Filed by ITC Holdings Corp. Pursuant to Rule 425 under the
Securities Act of 1933 and deemed filed pursuant
to Rule 14a-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Subject Company: ITC Holdings Corp,
Commission File No. 001-32576
Exhibit 99.1
ITC Holdings Corp.
Cameron M. Bready
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
47th Annual Edison Electric Institute Financial Conference November 13, 2012
Safe Harbor Language & Legal Disclosure
This document and the exhibits hereto contain certain statements that describe ITC Holdings Corp. (ITC) managements beliefs concerning future business conditions and prospects, growth opportunities and the outlook for ITCs business, including ITCs business and the electric transmission industry based upon information currently available. Such statements are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Wherever possible, ITC has identified these forward looking statements by words such as anticipates, believes, intends, estimates, expects, projects and similar phrases. These forward looking statements are based upon assumptions ITC management believes are reasonable. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause ITCs actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements, including, among other things, (a) the risks and
uncertainties disclosed in ITCs annual report on Form 10-K and ITCs quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) from time to time and (b) the following transactional factors (in addition to others described elsewhere in this document, in the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus included in the registration statement on Form S-4 that ITC filed with the SEC on September 25, 2012 in connection with the proposed transactions, and in subsequent filings with the SEC): (i) risks inherent in the contemplated transaction, including: (A) failure to obtain approval by the Companys shareholders; (B) failure to obtain regulatory approvals necessary to consummate the transaction or to obtain regulatory approvals on favorable terms; (C) the ability to obtain the required financings; (D) delays in consummating the transaction or the failure to consummate the transactions; and (E) exceeding the expected costs of the transactions; (ii) legislative and regulatory actions, and (iii) conditions of the capital markets during the periods covered by the forward-looking statements.
Because ITCs forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions that are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, many of which are beyond ITCs control or are subject to change, actual results could be materially different and any or all of ITCs forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They speak only as of the date made and can be affected by assumptions ITC might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in this document and the exhibits hereto and in ITCs annual and quarterly reports will be important in determining future results. Consequently, ITC cannot assure you that ITCs expectations or forecasts expressed in such forward-looking statements will be achieved. Actual future results may vary materially. Except as required by law, ITC undertakes no obligation to publicly update
any of ITCs forward-looking or other statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
The transaction is subject to certain conditions precedent, including regulatory approvals, approval of ITCs shareholders and the availability of financing. ITC cannot provide any assurance that the proposed transactions related thereto will be completed, nor can it give assurances as to the terms on which such transactions will be consummated.
2 |
|
Safe Harbor Language & Legal Disclosure
On September 25, 2012, ITC filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC registering shares of ITC common stock to be issued to Entergy shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, but this registration statement has not become effective. This registration statement includes a proxy statement of ITC that also constitutes a prospectus of ITC, and will be sent to ITC shareholders. In addition, Mid South TransCo LLC (TransCo) will file a registration statement with the SEC registering TransCo common units to be issued to Entergy shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions. Entergy shareholders are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus included in the ITC registration statement and the proxy statement/prospectus to be included in the TransCo registration statement (when available) and any other relevant documents, because they contain important information about ITC, TransCo and the proposed transactions. ITC shareholders are urged to read the proxy statement/prospectus included in the ITC registration statement and any other relevant documents because they contain important information about TransCo and the proposed transactions. The proxy statement/prospectus and other documents relating to the proposed transactions (when they are available) can be obtained free of charge from the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The documents, when available, can also be obtained free of charge from Entergy upon written request to Entergy Corporation, Investor Relations, P.O. Box 61000 New Orleans, LA 70161 or by calling Entergys Investor Relations information line at 1-888-ENTERGY (368-3749), or from ITC upon written request to ITC Holdings Corp., Investor Relations, 27175 Energy Way, Novi, MI 48377 or by calling 248-946-3000.
This communication is not a solicitation of a proxy from any security holder of ITC. However, Entergy, ITC and certain of their respective directors and executive officers and certain other members of management and employees may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from shareholders of ITC in connection with the proposed transaction under the rules of the SEC. Information about the directors and executive officers of Entergy, may be found in its 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012, and its definitive proxy statement relating to its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed with the SEC on March 23, 2012. Information about the directors and executive officers of ITC may be found in its 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2012, and its definitive proxy statement relating to its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed with the SEC on April 12, 2012.
