POL-2013.12.31-10-K
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-16091
PolyOne Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Ohio | | 34-1730488 |
| |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| |
33587 Walker Road, | | 44012 |
Avon Lake, Ohio | | (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (440) 930-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Shares, par value $.01 per share | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer £ | | Non-accelerated filer £ | | Smaller reporting company £ |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding common shares held by non-affiliates on June 28, 2013, determined using a per share closing price on that date of $24.78, as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, was $2,288,423,509.
The number of shares of common shares outstanding as of January 31, 2014 was 94,765,479.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporates by reference certain information from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
PART I
CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, statements that are not reported financial results or other historical information are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give current expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. They are based on management’s expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance and/or sales. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions; prospective changes in raw material costs, product pricing or product demand; future performance; estimated capital expenditures; results of current and anticipated market conditions and market strategies; sales efforts; expenses; the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings; and financial results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| |
• | the effect on foreign operations of currency fluctuations, tariffs and other political, economic and regulatory risks; |
| |
• | changes in polymer consumption growth rates where we conduct business; |
| |
• | changes in global industry capacity or in the rate at which anticipated changes in industry capacity come online in the industries in which we participate; |
| |
• | fluctuations in raw material prices, quality and supply, and in energy prices and supply; |
| |
• | production outages or material costs associated with scheduled or unscheduled maintenance programs; |
| |
• | unanticipated developments that could occur with respect to contingencies such as litigation and environmental matters, including any developments that would require any increase in our costs and/or reserves for such contingencies; |
| |
• | an inability to achieve or delays in achieving or achievement of less than the anticipated financial benefit from initiatives related to working capital reductions, cost reductions and employee productivity goals; |
| |
• | an inability to raise or sustain prices for products or services; |
| |
• | an inability to maintain appropriate relations with unions and employees; |
| |
• | the speed and extent of an economic recovery, including the recovery of the housing markets; |
| |
• | the financial condition of our customers, including the ability of customers (especially those that may be highly leveraged and those with inadequate liquidity) to maintain their credit availability; |
| |
• | disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the credit markets that may limit our access to capital; |
| |
• | other factors affecting our business beyond our control, including, without limitation, changes in the general economy, changes in interest rates and changes in the rate of inflation; |
| |
• | the amount and timing of repurchases, if any, of PolyOne common shares; |
| |
• | our ability to pay regular quarterly cash dividends and the amounts and timing of any future dividends; |
| |
• | our ability to realize anticipated savings and operational benefits from the realignment of assets, including the planned closure of certain manufacturing facilities; the timing of closings and shifts of production to new facilities related to asset realignments and any unforeseen disruptions of service or quality caused by such closings and/or production shifts; separation and severance amounts that differ from original estimates, amounts for non-cash charges related to asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation realignments of property, plant and equipment, that differ from original estimates; |
| |
• | our ability to identify and evaluate acquisition targets and consummate acquisitions; |
| |
• | the ability to successfully integrate acquired companies into our operations, retain the management teams of acquired companies, and retain relationships with customers of acquired companies, including, without limitation, ColorMatrix, Glasforms and Spartech; |
| |
• | other factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” |
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our reports on Forms 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K furnished to the SEC. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Business Overview
We are a premier provider of specialized polymer materials, services and solutions with operations in specialty polymer formulations, color and additive systems, plastic sheet and packaging solutions and polymer distribution. We are also a highly specialized developer and manufacturer of performance enhancing additives, liquid colorants and fluoropolymers and silicone colorants. Headquartered in Avon Lake, Ohio, we have employees at sales, manufacturing and distribution facilities in North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. We provide value to our customers through our ability to link our knowledge of polymers and formulation technology with our manufacturing and supply chain capabilities to provide value added solutions to designers, assemblers and processors of plastics (our customers). When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” mean PolyOne Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
PolyOne was formed on August 31, 2000 from the consolidation of The Geon Company (Geon) and M.A. Hanna Company (Hanna). Geon’s roots date back to 1927 when BFGoodrich scientist Waldo Semon produced the first usable vinyl polymer. In 1948, BFGoodrich created a vinyl plastic division that was subsequently spun off through a public offering in 1993, creating Geon, a separate publicly-held company. Hanna was formed in 1885 as a privately-held company and became publicly-held in 1927. In the mid-1980s, Hanna began to divest its historic mining and shipping businesses to focus on polymers. Hanna purchased its first polymer company in 1986 and completed its 26th polymer company acquisition in 2000.
PolyOne Corporation is incorporated in Ohio and headquartered in Avon Lake, Ohio. We employ approximately 7,000 people and have 85 manufacturing sites and 8 distribution facilities in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. We offer more than 35,000 polymer solutions to over 10,000 customers across the globe. In 2013, we had sales of $3.8 billion, 33% of which were to customers outside the United States.
We provide value to our customers with solutions built upon our ability to leverage our polymer and formulation expertise with our operational capabilities, being the essential link between large chemical producers (our raw material suppliers) and designers, assemblers and processors of plastics (our customers). We believe that our role in the value chain continues to become more essential as our customers need reliable suppliers with global reach and more effective solutions to improve their profitability and competitive advantage. Our goal is to provide our customers with specialized materials and service solutions through our global reach, broad market knowledge, technical expertise, product breadth, efficient manufacturing operations, a fully integrated information technology network, and raw material procurement leverage. Our end markets are primarily in transportation, packaging, building and construction, industrial, healthcare, consumer, wire and cable, electrical and electronics, and appliance.
Polymer Industry Overview
Polymers are a class of organic materials that are generally produced by converting natural gas or crude oil derivatives into monomers, such as ethylene, propylene, vinyl chloride and styrene. These monomers are then polymerized into chains called polymers, or plastic resin, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, in their most basic forms. Large petrochemical companies, including some in the petroleum industry, produce a majority of the monomers and base resins because they have direct access to the raw materials needed for production. Monomers make up the majority of the variable cost of manufacturing the base resin. As a result, the cost of a base resin tends to move in tandem with the industry market prices for monomers and the cost of raw materials and energy used during production. Resin selling prices can move in tandem with costs, but are largely driven by supply and demand balances.
Thermoplastic polymers make up a substantial majority of the resin market and are characterized by their ability to be reshaped repeatedly into new forms after heat and pressure are applied. Thermoplastics offer versatility and a wide range of applications. The major types of thermoplastics include polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester and a range of specialized engineering resins. Each type of thermoplastic has unique qualities and characteristics that make it appropriate for use in a particular application. Thermoplastic composites include these base resins, but are combined with a structural filler such as glass, carbon or polymer fibers to enhance strength, rigidity and structure. Further performance can be delivered through an engineered thermoplastic sheet or thick film, which may incorporate more than one resin formulation or composite in multiple layers to impart additional properties such as gas barrier, structural integrity and lightweighting.
Thermoplastic and polymer composites are found in a variety of end-use products and markets, including packaging, building and construction, wire and cable, transportation, medical, furniture and furnishings, durable goods, institutional products, electrical and electronics, adhesives, inks and coatings. Each type of thermoplastic resin has unique characteristics (such as flexibility, strength or durability) suitable for use in a particular end-use application. The packaging industry requires plastics that help keep food fresh and free of contamination while providing a variety of options for product display, and offering advantages in terms of weight and user-friendliness. In the building and construction industry, plastic provides an economical and energy efficient replacement for other traditional materials in piping applications, siding, flooring, insulation, windows and doors, as well as structural and interior or decorative uses. In the wire and cable industry, thermoplastics serve to protect by providing electrical insulation, flame resistance, durability, water resistance, and color coding to wire coatings and connectors. In the transportation industry, plastic has proven to be durable, lightweight and corrosion resistant while offering fuel savings, design flexibility and high performance, often replacing traditional materials such as metal and glass. In the medical industry, plastics are used for a vast array of devices and equipment, including blood and intravenous bags, medical tubing, catheters, lead replacement for radiation shielding, clamps and connectors to bed frames, curtains and sheeting, electronic enclosures and equipment housings. In the electronics industry, plastic enclosures and connectors not only enhance safety through electrical insulation, but thermally and electrically conductive plastics provide heat transferring, cooling, antistatic, electrostatic discharge, and electromagnetic shielding performance for critical applications including integrated circuit chip packaging.
Various additives can be formulated with a base resin and further engineered into a structure to provide them with greater versatility and performance. Polymer formulations and structures have advantages over metals, wood, rubber, glass and other traditional materials, which have resulted in the replacement of these materials across a wide spectrum of applications that range from automobile parts to construction materials. These specialized polymers offer advantages compared to traditional materials that include design freedom, processability, weight reduction, chemical resistance, flame retardance and lower cost. Plastics are renown for their durability, aesthetics, ease of handling and recyclability.
PolyOne Segments
We operate in five reportable segments: (1) Global Specialty Engineered Materials; (2) Global Color, Additives and Inks; (3) Designed Structures and Solutions; (4) Performance Products and Solutions; and (5) PolyOne Distribution.
On May 30, 2013, we sold our vinyl dispersion, blending and suspension resin assets (the "Resin Business") to Mexichem Specialty Resins Inc. (Mexichem). As a result of the sale, the Resin Business has been removed from the Performance Products and Solutions segment and presented as a discontinued operation in all periods presented.
On March 13, 2013 PolyOne acquired Spartech Corporation (Spartech), a supplier of sustainable plastic sheet, color and engineered materials, and packaging solutions, based in Clayton, Missouri. The Spartech acquisition expands PolyOne's specialty portfolio with adjacent technologies in attractive end markets where we already participate, as well as new end markets such as aerospace and security. By combining Spartech's leading market positions in sheet, rigid barrier packaging and specialty cast acrylics with PolyOne's capabilities, we believe we can better serve our customers and accelerate growth.
Spartech's results have been reflected within our Consolidated Statements of Income and within our newly created Designed Structures and Solutions segment, as well as within our existing Global Specialty Engineered Materials, Global Color, Additives and Inks and Performance Products and Solutions segments, since the date of acquisition.
Our segments are further discussed in Note 16, Segment Information.
Global Specialty Engineered Materials
Global Specialty Engineered Materials is a leading provider of specialty polymer formulations, services and solutions for designers, assemblers and processors of thermoplastic materials across a wide variety of markets and end-use applications. Our product portfolio, which we believe to be one of the most diverse in our industry, includes specialty formulated high-performance polymer materials that are manufactured using thermoplastic resins and elastomers, which are then combined with advanced polymer additives, reinforcement, filler, colorant and/or biomaterial technologies. Our technical and market expertise enables us to expand the performance range and structural properties of traditional engineering-grade thermoplastic resins to meet evolving customer needs. Global Specialty Engineered Materials has manufacturing, sales and service facilities located throughout North America, Europe, Asia and South America. Our product development and application reach is further enhanced by the capabilities of our Innovation Centers in the United States, Germany and China, which produce and evaluate prototype and sample parts to help assess end-use performance and guide product development. Our manufacturing capabilities are targeted at meeting our customers’ demand for speed, flexibility and critical quality.
On December 19, 2012, the Company acquired Glasforms, Inc. (Glasforms), a leading manufacturer of glass and carbon fiber reinforced polymers and advanced composite products. Glasforms results are included within the Global Specialty Engineered Materials segment.
Global Color, Additives and Inks
Global Color, Additives and Inks is a leading provider of specialized custom color and additive concentrates in solid and liquid form for thermoplastics, dispersions for thermosets, as well as specialty inks, plastisols, and vinyl slush molding solutions. Color and additive solutions include an innovative array of colors, special effects and performance-enhancing and eco-friendly solutions. When combined with a non-base resin, our solutions help customers achieve differentiated specialized colors and effects targeted at the demands of today’s highly design-oriented consumer and industrial end markets. Our additive concentrates encompass a wide variety of performance and process enhancing characteristics and are commonly categorized by the function that they perform, such as UV stabilization, antimicrobial, anti-static, blowing or foaming, antioxidant, lubricant, and productivity enhancement. Our colorant and additives concentrates are used in a broad range of polymers, including those used in medical and pharmaceutical devices, food packaging, personal care and cosmetics, transportation, building products, wire and cable markets. We also provide custom-formulated liquid systems that meet a variety of customer needs and chemistries, including vinyl, natural rubber and latex, polyurethane and silicone. Our offering also includes proprietary inks and latexes for diversified markets such as recreational and athletic apparel, construction and filtration, outdoor furniture and healthcare. Our liquid polymer coatings and additives are largely based on vinyl and are used in a variety of markets, including building and construction, consumer, healthcare, industrial, packaging, textiles, appliances, transportation, and wire and cable. Global Color, Additives and Inks has manufacturing, sales and service facilities located throughout North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Africa.
On December 21, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity of ColorMatrix for $486.1 million, net of cash acquired. ColorMatrix is a highly specialized developer and manufacturer of performance enhancing additives, liquid colorants, and fluoropolymer and silicone colorants.
Designed Structures and Solutions
On March 13, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of Spartech, a supplier of plastic sheet, color and engineered materials, and packaging solutions. As a result of the acquisition, a new reportable segment, "Designed Structures and Solutions", was created. Designed Structures and Solutions is comprised of the former Spartech Custom Sheet and Rollstock and Packaging Technologies businesses. We believe PolyOne's Designed Structures and Solutions segment is a market leader in providing specialized, full service and innovative solutions in engineered polymer structures, rigid barrier packaging and specialty cast acrylics. We utilize a variety of polymers, specialty additives and processing technologies to produce a complete portfolio of sheet, custom rollstock and specialty film, laminate and acrylic solutions. Our solutions can be engineered to provide structural or functional performance in an application or deliver design and visual aesthetics to meet our customers’ needs. Our offering also includes a wide range of sustainable, cost-effective stock and custom packaging solutions for various industry processes used in the food, medical, consumer and graphic arts markets. In addition to packaging, we also work closely with customers to provide solutions for transportation, building and construction, healthcare and consumer markets. Designed Structures and Solutions has manufacturing, sales and service facilities located throughout North America.
