Document
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
OR
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-36383
Five9, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 94- 3394123 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Bishop Ranch 8
4000 Executive Parkway, Suite 400
San Ramon, CA 94583
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(925) 201-2000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: x No: o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes: x No: o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | |
Large Accelerated Filer | o | | | Accelerated Filer | x |
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting Company) | | Smaller Reporting Company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes: o No: x
As of July 25, 2016, there were 52,554,124 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
FIVE9, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These statements reflect the current views of our senior management with respect to future events and our financial performance. These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our business, expenses, strategies, losses, growth plans, product and client initiatives, market growth projections, and our industry. Statements that include the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “project,” “forecast,” “estimate,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature identify forward-looking statements for purposes of the federal securities laws or otherwise.
Forward-looking statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. These factors include the information set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report, including the following:
| |
• | our quarterly and annual results may fluctuate significantly, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business and may result in decreases in the price of our common stock; |
| |
• | if we are unable to attract new clients or sell additional services and functionality to our existing clients, our revenue and revenue growth will be harmed; |
| |
• | our recent rapid growth may not be indicative of our future growth, and even if we continue to grow rapidly, we may fail to manage our growth effectively; |
| |
• | the markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed; |
| |
• | if we fail to manage our technical operations infrastructure, our existing clients may experience service outages, our new clients may experience delays in the deployment of our solution and we could be subject to, among other things, claims for credits or damages; |
| |
• | if our existing clients terminate their subscriptions or reduce their subscriptions and related usage, our revenues and gross margins will be harmed and we will be required to spend more money to grow our client base; |
| |
• | we sell our solution to larger organizations that require longer sales and implementation cycles and often demand more configuration and integration services or customized features and functions that we may not offer, any of which could delay or prevent these sales and harm our growth rates, business and operating results; |
| |
• | because a significant percentage of our revenue is derived from existing clients, downturns or upturns in new sales will not be immediately reflected in our operating results and may be difficult to discern; |
| |
• | we rely on third-party telecommunications and internet service providers to provide our clients and their customers with telecommunication services and connectivity to our cloud contact center software and any failure by these service providers to provide reliable services could subject us to, among other things, claims for credits or damages; |
| |
• | we have a history of losses and we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability; |
| |
• | we may not be able to secure additional financing on favorable terms, or at all, to meet our future capital needs; and |
| |
• | failure to comply with laws and regulations could harm our business and our reputation. |
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary statements included in this report. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may differ materially from what we anticipate. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements you read in this report reflect our views only as of the date of this report with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this report to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
FIVE9, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
| | (Unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 57,638 |
| | $ | 58,484 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | | 10,765 |
| | 10,567 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 3,390 |
| | 2,184 |
|
Total current assets | | 71,793 |
| | 71,235 |
|
Property and equipment, net | | 13,188 |
| | 13,225 |
|
Intangible assets, net | | 1,785 |
| | 2,041 |
|
Goodwill | | 11,798 |
| | 11,798 |
|
Other assets | | 932 |
| | 934 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 99,496 |
| | $ | 99,233 |
|
| | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 3,004 |
| | $ | 2,569 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities | | 9,153 |
| | 7,911 |
|
Accrued federal fees | | 6,008 |
| | 5,684 |
|
Sales tax liability | | 1,215 |
| | 1,262 |
|
Revolving line of credit | | 12,500 |
| | 12,500 |
|
Notes payable | | 6,576 |
| | 7,212 |
|
Capital leases | | 5,271 |
| | 4,972 |
|
Deferred revenue | | 7,898 |
| | 6,413 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 51,625 |
| | 48,523 |
|
Sales tax liability — less current portion | | 1,650 |
| | 1,915 |
|
Notes payable — less current portion | | 14,572 |
| | 17,327 |
|
Capital leases — less current portion | | 4,617 |
| | 4,606 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | | 579 |
| | 582 |
|
Total liabilities | | 73,043 |
| | 72,953 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | |
| |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 | | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 450,000 shares authorized, 52,554 shares and 51,165 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively | | 53 |
| | 51 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 189,199 |
| | 180,649 |
|
Accumulated deficit | | (162,799 | ) | | (154,420 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | 26,453 |
| | 26,280 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 99,496 |
| | $ | 99,233 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FIVE9, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Revenue | | $ | 38,886 |
| | $ | 30,274 |
| | $ | 76,901 |
| | $ | 60,548 |
|
Cost of revenue | | 16,764 |
| | 14,270 |
| | 33,374 |
| | 29,048 |
|
Gross profit | | 22,122 |
| | 16,004 |
| | 43,527 |
| | 31,500 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | 5,799 |
| | 5,568 |
| | 11,601 |
| | 11,606 |
|
Sales and marketing | | 12,637 |
| | 10,594 |
| | 25,343 |
| | 20,525 |
|
General and administrative | | 5,882 |
| | 6,027 |
| | 12,418 |
| | 13,302 |
|
Total operating expenses | | 24,318 |
| | 22,189 |
| | 49,362 |
| | 45,433 |
|
Loss from operations | | (2,196 | ) | | (6,185 | ) | | (5,835 | ) | | (13,933 | ) |
Other expense, net: | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | (1,197 | ) | | (1,155 | ) | | (2,396 | ) | | (2,294 | ) |
Interest income and other | | (33 | ) | | (49 | ) | | (78 | ) | | (47 | ) |
Total other expense, net | | (1,230 | ) | | (1,204 | ) | | (2,474 | ) | | (2,341 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | | (3,426 | ) | | (7,389 | ) | | (8,309 | ) | | (16,274 | ) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | 42 |
| | (20 | ) | | 70 |
| | (2 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (3,468 | ) | | $ | (7,369 | ) | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
Net loss per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | (0.15 | ) | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | (0.33 | ) |
Shares used in computing net loss per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted | | 52,143 |
| | 49,980 |
| | 51,760 |
| | 49,708 |
|
Comprehensive Loss: | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,468 | ) | | $ | (7,369 | ) | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Change in unrealized gain/loss on short-term investments, net of tax | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (3,468 | ) | | $ | (7,368 | ) | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
FIVE9, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 4,163 |
| | 3,685 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts | | 41 |
| | 134 |
|
Stock-based compensation | | 4,408 |
| | 4,065 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment | | 2 |
| | 9 |
|
Amortization of debt discount | | 178 |
| | 171 |
|
Others | | (7 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (245 | ) | | (57 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | (1,206 | ) | | (2,268 | ) |
Other assets | | 62 |
| | (87 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 357 |
| | (1,394 | ) |
Accrued and other current liabilities | | 1,389 |
| | 2,035 |
|
Accrued federal fees and sales tax liability | | 12 |
| | 165 |
|
Deferred revenue | | 1,535 |
| | 163 |
|
Other liabilities | | (53 | ) | | (58 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | 2,257 |
| | (9,710 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | (568 | ) | | (414 | ) |
(Increase) Decrease in restricted cash | | (60 | ) | | 806 |
|
Purchase of short-term investments | | — |
| | (20,000 | ) |
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments | | — |
| | 40,000 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (628 | ) | | 20,392 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options | | 3,352 |
| | 349 |
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock under ESPP | | 792 |
| | 680 |
|
Repayments of notes payable | | (3,563 | ) | | (1,572 | ) |
Payments of capital leases | | (3,056 | ) | | (3,095 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (2,475 | ) | | (3,638 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | (846 | ) | | 7,044 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | | |
Beginning of period | | 58,484 |
| | 58,289 |
|
End of period | | $ | 57,638 |
| | $ | 65,333 |
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | | | | |
Equipment obtained under capital lease | | $ | 3,352 |
| | $ | 2,394 |
|
Equipment purchased and unpaid at period-end | | 102 |
| | 34 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
FIVE9, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Five9, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a provider of cloud software for contact centers. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 2001 and is headquartered in San Ramon, California. The Company has offices in Europe and Asia, which primarily provide research, development, sales, marketing, and client support services.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Therefore, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The significant estimates made by management affect revenue, the allowance for doubtful accounts, intangible assets, goodwill, loss contingencies, including the Company’s accrual for federal fees and sales tax liability, accrued liabilities, stock-based compensation, provision for income taxes and uncertain tax positions. Management periodically evaluates such estimates and they are adjusted prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant Accounting Policies
The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, there were no changes to the Company's significant accounting policies.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. This ASU eliminates the requirement for companies to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent on the balance sheet and, instead, requires companies to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. As permitted by ASU 2015-17, the Company early-adopted this new guidance at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015 and applied it prospectively. No prior periods were retrospectively adjusted.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. The ASU provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The ASU does not change the accounting for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. A company can elect to adopt the ASU either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company adopted this guidance prospectively beginning in the first quarter of 2016 and the adoption did not have a material effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The ASU requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by this ASU. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, which clarifies that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company adopted this guidance retrospectively beginning in the first quarter of 2016 and the adoption did not have a material effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements for the prior periods or the current period reported.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Effective
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for certain types of financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company in its first quarter of 2020, and earlier adoption is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2017, with early application permitted. The Company is currently assessing the effect the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for both finance, or capital, and operating leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. The ASU also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. Lessor accounting will remain largely unchanged from current GAAP. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach that includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the effect the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new guidance requires management of public and private companies to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and, if so, disclose that fact. Management will also be required to evaluate and disclose whether its plans alleviate that doubt. The standard will be effective for the Company's annual period ending December 31, 2016 and interim and annual periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the requirement will have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016 and May 2016 within ASU 2015-04, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12, respectively (ASU 2014-09, ASU 2015-04, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 collectively, Topic 606). Topic 606 requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. Topic 606 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. Topic 606 is effective for the Company's annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018 using either a retrospective or a cumulative effect transition method. The Company has not yet selected a transition method or determined the effect of these ASUs on its ongoing financial reporting.
2. Fair Value Measurements
The Company carries cash equivalents consisting of money market funds at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is based on the price that would be received from selling an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:
Level 1 — Observable inputs which include unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are based on management’s assumptions, including fair value measurements determined by using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques.