3 |
|
Overview of ITC
ITCs pure play, fully regulated independent transmission model creates a unique, structurally advantaged infrastructure portfolio
FERC regulated rate construct supports efficient capitalization of needed investment and timely return of and on capital
Forward looking rates combined with approved ROEs and capital structures that facilitate investment
Actively developing transmission infrastructure required for reliability needs and emerging long-term energy policy
Portfolio of currently actionable investment opportunities drives growth and value creation
Proposed Entergy transaction transformational to ITC size, scale, scope and financial strength
4 |
|
Overview of ITC
STRATEGY
Multi faceted strategy leverages our sole focus on
Strategy reinforced with proposed Entergy transaction
Achieve and maintain best-in-class in core operations on our systems
Includes reliability, security and safety
Improvements over the years reflective of our investments and business practices
Non-discriminatory access to all generating resources
Support environmental stewardship
Fundamental core strategy serves as an important building block for development efforts
Leader in the development of a 21st century grid
Transmission outlook provides for significant investment opportunities
Thought leader in advocating and facilitating transmission development
Proven capabilities and strategically advantaged
5 |
|
ITC Strategy
THOUGHT LEADER IN TRANSMISSION DEVELOPMENT
Announced ITC Great Plains Expansion Project in October
Latest example of companys leadership in identifying innovative solutions to the nations electric transmission needs
Result of more than a year of extensive study of regional needs
Identifies package of high-voltage electric transmission projects designed to relieve system constraints impeding the
export of excess energy capacity inter-regionally
Five projects involve seven states and more than 2,700 miles of new transmission line
AC based approach reflects interconnectivity of power grid
Provides solution to integrate variety of energy sources, enhance overall grid reliability and enhance
flexibility and optionality throughout SPPs footprint
6 |
|
Transmission Investment
POLICY OVERVIEW
Significant need for transmission investment is widely recognized in the US and broadly supported
Blackout of 2003 which impacted much of the Midwest and eastern portion of the US heightened awareness to the
fragility of our existing transmission infrastructure
Energy policy Act of 2005 mandated that FERC establish incentives to facilitate greater transmission investment
Transmission policy reforms continue to evolve through FERC policies
Legislative changes in the US have generally stalled resulting in FERC addressing key policy issues
Recent FERC policy reform continues to be focused on reducing barriers to transmission investment:
Promoting transmission planning and cost allocation principles which support regional transmission
Issued Order 1000 in mid 2011 providing key principles on transmission planning and regional cost allocation that
also look to facilitate regional infrastructure
Order 1000 compliance activities are underway with compliance filings expected to begin later this year
7 |
|
Recent Regulatory Developments
New England ISO ROE complaint in hearing process (ITC not a party)
Current schedule anticipates initial decision in September 2013
Expect FERC to maintain historically granted ROEs that remain within a current zone of reasonableness
FERC 206 complaint against MISO formula rate protocols (ITC a party)
FERC initiated complaint on MISO formula rate protocols in May; protocols outline requirements for
rate implementation due to the absence of annual rate cases
Complaint limited to protocols on implementing rates and does not address rate elements (e.g., ROE)
ITC protocols highlighted as good examples
MISO responded to complaint defending current protocols; FERC has no stipulated period to act on matter
IPL complaint against ITC Midwest Attachment FF
IPL filed formal complaint against ITC Midwest Attachment FF policy in September; ITC responded in October
FERC previously approved Attachment FF policy
Expect FERC to uphold policy is just and reasonable; FERC has no stipulated period to act on matter
ITC Midwest complaint against ATC on MVP Project
ITC Midwest filed formal complaint against ATC associated with ownership dispute on MVP project #5
MISO Transmission Owner Agreement (TOA) calls for project to be split equally between the two interconnecting
parties, ITC Midwest and ATC; despite negotiations, ATC unwilling to agree to abide by TOA
FERC has recently supported TOA provisions in two previous complaints
Expect FERC to rule in favor of ITC Midwest
8 |
|
2012 Financial Performance
RECENT PERFORMANCE & FULL YEAR GUIDANCE
($ in Millions except per Share Data) NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, YEAR END $ Increase / % Increase / 2012 2011 2011 (Decrease) (Decrease)
Revenues $ 608.9 $ 555.8 $ 53.1 9.6% $ 757.4 Reported Diluted EPS $ 2.68 $ 2.49 $ 0.19 7.6% $ 3.31 Operating Diluted EPS $ 3.05 $ 2.49 $ 0.56 22.5% $ 3.35 Cash Flows from Operations $ 258.4 $ 286.6 ($ 28.2) (9.8%) $ 380.9 Capital Investments $ 626.2 $ 420.5 $ 205.7 48.9% $ 632.9
2012 operating EPS guidance of $4.10 to $4.15*
2012 capital investment guidance of $780 to $825 million*
Includes capital forecasts of $210 to $220 million, $150 to $160 million, $320 to $335 million and $100 to $110 million for ITCTransmission, METC, ITC Midwest and ITC Great Plains, respectively
*Based on operating EPS and capital investment guidance as of October 24, 2012. This guidance is not being updated at this time.
9
2013 Guidance
Performance in first nine months of 2012 provides solid foundation for 2013
Initial 2013 guidance*
Operating EPS guidance to $4.80 to $5.00, which excludes Entergy related transaction expenses
2013 capital investment guidance to $760 to $860 million
2013 GUIDANCE-CAPITAL INVESTMENTS ($ in Millions)
ITCTransmission $200 - $230 METC 160 - 180 ITC Midwest 270 - 300 ITC Great Plains 130 - 150
TOTAL $ 760 ?$ 860
*Based on operating EPS and capital investment guidance as of November 12, 2012. This guidance is not being updated at this time.
