Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GTECH S.P.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
Dear Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the shareholders of International Game Technology ("IGT") to be held on February 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. local time, at Signature Tower 3, Meeting Room D at The Signature at MGM Grand, 145 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada.
As previously announced, on July 15, 2014, GTECH S.p.A. ("GTECH") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with IGT to acquire IGT through the formation of a new holding company, Georgia Worldwide PLC, incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, which is referred to as "Holdco." The acquisition of IGT will be effected by (i) the merger of GTECH with and into Holdco (the "Holdco Merger"), pursuant to which each issued and outstanding ordinary share of GTECH, par value €1.00 (the "GTECH ordinary shares"), will be converted into the right to receive one ordinary share of Holdco, nominal value $0.10 ("Holdco ordinary shares"), and immediately thereafter, (ii) the merger of Georgia Worldwide Corporation, a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco, with and into IGT (the "IGT Merger" and, together with the Holdco Merger, the "Mergers"), with IGT surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco, in each case subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement. As consideration for the acquisition, IGT shareholders will receive a combination of $13.69 in cash, plus a number of Holdco ordinary shares equal to $4.56 divided by a the dollar value of GTECH ordinary shares prior to the closing, subject to adjustments and limitations described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, for each share of common stock, par value $0.00015625 per share, of IGT ("IGT common stock").
We urge all IGT shareholders to read the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the documents incorporated by reference in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, carefully and in their entirety. In particular, we urge you to read carefully "Risk Factors" beginning on page 38 of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.
IGT is holding a special meeting of shareholders to seek your approval of the Merger Agreement. The proposal to approve the Merger Agreement will be approved if holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting approve such proposal. IGT shareholders also are being asked to vote on a proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and on a non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger. The proposal to adjourn the meeting and the advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements will be approved if the number of votes cast in favor of such proposal exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to such proposal, assuming that a quorum is present.
Separately, holders of GTECH ordinary shares have already voted to approve the merger plan regarding the Holdco Merger at an extraordinary meeting of holders of GTECH ordinary shares held on November 4, 2014. The resolution to approve the merger plan received the vote of 96.8% of the ordinary share capital of GTECH participating in the vote on the resolution and 69% of the ordinary share capital of GTECH outstanding, including those shares voted by De Agostini S.p.A. and DeA Partecipazioni S.p.A., which as of November 4, 2014, owned collectively approximately 59% of the authorized and issued GTECH ordinary shares and had agreed to vote in favor of the merger plan regarding the Holdco Merger.
Your proxy is being solicited by the board of directors of IGT. After careful consideration, the IGT board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and determined that the entry into the Merger Agreement and the IGT Merger is fair and in the best interests of IGT. The IGT board of directors recommends unanimously that you vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger. In considering the recommendation of the IGT board of directors, you should be aware that directors and executive officers of IGT have interests in the proposed transaction that are in addition to, or different from, any interests they might have as shareholders. See "The MergersInterests of Certain Persons in the Mergers" beginning on page 126.
Your vote is very important. Please vote as soon as possible whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting by following the instructions in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. A failure to vote, failure to instruct a bank, broker or nominee or abstention from voting will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
On behalf of the IGT board of directors, thank you for your consideration and continued support.
|
Very truly yours, | |
|
Philip G. Satre |
|
|
International Game Technology |
None of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa ("CONSOB") nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved any of the transactions described in this proxy statement/prospectus or the securities to be issued under this document or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any securities, or a solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. For the avoidance of doubt, this proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities in Italy or in the U.K. or any other state in the European Economic Area or a solicitation of a proxy under the laws of Italy or England and Wales, and it is not intended to be, and is not, a prospectus or an offer document for the purposes of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority's Prospectus Rules or Listing Rules or within the meaning of Italian law and the rules of CONSOB.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated January 2, 2015 and is first being mailed to IGT shareholders on or about January 7, 2015.
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
6355 South Buffalo Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On February 10, 2015
A special meeting of shareholders of International Game Technology, a Nevada corporation ("IGT"), will be held on February 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. local time at Signature Tower 3, Meeting Room D at The Signature at MGM Grand, 145 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the following purposes:
IGT will transact no other business at the special meeting except such business as may properly be brought before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Please refer to the proxy statement/prospectus of which this notice forms a part for further information with respect to the business to be transacted at the special meeting.
The IGT board of directors unanimously determined that the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the "Merger Agreement") and the other transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests of IGT and approved the Merger Agreement. The IGT board of directors unanimously recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement and "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger (as defined herein).
The IGT board of directors has fixed the close of business on January 2, 2015 as the record date for determination of IGT shareholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only holders of record of common stock, par value $0.00015625 per share, of IGT ("IGT common stock") at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting. Approval of the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting.
Your vote is very important. A failure to vote in person, grant a proxy for your shares, or instruct a bank, broker or nominee how to vote at the special meeting will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. Whether or not you expect to attend the special meeting in person, we urge you to submit a proxy to vote your shares as promptly as possible by either: (1) logging onto www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on your proxy card;
(2) dialing the phone number included in your shareholder materials and listening for further directions; or (3) signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided, so that your shares may be represented and voted at the special meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished by the plan administrator, or record holder, as appropriate.
The enclosed proxy statement/prospectus provides a detailed description of the Mergers and the Merger Agreement. We urge you to read this proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents incorporated by reference, and the Annexes carefully and in their entirety. If you have any questions concerning the Mergers or this proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of IGT common stock, please contact IGT's proxy solicitor using the contact instructions on the enclosed proxy card.
By Order of the Board of Directors of International Game Technology, |
||
Paul C. Gracey, Jr. General Counsel and Secretary |
Las
Vegas, Nevada
January 2, 2015
THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS INCORPORATES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about International Game Technology ("IGT") from documents that IGT has filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), but that have not been included in this proxy statement/prospectus. Please see "Where You Can Find More Information" and "Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference" on pages 407 and 408, respectively, for more details.
You can obtain any of the documents filed with or furnished to the SEC by IGT at no cost from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. You may also request copies of these documents, including documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, at no cost by contacting IGT.
IGT will provide you with copies of the documents it has filed with the SEC relating to IGT, without charge, upon written request to:
International Game Technology
Attn: Investor Relations
6355 South Buffalo Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
In addition, if you have questions about the Mergers or the special meeting, need additional copies of this document or need to obtain proxy cards or other information related to the proxy solicitations, you may contact MacKenzie Partners, Inc. ("MacKenzie"), at the following address and telephone number:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call Collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll-Free (800) 322-2885
In order for IGT shareholders to receive timely delivery of the documents in advance of the special meeting, IGT shareholders must request the documents no later than February 3, 2015.
i
ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This document constitutes a prospectus of Holdco under Section 5 of the Securities Act with respect to the Holdco ordinary shares to be issued to IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the "Merger Agreement" among IGT, GTECH S.p.A., a joint stock company organized under the laws of Italy ("GTECH"), GTECH Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Gold US Sub")), Georgia Worldwide PLC, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales ("Holdco"), and Georgia Worldwide Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Sub") and to GTECH shareholders in the Holdco Merger. This document is also a notice of meeting and a proxy statement under Nevada law with respect to the special meeting at which IGT shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement (as defined in this proxy statement/prospectus) and certain related proposals.
No person has been authorized to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement/prospectus, and, if given or made by any person, such information must not be relied upon as having been authorized. This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful. The distribution or possession of the proxy statement/prospectus in or from certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. You should inform yourself about and observe any such restrictions, and none of either IGT, GTECH nor Holdco accepts any liability in relation to any such restrictions.
Neither the distribution of this proxy statement/prospectus nor the issuance by Holdco of Holdco ordinary shares in connection with the Mergers shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of IGT, GTECH or Holdco since the date of this proxy statement/prospectus or that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is correct as of any time subsequent to its date.
Information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding IGT has been provided by IGT and information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding GTECH, Holdco, GTECH Corporation and Sub has been provided by GTECH.
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
The following questions and answers are intended to address briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the Mergers and the special meeting. These questions and answers only highlight some of the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the Annexes and the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, to understand fully the proposed Mergers and the voting procedures for the special meeting. See "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 407.
In the course of reaching their decisions to adopt the Merger Agreement, each of the board of directors of IGT (the "IGT Board") and the board of directors of GTECH (the "GTECH Board") considered a number of important factors in their separate deliberations. For more details on these factors, see "The MergersReasons for the Merger and Recommendation of the IGT Board" and "The MergersGTECH Reasons for the Mergers."
1
Agreement. This document contains important information about the Mergers and the special meeting, and you should read it carefully.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the IGT Merger (the "IGT Merger Effective Time"), each issued and outstanding share of IGT common stock, other than shares owned by IGT, Holdco, Sub, GTECH, GTECH US or any of their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive a combination of (i) $13.69 in cash (together with any additional cash described in clause (iii) below, the "Per Share Cash Amount"), (ii) a number of Holdco ordinary shares determined by dividing $4.56 by the average of the volume-weighted average prices of GTECH ordinary shares on the Borsa Italiana (the "Italian Stock Exchange" or "ISE") (converted to the U.S. dollar equivalent) on ten randomly selected days within the period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second full trading day prior to the IGT Merger Effective Time (such average, the "GTECH Share Trading Price"), subject to a minimum of 0.1582 Holdco ordinary shares and a maximum of 0.1819 Holdco ordinary shares (the "Exchange Ratio"), provided that (iii) if the Exchange Ratio would, but for the cap described in clause (ii), exceed 0.1819, the Per Share Cash Amount will be increased by an additional amount in cash equal to the product of such excess number of shares (up to a maximum of 0.0321) and the GTECH Share Trading Price.
Moreover, as is described in more detail below and in "The Holdco Shares, Articles of Association and Terms and Conditions of the Special Voting SharesLoyalty Plan," Holdco shareholders who maintain their ownership of Holdco ordinary shares for a continuous period of three years will be entitled, upon election, to direct the exercise of voting rights in an equal number of special voting shares ("special voting shares"), subject to the conditions and restrictions described in the Articles of Association of Holdco to be adopted at Closing (the "Holdco Articles"). Each special voting share carries the right to 0.9995 votes. At the closing of the Mergers (the "Closing"), Holdco will issue a number of special voting shares equal to the number of Holdco ordinary shares issued and outstanding immediately following the Closing to a nominee to be appointed by Holdco (the "Nominee"), which Nominee will hold the special voting shares in accordance with the Holdco Articles.
2
Holdco has established the special voting share structure (the "loyalty voting structure") to reward long-term ownership of Holdco ordinary shares and promote stability of the Holdco shareholder base by granting eligible long-term Holdco shareholders the equivalent of 1.9995 votes for each Holdco ordinary share that they hold. The special voting shares do not have any material economic entitlements. Investors should view the special voting shares as a mere additional voting attribute of the qualifying ordinary shares.
3
performance measures achieved or deemed achieved as of the IGT Merger Effective Time), and (ii) the Cash Amount. IGT restricted stock unit awards granted between July 1, 2013 and July 15, 2014 (other than grants to non-employee directors or to employees who will become retirement-eligible prior to the final year of the award cycle) as well as certain awards granted after July 15, 2014 will be converted into a time-vested award with respect to Holdco ordinary shares, based on the Exchange Ratio and the performance measures achieved or deemed achieved as of the IGT Merger Effective Time, and vest on the earlier of (x) the date such award would have otherwise vested pursuant to the original terms of the award agreement and (y) the first anniversary of the Closing, subject to the employee's continued employment through the applicable vesting date (or upon a qualifying termination of employment prior to that date).
The IGT Board was aware of these potentially differing interests of IGT executive officers and directors and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and to recommend that IGT shareholders vote in favor of the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
For further information with respect to arrangements between IGT and its named executive officers, see the information included under "Proposal 3Advisory Vote on Merger-Related Compensation for IGT's Named Executive OfficersGolden Parachute Compensation" beginning on page 186 and under "The MergersInterests of Certain Persons in the Mergers" beginning on page 126.
4
U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors in respect of the receipt, ownership and loss of the entitlement to instruct the Nominee on how to vote in respect of special voting shares.
5
be required to pay a termination fee to the other party as described in "The Merger AgreementExpenses and Termination Fees."
In addition, the parties have agreed that receipt of gaming approvals from 22 jurisdictions is a condition to closing of the Mergers. As of December 23, 2014, applications for approval have been filed in all 22 jurisdictions and 12 approvals already have been granted. In addition, the required approvals from the Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli have been obtained. In addition to the jurisdictions identified by the parties as conditions to the Mergers, either IGT or GTECH may make further filings with gaming regulators in various jurisdictions as may be required by applicable law, but the expiration of any waiting periods, or receipt of any required approvals, in connection with such filings will not be conditions to the completion of the Mergers. GTECH may under certain circumstances waive the condition relating to any such required gaming approval on behalf of both GTECH and IGT if completion of the Mergers in the absence of such required gaming approvals would not constitute a violation of applicable law on the written advice of outside counsel reasonably satisfactory to IGT and GTECH.
For further details on regulatory approvals see "The Merger AgreementRegulatory Approvals" beginning at page 181.
6
particular, GTECH not having terminated the Merger Agreement following the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders representing more than 20% of the ordinary shares issued by GTECH at the date of signing the Merger Agreement. Rescission rights were validly exercised with respect to 19,796,852 GTECH ordinary shares during the withdrawal period, which ended on November 27, 2014. The shares for which rescission rights were exercised represent only 11.3% of GTECH's fully paid-up share capital as of the record date and 11.4% of GTECH's shares outstanding as of July 15, 2014.
For a more complete summary of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived (if permitted) prior to completion of the Mergers, see "The Merger AgreementConditions to the Mergers" beginning on page 175.
Tax matters can be complicated, and the tax consequences of the Mergers to you will depend on your particular circumstances. You should consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the Mergers to you.
GTECH shareholders are entitled to cash exit rights ("rescission rights") because Holdco is and will be a holding company and, as a result of the Holdco Merger, the registered office of Holdco will be outside of Italy, GTECH ordinary shares will be delisted from the ISE, and the company resulting from the Holdco Merger, Holdco, will be governed by the laws of a country other than Italy. Rescission rights may be exercised only by GTECH shareholders who do not concur in the approval of the extraordinary general meeting's resolution. The exercise of such rescission rights will be effective subject to the Holdco Merger becoming effective. A GTECH shareholder who has voted in favor of the Holdco Merger may not exercise any rescission right in relation to those shares that the relevant shareholder voted in favor of the Holdco Merger. A GTECH shareholder that properly exercises rescission rights will be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to the average closing price per GTECH ordinary share for the six-month period prior to the publication of the notice of call of the extraordinary general meeting, which is equal to €19.174.
7
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if GTECH shareholders exercise rescission rights under Italian law in respect of more than 20% of the GTECH ordinary shares issued and outstanding as of the date of the Merger Agreement, GTECH will be entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement upon payment of a termination fee to IGT as described in "The Merger AgreementExpenses and Termination Fees." Rescission rights were validly exercised with respect to 19,796,852 GTECH ordinary shares during the withdrawal period, which ended on November 27, 2014. The shares for which rescission rights were exercised represent only 11.3% of GTECH's fully paid-up share capital as of the record date and 11.4% of GTECH's shares outstanding as of July 15, 2014.
8
the Merger Agreement. The IGT Board unanimously recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
The IGT Board recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
The IGT Board recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
9
proposal to adjourn the special meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting may be approved and the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the voting power represented at the special meeting in person or by proxy. In that case, broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, although failure to vote and abstentions will have the same effect as votes "AGAINST" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting.
If you are the shareholder of record with respect to your shares of IGT common stock, you may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy.
IGT provides Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares of IGT common stock on-line, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares of IGT common stock registered in the name of your broker, bank, dealer or other similar organization, and you wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock. If you do not wish to vote in person or you will not be attending the special meeting, you should have received a proxy card and voting instructions with this proxy statement/prospectus from that organization. Please follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, dealer or other similar organization to ensure that your vote is counted.
10
then the proxy holders will vote your shares of IGT common stock in the manner recommended by the IGT Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement/prospectus and, therefore, "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting and "FOR" the non-binding proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: If you are a beneficial owner of shares of IGT common stock held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock with specific instructions, under the rules of the NYSE, the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock may generally vote on routine matters but cannot vote on non-routine matters. If the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares of IGT common stock on a non-routine matter, such as the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock will inform the inspector of elections for the special meeting that it does not have the authority to vote on this matter with respect to your shares of IGT common stock. This is generally referred to as a "broker non-vote." When the inspector of elections for the special meeting tabulates the votes for any particular matter, broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but will not otherwise be counted. In connection with the special meeting, broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting or the non-binding proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger. You should therefore provide voting instructions to the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock by carefully following the instructions provided in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Shareholder of Record: If you are an IGT shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote in any one of the following ways:
The most current proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy the inspector of elections for the special meeting receives is the one that is counted.
Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: If you are a beneficial owner of shares of IGT common stock held in street name, you will need to follow the instructions included on the proxy form provided to you by your broker regarding how to change your vote.
11
12
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call Collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll-Free (800) 322-2885
You also are urged to consult your own legal, tax and/or financial advisors with respect to any aspect of the Mergers, the Merger Agreement or other matters discussed in this proxy statement/prospectus.
13
This proxy statement/prospectus includes the consolidated financial statements of GTECH at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IFRS"). These consolidated financial statements are referred to collectively as the "Annual Consolidated Financial Statements."
This proxy statement/prospectus also includes the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of GTECH for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. These interim consolidated financial statements are referred to as the "Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements." The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods.
The GTECH financial information is presented in Euro.
The financial information of IGT is reported pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and is presented in U.S. dollars.
Financial information of IGT included in this proxy statement/prospectus has been derived from the following:
IGT reports the fiscal year on a 52/53-week period that ends on the Saturday nearest to September 30. For simplicity, IGT presents all fiscal years using the calendar month end. Therefore, all year ended information is referred to as September 30, whilst the quarter end information is referred to as December 31, March 31 or June 30 as appropriate.
The actual period ends for the periods presented in the financial statements referred to above are as follows:
Fiscal period
|
Presented as | Actual period end | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year end 2014 |
September 30, 2014 | September 27, 2014 | |||||
Year end 2013 |
September 30, 2013 | September 28, 2013 | |||||
Year end 2012 |
September 30, 2012 | September 29, 2012 | |||||
Nine months ended June 2014 |
June 30, 2014 | June 28, 2014 | |||||
Nine months ended June 2013 |
June 30, 2013 | June 29, 2013 |
Certain totals in the tables included in this proxy statement/prospectus may not add up due to rounding.
14
The following summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information that may be important to you. Accordingly, holders of International Game Technology ("IGT") common shares ("IGT shareholders") and GTECH S.p.A. ("GTECH") ordinary shares ("GTECH shareholders") are encouraged to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, its Annexes and the documents referred to or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. Each item in this summary includes a page reference directing you to a more complete description of that item. Please see "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 407.
Information about the Companies (see page 83)
International Game Technology is a global gaming company specializing in the design, development, manufacture, and marketing of casino-style gaming equipment, systems technology, and game content across multiple platformsland-based, online real-money and social gaming. IGT is a leading supplier of gaming entertainment products worldwide and provides a diverse offering of quality products and services at competitive prices, designed to enhance the gaming player experience.
International Game Technology was incorporated in Nevada in December 1980 to facilitate its initial public offering in 1981. Principally serving the U.S. gaming markets when founded, IGT expanded into jurisdictions outside the U.S. beginning in 1986.
The principal executive offices of IGT are located at 6355 South Buffalo Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 and its telephone number at that address is (702) 669-7777.
GTECH S.p.A. is a corporation (società per azioni) incorporated under the laws of Italy. The predecessor of GTECH was founded in 1990 as a consortium organized under the laws of Italy and later converted into a corporation. GTECH is one of the leading gaming operators in the world based on total wagers and, through its subsidiaries, including GTECH Corporation, is a leading B2B provider of lottery and gaming technology solutions and services worldwide. GTECH's goal is to be the leading commercial operator and provider of technology in the regulated worldwide gaming markets by delivering market leading products and services with a steadfast commitment to integrity, responsibility and growth. GTECH is listed on the ISE under the trading symbol "GTK" and has a Sponsored Level 1 American Depositary Receipt program listed on the United States over the counter market under the trading symbol "GTKYY". GTECH provides business-to-consumer and business-to-business products and services to customers in approximately 100 countries worldwide on six continents and had 8,668 employees at September 30, 2014.
The principal executive offices of GTECH S.p.A. are located at Viale del Campo Boario 56/D, 00154 Roma, Italy and its telephone number at that address is +39 06 51 899 1.
GTECH Corporation is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of GTECH S.p.A.
The principal executive offices of GTECH Corporation are located at 10 Memorial Boulevard, Providence, RI 02903 and its telephone number at that address is (401) 392-1000.
Georgia Worldwide PLC ("Holdco") is a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales. Holdco was incorporated on July 11, 2014 for the purpose of effecting the Mergers
15
(as defined below) as a private limited liability company under the legal name Georgia Worldwide Limited. On September 16, 2014, Holdco was re-registered as a public limited company under the legal name Georgia Worldwide PLC. Holdco has not conducted any business operations other than that incidental to its formation and in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Holdco does not beneficially own any shares of IGT common stock. Following the Mergers, it is expected that Holdco ordinary shares will be listed on the NYSE.
The principal executive offices of Georgia Worldwide PLC are located at 11 Old Jewry, 6th Floor, London, EC2R 8DU, United Kingdom and its telephone number at that address is +44 (0) 203 131 0300. Georgia Worldwide PLC's registered agent is Elian Corporate Services (UK) Limited (formerly Ogier Corporate Services (UK) Ltd.), 11 Old Jewry, 6th Floor, London, EC2R 8DU and its telephone number is +44 207 160 5000.
Georgia Worldwide Corporation ("Sub") a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco, was incorporated on July 11, 2014 under the laws of the State of Nevada. Sub is a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco that was formed solely for the purpose of effecting the IGT Merger (as defined below). Sub has not conducted any business operations other than that incidental to its formation and in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Sub does not beneficially own any shares of IGT common stock.
The principal executive offices of Sub are located at 10 Memorial Boulevard, Providence, RI 02903 and its telephone number is (401) 392-1000.
The Agreement and Plan of Merger (see page 156)
A copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the "Merger Agreement") is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus. GTECH and IGT encourage you to read the entire Merger Agreement carefully because it is the principal document governing the Mergers. For more information on the Merger Agreement, see the section entitled "The Merger Agreement" beginning on page 156.
Structure of the Transaction (see page 156)
The transaction will take place in two steps. First, GTECH will merge with and into Holdco in a cross-border merger (the "Holdco Merger") pursuant to which, following the effective time of the Holdco Merger (the "Holdco Merger Effective Time"), the independent existence of GTECH will cease, with Holdco surviving as the continuing entity. Immediately following the Holdco Merger Effective Time, Sub will merge with and into IGT in a reverse subsidiary merger, with IGT surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco (the "IGT Merger" and, together with the Holdco Merger, the "Mergers").
16
The following diagrams illustrate in simplified terms the current structure of GTECH and IGT and the expected structure of Holdco following the completion of the combination and certain reorganization transactions.
17
Merger Consideration (see page 157)
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the Holdco Merger Effective Time, each GTECH ordinary share, other than GTECH ordinary shares owned by Holdco, Sub, GTECH, GTECH Corporation ("GTECH US"), IGT or any of their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive one Holdco ordinary share.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at effective time of the IGT Merger (the "IGT Merger Effective Time"), each issued and outstanding share of IGT common stock, other than shares owned by Holdco, Sub, GTECH, GTECH US, IGT or any of their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive a combination of (i) the "Per Share Cash Amount," which is $13.69 in cash (together with any additional cash described in clause (iii) below) and (ii) the "Exchange Ratio," which is equal to a number of ordinary shares, nominal value $0.10 per share of Holdco (the "Holdco ordinary shares") determined by dividing $4.56 by the GTECH Share Trading Price, subject to a minimum of 0.1582 Holdco ordinary shares and a maximum of 0.1819 Holdco ordinary shares, provided that (iii) if the Exchange Ratio would, but for the cap described in clause (ii), exceed 0.1819, the Per Share Cash Amount will be increased by an additional amount in cash equal to the product of such excess number of shares (up to a maximum of 0.0321) and the GTECH Share Trading Price. The "GTECH Share Trading Price" is equal to the average of the volume-weighted average prices of ordinary shares, par value €1.00 of GTECH (the "GTECH ordinary shares") on the ISE (converted to the U.S. dollar equivalent) on ten randomly selected days within the period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second full trading day prior to the IGT Merger Effective Time.
