e10vqza
Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

Commission File No. 1-9158


MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  22-2554549
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

9601 Jeronimo Road
Irvine, California
92618

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 598-6000


Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes  x  No

As of November 19, 2002, 14,568,585 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.



 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K


Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

                     
        (in thousands, except share data)
        As of December 31,   As of September 30,
        2001   2002
       
 
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash
  $ 1,224     $ 545  
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,023 in 2001 and $546 in 2002
    2,396       2,244  
Inventories
    90       86  
Note receivable
    500       750  
Prepaids and other assets
    918       807  
Current assets held for sale
    204       579  
 
   
     
 
   
     Total current assets
    5,332       5,011  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net
    1,221       924  
Notes receivable
    250        
Intangibles, net
    799       1532  
Assets held for sale
    613       563  
Other assets
    73       261  
 
   
     
 
   
     Total assets
  $ 8,288     $ 8,291  
 
   
     
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
               
Current liabilities:
               
 
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ 112     $ 5,856  
 
Line of credit
          2,144  
 
Accounts payable
    1,903       1,479  
 
Customer deposits
    1,164       1,275  
 
Accrued liabilities
    2,402       2,397  
 
Income taxes payable
    235       101  
 
Unearned revenue
    1,743       3,033  
 
Current liabilities held for sale
    1,560       385  
 
   
     
 
   
     Total current liabilities
    9,119       16,670  
Line of credit
    2,424        
Long-term debt
    8,542       2,837  
Other liabilities
    1,195       1,263  
 
   
     
 
   
     Total liabilities
    21,280       20,770  
 
   
     
 
Stockholders’ deficiency:
               
 
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
           
 
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 24,000,000 shares; 13,656,085 and 14,568,585 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2002, respectively
    140       149  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    218,022       218,244  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (361 )     (488 )
 
Unearned compensation
          (100 )
 
Accumulated deficit
    (230,793 )     (230,284 )
 
   
     
 
   
     Total stockholders’ deficiency
    (12,992 )     (12,479 )
 
   
     
 
Commitments and contingencies
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency
  $ 8,288     $ 8,291  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                         
            (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)
            For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
            September 30,   September 30,
            (in thousands, except per share data)   (in thousands, except per share data)
            2001   2002   2001   2002
           
 
 
 
Revenue:
                               
   
Software
  $ 1,254     $ 1,396     $ 4,465     $ 3,787  
   
Network and computer equipment
    375       328       820       731  
   
Services
    4,474       3,987       13,588       12,413  
 
   
     
     
     
 
       
Total revenue
    6,103       5,711       18,873       16,931  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Direct costs:
                               
   
Software
    81       158       427       507  
   
Network and computer equipment
    274       276       421       569  
   
Services
    1,409       1,366       5,000       4,485  
 
   
     
     
     
 
       
Total direct costs
    1,764       1,800       5,848       5,561  
 
   
     
     
     
 
       
Gross profit
    4,339       3,911       13,025       11,370  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    1,985       2,418       5,901       6,828  
Research and development costs
    1,114       797       3,289       2,461  
Amortization of intangibles
    183       25       550       134  
Other operating (income) expense
    8       232       (1,340 )     237  
 
   
     
     
     
 
       
Operating income
    1,049       439       4,625       1,710  
Interest income
    4       1       53       4  
Interest expense
    (410 )     (372 )     (1,273 )     (1,146 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    643       68       3,405       568  
Income taxes
    (1 )     (8 )     (79 )     (16 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    642       60       3,326       552  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (231 )     (223 )     (1,227 )     (43 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
       
Net income (loss)
  $ 411     $ (163 )   $ 2,099     $ 509  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) per share:
                               
 
    Continuing Operations:
                               
     
    Basic income per share
  $ 0.05     $ 0.00     $ 0.26     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
    Diluted income per share
  $ 0.05     $ 0.00     $ 0.26     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
    Discontinued Operations:
                               
     
    Basic income (loss) per share
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.10 )   $ 0.00  
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
    Diluted income (loss) per share
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.10 )   $ 0.00  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
    Net income (loss) per share:
                               
     
    Basic income (loss) per share
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.16     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
    Diluted income (loss) per share
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.16     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
    Weighted average common shares used in determining
    income (loss) per share:
                               
Basic
    13,691       14,569       12,922       14,175  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Diluted
    13,928       14,569       13,113       14,182  
 
   
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

MAI Systems Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

                   
      For the Nine Months Ended
      September 30,
      (in thousands)
      2001   2002
     
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ (655 )   $ 1,933  
 
   
     
 
Cash flows used in investing activities -
               
 
Capital expenditures
    (124 )     (128 )
 
Software development costs
          (615 )
 
   
     
 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (124 )     (743 )
 
   
     
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
 
Net increase (decrease) in line of credit
    18       (280 )
 
Proceeds received from sale of subsidiary
    1,000        
 
Repayments of long-term debt
    (262 )     (89 )
 
Repayments of bridge loan
    (220 )      
 
   
     
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    536       (369 )
 
   
     
 
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations
    (243 )     821  
Net cash used in discontinued operations
    (423 )     (1,487 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    4       (13 )
 
   
     
 
Net change in cash
    (662 )     (679 )
 
   
     
 
Cash at beginning of period
    1,019       1,224  
 
   
     
 
Cash at end of period
  $ 357     $ 545  
 
   
     
 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities (see notes 4 and 8)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

MAI Systems Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Nine Months ended September 30, 2002

(Unaudited)

1.   Basis of Presentation and Liquidity

Companies for which this report is filed are MAI Systems Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). The information contained herein is unaudited, but gives effect to all adjustments (which are normal recurring accruals) necessary, in the opinion of Company management, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim period. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Although the Company believes that the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, which is on file with the SEC.