Performance Products and Solutions
Performance Products and Solutions is comprised of the Geon Performance Materials and Producer Services business units. The Geon business delivers an array of products and services for vinyl molding and extrusion processors located in North America and Asia. The Geon brand name carries strong recognition globally. Geon Performance Materials' products are sold to manufacturers of durable plastic parts and consumer-oriented products. We also offer a wide range of services including materials testing, component analysis, custom formulation development, colorant and additive services, part design assistance, structural analysis, process simulations, mold design and flow analysis and extruder screw design. Vinyl is used across a broad range of markets and applications, including, but not limited to: wire and cable, healthcare, building and construction, consumer and recreational products and transportation and packaging. The Producer Services business unit offers contract manufacturing and outsourced polymer manufacturing services to resin producers and polymer marketers, primarily in the United States and Mexico, as well as its own proprietary compounds for pressure pipe and drip irrigation applications. As a strategic and integrated supply chain partner, Producer Services offers resin producers a way to develop custom products for niche markets by using our process technology expertise and multiple manufacturing platforms.
PolyOne Distribution
The PolyOne Distribution business distributes more than 3,500 grades of engineering and commodity grade resins, including PolyOne-produced solutions, principally to the North American and Asian markets. These products are sold to over 6,000 custom injection molders and extruders who, in turn, convert them into plastic parts that are sold to end-users in a wide range of industries. Representing over 25 major suppliers, we offer our customers a broad product portfolio, just-in-time delivery from multiple stocking locations and local technical support. Recent expansion in Central America and Asia have bolstered PolyOne Distribution's ability to serve the specialized needs of customers globally.
Competition
The production of plastics and the manufacturing of custom and proprietary formulated color and additives systems for the plastics industry are highly competitive. Competition is based on service, performance, product innovation, product recognition, speed, delivery, quality and price. The relative importance of these factors varies among our products and services. We believe that we are the largest independent formulator of plastic materials and producer of custom and proprietary color and additive systems in the United States and Europe, with a growing presence in Asia and South America. Our competitors range from large international companies with broad product offerings to local independent custom producers whose focus is a specific market niche or product offering.
The distribution of polymer resin is also highly competitive. Speed, service, reputation, product line, brand recognition, delivery, quality and price, are the principal factors affecting competition. We compete against other national independent resin distributors in North America, along with other regional distributors. Growth in the polymer distribution market is directly correlated with growth in the base polymer resins market. We believe that the strength of our company name and reputation, the broad range of product offerings from our suppliers and our speed and responsiveness, coupled with the quality of products and agility of our distribution network, allow us to compete effectively.
Raw Materials
The primary raw materials used by our manufacturing operations are polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resin, polyolefin and other thermoplastic resins, plasticizers, inorganic and organic pigments, all of which we believe are in adequate supply. We have a long-term supply contract with Oxy Vinyls LP, a former equity investment affiliate, under which the majority of our PVC resin is supplied. This contract contains a year-by-year evergreen renewal provision, unless terminated by either party with a one-year advance notice. We believe this contract assures the availability of adequate amounts of PVC resin. We also believe that the pricing under this contract provides PVC resins to us at a competitive cost. See the discussion of risks associated with raw material supply and costs in Item 1A “Risk Factors”.
Patents and Trademarks
We own and maintain a number of patents and trademarks in the U.S. and other key countries that contribute to our competitiveness in the markets we serve because they protect our inventions and product names against infringement by others. Patents exist for 20 years from filing date if all fees are paid, and trademarks have an indefinite life based upon continued use. While we view our patents and trademarks to be valuable because of the
broad scope of our products and services and brand recognition we enjoy, we do not believe that the loss or expiration of any single patent or trademark would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Nevertheless, we have implemented management processes designed to protect our inventions and trademarks. The acquisition of ColorMatrix significantly increased the number of global patents and trademarks which we own and maintain.
Seasonality and Backlog
Sales of our products and services are slightly seasonal as demand is generally slower in the first and fourth calendar quarters of the year. Because of the nature of our business, we do not believe that our backlog is a meaningful indicator of the level of our present or future business.
Working Capital Practices
Our products are generally manufactured with a short turnaround time, and the scheduling of manufacturing activities from customer orders generally includes enough lead time to assure delivery of an adequate supply of raw materials. We offer payment terms to our customers that are competitive. We generally allow our customers to return merchandise if pre-agreed quality standards or specifications are not met; however, we employ quality assurance practices that seek to minimize customer returns. Our customer returns are immaterial.
Significant Customers
No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues in 2013, and we do not believe we would suffer a material adverse effect if we were to lose any single customer.
Research and Development
We have substantial technology and development capabilities. Our efforts are largely devoted to developing new product formulations to satisfy defined market needs, by providing quality technical services to evaluate alternative raw materials, assuring the continued success of our products for customer applications, providing technology to improve our products, processes and applications, and providing support to our manufacturing plants for cost reduction, productivity and quality improvement programs. We operate research and development centers that support our commercial development activities and manufacturing operations. These facilities are equipped with state-of-the-art analytical, synthesis, polymer characterization and testing equipment, along with pilot plants and polymer manufacturing operations that simulate specific production processes that allow us to rapidly translate new technologies into new products. Our investment in product research and development from continuing operations was $52.6 million in 2013, $41.3 million in 2012 and $36.4 million in 2011.
Methods of Distribution
We sell products primarily through direct sales personnel, distributors, including our PolyOne Distribution segment, and commissioned sales agents. We primarily use truck carriers to transport our products to customers, although some customers pick up product at our manufacturing facilities or warehouses. We also ship some of our manufactured products to customers by rail.
Employees
As of December 31, 2013, we employed approximately 7,000 people. Approximately 10% of our employees are represented by labor unions under collective bargaining agreements. We believe that relations with our employees are good, and we do not anticipate significant operating issues to occur as a result of current negotiations, or when we renegotiate collective bargaining agreements as they expire.
Environmental, Health and Safety
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that apply to the production, use and sale of chemicals, emissions into the air, discharges into waterways and other releases of materials into the environment and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of waste material. We endeavor to ensure the safe and lawful operation of our facilities in the manufacture and distribution of products, and we believe we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
We maintain a disciplined environmental and occupational safety and health compliance program and conduct periodic internal and external regulatory audits at our facilities to identify and categorize potential environmental exposures, including compliance matters and any actions that may be required to address. This effort can result in process or operational modifications, the installation of pollution control devices or cleaning up grounds or facilities. We believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable requirements.
We are strongly committed to safety as evidenced by our injury incidence rate of 0.97 per 100 full-time workers per year in 2013, our first reporting year including recently acquired Glasforms and Spartech. Our legacy PolyOne operations reported an incidence rate of 0.59 in 2013 compared to 0.54 in 2012. The 2012 average injury incidence rate for our NAICS Code (326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing) was 5.0.
In our operations, we must comply with product-related governmental law and regulations affecting the plastics industry generally and also with content-specific law, regulations and non-governmental standards. We believe that compliance with current governmental laws and regulations and with non-governmental content-specific standards will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The risk of additional costs and liabilities, however, is inherent in certain plant operations and certain products produced at these plants, as is the case with other companies in the plastics industry. Therefore, we may incur additional costs or liabilities in the future. Other developments, such as increasingly strict environmental, safety and health laws, regulations and related enforcement policies, including those under the Restrictions on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS), Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (covering Conflict Minerals), and the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, the implementation of additional content-specific standards, discovery of unknown conditions, and claims for damages to property, persons or natural resources resulting from plant emissions or products, could also result in additional costs or liabilities.
A number of foreign countries and domestic communities have enacted, or are considering enacting, laws and regulations concerning the use and disposal of plastic materials. Widespread adoption of these laws and regulations, along with public perception, may have an adverse impact on sales of plastic materials. Although many of our major markets are in durable, longer-life applications that could reduce the impact of these kinds of environmental regulations, more stringent regulation of the use and disposal of plastics may have an adverse effect on our business.
We have been notified by federal and state environmental agencies and by private parties that we may be a potentially responsible party (PRP) in connection with their investigation and remediation of a number of environmental sites. While government agencies assert that PRPs are jointly and severally liable at these sites, in our experience, interim and final allocations of liability costs are generally made based on the relative contribution of waste. However, even when allocations of costs based on relative contribution of waste have been made, we cannot assure that our allocation will not increase if other PRPs do not pay their allocated share of these costs.
We incurred environmental expenses, before insurance recoveries, of $61.2 million in 2013, $12.8 million in 2012 and $9.7 million in 2011. Our environmental expense in 2013, 2012 and 2011 related mostly to ongoing remediation projects. In 2013 and 2011, we received insurance recoveries $23.5 million and $3.3 million, respectively, as reimbursement of previously incurred environmental remediation costs.
We also conduct investigations and remediation at certain of our active and inactive facilities and have assumed responsibility for the resulting environmental liabilities from operations at sites we, or our predecessors, formerly owned or operated. We believe that our potential continuing liability at these sites will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In addition, we voluntarily initiate corrective and preventive environmental projects at our facilities. As of December 31, 2013, our reserves totaled $125.9 million, covering probable future environmental expenditures that we can reasonably estimate related to previously contaminated sites. This amount represents our best estimate of probable costs, based upon the information and technology currently available.
Depending upon the results of future testing, the ultimate remediation alternatives undertaken, changes in regulations, new information, newly discovered conditions and other factors, it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional costs in excess of the amount accrued at December 31, 2013. Such costs, if any, cannot be currently estimated. We may revise our estimate of this liability as new regulations or technologies are developed, or additional information is obtained.
Refer to Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, for further discussion of our environmental liabilities.
We expect cash paid for environmental expenditures will be approximately $12.0 million in 2014.
International Operations
Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, including currency fluctuations and devaluations, exchange controls, currency restrictions and changes in local economic conditions. While the impact of these risks is difficult to predict, any one or more of them could adversely affect our future operations. For more information about our international operations, see Note 16, Segment Information, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, which is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
Where You Can Find Additional Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 33587 Walker Road, Avon Lake, Ohio 44012, and our telephone number is (440) 930-1000. We are subject to the information reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance with these requirements, we file annual, quarterly and other reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to our business, financial results and other matters. The reports, proxy statements and other information we file may be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at the SEC’s Public Reference Room and via the SEC’s website (see below for more information).
You may inspect a copy of the reports, proxy statements and other information we file with the SEC, without charge, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain copies of the reports, proxy statements and other information we file with the SEC, from those offices for a fee. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings are available to the public at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
Our Internet address is www.polyone.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available, free of charge, on our website (www.polyone.com, select Investors and then SEC Edgar filings) or upon written request, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish them to the SEC. The contents of our website are not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the reference to our website does not constitute incorporation by reference into this Form 10-K of the information contained at that site.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, results of operations, financial position or cash flows. These risk factors should be considered along with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results or financial condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. The following discussion is not an all-inclusive listing of risks, although we believe these are the more material risks that we face. If any of the following occur, our business, results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.
Demand for and supply of our products and services may be adversely affected by several factors, some of which we cannot predict or control.
Several factors may affect the demand for and supply of our products and services, including:
| |
• | economic downturns in the significant end markets that we serve; |
| |
• | product obsolescence or technological changes that unfavorably alter the value/cost proposition of our products and services; |
| |
• | competition from existing and unforeseen polymer and non-polymer based products; |
| |
• | declines in general economic conditions or reductions in industrial production growth rates, both domestically and globally, which could impact our customers’ ability to pay amounts owed to us; |
| |
• | changes in environmental regulations that would limit our ability to sell our products and services in specific markets; and |
| |
• | inability to obtain raw materials or supply products to customers due to factors such as supplier work stoppages, supply shortages, plant outages or regulatory changes that may limit or prohibit overland transportation of certain hazardous materials and exogenous factors, like severe weather. |
If any of these events occur, the demand for and supply of our products and services could suffer.
Our manufacturing operations are subject to hazards and other risks associated with polymer production and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes.
The hazards and risks our manufacturing operations are subject to include, but are not limited to:
| |
• | explosions, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters; |
| |
• | mechanical failure resulting in protracted or short duration unscheduled downtime; |
| |
• | regulatory changes that affect or limit the transportation of raw materials; |
| |
• | inability to obtain or maintain any required licenses or permits; |
| |
• | interruptions and environmental hazards such as chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases into the environment or workplace; and |
| |
• | storage tank leaks or other issues resulting from remedial activities. |
The occurrence of any of these operating problems at our facilities may have a material adverse effect on the productivity and profitability of a particular manufacturing or distribution facility or on our operations as a whole, during and after the period of these operating difficulties. These operating problems may also cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment and environmental damage. We are subject to present claims and potential future claims with respect to workplace exposure, workers’ compensation and other matters. Although we maintain property and casualty insurance of the types and in the amounts that we believe are customary for the industry, we may not be fully insured against all potential hazards that are incident to our business or otherwise could occur.
Extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations impact our operations and assets.
Our operations on, and ownership of, real property are subject to extensive environmental, health and safety laws and regulations at the national, state and local governmental levels. The nature of our business exposes us to compliance costs and risks of liability under these laws and regulations due to the production, storage, transportation, recycling or disposal and/or sale of materials that can cause contamination and other harm to the environment or personal injury if they are improperly handled and released. Environmental compliance requirements on us and our vendors may significantly increase the costs of these activities involving raw materials, energy, finished products and wastes. We may incur substantial costs, including fines, criminal or civil sanctions, damages, remediation costs or experience interruptions in our operations for violations of these laws.