Based on the number of GTECH ordinary shares and shares of IGT common stock outstanding on the record date, and the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders representing 11.3% of GTECH's fully paid-up share capital as of the record date, it is anticipated that former IGT shareholders will own approximately 22.8% and former GTECH shareholders will own approximately 77.2% of the issued and outstanding Holdco ordinary shares immediately after completion of the Mergers. De Agostini, the largest shareholder of GTECH, is expected to own 51.8% of the issued and outstanding Holdco ordinary shares immediately after completion of the Mergers. It is currently estimated that (i) Holdco will issue or reserve for issuance approximately 153 million Holdco ordinary shares for the Holdco Merger and approximately 45 million Holdco ordinary shares for the IGT Merger and (ii) that the aggregate cash portion of the consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders will be approximately $3.5 billion.
In lieu of fractional shares, each IGT shareholder otherwise entitled to a fractional Holdco ordinary share will be entitled to receive an amount in cash (without interest), rounded down to the nearest cent, determined by multiplying (i) the GTECH Share Trading Price by (ii) the fractional entitlement.
Treatment of GTECH Equity Awards (see page 158)
Stock Options. At the Holdco Merger Effective Time, each stock option to acquire GTECH ordinary shares based on the value thereof granted under any GTECH stock plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the Holdco Merger Effective Time will be converted into an option, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the GTECH stock option prior to the Holdco Merger based on that number of Holdco ordinary shares equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the number of GTECH ordinary shares subject to GTECH stock option or stock appreciation right immediately prior to the Holdco Merger Effective Time by (ii) the Holdco Exchange Ratio, at an exercise price per share equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the per share exercise price specified in the stock option immediately prior to the Holdco Merger Effective Time by (B) the Holdco Exchange Ratio.
18
Restricted Stock Awards. At the Holdco Merger Effective Time, each GTECH ordinary share subject to vesting or other lapse restrictions pursuant to the GTECH stock plan immediately prior to the Holdco Merger Effective Time will be converted into the right to receive a number of Holdco ordinary shares equal to the Holdco Exchange Ratio, subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the GTECH restricted share award prior to the Holdco Merger.
Treatment of IGT Equity Awards (see page 159)
Stock Options. At the IGT Merger Effective Time, each outstanding unvested IGT stock option will fully vest and each outstanding IGT stock option will be cancelled in exchange for a cash payment equal to the product of (i) the total number of shares subject to such stock option and (ii) the excess, if any, of the Cash Amount over the exercise price per share of such stock option. Any IGT stock option that has a per-share exercise price that is greater than the Cash Amount will be cancelled for no consideration. The "Cash Amount" is equal to the sum of (a) the Per Share Cash Amount and (b) the product of the Exchange Ratio and the GTECH Share Trading Price.
Restricted Stock Units. At the IGT Merger Effective Time, except as noted below, each outstanding award of IGT restricted stock units (including performance-based restricted stock units) will fully vest and be cancelled in exchange for an amount equal to the product of (i) the number of shares subject to such award (which, in the case of performance-based restricted stock units, will be based on performance measures achieved or deemed achieved as of the IGT Merger Effective Time), and (ii) the Cash Amount. IGT restricted stock unit awards granted between July 1, 2013 and July 15, 2014 (other than grants to non-employee directors or to employees who will become retirement-eligible prior to the final year of the award cycle) as well as certain awards granted after July 15, 2014 will be converted into a time vested award with respect to Holdco ordinary shares, based on the Exchange Ratio and the performance measures achieved or deemed achieved as of the IGT Merger Effective Time, and vest on the earlier of (x) the date such award would have otherwise vested pursuant to the original terms of the award agreement and (y) the first anniversary of the Closing, subject to the employee's continued employment through the applicable vesting date (or upon a qualifying termination of employment prior to that date).
GTECH Reasons for the Mergers (see page 98)
At its meeting on July 13, 2014, the board of directors of GTECH (the "GTECH Board") unanimously authorized GTECH's entry into the Merger Agreement and concluded that, taking into account the then-current circumstances, the Mergers are fair to the shareholders of GTECH from a financial point of view.
The GTECH Board considered many factors in reaching the conclusion that, taking into account the then-current circumstances, the Mergers are fair to the shareholders of GTECH from a financial point of view. In arriving at its conclusion, the GTECH Board consulted with GTECH's management, legal advisors and its financial advisor, reviewed a significant amount of information, considered a number of factors in its deliberations and concluded that the transaction is likely to result in significant strategic and financial benefits to GTECH and its shareholders. For a more complete discussion of these factors, see "The MergersGTECH Reasons for the Mergers," beginning on page 98.
Opinion of Credit Suisse as Financial Advisor to GTECH (see page 101)
In connection with the Mergers, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited ("Credit Suisse"), GTECH's financial advisor, delivered to the GTECH Board on July 13, 2014, its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing on July 15, 2014, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, to the holders of GTECH's ordinary shares of the exchange of one Holdco ordinary share per GTECH ordinary share (the "Holdco Exchange Ratio") as provided by
19
the Merger Agreement in connection with the Holdco Merger and after giving effect to the aggregate merger consideration to be delivered to IGT shareholders in connection with the IGT Merger.
The full text of Credit Suisse's written opinion dated July 15, 2014, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex G to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. The shareholders of GTECH are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. Credit Suisse's written opinion is addressed to the GTECH Board, is directed only to the Holdco Exchange Ratio and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of GTECH as to how such shareholder should vote or act with respect to the Mergers or any other matter.
On October 1, 2014, in accordance with Italian market practice and to assist the GTECH board of directors with its approval of the merger plan regarding the Holdco Merger, Credit Suisse delivered to the GTECH board of directors a "bring-down" written opinion stating that, on the basis of the same criteria upon which the initial written opinion, dated July 15, 2014, was given, and on the basis of the same premises, qualifications and assumptions set out therein, as of October 1, 2014, nothing had come to Credit Suisse's attention which would cause it to alter its opinion that the Holdco Exchange Ratio, after giving effect to the aggregate merger consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger, was fair, from a financial point of view, to GTECH shareholders. A copy of Credit Suisse's "bring-down" opinion is attached hereto as Annex H.
For a description of the opinions that GTECH received from Credit Suisse, see "The MergersOpinion of Credit Suisse as Financial Advisor to GTECH" beginning on page 101 of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Reasons for the Mergers and Recommendation of the IGT Board (see page 111)
At its meeting held on July 15, 2014, the board of directors of IGT (the "IGT Board") unanimously (i) approved the Merger Agreement, (ii) determined that the Merger Agreement, the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are in the best interests of IGT, (iii) directed that the Merger Agreement be submitted to the IGT shareholders for approval at the special meeting, and (iv) determined to recommend that the IGT shareholders vote in favor of the approval of the Merger Agreement.
In adopting the Merger Agreement, the IGT Board considered a variety of factors in favor of the Mergers, which are discussed in further detail in "The MergersReasons for the Mergers and Recommendation of the IGT Board" on page 111.
The IGT Board unanimously recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, "FOR" the proposal to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if it is necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement and "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
Opinion of Morgan Stanley as Financial Advisor to IGT (see page 114)
At a meeting of the IGT Board on July 15, 2014, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC ("Morgan Stanley"), rendered to the IGT Board its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing on the same date, to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Morgan Stanley as set forth in its written opinion, the merger consideration to be received by the holders of shares of IGT common stock, taken in the aggregate, pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. On September 15, 2014, at a meeting of the IGT Board, Morgan Stanley delivered an oral confirmation to the IGT Board
20
confirming that, based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions described, had Morgan Stanley issued its written opinion referred to above on July 15, 2014 on the basis of the transactions contemplated by the current Merger Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, the conclusion set forth in its opinion would not have changed, which oral confirmation was subsequently confirmed in writing. The confirmatory letter did not address any circumstances, developments or events occurring after July 15, 2014, other than the execution of the Amendment, and Morgan Stanley's opinion is provided only as of such date.
The full text of Morgan Stanley's written fairness opinion to the IGT Board, dated as of July 15, 2014, and the confirmatory letter of Morgan Stanley, dated as of September 15, 2014, are attached hereto as Annex E and Annex F, respectively, and are incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. The foregoing summary of Morgan Stanley's opinion and confirmatory letter is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion and confirmatory letter. The opinion and confirmatory letter set forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Morgan Stanley in rendering such opinion and such confirmatory letter. You are urged to, and should, read Morgan Stanley's opinion and confirmatory letter and the summary of Morgan Stanley's opinion contained in this proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in their entirety. Morgan Stanley's opinion and confirmatory letter were for the benefit of the IGT Board, in its capacity as such, in connection with the IGT Board's consideration of the Mergers. Morgan Stanley's opinion addressed only the fairness from a financial point of view of the merger consideration, taken in the aggregate, to be received by the holders of shares of IGT common stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement, as of the date of the opinion and did not address any other aspects or implications of the Mergers. Morgan Stanley's opinion and confirmatory letter express no opinion or recommendation as to the underlying decision of IGT to engage in the proposed Mergers and were not intended to, and do not, constitute advice or a recommendation as to how any shareholder of IGT or GTECH should vote at any shareholders' meeting held in connection with the proposed Mergers or take any other action with respect to the Mergers. Morgan Stanley's opinion and confirmatory letter do not in any manner address the prices at which the Holdco ordinary shares will trade following completion of the Mergers or any time in the future.
For a description of the opinion and confirmatory letter that IGT received from Morgan Stanley, see "The MergersOpinion of Morgan Stanley as Financial Advisor to IGT" beginning page 114 of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Comparative Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information
The following table sets forth the closing market price per share of IGT common stock and GTECH ordinary shares in U.S. dollar or Euro, as the case may be, as reported on the NYSE for IGT shares or the ISE for GTECH ordinary shares. The table also sets forth the implied value of the merger consideration of Holdco ordinary shares per share of IGT common stock on each of the following dates, including the effect of the collar. In each case, the prices are given:
You are urged to obtain current market quotations for GTECH ordinary shares and IGT shares before making your decision with respect to the approval of the Merger Agreement. GTECH shares are listed on the Borsa Italiana (the "Italian Stock Exchange" or "ISE") under the symbol "GTK." IGT shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the symbol "IGT."
21
The market price per share of GTECH ordinary shares and IGT shares could change significantly and may not be indicative of the value of Holdco ordinary shares once they start trading.
|
GTECH ISE Trading |
IGT NYSE Trading |
Equivalent Value for Holdco Ordinary Shares |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 16, 2014 |
€ | 19.18 | $ | 15.64 | $ | 18.25 | ||||
July 15, 2014 |
€ | 18.44 | $ | 15.50 | $ | 18.25 | ||||
December 31, 2014 |
€ | 18.49 | $ | 17.25 | $ | 18.25 |
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices of GTECH ordinary shares and IGT shares.
|
GTECH ISE Trading |
IGT NYSE Trading |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference Date
|
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||
Year |
|||||||||||||
2014 |
€ | 23.98 | € | 15.43 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 12.22 | |||||
2013 |
€ | 23.23 | € | 17.59 | $ | 21.11 | $ | 14.60 | |||||
2012 |
€ | 17.94 | € | 11.28 | $ | 17.78 | $ | 11.10 | |||||
2011 |
€ | 15.14 | € | 8.75 | $ | 18.95 | $ | 13.54 | |||||
2010 |
€ | 14.50 | € | 8.99 | $ | 21.72 | $ | 13.82 | |||||
2009 |
€ | 17.64 | € | 11.59 | $ | 23.05 | $ | 7.12 |
|
GTECH ISE Trading |
IGT NYSE Trading |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference Date
|
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||
Quarter |
|||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter 2014 |
€ | 18.89 | € | 17.17 | $ | 17.27 | $ | 16.00 | |||||
Third Quarter 2014 |
€ | 19.21 | € | 15.43 | $ | 17.37 | $ | 15.11 | |||||
Second Quarter 2014 |
€ | 22.46 | € | 17.85 | $ | 16.13 | $ | 12.22 | |||||
First Quarter 2014 |
€ | 23.98 | € | 22.01 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 13.57 | |||||
Fourth Quarter 2013 |
€ | 23.23 | € | 20.74 | $ | 19.81 | $ | 16.43 | |||||
Third Quarter 2013 |
€ | 22.80 | € | 19.00 | $ | 21.11 | $ | 16.57 | |||||
Second Quarter 2013 |
€ | 21.64 | € | 18.09 | $ | 18.81 | $ | 15.83 | |||||
First Quarter 2013 |
€ | 19.24 | € | 17.59 | $ | 17.31 | $ | 14.60 | |||||
Fourth Quarter 2012 |
€ | 17.94 | € | 15.99 | $ | 14.68 | $ | 12.57 | |||||
Third Quarter 2012 |
€ | 17.55 | € | 15.03 | $ | 16.00 | $ | 11.10 |
|
GTECH ISE Trading |
IGT NYSE Trading |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference Date
|
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||
Month |
|||||||||||||
December 2014 |
€ | 18.50 | € | 17.17 | $ | 17.27 | $ | 16.86 | |||||
November 2014 |
€ | 18.89 | € | 17.78 | $ | 17.19 | $ | 16.16 | |||||
October 2014 |
€ | 18.65 | € | 18.18 | $ | 17.07 | $ | 16.00 | |||||
September 2014 |
€ | 18.81 | € | 17.89 | $ | 16.97 | $ | 16.27 | |||||
August 2014 |
€ | 18.20 | € | 15.43 | $ | 16.86 | $ | 16.29 | |||||
July 2014 |
€ | 19.21 | € | 18.00 | $ | 17.37 | $ | 15.11 | |||||
June 2014 |
€ | 20.25 | € | 17.85 | $ | 16.13 | $ | 12.46 | |||||
May 2014 |
€ | 21.71 | € | 19.39 | $ | 12.73 | $ | 12.22 | |||||
April 2014 |
€ | 22.46 | € | 20.74 | $ | 14.07 | $ | 12.25 | |||||
March 2014 |
€ | 23.98 | € | 22.01 | $ | 15.85 | $ | 13.57 | |||||
February 2014 |
€ | 23.96 | € | 22.12 | $ | 15.09 | $ | 14.12 | |||||
January 2014 |
€ | 23.26 | € | 22.09 | $ | 18.14 | $ | 14.43 |
22
As of December 31, 2014 (the latest practicable trading date prior to the date of this proxy statement/prospectus), the exchange rate U.S. dollars per Euro was 1.2101. The following table shows for the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2014, the low, high, average and period end exchange rate U.S. dollars per Euro.
Reference Date
|
Low | High | Average | Period End | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year |
|||||||||||||
2014 |
1.2101 | 1.3933 | 1.3286 | 1.2101 | |||||||||
2013 |
1.2781 | 1.3815 | 1.3281 | 1.3780 | |||||||||
2012 |
1.2085 | 1.3463 | 1.2853 | 1.3184 | |||||||||
2011 |
1.2915 | 1.4892 | 1.3923 | 1.2982 | |||||||||
2010 |
1.1930 | 1.4547 | 1.3260 | 1.3416 | |||||||||
2009 |
1.2531 | 1.5094 | 1.3943 | 1.4348 |
Reference Date
|
Low | High | Average | Period End | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month |
|||||||||||||
December 2014 |
1.2101 | 1.2510 | 1.2319 | 1.2101 | |||||||||
November 2014 |
1.2413 | 1.2572 | 1.2479 | 1.2467 | |||||||||
October 2014 |
1.2512 | 1.2781 | 1.2674 | 1.2529 | |||||||||
September 2014 |
1.2633 | 1.3138 | 1.2901 | 1.2633 | |||||||||
August 2014 |
1.3172 | 1.3429 | 1.3318 | 1.3172 | |||||||||
July 2014 |
1.3379 | 1.3680 | 1.3535 | 1.3380 | |||||||||
June 2014 |
1.3529 | 1.3692 | 1.3595 | 1.3692 | |||||||||
May 2014 |
1.3598 | 1.3933 | 1.3735 | 1.3646 | |||||||||
April 2014 |
1.3694 | 1.3888 | 1.3809 | 1.3866 | |||||||||
March 2014 |
1.3740 | 1.3928 | 1.3828 | 1.3783 | |||||||||
February 2014 |
1.3511 | 1.3812 | 1.3666 | 1.3812 | |||||||||
January 2014 |
1.3486 | 1.3688 | 1.3616 | 1.3486 |
The rates presented above may differ from the actual rates used in the preparation of Holdco's financial statements and other financial information appearing in this document. Holdco's inclusion of such rates is not meant to suggest that the U.S. dollar amounts actually represent Euro amounts or that such amounts could have been converted to U.S. dollars at any particular rate.
GTECH has been paying regular annual dividends and on May 8, 2014, declared a dividend of €130.5 million, which was paid on May 22, 2014 to the shareholders of record as of May 19, 2014. IGT has been paying regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per share since January 3, 2014. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, during the period before the closing of the Mergers (the "Closing"), IGT is prohibited from paying any dividends other than (i) IGT's ordinary course quarterly dividend to holders of IGT shares in a per share amount no greater than IGT's most recently declared quarterly dividend ($0.11), with record and payment dates in accordance with IGT's customary dividend schedule, (ii) dividends paid by a wholly owned subsidiary of IGT to IGT or another wholly owned subsidiary of IGT and (iii) the special dividend, if any. Similarly, during the period before the closing of the Mergers, GTECH is prohibited from paying any dividends other than (a) GTECH's ordinary course dividends to holders of GTECH ordinary shares in a per share amount no greater than GTECH's most recently declared dividend, with record and payment dates in accordance with GTECH's customary dividend schedule and (b) dividends paid by a wholly owned subsidiary to GTECH or another wholly owned subsidiary.
23
On December 17, 2014, GTECH and IGT agreed that (i) GTECH may declare and pay a €0.75 per share interim dividend to holders of GTECH ordinary shares, which was declared by GTECH on December 17, 2014, and is payable on January 21, 2015 and (ii) IGT's Board of Directors has the right, but not the obligation, to declare and pay a cash dividend to holders of IGT common stock, payable no earlier than February 1, 2015 and no later than March 31, 2015, which dividend, if declared, would be earlier than the customary timing of the second quarterly dividend, which is typically paid in April. The IGT dividend would not be a "Special Dividend" under the Merger Agreement.
Certain U.S. Tax Consequences of the Mergers (see page 135)
The receipt by U.S. holders of Holdco ordinary shares pursuant to the IGT Merger may be tax free for U.S. federal income tax purposes if at the effective time of the IGT Merger the fair market value of Holdco is at least equal to the fair market value of IGT. However, the receipt by U.S. holders of cash pursuant to the IGT Merger will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Holdco believes that the Holdco Merger constitutes a "reorganization" within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, U.S. holders (as defined in "Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations" below) of GTECH will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the exchange of GTECH ordinary shares for Holdco ordinary shares in the Holdco Merger.
For a further discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the IGT Merger, the Holdco Merger and a discussion of the tax treatment of the ownership and disposition of Holdco ordinary shares, see "Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations" below.
Certain U.K. Tax Consequences of the Mergers (see page 143)
IGT shareholders who are resident, for tax purposes, in the U.K. and who hold their IGT shares beneficially as investments may, as a result of the receipt of cash pursuant the IGT Merger, be treated as having effected a part disposal of their IGT shares and will be taxed accordingly. Subject to certain anti-avoidance provisions which are referred to in greater detail in the section of this document headed "Material U.K. Tax Considerations," the receipt of Holdco shares by IGT shareholders pursuant to the IGT Merger should be treated as a scheme for reconstruction for U.K. tax purposes and the Holdco ordinary shares should be treated as the same asset, acquired at the same time and for the same consideration as the IGT shares in respect of which they are issued.
GTECH shareholders who are resident, for tax purposes, in the U.K. and who hold their GTECH shares beneficially as investments should not, as a result of the receipt of Holdco ordinary shares pursuant to the Holdco Merger, be treated as disposing of their GTECH shares and should instead be treated as having acquired their Holdco ordinary shares at the same time and for the same consideration as the GTECH ordinary shares in respect of which they are issued. To the extent that U.K. tax resident GTECH shareholders exercise their rescission rights with respect to the Holdco Merger, they will be treated as having disposed of their GTECH ordinary shares and may be required to pay U.K. tax on chargeable gains accordingly.
Further details of the tax position of certain shareholders may be found in the section of this document headed "Material U.K. Tax Considerations."
Certain Italian Tax Consequences of the Mergers (see page 147)
Italian Shareholders (as defined in "Material Italian Tax Considerations") will not be subject to Italian income tax on the exchange of their GTECH ordinary shares for Holdco ordinary shares in the Holdco Merger.
The receipt by Italian Shareholders of cash pursuant to the exercise of their rescission rights in the Holdco Merger will be taxable for Italian income tax purposes.
24
For a further discussion of the material Italian tax consequences of the Holdco Merger, the IGT Merger and a discussion of the tax treatment of the ownership and disposition of Holdco ordinary shares, see "Material Italian Tax Considerations" below.
Delisting and Deregistration of IGT Common Stock (see page 133)
Upon consummation of the IGT Merger, the IGT common stock currently listed on the NYSE will cease to be listed on the NYSE and subsequently will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Interests of Directors, Board Members, and Executive Officers in the Combination (see page 126)
Shareholders of IGT should be aware that IGT directors and executive officers may have interests in the combination that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of IGT shareholders. These interests may include, but are not limited to, the continued engagement and/or employment, as applicable, of certain board members and executive officers of IGT, the continued positions of certain directors of IGT as directors of Holdco, agreements that provide for enhanced severance upon a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change in control, and the indemnification of former IGT directors and executive officers by Holdco. These interests also include the treatment in the combination of restricted stock units, stock options and other rights held by these directors and executive officers.
The IGT Board was aware of these potentially differing interests of IGT executive officers and directors and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Merger Agreement and to recommend that IGT shareholders vote in favor of the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
For further information with respect to arrangements between IGT and its named executive officers, see the information included under "Proposal 3Advisory Vote on Merger-Related Compensation for IGT's Named Executive OfficersGolden Parachute Compensation" beginning on page 186.
Indemnification and Insurance (see page 171)
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, GTECH's and IGT's directors and executive officers will be entitled to certain ongoing indemnification and coverage under directors' and officers' liability insurance policies from, and the organizational documents of, Holdco and IGT. See "The Merger AgreementCovenantsIndemnification and Insurance."
Board of Directors and Management of Holdco Following the Completion of the Mergers (see page 125)
Upon completion of the Mergers, the Board of Directors of Holdco (the "Holdco Board") will have 13 members, including, for a period of three years after the effective times of the Mergers: (i) the Chief Executive Officer of GTECH, (ii) five directors designated by IGT, including IGT's chairman and its Chief Executive Officer, (iii) six directors designated by GTECH's principal shareholders and (iv) one director mutually agreed to by IGT and GTECH. The composition of the Holdco Board will comply with the independence and corporate governance standards of the NYSE applicable to non-controlled domestic issuers. GTECH's Chief Executive Officer will be the Chief Executive Officer of Holdco.
In addition, for a period of three years following the transactions, IGT's chairman will be chairman of the Holdco Board, IGT's Chief Executive Officer will be a vice-chairman and one of the directors
25
designated by GTECH's principal shareholders will also be a vice-chairman. See "The Merger AgreementCovenantsCorporate Governance Matters" beginning on page 173.
No Solicitation of Transactions and Change of Recommendation (see pages 166 and 169)
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, IGT agreed to immediately cease any solicitations, discussions or negotiations existing on the date of the Merger Agreement with any persons with respect to any "acquisition proposal" for 20% or more of IGT's assets, consolidated revenue or earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), or common stock. Notwithstanding these general prohibitions, subject to certain conditions, if at any time prior to the approval of the Merger Agreement by the IGT shareholders, IGT receives a bona fide unsolicited written acquisition proposal from a third party and the IGT Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside financial advisors and outside counsel) that such acquisition proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal and the third party making such a proposal executes a confidentiality agreement having provisions that are no less favorable in the aggregate to IGT than those contained in the confidentiality agreement entered into between IGT and GTECH, IGT may:
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of the Merger Agreement, prior to the IGT shareholders' approval of the Merger Agreement, the IGT Board (or any committee of the IGT Board) may authorize, approve or recommend any competing acquisition proposal (or publicly propose to do so) or withhold, qualify or withdraw (or modify or amend in a manner adverse to GTECH), its recommendation that IGT shareholders approve the Merger Agreement, and IGT, the IGT Board or a committee of the IGT Board may cause IGT to enter into a competing acquisition proposal made after the date of the Merger Agreement and which was not solicited, initiated, encouraged or facilitated in breach of the non-solicitation obligations described in "The Merger AgreementCovenantsNo Solicitation of TransactionsIGT," and IGT may terminate the Merger Agreement, in response to a competing acquisition proposal made after the date of the Merger Agreement, if:
26
In addition, the IGT Board may change its recommendation in favor of the Merger Agreement in response to an intervening event which the IGT Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside counsel, after taking into account any changes to the Merger Agreement proposed by GTECH, that failure to change its recommendation would reasonably be likely to be inconsistent with the Board's fiduciary duties under applicable law. See "The Merger AgreementCovenantsNo Solicitation of TransactionsIGT" beginning on page 166.