The Company currently operates in one reportable business segment, which is the hospitality market, focusing primarily on the hotel, motel and resort destinations industry for which we design, sell, install and support enterprise information systems.

Although the Company has a net stockholders’ deficiency of $12,479,000 at September 30, 2002, the Company believes it will continue to generate sufficient funds from operations and obtain additional financing or restructure its subordinated notes with Canyon and CSA as well as its facility with Coast, as needed, to meet its operating and capital requirements. The Company is currently not able to pay its existing debt obligations with Canyon and Coast, which mature in March 2003 and April 2003, respectively and CSA, which matures in October 2003, without significantly modifying the existing terms of such debt. The Company is currently in negotiations with all of its secured creditors to restructure the terms of the existing debt, including extending the maturity dates. The Company expects to generate positive cash flow from its continuing operations during 2002 and 2003 from shipping out products and services from its $3.2 million backlog as of September 30, 2002 as well as new orders. Also, in July 2001, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of its investment in GSI and has received $2.5 million in 2001. The Company expects to receive an additional $500,000 in 2002 and an additional $250,000 to $300,000 in January 2003. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sustain profitability, generate positive cash flow from operations or obtain the necessary renewal and/or restructure of its debt. These financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern. If the Company is unsuccessful in the aforementioned efforts, the Company could be forced to liquidate certain of its assets, reorganize its capital structure and, if necessary, seek other remedies available to the Company.

2.   Inventories

Inventories are summarized as follows:

                 
    (dollars in thousands)
    December 31,   September 30,
    2001   2002
   
 
Finished goods
  $ 75     $ 70  
Replacement parts
    15       16  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 90     $ 86  
 
   
     
 

3.   Plan of Reorganization

In 1993, the Company emerged from a voluntary proceeding under the bankruptcy protection laws. Notwithstanding the confirmation and effectiveness of its Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”), the Bankruptcy Court continues to have jurisdiction to resolve disputed pre-petition claims against the Company to resolve matters related to the assumptions, assignment or rejection of executory contracts pursuant to the Plan and to resolve other matters that may arise in connection with the implementation of the Plan.

5


Table of Contents

Shares of common stock may be distributed by the Company to its former creditors. As of September 30, 2002, 6,738,251 shares of Common Stock had been issued pursuant to the Plan and were outstanding.

4.   Business Acquisitions

HOTEL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. (“HIS”):

Effective August 9, 1996, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of HIS pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. The Company placed approximately 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock issued in connection with the acquisition of HIS in an escrow account to be released in whole, or in part, upon final resolution of post closing adjustments. During the fourth quarter of 1996, arbitration proceedings were initiated regarding the final purchase price of HIS.

In November 1997, the purchase price for the acquisition of HIS was reduced by $931,000 pursuant to arbitration proceedings. As a result, goodwill was reduced by $931,000 and approximately 100,650 shares will be released from the escrow account and returned to the Company. In addition, further claims by the Company against HIS relating to legal costs and certain disbursements currently estimated at $650,000 are presently pending. Resolution of such claims may result in release of additional escrow shares to the Company. Upon settlement, the Company may, as needed, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement and related documents, issue additional shares of Common Stock in order that the recipients ultimately receive shares worth a fair value of $9.25 per share. This adjustment applies to a maximum of 73,466 shares of Common Stock. As of September 30, 2002, the fair market value of the Company’s common stock was $0.17 per share, which would result in approximately 5,138,110 additional shares being issued. Also, included in the escrow account at September 30, 2002 is 200,000 shares of Common Stock which do not have a guarantee of value. The amount and number of shares will be determined based on the final resolution of such claims. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2002, the final purchase price has not been determined.

HOSPITALITY SERVICES & SOLUTIONS (“HSS”):

On June 23, 2002, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Hospitality Services & Solutions pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $32,000, and $75,000 in cash. Additionally, the shareholders of HSS received a 20% minority interest in the Company’s combined operations in Asia. The net assets acquired from HSS are used in the business of software design, engineering and service relating to hotel information systems. The net assets also include subsidiaries of HSS in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.

5.   Business Divestitures

On June 19, 1999, the Company sold its gaming subsidiary (“GSI”). The Company received three promissory notes totaling $4,925,000 with face values of $1,100,000, $1,500,000 and $2,325,000, respectively (“Notes”).

On April 6, 2001 the Company entered into an agreement with the maker of the Notes whereby the maker reconveyed 100% of the Common Stock of GSI to the Company for the purpose of selling GSI to a third party. In connection with the agreement, the Company canceled the Notes and entered into a new $1.1 million secured promissory note with the same party. The maker will be paid a commission of 30% of cash receipts from the third party, which will be first applied to the $1.1 million note and paid in cash to the maker thereafter. On July 27, 2001, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with the third party for approximately $3.2 million whereby all of the assets of GSI were acquired and all of the liabilities assumed, except for approximately $300,000 of obligations, which will remain with GSI. The payment terms under the Agreement required a $1 million non-refundable cash payment to the Company, which was received on July 27, 2001 and a $1.5 million payment, which was received in December 2001. The Company also received a secured promissory note in the amount of $750,000. Under the terms of the secured promissory note, the third party was required to pay $500,000 in April 2002 (See Note 12) and the remaining $250,000 in January 2003. The third party is also required to pay an additional $250,000 in January 2003 subject to a maximum $250,000 reduction pursuant to the resolution of certain uncertainties as of the date of the Agreement.

Due to the uncertainty of collecting the unsecured amount of $250,000, gain recognition on that part of the proceeds has been deferred until collection can be assured. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of GSI of $245,000 in the fourth quarter of 2001.

