the consulting period, Mr. Hunter and the Hunter company are subject to non-competition obligations. Mr. Hunter will be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses in connection with his consulting services.

Other Compensation

Mr. R. L. Waltrip and certain other officers participate in the Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan, under which they are owners of life insurance policies. Mr. R. L. Waltrip’s policy provides a death benefit of $2,000,000. In December of 2003, the Split Dollar Life Insurance policies of Mr. Waltrip and certain other officers were changed to an arrangement whereby the individuals now pay the premiums and the Company provides a bonus to offset the premiums and related taxes. As part of the conversion to the Company bonus plan, the policies were restructured and allow the Company to receive its interest in the policies (representing the cumulative premiums paid by the Company prior to July 31, 2002).

Compensation of Directors

The compensation of directors is described under “Election of Directors — Director Compensation” herein above.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Board members who served on the Compensation Committee during 2004 were Messrs. Alan R. Buckwalter, III, Anthony L. Coelho, James H. Greer, and John W. Mecom, Jr. No member of the Compensation Committee in 2004 or at present was or is an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or was formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or had any relationships requiring disclosure by the Company.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

For 2004, SCI paid $132,435 in compensation to Mr. Kevin Mack in his capacity as an employee of the Company. Mr. Mack is the brother of Mr. Stephen M. Mack, Senior Vice President Middle Market Operations of the Company.

For 2004, SCI paid $151,954 in compensation to Mr. David Warren in his capacity as an employee of the Company. Mr. Warren is the stepson of Dr. Edward E. Williams, a director of the Company.

At the date of his resignation as Executive Vice President of the Company on January 18, 2000, Mr. W. Blair Waltrip had a three year employment agreement with the Company. In connection with the resignation, SCI modified Mr. W. Blair Waltrip’s employment agreement and agreed to provide Mr. W. Blair Waltrip, among other things, continuation of his Company stock options in accordance with their terms. In connection with the modification of the employment agreement, the Company elected to enforce Mr. W. Blair Waltrip’s post-employment non-competition obligations for the period from January 1, 2003 until December 31, 2005, during which the Company has and will make non-competition payments of $475,000 per year. Pursuant to the foregoing, the Company paid for or to Mr. W. Blair Waltrip $475,000 for 2004. Additionally, Mr. W. Blair Waltrip receives remuneration as a director of the Company.

In 1996, the family of Mr. Sumner James Waring, III, Vice President Major Market Operations, sold its business to SCI. In the transaction, Mr. Waring’s father entered a noncompetition agreement under which the Company pays him $100,000 per year for ten years. Mr. Waring’s father also has a Consulting Agreement expiring in 2005 under which the Company paid him fees (and an automobile allowance) of $88,500 for 2004. In addition, Mr. Waring’s father and mother own a company that leases an office building to SCI under a lease expiring in 2005 and providing for rent of $63,600 in 2004 and $65,400 in 2005. Mr. Waring’s father and mother also own a company that leases funeral homes to SCI under a lease expiring in 2016, for which the Company paid rent of $200,000 in 2004. In August 2004, Mr. Waring relocated from California to Houston at the Company’s request, and the Company reimbursed him $27,799 for relocation expenses.

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, Inc. (“BHMS”) is a holder of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. During 2004, BHMS was one of the investment managers of portfolios of independent trusts which hold funds collected from consumers in connection with preneed funeral sales and preneed cemetery sales. The process by which such portfolio managers are chosen and overseen is outlined above under the section entitled “Board of Directors — Board Committees — Investment Committee”. During 2004, BHMS managed on average approximately $97,263,000 for such trusts and was managing approximately $100,907,000 at the end of 2004. Such trusts are prohibited from investing in SCI stock or other SCI securities. For such services, the trusts paid fees of $319,519 to BHMS for 2004. It is expected that BHMS will continue to act as an investment manager for such trusts during 2005.

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”) is a holder of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. In 2004, Marsh Inc., a subsidiary of MMC, acted as agent for the Company in its purchase of (i) aviation insurance at a gross premium of $160,480, from which MMC received a commission of $24,072, and (ii) surety bonds relating to preneed sales in the Company’s funeral home and cemetery businesses for a gross premium of $45,524, from which MMC received a commission of $1,592. Further in 2004, the Company paid $34,060 to a subsidiary of MMC for quality assurance software and support. In addition, Mercer Delta, another subsidiary of MMC, provided consulting services to SCI and to the Company’s Board of Directors on various corporate governance initiatives for which MMC received consulting fees of $41,032 in 2004. It is expected that MMC subsidiaries will continue to provide services in 2004.

VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS

The table below sets forth information with respect to any person who is known to the Company as of March 22, 2005 to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock.

The table below sets forth, as of March 22, 2005, the amount of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned by each Named Executive Officer (except for Mr. B. D. Hunter who resigned February 9, 2005), each director and nominee for director, and all directors and executive officers as a group, based upon information

obtained from such persons. Securities reported as beneficially owned include those for which the persons listed have sole voting and investment power, unless otherwise noted.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to ensure the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent accountant’s qualifications, independence and performance and the performance of the Company’s internal audit functions. The Audit Committee’s functions are detailed in the section entitled “Board of Directors — Board Committees — Audit Committee” above. The Audit Committee Charter is available for viewing on the SCI’s home page, www.sci-corp.com, and is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it.