GTECH also agreed to cease any solicitations, discussions or negotiations with any persons that may be ongoing with respect to any GTECH acquisition proposal. GTECH further agreed that, until the Holdco Merger Effective Time, it would not: (i) initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage the submission of any GTECH acquisition proposal; (ii) furnish any nonpublic information regarding GTECH or its subsidiaries to any third person in connection with or in response to a GTECH acquisition proposal; or (iii) participate in any discussions or negotiations with respect to any GTECH acquisition proposal.
GTECH further agreed to promptly advise IGT of any GTECH acquisition proposal, provide a reasonably detailed summary of the material terms and conditions of such proposal and keep IGT reasonably informed of any material change to the material terms or conditions of any such proposal (including the identity of any person making such proposal). See "The Merger AgreementCovenantsNo Solicitation of TransactionsGTECH" beginning on page 169.
Conditions to the Mergers (see page 175)
Each party's obligation to effect the Mergers is subject to satisfaction, or waiver by such party, where permitted by law, at or prior to the Closing, of the following conditions:
27
In addition, IGT's obligation to effect the IGT Merger is subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following additional conditions:
The obligations of GTECH, Holdco and Sub to effect the Mergers are further subject to the satisfaction or waiver by GTECH of the following additional conditions:
In addition, GTECH and IGT have the right to terminate the Merger Agreement in certain circumstances. The joint merger plan adopted by GTECH and Holdco will provide that the Holdco Merger will be subject to the Merger Agreement not having been terminated by GTECH or IGT under the terms of the Merger Agreement; and, in particular, GTECH not having terminated the Merger Agreement following the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders representing more than 20% of the ordinary shares issued by GTECH at the date of signing the Merger Agreement.
For more information, see "The Merger AgreementConditions to the Mergers" beginning on page 175.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Holdco Merger Effective Time, whether before or after receipt of the IGT or GTECH shareholder approvals, as follows:
28
29
Closing have been satisfied or that it is willing to waive any unsatisfied conditions and IGT is otherwise ready, willing and able to consummate the Closing and (c) the condition relating to the receipt of the Holdco Merger Order is not satisfied within 45 days thereafter;
For more information, see "The Merger AgreementTermination" beginning on page 177.
Expenses and Termination Fees (see page 179)
All costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Merger Agreement and the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement generally are to be paid by the party incurring such costs and expenses, except that GTECH will be responsible for certain expenses associated with antitrust and gaming approvals, the NYSE listing application and the printing, filing and mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus and the registration statement of which it forms a part and other disclosure documents, provided that IGT must reimburse all such expenses if the Merger Agreement is terminated by GTECH because of an uncured breach of the Merger Agreement by IGT that gives rise to the failure of certain conditions to Closing.
In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated in the following circumstances, IGT must pay GTECH a termination fee of $135,317,000:
30
proposal" has the meaning described below in "The Merger AgreementCovenantsNo Solicitation of TransactionsIGT," except that all percentages therein will be changed to 50%.
In the event the Merger Agreement is terminated in the following circumstances, GTECH must pay IGT a termination fee of $270,634,000:
31
In addition, GTECH must pay IGT a termination fee of $135,317,000 if the Merger Agreement is terminated by GTECH because Holdco would, as a result of the adoption, implementation, promulgation, repeal, modification, amendment or change of any applicable law following the date of the Merger Agreement and prior to the Closing, be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes as of or after the Closing.
Regulatory Matters (see pages 130 and 181)
Under the HSR Act, GTECH and IGT cannot complete the Mergers until they have filed certain information and materials with the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the "Antitrust Division") and the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act has expired or been terminated. IGT and GTECH filed their respective notification and report forms under the HSR Act with the FTC and the Antitrust Division on July 29, 2014, and the antitrust agencies granted early termination of the applicable waiting period on August 8, 2014. Clearances and consents or the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under competition laws in Canada and Colombia also are conditions to the Mergers. On September 26, 2014, the applicable waiting period expired under the competition laws of Canada and on October 6, 2014, the Commissioner issued a no-action letter. On September 15, 2014, GTECH and IGT received notification from the competition authorities in Colombia of closing of the review of the transaction.
In addition, the parties have agreed that receipt of gaming approvals from 22 jurisdictions is a condition to completion of the Mergers. As of December 23, 2014, applications for approval have been filed in all 22 jurisdictions and 12 approvals already have been granted. In addition, the required approvals from the Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli have been obtained. In addition to the jurisdictions identified by the parties as conditions to the completion of the Mergers, either IGT or GTECH may make further filings with gaming regulators in various jurisdictions as may be required by applicable law, but the expiration of any waiting periods, or receipt of any required approvals, in connection with such filings will not be conditions to the completion of the Mergers. GTECH may under certain circumstances waive the condition relating to any such required gaming approval on
32
behalf of both GTECH and IGT if completion of the Mergers in the absence of such required gaming approvals would not constitute a violation of applicable law on the written advice of outside counsel reasonably satisfactory to IGT and GTECH.
For further details on regulatory approvals see "The MergersRegulatory Matters" and "The Merger AgreementRegulatory Approvals" beginning at pages 130 and 181, respectively.
The completion of the Mergers is not subject to GTECH's ability to obtain financing. GTECH anticipates that the funds needed to consummate the Mergers and the transactions contemplated thereby will be derived from a combination of (i) available cash on hand and (ii) third-party debt financing, which such debt financing is referred to herein as the "debt financing".
On July 15, 2014, GTECH obtained a debt commitment letter (the "debt commitment letter"), pursuant to which affiliates of Credit Suisse AG, Barclays PLC and Citigroup Inc. (collectively, the "commitment parties") provided commitments to fund a 364-day senior bridge term loan credit facility (the "bridge facility") in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $10.7 billion. The bridge facility is to consist of four sub-facilities, the proceeds of which are to be used, among other things, to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration, to fund transaction expenses, to redeem and/or refinance existing specified indebtedness of GTECH and IGT, to the extent applicable, and to fund cash payments to GTECH shareholders exercising rescission rights. It is anticipated that the bridge facility will be drawn only to the extent that GTECH is unable to raise debt financing in the form of term loans and/or debt securities at or prior to the closing of the Mergers.
As of December 12, 2014, the aggregate financing commitments under the bridge facility had been reduced to approximately $6.0 billion (assuming an exchange rate of $1.36 / €1.00) as a result of the following events (dollars and euros in millions):
Original Bridge Commitment |
$ | 10,704 | ||
Consent received from holders of IGT's $500 7.50% Notes due 2019 |
(505 | ) | ||
New senior credit facilities (described below) |
||||
Reduction per original commitment terms |
(848 | ) | ||
Reduction for prefunding of redemption of GTECH's €750 5.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2016 |
(1,114 | ) | ||
Reduction for prefunding or purchase of IGT stock options and restricted stock units |
(131 | ) | ||
Consent received from holders of GTECH's €500 5.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 and its €500 million 3.5% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 |
(1,545 | ) | ||
Reduction for excess of sub-facility over amount potentially payable to shareholders exercising rescission rights |
(498 | ) | ||
| | | | |
Bridge Commitment as of December 12, 2014 |
$ | 6,063 | ||
| | | | |
| | | | |
The obligation of each commitment party to fund its commitments under the debt commitment letter is subject to a number of conditions, including, without limitation, execution and delivery of definitive documentation consistent with the debt commitment letter. The commitments will expire on the earliest to occur of (i) the Outside Date (as defined in, and as may be extended pursuant to, the Merger Agreement (it being understood that such date will be extended to match the business day immediately following the Outside Date in the Merger Agreement provided such Outside Date is extended to a date not beyond the fifteen-month anniversary of the signing of the Merger Agreement)), (ii) the closing of the Acquisition (as defined in the debt commitment letter), (iii) the date the Merger Agreement is terminated or expires and (iv) receipt by the commitment parties of written notice from GTECH and Holdco of their election to terminate the commitments.
33
The definitive documentation governing the debt financing has not been finalized and, accordingly, the actual terms of the debt financing may differ from those described in this proxy statement/prospectus. Although the debt financing described in this proxy statement/prospectus is not subject to due diligence or a "market out," such financing may not be considered assured. The obligation of the commitment parties to provide debt financing under the debt commitment letter is, as noted above, subject to a number of conditions. There is a risk that these conditions will not be satisfied and the debt financing may not be available to fund all or a portion of the consideration required for the Mergers and/or may not be available when required. If any portion of the debt financing expires or otherwise becomes unavailable on the terms and conditions contemplated in the debt commitment letter, GTECH has the right, and must use reasonable best efforts under the Merger Agreement to seek alternative financing on terms and conditions that are at least as favorable, with respect to enforceability, financing structure and conditionality, to GTECH and IGT in the aggregate as those in the debt commitment letter. See "The MergersFinancing" on page 132.
In addition to the debt financing for the transaction, on November 5, 2014, GTECH announced that it, along with GTECH Corporation, had entered into a $2.6 billion five-year senior credit facilities agreement with a syndicate of 20 banks led by J.P. Morgan Limited and Mediobanca-Banca di Credito Finanziario S.p.A. The agreement provides for a $1.4 billion revolving credit facility for GTECH Corporation and a €850 million multicurrency revolving credit facility for GTECH. Upon completion of the Mergers, Holdco will be able to borrow under both facilities and IGT will be able to borrow under the U.S. dollar facility, which will be increased to $1.5 billion.
On December 18, 2014, GTECH commenced a tender offer and consent solicitation in respect of its €750,000,000 Subordinated Interest-Deferrable Capital Securities due 2066. The terms and conditions of the Capital Securities do not require the consent of holders in connection with the Mergers. If the Capital Securities tender offer and consent solicitation is consummated, GTECH expects to use funds available under its senior credit facilities to pay any related consideration to holders, estimated to be a maximum of $1.1 billion (assuming all holders tender and an exchange rate of $1.36 / €1.00).
Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on the record date, directors and executive officers of IGT and their affiliates were entitled to vote 1,613,630 shares of IGT common stock, or approximately 0.65% of the shares of IGT common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on that date. Each of IGT's directors and officers has indicated his or her present intention to vote their shares of IGT common stock in favor of each of the proposals to be presented at the special meeting, although none of them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.
Dissenters', Appraisal, Rescission or Similar Rights (see page 79)
Pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes 92A.390, IGT shareholders are not entitled to exercise dissenters', appraisal, cash exit or similar rights in connection with the Mergers. See "The Special MeetingNo Dissenter's Rights" on page 79.
GTECH shareholders are entitled to rescission rights because Holdco is and will be an holding company and, as a result of the Holdco Merger, the registered office of Holdco will be located outside of Italy, GTECH ordinary shares will be delisted from the ISE, and the company resulting from the Holdco Merger, Holdco, will be governed by the laws of a country other than Italy. Rescission rights may be exercised by GTECH shareholders who did not concur in the approval of the extraordinary general meeting's resolution. The exercise of such rights will be effective subject to the Holdco Merger becoming effective. A GTECH shareholder who has voted in favor of the Holdco Merger may not exercise any rescission rights in relation to those shares that the relevant shareholder voted in favor of
34
the Holdco Merger. A GTECH shareholder that properly exercises such rights will be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to the average closing price per GTECH ordinary share for the six-month period prior to the publication of the notice of call of the extraordinary general meeting which is equal to €19.174. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if GTECH shareholders exercise rescission rights under Italian law in respect of more than 20% of GTECH ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of the Merger Agreement, GTECH will be entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement upon payment of a termination fee to IGT as described in "The Merger AgreementExpenses and Termination Fees" beginning on page 179. Rescission rights were validly exercised with respect to 19,796,852 GTECH ordinary shares during the withdrawal period, which ended on November 27, 2014. The shares for which rescission rights were exercised represent only 11.3% of GTECH's current fully paid-up share capital and 11.4% of GTECH's shares outstanding as of July 15, 2014.
In the event of such termination, the Holdco Merger will not be completed and any exercise of rescission rights will not be effective.
The Support and Voting Agreements (see page 183)
In connection with the Merger Agreement, on July 15, 2014, IGT entered into a support agreement (the "Support Agreement") and a voting agreement (the "Voting Agreement") with De Agostini, which held approximately 59% of the outstanding ordinary shares of GTECH as of November 4, 2014. Under the Support Agreement, De Agostini agreed to vote its shares in favor of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any competing transaction. Under the Voting Agreement, De Agostini has agreed to vote its shares in accordance with the post-closing governance provisions set forth in the Merger Agreement and described below in "The Merger AgreementCovenantsCorporate Governance Matters" for a period of three years after the closing of the Mergers.
Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, De Agostini voted its shares in favor of the transactions at GTECH's extraordinary shareholders' meeting held on November 4, 2014. The resolution to approve the merger plan required the favorable vote of shareholders representing at least two-thirds of the shares represented at the meeting and the resolution received approval from 96.8% of the shares represented.
The foregoing descriptions of the Support Agreement and the Voting Agreement do not purport to be complete and are subject to, and qualified in their entirety by, the full text of such agreements, copies of which are filed herewith as Annexes C and D, respectively, and are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Listing of Holdco Ordinary Shares on Stock Exchange (page 133)
Holdco ordinary shares are currently not traded or quoted on a stock exchange or quotation system. However, it is a condition to closing that the Holdco ordinary shares be authorized for listing on the NYSE. Holdco expects that, following the transaction, Holdco ordinary shares will be listed for trading on the NYSE.
In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and in particular, with IFRS 3Business Combinations, the combination qualifies as the acquisition of IGT by Holdco. In particular, on the date at which control over IGT is acquired, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be recognized in Holdco's consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The difference between the acquisition consideration and the net fair value at the acquisition date of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net of any non-controlling interest in the IGT group, if positive will be recognized as goodwill, or if negative will be recognized in the consolidated income statement. The
35
acquisition consideration is defined as the sum of the acquisition date fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred by Holdco to former owners of IGT and any equity instruments issued. The shares that will be issued by Holdco as part of the IGT acquisition will be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date.
Comparison of Rights of GTECH Shareholders, Holdco Shareholders and IGT Shareholders (see page 376)
As a result of the Mergers, IGT and GTECH shareholders will become holders of Holdco ordinary shares, and will have different rights as holders of Holdco ordinary shares than they had as holders of shares of IGT and GTECH common stock. The differences between the rights of these respective holders result from the differences among Italian, U.K. and Nevada law and the respective governing documents of GTECH, Holdco and IGT. For additional information, please see "Comparison of Rights of Shareholders of GTECH, IGT and Holdco" beginning on page 376.
Litigation Related to the Mergers (see page 133)
Since the announcement of the Merger Agreement on July 16, 2014, a number of putative shareholder class action complaints have been filed against IGT, the IGT Board, GTECH, GTECH US, Holdco and Sub in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada, by purported IGT shareholders challenging the Mergers and seeking, among other things, damages, attorneys' and experts' fees and injunctive relief concerning the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and to prohibit the defendants from consummating the Mergers. Such complaints have been consolidated into a single action.
The complaints allege, among other things, that the members of the IGT Board breached their fiduciary duties by approving IGT's entry into the Merger Agreement and by failing to take steps to maximize the value of IGT to its shareholders, and that IGT, GTECH, GTECH US, Holdco, and Sub aided and abetted those alleged breaches. In addition, the complaints allege, among other things, that the proposed merger consideration to be received by shareholders of IGT is unfair and inadequate, that the process leading up to the Merger Agreement was flawed, and that certain provisions of the Merger Agreement impede a potential alternative transaction. The complaints seek, among other relief, class certification, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and damages.
IGT, the IGT Board and GTECH believe these lawsuits are without merit and intend to defend against them vigorously. For additional information, please see "The MergersLitigation Related to the Mergers" beginning on page 133.
The Special Meeting of IGT Shareholders (see page 76)
The special meeting is scheduled to be held at Signature Tower 3, Meeting Room D at The Signature at MGM Grand, 145 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada on February 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., local time.
At the special meeting, IGT shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on:
Only holders of record of IGT common stock at the close of business on January 2, 2015, the record date for the special meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting or
36
any adjournments or postponements thereof. At the close of business on the record date, 248,666,077 shares of IGT common stock were issued and outstanding. Holders of record of IGT common stock on the record date are entitled to one vote per share at the special meeting on each proposal.
You may vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" or you may "ABSTAIN" from voting on each proposal. The proposal to approve the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. If a quorum is present at the special meeting, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast in opposition of the proposal. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting may be approved and the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the voting power represented at the special meeting in person or by proxy. The non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger will be approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the proposal.
You can vote at the special meeting of IGT shareholders if you owned shares of IGT common stock at the close of business on January 2, 2015 the record date for the special meeting. Only IGT shareholders as of the close of business on the record date will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
No business may be transacted at the special meeting unless a quorum is present. Attendance in person or by proxy at the special meeting of holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting will constitute a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the special meeting may be adjourned to allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies by a majority of the voting power represented in person or by proxy at the special meeting.
The approval of the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote thereon. Each share of IGT common stock held as of the record date is entitled to one vote at the special meeting. As of the record date for the special meeting, IGT had 248,666,077 shares of common stock outstanding.
37
Investing in Holdco ordinary shares involves risks, some of which are related to the Mergers. In considering whether to vote for the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, you should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information included in or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including the risk factors described in IGT's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014. The respective businesses of GTECH and IGT, as well as their respective financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks, as well as other risks and uncertainties not currently known to GTECH or IGT or not currently deemed to be material.
Please see "Where You Can Find More Information" and "Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference" on pages 407 and 408, respectively, for information on where you can find the documents IGT has filed with or furnished to the SEC and which are incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGERS
Completion of the Mergers is subject to certain conditions, and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Mergers will not be completed.
The obligations of GTECH and IGT to complete the Mergers are subject to satisfaction or waiver (if permitted) of a number of conditions, including, among other conditions, (i) IGT and GTECH obtaining shareholder approvals, (ii) receipt of certain antitrust approvals, (iii) obtaining certain gaming regulatory approvals, (iv) effectiveness of this registration statement for the Holdco ordinary shares, (v) NYSE listing approval for the Holdco ordinary shares, (vi) the expiration or early termination of a 60-day GTECH creditor opposition period, (viii) the absence of any order prohibiting or restraining the Mergers, (ix) subject to certain materiality exceptions, the accuracy of each party's representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement and performance by each party of their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement, (x) the receipt of the Holdco Merger Order and (xi) in the case of IGT's obligation to close the IGT Merger, IGT's receipt of certain tax opinions.
On November 4, 2014, the extraordinary shareholders' meeting of GTECH approved the merger plan regarding the Holdco Merger.
The satisfaction of all of the required conditions could delay the completion of the Mergers for a significant period of time or prevent them from occurring. Any delay in completing the Mergers could cause the combined company not to realize some or all of the benefits that the combined company expects to achieve if the Mergers are successfully completed within its expected timeframe. Further, there can be no assurance that the conditions to the closing of the Mergers will be satisfied or waived or that the Mergers will be completed.
In addition, if the Mergers are not completed on or before July 15, 2015 (subject to certain extension rights), either GTECH or IGT may choose not to proceed with the Mergers. IGT may also terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, including among others in order to enter into an agreement with respect to a proposal that is determined by the IGT Board to be superior to the Merger Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement (including an opportunity for GTECH to match any such proposal). GTECH may also terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances, including among others (i) if GTECH shareholders exercise rescission rights under Italian law in respect of more than 20% of GTECH's ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of the Merger Agreement, (ii) if Holdco would, as a result of a change in applicable law, be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes as of or after the Closing or (iii) if the special voting shares provided for by the Holdco Articles cannot be implemented under certain circumstances.
38
At the end of the withdrawal period on November 27, 2014, GTECH shareholders representing only 11.4% of GTECH's shares outstanding as of July 15, 2014, exercised rescission rights with respect to their GTECH ordinary shares.
Failure to complete the Mergers could negatively impact the stock price and the future business and financial results of IGT and GTECH.
If the Mergers are not completed for any reason, including as a result of IGT shareholders failing to approve the Merger Agreement, the ongoing businesses of IGT may be adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Mergers, IGT and GTECH would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
In addition, GTECH and IGT could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Mergers or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against GTECH or IGT to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Mergers are not completed, these risks may materialize and may adversely affect GTECH's or IGT's businesses, financial condition, financial results and stock price.
Legal proceedings in connection with the Mergers, the outcomes of which are uncertain, could delay or prevent the completion of the Mergers.
IGT, the members of the IGT Board, GTECH, Holdco and Sub are named as defendants in a consolidated class action lawsuit brought by purported IGT shareholders challenging the proposed Mergers. The action alleges that members of the IGT Board breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell IGT for inadequate consideration and pursuant to an inadequate process, and that GTECH, Holdco and Sub aided and abetted these alleged breaches. Among other remedies, the plaintiffs seek to enjoin the Mergers.
One of the conditions to the closing of the Mergers is that no temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction or
39
other legal restraint or prohibition preventing the completion of the Mergers will be in effect. If the plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the defendants from consummating the Mergers on the agreed terms, then such injunction may prevent the Mergers from becoming effective, or from becoming effective within the expected timeframe.
The price of GTECH ordinary shares might decline prior to the completion of the Mergers, which could decrease the value of the merger consideration to be received by IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger. Further, when GTECH and IGT shareholders vote on the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, they will not know the exact value of the Holdco ordinary shares that will be issued in connection with the Mergers.
Upon completion of the Mergers, IGT shareholders will be entitled to receive for each share of IGT common stock that they own consideration in the form of Holdco ordinary shares and cash, subject to certain limitations and adjustments. While the stock portion of the consideration to be delivered to IGT shareholders will be adjusted based on a calculation of the average trading price of GTECH ordinary shares during a period prior to the Closing, no additional adjustment will be made to the extent such average price falls below $21.31 per GTECH ordinary share. Accordingly, the aggregate value of the consideration could be less than $18.25 per share if such average price per GTECH ordinary share were to be less than $21.31. In addition, because the stock portion of the consideration per share will be based on a calculation of the average trading price of GTECH ordinary shares during a period prior to the Closing, the actual value of the consideration delivered to IGT shareholders would decrease to the extent the value of GTECH ordinary shares at Closing is below such average price. Neither party has a right to terminate the Merger Agreement based upon changes in the market price of GTECH's ordinary shares, par value €1.00 (the "GTECH ordinary shares").
In addition, because the date on which the Mergers are completed will be later than the date of the IGT special meeting, IGT shareholders will not know the exact value of the Holdco ordinary shares that will be issued in connection with the Mergers at the time of the IGT special meeting. As a result, if the market price of Holdco ordinary shares upon the completion of the Mergers is lower than the market price of the GTECH ordinary shares on the date of the IGT special meeting, the market value of the merger consideration received by IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger could be lower than the market value of the merger consideration at the time of the vote by the IGT shareholders. Moreover, during this interim period, events, conditions or circumstances could arise that could have a material impact or effect on GTECH, IGT or the industries in which they operate.
Issuances of GTECH ordinary shares prior to the completion of the Mergers could decrease the value of the consideration to be delivered to IGT shareholders, and sales of Holdco ordinary shares after the completion of the Mergers may cause the market price of Holdco ordinary shares to fall.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, GTECH is permitted to issue shares prior to the completion of the Mergers under certain circumstances. Because each outstanding GTECH ordinary share will be converted into one Holdco ordinary share, the issuance of GTECH ordinary shares without an offsetting share repurchase prior to the completion of the Mergers would have the effect of diluting IGT shareholders' ownership of Holdco. In addition, such issuances could decrease the market price of GTECH ordinary shares, which could in turn decrease the value of the merger consideration to be delivered to IGT shareholders, as described above.
Following completion of the Mergers, Holdco shares will be publicly traded on the NYSE, enabling former IGT and GTECH shareholders (including De Agostini, although De Agostini will initially be subject to the share transfer restrictions of the Voting Agreement) to sell the Holdco ordinary shares they receive in the Mergers. Such sales of Holdco ordinary shares may take place promptly following the Mergers and could have the effect of decreasing the market price for Holdco ordinary shares below the market price of GTECH ordinary shares prior to the completion of the Mergers.
40
No trading market currently exists for Holdco ordinary shares.
Prior to the Mergers, there has been no market for the Holdco ordinary shares. At the effective time of the Mergers, the Holdco ordinary shares will be listed for trading on the NYSE. However, there can be no assurance that an active market for the Holdco ordinary shares will develop after closing of the Mergers, or that if it develops, the market will be sustained.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that restrict IGT's ability to pursue alternatives to the Mergers and, in specified circumstances, could require IGT to pay GTECH a termination fee.