We also conduct investigations and remediation at some of our active and inactive facilities and have assumed responsibility or have been assessed responsibility for environmental liabilities at sites formerly owned or operated by our predecessors or by us. Also, federal and state environmental statutes impose strict, and under some circumstances, joint and several liability for the cost of investigations and remedial actions on any company that generated waste, arranged for disposal of the waste, transported the waste to the disposal site or selected the disposal site, as well as the owners and operators of these sites. Any or all of the responsible parties may be required to bear all of the costs of clean up, regardless of fault or legality of the waste disposal or ownership of the site, and may also be subject to liability for natural resource damages. We have been notified by federal and state environmental agencies and private parties that we may be a potentially responsible party in connection with certain sites. We may incur substantial costs for some of these sites. It is possible that we will be identified as a potentially responsible party at more sites in the future which could result in our being assessed substantial investigation or cleanup costs.
We may also incur additional costs and liabilities as a result of increasingly strict environmental, safety and health laws, regulations and related enforcement policies, restrictions on the use of lead and phthalates under the Restrictions on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances and the Consumer Product Safety Information Act of 2008, and restrictions on greenhouse gases emissions.
The European Union has adopted REACH, a legislative act to cover Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals. The goal of this legislation, which became effective in June 2007, is to minimize risk to human health and to the environment by regulating the use of chemicals. As these regulations evolve, we will endeavor to remain in compliance with REACH, and similar regulations across the globe.
We accrue costs for environmental matters that have been identified when it is probable that these costs will be required and when they can be reasonably estimated. However, we may be subject to additional environmental liabilities or potential liabilities that have not been identified. We expect that we will continue to be subject to increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. We anticipate that compliance with these laws and regulations will continue to require capital expenditures and operating costs.
Our operations could be adversely affected by various risks inherent in conducting operations worldwide.
As noted above in Item 1, “Business,” we have extensive operations outside of the United States. Revenue from these operations (principally from Canada, Mexico, Europe, South America and Asia) was approximately 33% in 2013, 40% in 2012 and 40% in 2011 of our total revenues. Long-lived assets of our foreign operations represented 31% in 2013, 38% in 2012 and 37% in 2011 of our total long-lived assets.
International operations are subject to risks, which include, but are not limited to, the following:
| |
• | changes in local government regulations and policies including, but not limited to foreign currency exchange controls or monetary policy, repatriation of earnings, expropriation of property, duty or tariff restrictions, investment limitations and tax policies; |
| |
• | political and economic instability and disruptions, including labor unrest, civil strife, acts of war, guerrilla activities, insurrection and terrorism; |
| |
• | legislation that regulates the use of chemicals; |
| |
• | disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to U.S. laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA); |
| |
• | compliance with international trade laws and regulations, including export control and economic sanctions; |
| |
• | difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations; |
| |
• | limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies; |
| |
• | reduced protection of intellectual property rights; and |
| |
• | other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over the areas where our operations are conducted. |
In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws as well as export controls and economic sanction laws. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. We cannot assure you that our internal controls and procedures will always protect us from the reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. If we are found to be liable for FCPA, export control or sanction violations, we could suffer from criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, including loss of export privileges or authorization needed to conduct aspects of our international business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Any of these risks could have an adverse effect on our international operations by reducing the demand for our products. We may not be able to continue to operate in compliance with applicable customs, currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations or any other laws or regulations that we may be subject to. In addition, these laws or regulations may be modified in the future, and we may not be able to operate in compliance with those modifications.
We engage in acquisitions and joint ventures, and may encounter unexpected difficulties integrating those businesses.
Attainment of our strategic plan objectives require, in part, strategic acquisitions or joint ventures intended to complement or expand our businesses globally or add product technology that accelerates our specialization strategy, or both. Success will depend on our ability to complete these transactions or arrangements, and integrate the businesses acquired in these transactions as well as develop satisfactory working arrangements with our strategic partners in the joint ventures. Unexpected difficulties in integrating recent and future acquisitions with our existing operations and in managing strategic investments could occur. Furthermore, we may not realize the degree, or timing, of benefits initially anticipated.
Natural gas, electricity, fuel and raw material costs, and other external factors that are also beyond our control, as well as downturns in the home repair and remodeling and new home sectors of the economy, can cause fluctuations in our margins.
The cost of our natural gas, electricity, fuel and raw materials, and other costs, may not correlate with changes in the prices we receive for our products, either in the direction of the price change or in absolute magnitude. Natural gas and raw materials costs represent a substantial part of our manufacturing costs. Most of the raw materials we use are commodities and the price of each can fluctuate widely for a variety of reasons, including changes in availability because of major capacity additions or reductions or significant facility operating problems. Other external factors beyond our control can cause volatility in raw materials prices, demand for our products, product prices, sales volumes and margins. These factors include general economic conditions, the level of business activity in the industries that use our products, competitors’ actions, international events and circumstances, and governmental regulation in the United States and abroad, such as climate change regulation. These factors can also magnify the impact of economic cycles on our business. While we attempt to pass through price increases in energy costs and raw materials there can be no assurance that we can do so in the future.
Additionally, our products used in housing, transportation and building and construction markets are impacted by changes in demand in these sectors, which may be significantly affected by changes in economic and other conditions such as gross domestic product levels, employment levels, demographic trends, legislative actions and consumer confidence. These factors can lower the demand for and pricing of our products.
We face competition from other polymer companies as well as chemical companies.
We actively compete with companies that produce the same or similar products, and in some instances, with companies that produce different products that are designed for the same end uses. We encounter competition in price, payment terms, delivery, service, performance, product innovation, product recognition and quality, depending on the product involved.
We expect that our competitors will continue to develop and introduce new and enhanced products, which could cause a decline in the market acceptance of our products. In addition, our competitors could cause a reduction in the selling prices of some of our products as a result of intensified price competition. Competitive pressures can also result in the loss of major customers.
We may also experience increased competition from companies that offer products based on alternative technologies and processes that may be more competitive or better in price or performance, causing us to lose customers. Additionally, some of our customers may already be or may become large enough to justify developing in-house production capabilities. Any significant reduction in customer orders as a result of a shift to in-house production could adversely affect our sales and operating profits.
A major failure of our information systems could harm our business.
We depend on integrated information systems to conduct our business. We may experience operating problems with our information systems as a result of system failures, viruses, computer hackers or other causes. Any significant disruption or slowdown of our systems could cause customers to cancel orders or cause standard business processes to become inefficient or ineffective.
Disruptions in the global credit and financial markets could limit our access to credit, which could negatively impact our business.
Global credit and financial markets have experienced volatility in recent years, including volatility in securities prices, diminished liquidity and credit availability, declining valuations of certain investments and significant changes in the capital and organizational structures of certain financial institutions. These market conditions may limit our ability to access the capital necessary to grow and maintain our business. Accordingly, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter tenors than we prefer or pay unattractive interest rates, which could increase our interest expense, decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility.
The economic downturn in Europe has had and may in the future have a negative effect on our business and operations.
The economic downturn in Europe has caused, and may in the future cause a negative effect on our results of operations. Many of our customers, distributors and suppliers have been affected by these economic conditions. Current or potential customers may be unable to fund purchases or may determine to reduce purchases or inventories or may cease to continue in business. In addition, suppliers may not be able to supply us with needed raw materials on a timely basis, may increase prices or go out of business, which could result in our inability to meet customer demand or could affect our gross margins.
The agreements governing our debt, including our revolving credit facility and debt securities, contain various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions and also require us to meet financial maintenance tests, failure to comply with which could have a material adverse effect on us.
The agreement governing our senior secured revolving credit facility, and the indentures governing our debt securities, contain a number of significant covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to: consummate asset sales, incur additional debt or liens, consolidate or merge with any person or transfer or sell all or substantially all of our assets, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments, make investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, create dividend or other payment restrictions with respect to subsidiaries, make capital investments and alter the business we conduct.
In addition, these agreements require us to comply with specific financial ratios and tests, under which we are required to achieve specific financial and operating results. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control. A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under the
agreements. In the event of any default, our lenders could elect to declare all amounts borrowed under the agreements, together with accrued interest thereon, to be due and payable. In such event, we cannot assure that we would have sufficient assets to pay debt then outstanding under the agreements governing our debt. Any future refinancing of the revolving credit facility or debt securities may contain similar restrictive covenants.
To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to pay interest on our debt and to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend in part upon our future financial and operating performance and that of our subsidiaries and upon our ability to renew or refinance borrowings. Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect our ability to make these payments. While we believe that cash flow from our current level of operations, available cash and available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities will provide adequate sources of liquidity for at least the next twelve months, a significant drop in operating cash flow resulting from economic conditions, competition or other uncertainties beyond our control could create the need for alternative sources of liquidity. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations, we will have to pursue one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying capital or other expenditures, refinancing debt, selling assets, or raising equity capital.
We cannot guarantee that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our revolving credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including our revolving credit facilities, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
We have a significant amount of goodwill, and any future goodwill impairment charges could adversely impact our results of operations.
As of December 31, 2013, we had goodwill of $559.0 million. The future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, a material negative change in relationships with significant customers, strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, loss of key personnel or a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or disposed of, could result in goodwill impairment charges, which could adversely impact our results of operations. We have recorded goodwill impairment charges in the past, and such charges materially impacted our historical results of operations. For additional information, see Note 5, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Poor investment performance by our pension plan assets may increase our pension liability and expense, which may increase the required funding of our pension obligations and divert funds from other potential uses.
We provide defined benefit pension plans to eligible employees. Our pension expense and our required contributions to our pension plans are directly affected by the value of plan assets, the actual rate of return on plan assets and the actuarial assumptions we use to measure our defined benefit pension plan obligations, including the rate at which future obligations are discounted to a present value, or the discount rate. We assumed a weighted average rate of return of 8.41% on pension assets during 2013.
Poor investment performance by our pension plan assets resulting from a decline in prices in the equity and/or fixed income markets could increase the deficit position of our plans. Should the assets earn an average return less than our assumed rate, it is likely that future pension expenses and funding requirements would increase.
We cannot predict whether changing market or economic conditions, regulatory changes or other factors will further increase our pension expense or funding obligations, diverting funds we would otherwise apply to other uses.
Risks related to our pension and other post-retirement plans may adversely impact our results of operations and cash flow.
Significant changes in actual investment return on pension assets, discount rates, and other factors have and may continue to adversely affect our results of operations and pension contributions in future periods. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that we calculate income or expense for the plans using actuarial valuations. These valuations reflect assumptions about financial markets and interest rates. Changes in these assumptions have resulted in material charges to income in recent years and may continue in future periods. We establish the discount rate used to determine the present value of the projected and accumulated benefit obligation at the end of
each year based upon the available market rates for high quality, fixed income investments. An increase in the discount rate would increase future pension expense and, conversely, a decrease in the discount rate would decrease future pension expense.
Funding requirements for our U.S. pension plans may become more significant. The ultimate amounts to be contributed are dependent upon, among other things, interest rates, underlying asset returns and the impact of legislative or regulatory changes related to pension funding obligations. For a discussion regarding the significant assumptions used to estimate pension expense, including discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, and how our financial statements can be affected by pension plan accounting policies, see “Critical Accounting Policies” included in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
The failure to successfully integrate Spartech may adversely affect future results.
The success of our acquisition of Spartech will depend, in part, on our ability to realize anticipated benefits from combining the businesses of PolyOne and Spartech. To realize these anticipated benefits, the businesses of PolyOne and Spartech must be successfully combined. If we are not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.
As a result of the Spartech acquisition, we are undergoing restructurings that may cause disruption or could have an adverse effect on our business and operations.