10
Stand-Alone Five-Year Capital Plan
Five Year Capital Plan $4.2 billion infrastructure investment
*15 to 17% EPS CAGR from 2011 through 2016
11
Stand-Alone Projected Capital Plan
BLUEPRINT FOR GROWTH
Highly probable capital investments of ~$3.4 billion drive approximately 12% to 13% of expected operating EPS CAGR over the five year period
Remaining investment opportunities contribute approximately 3% to 4% of expected operating EPS CAGR
Comprised of approximately ~$800 million of intermediate and design-stage development projects
Additional investment opportunities represent attractive value creation opportunities for the business; alternative would be to return an additional $300 - $500 million of capital to shareholders
12
Dividend Policy
Quarterly Dividend
Dividend remains an important factor our overall shareholder return proposition
Remain committed to continuing to grow annually, stand-alone and pro forma ITC, while recognizing investment needs of the business
Historically resulted in annual increases of approximately 5% through 2011; approximately 7% increase in 2012
Dividend policy going forward
Believe we have additional flexibility around annual dividend increases, compared to historical levels
Expect this flexibility to allow us to preserve payout ratio in the high 30% range, even as we continue to grow earnings at a robust pace
Expect to be measured in dividend increases given attractive development pipeline opportunities and Entergy transaction
13
Overview of Entergy Transaction
Proposed Entergy Transaction Overview
Announced December 5, 2011 - Reverse Morris - Trust Entergys transmission business merges into ITC
Prior to merger, Entergy to pursue tax free spin off of transmission business and ITC to Transaction Structure effectuate $700 million recapitalization, anticipated to be share repurchase, a special dividend or a combination thereof
100% stock consideration
Entergy to issue approximately $1.775 billion of debt, to be assumed by ITC
ITC to issue approximately $700 million of debt at holdings level 50.1% Entergy shareholders Post- Merge 49.9% ITC shareholders
ITC Senior Two new independent directors who have transmission industry knowledge and familiarity Mgmt & Board with Entergys region
ITCs management team will remain intact for combined business, supplemented with key Entergy leadership personnel from Entergys transmission business
Headquarters Regional headquarters in Jackson, MS
Corporate headquarters in Novi, MI
Expected Closing In 2013, subject to timing of approvals
Approval Process Entergy retail regulatory approvals
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approvals
ITC shareholder approval
Certain other regulatory approvals
15
Transaction Approvals
Targeted to close in 2013, subject to the following approvals and closing conditions:
Authority Requirement Filed Approved
Louisiana PSC
New Orleans City Council
Arkansas PSC Change of control of transmission assets *
Mississippi PSC
Texas PUC
Change of control of transmission assets FERC Establish rate for new ITC subsidiaries
Authorization for operating company financings
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (DOJ / FTC) Pre-merger notification to review potential antitrust and competition issues
IRS Private Letter Ruling Ruling regarding tax-free treatment of the Transaction
Merger
Amendment to ITC Articles of Incorporation to increase the ITC Shareholders number of authorized shares
Authorization for issuance of greater than 20% of outstanding shares
* Filing also to be made at the Missouri Public Service Commission with respect to EAIs limited transmission assets located in Missouri.
16
Transaction Approvals
Authority Filed Approved*
Louisiana PSC
New Orleans City Council
Arkansas PSC
Mississippi PSC
Texas PUC
* Received approval, subject to conditions.
Transaction also requires that Entergy have the regulatory approvals to join an acceptable RTO
Requires regulatory approval from all five retail jurisdictions and FERC
Expect Entergy to satisfy this condition by successful execution of their process to join MISO
Entergy has filed in all five retail jurisdictions and has begun to receive some conditional approvals
17
Summary
Stand alone five-year plan positions company well to provide shareholder value while continuing to make needed investment in transmission for benefit of customers
Long term value proposition enhanced by Entergy transaction
ITC Business Model
Transmission Investment Landscape
Long-Term Capital Plan
Historical Underinvestment
Pure Play Transmission Model
Long Term Reliability Needs
& Grid Stability Best In Class Operations
Evolving Generation
Supportive Regulatory
Portfolio Construct
Integration of Renewables
Aging Coal Fleet
Strategic Footprint
Stricter Environmental Standards
Proven Development Capabilities
Increasingly Supportive Federal & Regulatory Framework
Development
Network Upgrades for New Generation
Base Capital Plan
EARNINGS PER SHARE
18
Appendix
Non-GAAP Reconciliation
OPERATING DILUTED EPS
NINE MONTHS ENDED
($ in Millions except per Share Data)
SEPTEMBER 30, $ Increase / % Increase / Year End 2012 2011 (Decrease) (Decrease) 2011
Reported Diluted EPS $ 2.68 $ 2.49 $ 0.19 7.6% $ 3.31 Pre-Tax Entergy Transaction Expenses 0.33 N/A 0.33 N/A 0.16 Pre- Tax Liability Audit Related Refund 0.25 N/A 0.25 N/A N/A
One Time CIT Adjustment N/A N/A N/A N/A (0.09) Income Taxes on Adjustments (0.21) N/A (0.21) N/A (0.03)
Operating Diluted EPS $ 3.05 $ 2.49 $ 0.56 22.5% $ 3.35
20