Under the Merger Agreement, IGT is restricted, subject to certain exceptions, from soliciting, initiating, knowingly encouraging, discussing or negotiating, or furnishing information with regard to, any inquiry, proposal or offer for a competing acquisition proposal from any person or entity. If IGT receives an unsolicited competing acquisition proposal from a third party and the IGT Board determines (after consultation with IGT's financial advisors and legal counsel) that such proposal is more favorable to the IGT shareholders than the Mergers and the IGT Board recommends such proposal to the IGT shareholders, IGT or GTECH would be entitled to terminate the Merger Agreement. Under such circumstances, IGT would be required to pay GTECH a termination fee equal to $135,317,000. These provisions could discourage a third party that may have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of IGT from considering or proposing such an acquisition, even if such third party were prepared to enter into a transaction that would be more favorable to IGT and its shareholders than the Mergers. See "The Merger AgreementTermination" and "The Merger AgreementExpenses and Termination Fees" beginning on pages 177 and 179, respectively.
After the Mergers, IGT shareholders will have a significantly lower ownership and voting interest in the combined company than they currently have in IGT and will exercise less influence over management.
Based on the number of GTECH ordinary shares and shares of IGT common stock outstanding as of the record date, and the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders representing 11.3% of GTECH's fully paid-up share capital as of the record date, it is anticipated that, immediately after completion of the Mergers, former GTECH shareholders will own approximately 77.2% of the outstanding Holdco ordinary shares and former IGT shareholders will own approximately 22.8% of the outstanding Holdco ordinary shares. Consequently, former IGT shareholders will have less influence over the management and policies of the combined company than they currently have over the management and policies of IGT. Furthermore, approximately 51.8% of the outstanding ordinary shares of Holdco will be owned by De Agostini, and such shareholder will have significant influence over all matters presented to Holdco's shareholders for approval, including election and removal of directors and change in control transactions. The interests of De Agostini may not always coincide with the interests of the other Holdco shareholders. In addition, under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Board of Directors of Holdco (the "Holdco Board") will, for a period of three years after the completion of the Mergers, consist of 13 members, including the Chief Executive Officer of GTECH and other directors to be designated by IGT and by GTECH's principal shareholders prior to the completion of the Mergers. Accordingly, holders of Holdco ordinary shares will have limited ability to influence the composition of the Holdco Board during such three-year period.
Some of the conditions to the Mergers may be waived by GTECH or IGT without resoliciting shareholder approval of the proposals approved by them.
Some of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement may be waived by GTECH or IGT, subject to certain limitations. If any conditions are waived, IGT and GTECH will evaluate whether amendment of this proxy statement/prospectus and resolicitation of proxies would be warranted. Subject to applicable law, if IGT and GTECH determine that resolicitation of IGT's shareholders is not warranted, the parties will have the discretion to complete the IGT Merger without seeking further
41
shareholder approval. No action by the IGT Board or GTECH Board with respect to the Merger Agreement may adversely affect the shareholders of IGT or GTECH, respectively, or affect the consideration to be received by the shareholders of IGT or GTECH in the Mergers unless their respective shareholders approve such action.
GTECH and IGT may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other key employees due to uncertainty associated with the Mergers.
Holdco's success after the Mergers have been completed will depend in part upon the ability of Holdco to retain key employees of GTECH and IGT. Competition for qualified personnel can be intense. Current and prospective employees of GTECH and/or IGT may experience uncertainty about the effect of the Mergers, which may impair GTECH's and IGT's ability to attract, retain and motivate key management, sales, marketing, technical and other personnel prior to and following the Mergers. Employee retention may be particularly challenging during the pendency of the Mergers, as employees of GTECH and IGT may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company.
In addition, pursuant to change-in-control provisions in IGT's employment and transition agreements, certain key employees of IGT are entitled to receive severance payments upon a constructive termination of employment. Certain key IGT employees potentially could terminate their employment following specified circumstances set forth in the applicable employment or transition agreement, including certain changes in such key employees' duties, position, responsibilities or compensation and collect severance. Such circumstances could occur in connection with the Mergers as a result of changes in roles and responsibilities. If key employees of GTECH or IGT depart, the integration of the companies may be more difficult and the combined company's business following the Mergers may be harmed. Furthermore, the combined company may have to incur significant costs in identifying, hiring and retaining replacements for departing employees and may lose significant expertise and talent relating to the businesses of GTECH or IGT, and the combined company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers may be adversely affected. In addition, there could be disruptions to or distractions for the workforce and management associated with activities of labor unions or works councils or integrating employees into the combined company. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that Holdco will be able to attract or retain key employees of GTECH and IGT to the same extent that those companies have been able to attract or retain their own employees in the past.
GTECH's and IGT's business relationships may be subject to disruption due to uncertainty associated with the Mergers.
Parties with which GTECH or IGT do business may experience uncertainty associated with the Mergers, including with respect to current or future business relationships with GTECH, IGT or the combined company. GTECH's and IGT's business relationships may be subject to disruption as customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors and others may attempt to negotiate changes in existing business relationships or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than GTECH, IGT or the combined company. These disruptions could have an adverse effect on the businesses, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the combined company, including an adverse effect on the combined company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers. The risk and adverse effect of such disruptions could be exacerbated by a delay in completion of the Mergers or termination of the Merger Agreement.
42
In order to complete the Mergers, GTECH and IGT must make certain governmental filings and obtain certain governmental authorizations, and if such filings and authorizations are not made or granted or are granted with conditions, completion of the Mergers may be jeopardized or the anticipated benefits of the Mergers could be reduced.
Although GTECH and IGT have agreed in the Merger Agreement to use their reasonable best efforts to make certain governmental filings and obtain the required governmental authorizations or termination of relevant waiting periods, as the case may be, there can be no assurance that the relevant waiting periods will expire or that the relevant authorizations will be obtained. In addition, the governmental authorities from which these authorizations are required have broad discretion in administering the governing regulations. As a condition to authorization of the Mergers, these governmental authorities may impose requirements, limitations or costs or require divestitures or place restrictions on the conduct of Holdco's business after completion of the Mergers. There can be no assurance that regulators will not impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions and that such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not have the effect of delaying completion of the Mergers or imposing additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of Holdco following the Mergers, or otherwise adversely affecting, including to a material extent, Holdco's businesses and results of operations after completion of the Mergers. In addition, there can be no assurance that these conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment of the Mergers.
If GTECH's financing for the Mergers becomes unavailable, the Mergers may not be completed.
GTECH's obligation to complete the Mergers is not subject to any conditions regarding the ability of GTECH to finance, or obtain debt financing for, the Mergers, and GTECH is obligated under the Merger Agreement to have sufficient funds available to satisfy its obligations under the Merger Agreement.
GTECH intends to finance all or a portion of the cash component of the merger consideration with new debt financing. The proceeds from these borrowings or issuances of debt financing will be used by GTECH to pay all or a portion of the cash consideration to be paid in the Mergers, to redeem and/or refinance existing specified indebtedness of GTECH, IGT and their subsidiaries and to pay related fees and expenses.
In the event that the debt financing contemplated by the debt commitment letter is not available, other financing may not be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. If other financing becomes necessary and GTECH is unable to obtain such other financing, the Mergers may not be completed.
GTECH may have difficulties in refinancing the bridge facility obtained for the Mergers
GTECH obtained a debt commitment pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, affiliates of Credit Suisse AG, Barclays PLC and Citigroup Inc. committed to fund a 364-day senior bridge term loan credit facility up to an aggregate principal amount of $10.7 billion, to cover the cash portion of the merger consideration, the transaction expenses, any potential redemption and/or refinancing of the existing indebtedness of GTECH and IGT, and the payments to any GTECH shareholders exercising rescission rights. As of December 12, 2014, the aggregate financing commitments under the bridge facility had been reduced to approximately $6.0 billion (assuming an exchange rate of $1.36 / €1.00) as a result of several events reducing the potential need for such financing.
The bridge facility will be drawn only to the extent that GTECH is unable to raise debt financing in the form of term loans and/or debt securities at or prior to the closing of the Mergers. To the extent that the bridge facility is drawn in part or in full, GTECH will need to seek alternative financing before its 364-day maturity (or its 544-day extended maturity subject to applicable conditions). There is a risk
43
that due to market conditions or otherwise, GTECH may not be able to find alternative financing timely, or to find other financing at least as favorable, with respect to cost, enforceability, financing structure and conditionality.
The opinion of GTECH's and IGT's financial advisors will not reflect changes in circumstances between the signing of the Merger Agreement and the completion of the Mergers.
The GTECH Board and IGT Board received opinions from their respective financial advisors in connection with their determinations to approve the Merger Agreement. GTECH and IGT have not obtained updated opinions from their financial advisors as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and do not expect to receive updated opinions prior to the completion of the Mergers. Changes in the operations and prospects of GTECH or IGT, general market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of GTECH or IGT and on which the financial advisors' opinions were based may significantly affect the value of IGT and GTECH and the prices of GTECH ordinary shares or IGT common stock by the time the Mergers are completed. The opinions do not speak as of the time the Mergers will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such opinions. Because the financial advisors will not be updating their opinions, the opinions will not address the fairness of the merger consideration to be received by IGT shareholders and GTECH shareholders from a financial point of view at the time the Mergers are completed. For a description of the opinions that GTECH and IGT received from their respective financial advisors, see "The MergersOpinion of Credit Suisse as Financial Advisor to GTECH" and "The MergersOpinion of Morgan Stanley as Financial Advisor to IGT" on pages 101 and 144, respectively.
IGT's executive officers and directors have interests in the Mergers that may be different from the interests of IGT shareholders generally.
When considering the recommendation of the IGT Board that IGT shareholders approve the Merger Agreement, IGT shareholders should be aware that directors and executive officers of IGT have certain interests in the Mergers that may be different from or in addition to the interests of IGT shareholders generally. These interests include the treatment of IGT equity compensation awards in the IGT Merger, positions as directors, officers or employees of Holdco following completion of the Mergers, the granting of retention awards, severance benefits, accelerated payout of deferred compensation benefits and other rights held by IGT's directors and executive officers, and the indemnification of former IGT directors and officers by Holdco. The IGT Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other things, in evaluating and negotiating the Merger Agreement and the Mergers and in recommending that the IGT shareholders approve the Merger Agreement. See "The MergersInterests of Certain Persons in the Mergers"; "The Merger AgreementCovenantsCorporate Governance Matters"; and "The Merger AgreementCovenantsIndemnification and Insurance" on pages 126, 173 and 171, respectively.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE COMBINED COMPANY
FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE MERGERS
The combined company may not realize the cost savings, synergies and other benefits that the parties expect to achieve from the Mergers.
The combination of two independent companies is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. As a result, the combined company will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of GTECH and IGT. The integration process may disrupt the business of either or both of the companies and, if implemented ineffectively, could preclude realization of the full benefits expected by GTECH and IGT, including $280 million of potential EBITDA synergies, driven by potential cost savings of $230 million and revenue synergies of $50 million, which we expect to achieve by fiscal year 2018. The failure of the combined company to
44
meet the challenges involved in successfully integrating the operations of GTECH and IGT or otherwise to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers could cause an interruption of the activities of the combined company and could seriously harm its results of operations. In addition, the overall integration of the two companies may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of client relationships, and diversion of management's attention, and may cause the combined company's stock price to decline. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:
Many of these factors will be outside of the combined company's control and any one of them could result in increased costs, decreased revenues and diversion of management's time and energy, which could materially impact the combined company's businesses, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even if the operations of GTECH and IGT are integrated successfully, the combined company may not realize the full benefits of the Mergers, including the synergies, cost savings or sales or growth opportunities that the combined company expects. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all. As a result, GTECH and IGT cannot assure their shareholders that the combination of GTECH and IGT will result in the realization of the full benefits anticipated from the Mergers.
GTECH and IGT will incur significant transaction and merger-related costs in connection with the Mergers.
GTECH and IGT expect to incur a number of non-recurring costs associated with the Mergers and combining the operations of the two companies. The substantial majority of non-recurring expenses will be comprised of transaction and regulatory costs related to the Mergers. GTECH and IGT have agreed to use their respective reasonable best efforts to effect all necessary notices, reports and other filings and to obtain all consents, registrations, approvals, permits, expirations of waiting periods and authorizations necessary or advisable to be obtained from any third party and/or any governmental entity in order to consummate the Mergers.
GTECH also will incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating and implementing integration plans, including facilities and systems consolidation costs and employment-related costs. GTECH continues to assess the magnitude of these costs, and additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the Mergers and the integration of the two companies.
The incurrence of these costs may materially impact the combined company's businesses, financial condition and results of operations until the integration is substantially completed.
45
As a result of the indebtedness to be incurred by GTECH in connection with the Mergers, the indebtedness of the combined company following completion of the Mergers will be substantially greater than the combined indebtedness of GTECH and IGT prior to the effective time of the Mergers. This increased indebtedness could adversely affect the combined company, including by decreasing the combined company's business flexibility, and will increase its interest expense.
The total debt of GTECH as of September 30, 2014 was approximately €2.891 billion. GTECH's pro forma total debt as of September 30, 2014, after giving effect to the Mergers, would be approximately €7.998 billion. The combined company would have substantially increased indebtedness following completion of the Mergers in relation to that of GTECH and IGT on a recent historical basis, which could have the effect, among other things, of reducing the combined company's flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions and will increase the combined company's interest expense. In addition, the amount of cash required to service the combined company's increased indebtedness following completion of the Mergers and thus the demands on the combined company's cash resources will be greater than the amount of cash required to service the indebtedness of GTECH and IGT prior to the Mergers. The increased levels of indebtedness following completion of the Mergers could also reduce funds available for the combined company's investments in product development as well as capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividend payments and other activities and may create competitive disadvantages for the combined company relative to other companies with lower debt levels. Further, it is not expected that all of Holdco's debt will be guaranteed by all of the entities of the combined company and accordingly, certain cash flows of the combined company may not be available to service company debt.
In connection with executing the combined company's business strategies following the Mergers, GTECH expects to continue to evaluate the possibility of acquiring additional assets and making further strategic investments, and GTECH or the combined company may elect to finance these endeavors by incurring additional indebtedness. Moreover, to respond to competitive challenges, GTECH or the combined company may be required to raise substantial additional capital to finance new product or service offerings. GTECH's or the combined company's ability to arrange additional financing will depend on, among other factors, GTECH's and, following the Mergers, the combined company's financial position and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and other factors beyond GTECH's or the combined company's control. No assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to the combined company or at all. If GTECH or the combined company is able to obtain additional financing, credit ratings of the combined company could be further adversely affected, which could further raise the combined company's borrowing costs and further limit its access to capital and its ability to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness.
Any downgrades of the combined company's credit ratings will impact the cost and availability of future borrowings.
Following the announcement of the Mergers, S&P lowered its corporate credit rating on GTECH to BBB- from BBB, and also lowered its short-term rating to A-3 from A-2. S&P also lowered its ratings on GTECH's senior unsecured debt to BBB- from BBB, and lowered its ratings on GTECH's subordinated debt to BB from BB+. Any further downgrades of the combined company's credit ratings will impact the cost and availability of future borrowings and, accordingly, the combined company's cost of capital, including any borrowings to refinance the bridge facility (if drawn).
Restrictive covenants in the combined company's debt instruments may restrict its ability to operate its business, and the combined company's failure to comply with these covenants could materially and adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.
Any further ratings downgrades could lead to enhanced covenant restrictions under the combined company's debt instruments, including in respect of dividend payments and share repurchases. In
46
addition, future borrowings under circumstances in which the combined company's debt is rated below investment grade may contain further covenant restrictions that impose significant restrictions on the way the combined company operates its business, including restrictions on its ability to:
Certain of the combined company's debt instruments will require it to comply with certain affirmative covenants and certain specified financial covenants and ratios.
These restrictions could affect its ability to operate its business and may limit its ability to react to market conditions or take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. For example, such restrictions could adversely affect the combined company's ability to finance its operations, make strategic acquisitions, investments or alliances, restructure its organization or finance its capital needs. Additionally, the combined company's ability to comply with these covenants and restrictions may be affected by events beyond its control such as prevailing economic, financial, regulatory and industry conditions. If it breaches any of these covenants (including financial covenants or ratios) or restrictions, the company could be in default under one or more of its debt instruments, which, if not cured or waived, could result in acceleration of the indebtedness under such agreements and cross defaults under its other debt instruments. Any such actions could result in the enforcement of its lenders' security interests and/or force the company into bankruptcy or liquidation, which could have a material adverse effect on the combined company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
The market price of Holdco ordinary shares after the Mergers may be affected by factors different from those that may currently affect the market price of GTECH ordinary shares and IGT common stock.
Upon completion of the Mergers, holders of GTECH ordinary shares (other than those who exercise rescission rights in connection with the Holdco Merger) and IGT common stock will become holders of Holdco ordinary shares. Holdco's businesses following the Mergers will differ from those of GTECH and IGT prior to completion of the Mergers in important respects and, accordingly, after the Mergers, the market price of Holdco ordinary shares may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the market price of GTECH ordinary shares and shares of IGT common stock.
Holdco ordinary shares to be received by GTECH and IGT shareholders as a result of the Mergers will have rights different from the GTECH ordinary shares and IGT common stock they hold prior to the effective time of the Mergers.
Upon completion of the Mergers, the rights of former GTECH and IGT shareholders who become shareholders of Holdco will be governed by the Holdco Articles and by the laws of England and Wales. The rights associated with GTECH ordinary shares and IGT common stock are different from the rights associated with Holdco ordinary shares. Material differences between the rights of shareholders of IGT and GTECH and the rights of shareholders of Holdco include differences with respect to, among other things, distributions, dividends, repurchases and redemptions, dividends in shares/bonus issues, preemptive rights, the election of directors, the removal of directors, the fiduciary and statutory duties of directors, conflicts of interests of directors, the indemnification of directors and officers,
47
limitations on director liability, the convening of annual meetings of shareholders and special shareholder meetings, notice provisions for meetings, the quorum for shareholder meetings, the adjournment of shareholder meetings, the exercise of voting rights, shareholder action by written consent, shareholder suits, shareholder approval of certain transactions, rights of dissenting shareholders, anti-takeover measures and provisions relating to the ability to amend governing documents. See "Comparison of Rights of Shareholders of GTECH, IGT and Holdco" beginning on page 376.
The combined company's inability to integrate recently acquired businesses or to successfully complete future acquisitions could limit its future growth or otherwise be disruptive to its ongoing business.
From time to time, the combined company expects it will pursue acquisitions in support of its strategic goals. In connection with any such acquisitions, the combined company could face significant challenges in managing and integrating its expanded or combined operations, including acquired assets, operations and personnel. There can be no assurance that acquisition opportunities will be available on acceptable terms or at all or that Holdco will be able to obtain necessary financing or regulatory approvals to complete potential acquisitions. The combined company's ability to succeed in implementing its strategy will depend to some degree upon the ability of its management to identify, complete and successfully integrate commercially viable acquisitions. Acquisition transactions may disrupt the combined company's ongoing business and distract management from other responsibilities.
Changes in consumer preferences and behavior could affect the popularity of the gaming industry.
The popularity and acceptance of gaming is influenced by the prevailing social mores, and changes in social mores could result in reduced acceptance of gaming as a leisure activity. The combined company's future financial success will depend on the appeal of its gaming offerings to its customers and players and the acceptance of gaming generally. If Holdco is not able to anticipate and react to changes in consumer preferences and social mores, its competitive and financial position may be adversely affected. In addition, the combined company's future success will also depend on the success of the gaming industry as a whole in attracting and retaining players in the face of increased competition for players' entertainment dollars. Gaming may lose popularity as new leisure activities arise or as other leisure activities become more popular. If the popularity of gaming declines for any reason, Holdco's business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
The combined company's information technology systems may be vulnerable to hacker intrusion, malicious viruses and other cybercrime attacks, which may harm its business and expose us to liability.
The combined company games and gaming systems depend to a great extent on the reliability and security of Holdco's information technology system, software and network, which are subject to damage and interruption caused by human error, problems relating to the telecommunications network, software failure, natural disasters, sabotage, viruses and similar events. Any interruption in Holdco's systems could have a negative effect on the quality of products and services offered and, as a result, on customer demand and therefore volume of sales. As Holdco will also offer online access to games and betting, such services may be subject to attack by hackers or experience other network interruptions that interfere with the provision of service and thereby subject the combined company to liability for losses by players or to fines from the applicable governmental authorities for failure to provide the required level of service under its concessions.
The Issuer is exposed to significant risks in relation to compliance with anti-corruption laws and regulations and economic sanctions programs.
Doing business on a worldwide basis requires Holdco to comply with the laws and regulations of various jurisdictions. In particular, the Issuer's international operations are subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 ("FCPA"), the United
48
Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010 (the "Bribery Act") and economic sanctions programs, including those administered by the UN, EU and OFAC and regulations set forth under the Comprehensive Iran Accountability Divestment Act. The FCPA prohibits providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of obtaining or retaining business or securing any improper business advantage. Holdco may deal with both governments and state-owned business enterprises, the employees of which are considered foreign officials for purposes of the FCPA. The provisions of the Bribery Act extend beyond bribery of foreign public officials and are more onerous than the FCPA in a number of other respects, including jurisdiction, non-exemption of facilitation payments and penalties. Economic sanctions programs restrict our business dealings with certain sanctioned countries.
As a result of doing business in foreign countries, Holdco is exposed to a risk of violating anti-corruption laws and sanctions regulations applicable in those countries where Holdco, its partners or agents operate. Some of the international locations in which Holdco operates lack a developed legal system and have high levels of corruption. Holdco's continued expansion and worldwide operations, including in developing countries, its development of joint venture relationships worldwide and the employment of local agents in the countries in which Holdco operates increases the risk of violations of anti-corruption laws, OFAC or similar laws. Violations of anti-corruption laws and sanctions regulations are punishable by civil penalties, including fines, denial of export privileges, injunctions, asset seizures, debarment from government contracts (and termination of existing contracts) and revocations or restrictions of licenses, as well as criminal fines and imprisonment. In addition, any major violations could have a significant impact on Holdco's reputation and consequently on its ability to win future business.
While Holdco believes that it has a strong culture of compliance and adequate systems of control, Holdco will seek to continuously improve its systems of internal controls and to remedy any weaknesses identified. There can be no assurance, however, that the policies and procedures will be followed at all times or effectively detect and prevent violations of the applicable laws by one or more of Holdco's employees, consultants, agents or partners and, as a result, Holdco could be subject to penalties and material adverse consequences on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Negative perceptions and publicity surrounding the gaming industry could lead to increased gaming regulation.
From time to time, the gaming industry is exposed to negative publicity related to gaming behavior, gaming by minors, the presence of gaming machines in too many shops, risks related to online gaming and alleged association with money laundering. Publicity regarding problem gaming and other concerns with the gaming industry, even if not directly connected to Holdco, could adversely impact its business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, if the perception develops that the gaming industry is failing to address such concerns adequately, the resulting political pressure may result in the industry becoming subject to increased regulation. Such an increase in regulation could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Future changes to U.S. and foreign tax laws could adversely affect Holdco.
Holdco believes that, under current law, it is, and following the closing will be, treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes. However, changes to the inversion rules in Section 7874 of the Internal Revenue Code or the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (including Treasury Regulations recently announced by the U.S. Treasury Department) or other guidance from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") could adversely affect Holdco's status as a foreign corporation for U.S. federal tax purposes or otherwise adversely affect Holdco for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and any such changes could have prospective or retroactive application to GTECH, IGT, their respective shareholders, affiliates or the Mergers. In addition, recent legislative proposals have aimed to expand the scope of U.S. corporate tax residence, and such legislation, if passed, could have an adverse effect on Holdco.
49
Moreover, the U.S. Congress, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and other government agencies in jurisdictions where GTECH, IGT and their affiliates do business are focusing on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. One example is in the area of "base erosion and profit shifting," where payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates. As a result, the tax laws in the United States and other countries in which GTECH, IGT and their affiliates do business could change on a prospective or retroactive basis, and any such changes could adversely affect Holdco and its affiliates (including IGT and its subsidiaries after the Mergers).
Holdco intends to operate so as to be treated exclusively as a resident of the U.K. for tax purposes, but the relevant tax authorities may treat it as also being a resident of another jurisdiction for tax purposes.
