MFS MULTIMARKET INCOME TRUST N-CSR
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF

REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-4975

MFS MULTIMARKET INCOME TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Susan S. Newton

Massachusetts Financial Services Company

111 Huntington Avenue

Boston, Massachusetts 02199

(Name and address of agents for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000

Date of fiscal year end: October 31

Date of reporting period: October 31, 2014


Table of Contents
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.


Table of Contents

ANNUAL REPORT

October 31, 2014

 

LOGO

 

MFS® MULTIMARKET INCOME TRUST

 

LOGO

 

MMT-ANN

 


Table of Contents

MFS® MULTIMARKET INCOME TRUST

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MMT

 

 

Letter from the Chairman and CEO     1   
Portfolio composition     2   
Management review     4   
Performance summary     7   
Portfolio managers’ profiles     9   
Dividend reinvestment and cash purchase plan     10   
Portfolio of investments     11   
Statement of assets and liabilities     41   
Statement of operations     42   
Statements of changes in net assets     43   
Statement of cash flows     44   
Financial highlights     45   
Notes to financial statements     47   
Report of independent registered public accounting firm     59   
Results of shareholder meeting     60   
Trustees and officers     61   
Board review of investment advisory agreement     66   
Proxy voting policies and information     70   
Quarterly portfolio disclosure     70   
Further information     70   
Federal tax information     70   
MFS® privacy notice     71   
Contact information    back cover   

 

NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO

 

Dear Shareholders:

The U.S. economy stands on much firmer ground than the rest of the world, expanding at an annualized pace of more than 3%. The U.S. Federal Reserve has ended its “QE3”

bond-purchasing program as the labor market has regained momentum amid other positive indicators. Improved consumer confidence and falling gasoline prices are expected to continue propelling demand for products and services heading into the end of the year.

In contrast, all other major economic regions continue to struggle. The eurozone economy is barely expanding, and deflation threatens the bloc. The European Central Bank has made several attempts to stimulate the region’s economy, but has so far held back from large-scale asset purchases, including government bonds.

Japan continues to try to strengthen its economy. After making early progress at ending deflation and stimulating growth last year, the country hit a setback last spring when the sales tax increase was introduced, causing the need for recent additional monetary stimulus. China continues to struggle, and its growth rate is projected to continue to slow as it transitions to a more sustainable economy.

As always, active risk management is integral to how we at MFS® manage your investments. We use a collaborative process, sharing insights across asset classes, regions and economic sectors. Our global investment team uses a diversified, multidisciplined, long-term approach.

We understand that these are challenging economic times. Applying proven principles, such as asset allocation and diversification, can best serve investors over the long term. We are confident that this approach can help you as you work with your financial advisors to reach your goals in the years ahead.

Respectfully,

 

LOGO

Robert J. Manning

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

MFS Investment Management

December 16, 2014

The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change and may not be relied upon for investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed.

 

1


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

 

Portfolio structure (i)

 

LOGO

 

Fixed income sectors (i)  
High Yield Corporates     60.1%   
Emerging Markets Bonds     20.1%   
Investment Grade Corporates     15.7%   
U.S. Government Agencies     5.3%   
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities     4.1%   
Floating Rate Loans     2.5%   
Non-U.S. Government Bonds     2.4%   
Mortgage-Backed Securities     1.7%   
Collateralized Debt Obligations     0.3%   
Asset-Backed Securities     0.3%   
U.S. Treasury Securities     (8.6)%   
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i)    
AAA     2.2%   
AA     0.9%   
A     7.2%   
BBB     25.2%   
BB     29.9%   
B     31.9%   
CCC     7.4%   
C     0.3%   
D     0.1%   
U.S. Government     2.2%   
Federal Agencies     7.0%   
Not Rated     (10.4)%   
Non-Fixed Income     0.1%   
Cash & Other     (4.0)%   
Portfolio facts (i)  
Average Duration (d)     5.1   
Average Effective Maturity (m)     7.4 yrs.   
Issuer country weightings (i)(x)   
United States     58.0%   
Mexico     4.6%   
Canada     3.7%   
United Kingdom     3.5%   
France     2.3%   
Israel     1.9%   
Indonesia     1.9%   
China     1.8%   
Germany     1.7%   
Other Countries     20.6%   
 

 

2


Table of Contents

Portfolio Composition – continued

 

 

(a) For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. U.S. Government includes securities issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Federal Agencies includes rated and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies.
(d) Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move.
(i) For purposes of this presentation, the components include the value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts.
(m) In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity.
(x) Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. For purposes of this presentation, United States includes Cash & Other.

From time to time Cash & Other may be negative due to borrowings for leverage transactions, timing of cash receipts, and/or equivalent exposure from any derivative holdings.

Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.

Cash & Other can include cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities.

Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/14.

The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.

 

3


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT REVIEW

Summary of Results

MFS Multimarket Income Trust (“fund”) is a closed-end fund. The fund’s investment objective is to seek high current income, but may also consider capital appreciation. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in fixed income securities. MFS considers debt instruments of all types to be fixed income securities. MFS normally invests the fund’s assets in corporate bonds of US and/or foreign issuers, US Government securities, foreign government securities, mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities of US and foreign issuers, and/or debt instruments of issuers located in emerging market countries. MFS allocates the fund’s assets across these categories with a view toward broad diversification across and within these categories. MFS may also invest the fund’s assets in equity securities.

For the twelve months ended October 31, 2014, shares of the MFS Multimarket Income Trust provided a total return of 7.13%, at net asset value and a total return of 5.09%, at market value. This compares with a return of 5.82% for the fund’s benchmark, the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index. Over the same period, the fund’s other benchmark, the MFS Multimarket Income Trust Blended Index (“Blended Index”), generated a return of 5.36%. The Blended Index reflects the blended returns of various fixed income market indices, with percentage allocations to each index designed to resemble the fixed income allocations of the fund. The market indices and related percentage allocations used to compile the Blended Index are set forth in the Performance Summary.

The performance commentary below is based on the net asset value performance of the fund which reflects the performance of the underlying pool of assets held by the fund. The total return at market value represents the return earned by owners of the shares of the fund which are traded publicly on the exchange.

Market Environment

Prior to the reporting period, the decision by the US Federal Reserve (“Fed”) to postpone the tapering of its quantitative easing (“QE”) program surprised markets. Favorable market reactions were tempered, however, by tense negotiations over US fiscal policy which resulted in a 16-day partial shutdown of the federal government (from October 1 through 16, 2013) and a short-term extension in the debt ceiling. The volatility was short-lived, however, as an extension of budget and debt ceiling deadlines allowed the government to re-open, and subsequent economic data reflected moderate but resilient US growth. Also well-received was the decision by the European Central Bank (“ECB”) to cut its policy rate as inflation pressures waned in the region. In addition, equity investors appeared to have concluded that there would be no major change in US monetary policy as a result of the nomination of Janet Yellen as the new Fed Chair for a term beginning in early 2014 and that tapering would have no major impact on the trajectory.

As the period progressed, financial markets were forced to contend with a series of positive and negative return episodes. Geopolitical tensions flared in the Middle East and Russia/Ukraine. Market setbacks were short-lived, as improving economic growth in the US coupled with prospects for easier monetary policy in regions with slowing growth such as Japan, Europe and China, supported risk assets. For example, the ECB cut policy interest rates into negative territory and, by the end of the period,

 

4


Table of Contents

Management Review – continued

 

expectations were for additional rate cuts and the announcement for non-conventional easing measures. Similarly, the Bank of Japan surprised markets late in the period with fresh stimulus measures given lackluster growth trends and the related decline in developed market government bond yields and credit spreads were also supportive for equity markets. At the end of the period, the US equity market was trading at all-time highs.

Contributors to Performance

Relative to the Blended Index, a lesser relative exposure to Venezuelan bonds contributed to performance.

The fund’s return from yield, which was greater than that of the Blended Index, was also a key contributor to relative performance.

The fund’s lesser exposure to shifts in the middle portion (centered around maturities of 7 years) of the US yield curve (y) also benefited relative returns.

Detractors from Performance

During the reporting period, the fund’s lesser exposure to shifts in the long end (centered around maturities of 10 or more years) of the US yield curve detracted from relative returns as the yield curve steepened.

Credit quality in US bonds, particularly in “B” rated (r) securities, was another area of relative weakness.

The fund employs leverage and, to the extent that investments are purchased through the use of leverage, the fund’s net asset value may increase or decrease at a greater rate than a comparable unleveraged fund. During the reporting period, the use of leverage did not have a material impact on the fund’s performance.

Respectfully,

 

Richard Hawkins   William Adams   Ward Brown   David Cole
Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager
Pilar Gomez-Bravo   Robert Persons   Matthew Ryan  
Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager   Portfolio Manager  

 

(r) Bonds rated “BBB”, “Baa”, or higher are considered investment grade; bonds rated “BB”, “Ba”, or below are considered non-investment grade. The source for bond quality ratings is Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, Inc. and are applied using the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). For securities which are not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated.
(y) A yield curve graphically depicts the yields of different maturity bonds of the same credit quality and type; a normal yield curve is upward sloping, with short-term rates lower than long-term rates.

 

5


Table of Contents

Management Review – continued

 

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover and do not necessarily reflect the views of MFS or any other person in the MFS organization. These views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and MFS disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS portfolio. References to specific securities are not recommendations of such securities, and may not be representative of any MFS portfolio’s current or future investments.

 

6


Table of Contents

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY THROUGH 10/31/14

The following chart represents the fund’s historical performance in comparison to its benchmark(s). Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost; current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. The performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the sale of fund shares. Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results.

Price Summary for MFS Multimarket Income Trust

                   Date        Price     

 

Year Ended 10/31/14

     Net Asset Value        10/31/14         $7.39  
              10/31/13         $7.50  
     New York Stock Exchange Price        10/31/14         $6.37  
              6/25/14  (high) (t)       $6.67  
              10/15/14  (low) (t)       $6.23  
                10/31/13         $6.59    

Total Returns vs Benchmarks

 

         

 

Year Ended 10/31/14

     MFS Multimarket Income Trust at       
    

New York Stock Exchange Price (r)

     5.09%  
    

Net Asset Value (r)

     7.13%  
     Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index (f)      5.82%  
     MFS Multimarket Income Trust Blended Index (f)(w)      5.36%  
     Barclays Global Aggregate Credit Bond Index (f)      3.30%  
     Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index (f)      3.32%  
       JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (f)      7.20%    

 

(f) Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc.

 

(r) Includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gain distributions.

 

(t) For the period November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014.

 

(w) MFS Multimarket Income Trust Blended Index is at a point in time and allocations during the period can change. As of October 31, 2014, the blended index was comprised of 50% Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index, 20% JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global, 20% Barclays Global Aggregate Credit Bond Index, and 10% Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index.

 

7


Table of Contents

Performance Summary – continued

 

Benchmark Definitions

Barclays Global Aggregate Credit Bond Index – a subset of the Global Aggregate Index, and contains investment grade credit securities from the U.S. Aggregate, Pan-European Aggregate, Asian-Pacific Aggregate, Eurodollar, 144A, and Euro-Yen indices. Credit securities are publicly issued corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes that meet the specified maturity, liquidity and quality requirements.

Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index – measures debt issued by the U.S. Government, and its agencies, as well as mortgage-backed pass-through securities of Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC).

Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index – is a component of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index, which measures performance of non-investment grade, fixed rate debt. The index limits the maximum exposure to any one issuer to 2%.

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global – measures the performance of U.S. dollar- denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Notes to Performance Summary

The fund’s shares may trade at a discount or premium to net asset value. When fund shares trade at a premium, buyers pay more than the net asset value underlying fund shares, and shares purchased at a premium would receive less than the amount paid for them in the event of the fund’s liquidation.

The fund’s monthly distributions may include a return of capital to shareholders to the extent that distributions are in excess of the fund’s net investment income and net capital gains, determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations. Distributions that are treated for federal income tax purposes as a return of capital will reduce each shareholder’s basis in his or her shares and, to the extent the return of capital exceeds such basis, will be treated as gain to the shareholder from a sale of shares. Returns of shareholder capital have the effect of reducing the fund’s assets and increasing the fund’s expense ratio.

Net asset values and performance results based on net asset value per share do not include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may differ from amounts reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities or the Financial Highlights.

From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.

 

In accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund hereby gives notice that it may from time to time repurchase shares of the fund in the open market at the option of the Board of Trustees and on such terms as the Trustees shall determine.

 

8


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS’ PROFILES

 

Portfolio Manager   Primary Role   Since   Title and Five Year History
Richard Hawkins   Lead Portfolio

Manager

  2006   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1988.
William Adams   Lower Quality
Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2011   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2009.
Ward Brown   Emerging Markets

Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2012   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2005.
David Cole   Lower Quality

Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2006   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2004.
Pilar Gomez-Bravo   Investment Grade

Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2013   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2013; Managing Director of Imperial Capital from May 2012 to March 2013; Portfolio Manager and Head of Research of Negentropy Capital from June 2011 to April 2012; Co-founder of Marengo Asset Management from June 2010 to April 2011; Head of Credit Europe Neuberger Berman from June 2006 to May 2010.
Robert Persons   Investment Grade

Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2013   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 2000.
Matthew Ryan   Emerging Markets

Debt Instruments

Portfolio Manager

  2004   Investment Officer of MFS; employed in the investment management area of MFS since 1997.

 

9


Table of Contents

DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN

The fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) that allows common shareholders to reinvest either all of the distributions paid by the fund or only the long-term capital gains. Generally, purchases are made at the market price unless that price exceeds the net asset value (the shares are trading at a premium). If the shares are trading at a premium, purchases will be made at a price of either the net asset value or 95% of the market price, whichever is greater. You can also buy shares on a quarterly basis in any amount $100 and over. The Plan Agent will purchase shares under the Cash Purchase Plan on the 15th of January, April, July, and October or shortly thereafter.

If shares are registered in your own name, new shareholders will automatically participate in the Plan, unless you have indicated that you do not wish to participate. If your shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you may wish to request that your shares be re-registered in your own name so that you can participate. There is no service charge to reinvest distributions, nor are there brokerage charges for shares issued directly by the fund. However, when shares are bought on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant pays a pro rata share of the transaction expenses, including commissions. Dividends and capital gains distributions are taxable whether received in cash or reinvested in additional shares – the automatic reinvestment of distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on the distributions.

You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by going to the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com, by calling 1-800-637-2304 any business day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078. Please have available the name of the fund and your account number. For certain types of registrations, such as corporate accounts, instructions must be submitted in writing. Please call for additional details. When you withdraw from the Plan, you can receive the value of the reinvested shares in one of three ways: your full shares will be held in your account, the Plan Agent will sell your shares and send the proceeds to you, or you may transfer your full shares to your investment professional who can hold or sell them. Additionally, the Plan Agent will sell your fractional shares and send the proceeds to you.

If you have any questions or for further information or a copy of the Plan, contact the Plan Agent Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Transfer Agent for the fund) at 1-800-637-2304, at the Plan Agent’s website at www.computershare.com, or by writing to the Plan Agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078.

 

10


Table of Contents

PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

10/31/14

The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.

 

Bonds - 110.6%                 
Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Aerospace - 1.4%                 
Bombardier, Inc., 7.5%, 3/15/18 (n)    $ 760,000      $ 843,600   
Bombardier, Inc., 7.75%, 3/15/20 (n)      930,000        1,032,300   
Bombardier, Inc., 6.125%, 1/15/23 (n)      885,000        911,550   
CPI International, Inc., 8.75%, 2/15/18      1,050,000        1,089,375   
Gencorp, Inc., 7.125%, 3/15/21      1,405,000        1,492,813   
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 3/15/21      1,755,000        1,886,625   
TransDigm, Inc., 6%, 7/15/22      245,000        247,756   
TransDigm, Inc., 6.5%, 7/15/24      575,000        592,250   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,096,269   
Apparel Manufacturers - 0.4%                 
Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 12/15/20    $ 845,000      $ 896,756   
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 12/15/22      1,220,000        1,210,850   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,107,606   
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 4.7%                 
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., FRN, 5.753%, 2/10/51    $ 1,558,729      $ 1,713,782   
Bayview Financial Acquisition Trust, FRN, 5.483%, 2/28/41 (d)(q)      252,932        257,555   
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.752%, 12/28/40 (z)      2,331,137        1,387,631   
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.71%, 12/10/49      390,311        52,302   
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.366%, 12/11/49      1,400,000        1,464,245   
Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Trust, “AM”, FRN, 5.702%, 6/15/39      1,781,000        1,874,112   
Crest Ltd., CDO, 7%, 1/28/40 (a)(p)      2,733,062        61,221   
Dryden Senior Loan Fund, 2013-26A, “A”, CLO, FRN, 1.33%, 7/15/25 (z)      1,500,000        1,474,137   
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 17.857%, 1/05/25 (i)(z)      329,471        82,368   
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.734%, 1/12/43 (d)(i)(q)(z)      532,996        671   
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.618%, 11/18/35 (i)      5,649,869        123,111   
GMAC LLC, FRN, 8.071%, 4/15/34 (d)(n)(q)      1,171,517        656,950   
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.796%, 8/10/45      1,890,273        2,066,641   
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., 5.475%, 3/10/39      1,745,342        1,840,938   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., 5.552%, 5/12/45      1,542,227        1,625,336   

 

11


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Asset-Backed & Securitized - continued                 
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., “A4”, FRN, 5.785%, 6/15/49    $ 2,000,000      $ 2,169,120   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.475%, 4/15/43      1,526,838        1,590,758   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., FRN, 5.863%, 4/15/45      1,590,000        1,675,947   
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Trust, 2007-LD11, “AM”, FRN, 5.785%, 6/15/49      2,243,253        2,349,808   
Lehman Brothers Commercial Conduit Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.175%, 2/18/30 (i)      762,587        16,851   
Morgan Stanley Capital I Trust, “AM”, FRN, 5.683%, 4/15/49      1,674,000        1,748,473   
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.415%, 4/28/39 (i)(z)      3,294,719        16,638   
Multi Security Asset Trust, “A3”, CDO, 5%, 11/28/35 (n)      345,337        344,861   
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A4”, FRN, 5.941%, 2/15/51      998,222        1,078,037   
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 5.118%, 7/15/42      1,240,991        1,261,445   
    

 

 

 
             $ 26,932,938   
Automotive - 2.5%                 
Accuride Corp., 9.5%, 8/01/18    $ 1,365,000      $ 1,419,600   
Allison Transmission, Inc., 7.125%, 5/15/19 (n)      1,630,000        1,713,538   
FCE Bank PLC, 1.875%, 5/12/16    EUR 300,000        383,577   
Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 1.7%, 5/09/16    $ 1,000,000        1,007,461   
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 6.5%, 3/01/21      1,225,000        1,310,750   
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 5/15/22      420,000        456,750   
Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., 2.7%, 3/15/17 (n)      600,000        618,159   
Hyundai Capital America, 4%, 6/08/17 (n)      256,000        271,108   
Jaguar Land Rover PLC, 8.125%, 5/15/21 (n)      2,020,000        2,222,000   
Lear Corp., 8.125%, 3/15/20      424,000        447,850   
Lear Corp., 4.75%, 1/15/23      730,000        731,825   
Lear Corp., 5.375%, 3/15/24      140,000        143,500   
Renault S.A., 3.625%, 9/19/18    EUR 475,000        636,925   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 6.875%, 8/15/18 (n)(p)    $ 655,000        686,113   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 3.25%, 5/15/19    EUR 470,000        582,031   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 4.75%, 5/15/21 (n)    $ 565,000        563,588   
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19 (p)(z)      305,000        315,675   
TRW Automotive, Inc., 4.5%, 3/01/21 (n)      500,000        502,500   
Volkswagen International Finance N.V., 3.875% to 9/04/18, FRN to 9/29/49    EUR 400,000        532,285   
    

 

 

 
             $ 14,545,235   
Biotechnology - 0.1%                 
Life Technologies Corp., 6%, 3/01/20    $ 363,000      $ 419,107   

 

12


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Broadcasting - 1.8%                 
AMC Networks, Inc., 7.75%, 7/15/21    $ 884,000      $ 963,560   
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 9%, 3/01/21      701,000        701,000   
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “A”, 6.5%, 11/15/22      245,000        252,350   
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc., “B”, 6.5%, 11/15/22      945,000        978,075   
Grupo Televisa S.A.B., 5%, 5/13/45      200,000        199,040   
Liberty Media Corp., 8.5%, 7/15/29      1,280,000        1,417,600   
Liberty Media Corp., 8.25%, 2/01/30      50,000        54,500   
Netflix, Inc., 5.375%, 2/01/21      945,000        982,800   
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/20      900,000        933,750   
Omnicom Group, Inc., 3.65%, 11/01/24      154,000        152,980   
ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG, 2.625%, 4/15/21    EUR 485,000        626,423   
SES S.A., 3.6%, 4/04/23 (n)    $ 226,000        230,366   
Univision Communications, Inc., 6.875%, 5/15/19 (n)      1,035,000        1,088,044   
Univision Communications, Inc., 7.875%, 11/01/20 (n)      940,000        1,016,375   
Vivendi S.A., 4%, 3/31/17    EUR 400,000        543,305   
    

 

 