We are undergoing certain restructurings and intended to realize certain of the potential synergies of our acquisition of Spartech. There can be no assurance that such restructurings and reorganizations will be successful or properly implemented. If any of such internal restructurings are not successful or properly implemented, we may fail to realize the potential synergies of the acquisition, which may harm our business and results of operations or cause disruptions to our operations, including disruption in our supply chain.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Headquartered in Avon Lake, Ohio we operate globally with principal locations consisting of 85 manufacturing sites and 8 distribution facilities in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. We own the majority of our manufacturing sites and lease our distribution facilities. We believe that the quality and production capacity of our facilities is sufficient to maintain our competitive position for the foreseeable future. The following table identifies the principal facilities of our segments:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Performance Products and Solutions | | Global Specialty Engineered Materials | | Global Color, Additives and Inks | | PolyOne Distribution | | Designed Structures and Solutions |
1. Long Beach, California | | 1. McHenry, Illinois | | 1. Glendale, Arizona | | 1. Rancho Cucamonga, | | 1. Arlington, Texas (4) |
2. Terre Haute, Indiana | | 2. Avon Lake, Ohio | | 2. Kennesaw, Georgia | | California | | 2. Evanston, Illinois (4) |
3. Louisville, Kentucky | | Dyersburg, Tennessee (1) | | Suwanee, Georgia (3) | | 2. Chicago, Illinois | | 3. Cape Girardeau, |
4. Avon Lake, Ohio | | 3. North Haven, Connecticut | | 3. Elk Grove Village, Illinois | | 3. Eagan, Minnesota | | Missouri (4) |
5. Clinton, Tennessee | | Seabrook, Texas (1) | | 4. St. Louis, Missouri | | 4. Edison, New Jersey | | 4. Goodyear, Arizona (4) |
6. Dyersburg, Tennessee | | 4. Gaggenau, Germany | | 5. Sullivan, Missouri | | 5. Statesville, North | | 5. Greenville, Ohio (4) |
7 Pasadena, Texas | | 5. Istanbul, Turkey | | 6. Massillon, Ohio | | Carolina | | 6. Hackensack, |
8. Seabrook, Texas | | 6. Barbastro, Spain | | 7. Norwalk, Ohio | | 6. Elyria, Ohio | | New Jersey (4) |
9 Orangeville, Ontario, | | 7. Melle, Germany | | 8. North Baltimore, Ohio | | 7. La Porte, Texas | | 7. La Mirada, California (4) |
Canada | | 8 & 9. Suzhou, China (2) | | 9. Lehigh, Pennsylvania | | 8. Brampton, Ontario, | | 8. Manitowoc, Wisconsin (4) |
10. St. Remi de Napierville, | | 10. Shenzhen, China | | 10. Vonore, Tennessee | | Canada | | 9. McMinnville, Oregon (4) |
Quebec, Canada | | Jurong, Singapore (3) | | 11. Toluca, Mexico | | (8 Distribution Facilities) | | 10. Muncie, Indiana (4) |
11. Dongguan, China | | 11. Diadema, Brazil | | 12. Assesse, Belgium | | | | 11. Newark, New Jersey (4) |
12. Lake Charles, Louisiana (4) | | 12. Joinville, Brazil | | 13. Cergy, France | | | | 12. Paulding, Ohio (4) |
13. Lockport, New York (4) | | 13. Birmingham, Alabama | | 14. Tossiat, France | | | | 13. Pleasant Hill, Iowa (4) |
14. Donora, Pennsylvania (4) | | 14. Donchery, France (4) | | 15. Bendorf, Germany | | | | 14 & 15. Portage, |
Cape Girardeau, | | (14 Manufacturing Plants) | | 16. Gyor, Hungary | | | | Wisconsin (4) (6) |
Missouri (1) (4) | | | | 17. Kutno, Poland | | | | 16. Ripon, Wisconsin (4) |
15. Ramos Arizpe, Mexico (4) | | | | 18. Pune, India | | | | 17. Salisbury, Maryland (4) |
(15 Manufacturing Plants) | | | | 19. Pamplona, Spain | | | | 18. Sheboygan Falls, |
| | | | 20. Bangkok, Thailand | | | | Wisconsin (4) |
| | | | 21. Pudong (Shanghai), | | | | 19. Stamford, Connecticut (4) |
| | | | China | | | | 20. Warsaw, Indiana (4) |
| | | | 22. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (5) | | | | 21. Wichita, Kansas (4) |
| | | | Shenzhen, China (1) | | | | 22. Grandby, Canada (4) |
| | | | 23. Tianjin, China | | | | Ramos Arizpe, Mexico (4) |
| | | | 24. Novo Hamburgo, Brazil | | | | (22 Manufacturing Plants) |
| | | | 25. Berea, Ohio | | | | |
| | | | 26. Richland Hills, Texas | | | | |
| | | | 27. Bethel, Connecticut | | | | |
| | | | 28. Barberton, Ohio | | | | |
| | | | 29. Knowsley, United | | | | |
| | | | Kingdom | | | | |
| | | | 30. Eindhoven,Netherlands | | | | |
| | | | 31. Suzhou, China | | | | |
| | | | 32. Shanghai, China | | | | |
| | | | 33. Itupeva, Brazil | | | | |
| | | | 34. Odkarby, Finland | | | | |
| | | | Manitowoc, Wisconsin (1) (4) | | | | |
| | | | (34 Manufacturing Plants) | | | | |
| |
(1) | Facility is not included in manufacturing plants total as it is also included as part of another segment. |
| |
(2) | There are two manufacturing plants located at Suzhou, China. |
| |
(3) | Facility is not included in manufacturing plants total as it is a design center/lab. |
| |
(4) | Facility added in connection with the acquisition of Spartech on March 13, 2013. |
| |
(5) | Facility added in connection with the JE.A. Juffali & Brothers Limited joint venture on April 9, 2013. |
| |
(6) | There are two manufacturing plants located at Portage, Wisconsin. |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In December 2007, the EPA met with the Company to discuss possible violations of the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act at its polyvinyl chloride resin manufacturing facilities located in Henry, Illinois and Pedricktown, New Jersey. Further discussions between representatives for the Company and the EPA occurred in 2008, during which the Company provided additional information requested by the EPA, as well as its position regarding the compliance status of the facilities, and discussed certain modifications to testing procedures and record keeping in these facilities. In January 2009, we received a letter from the EPA proposing a resolution of any violations identified that would include our payment of penalties in the amount of $1.3 million. We subsequently have reached a tentative settlement with the EPA under which the Company would pay a $0.3 million penalty, install certain Supplemental Environmental Projects (each a "SEP") and undertake certain modifications to its operations and recordkeeping at these two facilities.
On May 30, 2013, the Company divested these two facilities, and the business they support to Mexichem. In that transaction, Mexichem undertook to perform the Company’s post-transaction operational obligations under a final settlement with the EPA, other than the obligations to pay the penalty and to install the SEPs. The Company, Mexichem and the United States subsequently executed a settlement document in the form of a Consent Order. The United States thereupon filed an action against the Company in the Central District for Illinois and moved the court to enter the Consent Order. As required by law and regulation, the court ordered publication for public comment. The public comment period expired December 27, 2013. Once the court enters the Consent Order, the Company will pay the penalty and complete installation of the SEPs. Mexichem will have the obligation to honor and perform the recordkeeping and operational modifications contained in the Consent Order going forward.
Information regarding other legal proceedings can be found in Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements and is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive officers are elected by our Board of Directors to serve one-year terms. The following table lists the name of each person currently serving as an executive officer of our company, their age as of February 13, 2014 and current position with our company:
|
| | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position |
Stephen D. Newlin | | 61 | | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Robert M. Patterson | | 41 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Thomas J. Kedrowski | | 55 | | Executive Vice President, Global Operations and Process Improvement |
Bradley C. Richardson | | 55 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Michael E. Kahler | | 56 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer |
Craig M. Nikrant | | 52 | | Senior Vice President, President of Global Specialty Engineered Materials |
Kurt C. Schuering | | 50 | | Senior Vice President, President of Distribution |
Michael A. Garratt | | 50 | | Senior Vice President, President of Performance Products and Solutions |
Kenneth M. Smith | | 59 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Human Resource Officer |
John V. Van Hulle | | 56 | | Senior Vice President, President of Global Color, Additives and Inks |
Julie A. McAlindon | | 46 | | Senior Vice President, President of Designed Structures and Solutions |
Stephen D. Newlin: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, February 2006 to date. President — Industrial Sector of Ecolab Inc. (a global developer and marketer of cleaning and sanitizing specialty chemicals, products and services) from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Newlin served as President and a Director of Nalco Chemical Company (a manufacturer of specialty chemicals, services and systems) from 1998 to 2001, and was Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Newlin serves on the Board of Directors of Black Hills Corporation and Oshkosh Corporation.
Robert M. Patterson: Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, March 2012 to date. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, January 2011 to March 2012. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, May 2008 to January 2011. Vice President and Treasurer of Novelis, Inc. (an aluminum rolled products manufacturer) from 2007 to May 2008. Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Novelis from 2006 to 2007. Mr. Patterson served as Vice President and Segment Chief Financial Officer, Thermal and Flow Technology Segments of SPX Corporation (a multi-industry manufacturer and developer) from 2005 to 2006 and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Cooling Technologies and Services of SPX from 2004 to 2005.
Mr. Patterson served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Marley Cooling Tower Company, a cooling tower manufacturer and subsidiary of SPX, from 2002 to 2004.
Thomas J. Kedrowski: Executive Vice President, Global Operations and Process Improvement, January 2012 to date. Senior Vice President, Supply Chain and Operations, September 2007 to December 2012. Vice President of Strategy and Process Improvement, H.B. Fuller Company (a global manufacturer and marketer of adhesives and specialty chemical products) from November 2005 to April 2007. Vice President of Global Operations, H.B. Fuller Company from February 2002 to November 2005.
Bradley C. Richardson: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, November 2013 to date. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diebold, Incorporated (an integrated self-service delivery manufacturer for the banking industry and security systems) from November 2009 through November 2013. Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Chief Financial Officer at Modine Manufacturing Company (a manufacturer of thermal management systems and components) from 2003 to 2009. Vice President, Performance Management Planning and Control, Chief Financial Officer, Upstream, BP Amoco, London, (a producer of oil, natural gas, and petro chemicals) 2000 to 2003. Mr. Richardson serves on the Board of Directors of Brady Corporation and is Chair of its Audit Committee.
Michael E. Kahler: Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer, January 2010 to date. Senior Vice President, Commercial Development, May 2006 to January 2010. President, Process Technology Division, Alfa Laval Inc. (a global provider of heat transfer, separation and fluid handling products and engineering solutions) from January 2004 to March 2006. Group Vice President, Nalco Chemical Company (a manufacturer of specialty chemicals, services and systems) from December 1999 to October 2002.
Craig M. Nikrant: Senior Vice President, President of Global Specialty Engineered Materials, January 2010 to date. Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Engineered Materials, September 2006 to December 2009. General Manager, Specialty Film & Sheet, General Electric Plastics, June 2004 to September 2006. Director, Global Commercial Effectiveness, General Electric Plastics (a former division of General Electric specializing in supplying plastics), December 2003 to June 2004. Six Sigma Master Black Belt, General Electric Company Plastics Business, March 2001 to December 2002. General Manager, Commercial Operations, North Central Region, General Electric Plastics, June 1999 to March 2001.
Kurt C. Schuering: Senior Vice President, President of Distribution, January 2012 to date. Vice President, Key Account Management, April 2007 to December 2011. General Manager, Automotive — GE Industrial, June 2006 to March 2007. Executive Director, Automotive — GE Plastics, May 2004 to May 2006. Global Product Manager, Lexan — GE Plastics June 2002 to April 2004.
Michael A. Garratt: Senior Vice President, President of Performance Products and Solutions, September 2013 to date. President, Marmon Utility (a manufacturer of medium-high voltage utility, subsea and down-hole power cables and molded insulator systems), March 2011 to September 2013. Chief Operating Officer, Excel Polymers (a custom thermoset rubber formulator), November 2009 to December 2010. Vice President and General Manager - Americas Compounding and Performance Additives, Excel Polymers, March 2009 to November 2009. Vice President and General Manager - Industrial and Consumer, Excel Polymers, December 2005 to March 2009. From August 1994 to June 2005, Mr. Garratt worked for DuPont Dow Elastomers (a global manufacturer of engineered thermoset rubber and thermoplastic elastomer materials) in market development and product management positions, culminating in a regional commercial leadership role for Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
Kenneth M. Smith: Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Human Resources Officer, May 2006 to date. Chief Human Resources Officer, January 2003 to date, and Vice President and Chief Information Officer, September 2000, upon formation of PolyOne, to April 2006. Vice President, Information Technology, The Geon Company, May 1999 to August 2000, and Chief Information Officer, August 1997 to May 1999.
John V. Van Hulle: Senior Vice President, President of Global Color, Additives and Inks, January 2010 to date. Senior Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Color, Additives and Inks, July 2006 to January 2010. President and Chief Executive Officer — ChemDesign Corporation (a custom chemical manufacturer), December 2001 to July 2006. President, Specialty & Fine Chemicals — Cambrex Corporation (a specialty chemical and pharmaceutical business) August 1994 to November 2000.
Julie McAlindon: Senior Vice President, President of Designed Structures and Solutions, March 2013 to date. Vice President of Marketing, May 2010 to March 2013. Global Corporate Account Director, Dow Advanced Materials, The Dow Chemical Company (a global provider of chemicals and plastics) July 2009 to May 2010, Global Strategic Marketing Director, Dow Coating Solutions, The Dow Chemical Company, March 2008 to July 2009. Global Business Director, Polypropylene, The Dow Chemical Company, May 2007 to March 2008. Senior Product Director,
Solution Polyethylene, The Dow Chemical Company, May 2005 to May 2007. Global Marketing Executive, UCON™ Fluids and Lubricants, The Dow Chemical Company, March 2002 to May 2005.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table sets forth the range of the high and low sale prices for our common shares, $0.01 par value per share, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, where the shares are traded under the symbol “POL,” for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2013 Quarters | | 2012 Quarters |
Common share price: | | Fourth | | Third | | Second | | First | | Fourth | | Third | | Second | | First |
High | | $ | 35.77 |
| | $ | 30.96 |
| | $ | 26.84 |
| | $ | 25.63 |
| | $ | 21.00 |
| | $ | 17.53 |
| | $ | 14.85 |
| | $ | 15.48 |
|
Low | | $ | 28.66 |
| | $ | 24.76 |
| | $ | 21.42 |
| | $ | 20.96 |
| | $ | 15.72 |
| | $ | 13.65 |
| | $ | 12.39 |
| | $ | 11.58 |
|
As of January 31, 2014, there were 2,338 holders of record of our common shares.