Holdco is a company incorporated in the U.K. Current U.K. law, the decisions of the U.K. courts and the published practice of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, or HMRC, suggest that Holdco, a group holding company, is likely to be regarded as being a U.K. resident from incorporation and remaining so if, as Holdco intends that, (i) all major meetings of its Board of Directors and most routine meetings are held in the U.K. with a majority of directors present in the U.K. for those meetings; (ii) at those meetings there are full discussions of, and decisions are made regarding, the key strategic issues affecting Holdco and its subsidiaries; (iii) those meetings are properly minuted; (iv) at least some of the directors of Holdco, together with supporting staff, are based in the U.K.; and (v) Holdco has permanent staffed office premises in the U.K. sufficient to discharge its functions as a holding company.
Even if Holdco is resident of the U.K. for tax purposes, as expected, it would nevertheless not be treated as a resident of the U.K. if (a) it were concurrently resident of another jurisdiction (applying the tax residence rules of that jurisdiction) that has a double tax treaty with the U.K. and (b) there is a tiebreaker provision in that tax treaty which allocates exclusive residence to that other jurisdiction.
Residence of Holdco for Italian tax purposes is largely a question of fact based on all relevant circumstances. A rebuttable presumption of residence in Italy may apply under Article 73(5-bis) of the Italian Consolidated Tax Act, or CTA. However, Holdco intends to set up its management and organizational structure in such a manner that it should be regarded as resident in the U.K. from its incorporation for the purposes of the Italy-U.K. tax treaty. Because this analysis is highly factual and may depend on future changes in Holdco's management and organizational structure, there can be no assurance regarding the final determination of Holdco's tax residence. Should Holdco be treated as an Italian tax resident, it would be subject to taxation in Italy on its worldwide income and may be required to comply with withholding tax and/or reporting obligations provided under Italian tax law, which could result in additional costs and expenses.
Should Italian withholding taxes be imposed on future dividends or distributions with respect to Holdco ordinary shares, whether such withholding taxes are creditable against a tax liability to which a shareholder is otherwise subject depends on the laws of such shareholder's jurisdiction and such shareholder's particular circumstances. Shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors in respect of the consequences of the potential imposition of Italian withholding taxes.
As an English public limited company, certain capital structure decisions will require shareholder approval which may limit Holdco's flexibility to manage its capital structure.
English law provides that a board of directors may only allot shares (or rights to subscribe for or convertible into shares) with the prior authorization of shareholders, such authorization being up to the aggregate nominal amount of shares and for a maximum period of five years, each as specified in the articles of association or relevant shareholder resolution. This authorization would need to be renewed by Holdco's shareholders upon its expiration (i.e., at least every five years). The articles of association that will apply to Holdco after the Mergers become effective will authorize the allotment of additional
50
shares for a period of five years from the date of the relevant shareholder resolution, which authorization will need to be renewed upon expiration (i.e., at least every five years) but may be sought more frequently for additional five-year terms (or any shorter period).
English law also generally provides shareholders with preemptive rights when new shares are issued for cash; however, it is possible for the articles of association, or shareholders in general meeting, to exclude preemptive rights. Such an exclusion of preemptive rights may be for a maximum period of up to five years from the date of adoption of the articles of association, if the exclusion is contained in the articles of association, or from the date of the shareholder resolution, if the exclusion is by shareholder resolution; in either case, this exclusion would need to be renewed by Holdco's shareholders upon its expiration (i.e., at least every five years). The articles of association that will apply to Holdco after the Mergers will exclude preemptive rights for a period of five years following the date of the relevant shareholder resolution, which exclusion will need to be renewed upon expiration (i.e., at least every five years) to remain effective, but may be sought more frequently for additional five-year terms (or any shorter period).
English law also generally prohibits a public company from repurchasing its own shares without the prior approval of shareholders by ordinary resolution, being a resolution passed by a simple majority of votes cast, and other formalities. Such approval may be for a maximum period of up to five years. Holdco anticipates that, prior to the completion of the Mergers, an ordinary resolution will be adopted to permit purchases of Holdco shares. This ordinary resolution will need to be renewed upon expiration (i.e., at least every five years) but may be sought more frequently for additional five-year terms (or any shorter period).
See "The Holdco Shares, Articles of Association and Terms and Conditions of the Special Voting Shares" beginning on page 367.
English law will require that Holdco meet certain additional financial requirements before it declares dividends or repurchases shares following the Mergers.
Under English law, Holdco will only be able to declare dividends, make distributions or repurchase shares out of "distributable profits." "Distributable profits" are a company's accumulated, realized profits, so far as not previously utilized by distribution or capitalization, less its accumulated, realized losses, so far as not previously written off in a reduction or reorganization of capital duly made. In addition, Holdco, as a public company, may only make a distribution if the amount of its net assets is not less than the aggregate of its called-up share capital and undistributable reserves and if, and to the extent that, the distribution does not reduce the amount of those assets to less than that aggregate. Immediately after the Mergers, Holdco may not have "distributable profits." Following the effective date for the Mergers, it is expected that Holdco will capitalize the merger reserve created pursuant to the Mergers and implement a parallel court-approved reduction of that capital in order to create a reserve of an equivalent amount of distributable profits to support the payment of possible future dividends or future share repurchases. Neither the capitalization or the reduction will impact shareholders' relative interests in the capital of Holdco. The Holdco articles of association will, from the effective date of the Mergers, permit Holdco by ordinary resolution of the shareholders to declare dividends, provided that the directors have made a recommendation as to its amount. The dividend shall not exceed the amount recommended by the directors. The directors may also decide to pay interim dividends if it appears to them that the profits available for distribution justify the payment. When recommending or declaring the payment of a dividend, the directors will be required under English law to comply with their duties, including considering Holdco's future financial requirements.
The enforcement of shareholder judgments against Holdco may be more difficult.
Because Holdco is a public limited company incorporated under English law, after the effective time of the Mergers, shareholders could experience more difficulty enforcing judgments obtained
51
against Holdco in U.S. and Italian courts than would currently be the case for U.S. or Italian judgments obtained against IGT or GTECH. In addition, it may be more difficult (or impossible) to bring some types of claims against Holdco in courts in England than it would be to bring similar claims against a U.S. company in a U.S. court or an Italian company in Italian court.
Transfers of Holdco ordinary shares may be subject to stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax ("SDRT") in the U.K., which would increase the cost of dealing in Holdco ordinary shares as compared to GTECH or IGT shares.
Stamp duty and/or SDRT are imposed in the U.K. on certain transfers of chargeable securities (which include shares in companies incorporated in the U.K.) at a rate of 0.5% of the consideration paid for the transfer. Certain issues or transfers of shares to depositaries or into clearance systems, as discussed below, are charged at a higher rate of 1.5%.
Transfers of shares held in book entry form through the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTC") should not be subject to stamp duty or SDRT in the U.K. A transfer of title in the shares from within the DTC system out of DTC and any subsequent transfers that occur entirely outside the DTC system, including repurchase by Holdco, will generally be subject to stamp duty or SDRT at a rate of 0.5% of any consideration, which is payable by the transferee of the shares. Any such duty must be paid (and the relevant transfer document stamped by HMRC) before the transfer can be registered in the books of Holdco. If such shares are redeposited into the DTC system, the redeposit will attract stamp duty or SDRT at the higher 1.5% rate.
Following the Mergers, Holdco expects to put in place arrangements to require that shares held in certificated form cannot be transferred into the DTC system until the transferor of the shares has first delivered the shares to a depository specified by Holdco so that stamp duty or SDRT may be collected in connection with the initial delivery to the depository. Any such shares will be evidenced by a receipt issued by the depository. Before the transfer can be registered in the books of Holdco, the transferor will also be required to put in the depository funds to settle the applicable stamp duty or SDRT, which will be charged at a rate of 1.5% of the value of the shares.
If Holdco ordinary shares are not eligible for deposit and clearing within the facilities of DTC, then transactions in its securities may be disrupted.
The facilities of DTC are a widely-used mechanism that allow for rapid electronic transfers of securities between the participants in the DTC system, which include many large banks and brokerage firms. Holdco expects that, upon the completion of the Mergers, Holdco ordinary shares will be eligible for deposit and clearing within the DTC system. However, DTC is not obligated to accept Holdco ordinary shares for deposit and clearing within its facilities at the Closing and, even if DTC does initially accept Holdco ordinary shares, it will generally have discretion to cease to act as a depository and clearing agency for Holdco ordinary shares. If DTC determines at any time that Holdco ordinary shares are not eligible for continued deposit and clearance within its facilities, then Holdco believes that Holdco ordinary shares would not be eligible for continued listing on a U.S. securities exchange and trading in Holdco ordinary shares would be disrupted. While Holdco would pursue alternative arrangements to preserve the listing and maintain trading, any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of Holdco ordinary shares.
GTECH's and IGT's actual financial positions and results of operations may differ materially from the unaudited pro forma financial data included in this proxy statement/prospectus.
The pro forma financial information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be an accurate indication of the combined company's financial position or results of operations if the Mergers and associated financing transactions are completed on the dates indicated. The pro forma financial information has been derived from the audited and
52
unaudited historical financial statements of GTECH and IGT and certain adjustments and assumptions have been made regarding the combined company after giving effect to the Mergers and associated financing transactions. The assets and liabilities of IGT have been measured at fair value based on various preliminary estimates using assumptions that GTECH management believes are reasonable utilizing information currently available and factually supportable. The process for estimating the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities requires the use of judgment in determining the appropriate assumptions and estimates. These estimates may be revised as additional information becomes available and as additional analyses are performed. Differences between preliminary estimates in the pro forma financial information and the final acquisition accounting will occur and could have a material impact on the pro forma financial information and the combined company's financial position and future results of operations.
In addition, the assumptions used in preparing the pro forma financial information may not prove to be accurate, and other factors may affect the combined company's financial condition or results of operations following the Closing. Any potential decline in Holdco's financial condition or results of operations may cause significant variations in the price of Holdco ordinary shares. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information" beginning on page 270 of this proxy statement/prospectus.
De Agostini will have significant voting power with respect to corporate matters considered by the shareholders of Holdco.
Following the Mergers, based on the number of GTECH ordinary shares and shares of IGT common stock outstanding as of the record date, and the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders representing 11.3% of GTECH's fully paid-up share capital as of the record date, it is expected that De Agostini will beneficially own shares representing approximately 51.8% of the aggregate voting power of Holdco. By virtue of De Agostini's voting power in Holdco, as well as De Agostini's representation on the Holdco Board, De Agostini may have significant influence over the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matters submitted to Holdco shareholders for approval. De Agostini will be able to block any such matter which, under English law, requires approval by special resolution (i.e., a resolution approved by the holders of at least 75% of the aggregate voting power of the outstanding Holdco ordinary shares, being entitled to vote, voting on the resolution), such as amendment of the Holdco Articles or the exclusion of preemptive rights.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, De Agostini and IGT entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which, subject to certain conditions, De Agostini agreed to vote the Holdco ordinary shares it will beneficially own in support of the corporate governance and leadership structure for Holdco for three years following the Closing as outlined below in the "The Merger AgreementCovenantsCorporate Governance Matters" beginning on page 173.
The loyalty voting structure to be implemented in connection with the Mergers may concentrate voting power in a small number of Holdco shareholders and such concentration may increase over time.
Holdco shareholders that maintain their ownership of Holdco ordinary shares continuously for at least three years will be entitled, upon election, to direct the voting rights in respect of one special voting share per ordinary share held for such period, provided that such shareholders meet the conditions described in "The Holdco Shares, Articles of Association and Terms and Conditions of the Special Voting Shares" beginning on page 367. If Holdco shareholders maintaining ownership of a significant number of Holdco ordinary shares for an uninterrupted period of at least three years elect to receive the right to direct the exercise of the voting rights attaching to special voting shares, it is possible that a relatively large proportion of the voting power of Holdco could be further concentrated in a relatively small number of shareholders who would have significant influence over Holdco.
53
The loyalty voting structure may prevent or frustrate attempts by Holdco shareholders to change Holdco's management and hinder efforts to acquire a controlling interest in Holdco, and the Holdco ordinary share price may be lower as a result.
The provisions of the Holdco Articles establishing the loyalty voting structure may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or attempt to acquire, control of Holdco, even if a change of control were considered favorably by shareholders holding a majority of Holdco ordinary shares. As a result of the loyalty voting structure, it is possible that a relatively large proportion of the voting power of Holdco could be concentrated in a relatively small number of holders who would have significant influence over Holdco. Such shareholders participating in the loyalty voting structure could reduce the likelihood of change of control transactions that may otherwise benefit holders of Holdco ordinary shares.
The loyalty voting structure may also prevent or discourage shareholders' initiatives aimed at changes in Holdco's management.
Tax consequences of the loyalty voting structure are uncertain.
No statutory, judicial or administrative authority has provided public guidance on how the receipt, ownership, or loss of the entitlement to instruct the Nominee on how to vote in respect of special voting shares and, as a result, the tax consequences are uncertain.
The fair market value of the Holdco special voting shares, which may be relevant to the tax consequences, is a factual determination and is not governed by any guidance that directly addresses such a situation. Because, among other things, (i) the special voting shares are not transferrable (other than in very limited circumstances as provided for in the loyalty voting structure), (ii) on a return of capital of Holdco on a winding up or otherwise, the holders of the special voting shares will only be entitled to receive out of Holdco assets available for distribution to its shareholders, in aggregate, $1, and (iii) loss of the entitlement to instruct the Nominee on how to vote in respect of special voting shares will occur for nil consideration, Holdco believes and intends to take the position that the value of each special voting share is minimal. However, the relevant tax authorities could assert that the value of the special voting shares as determined by Holdco is incorrect. The tax treatment of the loyalty voting structure is unclear and shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of receipt, ownership and loss of the entitlement to instruct the Nominee on how to vote in respect of special voting shares. See "Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations", "Material U.K. Tax Considerations" and "Material Italian Tax Considerations" for a further discussion.
The combined company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk.
The combined company will transact business in numerous countries around the world and expects that a significant portion of its business will continue to take place in international markets. Holdco will prepare its consolidated financial statements in its functional currency, while the financial statements of each of its subsidiaries will be prepared in the functional currency of that entity. Accordingly, fluctuations in the exchange rate of the functional currencies of the combined company's foreign currency entities against the functional currency of Holdco will impact its results of operations and financial condition. As such, it is expected that the combined company's revenues and earnings will continue to be exposed to the risks that may arise from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which could have a material adverse effect on Holdco's business, results of operation or financial condition.
54
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO GTECH'S BUSINESS
GTECH is exposed to risks associated with the performance of the global economy, the Eurozone debt crisis and the prevailing economic conditions in the markets in which it operates, including Italy.
GTECH is exposed to risks associated with the performance of the global economy and the markets in which it operates. GTECH's income and results of operations have been influenced, and will continue to be influenced, to a certain degree, by the general state and the performance of the global economy. The recent volatility of the financial markets shows that there can be no assurance that any recovery is sustainable or that there will be no recurrence of the global financial and economic crisis or similar adverse market conditions.
GTECH's business is particularly sensitive to reductions in discretionary consumer spending in the markets in which it operates, which may be affected by general economic conditions in these markets. Economic contraction, economic uncertainty and the perception by GTECH's customers of weak or weakening economic conditions may cause a decline in demand for entertainment in the forms of the gaming services that GTECH offers. In addition, changes in discretionary consumer spending or consumer preferences could be driven by factors such as an unstable job market, perceived or actual disposable consumer income and wealth, or fears of war and future acts of terrorism.
In particular, the lack of resolution of the sovereign debt crisis of several countries of the Eurozone, including Greece, Italy, Cyprus, Ireland, Spain and Portugal, together with the risk of contagion to other, more stable, countries, particularly France and Germany, has raised a number of uncertainties regarding the stability and overall standing of the European Monetary Union. Concerns that the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis could worsen may lead to the reintroduction of national currencies in one or more Eurozone countries or, in particularly dire circumstances, the abandonment of the Euro. The departure or risk of departure from the Euro by one or more Eurozone countries and/or the abandonment of the Euro as a currency could have major negative effects on both existing contractual relations and the fulfillment of obligations by GTECH and/or its customers, which could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
A significant portion of GTECH's total consolidated revenues is derived from government concessions in Italy including the Lotto and instant lottery concessions.
A substantial portion of GTECH's revenues, equal to approximately 53.7% of GTECH's total consolidated revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 (52.4% and 54.8% for the years ended December, 31 2013 and 2012, respectively), is derived from exclusive and non-exclusive concessions awarded to GTECH by Agenzia delle Dogane e Dei Monopoli ("ADM"), the governmental authority responsible for regulating and supervising gaming in Italy. In particular, a substantial portion of GTECH's revenues is derived from two exclusive concessions, one for the operation of the Lotto game (the "Lotto Concession") and one for instant tickets (equal to approximately 14.1% and 12.1%, respectively, of GTECH's total consolidated revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014, 13.3% and 12.3%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 13.1% and 12.4%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012). The Lotto Concession and the instant ticket majority-owned concession have been respectively awarded by ADM to GTECH and its subsidiary, Lotterie Nazionali S.r.l. GTECH expects that the Lotto Concession will expire on June 8, 2016, while the instant ticket concession will expire on September 30, 2019.
GTECH's management believes that in the future, a significant portion of GTECH's business and profitability will continue to depend upon the concessions awarded to GTECH by ADM and other Italian governmental entities. Therefore, a material reduction in GTECH's revenues from these concessions, including as a result of an early termination or non-renewal of these concessions following
55
their expiration, could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
Management believes that the Lotto Concession held by GTECH will expire on June 8, 2016 as was determined by an arbitral ruling in favor of GTECH on August 1, 2005, and confirmed by the Supreme Court of Cassation on February 3, 2014. However, as described further below in the section "Business of GTECH and Certain Information about GTECHLegal ProceedingsLotto Game Concession: Lottomatica/ADM ArbitrationStanley International Betting Limited Appeal," the final expiration date of the Lotto Concession is subject to dispute and an appeal lodged by Stanley International Betting Limited ("Stanley") is still pending. The outcome of this appeal before the State Council related to the ability for the Lotto Concession to be renewed after its first nine year term could result in the earlier termination of GTECH's Lotto Concession prior to June 8, 2016.
Despite several prior arbitral awards and judicial decisions in GTECH's favor, ADM nonetheless may continue to seek monetary or other relief from GTECH in respect of these four disputed years of concession, potentially through additional legal or administrative action. As described herein, although GTECH has strong arguments in defense of these allegations, an adverse finding or settlement could result in significant damages or other payments. It is uncertain what effect, if any, the ongoing dispute regarding the expiration of the Lotto concession will have on GTECH's ability to renew the Lotto concession and, if renewed, the economics of the new concession.
GTECH relies on time-limited government concessions in order to conduct its main business activities. Termination of the Lotto, instant lottery and machine gaming concessions in Italy would have a material adverse effect on GTECH's revenues.
GTECH is required to obtain and maintain licenses from various jurisdictions in order to operate its business. Upon the expiration of GTECH's concessions, new concessions may be awarded to one or more parties through a competitive bidding process open to parties other than GTECH or its subsidiaries. In addition, concessions may be terminated prior to their expiration dates upon the occurrence of certain events of default affecting GTECH or its subsidiaries or if their continuation is determined under applicable principles of law to be against the public interest.
Before the expiration date of the Lotto concession in June 2016, the Italian government will issue a request for proposal ("RFP") to award a new Lotto concession. GTECH's management does not anticipate any constraints to participating in the RFP for the new concession, but GTECH cannot be certain of the results of the tender, including whether GTECH will be awarded the new concession, or what costs will be associated with award of the concession.
The instant ticket concession is, in theory, renewable, but GTECH's management does not believe it is likely. Instead, GTECH's management believes that an RFP will be issued under a different law, with new rules, for a new concession. Under the new rules, the RFP may result in a non-exclusive concession (i.e., more than one bidder may be awarded the concession), and award of the concession may entail payment of a lump sum.
As with the above concessions, the non-exclusive concession for the operation of video lottery terminals ("VLTs") and amusement with prize machines ("AWPs") held by Lottomatica Videlot Rete S.p.A., as well as the betting concessions that expire in June 2016 held by Lottomatica Scommesses S.r.l., will be subject to the same concerns. Finally, the conditions for any new concession will be established by law and included in the rules of the new concession.
There can be no assurance that GTECH will be able to renew any of its existing concessions, and the loss, denial, non-renewal or renewal on different terms of any of its concessions could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
56
See "Business of GTECH and Certain Information About GTECHBusiness SegmentsItaly" for more information on GTECH's Italian concessions, beginning on page 220.
GTECH's obligation to transfer assets upon the termination of the Lotto and other concessions could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's financial position and results of operations.
Upon the termination or non-renewal of the Lotto, the instant lottery or machine gaming concessions, GTECH will be required at the request of ADM to transfer to ADM, free of charge, ownership of certain assets that are part of its central system used to operate the Lotto, the instant lottery or machine gaming and equipment such as terminals at the points of sale, facilities, software, data files, and any other related assets that may be necessary for the full functioning, operation, and operability of the system itself. As of September 30, 2014, the value of such assets was €52 million (the value of such assets was €61 million as of December 31, 2013) or approximately 0.7% of GTECH's consolidated total assets and approximately 1.2% without goodwill (the value of such assets was approximately 0.9% of GTECH's consolidated total assets and approximately 1.5% without goodwill as of December 31, 2013). The obligation to transfer the Lotto concession assets may also have detrimental effects on certain other businesses operated by GTECH because GTECH uses terminals, central system hardware and software used in the operation of Lotto in connection with certain of its other businesses.
GTECH is subject to substantial penalties for failure to perform under its concessions and contracts.
GTECH's Italian concessions, lottery contracts in the United States and in other jurisdictions and other service contracts often require substantial performance bonds to secure its performance under such contracts and require GTECH to pay substantial monetary liquidated damages in the event of non-performance by GTECH.
As of December 31, 2013, GTECH had outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit in an aggregate amount of approximately €956.9 million. These instruments present a potential for expense for GTECH and divert financial resources from other uses.
Claims on performance bonds, drawings on letters of credit and payment of liquidated damages could individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
Slow growth or declines in sales of lottery goods and services could lead to lower revenues and cash-flows for GTECH.
In recent years, as the lottery industry has matured in the primary markets where GTECH operates, the rate of lottery sales growth has moderated and some of GTECH's customers have from time-to-time experienced a downward trend in sales. GTECH's dependence on large jackpot games and specifically, the decline in aggregate sales at similar jackpot levels ("jackpot fatigue") has had a negative impact on revenue from this game category. These developments may in part reflect increased competition for consumers' discretionary spending, including from a proliferation of destination gaming venues and an increased availability of internet gaming opportunities. GTECH's future success will depend, in part, on the success of the lottery industry, as a whole, in attracting and retaining new players in the face of such increased competition in the entertainment and gambling markets (which competition may continue to increase), as well as its own success in developing innovative services, products and distribution methods/systems to achieve this goal. In addition, there is a risk that new products and services may replace existing products and services. The replacement of old products and services with new products and services may offset the overall growth of sales of GTECH. A failure by GTECH to achieve these goals could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
57
GTECH faces risks related to the extensive and complex governmental regulation applicable to its operations.
GTECH's activities are subject to extensive and complex governmental regulation which varies from time to time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction where GTECH operates, which includes restrictions on advertising, increases in or differing interpretations by authorities on taxation, limitations on the use of cash and anti-money laundering compliance procedures. GTECH believes that it has developed procedures designed to comply with such regulatory requirements. However, any failure by GTECH to so comply or its inability to obtain required suitability findings could lead regulatory authorities to seek to restrict GTECH's business in their jurisdictions.
In addition, GTECH is subject to extensive background investigations in its lottery and gaming businesses. Authorities generally conduct such investigations prior to and after the award of a lottery contract or issuance of a gaming license. Such investigations frequently include individual suitability standards for officers, directors, major shareholders and key employees. Authorities are generally empowered to disqualify GTECH from receiving a lottery contract or operating a lottery system as a result of any such investigation. GTECH's failure, or the failure of any of its personnel, systems or machines, in obtaining or retaining a required license or approval in one jurisdiction could negatively impact its ability to obtain or retain required licenses and approvals in other jurisdictions. Any such failure would decrease the geographic areas where GTECH may operate and as a result could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
Further, there have been, are currently and may in the future continue to be, investigations of various types conducted by governmental authorities into possible improprieties and wrongdoing in connection with GTECH's efforts to obtain or the awarding of lottery contracts and related matters. Because such investigations frequently are conducted in secret, GTECH may not necessarily know of the existence of an investigation in which it might be involved. Because GTECH's reputation for integrity is an important factor in its business dealings with lottery and other governmental agencies, a governmental allegation or a finding of improper conduct by or attributable to GTECH in any manner or the prolonged investigation of these matters by governmental or regulatory authorities could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects, including its ability to retain existing contracts or to obtain new or renewed contracts, both in the subject jurisdiction and elsewhere. In addition, adverse publicity resulting from any such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's reputation, results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
GTECH may be subject to an unfavorable outcome with respect to pending litigation, which could result in substantial monetary damages or other harm to GTECH.
