PRE 14A
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.
)
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[X] |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-2. |
THE KOREA FUND, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its
Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if
other than Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-12. |
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
[ ] |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
[ ] |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
Dear Stockholders:
We are pleased to enclose the notice of and proxy statement for
a Special Meeting of Stockholders of The Korea Fund, Inc. (NYSE:
KF; the Fund) to be held at 4:00 p.m., Eastern
time, on April 11, 2007, at the offices of Ropes &
Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York (the
Meeting).
We are asking for your vote on the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
To approve a new investment management agreement for the Fund
with RCM Capital Management LLC (RCM SF);
|
|
|
|
To approve a new
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM Asia Pacific Limited (RCM
AP); and
|
|
|
|
To approve the issuance of Fund shares at a price below net
asset value in connection with a capital gains distribution
payable in Fund shares (valued at the lower of market price or
net asset value) or, at the election of the stockholder, in cash.
|
We would like to provide you with some background information on
the issues we are proposing to stockholders and ask for your
vote on these important proposals affecting the Fund.
Proposed
Manager Change
On my assuming the position of chairman of your Funds
board of directors (the Board), following the Annual
Stockholders Meeting in 2005, the Board clarified that the
Funds investment policy is to seek long term capital
growth through seeking to outperform the Funds benchmark
by active management across the large-, medium- and small-cap
sectors of the Korean equity markets. Simultaneously, the
Board instigated certain changes in order to better monitor the
Funds investment process and performance.
These changes included:
|
|
|
|
|
the formation of an Investment Committee of the Board
specifically tasked with monitoring investment-related matters;
|
|
|
|
the development of a broader peer group against which to monitor
the Funds performance; and
|
|
|
|
the appointment of an independent specialist investment
consulting firm with a strong presence in Asia to provide the
Board with comprehensive quarterly analysis of both the style
and performance of your Funds portfolio.
|
By the third quarter of 2006, the Board, working closely with
its consultant, Mercer Investment Consultings Asia office,
determined that it should consider alternative investment
managers for the Fund. With the assistance of its independent
investment consulting firm, the Board developed an initial list
of some
12 investment managers, all with proven expertise in the
Korean equity market. The Board then reduced this initial list
to a short list of five firms. Such reduction involved
on-site due
diligence by the consultant and
in-person
presentations by the consultant to the Board. In October 2006,
the Board held
in-person
beauty parades with the five finalists. After these
in-person
presentations, the Board requested and reviewed considerable
further due diligence materials from three of the finalists with
the help of significant research and assistance from its
consultant. At a subsequent
in-person
board meeting held over two days in early December 2006, after
having given careful consideration to each of the finalists,
including the Funds current investment manager, the Board
unanimously recommended to pursue RCM SF as the Funds
investment manager and RCM AP as a
sub-adviser
to the Fund, subject to further diligence and finalization of
material terms, as well as approval by the Funds
stockholders.
RCM SF and its affiliates (RCM) make up a global
investment organization consisting of separate affiliated
entities with offices in key financial centers around the world,
including San Francisco, London, Frankfurt, Hong Kong,
Tokyo and Sydney. As of December 31, 2006, these affiliated
entities collectively advised or managed approximately
$155 billion, including approximately $21 billion
managed by RCM SF in San Francisco and approximately
$10 billion managed by RCM AP in Hong Kong. RCM is part of
the Allianz Global Investors Group. Research is at the
cornerstone of RCMs global investment process and this
fundamental research is organized globally by industry sector.
RCM includes a market research capability known as
Grassrootssm
that complements the fundamental research of its career
analysts. RCM manages mutual funds and unit trusts, insurance
funds, corporate funds, pension funds, endowment and charity
funds and government institutional monies in North America,
Europe and Asia Pacific.
The investment management business of RCM in the Asia Pacific
region was established in Hong Kong in 1983 (formerly Thornton
Management) providing international investors with specialist
Asian equity management through a range of mutual finds and
discretionary management services. Hong Kong remains RCMs
regional center with 37 investment professionals managing a
range of Asian regional and single country portfolios. RCM in
Asia Pacific also has offices in Tokyo and Sydney. The
investment approach in Asia seeks to identify companies that can
deliver superior risk adjusted returns as a result of a
re-rating or through the identification of earnings drivers that
are not thought to be discounted fully in the current price.
Using its proprietary research, RCM builds portfolios stock by
stock while taking account of the implied sector allocation for
risk control purposes. The majority of active return is expected
to be a result of stock levels considerations. From Hong Kong,
RCM manages approximately $1 billion in Korean equities
including dedicated funds organized for
non-US
investors.
In short, the Board identified RCM as possessing:
|
|
|
|
|
impressive and focused research, at both the macro and micro
levels;
|
|
|
|
a concentrated portfolio construction methodology, driven by its
research;
|
|
|
|
a risk management process which is independent of the individual
portfolio manager;
|
|
|
|
a strong Asian presence;
|
|
|
|
a boutique asset management culture with strong and supportive
ownership by Allianz SE (parent company to RCM);
|
|
|
|
performance that has been historically successful in the Korean
stock market as well as other equity markets;
|
|
|
|
strong and well-integrated U.S. and local compliance
oversight; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
infrastructure and marketing support from its affiliate, Allianz
Global Investors Fund Management LLC, especially in the
closed-end investment company field, a key growth area for the
group.
|
Additional information regarding RCM and its affiliates is set
out in the accompanying proxy statement.
Following negotiation of mutual satisfactory contract terms, the
Board of Directors approved, on January 25, 2007, new
investment management and
sub-advisory
agreements with RCM SF and RCM AP. These contracts are being
submitted for your approval as described in the proxy statement.
Beginning April 1, 2007, RCM SF and RCM AP will serve as
the investment manager and
sub-adviser,
respectively, to the Fund pursuant to interim agreements, as
permitted by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
1940 Act), pending stockholder approval of the new
contracts.
Proposal to
Declare Capital Gains Dividend in Stock
It has been the Funds investment managers style to
buy and hold investments for a long period of time,
and this approach has resulted in some very rewarding capital
gains in the portfolio since its inception some 24 years
ago. However, these gains have become such a large percentage of
the total value of the Funds portfolio that the Board
believes they have begun to inhibit the proactive investment
decision-making necessary to sustain good performance in the
future. As of December 31, 2006, unrealized capital gains
represented approximately 81% of the Funds net assets. The
Board expects that the Funds new manager will make
substantial changes to the Funds current holdings, which
in connection with the transition of the portfolio will likely
result in the realization of a significant amount of capital
gains. Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, any such
realized gains must be distributed to stockholders at the end of
the year in which they have been realized in order to avoid
income and excise taxes. Paying such dividends in cash would
likely require the sale of additional portfolio holdings during
the current year, the capital gains realized from which would
also need to be distributed. In short, this builds a so-called
cascading effect somewhat similar to a
snowball running downhill, gaining size as it
descends which will cause the Fund to shrink and its
expense ratio to increase. A potential way of mitigating this
cascade is to pay out capital gains in Fund shares, with a cash
alternative, which will more easily permit those stockholders
wishing to maintain exposure to Korea to retain their positions.
The expected capital gains distribution paid in Fund shares will
be issued at the lower of the market value of Fund shares or net
asset value of Fund shares. As the Funds shares are
currently trading at a discount to net asset value, it is likely
that those stockholders electing a pay out in Fund shares will
receive such shares at a price below net asset value. By
reinvesting the capital gains distribution in the Fund,
stockholders will reduce the amount by which the Fund will
shrink, thereby reducing the likelihood of an increase in the
Funds expense ratio. Alternatively, stockholders wishing
to raise cash may either sell stock or elect to accept the
dividend in cash. Additional information on this issue is set
out in the proxy statement.
The Board of Directors of the Fund unanimously believes the
proposals are in the best interests of the Fund and its
stockholders and recommends that you vote for the
approval of the proposals described in the proxy statement.
Stockholders who are unable to attend the Meeting are strongly
encouraged to vote by proxy, which is customary in corporate
meetings of this kind. A proxy statement regarding the Meeting,
a proxy card for your vote at the Meeting, and an
envelope postage prepaid in which to
return your proxy card are enclosed. You may also vote by
touch-tone telephone or through the Internet by following the
instructions on the enclosed proxy card.
Following this letter, we have included some questions and
answers regarding the issues set out in this proxy statement.
This information is intended to help you answer questions you
may have and help you cast your
votes, and is being provided as a supplement to, not a
substitute for, the proxy statement, which we urge you to review
carefully.
Your vote is very important to us and if you have concerns
please feel free to contact me at (+44 7768 068 200). If we do
not hear from you by [ ], 2007, our
proxy solicitor may contact you.
Thank you for your attention, for your response and for your
continued investment in the Fund.
Yours very sincerely,
Julian Reid
Chairman of the Board,
on behalf of the full Board
STOCKHOLDERS ARE
URGED TO SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND MAIL IT IN
THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE SO AS TO ENSURE A QUORUM
AT THE MEETING. THIS IS IMPORTANT WHETHER YOU OWN FEW OR MANY
SHARES.
QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS
REGARDING THE PROXY STATEMENT AND
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
While we
encourage you to read the full text of the enclosed proxy
statement, for your convenience, we have provided a brief
overview of the matters to be voted on.
|
|
|
Q. |
|
What am I being asked to vote on in this proxy statement? |
|
A. |
|
You are being asked to vote on proposals to: |
|
|
|
1. Approve a new investment management agreement between
the Fund and RCM Capital Management LLC (RCM SF),
pursuant to which RCM SF will become the Funds new
investment manager.
|
|
|
|
2. Approve a new
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM Asia Pacific Limited (RCM
AP), pursuant to which RCM AP will become the Funds
new
sub-adviser.
|
|
|
|
3. Approve the issuance of Fund shares at a price below net
asset value in connection with a capital gains distribution to
be made in Fund shares (valued at the lower of market price or
net asset value) or, at the election of the stockholder, in cash.