The following table presents quarterly dividends declared per common share for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
|
| | | | | | | |
Quarter Ended: | 2013 | | 2012 |
March 31, | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
|
June 30, | 0.06 |
| | 0.05 |
|
September 30, | 0.06 |
| | 0.05 |
|
December 31, | 0.08 |
| | 0.05 |
|
Total | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
|
The table below sets forth information regarding repurchase of shares of our common stock during the period indicated. For the full year 2013, we repurchased 5.0 million shares at a weighted average share price of $26.30.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program (1) |
October 1 to October 31 | 164,372 |
| | $ | 29.77 |
| | 164,372 |
| | 15,992,323 |
|
November 1 to November 30 | 902,301 |
| | 31.14 |
| | 902,301 |
| | 15,090,022 |
|
December 1 to December 31 | 90,022 |
| | 31.94 |
| | 90,022 |
| | 15,000,000 |
|
Total | 1,156,695 |
| | $ | 31.01 |
| | 1,156,695 |
| | |
(1) In August 2008, PolyOne's Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program authorizing PolyOne to purchase up to 10.0 million shares of its common stock. Between August 2008 and October 2011, PolyOne repurchased 5.3 million shares of common stock available for repurchase, at an average price paid per share of $11.71. On October 11, 2011, PolyOne's Board of Directors increased the common stock repurchase authorization by an additional 5.3 million shares of common stock. From October 2011 through October 2012, PolyOne repurchased 3.2 million shares of common stock available for repurchase, at an average price per share of $11.54. On October 23, 2012, PolyOne's Board of Directors further increased the common stock repurchase authorization amount by an additional 13.2 million shares of common stock to 20.0 million. From March 13, 2013 to December 31, 2013, PolyOne repurchased 5.0 million shares of common stock available for repurchase at an average price per share of $26.30. Purchases of common stock may be made by open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans and accelerated share repurchases.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes to our accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the financial data presented below, including matters that might cause this data not to be indicative of our future financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions, except per share data) | | 2013(1) | | 2012(2) | | 2011(3) | | 2010(4) | | 2009(5) |
Sales | | $ | 3,771.2 |
| | $ | 2,860.8 |
| | $ | 2,709.4 |
| | $ | 2,506.2 |
| | $ | 1,978.5 |
|
Operating income | | 231.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | 203.0 |
| | 159.2 |
| | 126.5 |
|
Net income from continuing operations net of income tax | | 92.9 |
| | 53.2 |
| | 153.4 |
| | 152.5 |
| | 96.1 |
|
Net income from continuing operations attributable to PolyOne shareholders | | 94.0 |
| | 53.3 |
| | 153.4 |
| | 152.5 |
| | 96.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash dividends declared per common share | | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to PolyOne shareholders: |
Basic | | $ | 0.98 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
| | $ | 1.64 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.97 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
| | $ | 1.59 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 2,944.1 |
| | $ | 2,128.0 |
| | $ | 2,078.1 |
| | $ | 1,671.9 |
| | $ | 1,416.0 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion | | $ | 976.2 |
| | $ | 703.1 |
| | $ | 704.0 |
| | $ | 432.9 |
| | $ | 389.2 |
|
| |
(1) | Included in operating income for 2013 are: 1) gains of $26.9 million primarily related to the 2013 SunBelt Chlor Alkali Partnership (SunBelt) earn-out, 2) a mark-to-market gain related to our pension and OPEB plans of $44.0 million, 3) expenses of $61.2 million related to environmental remediation costs, 4) insurance recoveries of $23.5 million, 5) $7.0 million gain on commercial litigation, 6) expenses of $52.0 million related to plant closure costs and reductions in force and 7) acquisition-related costs (including inventory fair value adjustments) of $15.2 million. |
| |
(2) | Included in operating income for 2012 are: 1) gains of $23.4 million for the 2012 SunBelt earn-out , 2) a mark-to-market loss related to our pension and OPEB plans of $42.0 million, 3) expenses of $12.8 million related to environmental remediation costs, 4) expenses of $11.5 million related to plant closure costs and reductions in force and 5) acquisition-related costs of $9.3 million. |
| |
(3) | Included in operating income for 2011 are: 1) gains of $146.3 million related to the sale of our equity interest in SunBelt Chlor Alkali Partnership (SunBelt), which includes the 2011 earn-out of $18.1 million, 2) a mark-to-market loss related to our pension and OPEB plans of $83.8 million, 3) environmental remediation costs of $9.7 million and 4) acquisition-related costs of $6.6 million. Included in net income for 2011 is a $29.5 million tax benefit related to our investment in O’Sullivan Engineered Films and a $13.0 million tax benefit primarily related with the reversal of valuation allowances. |
| |
(4) | Included in operating income for 2010 are: 1) gains of $23.9 million related to legal and insurance settlements, 2) insurance recoveries of $16.7 million related to reimbursement of previously incurred environmental expenses, 3) a gain of $16.3 million related to the sale of our 50% interest in BayOne, 4) debt extinguishment costs of $29.5 million, 5) environmental remediation costs of $20.5 million and 6) a mark-to-market loss related to our pension and OPEB plans of $9.6 million. Included in net income are tax benefits of $107.1 million associated with the reversal of our valuation allowances. |
| |
(5) | Included in operating income for 2009 results are: 1) $40.4 million related to a curtailment gains related to amendments to certain pension and benefit plans, 2) insurance recoveries of $23.9 million related to reimbursement of previously incurred environmental expenses, 3) a mark-to-market gain related to our pension and OPEB plans of $26.4 million, 4) charges of $27.2 million related to employee separation and plant phase-out costs, 5) environmental remediation costs of $11.7 million and 6) goodwill impairment charges of $5.0 million. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is designed to provide information that is supplemental to, and should be read together with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information in this Item 7 is intended to assist the reader in obtaining an understanding of our consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, the primary factors that accounted for those changes, and any known trends or uncertainties that we are aware of that may have a material effect on our future performance, as well as how certain accounting principles affect our consolidated financial statements.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in “Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”
Our Business
We are a premier provider of specialized polymer materials, services and solutions with operations in specialty polymer formulations, color and additive systems, plastic sheet and packaging solutions and polymer distribution. We are also a highly specialized developer and manufacturer of performance enhancing additives, liquid colorants, and fluoropolymer and silicone colorants. Headquartered in Avon Lake, Ohio, with 2013 sales of $3.8 billion, we have manufacturing sites and distribution facilities in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. We currently employ approximately 7,000 people and offer more than 35,000 polymer solutions to over 10,000 customers across the globe. We provide value to our customers through our ability to link our knowledge of polymers and formulation technology with our manufacturing and supply chain capabilities to provide value-added solutions to designers, assemblers and processors of plastics (our customers).
Business Model and Key Concepts
The central focus of our business model is to provide specialized material and service solutions to our customers by leveraging our global footprint, product and technology breadth, manufacturing expertise, fully integrated information technology network, broad market reach and raw material procurement strength. These resources enable us to capitalize on dynamic changes in the end markets we serve, which include transportation, packaging, building and construction, industrial, healthcare, consumer, wire and cable, electrical and electronics, and appliance.
Key Challenges
Overall, our business faces exposure resulting from economic downturns, especially as it relates to affected markets such as building and construction, consumer, electrical, and industrial. Maintaining profitability during periods of raw material price volatility is another critical challenge. Further, we need to capitalize on the opportunity to accelerate development of products that meet a growing body of environmental laws and regulations such as lead and phthalate restrictions included in the Restrictions on the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances and the Consumer Product Safety Information Act of 2008.
Strategy and Key Trends
To address these challenges and achieve our vision, we have implemented a strategy with four core components: specialization, globalization, operational excellence and commercial excellence. Specialization differentiates us through products, services, technology, and solutions that add value. Globalization allows us to service our customers with consistency wherever their operations might be around the world. Operational excellence empowers us to respond to the voice of the customer while focusing on continuous improvement. Commercial excellence enables us to deliver value to customers by supporting their growth and profitability.
In the short term, we will maintain our focus on top-line growth, improving or maintaining the cost/price relationship with regard to raw materials and improving working capital efficiency. In addition to driving top-line growth, we have established margin improvement targets for all businesses. In 2014, our capital expenditures will be focused primarily to support sales growth, our continued investment in the Spartech integration and restructuring activities, and other strategic investments. We also continue to consider acquisitions and other synergy opportunities that
complement our core platforms. These actions will ensure that we continue to invest in capabilities that advance the pace of our transformation and continue to support growth in key markets and product offerings.
We will continue our enterprise-wide Lean Six Sigma program directed at improving profitability and cash flow by applying proven management techniques and strategies to key areas of the business, such as pricing, supply chain and operations management, productivity and quality. Long-term trends that currently provide opportunities to leverage our strategy include the drive toward sustainability in polymers and their processing, the emergence of biodegradable and bio-based polymers, consumer concern over the use of bisphenol-A (BPA) in infant-care products and developing legislation that bans lead and certain phthalates from toys and child-care items.
Recent Developments
On May 30, 2013, PolyOne sold its vinyl dispersion, blending and suspension resin assets (Resin Business) to Mexichem Specialty Resins Inc. (Mexichem), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mexichem, S.A.B. de C.V., for $250.0 million cash consideration. This sale resulted in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of $223.7 million ($138.5 million, net of tax), which is reflected within the Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes of the Consolidated Statements of Income. As a result of the sale of our Resin Business, this business has been removed from the Performance Products and Solutions segment and presented as a discontinued operation. See Note 16, Segment Information for further information.
On March 13, 2013, PolyOne acquired Spartech Corporation (Spartech), a supplier of sustainable plastic sheet, color and engineered materials, and packaging solutions, based in Clayton, Missouri, with 2012 sales of $1,149.4 million and net income from continuing operations of $2.7 million. At the effective time of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Spartech common stock was canceled and converted into the right to receive consideration equal to $2.67 in cash and 0.3167 shares of PolyOne common stock. PolyOne paid $83.4 million in cash and issued approximately 10.0 million shares of its common stock to Spartech's stockholders. PolyOne funded the cash portion of the consideration, and the repayment of certain portions of Spartech's debt, with a portion of the net proceeds of its issuance of 5.25% senior notes due 2023, discussed in Note 6, Financing Arrangements.
The Spartech acquisition expands PolyOne's specialty portfolio with adjacent technologies in attractive end markets where we already participate, as well as new end markets such as aerospace and security. By combining Spartech's leading market positions in sheet, rigid barrier packaging and specialty cast acrylics with PolyOne's capabilities, we believe we can better serve our customers and accelerate growth. As a result of the acquisition of Spartech, we created a new segment. Spartech's former Custom Sheet and Rollstock and Packaging Technology businesses are reported within this new segment referred to as "Designed Structures and Solutions", and the remaining Spartech businesses were split among PolyOne's existing Global Color, Additives and Inks, Global Specialty Engineered Materials and Performance Products and Solutions segments.
Highlights and Executive Summary
A summary of PolyOne’s sales, operating income, income from continuing operations net of income taxes, net income from continuing operations attributable to PolyOne common shareholders, liquidity and total debt is included in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Sales | | $ | 3,771.2 |
| | $ | 2,860.8 |
| | $ | 2,709.4 |
|
Operating income | | 231.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | 203.0 |
|
Income from continuing operations net of income taxes | | 92.9 |
| | 53.2 |
| | 153.4 |
|
Net income from continuing operations attributable to PolyOne common shareholders | | 94.0 |
| | 53.3 |
| | 153.4 |
|
| | | | | | |
Liquidity | | $ | 650.9 |
| | $ | 381.2 |
| | $ | 340.1 |
|
Total debt | | $ | 988.9 |
| | $ | 706.9 |
| | $ | 707.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Results of Operations | | | | | | | | Variances — Favorable (Unfavorable) |
| | | | | | | | 2013 versus 2012 | | 2012 versus 2011 |
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % Change | | Change | | % Change |
Sales | | $ | 3,771.2 |
| | $ | 2,860.8 |
| | $ | 2,709.4 |
| | $ | 910.4 |
|
| 31.8 | % | | $ | 151.4 |
| | 5.6 | % |
Cost of sales | | 3,109.0 |
| | 2,329.7 |
| | 2,280.1 |
| | (779.3 | ) |
| (33.5 | )% | | (49.6 | ) | | (2.2 | )% |
Gross margin | | 662.2 |
| | 531.1 |
| | 429.3 |
| | 131.1 |
|
| 24.7 | % | | 101.8 |
| | 23.7 | % |
Selling and administrative expense | | 457.6 |
| | 417.0 |
| | 378.3 |
| | (40.6 | ) |
| (9.7 | )% | | (38.7 | ) | | (10.2 | )% |
Income related to previously owned equity affiliates | | 26.9 |
| | 23.4 |
| | 152.0 |
| | 3.5 |
|
| 15.0 | % | | (128.6 | ) | | (84.6 | )% |
Operating income | | 231.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | 203.0 |
| | 94.0 |
|
| 68.4 | % | | (65.5 | ) | | (32.3 | )% |
Interest expense, net | | (63.5 | ) | | (50.8 | ) | | (33.7 | ) | | (12.7 | ) |
| (25.0 | )% | | (17.1 | ) | | (50.7 | )% |
Debt extinguishment costs
| | (15.8 | ) | | — |
| | (0.9 | ) | | (15.8 | ) |
| (100.0 | )% | | 0.9 |
| | 100.0 | % |
Other (expense) income, net | | (1.2 | ) | | (3.4 | ) | | 0.5 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| 64.7 | % | | (3.9 | ) | | (780.0 | )% |
Income from continuing operations, before income taxes | | 151.0 |
| | 83.3 |
| | 168.9 |
| | 67.7 |
|
| 81.3 | % | | (85.6 | ) | | (50.7 | )% |
Income tax expense | | (58.1 | ) | | (30.1 | ) | | (15.5 | ) | | (28.0 | ) |
| (93.0 | )% | | (14.6 | ) | | (94.2 | )% |
Net income from continuing operations | | $ | 92.9 |
| | $ | 53.2 |
| | $ | 153.4 |
| | $ | 39.7 |
| | 74.6 | % | | $ | (100.2 | ) | | (65.3 | )% |
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | 149.8 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 131.2 |
| | 705.4 | % | | (0.6 | ) | | (3.1 | )% |
Net income | | 242.7 |
| | 71.8 |
| | $ | 172.6 |
| | 170.9 |
| | 238.0 | % | | (100.8 | ) | | (58.4 | )% |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 1.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 1.0 |
| | 1,000 | % | | 0.1 |
| | 100.0 | % |
Net income attributable to PolyOne common shareholders | | $ | 243.8 |
| | $ | 71.9 |
| | $ | 172.6 |
| | $ | 171.9 |
| | 239.1 | % | | $ | (100.7 | ) | | (58.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share attributable to PolyOne common shareholders - basic: | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.98 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
| | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations | | 1.57 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.21 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2.55 |
| | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.87 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share attributable to PolyOne common shareholders - diluted: | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.97 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
| | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations | | 1.56 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.21 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2.53 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
| | $ | 1.84 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales
Sales increased 31.8% in 2013 compared to 2012, 30.6% of which is attributable to the acquisitions of Spartech and Glasforms. Improved mix and increased pricing, primarily associated with higher raw material costs, increased sales 3.3%, while favorable currency exchange rates impacted sales by 0.4%. These increases were partially offset by volume declines of 2.5%.