On October 9, 2001, the Company sold certain rights under customer contracts together with the related assets and liabilities of its domestic Legacy hardware maintenance division to the third party which currently provides the on-site repair and warranty service to the Company’s Legacy hardware maintenance customers. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company retained the software maintenance component of the customer contracts and will continue to provide the software support services directly to the domestic Legacy customer base. Additionally, the third party will be required to pay the

6


Table of Contents

Company approximately 15% of the third party’s hardware maintenance revenue stream relating to the hardware maintenance customer contracts subsequent to October 31, 2003. In connection with the sale, the Company received $328,000 in cash and sold approximately $157,000 of assets consisting of inventory, spare parts, fixed assets and certain accounts receivable. The third party also assumed approximately $1,091,000 of liabilities consisting of accrued liabilities of approximately $366,000 and deferred revenue of approximately $725,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $1,262,000 in October 2001, which is included in other operating income.

6.   Businesses Held For Sale

In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a plan to sell its Process manufacturing and Legacy divisions. The Process manufacturing business division designs, sells, installs and supports total enterprise solutions to the process manufacturing industry. The Legacy business provides a wide array of products and services to its customers who continue to use its proprietary host-based computer systems, including field engineering services, new and replacement equipment, operating systems and software application products. These products and services upgrade, enhance and integrate the legacy systems with currently available computer technologies.

The Company is actively seeking buyers for its Process Manufacturing and Legacy divisions and expects to consummate the sale of these divisions during 2002. These divisions are available for immediate sale subject only to customary terms for such sales.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company has reflected all of the assets and liabilities of Process Manufacturing and Legacy in the consolidated balance sheets as held for sale and the operating results of these businesses have been reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.

Summarized below is historical financial information about Process Manufacturing and Legacy (in thousands):

                                 
    For The Three Months Ended   For The Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2001   2002   2001   2002
   
 
 
 
Revenue
  $ 1,342     $ 585     $ 4,450     $ 2,072  
Income (loss) before income tax
    (231 )     (223 )     (1,227 )     (43 )

7.   Line of Credit and Bridge Loan and Long Term Debt

Line of Credit & Bridge Loan

On July 28, 1999, the Company obtained a Bridge Loan from Coast Business Credit (“Coast”) in the amount of $2,000,000. The Bridge Loan originally bore interest at prime plus 5% (prime plus 8% when default interest rates apply). Loan origination fees of $75,000 paid to Coast in connection with the Bridge Loan were amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan. During the first quarter of 2001, the remaining balance of the Bridge Loan was repaid in full. In April 1998, the Company negotiated a $5,000,000 secured revolving credit facility with Coast. The availability of this facility is based on a calculation using a rolling average of certain cash collections. The facility is secured by all assets, including intellectual property of the Company, and bore interest at prime plus 4.5% and expires on April 30, 2003. The credit facility was amended to allow for aggregate borrowings on an interest only basis under the credit facility not to exceed $3,360,000. In connection with the amendment, the Company agreed to pay Coast a fee of $300,000 (“Loan Fee”) in weekly installments of $35,000 commencing after the Bridge Loan is paid in full. The Loan Fee was fully paid by April 23, 2001. The facility contains various restrictions and covenants, including a minimum consolidated net worth, debt coverage ratio and minimum quarterly profitability. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2002 except for its minimum quarterly profitability covenant of $250,000. Coast has informed the Company that it is in default and that Coast reserves all rights and remedies as provided in the loan agreement. Additionally, the Company capitalized $256,000 of software development costs during the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

At December 31, 2001, approximately $2,579,000 $2,424,400, respectively, was available and drawn down under the credit facility. At September 30, 2002, approximately $2,162,000 and $2,144,000 was available and drawn down under the credit facility.

The Loan Fee of $300,000 is classified in prepaids and other current assets and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the facility.

The Company is currently in negotiations with Coast to restructure the terms of the facility including extending its maturity

7


Table of Contents

date. There can be no assurance that Coast and MAI will come to terms on a restructuring or that management will be successful in finding a replacement lender with acceptable terms.

Long-Term Debt

In March 1997, the Company issued $6,000,000 of 11% subordinated notes payable due in 2004 to an investment fund managed by Canyon Capital Management LP (“Canyon”). In September 1997, this indebtedness was reduced to $5,250,000 through application of a portion of the proceeds realized from the exercise of warrants by Canyon. The notes called for semi-annual interest payments.

The Company and Canyon subsequently entered into a forbearance agreement which provided that the Company pay Canyon weekly interest payments of $12,500 effective January 1, 2000. In addition, the Company executed a security agreement, which provided Canyon with a lien on all of the Company’s tangible and intangible property, which lien is junior to the lien granted to Coast.

On April 13, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Canyon, which waived all existing events of default, accelerated the maturity date to March 3, 2003 and provided for continued weekly interest payments of $12,500. On January 31, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Canyon whereby the specified accrued interest of $431,000 was added to the principal balance of the subordinated notes payable. As part of this agreement, the Company also agreed to pay Canyon an additional $79,000 loan fee, of which $29,000 was added to principal. The principal balance outstanding on the subordinate notes payable to Canyon was approximately $5,690,000 and $5,670,000 at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2002, respectively.

The Company is currently in negotiations with Canyon to restructure the terms of the subordinated notes including extending its maturity date. There can be no assurance that Canyon and MAI will come to terms on a restructuring or that management will be successful in finding a replacement lender with acceptable terms.

In connection with a settlement agreement with CSA (see Note 12), the Company issued $2.8 million of subordinated debt to CSA. The $2.8 million of debt is secured by all of the Company’s assets which is subordinate to Coast and Canyon, accrues interest at 10% per annum and requires payments of $37,500 from March 1, 2002 through September 1, 2002 and monthly payments of $107,500 commencing on October 1, 2002 until October 2003 when all remaining unpaid principal and accrued interest is to be paid in full. The balance outstanding on the subordinate debt to CSA was $2,800,000 at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2002.