|
|
|
|
Proposed Manager Change |
|
Q. |
|
Why am I being asked to vote on new management agreements? |
|
A. |
|
On January 25, 2007, after careful consideration of
possible alternatives to the Funds investment management
arrangements, the Board of Directors, which consists entirely of
independent directors, unanimously determined that it would be
in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders to select
RCM SF and RCM AP as the new investment advisers for the Fund
and approved, subject to stockholder approval, new investment
management and
sub-advisory
agreements. In addition, the Board of Directors, as permitted by
the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act),
approved an interim investment management agreement between the
Fund and RCM SF, an interim
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM AP and a
sub-administration
agreement between RCM SF and Allianz Global Investors Fund
Management LLC (AGIFM), all of which will become
effective on April 1, 2007. Pursuant to the interim
agreements, RCM SF will serve as interim investment manager to
the Fund, and RCM AP will serve as interim
sub-adviser
to the Fund until the earlier of the date that shareholder
approval of the new agreements is obtained or August 29,
2007. |
|
|
|
RCM SF was founded as Rosenberg Capital Management and began
managing assets in 1970. RCM SF is a wholly owned indirect
subsidiary of Allianz SE, a publicly traded German insurance and
financial services company. RCM SF is a Delaware limited
liability company, located at Four Embarcadero Center,
San Francisco, California 94111. |
|
|
|
Although the Asia Pacific presence of RCM SF and its affiliates
(RCM) has been established in Hong Kong since
1983, RCM AP was formed in 2006 and licensed by the Hong Kong
SFC and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in January
of 2007. RCM AP is in the process of succeeding to all of
Allianz Global Investors Hong Kong Limiteds equity
management business in Hong Kong as part of a legal
restructuring by Allianz Global Investors of its group companies
in the Asia Pacific. RCM AP is a wholly owned indirect
subsidiary of Allianz SE. RCM AP is located at 21/F, Cheung Kong
Center, 2 Queens Road Central, Central, Hong Kong. The
assets under management to which it will |
|
|
|
|
|
succeed were approximately $9.5 billion as of
December 31, 2006. RCM AP has not previously managed a
U.S. registered investment company. |
|
|
|
Organized in 2000, AGIFM provides investment management,
advisory and fund administration services to a number of
closed-end and open-end investment company clients. AGIFM is a
wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Allianz SE. As of
December 31, 2006, AGIFM and its investment management
affiliates had approximately $691.9 billion in assets under
management. AGIFM has it principal offices at 1345 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, New York 10105. |
|
Q. |
|
Could you tell me more about RCM? |
|
A. |
|
RCM is a global investment organization consisting of separate
affiliated entities with offices in key financial centers around
the world, including San Francisco, London, Frankfurt, Hong
Kong, Tokyo and Sydney. As of December 31, 2006, these
affiliated entities collectively advised or managed
approximately $155 billion, including approximately
$21 billion managed by RCM SF in San Francisco and
approximately $10 billion managed by RCM AP in Hong Kong.
RCM is part of the Allianz Global Investors Group. Research is
at the cornerstone of RCMs global investment process and
this fundamental research is organized globally by industry
sector. RCM includes a market research capability known as
Grassrootssm
that complements the fundamental research of its career
analysts. RCM manages mutual funds and unit trusts, insurance
funds, corporate funds, pension funds, endowment and charity
funds and government institutional monies in North America,
Europe and Asia Pacific. |
|
|
|
The investment management business of RCM in the Asia Pacific
region was established in Hong Kong in 1983 (formerly Thornton
Management) providing international investors with specialist
Asian equity management through a range of mutual finds and
discretionary management services. Hong Kong remains RCMs
regional center with 37 investment professionals managing a
range of Asian regional and single country portfolios. RCM in
Asia Pacific also has offices in Tokyo and Sydney. The
investment approach in Asia seeks to identify companies that can
deliver superior risk adjusted returns as a result of a
re-rating or through the identification of earnings drivers that
are not thought to be discounted fully in the current price.
Using its proprietary research, RCM builds portfolios stock by
stock while taking account of the implied sector allocation for
risk control purposes. The majority of active return is expected
to be a result of stock levels considerations. From Hong Kong,
RCM manages a total of approximately $1 billion in Korean
equities, including dedicated funds organized for
non-U.S. investors. |
|
|
|
RCMs single country research coverage, as in the case for
a dedicated Korea fund, is shared between the country
specialists and the regional sector analysts, representing a
subtle difference from RCMs global approach. Country
specialists tend to cover those companies that relate to local
factors more than any regional (or global) factor and therefore
tend to follow the mid- and small-cap sectors more closely.
Sector specialists cover the larger capitalized names and
typically stocks that could be recommended for regional or
global portfolios. Coverage lists are set and agreed upon by
both the head of regional research and the regional Chief
Investment Officer. |
|
|
|
In short, the Board has identified RCM as having impressive and
focused research at both the macro- and micro-levels, a
concentrated portfolio construction methodology driven by its
research ideas, a strong management process that is independent
of the individual portfolio manager, U.S. management that
provides clear support for, and compliance control of, its Asian
operations and performance that has been historically successful. |
|
|
|
Q. |
|
Could you tell me about RCMs investment style? |
|
A. |
|
RCMs investment philosophy in Asia Pacific is to seek
out-performance over the investment cycle (typically 3 to
5 years) based upon researching and identifying growth
prospects of quality companies that are incorporated in the
portfolios using a disciplined investment methodology that
includes both risk and liquidity controls. |
|
|
|
Under this approach, RCM identifies stocks that fall into two
main categories: (i) companies that are expected to re-rate
as a result of the markets not fully recognizing the
growth potential of the business, and (ii) companies that
will benefit from share price appreciation resulting from an
earnings surprise. |
|
|
|
RCMs investment approach in Asia Pacific is predicated on
a bottom-up,
fundamentally driven investment process by which RCM builds
portfolios based on the aggregate of individual stock
recommendations after taking account of the risk characteristics
at the total portfolio level. |
|
|
|
For further information regarding RCMs investment style,
please see Proxy Statement
Proposal 1 Description of Investment
Managers Investment Style. |
|
Q. |
|
Will there be any significant changes to the Funds
portfolio management? |
|
A. |
|
The Board expects that RCM SF and RCM AP will manage the
Funds portfolio in line with their focused approach which
will result in the Fund having a more concentrated portfolio
than has previously been the case. As a result, the Board
expects that RCM SF and RCM AP will make substantial changes to
the Funds current holdings in connection with the
transition of the portfolio. |
|
Q. |
|
How do the proposed new agreements differ from the
Funds previous agreements? |
|
A. |
|
Other than its parties, term dates and fees (described below),
the rights and obligations under the new investment
management agreement (the New Investment Management
Agreement) between the Fund and RCM SF are substantially
identical to those under the Funds current investment
management agreement (the Current Investment Management
Agreement) with Deutsche Investment Management Americas
Inc. (DeIM). With regard to the new
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM AP (the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement), in addition to its parties, term dates and
fees, the provisions of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement differ from those of the Funds current
sub-advisory
agreement (the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement) with Deutsche Investment Trust Management
Company Limited (DeITMC) by significantly expanding
the services to be provided by the
sub-adviser.
(See Proxy Statement Proposal 2 for
a detailed discussion of how the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement differs from the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement with regard to
sub-advisory
fees and
sub-advisory
services.) |
|
Q. |
|
Will the Funds total advisory services fees
increase? |
|
A. |
|
Yes, fees will be higher, particularly relative to the recent
very favorable rates provided to the Fund. In consideration of
the services to be rendered under the New Investment Management
Agreement, the Fund will pay RCM SF a monthly fee which, on an
annual basis, is equal to 0.750% per annum of the value of
the Funds average daily net assets up to and including
$250 million of assets; 0.725% per annum of the
value of the Funds average daily net assets on the next
$250 million of assets; 0.700% per annum of the value
of the Funds average daily net assets on the next
$250 million of assets; 0.675% per annum of the value
of the Funds average daily net assets on the next
$250 million of assets; and 0.650% per annum of
the value of the Funds average daily net assets in excess
of $1 billion. Under the Current Investment Management
Agreement, the Fund paid DeIM a monthly fee which, on an annual
basis, is equal to 0.60% per annum of the value of the
Funds net assets up to and including $250 million |
|
|
|
|
|
of assets; 0.575% per annum of the value of the Funds
net assets on the next $250 million of assets;
0.55% per annum of the value of the Funds net assets
on the next $250 million of assets; 0.525% per annum
of the value of the Funds net assets on the next
$250 million of assets; and 0.50% per annum of the
value of the Funds net assets in excess of $1 billion. |
|
|
|
As of the end of the Funds last fiscal year, the Fund had
net assets of $1,048,086,586 and paid an aggregate fee to the
investment manager under its Current Investment Management
Agreement during such period equal to $6,195,529. Had the New
Investment Management Agreement been in effect during this
period, the Fund would have paid the investment manager an
aggregate fee equal to $7,989,875 during such period. Thus, the
aggregate fee under the New Investment Management Agreement
would have been 29% greater than the aggregate fee under the
Current Investment Management Agreement had the New Investment
Management Agreement been in effect during the Funds last
fiscal year. |
|
|
|
Fees payable under the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement are paid by RCM SF, not the Fund. |
|
|
|
Until December 2004, the Fund paid DeIM 1.000% per annum of
the Funds net assets. At that time, DeIM voluntarily
agreed to reduce fees to 0.6000% per annum in response to
various pressures from the Board and certain major stockholders.
In comparison to the Funds Lipper peer group and the
Funds peer group identified by the Board, the total
advisory services fees under the proposed new advisory
agreements are still very competitive. |
|
Q. |
|
How does the Funds Board of Directors recommend I vote
on Proposals #1 and #2 approval of the new
investment management and
sub-advisory
agreements? |
|
A. |
|
After careful consideration over an extended period of time of
possible alternatives to the previous management arrangements,
the Funds Board of Directors has unanimously determined
that it would be in the best interests of the Fund and its
stockholders to select RCM SF as the new investment manager and
RCM AP as the new
sub-adviser
for the Fund and recommends that you vote FOR the
approval of the New Investment Management Agreement and
FOR the approval of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement. |
|
|
|
Proposed Issuance of Fund Shares in Connection with a
Capital Gains Dividend |
|
Q. |
|
Why am I being asked to vote on the issuance of Fund shares
in connection with a capital gains dividend? |
|
A. |
|
Over a long period, the Fund has built up a high level of
unrealized capital gains which has made it difficult to pursue
ongoing active management a fact that the Board
believes to be a possible cause for the Funds recent
underperformance relative to its benchmark. Although the Board
understands the reluctance of many stockholders to pay taxes on
capital gains distributions, it must also recognize that many
Fund stockholders are not subject to taxes, and thus balance the
interests of some stockholders in avoiding capital gains against
the interests of all stockholders in superior performance. In
addition, the proposed change in investment manager will likely
create additional realization of gains, especially while the
portfolio is transitioned to the new investment manager.