Sales increased 5.6% in 2012 compared to 2011, 7.4% is related to the acquisition of ColorMatrix and a 1.6% increase related to improved sales mix and increased market pricing associated with raw material inflation. These increases were partially offset by declines in volume of 1.9%, primarily associated with weak demand in Europe, and unfavorable currency exchange rates of 1.5%.
Cost of sales
As a percent of sales, cost of sales increased from 81.4% in 2012 to 82.4% in 2013 primarily due to a $15.7 million increase in restructuring charges as a result of the Spartech re-alignment actions, and a $24.9 million increase in net environmental charges, primarily related to a revision to our Calvert City reserve of $47.0 million, offset by insurance recoveries of $23.5 million. Additionally, the increase in costs of goods sold was impacted by Spartech sales, which currently have lower margins than organic PolyOne sales. These items more than offset PolyOne's organic margin improvement.
Cost of sales as a percentage of sales decreased from 84.2% in 2011 to 81.4% in 2012. The improvement in cost of sales as a percentage of sales was driven primarily by the increase in sales associated with ColorMatrix, a specialty
platform business, which, like our other specialty businesses, has higher gross margins than our other segments. Additionally, improved mix favorably impacted cost of sales as a percentage of sales.
Selling and administrative expense
These costs include selling, technology, administrative functions, corporate and general expenses. Selling and administrative expense in 2013 increased $40.6 million, primarily related to acquisitions and acquisition-related costs totaling $70.3 million, increased restructuring costs of $24.8 million and increased stock based compensation expense of $6.1 million. Additionally, organic segment selling and administrative expense increased $16.3 million, primarily driven by additional commercial resources and inflation. These increases more than offset a commercial litigation gain of $7.0 million, and a $83.1 million favorable difference in the pension and other post-retirement mark-to-market adjustment. In 2013, we recognized a gain of $42.4 million compared to a charge of $40.7 million in 2012. This favorable mark-to-market adjustment was driven primarily by increased discount rates and returns on plan assets in excess of our weighted average assumed rate of return of 8.41% on plan assets in 2013.
Selling and administrative expense increased $38.7 million in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to the acquisition of ColorMatrix, which resulted in increased selling and administrative expense and higher amortization expense associated with acquired intangible assets. Additionally, in 2012 we incurred $11.1 million of charges related to plant closures and reductions in force that were included in selling and administrative expense. These actions, and the related charges, were in response to weak demand in Europe. These increases were partially offset by lower pension and post-retirement costs, primarily driven by a $40.7 million decrease, within selling and administrative expense, for the 2012 pension and other post-retirement mark-to-market adjustment compared to 2011. This decrease was driven primarily by improved returns on plan assets in 2012 versus 2011.
Income Related to Previously Owned Equity Affiliates
Income related to previously owned equity affiliates for 2013, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Income related to equity affiliates | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5.7 |
|
Gain on sale of investment in SunBelt | | 26.9 |
| | 23.4 |
| | 146.3 |
|
Income related to previously owned equity affiliates | | $ | 26.9 |
| | $ | 23.4 |
| | $ | 152.0 |
|
Effective February 28, 2011, we sold our 50% equity investment in SunBelt and recognized a pre-tax gain of $128.2 million. We also recognized a gain of $18.1 million and $23.4 million associated with the first and second of the three annual contingent earn-outs associated with the sale in 2011 and 2012, respectively. In 2013, we recognized a gain of $26.9 million, primarily associated with the third and final earn-out. The gains associated with our sale of our equity investment in SunBelt are reflected within Corporate and eliminations in our segment reporting.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense, net increased $12.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to higher average borrowing levels in 2013 related to the 5.25% senior notes due 2023 issued on February 28, 2013, in connection with the Spartech acquisition.
Interest expense, net increased $17.1 million in 2012 compared to 2011, primarily due to higher average borrowing levels in 2012 related to the senior secured term loan entered into on December 21, 2011, in connection with the ColorMatrix acquisition.
Debt extinguishment costs
Debt extinguishment costs of $15.8 million for 2013 includes $5.2 million related to the repurchase of $44.7 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior notes due 2020 and our 7.50% debentures due 2015. Debt extinguishment costs for 2013 also includes $10.6 million related to the repayment of the outstanding principal amount of $297.0 million under our senior secured term loan.
Debt extinguishment costs for 2011 include costs related to our repurchase of the aggregate principal of $22.9 million of our 8.875% senior notes that were due in 2012 at a premium of $0.9 million.
Income tax expense from continuing operations
In 2013 and 2012, we recognized tax expense of $58.1 million and $30.1 million, respectively. This increase was driven primarily by increased earnings in 2013, and a shift in earnings to the United States as a result of the acquisitions of Spartech and Glasforms, which have earnings primarily in the United States.
In 2012 and 2011, we recognized tax expense of $30.1 million and $15.5 million, respectively. In 2011, we recognized income tax expense primarily related to the sale of our equity interest in the SunBelt joint venture offset by a tax benefit associated with our divested investment in O'Sullivan Engineered Films, Inc. of $29.5 million. We also recognized a tax benefit related to a reduction in deferred tax valuation allowances related to various state and foreign deferred tax assets of $13.0 million.
Segment Information
Operating income is the primary financial measure that is reported to the chief operating decision makers for purposes of making decisions about allocating resources to the segment and assessing its performance. Operating income at the segment level does not include: corporate general and administrative costs that are not allocated to segments; intersegment sales and profit eliminations; charges related to specific strategic initiatives, such as the consolidation of operations; restructuring activities, including employee separation costs resulting from personnel reduction programs, plant closure and phase-out costs; executive separation agreements; share-based compensation costs; environmental remediation costs for facilities no longer owned or closed in prior years; gains and losses on the divestiture of joint ventures and equity investments; actuarial gains and losses related to pension and post-retirement benefit plans; and certain other items that are not included in the measure of segment profit or loss that is reported to and reviewed by the chief operating decision makers. These costs are included in Corporate and eliminations.
As a result of the acquisition of Spartech in March 2013, we created a new segment. Spartech's former Custom Sheet and Rollstock and Packaging Technology businesses are reported within this new segment, referred to as "Designed Structures and Solutions", and the remaining Spartech businesses were split among PolyOne's existing Global Specialty Engineered Materials, Global Color, Additives and Inks and Performance Products and Solutions segments.
PolyOne has five reportable segments: (1) Global Specialty Engineered Materials; (2) Global Color, Additives and Inks; (3) Designed Structures and Solutions, (4) Performance Products and Solutions; and (5) PolyOne Distribution.
Our segments are further discussed in Note 16, Segment Information, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Sales and Operating Income — 2013 compared with 2012 and 2012 compared with 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 2013 versus 2012 | | 2012 versus 2011 |
(Dollars in millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | Change | | % Change | | Change | | % Change |
Sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global Specialty Engineered Materials | | $ | 615.5 |
| | $ | 543.6 |
| | $ | 575.1 |
| | $ | 71.9 |
| | 13.2 | % | | $ | (31.5 | ) | | (5.5 | )% |
Global Color, Additives and Inks | | 852.3 |
| | 778.2 |
| | 617.7 |
| | 74.1 |
| | 9.5 | % | | 160.5 |
| | 26.0 | % |
Designed Structures and Solutions | | 597.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 597.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Performance Products and Solutions | | 773.2 |
| | 630.3 |
| | 639.1 |
| | 142.9 |
| | 22.7 | % | | (8.8 | ) | | (1.4 | )% |
PolyOne Distribution | | 1,075.2 |
| | 1,030.3 |
| | 996.5 |
| | 44.9 |
| | 4.4 | % | | 33.8 |
| | 3.4 | % |
Corporate and eliminations | | (142.4 | ) | | (121.6 | ) | | (119.0 | ) | | (20.8 | ) | | (17.1 | )% | | (2.6 | ) | | (2.2 | )% |
Sales | | $ | 3,771.2 |
| | $ | 2,860.8 |
| | $ | 2,709.4 |
| | $ | 910.4 |
| | 31.8 | % | | $ | 151.4 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global Specialty Engineered Materials | | $ | 57.2 |
| | $ | 47.0 |
| | $ | 45.9 |
| | 10.2 |
| | 21.7 | % | | $ | 1.1 |
| | 2.4 | % |
Global Color, Additives and Inks | | 104.0 |
| | 75.3 |
| | 50.2 |
| | 28.7 |
| | 38.1 | % | | 25.1 |
| | 50.0 | % |
Designed Structures and Solutions | | 33.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 33.4 |
| | 100.0 | % | | — |
| | — | % |
Performance Products and Solutions | | 56.0 |
| | 38.8 |
| | 27.7 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 44.3 | % | | 11.1 |
| | 40.1 | % |
PolyOne Distribution | | 63.3 |
| | 66.0 |
| | 56.0 |
| | (2.7 | ) | | (4.1 | )% | | 10.0 |
| | 17.9 | % |
Corporate and eliminations | | (82.4 | ) | | (89.6 | ) | | 23.2 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 8.0 | % | | (112.8 | ) | | (486.2 | )% |
Operating income | | $ | 231.5 |
| | $ | 137.5 |
| | $ | 203.0 |
| | $ | 94.0 |
| | 68.4 | % | | $ | (65.5 | ) | | (32.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income as a percentage of sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global Specialty Engineered Materials | | 9.3 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 0.7% points | | 0.6% points |
Global Color, Additives and Inks | | 12.2 | % | | 9.7 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 2.5% points | | 1.6% points |
Designed Structures and Solutions | | 5.6 | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | | — |
Performance Products and Solutions | | 7.2 | % | | 6.2 | % | | 4.3 | % | | 1.0% points | | 1.9% points |
PolyOne Distribution | | 5.9 | % | | 6.4 | % | | 5.6 | % | | (0.5)% points | | 0.8% points |
Total | | 6.1 | % | | 4.8 | % | | 7.5 | % | | 1.3% points | | (2.7)% points |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Global Specialty Engineered Materials
Sales increased $71.9 million, or 13.2%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Sales increased 10.0% due to the Spartech and Glasforms acquisitions and 2.6% due to organic sales primarily in the consumer and health care end markets, while favorable foreign exchange rates impacted sales by 0.6%.
Operating income increased $10.2 million in 2013 compared to 2012. This increase was driven primarily by organic improvements in sales and mix.
Sales decreased $31.5 million, or 5.5%, in 2012 compared to 2011. Volume declines of 4.7% related primarily to decreased demand in Europe and unfavorable currency exchange rates of 3.3% more than offset a 2.5% improvement in sales related to pricing associated with raw material inflation and improved product mix.
While sales decreased over the prior year, operating income increased $1.1 million in 2012 as compared to 2011, driven by margin expansion resulting from improved product mix and cost reductions as a result of restructuring actions.
Global Color, Additives and Inks
Sales increased $74.1 million, or 9.5%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Sales increased 8.0% as a result of the Spartech acquisition, 6.8% due to improved price and mix and 0.9% due to favorable exchange rate impacts. These increases were partially offset by a 6.2% decline in volume primarily in the industrial and packaging end markets.
Operating income increased $28.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase is primarily due to improvement in mix and the Spartech acquisition.
Sales increased $160.5 million, or 26.0%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the ColorMatrix acquisition positively impacting sales by 32.3%. Increased pricing, associated with raw material inflation, and improved product mix increased sales by 7.4%. These increases were partially offset by volume declines of 10.0%, primarily related to decreased demand in Europe, and unfavorable currency exchange rates of 3.7%.
Operating income increased $25.1 million in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to ColorMatrix adding $23.8 million of operating income in 2012.
Designed Structures and Solutions
The Designed Structures and Solutions segment is comprised of the former Spartech Custom Sheet and Rollstock and Packaging Technology segments. Sales for this segment were $597.4 million since the date of acquisition. Operating income for this segment was $33.4 million since the date of acquisition.
Performance Products and Solutions
Sales increased $142.9 million, or 22.7%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Sales increased 25.3% due to the Spartech acquisition and 2.2% due to improved pricing and mix. These increases were partially offset by volume declines of 4.8% primarily related to contract manufacturing for the transportation end market.
Operating income increased $17.2 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to improved price and mix and the Spartech acquisition.
Sales decreased $8.8 million, or 1.4%, in 2012 compared to 2011 due to volume declines of 2.0%, primarily in construction and industrial applications. The sales decrease was partially offset by improvements in pricing, primarily associated with raw material inflation, and improved mix of 0.5% and favorable foreign currency exchange rates of 0.1%.
Operating income increased $11.1 million in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to expanding margins as a result of improved product mix.
PolyOne Distribution
Sales increased $44.9 million, or 4.4%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Increased pricing associated with higher raw material costs increased sales by 3.1%, while volume increases favorably impacted sales by 1.3%.
Operating income decreased $2.7 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to higher raw material costs.
Sales increased $33.8 million, or 3.4%, in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to increased volume of 3.6%, most notably in the appliance, transportation and healthcare end markets. This increase was partially offset by unfavorable pricing, primarily associated with raw material price declines, and mix of 0.2%.
Operating income increased $10.0 million in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to higher volumes.