The agreement with CSA was revised whereby the Company shall be required to pay the required payments under the subordinated note unless and until it pays $1 million by December 31, 2002. Upon payment of the $1 million, contractual payments under the subordinated note will cease until a final payment in the amount of $400,000 is paid by February 28, 2003. If the Company does not make all of the modified payments to CSA, the subordinated note will revert back to its original terms. As of November 14, 2002, the Company had not made the modified payment nor its October 1, 2002 and November 1, 2002 required payment under the subordinated notes to CSA. CSA has not formally notified the Company of its default. The Company is currently in negotiations with CSA to restructure the terms of the subordinated notes including extending its maturity date. There can be no assurance that CSA and MAI will come to terms on a restructuring or that management will be successful in finding a replacement lender with acceptable terms.

8.   Common Stock

In January and February of 2001, the Company entered into agreements with several creditors to retire approximately $2.1 million of Company obligations in exchange for 798,000 shares of Common Stock and $470,000 of cash. This resulted in a gain of $1,377,000. To fulfill its performance under the agreement, the Company issued the 798,000 shares of its Common Stock and registered the shares with the SEC. The Company was also required to pay the $470,000 to the creditors as prescribed in the respective agreements. All payments required under the agreements were made in 2001 and the first quarter of 2002.

In May 2002, the Company issued 612,500 shares of restricted common stock to its members of the board of directors and certain of its corporate officers. Recipients are not required to provide consideration to the Company other than rendering the service and have the right to vote the shares.

Under SFAS No. 123, compensation cost is recognized for the fair value of the restricted stock awarded, which is its fair market value without restrictions at the date of grant, which was $0.25 per share. The total market value of the shares of $153,125 was treated as unearned compensation and is being amortized to expense in proportion to the vesting schedule through March 2005. The unamortized balance as of September 30, 2002 is $100,000.

8


Table of Contents

9.   Accounting Changes

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 141 and SFAS 142. SFAS 141 requires business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. It also specifies the types of acquired intangible assets that are required to be recognized and reported separate from goodwill. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangibles no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. There was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS 142.

Net income and earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal 2001 adjusted to exclude amortization expense (net of taxes) is as follows:

                     
        For the Three Months   For the Nine Months
        Ended   Ended
        September 30, 2001   September 30, 2001
Net income:
               
 
Reported net income
  $ 411     $ 2,099  
 
Goodwill amortization
    105       315  
 
   
     
 
   
Adjusted net income
  $ 516     $ 2,414  
 
   
     
 
Basic earnings per share:
               
 
Reported basic earnings per share
  $ 0.03     $ 0.16  
 
Goodwill amortization
    0.01       0.02  
 
   
     
 
   
Adjusted basic earnings per share
  $ 0.04     $ 0.18  
 
   
     
 
Diluted earnings per share:
               
 
Reported diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.03     $ 0.16  
 
Goodwill amortization
    0.01       0.02  
 
   
     
 
   
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.04     $ 0.18  
 
   
     
 

As of September 30, 2002, net intangible assets consisted of $917,000 of goodwill and $615,000 of capitalized software. Capitalized software amortization was $64,000 $45,000 and $25,000 during the first, second, and third quarters of 2002, respectively.

10.   Income Per Share of Common Stock

Basic and diluted income per share is computed using the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Consideration is also given in the diluted income per share calculation for the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants.

The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share under the provisions of SFAS 128:

                                 
    For the Three Months Ended   For the Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2001   2002   2001   2002
   
 
 
 
    (in thousands except per share data)   (in thousands except per share data)
Numerator:
                               
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share – net income
  $ 411     $ (163 )   $ 2,099     $ 509  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per share- weighted average number of Common shares outstanding during the period
    13,691       14,569       12,922       14,175  
Incremental common shares attributable to exercise of outstanding shares
    237             191       7  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
    13,928       14,569       13,113       14,182  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.16     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ 0.16     $ 0.04  
 
   
     
     
     
 

9


Table of Contents

The computation does not consider the additional shares of common stock which may be issued in connection with past acquisitions. The number of antidilutive options and warrants that were excluded from the computation of incremental common shares were 2,126,894 and 2,667,272 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively.

11.   Accounting Pronouncements

On October 3, 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long –Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While Statement No. 144 supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long –Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets for Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of that Statement.

Statement No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirement in Opinion 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale.

Statement No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company elected to adopt Statement No. 144 as of December 31, 2001. There was no impact on the statement of operations as a result of the adoption of Statement No. 144.

In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 (“SFAS 145”), “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections, “to update, clarify and simplify existing accounting pronouncements. FASB Statement No. 4, which required all gains and losses from debt extinguishments to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related tax effect, was rescinded. Consequently, FASB Statement No. 64, which amended FASB Statement No. 4, was rescinded because it was no longer necessary. The adoption of SFAS 145 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS 146 addresses accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit An Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). “SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. We do not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material effect on our financial statements.

12.   Legal Proceedings

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings

At September 30, 2002, there was only one material claim to be settled regarding the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings, a tax claim with the United States Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”). The amount of this claim is in dispute. The Company has reserved $712,000 for settlement of this claim, which it is anticipated would be payable to the Service in equal monthly installments over a period of six (6) years from the settlement date at an interest rate of 6%.

CSA Private Limited

CSA is a MAI shareholder. On August 9, 1996, MAI acquired from Hotel Information Systems, Inc. (“HIS”) substantially all their assets and certain of their liabilities (the “HIS Acquisition”). At the time of MAI’s acquisition of HIS in 1996, CSA was a shareholder of HIS and, in connection with the purchase, MAI agreed to issue to CSA shares of its Common Stock worth approximately $4.8 million in August 1996, which amount had increased to approximately $6.8 million as of December 31, 2000, pursuant to the agreement. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with CSA in February, 2001 whereby it (i) issued CSA 1,916,014 additional shares of our Common Stock to bring CSA’s total share ownership to 2,433,333 shares; (ii) filed a registration statement for all of CSA’s shares of our Common Stock which has been declared effective by the SEC so that such shares are now freely tradable; and (iii) executed a secured debt instrument in favor of CSA in the principal sum of $2,800,000 which is subordinate only to the Company’s present group of two (2) senior

10


Table of Contents

secured leaders and required cash installment payments to commence in March 2002 (see note 7).

