UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
|
|
|
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
|
|
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-3551 |
EQT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA |
|
25-0464690 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
625 Liberty Avenue, Suite 1700, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania |
|
15222 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
(412) 553-5700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code:)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer ý |
|
Accelerated Filer o |
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of September 30, 2010, 149,143,564 shares of common stock, no par value, of the registrant were outstanding.
EQT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Index
EQT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements of Consolidated Income (Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||
|
|
(Thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
257,335 |
|
$ |
218,357 |
|
$ |
951,490 |
|
$ |
925,800 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Purchased gas costs |
|
8,838 |
|
13,573 |
|
138,769 |
|
257,171 |
|
||||||
Operation and maintenance |
|
41,232 |
|
35,149 |
|
113,094 |
|
102,148 |
|
||||||
Production |
|
15,261 |
|
15,565 |
|
46,844 |
|
44,927 |
|
||||||
Exploration |
|
941 |
|
4,526 |
|
3,354 |
|
12,252 |
|
||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
34,333 |
|
59,906 |
|
117,961 |
|
125,237 |
|
||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
68,548 |
|
49,706 |
|
195,644 |
|
140,483 |
|
||||||
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
169,153 |
|
$ |
178,425 |
|
$ |
615,666 |
|
$ |
682,218 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
88,182 |
|
$ |
39,932 |
|
$ |
335,824 |
|
$ |
243,582 |
|
||
Other income |
|
278 |
|
511 |
|
958 |
|
1,799 |
|
||||||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments |
|
2,646 |
|
1,950 |
|
7,593 |
|
4,682 |
|
||||||
Interest expense |
|
33,861 |
|
32,393 |
|
102,075 |
|
78,096 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Income before income taxes |
|
57,245 |
|
10,000 |
|
242,300 |
|
171,967 |
|
||||||
Income taxes |
|
20,723 |
|
7,091 |
|
87,713 |
|
70,420 |
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
36,522 |
|
$ |
2,909 |
|
$ |
154,587 |
|
$ |
101,547 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Earnings per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
149,133 |
|
130,850 |
|
143,048 |
|
130,806 |
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
||
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
149,775 |
|
131,505 |
|
143,806 |
|
131,450 |
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
||
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
EQT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
154,587 |
|
$ |
101,547 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
2,917 |
|
(2,110) |
|
||
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization |
|
195,644 |
|
140,483 |
|
||
Other income |
|
(231) |
|
(1,799) |
|
||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments |
|
(7,593) |
|
(4,682) |
|
||
Equity Award Expense |
|
10,290 |
|
5,208 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
99,205 |
|
94,799 |
|
||
Decrease in inventory |
|
15,589 |
|
60,484 |
|
||
Decrease in accounts receivable and unbilled revenues |
|
90,183 |
|
176,121 |
|
||
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
(57,402) |
|
(213,206) |
|
||
Change in derivative instruments at fair value, net |
|
(9,294) |
|
51,658 |
|
||
Changes in other assets and liabilities |
|
127,152 |
|
144,482 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
621,047 |
|
552,985 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(863,011) |
|
(636,066) |
|
||
Capital contributions to Nora Gathering, LLC |
|
|
|
(6,400) |
|
||
Investment in available-for-sale securities |
|
(750) |
|
(3,000) |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(863,761) |
|
(645,466) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid |
|
(94,438) |
|
(86,517) |
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
537,239 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
||
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
(6,874) |
|
||
Repayments of long term debt |
|
|
|
(2,000) |
|
||
Decrease in short-term loans |
|
(5,000) |
|
(319,917) |
|
||
Proceeds from exercises under employee compensation plans |
|
2,280 |
|
293 |
|
||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
440,081 |
|
284,985 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
197,367 |
|
192,504 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
197,367 |
|
$ |
192,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid (received) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest, net of amount capitalized |
|
$ |
80,703 |
|
$ |
50,668 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
(124,124) |
|
$ |
(103,229) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
EQT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
197,367 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable (less accumulated provision for doubtful accounts: September 30, 2010, $ 16,079; December 31, 2009, $16,792) |
|
93,424 |
|
155,574 |
|
||
Unbilled revenues |
|
7,350 |
|
38,300 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
167,368 |
|
182,957 |
|
||
Derivative instruments, at fair value |
|
280,316 |
|
163,879 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
22,292 |
|
154,456 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
768,117 |
|
695,166 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Equity in nonconsolidated investments |
|
189,245 |
|
181,866 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
7,551,011 |
|
6,478,486 |
|
||
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion |
|
1,744,382 |
|
1,563,755 |
|
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
5,806,629 |
|
4,914,731 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments, available-for-sale |
|
38,625 |
|
36,156 |
|
||
Regulatory assets |
|
95,643 |
|
99,144 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
27,643 |
|
30,194 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,925,902 |
|
$ |
5,957,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
EQT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Short-term loans |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
191,585 |
|
248,987 |
|
||
Derivative instruments, at fair value |
|
119,379 |
|
132,518 |
|
||
Other current liabilities |
|
207,192 |
|
226,169 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
518,156 |
|
612,674 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
1,949,200 |
|
1,949,200 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits |
|
1,184,411 |
|
1,039,473 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
215,118 |
|
204,880 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
3,866,885 |
|
3,806,227 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value, authorized 320,000 shares; shares issued: September 30, 2010, 175,685 and December 31, 2009, 157,630 |
|
1,720,361 |
|
952,237 |
|
||
Treasury stock, shares at cost: September 30, 2010, 26,542; December 31, 2009, 26,699 |
|
(479,260) |
|
(482,125) |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
1,755,507 |
|
1,695,358 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
62,409 |
|
(14,440) |
|
||
Total common stockholders equity |
|
3,059,017 |
|
2,151,030 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,925,902 |
|
$ |
5,957,257 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
A. Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the requirements of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of EQT Corporation and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In this Form 10-Q, references to we, us, our, EQT, EQT Corporation, and the Company refer collectively to EQT Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
Due to the seasonal nature of the Companys natural gas distribution and storage businesses and the volatility of commodity prices, the interim statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in EQT Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 18 of this document.
B. Segment Information
Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the enterprise for which separate financial information is produced internally and are subject to evaluation by the Companys chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources.
The Company reports its operations in three segments, which reflect its lines of business. The EQT Production segment includes the Companys exploration for, and development and production of, natural gas, and a limited amount of crude oil, in the Appalachian Basin. EQT Midstreams operations include the natural gas gathering, processing, transportation and storage activities of the Company as well as sales of natural gas liquids (NGLs). Distributions operations are primarily comprised of the state-regulated natural gas distribution activities of the Company.