Due to the nature of its business, GTECH is involved in a number of legal, regulatory, tax and arbitration proceedings regarding, among other matters, claims by and against it as well as injunctions by third parties arising out of the ordinary course of its business and is subject to investigations and compliance inquiries related to its on-going operations. The outcome of these proceedings and similar future proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. As of September 30, 2014, GTECH's total provision for litigation risks was €6.6 million. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate the outcome of any proceeding. As such, the amounts of GTECH's provision for litigation risk, accrued also on the basis of assessments made by external counsel, could vary significantly from the amounts GTECH may be asked to pay and from the amounts GTECH would ultimately pay in any such proceeding. In addition, unfavorable resolution of or significant delay in adjudicating such proceedings could require GTECH to pay substantial monetary damages or penalties and/or incur costs which may exceed any provision for litigation risks or, under certain circumstances, cause the termination or revocation of the relevant concession, license or authorization and thereby have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
58
GTECH faces risks in connection with its international operations.
GTECH is a global business and derives a substantial portion of its revenues from operations outside of Italy and the United States (15.5% of GTECH's total consolidated revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014; 19.3% and 18.5% for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively). Risks associated with GTECH's international operations include increased governmental regulation of the online lottery industry in the markets where it operates, exchange controls or other currency restrictions and significant political instability.
Other economic risks that GTECH's international activity subjects it to include inflation, currency devaluation, illiquid or restricted foreign exchange markets, high interest rates, debt default, unstable capital markets and foreign direct investment restrictions. Political risks include change of leadership, change of governmental policies, new foreign exchange controls regulating the flow of money into or out of a country, failure of a government to honor existing contracts, changes in tax laws and corruption, as well as global risk aversion driven by political unrest, war and terrorism. Finally, social instability risks include high crime in certain of the countries in which GTECH operates due to poor economic and political conditions, riots, unemployment and poor health conditions. These factors may affect GTECH's work force as well as the general business environment in a country. The materialization of such risks could have a negative impact on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
If GTECH is unable to protect its intellectual property or prevent its use by third parties, its ability to compete in the market may be harmed.
GTECH protects its proprietary technology and intellectual property to ensure that its competitors do not use such technology and intellectual property. However, intellectual property laws in Italy, the United States and in other jurisdictions may afford differing and limited protection, may not permit GTECH to gain or maintain a competitive advantage, and may not prevent GTECH's competitors from duplicating its products, designing around its patented products, or gaining access to its proprietary information and technology.
Although GTECH takes measures intended to prevent disclosure of its trade secrets through non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions, GTECH may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of its technical knowledge or trade secrets. For example, there can be no assurance that consultants, vendors, former employees or current employees will not breach their obligations regarding non-disclosure and restrictions on use. In addition, anyone could seek to challenge, invalidate, circumvent or render unenforceable any GTECH patent. GTECH cannot provide assurance that any pending or future patent applications it holds will result in an issued patent, or that, if patents are issued, they would necessarily provide meaningful protection against competitors and competitive technologies and/or adequately protect GTECH's then-current products and technologies. GTECH may not be able to detect the unauthorized use of its intellectual property or take appropriate steps to enforce its intellectual property rights effectively, and certain contractual provisions, including restrictions on use, copying, transfer and disclosure of licensed programs, may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions.
GTECH licenses intellectual property rights from third parties. If such third parties do not properly maintain or enforce the intellectual property rights underlying such licenses, or if such licenses are terminated or expire without being renewed, GTECH could lose the right to use the licensed intellectual property, which could adversely affect its competitive position or its ability to commercialize certain of its technologies, products or services.
GTECH intends to enforce its intellectual property rights, and from time to time it may initiate claims against third parties that it believes are infringing its intellectual property rights if it is unable to resolve matters satisfactorily through negotiation. Litigation brought to protect and enforce GTECH's
59
intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management and could fail to obtain the results sought and could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
Third party intellectual property infringement claims against GTECH could limit or affect its ability to compete effectively.
GTECH cannot provide assurance that its products or methods do not infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. Infringement and other intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against GTECH, whether successful or not, are costly, time-consuming and distracting to management, and could harm GTECH's reputation. In addition, intellectual property litigation or claims could require GTECH to do one or more of the following: (i) cease selling or using any of its products that allegedly incorporate the infringed intellectual property, (ii) pay substantial damages, (iii) obtain a license from the third party owner, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, (iv) rebrand or rename its products, and (v) redesign its products to avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may not be possible and, if possible, could be costly, time-consuming or result in a less effective product. The loss of proprietary technology or a successful claim against GTECH could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
GTECH's business prospects and future success rely heavily upon the integrity of its employees, directors and agents and the security of its systems.
The real and perceived integrity and security of a lottery is critical to its ability to attract players. GTECH strives to set exacting standards of personal integrity for its employees and directors, as well as system security for the systems that it provides to its customers, and its reputation in this regard is an important factor in its business dealings with lottery and other governmental agencies. For this reason, an allegation or a finding of improper conduct on GTECH's part, or on the part of one or more of its current or former employees, directors or agents that is attributable to GTECH, or an actual or alleged system security defect or failure attributable to GTECH, could have a material adverse effect upon GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects, including its ability to retain or renew existing contracts or obtain new contracts.
GTECH's systems are subject to network interruption risks which could have a negative impact on the quality of the services offered by GTECH and, as a result, on demand from consumers and consequently volume of sales and revenues.
GTECH's ability to provide goods (such as software and lottery terminals) and services to its customers and to effectively operate its games and services depends to a great extent on the reliability and security of the information technology systems providers and networks it uses. Information technology systems and networks used by GTECH are potentially subject to damage and interruption caused by human error, problems relating to the telecommunications network, natural disasters, sabotage, hacking, viruses and similar events. Interruptions in the system could have a negative impact on the quality of the services offered and, as a result, on demand from consumers and consequently on the volume of sales and revenues. In addition, interruptions in systems or networks could result in the termination of certain of GTECH's concessions or lottery contracts or the imposition of substantial penalties. GTECH has, from time to time, experienced system downtime and problems with telecommunications networks.
60
GTECH may not be able to respond to technological changes or to satisfy future technology demands of its customers, in which case it could fall behind its competitors.
Many of GTECH's software and hardware products are based on proprietary technologies. While management believes that certain of GTECH's technologies, such as the GTECH Enterprise Series open-architecture software platform, provide an industry standard, if GTECH were to fail to enhance its product and service offerings to take advantage of technological developments, it may fall behind its competitors and GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects could suffer.
GTECH's lottery operations are dependent upon its continued ability to retain and extend its existing contracts and win new contracts.
GTECH derives a portion of its revenues and cash flow from its portfolio of long-term lottery contracts in the Americas and International segments (equal to approximately 28.3% of GTECH's total consolidated revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 and 27.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively), awarded through competitive procurement processes. In addition, GTECH's U.S. lottery contracts typically permit a lottery authority to terminate the contract at any time for failure to perform and for other specified reasons, and many of these contracts in the U.S. permit the lottery authority to terminate the contract at will with limited notice and do not specify the compensation, if any, to which GTECH would be entitled were such termination to occur.
Further, in the event that GTECH is unable or unwilling to perform, some of its lottery contracts permit the lottery authority to acquire title to its system related equipment and software during the term of the contract or upon the expiration or earlier termination of the contract, in some cases without paying GTECH any compensation related to the transfer of that equipment and software to the lottery authority.
The termination of or failure to renew or extend one or more of GTECH's lottery contracts, or the renewal or extension of one or more of GTECH's lottery contracts on materially altered terms or the transfer of its assets without compensation could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
GTECH has a concentrated customer base and the loss of any of its larger customers (or lower sales from any of these customers) could lead to significantly lower revenue.
Revenues from GTECH's top ten customers outside of Italy accounted for approximately 18.1% of GTECH's total consolidated revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2014 (18.3% and 17.7% for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively). If GTECH were to lose any of these larger customers, or if these larger customers experience slow lottery ticket sales and consequently reduced lottery revenue, there could be a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
GTECH's dependence on certain suppliers creates a risk of implementation delays if the supply contract is terminated or breached, and any delays may result in substantial penalties.
GTECH purchases most of the parts, components and subassemblies necessary for its lottery and machine gaming terminals and other system components from outside sources. GTECH outsources all of the manufacturing and assembly of certain lottery products to a single vendor while other products have portions outsourced to multiple qualified vendors. Although GTECH works closely with its manufacturing outsourcing vendor and GTECH is likely to be able to realign its manufacturing facilities to manufacture its products itself, GTECH's operating results could be adversely affected if one or more of its manufacturing outsourcing vendors failed to meet production schedules. For example, while most of the parts, components and subassemblies can be purchased through more than one supplier, GTECH currently has approximately three material sole source vendors for lottery terminals for its
61
lottery products. GTECH's total purchases from these three vendors during the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately 57.7% of its total consolidated purchases of parts, components and subassemblies for that product for that year. GTECH's management believes that if a supply contract with one of these vendors were to be terminated or breached, GTECH would be able to replace the vendor. However, it may take time to replace the vendor under some circumstances and any replacement parts, components or subassemblies may be more expensive, which could reduce GTECH's margins. Depending on a number of factors, including the level of the related part, component or subassembly in GTECH's inventory, the time it takes to replace a vendor may result in a delay in its implementation for a customer. Generally, if GTECH fails to meet its delivery schedules under its contracts, it may be subject to substantial penalties or liquidated damages, or even contract termination, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
New arrangements with state lotteries in the U.S. such as lottery manager contracts may increase the risks to GTECH in its dealings with state lotteries, including requiring the guarantee of income, up-front payments or similar arrangements.
In the United States, state lotteries are exploring lottery manager contracts as a means of maximizing lottery profits. Under these contracts (currently in Illinois, Indiana and New Jersey), GTECH is required to guarantee income levels to the state. In addition, in other states, agreements may require upfront payments for concessions. Arrangements such as the guarantee of income when not achieved, large up-front payments or other similar arrangements may have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operation, business, financial condition or prospects.
GTECH's business may be adversely affected by competition.
The gaming business is highly competitive. GTECH faces competition from a number of companies in Italy, the United States and worldwide. Although GTECH is making investments, including the Mergers intended to position it to exploit the opportunities in the machine gaming, interactive gaming and sports betting markets, it expects significant competition in these markets from other companies. Competition could cause GTECH to lose players or customers and could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects. The online lottery industry has faced increased competition from the entertainment and gambling industries in recent years, including from a proliferation of destination gaming venues, and an increased availability of gaming opportunities including gaming opportunities on the internet. In recent years there has been increased competition in the gaming industry and in some instances, GTECH observed extremely aggressive pricing from these competitors in an effort to gain market share. Increased competition and aggressive pricing practices from competitors could adversely affect GTECH's ability to retain business, to win new business and may impact the margin of profitability on contracts that GTECH is successful in retaining or winning. Also, awards of contracts to GTECH are, from time to time, challenged by its competitors. Increased competition also may have a material adverse effect on the profitability of contracts which GTECH does obtain. Over the past several fiscal years, GTECH has experienced and may continue to experience a reduction in the percentage of lottery ticket sales that it receives from certain customers resulting from contract rebids, extensions and renewals due to a number of factors, including the substantial growth of lottery sales, reductions in the cost of technology and telecommunications services and general and competitive dynamics.
GTECH may also be affected by increased competition as a result of consolidation among gaming equipment and technology companies. GTECH expects the trend toward consolidation in its global industry to continue as gaming equipment and technology companies attempt to strengthen or expand their market positions in the gaming industry through mergers and acquisitions. Several acquisitions of slot machine and other gaming equipment makers by gaming technology companies have been
62
announced recently, such as the pending acquisition of Bally Technologies by Scientific Games Corp., announced in August 2014, and the acquisition of Multimedia Games by Global Cash Access Holdings Inc., announced in September 2014 and expected to close next year. GTECH believes that industry consolidation such as these acquisitions may result in stronger competitors that are better able to compete by increasing their scale and operating efficiencies. Consolidation may also result in competitors with greater resources which may be directed toward accelerating innovation and product development, resulting in a broader service and product offering. Such changes in the competitive landscape could potentially reduce GTECH's market share and lead to declining sales volumes and prices for its products and services. If any of these risks are realized, GTECH's competitive position and therefore its business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.
The gaming and betting industry is highly regulated.
The gaming and betting industry is heavily regulated. In Italy, this regulation determines, among others, (i) games that may be operated and amounts that may be charged by operators, (ii) the prizes for the players, (iii) the compensation paid to concessionaires, including GTECH, (iv) the kinds of points of sale and (v) the applicable tax regulations. Renewing existing and applying for new licenses, concessions, permits and approvals can be costly and time consuming and there is no assurance of success. Any failure to renew or obtain any such license, concession, permit or approval could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects. Any changes in the legal or regulatory framework or other changes, such as increases in the taxation of gaming or betting, changes in the compensation paid to concessionaires or increases in the number of licenses, authorizations or concessions awarded to competitors of GTECH could materially and adversely affect its profitability. For instance, the profitability of the video lottery terminal ("VLT") sector has declined since 2012, after ADM increased taxation on VLTs from 2% to 4% in January 2012 and then to 5% during 2013.
In the United States and in many international jurisdictions where GTECH currently operates or seeks to do business, lotteries are not permitted unless expressly authorized by law. The successful implementation of GTECH's growth strategy and its business could be materially adversely affected if jurisdictions that do not currently authorize lotteries do not approve new lotteries or if those jurisdictions that currently authorize lotteries do not continue to permit such activities.
Once authorized, the ongoing operations of lotteries and lottery operators are typically subject to extensive and evolving regulation. In the United States, in particular, lottery authorities generally conduct an investigation of the winning vendor and its employees prior to and after the award of a lottery contract. Further, lottery authorities may require the removal of any of the vendor's employees deemed to be unsuitable and are generally empowered to disqualify GTECH from receiving a lottery contract or operating a lottery system as a result of any such investigation. Some jurisdictions also require extensive personal and financial disclosure and background checks from persons and entities beneficially owning a specified percentage (typically 5% or more) of GTECH's securities. The failure of these beneficial owners to submit to such background checks and provide required disclosure could jeopardize the award of a lottery contract to GTECH or provide grounds for termination of an existing lottery contract. Additional restrictions are often imposed by international jurisdictions upon foreign corporations, such as GTECH, seeking to do business there.
Finally, sales generated by lottery games frequently are dependent upon decisions over which GTECH has no control made by lottery authorities with respect to the operation of these games, such as matters relating to the marketing and prize payout features of lottery games. Because GTECH is typically compensated in whole or in part based on a jurisdiction's gross lottery sales, lower than anticipated sales due to these factors could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
63
The illegal gaming market could negatively affect GTECH's business.
A significant threat for the entire gaming and betting industry arises from illegal activities. Such illegal activities may drain significant betting volumes away from the regulated industry. In particular, illegal gaming could take away a portion of the present players that are the focus of GTECH's business. The loss of such players could have a material adverse effect on GTECH's results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO IGT'S BUSINESS
You should read and consider risk factors specific to IGT's business that will also affect the combined company after the Mergers. These risks are described in Part I, Item 1A of IGT's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2014 and in other documents that are incorporated by reference into this document. See "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 407 of this proxy statement/prospectus for the location of information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus.
64
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF GTECH
The following tables set forth summary historical consolidated financial and other data of GTECH for the periods indicated and has been derived from:
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for a full year or any future interim period. The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods.
The following information is presented in millions of Euro, unless otherwise specified.
The following information should be read in conjunction with "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of GTECH," "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information," the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. Historical results for any period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
Consolidated Income Statement Data
|
For the nine months ended September 30, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | |||||
|
(€ million, except per share data) |
||||||
Total revenue |
2,260.2 | 2,289.7 | |||||
Operating income |
470.1 | 455.3 | |||||
Income before income tax expense |
323.7 | 329.0 | |||||
Net income(1) |
191.0 | 198.0 | |||||
Attributable to: |
|||||||
Owners of the parent |
176.1 | 174.1 | |||||
Non-controlling interests |
14.9 | 23.9 | |||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 1.01 | |||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 1.01 |
65
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data
|
At September 30, |
At December 31, |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | |||||
|
(€ million, except share information) |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
455.6 | 419.1 | |||||
Total assets |
7,303.4 | 7,123.4 | |||||
Debt(1) |
2,890.6 | 2,856.6 | |||||
Non-current liabilities |
2,957.4 | 2,915.7 | |||||
Total equity |
2,757.4 | 2,603.5 | |||||
Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
2,473.7 | 2,199.9 | |||||
Non-controlling interests |
283.7 | 403.6 |
Consolidated Income Statement Data
|
For the years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
|
(€ million, except per share data) |
|||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
3,062.8 | 3,075.7 | 2,973.7 | 2,314.1 | 2,176.9 | |||||||||||
Operating income |
559.0 | 583.1 | 539.3 | 386.0 | 366.4 | |||||||||||
Income before income tax expense |
385.8 | 424.0 | 365.9 | 113.5 | 188.2 | |||||||||||
Net income(1) |
205.0 | 265.2 | 205.7 | 45.4 | 112.3 | |||||||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||
Owners of the parent |
175.4 | 233.1 | 173.1 | 0.5 | 68.1 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
29.6 | 32.1 | 32.6 | 44.9 | 44.2 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 1.35 | 1.01 | | 0.45 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 1.35 | 1.01 | | 0.45 |
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data
|
At December 31, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
|
(€ million) |
|||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
419.1 | 455.8 | 190.7 | 152.4 | 469.3 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
7,123.4 | 7,277.3 | 7,006.9 | 6,962.9 | 6,204.6 | |||||||||||
Debt(1) |
2,856.6 | 2,960.6 | 2,802.4 | 2,951.7 | 2,694.3 | |||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
2,915.7 | 3,056.2 | 2,904.1 | 3,149.7 | 2,976.6 | |||||||||||
Total equity |
2,603.5 | 2,642.3 | 2,609.2 | 2,358.9 | 1,896.8 | |||||||||||
Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
2,199.9 | 2,267.8 | 2,187.1 | 1,914.4 | 1,837.7 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
403.6 | 374.5 | 422.1 | 444.5 | 59.1 |
66
SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF IGT
The following tables set forth summary historical consolidated financial and other data of IGT for the periods indicated and have been derived from:
The IGT audited consolidated financial statements referred to above have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of U.S. GAAP.
The following information should be read in conjunction with IGT's historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes as well as the section entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained in IGT's Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporated by reference herein. Historical results for any period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
Consolidated Income Statement Data
|
For the years ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
|
(US$ million, except per share data) |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
2,058.1 | 2,341.6 | 2,150.7 | 1,957.0 | 1,917.2 | |||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,214.6 | 1,344.4 | 1,237.6 | 1,138.4 | 1,087.3 | |||||||||||
Operating income |
408.6 | 494.1 | 421.7 | 504.9 | 424.8 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, before tax |
321.3 | 402.3 | 342.8 | 427.9 | 304.9 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
247.9 | 272.7 | 249.7 | 292.3 | 219.6 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | (3.8 | ) | (8.7 | ) | (33.6 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
247.9 | 272.7 | 245.9 | 283.6 | 186.0 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share (in US$) |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
1.00 | 1.04 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.73 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | (0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
1.00 | 1.04 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.62 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share (in US$) |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
0.99 | 1.03 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.73 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | (0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
0.99 | 1.03 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.62 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share (in US$) |
0.44 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
67
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
At September 30, | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
|
(US$ million) |
|||||||||||||||
Cash and short-term investment securities(1) |
314.4 | 809.1 | 288.2 | 552.0 | 248.9 | |||||||||||
Working capital(2) |
676.3 | 267.5 | 633.0 | 875.2 | 620.1 | |||||||||||
Total assets |
3,989.5 | 4,612.8 | 4,285.1 | 4,154.4 | 4,007.0 | |||||||||||
Debt, net (current and non-current) |
1,878.6 | 2,192.9 | 1,846.4 | 1,646.3 | 1,674.3 | |||||||||||
Jackpot liabilities (current and non-current) |
379.1 | 425.0 | 481.0 | 508.4 | 570.9 | |||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
2,247.1 | 1,850.2 | 2,457.0 | 2,174.9 | 2,190.4 | |||||||||||
Total equity |
1,197.6 | 1,254.1 | 1,197.8 | 1,444.8 | 1,234.3 |
68
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The selected unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
The selected unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information of Georgia Worldwide PLC ("Holdco") has been prepared to represent the pro forma effects of the following transactions (the "Transactions"):
GTECH has called its 5.375% notes due 2016 (the "GTECH 2016 notes"). In addition, consent from GTECH note holders to amend the indenture governing the 5.375% notes due 2018 and the 3.500% notes due 2020 for an aggregate amount of €1.0 billion was obtained.
Furthermore, consent to amend the indenture was obtained from IGT bondholders in relation to the 7.5% bond due 2019 amounting to €397.4 million ($0.5 billion at a $ to € exchange rate of 0.795). Votes to amend the indenture were obtained from GTECH bondholders in relation to the 5.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 and the 3.5% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 amounting to €1.0 billion.
It is anticipated that the Bridge Facility will be drawn only to the extent that GTECH is unable (i) to obtain consent from the counterparties of GTECH and IGT derivative financial instruments and (ii) to raise debt financing in the form of term loans and/or debt securities at or prior to the closing of the Mergers. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable at this time;
69
actual results may materially differ from the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information; and
On July 15, 2014 GTECH, Holdco, Sub and GTECH Corporation, entered into the merger agreement with IGT (the "Merger Agreement") to acquire the entire issued share capital of IGT. The completion of the Mergers is subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including antitrust approval, gaming approvals, the receipt of a merger order from the High Court of England and Wales, IGT and GTECH shareholder approvals and NYSE listing approval for the Holdco ordinary shares.
This information should be read in conjunction with the audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of GTECH as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 included in this proxy statement/prospectus, and the historical audited financial statements of IGT, which are available in IGT's Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2014, and the historical unaudited financial statements of IGT, which are available in IGT's Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 28, 2014, which are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of financial position has been prepared assuming that the Transactions had occurred on September 30, 2014. The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statements have been prepared assuming that the Transactions had occurred on January 1, 2013. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information does not purport to represent what our actual results of operations would have been if the Transactions had actually occurred on the dates assumed, nor is it necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information is presented for illustrative purposes only and based upon available information and certain assumptions that each of GTECH and IGT believe are reasonable, including assumptions pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information is presented in millions of Euro and prepared, unless otherwise specified, on a basis that is consistent with the accounting policies used in the preparation of the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements of GTECH, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. It should be noted that IGT consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and presented in U.S. dollars. The historical IGT amounts reflected in the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information have been derived from IGT's consolidated financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP and reconciled to IFRS, as applicable, and as further discussed below in Note 2 to the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information based on a preliminary IFRS analysis. The reconciliation has not been audited.
70
Furthermore, certain current market based assumptions were used which will be updated upon completion of the Transactions. Management believes the estimated fair values utilized for the assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed are based on reasonable estimates and assumptions. Preliminary fair value estimates may change as additional information becomes available and such changes could be material, as certain valuations and other studies have yet to commence or progress to a stage where there is sufficient information for a definitive measurement. In addition, a preliminary analysis of U.S. GAAP to IFRS differences and related accounting policies has been completed based on information made available to date. However, following the consummation of the combination, management will conduct a final analysis. As a result of that analysis, management may identify differences that, when finalized, could have a material impact on this Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information.