Thereafter, the Board and the investment manager intend to
monitor the gains more closely to provide a more even stream of
returns to stockholders without negatively affecting the
Funds total rate of return. |
|
|
|
A means of optimizing the return to stockholders of such capital
gains, and simultaneously reducing the
cascade effect (see below) on the Fund,
is making a capital gains distribution to stockholders that is
payable in Fund shares (valued at the lower of market price or
net asset value) which may be issued at |
|
|
|
|
|
a discount to net asset value (see below). For those
stockholders wishing to receive such capital gains distribution
in cash, there is a cash alternative available on request. |
|
|
|
The Fund is seeking shareholder approval of the issuance of
these shares in order to ensure compliance with the New York
Stock Exchange rules requiring shareholder approval for
issuances in excess of 20% of the Funds outstanding shares
and for issuances to substantial security holders of the Fund,
and also as a protective matter to come within certain 1940 Act
provisions regarding issuances of Fund shares at a price below
net asset value. |
|
Q. |
|
What is cascading and what does it
mean for the Fund? |
|
A. |
|
Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the
Code), the Fund is required each calendar year to
distribute at least 98% of its capital gain net income for the
12-month
period ending on October 31st in order to avoid an
excise tax; in addition, the Fund would bear tax at the Fund
level on any net capital gain income that is not distributed. If
the Fund makes a capital gains distribution in cash and the Fund
remains fully invested, it will need to sell additional
portfolio securities to raise the cash to make the distribution.
These additional sales will cause the Fund to realize additional
capital gains that in turn must be distributed. As a result of
this cascade, the Fund would shrink, likely causing
an increase in the Funds expense ratio. |
|
Q. |
|
New Fund shares in connection with this proposed capital
gains dividend could be offered at a discount to net asset
value why, and is it to stockholders
benefit? |
|
A. |
|
It has been the Funds investment managers style to
buy and hold investments for a long
period of time, and this approach has resulted in some very
rewarding capital gains in the portfolio since its inception
some 24 years ago. However, these unrealized capital gains
have become such a large percentage of the total value of the
Funds portfolio that the Board believes they have begun to
inhibit the proactive investment decision-making necessary to
sustain good performance in the future. As of December 31,
2006, unrealized capital gains represented approximately 81% of
the Funds net assets. The Board expects that the
Funds new manager will make substantial changes to the
Funds current holdings, which in connection with the
transition of the portfolio will likely result in the
realization of a significant amount of capital gains. Under the
Code, any such realized gains must be distributed to
stockholders at the end of the year in which they have been
realized in order to avoid income and excise taxes on the Fund.
Paying such dividends in cash would likely require the sale of
additional portfolio holdings during the current year, the
capital gains realized from which would also need to be
distributed. In short, this builds a so-called
cascading effect somewhat similar to a
snowball running downhill, gaining size as it
descends which will cause the Fund to shrink and its
expense ratio to increase. A potential way to mitigate this
cascade is to pay out capital gains in Fund shares, with a cash
alternative, which will more easily permit those stockholders
wishing to maintain exposure to Korea to retain their positions.
The expected capital gains distribution paid in Fund shares will
be issued at the lower of the market value of Fund shares or net
asset value of Fund shares. As the Funds shares are
currently trading at a discount to net asset value, it is likely
that those stockholders electing a pay out in Fund shares will
receive such shares at a price below net asset value. By
reinvesting the capital gains distribution in the Fund,
stockholders will reduce the amount by which the Fund will
shrink, thereby reducing the likelihood of an increase in the
Funds expense ratio. Alternatively, stockholders wishing
to raise cash may either sell stock or elect to accept the
dividend in cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
The full amount of such capital gains distribution, whether
received in additional Fund shares or cash, will be reportable
by stockholders who are U.S. taxpayers as long-term capital
gain on their U.S. federal income tax returns. In addition,
whether paid in cash or additional Fund shares, the amounts
distributed will be net of any applicable withholding taxes. |
|
Q. |
|
How will the change in the Funds investment manager
impact the Funds management of the share price
discount? |
|
A. |
|
The Board is very aware of the concerns of share price discounts
relative to the net asset value and has already commenced
planning moves with the strong intent to managing any such
discount for the benefit of all shareholders. |
|
Q. |
|
How does the Funds Board of Directors recommend I vote
on Proposal #3 the issuance of Funds
shares at a price below net asset value? |
|
A. |
|
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders of the Fund
vote FOR the approval of the Funds ability to
issue its stock at a price below net asset value in connection
with its cash election dividend. |
|
Q. |
|
Will my vote make a difference? |
|
A. |
|
Your vote is needed to ensure that the proposals can be acted
upon. The Funds Board of Directors encourages all
stockholders to participate in the governance of their Fund. |
|
Q. |
|
Whom should I call if I have questions? |
|
A. |
|
If you need any assistance, or have any questions regarding the
proposals or how to vote your shares, please call
[ ] at
[ ]. |
|
Q. |
|
How do I go about voting my shares? |
|
A. |
|
Stockholders who are unable to attend the Meeting are strongly
encouraged to vote by proxy, which is customary in corporate
meetings of this kind. A proxy statement regarding the Meeting,
a proxy card for your vote at the Meeting, and an
envelope postage prepaid in which to
return your proxy card are enclosed. You may also vote by
touch-tone telephone or through the Internet by following the
instructions on the enclosed proxy card. |
THE KOREA FUND,
INC.
Notice
of Special Meeting of Stockholders
To the Stockholders of The Korea Fund, Inc.:
Please take notice that a Special Meeting of Stockholders (the
Meeting) of The Korea Fund, Inc. (the
Fund) has been called to be held at the offices of
Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of the Americas,
New York, NY, on April 11, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.,
Eastern time, for the following purposes and to transact such
other business, if any, as may properly come before the Meeting:
PROPOSAL 1: To approve a new investment
management agreement for the Fund with RCM Capital Management
LLC (RCM SF);
PROPOSAL 2: To approve a new
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM Asia Pacific Limited; and
PROPOSAL 3: To approve the issuance of Fund
shares at a price below net asset value in connection with a
capital gains distribution payable in Fund shares (valued at the
lower of market price or net asset value) or, at the election of
the stockholder, in cash.
The appointed proxies will vote in their discretion on any other
business as may properly come before the Meeting or any
adjournments or postponements thereof.
Holders of record of the shares of common stock of the Fund at
the close of business on February 21, 2007 are entitled to
vote at the Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
By order of the Board of Directors,
John Millette, Secretary
[ ], 2007
IMPORTANT: We
urge you to sign and date the enclosed proxy card and mail it in
the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope or vote by touch-tone
telephone or through the Internet, so as to ensure a quorum at
the Meeting. This is important whether you own few or many
shares. Your prompt voting may save the Fund the necessity and
expense of further solicitations to ensure a quorum at the
Meeting. If you can attend the Meeting and wish to vote your
shares in person at that time, you will be able to do
so.
If you have
any questions concerning the procedures to be followed to vote
your shares, please contact
[ ]
at
[ ].
PROXY
STATEMENT
GENERAL
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of The Korea
Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Fund), for
use at a Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the
offices of Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of the
Americas, New York, NY, on April 11, 2007 at
4:00 p.m., Eastern time, and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof (collectively, the Meeting).
This Proxy Statement, the Notice of Special Meeting and the
proxy card are first being mailed to stockholders on or about
[ ], 2007 or as soon as practicable
thereafter. If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, or
an Internet or telephonic vote is delivered, that vote may
nevertheless be revoked at any time prior to its use by written
notification received by the Fund (addressed to the Funds
Secretary at the Funds principal executive offices, 345
Park Avenue, New York, NY 10154), by the execution of a
later-dated proxy, by the Funds receipt of a subsequent
valid Internet or telephonic vote, or by attending the Meeting
and voting in person. Proxies voted by telephone or through the
Internet may be revoked at any time before they are voted in the
same manner that proxies voted by mail may be revoked. All
properly executed proxies received in time for the Meeting will
be voted as specified in the proxy or, if no specification is
made, for the approval of the proposals named in the Proxy
Statement and in the discretion of the proxy holders on any
other matter that may properly come before the Meeting.
The presence at the Meeting, in person or by proxy, of
stockholders entitled to cast a majority of the votes entitled
to be cast shall be necessary and sufficient to constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business. For purposes of
determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at
the Meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will
be treated as shares that are present, but which have not been
voted. Broker non-votes are proxies received by the Fund from
brokers or nominees when the broker or nominee has neither
received instructions from the beneficial owner or other persons
entitled to vote nor has discretionary power to vote on a
particular matter. Accordingly, stockholders are urged to
forward their voting instructions promptly.
Approval of the new investment management and
sub-advisory
agreements requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding voting securities of the
Fund. The term majority of the outstanding voting
securities, as defined in the 1940 Act and as used in this
Proxy Statement, means: the affirmative vote of the lesser of
(i) 67% of the voting securities of the Fund present at the
Meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of
the Fund are present in person or by proxy or (ii) more
than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund.
Approval of an issuance of shares representing 20% or more of
the Funds pre-issuance outstanding voting power, or an
issuance to a substantial security holder of the Fund, requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
proposal, provided that the total vote cast on the proposal
represents over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to
vote on the proposal. In addition, approval of the Funds
ability to sell its stock at a price below net asset value
pursuant to Section 23(b)(2) of the 1940 Act requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the Funds common
stockholders.
Abstentions will have the effect of an against vote
on each of the proposals. Broker non-votes will have the effect
of an against vote for each of the proposals if such
vote is determined on the basis of obtaining the affirmative
vote of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of a Fund.
Broker non-votes will not constitute for or
against votes for either of the proposals, and will
be disregarded in determining the voting securities
present if such vote is determined on the basis of
the affirmative vote of 67% of the voting securities of the Fund
present at the Meeting.
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 1
Holders of record of the common stock of the Fund at the close
of business on February 21, 2007 (the Record
Date) will be entitled to one vote per share on all
business of the Meeting and any adjournments or postponements.
There were [ ] shares of common stock outstanding on the
Record Date.
The Fund provides periodic reports to all stockholders, which
highlight relevant information, including investment results and
a review of portfolio changes. You may receive an additional
copy of the Funds annual report for its fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006 and a copy of any more recent semi-annual
report, without charge, by calling
(800) 349-4281
or writing the Fund at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York
10154.
2 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
PROPOSAL 1. APPROVAL
OF NEW INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FUND AND
RCM:
At the Meeting, you will be asked to approve a new investment
management agreement (the New Investment Management
Agreement) between the Fund and RCM Capital Management LLC
(RCM SF). Beginning April 1, 2007, RCM SF will
serve as the Funds interim investment manager pursuant to
the interim investment management agreement that the Board of
Directors approved on January 25, 2007. A general
description of the proposed New Investment Management Agreement
is included below. The form of the New Investment Management
Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
On January 25, 2007, after careful consideration of
possible alternatives to the Funds current management and
sub-advisory
arrangements, the Board of Directors determined that it would be
in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders to select
RCM SF as the new investment manager for the Fund, succeeding
Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (DeIM).
