(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

/X/  No fee required.

/  /  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

(1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)  Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)     Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)     Total fee paid:
/  /     Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
/  /   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)  Amount previously paid:
(2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)  Filing Party:
(4)  Date Filed:

May 5, 2011

Dear Fellow Cedar Fair Unitholders:

We are again asking you to demand a positive change at our Company. It is unfortunate that we even have to pursue this path given the strong message that unitholders resoundingly sent to the Board of Directors and management team a short while ago; however, the Company says that unitholders do not have any right to nominate directors. This presents a problem for anyone who cares about having their vote matter. Without the right to nominate, the right to elect in a plurality voting system (as opposed to a majority voting system) means nothing. For example, if a board were to hypothetically nominate Bernie Madoff for an open slot, there could be no competing candidates offered to unitholders to oppose him.

Now suppose every single unitholder withholds its votes for Bernie Madoff as one would suspect they might. That means that 55 million units do not want Bernie Madoff elected to a company's board. However, all it takes is one single vote for Bernie Madoff to be elected to the board of directors. Just one vote!!! As long as one single unit casts its vote for Bernie Madoff (presumably cast by management since they nominated Bernie Madoff in the first place, and they own a few units), then Bernie Madoff would be elected to the board. Unitholders would be powerless to stop this since they do not have the right to nominate a candidate (no matter how qualified that candidate might be).

The key is that unitholders can only withhold their 55 million votes. They cannot vote for someone they actually like - precisely because they are prevented from nominating candidates. Does this sound like a good situation for unitholders? Obviously, it is not. While we are not implying that a reasonable board would nominate someone like Bernie Madoff as a director, this highlights the enormity of the problem that unitholders currently face without nomination rights.

Fortunately, the Board has recognized that unitholders might want to fix this issue and has proposed two amendments that would allow unitholders to nominate directors for election to the Board. Although we do not see eye-to-eye with the Board on many issues, we do support what the Board has proposed here, and we do give credit where credit is due. Proposal 1 is an amendment to the Regulations to permit the Partnership Agreement to include a provision giving unitholders the right to nominate directors for election to the Board. Proposal 2 is an amendment to the Partnership Agreement to establish certain procedures and information requirements pursuant to which unitholders can nominate directors for election to the Board. Combined, these two amendments are what is necessary to avoid the problem described above.

In order for unitholders to approve Board Proposal 1 and Board Proposal 2 above, the Board set the approval threshold at 80% of the outstanding Units of the Company entitled to vote, consistent with the Regulations, so it is therefore critically important that ALL unitholders (i) check the FOR boxes, (ii) sign and (iii) date their proxy cards. Because of the extremely high threshold set by the Board, each unitholder must vote its Units, as simply not voting will count as a vote AGAINST the Board Proposals.