Pro forma adjustments relating to the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of financial position have been translated into Euro using the applicable exchange rate of $1 per €0.795 at September 30, 2014. Pro forma adjustments relating to the unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement have been translated into Euro using an average exchange rate of $1 per € 0.753 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $1 per € 0.738 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is based on estimates and assumptions set forth in the notes to such information. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is being furnished for informational purposes only. Although we believe that the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is presented based on reasonable management assumptions, these should not be interpreted as actual results of operations, or as an indication of future consolidated results, as a calculation of dividends or for any other purposes.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction with "Risk Factors," "Forward-Looking Statements "Selected Historical Financial Data of GTECH," "Selected Historical Financial Data of IGT," the historical financial statements of GTECH and IGT, respectively, including the related notes thereto and the Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements, included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Income Statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2014
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unaudited GTECH IFRS Historical |
Unaudited IGT Reclassified |
Adjustments | Unaudited Holdco IFRS Pro Forma |
|||||||||
|
(€ million, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Total revenue |
2,260.2 | 1,112.9 | (1.1 | ) | 3,372.0 | ||||||||
Operating income |
470.2 | 215.1 | (130.7 | ) | 554.6 | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense |
323.8 | 155.0 | (306.0 | ) | 172.8 | ||||||||
Net income(1) |
191.1 | 129.4 | (202.0 | ) | 118.5 | ||||||||
Attributable to: |
|||||||||||||
Owners of the parent |
176.1 | 129.4 | (202.0 | ) | 103.5 | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
15.0 | | | 15.0 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 0.52 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 0.52 | |||||||||||
Dividends paid per ordinary share (in Euro) |
0.75 | 0.66 |
71
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Income Statement for the year ended December 31, 2013
|
For the year ended December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GTECH IFRS Historical |
Unaudited IGT Reclassified |
Adjustments | Unaudited Holdco IFRS Pro Forma |
|||||||||
|
(€ million, except per share data) |
||||||||||||
Total revenue |
3,062.8 | 1,785.0 | (13.4 | ) | 4,834.4 | ||||||||
Operating income |
559.0 | 389.9 | (218.0 | ) | 730.9 | ||||||||
Income before income tax expense |
385.8 | 306.6 | (464.7 | ) | 227.7 | ||||||||
Net income(1) |
205.0 | 207.8 | (311.1 | ) | 101.7 | ||||||||
Attributable to: |
|||||||||||||
Owners of the parent |
175.4 | 207.8 | (311.1 | ) | 72.1 | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
29.6 | | | 29.6 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 0.36 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (in Euro)(1) |
1.01 | 0.36 | |||||||||||
Dividends paid per ordinary share (in Euro) |
0.73 | 0.63 |
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2014
|
As of September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unaudited GTECH IFRS Historical |
Unaudited IGT Reclassified |
Adjustments | Unaudited Holdco IFRS Pro Forma |
|||||||||
|
(€ million) |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
455.6 | 99.7 | | 555.3 | |||||||||
Total assets |
7,303.5 | 2,966.8 | 3,525.1 | 13,795.4 | |||||||||
Debt(1) |
2,890.5 | 1,453.8 | 3,363.2 | 7,707.5 | |||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
2,957.4 | 1,728.2 | 4,267.5 | 8,953.1 | |||||||||
Total equity |
2,757.5 | 855.5 | (531.1 | ) | 3,081.9 | ||||||||
Equity attributable to owners of the parent |
2,473.8 | 855.5 | (531.1 | ) | 2,798.2 | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
283.7 | | | 283.7 |
72
Set forth below are earnings, cash dividends and book value per share data for:
The following information should be read in conjunction with "Note on Presentation," "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of GTECH," "Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Information," the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and the Annual Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. Historical results for any period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
The unaudited pro forma data below is presented for illustrative purposes only. It does not purport to represent the historical results or what the combined company's financial position would have been if the Merger occurred on the date assumed and it is not necessarily indicative of the combined company's future results or financial position.
|
At and for the nine months ended September 30, |
At and for the year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
|
(In €) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.35 | 1.01 | | 0.45 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share |
0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.68 | |||||||||||||||
Book value per share |
14.14 | n/a | 12.64 | 13.15 | 12.71 | 11.13 | 10.69 |
|
At and for the year ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||
|
(in US$) |
|||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
1.00 | 1.04 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.62 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends per share |
0.44 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |||||||||||
Book value per share |
4.84 | 4.90 | 4.50 | 4.86 | 4.14 |
|
At and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 |
For the year ended December 31, 2013 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(In €) |
||||||
Basic earnings per share |
0.52 | 0.36 | |||||
Cash dividends per share |
0.66 | 0.63 | |||||
Book value per share |
14.05 | n/a |
73
This proxy statement/prospectus contains forward-looking statements concerning IGT, GTECH, Holdco, the proposed transactions and other matters. These statements may discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to future plans, trends, events, results of operations or financial condition, or otherwise, based on current beliefs of the management of IGT and GTECH as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, such management. Forward-looking statements may be accompanied by words such as "aim," "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "could," "would," "should," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "future," "guidance," "intend," "may," "will," "possible," "potential," "predict," "project" or similar words, phrases or expressions. These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the parties' control. Therefore, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in these statements include:
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. You should carefully consider the foregoing factors and the other risks and uncertainties that affect the parties' businesses, including those described in this proxy statement/prospectus, as well as IGT's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other documents filed from time to time with the SEC. Except as required under applicable law, the parties do not assume any obligation to update these
74
forward-looking statements. Nothing in this proxy statement/prospectus is intended, or is to be construed, as a profit forecast or to be interpreted to mean that earnings per GTECH ordinary share or IGT share for the current or any future financial years or those of the combined company, will necessarily match or exceed the historical published earnings per GTECH ordinary share or IGT share, as applicable.
75
This proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to the IGT shareholders as part of a solicitation of proxies by the IGT Board for use at the special meeting that has been called to approve the Merger Agreement, approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the Merger Agreement, and approve the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger, and at any properly convened meeting following an adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy statement/prospectus provides IGT shareholders with the information they need to know to be able to vote or instruct their vote to be cast at the special meeting.
The special meeting is scheduled to be held at Signature Tower 3, Meeting Room D at The Signature at MGM Grand, 145 East Harmon Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada on February 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., local time.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, IGT shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on:
Recommendation of the Board of Directors of IGT
The IGT Board unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement, the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated thereby are in the best interests of IGT and approved the Merger Agreement.
The IGT Board unanimously recommends that IGT shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement; "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the foregoing proposal; and "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
Record Date; Shareholders Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of IGT common stock at the close of business on January 2, 2015, the record date for the special meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. At the close of business on the record date, 248,666,077 shares of IGT common stock were issued and outstanding. Holders of record of IGT common stock on the record date are entitled to one vote per share at the special meeting on each proposal.
No business may be transacted at the special meeting unless a quorum is present. Attendance in person or by proxy at the special meeting of holders of record of a majority of the shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting will constitute a quorum. If a quorum is not present, or if fewer shares of IGT common stock are voted in favor of the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement than the number required for its approval, the special meeting may be adjourned to
76
allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies or votes. At any subsequent reconvening of the special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the special meeting, except for any proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the subsequent meeting.
Abstentions (shares of IGT common stock for which proxies have been received but for which the holders have abstained from voting) and broker non-votes (as discussed below) will be included in the calculation of the number of shares of IGT common stock represented at the special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been achieved. However, as discussed below under "Required Vote," abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as voting against the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
You may vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" or you may "ABSTAIN" from voting on each proposal.
If, on the record date, your shares of IGT common stock were held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares of IGT common stock held in "street name," and the organization holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the special meeting. In that case, this proxy statement/prospectus has been forwarded to you by the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of IGT common stock held in "street name" and do not provide the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock with specific instructions, under the rules of the NYSE, the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock may generally vote on routine matters but cannot vote on non-routine matters. If the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares of IGT common stock on a non-routine matter, such as the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock will inform the inspector of elections for the special meeting that it does not have the authority to vote on a non-routine matter with respect to your shares of IGT common stock. This is generally referred to as a "broker non-vote."
The proposal to approve the Merger Agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of IGT common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. Because the vote on the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement is based on the total number of shares outstanding, rather than the number of actual votes present or cast, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as voting against the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement.
If a quorum is present at the special meeting, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast in opposition of the proposal. In that case, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the proposal to adjourn the special meeting may be approved and the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the voting power represented at the special meeting in person or by proxy. In that case, broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, although abstentions will have the same effect as votes "AGAINST" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting.
The non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger will be approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
77
Voting by IGT's Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on the record date, directors and executive officers of IGT and their affiliates were entitled to vote 1,613,630 shares of IGT common stock, or approximately 0.65% of the shares of IGT common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on that date. Each of IGT's directors and officers has indicated his or her present intention to vote their shares of IGT common stock in favor of each of the proposals to be presented at the special meeting, although none of them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.
If, on the record date, your shares of IGT common stock were registered directly in your name with IGT's transfer agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., then you are a shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and you may vote in person at the special meeting or by proxy. If your shares are held in "street name," you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee in order to vote.
Voting in Person
If you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the special meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares of IGT common stock are held in "street name," and you wish to vote at the special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting a proxy executed in your favor from the record holder (your broker, bank or other nominee) of the shares authorizing you to vote at the special meeting, along with proper identification.
Voting by Proxy
If you are an IGT shareholder of record, a proxy card is enclosed for your use. IGT requests that you submit a proxy via Internet by logging onto www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on your proxy card or by telephone by dialing the phone number included in your shareholder materials and listening for further directions or by signing the accompanying proxy and returning it promptly by mail. You should vote your proxy in advance of the special meeting even if you plan to attend the special meeting. You can always change your vote at the special meeting.
Shareholders of record of IGT may submit their proxies through the mail by completing their proxy card, and signing, dating and returning it. To be valid, a returned proxy card must be signed and dated. If you hold your shares of IGT common stock in "street name", you will receive instructions from the organization that holds your shares of IGT common stock that you must follow in order to vote your shares. If you vote by Internet or telephone, you need not return a proxy card by mail, but your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on February 9, 2015.
All shares represented by properly executed proxies received in time for the special meeting will be voted at the special meeting in the manner specified by the shareholders giving those proxies. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted in the manner recommended by the IGT Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement/prospectus and, therefore, "FOR" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement, "FOR" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting and "FOR" the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes "AGAINST" the proposal to approve the Merger Agreement. If a quorum is present at the special meeting, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting. If a quorum is not
78
present at the special meeting, broker non-votes will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, although abstentions will have the same effect as votes "AGAINST" the proposal to adjourn the special meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements for IGT's named executive officers in connection with the IGT Merger.
If you are the record holder of stock, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the special meeting. You can do this in any one of the following ways:
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in "street name", you will need to follow the instructions included on the proxy form provided to you by your broker regarding how to change your vote.
IGT is soliciting proxies for the special meeting from its shareholders. IGT will pay its own cost of soliciting proxies, including the cost of mailing this proxy statement, from its shareholders. In addition to solicitation by use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by each of IGT's directors and executive officers, each of whom is a participant in this proxy statement/prospectus, in person or by telephone or other means of communication. These persons will not receive additional compensation, but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with this solicitation.
IGT has retained the services of MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of $25,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the services provided. IGT will make arrangements with brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares held of record by them. IGT will also reimburse these brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding the proxy materials.
Pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes 92A.390, IGT shareholders are not entitled to exercise dissenters', appraisal, cash exit or similar rights in connection with the IGT Merger.
Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address
If you are a beneficial owner, but not the record holder, of IGT common stock, your broker, bank or other nominee may only deliver one copy of this proxy statement/prospectus to multiple shareholders who share an address unless that nominee has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. IGT will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of
79
this proxy statement/prospectus to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. A shareholder who wishes to receive a separate copy of this proxy statement/prospectus, now or in the future, should submit their request to IGT by telephone at 866-296-4232 or by submitting a written request to InvestorRelations@IGT.com or IGT Investor Relations, 6355 South Buffalo Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89113. Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of proxy materials and annual reports and wish to receive a single copy of such materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all shareholders at the shared address in the future.
Any adjournment of the special meeting may be made from time to time by IGT shareholders. If a quorum is present at the special meeting, the special meeting may be adjourned if the votes cast in favor of adjournment exceed the number of votes cast in opposition. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the voting power represented at the special meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
In either case, the adjourned meeting may take place without further notice other than by an announcement made at the special meeting unless a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which case a notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the special meeting. If a quorum is not present at the special meeting, or if a quorum is present at the special meeting but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Merger Agreement, then IGT may seek to adjourn the special meeting so as to permit the further solicitation of proxies. Under Nevada law, if the meeting is adjourned to a date more than 60 days after the date of the meeting, the board of directors must set a new record date.
It is not expected that any other matter will be presented for action at the special meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the special meeting, the persons named in the proxies will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. The grant of a proxy will also confer discretionary authority on the persons named in the proxy as proxy appointees to vote in accordance with their best judgment on matters incident to the conduct of the special meeting, including (except as stated in the following sentence) postponement or adjournment for the purpose of soliciting votes. However, shares represented by proxies that have been voted "AGAINST" the approval of the Merger Agreement and the IGT Merger will not be used to vote "FOR" postponement or adjournment of the special meeting to allow additional time to solicit additional votes "FOR" the approval of the Merger Agreement and the IGT Merger.
80
PROPOSAL 1APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
This section of the document describes material aspects of the Mergers. This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire document, including the full text of the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A, and the other documents referred to for a more complete understanding of the Mergers.
As discussed throughout this document, IGT is asking its shareholders to approve the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which GTECH will acquire IGT through the formation of Holdco, a new holding company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, which prior to the Closing will be renamed. The acquisition of IGT will be effected by (i) the merger of GTECH with and into Holdco, pursuant to which each issued and outstanding GTECH ordinary share will be converted into the right to receive one Holdco ordinary share, and immediately thereafter, (ii) the merger of Sub, a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco, with and into IGT, with IGT surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco, in each case subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, at the IGT Merger Effective Time, each issued and outstanding share of IGT common stock, other than shares owned by IGT, Holdco, Sub, GTECH, GTECH US or any of their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive a combination of (i) $13.69 in cash (together with any additional cash described in clause (iii) below, the "Per Share Cash Amount"), (ii) a number of Holdco ordinary shares determined by dividing $4.56 by the average of the volume-weighted average prices of GTECH ordinary shares on the ISE (converted to the U.S. dollar equivalent) on ten randomly selected days within the period of 20 consecutive trading days ending on the second full trading day prior to the IGT Merger Effective Time (such average, the "GTECH Share Trading Price"), subject to a minimum of 0.1582 Holdco ordinary shares and a maximum of 0.1819 Holdco ordinary shares (the "Exchange Ratio"), provided that (iii) if the Exchange Ratio would, but for the cap described in clause (ii), exceed 0.1819, the Per Share Cash Amount will be increased by an additional amount in cash equal to the product of such excess number of shares (up to a maximum of 0.0321) and the GTECH Share Trading Price.
The following tables provide, for illustrative purposes, the implied value of the merger consideration per share of IGT common stock at different assumed trading prices of GTECH ordinary shares and at different assumed USD/EUR exchange rates, respectively. The actual GTECH Share Trading Price and the ultimate value of the merger consideration paid to IGT shareholders may be more than or less than the amounts shown. Please see "Risk FactorsRisk Factors Relating to the MergersThe price of GTECH ordinary shares might decline prior to the completion of the Mergers, which could decrease the value of the merger consideration to be received by IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger. Further, when GTECH and IGT shareholders vote on the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, they will not know the exact value of the Holdco ordinary shares that will be issued in connection with the Mergers" on page 40 for more information.
81
Illustrative Values of Merger Consideration to IGT Shareholders
(Value per share of IGT common stock)
Illustrative GTECH share price (EUR) |
Illustrative USD / EUR FX Rate |
Illustrative GTECH Share Trading Price (USD) |
Implied Exchange Ratio |
Implied Per Share Cash Amount |
Implied value of Holdco shares(1) |
Implied value of merger consideration to IGT shareholders(2) |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
€ | 14.00 | 1.30 | $ | 18.20 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.27 | $ | 3.31 | $ | 17.58 | |||||||||
€ | 14.50 | 1.30 | $ | 18.85 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.30 | $ | 3.43 | $ | 17.72 | |||||||||
€ | 15.00 | 1.30 | $ | 19.50 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.32 | $ | 3.55 | $ | 17.86 | |||||||||
€ | 15.50 | 1.30 | $ | 20.15 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.34 | $ | 3.67 | $ | 18.00 | |||||||||
€ | 16.00 | 1.30 | $ | 20.80 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.36 | $ | 3.78 | $ | 18.14 | |||||||||
€ | 16.50 | 1.30 | $ | 21.45 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.35 | $ | 3.90 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 17.00 | 1.30 | $ | 22.10 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.23 | $ | 4.02 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 17.50 | 1.30 | $ | 22.75 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.11 | $ | 4.14 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.00 | 1.30 | $ | 23.40 | 0.1819x | $ | 13.99 | $ | 4.26 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.30 | $ | 24.05 | 0.1819x | $ | 13.88 | $ | 4.37 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 19.00 | 1.30 | $ | 24.70 | 0.1819x | $ | 13.76 | $ | 4.49 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 19.50 | 1.30 | $ | 25.35 | 0.1799x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 20.00 | 1.30 | $ | 26.00 | 0.1754x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 20.50 | 1.30 | $ | 26.65 | 0.1711x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 21.00 | 1.30 | $ | 27.30 | 0.1670x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 21.50 | 1.30 | $ | 27.95 | 0.1631x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 22.00 | 1.30 | $ | 28.60 | 0.1594x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 22.50 | 1.30 | $ | 29.25 | 0.1582x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.63 | $ | 18.32 | |||||||||
€ | 23.00 | 1.30 | $ | 29.90 | 0.1582x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.73 | $ | 18.42 |
Illustrative GTECH share price (EUR) |
Illustrative USD / EUR FX Rate |
Illustrative GTECH Share Trading Price (USD) |
Implied Exchange Ratio |
Implied Per Share Cash Amount |
Implied value of Holdco shares(1) |
Implied value of merger consideration to IGT shareholders(2) |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
€ | 18.50 | 0.95 | $ | 17.58 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.25 | $ | 3.20 | $ | 17.45 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.00 | $ | 18.50 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.28 | $ | 3.37 | $ | 17.65 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.05 | $ | 19.43 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.31 | $ | 3.53 | $ | 17.85 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.10 | $ | 20.35 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.34 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 18.04 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.15 | $ | 21.28 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.37 | $ | 3.87 | $ | 18.24 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.20 | $ | 22.20 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.21 | $ | 4.04 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.25 | $ | 23.13 | 0.1819x | $ | 14.04 | $ | 4.21 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.30 | $ | 24.05 | 0.1819x | $ | 13.88 | $ | 4.37 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.35 | $ | 24.98 | 0.1819x | $ | 13.71 | $ | 4.54 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.40 | $ | 25.90 | 0.1761x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.45 | $ | 26.83 | 0.1700x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.50 | $ | 27.75 | 0.1643x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.55 | $ | 28.68 | 0.1590x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 18.25 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.60 | $ | 29.60 | 0.1582x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.68 | $ | 18.37 | |||||||||
€ | 18.50 | 1.65 | $ | 30.53 | 0.1582x | $ | 13.69 | $ | 4.83 | $ | 18.52 |
Notes:
82
Information about the Companies
IGT is a global gaming company specializing in the design, development, manufacture, and marketing of casino-style gaming equipment, systems technology, and game content across multiple platformsland-based, online real-money and social gaming. IGT is a leading supplier of gaming entertainment products worldwide and provides a diverse offering of quality products and services at competitive prices, designed to enhance the gaming player experience.
IGT was incorporated under the laws of Nevada in December 1980 to facilitate its initial public offering in 1981. Principally serving the U.S. gaming markets when founded, IGT expanded into jurisdictions outside the U.S. beginning in 1986. The principal executive offices of IGT are located at 6355 South Buffalo Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 and its telephone number at that address is (702) 669-7777.
GTECH is a corporation (società per azioni) incorporated under the laws of Italy. The predecessor of GTECH was founded in 1990 as a consortium organized under the laws of Italy and later converted into a corporation. GTECH is one of the leading gaming operators in the world based on total wagers and, through its subsidiaries, including GTECH Corporation, is a leading B2B provider of lottery and gaming technology solutions and services worldwide. GTECH's goal is to be the leading commercial operator and provider of technology in the regulated worldwide gaming markets by delivering market leading products and services with a steadfast commitment to integrity, responsibility and growth. GTECH is listed on the ISE under the trading symbol "GTK" and has a Sponsored Level 1 American Depositary Receipt ("ADR") program listed on the United States over the counter market under the trading symbol "GTKYY." GTECH provides business to consumer and business to business products and services to customers in approximately 100 countries worldwide on six continents and had 8,668 employees at September 30, 2014.
The principal executive offices of GTECH are located at Viale del Campo Boario 56/D, 00154 Roma, Italy and its telephone number at that address is +39 06 51 899 1.
GTECH Corporation is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of GTECH S.p.A.
The principal executive offices of GTECH Corporation are located at 10 Memorial Boulevard, Providence, RI 02903 and its telephone number at that address is (401) 392-1000.
Holdco is a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales. Holdco was incorporated on July 11, 2014, as a private limited liability company under the legal name Georgia Worldwide Limited for the purpose of effecting the Mergers. On September 16, 2014, Holdco was re-registered as a public limited company under the legal name Georgia Worldwide PLC. Holdco has not conducted any business operations other than that incidental to its formation and in connection with the Mergers contemplated by the Merger Agreement. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Holdco does not beneficially own any shares of IGT common stock. Following the Mergers, it is expected that Holdco ordinary shares will be listed on the NYSE.
The principal executive offices of Georgia Worldwide PLC are located at 11 Old Jewry, 6th Floor, London, EC2R 8DU, United Kingdom and its telephone number at that address is +44 (0) 203 131 0300. Georgia Worldwide PLC's registered agent is Elian Corporate Services (UK)
83
Limited (formerly Ogier Corporate Services (UK) Ltd.), 11 Old Jewry, 6th Floor, London, EC2R 8DU and its telephone number is +44 207 160 5000.
Sub is a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdco. It was incorporated on July 11, 2014 and was formed solely for the purpose of affecting the IGT Merger. Sub has not conducted any business operations other than that incidental to its formation and in connection with the Mergers contemplated by the Merger Agreement. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Sub does not beneficially own any shares of IGT common stock.
The principal executive offices of Sub are located at 10 Memorial Boulevard, Providence, RI 02903 and its telephone number at that address is (401) 392-1000. Sub's registered agent in Nevada is CSC Services Of Nevada, Inc., located at 2215-B Renaissance Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89119.
The IGT board of directors, together with certain members of IGT senior management, periodically reviews and considers various strategic alternatives available to IGT, including whether the continued execution of IGT's strategy as a stand-alone company or the possible sale of IGT to, or a combination of IGT with, a third party would offer the best avenue to maximize stockholder value. In addition, the IGT board of directors, together with certain members of IGT senior management, periodically reviews and assesses IGT's operations and financial performance, competitive position, industry trends and potential strategic initiatives, including potential acquisitions, dispositions, recapitalization transactions, share repurchase and dividend alternatives and business combinations. In 2013, the acquisition of WMS Industries Inc. by Scientific Games Corporation and the acquisition of SHFL entertainment, Inc. by Bally Technologies, Inc. suggested the beginning of a period of consolidation in IGT's industry.
In May 2012, IGT held preliminary discussions with GTECH, with whom it had a pre-existing commercial relationship, regarding the possibility of combining their interactive businesses. The parties entered into a confidentiality agreement, but discussions did not progress beyond the exploratory stage and terminated in July 2012.
On December 3, 2012, Lorenzo Pellicioli, chairman of GTECH, contacted Philip Satre, chairman of IGT and inquired as to whether IGT would be interested in discussing a possible business combination transaction between the companies. Mr. Satre indicated that he would be willing to have a conversation regarding a possible transaction, though no such conversation took place until April 2013.
In April 2013, a representative of Company A, a private equity firm, contacted Patti Hart, chief executive officer of IGT, to arrange a discussion about conditions in IGT's industry. Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart met with representatives of Company A in New York later that month and had a high-level discussion about the gaming industry. Subsequently, in April 2013, Ms. Hart and John Vandemore, chief financial officer of IGT, met with representatives of Company A in New York to discuss the state of the gaming industry. During the meeting, the parties agreed to evaluate a transaction that could leverage each party's gaming industry knowledge and assets. On May 3, 2013, IGT entered into a confidentiality and standstill agreement with Company A to facilitate Company A's review of a possible transaction. Company A conducted a due diligence review of IGT in the summer of 2013, but the parties ultimately determined to terminate discussions regarding a possible transaction in July 2013 when the parties were unable to agree upon a valuation of IGT's business.
On April 14, 2013, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart had dinner with Mr. Pellicioli and Marco Sala, chief executive officer of GTECH, to discuss a possible business combination between the companies.
84
On May 13, 2013, IGT and GTECH entered into a mutual confidentiality and standstill agreement to facilitate the exchange of confidential information regarding a possible transaction between the parties.
Following the execution of the confidentiality agreement, and throughout the summer of 2013 (including an August 4, 2013 meeting among Mr. Satre, Ms. Hart, Mr. Pellicioli and Mr. Sala and an August 21, 2013 meeting among Ms. Hart, Mr. Vandemore, Mr. Sala and other representatives of IGT and GTECH), IGT and GTECH conducted due diligence reviews of each other's businesses and engaged in discussions regarding a possible business combination transaction. The parties contemplated that the transaction would be structured as a "merger of equals" stock-for-stock transaction, with no premium payable to either company's stockholders, and that the combined company would be organized under a non-U.S. holding company. In addition, GTECH proposed that the leadership of the combined company would include Mr. Satre, as chairman, Mr. Pellicioli and Ms. Hart, as vice chairmen, and Mr. Sala, as chief executive officer.