At this meeting, the Directors approved, subject to stockholder
approval, the New Investment Management Agreement, pursuant to
which RCM SF would become the Funds new investment
manager. At the meeting, the Board of Directors also approved an
interim investment management agreement, as permitted under the
1940 Act, pursuant to which RCM SF will serve as interim
investment manager to the Fund beginning April 1, 2007. The
terms of this interim investment management agreement are
substantially identical to those of the New Investment
Management Agreement, except that the compensation paid by the
Fund to the investment manager under the interim agreement is
identical to that paid under the Funds previous investment
management agreement with DeIM (the Current Investment
Management Agreement) and the termination provisions under
the interim investment management agreement require a
10-day
written notice instead of the
60-day
written notice that the New Investment Management Agreement
requires. The Board of Directors also approved new
sub-advisory
and interim
sub-advisory
agreements with RCM Asia Pacific Limited (RCM AP)
(discussed below in Proposal 2) and a new
sub-administration
agreement with Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC
(AGIFM), pursuant to which AGIFM will serve as the
Funds
sub-administrator
beginning April 1, 2007.
One goal of the Board of Directors in changing the Funds
investment manager was to engage an investment manager that
would manage the Funds portfolio more actively than has
previously been the case. Should the New Investment Management
Agreement be approved by the stockholders, it is expected that
RCM SF and RCM AP will make substantial changes to the
Funds current holdings, which in connection with the
transition of the portfolio will likely result in the
realization of a significant amount of capital gains. As of
December 31, 2006, the Fund had approximately $697,643,794
in net unrealized long-term capital gains. See Proposal 3
below for the Funds proposed plan to address certain of
the consequences to the Fund that realizing these capital gains
may have on the Funds future operation.
DESCRIPTION OF
THE CURRENT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Investment Managers
Responsibilities. Under the Current Investment
Management Agreement, DeIM, as investment manager, provides the
Fund with continuing investment management services. The
investment manager makes investment decisions, prepares and
makes available research and statistical data and supervises the
acquisition and disposition of securities by the Fund, all in
accordance with the Funds investment objectives and
policies and in accordance with guidelines and directions from
the Funds Board of Directors. The investment manager
assists the Fund as it may reasonably request in the conduct of
the Funds business, subject to the direction and control
of the Funds Board of Directors. The investment manager is
required to maintain or cause to be maintained for the Fund all
books, records and reports and any other information required to
be
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 3
maintained under the 1940 Act to the extent such books, records
and reports and any other information are not maintained by the
Funds custodian or other agents of the Fund. The
investment manager also supplies the Fund with office space in
New York and furnishes clerical services in the United States
related to research, statistical and investment work. The
investment manager renders to the Fund administrative services
such as preparing reports to, and meeting materials for, the
Funds Board of Directors and reports and notices to Fund
stockholders, preparing and making filings with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and other regulatory and self-regulatory
organizations, including preliminary and definitive proxy
materials and post-effective amendments to the Funds
registration statement, providing assistance in certain
accounting and tax matters and investor public relations,
monitoring the valuation of portfolio securities, calculation of
net asset value and calculation and payment of distributions to
stockholders, and overseeing arrangements with the Funds
custodian. The investment manager agrees to pay reasonable
salaries, fees and expenses of the Funds officers and
employees and any fees and expenses of the Funds Directors
who are directors, officers or employees of the investment
manager, except that the Fund bears travel expenses (or an
appropriate portion of those expenses) of Directors and officers
of the Fund who are directors, officers or employees of the
investment manager to the extent that such expenses relate to
attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or any
committees of or advisors to the Board. During the Funds
most recent fiscal year, no compensation, direct or otherwise
(other than through fees paid to the investment manager), was
paid or became payable by the Fund to any of its officers or
Directors who were affiliated with the investment manager.
Under the Current Investment Management Agreement, to the extent
permissible by law, the investment manager is authorized to
appoint certain of its affiliates as
sub-advisers
to perform certain of the investment managers duties. In
such cases, the investment manager is also authorized to adjust
the duties, the amount of assets to be managed and the fees paid
to any such affiliated
sub-advisers.
These affiliated
sub-advisers
must be entities that the investment manager controls, is
controlled by, or is under common control with, and any such
appointments are subject to the further approval of the
Independent Directors and the full Board. Stockholders of the
Fund that are affected by any adjustment would receive prompt
notice following approval by the Directors. The management fee
rates paid by the Funds do not increase as a result of any such
action; all fees incurred by a
sub-adviser
continue to be the responsibility of the investment manager. The
investment manager retains full responsibility for the actions
of any such
sub-adviser
or delegates.
Fund Expenses. Under the Current
Investment Management Agreement, the Fund pays or causes to be
paid all of its other expenses, including, among others, the
following: organization and certain offering expenses (including
out-of-pocket
expenses, but not including overhead or employee costs of the
investment manager or of any one or more organizations retained
by the Fund or by the investment manager as Korean adviser to
the Fund); legal expenses; auditing and accounting expenses;
telephone, facsimile, postage and other communications expenses;
taxes and governmental fees; stock exchange listing fees; fees,
dues and expenses incurred in connection with membership in
investment company trade organizations; fees and expenses of the
Funds custodians, subcustodians, transfer agents and
registrars, and accounting agents; payment for portfolio pricing
or valuation services to pricing agents, accountants, bankers
and other specialists, if any; expenses of preparing share
certificates and other expenses in connection with the issuance,
offering, distribution, sale or underwriting of securities
issued by the Fund; expenses of registering or qualifying
securities of the Fund for sale; expenses related to investor
and public relations; freight, insurance and other charges in
connection with the shipment of the Funds portfolio
securities; brokerage commissions or other costs of acquiring or
disposing of any portfolio securities of the Fund; expenses of
preparing and distributing reports, notices and dividends to
stockholders; expenses of the dividend reinvestment and cash
purchase plan (except for brokerage expenses
4 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
paid by participants in such plan); costs of stationery; any
litigation expenses; and costs of stockholders and other
meetings.
Compensation Paid to the Investment
Manager. In return for the services provided by the
investment manager as investment manager, and the expenses it
assumes under the Current Investment Management Agreement, the
Fund pays DeIM a monthly fee which, on an annual basis, is equal
to 0.60% per annum of the value of the Funds net
assets up to and including $250 million of assets;
0.575% per annum of the value of the Funds net assets
on the next $250 million of assets; 0.55% per annum of
the value of the Funds net assets on the next
$250 million of assets 0.525% per annum of the value
of the Funds net assets on the next $250 million of
assets; and 0.50% per annum of the value of the Funds
net assets in excess of $1 billion. As of the end of the
Funds last fiscal year, the Fund had net assets of
$1,048,086,586 and paid an aggregate fee to the investment
manager under its Current Investment Management Agreement during
such period equal to $6,195,529.
Non-Exclusivity. Under the Current Investment
Management Agreement, the investment manager is permitted to
provide investment advisory services to other clients, including
clients which may invest in securities of Korean issuers and, in
providing such services, may use information furnished by
advisors and consultants to the Fund and others. Conversely,
information furnished by others to the investment manager in
providing services to other clients may be useful to the
investment manager in providing services to the Fund.
Termination of the Agreement. The Current
Investment Management Agreement may be terminated at any time
without payment of penalty by the Funds Board of
Directors, by vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding
voting securities of the Fund, or by the investment manager on
60 days written notice. The Current Investment
Management Agreement automatically terminates in the event of
its assignment (as defined under the 1940 Act), provided that an
assignment to a corporate successor to all or substantially all
of the investment managers business or to a wholly owned
subsidiary of such corporate successor which does not result in
a change of actual control or management of the investment
managers business shall not be deemed to be an assignment
for the purposes of the Current Investment Management Agreement.
Liability of the Investment Manager. The
Current Investment Management Agreement provides that the
investment manager is not liable for any act or omission, error
of judgment or mistake of laws or for any loss suffered by a
Fund in connection with matters to which the Current Investment
Management Agreement relates, except a loss resulting from
willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part
of the investment manager in the performance of its duties or
from reckless disregard by the investment manager of its
obligations and duties under the Current Investment Management
Agreement. The Current Investment Management Agreement also
contains provisions that provide that DeIM shall use its best
efforts to seek the best overall terms available in executing
transactions for the Fund and selecting brokers and dealers and
shall consider on a continuing basis all factors it deems
relevant, including the consideration of the brokerage and
research services (as those terms are defined in
Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)) provided to the Fund
and/or other
accounts over which DeIM or an affiliate exercises investment
discretion. In addition, with respect to the allocation of
investment and sale opportunities among the Fund and other
accounts or funds managed by DeIM, the Current Investment
Management Agreement provides that DeIM shall allocate such
opportunities in accordance with procedures believed by DeIM to
be equitable to each entity.
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 5
Additional
Information About the Investment Management Agreements
The date of the Current Investment Management Agreement is
April 5, 2002. The date when the Current Investment
Management Agreement was last approved by the stockholders of
the Fund is March 28, 2002. The date when the New
Investment Management Agreement was approved by the Directors of
the Fund is January 25, 2007. The termination date (unless
continued) of the New Investment Management Agreement is
September 30, 2008.
Description of
New Investment Management Agreement and Differences Between the
Current and New Investment Management Agreement
The New Investment Management Agreement for the Fund will be
dated as of April 11, 2007. The New Investment Management
Agreement will be in effect for an initial term ending on
September 30, 2008, and may be continued thereafter from
year to year only if specifically approved at least annually by
the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting
securities (as defined below under Required
Vote) of the Fund, or by the Board and, in either event,
the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors, cast in
person at a meeting called for such purpose.
Other than its parties, term dates and fees (described below),
the rights and obligations under the New Investment Management
Agreement of the Fund are substantially identical to those under
the Current Investment Management Agreement. Unlike the Current
Investment Management Agreement, however, the New Investment
Management Agreement does not expressly provide that the
investment manager will furnish office space, facilities and
clerical services as the Fund may require for its reasonable
needs because the parties agree that such provision refers to
services that RCM SF, as investment manager, typically provides
for its clients and that the other provisions of the New
Investment Management Agreement obligate RCM SF to provide such
services to the Fund.
Comparison of
Fees
In consideration of the services to be rendered under the New
Investment Management Agreement, the Fund will pay RCM SF a
monthly fee which, on an annual basis, is equal to
0.750% per annum of the value of the Funds average
daily net assets up to and including $250 million of
assets; 0.725% per annum of the value of the Funds
average daily net assets on the next $250 million of
assets; 0.700% per annum of the value of the Funds
average daily net assets on the next $250 million of
assets; 0.675% per annum of the value of the Funds
average daily net assets on the next $250 million of
assets; and 0.650% per annum of the value of the
Funds average daily net assets in excess of
$1 billion.
As described above, under the Current Investment Management
Agreement, the Fund paid DeIM a monthly fee which, on an annual
basis, is equal to 0.60% per annum of the value of the
Funds net assets up to and including $250 million of
assets; 0.575% per annum of the value of the Funds
net assets on the next $250 million of assets;
0.55% per annum of the value of the Funds net assets
on the next $250 million of assets; 0.525% per annum
of the value of the Funds net assets on the next
$250 million of assets; and 0.50% per annum of the
value of the Funds net assets in excess of $1 billion.