 
             $ 10,140,168   
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.4%                 
E*TRADE Financial Corp., 6.375%, 11/15/19    $ 2,050,000      $ 2,185,813   
Building - 3.0%                 
Allegion U.S. Holding Co., Inc., 5.75%, 10/01/21    $ 1,535,000      $ 1,607,913   
Building Materials Corp. of America, 5.375%, 11/15/24 (n)      890,000        892,225   
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.875%, 8/15/18 (n)      885,000        919,073   
Building Materials Holding Corp., 7%, 2/15/20 (n)      470,000        494,440   
Building Materials Holding Corp., 6.75%, 5/01/21 (n)      715,000        766,838   
CEMEX Finance LLC, 9.375%, 10/12/22      335,000        386,088   
CEMEX Finance LLC, 6%, 4/01/24 (n)      488,000        497,614   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 3/25/19 (n)      202,000        209,323   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 6.5%, 12/10/19 (n)      405,000        433,856   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 7.25%, 1/15/21 (n)      506,000        545,848   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.7%, 1/11/25 (z)      594,000        581,942   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., FRN, 5.233%, 9/30/15 (n)      552,000        562,516   
Cimpor Financial Operations B.V., 5.75%, 7/17/24 (n)      284,000        273,066   
CRH Finance Ltd., 3.125%, 4/03/23    EUR 300,000        416,119   
Gibraltar Industries, Inc., 6.25%, 2/01/21    $ 625,000        643,750   
HD Supply, Inc., 8.125%, 4/15/19      560,000        604,800   
HD Supply, Inc., 7.5%, 7/15/20      990,000        1,054,350   
Headwaters, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/19      490,000        502,250   
Headwaters, Inc., 7.625%, 4/01/19      330,000        344,850   
Holcim Finance Luxembourg S.A., 3%, 1/22/24    EUR 200,000        278,944   
Holcim GB Finance Ltd., 8.75%, 4/24/17    GBP 200,000        372,134   
Mohawk Industries, Inc., 3.85%, 2/01/23    $ 653,000        660,169   

 

13


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Building - continued                 
Nortek, Inc., 8.5%, 4/15/21    $ 1,170,000      $ 1,257,750   
Odebrecht Finance Ltd., 7.125%, 6/26/42 (n)      419,000        439,741   
Owens Corning, Inc., 4.2%, 12/15/22      364,000        366,428   
Roofing Supply Group LLC/Roofing Supply Finance, Inc., 10%, 6/01/20 (n)      908,000        942,050   
Union Andina de Cementos S.A.A., 5.875%, 10/30/21 (z)      270,000        274,104   
USG Corp., 7.875%, 3/30/20 (n)      525,000        564,375   
USG Corp., 5.875%, 11/01/21 (n)      245,000        252,963   
    

 

 

 
             $ 17,145,519   
Business Services - 1.1%                 
Equinix, Inc., 4.875%, 4/01/20    $ 855,000      $ 874,238   
Equinix, Inc., 5.375%, 4/01/23      530,000        546,563   
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., 3.875%, 6/05/24      664,000        673,109   
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.375%, 8/15/21      439,000        456,560   
Iron Mountain, Inc., 6%, 8/15/23      780,000        822,900   
Lender Processing Services, Inc., 5.75%, 4/15/23      330,000        349,800   
NeuStar, Inc., 4.5%, 1/15/23      1,015,000        877,975   
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 3/05/18 (n)      664,000        681,073   
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 5/02/19 (n)      965,000        981,195   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,263,413   
Cable TV - 3.9%                 
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 8.125%, 4/30/20    $ 1,600,000      $ 1,696,000   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 7.375%, 6/01/20      390,000        418,031   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 6.5%, 4/30/21      1,015,000        1,070,825   
CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 5.75%, 1/15/24      975,000        998,156   
Cequel Communications Holdings, 6.375%, 9/15/20 (n)      970,000        1,011,225   
Comcast Corp., 4.65%, 7/15/42      700,000        736,426   
Comcast Corp., 4.75%, 3/01/44      292,000        313,742   
DISH DBS Corp., 6.75%, 6/01/21      890,000        987,900   
DISH DBS Corp., 5%, 3/15/23      1,010,000        1,006,213   
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 6.625%, 12/15/22      1,545,000        1,626,113   
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A., 5.5%, 8/01/23      1,495,000        1,498,738   
Intelsat Luxembourg S.A., 8.125%, 6/01/23      645,000        685,313   
Lynx I Corp., 5.375%, 4/15/21 (n)      520,000        539,500   
Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 4/15/23 (n)      675,000        713,813   
Nara Cable Funding Ltd., 8.875%, 12/01/18    EUR 300,000        393,878   
Numericable Group S.A., 6%, 5/15/22 (n)    $ 1,290,000        1,319,025   
Shaw Communications, Inc., 5.65%, 10/01/19    CAD 475,000        474,309   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.25%, 5/15/20 (n)    $ 290,000        288,369   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.875%, 10/01/20 (n)      130,000        137,150   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 5.75%, 8/01/21 (n)      195,000        202,313   

 

14


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Cable TV - continued                 
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 4.625%, 5/15/23 (n)    $ 540,000      $ 521,100   
SIRIUS XM Radio, Inc., 6%, 7/15/24 (n)      560,000        583,800   
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5.75%, 6/02/31    GBP 250,000        469,874   
Unitymedia Hessen, 5.5%, 1/15/23 (n)    $ 950,000        990,375   
Unitymedia KabelBW GmbH, 6.125%, 1/15/25 (z)      700,000        730,625   
UPCB Finance III Ltd., 6.625%, 7/01/20 (n)      959,000        1,009,348   
Videotron Ltd., 5.375%, 6/15/24 (n)      155,000        159,650   
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 5.5%, 1/15/21    GBP 300,000        500,345   
VTR Finance B.V., 6.875%, 1/15/24 (n)    $ 207,000        217,350   
Ziggo Bond Co. B.V., 8%, 5/15/18 (n)    EUR 680,000        922,444   
    

 

 

 
             $ 22,221,950   
Chemicals - 2.7%                 
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 5.875%, 6/15/21    $ 995,000      $ 1,079,575   
Celanese U.S. Holdings LLC, 4.625%, 11/15/22      405,000        408,038   
CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/01/23      577,000        569,400   
Consolidated Energy Finance S.A., 6.75%, 10/15/19 (z)      384,000        391,680   
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 5/15/19      379,000        477,347   
Flash Dutch 2 B.V./U.S. Coatings Acquisition, 7.375%, 5/01/21 (n)      810,000        876,825   
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp., 6.625%, 4/15/20      500,000        500,000   
Hexion U.S. Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance, 8.875%, 2/01/18      1,015,000        1,003,581   
Huntsman International LLC, 8.625%, 3/15/21      1,240,000        1,351,600   
Huntsman International LLC, 5.125%, 4/15/21    EUR 335,000        437,303   
INEOS Finance PLC, 8.375%, 2/15/19 (n)    $ 1,390,000        1,490,775   
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 6.125%, 8/15/18 (n)      920,000        928,050   
INEOS Group Holdings S.A., 5.875%, 2/15/19 (n)      455,000        454,431   
LYB International Finance B.V., 4%, 7/15/23      270,000        280,035   
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., 5.75%, 4/15/24      487,000        568,496   
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 8/01/23 (n)      372,000        388,740   
NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5%, 5/01/25 (n)      485,000        500,763   
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., 5.5%, 4/21/20 (n)      353,000        384,679   
Taminco Global Chemical Corp., 9.75%, 3/31/20 (n)      1,200,000        1,320,000   
Tronox Finance LLC, 6.375%, 8/15/20      1,410,000        1,448,775   
W.R. Grace & Co., 5.125%, 10/01/21 (n)      495,000        515,731   
    

 

 

 
             $ 15,375,824   
Computer Software - 0.4%                 
Oracle Corp., 3.4%, 7/08/24    $ 483,000      $ 488,450   
Syniverse Holdings, Inc., 9.125%, 1/15/19      436,000        457,800   
VeriSign, Inc., 4.625%, 5/01/23      1,165,000        1,160,631   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,106,881   

 

15


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Computer Software - Systems - 0.4%                 
Audatex North America, Inc., 6%, 6/15/21 (n)    $ 820,000      $ 867,150   
Audatex North America, Inc., 6.125%, 11/01/23 (n)      220,000        233,200   
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 8.5%, 4/01/19      700,000        742,000   
CDW LLC/CDW Finance Corp., 6%, 8/15/22      485,000        511,675   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,354,025   
Conglomerates - 1.7%                 
Alfa S.A.B de C.V., 5.25%, 3/25/24 (n)    $ 217,000      $ 236,259   
Amsted Industries Co., 5%, 3/15/22 (n)      1,350,000        1,331,438   
BC Mountain LLC, 7%, 2/01/21 (n)      980,000        882,000   
Dynacast International LLC, 9.25%, 7/15/19      755,000        806,906   
EnPro Industries, Inc., 5.875%, 9/15/22 (n)      770,000        789,250   
Entegris, Inc., 6%, 4/01/22 (n)      1,275,000        1,297,313   
KION Finance S.A., 6.75%, 2/15/20    EUR 450,000        604,520   
Metalloinvest Finance Ltd., 5.625%, 4/17/20 (n)    $ 708,000        641,625   
Renaissance Acquisition, 6.875%, 8/15/21 (n)      1,300,000        1,355,250   
Rexel S.A., 6.125%, 12/15/19 (n)      1,085,000        1,120,263   
Siemens Financierings N.V., 5.25% to 9/14/16, FRN to 9/14/66    EUR 300,000        403,671   
Siemens Financierings N.V., 6.125% to 9/14/16, FRN to 9/14/66    GBP 150,000        253,753   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,722,248   
Construction - 0.3%                 
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.9%, 2/04/21    $ 590,000      $ 623,925   
Empresas ICA S.A.B. de C.V., 8.875%, 5/29/24 (n)      914,000        927,710   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,551,635   
Consumer Products - 0.7%                 
Elizabeth Arden, Inc., 7.375%, 3/15/21    $ 595,000      $ 539,963   
Mattel, Inc., 1.7%, 3/15/18      192,000        190,992   
Prestige Brands, Inc., 8.125%, 2/01/20      373,000        399,110   
Prestige Brands, Inc., 5.375%, 12/15/21 (n)      720,000        696,600   
Prosegur Compania de Seguridad S.A., 2.75%, 4/02/18    EUR 400,000        528,428   
Reckitt Benckiser Treasury Services PLC, 3.625%, 9/21/23 (n)    $ 500,000        519,833   
Spectrum Brands, Inc., 6.375%, 11/15/20      965,000        1,022,900   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,897,826   
Consumer Services - 1.2%                 
ADT Corp., 6.25%, 10/15/21    $ 1,525,000      $ 1,601,250   
ADT Corp., 4.125%, 6/15/23      370,000        340,400   
Garda World Security Corp., 7.25%, 11/15/21 (n)      755,000        751,225   
Garda World Security Corp., 7.25%, 11/15/21 (n)      255,000        253,725   
Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., 7.875%, 11/30/17      475,000        450,063   
Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/01/20      1,495,000        1,539,850   
Service Corp. International, 7%, 6/15/17      1,025,000        1,119,813   

 

16


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Consumer Services - continued                 
Service Corp. International, 5.375%, 5/15/24    $ 715,000      $ 736,450   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,792,776   
Containers - 2.1%                 
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 10/15/20 (n)    $ 1,450,000      $ 1,555,125   
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC, 9.125%, 10/15/20 (n)      750,000        808,125   
Ball Corp., 5%, 3/15/22      1,338,000        1,401,555   
Ball Corp., 4%, 11/15/23      280,000        268,800   
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 9.75%, 1/15/21      180,000        200,925   
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., 5.5%, 5/15/22      1,155,000        1,159,331   
Crown American LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/23      1,635,000        1,606,388   
Greif, Inc., 6.75%, 2/01/17      580,000        629,300   
Reynolds Group, 7.125%, 4/15/19      910,000        945,263   
Reynolds Group, 9.875%, 8/15/19      375,000        407,344   
Reynolds Group, 5.75%, 10/15/20      600,000        624,000   
Reynolds Group, 8.25%, 2/15/21      1,280,000        1,376,000   
Signode Industrial Group, 6.375%, 5/01/22 (n)      1,005,000        974,850   
    

 

 

 
             $ 11,957,006   
Defense Electronics - 0.4%                 
BAE Systems PLC, 4.125%, 6/08/22    GBP 350,000      $ 590,281   
Ducommun, Inc., 9.75%, 7/15/18    $ 1,417,000        1,544,530   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,134,811   
Electrical Equipment - 0.2%                 
Anixter, Inc., 5.125%, 10/01/21    $ 970,000      $ 984,429   
Electronics - 1.2%                 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 6.75%, 3/01/19    $ 975,000      $ 921,375   
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 7.5%, 8/15/22      320,000        292,800   
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 7%, 7/01/24      295,000        258,863   
Micron Technology, Inc., 5.875%, 2/15/22 (n)      695,000        729,750   
Micron Technology, Inc., 5.5%, 2/01/25 (n)      460,000        465,750   
Nokia Corp., 5.375%, 5/15/19      325,000        349,375   
Nokia Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/39      250,000        270,625   
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 2/15/21 (n)      480,000        506,400   
NXP B.V., 5.75%, 3/15/23 (n)      400,000        423,000   
Sensata Technologies B.V., 6.5%, 5/15/19 (n)      1,045,000        1,093,331   
Sensata Technologies B.V., 5.625%, 11/01/24 (z)      475,000        501,422   
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 6.55%, 10/01/17      700,000        796,832   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,609,523   
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 5.2%                 
Banco de Reservas de la Republica Dominicana, 7%, 2/01/23 (n)    $ 946,000      $ 955,460   
Banco do Estado Rio Grande do Sul S.A., 7.375%, 2/02/22 (n)      412,000        431,393   

 

17


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - continued                 
Caixa Economica Federal, 4.25%, 5/13/19 (n)    $ 300,000      $ 302,550   
CNOOC Finance (2013) Ltd., 3%, 5/09/23      389,000        369,001   
CNPC (HK) Overseas Capital Ltd., 4.5%, 4/28/21 (n)      1,242,000        1,327,248   
CNPC General Capital Ltd., 3.4%, 4/16/23 (n)      391,000        379,785   
Comision Federal de Electricidad , 4.875%, 1/15/24      465,000        490,575   
Comision Federal de Electricidad, 4.875%, 1/15/24 (n)      211,000        222,605   
Comision Federal de Electricidad, 5.75%, 2/14/42 (n)      915,000        967,613   
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, Inc., 2.25%, 7/09/24 (z)    EUR 104,000        132,806   
Ecopetrol S.A., 7.375%, 9/18/43    $ 474,000        581,835   
Ecopetrol S.A., 5.875%, 5/28/45      342,000        351,405   
Empresa Nacional del Petroleo, 4.375%, 10/30/24 (z)      296,000        293,040   
Gaz Capital S.A., 4.95%, 2/06/28 (n)      492,000        435,667   
KazAgro National Management Holding, 4.625%, 5/24/23 (n)      382,000        367,675   
Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Co., 6.95%, 7/10/42 (n)      316,000        352,340   
KazMunayGas National Co., 4.4%, 4/30/23 (n)      285,000        279,870   
KazMunayGas National Co., 6%, 11/07/44 (z)      307,000        302,797   
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.25%, 6/28/17 (n)      1,029,000        1,142,190   
Majapahit Holding B.V., 8%, 8/07/19 (n)      1,197,000        1,403,483   
Majapahit Holding B.V., 7.75%, 1/20/20 (n)      1,045,000        1,216,119   
Office Cherifien des Phosphates, 6.875%, 4/25/44 (n)      373,000        407,111   
Oleoducto Central S.A., 4%, 5/07/21 (n)      205,000        207,563   
Pemex Project Funding Master Trust, 5.75%, 3/01/18      1,341,000        1,482,207   
Pertamina PT, 5.25%, 5/23/21 (n)      511,000        536,550   
Pertamina PT, 4.875%, 5/03/22 (n)      540,000        550,800   
Pertamina PT, 4.3%, 5/20/23 (n)      323,000        314,118   
Pertamina PT, 5.625%, 5/20/43 (n)      371,000        355,233   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 8%, 5/03/19      926,000        1,124,997   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6%, 3/05/20      805,000        913,434   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 1/21/21      1,360,000        1,503,548   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 1/24/22      1,048,000        1,117,168   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 1/18/24      640,000        676,800   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.25%, 1/15/25 (z)      109,000        110,341   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 6/27/44 (z)      254,000        264,795   
Petroleum Co. of Trinidad & Tobago Ltd., 9.75%, 8/14/19 (n)      476,000        595,000   
Petroleum Co. of Trinidad & Tobago Ltd., 6%, 5/08/22      435,333        466,351   
PT Pelabuhan Indonesia III, 4.875%, 10/01/24 (z)      200,000        203,000   
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, 5.125%, 5/16/24 (n)      438,000        449,498   
PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara, 5.5%, 11/22/21 (n)      752,000        799,000   
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 6.75%, 9/30/19 (n)      825,000        977,625   
Sinopec Capital (2013) Ltd., 3.125%, 4/24/23 (n)      666,000        635,696   
Sinopec Capital (2013) Ltd., 4.25%, 4/24/43 (n)      548,000        525,238   
Sinopec Group Overseas Development (2012) Ltd., 3.9%, 5/17/22 (n)      544,000        556,125   

 

18


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - continued                 
Sinopec Group Overseas Development (2014) Ltd., 4.375%, 4/10/24 (n)    $ 177,000      $ 184,857   
State Grid Overseas Investment (2014) Ltd., 4.125%, 5/07/24 (n)      2,263,000        2,350,320   
    

 

 

 
             $ 29,612,832   
Emerging Market Sovereign - 6.1%                 
Dominican Republic, 7.5%, 5/06/21 (n)    $ 879,000      $ 999,863   
Dominican Republic, 6.6%, 1/28/24 (n)      188,000        208,210   
Dominican Republic, 5.875%, 4/18/24 (n)      206,000        217,330   
Federative Republic of Brazil, 4.25%, 1/07/25      372,000        377,952   
Oriental Republic of Uruguay, 4.5%, 8/14/24      567,000        598,185   
Republic of Colombia, 8.125%, 5/21/24      679,000        904,768   
Republic of Colombia, 6.125%, 1/18/41      658,000        789,600   
Republic of Croatia, 5.5%, 4/04/23 (n)      1,362,000        1,425,841   
Republic of El Salvador, 6.375%, 1/18/27 (z)      43,000        44,075   
Republic of Guatemala, 5.75%, 6/06/22 (n)      387,000        424,733   
Republic of Hungary, 5.375%, 2/21/23      674,000        724,550   
Republic of Indonesia, 6.875%, 1/17/18      838,000        945,934   
Republic of Indonesia, 11.625%, 3/04/19      733,000        982,220   
Republic of Indonesia, 4.875%, 5/05/21 (n)      336,000        359,100   
Republic of Indonesia, 2.875%, 7/08/21 (z)    EUR 375,000        476,980   
Republic of Indonesia, 3.375%, 4/15/23 (n)    $ 517,000        495,028   
Republic of Indonesia, 5.875%, 1/15/24 (n)      225,000        255,938   
Republic of Kazakhstan, 3.875%, 10/14/24 (z)      427,000        419,528   
Republic of Kazakhstan, 4.875%, 10/14/44 (z)      207,000        199,755   
Republic of Lithuania, 6.125%, 3/09/21 (n)      499,000        581,325   
Republic of Lithuania, 6.625%, 2/01/22 (n)      1,425,000        1,717,125   
Republic of Panama, 8.875%, 9/30/27      1,273,000        1,823,563   
Republic of Panama, 9.375%, 4/01/29      873,000        1,305,135   
Republic of Paraguay, 4.625%, 1/25/23 (n)      212,000        216,452   
Republic of Peru, 7.35%, 7/21/25      544,000        719,440   
Republic of Peru, 8.75%, 11/21/33      629,000        967,088   
Republic of Philippines, 5.5%, 3/30/26      802,000        936,335   
Republic of Poland, 5%, 3/23/22      609,000        684,354   
Republic of Romania, 6.75%, 2/07/22 (n)      1,074,000        1,286,652   
Republic of Romania, 4.375%, 8/22/23 (n)      486,000        506,048   
Republic of Romania, 4.875%, 1/22/24 (n)      328,000        353,420   
Republic of Slovakia, 4.375%, 5/21/22 (n)      1,047,000        1,139,921   
Republic of Turkey, 7%, 3/11/19      790,000        904,899   
Republic of Turkey, 5.625%, 3/30/21      670,000        733,627   
Republic of Turkey, 6.25%, 9/26/22      646,000        733,210   
Republic of Venezuela, 7.65%, 4/21/25      673,000        403,800   
Republic of Vietnam, 6.75%, 1/29/20      537,000        601,440   
Russian Federation, 4.875%, 9/16/23      200,000        200,290   

 

19


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Emerging Market Sovereign - continued                 
Russian Federation, 4.875%, 9/16/23 (n)    $ 1,200,000      $ 1,201,740   
Russian Federation, 7.5%, 3/31/30      382,520        433,965   
Russian Federation, 5.625%, 4/04/42 (n)      600,000        605,502   
United Mexican States, 3.625%, 3/15/22      1,710,000        1,752,750   
United Mexican States, 4%, 10/02/23      1,364,000        1,424,016   
United Mexican States, 8.5%, 5/31/29    MXN  29,290,000        2,587,414   
United Mexican States, 5.75%, 10/12/10    $ 408,000        432,005   
    

 

 