Operating segments are evaluated on their contribution to the Companys consolidated results based on operating income, equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments and other income. Interest expense and income taxes are managed on a consolidated basis. Headquarters costs are billed to the operating segments based upon a fixed allocation of the headquarters annual operating budget. Actual headquarters expenses in excess of budget, which are primarily related to incentive compensation and administrative costs, are not allocated to the operating segments.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Substantially all of the Companys operating revenues, income from operations and assets are generated or located in the United States.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Production |
|
$ |
115,218 |
|
$ |
91,922 |
|
$ |
345,163 |
|
$ |
279,570 |
|
EQT Midstream |
|
175,227 |
|
124,065 |
|
528,766 |
|
366,939 |
|
||||
Distribution |
|
53,208 |
|
54,599 |
|
338,812 |
|
425,865 |
|
||||
Less: intersegment revenues (a) |
|
(86,318) |
|
(52,229) |
|
(261,251) |
|
(146,574) |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
257,335 |
|
$ |
218,357 |
|
$ |
951,490 |
|
$ |
925,800 |
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Production |
|
$ |
39,827 |
|
$ |
31,522 |
|
$ |
122,097 |
|
$ |
109,587 |
|
EQT Midstream |
|
51,682 |
|
37,878 |
|
177,963 |
|
119,660 |
|
||||
Distribution |
|
644 |
|
3,230 |
|
52,353 |
|
56,435 |
|
||||
Unallocated expense (b) |
|
(3,971) |
|
(32,698) |
|
(16,589) |
|
(42,100) |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
88,182 |
|
$ |
39,932 |
|
$ |
335,824 |
|
$ |
243,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Reconciliation of operating income to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Midstream |
|
$ |
193 |
|
$ |
342 |
|
$ |
452 |
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
Distribution |
|
85 |
|
169 |
|
506 |
|
552 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
278 |
|
$ |
511 |
|
$ |
958 |
|
$ |
1,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Production |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
EQT Midstream |
|
2,607 |
|
1,946 |
|
7,472 |
|
4,608 |
|
||||
Unallocated |
|
13 |
|
1 |
|
40 |
|
24 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
$ |
7,593 |
|
$ |
4,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense |
|
33,861 |
|
32,393 |
|
102,075 |
|
78,096 |
|
||||
Income taxes |
|
20,723 |
|
7,091 |
|
87,713 |
|
70,420 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
36,522 |
|
$ |
2,909 |
|
$ |
154,587 |
|
$ |
101,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
EQT Production |
|
$ |
3,814,091 |
|
$ |
2,931,053 |
|
||||||
EQT Midstream |
|
2,043,413 |
|
1,984,525 |
|
||||||||
Distribution |
|
803,265 |
|
860,222 |
|
||||||||
Total operating segments |
|
6,660,769 |
|
5,775,800 |
|
||||||||
Headquarters assets, including cash and short-term investments |
|
265,133 |
|
181,457 |
|
||||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,925,902 |
|
$ |
5,957,257 |
|
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Production |
|
$ |
46,658 |
|
$ |
29,856 |
|
$ |
131,036 |
|
$ |
83,724 |
|
EQT Midstream |
|
15,705 |
|
13,477 |
|
46,240 |
|
38,502 |
|
||||
Distribution |
|
6,057 |
|
5,525 |
|
18,067 |
|
16,449 |
|
||||
Other |
|
128 |
|
848 |
|
301 |
|
1,808 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
68,548 |
|
$ |
49,706 |
|
$ |
195,644 |
|
$ |
140,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Expenditures for segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
EQT Production (c) |
|
$ |
267,154 |
|
$ |
144,497 |
|
$ |
698,538 |
|
$ |
446,813 |
|
EQT Midstream (c) |
|
59,499 |
|
39,817 |
|
138,479 |
|
155,334 |
|
||||
Distribution |
|
9,382 |
|
9,844 |
|
21,107 |
|
25,337 |
|
||||
Other |
|
4,116 |
|
2,560 |
|
4,887 |
|
8,582 |
|
||||
Total |
|
$ |
340,151 |
|
$ |
196,718 |
|
$ |
863,011 |
|
$ |
636,066 |
|
(a) Intersegment revenues primarily represent natural gas sales from EQT Production to EQT Midstream and transportation activities between EQT Midstream and Distribution.
(b) Unallocated expense primarily consists of incentive compensation and administrative costs in excess of budget that are not allocated to the operating segments.
(c) Expenditures for segment assets for 2010 include $29.5 million in cash and exclude approximately $230.7 million of EQT stock issued for the acquisition of additional Marcellus Shale acreage in the second quarter of 2010.
C. Derivative Instruments
Natural Gas Hedging Instruments
The Companys primary market risk exposure is with regard to future prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids, which can affect the operating results of the Company primarily through the EQT Production and EQT Midstream segments. The Companys overall objective in its commodity hedging program is to ensure an adequate level of return for the well development and infrastructure investments at these segments.
The Company uses non-leveraged derivative commodity instruments that are placed with major financial institutions whose creditworthiness is continually monitored. Futures contracts obligate the Company to buy or sell a designated commodity at a future date for a specified price and quantity at a specified location. Swap agreements involve payments to or receipts from counterparties based on the differential between a fixed and variable price for the commodity. Collar agreements require the counterparty to pay the Company if the index price falls below the floor price and the Company to pay the counterparty if the index price rises above the cap price. Put option contracts provide protection from dropping prices and require the counterparty to pay the Company if the index price falls below the contract price. The Company also engages in a limited number of basis swaps to protect earnings from undue exposure to the risk of geographic disparities in commodity prices and interest rate swaps to hedge exposure to interest rate fluctuations on short or long-term debt.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value. The accounting for the changes in fair value of the Companys derivative instruments depends on the use of the derivative instruments. At contract inception, the Company designates its derivative instruments as hedging or trading activities. To the extent that a derivative instrument has been designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, and is subsequently reclassified into earnings, in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction, in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. For derivative instruments that have not been designated as cash flow hedges, the change in fair value for the instrument is recognized in the Statements of Consolidated Income as operating revenues each period.
Exchange-traded instruments are generally settled with offsetting positions. Over the counter (OTC) arrangements require settlement in cash. Settlements of derivative commodity instruments are reported as a component of cash flows from operations in the accompanying Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The various derivative commodity instruments used by the Company to hedge its exposure to variability in expected future cash flows associated with the fluctuations in the price of natural gas related to the Companys forecasted sale of equity production and forecasted natural gas purchases and sales have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. See Commodity Risk Management in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q for further details of the Companys hedged position.
The Company assesses the effectiveness of hedging relationships and the degree that the gain (loss) for the hedging instrument offsets the loss (gain) on the hedged item, both at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis. If the gain (loss) for the hedging instrument is greater than the loss (gain) on the hedged item, the ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge is immediately recognized in operating revenues in the Statements of Consolidated Income.
The Company also enters into a limited amount of energy trading contracts to leverage its assets and limit its exposure to shifts in market prices and has a limited amount of other derivative instruments not designated as hedges.