As of the end of the Funds last fiscal year, the Fund had
net assets of $1,048,086,586 and paid an aggregate fee to the
investment manager under its Current Investment Management
Agreement during such period equal to $6,195,529. Had the New
Investment Management Agreement been in effect during this
period, the Fund would have paid the investment manager an
aggregate fee equal to $7,989,875 during such period. Thus, the
aggregate fee under the New Investment Management Agreement
would have been 29% greater than the
6 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
aggregate fee under the Current Investment Management Agreement
had the New Investment Management Agreement been in effect
during the Funds last fiscal year.
The following table provides a comparison of the fees paid to
the investment manager during the Funds last fiscal year
under the Current Investment Management Agreement with the fees
that the Fund would have paid the investment manager during that
same period had the New Investment Management Agreement been in
effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Aggregate Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
Paid by
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of the
|
|
|
Fund to
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Agreement
|
|
Management
Fee
|
|
Last Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
Manager
|
|
|
|
|
Current Investment Management
Agreement
|
|
As a percentage of the Funds
net assets:
0.60% up to $250 million;
0.575% on the next $250 million;
0.55% on the next $250 million;
0.525% on the next $250 million;
0.50% over $1 billion
|
|
$
|
1,048,086,586
|
|
|
$
|
6,195,529
|
|
New Investment Management Agreement
|
|
As a percentage of the Funds
average daily net assets:
0.750% up to $250 million;
0.725% on the next $250 million;
0.700% on the next $250 million;
0.675% on the next $250 million;
0.650% over $1 billion
|
|
$
|
1,048,086,586
|
|
|
$
|
7,989,875
|
|
|
The following example is intended to help you compare the
expenses you would pay on a $1000 investment under the Current
Investment Management Agreement with those under the New
Investment Management Agreement, assuming a 5% annual return:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
You would pay the following expenses on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,000
investment, assuming a 5% annual return
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Current Investment
Management Agreement
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
Under the New Investment Management
Agreement
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
$
|
[ ]
|
|
|
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 7
Board
Considerations
In the summer of 2006, the Board commenced a comprehensive
review of the Funds current investment management
arrangements with DeIM. The Boards review included
conducting a request for proposals process for potential new
managers for the Fund with assistance of an independent
consultant to the Board. In December 2006, the Board announced
that the Directors had unanimously agreed to pursue negotiations
with RCM SF and affiliated entities to provide investment
management and administrative services to the Fund.
On January 25, 2007, the Board unanimously approved an
interim Investment Management Agreement with RCM SF as the
Funds investment manager, an interim
Sub-Advisory
Agreement between RCM SF and RCM AP and an interim
sub-administration
agreement between RCM SF and AGIFM, each effective as of
April 1, 2007, and unanimously voted to recommend that the
New Investment Management Agreement and
Sub-Advisory
Agreement be approved by stockholders.
In reaching its decision to recommend that stockholders approve
the New Investment Management Agreement and New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, the Board considered the following factors, among
others:
|
|
|
RCM APs investment performance relative to the investment
performance of the Fund, both absolute and relative to various
benchmarks and industry peer groups. In this regard, the Board
observed that RCM APs performance had outperformed the
Fund and its benchmark in recent 1 year, 3 year and
5 year periods based on performance information provided by
the Funds investment consulting firm, Mercer Investment
Consulting. The Board also observed that RCM AP had performed
well relative to other funds in its Lipper peer group and the
Funds peer group identified by the Board.
|
|
|
The resources and operations of RCM SF and its affiliates,
including the experience and professional qualifications of RCM
SF-affiliated personnel that would be providing compliance and
other services to the Fund. The Board noted that, pursuant to
the Current and New Investment Management Agreement, Current and
New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and
sub-administration
agreement, RCM SF, RCM AP and AGIFM will provide similar
services to those provided by DeIM and its affiliates.
|
|
|
With regard to the New Investment Management Agreement, New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and
sub-administration
agreement, the Board considered its terms and conditions, as
well as the fee rates that would be applicable to the
arrangements. The interim agreements have identical fee terms as
to those currently in place. The permanent agreements
recommended to be approved by stockholders call for an increase
in fees but are still below average for comparable closed-end
funds. The Board concluded that any economies of scale to be
enjoyed by RCM SF were properly reflected in the fee
arrangements for the benefit of the Funds stockholders,
and that in light of the Funds closed-end structure there
were limited opportunities for future material asset growth. In
particular, the Board considered that the current tax position
of the Fund is expected to lead to a reduction in the
Funds net assets in the coming years.
|
|
|
RCM SF and its affiliates personnel (including
particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing
services to the Fund), resources, policies and investment
processes. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality
and range of services provided by RCM SF and its affiliates
should benefit the Fund and its stockholders.
|
|
|
The nature, scope and quality of the services proposed to be
provided by RCM SF and its affiliates to the Fund. In this
regard, the Board considered, among other things, that the types
of services to be provided under the previous Investment
Advisory, Management and Administration Agreement were
comparable to those typically found in agreements of such type,
and the proposed New Investment Management
|
8 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
|
|
|
Agreement, New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and
sub-administration
agreement would result in a comparable level of services.
|
|
|
|
The estimated costs of the services to, and profits realized by,
RCM SF and its affiliates from their relationships with the
Fund. In this regard, the Board considered that RCM SFs
future profitability would likely be lower than its estimated
current profitability as a result of the reduction in the
Funds net assets due to the Funds current tax
position noted above.
|
|
|
The investment management fee rates paid to RCM SF relative to
those payable for similar accounts advised by RCM SF, including
differences in the scope of services typically provided to
mutual funds relative to institutional accounts. The Directors
noted that the fee rates paid by the Fund were lower than the
applicable Lipper peer group (based on data provided by Mercer
Investment Consulting). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees
paid by similar institutional accounts advised by RCM SF, in
light of the material differences in the scope of services
provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to
institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the
Board concluded that the proposed new fee schedule represents
reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and
quality of the investment services being provided to the Fund.
|
|
|
The practices of RCM SF and RCM AP regarding the selection and
compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio
transactions for the Fund, including RCM APs soft dollar
practices. The Board considered that a portion of the
Funds brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of RCM SF,
subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also
reviewed and approved, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a
plan whereby a limited portion of the Funds brokerage may
in the future be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide
to RCM SF and its affiliates) research services from third
parties that are generally useful to RCM SF and its affiliates
in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it will
monitor the allocation of the Funds brokerage to ensure
that the principle of best price and execution
remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
|
|
|
RCM SFs commitment to and record of compliance, including
its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard,
the Board considered the significant attention and resources
dedicated by RCM SF to documenting its compliance
processes. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience
and seniority of the Funds chief compliance officer, who
reports to the Board; (ii) the large number of compliance
personnel who report to the Funds chief compliance
officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources
by RCM SF to compliance matters.
|
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to approve
the Funds New Investment Management Agreement and New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and concluded that the Agreements were in the best
interests of the Funds stockholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular
weight to any single factor identified above. The Board
considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings,
many of which were in executive session with only the Directors
and their counsel present. It is possible that individual
Director may have weighed these factors differently in reaching
their individual decisions to approve the New Investment
Management Agreement and
Sub-Advisory
Agreement.
Information about
RCM SF
RCM SF and its affiliates (RCM) make up a
global investment organization consisting of separate affiliated
entities with offices in key financial centers around the world,
including San Francisco, London, Frankfurt,
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 9
Hong Kong, Tokyo and Sydney. As of December 31, 2006, these
affiliated entities collectively advised or managed
approximately $155 billion, including approximately
$21 billion managed by RCM SF in San Francisco and
approximately $10 billion managed by RCM AP in Hong Kong.
RCM is part of the Allianz Global Investors Group.
RCM SF is a wholly owned subsidiary of RCM US Holdings LLC,
located at Four Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA
94111. RCM US Holdings LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Allianz Global Investors AG, located at Nyphenburger Strasse
112-116,
80636 Munich, Germany. Allianz Global Investors AG is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Allianz SE, located at
Koeniginstrasse 28, Munich, Germany.
The name, address and principal occupation of each of RCM
SFs principal executive officers and members of its
Management Committee are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Address
|
|
Positions with
RCM SF
|
|
|
Udo Frank
|
|
c/o RCM, Four Embarcadero
Center,
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
Chief Executive Officer &
Member of RCM Management Committee
|
Andreas Utermann
|
|
c/o RCM, 155 Bishopsgate, London
EC2M 3AD
|
|
Global Chief Investment Officer
|
Peter J. Anderson
|
|
c/o RCM, Four Embarcadero
Center,
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
Chief Investment Officer &
Member of RCM Management Committee
|
Robert J. Goldstein
|
|
c/o RCM, Four Embarcadero
Center,
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, General
Counsel and Member of RCM Management Committee
|
Gregory M. Siemons
|
|
c/o RCM, Four Embarcadero
Center,
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
To the Boards knowledge, there are currently no officers
or directors of the Fund who are also officers, employees, or
directors of or owners of a membership interest in RCM SF. In
connection with the proposed transition of the Funds
investment advisory arrangements, it has been proposed that the
following employees of RCM SFs affiliates will serve as
officers of the Fund:
|
|
|
Name of
Employee (RCM Affiliate Employer)
|
|
Proposed Position
at the Fund
|
|
|
Robert J. Goldstein (an employee of
RCM SF)
|
|
President
|
Youse Guia (an employee of Allianz
Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
Brian Shlissel (an employee of
AGIFM)
|
|
Treasurer
|
Larry Altadonna (an employee of
AGIFM)
|
|
Assistant Treasurer
|
Thomas Fuccillo (an employee of
Allianz Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Secretary
|
Lagan Srivastava (an employee of
Allianz Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Assistant Secretary
|
|
To the Boards knowledge, no director of the Fund has any
material interest, direct or indirect, in any material
transactions since the beginning of the most recently completed
fiscal year, or in any material proposed transactions, to which
RCM SF or any of its parents or subsidiaries was or is to be a
party.
Description of
RCMs Investment Style
RCMs investment philosophy in Asia Pacific is to seek
out-performance over the investment cycle (typically 3 to
5 years) based upon researching and identifying growth
prospects of quality companies that are incorporated in the
portfolios using a disciplined investment methodology that
includes both risk and liquidity controls.
10 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
Under this approach, RCM identifies stocks that fall into two
main categories: (i) companies that are expected to re-rate
as a result of the markets not fully recognizing the
growth potential of the business, and (ii) companies that
are expected to benefit from share price appreciation resulting
from an earnings surprise.