 
             $ 35,101,106   
Energy - Independent - 5.3%                 
Afren PLC, 11.5%, 2/01/16 (n)    $ 335,000      $ 345,888   
Afren PLC, 10.25%, 4/08/19 (n)      219,000        227,804   
American Energy-Permian Basin LLC, 7.125%, 11/01/20 (n)      375,000        324,375   
American Energy-Permian Basin LLC, 7.375%, 11/01/21 (n)      520,000        455,000   
Antero Resources Finance Corp., 6%, 12/01/20      625,000        650,000   
Antero Resources Finance Corp., 5.375%, 11/01/21      1,020,000        1,035,300   
Athlon Holdings LP/Athlon Finance Corp., 6%, 5/01/22 (n)      945,000        1,017,647   
Baytex Energy Corp., 5.125%, 6/01/21 (n)      360,000        351,000   
Baytex Energy Corp., 5.625%, 6/01/24 (n)      795,000        767,175   
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 8.625%, 10/15/20      435,000        443,700   
BreitBurn Energy Partners LP, 7.875%, 4/15/22      1,405,000        1,347,922   
Chaparral Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 11/15/22      975,000        950,625   
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 5.75%, 3/15/23      395,000        432,525   
Cimarex Energy Co., 4.375%, 6/01/24      420,000        426,825   
Concho Resources, Inc., 6.5%, 1/15/22      1,125,000        1,215,000   
Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 4/01/23      925,000        978,188   
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.9%, 6/01/44      235,000        232,080   
Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 4/15/23      315,000        329,957   
Denbury Resources, Inc., 4.625%, 7/15/23      549,000        507,139   
EP Energy LLC, 6.875%, 5/01/19      330,000        343,200   
EP Energy LLC, 9.375%, 5/01/20      1,405,000        1,534,963   
EP Energy LLC, 7.75%, 9/01/22      2,590,000        2,732,450   
Halcon Resources Corp., 8.875%, 5/15/21      1,475,000        1,209,500   
Harvest Operations Corp., 6.875%, 10/01/17      540,000        550,800   
Hilcorp Energy I LP/Hilcorp Finance Co., 5%, 12/01/24 (z)      175,000        168,000   
Hilcorp Energy I/Hilcorp Finance Co., 8%, 2/15/20 (n)      350,000        367,500   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 8.625%, 4/15/20      45,000        45,113   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 7.75%, 2/01/21      1,647,000        1,614,060   
Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp., 6.5%, 9/15/21      495,000        452,925   
MEG Energy Corp., 6.5%, 3/15/21 (n)      1,310,000        1,296,900   
MEG Energy Corp., 7%, 3/31/24 (n)      915,000        919,575   
Northern Blizzard Resources, Inc., 7.25%, 2/01/22 (n)      670,000        636,500   
Nostrum Oil & Gas Finance B.V., 6.375%, 2/14/19 (n)      293,000        293,733   
Oasis Petroleum, Inc., 6.875%, 3/15/22      1,320,000        1,372,800   

 

20


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Energy - Independent - continued                 
Range Resources Corp., 5%, 8/15/22    $ 1,030,000      $ 1,080,213   
Rosetta Resources, Inc., 5.625%, 5/01/21      430,000        417,100   
RSP Permian, Inc., 6.625%, 10/01/22 (n)      515,000        513,610   
Sanchez Energy Corp., 6.125%, 1/15/23 (n)      1,155,000        1,100,138   
SandRidge Energy, Inc., 8.125%, 10/15/22      670,000        606,350   
SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 11/15/21      1,205,000        1,250,188   
    

 

 

 
             $ 30,543,768   
Energy - Integrated - 0.8%                 
BG Energy Capital PLC, FRN, 6.5%, 11/30/72    EUR 350,000      $ 493,711   
BP Capital Markets PLC, 2.521%, 1/15/20    $ 119,000        119,523   
Eni S.p.A., 4%, 6/29/20    EUR 300,000        439,553   
Listrindo Capital B.V., 6.95%, 2/21/19 (n)    $ 239,000        254,535   
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 4.563%, 4/24/23 (n)      1,029,000        933,665   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 7.25%, 12/12/21 (n)      1,145,000        1,222,288   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.125%, 3/28/23 (n)      600,000        574,500   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.625%, 1/19/25 (z)      272,000        258,658   
Repsol International Finance B.V., 3.625%, 10/07/21    EUR 400,000        573,247   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,869,680   
Entertainment - 1.4%                 
Activision Blizzard, Inc., 6.125%, 9/15/23 (n)    $ 1,485,000      $ 1,607,513   
Carnival Corp., 1.2%, 2/05/16      500,000        500,585   
Cedar Fair LP, 5.25%, 3/15/21      1,130,000        1,135,650   
Cedar Fair LP, 5.375%, 6/01/24 (n)      415,000        415,000   
Cinemark USA, Inc., 5.125%, 12/15/22      1,045,000        1,045,000   
Cinemark USA, Inc., 4.875%, 6/01/23      780,000        768,300   
Seven Seas Cruises S. DE R.L., 9.125%, 5/15/19      1,270,000        1,349,375   
Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/21 (n)      1,325,000        1,331,625   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,153,048   
Financial Institutions - 3.4%                 
AerCap Ireland Capital Ltd., 5%, 10/01/21 (n)    $ 575,000      $ 598,000   
Aircastle Ltd., 4.625%, 12/15/18      790,000        801,850   
Aircastle Ltd., 5.125%, 3/15/21      385,000        389,813   
Aviation Capital Group, 4.625%, 1/31/18 (n)      685,000        713,882   
Aviation Capital Group, 6.75%, 4/06/21 (n)      745,000        849,300   
CIT Group, Inc., 5.25%, 3/15/18      1,615,000        1,703,825   
CIT Group, Inc., 6.625%, 4/01/18 (n)      1,447,000        1,584,465   
CIT Group, Inc., 5.5%, 2/15/19 (n)      1,269,000        1,353,864   
CIT Group, Inc., 3.875%, 2/19/19      1,255,000        1,262,844   
CIT Group, Inc., 5%, 8/15/22      875,000        915,469   
General Electric Capital Corp., 6.375% to 11/15/17, FRN to 11/15/67      300,000        320,250   

 

21


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Financial Institutions - continued                 
Icahn Enterprises LP, 6%, 8/01/20    $ 1,060,000      $ 1,113,000   
Icahn Enterprises LP, 5.875%, 2/01/22      1,405,000        1,443,638   
International Lease Finance Corp., 7.125%, 9/01/18 (n)      337,000        381,653   
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 6.5%, 8/01/18      640,000        627,200   
Nationstar Mortgage LLC/Capital Corp., 7.875%, 10/01/20      1,560,000        1,536,600   
SLM Corp., 4.875%, 6/17/19      276,000        280,140   
SLM Corp., 8%, 3/25/20      1,815,000        2,082,713   
SLM Corp., 7.25%, 1/25/22      935,000        1,044,863   
SLM Corp., 6.125%, 3/25/24      455,000        469,792   
    

 

 

 
             $ 19,473,161   
Food & Beverages - 2.0%                 
B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 6/01/21    $ 855,000      $ 840,038   
BRF S.A., 5.875%, 6/06/22 (n)      216,000        237,600   
BRF S.A., 3.95%, 5/22/23 (n)      205,000        193,725   
BRF S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/24 (n)      382,000        382,478   
BRF S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/24      660,000        660,825   
Coca-Cola HBC Finance B.V., 4.25%, 11/16/16    EUR 348,000        467,075   
Constellation Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 5/01/21    $ 150,000        150,188   
Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.25%, 5/01/23      1,460,000        1,467,300   
Cosan Luxembourg S.A., 5%, 3/14/23 (n)      205,000        197,313   
Darling Ingredients, Inc., 5.375%, 1/15/22      990,000        992,475   
Embotelladora Andina S.A., 5%, 10/01/23 (n)      418,000        442,766   
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V., 4.5%, 1/25/22 (n)      417,000        439,510   
H.J. Heinz Co., 4.25%, 10/15/20      790,000        797,742   
JBS Investments GmbH, 7.75%, 10/28/20 (n)      201,000        220,222   
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 2.25%, 6/05/17      700,000        714,442   
Minerva Luxembourg S.A., 7.75%, 1/31/23 (n)      204,000        213,180   
Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 8/01/21 (n)      1,315,000        1,393,900   
Tyson Foods, Inc., 6.6%, 4/01/16      820,000        882,898   
Tyson Foods, Inc., 5.15%, 8/15/44      156,000        166,560   
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 2.9%, 10/21/19 (n)      239,000        243,051   
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 3.375%, 10/21/20 (n)      124,000        126,666   
    

 

 

 
             $ 11,229,954   
Food & Drug Stores - 0.1%                 
CVS Health Corp., 3.375%, 8/12/24    $ 354,000      $ 352,968   
Loblaw Cos. Ltd., 4.86%, 9/12/23    CAD 423,000        407,852   
    

 

 

 
             $ 760,820   
Forest & Paper Products - 0.3%                 
Appvion, Inc., 9%, 6/01/20 (n)    $ 795,000      $ 620,100   
International Paper Co., 6%, 11/15/41      700,000        806,698   
Tembec Industries, Inc., 9%, 12/15/19 (n)      570,000        577,125   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,003,923   

 

22


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Gaming & Lodging - 1.6%                 
CCM Merger, Inc., 9.125%, 5/01/19 (n)    $ 890,000      $ 956,750   
Chester Downs & Marina LLC, 9.25%, 2/01/20 (n)      425,000        378,250   
Greektown Holdings LLC, 8.875%, 3/15/19 (n)      860,000        864,300   
Hilton Worldwide Finance Co., 5.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      1,125,000        1,185,469   
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 8.875%, 6/15/20      280,000        299,600   
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., 5.875%, 3/15/21      575,000        589,375   
MGM Resorts International, 6.625%, 12/15/21      820,000        897,900   
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 8.75%, 5/15/20      610,000        648,125   
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., REIT, 5%, 4/15/21      975,000        970,125   
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 2.5%, 3/01/18      650,000        653,799   
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., 5.625%, 3/01/21      132,000        147,541   
Wynn Las Vegas LLC, 7.75%, 8/15/20      1,250,000        1,343,750   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,934,984   
Industrial - 0.6%                 
Dematic S.A., 7.75%, 12/15/20 (n)    $ 1,395,000      $ 1,485,675   
Howard Hughes Corp., 6.875%, 10/01/21 (n)      1,260,000        1,332,450   
SPL Logistics Escrow LLC, 8.875%, 8/01/20 (n)      795,000        860,588   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,678,713   
Insurance - 0.8%                 
AIG SunAmerica Global Financing X, 6.9%, 3/15/32 (n)    $ 484,000      $ 643,156   
American International Group, Inc., 4.875% to 3/15/17, FRN to 3/15/67    EUR 600,000        784,973   
Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A., 7.75% to 2022, FRN to 12/12/42    EUR 200,000        313,914   
Aviva PLC, 5.7% to 9/29/15, FRN to 9/29/49    EUR 400,000        514,666   
CNP Assurances S.A., 6% to 9/14/20, FRN to 9/14/40    EUR 400,000        572,690   
Delta Lloyd N.V., FRN, 9%, 8/29/42    EUR 450,000        734,221   
Unum Group, 7.125%, 9/30/16    $ 829,000        922,695   
Unum Group, 4%, 3/15/24      259,000        265,402   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,751,717   
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 0.7%                 
Amlin PLC, 6.5% to 12/19/16, FRN to 12/19/26    GBP 200,000      $ 331,138   
Clerical Medical Finance PLC, 4.25% to 6/24/15, FRN to 10/15/19    EUR 500,000        626,811   
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 8/15/20    $ 700,000        804,249   
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., 2.55%, 10/15/18      330,000        337,224   
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., 3.5%, 6/03/24      315,000        316,752   
QBE Capital Funding III Ltd., 7.5% to 5/24/21, FRN to 5/24/41    GBP 300,000        535,772   
ZFS Finance USA Trust II, 6.45% to 6/15/16, FRN to 12/15/65 (n)    $ 810,000        862,650   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,814,596   

 

23


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.2%                 
Caisse d’Amortissement de la Dette Sociale, 1%, 5/25/18    EUR 350,000      $ 451,844   
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 5/25/16    $ 315,000        330,356   
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 6/26/17      125,000        133,305   
ESB Finance Ltd., 4.375%, 11/21/19    EUR 400,000        583,853   
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.7%, 2/10/17 (n)    $ 843,000        910,862   
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 5.625%, 6/21/18 (n)      2,268,000        2,409,977   
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.875%, 6/21/23 (n)      1,683,000        1,927,035   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,747,232   
International Market Sovereign - 1.0%                 
Commonwealth of Australia, 5.75%, 5/15/21    AUD 759,000      $ 775,782   
Government of Japan, 1.1%, 6/20/20    JPY  217,950,000        2,043,542   
Government of Japan, 2.1%, 9/20/24    JPY 35,750,000        368,464   
Republic of Iceland, 4.875%, 6/16/16 (n)    $ 1,716,000        1,800,657   
Republic of Iceland, 5.875%, 5/11/22 (n)      631,000        712,991   
    

 

 

 
             $ 5,701,436   
Internet - 0.4%                 
Baidu, Inc., 3.25%, 8/06/18    $ 1,846,000      $ 1,898,022   
Baidu, Inc., 3.5%, 11/28/22      475,000        465,823   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,363,845   
Machinery & Tools - 1.5%                 
Ashtead Capital, Inc., 5.625%, 10/01/24 (n)    $ 1,465,000      $ 1,527,263   
CNH America LLC, 7.25%, 1/15/16      1,065,000        1,122,510   
Ferreycorp S.A.A., 4.875%, 4/26/20 (n)      347,000        342,663   
H&E Equipment Services Co., 7%, 9/01/22      1,050,000        1,120,875   
Jurassic Holdings III, Inc., 6.875%, 2/15/21 (n)      875,000        881,563   
Light Tower Rentals, Inc., 8.125%, 8/01/19 (n)      625,000        615,625   
Loxam SAS, 4.875%, 7/23/21 (z)    EUR 650,000        798,257   
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., 8.25%, 2/01/21    $ 910,000        991,900   
United Rentals North America, Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/24      135,000        141,581   
United Rentals North America, Inc., 7.625%, 4/15/22      789,000        879,735   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,421,972   
Major Banks - 3.6%                 
ABN AMRO North America Finance, Inc., 7.125%, 7/06/22    EUR 250,000      $ 407,566   
Banco Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.781%, 10/07/15 (n)    $ 500,000        512,688   
Bank of America Corp., 4.125%, 1/22/24      475,000        494,011   
Bank of America Corp., 4.2%, 8/26/24      904,000        910,474   
Bank of America Corp., 4.875%, 4/01/44      212,000        227,036   
Bank of America Corp., FRN, 5.2%, 12/31/49      2,189,000        2,030,298   
Barclays Bank PLC, 6%, 1/14/21    EUR 300,000        453,178   
Barclays Bank PLC, 6.75% to 1/16/18, FRN to 1/16/23    GBP 200,000        349,176   
BBVA Senior Finance S.A., 3.25%, 3/21/16    EUR 300,000        390,329   

 

24


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Major Banks - continued                 
BNP Paribas, FRN, 2.983%, 12/22/14    $ 1,532,000      $ 1,537,359   
Credit Agricole S.A., 7.375%, 12/18/23    GBP 200,000        399,361   
Credit Agricole S.A., 7.875% to 10/26/19, FRN to 10/29/49    EUR 350,000        521,279   
DBS Bank Ltd., 3.625% to 9/21/17, FRN to 9/21/22 (n)    $ 1,055,000        1,087,200   
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/19      1,200,000        1,432,842   
ING Bank N.V., 4.875%, 1/18/21    EUR 250,000        389,175   
ING Bank N.V., 3.50% to 11/21/18, FRN to 11/21/23    EUR 500,000        660,400   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 3.25%, 9/23/22    $ 765,000        766,043   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6.75% to 2/01/24, FRN to 1/29/49      486,000        512,050   
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6% to 8/01/23, FRN to 12/29/49      1,315,000        1,303,494   
Morgan Stanley, 3.875%, 4/29/24      500,000        506,546   
Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 4/01/18      1,000,000        1,145,156   
PNC Bank N.A., 3.8%, 7/25/23      600,000        618,280   
Regions Financial Corp., 2%, 5/15/18      421,000        417,610   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 5.5%, 3/23/20    EUR 300,000        464,913   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.648% to 9/30/31, FRN to 8/29/49    $ 765,000        899,831   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 6.99% to 2017, FRN to 10/29/49 (n)      435,000        493,725   
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, FRN, 3.625%, 3/25/24    EUR 500,000        636,043   
Societe Generale, 4.25%, 7/13/22    EUR 200,000        309,934   
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.9% to 6/15/24, FRN to 12/29/49      509,000        523,303   
    

 

 

 
             $ 20,399,300   
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 3.0%                 
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 5.125%, 8/01/21    $ 225,000      $ 235,125   
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., 6.875%, 2/01/22      1,715,000        1,847,913   
Davita, Inc., 6.625%, 11/01/20      1,696,000        1,774,440   
Davita, Inc., 5.125%, 7/15/24      555,000        566,100   
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.625%, 7/31/19 (n)      800,000        857,000   
Fresenius Medical Care Capital Trust III, 5.875%, 1/31/22 (n)      430,000        468,700   
Fresenius US Finance II, Inc., 4.25%, 2/01/21 (n)      84,000        86,625   
HCA, Inc., 4.25%, 10/15/19      785,000        797,756   
HCA, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/22      980,000        1,138,025   
HCA, Inc., 5.875%, 3/15/22      1,140,000        1,251,150   
HCA, Inc., 5%, 3/15/24      690,000        711,569   
HealthSouth Corp., 8.125%, 2/15/20      1,510,000        1,589,275   
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., 5.5%, 12/01/21      1,710,000        1,791,225   
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 8/01/20      1,920,000        2,044,800   
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 4/01/21      1,070,000        1,072,675   
Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/20      1,010,000        941,926   
    

 

 

 
             $ 17,174,304   

 

25


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Medical Equipment - 0.5%                 
Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/01/20    $ 517,000      $ 553,190   
Physio-Control International, Inc., 9.875%, 1/15/19 (n)      603,000        649,733   
Teleflex, Inc., 6.875%, 6/01/19      800,000        858,000   
Teleflex, Inc., 5.25%, 6/15/24 (n)      695,000        705,425   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,766,348   
Metals & Mining - 3.1%                 
ArcelorMittal S.A., 6.75%, 2/25/22    $ 260,000      $ 288,626   
ArcelorMittal S.A., 7.25%, 3/01/41      405,000        418,163   
Arch Coal, Inc., 8%, 1/15/19 (n)      470,000        305,500   
Arch Coal, Inc., 7.25%, 10/01/20      300,000        144,000   
Cameco Corp., 5.67%, 9/02/19    CAD 765,000        756,706   
Century Aluminum Co., 7.5%, 6/01/21 (n)    $ 1,405,000        1,496,325   
Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 5/15/23      743,000        724,425   
Consol Energy, Inc., 6.375%, 3/01/21      340,000        351,900   
Consol Energy, Inc., 5.875%, 4/15/22 (n)      1,354,000        1,374,310   
EVRAZ, Inc. N.A. Canada, 7.5%, 11/15/19 (z)      820,000        830,250   
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 10/15/19 (n)      1,496,000        1,488,520   
First Quantum Minerals Ltd., 7.25%, 5/15/22 (n)      245,000        238,875   
Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., 8.25%, 11/01/19 (n)      1,285,000        1,333,188   
Glencore Finance (Europe) S.A., 6.5%, 2/27/19    GBP 150,000        273,776   
GrafTech International Co., 6.375%, 11/15/20    $ 940,000        876,644   
Lundin Mining Corp., 7.5%, 11/01/20 (n)      455,000        474,338   
Lundin Mining Corp., 7.875%, 11/01/22 (n)      455,000        473,200   
Molycorp, Inc., 10%, 6/01/20      260,000        185,900   
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.875%, 2/15/23      650,000        735,111   
Rio Tinto Finance (USA) Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/21      242,000        252,124   
Southern Copper Corp., 5.25%, 11/08/42      700,000        656,894   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.125%, 10/01/21 (n)      435,000        450,225   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.25%, 4/15/23      435,000        456,750   
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 5.5%, 10/01/24 (n)      435,000        460,013   
Suncoke Energy Partners LP/Suncoke Energy Partners Finance Corp., 7.375%, 2/01/20 (n)      375,000        391,875   
Suncoke Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 8/01/19      700,000        734,860   
TMS International Corp., 7.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      680,000        710,600   
Walter Energy, Inc., 9.5%, 10/15/19 (n)      440,000        381,700   
Walter Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 4/15/21      470,000        122,200   
Xstrata Finance (Canada) Ltd., 5.25%, 6/13/17    EUR 300,000        418,791   
    

 

 

 
             $ 17,805,789   
Midstream - 3.9%                 
Access Midstream Partner LP, 4.875%, 3/15/24    $ 240,000      $ 250,800   
Access Midstream Partners Co., 5.875%, 4/15/21      320,000        338,400   
Access Midstream Partners Co., 4.875%, 5/15/23      635,000        663,575   

 

26


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Midstream - continued                 
AmeriGas Finance LLC, 6.75%, 5/20/20    $ 1,375,000      $ 1,464,375   
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP/Atlas Pipeline, 4.75%, 11/15/21      305,000        304,238   
Atlas Pipeline Partners LP/Atlas Pipeline, 5.875%, 8/01/23      1,180,000        1,224,250   
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, 6%, 12/15/20      860,000        870,750   
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, 6.125%, 3/01/22      565,000        570,650   
El Paso Corp., 7.75%, 1/15/32      2,394,000        2,992,500   
Enbridge, Inc., 3.19%, 12/05/22    CAD 500,000        445,175   
Energy Transfer Equity LP, 7.5%, 10/15/20    $ 1,165,000        1,339,750   
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 3.6%, 2/01/23      591,000        578,995   
Enterprise Products Operating LLC, 3.9%, 2/15/24      287,000        295,371   
Enterprise Products Operating LLC, 4.85%, 3/15/44      148,000        152,419   
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.5%, 5/01/21      845,000        851,338   
Ferrellgas LP/Ferrellgas Finance Corp., 6.75%, 1/15/22      1,180,000        1,188,850   
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 4.15%, 2/01/24      341,000        337,630   
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 5.4%, 9/01/44      281,000        275,256   
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 5.5%, 2/15/23      810,000        862,650   
MarkWest Energy Partners LP, 4.5%, 7/15/23      626,000        641,650   
ONEOK, Inc., 4.25%, 2/01/22      424,000        418,778   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.625%, 2/01/21      860,000        900,850   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.625%, 4/15/23      1,285,000        1,329,975   
Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.75%, 5/15/24 (n)      545,000        563,394   
Spectra Energy Partners LP, 4.75%, 3/15/24      306,000        331,645   
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC/Summit Midstream Finance Corp., 7.5%, 7/01/21      580,000        629,300   
Summit Midstream Holdings LLC/Summit Midstream Finance Corp., 5.5%, 8/15/22      765,000        765,000   
Sunoco Logistics Partners LP, 5.3%, 4/01/44      319,000        330,029   
Targa Resources Partners LP/Targa Resources Finance Corp., 4.125%, 11/15/19 (n)      575,000        583,625   
Williams Cos., Inc., 3.7%, 1/15/23      600,000        564,430   
    