Each member of the Audit Committee is independent and financially literate, as defined by the New York Stock Exchange rules, and is limited to serving on no more than three audit committees. The Board of Directors has appointed, and the Audit Committee has acknowledged, Mr. Victor L. Lund, Chairman of the Audit Committee, as the Audit Committee Financial Expert as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management of the Company and with the independent accountants. Specifically, the Committee has discussed with the independent accountants the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards), as modified or supplemented. The Committee received a written disclosure letter from the Company’s independent accountants as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as modified and supplemented. The Committee has also reviewed the independence of the independent accountants considering the compatibility of non-audit services with maintaining their independence from the Company. Based on the preceding review and discussions contained in this paragraph, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form  10-K for the 2004 fiscal year for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Victor L. Lund, Chair

Alan R. Buckwalter, III

Jack Finkelstein

S. Malcolm Gillis

Edward E. Williams

PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has recommended PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PricewaterhouseCoopers”) to serve as the independent accountants for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. PricewaterhouseCoopers and its predecessors have audited the Company’s accounts since 1993. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions at such meeting. The Audit Committee wishes to submit the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers for shareholders’ approval at the Annual Meeting. If the shareholders do not give approval, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.

Audit Fees and All Other Fees

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services, and other services performed by the independent auditor. The policy permits the Audit Committee to grant pre-approval for specifically defined audit and non-audit services.

Fees for audit services totaled $6,651,942 in 2004 and $2,663,622 in 2003, including fees associated with the annual audit and for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and statutory audits required internationally.

Fees for audit related services totaled $-0- in 2004 and $2,264,160 in 2003. Audit related services in 2003 were related to due diligence performed in connection with the disposition of international operations.

Fees for tax services, including tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, totaled $207,450 in 2004 and $197,133 in 2003. Fees for tax services in both years were primarily related to compliance work in the Company’s international operations.

Fees for all other services not described above totaled approximately $2,800 in 2004 and $806,577 in 2003. The 2004 amount was a licensing fee for a research data base, and the fees paid in 2003 were related to restructuring advice for the Company’s international operations.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS OF THE COMPANY.

OTHER MATTERS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company during its most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and written representations from reporting persons that no Form 5 was required, the Company believes that all required Form 3, 4 and 5 reports for transactions occurring in 2004 were timely filed, except that Mr. James M. Shelger, Senior Vice President General Counsel, filed late one Form 4 in 2004 reporting one transaction in 2004.

Proxy Solicitation

In addition to solicitation by mail, further solicitation of proxies may be made by mail, facsimile, telephone, telegraph or oral communication following the original solicitation by directors, officers and regular employees of the Company who will not be additionally compensated therefor, or by its transfer agent. The expense of such solicitation will be borne by the Company and will include reimbursement paid to brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material regarding the Annual Meeting to beneficial owners. In addition, the Company has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to aid in the solicitation of proxies from shareholders generally in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such solicitations may be by mail, facsimile, telephone, telegraph or personal interview. The fee of such firm is not expected to exceed $12,000 plus reimbursement for reasonable expenses.

Other Business

The Board of Directors of the Company is not aware of other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders; however, if any such matters are properly presented for action, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment.

Submission of Shareholder Proposals

Any proposal to be presented by a shareholder at the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on May 11, 2006 must be received by the Company by December 19, 2005, so that it may be considered by the Company for inclusion in its proxy statement relating to that meeting.

Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, any holder of Common Stock of the Company desiring to bring business before the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on May 11, 2006 in a form other than a shareholder proposal in accordance with the preceding paragraph must give advance written notice in accordance with the Bylaws that is received by the Company, addressed to the Secretary, no earlier than January 11, 2006 and no later than January 31, 2006. Any notice pursuant to this or the preceding paragraph should be addressed to the Secretary of the Company, 1929 Allen Parkway, P.O. Box 130548, Houston, Texas 77219-0548.

To avoid unnecessary expense, please return your proxy regardless of the number of shares that you own. Simply date, sign and return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed business reply envelope. Thank you.

Service Corporation International

1929 Allen Parkway

P.O. Box 130548

Houston, Texas 77219-0548

April 18, 2005

Service Corporation International

1929 Allen Parkway

P.O. Box 130548

Houston, Texas 77219-0548

ò DETACH PROXY CARD HERE ò

---

Please mark, sign, date and
return this proxy promptly		x
using the enclosed envelope.		Votes MUST be indicated
		(x) in Black or Blue ink.

1.		ELECTION OF DIRECTORS. (The Board recommends a vote FOR all of the nominees).		FOR		AGAINST		ABSTAIN

FOR ALL

o

WITHHOLD FOR ALL

o

*EXCEPTIONS

o

2.

Approval of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants

o

o

o

for fiscal 2005. (The Board recommends

Nominees:

Thomas L. Ryan, S. Malcolm Gillis,

vote FOR this proposal).

Clifton H. Morris, Jr. and W. Blair Waltrip.

(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “Exceptions” box and write that nominee’s name in the space provided below.) *Exceptions:

To change your address, please mark this box.

o

SCAN LINE

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and of the Proxy Statement Please sign exactly as the name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign personally. Where applicable, indicate your official position or representation capacity.

Date		Share Owner sign here		Co-Owner sign here

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

For The Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 12, 2005

The undersigned hereby appoints Robert L. Waltrip, Jeffrey E. Curtiss and James M. Shelger, and each or any of them as attorneys, agents and proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Service Corporation International (the “Company”) to be held in the Newmark Group Auditorium, American Funeral Service Training Center, 415 Barren Springs Drive, Houston, Texas 77090 on Thursday, May 12, 2005, at 10:00 a.m., Houston time, and any adjournment(s) thereof, and to vote thereat the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present as indicated below and on the reverse side hereof and, in their discretion, upon any other business which may properly come before said meeting. This Proxy when properly executed will be voted in accordance with your indicated directions. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of directors and FOR approval of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants.

(Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)