In connection with the settlement agreement with CSA, the Company recorded the $2.8 million debt issuance as a reduction in paid in capital and the 1,916,014 additional shares at par as an addition to Common Stock and a reduction to additional paid in capital.

Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community

A lawsuit has been filed by Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community (“Cher-Ae Heights”) against Logix Development Corporation (Logix), now known as MAI Development Corporation, as a co-defendant for a breach of contract by the Company’s formerly owned gaming subsidiary along with the new owners, Monaco Informatiques Systemes (“MIS”), who acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the gaming subsidiary on July 27, 2001. Based upon this suit, MIS has informed the Company that it did not intend to pay the next $500,000 due to the Company under a promissory note and security agreement (see note 5). The Company is currently in settlement negotiations with Cher-Ae Heights and MIS to resolve any and all outstanding legal issues associated with Cher-Ae Heights and the July 27, 2001 Agreement and believes that the promissory note will be recoverable through payments from MIS.

Logix Development Corporation

The Company entered into a settlement agreement with Logix in July of 2002 whereby it (i) issued Logix 200,000 shares of our Common Stock (ii) required the Company to make various cash installment payments totaling $175,000 to be paid within 1 year and (iii) executed a contract with Logix for a consulting project in the amount of $50,000.

Other Litigation

The Company is also involved in various other legal proceedings that are incident to its business. Management believes the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

13.   Comprehensive Income

The following table summarizes components of comprehensive income:

                                 
    For The Three Months Ended   For The Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2001   2002   2001   2002
   
 
 
 
Net income
  $ 411     $ (163 )   $ 2,099     $ 509  
Change in cumulative translation Adjustments
    46       (37 )     56       (128 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Comprehensive income
  $ 457     $ (200 )   $ 2,155     $ 381  
 
   
     
     
     
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of cumulative translation adjustments.

14.   Subsequent Events

On December 6, 2002, the Company sold all the assets and certain liabilities of its Canadian operations to the management of this subsidiary pursuant to a stock purchase agreement. In connection with the sale, the Company also entered into a software distribution agreement whereby the buyer has a non-exclusive right and license to market and install the Company’s hospitality products in Canada. The sale resulted in a loss of approximately $630,000, which will be included in the loss from the sale of discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2002.

11


Table of Contents

On December 6, 2002, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement whereby all the assets and certain liabilities of its process manufacturing software division were sold to a third party for cash of $250,000. The sale resulted in a loss of approximately $391,000, which will be included in the loss from the sale of discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2002.

12


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable and intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. This forms the basis of judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition

We record revenue in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended. We license our products through our direct sales force and indirectly through resellers. We recognize revenue from sales of hardware, software and professional services and from arrangements involving multiple elements of each of the above. Revenue for multiple element arrangements are recorded by allocating revenue to the various elements based on their respective fair values as evidenced by vendor specific objective evidence. The fair value in multi-element arrangements is determined based upon the price charged when sold separately. Revenue is not recognized until persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Sales of network and computer equipment are recorded when title and risk of loss transfers. Software revenues are recorded when application software programs are shipped to end users, resellers and distributors, provided the Company is not required to provide services essential to the functionality of the software and/or significantly modify, customize or produce the software. Professional services fees for software development, training and installation are recognized as the services are provided. Maintenance revenues are recorded evenly over the related contract period.

Accounts Receivable

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The amount of our reserves is based on historical experience and our analysis of the accounts receivable balances outstanding. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required which would result in an additional general and administrative expense in the period such determination was made. While such credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past.

Intangible Assets

We record goodwill arising from acquisitions as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and such goodwill was being amortized over a useful life of five to seven years. In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for using the purchase method and provides new criteria for recording intangible assets separately from goodwill. Existing goodwill and intangible assets will be evaluated against these new criteria, which may result in certain intangible assets being subsumed into goodwill. SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives will not be amortized into results of operations, but instead will be evaluated at least annually for impairment and written down when the recorded value exceeds the estimated fair value. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. As a result, the Company has ceased amortization of goodwill, reducing annual amortization expense. In addition, impairment reviews may result in charges against earnings to write down the value of goodwill.

The Company capitalized $256,000 and $615,000 of software development costs during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, respectively, relating to its new N-Tier, Internet-native corporate application suite of products written. Although the Company has not yet sold any of the modules to this suite of applications, the Company believes that

13


Table of Contents

its new product will produce new sales adequate to recover amounts capitalized.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2002, working capital decreased from a working capital deficiency of $3,787,000 at December 31, 2001 to a working capital deficiency of $11,659,000 as an additional $7.9 million of Company debt was classified as current as of September 30, 2002. Excluding unearned revenue of $3,033,000, the Company’s working capital deficiency at September 30, 2002 would be $8,626,000 or a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 0.37 to 1.0. Excluding unearned revenue, working capital deficiency at December 31, 2001 was $2,044,000 with a current ratio of 0.72 to 1.0. Excluding unearned revenue, the increase in the working capital deficiency of $6,582,000 was primarily attributable to an increase in current portion of long-term debt and line of credit of $7,888,000 and customer deposits of $111,000 offset by increases in note receivable of $250,000, current assets held for sale of $375,000 and decreases in accounts payable of $424,000, income taxes payable of $134,000 and current liabilities held for sale of $1,175,000.