All derivatives recognized in the balance sheet and used in cash flow hedging relationships are commodity contracts. All gains (losses) recognized in income or reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) into income are reported in operating revenues. All derivative instrument assets and liabilities are reported in the balance sheet as derivative instruments, at fair value. These derivative instruments are reported as either current assets or current liabilities due to their highly liquid nature. The Company can net settle its derivative instruments at any time.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) (effective portion), net of tax |
|
$ |
59,120 |
|
$ |
4,392 |
|
$ |
120,346 |
|
$ |
146,402 |
|
Amount of gain reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion), net of tax (a) |
|
17,331 |
|
26,769 |
|
45,549 |
|
107,725 |
|
||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) (b) |
|
2,980 |
|
2,262 |
|
2,367 |
|
(3,076) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Amount of loss recognized in income |
|
$ |
(1,323) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1,234) |
|
$ |
(27) |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||
Asset derivatives |
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
185,254 |
|
$ |
111,375 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
95,062 |
|
52,504 |
|
||
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
280,316 |
|
$ |
163,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||
Liability derivatives |
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
11,789 |
|
$ |
61,179 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
107,590 |
|
71,339 |
|
||
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
119,379 |
|
$ |
132,518 |
|
(a) Includes $7.9 million and $10.5 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, of unrealized hedge gains reclassified into earnings to offset lower of cost or market adjustments on hedged items. Includes $0.3 million and $9.1 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2009, respectively, of unrealized hedge gains reclassified into earnings to offset lower of cost or market adjustments on hedged items. The Company also had an immaterial amount of OCI reclassified to interest expense related to an interest rate swap on long-term debt.
(b) No amounts have been excluded from effectiveness testing.
The net fair value of derivative instruments changed during the first nine months of 2010 primarily as a result of a decrease in natural gas prices. The absolute quantities of the Companys derivative commodity instruments that have been designated and qualify as cash flow hedges totaled 164 Bcf and 172 Bcf as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and are primarily related to natural gas swaps and collars.
The Company had net deferred gains of $90.4 million and $15.6 million in accumulated OCI (loss), net of tax, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, associated with the effective portion of the change in fair value of its derivative commodity instruments designated as cash flow hedges. Assuming no change in price or new transactions, the Company estimates that approximately $46.8 million of net unrealized gains on its derivative commodity instruments reflected in accumulated OCI (loss), net of tax, as of September 30, 2010 will be recognized in earnings during the next twelve months due to the settlement of hedged transactions. This recognition occurs through an increase in the Companys net operating revenues resulting in the average hedged price becoming the realized sales price.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative contracts. This credit exposure is limited to derivative contracts with a positive fair value. The Company believes that New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) traded futures contracts have minimal credit risk because Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations are in place to protect exchange participants, including the Company, from potential financial instability of the exchange members. The Companys swap, collar and option derivative instruments are primarily with financial institutions and thus are subject to events that would impact those companies individually as well as that industry as a whole.
The Company utilizes various processes and analyses to monitor and evaluate its credit risk exposures. This includes closely monitoring current market conditions, counterparty credit spreads and credit default swap rates. Credit exposure is controlled through credit approvals and limits. To manage the level of credit risk, the Company deals with financial counterparties that are of investment grade, enters into netting agreements whenever possible and may obtain collateral or other security.
When the net fair value of any of the Companys swap agreements represents a liability to the Company which is in excess of the agreed-upon threshold between the Company and the financial institution acting as counterparty, the counterparty requires the Company to remit funds to the counterparty as a margin deposit for the derivative liability which is in excess of the threshold amount. The Company records these deposits as a current asset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. When the net fair value of any of the Companys swap agreements represents an asset to the Company which is in excess of the agreed-upon threshold between the Company and the financial institution acting as counterparty, the Company requires the counterparty to remit funds as margin deposits in an amount equal to the portion of the derivative asset which is in excess of the threshold amount. The Company records a current liability for such amounts received. The Company had no such deposits in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
When the Company enters into exchange-traded natural gas contracts, exchanges may require the Company to remit funds to the corresponding broker as good-faith deposits to guard against the risks associated with changing market conditions. Participants must make such deposits based on an established initial margin requirement as well as the net liability position, if any, of the fair value of the associated contracts. In the case where the fair value of such contracts is in a net asset position, the broker may remit funds to the Company, in which case the Company records a current liability for such amounts received. The initial margin requirements are established by the exchanges based on prices, volatility and the time to expiration of the related contract and are subject to change at the exchanges discretion. The Company recorded a current asset of $0.6 million as of September 30, 2010 and a current liability of $6.9 million as of December 31, 2009 for such deposits in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Certain of the Companys derivative instrument contracts provide that if the Companys credit ratings are lowered below investment grade, additional collateral must be deposited with the counterparty. Contracts have differing terms in that some require collateral if just one of the ratings agencies downgrades the company to a level below investment grade, while others refer to the rating of just one ratings agency and still others have no ratings trigger. If required, the additional collateral can be up to 100% of the derivative liability. As of September 30, 2010, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
liability position was $9.9 million, for which the Company had no collateral posted on September 30, 2010. If the Companys credit rating had been downgraded below investment grade on September 30, 2010, the Company would have been required to post additional collateral of $9.9 million in respect of the liability position. Investment grade refers to the quality of the Companys credit as assessed by one or more credit rating agencies. The Companys long-term corporate credit rating was BBB by Standard & Poors Rating Services (S&P), Baa1 by Moodys Investor Services (Moodys) and BBB+ by Fitch Ratings Service (Fitch) at September 30, 2010. In order to be considered investment grade, the Company must be rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch and Baa3 or higher by Moodys. Anything below these ratings is considered non-investment grade.
D. Investments, Available-For-Sale
As of September 30, 2010, the investments classified by the Company as available-for-sale consist of $38.6 million of equity and bond funds intended to fund plugging and abandonment and other liabilities for which the Company self-insures.
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Fair |
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity funds |
|
$ |
23,284 |
|
$ |
6,320 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
29,604 |
|
Bond funds |
|
7,891 |
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
9,021 |
|
||||
Total investments |
|
$ |
31,175 |
|
$ |
7,450 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
38,625 |
|
Unrealized gains or losses with respect to temporarily impaired investments classified as available-for-sale are recognized within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of equity, accumulated other comprehensive loss. The Company evaluates these investments quarterly and if the Company subsequently determines that a loss is other-than-temporary, any unrealized losses stemming from such impaired investments will be recognized in earnings.
During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company purchased additional securities with a cost basis totaling $0.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
E. Fair Value Measurements
The Company has an established process for determining fair value for its financial instruments, principally derivative commodity instruments and available-for-sale investments. Fair value is based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon models that use as inputs market-based parameters, including but not limited to forward curves, discount rates, broker quotes, volatilities and nonperformance risk. Nonperformance risk considers, among other things, the effect of the Companys credit standing on the fair value of liabilities and the effect of the counterpartys credit standing on the fair value of assets. The Company estimates nonperformance risk by analyzing publicly available market information, including a comparison of the yield on debt instruments with credit ratings similar to the Companys or counterpartys credit rating and the yield of a risk free instrument. The Company also considers credit default swaps rates where applicable.
The Company has categorized its financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Financial instruments included in Level 1 include the Companys futures contracts and available-for-sale investments, while instruments included in Level 2 include the majority of the Companys swap agreements, and instruments included in Level 3 include the Companys collar and option agreements and an insignificant portion of the Companys swap agreements. Since the adoption of fair value accounting, the Company has not made any changes to its classification of financial instruments in each category.
The fair value of financial instruments included in Level 2 is based on industry models that use significant observable inputs, including NYMEX forward curves and LIBOR-based discount rates. Swaps included in Level 3
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
are valued using internal models that use significant unobservable inputs; these internal models are validated each period with non-binding broker price quotes. The Company has not experienced significant differences between internally calculated values and broker price quotes. Collars and options included in Level 3 are valued using internal models calculated with market derived volatilities. The Company uses NYMEX forward curves to value futures, NYMEX swaps, collars and options. The NYMEX forward curves are validated to external sources at least monthly.