 

 

 
             $ 22,065,648   
Mortgage-Backed - 1.7%                 
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 1/01/37 - 8/01/37    $ 2,677,666      $ 2,998,546   
Fannie Mae, FRN, 0.405%, 5/25/18      6,590,124        6,586,723   
    

 

 

 
             $ 9,585,269   
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.1%                 
Centrica PLC, 4.375%, 3/13/29    GBP 250,000      $ 419,545   
GNL Quintero S.A., 4.634%, 7/31/29 (n)    $ 377,000        388,538   
    

 

 

 
             $ 808,083   
Network & Telecom - 2.4%                 
British Telecom PLC, 1.125%, 6/10/19    EUR 360,000      $ 457,707   
British Telecom PLC, 5.75%, 12/07/28    GBP 300,000        570,720   

 

27


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Network & Telecom - continued                 
Centurylink, Inc., 6.45%, 6/15/21    $ 670,000      $ 733,650   
Centurylink, Inc., 6.75%, 12/01/23      255,000        283,050   
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 3/15/42      890,000        887,775   
Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 8/15/31      920,000        998,200   
Columbus International, Inc., 7.375%, 3/30/21 (n)      200,000        212,000   
Deutsche Telekom International Finance B.V., 4.875%, 4/22/25    EUR 250,000        404,618   
Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 4.875%, 10/30/24 (n)    $ 776,000        803,772   
Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 4.75%, 8/01/26 (n)      2,336,000        2,365,574   
Frontier Communications Corp., 8.125%, 10/01/18      245,000        278,198   
Telecom Italia Capital, 6%, 9/30/34      320,000        315,200   
Telecom Italia Finance S.A., 7.75%, 1/24/33    EUR 170,000        275,753   
Telecom Italia S.p.A., 5.375%, 1/29/19    EUR 400,000        555,054   
Telecom Italia S.p.A., 5.303%, 5/30/24 (n)    $ 900,000        911,250   
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 10/01/22      295,000        325,975   
TW Telecom Holdings, Inc., 5.375%, 10/01/22      565,000        624,325   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 6.4%, 9/15/33      1,000,000        1,218,064   
Verizon Communications, Inc., 6.55%, 9/15/43      478,000        602,570   
Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 10/15/20      710,000        756,150   
    

 

 

 
             $ 13,579,605   
Oil Services - 1.1%                 
Bristow Group, Inc., 6.25%, 10/15/22    $ 1,090,000      $ 1,133,600   
Odebrecht Offshore Drilling Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 10/01/22 (n)      1,476,328        1,546,453   
Odebrecht Oil & Finance Co., 7.% to 6/17/24, FRN to 12/29/49 (n)      201,000        195,473   
Pacific Drilling S.A., 5.375%, 6/01/20 (n)      1,050,000        939,094   
QGOG Constellation S.A., 6.25%, 11/09/19 (n)      438,000        431,430   
Shale-Inland Holdings LLC/Finance Co., 8.75%, 11/15/19 (n)      710,000        734,850   
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/21      1,505,000        1,501,238   
    

 

 

 
             $ 6,482,138   
Oils - 0.1%                 
CITGO Petroleum Corp., 6.25%, 8/15/22 (n)    $ 605,000      $ 615,588   
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 3.1%                 
Banco de Credito del Peru, 6.125% to 4/24/22, FRN to 4/24/27 (n)    $ 509,000      $ 547,175   
Banco GNB Sudameris S.A., 3.875%, 5/02/18 (n)      431,000        426,130   
Banco Inbursa S.A. Institucion de Banca Multiple Grupo Financiero Inbursa, 4.125%, 6/06/24 (n)      583,000        571,340   
Bancolombia S.A., 5.95%, 6/03/21      1,094,000        1,212,973   
Bankia S.A., 3.5%, 1/17/19    EUR 400,000        542,237   

 

28


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - continued                 
Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel, 2%, 9/19/19    EUR 300,000      $ 398,917   
BBVA Banco Continental S.A., 5%, 8/26/22 (n)    $ 325,000        342,550   
BBVA Banco Continental S.A., 5.25% to 9/22/24, FRN to 9/22/29 (z)      104,000        105,196   
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.5%, 3/10/21 (n)      1,207,000        1,339,770   
BBVA Bancomer S.A. de C.V., 6.75%, 9/30/22 (n)      848,000        960,360   
BBVA Continental, 5.75%, 1/18/17 (n)      518,000        556,850   
BPCE S.A., 4.5%, 3/15/25 (n)      302,000        293,337   
CaixaBank S.A., 5% to 9/04/18, FRN to 11/14/23    EUR 400,000        543,370   
Capital One Financial Corp., 1%, 11/06/15    $ 800,000        802,032   
Citigroup, Inc., 1.25%, 1/15/16      125,000        125,533   
Corpbanca, 3.875%, 9/22/19 (z)      1,596,000        1,608,675   
Discover Bank, 7%, 4/15/20      249,000        294,718   
Discover Bank, 4.25%, 3/13/26      312,000        323,965   
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 9/30/19, FRN to 8/29/49 (n)      2,583,000        3,512,880   
Industrial Senior Trust, 5.5%, 11/01/22 (n)      220,000        218,350   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 4.125%, 9/19/16    EUR 300,000        400,289   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 5.25%, 1/28/22    GBP 250,000        441,976   
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 5.017%, 6/26/24 (n)    $ 534,000        521,886   
KBC Internationale Financieringsmaatschappij N.V., 4.5%, 3/27/17    EUR 300,000        411,868   
LBG Capital No. 2 PLC, 6.385%, 5/12/20    EUR 450,000        601,418   
Macquarie Group Ltd., 3%, 12/03/18 (n)    $ 404,000        415,929   
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 4%, 9/19/22    GBP 200,000        343,458   
    

 

 

 
             $ 17,863,182   
Pharmaceuticals - 1.9%                 
Bayer AG, 3.00% to 7/01/20, FRN to 7/01/75    EUR 360,000      $ 464,149   
Bayer U.S. Finance LLC, 3.375%, 10/08/24 (n)    $ 225,000        225,658   
Celgene Corp., 1.9%, 8/15/17      526,000        530,789   
Endo Finance LLC/Endo Finco, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/22 (n)      1,190,000        1,270,325   
Forest Laboratories, Inc., 4.375%, 2/01/19 (n)      618,000        647,330   
Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3.7%, 4/01/24      545,000        560,373   
Hospira, Inc., 5.2%, 8/12/20      72,000        77,916   
Mallinckrodt International Finance S.A., 5.75%, 8/01/22 (n)      890,000        932,275   
Mylan, Inc., 2.6%, 6/24/18      1,000,000        1,014,290   
Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 6%, 1/15/21 (n)      585,000        633,263   
Teva Pharmaceutical Finance B.V., 2.95%, 12/18/22      500,000        484,836   
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7%, 10/01/20 (n)      1,560,000        1,634,100   
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 7.25%, 7/15/22 (n)      815,000        859,825   
Vantage Point Imaging, 7.5%, 7/15/21 (n)      525,000        561,750   
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1.875%, 10/01/17      700,000        693,851   
    

 

 

 
             $ 10,590,730   

 

29


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Precious Metals & Minerals - 0.4%                 
Aurico Gold, Inc., 7.75%, 4/01/20 (n)    $ 920,000      $ 901,600   
Eldorado Gold Corp., 6.125%, 12/15/20 (n)      1,540,000        1,524,600   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,426,200   
Printing & Publishing - 0.7%                 
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 6/15/18 (z)    $ 32,653      $ 31,673   
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 10/15/19      570,000        592,800   
Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 7/15/20      460,000        476,100   
Gannett Co., Inc., 4.875%, 9/15/21 (n)      255,000        256,913   
Gannett Co., Inc., 6.375%, 10/15/23      840,000        903,000   
Lamar Media Corp., 5%, 5/01/23      755,000        755,094   
Nielsen Finance LLC, 5%, 4/15/22 (n)      715,000        725,725   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,741,305   
Railroad & Shipping - 0.1%                 
Watco Cos. LLC, 6.375%, 4/01/23 (n)    $ 720,000      $ 730,800   
Real Estate - Apartment - 0.1%                 
Deutsche Annington Immobilien SE, 2.125%, 7/09/22    EUR 450,000      $ 582,527   
Real Estate - Healthcare - 0.6%                 
Aviv Healthcare Properties LP/Aviv Healthcare, REIT, 6%, 10/15/21    $ 1,110,000      $ 1,143,300   
HCP, Inc., REIT, 3.875%, 8/15/24      278,000        277,877   
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.875%, 5/01/21      760,000        813,200   
MPT Operating Partnership LP, REIT, 6.375%, 2/15/22      1,255,000        1,333,438   
    

 

 

 
             $ 3,567,815   
Real Estate - Other - 0.9%                 
CNL Lifestyle Properties, Inc., REIT, 7.25%, 4/15/19    $ 705,000      $ 720,863   
DuPont Fabros Technology LP, REIT, 5.875%, 9/15/21      1,915,000        1,991,600   
ERP Properties, REIT, 7.75%, 7/15/20      990,000        1,195,870   
ERP Properties, REIT, 5.75%, 8/15/22      250,000        274,954   
Felcor Lodging LP, REIT, 5.625%, 3/01/23      945,000        942,638   
    

 

 

 
             $ 5,125,925   
Real Estate - Retail - 0.4%                 
Hammerson PLC, REIT, 2.75%, 9/26/19    EUR 300,000      $ 406,949   
Hammerson PLC, REIT, 6%, 2/23/26    GBP 250,000        485,449   
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 10.35%, 4/01/19    $ 900,000        1,191,327   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,083,725   
Restaurants - 0.1%                 
YUM! Brands, Inc., 5.35%, 11/01/43    $ 306,000      $ 321,671   

 

30


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Retailers - 1.6%                 
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., 5.165%, 8/01/44    $ 423,000      $ 422,607   
Best Buy Co., Inc., 5.5%, 3/15/21      1,175,000        1,207,313   
Bon Ton Stores, Inc., 8%, 6/15/21      650,000        565,500   
Dollar General Corp., 4.125%, 7/15/17      831,000        865,433   
Gap, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/21      1,000,000        1,129,318   
Home Depot, Inc., 4.875%, 2/15/44      378,000        425,794   
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 10/15/19 (n)(p)      705,000        648,600   
Limited Brands, Inc., 7%, 5/01/20      415,000        471,025   
Limited Brands, Inc., 6.95%, 3/01/33      360,000        374,400   
Marks & Spencer Group PLC, 4.75%, 6/12/25    GBP 300,000        504,785   
Neiman Marcus Group Ltd., 8%, 10/15/21 (n)    $ 440,000        469,342   
Rite Aid Corp., 9.25%, 3/15/20      595,000        657,356   
S.A.C.I. Falabella, 4.375%, 1/27/25 (z)      389,000        390,442   
Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/19      590,000        632,775   
Wesfarmers Ltd., 1.874%, 3/20/18 (n)      156,000        155,671   
    

 

 

 
             $ 8,920,361   
Specialty Chemicals - 0.4%                 
Chemtura Corp., 5.75%, 7/15/21    $ 1,215,000      $ 1,211,963   
Ecolab, Inc., 4.35%, 12/08/21      500,000        546,833   
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 9/17/44 (z)      748,000        748,000   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,506,796   
Specialty Stores - 0.4%                 
Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 5%, 6/01/22 (n)    $ 1,150,000      $ 1,138,500   
Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., 7%, 7/01/22 (n)      325,000        336,781   
Michaels Stores, Inc., 5.875%, 12/15/20 (n)      750,000        759,375   
    

 

 

 
             $ 2,234,656   
Supermarkets - 0.1%                 
Delhaize Group, 3.125%, 2/27/20    EUR 300,000      $ 410,724   
William Morrison Supermarkets PLC, 3.5%, 7/27/26    GBP 150,000        216,545   
    

 

 

 
             $ 627,269   
Supranational - 0.2%                 
European Investment Bank, 5.125%, 5/30/17    $ 500,000      $ 553,228   
European Investment Bank, 4.25%, 4/15/19    EUR 350,000        517,204   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,070,432   
Telecommunications - Wireless - 4.6%                 
Altice Financing S.A., 6.5%, 1/15/22 (n)    $ 2,026,000      $ 2,081,715   
Altice Finco S.A., 8.125%, 1/15/24 (n)      919,000        967,248   
America Movil S.A.B. de C.V., 4.75%, 6/28/22    EUR 525,000        813,616   
American Tower Corp., REIT, 3.5%, 1/31/23    $ 743,000        711,073   

 

31


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Telecommunications - Wireless - continued                 
Bharti Airtel International (Netherlands) B.V., 3.375%, 5/20/21 (n)    EUR 124,000      $ 164,756   
Bharti Airtel International B.V., 5.35%, 5/20/24 (n)      1,368,000        1,470,162   
Crown Castle International Corp., 4.875%, 4/15/22      375,000        378,750   
Crown Castle International Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/23      735,000        752,456   
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 1/15/20 (n)      420,000        485,253   
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 9/01/17 (n)      1,140,000        1,167,075   
Digicel Group Ltd., 8.25%, 9/30/20 (n)      615,000        642,675   
Digicel Group Ltd., 6%, 4/15/21 (n)      1,614,000        1,630,140   
Digicel Group Ltd., 7.125%, 4/01/22 (n)      731,000        734,655   
Eileme 2 AB, 11.625%, 1/31/20 (n)      925,000        1,059,125   
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 4.75%, 5/22/20 (n)      446,000        440,425   
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 6.625%, 10/15/21 (n)      412,000        440,840   
MTS International Funding Ltd., 5%, 5/30/23 (n)      201,000        180,146   
Rogers Communications, Inc., 5%, 3/15/44      278,000        289,811   
SBA Tower Trust, 2.898%, 10/15/19 (n)      439,000        440,166   
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 11/15/28      1,210,000        1,176,725   
Sprint Corp., 7.875%, 9/15/23 (n)      1,410,000        1,526,325   
Sprint Corp., 7.125%, 6/15/24 (n)      790,000        811,725   
Sprint Nextel Corp., 9%, 11/15/18 (n)      470,000        552,838   
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 11/15/22      1,050,000        1,047,375   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.125%, 1/15/22      145,000        150,256   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.5%, 1/15/24      405,000        424,238   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.464%, 4/28/19      395,000        411,788   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.25%, 4/01/21      1,675,000        1,748,281   
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.633%, 4/28/21      540,000        569,025   
VimpelCom Ltd., 5.95%, 2/13/23 (n)      255,000        234,302   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 4%, 7/15/20 (n)    EUR 300,000        370,306   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 4.75%, 7/15/20 (n)    $ 995,000        972,613   
Wind Acquisition Finance S.A., 7.375%, 4/23/21 (n)      1,435,000        1,402,713   
    

 

 

 
             $ 26,248,597   
Telephone Services - 0.7%                 
B Communications Ltd., 7.375%, 2/15/21 (n)    $ 1,872,000      $ 1,993,867   
Cogent Communications Group, Inc., 8.375%, 2/15/18 (n)      460,000        481,850   
Frontier Communications Corp., 6.25%, 9/15/21      305,000        315,103   
Level 3 Financing, Inc., 8.625%, 7/15/20      425,000        467,500   
TELUS Corp., 5.05%, 7/23/20    CAD 765,000        756,095   
    

 

 

 
             $ 4,014,415   
Tobacco - 0.3%                 
Altria Group, Inc., 4%, 1/31/24    $ 164,000      $ 169,762   
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 6/23/19      257,000        314,831   
Philip Morris International, Inc., 4.875%, 11/15/43      356,000        386,304   

 

32


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Tobacco - continued                 
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 6/15/17    $ 816,000      $ 920,042   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,790,939   
Transportation - Services - 1.3%                 
Aguila American Resources Ltd., 7.875%, 1/31/18 (n)    $ 870,000      $ 872,175   
ERAC USA Finance Co., 7%, 10/15/37 (n)      628,000        826,209   
HIT Finance B.V., 4.875%, 10/27/21    EUR 300,000        461,986   
Jack Cooper Holdings Corp., 9.25%, 6/01/20 (n)    $ 995,000        1,067,138   
Navios Logistics Finance (U.S.), Inc., 7.25%, 5/01/22 (n)      299,000        301,243   
Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp., 8.125%, 11/15/21 (n)      591,000        601,343   
Navios Maritime Holding, Inc., 7.375%, 1/15/22 (n)      1,325,000        1,331,625   
Stena AB, 7%, 2/01/24 (n)      1,215,000        1,211,963   
Syncreon Group BV/Syncre, 8.625%, 11/01/21 (n)      585,000        571,838   
Topaz Marine S.A., 8.625%, 11/01/18 (n)      208,000        211,640   
Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Ltd., 8.875%, 6/15/21      246,000        258,300   
    

 

 

 
             $ 7,715,460   
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 5.3%                 
Fannie Mae, 1.125%, 4/27/17    $ 15,000,000      $ 15,123,510   
Freddie Mac, 0.875%, 2/22/17      15,000,000        15,050,055   
    

 

 

 
             $ 30,173,565   
U.S. Treasury Obligations - 2.1%                 
U.S. Treasury Bonds, 3.125%, 11/15/41 (f)    $ 12,069,000      $ 12,291,528   
Utilities - Electric Power - 2.7%                 
AES Corp., 7.375%, 7/01/21    $ 560,000      $ 638,925   
Alabama Power Co., 4.15%, 8/15/44      201,000        204,436   
Calpine Corp., 5.375%, 1/15/23      550,000        555,500   
CMS Energy Corp., 5.05%, 3/15/22      500,000        560,222   
CMS Energy Corp., 3.875%, 3/01/24      200,000        206,721   
Colbun S.A., 4.5%, 7/10/24 (n)      243,000        244,857   
Covanta Holding Corp., 7.25%, 12/01/20      1,815,000        1,932,975   
Covanta Holding Corp., 6.375%, 10/01/22      320,000        340,800   
E.CL S.A., 4.5%, 1/29/25 (z)      609,000        610,609   
E.ON International Finance B.V., 6.375%, 6/07/32    GBP 200,000        407,780   
EDP Finance B.V., 5.25%, 1/14/21 (n)    $ 200,000        207,538   
EDP Finance B.V., 4.125%, 1/20/21    EUR 350,000        478,076   
Empresa de Energia de Bogota S.A., 6.125%, 11/10/21 (n)    $ 303,000        327,528   
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A., 4.25%, 4/15/24      127,000        128,742   
Enel S.p.A., 6.25%, 6/20/19    GBP 250,000        462,309   
Enel S.p.A., 5.25%, 5/20/24    EUR 300,000        483,830   
Enel S.p.A. , 8.75% to 2013, FRN to 9/24/73 (n)    $ 500,000        583,750   
Greenko Dutch B.V., 8%, 8/01/19 (n)      410,000        404,875   

 

33


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Bonds - continued                 
Utilities - Electric Power - continued                 
NGG Finance PLC, FRN, 5.625%, 6/18/73    GBP 250,000      $ 420,321   
NRG Energy, Inc., 8.25%, 9/01/20    $ 1,860,000        2,011,125   
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.25%, 7/15/22      385,000        402,325   
NRG Energy, Inc., 6.625%, 3/15/23      1,420,000        1,498,100   
PPL Capital Funding, Inc., 5%, 3/15/44      270,000        290,919   
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 5.375%, 5/01/21 (n)      183,000        206,499   
Red Electrica de Espana, 4.75%, 2/16/18    EUR 200,000        283,643   
Southern Electric Power Co. Ltd., 4.625%, 2/20/37    GBP 200,000        341,247   
Transelec S.A., 4.25%, 1/14/25 (n)    $ 235,000        235,774   
Waterford 3 Funding Corp., 8.09%, 1/02/17      813,046        812,936   
    

 

 

 
             $ 15,282,362   
Utilities - Gas - 0.1%                 
Transport de Gas Peru, 4.25%, 4/30/28 (n)    $ 387,000      $ 371,520   
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $618,380,301)            $ 631,271,641   
Convertible Bonds - 0.1%                 
Network & Telecom - 0.1%                 
Nortel Networks Corp., 2.125%, 4/15/14 (a)(d) (Identified Cost, $194,556)    $ 197,000      $ 192,814   
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - 2.5%                 
Aerospace - 0.1%                 
TransDigm, Inc., Term Loan C, 3.75%, 2/28/20    $ 664,085      $ 652,671   
Building - 0.2%                 
ABC Supply Co., Inc., Term Loan, 3.5%, 4/16/20    $ 884,058      $ 862,399   
HD Supply, Inc., Term Loan B, 4%, 6/28/18      489,948        485,457   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,347,856   
Business Services - 0.0%                 
Fleetcor Technologies, Inc., Term Loan B, 9/24/21 (o)    $ 122,316      $ 122,163   
Cable TV - 0.1%                 
Cequel Communications LLC, Term Loan B, 3.5%, 2/14/19    $ 471,763      $ 466,034   
Conglomerates - 0.2%                 
Entegris, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 4/30/21    $ 775,533      $ 748,390   
Silver II U.S. Holdings LLC, Term Loan, 4%, 12/13/19      581,769        567,770   
    