Cash was $545,000 at September 30, 2002, as compared to $1,224,000 at December 31, 2001. Availability under the Company’s secured revolving credit facility is based on a calculation using a rolling average of certain cash collections. At September 30, 2002, approximately $2,162,000 was available and $2,144,000 was drawn down under this facility. The facility expires on April 30, 2003.

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, totaled $743,000 which represented capital expenditures of $128,000 and capitalized software of $615,000.

Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 totaled $369,000, which is comprised of a $280,000 decrease in the secured revolving credit facility and $89,000 in repayments of long-term debt. The revolving credit facility requires monthly interest only payments on the average outstanding balance for the period. The Company is required to make weekly payments of $12,500 on the subordinated debt. The facility, and subordinated debt pursuant to an intercreditor agreement between Canyon Capital and Coast Business Credit, contains various restrictions and covenants, including an adjusted minimum consolidated net worth of ($4,758,102) as of September 30, 2002, minimum quarterly debt coverage ratio of 1.1:1 and minimum quarterly profitability of $250,000. In the event that we are not in compliance with the various restrictions and covenants and were unable to receive waivers for non-compliance, the facility and subordinated debt would become immediately due and payable. We were in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2002, except for our minimum quarterly profitability covenant of $250,000. Coast has informed the Company that it is in default and that Coast reserves all rights and remedies as provided in the loan agreement. Additionally, the Company capitalized $256,000 of software development costs during the quarter ended September 30, 2002. The restrictions and covenants are assessed quarterly.

Stockholders’ deficiency decreased from $12,992,000 at December 31, 2001 to $12,479,000 at September 30, 2002, mainly as a result of net income of $509,000 and the issuance of common stock of $231,000 offset by an increase in the accumulated other comprehensive loss of $127,000 and unearned compensation of $100,000.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 totaled $1,933,000 and mainly related to an increase in unearned revenue of $1,040,000, customer deposits of $111,000, net income for the period of $509,000, non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible assets of $775,000 and a decrease in accounts receivable of $260,000 and $191,000 of prepaids and other assets, offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $570,000, accrued liabilities of $132,000, and income taxes payable of $139,000. Net cash used for discontinued operations was $1,487,000. The Company expects that it will generate cash from its operating activities during the next twelve months.

Although the Company has a net stockholders’ deficiency of $12,479,000 at September 30, 2002, the Company believes it will continue to generate sufficient funds from operations and obtain additional financing or restructure its subordinated notes with Canyon and CSA as well as its facility with Coast, as needed, to meet its operating and capital requirements. The Company is currently not able to pay its existing debt obligations with Canyon and Coast, which mature in March 2003 and April 2003, respectively and CSA, which matures in October 2003, without significantly modifying the existing terms of such debt. The Company is currently in negotiations with all of its secured creditors to restructure the terms of the existing debt, including extending the maturity dates. The Company expects to generate positive cashflow from its continuing operations during 2002 and 2003 from shipping out products and services from its $3.2 million backlog as of September 30, 2002 as well as new orders. Also, in July 2001, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of its investment in GSI and has received $2.5 million in 2001. The Company expects to receive an additional $500,000 in 2002 and an additional $250,000 to $300,000 in January 2003. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sustain profitability, generate positive cash flow from operations or obtain the necessary renewal and/or restructure of its debt. These financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern. If the

14


Table of Contents

Company is unsuccessful in the aforementioned efforts, the Company could be forced to liquidate certain of its assets, reorganize its capital structure and, if necessary, seek other remedies available to the Company.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes the Company’s obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2002:

                                         
            Payments Due by Period (in thousands)        
           
       
            Less Than                        
Contractual Cash Obligations   Total   1 Year   1-3 Years   4-5 Years   After 5 Years

 
 
 
 
 
Long-Term Debt
  $ 8,787     $ 5,928     $ 2,607     $     $ 252  
Line of Credit
    2,144       2,144                    
Operating Leases
    1,372       765       540       67        
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 12,303     $ 8,837     $ 3,147     $ 67     $ 252  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 

15


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

                                 
    September 30,   Percentage of   September30,   Percentage of
    2001   Revenue   2002   Revenue
   
 
 
 
    (in thousands)           (in thousands)        
Revenue
  $ 6,103       100.0 %   $ 5,711       100.0 %
Gross profit
    4,339       71.1 %     3,911       68.5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    1,985       32.5 %     2,418       42.3 %
Research and development costs
    1,114       18.3 %     797       14.0 %
Amortization of intangibles
    183       3.0 %     25       0.4 %
Other operating income
    8       0.1 %     232       4.1 %
Interest expense, net
    406       6.7 %     371       6.5 %
Income taxes
    1       0.0 %     8       0.1 %
Loss from discontinued operations
    (231 )     (3.8 )%     (223 )     (3.9 )%
Net income
  $ 411       6.7 %   $ (163 )     (2.9 )%

Revenue for 2002 was $5,711,000 compared to $6,103,000 in 2001 or a 6.4% decrease. Revenue decreased $392,000 in 2002, as a result of decreased professional services and maintenance services mainly due to decreased capital spending on information technology in 2002 due to the effects of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the hospitality industry.

The decrease in revenue in 2002 was mainly attributable to a decrease in services as many hotels have reduced their operating costs by canceling or reducing contracted services, including support, in a post September 11, 2001 economy. Many hotels have requested that their suppliers reduce the cost of service or delay any price while they are experiencing reduced guest occupancy and lower average daily rates on their inventory of rooms. Certain hotels have also established their own help desks to further reduce costs. As a result, the Company did not raise support prices in 2002 and agreed, with certain of its clients, to provide a second line of support versus a first line of support that was previously provided to such clients. Our continuing hospitality business unit continues to generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund its ongoing operating activities.