The fair value of assets carried at fair value was determined using the following inputs (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 |
| | Total | | Level 1 |
Assets | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 20,047 |
| | $ | 20,047 |
|
| | | | |
| | December 31, 2015 |
| | Total | | Level 1 |
Assets | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 20,010 |
| | $ | 20,010 |
|
3. Financial Statement Components
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Cash | | $ | 37,591 |
| | $ | 38,474 |
|
Money market funds | | 20,047 |
| | 20,010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 57,638 |
| | $ | 58,484 |
|
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Trade accounts receivable | | $ | 9,901 |
| | $ | 9,554 |
|
Unbilled trade accounts receivable, net of advance client deposits | | 872 |
| | 1,028 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | (8 | ) | | (15 | ) |
Accounts receivable, net | | $ | 10,765 |
| | $ | 10,567 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Prepaid expenses | | $ | 3,034 |
| | $ | 1,800 |
|
Other current assets | | 356 |
| | 384 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 3,390 |
| | $ | 2,184 |
|
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Computer and network equipment | | $ | 33,358 |
| | $ | 30,277 |
|
Computer software | | 4,008 |
| | 3,566 |
|
Internal-use software development costs | | 453 |
| | 128 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | | 1,130 |
| | 1,113 |
|
Leasehold improvements | | 622 |
| | 619 |
|
Property and equipment | | 39,571 |
| | 35,703 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (26,383 | ) | | (22,478 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 13,188 |
| | $ | 13,225 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense associated with property and equipment was $1.9 million and $3.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $1.8 million and $3.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
Property and equipment capitalized under capital lease obligations consist primarily of computer and network equipment and were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Gross | | $ | 30,648 |
| | $ | 27,302 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (19,794 | ) | | (16,429 | ) |
Total | | $ | 10,854 |
| | $ | 10,873 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Accrued compensation and benefits | | $ | 6,675 |
| | $ | 5,718 |
|
Accrued expenses | | 2,478 |
| | 2,193 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities | | $ | 9,153 |
| | $ | 7,911 |
|
4. Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Developed technology | | $ | 2,460 |
| | $ | (951 | ) | | $ | 1,509 |
| | $ | 2,460 |
| | $ | (775 | ) | | $ | 1,685 |
|
Customer relationships | | 520 |
| | (281 | ) | | 239 |
| | 520 |
| | (229 | ) | | 291 |
|
Domain names | | 50 |
| | (27 | ) | | 23 |
| | 50 |
| | (22 | ) | | 28 |
|
Non-compete agreements | | 140 |
| | (126 | ) | | 14 |
| | 140 |
| | (103 | ) | | 37 |
|
Total | | $ | 3,170 |
| | $ | (1,385 | ) | | $ | 1,785 |
| | $ | 3,170 |
| | $ | (1,129 | ) | | $ | 2,041 |
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
As of June 30, 2016, the expected future amortization expense for intangible assets was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | |
Period | | Expected Future Amortization Expense |
Remainder of 2016 | | $ | 247 |
|
2017 | | 465 |
|
2018 | | 442 |
|
2019 | | 351 |
|
2020 | | 280 |
|
Total | | $ | 1,785 |
|
5. Debt
2013 Loan and Security Agreement
Prior to the effectiveness of the 2016 Loan and Security Agreement that was entered into on August 1, 2016 (see Note 11), the Company had a revolving line of credit of up to $20.0 million (“Prior Revolving Credit Facility”) under a loan and security agreement with a lender, which was entered into in March 2013 and last amended in December 2014 (“2013 Loan and Security Agreement”). The Prior Revolving Credit Facility carried a variable annual interest rate of the prime rate plus 0.50% and would mature on December 1, 2016.
The 2013 Loan and Security Agreement was collateralized by substantially all the assets of the Company. The balance outstanding cannot exceed the lesser of (i) $20.0 million or (ii) an amount equal to the Company’s monthly recurring revenue for the three months prior multiplied by the average Dollar-Based Retention Rate over the prior twelve months, less the amount accrued for the Company’s Universal Service Fund (“USF”) obligation (accrued federal fees). As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the outstanding principal balance under the Prior Revolving Credit Facility was $12.5 million, which is disclosed as a current liability, and the amount available for additional borrowings was $7.5 million.
In connection with its acquisition of SoCoCare in October 2013, the Company also borrowed $5.0 million under a term loan (the “Term Loan”) under the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement in October 2013. Monthly interest-only payments were due on the advance at the prime rate plus 1.50% through September 2014. Principal and interest payments were due in equal monthly installments from October 2014 through the maturity of the Term Loan in March 2017. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately $1.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in principal amount of this Term Loan was outstanding and is included as notes payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The 2013 Loan and Security Agreement contained certain covenants, including the requirement that the Company maintain $7.5 million of cash deposited with the lender for the term of the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2016. The 2013 Loan and Security Agreement remained senior to other debt, including the debt issued under the 2014 Loan and Security Agreement discussed below.
2014 Loan and Security Agreement
Prior to the effectiveness of the 2016 Loan and Security Agreement that was entered into on August 1, 2016 (see Note 11), the Company had a term loan facility of $30.0 million with a syndicate of two lenders (“Lenders”), which was entered into in February 2014 and amended in December 2014 and February 2015 (the “2014 Loan and Security Agreement”). The term loan facility was available to the Company in tranches. The first tranche for $20.0 million was advanced upon the closing of the agreement. The remaining $10.0 million was available for drawdown by the Company until February 20, 2016 in $1.0 million increments, which expired on February 20, 2016. The Company incurred $0.4 million in debt costs in connection with borrowing the first tranche in February 2014. The term loan bore interest at a variable per annum rate equal to the greater of 10% or LIBOR plus 9%. Interest was due and payable on the last business day of each month during the term of the loan commencing in February 2014. Monthly principal payments were due beginning in February 2016 based on 1/60th of the outstanding balance
at that time and would continue until all remaining principal outstanding under the term loan becomes due and payable in February 2019. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, $18.3 million and $20.0 million of this loan facility was outstanding and is included as notes payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The term loan was secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and was subordinate to the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement. The 2014 Loan and Security Agreement contained certain covenants and included the occurrence of a material adverse event, as defined in the agreement and determined by the Lenders, as an event of default. As of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
In connection with entering into the 2014 Loan and Security Agreement, the Company issued to the Lenders warrants to purchase 177,865 shares of common stock at $10.12 per share, which vest and become exercisable over a ten year term from the date of issuance, based on amounts drawn under the $30.0 million term loan facility. Based on the drawdown of $20.0 million in February 2014, 118,577 shares of common stock issuable under the warrants vested and are exercisable by the Lenders. The fair value of these vested warrants of $1.0 million was recorded as a discount against the debt proceeds and was being recognized as additional interest expense over the term of the loan. The remaining 59,288 shares of common stock issuable under the warrants pertaining to the undrawn $10.0 million did not vest and were no longer exercisable on February 20, 2016 when the $10.0 million was no longer available for borrowing.
Promissory Note
In July 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") for $4.1 million as a financing arrangement for that amount of accrued federal fees. The promissory note carried a fixed annual interest rate of 12.75% and was repayable in 42 equal monthly installments of principal and interest beginning in August 2013. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of this promissory note was outstanding and is included as notes payable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
FCC Civil Penalty
In June 2015, the Company entered into a consent decree with the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") Enforcement Bureau (Note 9), in which the Company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $2.0 million to the U.S. Treasury in twelve equal quarterly installments starting in July 2015 without interest. As a result, the Company discounted the $2.0 million liability, which was accrued in the third quarter of 2014 for the then tentative civil penalty, to its present value of $1.7 million at an annual interest rate of 12.75% to reflect the imputed interest and reclassified this discounted liability from 'Accrued federal fees' to 'Notes payable.' The $0.3 million discount was recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expense in the three months ended June 30, 2015 and is being recognized as interest expense over the payment term of the civil penalty. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the outstanding civil penalty payable was $1.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of which the net carrying value was $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and are included as 'Notes payable' in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s outstanding debt is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Term loan under 2014 Loan and Security Agreement | | $ | 18,333 |
| | $ | 20,000 |
|
Term loan under 2013 Loan and Security Agreement | | 1,500 |
| | 2,500 |
|
Promissory note to USAC | | 811 |
| | 1,459 |
|
FCC civil penalty | | 1,333 |
| | 1,667 |
|
Total notes payable, gross | | 21,977 |
| | 25,626 |
|
Less: discount | | (829 | ) | | (1,087 | ) |
Total notes payable, net carrying value | | 21,148 |
| | 24,539 |
|
Revolving line of credit | | 12,500 |
| | 12,500 |
|
Total debt, net carrying value | | $ | 33,648 |
| | $ | 37,039 |
|
Less: current portion of debt * | | (19,076 | ) | | (19,712 | ) |
Total debt, less current portion ** | | 14,572 |
| | 17,327 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
* Included in ‘Revolving line of credit’ and ‘Notes payable’ in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
** Included in ‘Notes payable - less current portion’ in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
Future principal payments of the Company’s outstanding debt as of June 30, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | |
Period | | Amount to Mature |
Remainder of 2016 | | $ | 16,524 |
|
2017 | | 5,286 |
|
2018 | | 4,334 |
|
2019 | | 8,333 |
|
Total | | $ | 34,477 |
|
6. Stockholders’ Equity
Capital Structure
The Company is authorized to issue 450,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had 52,554,124 shares and 51,164,621 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
The Company is also authorized to designate and issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001 per share in one or more series without stockholder approval and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.
Warrants
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 131,597 shares and 190,885 shares of common stock, respectively, with a weighted-average exercise price of $9.89 per share and $9.96 per share, respectively. These warrants expire primarily in October 2023 and February 2024.
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
Shares of common stock reserved for future issuance related to outstanding equity awards, common stock warrants, and employee equity incentive plans were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | June 30, 2016 |
Stock options outstanding | | 5,831 |
|
Restricted stock units outstanding | | 2,228 |
|
Shares available for future grant under 2014 Plan | | 6,263 |
|
Shares available for future issuance under ESPP | | 1,258 |
|
Common stock warrants outstanding | | 132 |
|
Total shares of common stock reserved | | 15,712 |
|
Equity Incentive Plans
Prior to its initial public offering (“IPO”), the Company granted stock options under its Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2004 Plan”).