 

 

 
             $ 1,316,160   
Consumer Services - 0.1%                 
Realogy Corp., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 3/05/20    $ 589,570      $ 582,347   

 

34


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued                 
Containers - 0.1%                 
Berry Plastics Group, Inc., Term Loan E, 3.75%, 1/06/21    $ 454,823      $ 446,674   
Electronics - 0.2%                 
Avago Technologies Cayman Ltd., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 5/06/21    $ 944,028      $ 940,488   
Energy - Independent - 0.1%                 
MEG Energy Corp., Term Loan, 3.75%, 3/31/20    $ 527,805      $ 517,908   
Entertainment - 0.1%                 
Cedar Fair LP, Term Loan B, 3.25%, 3/06/20    $ 368,283      $ 366,288   
Food & Beverages - 0.0%                 
H.J. Heinz Co., Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 6/05/20    $ 271,174      $ 269,254   
Gaming & Lodging - 0.1%                 
Hilton Worldwide Finance LLC, Term Loan B2, 3.5%, 10/25/20    $ 852,129      $ 843,075   
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.1%                 
Community Health Systems, Inc., Term Loan D, 4.25%, 1/27/21    $ 180,230      $ 180,342   
Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc., Term Loan B, 3.5%, 6/24/21      373,393        369,393   
    

 

 

 
             $ 549,735   
Metals & Mining - 0.1%                 
FMG Resources Ltd., Term Loan B, 3.75%, 6/30/19    $ 479,847      $ 467,679   
Printing & Publishing - 0.1%                 
CBS Outdoor Americas Capital LLC, Term Loan B, 3%, 1/31/21    $ 574,548      $ 562,578   
Retailers - 0.2%                 
Dollar Tree, Inc., Term Loan, 8/08/15 (o)    $ 630,000      $ 630,000   
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 4.87%, 6/21/21      328,597        328,289   
    

 

 

 
             $ 958,289   
Specialty Stores - 0.1%                 
Mens Wearhouse Inc. Term Loan B, 4.5%, 6/18/21    $ 670,988      $ 668,262   
Supermarkets - 0.1%                 
Albertson’s Holdings LLC Term Loan B4, 4.5%, 8/25/21    $ 617,479      $ 617,136   
Telephone Services - 0.1%                 
Level 3 Financing, Inc., Term Loan B, 1/31/22 (o)    $ 751,583      $ 753,697   
Transportation - Services - 0.2%                 
Commercial Barge Line Co., Term Loan B, 7.5%, 9/15/19    $ 1,008,763      $ 1,006,872   

 

35


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Issuer    Shares/Par     Value ($)  
    
Floating Rate Loans (g)(r) - continued                 
Utilities - Electric Power - 0.2%                 
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Term Loan B1, 3%, 5/03/20    $ 927,006      $ 898,907   
Total Floating Rate Loans (Identified Cost, $14,511,740)      $ 14,354,073   
Common Stocks - 0.0%                 
Automotive - 0.0%                 
Accuride Corp. (a)      20,680      $ 99,678   
Printing & Publishing - 0.0%                 
American Media Operations, Inc. (a)      8,368      $ 1,502   
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $399,733)            $ 101,180   
Money Market Funds - 3.1%                 
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.09%,
at Cost and Net Asset Value (v)
     17,572,803      $ 17,572,803   
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $651,059,133)            $ 663,492,511   
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (16.3)%              (93,038,885
Net Assets - 100.0%            $ 570,453,626   

 

(a) Non-income producing security.
(d) In default.
(f) All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts.
(g) The rate shown represents a weighted average coupon rate on settled positions at period end, unless otherwise indicated.
(i) Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security.
(n) Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $211,415,469, representing 37.1% of net assets.
(o) All or a portion of this position has not settled. Upon settlement date, interest rates for unsettled amounts will be determined. The rate shown, if any, represents the weighted average coupon rate for settled amounts.
(p) Payment-in-kind security for which interest income may be received in additional securities and/or cash. During the period, the following amount of interest income was received in additional securities and/or cash:

 

Payment-in-kind Securities    Cash     

Additional

Securities

 
Jo-Ann Stores Holdings, Inc., 9.75%, 10/15/19      $68,738         $—   
Schaeffler Finance B.V., 6.875%, 8/15/18      22,516           
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19                
Total      $91,254         $—   

 

(q) Interest received was less than stated coupon rate.

 

36


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

(r) Remaining maturities of floating rate loans may be less than stated maturities shown as a result of contractual or optional prepayments by the borrower. Such prepayments cannot be predicted with certainty. These loans may be subject to restrictions on resale. Floating rate loans generally have rates of interest which are determined periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium.
(v) Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end.
(z) Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities:

 

Restricted Securities  

Acquisition

Date

  Cost     Value  
American Media, Inc., 13.5%, 6/15/18   12/22/10     $32,967        $31,673   
BBVA Banco Continental S.A., 5.25% to 9/22/24, FRN to , 9/22/29   9/15/14     103,293        105,196   
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.752%, 12/28/40   3/01/06     2,331,137        1,387,631   
CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V., 5.7%, 1/11/25   9/04/14     594,000        581,942   
Consolidated Energy Finance S.A., 6.75%, 10/15/19   10/02/14     380,205        391,680   
Corpbanca, 3.875%, 9/22/19   9/16/14     1,585,679        1,608,675   
Corporacion Nacional del Cobre de Chile, Inc., 2.25%, 7/09/24   7/02/14     140,220        132,806   
Dryden Senior Loan Fund, 2013-26A, “A”, CLO, FRN, 1.33%, 7/15/25   9/26/14     1,476,175        1,474,137   
E.CL S.A., 4.5%, 1/29/25   10/24/14     605,683        610,609   
EVRAZ, Inc. N.A. Canada, 7.5%, 11/15/19   10/31/14     821,438        830,250   
Empresa Nacional del Petroleo S.A., 4.375%, 10/30/24   10/27/14     294,012        293,040   
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 17.857%, 1/05/25   1/29/03     24,854        82,368   
First Union National Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, FRN, 1.734%, 1/12/43   12/11/03     637        671   
Hilcorp Energy I LP/Hilcorp Finance Co., 5%, 12/01/24   10/16/14     167,361        168,000   
KazMunayGas National Co., 6%, 11/07/44   10/31/14     302,797        302,797   
Loxam SAS, 4.875%, 7/23/21   7/18/14     879,092        798,257   
Mexichem S.A.B. de C.V., 5.875%, 9/17/44   9/09/14     741,652        748,000   
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.415%, 4/28/39   7/20/04     42,678        16,638   
PT Pelabuhan Indonesia III, 4.875%, 10/01/24   9/24/14     198,836        203,000   
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.625%, 1/19/25   9/15/14     269,424        258,658   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.25%, 1/15/25   10/06/14     108,373        110,341   
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 6/27/44   10/06/14     258,810        264,795   
Republic of El Salvador, 6.375%, 1/18/27   9/11/14     43,000        44,075   
Republic of Indonesia, 2.875%, 7/08/21   7/02/14     508,944        476,980   
Republic of Kazakhstan, 3.875%, 10/14/24   10/06/14     420,140        419,528   
Republic of Kazakhstan, 4.875%, 10/14/44   10/06/14     199,396        199,755   
S.A.C.I. Falabella, 4.375%, 1/27/25   10/22/14     388,736        390,442   
Schaeffler Holding Finance B.V., 6.25%, 11/15/19   10/21/14     305,000        315,675   

 

37


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Restricted Securities - continued  

Acquisition

Date

  Cost     Value  
Sensata Technologies B.V., 5.625%, 11/01/24   10/07/14-10/16/14     $476,870        $501,422   
Union Andina de Cementos S.A.A., 5.875%, 10/30/21   10/28/14     270,000        274,104   
Unitymedia KabelBW GmbH, 6.125%, 1/15/25   10/07/14     700,000        730,625   
Total Restricted Securities         $13,753,770   
% of Net assets         2.4%   

The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:

 

CDO   Collateralized Debt Obligation
CLO   Collateralized Loan Obligation
FRN   Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end.
PLC   Public Limited Company
REIT   Real Estate Investment Trust

Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:

 

AUD   Australian Dollar
BRL   Brazilian Real
CAD   Canadian Dollar
CHF   Swiss Franc
DKK   Danish Krone
EUR   Euro
GBP   British Pound
INR   Indian Rupee
JPY   Japanese Yen
KRW   Korean Won
MXN   Mexican Peso
NOK   Norwegian Krone
SEK   Swedish Krona
SGD   Singapore Dollar
ZAR   South African Rand

Derivative Contracts at 10/31/14

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 10/31/14

 

Type   Currency   Counter-
party
 

Contracts
to

Deliver/
Receive

   

Settlement

Date Range

 

In

Exchange

For

   

Contracts

at Value

   

Net

Unrealized

Appreciation

(Depreciation)

 
Asset Derivatives                            
SELL   BRL   UBS AG     16,884,681      12/02/14     $6,873,191        $6,755,710        $117,481   
SELL   CAD   Goldman Sachs International     1,825      1/09/15     1,628        1,616        12   
SELL   CAD   Merrill Lynch International Bank     3,275,635      1/09/15     2,915,200        2,901,547        13,653   
SELL   EUR   Barclays Bank PLC     9,255,755      12/18/14-1/09/15     11,985,780        11,602,172        383,609   
SELL   EUR   Credit Suisse Group     15,547,956      1/09/15     19,647,724        19,492,298        155,426   

 

38


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 10/31/14 - continued

 

Type   Currency  

Counter-

party

 

Contracts
to

Deliver/
Receive

   

Settlement

Date Range

   

In

Exchange

For

   

Contracts

at Value

   

Net

Unrealized

Appreciation

(Depreciation)

 
Asset Derivatives - continued                              
SELL   EUR   Goldman Sachs International     469,130        1/09/15        $591,881        $588,143        $3,738   
SELL   GBP   Barclays Bank PLC     96,000        1/09/15        154,315        153,491        824   
SELL   GBP   Credit Suisse Group     2,803,861        1/09/15        4,485,707        4,482,994        2,713   
SELL   GBP   Merrill Lynch International Bank     2,803,861        1/09/15        4,488,968        4,482,994        5,974   
SELL   JPY   Deutsche Bank AG     271,593,273        1/09/15        2,511,298        2,419,950        91,348   
SELL   JPY   Goldman Sachs International     21,875,000        1/09/15        202,501        194,911        7,590   
SELL   NOK   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     6,710        1/09/15        1,035        993        42   
BUY   ZAR   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     921,000        1/09/15        81,014        82,562        1,548   
             

 

 

 
                $783,958   
             

 

 

 
Liability Derivatives                              
SELL   AUD   Westpac Banking Corp.     861,592        1/09/15        $745,618        $754,699        $(9,081
BUY   BRL   Citibank N.A.     17,946,000        12/02/14        7,200,000        7,180,353        (19,647
SELL   CHF   UBS AG     5,432,919        1/09/15        5,631,456        5,650,371        (18,915
BUY   DKK   Citibank N.A.     11,054        1/09/15        1,871        1,862        (9
BUY   EUR   Citibank N.A.     111,877        1/09/15        141,489        140,259        (1,230
BUY   EUR   Merrill Lynch International Bank     418,476        1/09/15        530,492        524,638        (5,854
BUY   EUR   UBS AG     375,855        1/09/15        475,566        471,205        (4,361
BUY   INR   Barclays Bank PLC     353,296,000        11/21/14        5,773,754        5,733,370        (40,384
BUY   KRW   JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.     112,535,000        12/16/14        105,409        105,124        (285
SELL   MXN   UBS AG     32,899,000        1/09/15        2,433,358        2,433,597        (239
BUY   SEK   Goldman Sachs International     272        1/09/15        38        37        (1
BUY   SGD   Citibank N.A.     102,000        1/09/15        79,876        79,380        (496
             

 

 

 
                $(100,502
             

 

 

 

 

39


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Investments – continued

 

Futures Contracts at 10/31/14

 

Description    Currency      Contracts      Value   

Expiration

Date

    

Unrealized

Appreciation

(Depreciation)

 
Liability Derivatives      
Interest Rate Futures            
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short)      USD         477       $60,273,422      December - 2014         $(325,285
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short)      USD         8       1,128,750      December - 2014         (11,097
              

 

 

 
                 $(336,382
              

 

 

 

At October 31, 2014, the fund had cash collateral of $60,000 and other liquid securities with an aggregate value of $688,465 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts. Cash collateral is comprised of “Restricted cash” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

40


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

At 10/31/14

This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.

 

Assets         

Investments-

  

Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $633,486,330)

     $645,919,708   

Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value

     17,572,803   

Total investments, at value (identified cost, $651,059,133)

     $663,492,511   

Cash

     57,208   

Restricted cash

     60,000   

Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $383,510)

     377,418   

Receivables for

  

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

     783,958   

Daily variation margin on open futures contracts

     130,453   

Investments sold

     3,365,436   

Interest

     8,690,410   

Other assets

     63,449   

Total assets

     $677,020,843   
Liabilities         

Notes payable

     $100,000,000   

Payables for

  

Distributions

     155,904   

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

     100,502   

Investments purchased

     5,605,549   

Payable to affiliates

  

Investment adviser

     19,533   

Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs

     5,810   

Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation

     178,711   

Accrued interest expense

     68,882   

Deferred country tax expense payable

     271,733   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     160,593   

Total liabilities

     $106,567,217   

Net assets

     $570,453,626   
Net assets consist of         

Paid-in capital

     $552,770,858   

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies (net of $117,683 deferred country tax)

     12,610,198   

Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     3,371,652   

Undistributed net investment income

     1,700,918   

Net assets

     $570,453,626   

Shares of beneficial interest outstanding

     77,230,862   

Net asset value per share (net assets of $570,453,626 / 77,230,862 shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

     $7.39   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

41


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Year ended 10/31/14

This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.

 

Net investment income         

Income

  

Interest

     $36,302,226   

Dividends

     68,237   

Dividends from underlying affiliated funds

     27,623   

Total investment income

     $36,398,086   

Expenses

  

Management fee

     $4,042,972   

Transfer agent and dividend disbursing costs

     137,752   

Administrative services fee

     83,874   

Independent Trustees’ compensation

     75,418   

Stock exchange fee

     69,120   

Custodian fee

     87,156   

Interest expense

     848,009   

Shareholder communications

     184,492   

Audit and tax fees

     80,267   

Legal fees

     13,245   

Miscellaneous

     41,071   

Total expenses

     $5,663,376   

Fees paid indirectly

     (372

Reduction of expenses by investment adviser

     (998

Net expenses

     $5,662,006   

Net investment income

     $30,736,080   
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency   

Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis)

  

Investments (net of $136,343 country tax)

     $9,998,022   

Futures contracts

     (2,632,718

Foreign currency

     2,026,401   

Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     $9,391,705   

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  

Investments (net of $4,511 decrease in deferred country tax)

     $(8,876,729

Futures contracts

     996,139   

Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies

     919,035   

Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation

     $(6,961,555

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     $2,430,150   

Change in net assets from operations

     $33,166,230   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

42


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.

 

     Years ended 10/31  
     2014      2013  
Change in net assets              
From operations                  

Net investment income

     $30,736,080         $34,125,056   

Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency

     9,391,705         20,848,699   

Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation

     (6,961,555      (31,209,800

Change in net assets from operations

     $33,166,230         $23,763,955   
Distributions declared to shareholders                  

From net investment income

     $(32,557,449      $(36,124,929

From net realized gain on investments

     (10,287,949        

Total distributions declared to shareholders

     $(42,845,398      $(36,124,929

Change in net assets from fund share transactions

     $(6,163,584      $(1,314,939

Total change in net assets

     $(15,842,752      $(13,675,913
Net assets                  

At beginning of period

     586,296,378         599,972,291   

At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $1,700,918 and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $872,273, respectively)

     $570,453,626         $586,296,378   

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

43


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Year ended 10/31/14

This statement provides a summary of cash flows from investment activity for the fund.

 

Cash flows from operating activities:         

Change in net assets from operations

     $33,166,230   
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:         

Purchase of investment securities

     (350,633,961

Proceeds from disposition of investment securities

     357,444,464   

Payments for futures contracts

     (2,632,718

Proceeds from disposition of short-term investments, net

     6,868,641   

Realized gain/loss on investments

     (10,134,365

Realized gain/loss on futures contracts

     2,632,718   

Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments

     8,881,240   

Unrealized appreciation/depreciation on foreign currency contracts

     (995,083

Net amortization/accretion of income

     1,750,168   

Decrease in interest and dividends receivable

     1,408,447   

Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities

     80,128   

Increase in receivable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts

     (54,672

Decrease in restricted cash

     617,700   

Increase in other assets

     (272

Decrease in interest payable

     (4,884

Net cash provided by operating activities

     $48,393,781   
Cash flows from financing activities:         

Distributions paid in cash

     (42,870,553

Repurchase of shares of beneficial interest

     (6,163,584

Net cash used by financing activities

     $(49,034,137

Net decrease in cash

     $(640,356
Cash:         

Beginning of period

     $1,074,982   

End of period (including foreign currency of $377,418)

     $434,626   

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the year ended October 31, 2014 for interest was $852,893.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

44


Table of Contents

Financial Statements

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the past 5 years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.

 

    Years ended 10/31  
    2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $7.50        $7.65        $7.20        $7.44        $6.83   
Income (loss) from investment operations                                   

Net investment income (d)

    $0.39        $0.44        $0.47        $0.50        $0.52   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
investments and foreign currency

    0.04        (0.13     0.49        (0.20     0.63   

Total from investment operations

    $0.43        $0.31        $0.96        $0.30        $1.15   
Less distributions declared to shareholders                                   

From net investment income

    $(0.42     $(0.46     $(0.51     $(0.54     $(0.54

From net realized gain on investments

    (0.13                            

Total distributions declared to shareholders

    $(0.55     $(0.46     $(0.51     $(0.54     $(0.54

Net increase from repurchase of capital shares

    $0.01        $0.00 (w)      $—        $—        $—   

Net asset value, end of period (x)

    $7.39        $7.50        $7.65        $7.20        $7.44   

Market value, end of period

    $6.37        $6.59        $7.31        $6.68        $7.11   

Total return at market value (%)

    5.09        (3.73     17.56        1.67        27.18   

Total return at net asset value (%) (j)(r)(s)(x)

    7.13        4.69        14.15        4.73        18.08   
Ratios (%) (to average net assets)
and Supplemental data:
                                   

Expenses before expense reductions (f)

    0.98        1.02        1.10        1.12        1.25   

Expenses after expense reductions (f)

    0.98        1.02        1.10        1.12        1.25   

Net investment income

    5.32        5.75        6.39        6.80        7.39   

Portfolio turnover

    46        65        48        49        65   

Net assets at end of period (000 omitted)

    $570,454        $586,296        $599,972        $564,446        $583,317   
Supplemental Ratios (%):                                        

Ratio of expenses to average net assets after
expense reductions and excluding interest
expense (f)

    0.83        0.86        0.91        0.91        0.97   
Senior Securities:                                        

Total notes payable outstanding (000 omitted)

    $100,000        $100,000        $100,000        $100,000        $100,000   

Asset coverage per $1,000 of indebtedness (k)

    $6,705        $6,863        $7,000        $6,644        $6,833   

 

45


Table of Contents

Financial Highlights – continued

 

 

(d) Per share data is based on average shares outstanding.
(f) Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable.
(j) Total return at net asset value is calculated using the net asset value of the fund, not the publicly traded price and therefore may be different than the total return at market value.
(k) Calculated by subtracting the fund’s total liabilities (not including notes payable) from the fund’s total assets and dividing this number by the notes payable outstanding and then multiplying by 1,000.
(r) Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower.
(s) From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.
(w) Per share amount was less than $0.01.
(x) The net asset values per share and total returns at net asset value per share have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes.

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

46


Table of Contents

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Business and Organization

MFS Multimarket Income Trust (the fund) is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified closed-end management investment company.

The fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.

(2) Significant Accounting Policies

General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU 2014-11”). ASU 2014-11 changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions (i.e., repurchase agreements that settle at the same time as the maturity of the transferred financial asset) and enhances the required disclosures for repurchase agreements and other similar transactions. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2014-11 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures which would first be effective for interim reporting periods beginning after March 15, 2015.

Balance Sheet Offsetting – The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty. The fund’s right to setoff may be restricted

 

47


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

or prohibited by the bankruptcy or insolvency laws of the particular jurisdiction to which a specific master netting agreement counterparty is subject. Balance sheet offsetting disclosures, to the extent applicable to the fund, have been included in the fund’s Significant Accounting Policies note under the captions for each of the fund’s in-scope financial instruments and transactions.

Investment Valuations – Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Debt instruments and floating rate loans, including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.

The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services

 

48


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in total investments, such as futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2014 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:

 

Investments at Value    Level 1     Level 2      Level 3      Total  
Equity Securities      $99,678        $1,502         $—         $101,180   
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents             42,465,093                 42,465,093   
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt             78,233,096                 78,233,096   
U.S. Corporate Bonds             318,053,434                 318,053,434   
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities             9,842,823                 9,842,823   
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities             23,407,533                 23,407,533   
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs)             3,267,849                 3,267,849   
Foreign Bonds             156,194,627                 156,194,627   
Floating Rate Loans             14,354,073                 14,354,073   
Mutual Funds      17,572,803                        17,572,803   
Total Investments      $17,672,481        $645,820,030         $—         $663,492,511   
Other Financial Instruments                           
Futures Contracts      $(336,382     $—         $—         $(336,382
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts             683,456                 683,456   

For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.