The following assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period:
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements at reporting date using |
|
||||||||
Description |
|
September 30,
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Investments, available-for-sale |
|
$ |
38,625 |
|
$ |
38,625 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Derivative instruments, at fair value |
|
280,316 |
|
12,350 |
|
128,946 |
|
139,020 |
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
318,941 |
|
$ |
50,975 |
|
$ |
128,946 |
|
$ |
139,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivative instruments, at fair value |
|
$ |
119,379 |
|
$ |
12,113 |
|
$ |
106,714 |
|
$ |
552 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
119,379 |
|
$ |
12,113 |
|
$ |
106,714 |
|
$ |
552 |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, at fair |
|
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
88,570 |
|
Total gains or losses: |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
(9) |
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
89,251 |
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
(39,344) |
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
- |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
138,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets and liabilities still held as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
Gains and losses related to derivative commodity instruments included in earnings for the period are reported in operating revenues in the Statements of Consolidated Income. All gains or losses related to available-for-sale securities are included in other income.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
F. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
36,522 |
|
$ |
2,909 |
|
$ |
154,587 |
|
$ |
101,547 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net change in cash flow hedges |
|
41,816 |
|
(22,348) |
|
74,885 |
|
38,765 |
|
||||
Unrealized gain on investments, available-for-sale |
|
2,252 |
|
2,651 |
|
753 |
|
3,502 |
|
||||
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plans |
|
405 |
|
388 |
|
1,211 |
|
1,164 |
|
||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
80,995 |
|
$ |
(16,400) |
|
$ |
231,436 |
|
$ |
144,978 |
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||
Net unrealized gain from hedging transactions |
|
$ |
90,182 |
|
$ |
15,297 |
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
4,843 |
|
4,090 |
|
||
Pension and other post-retirement benefits adjustment |
|
(32,616) |
|
(33,827) |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
62,409 |
|
$ |
(14,440) |
|
G. Income Taxes
The Company estimates an annual effective income tax rate based on projected results for the year and applies this rate to income before taxes to calculate income tax expense. The effective tax rate is further adjusted for non-recurring discrete items. Refinements made due to subsequent information that affects the estimated annual effective income tax rate are reflected as adjustments in the current period. Separate effective income tax rates are calculated for net income from continuing operations and any other separately reported net income items, such as discontinued operations.
The Companys effective income tax rate for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was 36.2%. The Company currently estimates the annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 36.2%. The estimated annual effective income tax rate as of September 30, 2009 was 40.9%. The decrease in the expected annual effective tax rate from 2009 is primarily the result of the impact of certain nondeductible expenses in 2009 and the loss of certain prior year deductions in 2009 as a result of carrying 2009 losses back to receive a cash refund of taxes paid in prior years.
There were no material changes to the Companys methodology or to the balance recorded for unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed its audit and review of the Companys federal income tax filings through 2005. The only unresolved issue in such prior periods relates to research and experimentation tax credits of $3.8 million claimed by the Company for years 2001 through 2005. This issue is currently under review at the Appeals Division of the IRS. The IRS commenced its audit and review of the Companys federal income tax filings for the 2006 through 2009 years during the second quarter of 2010. The Company also is the subject of various state income tax examinations. The Company believes that it is appropriately reserved for any uncertain tax positions claimed during the periods to be reviewed.
The Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 extended the tax net operating loss carryback provision from 2 years to 5 years for either the 2008 or 2009 tax year. The Company elected to carryback its 2009 tax operating loss under this new law and received a refund of $121.5 million from the IRS during the first quarter of
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2010. During the third quarter of 2010 the Company filed a superseding tax return for the 2009 tax year in which the Company has requested an additional refund of $1.9 million relating to the carryback of the 2009 net operating tax loss. EQT also received a refund from the IRS of $115.2 million, primarily in the second quarter of 2009, relating to the 2008 net operating loss carryback. These net operating losses were primarily generated from intangible drilling costs (IDC) for the Companys drilling program that are deducted currently for tax purposes and from accelerated tax depreciation associated with the expansion of the Companys midstream business.
H. Short-Term Loans
On October 27, 2006, the Company entered into a $1.5 billion, five-year revolving credit agreement, which replaced the Companys previous $1 billion, five-year revolving credit agreement. On December 15, 2006, the maturity date was extended to October 26, 2011. Additionally, the Company may request two one-year extensions of the stated maturity date; however, these extensions require the approval of 51% of the lenders underwriting the credit facility. Any such extension shall only apply to the lenders who consent to the extension and any lender who replaces a non-consenting lender pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, share repurchases and other purposes including support of a commercial paper program. Subject to certain terms and conditions, the Company may, on a one time basis, request that the lenders commitments be increased to an aggregate amount of up to $2.0 billion. Each lender in the facility may decide if it will increase its commitment. The credit facility is underwritten by a syndicate of 15 financial institutions each of which is obligated to fund its pro-rata portion of any borrowings by the Company.
The Company is not required to maintain compensating bank balances. The Companys long-term corporate credit rating, as determined by S&P, Moodys or Fitch, on the Companys non-credit-enhanced, senior unsecured long-term debt, determine the level of fees associated with its lines of credit in addition to the interest rate charged by the counterparties on any amounts borrowed against the lines of credit; the lower the Companys long-term corporate credit rating, the higher the level of fees and borrowing rate.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had no loans outstanding under the revolving credit facility. An irrevocable standby letter of credit of $23.5 million was outstanding at September 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding short-term loans under the revolving credit facility of $5.0 million and an irrevocable standby letter of credit of $24.4 million. Commitment fees averaging approximately one-twelfth of one percent in 2010 and 2009 were paid to maintain credit availability under the revolving credit facility.
The weighted average interest rate for short-term loans outstanding as of December 31, 2009 was 0.51% per annum. The maximum amount of outstanding short-term loans at any time during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $139.7 million and $491.7 million, respectively. The average daily balance of short-term loans outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $17.7 million and $156.7 million, respectively, at weighted average annual interest rates of 0.86% and 0.73%, respectively.
I. Long-Term Debt
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
||||||
5.15% notes, due November 15, 2012 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
||
5.00% notes, due October 1, 2015 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
||||
5.15% notes, due March 1, 2018 |
|
200,000 |
|
200,000 |
|
||||
6.50% notes, due April 1, 2018 |
|
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
||||
8.13% notes, due April 1, 2019 |
|
700,000 |
|
700,000 |
|
||||
7.75% debentures, due July 15, 2026 |
|
115,000 |
|
115,000 |
|
||||
Medium-term notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
7.6% Series C, due 2018 |
|
8,000 |
|
8,000 |
|
||||
8.5% to 9.0% Series A, due 2009 thru 2021 |
|
46,200 |
|
46,200 |
|
||||
7.3% to 7.6% Series B, due 2013 thru 2023 |
|
30,000 |
|
30,000 |
|
||||
|
|
1,949,200 |
|
1,949,200 |
|
||||
Less debt payable within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,949,200 |
|
$ |
1,949,200 |
|
||
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The indentures and other agreements governing the Companys indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants including covenants that restrict the Companys ability to incur indebtedness, incur liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, complete acquisitions, merge, sell assets and perform certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in the Companys debt rating would not trigger a default under the indentures and other agreements governing the Companys indebtedness.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are $0 in 2010, $6.0 million in 2011, $200.0 million in 2012, $10.0 million in 2013, and $5.0 million in 2014.
J. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash equivalents and short-term loans approximates fair value due to the short maturity of the instruments. Available-for-sale securities and derivative instruments are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. See Notes C, D and E.
The estimated fair value of long-term debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was approximately $2 billion and $2 billion, respectively. The fair value was estimated using the Companys established fair value methodology based on discounted values using a current discount rate reflective of the remaining maturity.
K. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment intended to enhance fair value disclosures, improve the transparency of the inputs and assumptions used to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities reported, and improve comparability with International Financial Reporting Standards. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company adopted certain provisions of this amendment; this did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. Other provisions of the amendment are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the affect that this amendment will have on its consolidated financial statement disclosures.
L. Acquisitions
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company acquired approximately 48,000 net acres in the Marcellus Shale from a group of private operators and landowners. The acreage is located primarily in Cameron, Clearfield, Elk and Jefferson counties in Pennsylvania. The Company paid $260.2 million for these assets, approximately 90% in EQT stock ($230.7 million) and approximately 10% in cash ($29.5 million). Following the closing of the acquisition, the Company holds approximately 500,000 net acres in the high pressure Marcellus Shale fairway.
M. Earnings Per Share
Potentially dilutive securities, consisting of options and restricted stock awards, which were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share totaled 642,209 and 654,510 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and 757,591 and 643,565 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Options to purchase common stock not included within potentially dilutive securities totaled 1,327,494 and 935,639 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and 1,249,037 and 967,773 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
N. Other Events
On March 16, 2010, the Company completed a public offering of 12,500,000 shares of its common stock, no par value, at an offering price to the public of $44.00 per share. The proceeds from the offering are being used to accelerate development of the Marcellus Shale and Huron/Berea plays. The Company includes the Lower Huron, Cleveland, Berea Sandstone and other Devonian Shales, except Marcellus, in its Huron/Berea play.
The underwriters in this transaction also exercised their over-allotment option to purchase 225,000 additional shares of the Companys Common Stock on April 14, 2010 at an offering price to the public of $44.00 per share.
O. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of financial statement issuance.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Disclosures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Statements that do not relate strictly to historical or current facts are forward-looking and usually identified by the use of words such as anticipate, estimate, will, may, forecasts, approximate, expect, project, intend, plan, believe and other words of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial matters. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this report include the matters discussed in the sections captioned Outlook in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, and growth and anticipated financial and operational performance of the Company and its subsidiaries, including guidance regarding the Companys drilling and infrastructure programs (including the Equitrans Marcellus Expansion Project) and technology, transactions, including asset sales and/or joint ventures involving the Companys assets, the timing of construction of public-access natural gas refueling stations, production and sales volumes, revenue projections, reserves, operating costs, well costs, capital expenditures, financing requirements and availability, hedging strategy, the effects of government regulation and tax position. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on current expectations and assumptions about future events. While the Company considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Companys control. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance and results of the Companys business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, Risk Factors of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the Company does not intend to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In reviewing any agreements incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q, please remember such agreements are included to provide information regarding the terms of such agreements and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by the Company, which should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties should those statements prove to be inaccurate. The representations and warranties were made only as of the date of the relevant agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in such agreement and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties alone may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
EQT Corporations consolidated net income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $36.5 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to $2.9 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, reported for the same period a year ago. Several factors contributed to the increase in net income between periods. The Companys results were favorably impacted by increased produced natural gas sales volumes, lower long-term compensation accruals, higher gathering revenues and increased net revenues for NGLs. These favorable variances were partially offset by increased depreciation, depletion and amortization resulting from the Companys investment in natural gas producing properties and lower average well-head sales prices due to lower hedging gains and lower hedged volumes.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Companys share price and performance in relation to its peer group improved, resulting in the Company incurring $24.3 million of long-term compensation expense under its 2009 Shareholder Value Plan (2009 SVP). The 2009 SVPs performance period ended on December 31, 2009. The 2009 SVP was a liability plan, in which awards were valued at the end of the performance period, based upon a combination of the Companys stock price, a factor determined by the Companys performance compared to its peers and the Companys return on total capital.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
vs. Nine months ended September 30, 2009
EQT Corporations consolidated net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $154.6 million or $1.07 per diluted share, compared to $101.5 million, or $0.77 per diluted share, reported for the same period a year ago. Several factors contributed to the increase in net income between periods. The Companys results were favorably impacted by increased produced natural gas sales volumes, increased sales prices for NGLs, lower long-term compensation accruals and higher gathering volumes. These favorable variances were partially offset by higher DD&A, higher interest charges, lower average well-head sales prices for natural gas as a result of hedging activities and increased operating and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, consistent with the growth of the business.
The Company has reported the components of each segments operating income and various operational measures in the sections below and, where appropriate, has provided information describing how a measure was derived. EQTs management believes that presentation of this information provides useful information to management and investors regarding the financial condition, operations and trends of each of EQTs segments without being obscured by the financial condition, operations and trends for the other segments or by the effects of corporate allocations of interest and income taxes. In addition, management uses these measures for budget planning purposes.
EQT PRODUCTION
OVERVIEW
EQT Productions strategy is to maximize value by profitably developing the Companys extensive acreage position primarily through organic growth enabled by a low cost structure. The Company is focused on continuing its significant organic production and reserve growth through its developmental drilling program and believes that it is a technological leader in drilling shale. The Company commenced drilling operations (spud or drilled) 79 horizontal Marcellus Shale wells in the first nine months of 2010 compared to 27 in the first nine months of 2009. Additionally, the Company drilled 191 horizontal Huron/Berea wells in the nine months of 2010 compared to 243 in the nine months of 2009. Over the past three years, the Company has experienced a 99.8% developmental drilling success rate. See Capital Resources and Liquidity in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q for details regarding the Companys capital expenditures for drilling and development.
EQT Productions operating revenues for the third quarter of 2010 increased 25% compared to 2009 as a result of significantly increased sales of produced natural gas partially offset by lower average well-head sales prices. Sales of produced natural gas increased 35% from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010. The increase was the result of increased production from the 2009 and 2010 horizontal shale drilling programs. The average well-head sales price decreased 7% due to lower hedging gains and lower hedged gas sales compared to 2009, partially offset by an increase in the average NYMEX price.