In March 2014, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders approved the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”) and 5,300,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan. In addition, on the first day of each year beginning in 2015 and ending in 2024, the 2014 Plan provides for an annual automatic increase to the shares reserved for issuance in an amount equal to 5% of the total number of shares outstanding on December 31st of the preceding calendar year or a lesser number as determined by the Company’s board of directors. Pursuant to the automatic annual increase, 2,558,231 and 2,466,124 additional shares were reserved under the 2014 Plan on January 1, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
No further grants were made under the 2004 Plan once the 2014 Plan became effective on April 3, 2014. Upon the effectiveness of the 2014 Plan, all shares reserved for future issuance under the 2004 Plan became available for issuance under the 2014 Plan. After the IPO, any forfeited or expired shares that would have otherwise returned to the 2004 Plan instead return to the 2014 Plan. As of June 30, 2016, 6,263,141 shares of common stock were available for future grant under the 2014 Plan.
The 2004 Plan and the 2014 Plan are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Stock Options
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows (in thousands, except years and per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 | | 6,092 |
| | $ | 4.58 |
| | | | |
Options granted (weighted average grant date fair value of $4.00 per share) | | 724 |
| | 8.54 |
| | | | |
Options exercised | | (713 | ) | | 4.70 |
| | | | |
Options forfeited or expired | | (272 | ) | | 6.80 |
| | | | |
Outstanding as of June 30, 2016 | | 5,831 |
| | $ | 4.95 |
| | 6.4 | | $ | 40,709 |
|
The Company has computed the aggregate intrinsic value amounts disclosed in the above table based on the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing market price of the Company’s common stock of $11.90 per share as of June 30, 2016 for all in-the-money options outstanding.
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the Company's restricted stock unit ("RSU") activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 | | 1,818 |
| | $ | 5.01 |
|
RSUs granted | | 1,005 |
| | 8.45 |
|
RSUs vested and released | | (512 | ) | | 5.31 |
|
RSUs forfeited | | (83 | ) | | 5.64 |
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2016 | | 2,228 |
| | $ | 6.47 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company's 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") became effective on April 3, 2014 and is described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The number of shares of common stock originally reserved for issuance under the ESPP was 880,000 shares, which will increase automatically each year, beginning on January 1, 2015 and continuing through January 1, 2024, by the lesser of (i) 1% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year; (ii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment to reflect any split or combination of the Company’s common stock); or (iii) such lesser number as determined by the Company’s board of directors. Pursuant to the automatic annual increase, 511,646 additional shares were reserved under the ESPP on January 1, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, 1,258,442 shares of common stock were available for future grants under the ESPP.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, 164,310 shares were purchased on May 13, 2016 at a price of $4.82 per share under the ESPP.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Cost of revenue | | $ | 329 |
| | $ | 218 |
| | $ | 594 |
| | $ | 406 |
|
Research and development | | 528 |
| | 340 |
| | 963 |
| | 914 |
|
Sales and marketing | | 544 |
| | 458 |
| | 978 |
| | 982 |
|
General and administrative | | 1,013 |
| | 814 |
| | 1,873 |
| | 1,763 |
|
Total stock-based compensation | | $ | 2,414 |
| | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | 4,408 |
| | $ | 4,065 |
|
As of June 30, 2016, unrecognized stock-based compensation expenses by award type, net of estimated forfeitures, and their expected weighted-average recognition periods are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except years).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Option | | RSU | | ESPP |
Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense | | $ | 6,951 |
| | $ | 12,218 |
| | $ | 328 |
|
Weighted-average amortization period | | 2.4 years |
| | 3.0 years |
| | 0.4 years |
|
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense that is calculated based upon awards ultimately expected to vest and, thus, stock-based compensation expense is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. All stock-based compensation for equity awards granted to employees and non-employee directors is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award.
The Company values RSUs at the closing market price of its common stock on the date of grant. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option and purchase right under the ESPP granted to employees on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and using the assumptions noted in the below table. The weighted-average assumptions used to value stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Stock Options | | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Expected term (years) | | 6.1 | | 6.1 | | 6.0 | | 6.1 |
Volatility | | 48% | | 49% | | 48% | | 49% |
Risk-free interest rate | | 1.2% | | 1.5% | | 1.5% | | 1.5% |
Dividend yield | | — | | — | | — | | — |
7. Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, and excludes any dilutive effects of employee stock-based awards and warrants. Diluted net income per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares, including common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and vesting of restricted stock. As the Company had net losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, all potentially issuable common shares were determined to be anti-dilutive.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Net loss | | $ | (3,468 | ) | | $ | (7,369 | ) | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | | 52,143 |
| | 49,980 |
| | 51,760 |
| | 49,708 |
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share | | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | (0.15 | ) | | $ | (0.16 | ) | | $ | (0.33 | ) |
The following securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented (in thousands).
|
| | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Stock options | | 5,831 |
| | 6,775 |
|
Restricted stock units | | 2,228 |
| | 1,526 |
|
ESPP | | 147 |
| | 178 |
|
Common stock warrants | | 132 |
| | 360 |
|
Total | | 8,338 |
| | 8,839 |
|
8. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $42 thousand and $70 thousand, respectively. The benefit from income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately $20 thousand and $2 thousand, respectively. The provision for or benefit from income taxes consisted primarily of foreign income taxes.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the provision for or benefit from income taxes differed from the statutory amount primarily due to the Company realizing no benefit for current year losses due to maintaining a full valuation allowance against its domestic net deferred tax assets.
The realization of tax benefits of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future levels of taxable income, of an appropriate character, in the periods the items are expected to be deductible or taxable. Based on the available objective evidence, the Company does not believe it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realizable. Accordingly, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against the domestic net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Company intends to maintain the remaining valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal of, or decrease in, the valuation allowance.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, there were no material changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company’s principal commitments consist of future payment obligations under capital leases to finance data centers and other computer and networking equipment purchases, operating lease agreements for office space, research and development, and sales and marketing facilities, and agreements with third parties to provide co-location hosting, telecommunication usage and equipment maintenance services. These commitments as of December 31, 2015 are disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and did not change materially during the six months ended June 30, 2016 except for the acquisition of certain additional data center and network equipment and software under multiple capital leases. As of June 30, 2016, the total minimum future payment commitments under these capital leases added during the six months ended June 30, 2016 were approximately $3.8 million, of which $0.8 million is due in 2016, with the remainder due over approximately 31 months.
Universal Services Fund Liability
During the third quarter of 2012, the Company determined that based on its business activities, it is classified as a telecommunications service provider for regulatory purposes and it should make direct contributions to the federal USF and related funds based on revenues it receives from the resale of interstate and international telecommunications services. Previously, the Company had believed that the telecommunications services were an integral part of an information service that the Company provides via its software and had instead made indirect USF contributions via payments to its wholesale telecommunications service providers. In order to comply with the obligation to make direct contributions, the Company made a voluntary self-disclosure to the FCC Enforcement Bureau and registered with the USAC, which is charged by the FCC with administering the USF. The Company filed exemption certificates with its wholesale telecommunications service providers in order to eliminate its obligation to reimburse such wholesale telecommunications service providers for their USF contributions calculated on services sold to the Company.
The Company’s registration with USAC subjects it to assessments for unpaid USF contributions, as well as interest thereon and civil penalties, due to its late registration and past failure to recognize its obligation as a USF contributor and as an international carrier. The Company will be required to pay assessments for periods prior to the Company’s registration. As of December 31, 2012, the total past due USF contribution being imposed by USAC and accrued by the Company for the period from 2003 through 2012 was $8.1 million, of which $4.7 million was undisputed and $3.4 million, including $0.8 million that pertains to 2003 through 2007, was disputed. While the Company is in administrative proceedings before the FCC to limit such back assessments to the period 2008 through 2012, it is possible that it will be required to pay back assessments for the period from 2003 through 2007. In 2013, the Company began remitting required contributions on a prospective basis directly to USAC.
In July 2013, the Company and USAC agreed to a financing arrangement for $4.1 million of the undisputed $4.7 million of the unpaid USF contributions whereby the Company issued to USAC a promissory note payable in the principal amount of the $4.1 million and paid off the remaining undisputed $0.6 million. The repayment terms of the promissory note payable are disclosed in Note 5. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the principal balance of the promissory note payable was $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and is included in the notes payable amounts on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition to the promissory note payable, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had an accrued liability for the disputed portion of the unpaid USF contributions and estimated interest and penalties of $5.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively, included in accrued federal fees on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded interest and penalty expenses of $0.1 million and $0.3 million as a charge to general and administrative expense, which were related to its disputed unpaid USF obligations.
On June 12, 2015, in connection with the Company’s disclosure to the FCC, the Company entered into a consent decree with the FCC Enforcement Bureau. In the consent decree, the Company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $2.0 million to the U.S. Treasury in twelve equal quarterly installments starting in July 2015 without interest (Note 5). In the third quarter of 2014, the Company accrued a $2.0 million liability for the then tentative civil penalty. The consent decree also requires the Company to adopt certain internal regulatory compliance monitoring and training requirements, and to report on the status of those compliance efforts to the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau for three years. The Company’s implementation of the internal regulatory compliance monitoring and training
requirements were completed in August 2015, and its annual compliance reporting to the FCC will continue until June 2018.
State and Local Taxes and Surcharges
In April 2012, the Company commenced collecting and remitting sales taxes on sales of subscription services in all the U.S. states in which it determined it was obligated to do so. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company conducted an updated sales tax review of the taxability of sales of its subscription services. As a result, the Company determined that it may be obligated to collect and remit sales taxes on such sales in four additional states. Based on its best estimate of the probable sales tax liability in those four states relating to its sales of subscription services during the period 2011 through 2014, during the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded a general and administrative expense of $0.6 million as an immaterial out of period adjustment to accrue for such taxes.
During 2013, the Company analyzed its activities and determined it may be obligated to collect and remit various state and local taxes and surcharges on its usage-based fees. The Company had not remitted state and local taxes on usage-based fees in any of the periods prior to 2014 and therefore accrued a sales tax liability for this contingency. In January 2014, the Company commenced paying such taxes and surcharges to certain state authorities. In June 2014, the Company commenced collecting state and local taxes or surcharges on usage-based fees from its clients on a current basis and remitting such taxes to the applicable U.S. state taxing authorities.
During the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the Company remitted $25 thousand and $0.9 million for its contingent sales taxes on both usage-based fees and sales of subscription services. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company has remitted $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for its contingent sales taxes on both usage-based fees and sales of subscription services.
The Company recognized a $0.2 million gain and a $0.2 million gain for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and $0.3 million expense and $1.0 million expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, as general and administrative expense related to its estimated sales tax liability on both usage-based fees and sales of subscription services in the U.S. and Canada, which was not being collected from its clients.