RCMs investment approach in Asia Pacific is predicated on
a bottom-up,
fundamentally driven investment process by which RCM builds
portfolios based on the aggregate of individual stock
recommendations after taking account of the risk characteristics
at the total portfolio level.
Portfolio
Construction
Portfolio construction is predominately judgmentally-driven
focusing on using the best investment ideas from the research
process. The portfolio manager looks to add value by taking
active positions versus the benchmark where the
bottom-up
stock selection process identifies investment opportunities.
Traders address pricing spreads and liquidity issues when
discussing investment proposals with investment managers.
Members of the relevant sector research team, the designated
portfolio manager, and often a representative from the
Grassroots research team, register opinions and vote on stocks.
These votes are recorded and re-evaluated at regular and
frequent intervals. Managers look for stocks which show good
potential for both secular and internal earnings growth. Through
extensive research and local market awareness, RCM aims to
identify both local and international trends and avoid
predictable threats to a business, whether technological,
regulatory, or via competition.
Idea
Generation
Stock ideas at RCM are generated at the market and sector level
from the stock universe. Managers look for stocks that show good
potential for both secular and internal earnings growth. Through
extensive research and local market awareness, RCM aims to avoid
predictable threats to a business, whether technological,
regulatory, or via competition.
In general, the decision at RCM to create a new position is
driven by a disciplined team process based around a stock rating
system. All stocks are rated on a 1 to 5 basis for considered
inclusion within an equity portfolio. This systematic stock
analysis ensures consistency on a global basis across RCMs
different offices.
Except as otherwise indicated earlier, RCMs fundamental
research and disciplined screening criteria are applied to each
and every security proposed for inclusion in portfolios. For all
stocks in the universe, RCM derives target relative P/Es to
arrive at a
12-month
total risk adjusted return projection. If a stock is found to
have a positive relative valuation (risk/return), it becomes a
outperformer. If negative, estimates are
re-assessed,
the stock monitored for possible dips in price, presenting a
buying opportunity, or the idea is discarded. All outperformers
are then compared to current holdings, to see if any of them
have higher positive projected returns, and should therefore be
purchased.
RCMs primary sell discipline is derived from the use of a
valuation system that not only flags potential outperformers,
but also continually monitors for stocks which develop negative
risk/return ratios. Unless the process can justify a higher P/E
target, higher earnings estimates or lower specific risk, a
stock is flagged as underperformer when it shows
insufficient returns relative to the market and other stocks.
There are typically three occurrences that trigger RCMs
sell discipline: 1) growth is compromised; 2) quality
(management or financial) is compromised and/or 3) a low
risk/return.
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 11
Normally, stocks are chosen for their growth prospects and
therefore analysts naturally monitor stocks for their long-term
suitability for equity portfolios.
12-18 months
would be considered the minimum holding period although in
general RCMs investment philosophy is geared toward a
long-term three-year period.
Once recommendations have been made, they are entered onto RIMS
Express, the central repository for global analysis at RCM.
Company fundamentals are entered, along with the analysts
recommendations and a calculation of target price and hence
percentage upside. In this way the fund manager can
differentiate between votes with the same rank, on an absolute
basis. The database within the proprietary system RIMS as
detailed above has also been constructed to include information
acquired through external systems such as IBES, Trapeze and
FirstCall.
Research analysts are the primary source of investment ideas;
however, RCM uses other tools to assist. Quantitative tools
monitoring consensus earnings expectations are applied. Some
external research is assessed which accounts for approximately
10% of RCMs total research. Analysts are responsible for
communicating ideas and recommendations to the equity team.
GrassrootsSM
is used for cross validation and from time to time generates
ideas.
Risk
Management
Risks are assessed at the overall portfolio, country, industry,
style and individual stock levels. Risk review ensures that
overall portfolio risks adhere to internal investment guidelines
and are in line with return expectations.
Reporting to the CIO, RCMs risk manager reviews portfolio
risk with the CIO and fund managers on bi-weekly basis. On a
quarterly basis, RCMs Global CIO and global risk manager
conduct portfolio risk reviews with the CIO, risk manager and
fund managers in Asia to address risk control issues.
Central to portfolio construction is risk management which
ensures that clients guidelines are adhered to. Using
Wilshire, APT and Style Research, the Performance &
Risk Reporting Department (PRR) ensures that
RCMs equity teams are continuously monitored to achieve
truth in labeling, meeting risk and performance targets and
providing transparency and accountability with respect to
performance metrics. The PRR is responsible for the calculation
and analysis of portfolio returns.
Required
Vote
Approval of the New Investment Management Agreement requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding voting
securities. The term majority of the outstanding
voting securities, as defined in the 1940 Act and as used
in this Proxy Statement, means the affirmative vote of the
lesser of (i) 67% of the voting securities of the Fund
present at the Meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding
voting securities of the Fund are present in person or by proxy
or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities
of the Fund.
The
directors of The Korea Fund unanimously recommend that
stockholders of The Korea Fund vote FOR the approval of the
New Investment Management Agreement.
12 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
PROPOSAL 2. APPROVAL
OF NEW
SUB-ADVISORY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN RCM AND RCM AP:
At the Meeting, you will be asked to approve a new
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM AP (the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement). Beginning April 1, 2007, RCM AP will
serve as the Funds interim
sub-adviser
pursuant to the interim
sub-advisory
agreement that the Board of Directors approved on
January 25, 2007. A general description of the proposed New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement is included below. The form of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
As discussed under Proposal 1 above, on January 25,
2007, after careful consideration of possible alternatives to
the Funds management and
sub-advisory
arrangements, the Board of Directors, including a majority of
the Independent Directors, determined that it would be in the
best interests of the Fund and its stockholders to approve,
subject to Stockholder approval, the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, pursuant to which RCM AP would become the Funds
new
sub-adviser,
succeeding Deutsche Investment Trust Management Company
Limited (DeITMC). At the meeting, the Board of
Directors also approved an interim
sub-advisory
agreement, as permitted under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which
RCM AP will serve as interim
sub-adviser
to the Fund beginning April 1, 2007. The terms of this
interim
sub-advisory
agreement are substantially identical to those of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, except that the compensation paid by the investment
manager to the
sub-adviser
under the interim agreement is identical to that paid under the
Funds previous
sub-advisory
agreement with DeITMC (the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement) and the termination provisions under the
interim
sub-advisory
agreement require a
10-day
written notice instead of the
60-day
written notice that the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement requires.
Description of
the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement
The Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement provides that DeITMC shall furnish DeIM with
information, investment recommendations, advice and assistance,
as DeIM from time to time reasonably requests. In addition, the
Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement provides that DeITMC shall maintain a separate staff
within its organization to furnish such services exclusively to
DeIM. For the benefit of the Fund, DeITMC has agreed to pay the
fees and expenses of any Directors or officers of the Fund who
are directors, officers or employees of DeITMC or its
affiliates, except that the Fund has agreed to bear certain
travel expenses of such Director, officer or employee to the
extent such expenses relate to the attendance as a Director at a
Board meeting of the Fund.
In return for the services it renders under the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, DeITMC is paid by DeIM monthly compensation which, on
an annual basis, is equal to 0.2875% of the value of the
Funds net assets up to and including $50 million;
0.2750% of the value of such assets on the next
$50 million; 0.2500% of the value of such assets on the
next $250 million; 0.2375% of such assets on the next
$400 million; and 0.2250% of such assets in excess of
$750 million. During the fiscal year ended June 30,
2006, the fees paid by DeIM to DeITMC, pursuant to the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, amounted to $3,403,137.
The Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement further provides that DeITMC shall not be liable for
any act or omission in the course of, connected with or arising
out of any services to be rendered under the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, except by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or
gross negligence on the part of DeITMC in the performance of its
duties or from reckless disregard by DeITMC of its obligations
and duties under the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement.
The Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement may be terminated without penalty upon sixty
(60) days written notice by either party, or by a
majority vote of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund,
and automatically terminates in the event of the termination of
the Funds currently effective investment advisory,
management and administration agreement or in the event of its
assignment.
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 13
Description of
New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and Comparison of New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement
In addition to its parties, term dates and fees (described
below), the provisions of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement of the Fund differ from those of Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement by significantly expanding the services to be provided
by the
Sub-Adviser.
Provisions of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement that have such an effect include:
|
|
|
RCM APs obligation to furnish continuously an investment
program for the Fund and shall make investment decisions on
behalf of the Fund and place all orders for the purchase and
sale of the Funds portfolio securities. In the performance
of its duties, RCM AP will (i) comply with the provisions
of the Funds Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and
Amended and Restated By-Laws, including any amendments thereto,
and the investment objectives, policies and restrictions of the
Fund, (ii) use its best efforts to safeguard and promote
the welfare of the Fund and (iii) comply with other
policies which the Funds Board of Directors or RCM SF, as
the case may be, may from time to time determine. RCM AP and RCM
SF will each make its officers and employees available to the
other from time to time at reasonable times to review the
investment policies of the Fund and to consult with each other
and any other
sub-adviser(s)
to the Fund regarding the investment affairs of the Fund.
|
|
|
RCM APs obligation to be responsible, either directly or
through others it selects, for the daily monitoring of the
investment activities and portfolio holdings of the Funds
portfolio in connection with the Funds compliance with the
Funds investment objectives, policies and restrictions.
RCM AP will also cooperate with and provide sufficient
information to RCM SF to assist with its monitoring of the
investment activities and portfolio holdings of the Fund in
connection with the Funds overall compliance with the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the Funds compliance with
its investment objectives, policies and restrictions, and the
Funds satisfaction of quarterly diversification
requirements for qualification as a regulated investment company
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
|
|
|
RCM APs obligation, at its expense, either directly or
through others that it selects, to furnish (i) all
necessary investment and management facilities, including
salaries of personnel, required for it to execute its duties
faithfully and (ii) administrative facilities, including
bookkeeping, clerical personnel and equipment necessary for the
efficient conduct of the Funds investment affairs,
including verification and oversight of the pricing of the
portfolio securities and other instruments comprising the
Funds portfolio (but excluding determination of net asset
value and shareholder accounting services).
|
|
|
RCM APs obligation, in the selection of brokers or dealers
and the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio
investments for the Fund, to seek to obtain for the Fund the
most favorable price and execution available, except to the
extent RCM AP may be permitted to pay higher brokerage
commissions for brokerage and research services as described
below. In using its best efforts to obtain for the Fund the most
favorable price and execution available, RCM AP, bearing in mind
the Funds best interests at all times, shall consider all
factors it deems relevant, including by way of illustration,
price, the size of the transaction, the nature of the market for
the security, the amount of the commission, the timing of the
transaction taking into account market prices and trends, the
reputation, experience and financial stability of the broker or
dealer involved and the quality of service rendered by the
broker or dealer in other transactions. Subject to such policies
as the Funds Board of Directors may determine, RCM AP
shall not be deemed to have acted unlawfully or to have breached
any duty created by the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement or otherwise solely by reason of its having caused the
Fund to pay a broker or dealer that provides brokerage and
research services to RCM AP an amount of commission for
effecting a portfolio investment transaction
|
14 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
|
|
|
in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer
would have charged for effecting that transaction, if RCM AP
determines in good faith that such amount of commission was
reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and
research services provided by such broker or dealer, viewed in
terms of either that particular transaction or RCM APs
overall responsibilities with respect to the Fund and to other
RCM AP clients as to which RCM AP exercises investment
discretion. RCM SF agrees with RCM AP that any entity or person
associated with RCM AP which is a member of a national
securities exchange is authorized to effect any transaction on
such exchange for the account of the Fund which is permitted by
Section 11(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
Comparison of
Fees
In consideration of the services to be rendered under the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, RCM SF will pay RCM AP a monthly fee which, on an
annual basis, is equal to 0.4000% per annum of the value of
the Funds average daily net assets.