Third quarter operating expenses at EQT Production in 2010 included an increase in the Companys depletion expense as a result of higher depletion rates attributable to the significant on-going well development program and increased production volumes.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EQT PRODUCTION
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
Nine
Months Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
||||
OPERATIONAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Natural gas and oil production (MMcfe) |
|
35,334 |
|
26,722 |
|
32.2 |
|
99,520 |
|
76,705 |
|
29.7 |
|
||||
Company usage, line loss (MMcfe) |
|
(1,346) |
|
(1,566) |
|
(14.0) |
|
(3,617) |
|
(4,207) |
|
(14.0) |
|
||||
Total sales volumes (MMcfe) |
|
33,988 |
|
25,156 |
|
35.1 |
|
95,903 |
|
72,498 |
|
32.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Average (well-head) sales price ($/Mcfe) (a) |
|
$ |
3.32 |
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
(6.5) |
|
$ |
3.53 |
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
(6.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Lease operating expenses (LOE), excluding production taxes ($/Mcfe) |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
(31.3) |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
(14.3) |
|
Production taxes ($/Mcfe) |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
(19.2) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
(23.3) |
|
Production depletion ($/Mcfe) |
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
21.2 |
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Production depletion |
|
$ |
44,609 |
|
$ |
27,734 |
|
60.8 |
|
$ |
125,113 |
|
$ |
79,165 |
|
58.0 |
|
Other depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) |
|
2,049 |
|
2,122 |
|
(3.4) |
|
5,923 |
|
4,559 |
|
29.9 |
|
||||
Total DD&A |
|
$ |
46,658 |
|
$ |
29,856 |
|
56.3 |
|
$ |
131,036 |
|
$ |
83,724 |
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Capital expenditures (thousands) (b) |
|
$ |
267,154 |
|
$ |
144,497 |
|
84.9 |
|
$ |
929,225 |
|
$ |
446,813 |
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
115,218 |
|
$ |
91,922 |
|
25.3 |
|
$ |
345,163 |
|
$ |
279,570 |
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
LOE, excluding production taxes |
|
7,856 |
|
8,633 |
|
(9.0) |
|
24,056 |
|
21,845 |
|
10.1 |
|
||||
Production taxes |
|
7,405 |
|
6,932 |
|
6.8 |
|
22,788 |
|
23,082 |
|
(1.3) |
|
||||
Exploration expense |
|
941 |
|
4,527 |
|
(79.2) |
|
3,354 |
|
12,252 |
|
(72.6) |
|
||||
SG&A |
|
12,531 |
|
10,452 |
|
19.9 |
|
41,832 |
|
29,080 |
|
43.9 |
|
||||
DD&A |
|
46,658 |
|
29,856 |
|
56.3 |
|
131,036 |
|
83,724 |
|
56.5 |
|
||||
Total operating expenses |
|
75,391 |
|
60,400 |
|
24.8 |
|
223,066 |
|
169,983 |
|
31.2 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
39,827 |
|
$ |
31,522 |
|
26.3 |
|
$ |
122,097 |
|
$ |
109,587 |
|
11.4 |
|
(a) Average (well-head) sales price is calculated as market price adjusted for hedging activities. In addition, EQT Production allocates some revenues to EQT Midstream for gathering, processing and transportation of the produced gas and NGLs. EQT Midstream revenues totaled $2.31 and $2.18 per Mcfe for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2.37 and $2.06 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Average well-head sales price to EQT Corporation totaled $5.63 and $5.73 per Mcfe for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5.90 and $5.82 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(b) Capital expenditures for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 include $310.9 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for undeveloped property acquisitions, primarily within the Marcellus Shale play. This amount includes $230.7 million of undeveloped property which was acquired with EQT stock in the second quarter of 2010.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
EQT Productions operating income totaled $39.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $31.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The $8.3 million increase in operating income was primarily the result of an increase in sales of produced natural gas partially offset by higher DD&A, a decrease in the average well-head sales price and higher SG&A expenses.
Total operating revenues were $115.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $91.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The $23.3 million increase in total operating revenues was primarily due to an increase in produced natural gas sales volumes partially offset by a 7% decrease in the average well-head sales price. The increase in produced natural gas sales volumes was the result of increased production from the 2009 and 2010 drilling programs, primarily in the Marcellus and Huron/Berea Shale plays. The increase in produced natural gas sales volumes was partially offset by the normal production decline in the Companys wells. The $0.23 per Mcfe decrease in the average well-head sales price was primarily due to lower hedging gains and lower hedged gas sales compared to 2009, partially offset by a 29% increase in the average NYMEX price.
Operating expenses totaled $75.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $60.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily the result of increases in DD&A and SG&A. The increase in DD&A is primarily due to increases in the depletion unit rate ($8.5 million) and volumes ($8.5 million). The $0.22 per Mcfe increase in the depletion rate is primarily attributable to the increased investment in oil and gas producing properties. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to an increase in hiring, relocation and personnel costs. These factors were partially offset by a decrease in exploration expense due to a reduction in geophysical activity in the current year as well as a decrease in LOE from increased road and location maintenance in the prior year as a result of storms and flooding in late summer 2009. The timing of these expenses can vary from one year to the next, however the LOE unit rate is trending downword, primarily due to the increase in the produced volumes.
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
vs. Nine months ended September 30, 2009
EQT Productions operating income totaled $122.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $109.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The $12.5 million increase in operating income was primarily the result of an increase in sales of produced natural gas ($87.9 million) partially offset by higher DD&A, a decrease in the average well-head sales price ($21.7 million) and higher SG&A expenses.
Total operating revenues were $345.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $279.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The $65.6 million increase in total operating revenues was primarily due to a 32% increase in sales of produced natural gas partially offset by a 6% decrease in the average well-head sales price. The increase in produced natural gas sales volumes was the result of increased production from the 2009 and 2010 drilling programs, primarily in the Marcellus Shale and Huron/Berea plays. The $0.23 per Mcfe decrease in the average well-head sales price was primarily due to lower hedging gains and lower hedged gas sales partially offset by a 17% increase in the average NYMEX price.
Operating expenses totaled $223.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $170.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily the result of increased DD&A from increases in the depletion unit rate ($23.1 million) and volume ($22.6 million). The $0.23 increase in the depletion rate was primarily attributable to the increased investment in the Companys oil and gas producing properties. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to a $4.5 million charge related to the buy-out of excess contractual capacity for the processing and disposal of salt water as well as higher personnel costs and hiring and relocation costs and a favorable adjustment to the reserve for uncollectible accounts in the prior year. The increase in LOE, excluding production taxes was primarily due to increased activity in the Marcellus Shale play in the current year. These factors were partially offset by a decrease in exploration expense due to a reduction in geophysical activity compared to the prior year.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OUTLOOK
EQT Productions business strategy is focused on organic growth of the Companys natural gas reserves and sales volumes. EQT Productions strategy is primarily comprised of:
· Expanding production and developing reserves through horizontal drilling in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky. The Company is committed to expanding its production and developing its reserves through cost-effective, technologically-advanced horizontal drilling in its existing plays. A substantial portion of the Companys drilling efforts will be focused on drilling horizontal wells in shale formations in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Kentucky.
· Marcellus Shale
The
Company owns approximately 500,000 net acres in the Marcellus shale, primarily
in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia. The Marcellus is the Companys fastest
growing and most profitable play.
Estimated ultimate recovery per well have increased significantly since
the Companys first Marcellus well and total cost per well has declined over
the same time. The Company expects to
access significantly more reserves through extended lateral drilling
procedures, for less than a proportional amount of development costs. The Company is also experimenting with new
hydraulic fracturing designs to further increase recoveries.