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had total accrued liabilities of $2.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for such contingent sales taxes and surcharges that were not being collected from its clients but may be imposed by various taxing authorities, of which $0.3 million and $0.8 million were included in current “Sales tax liability” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, respectively, and the remaining were included in non-current “Sales tax liability” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s estimate of the probable loss incurred under this contingency is based on its analysis of the source location of its usage-based fees and the regulations and rules in each tax jurisdiction.
Legal Matters
The Company is involved in various legal and regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business. In management’s opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or its financial position. However, due to the uncertain nature of legal matters, an unfavorable resolution of a matter could materially affect the Company’s future consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a particular period.
The Company is currently involved in the following lawsuit as a defendant.
NobelBiz Litigation
On August 5, 2011, NobelBiz sent a letter to the Company asserting infringement of a patent related to virtual call centers. On April 3, 2012, NobelBiz filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The patent asserted in the complaint is different, but related, to the patent asserted in the original letter. The lawsuit, NobelBiz Inc. v. Five9, Inc., Case No. 6:12-cv-00243-LED, alleges that the Company’s local caller ID management service infringes United States Patent No. 8,135,122, or the ‘122 patent. The ‘122 patent, titled “System and Method for Modifying Communication Information (MCI),” issued on March 13, 2012, and according to the complaint is alleged to relate to “a system for processing a telephone call from a call originator (also referred to as a calling party) to a call target (also referred to as a receiving party), where the system accesses a database storing outgoing telephone numbers, selects a replacement telephone number from the outgoing telephone numbers based on the telephone number of the call target, and originates an outbound call to
the call target with a modified outgoing caller identification (‘caller ID’).” NobelBiz seeks damages in the form of lost profits as well as injunctive relief. The lawsuit is one of several lawsuits filed by NobelBiz against various companies including TCN Inc., LiveVox, Inc. and Global Connect LLC. On March 28, 2013, the court granted the Company’s motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Subsequently, NobelBiz amended its complaint to add claims related to U.S. Patent No. 8,565,399, or the ‘399 patent, which is a continuation in the same family as the ‘122 patent and addresses the same technology. The Company responded to the complaint and amended complaint by asserting noninfringement and invalidity of the ‘122 and ‘399 patents. On January 16, 2015, the court issued an order regarding claim construction of the two patents-in-suit. On March 7, 2016, the court stayed the case pending an appeal in lawsuits involving NobelBiz, Global Connect and TCN that also involve the ‘122 and ‘399 patents. The appeal for those cases is likely to last until late 2016 or into 2017, after which time the lawsuit between NobelBiz and Five9 will resume and a new schedule will be entered by the Court.
The Company has investigated the claims alleged in the complaint and believes that it has good defenses to the claims. While the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has been incurred, the ultimate resolution of the matter could potentially result in a loss. Management’s best estimate of the low end of the range of the potential loss is zero. At this time, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the high end of the range of the potential loss, which could be material to the Company’s results of operations. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued a loss related to this matter.
Indemnification Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnification of varying scope and terms to clients, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors, officers and certain employees that require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees. No demands have been made upon the Company to provide indemnification under such agreements and thus there are no claims that the Company is aware of that would have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, or condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
10. Geographical Information
The following table is a summary of revenues by geographic region based on client billing address and has been estimated based on the amounts billed to clients during the periods (in thousands).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
United States | | $ | 36,104 |
| | $ | 28,088 |
| | $ | 71,697 |
| | $ | 56,367 |
|
International | | 2,782 |
| | 2,186 |
| | 5,204 |
| | 4,181 |
|
Total revenue | | $ | 38,886 |
| | $ | 30,274 |
| | $ | 76,901 |
| | $ | 60,548 |
|
The following table summarizes total property and equipment, net in the respective locations (in thousands).
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
United States | | $ | 11,178 |
| | $ | 10,939 |
|
International | | 2,010 |
| | 2,286 |
|
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 13,188 |
| | $ | 13,225 |
|
11. Subsequent Events
2016 Loan and Security Agreement
On August 1, 2016, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement (the “2016 Loan and Security Agreement”) with two lenders for a revolving line of credit (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”) of up to $50.0
million. The New Revolving Credit Facility matures in August 2019. The New Revolving Credit Facility carries a variable annual interest rate of the prime rate plus 0.50% or the prime rate plus 0.75% if our adjusted EBITDA is negative at the end of any fiscal quarter. Upon the effectiveness of the 2016 Loan and Security Agreement, the Company immediately drew down $32.6 million and terminated the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement and the 2014 Loan and Security Agreement by repaying the aggregate outstanding principal, accrued interest and prepayment penalty balances thereunder of $32.4 million along with $0.2 million in administrative fees.
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Overview
We are a pioneer and leading provider of cloud software for contact centers, facilitating approximately three billion interactions between our more than 2,000 clients and their customers per year. We believe we achieved this leadership position through our expertise and technology, which has empowered us to help organizations of all sizes transition from legacy on-premise contact center systems to our cloud solution. Our solution, which is comprised of our Virtual Contact Center (“VCC”) cloud platform and applications, allows simultaneous management and optimization of customer interactions across voice, chat, email, web, social media and mobile channels, either directly or through our application programming interfaces ("APIs"). Our VCC cloud platform routes each customer interaction to an appropriate agent resource, and delivers relevant customer data to the agent in real-time to optimize the customer experience. Unlike legacy on-premise contact center systems, our solution requires minimal up-front investment and can be rapidly deployed and adjusted depending on our client’s requirements.
Since founding our business in 2001, we have focused exclusively on delivering cloud contact center software. We initially targeted smaller contact center opportunities with our telesales team and, over time, invested in expanding the breadth and depth of the functionality of our cloud platform to meet the evolving requirements of our clients. In 2009, we made a strategic decision to expand our market opportunity to include larger contact centers. This decision drove further investments in research and development and the establishment of our field sales team to meet the requirements of these larger contact centers. We believe this shift has helped us diversify our client base while significantly enhancing our opportunity for future revenue growth. To complement these efforts, we have also focused on building client awareness and driving adoption of our solution through marketing activities, which include internet advertising, digital marketing campaigns, social marketing, trade shows, industry events and telemarketing.
We provide our solution through a SaaS business model with recurring subscriptions. We offer a comprehensive suite of applications delivered on our VCC cloud platform that are designed to enable our clients to manage and optimize interactions across inbound and outbound contact centers. We primarily generate revenue by selling subscriptions and related usage of our VCC cloud platform. We charge our clients monthly subscription fees for access to our solution, primarily based on the number of agent seats, as well as the specific functionalities and applications our clients deploy. We define agent seats as the maximum number of named agents allowed to concurrently access our solution. Our clients typically have more named agents than agent seats, and multiple named agents may use an agent seat, though not simultaneously. Substantially all of our clients purchase both subscriptions and related telephony usage from us. A small percentage of our clients subscribe to our platform but purchase telephony usage directly from wholesale telecommunications service providers. We do not sell telephony usage on a stand-alone basis to any client. The related usage fees are based on the volume of minutes for inbound and outbound interactions. We also offer bundled plans, generally for smaller deployments, where the client is charged a single monthly fixed fee per agent seat that includes both subscription and unlimited usage in the contiguous 48 states and, in some cases, Canada. We offer monthly, annual and multiple-year contracts to our clients, generally with 30 days’ notice required for changes in the number of agent seats. Our clients can use this notice period to rapidly adjust the number of agent seats used to meet their changing contact center volume needs, including to reduce the number of agent seats to zero. As a general matter, this means that a client can effectively terminate its agreement with us upon 30 days’ notice. Our larger clients typically choose annual contracts, which generally include an implementation and ramp period of several months. Fixed subscription fees, including bundled plans, are generally billed monthly in advance, while related usage fees are billed in arrears. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, subscription and related usage fees accounted for 94% and 95% of our revenue, respectively. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015, subscription and related usage fees accounted for 96% and 97% of our revenue, respectively. The remainder was comprised of professional services revenue from the implementation and optimization of our solution.
Our revenue increased to $38.9 million and $76.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 from $30.3 million and $60.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Revenue growth has primarily been driven by our larger clients. For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, no single client accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. As of June 30, 2016, we had over 2,000 clients across multiple industries. Our clients' subscriptions generally range in size from fewer than 10 agent seats to approximately 1,000 agent seats.
We have continued to make significant expenditures and investments, including in sales and marketing, research and development and infrastructure. We primarily evaluate the success of our business based on revenue growth, adjusted EBITDA and the efficiency and effectiveness of our investments. The growth of our business and our future success depend on many factors, including our ability to continue to expand our client base, particularly in larger opportunities, grow revenue from our existing client base, develop innovative products and features, and expand internationally. While these areas represent significant opportunities for us, they also pose risks and challenges that we must successfully address in order to sustain the growth of our business and improve our operating results. In order to pursue these opportunities, we anticipate that we will continue to expand our operations and headcount in the near term.
Due to our continuing investments to grow our business, increase our sales and marketing efforts, pursue new opportunities, enhance our solution and build our technology, we expect our cost of revenue and operating expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods. However, we expect these expenses to decrease as a percentage of revenue as we grow our revenue and gain economies of scale by increasing our client base without direct incremental development costs and by utilizing more of the capacity of our data centers.
Key Operating and Financial Performance Metrics
In addition to measures of financial performance presented in our condensed consolidated financial statements, we monitor the key metrics set forth below to help us evaluate growth trends, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and assess operational efficiencies.
Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate
We believe that our Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate provides insight into our ability to retain and grow revenue from our clients, and is a measure of the long-term value of our client relationships. Our Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate is calculated by dividing our Retained Net Invoicing by our Retention Base Net Invoicing on a monthly basis, which we then average using the rates for the trailing twelve months for the period being presented. We define Retention Base Net Invoicing as recurring net invoicing from all clients in the comparable prior year period, and we define Retained Net Invoicing as recurring net invoicing from that same group of clients in the current period. We define recurring net invoicing as subscription and related usage revenue excluding the impact of service credits, reserves and deferrals. Historically, the difference between recurring net invoicing and our subscription and related usage revenue has been within 10%.
The following table shows our Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate for the periods presented:
|
| | | | |
| | Twelve Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate | | 100% | | 94% |
The increase in our Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate from June 30, 2015 to June 30, 2016 was primarily due to our larger clients both increasing the number of agent seats and increasing the revenue per agent seat.