As described above, under the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement, DeIM paid DeITMC a monthly fee which, on an annual
basis, is equal to 0.2875% of the value of the Funds net
assets up to and including $50 million; 0.2750% of the
value of such assets on the next $50 million; 0.2500% of
the value of such assets on the next $250 million; 0.2375%
of such assets on the next $400 million; and 0.2250% of
such assets in excess of $750 million.
As of the end of the Funds last fiscal year, the Fund had
net assets of $1.048 billion, and the investment manager
paid an aggregate fee to the
Sub-Adviser
under its Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement during such period equal to $3,403,137. Had the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement been in effect during this period, the investment
manager would have paid the
Sub-Adviser
an aggregate fee equal to $4,532,231 during such period. Thus,
the aggregate fee under the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement would have been 33% greater than the aggregate fee
under the Current
Sub-Advisory
Agreement had the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement been in effect during the Funds last fiscal year.
Board
Considerations
Because RCM SF pays all
sub-advisory
fees under the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement and remains fully responsible under the New Investment
Management Agreement for the provision of such services as
described above, the Boards considerations in its
approving the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement are incorporated with its considerations in its
approving the New Investment Management Agreement (See
Proposal 1 Board Considerations).
Information about
Sub-Adviser
RCM AP was formed in 2006 and licensed by the Hong Kong SFC and
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in January of
2007. RCM AP is in the process of succeeding to all of Allianz
Global Investors Hong Kong Limiteds equity management
business in Hong Kong as part of a legal restructuring by
Allianz Global Investors of its group companies in the Asia
Pacific. RCM AP is located at 21/F, Cheung Kong Center, 2
Queens Road Central, Central, Hong Kong the assets under
management to which it will succeed to were approximately
$10 billion as of December 31, 2006.
RCM AP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz Global Investors
Asia Pacific GmbH (AGIAP) of Nymphenburger Str.
112-116,
D-80636, Munich,Germany. AGIAP is a German company that is
wholly owned by Allianz Global Investors AG of Nymphenburger
Str.
112-116,
D-80636, Munich,Germany (AGI).
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 15
RCM AP has its principal office at 21/F Cheung Kong Center, 2
Queens Road, Central, Hong Kong. AGI acts as a holding
company for the asset management business of Allianz SE. AGI is
wholly owned by Allianz SE (Allianz) (74.47% is held
directly by Allianz and the remaining share is held via
Allianz-Argos 6 Vermögensverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, which
is wholly owned by Allianz Finanzbeteiligungs GmbH, which in
turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz). Allianzs
principal executive offices are located at
Koeniginstrasse 28, D-80802, Munich, Germany.
The name, address and principal occupation of each of RCM
APs principal executive officers and directors are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Address
|
|
Positions with
RCM AP
|
|
|
Mark Konyn
|
|
21/F Cheung Kong Center,
2 Queens Road, Central, Hong Kong
|
|
Director & Chief Executive
Officer
|
Steve Bryant
|
|
21/F Cheung Kong Center,
2 Queens Road, Central, Hong Kong
|
|
Director & Chief Operating
Officer
|
Raymond Chan
|
|
21/F Cheung Kong Center,
2 Queens Road, Central, Hong Kong
|
|
Director & Chief
Investment Officer & Chairman of the Hong Kong Balanced
Investment Committee
|
Kent Rossiter
|
|
21/F Cheung Kong Center,
2 Queens Road, Central, Hong Kong
|
|
Director & Head of
Regional Asia Pacific Trading
|
|
To the Boards knowledge, there are currently no officers
or directors of the Fund who are also officers, employees, or
directors of or owners of a material interest in RCM AP. In
connection with the proposed transition of the Funds
investment advisory arrangements, it has been proposed that the
following employees of RCM APs affiliates will serve as
officers of the Fund:
|
|
|
Name of
Employee (RCM AP Affiliate Employer)
|
|
Proposed Position
at the Fund
|
|
|
Robert J. Goldstein (an employee of
RCM SF)
|
|
President
|
Youse Guia (an employee of Allianz
Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer
|
Brian Shlissel (an employee of
AGIFM)
|
|
Treasurer
|
Larry Altadonna (an employee of
AGIFM)
|
|
Assistant Treasurer
|
Thomas Fuccillo (an employee of
Allianz Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Secretary
|
Lagan Srivastava (an employee of
Allianz Global Investors of America LP)
|
|
Assistant Secretary
|
|
To the Boards knowledge, no director of the Fund has any
material interest, direct or indirect, in any material
transactions since the beginning of the most recently completed
fiscal year, or in any material proposed transactions, to which
RCM AP or any of its parents or subsidiaries was or is to be a
party.
REQUIRED
VOTE
Approval of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the outstanding voting securities. The term majority
of the outstanding voting securities, as defined in the
1940 Act and as used in this Proxy Statement, means: the
affirmative vote of the lesser of (i) 67% of the voting
securities of the Fund present at the Meeting if more than 50%
of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund are present in
person or by proxy or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding
voting securities of the Fund.
The
directors of The Korea Fund unanimously recommend that
stockholders of The
Korea Fund vote FOR the approval of the New
Sub-Advisory
Agreement.
16 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
PROPOSAL 3. APPROVAL
OF ISSUANCE OF FUND SHARES AT A PRICE BELOW NET ASSET VALUE IN
CONNECTION WITH A CAPITAL GAINS DISTRIBUTION PAYABLE IN FUND
SHARES OR, AT THE ELECTION OF THE STOCKHOLDER, IN
CASH:
As discussed above in Proposal 1, it is expected that RCM
SF and RCM AP will make substantial changes to the Funds
current holdings, which in connection with the transition of the
portfolio will likely result in the realization of a significant
amount of capital gains. As a result, the Fund will realize
large amounts of long-term capital gains. Under the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the Code), the Fund
is required each calendar year to distribute at least 98% of its
capital gain net income for the
12-month
period ending on October 31st in order to avoid an
excise tax; in addition, the Fund would bear tax at the Fund
level on any net capital gain income that is not distributed. If
the Fund makes a capital gains distribution in cash and the Fund
remains fully invested, it will need to sell additional
portfolio securities to raise the cash to make the distribution.
These additional sales will cause the Fund to realize additional
capital gains that in turn must be distributed. As a result of
this cascade, the Fund would shrink, likely causing
an increase in the Funds expense ratio.
In an effort to reduce the need for the Fund to raise cash to
make the distribution (and thereby reduce the effect of any
cascade), the Fund intends to make all or part of
its capital gains distribution in newly issued Fund shares or,
at the election of the stockholder, in cash (a Cash
Election Dividend). Stockholders that do not make any
election, or whose elections are not received before an
appropriate deadline, would receive the distribution in Fund
shares.
Shares issued pursuant to the Cash Election Dividend would be
issued at the lower of (i) market price as of a date
close to the payment date and (ii) net asset value
(NAV) on the pricing date, but not less than 95% of
the closing price on that date. Because the Fund shares have
typically traded at a discount to NAV, it is likely that the
shares issued pursuant to the Cash Election Dividend would be
issued at a price below NAV.
The full amount of the Cash Election Dividend, whether received
in additional Fund shares or cash, will be reportable by
stockholders who are U.S. taxpayers as long-term capital
gain on their U.S. federal income tax returns. In addition,
whether paid in cash or additional Fund shares, the amounts
distributed will be net of any applicable withholding taxes.
If the shares are issued at less than NAV, the issuance of such
shares will result in dilution of the aggregate NAV of the
shares of the Fund held by those stockholders who elect to
receive the Cash Election Dividend in cash, and such
stockholders will, upon completion of the Funds payment of
the Cash Election Dividend, own a smaller proportional interest
in the Fund.
Rule 312.03 of the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) requires that NYSE-listed companies such as
the Fund obtain shareholder approval prior to issuing an amount
of shares representing 20% or more of the voting power
outstanding prior to the issuance of such shares.
Rule 312.03 also requires the Fund to obtain shareholder
approval prior to issuing shares to any substantial security
holder of the Fund. Depending on the identity and number of Fund
shares held by persons electing to receive cash in the Cash
Election Dividend, the dividend could involve an issuance of 20%
or more of the Funds pre-issuance outstanding shares, and
it could also involve an issuance of shares to a substantial
stockholder of the Fund. See Additional Information
below for disclosure as to stockholders beneficially owning more
than 5% of the Funds outstanding shares.
In addition, Section 23(b) of the Investment Company Act of
1940 (the 1940 Act) restricts registered closed-end
funds such as the Fund from issuing their stock at a price below
NAV, although, among other exceptions, it permits such issuances
with the consent of a majority of its common
stockholders. At the
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 17
Meeting, you will be asked to approve the Funds ability to
issue its stock at a price below NAV in connection with its
intended Cash Election Dividend. While the Fund does not believe
that Section 23(b) requires stockholder approval for the
Fund to pay a Cash Election Dividend, the Fund believes that
obtaining stockholder approval would better ensure the
Funds compliance with this provision of the 1940 Act. In
other words, except to the extent required under the NYSE rules,
any decision of the Funds Board of Directors to pay a Cash
Election Dividend is not conditioned on the results of the
stockholders vote on this proposal.
REQUIRED
VOTE
Under the rules of the NYSE, an issuance of shares representing
20% or more of the Funds pre-issuance outstanding voting
power, or an issuance to a substantial security holder of the
Fund, requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the
proposal, provided that the total vote cast on the proposal
represents over 50% in interest of all securities entitled to
vote on the proposal. In addition, approval of the Funds
ability to sell its stock at a price below NAV pursuant to
Section 23(b)(2) of the 1940 Act requires the affirmative
vote of a majority of its common stockholders.