· Huron/Berea Shale
The Company owns approximately 2.2 million acres in the Huron/Berea Shale play and continues to focus on its highly successful horizontal drilling program by drilling fractured horizontal wells and extending the lateral length when possible. Many of the Huron/Berea wells produce wet gas, with significant NGL content. NGLs receive higher prices per Btu than natural gas, improving the economics over an equivalent dry gas well. The company has significant mid-stream capacity in the Huron/Berea play and is concentrating its drilling near this capacity to further enhance the return on investment.
· Maintaining
flexibility in a low price environment The pace at which the
Company is able to grow production and reserves is impacted by drilling success
and the price for natural gas. The
Company has mitigated some of the commodity price risk by hedging a portion of
its production. The Company believes
that its position as a low cost operator allows for the development of reserves and production in a low price environment.
· Geological and geophysical expenditures In 2010, the Company is spending $10.5 million on seismic data to determine optimal placement for future Marcellus wells and $1.5 million on 2D and 3D seismic data over properties in which the Company holds deeper exploration and drilling rights.
EQT MIDSTREAM
OVERVIEW
EQT Midstreams 2010 third quarter net operating revenues increased 25% from the third quarter 2009. The increase is primarily due to higher gathering and processing volumes, increased NGL sales prices and higher average gathering fees. Increases in net operating revenues were partially offset by increased operating expenses. Operating and maintenance (O&M) expense increased in conjunction with the overall growth of the business while DD&A increased primarily due to the investment in infrastructure.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company and DCP Midstream Partners, and its sponsor, DCP Midstream, LLC (together, DCP), signed a non-binding letter of intent to create a natural gas processing and related NGL infrastructure joint venture to serve EQT Production and third party producers in the Marcellus and Huron/Berea Shale areas of the Appalachian basin. The letter of intent contemplated that the joint venture would pursue gas processing and related NGL infrastructure opportunities and would be the preferred processor for the Companys wet gas in the Marcellus and Huron/Berea Shale areas. Since that time, the Company and DCP have evaluated a number of alternative transaction structures, in addition to the originally proposed joint venture structure, to address the Companys processing needs. The parties are currently discussing possible terms associated with these alternative transaction structures.
See Capital Resources and Liquidity in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q for details regarding the Companys capital expenditures for EQT Midstream infrastructure projects.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
EQT MIDSTREAM
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
||||||
OPERATIONAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Gathering and processing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Gathered volumes (BBtu) |
|
49,990 |
|
40,849 |
|
22.4 |
|
142,074 |
|
118,918 |
|
19.5 |
|
||||||
Average gathering fee ($/MMBtu) |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
6.7 |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
5.8 |
|
||
Gathering and compression expense ($/MMBtu) |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
(4.8) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
(7.3) |
|
||
NGLs sold (Mgal) (a) |
|
37,348 |
|
29,948 |
|
24.7 |
|
107,077 |
|
89,836 |
|
19.2 |
|
||||||
Average NGL sales price ($/gal) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
28.2 |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
55.1 |
|
||
Transmission pipeline throughput (BBtu) |
|
27,138 |
|
21,471 |
|
26.4 |
|
76,196 |
|
61,003 |
|
24.9 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net operating revenues (thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Gathering |
|
$ |
54,014 |
|
$ |
42,725 |
|
26.4 |
|
$ |
153,777 |
|
$ |
122,178 |
|
25.9 |
|
||
Processing |
|
23,699 |
|
15,076 |
|
57.2 |
|
72,040 |
|
31,823 |
|
126.4 |
|
||||||
Transmission |
|
19,497 |
|
18,006 |
|
8.3 |
|
59,057 |
|
55,551 |
|
6.3 |
|
||||||
Storage, marketing and other |
|
11,849 |
|
11,737 |
|
1.0 |
|
52,402 |
|
51,758 |
|
1.2 |
|
||||||
Total net operating revenues |
|
$ |
109,059 |
|
$ |
87,544 |
|
24.6 |
|
$ |
337,276 |
|
$ |
261,310 |
|
29.1 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Capital expenditures (thousands) |
|
$ |
59,499 |
|
$ |
39,817 |
|
49.4 |
|
$ |
138,479 |
|
$ |
155,334 |
|
(10.9) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
FINANCIAL DATA (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
175,227 |
|
$ |
124,065 |
|
41.2 |
|
$ |
528,766 |
|
$ |
366,939 |
|
44.1 |
|
||
Purchased gas costs |
|
66,168 |
|
36,521 |
|
81.2 |
|
191,490 |
|
105,629 |
|
81.3 |
|
||||||
Total net operating revenues |
|
$ |
109,059 |
|
$ |
87,544 |
|
|
24.6 |
|
$ |
337,276 |
|
$ |
261,310 |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Operating and maintenance (O&M) |
|
30,140 |
|
24,957 |
|
20.8 |
|
79,694 |
|
70,597 |
|
12.9 |
|
||||||
SG&A |
|
11,532 |
|
11,232 |
|
2.7 |
|
33,379 |
|
32,551 |
|
2.5 |
|
||||||
DD&A |
|
15,705 |
|
13,477 |
|
16.5 |
|
46,240 |
|
38,502 |
|
20.1 |
|
||||||
Total operating expenses |
|
57,377 |
|
49,666 |
|
15.5 |
|
159,313 |
|
141,650 |
|
12.5 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
51,682 |
|
$ |
37,878 |
|
36.4 |
|
$ |
177,963 |
|
$ |
119,660 |
|
48.7 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Other income |
|
$ |
193 |
|
$ |
342 |
|
(43.6) |
|
$ |
452 |
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
(63.8) |
|
||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments |
|
$ |
2,607 |
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
34.0 |
|
$ |
7,472 |
|
$ |
4,608 |
|
62.2 |
|
||
(a) NGLs sold includes NGLs recovered at the Companys processing plant and transported to a fractionation plant owned by a third party for separation into commercial components, net of volumes retained, as well as equivalent volumes sold at liquid component prices under the Companys contractual processing arrangements with third parties.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
EQT Midstreams operating income totaled $51.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $37.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The $13.8 million increase in operating income was primarily the result of increased gathered volumes and rates and favorable commodity prices for NGLs, partially offset by increases in O&M and DD&A expense.
Total net operating revenues were $109.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $87.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in total net operating revenues was primarily
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
due to an $11.3 million increase in gathering net operating revenues and an $8.6 million increase in processing net operating revenues. Processing net revenues increased due to a 28% higher sales price for NGLs and a 25% increase in NGLs sold. The majority of the processing net revenues are from processing wet gas produced by EQT Production shale wells.
Gathering net operating revenues increased due to a 22% increase in gathered volumes as well as a 7% increase in gathering rates. This increase was driven primarily by higher Marcellus Shale volumes from EQT Production.
Total operating revenues increased $51.2 million from the prior year to $175.2 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of higher gathered volumes and rates as well as increased NGL sales prices and NGLs sold. In addition, increased marketed volumes, primarily as a result of higher Marcellus activity with affiliates, resulted in increases in both total operating revenues and purchased gas costs.
Operating expenses totaled $57.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $49.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The $7.7 million increase in operating expenses was due to increases of $5.2 million in O&M and $2.2 million in DD&A. The increase in O&M is primarily due to higher operating costs associated with the increased gathered volumes and processed NGLs including property taxes, electricity and severance taxes as well as a $2.6 million loss on compressor decommissioning at the Kentucky hydrocarbon processing facility. The increase in DD&A was primarily due to the increased investment in gathering, processing and transmission infrastructure.