Adjusted EBITDA
We monitor adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to analyze our financial results and believe that it is useful to investors, as a supplement to U.S. GAAP measures, in evaluating our ongoing operational performance and enhancing an overall understanding of our past financial performance. We believe that adjusted EBITDA helps illustrate underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the income or expenses that we exclude from adjusted EBITDA. Furthermore, we use this measure to establish budgets
and operational goals for managing our business and evaluating our performance. We also believe that adjusted EBITDA provides an additional tool for investors to use in comparing our recurring core business operating results over multiple periods with other companies in our industry.
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and our calculation of adjusted EBITDA may differ from that of other companies in our industry. We compensate for the inherent limitations associated with using adjusted EBITDA through disclosure of these limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, net loss. We calculate adjusted EBITDA as net loss before (1) depreciation and amortization, (2) stock-based compensation, (3) interest income, expense and other, (4) provision for income taxes, and (5) other unusual items that do not directly affect what we consider to be our core operating performance.
The following table shows a reconciliation from net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Net loss | | $ | (3,468 | ) | | $ | (7,369 | ) | | $ | (8,379 | ) | | $ | (16,272 | ) |
Non-GAAP adjustments: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization (1) | | 2,060 |
| | 1,910 |
| | 4,163 |
| | 3,685 |
|
Stock-based compensation (2) | | 2,414 |
| | 1,830 |
| | 4,408 |
| | 4,065 |
|
Interest expense | | 1,197 |
| | 1,155 |
| | 2,396 |
| | 2,294 |
|
Interest income and other | | 33 |
| | 49 |
| | 78 |
| | 47 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | 42 |
| | (20 | ) | | 70 |
| | (2 | ) |
Out of period adjustment for sales tax liability (3) | | — |
| | 190 |
| | — |
| | 765 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 2,278 |
| | $ | (2,255 | ) | | $ | 2,736 |
| | $ | (5,418 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Depreciation and amortization expenses included in our results of operations are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Cost of revenue | | $ | 1,616 |
| | $ | 1,558 |
| | $ | 3,296 |
| | $ | 2,997 |
|
Research and development | | 161 |
| | 102 |
| | 309 |
| | 189 |
|
Sales and marketing | | 54 |
| | 51 |
| | 107 |
| | 100 |
|
General and administrative | | 229 |
| | 199 |
| | 451 |
| | 399 |
|
Total depreciation and amortization | | $ | 2,060 |
| | $ | 1,910 |
| | $ | 4,163 |
| | $ | 3,685 |
|
(2) See Note 6 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for stock-based compensation expense included in our results of operations for the periods presented.
(3) Included in general and administrative expense. The 2015 amounts represent immaterial out of period adjustments recorded in the first two quarters of 2015 for 2011 through 2014.
Key Components of Our Results of Operations
Revenue
Our revenue consists of subscription and related usage as well as professional services. We consider our subscription and related usage to be recurring revenue. This recurring revenue includes fixed subscription fees for the delivery and support of our VCC cloud platform, as well as related usage fees. The related usage fees are based on the volume of minutes for inbound and outbound client interactions. We also offer bundled plans, generally for smaller deployments, where the client is charged a single monthly fixed fee per agent seat that includes both subscription and unlimited usage in the contiguous 48 states and, in some cases, Canada. We offer monthly, annual and multiple-year contracts for our clients, generally with 30 days’ notice required for changes in the number of agent seats. Our clients can use this notice period to rapidly adjust the number of agent seats used to meet their
changing contact center volume needs, including to reduce the number of agent seats to zero. As a general matter, this means that a client can effectively terminate its agreement with us upon 30 days’ notice.
Fixed subscription fees, including plans with bundled usage, are generally billed monthly in advance, while variable usage fees are billed in arrears. Fixed subscription fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable term, predominantly the monthly contractual billing period. Support activities include technical assistance for our solution and upgrades and enhancements on a when and if available basis, which are not billed separately. Variable subscription related usage fees for non-bundled plans are billed in arrears based on client-specific per minute rate plans and are recognized as actual usage occurs. We generally require advance deposits from clients based on estimated usage. All fees, except usage deposits, are non-refundable.
In addition, we generate professional services revenue from assisting clients in implementing our solution and optimizing its use. These services include application configuration, system integration and education and training services. Professional services are primarily billed on a fixed-fee basis and are typically performed by us directly. In limited cases, our clients choose to perform these services themselves or engage their own third-party service providers to perform such services. Professional services are recognized as the services are performed using the proportional performance method, with performance measured based on labor hours, provided all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
Cost of Revenue
Our cost of revenue consists primarily of personnel costs (including stock-based compensation), fees that we pay to telecommunications providers for usage, USF contributions and other regulatory costs, depreciation and related expenses of our servers and equipment, costs to build out and maintain co-location data centers, allocated office and facility costs and amortization of acquired technology. Cost of revenue can fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the fees we pay to telecommunications providers, which vary depending on our clients’ usage of our VCC cloud platform, the timing of capital expenditures and related depreciation charges and changes in headcount. We expect to continue investing in our network infrastructure and operations and client support function to maintain high quality and availability of service. Therefore, we expect our cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars but decrease as a percentage of revenue for the foreseeable future. As our business grows, we expect to continue to realize economies of scale in network infrastructure, personnel and client support.
Operating Expenses
We classify our operating expenses as research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of salary and related expenses (including stock-based compensation) for personnel related to the development of improvements and expanded features for our services, as well as quality assurance, testing, product management and allocated overhead. We expense research and development expenses as they are incurred except for internal-use software development costs that qualify for capitalization. We believe that continued investment in our solution is important for our future growth, and we expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars in the foreseeable future, although these expenses as a percentage of our revenue are expected to continue to decrease over time.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses (including stock-based compensation) for employees in sales and marketing, sales commissions, as well as advertising, marketing, corporate communications, travel costs and allocated overhead. We expense the costs of sales commissions associated with the acquisition or renewal of client contracts as incurred in the period the contract is acquired or the renewal occurs. We believe it is important to continue investing in sales and marketing to continue to generate revenue growth. Accordingly, we expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars as we continue to support our growth initiatives, although these expenses as a percentage of our revenue are expected to decrease over time.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salary and related expenses (including stock-based compensation) for management, finance and accounting, legal, information systems and human resources personnel, professional fees, compliance costs, other corporate expenses and allocated overhead. We expect that general and administrative expenses will fluctuate in absolute dollars from period to period but continue to decline as a percentage of revenue over time.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net consists primarily of interest expense associated with our debt and capital leases. We expect other expense to increase in the third quarter of 2016 due to losses on the refinancing of debt to be recorded in connection with the repayment of amounts due under the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement and the 2014 Loan and Security Agreement. We expect interest expense for our outstanding debt to decrease due to a lower interest rate for our New Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 11 of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q). We expect interest expense for our capital leases to increase as a result of our continued capital spending funded by capital leases.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists primarily of corporate income taxes resulting from profits generated in foreign jurisdictions by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, along with state income taxes payable in the United States.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Based on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss set forth in this quarterly report, the following table sets forth our operating results as a percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 |
Revenue | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
Cost of revenue | | 43 | % | | 47 | % | | 43 | % | | 48 | % |
Gross profit | | 57 | % | | 53 | % | | 57 | % | | 52 | % |
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | 15 | % | | 18 | % | | 15 | % | | 19 | % |
Sales and marketing | | 32 | % | | 35 | % | | 33 | % | | 34 | % |
General and administrative | | 16 | % | | 20 | % | | 17 | % | | 22 | % |
Total operating expenses | | 63 | % | | 73 | % | | 65 | % | | 75 | % |
Loss from operations | | (6 | )% | | (20 | )% | | (8 | )% | | (23 | )% |
Other expense, net: | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% | | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% |
Interest income and other | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Total other expense, net | | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% | | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% |
Loss before income taxes | | (9 | )% | | (24 | )% | | (11 | )% | | (27 | )% |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Net loss | | (9 | )% | | (24 | )% | | (11 | )% | | (27 | )% |
Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Revenue | | $38,886 | | $30,274 | | $8,612 | | 28% | | $76,901 | | $60,548 | | $16,353 | | 27% |
The increase in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015 was primarily attributable to our larger clients, driven by an increase in our sales and marketing activities and our improved brand awareness. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the majority of our revenue was from our larger clients. Our average recurring revenue per agent seat within our larger clients increased slightly between these periods due mainly to increased sales of add on products.
Cost of Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Cost of revenue | | $16,764 | | $14,270 | | $2,494 | | 17% | | $33,374 | | $29,048 | | $4,326 | | 15% |
% of Revenue | | 43% | | 47% | | | | | | 43% | | 48% | | | | |
The increase in cost of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015 was primarily due to a $1.0 million and a $2.0 million increase in cash-based personnel costs driven by increased headcount, a $0.6 million and a $1.0 million increase in third party hosted software costs due to increased client activities, a $0.5 million and a $0.9 million increase in USF contributions and other federal telecommunication service fees primarily due to increased client usage, and a $0.4 million and a $0.7 million increase in facility-related costs. The remainder of the increase was primarily due to our business growth and system implementations. These increases were offset in part by a $0.2 million and a $1.3 million decrease in telecommunication carrier costs relating to our clients' long distance call usage due to improved usage efficiencies.
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Gross profit | | $22,122 | | $16,004 | | $6,118 | | 38% | | $43,527 | | $31,500 | | $12,027 | | 38% |
% of Revenue | | 57% | | 53% | | | | | | 57% | | 52% | | | | |
The increase in gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015 was primarily due to improved efficiencies in usage, subscription and professional services, and to continued benefit from economies of scale as our revenue increased.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Research and development | | $5,799 | | $5,568 | | $231 | | 4% | | $11,601 | | $11,606 | | $(5) | | —% |
% of Revenue | | 15% | | 18% | | | | | | 15% | | 19% | | | | |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, research and development expenses did not change significantly from the same periods of 2015.
Sales and Marketing
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Sales and marketing | | $12,637 | | $10,594 | | $2,043 | | 19% | | $25,343 | | $20,525 | | $4,818 | | 23% |
% of Revenue | | 32% | | 35% | | | | | | 33% | | 34% | | | | |
The increase in sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015 was primarily due to a $0.6 million and a $1.8 million increase in cash-based personnel-related costs, a $0.6 million and a $1.3 million increase in commissions paid to sales personnel driven by the growth in sales and bookings of our solution, and a $0.5 million and a $1.0 million increase in discretionary and other
marketing-related expenses. These increases as well as the remainder of the increase were primarily due to the execution of our growth strategy to acquire new clients, increase the number of agent seats within our existing client base and establish brand awareness.