Corporate and Eliminations
The following table breaks down Corporate and eliminations into its various components for 2013, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Environmental remediation costs | | $ | (61.2 | ) | | $ | (12.8 | ) | | $ | (9.7 | ) |
Gains from insurance and legal settlements (a) | | 30.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.3 |
|
Employee separation and plant phase-out | | (52.0 | ) | | (11.5 | ) | | (2.8 | ) |
Gain on sale related to investment in equity affiliate (b) | | 26.9 |
| | 23.4 |
| | 146.3 |
|
Incentive and share based compensation | | (41.7 | ) | | (33.2 | ) | | (24.3 | ) |
Mark-to-market pension adjustment gain (loss) (c) | | 44.0 |
| | (42.0 | ) | | (83.8 | ) |
Acquisition-related costs, including inventory fair value adjustments | | (15.2 | ) | | (9.3 | ) | | (6.6 | ) |
SunBelt joint venture | | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
|
All other and eliminations (d) | | (13.7 | ) | | (4.2 | ) | | (4.2 | ) |
Total Corporate and eliminations | | $ | (82.4 | ) | | $ | (89.6 | ) | | $ | 23.2 |
|
| |
(a) | These settlements related to the reimbursement of previously incurred environmental costs of $23.5 million and a $7.0 million gain from commercial litigation. |
| |
(b) | On February 28, 2011, we sold our 50% equity interest in SunBelt to Olin Corporation. Gains of $146.3 million related to this sale include a $18.1 million earn-out for 2011 performance. The gain for 2012 and 2013 primarily represents the second and third of a three year annual earn-out related to the sale of our equity interest in SunBelt. |
| |
(c) | We have elected to immediately recognize actuarial gains and losses, after consideration of inventory capitalization, in our operating results in the year in which the gains or losses occur related to our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans. Amounts shown here reflect such adjustments. |
| |
(d) | All other and eliminations is comprised of intersegment eliminations and corporate general and administrative costs that are not allocated to segments. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our objective is to finance our business through operating cash flow and an appropriate mix of debt and equity. By laddering the maturity structure, we avoid concentrations of debt, reducing liquidity risk. We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt with cash and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. We may also seek to repurchase our outstanding common stock securities. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.
The following table summarizes our liquidity as of December 31, 2013:
|
| | | |
| As of December 31, |
(In millions) | 2013 |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 365.2 |
|
Revolving credit availability | 285.7 |
|
Liquidity | $ | 650.9 |
|
As of December 31, 2013, approximately 59% of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents resided outside the United States. Repatriation of these funds could result in potential foreign and domestic taxes. Based on current projections, we believe that we will be able to continue to manage and control working capital, discretionary spending and capital expenditures and that cash provided by operating activities, along with available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facilities, should allow us to maintain adequate levels of available capital resources to fund our operations, meet debt service obligations and continue to repurchase our outstanding common stock.
Expected sources of cash in 2014 include cash from operations, available liquidity under our revolving credit facility, if needed, and cash earn-outs from the sale of previously owned equity affiliates. We expect the third and final of the three cash earn-outs from the sale of our equity interest in SunBelt of $26.8 million to be paid in the first half of 2014. Expected uses of cash in 2014 include interest payments, cash taxes, contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, dividend payments, share repurchases, environmental remediation at inactive and formerly owned sites and capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are currently estimated to be $100 million in 2014, primarily to support sales growth, our continued investment in recent acquisitions, the North American Realignment, and other strategic investments.
On March 1, 2013, the agreement governing our $300.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility was amended and restated. The amendment and restatement resulted in an increase in commitments of $100.0 million for a maximum facility size of $400.0 million, subject to a borrowing base with advances against certain U.S. and Canadian accounts receivable and inventory. We have the option to increase the availability under the facility to $450.0 million, subject to meeting certain requirements and obtaining commitments for such increase. In connection with the amendment and restatement, we also extended the maturity date to March 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants, there were no outstanding borrowings under our asset-backed revolving credit facility which had availability of $282.3 million.
Cash Flows
The following summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | |
Operating Activities | | $ | 109.0 |
| | $ | 106.9 |
| | $ | 72.5 |
|
Investing Activities | | (60.1 | ) | | (72.3 | ) | | (422.5 | ) |
Financing Activities | | 104.8 |
| | (17.5 | ) | | 163.9 |
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | 1.5 |
| | 1.0 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 155.2 |
| | $ | 18.1 |
| | $ | (186.2 | ) |
Operating activities
In 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $109.0 million as compared to $106.9 million in 2012. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $2.1 million is primarily driven by higher earnings and improved working capital, which more than offset increased income tax payments associated with higher earnings and the gain on the Resin Business sale, which resulted in tax payments associated with the $85.2 million of income tax expense recognized on the gain.
Working capital as a percentage of sales, which we define as accounts receivable, plus inventory, less accounts payable, divided by sales increased from 10.3% at December 31, 2012 to 10.7% at December 31, 2013. The increase in working capital primarily relates to the acquisitions of Spartech and Glasforms, which unfavorably impacted working capital as a percentage of sales by 0.6%, while organic working capital as a percentage of sales improved by 0.2%. Days sales outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were 49.2 and 47.6, respectively.
In 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $106.9 million as compared to $72.5 million in 2011. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $34.4 million is primarily related to an increase in cash generated from earnings and an increase in tax refunds of $12.0 million received in 2012 as compared to 2011, partially offset by an increase in pension contributions of $31.2 million and interest payments of $13.8 million in 2012.
Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities during 2013 of $60.1 million primarily reflects our acquisition of Spartech for $258.8 million, net of cash acquired, and capital expenditures of $76.4 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by cash proceeds received of $275.7 million primarily related to the sale of our Resin Business for $250.0 million and the $23.2 million payment for year two of the three year earn-out from the sale of our 50% equity investment in SunBelt.
Net cash used by investing activities during 2012 of $72.3 million reflects our acquisition of Glasforms for $33.8 million, net of cash acquired and capital expenditures of $57.4 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by cash proceeds of $18.9 million, primarily related to the receipt of the first of three earn-outs related to our 2011 sale of our equity investment in SunBelt.
Net cash used by investing activities during 2011 of $422.5 million reflects our acquisitions of ColorMatrix for $486.1 million, net of cash acquired, and Uniplen for $21.8 million, net of cash acquired, capital expenditures of $54.1 million, and an earn-out payment of $0.5 million related to our 2009 acquisition of New England Urethane (NEU). These cash outflows were offset by cash proceeds of $140.0 million from the sale of our equity investment in SunBelt and other assets.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 2013 reflects repayment of our long-term debt of $343.3 million, debt financing costs of $13.0 million, premium on early extinguishment of long-term debt of $4.6 million, repurchases of $131.6 million of our outstanding common stock and dividend payments of $21.5 million. These cash outflows were more than offset by proceeds received from the issuance of our 5.25% senior notes due 2023 of $600.0 million, net proceeds from borrowings under our credit facilities of $11.5 million and income tax benefits of $7.3 million related to the exercise of equity awards.
Net cash used in financing activities in 2012 reflects scheduled payments on our long-term debt of $3.0 million, repurchase of common shares for treasury of $15.9 million under our stock repurchase program and dividend payments of $16.9 million. These cash outflows were partially offset by net proceeds on the exercise of stock awards of $15.1 million and proceeds received from noncontrolling interests of $2.4 million related to the start-up of our joint venture in Saudi Arabia.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $163.9 million in 2011 reflects net proceeds from our new term loan of $297.0 million and the exercise of stock awards of $6.9 million. These cash inflows were partially offset by $73.6 million for the repurchase of outstanding common shares, $22.9 million for the repurchase of our 8.875% senior notes due in 2012, $20.0 million for the repayment of our 6.58% medium-term notes at maturity, debt financing costs of $11.5 million, dividend payments of $11.1 million and $0.9 million of debt extinguishment costs associated with the early repurchase of the 2012 notes.
Total Debt
The following summarizes our debt as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, |
(Dollars in millions) | | 2013 | | 2012 (1) |
7.500% debentures due 2015 | | $ | 48.7 |
| | $ | 50.0 |
|
Senior secured term loan due 2017 | | — |
| | 294.5 |
|
7.375% senior notes due 2020 | | 316.6 |
| | 360.0 |
|
5.250% senior notes due 2023 | | 600.0 |
| | — |
|
Other debt | | 23.6 |
| | 2.4 |
|
Total debt | | $ | 988.9 |
| | $ | 706.9 |
|
Less: short-term and current portion of long-term debt | | 12.7 |
| | 3.8 |
|
Total long-term debt, net of current portion | | $ | 976.2 |
| | $ | 703.1 |
|
| |
(1) | Senior secured term loan includes $2.5 million of unamortized discounts. |
In 2013, we repurchased $43.4 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.375% senior notes due 2020, $1.3 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.50% debentures due 2015 and $1.6 million of our other debt. In 2013, we recognized debt extinguishment costs of $5.2 million related to the early retirement of debt, which is shown within the Debt extinguishment costs line in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
On March 1, 2013, the agreement governing our $300.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility was amended and restated. The amendment and restatement resulted in an increase in commitments of $100.0 million for a maximum facility size of $400.0 million, subject to a borrowing base with advances against certain U.S. and Canadian accounts receivable and inventory. We have the option to increase the availability under the facility to $450.0 million, subject to meeting certain requirements and obtaining commitments for such increase. In connection with the amendment and restatement, we also extended the maturity date to March 1, 2018. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants, had no outstanding borrowings and had availability of $282.3 million under this facility.
On February 28, 2013, we issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, which mature on March 15, 2023. The senior notes bear interest at an annual rate of 5.25% payable semi-annually, in arrears, on March 15 and September 15 of each year, which commenced on September 15, 2013. We used a portion of the proceeds to repay the outstanding principal amount of $297.0 million on our senior secured term loan. As a result of the repayment of our senior secured term loan, we recognized $10.6 million of debt extinguishment costs.
On October 2, 2012, the Company entered into a credit line with Saudi Hollandi Bank for $10.7 million, with an interest rate equal to the Saudi Arabia Interbank Offered Rate (SAIBOR) plus a fixed rate of 0.85%. In 2013, the Company renewed this credit line and increased the borrowing capacity to $16.0 million. The credit line is being used to fund capital expenditures related to the manufacturing facility in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and is subject to an
annual renewal. As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants, and borrowings under the credit line were $12.3 million with an interest rate of 1.85%.
For additional information about our financing arrangements, see Note 6, Financing Arrangements, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, including foreign exchange contracts, and trade accounts receivable, subject us to potential credit risk. Concentration of credit risk for trade accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of customers constituting our customer base and their distribution among many industries and geographic locations. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to foreign exchange contracts in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties to these financial instruments. We believe that the risk of incurring material losses related to this credit risk is remote. We do not require collateral to support the financial position of our credit risks.
Guarantee of Indebtedness of Others
On February 28, 2011, we sold our 50% equity interest in SunBelt to Olin for $132.3 million in cash and the assumption by Olin of the obligations under our guarantee of senior secured notes issued by SunBelt of $42.7 million at the time of sale, $24.4 million as of December 31, 2013. Until the guarantee is formally assigned to Olin, we remain obligated under the guarantee, although Olin has agreed to indemnify us for amounts that we may be obligated to pay under the guarantee. These notes mature in December 2017.
Letters of Credit
Our revolving credit facility provides up to $50.0 million for the issuance of letters of credit, $20.9 million of which was used at December 31, 2013. These letters of credit are issued by the bank in favor of third parties and are mainly related to insurance claims.
Contractual Cash Obligations
The following table summarizes our obligations under debt agreements, operating leases, interest obligations, pension and other post-retirement plan obligations and purchase obligations as of December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payment Due by Period |
(In millions) | | Total | | 2014 | | 2015 & 2016 | | 2017 & 2018 | | Thereafter |
Total debt (1) | | $ | 988.9 |
| | $ | 12.7 |
| | $ | 57.7 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 917.4 |
|
Operating leases | | 76.7 |
| | 18.7 |
| | 25.7 |
| | 13.0 |
| | 19.3 |
|
Interest on long-term debt obligations (2) | | 473.4 |
| | 59.5 |
| | 114.1 |
| | 110.3 |
| | 189.5 |
|
Pension and post-retirement obligations (3) | | 64.9 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 13.3 |
| | 12.9 |
| | 32.1 |
|
Purchase obligations (4) | | 15.7 |
| | 8.9 |
| | 5.9 |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
|
Total | | $ | 1,619.6 |
| | $ | 106.4 |
| | $ | 216.7 |
| | $ | 138.2 |
| | $ | 1,158.3 |
|
| |
(1) | Total debt includes both the current and long-term portions of debt, as reported in Note 6, Financing Arrangements, to the consolidated financial statements. |
| |
(2) | Represents estimated contractual interest payments for all debt. |
| |
(3) | Pension and post-retirement obligations relate to our U.S. and international pension and other post-retirement plans. The expected payments associated with these plans represent an actuarial estimate of future assumed payments based upon retirement and payment patterns. Due to uncertainties regarding the assumptions involved in estimating future required contributions to our pension and non-pension postretirement benefit plans, including: (i) interest rate levels, (ii) the amount and timing of asset returns and (iii) what, if any, changes may occur in pension funding legislation, the estimates in the table may differ materially from actual future payments. |
| |
(4) | Purchase obligations are primarily comprised of service agreements related to telecommunication, information technology, utilities and other manufacturing plant services and certain capital commitments. |
The table also excludes the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits, since we cannot predict with reasonable certainty the timing of cash settlements, if any, with the respective taxing authorities. At December 31, 2013, the gross liability for unrecognized income tax benefits, including interest and penalties, totaled $18.2 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K other than the SunBelt debt guarantee described previously in the Guarantee of Indebtedness of Others section.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Significant accounting policies are described more fully in Note 1, Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and assumptions that we believe are reasonable considering the related facts and circumstances. The application of these critical accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions for future uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. We believe that the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. We have reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
| | | | |
Pension and Other Post-retirement Plans |
• We account for our defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement plans in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits. We immediately recognize actuarial gains and losses, after consideration of inventory capitalization, in our operating results in the year in which the gains or losses occur. In 2013, we recognized a $44.0 million gain as a result of the recognition of these actuarial gains, which favorably impacted our statement of income, statement of comprehensive income, and the funded status of our pension plans. These gains were mainly driven by an increase in discount rates and asset returns in excess of our assumed rate of return of 8.41%. | | • Asset returns and interest rates significantly affect the value of future assets and liabilities of our pension and post-retirement plans and therefore the funded status of our plans. It is difficult to predict these factors due to the volatility of market conditions. • To develop our discount rate, we consider the yields of high-quality, fixed-income investments with maturities that correspond to the timing of our benefit obligations. • To develop our expected long-term return on plan assets, we consider our historical long-term asset return experience, the expected investment portfolio mix of plan assets and an estimate of long-term investment returns. The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 8.41% for 2013, 8.43% for 2012 and 8.50% 2011.