 

49


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

The following is a reconciliation of level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between the levels as of the end of the period. The table presents the activity of level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.

 

    

Equity

Securities

 
Balance as of 10/31/13      $41,673   

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

     (40,171

Transfers out of level 3

     (1,502
Balance as of 10/31/14      $—   

Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.

Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.

The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:

 

        Fair Value (a)  
Risk   Derivative Contracts   Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives  
Interest Rate   Interest Rate Futures     $—        $(336,382
Foreign Exchange   Forward Foreign Currency Exchange     783,958        (100,502
Total       $783,958        $(436,884

 

(a) The value of futures contracts includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

 

50


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended October 31, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Operations:

 

Risk   

Futures

Contracts

    

Foreign

Currency

 
Interest Rate      $(2,632,718      $—   
Foreign Exchange              2,077,110   
Total      $(2,632,718      $2,077,110   

The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended October 31, 2014 as reported in the Statement of Operations:

 

Risk    Futures
Contracts
    

Translation

of Assets

and

Liabilities in

Foreign

Currencies

 
Interest Rate      $996,139         $—   
Foreign Exchange              995,083   
Total      $996,139         $995,083   

Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an ISDA Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any. The fund’s right to setoff may be restricted or prohibited by the bankruptcy or insolvency laws of the particular jurisdiction to which a specific ISDA counterparty is subject.

Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to

 

51


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “Restricted cash” or “Deposits with brokers.” Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, are noted in the Portfolio of Investments.

Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, currency exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.

Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.

The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.

Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty

 

52


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.

Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which contractually obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. The fund generally provides this financial support in order to preserve its existing investment or to obtain a more senior secured interest in the assets of the borrower. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.

Statement of Cash Flows – Information on financial transactions which have been settled through the receipt or disbursement of cash is presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is the amount included within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and includes cash on hand at its custodian bank and does not include any short term investments.

Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.

Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.

The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.

 

53


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the year ended October 31, 2014, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal and state tax returns for all open tax years and does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law. Foreign income taxes may be withheld by certain countries in which the fund invests. Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund on securities issued in or by certain foreign countries may be subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries.

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.

Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities, straddle loss deferrals, and derivative transactions.

The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last two fiscal years is as follows:

 

     10/31/14      10/31/13  
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains)      $32,557,449         $36,124,929   
Long-term capital gains      10,287,949           
Total distributions      $42,845,398         $36,124,929   

 

54


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:

 

As of 10/31/14       
Cost of investments      $654,021,175   
Gross appreciation      21,774,329   
Gross depreciation      (12,302,993
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)      $9,471,336   
Undistributed ordinary income      3,419,378   
Undistributed long-term capital gain      5,937,702   
Other temporary differences      (1,145,648

(3) Transactions with Affiliates

Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.34% of the fund’s average daily net assets and 5.40% of gross income. Gross income is calculated based on tax elections that generally include the accretion of discount and exclude the amortization of premium, which may differ from investment income reported in the Statement of Operations. The management fee, from net assets and gross income, incurred for the year ended October 31, 2014 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.70% of the fund’s average daily net assets.

Transfer Agent – The fund engages Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“Computershare”) as the sole transfer agent for the fund. MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC) monitors and supervises the activities of Computershare for an agreed upon fee approved by the Board of Trustees. For the year ended October 31, 2014, these fees paid to MFSC amounted to $34,211.

Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the year ended October 31, 2014 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0145% of the fund’s average daily net assets.

Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS and MFSC.

Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002,

 

55


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $4,730 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $7,837. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the year ended October 31, 2014. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both plans amounted to $130,796 at October 31, 2014, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Deferred Trustee Compensation – Under a Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), independent Trustees previously were allowed to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual compensation. Effective January 1, 2005, the Board elected to no longer allow Trustees to defer receipt of future compensation under the Plan. Amounts deferred under the Plan are invested in shares of certain MFS Funds selected by the independent Trustees as notional investments. Deferred amounts represent an unsecured obligation of the fund until distributed in accordance with the Plan. Included in “Other assets” and “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities is $47,905 of deferred Trustees’ compensation. There is no current year expense associated with the Plan.

Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. Frank L. Tarantino serves as the ICCO and is an officer of the funds and the sole member of Tarantino LLC. Prior to June 1, 2014, Robyn L. Griffin served as the Assistant ICCO and was an officer of the funds. Ms. Griffin is the sole member of Griffin Compliance LLC. Effective May 31, 2014, Ms. Griffin resigned as Assistant ICCO and the service agreement between the funds and Griffin Compliance LLC was terminated. For the year ended October 31, 2014, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $2,852 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $998, which is included in the reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO. On October 31, 2014, Mr. Tarantino resigned as ICCO and the service agreement between the funds and Tarantino LLC for the services of an ICCO was terminated. Effective November 1, 2014, the funds entered into a service agreement which provides for payment of fees solely by the funds to Tarantino LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent

 

56


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

Senior Officer (ISO). Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ISO.

The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.

(4) Portfolio Securities

For the year ended October 31, 2014, purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, were as follows:

 

     Purchases      Sales  
U.S. Government securities      $36,670,241         $6,871,842   
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities)      $256,449,398         $289,157,468   

(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest

The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. The Trustees have authorized the repurchase by the fund of up to 10% annually of its own shares of beneficial interest. The fund repurchased and retired 945,042 shares of beneficial interest during the year ended October 31, 2014 at an average price per share of $6.52 and a weighted average discount of 11.85% per share. The fund repurchased and retired 202,200 shares of beneficial interest during the year ended October 31, 2013 at an average price per share of $6.50 and a weighted average discount of 11.84% per share. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:

 

     Year ended
10/31/14
     Year ended
10/31/13
 
     Shares      Amount      Shares      Amount  
Capital shares reacquired      (945,042      $(6,163,584      (202,200      $(1,314,939

(6) Loan Agreement

The fund has a credit agreement with a bank for a revolving secured line of credit that can be drawn upon up to $100,000,000. At October 31, 2014, the fund had outstanding borrowings under this agreement in the amount of $100,000,000, which are secured by a lien on the fund’s assets. The loan’s carrying value in the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The loan value as of the reporting date is considered level 2 under the fair value hierarchy. The credit agreement matures on August 21, 2015. Borrowing under the agreement can be made for liquidity or leverage purposes. Interest is charged at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread or an alternate rate, at the option of the borrower, stated as the greater of Overnight LIBOR or the Federal Funds Rate each plus an agreed upon spread. The fund incurred interest expense of $848,009 during the period. The fund may also be charged a commitment fee based on the average daily unused portion of the line of credit. The fund did not incur a commitment fee during the period. For the year ended October 31, 2014, the average loan balance was $100,000,000 at a weighted average annual interest rate of 0.848%. The fund is subject to certain covenants including, but not limited to, requirements with respect to asset coverage, portfolio diversification and liquidity.

 

57


Table of Contents

Notes to Financial Statements – continued

 

(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers

An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:

 

Underlying Affiliated Fund    Beginning
Shares/Par
Amount
     Acquisitions
Shares/Par
Amount
     Dispositions
Shares/Par
Amount
    Ending
Shares/Par
Amount
 
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio      24,441,444         181,402,386         (188,271,027     17,572,803   
Underlying Affiliated Fund    Realized
Gain (Loss)
     Capital Gain
Distributions
     Dividend
Income
    Ending
Value
 
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio      $—         $—         $27,623        $17,572,803   

 

58


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of MFS Multimarket Income Trust:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of MFS Multimarket Income Trust (the Fund), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2014, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2014, by correspondence with the custodian and others or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from others were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MFS Multimarket Income Trust at October 31, 2014, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

LOGO

Boston, Massachusetts

December 18, 2014

 

59


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF SHAREHOLDER MEETING

(unaudited)

At the annual meeting of shareholders of MFS Multimarket Income Trust, which was held on October 2, 2014, the following action was taken:

Item 1: To elect the following individuals as Trustees:

 

     Number of Shares  

Nominee

   For     

Withheld Authority

 
Steven E. Buller      64,020,532.370         1,539,936.849   
William R. Gutow      63,944,929.994         1,615,539.225   
Michael Hegarty      63,974,811.712         1,585,657.507   
John P. Kavanaugh      64,105,419.703         1,455,049.516   
Robert W. Uek      63,994,811.709         1,565,657.510   

 

60


Table of Contents

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS — IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND

The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, as of December 1, 2014, are listed below, together with their principal occupations during the past five years. (Their titles may have varied during that period.) The address of each Trustee and Officer is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

INTERESTED TRUSTEES
Robert J. Manning (k)
(age 51)
  Trustee   February 2004   2016   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director; President (until 2009); Chief Investment Officer (until 2010)   N/A

Robin A. Stelmach (k)

(age 53)

  Trustee and President   January 2014   2015   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer   N/A
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES    
David H. Gunning
(age 72)
  Trustee and Chair of Trustees   January 2004   2015   Private investor   Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (welding equipment manufacturer), Director; Development Alternatives, Inc. (consulting), Director/Non-Executive Chairman

Steven E. Buller

(age 63)

  Trustee   February 2014   2014   Chairman, Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council; Standing Advisory Group, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Member; BlackRock, Inc. (investment management), Managing Director (until 2014), BlackRock Finco UK (investment management), Director (until 2014)   N/A

 

61


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Robert E. Butler
(age 73)
  Trustee   January 2006   2015   Consultant – investment company industry regulatory and compliance matters   N/A

Maureen R. Goldfarb

(age 59)

  Trustee   January 2009   2016   Private investor   N/A
William R. Gutow
(age 73)
  Trustee   December 1993   2014   Private investor and real estate consultant; Capitol Entertainment Management Company (video franchise), Vice Chairman   Texas Donuts (donut franchise), Vice Chairman (until 2010)
Michael Hegarty
(age 69)
  Trustee   December 2004   2014   Private investor   Brookfield Office Properties, Inc. (real estate), Director; Rouse Properties Inc. (real estate), Director; Capmark Financial Group Inc. (real estate), Director

John P. Kavanaugh

(age 60)

  Trustee   January 2009   2014   Private investor   N/A

Maryanne L. Roepke

(age 58)

  Trustee   May 2014   2016   American Century Investments (investment management), Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (until 2014)   N/A
Laurie J. Thomsen
(age 57)
  Trustee   March 2005   2016   Private investor; New Profit, Inc. (venture philanthropy), Executive Partner (until 2010)   The Travelers Companies (insurance), Director
Robert W. Uek
(age 73)
  Trustee   January 2006   2014   Consultant to investment company industry   N/A
OFFICERS          
Christopher R. Bohane (k)
(age 40)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel   N/A

 

62


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Kino Clark (k)

(age 46)

  Assistant Treasurer   January 2012   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President   N/A

Thomas H. Connors (k)

(age 55)

 

Assistant

Secretary and Assistant Clerk

  September 2012   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel; Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (financial service provider), Director and Senior Counsel (until 2012)   N/A
Ethan D. Corey (k)
(age 51)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A
David L. DiLorenzo (k)
(age 46)
  Treasurer   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President   N/A

Timothy M. Fagan (k)

(age 46)

  Chief Compliance Officer   November 2014   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chief Compliance Officer; Vice President and Senior Counsel (until 2012)   N/A

Brian E. Langenfeld (k)

(age 41)

  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   June 2006   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A

Susan S. Newton (k)

(age 64)

  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   May 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A
Susan A. Pereira (k)
(age 44)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   July 2005   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A

 

63


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

Name, Age

 

Position(s)
Held

with Fund

 

Trustee/Officer

Since (h)

 

Term

Expiring

 

Principal
Occupations During

the Past Five Years

 

Other

Directorships (j)

Kasey L. Phillips (k)

(age 43)

  Assistant Treasurer   September 2012   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President; Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Senior Vice President, Fund Treasurer (until 2012)   N/A
Mark N. Polebaum (k)
(age 62)
  Secretary and Clerk   January 2006   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary   N/A

Matthew A. Stowe (k)

(age 40)

  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   October 2014   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel   N/A
Frank L. Tarantino
(age 70)
  Independent Senior Officer   June 2004   N/A   Tarantino LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal   N/A
Richard S. Weitzel (k)
(age 44)
  Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk   October 2007   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel   N/A
James O. Yost (k)
(age 54)
  Deputy Treasurer   September 1990   N/A   Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President   N/A

 

(h) Date first appointed to serve as Trustee/officer of an MFS Fund. Each Trustee has served continuously since appointment unless indicated otherwise. For the period from December 15, 2004 until February 22, 2005, Mr. Manning served as Advisory Trustee. Prior to January 2012, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Assistant Treasurers of the Funds. Ms. Stelmach was appointed as President of the Funds as of October 1, 2014.
(j) Directorships or trusteeships of companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (i.e., “public companies”).
(k) “Interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (referred to as the 1940 Act), which is the principal federal law governing investment companies like the fund, as a result of position with MFS. The address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.

The Trust holds annual shareholder meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are elected for fixed terms. The Board of Trustees is currently divided into three classes, each having a term of three years which term expires on the date of the

 

64


Table of Contents

Trustees and Officers – continued

 

third annual meeting following the election to office of the Trustee’s class. Each year the term of one class expires. Each Trustee and officer will serve until next elected or his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal.

Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh, Uek and Mses. Thomsen and Roepke are members of the Fund’s Audit Committee.

Each of the Fund’s Trustees and officers holds comparable positions with certain other funds of which MFS or a subsidiary is the investment adviser or distributor, and, in the case of the officers, with certain affiliates of MFS. As of December 1, 2014, the Trustees served as board members of 135 funds within the MFS Family of Funds.

 

 

Investment Adviser   Custodian
Massachusetts Financial Services Company   State Street Bank and Trust Company

111 Huntington Avenue

Boston, MA 02199-7618

 

1 Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111-2900

Portfolio Managers   Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Richard Hawkins   Ernst & Young LLP
William Adams   200 Clarendon Street
Ward Brown   Boston, MA 02116
David Cole  
Pilar Gomez-Bravo  
Robert Persons  
Matthew Ryan  

 

65


Table of Contents

BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2014 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.

In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.

In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance (based on net asset value) of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2013 and the investment performance (based on net asset value) of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment

 

66


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.

The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.

Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s common shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 15th out of a total of 20 funds in the Lipper performance universe for this three-year period (a ranking of first place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the best performer and a ranking of last place out of the total number of funds in the performance universe indicating the worst performer). The total return performance of the Fund’s common shares ranked 13th out of a total of 20 funds for the one-year period and 11th out of a total of 16 funds for the five-year period ended December 31, 2013. Given the size of the Lipper performance universe and information previously provided by MFS regarding differences between the Fund and other funds in its Lipper performance universe, the Trustees also reviewed the Fund’s performance in comparison to a custom benchmark developed by MFS. The Fund out-performed its custom benchmark for each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2013 (one-year: 3.3% total return for the Fund versus 2.3% total return for the benchmark; three-year: 8.1% total return for the Fund versus 7.2% total return for the benchmark; five-year: 14.2 % total return for the Fund versus 13.3% total return for the benchmark). Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.

In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.

 

67


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s common shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each lower than the Lipper expense group median.

The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.

The Trustees considered that, as a closed-end fund, the Fund is unlikely to experience meaningful asset growth. As a result, the Trustees did not view the potential for realization of economies of scale as the Fund’s assets grow to be a material factor in their deliberations. The Trustees noted that they would consider economies of scale in the future in the event the Fund experiences significant asset growth, such as through an offering of preferred shares (which is not currently contemplated), or a material increase in the market value of the Fund’s portfolio securities.

The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.

After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.

In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.

The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative services provided to the Fund by MFS under agreements other than the investment advisory agreement. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action

 

68


Table of Contents

Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued

 

recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.

The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.

Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2014.

 

69


Table of Contents

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION

MFS votes proxies on behalf of the fund pursuant to proxy voting policies and procedures that are available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE

The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:

Public Reference Room

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE, Room 1580

Washington, D.C. 20549

Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the Fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.

FURTHER INFORMATION

From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “Market Commentary” and “Announcements” sub sections in the “Market Outlooks” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Closed-End Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.

Additional information about the fund (e.g. performance, dividends and the fund’s price history) is also available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Closed-End Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.

FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (unaudited)

The fund will notify shareholders of amounts for use in preparing 2014 income tax forms in January 2015. The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

The fund designates $11,317,000 as capital gain dividends paid during the fiscal year.

 

70


Table of Contents

rev. 3/11

 

 

FACTS

 

  WHAT DOES MFS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?   LOGO

 

Why?   Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.

 

What?  

The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:

 

 Social Security number and account balances

 Account transactions and transaction history

 Checking account information and wire transfer instructions

 

When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice.

 

How?   All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons MFS chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.

 

Reasons we can share your
personal information
  Does MFS
share?
  Can you limit
this sharing?

For our everyday business purposes –

such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus

  Yes   No

For our marketing purposes –

to offer our products and services to you

  No   We don’t share
For joint marketing with other financial companies   No   We don’t share

For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –

information about your transactions and experiences

  No   We don’t share

For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –

information about your creditworthiness

  No   We don’t share
For nonaffiliates to market to you   No   We don’t share

 

Questions?   Call 800-225-2606 or go to mfs.com.

 

71


Table of Contents
Page 2  

 

 

Who we are
Who is providing this notice?   MFS Funds, MFS Investment Management, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, and MFS Service Center, Inc.

 

What we do
How does MFS protect my personal information?   To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include procedural, electronic, and physical safeguards for the protection of the personal information we collect about you.
How does MFS collect my personal information?  

We collect your personal information, for example, when you

 

open an account or provide account information

direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities

make a wire transfer

 

We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates and other companies.

Why can’t I limit all sharing?  

Federal law gives you the right to limit only

 

sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness

affiliates from using your information to market to you

sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you

 

State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.

 

Definitions
Affiliates  

Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.

 

MFS does not share personal information with affiliates, except for everyday business purposes as described on page one of this notice.

Nonaffiliates  

Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.

 

MFS does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.

Joint Marketing  

A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.

 

MFS doesnt jointly market.

 

 

Other important information
If you own an MFS product or receive an MFS service in the name of a third party such as a bank or broker-dealer, their privacy policy may apply to you instead of ours.

 

72


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

CONTACT US

TRANSFER AGENT, REGISTRAR, AND

DIVIDEND DISBURSING AGENT

CALL

1-800-637-2304

9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time

WRITE

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

P.O. Box 43078

Providence, RI 02940-3078

 

New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MMT


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as defined in Form N-CSR that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to an element of the Code’s definitions enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.

A copy of the Code of Ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

 

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Messrs. Robert E. Butler, John P. Kavanaugh and Robert W. Uek and Mses. Maryanne L. Roepke and Laurie J. Thomsen, members of the Audit Committee, have been determined by the Board of Trustees in their reasonable business judgment to meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. In addition, Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh and Uek and Mses. Roepke and Thomsen are “independent” members of the Audit Committee (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The Securities and Exchange Commission has stated that the designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 on the Form N-CSR does not impose on such a person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

 

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Items 4(a) through 4(d) and 4(g):

The Board of Trustees has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to serve as independent accountants to the Registrant (hereinafter the “Registrant” or the “Fund”). The tables below set forth the audit fees billed to the Fund as well as fees for non-audit services provided to the Fund and/or to the Fund’s investment adviser, Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”) and to various entities either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with MFS that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“MFS Related Entities”).


Table of Contents

For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, audit fees billed to the Fund by E&Y were as follows:

 

     Audit Fees  
     2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

     

MFS Multimarket Income Trust

     54,150         53,517   

For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, fees billed by E&Y for audit-related, tax and other services provided to the Fund and for audit-related, tax and other services provided to MFS and MFS Related Entities were as follows:

 

     Audit-Related  Fees1      Tax Fees2      All Other Fees3  
     2014      2013      2014      2013      2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

                 

To MFS Multimarket Income Trust

     10,843         10,714         10,101         9,978         0         0   
     Audit-Related  Fees1      Tax Fees2      All Other Fees3  
     2014      2013      2014      2013      2014      2013  

Fees billed by E&Y:

                 

To MFS and MFS Related Entities of MFS Multimarket Income Trust*

     0         0         0         0         0         0   

 

     Aggregate Fees for Non-audit
Services
 
     2014      2013  

Fees Billed by E&Y:

     

To MFS Multimarket Income Trust, MFS and MFS Related Entities#

     95,944         78,692   

 

* 

This amount reflects the fees billed to MFS and MFS Related Entities for non-audit services relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund (portions of which services also related to the operations and financial reporting of other funds within the MFS Funds complex).

#

This amount reflects the aggregate fees billed by E&Y for non-audit services rendered to the Fund and for non-audit services rendered to MFS and the MFS Related Entities.

1

The fees included under “Audit-Related Fees” are fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements, but not reported under “Audit Fees,” including accounting consultations, agreed-upon procedure reports, attestation reports, comfort letters and internal control reviews.

2 

The fees included under “Tax Fees” are fees associated with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews and tax distribution and analysis.

3 

The fees under “All Other Fees” are fees for products and services provided by E&Y other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees”.

Item 4(e)(1):

Set forth below are the policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees relating to the pre-approval of audit and non-audit related services:

To the extent required by applicable law, pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the Board is needed for all audit and permissible non-audit services rendered to the Fund and all permissible non-audit services rendered to MFS or MFS Related Entities if the services relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. Pre-approval is currently on an engagement-by-engagement basis. In the event pre-approval of such services is necessary between regular meetings of the Audit Committee and it is not


Table of Contents

practical to wait to seek pre-approval at the next regular meeting of the Audit Committee, pre-approval of such services may be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee for approval; provided that the Chair may not pre-approve any individual engagement for such services exceeding $50,000 or multiple engagements for such services in the aggregate exceeding $100,000 between such regular meetings of the Audit Committee. Any engagement pre-approved by the Chair between regular meetings of the Audit Committee shall be presented for ratification by the entire Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Item 4(e)(2):

None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Fund and MFS and MFS Related Entities relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant disclosed above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit, review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).