Gross profit for 2002 decreased to $3,911,000 (68.5%) from $4,339,000 (71.1%) in 2001. The decrease in gross profit is mainly due to the decrease in professional services and maintenance services revenues during the period in excess of the Company’s cost reductions. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased from $1,985,000 in 2001 to $2,418,000 in 2002. The increase is mainly due to an increase in selling & marketing, expenses for trade shows, advertisements and additional head count and other employee related expenses as the Company actively markets components of its newly developed enterprise suite of applications. Additionally, approximately $225,000 was expensed to S,G&A during the period in connection with the Company’s legal settlement with Logix.

The decrease in research and development costs in 2002 was due to the capitalization of approximately $257,000 of software development costs associated with the Company’s new product development for hospitality. There were no such costs capitalized in 2001.

The decrease in amortization of intangibles in 2002 versus the comparable period of 2001 is due to the fact that goodwill is no longer amortized to expense commencing January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization was $105,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

Net interest expense was $406,000 in 2001 compared to $371,000 in 2002. The decrease is mainly due to the Company not incurring interest expense for the Bridge Loan in 2002. The Bridge loan was paid in full in 2001.

The income tax provision reflects a tax provision for our foreign operations only and alternative minimum taxes for domestic operations due to the utilization for net operating loss carry forward in 2001 and 2002.

Results from discontinued operations improved from a loss of $231,000 in 2001 to loss of $223,000 in 2002 as a result of decreased Process Manufacturing operating expenses from $866,000 in 2001 to $401,000 in 2002. Revenue from discontinued operations decreased from $1,342,000 in 2001 to $585,000 in 2002. Revenue from Process Manufacturing decreased from $482,000 in 2001 to $339,000 in 2002 as the process business unit continued its transition from a direct selling model to a reseller model and completed development of new products. During 2000, we focused on developing enhancements to our CIMPRO V and CIMPRO classic process manufacturing products which were released in late 2001 and early 2002. Additionally, consistent with our strategy to focus on providing software and services to our vertical markets, our legacy revenue (traditional hardware contract service revenues and proprietary add-on sales) declined $614,000 (71.3%) from $860,000 in 2001 to $246,000 in 2002, largely due to the sale of its domestic legacy hardware

16


Table of Contents

business in October 2001 and expected decreased volume and customers replacing their legacy systems. The Company is actively engaged in selling its businesss units classified as discontinued operations.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

                                 
    September 30,   Percentage of   September 30,   Percentage of
    2001   Revenue   2002   Revenue
   
 
 
 
    (in thousands)         (in thousands)    
Revenue
  $ 18,873       100.0 %   $ 16,931       100.0 %
Gross profit
    13,025       69.0 %     11,370       67.2 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    5,901       31.3 %     6,828       40.4 %
Research and development costs
    3,289       17.4 %     2,461       14.6 %
Amortization of intangibles
    550       2.9 %     134       0.8 %
Other operating (income) expense
    (1,340 )     (7.1 )%     237       1.4 %
Interest expense, net
    1,220       6.5 %     1,142       6.8 %
Income taxes
    79       0.4 %     16       0.1 %
Loss from discontinued operations
    (1,227 )     (6.5 )%     (43 )     (0.3 )%
 
                               
Net income
  $ 2,099       11.1 %   $ 509       3.0 %

Revenue for 2002 was $16,931,000 compared to $18,873,000 in 2001 or a 10.5% decrease. Revenue decreased $688,000 in 2002, as a result of decreased professional services and maintenance services mainly due to decreased capital spending on information technology in 2002 due to the effects of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the hospitality industry.

The decrease in revenue in 2002 was mainly attributable to a decrease in services as many hotels have reduced their operating costs by canceling or reducing contracted services, including support, in a post September 11, 2001 economy. Many hotels have requested that their suppliers reduce the cost of service or delay any price increases while they are experiencing reduced guest occupancy and lower average daily rates on their inventory of rooms. Certain hotels have also established their own help desks to further reduce costs. As a result, the Company did not raise support prices in 2002 and agreed, with certain of its clients, to provide a second line of support versus a first line of support that was previously provided to such clients. Our continuing hospitality business unit continues to generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund its ongoing operating activities.

Gross profit for 2002 decreased to 11,370,000 (67.2%) from $13,025,000 (69.0%) in 2001. The decrease in gross profit is mainly due to the decrease in professional services and maintenance services revenues during the period in excess of the Company’s cost reductions. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased from $5,901,000 in 2001 to $6,828,000 in 2002. The increase is mainly due to an increase in selling & marketing, expenses for trade shows, advertisements and additional head count and other employee related expenses as the Company actively markets components of its newly developed enterprise suite of applications. Additionally, approximately $225,000 was expensed to S,G&A during the period in connection with the Company’s legal settlement with Logix.

The decrease in research and development costs in 2002 was due to the capitalization of approximately $615,000 of software development costs associated with the Company’s new product development for hospitality. There were no such costs capitalized in 2001.

The decrease in amortization of intangibles in 2002 versus the comparable period of 2001 is due to the fact that goodwill is no longer amortized to expense commencing January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization was $315,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Other operating (income) expense was ($1,340,000) in 2001 and $237,000 in 2002. The decrease in other operating income in 2002 is mainly due to the Company issuing Common Stock to certain creditors to satisfy its obligations, which resulted in a gain of $1,377,000 in the first quarter of 2001. There were no such transactions in 2002.

Net interest expense was $1,220,000 in 2001 compared to $1,142,000 in 2002. The decrease is mainly due to the Company not incurring interest expense for the Bridge Loan in 2002. The Bridge loan was paid in full in 2001.

The income tax provision only reflects a tax provision for our foreign operations and alternative minimum taxes for domestic operations due to the utilization for net operating loss carry forward in 2001 and 2002.