• As our funded levels have improved during 2013, we have shifted our U.S. qualified pension assets to a larger fixed income weighting. As a result, we have lowered our weighted average expected return on plan assets to 6.85% in 2014. While this change will lower our expected return on plan assets, our strategy is for our assets to increase/decrease proportionally with our liability such that our funding levels do not deteriorate. Further, our weighted average discount rate, which is used to determine our 2014 net periodic cost increased to 4.83%. This increase will result in an increase to the interest cost component of our net periodic pension cost for 2014. | | • The weighted average discount rates used to value our pension liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 4.83% and 4.12%, post-retirement liabilities were 4.38% and 3.71%. As of December 31, 2013, an increase/decrease in the discount rate of 50 basis points, holding all other assumptions constant, would have increased or decreased pre-tax income and the related pension and post-retirement liability by approximately $28.6 million. An increase/decrease in the discount rate of 50 basis points as of December 31, 2013 would result in a change of approximately $1.3 million in the 2014 net periodic benefit cost. • As we recognize returns on our plan assets based upon the actual returns of these assets through a mark-to-market adjustment that is recorded in the fourth quarter, no sensitivity analysis for a one percentage increase/decrease in our expected long-term return on plan assets has been provided. |
| | | | |
Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets |
• Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of acquired companies. We follow the guidance in ASC 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other, and test goodwill for impairment at least annually, absent a triggering event that would warrant an impairment assessment. On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, we perform our goodwill impairment testing as of the first day of October of each year. | | • We have identified our reporting units at the operating segment level, or in some cases, one level below the operating segment level. Goodwill is allocated to the reporting units based on the estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. • We estimated fair value using the best information available to us, including market information and discounted cash flow projections also referred to as the income approach. • The income approach requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding projected economic and market conditions, growth rates, operating margins and cash expenditures. | | • If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we may be exposed to additional goodwill impairment charges. • Based on our 2013 annual impairment test, no reporting unit is considered at risk and the fair value of the majority of our reporting units significantly exceeded the corresponding carrying value. |
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
| | | | |
• At December 31, 2013, our Consolidated Balance Sheet reflected $96.3 million of indefinite lived trade name assets, which includes, $33.2 million associated with the trade name acquired as part of the acquisition of GLS and $63.1 million associated with trade names acquired as part of the ColorMatrix acquisition. | | • We estimate the fair value of trade names using a “relief from royalty payments” approach. This approach involves two steps: (1) estimating reasonable royalty rate for the trade name and (2) applying this royalty rate to a net sales stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine fair value. Fair value is then compared with the carrying value of the trade name. | | • If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we may be exposed to impairment charges related to our indefinite lived trade names. • Based on our 2013 annual impairment test, no trade names were considered at risk. |
| | | | |
Income Taxes | | | | |
• We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method under ASC 740. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. In addition, deferred tax assets are also recorded with respect to net operating losses and other tax attribute carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when realization of the benefit of deferred tax assets is not deemed to be more likely than not. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. | | • The ultimate recovery of certain of our deferred tax assets is dependent on the amount and timing of taxable income that we will ultimately generate in the future and other factors such as the interpretation of tax laws. This means that significant estimates and judgments are required to determine the extent that valuation allowances should be provided against deferred tax assets. We have provided valuation allowances as of December 31, 2013 aggregating to $29.3 million against such assets based on our current assessment of future operating results and these other factors. At December 31, 2013, the gross liability for unrecognized income tax benefits, including interest and penalties, totaled $18.2 million. | | • Although management believes that the estimates and judgments discussed herein are reasonable, actual results could differ, which could result in income tax expense or benefits that could be material. |
| | |
• We recognize net tax benefits under the recognition and measurement criteria of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, which prescribes requirements and other guidance for financial statement recognition and measurement of positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns. We record interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. | | | | |
| | |
Environmental Liabilities | | | | |
• Based upon our estimates, we have $125.9 million accrued at December 31, 2013 to cover probable future environmental expenditures. Any such provision is recognized using the Company's best estimate of the amount of loss incurred, or at the lower end of an estimated range, when a single best estimate is not determinable. In some cases, the Company may be able to recover a portion of the costs relating to these obligations from insurers or other third parties; however, the Company records such amounts only when it is probable that they will be collected.
| | • This accrual represents our best estimate of the remaining probable costs based upon information and technology currently available. Depending upon the results of future testing, the ultimate remediation alternatives undertaken, changes in regulations, new information, newly discovered conditions and other factors, it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional costs in excess of the amount accrued. However, such additional costs, if any, cannot currently be estimated. Our estimate of this liability may be revised as new regulations or technologies are developed or additional information is obtained. | | • If further developments or resolution of these matters are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments, we may need to recognize a significant adjustment in a future period.
• As noted in Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, we recorded a $47.0 million adjustment related to our ongoing remedial investigation and feasibility study (RIFS) at Calvert City. As we progress through certain benchmarks such as completion of the RIFS, issuance of a record of decision and remedial design, additional information may become available that requires an adjustment to our existing reserves. |
|
| | | | |
Description | | Judgments and Uncertainties | | Effect if Actual Results Differ from Assumptions |
| | | | |
Share-Based Compensation | | | | |
| | | | |
We have share-based compensation plans that include non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights (SARs). See Note 15, Share-Based Compensation, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our stock-based compensation programs. | | Option-pricing models and generally accepted valuation techniques require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to determine the fair value of our awards. These assumptions and judgments include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, future forfeiture rates and risk-free rates of return. | | • We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to determine share-based compensation expense. |
| | | |
• We determined the fair value of the SARs granted in 2013 and 2012 based on a Monte Carlo simulation method. For SARs granted during 2011, we used the Black-Scholes method. | | | |
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks from changes in interest rates on debt obligations and foreign currency exchange rates that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. We intend to use these derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative investment purposes.
Interest rate exposure — Interest on our asset-backed revolving credit facility is based upon a Prime rate or LIBOR, plus a margin. Interest on the credit line with Saudi Hollandi Bank is based upon SAIBOR plus a fixed rate of 0.85%. All other debt obligations are primarily fixed rate obligations. There would be no material impact on our interest expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in market rates of interest on our outstanding variable rate debt as of December 31, 2013.
Foreign currency exposure — We enter into intercompany lending transactions that are denominated in various foreign currencies and are subject to financial exposure from foreign exchange rate movement from the date a loan is recorded to the date it is settled or revalued. To mitigate this risk, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts, which had a fair value of less than $0.1 million at December 31, 2013. Gains and losses on these contracts generally offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged.
We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Shareholders’ equity section of the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net sales and expenses in our foreign operations’ foreign currencies are translated into varying amounts of U.S. dollars depending upon whether the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Financial Statements
|
| | |
| Page |
Management’s Report | 36 |
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 37-38 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: | |
Consolidated Statements of Income | 39 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | 40 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 41 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 42 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity | 43 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 44-70 |
|
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT
The management of PolyOne Corporation is responsible for preparing the consolidated financial statements and disclosures included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements and disclosures included in this Annual Report fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial position, results of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows of PolyOne Corporation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company is captured and reported in a timely manner. Management has evaluated the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures at December 31, 2013 and found them to be effective.
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that provide reasonable assurance that: PolyOne Corporation’s accounting records accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; unauthorized or improper acquisition, use or disposal of Company assets will be prevented or timely detected; the Company’s transactions are properly recorded and reported to permit the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles; and the Company’s receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Board of Directors of the Company.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of PolyOne’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 and has prepared Management’s Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting contained on page 71 of this Annual Report, which concludes that as of December 31, 2013, PolyOne’s internal control over financial reporting is effective and that no material weaknesses were identified.
|
| | | |
| | | |
/s/ STEPHEN D. NEWLIN | | | /s/ BRADLEY C. RICHARDSON |
| | | |
Stephen D. Newlin | | | Bradley C. Richardson |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | | |
February 13, 2014
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PolyOne Corporation
We have audited PolyOne Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). PolyOne Corporation's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying “Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, PolyOne Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PolyOne Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 and our report dated February 13, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 13, 2014
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of PolyOne Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PolyOne Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PolyOne Corporation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), PolyOne Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 13, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 13, 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
(In millions, except per share data) | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Sales | | $ | 3,771.2 |
| | $ | 2,860.8 |
| | $ | 2,709.4 |
|
Cost of sales | | 3,109.0 |
| | 2,329.7 |
| | 2,280.1 |
|
Gross margin | | 662.2 |
| | 531.1 |
| | 429.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expense | | 457.6 |
| | 417.0 |
| | 378.3 |
|
Income related to previously owned equity affiliates | | 26.9 |
| | 23.4 |
| | 152.0 |
|
Operating income | | 231.5 |
| | 137.5 |
| | 203.0 |
|
Interest expense, net | | (63.5 | ) | | (50.8 | ) | | (33.7 | ) |
Debt extinguishment costs | | (15.8 | ) | | — |
| | (0.9 | ) |
Other (expense) income, net | | (1.2 | ) | | (3.4 | ) | | 0.5 |
|
Income from continuing operations, before income taxes | | 151.0 |
| | 83.3 |
| | 168.9 |
|
Income tax expense | | (58.1 | ) | | (30.1 | ) | | (15.5 | ) |
Net income from continuing operations | | 92.9 |
| | 53.2 |
| | 153.4 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | | 149.8 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 19.2 |
|
Net income | | 242.7 |
| | 71.8 |
| | 172.6 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 1.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
Net income attributable to PolyOne common shareholders | | $ | 243.8 |
| | $ | 71.9 |
| | $ | 172.6 |
|
| | | | | | |
Earnings per share attributable to PolyOne common shareholders - basic: | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.98 |
| | $ | 0.60 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
|
Discontinued operations | | 1.57 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.21 |
|
Total | | $ | 2.55 |
| | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 1.87 |
|
| | | | | | |
Earnings per share attributable to PolyOne common shareholders - diluted: | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.97 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.63 |
|
Discontinued operations | | 1.56 |
| | 0.21 |
| | 0.21 |
|
Total | | $ | 2.53 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
| | $ | 1.84 |
|
| | | | | | |
Cash dividends declared per common share | | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
|
| | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: | | | | | | |
Basic | | 95.5 |
| | 89.1 |
| | 92.2 |
|
Diluted | | 96.5 |
| | 89.8 |
| | 94.3 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net income | $ | 242.7 |
| | $ | 71.8 |
| | $ | 172.6 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: | | |
| | |
Translation adjustments | (3.7 | ) | | 1.1 |
| | (9.0 | ) |
Amortization of prior service credits, net of tax of $6.5 - 2012 and $6.5 - 2011 | — |
| | (10.9 | ) | | (10.8 | ) |
Total other comprehensive loss | (3.7 | ) | | (9.8 | ) | | (19.8 | ) |
Total comprehensive income | 239.0 |
| | 62.0 |
| | 152.8 |
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests | 1.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to PolyOne common shareholders | $ | 240.1 |
| | $ | 62.1 |
| | $ | 152.8 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(In millions) | 2013 | | 2012 |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 365.2 |
| | $ | 210.0 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | 428.0 |
| | 313.9 |
|
Inventories, net | 342.5 |
| | 244.4 |
|
Assets held-for-sale | — |
| | 39.3 |
|
Other current assets | 117.9 |
| | 81.1 |
|
Total current assets | 1,253.6 |
| | 888.7 |
|
Property, net | 646.2 |
| | 385.8 |
|
Goodwill | 559.0 |
| | 405.5 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 365.8 |
| | 340.0 |
|
Other non-current assets | 119.5 |
| | 108.0 |
|
Total assets | $ | 2,944.1 |
| | $ | 2,128.0 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt | $ | 12.7 |
| | $ | 3.8 |
|
Accounts payable | 386.9 |
| | 296.1 |
|
Liabilities held-for-sale | — |
| | 18.0 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 209.3 |
| | 141.9 |
|
Total current liabilities | 608.9 |
| | 459.8 |
|
Long-term debt | 976.2 |
| | 703.1 |
|
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions | 14.7 |
| | 17.0 |
|
Pension benefits | 62.6 |
| | 182.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 133.8 |
| | 31.8 |
|
Other non-current liabilities | 169.4 |
| | 102.1 |
|
Total non-current liabilities | 1,356.7 |
| | 1,036.8 |
|
| | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | |
Preferred stock, 40.0 shares authorized, no shares issued | — |
| | — |
|
Common Shares, $0.01 par, 400.0 shares authorized, 122.2 shares issued | 1.2 |
| |