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments totaled $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and relates to equity earnings recorded for EQT Midstreams investment in Nora Gathering, LLC.
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
vs. Nine months ended September 30, 2009
EQT Midstreams operating income totaled $178.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $119.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The $58.3 million increase in operating income was primarily the result of increased NGLs sold and increased NGL sales price, as well as increased gathered volumes and rates, partially offset by increases in O&M and DD&A expense.
Total net operating revenues were $337.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $261.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in total net operating revenues was primarily due to a $40.2 million increase in processing net operating revenues, a $31.6 million increase in gathering net operating revenues and a $3.5 million increase in transmission net operating revenues.
The increase in processing net revenues in the third quarter 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009 resulted primarily from a 55% higher sales price for NGLs combined with a 19% increase in NGLs sold.
Gathering net operating revenues increased as a result of a 20% increase in gathered volumes as well as a 6% increase in gathering rates. This increase was driven primarily by higher Marcellus Shale volumes from EQT Production.
Transmission net operating revenues increased primarily as a result of higher firm transportation activity resulting from increased Marcellus shale volumes from affiliated shippers.
Storage, marketing and other net operating revenues were comparable with prior year as decreased margins on third party marketing that primarily utilized pipeline capacity offset increased marketing of affiliated production.
Total operating revenues increased $161.8 million from the prior year to $528.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of increased NGL sales prices and NGLs sold as well as higher gathered volumes and rates. In addition, increased marketed volumes, primarily as a result of higher Marcellus Shale activity with affiliates, resulted in increases in both total operating revenues and purchased gas costs.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Operating expenses totaled $159.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $141.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increases of $9.1 million in O&M and $7.7 million in DD&A. The increase in O&M is primarily due to higher operating costs associated with the growth of the business as well as a $2.6 million loss on compressor decommissioning at the Kentucky hydrocarbon processing facility. The increase in DD&A was primarily due to this increased investment in gathering, processing and transmission infrastructure.
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated investments totaled $7.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and relates to equity earnings recorded for EQT Midstreams investment in Nora Gathering, LLC.
OUTLOOK
EQT Midstreams long-term strategy is focused on capitalizing on its infrastructure asset position in the heart of the Marcellus Shale play in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia. The location of the Companys midstream assets across a wide area of the Marcellus Shale uniquely positions the segment for growth. In addition, EQT Midstream continues to provide and maintain a long-term growth platform for EQT Production in the Huron/Berea play. Key projects supporting EQT Midstreams strategy include:
· Gathering Projects. In the first quarter of 2010, EQT Midstream completed construction of the first phase of the Ingram Gathering system which provides delivery capacity of 50 MMcfe per day of EQT production in Greene County, Pennsylvania, into two Equitrans pipelines. The second phase of this project extended the system further east and added 4,800HP of compression. The second phase was completed in the third quarter and provides an additional 70 MMcfe per day of capacity for EQTs production. In Northern West Virginia, EQT Midstream is in the process of constructing a Doddridge Gathering System Expansion which will deliver EQTs production from North Central West Virginia into the western leg of the Equitrans system. Capacity additions of at least 60 MMcfe per day are expected to be made available by year-end, bringing total Marcellus gathering capacity in West Virginia to approximately 85 MMcfe per day.
· Equitrans Marcellus Expansion Project. The Equitrans Marcellus Expansion Project is underway and, given its significant scope, is progressing in stages. Equitrans completed construction of Phase 1 and put that phase into service on October 1, 2010. This expansion created approximately 100,000 Dth per day of new delivery capacity to Equitrans interconnections with five interstate pipeline facilities. Progress on the next phase is underway. Equitrans has commenced the environmental review for Phase 2 and is finalizing commercial commitments. Equitrans anticipates filing the certificate application for Phase 2 with the FERC in early 2011, anticipates obtaining final approval in the Summer of 2011 and expects to have Phase 2 in service by the end of 2012.
Gathering, processing and transmission volumes are expected to increase as EQT Midstream expands its infrastructure to support EQT Productions growth in the Marcellus and Huron/Berea Shale plays. In light of the anticipated continued growth, EQT Midstream is also considering partnering with third parties and other arrangements, including a potential sale of the Big Sandy Pipeline, to facilitate the continued expansion of its assets.
Storage, marketing and other net operating revenues for the fourth quarter 2010 are expected to be approximately $15 million lower than the fourth quarter 2009. This is primarily due to the relative lack of seasonal volatility and spreads in the forward curve. Third party marketing margins are also expected to be lower as contracts expire in an environment where capacity constraints have eased, resulting in a smaller premium for marketing services related to our currently unused capacity.
EQT Corporation and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
DISTRIBUTION
OVERVIEW
In October 2009, Equitable Gas filed a request with the West Virginia Public Service Commission (WV PSC) to increase the rates it charges its approximately 13,000 customers for delivery of natural gas in West Virginia. It was the first West Virginia delivery rate increase requested by Equitable Gas since 1991. In May 2010, Equitable Gas reached a settlement with the active parties that would result in a projected revenue increase of approximately $1.6 million annually. The settlement was approved by the WV PSC on August 24, 2010.
Distributions net operating income for the third quarter decreased from $3.2 million in 2009 to $0.6 million in 2010, primarily due to lower residential throughput over the same period in 2009, lower asset optimization revenues, increased field operating and maintenance activities and higher depreciation expense.
See Capital Resources and Liquidity in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q for information on the Companys capital expenditures for distribution projects.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
DISTRIBUTION
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
OPERATIONAL DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Heating degree days (30 year average: |
|
73 |
|
81 |
|
(9.9) |
|
3,350 |
|
3,521 |
|
(4.9) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Residential sales volumes (MMcf) |
|
1,131 |
|
1,282 |
|
(11.8) |
|
15,234 |
|
15,915 |
|
(4.3) |
|
||||
Commercial and industrial volumes (MMcf) |
|
3,990 |
|
5,178 |
|
(22.9) |
|
20,820 |
|
21,813 |
|
(4.6) |
|
||||
Total throughput (MMcf) Distribution |
|
5,121 |
|
6,460 |
|
(20.7) |
|
36,054 |
|
37,728 |
|
(4.4) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net operating revenues (thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Residential |
|
$ |
13,642 |
|
$ |
14,044 |
|
(2.9) |
|
$ |
80,605 |
|
$ |
77,039 |
|
4.6 |
|
Commercial & industrial |
|
6,374 |
|
6,353 |
|
0.3 |
|
33,862 |
|
34,170 |
|
(0.9) |
|
||||
Off-system and energy services |
|
4,206 |
|
4,921 |
|
(14.5) |
|
15,816 |
|
16,854 |
|
(6.2) |
|
||||
Total net operating revenues |
|
24,222 |
|
25,318 |
|
(4.3) |
|
130,283 |
|
128,063 |
|
1.7 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Capital expenditures (thousands) |
|
$ |
9,382 |
|
$ |
9,844 |
|
(4.7) |
|
$ |
21,107 |
|
$ |
25,337 |
|
(16.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
FINANCIAL DATA (thousands) |
|