Item 4(f): Not applicable.

Item 4(h): The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by a Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm of non-audit services to MFS and MFS Related Entities that were not pre-approved by the Committee (because such services were provided prior to the effectiveness of SEC rules requiring pre-approval or because such services did not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant) was compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm as the Registrant’s principal auditors.

 

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

The Registrant has an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Robert E. Butler, John P. Kavanaugh, and Robert W. Uek and Mses. Maryanne L. Roepke and Laurie J. Thomsen.

 

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

A schedule of investments of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of the Registrant under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

 

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

MASSACHUSETTS FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY


Table of Contents

PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

February 1, 2014

Massachusetts Financial Services Company, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS International (UK) Limited, MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management (Canada) Limited, MFS Investment Management Company (Lux) S.à r.l., MFS International Singapore Pte. Ltd., and MFS’ other subsidiaries that perform discretionary investment management activities (collectively, “MFS”) have adopted proxy voting policies and procedures, as set forth below (“MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures”), with respect to securities owned by the clients for which MFS serves as investment adviser and has the power to vote proxies, including the pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS (the “MFS Funds”). References to “clients” in these policies and procedures include the MFS Funds and other clients of MFS, such as funds organized offshore, sub-advised funds and separate account clients, to the extent these clients have delegated to MFS the responsibility to vote proxies on their behalf under the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

 

  The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures include:

 

  A. Voting Guidelines;

 

  B. Administrative Procedures;

 

  C Records Retention; and

 

  D. Reports.

 

  A. VOTING GUIDELINES

 

1. General Policy; Potential Conflicts of Interest

MFS’ policy is that proxy voting decisions are made in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in the interests of any other party or in MFS’ corporate interests, including interests such as the distribution of MFS Fund shares and institutional client relationships.

MFS reviews corporate governance issues and proxy voting matters that are presented for shareholder vote by either management or shareholders of public companies. Based on the overall principle that all votes cast by MFS on behalf of its clients must be in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of such clients, MFS has adopted proxy voting guidelines, set forth below, that govern how MFS generally will vote on specific matters presented for shareholder vote.


Table of Contents

As a general matter, MFS votes consistently on similar proxy proposals across all shareholder meetings. However, some proxy proposals, such as certain excessive executive compensation, environmental, social and governance matters, are analyzed on a case-by-case basis in light of all the relevant facts and circumstances of the proposal. Therefore, MFS may vote similar proposals differently at different shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of the issuer or the terms of the proposal. In addition, MFS also reserves the right to override the guidelines with respect to a particular proxy proposal when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients.

MFS also generally votes consistently on the same matter when securities of an issuer are held by multiple client accounts, unless MFS has received explicit voting instructions to vote differently from a client for its own account. From time to time, MFS may also receive comments on the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures from its clients. These comments are carefully considered by MFS when it reviews these guidelines and revises them as appropriate.

These policies and procedures are intended to address any potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that are likely to arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. If such potential material conflicts of interest do arise, MFS will analyze, document and report on such potential material conflicts of interest (see Sections B.2 and D below), and shall ultimately vote the relevant proxies in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of its clients. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring and reporting with respect to such potential material conflicts of interest.

MFS is also a signatory to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. In developing these guidelines, MFS considered environmental, social and corporate governance issues in light of MFS’ fiduciary obligation to vote proxies in the best long-term economic interest of its clients.

 

2. MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues

Election of Directors

MFS believes that good governance should be based on a board with at least a simple majority of directors who are “independent” of management, and whose key committees (e.g., compensation, nominating, and audit committees) consist


Table of Contents

entirely of “independent” directors. While MFS generally supports the board’s nominees in uncontested or non-contentious elections, we will not support a nominee to a board of a U.S. issuer (or issuer listed on a U.S. exchange) if, as a result of such nominee being elected to the board, the board would consist of a simple majority of members who are not “independent” or, alternatively, the compensation, nominating (including instances in which the full board serves as the compensation or nominating committee) or audit committees would include members who are not “independent.”

MFS will also not support a nominee to a board if we can determine that he or she attended less than 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason stated in the proxy materials or other company communications. In addition, MFS may not support some or all nominees standing for re-election to a board if we can determine: (1) the board or its compensation committee has re-priced or exchanged underwater stock options since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval; (2) the board or relevant committee has not taken adequately responsive action to an issue that received majority support or opposition from shareholders; (3) the board has implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval since the last annual meeting and such poison pill is not on the subsequent shareholder meeting’s agenda, (including those related to net-operating loss carryforwards); (4) the board or relevant committee has failed to adequately oversee risk by allowing the hedging and/or significant pledging of company shares by executives; or (5) there are governance concerns with a director or issuer.

MFS may not support certain board nominees of U.S. issuers under certain circumstances where MFS deems compensation to be egregious due to pay-for-performance issues and/or poor pay practices. Please see the section below titled “MFS’ Policy on Specific Issues — Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation” for further details.

MFS evaluates a contested or contentious election of directors on a case-by-case basis considering the long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry, management’s track record, the qualifications of all nominees, and an evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders.

Majority Voting and Director Elections

MFS votes for reasonably crafted proposals calling for directors to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast and/or the elimination of the plurality standard for electing directors (including binding resolutions requesting that the board amend the company’s bylaws), provided the proposal includes a carve-out for a plurality voting standard when there are more director nominees than board seats (e.g., contested elections) (“Majority Vote Proposals”).


Table of Contents

Classified Boards

MFS generally supports proposals to declassify a board (i.e.; a board in which only one-third of board members is elected each year) for all issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies. MFS generally opposes proposals to classify a board for issuers other than for certain closed-end investment companies.

Proxy Access

MFS believes that the ability of qualifying shareholders to nominate a certain number of directors on the company’s proxy statement (“Proxy Access”) may have corporate governance benefits. However, such potential benefits must be balanced by its potential misuse by shareholders. Therefore, we support Proxy Access proposals at U.S. issuers that establish an ownership criteria of 3% of the company held continuously for a period of 3 years. MFS analyzes all other proposals seeking Proxy Access on a case-by-case basis. In its analysis, MFS will consider the proposed ownership criteria for qualifying shareholders (such as ownership threshold and holding period) as well as the proponent’s rationale for seeking Proxy Access.

Stock Plans

MFS opposes stock option programs and restricted stock plans that provide unduly generous compensation for officers, directors or employees, or that could result in excessive dilution to other shareholders. As a general guideline, MFS votes against restricted stock, stock option, non-employee director, omnibus stock plans and any other stock plan if all such plans for a particular company involve potential dilution, in the aggregate, of more than 15%. However, MFS will also vote against stock plans that involve potential dilution, in aggregate, of more than 10% at U.S. issuers that are listed in the Standard and Poor’s 100 index as of December 31 of the previous year. In the cases where a stock plan amendment is seeking qualitative changes and not additional shares, MFS will vote its shares on a case-by-case basis.


Table of Contents

MFS also opposes stock option programs that allow the board or the compensation committee to re-price underwater options or to automatically replenish shares without shareholder approval. MFS also votes against stock option programs for officers, employees or non-employee directors that do not require an investment by the optionee, that give “free rides” on the stock price, or that permit grants of stock options with an exercise price below fair market value on the date the options are granted. MFS will consider proposals to exchange existing options for newly issued options, restricted stock or cash on a case-by-case basis, taking into account certain factors, including, but not limited to, whether there is a reasonable value-for-value exchange and whether senior executives are excluded from participating in the exchange.

MFS supports the use of a broad-based employee stock purchase plans to increase company stock ownership by employees, provided that shares purchased under the plan are acquired for no less than 85% of their market value and do not result in excessive dilution.

Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation

MFS believes that competitive compensation packages are necessary to attract, motivate and retain executives. However, MFS also recognizes that certain executive compensation practices can be “excessive” and not in the best, long-term economic interest of a company’s shareholders. We believe that the election of an issuer’s board of directors (as outlined above), votes on stock plans (as outlined above) and advisory votes on pay (as outlined below) are typically the most effective mechanisms to express our view on a company’s compensation practices.

MFS generally opposes shareholder proposals that seek to set rigid restrictions on executive compensation as MFS believes that compensation committees should retain some flexibility to determine the appropriate pay package for executives. Although we support linking executive stock option grants to a company’s performance, MFS also opposes shareholder proposals that mandate a link of performance-based pay to a specific metric. MFS generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals that (i) require the issuer to adopt a policy to recover the portion of performance-based bonuses and awards paid to senior executives that were not earned based upon a significant negative restatement of earnings unless the company already has adopted a satisfactory policy on the matter, (ii) expressly prohibit the backdating of stock options, and (iii) prohibit the acceleration of vesting of equity awards upon a broad definition of a “change-in-control” (e.g.; single or modified single-trigger).


Table of Contents

Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

MFS will analyze advisory votes on executive compensation on a case-by-case basis. MFS will vote against an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS determines that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices and will vote in favor of an advisory vote on executive compensation if MFS has not determined that the issuer has adopted excessive executive compensation practices. Examples of excessive executive compensation practices may include, but are not limited to, a pay-for-performance disconnect, employment contract terms such as guaranteed bonus provisions, unwarranted pension payouts, backdated stock options, overly generous hiring bonuses for chief executive officers, unnecessary perquisites, or the potential reimbursement of excise taxes to an executive in regards to a severance package. In cases where MFS (i) votes against consecutive advisory pay votes, or (ii) determines that a particularly egregious excessive executive compensation practice has occurred, then MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees. MFS may also vote against certain or all board nominees if an advisory pay vote for a U.S. issuer is not on the agenda, or the company has not implemented the advisory vote frequency supported by a plurality/ majority of shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals to include an advisory shareholder vote on an issuer’s executive compensation practices on an annual basis.

“Golden Parachutes”

From time to time, MFS may evaluate a separate, advisory vote on severance packages or “golden parachutes” to certain executives at the same time as a vote on a proposed merger or acquisition. MFS will support an advisory vote on a severance package on a on a case-by-case basis, and MFS may vote against the severance package regardless of whether MFS supports the proposed merger or acquisition.

Shareholders of companies may also submit proxy proposals that would require shareholder approval of severance packages for executive officers that exceed certain predetermined thresholds. MFS votes in favor of such shareholder proposals when they would require shareholder approval of any severance package for an executive officer that exceeds a certain multiple of such officer’s annual compensation that is not determined in MFS’ judgment to be excessive.

Anti-Takeover Measures

In general, MFS votes against any measure that inhibits capital appreciation in a stock, including proposals that protect management from action by shareholders. These types of proposals take many forms, ranging from “poison pills” and “shark repellents” to super-majority requirements.


Table of Contents

MFS generally votes for proposals to rescind existing “poison pills” and proposals that would require shareholder approval to adopt prospective “poison pills,” unless the company already has adopted a clearly satisfactory policy on the matter. MFS may consider the adoption of a prospective “poison pill” or the continuation of an existing “poison pill” if we can determine that the following two conditions are met: (1) the “poison pill” allows MFS clients to hold an aggregate position of up to 15% of a company’s total voting securities (and of any class of voting securities); and (2) either (a) the “poison pill” has a term of not longer than five years, provided that MFS will consider voting in favor of the “poison pill” if the term does not exceed seven years and the “poison pill” is linked to a business strategy or purpose that MFS believes is likely to result in greater value for shareholders; or (b) the terms of the “poison pill” allow MFS clients the opportunity to accept a fairly structured and attractively priced tender offer (e.g. a “chewable poison pill” that automatically dissolves in the event of an all cash, all shares tender offer at a premium price). MFS will also consider on a case-by-case basis proposals designed to prevent tenders which are disadvantageous to shareholders such as tenders at below market prices and tenders for substantially less than all shares of an issuer.

MFS will consider any poison pills designed to protect a company’s net-operating loss carryforwards on a case-by-case basis, weighing the accounting and tax benefits of such a pill against the risk of deterring future acquisition candidates.

Reincorporation and Reorganization Proposals

When presented with a proposal to reincorporate a company under the laws of a different state, or to effect some other type of corporate reorganization, MFS considers the underlying purpose and ultimate effect of such a proposal in determining whether or not to support such a measure. MFS generally votes with management in regards to these types of proposals, however, if MFS believes the proposal is in the best long-term economic interests of its clients, then MFS may vote against management (e.g. the intent or effect would be to create additional inappropriate impediments to possible acquisitions or takeovers).

Issuance of Stock

There are many legitimate reasons for the issuance of stock. Nevertheless, as noted above under “Stock Plans,” when a stock option plan (either individually or when aggregated with other plans of the same company) would substantially dilute the existing equity (e.g. by approximately 10-15% as described above), MFS generally votes against the plan. In addition, MFS typically votes against proposals where management is asking for authorization to issue common or preferred stock with no reason stated (a “blank check”) because the unexplained authorization could work as a potential anti-takeover device. MFS may also vote against the authorization or issuance of common or preferred stock if MFS determines that the requested authorization is excessive or not warranted.


Table of Contents

Repurchase Programs

MFS supports proposals to institute share repurchase plans in which all shareholders have the opportunity to participate on an equal basis. Such plans may include a company acquiring its own shares on the open market, or a company making a tender offer to its own shareholders.

Cumulative Voting

MFS opposes proposals that seek to introduce cumulative voting and for proposals that seek to eliminate cumulative voting. In either case, MFS will consider whether cumulative voting is likely to enhance the interests of MFS’ clients as minority shareholders.

Written Consent and Special Meetings

The right to call a special meeting or act by written consent can be a powerful tool for shareholders. As such, MFS supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders who hold at least 10% of the issuer’s outstanding stock to call a special meeting. MFS also supports proposals requesting the right for shareholders to act by written consent.

Independent Auditors

MFS believes that the appointment of auditors for U.S. issuers is best left to the board of directors of the company and therefore supports the ratification of the board’s selection of an auditor for the company. Some shareholder groups have submitted proposals to limit the non-audit activities of a company’s audit firm or prohibit any non-audit services by a company’s auditors to that company. MFS opposes proposals recommending the prohibition or limitation of the performance of non-audit services by an auditor, and proposals recommending the removal of a company’s auditor due to the performance of non-audit work for the company by its auditor. MFS believes that the board, or its audit committee, should have the discretion to hire the company’s auditor for specific pieces of non-audit work in the limited situations permitted under current law.

Other Business

MFS generally votes against “other business” proposals as the content of any such matter is not known at the time of our vote.


Table of Contents

Adjourn Shareholder Meeting

MFS generally supports proposals to adjourn a shareholder meeting if we support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda. MFS generally votes against proposals to adjourn a meeting if we do not support the other ballot items on the meeting’s agenda.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Issues

MFS believes that a company’s ESG practices may have an impact on the company’s long-term economic financial performance and will generally support proposals relating to ESG issues that MFS believes are in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. For those ESG proposals for which a specific policy has not been adopted, MFS considers such ESG proposals on a case-by-case basis. As a result, it may vote similar proposals differently at various shareholder meetings based on the specific facts and circumstances of such proposal.

MFS generally supports proposals that seek to remove governance structures that insulate management from shareholders (i.e., anti-takeover measures) or that seek to enhance shareholder rights. Many of these governance-related issues, including compensation issues, are outlined within the context of the above guidelines. In addition, MFS typically supports proposals that require an issuer to reimburse successful dissident shareholders (who are not seeking control of the company) for reasonable expenses that such dissident incurred in soliciting an alternative slate of director candidates. MFS also generally supports reasonably crafted shareholder proposals requesting increased disclosure around the company’s use of collateral in derivatives trading. MFS typically supports proposals for an independent board chairperson. However, we may not support such proposals if we determine there to be an appropriate and effective counter-balancing leadership structure in place (e.g.; a strong, independent lead director with an appropriate level of powers and duties). For any governance-related proposal for which an explicit guideline is not provided above, MFS will consider such proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if MFS believes that it is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.

MFS generally supports proposals that request disclosure on the impact of environmental issues on the company’s operations, sales, and capital investments. However, MFS may not support such proposals based on the facts and circumstances surrounding a specific proposal, including, but not limited to, whether (i) the proposal is unduly costly, restrictive, or burdensome, (ii) the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that environmental matters pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments, or (iii) the proposal seeks a level of disclosure that exceeds that provided by the company’s industry peers. MFS will analyze all other environmental proposals on a case-by-case basis and will support such proposals if


Table of Contents

MFS believes such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders.

MFS will analyze social proposals on a case-by-case basis. MFS will support such proposals if MFS believes that such proposal is in the best long-term economic interest of the company’s shareholders. Generally, MFS will support shareholder proposals that (i) seek to amend a company’s equal employment opportunity policy to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; and (ii) request additional disclosure regarding a company’s political contributions (including trade organizations and lobbying activity) (unless the company already provides publicly-available information that is sufficient to enable shareholders to evaluate the potential opportunities and risks that such contributions pose to the company’s operations, sales and capital investments).

The laws of various states or countries may regulate how the interests of certain clients subject to those laws (e.g. state pension plans) are voted with respect to social issues. Thus, it may be necessary to cast ballots differently for certain clients than MFS might normally do for other clients.

Foreign Issuers

MFS generally supports the election of a director nominee standing for re-election in uncontested or non-contentious elections unless it can be determined that (1) he or she failed to attend at least 75% of the board and/or relevant committee meetings in the previous year without a valid reason given in the proxy materials; (2) since the last annual meeting of shareholders and without shareholder approval, the board or its compensation committee has re-priced underwater stock options; or (3) since the last annual meeting, the board has either implemented a poison pill without shareholder approval or has not taken responsive action to a majority shareholder approved resolution recommending that the “poison pill” be rescinded. In such circumstances, we will vote against director nominee(s). Also, certain markets outside of the U.S. have adopted best practice guidelines relating to corporate governance matters (e.g. the United Kingdom’s Corporate Governance Code). Many of these guidelines operate on a “comply or explain” basis. As such, MFS will evaluate any explanations by companies relating to their compliance with a particular corporate governance guideline on a case-by-case basis and may vote against the board nominees or other relevant ballot item if such explanation is not satisfactory. In some circumstances, MFS may submit a vote to abstain from certain director nominees or the relevant ballot items if we have concerns with the nominee or ballot item, but do not believe these concerns rise to the level where a vote against is warranted.

MFS generally supports the election of auditors, but may determine to vote against the election of a statutory auditor in certain markets if MFS reasonably believes that the statutory auditor is not truly independent.


Table of Contents

Some international markets have also adopted mandatory requirements for all companies to hold shareholder votes on executive compensation. MFS will vote against such proposals if MFS determines that a company’s executive compensation practices are excessive, considering such factors as the specific market’s best practices that seek to maintain appropriate pay-for-performance alignment and to create long-term shareholder value. We may alternatively submit an abstention vote on such proposals in circumstances where our executive compensation concerns are not as severe.

Many other items on foreign proxies involve repetitive, non-controversial matters that are mandated by local law. Accordingly, the items that are generally deemed routine and which do not require the exercise of judgment under these guidelines (and therefore voted with management) for foreign issuers include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) receiving financial statements or other reports from the board; (ii) approval of declarations of dividends; (iii) appointment of shareholders to sign board meeting minutes; (iv) discharge of management and supervisory boards; and (v) approval of share repurchase programs (absent any anti-takeover or other concerns). MFS will evaluate all other items on proxies for foreign companies in the context of the guidelines described above, but will generally vote against an item if there is not sufficient information disclosed in order to make an informed voting decision. For any ballot item where MFS wishes to express a more moderate level of concern than a vote of against, we will cast a vote to abstain.

In accordance with local law or business practices, some foreign companies or custodians prevent the sales of shares that have been voted for a certain period beginning prior to the shareholder meeting and ending on the day following the meeting (“share blocking”). Depending on the country in which a company is domiciled, the blocking period may begin a stated number of days prior or subsequent to the meeting (e.g. one, three or five days) or on a date established by the company. While practices vary, in many countries the block period can be continued for a longer period if the shareholder meeting is adjourned and postponed to a later date. Similarly, practices vary widely as to the ability of a shareholder to have the “block” restriction lifted early (e.g. in some countries shares generally can be “unblocked” up to two days prior to the meeting whereas in other countries the removal of the block appears to be discretionary with the issuer’s transfer agent). Due to these restrictions, MFS must balance the benefits to its clients of voting proxies against the potentially serious portfolio management consequences of a reduced flexibility to sell the underlying shares at the most advantageous time. For companies in countries with share blocking periods or in markets where some custodians may block shares, the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock regardless of changing conditions generally outweighs the advantages of voting at the shareholder meeting for routine items. Accordingly, MFS will not vote those proxies in the absence of an unusual, significant vote that outweighs the disadvantage of being unable to sell the stock.


Table of Contents

In limited circumstances, other market specific impediments to voting shares may limit our ability to cast votes, including, but not limited to, late delivery of proxy materials, untimely vote cut-off dates, power of attorney and share re-registration requirements, or any other unusual voting requirements. In these limited instances, MFS votes securities on a best efforts basis in the context of the guidelines described above.

 

  B. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

 

  1. MFS Proxy Voting Committee

The administration of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures is overseen by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, which includes senior personnel from the MFS Legal and Global Investment Support Departments. The Proxy Voting Committee does not include individuals whose primary duties relate to client relationship management, marketing, or sales. The MFS Proxy Voting Committee:

 

  a. Reviews these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures at least annually and recommends any amendments considered to be necessary or advisable;

 

  b. Determines whether any potential material conflict of interest exists with respect to instances in which MFS (i) seeks to override these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (ii) votes on ballot items not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures; (iii) evaluates an excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors; or (iv) requests a vote recommendation from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); and

 

  c. Considers special proxy issues as they may arise from time to time.