The
directors of The Korea Fund unanimously recommend that
stockholders of The Korea Fund vote FOR the approval of the
Funds ability to sell its stock at a price below NAV in
connection with its Cash Election Dividend.
Additional
Information
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 30(h)
of the 1940 Act, as applied to a closed-end management
investment company, require the Funds Directors and
executive officers, the Funds investment manager (RCM SF,
beginning April 1, 2007), affiliates of the Funds
investment manager, the Funds
sub-adviser
(RCM AP, beginning April 1, 2007), and persons who
beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of
the Funds outstanding securities (all such persons
collectively, Reporting Persons) to file reports of
ownership of the Funds securities and changes in such
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). Such persons are required by
SEC regulations to furnish the Fund with copies of all such
filings.
Based on a review of reports filed by the Funds Directors
and executive officers, the Funds investment manager,
officers and Directors of the investment manager, and affiliated
persons of the Funds investment manager, and written
representations by the Reporting Persons that no year-end
reports were required for such persons, all filings required by
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006 were timely; however, John Robbins, the Chief
Compliance Officer of the Funds previous investment
manager, filed a Form 3 twenty-seven days late. As a
convenience to the Directors, the Funds investment manager
assists the Directors in making their Section 16 filings.
18 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
According to a Schedule 13F filing made with the SEC on
June 30, 2006, the following stockholder owned beneficially
more than 5% of the Funds outstanding common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
of
|
|
|
Title of
Class
|
|
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
Percent of
Class
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
City of London Investment Group,
PLC
c/o City of London Investment Management
Company, Limited, 10 Eastcheap,
London, EC3M ILX, England
|
|
6,527,452 shares1
|
|
24.21%
|
|
|
|
1
|
City of London
Investment Group, PLC held sole voting power and sole investment
power with respect to the above number of shares. City of London
Investment Group, PLC held 6,527,452 shares, or 24.21% of
the Funds outstanding stock, through its control of City
of London Investment Management Company Limited.
|
Except as noted above, to the best of the Funds knowledge,
as of [ ], no other person owned
beneficially more than 5% of the Funds outstanding stock.
Stockholder
Communications with Directors
The Fund has established procedures for stockholders to send
communications to the Board of Directors. Communications should
be sent in writing to the Board of Directors of The Korea Fund,
Inc., c/o Thomas J. Fuccillo, Secretary to the Fund, Allianz
Global Investors, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York,
New York 10105. The Secretary of the Fund will
promptly forward copies of all written correspondence to the
Directors.
Service
Providers
Beginning April 1, 2007, RCM SF will serve as the
Funds interim investment manager under the interim
management agreement. The address of RCM SF is Four Embarcadero
Center, San Francisco, California 94111.
Beginning April 1, 2007, RCM AP will serve as the
Funds interim
sub-adviser
under the interim
sub-advisory
agreement between RCM SF and RCM AP. The address of RCM AP is
21/F., Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queens Road Central,
Central, Hong Kong.
Beginning April 1, 2007, AGIFM will serve as the
Funds
sub-administrator
under the
sub-administration
agreement between RCM SF and AGIFM. The address of AGIFM is 1345
Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105.
Other
Matters
The Board of Directors does not know of any matters to be
brought before the Meeting other than those mentioned in this
Proxy Statement. The appointed proxies will vote on any other
business that comes before the Meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof in their discretion.
Miscellaneous
Proxies will be solicited by mail and may be solicited in person
or by telephone by officers of the Fund or personnel of RCM SF.
The Fund has retained [ ],
[Address] to assist in the proxy solicitation.
[ ] will be paid a fee not to
exceed $[ ] plus expenses. The
costs and expenses connected with the solicitation of proxies by
the Funds officers or [ ], in
person or by telephone, will be borne by the Fund. The Fund will
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 19
reimburse banks, brokers, and other persons holding the
Funds shares registered in their names or in the names of
their nominees, for their expenses incurred in sending proxy
material to and obtaining proxies from the beneficial owners of
such shares.
Solicitation of proxies is being made primarily by the mailing
of this Proxy Statement with its enclosures on or about
[ ], 2007. As mentioned above,
[ ] will assist in the solicitation
of proxies.
As the meeting date approaches, certain stockholders may receive
telephone calls from representatives of
[ ] if their votes have not been
received. Authorization to permit
[ ] to execute proxies may be
obtained by telephonic instructions or electronically
transmitted instructions from stockholders of the Fund. If
proxies are obtained telephonically, they will be recorded in
accordance with procedures that are consistent with applicable
law and that the Fund believes are reasonably designed to ensure
that both the identity of the stockholder casting the vote and
the voting instructions of the stockholder are accurately
determined.
If a stockholder wishes to participate in the Meeting, but does
not wish to give a proxy by telephone, the stockholder may still
submit the proxy card originally sent with this Proxy Statement.
Should stockholders require additional information regarding the
proxy or a replacement proxy card, they may contact
[ ] toll-free at
1-800-[ ].
Any proxy given by a stockholder is revocable until voted at the
Meeting. See Proxy Statement General.
In the event that sufficient votes in favor of any proposal set
forth in the Notice of this Meeting are not received by
[ ], 2007, the persons named as
appointed proxies on the enclosed proxy card may propose one or
more adjournments of the Meeting to permit further solicitation
of proxies. Any such adjournment will require the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the
session of the Meeting to be adjourned. The persons named as
appointed proxies on the enclosed proxy card will vote in favor
of such adjournment those proxies which they are entitled to
vote in favor of the proposal for which further solicitation of
proxies is to be made. They will vote against any such
adjournment those proxies required to be voted against such
proposal. The costs of any such additional solicitation and of
any adjourned session will be borne by the Fund.
Stockholder
Proposals
Stockholders wishing to submit proposals pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act for inclusion in the proxy statement for
the Funds 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, which is
expected to be held in October 2007, should send their written
proposals to Secretary of the Fund, c/o Allianz Global
Investors Fund Management LLC, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, NY 10105, by May 4, 2007. The timely submission of a
proposal does not guarantee its inclusion.
For nominations of candidates for election as Directors (other
than nominations made by or at the recommendation of the
Directors) or other business to be properly brought before the
annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must comply
with the Funds By-Laws, which, among other things, require
that the stockholder must give timely notice thereof in writing
to the Secretary of the Fund, the stockholder must be a
stockholder of record, and the notice must contain the
information about the nomination or other business that is
required by the Funds By-Laws. To be timely, any such
notice must be delivered to or mailed by certified mail, return
receipt requested, and received at the principal executive
offices of the Fund not later than 90 days nor more than
120 days prior to the date of the meeting; provided,
however, that if less than 100 days notice or prior
public disclosure is given or made to stockholders, any such
notice by a stockholder to be timely must be so received not
later than the close of business on the 10th day following
the earlier of
20 THE
KOREA FUND, INC.
the day on which such notice of the date of the annual or
special meeting was given or such public disclosure was made.
The Fund may exercise discretionary voting authority with
respect to stockholder proposals for the 2007 meeting of
stockholders that are not included in the proxy statement and
form of proxy, if notice of such proposals is not received by
the Fund at the above address within the time frame indicated
above. Even if timely notice is received, the Fund may exercise
discretionary voting authority in certain other circumstances.
Discretionary voting authority is the ability to vote proxies
that stockholders have executed and returned to the Fund on
matters not specifically reflected on the form of proxy.
By order of the Board of Directors,
John Millette
Secretary
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154
[ ], 2007
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. 21
Exhibit A
FORM OF
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. A-0.1
Exhibit B
FORM OF
SUB-ADVISORY
AGREEMENT
THE
KOREA FUND,
INC. B-0.1
TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE
THE KOREA FUND, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Special Meeting of Stockholders April 11, 2007
P
R
O
X
Y
The undersigned hereby appoints Thomas Fuccillo,
Brian Schlissel and Lagan Srivastava, and each of them, the proxies of the undersigned,
with full power of substitution in each of them, to represent the undersigned and to vote all
shares of The Korea Fund, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of
Stockholders of The Korea Fund, Inc. at 4:00 p.m., Eastern time, on April 11, 2007, at the offices
of Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Special Meeting of
Stockholders and accompanying Proxy Statement and revokes any proxy previously given with respect
to the meeting.
THIS PROXY, IF PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE
INDICATED ON A PROPERLY EXECUTED PROXY, THE UNDERSIGNEDS VOTE WILL BE CAST FOR EACH PROPOSAL.
PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED.
SEE REVERSE SIDE
THE KOREA FUND, INC. OFFERS STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD
THREE WAYS TO VOTE YOUR PROXY
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you had returned your proxy card. We encourage you to use these cost effective and convenient
ways of voting, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
TELEPHONE VOTING
This method of voting is available for residents of the U.S. and Canada. On a touch tone telephone,
call TOLL FREE 1-[ ]-[ ], 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. You will be asked to enter ONLY the
CONTROL NUMBER shown below. Have your voting instruction card ready, then follow the prerecorded
instructions. Your vote will be confirmed and cast as you direct. Available until [ ] p.m. Eastern
time on [ ], 2007.
INTERNET VOTING
Visit the Internet voting Web site at [ ]. Enter the COMPANY NUMBER AND CONTROL NUMBER shown below
and follow the instructions on your screen. You will incur only your usual Internet charges.
Available until [ ] p.m. Eastern time on [ ], 2007.
VOTING BY MAIL
Simply sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope to [ ]., [Address].
If you are voting by telephone or the Internet, please do not mail your proxy card.
COMPANY NUMBER
CONTROL NUMBER
6 DETACH BELOW AND RETURN USING THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED ONLY IF YOU ARE VOTING BY MAIL 6
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Please mark votes as in this example
|
|
|
The Board of Directors of the Fund recommends that Stockholders vote FOR Proposal 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
THE APPROVAL OF THE NEW INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
FUND AND RCM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors of the Fund recommends that Stockholders vote FOR Proposal 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
THE APPROVAL OF THE NEW SUB-ADVISORY
AGREEMENT BETWEEN RCM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, AND RCM ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors of the Fund recommends that Stockholders vote FOR Proposal 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
THE APPROVAL OF THE ISSUANCE OF FUND
SHARES AT A PRICE BELOW NET ASSET
VALUE IN CONNECTION WITH A CAPITAL
GAINS DISTRIBUTION PAYABLE IN FUND
SHARES (VALUED AT THE LOWER OF
MARKET PRICE OR NET ASSET VALUE) OR,
AT THE ELECTION OF THE STOCKHOLDER, IN CASH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
AGAINST
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
o
|
o
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion on any other business which may properly come before the
meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME OR NAMES APPEAR. WHEN SIGNING AS ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE OR
GUARDIAN, PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL TITLE AS SUCH. |