General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
General and administrative | | $5,882 | | $6,027 | | $(145) | | (2)% | | $12,418 | | $13,302 | | $(884) | | (7)% |
% of Revenue | | 16% | | 20% | | | | | | 17% | | 22% | | | | |
The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015 was primarily due to a $0.6 million and a $0.2 million immaterial out of period adjustment recorded in the first and the second quarters of 2015 for additional sales taxes for certain revenue earned during the period 2011 through the first quarter of 2015.
Other Expense, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (in thousands, except percentages) |
Interest expense | | $ | (1,197 | ) | | $ | (1,155 | ) | | $ | (42 | ) | | 4 | % | | (2,396 | ) | | (2,294 | ) | | (102 | ) | | 4 | % |
Interest income and other | | (33 | ) | | (49 | ) | | 16 |
| | (33 | )% | | (78 | ) | | (47 | ) | | (31 | ) | | 66 | % |
Total other expense, net | | $ | (1,230 | ) | | $ | (1,204 | ) | | $ | (26 | ) | | 2 | % | | $ | (2,474 | ) | | $ | (2,341 | ) | | $ | (133 | ) | | 6 | % |
% of Revenue | | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% | | | | | | (3)% | | (4)% | | | | |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, other expense, net did not change significantly from the same periods of 2015.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
To date, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of our solution, lease facilities and net proceeds from our equity and debt financings. As of June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $57.6 million.
As of June 30, 2016, we had a total of $32.3 million in principal amount outstanding under two term loans and a revolving credit facility governed by our 2014 Loan and Security Agreement and 2013 Loan and Security Agreement. On August 1, 2016, we entered into the 2016 Loan and Security Agreement with two lenders for the New Revolving Credit Facility of up to $50.0 million. The New Revolving Credit Facility matures in August 2019. Under the terms of the New Revolving Credit Facility, the balance outstanding cannot exceed our trailing four months of MRR (monthly recurring revenue including subscription and usage) multiplied by the average trailing 12 month dollar based retention rate (calculated on the same basis as set forth in Item 2 of this report, see "Annual Dollar-Based Retention Rate"). The New Revolving Credit Facility carries a variable annual interest rate of the prime rate plus 0.50% or the prime rate plus 0.75% if our adjusted EBITDA is negative at the end of any fiscal quarter. Upon the effectiveness of the 2016 Loan and Security Agreement, we immediately drew down $32.6 million and terminated the 2013 Loan and Security Agreement and the 2014 Loan and Security Agreement by repaying the aggregate outstanding principal, accrued interest and prepayment penalty balances thereunder of $32.4 million along with $0.2 million in administrative fees.
In addition, as of June 30, 2016, we had a $1.3 million FCC civil penalty payable to the U.S. Treasury and $0.8 million in outstanding principal amount under a promissory note with the USAC (see Note 5 of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q).
We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents and the amount available for borrowing under our New Revolving Credit Facility (or any refinancing of the facility) will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs at least through June 30, 2017. Our future capital requirements will depend on many
factors including our growth rate, continuing market acceptance of our solution, client retention, ability to gain new clients, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities and the introduction of new and enhanced offerings. We may also acquire or invest in complementary businesses, technologies and intellectual property rights, which may increase our future capital requirements, both to pay acquisition costs and to support our combined operations. We may raise additional equity or debt financing at any time. We may not be able to raise additional equity or debt financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired or required, our business, operating results, and financial condition would be harmed. In addition, if our operating performance during the next twelve months is below our expectations, our liquidity and ability to operate our business could be harmed.
If we raise additional funds by issuing equity or equity-linked securities, the ownership of our existing stockholders will be diluted. If we raise additional funds through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, we will be subject to increased debt service obligations and could also be subject to restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, and other operating restrictions that could harm our ability to conduct our business.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented (in thousands, except percentages):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended |
| | June 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | 2,257 |
| | $ | (9,710 | ) | | $ | 11,967 |
| | (123 | )% |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (628 | ) | | 20,392 |
| | (21,020 | ) | | (103 | )% |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (2,475 | ) | | (3,638 | ) | | 1,163 |
| | (32 | )% |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (846 | ) | | $ | 7,044 |
| | $ | (7,890 | ) | | (112 | )% |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash provided by or used in operating activities is primarily influenced by our personnel-related expenditures, datacenters and telecommunications carrier costs, office and facility related costs, USF contributions and other regulatory costs and the amount and timing of client payments. If we continue to improve our financial results, we expect net cash provided by operating activities to increase. Our largest source of operating cash inflows is cash collections from our clients for subscription and related usage services. Payments from clients for these services are typically received monthly. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, our days-sales-outstanding were 23 and 24 days, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $2.3 million as compared to net cash used by operating activities of $9.7 million for the same period of 2015. The improvement was primarily due to an $8.6 million decrease in net loss after adjusting for non-cash expenses and a $3.4 million favorable change in net cash flows resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, cash inflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities included a $1.5 million increase in deferred revenue primarily attributable to increased billings, a $1.4 million increase in accrued and other liabilities primarily for sales commissions driven by the growth in sales and bookings of our solution and additional employee paid-time-off liability due to timing, and a $0.4 million increase in accounts payable related to timing of liabilities and payments. Cash outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities included primarily a $1.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily related to long-term maintenance contracts and annual subscription fees on third-party licensed technology and insurance policies, and a $0.2 million increase in accounts receivable due to increased sales.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, cash outflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities were principally comprised of a $2.3 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets primarily related to a Canadian VAT receivable recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2015 and long-term maintenance contracts and annual subscription fees for third-party SaaS services, and a $1.4 million decrease in accounts payable related to timing of liabilities and payments. Cash inflows from changes in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to a $2.0 million increase in accrued and other liabilities attributable primarily to a Canadian VAT liability recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2015 and additional employee paid-time-off liability due to timing of usage and increased employee headcount and increased bonus accrual driven by our improved financial performance.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily for purchase of property and equipment.
Net cash provided by investing activities of $20.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily from proceeds of $40.0 million from maturity of short-term investments and a $0.8 million decrease in restricted cash due to the release of two letters of credit related to our office lease obligation and an insurance policy, offset in part by purchase of short-term investments of $20.0 million and purchase of property and equipment of $0.4 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, cash used in financing activities of $2.5 million was primarily for repayments of $6.6 million on notes payable obligations and our capital leases, offset in part by cash received from stock option exercises of $3.4 million and proceeds of $0.8 million from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, cash used in financing activities of $3.6 million was primarily for repayments of $4.7 million on our capital leases and notes payable obligations, offset in part by cash received from stock option and warrants exercises of $0.3 million and proceeds of $0.7 million from the sale of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe our critical accounting policies involve the greatest degree of judgment and complexity and have the greatest potential impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, our critical accounting policies did not materially change. Please see Note 1 of Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2016, we did not have any off balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K, such as the use of unconsolidated subsidiaries, structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
Contractual Obligations
Our principal contractual obligations consist of future payment obligations under debt, capital leases to finance data centers and other computer and networking equipment, operating leases for office space, research and development, and sales and marketing facilities, and agreements with third parties to provide co-location hosting, telecommunication usage and equipment maintenance services. These commitments as of December 31, 2015 are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and did not change during the six months ended June 30, 2016 except for the acquisition of certain additional data center and network equipment and software under multiple capital leases. As of June 30, 2016, total minimum future payment commitments under these capital leases added during the six months ended June 30, 2016 were approximately $3.8 million, of which $0.8 million is due in 2016, with the remainder due over approximately 31 months thereafter. In August 2016, we also entered into the New Revolving Credit Facility. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of our business. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk
exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
As of June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $57.6 million that were held primarily in cash or money-market funds. We hold our cash and cash equivalents for working capital purposes. Declines in interest rates would reduce future interest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the effect of a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in overall interest rates would not have had a material impact on our interest income. The carrying amount of our cash equivalents reasonably approximates fair value. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the short-term nature of our money-market funds, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our cash equivalents as a result of changes in interest rates.
As of June 30, 2016, we had a total of $32.3 million in outstanding borrowings under our variable interest rate debt or financing agreements. See Note 5 of the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-Q for a detailed discussion of our indebtedness. For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, a hypothetical 10% increase in the interest rates under these agreements would have increased our interest expense by approximately $0.1 million.
Foreign Currency Risk
The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, and therefore our revenue is not currently subject to material direct foreign currency risk. However, if the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to other currencies, such strengthening could have an indirect effect on our sales to the extent it raises the cost of our solution to non-U.S. clients and thereby could reduce demand. A weaker U.S. dollar could have the opposite effect. The precise indirect effect of currency fluctuations is difficult to measure or predict because our sales are influenced by many factors in addition to the impact of such currency fluctuations.
Our operating expenses are primarily denominated in the currencies of the countries in which our operations are located, which are primarily the U.S., the Philippines, Russia, and the U.K. Our consolidated results of operations and cash flows are, therefore, subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and may be adversely affected in the future due to changes in foreign exchange rates. To date, we have not entered into any hedging arrangements with respect to foreign currency risk or other derivative financial instruments. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the effect of a hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates applicable to our business would have had a maximum impact of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, on our operating results.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2016.
Based on management’s evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were designed, and were effective, to provide assurance at a reasonable level that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the three months ended June 30, 2016, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to certain legal and regulatory proceedings described below, and from time to time may be involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings relating to contractual disputes, intellectual property rights, employment matters, regulatory compliance matters and other litigation matters.