Results from discontinued operations improved from a loss of $1,227,000 in 2001 to loss of $43,000 in 2002 as a result of decreased Process Manufacturing operating expenses from $2,819,000 in 2001 to $1,039,000 in 2002. Revenue from discontinued operations decreased from $4,450,000 in 2001 to $2,073,000 in 2002. Revenue from Process Manufacturing decreased from $1,565,000 in 2001 to $1,172,000 in 2002 as the process business unit continued its transition from a direct selling model to a reseller model and completed development of new products. During 2000, we focused on developing

17


Table of Contents

enhancements to our CIMPRO V and CIMPRO classic process manufacturing products which were released in late 2001 and early 2002. Additionally, consistent with our strategy to focus on providing software and services to our vertical markets, our legacy revenue (traditional hardware contract service revenues and proprietary add-on sales) declined $1,984,000 (68.8%) from $2,885,000 to $901,000, largely due to the sale of its domestic legacy hardware business in October 2001 and expected decreased volume and customers replacing their legacy systems.

Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market Risk Disclosures

The following discussion about the Company’s market risk disclosures contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not have derivative financial instruments for hedging, speculative, or trading purposes.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Of the Company’s approximate $10.8 million principal amount of indebtedness at September 30, 2002, approximately $2.1 million bears interest at a rate that fluctuates based on changes in prime rate. A one percentage point change in the underlying prime rate would result in an approximately $21,000 change in the annual amount of interest payable on such debt. Of the remaining amount of approximately $8.7 million, $5.6 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 11%, $2.8 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 10% and $300,000 bears fixed interest rates ranging from 6% to 17.5%.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Company believes that its exposure to currency exchange fluctuation risk is insignificant because the Company’s transactions with international vendors are generally denominated in US dollars. The currency exchange impact on intercompany transactions was immaterial for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

Item 4. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

  (a)   Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date (“Evaluation Date”) within 90 days before the filing date of this quarterly report, have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities.

  (b)   Changes in internal controls

There were no significant changes in our internal controls or to our knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

18


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings

At September 30, 2002, there was only one material claim to be settled regarding the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings, a tax claim with the United States Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”). The amount of this claim is in dispute. The Company has reserved $712,000 for settlement of this claim, which it is anticipated would be payable to the Service in equal monthly installments over a period of six (6) years from the settlement date at an interest rate of 6%.

CSA Private Limited

CSA is a MAI shareholder. On August 9, 1996, MAI acquired from Hotel Information Systems, Inc. (“HIS”) substantially all their assets and certain of their liabilities (the “HIS Acquisition”). At the time of MAI’s acquisition of HIS in 1996, CSA was a shareholder of HIS and, in connection with the purchase, MAI agreed to issue to CSA shares of its Common Stock worth approximately $4.8 million in August 1996, which amount had increased to approximately $6.8 million as of December 31, 2000, pursuant to the agreement. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with CSA in February, 2001 whereby it (i) issued CSA 1,916,014 additional shares of our Common Stock to bring CSA’s total share ownership to 2,433,333 shares; (ii) filed a registration statement for all of CSA’s shares of our Common Stock which has been declared effective by the SEC so that such shares are now freely tradable; and (iii) executed a secured debt instrument in favor of CSA in the principal sum of $2,800,000 which is subordinate only to the Company’s present group of two (2) senior secured leaders and required cash installment payments to commence in March 2002 (see note 7 to the financial statements).

In connection with the settlement agreement with CSA, the Company recorded the $2.8 million debt issuance as a reduction in paid in capital and the 1,916,014 additional shares at par as an addition to Common Stock and a reduction to additional paid in capital.

Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community

A lawsuit has been filed by Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community (“Cher-Ae Heights”) against Logix Development Corporation (Logix), now known as MAI Development Corporation, as a co-defendant for a breach of contract by the Company’s formerly owned gaming subsidiary along with the new owners, Monaco Informatiques Systemes (“MIS”), who acquired the assets and certain liabilities of the gaming subsidiary on July 27, 2001. Based upon this suit, MIS has informed the Company that it did not intend to pay the next $500,000 due to the Company under a promissory note and security agreement (see note 5 to the financial statements). The Company is currently in settlement negotiations with Cher-Ae Heights and MIS to resolve any and all outstanding legal issues associated with Cher-Ae Heights and the July 27, 2001 Agreement and believes that the promissory note will be recoverable through payments from MIS.

Logix Development Corporation

The Company entered into a settlement agreement with Logix in July of 2002 whereby it (i) issued Logix 200,000 shares of our Common Stock (ii) required the Company to make various cash installment payments totaling $175,000 to be paid within 1 year and (iii) executed a contract with Logix for a consulting project in the amount of $50,000.

Other Litigation

The Company is also involved in various other legal proceedings that are incident to its business. Management believes the ultimate outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

  (a)   None.
 
  (b)   None.
 
  (c)   None
 
  (d)   None.

19


Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

  (a)   None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  (a)   None

Item 5. Other Information

      None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

  (a)   Exhibits
 
  99.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer, W. Brian Kretzmer, as required by Sections 3.02 and 9.06 of Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  99.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer, James W. Dolan, as required by Sections 3.02 and 9.06 of Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  (b)   Reports on Form 8-K: None.

* Previously filed

20


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

     
    MAI SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
     
Date: November 19, 2002   /s/James W. Dolan
   
    James W. Dolan
    Chief Financial and Operating Officer
    (Chief Financial and Accounting Officer)

21


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William B. Kretzmer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

             
Date: November 19, 2002   By:   /s/ William B. Kretzmer
   
       
   
        William B. Kretzmer    
        Chief Executive Officer    

22


Table of Contents

I, James W. Dolan, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI Systems Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

         
Date: November 19, 2002   By:   /s/ James W. Dolan
       
        James W. Dolan
        Chief Financial and Operating Officer

23