 

  2. Potential Conflicts of Interest

The MFS Proxy Voting Committee is responsible for monitoring potential material conflicts of interest on the part of MFS or its subsidiaries that could arise in connection with the voting of proxies on behalf of MFS’ clients. Due to the client focus of our investment management business, we believe that the potential for actual material conflict of interest issues is small. Nonetheless, we have developed precautions to assure that all proxy votes are cast in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders.1 Other MFS internal policies require all MFS employees to avoid actual and potential conflicts of interests between personal activities and

 

1  For clarification purposes, note that MFS votes in what we believe to be the best, long-term economic interest of our clients entitled to vote at the shareholder meeting, regardless of whether other MFS clients hold “short” positions in the same issuer.


Table of Contents

MFS’ client activities. If an employee (including investment professionals) identifies an actual or potential conflict of interest with respect to any voting decision (including the ownership of securities in their individual portfolio), then that employee must recuse himself/herself from participating in the voting process. Any significant attempt by an employee of MFS or its subsidiaries to unduly influence MFS’ voting on a particular proxy matter should also be reported to the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

In cases where proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist. In cases where (i) MFS is considering overriding these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (ii) matters presented for vote are not governed by these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures, (iii) MFS evaluates a potentially excessive executive compensation issue in relation to the election of directors or advisory pay or severance package vote, (iv) a vote recommendation is requested from an MFS portfolio manager or investment analyst (e.g. mergers and acquisitions); or (v) MFS evaluates a director nominee who also serves as a director of the MFS Funds (collectively, “Non-Standard Votes”); the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will follow these procedures:

 

  a. Compare the name of the issuer of such proxy against a list of significant current (i) distributors of MFS Fund shares, and (ii) MFS institutional clients (the “MFS Significant Distributor and Client List”);

 

  b. If the name of the issuer does not appear on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then no material conflict of interest will be deemed to exist, and the proxy will be voted as otherwise determined by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee;

 

  c. If the name of the issuer appears on the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, then the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will be apprised of that fact and each member of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will carefully evaluate the proposed vote in order to ensure that the proxy ultimately is voted in what MFS believes to be the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests; and

 

  d. For all potential material conflicts of interest identified under clause (c) above, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee will document: the name of the issuer, the issuer’s relationship to MFS, the analysis of the matters submitted for proxy vote, the votes as to be cast and the reasons why the MFS Proxy Voting Committee determined that the votes were cast in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients, and not in MFS’ corporate interests. A copy of the foregoing documentation will be provided to MFS’ Conflicts Officer.


Table of Contents

The members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee are responsible for creating and maintaining the MFS Significant Distributor and Client List, in consultation with MFS’ distribution and institutional business units. The MFS Significant Distributor and Client List will be reviewed and updated periodically, as appropriate.

If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by Sun Life Financial, Inc. or any of its affiliates (collectively “Sun Life”), MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client pursuant to the recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.’s (“ISS”) benchmark policy, or as required by law.

Except as described in the MFS Fund’s prospectus, from time to time, certain MFS Funds (the “top tier fund”) may own shares of other MFS Funds (the “underlying fund”). If an underlying fund submits a matter to a shareholder vote, the top tier fund will generally vote its shares in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the underlying fund. If there are no other shareholders in the underlying fund, the top tier fund will vote in what MFS believes to be in the top tier fund’s best long-term economic interest. If an MFS client has the right to vote on a matter submitted to shareholders by a pooled investment vehicle advised by MFS, MFS will cast a vote on behalf of such MFS client in the same proportion as the other shareholders of the pooled investment vehicle.

 

  3. Gathering Proxies

Most proxies received by MFS and its clients originate at Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Broadridge and other service providers, on behalf of custodians, send proxy related material to the record holders of the shares beneficially owned by MFS’ clients, usually to the client’s proxy voting administrator or, less commonly, to the client itself. This material will include proxy ballots reflecting the shareholdings of Funds and of clients on the record dates for such shareholder meetings, as well as proxy materials with the issuer’s explanation of the items to be voted upon.

MFS, on behalf of itself and certain of its clients (including the MFS Funds) has entered into an agreement with an independent proxy administration firm pursuant to which the proxy administration firm performs various proxy vote related administrative services such as vote processing and recordkeeping functions. Except as noted below, the proxy administration firm for MFS and its clients, including the MFS Funds, is ISS. The proxy administration firm for MFS Development Funds, LLC is Glass, Lewis & Co., Inc. (“Glass Lewis”; Glass Lewis and ISS are each hereinafter referred to as the “Proxy Administrator”).


Table of Contents

The Proxy Administrator receives proxy statements and proxy ballots directly or indirectly from various custodians, logs these materials into its database and matches upcoming meetings with MFS Fund and client portfolio holdings, which are input into the Proxy Administrator’s system by an MFS holdings data-feed. Through the use of the Proxy Administrator system, ballots and proxy material summaries for all upcoming shareholders’ meetings are available on-line to certain MFS employees and members of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee.

It is the responsibility of the Proxy Administrator and MFS to monitor the receipt of ballots. When proxy ballots and materials for clients are received by the Proxy Administrator, they are input into the Proxy Administrator’s on-line system. The Proxy Administrator then reconciles a list of all MFS accounts that hold shares of a company’s stock and the number of shares held on the record date by these accounts with the Proxy Administrator’s list of any upcoming shareholder’s meeting of that company. If a proxy ballot has not been received, the Proxy Administrator contacts the custodian requesting the reason as to why a ballot has not been received.

 

  4. Analyzing Proxies

Proxies are voted in accordance with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures. The Proxy Administrator, at the prior direction of MFS, automatically votes all proxy matters that do not require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment with respect to these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures as determined by MFS. With respect to proxy matters that require the particular exercise of discretion or judgment, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee considers and votes on those proxy matters. MFS also receives research and recommendations from the Proxy Administrator which it may take into account in deciding how to vote. MFS uses the research of ISS to identify (i) circumstances in which a board may have approved excessive executive compensation, (ii) environmental and social proposals that warrant further consideration or (iii) circumstances in which a non-U.S. company is not in compliance with local governance or compensation best practices. In those situations where the only MFS fund that is eligible to vote at a shareholder meeting has Glass Lewis as its Proxy Administrator, then we will utilize research from Glass Lewis to identify such issues. MFS analyzes such issues independently and does not necessarily vote with the ISS or Glass Lewis recommendations on these issues. MFS may also use other research tools in order to identify the circumstances described above. Representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee review, as appropriate, votes cast to ensure conformity with these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.


Table of Contents

As a general matter, portfolio managers and investment analysts have little involvement in most votes taken by MFS. This is designed to promote consistency in the application of MFS’ voting guidelines, to promote consistency in voting on the same or similar issues (for the same or for multiple issuers) across all client accounts, and to minimize the potential that proxy solicitors, issuers, or third parties might attempt to exert inappropriate influence on the vote. In limited types of votes (e.g. mergers and acquisitions, capitalization matters, potentially excessive executive compensation issues, or shareholder proposals relating to environmental and social issues), a representative of MFS Proxy Voting Committee may consult with or seek recommendations from MFS portfolio managers or investment analysts.2 However, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee would ultimately determine the manner in which all proxies are voted.

As noted above, MFS reserves the right to override the guidelines when such an override is, in MFS’ best judgment, consistent with the overall principle of voting proxies in the best long-term economic interests of MFS’ clients. Any such override of the guidelines shall be analyzed, documented and reported in accordance with the procedures set forth in these policies.

 

  5. Voting Proxies

In accordance with its contract with MFS, the Proxy Administrator also generates a variety of reports for the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, and makes available on-line various other types of information so that the MFS Proxy Voting Committee or proxy team may review and monitor the votes cast by the Proxy Administrator on behalf of MFS’ clients.

For those markets that utilize a “record date” to determine which shareholders are eligible to vote, MFS generally will vote all eligible shares pursuant to these guidelines regardless of whether all (or a portion of) the shares held by our clients have been sold prior to the meeting date.

 

  6. Securities Lending

From time to time, the MFS Funds or other pooled investment vehicles sponsored by MFS may participate in a securities lending program. In the event MFS or its agent receives timely notice of a shareholder meeting for a U.S. security, MFS and its agent will attempt to recall any securities on loan before the meeting’s record date so that MFS will be entitled to vote these shares. However, there may be instances in which MFS is unable to timely recall securities on loan for a U.S. security, in which cases MFS will not be able to vote these shares. MFS will report to the appropriate board of the MFS Funds those instances in which MFS is not able to timely recall the loaned securities. MFS generally does not

 

2  From time to time, due to travel schedules and other commitments, an appropriate portfolio manager or research analyst may not be available to provide a vote recommendation. If such a recommendation cannot be obtained within a reasonable time prior to the cut-off date of the shareholder meeting, the MFS Proxy Voting Committee may determine to abstain from voting.


Table of Contents

recall non-U.S. securities on loan because there may be insufficient advance notice of proxy materials, record dates, or vote cut-off dates to allow MFS to timely recall the shares in certain markets on an automated basis. As a result, non-U.S. securities that are on loan will not generally be voted. If MFS receives timely notice of what MFS determines to be an unusual, significant vote for a non-U.S. security whereas MFS shares are on loan, and determines that voting is in the best long-term economic interest of shareholders, then MFS will attempt to timely recall the loaned shares.

 

  7. Engagement

The MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures are available on www.mfs.com and may be accessed by both MFS’ clients and the companies in which MFS’ clients invest. From time to time, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial for representatives from the MFS Proxy Voting Committee to engage in a dialogue or written communication with a company or other shareholders regarding certain matters on the company’s proxy statement that are of concern to shareholders, including environmental, social and governance matters. A company or shareholder may also seek to engage with representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee in advance of the company’s formal proxy solicitation to review issues more generally or gauge support for certain contemplated proposals.

 

C. RECORDS RETENTION

MFS will retain copies of these MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time and will retain all proxy voting reports submitted to the Board of Trustees of the MFS Funds for the period required by applicable law. Proxy solicitation materials, including electronic versions of the proxy ballots completed by representatives of the MFS Proxy Voting Committee, together with their respective notes and comments, are maintained in an electronic format by the Proxy Administrator and are accessible on-line by the MFS Proxy Voting Committee. All proxy voting materials and supporting documentation, including records generated by the Proxy Administrator’s system as to proxies processed, including the dates when proxy ballots were received and submitted, and the votes on each company’s proxy issues, are retained as required by applicable law.

 

D. REPORTS

U.S. Registered MFS Funds

MFS publicly discloses the proxy voting records of the U.S. registered MFS Funds on a quarterly basis. MFS will also report the results of its voting to the Board of Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds. These reports will include: (i) a summary of how votes were cast (including advisory votes on pay and “golden


Table of Contents

parachutes”) ; (ii) a summary of votes against management’s recommendation; (iii) a review of situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the guidelines and the rationale therefore; (iv) a review of the procedures used by MFS to identify material conflicts of interest and any matters identified as a material conflict of interest; (v) a review of these policies and the guidelines; (vi) a review of our proxy engagement activity; (vii) a report and impact assessment of instances in which the recall of loaned securities of a U.S. issuer was unsuccessful; and (viii) as necessary or appropriate, any proposed modifications thereto to reflect new developments in corporate governance and other issues. Based on these reviews, the Trustees of the U.S. registered MFS Funds will consider possible modifications to these policies to the extent necessary or advisable.

Other MFS Clients

MFS may publicly disclose the proxy voting records of certain other clients (including certain MFS Funds) or the votes it casts with respect to certain matters as required by law. A report can also be printed by MFS for each client who has requested that MFS furnish a record of votes cast. The report specifies the proxy issues which have been voted for the client during the year and the position taken with respect to each issue and, upon request, may identify situations where MFS did not vote in accordance with the MFS Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

Except as described above, MFS generally will not divulge actual voting practices to any party other than the client or its representatives because we consider that information to be confidential and proprietary to the client. However, as noted above, MFS may determine that it is appropriate and beneficial to engage in a dialogue with a company regarding certain matters. During such dialogue with the company, MFS may disclose the vote it intends to cast in order to potentially effect positive change at a company in regards to environmental, social or governance issues.

 

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Portfolio Manager(s)

Information regarding the portfolio manager(s) of the MFS Multimarket Income Trust (the “Fund”) is set forth below. Each portfolio manager is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund.


Table of Contents

Portfolio Manager

   Primary Role   

Since

   Title and Five Year History

Richard O. Hawkins

   Lead Portfolio Manager    2006    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
1988
        

William J. Adams

   Lower Quality Debt
Instruments Portfolio
Manager
   2011    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
2009; Credit Analyst at MFS from
1997 to 2005
        

Ward Brown

   Emerging Markets
Debt Instruments
Portfolio Manager
   2012    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
2005
        

David P. Cole

   Lower Quality Debt
Instruments Portfolio
Manager
   2006    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
2004
        

Pilar Gomez-Bravo

   Investment Grade Debt
Instruments Portfolio
Manager
   2013    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
2013; Managing Director of Imperial
Capital from May 2012 to March
2013; Portfolio Manager and Head of
Research of Negentropy Capital from
June 2011 to April 2012; Co-founder
of Marengo Asset Management from
June 2010 to April 2011; Head of
Credit Europe Neuberger Berman
from June 2006 to May 2010
        

Robert D. Persons

   Investment Grade Debt
Instruments Portfolio
Manager
   2013    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
2000
        

Matthew W. Ryan

   Emerging Markets
Debt Instruments
Portfolio Manager
   2004    Investment Officer of MFS; employed
in the investment area of MFS since
1997
        

Compensation

Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed annually. As of December 31, 2013, portfolio manager total cash compensation is a combination of base salary and performance bonus:

Base Salary – Base salary represents a smaller percentage of portfolio manager total cash compensation than performance bonus.

Performance Bonus – Generally, the performance bonus represents more than a majority of portfolio manager total cash compensation.

The performance bonus is based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative factors, generally with more weight given to the former and less weight given to the latter. The quantitative portion is based on the pre-tax performance of assets managed by the portfolio manager over one-, three-, and five-year periods relative to peer group universes and/or indices (“benchmarks”). As of December 31, 2013, the following benchmarks were used to measure the following portfolio manager’s performance for the Fund:


Table of Contents

Fund

  

Portfolio

Manager

  

Benchmark(s)

MFS Multimarket Income Trust

   Richard O. Hawkins   

Barclays Global Aggregate Credit Bond Index

JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global

Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index

Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index

     
   William J. Adams    Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index
   Ward Brown    JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global
     
   David P. Cole    Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index
   Pilar Gomez-Bravo    Barclays Global Credit Index
     
   Robert D. Persons    Barclays Global Credit Index
   Matthew W. Ryan    JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global

Additional or different benchmarks, including versions of indices, custom indices, and linked indices that combine performance of different indices for different portions of the time period, may also be used. Primary weight is given to portfolio performance over a three-year time period with lesser consideration given to portfolio performance over one- and five-year periods (adjusted as appropriate if the portfolio manager has served for less than five years). The qualitative portion is based on the results of an annual internal peer review process (conducted by other portfolio managers, analysts, and traders) and management’s assessment of overall portfolio manager contributions to investor relations and the investment process (distinct from fund and other account performance). This performance bonus may be in the form of cash and/or a deferred cash award, at the discretion of management. A deferred cash award is issued for a cash value and becomes payable over a three-year vesting period if the portfolio manager remains in the continuous employ of MFS or its affiliates. During the vesting period, the value of the unfunded deferred cash award will fluctuate as though the portfolio manager had invested the cash value of the award in an MFS Fund(s) selected by the portfolio manager. A selected fund may be, but is not required to be, a fund that is managed by the portfolio manager.

Portfolio managers also typically benefit from the opportunity to participate in the MFS Equity Plan. Equity interests and/or options to acquire equity interests in MFS or its parent company are awarded by management, on a discretionary basis, taking into account tenure at MFS, contribution to the investment process, and other factors.

Finally, portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans (including a defined contribution plan and health and other insurance plans) and programs available generally to other employees of MFS. The percentage such benefits represent of any portfolio manager’s compensation depends upon the length of the individual’s tenure at MFS and salary level, as well as other factors.


Table of Contents

Ownership of Fund Shares

The following table shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Fund beneficially owned by the Fund’s portfolio manager(s) as of the Fund’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2014. The following dollar ranges apply:

N. None

A. $1 – $10,000

B. $10,001 – $50,000

C. $50,001 – $100,000

D. $100,001 – $500,000

E. $500,001 – $1,000,000

F. Over $1,000,000

 

Name of Portfolio Manager

  

Dollar Range of Equity Securities in Fund

Richard O. Hawkins

   N

William J. Adams

   N

Ward Brown

   N

David P. Cole

   N

Pilar Gomez-Bravo

   N

Robert D. Persons

   N

Matthew W. Ryan

   N

Other Accounts

In addition to the Fund, each portfolio manager of the Fund is named as a portfolio manager of certain other accounts managed or subadvised by MFS or an affiliate. The number and assets of these accounts were as follows as of October 31, 2014:

 

      Registered Investment
Companies*
   Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles
   Other Accounts

Name

   Number of
Accounts
   Total
Assets
   Number of
Accounts
   Total Assets    Number of
Accounts
   Total Assets

Richard O. Hawkins

   10    $18.1 billion    3    $3.4 billion    2    $127.1 million

William J. Adams

   13    $8.0 billion    4    $1.2 billion    1    $110.9 million

Ward Brown

   12    $11.6 billion    8    $4.1 billion    6    $1.4 billion

David P. Cole

   12    $8.0 billion    2    $952.5 million    1    $109.9 million

Pilar Gomez-Bravo

   4    $3.6 billion    3    $3.3 billion    1    $97.2 million

Robert D. Persons

   11    $14.2 billion    5    $4.0 billion    2    $266.8 million

Matthew W. Ryan

   14    $12.4 billion    9    $5.0 billion    6    $1.4 billion

 

* Includes the Fund.


Table of Contents

Advisory fees are not based upon performance of any of the accounts identified in the table above.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

The Adviser seeks to identify potential conflicts of interest resulting from a portfolio manager’s management of both the Fund and other accounts, and has adopted policies and procedures designed to address such potential conflicts.

The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) gives rise to conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives and strategies, benchmarks, time horizons and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In certain instances there are securities which are suitable for the Fund’s portfolio as well as for accounts of the Adviser or its subsidiaries with similar investment objectives. The Fund’s trade allocation policies may give rise to conflicts of interest if the Fund’s orders do not get fully executed or are delayed in getting executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts of the Adviser or its subsidiaries. A portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s investments. Investments selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform investments selected for the Fund.

When two or more clients are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, the securities are allocated among clients in a manner believed by the Adviser to be fair and equitable to each. Allocations may be based on many factors and may not always be pro rata based on assets managed. The allocation methodology could have a detrimental effect on the price or volume of the security as far as the Fund is concerned.

The Adviser and/or a portfolio manager may have a financial incentive to allocate favorable or limited opportunity investments or structure the timing of investments to favor accounts other than the Fund, for instance, those that pay a higher advisory fee and/or have a performance adjustment and/or include an investment by the portfolio manager.


Table of Contents
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

 

MFS Multimarket Income Trust

Period

   (a) Total number
of Shares
Purchased
     (b)
Average
Price
Paid per
Share
     (c) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
     (d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
under the Plans
or Programs

11/01/13-11/30/13

     0         N/A         0       7,635,610

12/01/13-12/31/13

     159,360         6.52         159,360       7,476,250

1/01/14-1/31/14

     0         N/A         0       7,476,250

2/01/14-2/28/14

     0         N/A         0       7,476,250

3/01/14-3/31/14

     164,049         6.52         164,049       7,637,605

4/01/14-4/30/14

     0         N/A         0       7,637,605

5/01/14-5/31/14

     0         N/A         0       7,637,605

6/01/14-6/30/14

     235,033         6.68         235,033       7,402,572

7/01/14-7/31/14

     0         N/A         0       7,402,572

8/01/14-8/31/14

     0         N/A         0       7,402,572

9/01/14-9/30/14

     386,600         6.43         386,600       7,015,972

10/01/14-10/31/14

     0         N/A         0       7,015,972

Total

     945,042         6.52         945,042      

 

Note:

The Board of Trustees approves procedures to repurchase shares annually. The notification to shareholders of the program is part of the semi-annual and annual reports sent to shareholders. These annual programs begin on March 1st of each year. The programs conform to the conditions of Rule 10b-18 of the securities Exchange Act of 1934 and limit the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased in each annual period (March 1 through the following February 28) to 10% of the Registrant’s outstanding shares as of the first day of the plan year (March 1). The aggregate number of shares available for purchase for the March 1, 2014 plan year is 7,801,654.

 

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.

 

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

(a) Based upon their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

 

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter covered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Table of Contents
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

 

(a) File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.

 

  (1) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Code of Ethics attached hereto.

 

  (2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto.

 

  (3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the Registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.

 

(b) If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto.


Table of Contents

Notice

A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant MFS MULTIMARKET INCOME TRUST

 

By (Signature and Title)*    ROBIN A. STELMACH
  Robin A. Stelmach, President

Date: December 18, 2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By (Signature and Title)*    ROBIN A. STELMACH
 

Robin A. Stelmach, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: December 18, 2014

 

By (Signature and Title)*   DAVID L. DILORENZO
 

David L. DiLorenzo, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer

and Accounting Officer)

Date: December 18, 2014

 

* Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.