NobelBiz Litigation
On August 5, 2011, NobelBiz sent a letter to us asserting infringement of a patent related to virtual call centers. On April 3, 2012, NobelBiz filed a patent infringement lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The patent asserted in the complaint is different, but related, to the patent asserted in the original letter. The lawsuit, NobelBiz Inc. v. Five9, Inc., Case No. 6:12-cv-00243-LED, alleges that our local caller ID management service infringes United States Patent No. 8,135,122, or the ‘122 patent. The ‘122 patent, titled “System and Method for Modifying Communication Information (MCI),” issued on March 13, 2012, and according to the complaint is alleged to relate to “a system for processing a telephone call from a call originator (also referred to as a calling party) to a call target (also referred to as a receiving party), where the system accesses a database storing outgoing telephone numbers, selects a replacement telephone number from the outgoing telephone numbers based on the telephone number of the call target, and originates an outbound call to the call target with a modified outgoing caller identification (‘caller ID’).” NobelBiz seeks damages in the form of lost profits as well as injunctive relief. The lawsuit is one of several lawsuits filed by NobelBiz against various companies including TCN Inc., LiveVox, Inc. and Global Connect LLC. On March 28, 2013, the court granted our motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Subsequently, NobelBiz amended its complaint to add claims related to U.S. Patent No. 8,565,399, or the ‘399 patent, which is a continuation in the same family as the ‘122 patent and addresses the same technology. We responded to the complaint and amended complaint by asserting noninfringement and invalidity of the ‘122 and ‘399 patents. On January 16, 2015, the court issued an order regarding claim construction of the two patents-in-suit. On March 7, 2016, the court stayed the case pending an appeal in lawsuits involving NobelBiz, Global Connect and TCN that also involve the ‘122 and ‘399 patents. The appeal for those cases is likely to last until late 2016 or into 2017, after which time the lawsuit between NobelBiz and Five9 will resume and a new schedule will be entered by the Court.
The outcome of litigation and regulatory claims cannot be predicted with certainty, may be expensive and cause distraction to our management, even if we are ultimately successful, and could harm our future results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this report. If any of the following risks or other risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects could be materially harmed, and the price of our common stock could decline.
The following description of the risk factors associated with our business includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2016.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Our quarterly and annual results may fluctuate significantly, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business and may result in decreases in the price of our common stock.
Our quarterly and annual results of operations, including our revenues, profitability and cash flow have varied, and may vary significantly in the future, and period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. Accordingly, the results of any one quarter or period should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Our quarterly and annual financial results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control and, as a result, may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business. Fluctuation in quarterly and annual results may harm the value of our common stock. Factors that may cause fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results include, without limitation:
| |
• | market acceptance of our solution; |
| |
• | our ability to attract new clients and grow our business with existing clients; |
| |
• | changes in strategic and client relationships; |
| |
• | the amount and timing of costs and expenses related to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure; |
| |
• | the timing and success of new product and feature introductions by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive dynamics of our industry, including consolidation among competitors, clients or strategic partners; |
| |
• | network outages or security breaches, which may result in the loss of clients, client credits and harm to our reputation; |
| |
• | seasonal factors that may cause our revenues in the first half of a year to be relatively lower than our revenues in the second half of a year; |
| |
• | inaccessibility or failure of our cloud contact center software due to failures in the products or services provided by third parties; |
| |
• | the timing of recognition of revenues; |
| |
• | increases or decreases in the elements of our solution or pricing changes upon any renewals of client agreements; |
| |
• | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; |
| |
• | the level of professional services and support we provide our clients; |
| |
• | the components of our revenue; |
| |
• | the addition or loss of key clients, including through acquisitions or consolidations; |
| |
• | general economic, industry and market conditions; |
| |
• | the timing of costs and expenses related to the development or acquisition of technologies or businesses and potential future charges for impairment of goodwill from acquired companies; |
| |
• | compliance with, or changes in, the current and future regulatory environment; |
| |
• | the hiring, training and retention of key employees; |
| |
• | litigation or other claims against us; |
| |
• | our ability to obtain additional financing; and |
| |
• | advances and trends in new technologies and industry standards. |
If we are unable to attract new clients or sell additional services and functionality to our existing clients, our revenue and revenue growth will be harmed.
To increase our revenue, we must add new clients, add additional agent seats and sell additional functionality to existing clients, and encourage existing clients to renew their subscriptions on terms favorable to us. As our industry matures, as our clients experience seasonal trends in their business, or as competitors introduce lower cost and/or differentiated products or services that are perceived to compete favorably with ours, our ability to add new clients and renew, maintain or upsell existing clients based on pricing, cost of ownership, technology and functionality could be impaired. As a result, we may be unable to renew our agreements with existing clients, attract new clients or grow or maintain our business with existing clients, which could harm our revenue and growth.
Furthermore, a portion of our revenue is generated by acquiring domestic and international telecommunications minutes from wholesale telecommunication service providers and reselling those minutes to our clients. As a result, we must resell more minutes if telecommunications rates decrease to maintain our level of usage revenue.
Our recent rapid growth may not be indicative of our future growth, and if we continue to grow rapidly, we may fail to manage our growth effectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2016, our revenue was $38.9 million, which increased by $8.6 million, or 28%, from $30.3 million for the same period of 2015. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, our revenue was $76.9 million, which increased by $16.4 million, or 27%, from $60.5 million for the same period of 2015. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, our revenue was $128.9 million, $103.1 million and $84.1 million, respectively, representing year-over-year growth of 25% and 23%, respectively. In the future, as our revenue increases, our annual revenue growth rate may decline. We believe growth of our revenue depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:
| |
• | compete with other vendors of cloud-based enterprise contact center systems to capture market share from providers of legacy on-premise systems; |
| |
• | increase our existing clients’ use of our solution and further develop our partner ecosystem; |
| |
• | introduce our solution to new markets outside the United States and increase global awareness of our brand; |
| |
• | strengthen and improve our solution through significant investments in research and development and the introduction of new and enhanced solutions; and |
| |
• | selectively pursue acquisitions. |
If we are not successful in achieving these objectives, our revenue may be harmed. In addition, we plan to continue to invest in future growth, including expending substantial financial and other resources on:
| |
• | sales and marketing, including a significant expansion of our sales organization; |
| |
• | our technology infrastructure, including systems architecture, management tools, scalability, availability, performance and security, as well as disaster recovery measures; |
| |
• | solution development, including investments in our solution development team and the development of new solutions, as well as new applications and features for existing solutions; |
| |
• | international expansion; and |
| |
• | general administration, including legal, regulatory compliance and accounting expenses. |
Moreover, we continue to expand our headcount and operations. We grew from 630 employees as of December 31, 2014 to 717 employees as of June 30, 2016. We anticipate that we will continue to expand our operations and headcount in the near term. This growth has placed, and future growth will place, a significant strain on our management, administrative, operational and financial resources and infrastructure. Our success will depend in part on our ability to manage this growth effectively. To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. Failure to effectively manage growth could result in difficulty or delays in adding new clients, declines in quality or client satisfaction, increases in costs, system failures, difficulties in introducing new features or solutions, the need for more capital than we anticipate or other operational difficulties, and any of these difficulties could harm our business performance and results of operations.
The expected addition of new employees and the capital investments that we anticipate will be necessary to manage our anticipated growth will make it more difficult for us to generate earnings or offset any future revenue shortfalls by reducing costs and expenses in the short term. If we fail to manage our anticipated growth, we will be unable to execute our business plan successfully.
The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and if we do not compete effectively, our operating results could be harmed.
The market for contact center solutions is highly competitive. Generally, we do not have long-term contracts with our clients and our clients can terminate our service and switch to competitors’ offerings on short notice.
We currently compete with large legacy technology vendors that offer on-premise enterprise telephony and contact center systems, such as Avaya and Cisco, and legacy on-premise software companies that come from a computer-telephony integration ("CTI") heritage, such as Aspect, Genesys, and Interactive Intelligence. These companies are supplementing their traditional on-premise contact center systems with cloud offerings, either through acquisition or in-house development. Additionally, we compete with vendors that historically provided other contact center services and technologies and expanded to offer cloud contact center software. These companies include inContact (which recently announced it was being acquired by NICE Ltd.) and LiveOps. We also face competition from smaller contact center service providers with specialized contact center software offerings. Our actual and potential competitors may enjoy competitive advantages over us, including greater name recognition, longer operating histories and larger marketing budgets, as well as greater financial or technical resources. With the introduction of new technologies and market entrants, we expect competition to intensify in the future.
Some of our competitors can devote significantly greater resources than we can to the development, promotion and sale of their products and services and many have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. Current or potential competitors may also be acquired by third parties with significantly greater resources, such as NICE Ltd.'s acquisition of inContact. In addition, many of our competitors have stronger name recognition, longer operating histories, established relationships with clients, more comprehensive product offerings, larger installed bases and major distribution agreements with consultants, system integrators and resellers. Our
competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their product offerings or resources and ability to compete. If our competitors’ products, services or technologies become more accepted than our solution, if they are successful in bringing their products or services to market earlier than ours, or if their products or services are less expensive or more technologically capable than ours, our revenues could be harmed. Pricing pressures and increased competition could result in reduced sales and revenues, reduced margins and loss of, or a failure to maintain or improve, our competitive market position, any of which could harm our business.
If we fail to manage our technical operations infrastructure, our existing clients may experience service outages, our new clients may experience delays in the deployment of our solution and we could be subject to, among other things, claims for credits or damages.
Our success depends in large part upon the capacity, stability and performance of our operations infrastructure. From time to time, we have experienced interruptions in service, and may experience such interruptions in the future. These service interruptions may be caused by a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, viruses, security attacks, fraud, spikes in client usage and denial of service issues. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. Our failure to achieve or maintain expected performance levels, stability and security could harm our relationships with our clients, result in claims for credits or damages, damage our reputation and significantly reduce client demand for our solution and harm our business.
Any future service interruptions could:
| |
• | cause our clients to seek credits or damages for losses incurred; |
| |
• | cause existing clients to cancel or elect not to renew their contracts; |
| |
• | affect our reputation as a reliable service provider; |
| |
• | make it more difficult for us to attract new clients or expand our business with existing clients; or |
| |
• | require us to replace existing equipment. |
We have experienced significant growth in the number of agents and interactions that our infrastructure supports. As the number of agent seats within our client base grows and our clients' use of our service increases, we will be required to make additional investments in our capacity to maintain adequate stability and performance, the availability of which may be limited or the cost of which may be prohibitive. In addition, we need to properly manage our operations infrastructure in order to support version control, changes in hardware and software parameters and the evolution of our solution. If we do not accurately predict or improve our infrastructure requirements to keep pace with growth in our business, our business could be harmed.
If our existing clients terminate their subscriptions or reduce their subscriptions and related usage, our revenues and gross margins will be harmed and we will be required to spend more money to grow our client base.
We expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from existing clients. As a result, retaining our existing clients is critical to our future operating results. We offer monthly, annual and multiple-year contracts to our clients, with 30 days’ notice generally required for changes in the number of agent seats or termination of their contracts. Subscriptions and related usage by our existing clients may decrease if:
| |
• | clients are not satisfied with our services, prices or the functionality of our solution; |
| |
• | the stability, performance and security of our hosting infrastructure and hosting services are not satisfactory; |
| |
• | our clients’ business declines due to industry cycles, seasonality, business difficulties or other reasons; |
| |
• | competition increases from other contact center providers; |
| |
• | alternative technologies, products or features emerge that we do not provide; |
| |
• | our clients or potential clients experience financial difficulties; |
| |
• | the volume of minutes for inbound and outbound interactions between our clients and their customers decreases; or |
| |
• | the U.S. or global economy declines. |
If our existing clients’ subscriptions and related usage decrease or are terminated, we will need to spend more money to acquire new clients to maintain our existing level of revenues. We incur significant costs and expenses, including sales and marketing expenses, to acquire new clients, and those costs and expenses are an important factor
in determining our net profitability. There can be no assurance that our efforts to acquire new clients will be successful.
The loss of one or more of our key clients, or a failure to renew our subscription agreements with one or more of our key clients, could harm our ability to market our solution.
We rely on our reputation and recommendations from key clients in order to market and sell our solution. The loss of any of our key clients, or a failure of some of them to renew or to continue to recommend our solution, could have a significant impact on our revenues, reputation and our ability to obtain new clients. In addition, acquisitions of our clients could lead to cancellation of our contracts with those clients, thereby reducing the number of our existing and potential clients.
Our growth depends in part on the success of our strategic relationships with third parties and our failure to successfully grow and manage these relationships could harm our business.
We leverage strategic relationships with third parties, such as CRM system integrator, technology and telephony providers. For example, our CRM and system integrator relationships provide significant lead generation for new client opportunities. As we grow our business, we will continue to depend on both existing and new strategic relationships. Our competitors may be more successful than we are in establishing or expanding relationships with third parties or may provide incentives to third parties to favor their products over our solution. These strategic partners may cease to recommend our solution to prospective clients due to actual or perceived lack of features, technological issues or failures, reputational concerns, economic incentives, or other factors, which would harm our business, financial conditions and operations. Furthermore, there has and continues to be a significant amount of consolidation in our industry and adjacent industries, if our partners are acquired, fail to work effectively with us or go out of business, they may no longer support or promote our solution, or may be less effective in doing so, which could harm our business, financial condition and operations. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our strategic relationships with third parties, or these partners fail to recommend our solution, our ability to compete in the marketplace or to grow our revenues could be impaired and our operating results may suffer. Even if we are successful, we cannot assure you that these relationships will result in increased client usage of our solution or increased revenue.
In addition, identifying new partners, and negotiating and documenting relationships with them, requires significant time and resources. As the complexity of our solution and our third-party relationships increases, the management of those relationships and the negotiation of contractual terms sufficient to protect our rights and limit our potential liabilities will become more complicated. We also license technology from certain third-party partners, including through OEM relationships. Certain of these agreements permit either party to terminate all or a portion of the relationship without cause at any time and for any reason. If one of these agreements is terminated by the other party, we would have to find an alternative source or develop new technology ourselves, either of which could cause delays in our ability to offer our solution or certain product features to our clients, result in increased expense and harm our business. Our inability to successfully manage and maintain these complex relationships or negotiate sufficient contractual terms could harm our business.
Our clients may fail to comply with the terms of their agreements, necessitating action by us to collect payment, or may terminate their subscriptions for our solution.
If clients fail to pay us under the terms of our agreements or fail to comply with the terms of our agreements, including compliance with regulatory requirements, we may terminate clients, lose revenue, be unable to collect amounts due to us, be subject to legal or regulatory action and incur costs in enforcing the terms of our contracts, including litigation. Some of our clients may seek bankruptcy protection or other similar relief and fail to pay amounts due to us, seek reimbursement for amounts already paid, or pay those amounts more slowly, either of which could harm our operating results, financial position and cash flow.
We sell our solution to larger organizations that require longer sales and implementation cycles and often demand more configuration and integration services or customized features and functions that we may not offer, any of which could delay or prevent these sales and harm our growth rates, business and operating results.
As we continue to target our sales efforts at larger organizations, we face greater costs, longer sales and implementation cycles and less predictability in completing our sales. These larger organizations typically require more configuration and integration services, which increases our upfront investment in sales and deployment efforts, with no guarantee that these clients will subscribe to our solution or increase the scope of their subscription. Furthermore, with larger organizations, we must provide greater levels of education regarding the use and benefits of
our solution to a broader group of people. As a result of these factors, we must devote a significant amount of sales support and professional services resources to individual clients and prospective clients, thereby increasing the cost and time required to complete sales. Our typical sales cycle for larger organizations is four to five months, but can be significantly longer, and we expect that our average sales cycle may increase as sales to larger organizations continue to grow as a percentage of our business. Longer sales cycles could cause our operating and financial results to be less predictable and to fluctuate from period to period. In addition, many of our clients that are larger organizations initially deploy our solution to support only a portion of their contact center agents. Our success depends on our ability to increase the number of agent seats and the number of applications utilized by larger organizations over time. There is no guarantee that these clients will increase their subscriptions for our solution. If we do not expand our initial relationships with larger organizations, the return on our investments in sales and deployment efforts for these clients will decrease and our business may suffer.
Furthermore, we may not be able to provide the configuration and integration services that larger organizations typically require. For example, our solution does not currently permit clients to modify our code, but instead requires them to use our set of APIs. If prospective clients require customized features or functions that we do not offer, and that would be difficult for them to deploy themselves, they will need to use our services or third-party service providers or we may lose sales opportunities with larger organizations and our business could suffer.
Because a significant percentage of our revenue is derived from existing clients, downturns or upturns in new sales will not be immediately reflected in our operating results and may be difficult to discern.
We generally recognize subscription revenue from clients monthly as services are delivered. As a result, a significant percentage of the subscription revenue we report in each quarter is derived from existing clients. Consequently, a decline in new subscriptions in any single quarter will likely have only a small impact on our revenue results for that quarter. However, the cumulative impact of such declines could harm our revenues in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of our solution, and potential changes in our pricing policies or renewal rates, will typically not be reflected in our results of operations until future periods. We also may be unable to adjust our cost structure to reflect the changes in revenue, resulting in lower margins and earnings. In addition, our subscription model makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new clients will be recognized over time as services are delivered. For example, many of our clients initially deploy our solution to support only a portion of their contact center agents. Any increase to our revenue and the value of these existing client relationships will only be reflected in our results of operations if and when these clients increase the number of agent seats and the number of components of our solution over time.
We rely on third-party telecommunications and internet service providers to provide our clients and their customers with telecommunication services and connectivity to our cloud contact center software and any failure by these service providers to provide reliable services could subject us to, among other things, claims for credits or damages.
We rely on third-party telecommunication service providers to provide our clients and their customers with telecommunication services. These telephony services include the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”) telephone numbers, call termination and origination services, and local number portability for our clients. In addition, we depend on our internet bandwidth suppliers to provide uninterrupted and error-free service through their telecommunications networks. We exercise little control over these third-party providers, which increases our vulnerability to problems with the services they provide. If any of these service providers fail to provide reliable services, or terminate or increase the cost of the services that we and our clients depend on, we may be required to switch to another service provider. Delays caused by switching our technology to another service provider, if available, and qualifying this new service provider could materially harm our client relationships, business, financial condition and operating results.
Due to our reliance on these service providers, when problems occur, it may be difficult to identify the source of the problem. Service disruption or outages, whether caused by our service, the products or services of our third-party service providers, or our clients’ or their customers’ equipment and systems, may result in loss of market acceptance of our solution and any necessary repairs or other remedial actions may force us to incur significant costs and expenses. Any failure on the part of third-party service providers to achieve or maintain expected performance levels, stability and security could harm our relationships with our clients, result in claims for credits or damages, damage our reputation, significantly reduce client demand for our solution and seriously harm our financial condition and operating results.
We have a history of losses and we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability.
We have incurred significant losses in each period since our inception in 2001. We incurred net losses of $3.5 million and $8.4 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and a net loss of $25.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $162.8 million. These losses and our accumulated deficit reflect the substantial investments we have made to develop our solution and acquire new clients. We expect the dollar amount of our costs and expenses to increase in the future as revenue increases, although at a slower rate. We expect our losses to continue for the foreseeable future as we continue to develop and expand our business. Furthermore, to the extent we are successful in increasing our client base, we may also incur increased losses because costs associated with acquiring clients are generally incurred up front, while revenues are recognized over the course of the client relationship. We also have negative gross margins on our professional services, which are expected to continue in the future. In addition, as a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. You should not consider our historical or recent growth in revenues as necessarily indicative of our future performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will achieve profitability in the future nor that, if we do become profitable, we will sustain profitability.
If the market for cloud contact center software solutions develops more slowly than we expect or declines, our business could be harmed.
The cloud contact center software market is not as mature as the market for legacy on-premise contact center systems, and it is uncertain whether cloud contact center solutions will achieve and sustain high levels of client demand and market acceptance. Our success will depend to a substantial extent on the widespread adoption of cloud contact center software solutions as a replacement for legacy on-premise systems. Many larger organizations have invested substantial technical, personnel and financial resources to integrate legacy on-premise contact center systems into their businesses and, therefore, may be reluctant or unwilling to migrate to cloud contact center solutions such as ours. It is difficult to predict client adoption rates and demand for our solution, the future growth rate and size of the cloud contact center software market, or the entry of competitive products and services. The expansion of the cloud contact center software market depends on a number of factors, including the refresh rate for legacy on-premise systems, cost, performance and perceived value associated with cloud contact center software solutions, as well as the ability of providers of cloud contact center software solutions to address security, stability and privacy concerns. If we or other cloud contact center solution providers experience security incidents, loss of client data, disruptions in service or other problems, the market for cloud contact center software products, solutions and services as a whole, including our solution, may be harmed. If cloud contact center software solutions do not achieve widespread adoption, or there is a reduction in demand for such solutions caused by a lack of client acceptance, enhanced product offerings from on-premise providers, technological challenges, weakening economic conditions, security or privacy concerns, competing technologies and products, decreases in corporate spending or otherwise, it could result in decreased revenues and our business could be harmed.