On August 19 and August 22, 2013, the executive committee of the IGT board met to discuss the proposed terms for the possible transaction with GTECH. The committee directed management to update the full board of directors at its next meeting.
On August 27, 2013, the IGT board met telephonically to discuss the status of negotiations with GTECH. A representative of Sidley Austin LLP, legal counsel to IGT, and which we refer to as Sidley, participated and discussed the fiduciary duties of the IGT board and other legal matters. Ms. Hart and other members of IGT senior management reviewed the status of discussions with GTECH, which continued to focus on a no-premium merger of equals transaction, and the remaining unresolved issues. The IGT board directed management to terminate discussions with GTECH based on its determination that the parties would not be able to reach a satisfactory agreement.
Following the termination of discussions with GTECH regarding the possible business combination transaction, representatives of IGT and GTECH met from time to time in late 2013 and early 2014 at industry conferences and telephonically to discuss a possible acquisition by IGT of a subsidiary of GTECH. These discussions did not progress to the point of negotiations.
In December 2013, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart determined it would be prudent for the IGT board to understand strategic and financial alternatives available to the company in light of trends in the gaming equipment supplier industry, including recent transactions involving a premium. IGT invited Morgan Stanley to meet to discuss these matters, and on January 20, 2014, representatives of Morgan Stanley provided members of IGT senior management with their views of the gaming equipment supplier industry, IGT's competitive position in the industry and strategic and financial alternatives available to IGT to enhance stockholder value, including, but not limited to, potential strategic acquisitions (including a possible acquisition of Company B, a large publicly traded company in the gaming industry), a return of capital through share buybacks, special dividends or other means, strategic alternatives regarding IGT's interactive business and a potential sale of the company. Morgan Stanley also reviewed with IGT the risks faced by and possibilities available to IGT in the current industry environment. IGT's senior management directed Morgan Stanley to continue to analyze the company's strategic and financial alternatives for further consideration by the IGT board.
On February 2, 2014, IGT entered into a confidentiality agreement with Company B to facilitate a meeting between the parties. The next day, representatives of IGT and representatives of Morgan Stanley met with representatives of Company B in London to discuss the possibility of an acquisition of Company B by IGT; however, Company B did not make available to IGT any non-public information.
On February 12, 2014, the IGT board met telephonically to discuss the potential acquisition of Company B. Members of IGT senior management presented an overview of Company B and the strategic rationale for a transaction, and representatives of Morgan Stanley summarized the terms of a
85
proposed preliminary indication of interest to be submitted by IGT, as well as certain financial information regarding the proposed transaction. The IGT board discussed the proposed transaction and authorized the submission of the indication of interest and the engagement of Morgan Stanley for the possible acquisition transaction. The IGT board also determined to engage Morgan Stanley in connection with an overall review of strategic and financial alternatives available to IGT. On February 14, 2014, IGT entered into an engagement letter with Morgan Stanley.
Following the February 12 board meeting, IGT submitted the indication of interest to Company B. On February 28, 2014, Company B notified IGT that it was not willing to pursue a transaction on the terms offered by IGT. On March 4, 2014, at the direction of the executive committee of the IGT board, IGT submitted a revised indication of interest to Company B, which was rejected by Company B on March 9, 2014. After consultation with the executive committee of the IGT board, Ms. Hart notified Company B on March 9, 2014 that IGT was terminating discussions with respect to the proposed transaction. Despite the termination of discussions, members of IGT senior management believed there may be a future opportunity to re-engage with Company B regarding a possible transaction.
In early March 2014, during a telephone conversation on another matter between James McCann, a former director of GTECH, and Paget Alves, a director of IGT and a former director of GTECH, Mr. McCann mentioned that Mr. Pellicioli had expressed continued interest in discussing a possible combination with IGT. That contact was reported to the IGT board.
On March 10, 2014, the IGT board met in person at a regularly scheduled meeting. Representatives of Morgan Stanley were present for a portion of the meeting, and delivered a presentation regarding IGT's strategic and financial alternatives, including a possible acquisition of Company B, a strategic combination, strategic alternatives regarding IGT's interactive business, a leveraged buyout, a return of capital through share buybacks, special dividends or other means and maintaining the status quo. With respect to a strategic combination, Morgan Stanley's presentation noted that there were only a limited number of potential counterparties for an acquisition or merger, but identified GTECH as a potential candidate. The IGT board directed management to explore the company's strategic and financial alternatives, including by approaching GTECH regarding a possible business combination transaction and by approaching certain private equity firms regarding a possible leveraged buyout of IGT. Morgan Stanley identified three private equity firms, which we refer to as Company A, Company C and Company D, respectively, as the parties most likely to have an interest in acquiring IGT based on their interest in and knowledge of the gaming equipment supplier industry, their willingness and ability to obtain necessary gaming licenses, the size of their funds and, in the case of Company A, their previous interest in IGT. Approaches to other possible strategic counterparties were considered but not pursued due to various issues, including regulatory and financial issues.
In late March 2014, Mr. Alves contacted Mr. McCann to suggest that Mr. Satre and Mr. Pellicioli meet to discuss a possible business combination transaction between IGT and GTECH. Subsequently, on March 27, 2014, Mr. Satre contacted Mr. Pellicioli to finalize the plans for an in person meeting.
From March 25 to March 27, 2014, representatives of Morgan Stanley contacted Company C and Company D to discuss whether they may be interested in a possible leveraged buyout of IGT. Members of IGT senior management determined that IGT, rather than Morgan Stanley, would contact Company A and GTECH directly, in light of IGT's prior discussions with those parties.
On March 25, 2014, in connection with the announcement of a planned reduction in force requiring the issuance of employee notices under the WARN Act, IGT issued lowered guidance with regard to fiscal 2014 anticipated results. In the first trading day following the public disclosure of such lowered guidance, shares of IGT common stock closed at $13.62 per share on the NYSE, down 8.3% from the previous closing price of $14.85 per share.
86
On March 25, 2014, representatives of Company A met with Ms. Hart to discuss a possible acquisition of IGT in a leveraged buyout transaction. The parties subsequently executed a confidentiality agreement on April 4, 2014 to facilitate Company A's review of a possible business combination transaction with IGT. The confidentiality agreement contained a customary standstill covenant (which included a provision that the standstill would terminate if IGT entered into a definitive change of control agreement with another party), which generally prohibited Company A from acquiring IGT securities or otherwise seeking to acquire control of the company, and which by its terms would terminate upon IGT's execution of a definitive agreement with a third party providing for a change of control of IGT.
On April 4, 2014, Mr. Satre and Mr. Pellicioli had a telephone call in anticipation of a meeting scheduled for April 11, 2014 to discuss the agenda for that meeting.
On April 4, 2014, representatives of Company C met with Ms. Hart to discuss a possible acquisition of IGT in a leveraged buyout transaction. Company C negotiated the terms of a confidentiality and standstill agreement with IGT regarding such a transaction, but ultimately did not execute the agreement and notified Morgan Stanley on April 22, 2014 that it had determined not to pursue such a transaction due to concerns over gaming industry regulatory requirements.
On April 8, 2014, members of IGT senior management met with representatives of Company A in Las Vegas to discuss due diligence matters.
On April 8, 2014, Ms. Hart met with the chairman of Company E, a company with operations in the online wagering business, to discuss whether IGT would consider a sale of its interactive business. Other companies in the online wagering business had, from time to time, made similar inquiries. Ms. Hart indicated that IGT would not be interested.
On April 9, 2014, Ms. Hart met with representatives of Company D to discuss the state of IGT's industry and a possible acquisition of IGT in a leveraged buyout transaction. On April 16, 2014, IGT entered into a confidentiality and standstill agreement with Company D to facilitate its review of a possible business combination transaction with IGT.
On April 11, 2014, Mr. Satre and Mr. Alves met with Mr. Pellicioli, Mr. McCann and Paolo Ceretti, a GTECH board member, in New York City to discuss a possible business combination transaction between IGT and GTECH. The specific financial terms of a possible transaction were not discussed, but Mr. Pellicioli indicated that GTECH would be interested in a transaction and had a preference for using equity consideration. During the discussion, it was noted that the prior discussions relating to a no-premium merger of equals had terminated in part because of a disagreement over governance and management, but that in the event of a transaction providing a premium and cash to the IGT shareholders the IGT board might have a different perspective on those issues.
On April 15, 2014, the executive committee of the IGT board met telephonically to review the status of discussions with each of GTECH, Company A, Company B, Company C and Company D. The committee directed management to continue to evaluate the company's strategic and financial alternatives, including a return of capital to IGT stockholders and strategic alternatives regarding its interactive business. After that meeting, IGT retained Sidley to advise it with respect to possible business combination transactions.
On April 23 and April 24, 2014, members of IGT senior management met with Company D in Las Vegas and made presentations regarding IGT's business, with representatives of Morgan Stanley in attendance.
On April 24, 2014, representatives of Morgan Stanley discussed a possible transaction between IGT and GTECH with Credit Suisse, financial advisor to GTECH.
87
On May 6, 2014, Company D notified IGT that it had determined not to pursue a possible transaction.
On May 6, 2014, Morgan Stanley received a letter from Company A setting forth its preliminary non-binding indication of interest to acquire 100% of the outstanding equity interests of IGT for consideration in the range of $15.50 - $16.50 per share, in cash.
On May 6, 2014, Ms. Hart met with the chairman and another representative of Company F, a company operating in the gaming industry. The meeting was requested on May 5, 2014 by the chairman of Company F, who indicated Company F's interest in acquiring IGT. At the meeting, the chairman of Company F asked Ms. Hart what price the IGT board would require to agree to a sale. Ms. Hart declined to provide a price in response to this question, and indicated that the IGT board would not be focused solely on the then current share price in considering the sufficiency of any offer. The chairman of Company F then suggested that the IGT board was seeking a price of "at least $18 per share" and added that "you're never going to get $18." Ms. Hart declined to react to the validity of these statements.
On May 7, 2014, each of Company F and GTECH delivered a letter indicating its interest in acquiring IGT. Company F indicated an interest in acquiring IGT in an all-cash transaction, but did not indicate a price. GTECH indicated its expectation that approximately 50% of the consideration payable to IGT stockholders in a possible transaction would consist of shares of a newly organized holding company, which we refer to as Holdco, with the balance payable in cash. GTECH did not indicate a price, but stated that there would be a premium commensurate with the proposed transaction structure.
On May 8 and May 9, 2014, the IGT board met in person at a regularly scheduled board meeting. During the meeting, representatives of IGT senior management presented financial projections for the company comprising scenarios for the company's performance based upon a range of assumptions pertaining to the timing of a recovery in the gaming equipment supplier industry. During the portion of the board meeting held on May 9, a representative of Sidley discussed the fiduciary duties of the IGT board and other legal matters and representatives of Morgan Stanley provided an update regarding the company's strategic and financial alternatives, including a leveraged buyout transaction (including with Company A, Company C and Company D), a business combination with GTECH or Company F, and re-engagement with Company B. The IGT board instructed management to continue its exploration of possible transactions with Company A, GTECH and Company F, and to develop analyses of certain strategic and financial alternatives, including continued operation as a standalone company while undertaking either a transaction to capitalize on the success of IGT's interactive business or a return of capital to IGT stockholders.
On May 12, 2014, the chairman of Company F spoke with a representative of Morgan Stanley regarding IGT's evaluation of its strategic and financial alternatives. During the call, the Morgan Stanley representative indicated that Company F would be required to enter into a confidentiality agreement in order to receive certain confidential information regarding IGT, which would contain a customary standstill provision. On May 13, 2014, the chairman of Company F sent a letter to Morgan Stanley expressing concern that Company F had not previously been invited to submit an offer to acquire IGT. The letter reaffirmed Company F's interest in acquiring IGT in an all-cash transaction, but did not specify a price. The letter also expressed the view that it was not appropriate for Company F to agree to any standstill restrictions. Later that day, Morgan Stanley replied to Company F stating that the IGT board had not made any decision regarding a sale of the company and that the board was committed to running a process that would produce the best transaction if the board ultimately decided to engage in such a transaction. On May 13, 2014, Sidley sent a draft confidentiality agreement to Company F's legal counsel, which included a customary standstill provision (including a provision that the standstill would terminate if IGT entered into a definitive change in control agreement with another party).
88
On May 13, 2014, Morgan Stanley sent to Credit Suisse a draft amendment to IGT's and GTECH's pre-existing confidentiality agreement that had been entered into in connection with their consideration of a possible business combination transaction in 2013. The amendment proposed to renew the standstill provision (which had expired) and generally contained terms consistent with those agreed to by other parties. On May 15, 2014, Credit Suisse notified Morgan Stanley that GTECH would consider IGT's request to enter into an amendment to the pre-existing confidentiality agreement. Morgan Stanley indicated that IGT would not share any further confidential information until such an amendment was executed.
On or about May 16, 2014, Mr. Satre spoke by telephone with Mr. Pellicioli to discuss GTECH's participation in a sale process.
On May 16, 2014, Ms. Hart had a conversation with a representative of Company D, which had withdrawn from the process on May 6, 2014. The representative of Company D indicated that Company D was trying to find a creative way to structure an acquisition of IGT. Ms. Hart indicated that the IGT board would be open to receiving any such proposal that Company D might offer.
On May 20, 2014, members of IGT senior management made presentations to Company A regarding IGT's business, with representatives of Morgan Stanley in attendance. Subsequently on May 27, 2014, representatives of IGT and representatives of Morgan Stanley participated on a conference call with representatives of Company A to discuss certain remaining matters in connection with Company A's due diligence review.
On May 20, 2014, IGT entered into a confidentiality agreement with Company F to facilitate Company F's review of a possible business combination transaction with IGT. The confidentiality agreement contained a customary standstill covenant, which generally prohibited Company F from acquiring IGT securities or otherwise seeking to acquire control of the company, and which by its terms would terminate upon IGT's public announcement of its entry into a definitive agreement with a third party providing for a change of control transaction of IGT. Subsequently, on May 21, 2014, members of IGT senior management made presentations to Company F regarding IGT's business, with representatives of Morgan Stanley in attendance.
On May 22, 2014, Mr. Satre, members of IGT senior management and representatives of Morgan Stanley met with representatives of GTECH in order to receive GTECH's presentation regarding its business and the terms of its proposal. During the meeting, GTECH communicated its interest in acquiring IGT at a price in the range of $15.00 - $17.00 per share, with 50% of the consideration payable to IGT stockholders in a possible transaction consisting of shares of Holdco and 50% in cash. GTECH also indicated that Holdco would be organized in the United Kingdom. GTECH requested that IGT enter into negotiations with GTECH on an exclusive basis, which request was rejected by IGT during the meeting. IGT did not make presentations to GTECH regarding IGT's business because GTECH had not yet executed the proposed amendment to the parties' pre-existing confidentiality agreement.
On May 24, 2014, Morgan Stanley distributed a process letter to each of Company A, Company F and GTECH requesting that the parties submit preliminary non-binding proposals for an acquisition of IGT by May 30, 2014. In its letter to GTECH, Morgan Stanley indicated that GTECH's ability to participate in the process would be conditioned on the execution by GTECH of the amendment to IGT and GTECH's pre-existing confidentiality agreement that Morgan Stanley had previously provided.
On May 26, 2014, Credit Suisse reiterated to Morgan Stanley GTECH's request that IGT enter into negotiations with GTECH on an exclusive basis, which request was again rejected.
On May 29, 2014, Morgan Stanley presented its preliminary valuation analysis to Mr. Satre, Ms. Hart and other members of IGT senior management based on various valuation methodologies and assumptions.
89
On May 30, 2014, IGT received written proposals from each of Company A, Company F and GTECH. Company A indicated its interest in acquiring IGT at a price in the range of $16.00 - $16.50 per share, in cash; Company F indicated a price of $14.75 per share, in cash; and GTECH indicated a price of $17.00 per share, with 50% of the consideration payable to IGT stockholders consisting of shares of Holdco and 50% in cash. GTECH's proposal also set forth certain related terms, including the composition of the Holdco board of directors, which would consist of 11 members, including Mr. Satre as chairman, Ms. Hart as a vice chairman, and two other members from the existing IGT board, and the intent that Holdco's shares would be listed solely on the NYSE. In its indication of interest, GTECH also requested that IGT enter into negotiations with GTECH on an exclusive basis. GTECH also provided to IGT its version of a draft amendment to the confidentiality and standstill agreement.
In early June 2014, Mr. McCann contacted Mr. Alves to discuss GTECH's proposal, and indicated that GTECH was very interested in a transaction with IGT. Mr. Alves responded that GTECH's offer was low on price and presented numerous governance and other issues that would need to be addressed.
Morgan Stanley notified Company F on May 31, 2014 that its indicated price of $14.75 per share was materially lower than the other proposals and that Company F likely would not be invited to advance in the process if it did not increase its price. On May 31, 2014, Company F notified Morgan Stanley that it was prepared to increase its offer, and submitted a revised proposal on June 1, 2014 indicating a price of $16.00 per share, in cash.
On June 2, 2014, the IGT board met telephonically to review the terms of the proposals. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and Sidley were also present at the meeting. Ms. Hart reviewed the strategic and financial alternatives being considered by the board, and representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed developments since the May 9 board meeting, the preliminary indications of interest received from Company A, GTECH and Company F, and its preliminary valuation analysis of the company based on various valuation methodologies and assumptions. The board authorized management to grant access to the company's due diligence data room to each of the three bidders (subject, in the case of GTECH, to the execution of an amended confidentiality and standstill agreement), and to continue discussions with each of them regarding the proposed transactions. The board also authorized management to request final bids from the parties by the end of June and directed management to reject GTECH's request for exclusivity.
On June 3, 2014, Morgan Stanley contacted each of Company A, GTECH and Company F to convey the IGT board's determinations.
On June 3, 2014, IGT granted access to the company's online data room to each of Company A and Company F, and certain of their respective representatives. Due to confidentiality concerns, each of the bidders was informed that it would not be given full access to certain confidential information (including, in the case of Company F, certain commercial contracts and intellectual property that IGT deemed to be competitively sensitive) unless the IGT board determined that it would be willing to enter into a definitive agreement with that party after submission of the parties' final proposals.
On June 4, 2014, Ms. Hart spoke telephonically with Mr. Sala to discuss GTECH's refusal to sign an amendment to the parties' pre-existing confidentiality agreement. Ms. Hart indicated that IGT would not grant to GTECH access to the company's online data room until GTECH agreed to confidentiality and standstill terms consistent with those agreed to by other bidders. Mr. Satre had a similar call with Mr. Pellicioli.
Between June 4 and June 6, 2014, Sidley and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, legal counsel for GTECH, and which we refer to as Wachtell, negotiated the terms of an amendment to the confidentiality and standstill agreement between IGT and GTECH.
90
On June 6, 2014, IGT and GTECH entered into an amendment to their confidentiality agreement, which, among other things, specified that the standstill obligations applicable to GTECH would terminate upon the public announcement of IGT's entry into a definitive agreement with a third party providing for a change in control transaction or on the six-month anniversary of the termination by IGT of all ongoing discussions relating to a potential business combination. During the week of June 9, 2014, IGT offered to each of Company A and Company F an amendment to their respective confidentiality and standstill agreements to provide each of them the same six-month anniversary provision.
On June 7, 2014, IGT provided GTECH with copies of management presentations and granted access to the company's online data room to GTECH and certain of its representatives.
On June 9, 2014, Reuters reported that IGT had retained Morgan Stanley to explore a sale of the company. Following the report, shares of IGT common stock closed at $14.31 per share on the NYSE, up 14.4% from the previous closing price of $12.51 per share on June 6, 2014.
From June 9 through June 11, 2014, during a series of meetings in New York City, representatives of IGT delivered management presentations to representatives of GTECH, representatives of Company A and its proposed sources of debt financing, and representatives of Company F and its proposed sources of debt financing, with representatives of Morgan Stanley in attendance.
On June 9, 2014, Ms. Hart and Mr. Vandemore had dinner with Mr. Sala and Alberto Fornaro, chief financial officer of GTECH. At that dinner, they discussed the state of the companies' respective industries and businesses, synergies, the process for due diligence on GTECH and transaction structure. There was no discussion of price or management roles.
On June 10, 2014, Ms. Hart and Mr. Vandemore had lunch with the chairman and another representative of Company F. The Company F representatives made inquiry about IGT's interactive strategy. There was no discussion of price, but the chairman of Company F volunteered that Company F would be interested in Ms. Hart's and Mr. Vandemore's continued service if Company F acquired IGT.
On June 11, 2014, Morgan Stanley received a letter from Company E inquiring about IGT's willingness to consider a sale of its interactive business. Morgan Stanley indicated that it would share the letter with IGT.
On June 12 and June 13, 2014, the IGT board met in person at a regularly scheduled board meeting. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and a representative of Sidley also participated in portions of the meeting. Mr. Vandemore reported on the company's recent financial performance and expressed the view that, based on that performance, the delayed recovery case, a set of financial projections that had been previously prepared by IGT and that assumed that the timing of a recovery in the gaming equipment supplier industry would be delayed, was a more likely scenario than the case reflected in the long range plan for the company. During the portion of the board meeting held on June 12, representatives of Morgan Stanley provided an update on activities since the June 2 board meeting, including management presentations and other due diligence activities, and delivered a presentation regarding a possible return of capital and strategic alternatives regarding its interactive business, as alternatives to a sale of the company. During the portion of the board meeting held on June 12, the representative of Sidley reviewed the potential terms of a draft merger agreement, as well as certain antitrust considerations in a possible transaction with each of the three bidders. The IGT board also reviewed with its financial and legal advisors the timeline for receiving and evaluating final proposals from the potential bidders.
On June 13, 2014, Morgan Stanley distributed revised process letters to each of Company A, Company F and GTECH requesting that the parties submit best and final non-binding proposals for an acquisition of IGT by June 30, 2014.
91
On June 13, 2014, IGT received an unsolicited joint letter from Company G, a small strategic bidder, and Company H, a private equity firm, setting forth a non-binding preliminary proposal for Company G to acquire IGT for consideration of $15.00 - $20.00 per share, in cash, with equity financing to be provided by Company H to Company G in a transaction that would result in Company H controlling Company G and requiring a Company G shareholder vote.
On June 14, 2014, GTECH informed IGT that, due to GTECH's understanding that there might be a news report forthcoming that would report that IGT was exploring strategic alternatives and that GTECH would be identified as a potential transaction party, GTECH would, in such case, be required to make a public disclosure of its discussions with IGT by the Milan stock exchange where GTECH's shares are listed for trading.
The IGT board met telephonically on June 15, 2014 to review the terms of the letter from Company G and Company H. A representative of Morgan Stanley and a representative of Sidley were also present for the meeting. The IGT board discussed several concerns with the proposal described in the letter, including anticipated difficulties in Company G's obtaining required gaming approvals (due to its lack of prior experience in the gaming industry), Company G's having a market capitalization of approximately 15% of IGT's market capitalization, the very wide range in the price range specified in the proposal and the fact that the proposed transaction would generally constitute a change of control with respect to Company G and therefore be subject to the receipt of significant additional approvals, and the proposed use of a transaction structure which, in the view of IGT's regulatory compliance personnel, would be highly uncertain to pass regulatory review and, at a minimum, would require a lengthy period of time. The IGT board directed the company's advisors to communicate to Company G and Company H that they would not be invited to participate in the process. On June 16, Morgan Stanley informed Company H of the board's decision.
From June 13 through June 30, 2014, IGT participated in additional meetings or calls with representatives of Company A, GTECH and Company F regarding the parties' respective due diligence reviews of IGT. During this period, IGT and its advisors also conducted a due diligence review of GTECH, including discussions between the parties regarding any synergies that might be expected in a possible transaction between the parties.
On June 16, 2014, GTECH issued a press release announcing that it was engaged in preliminary, exploratory discussions as part of a process regarding a potential transaction with IGT.
On June 16, 2014, following the issuance of GTECH's press release, IGT issued a press release announcing that it was exploring a range of strategic alternatives, but that no decision had been made regarding any particular strategic alternative. Following the release, shares of IGT common stock closed at $15.64 per share on the NYSE, up an aggregate of 25.0% from the closing price on June 6, 2014 (the last full trading day prior to the publication of the Reuters report).
On June 16, 2014, IGT and Company A entered into an amendment to their confidentiality agreement, which, among other things, specified that the standstill obligations applicable to Company A would terminate upon the public announcement of IGT's entry into a definitive agreement with a third party providing for a change in control transaction or on the six-month anniversary of the termination by IGT of all ongoing discussions relating to a potential business combination.
On June 16, 2014, Company D informed Morgan Stanley that it was exploring an alternative transaction structure involving a cooperative bid with another company in the gaming industry, but did not convey a specific proposal.
On June 19, 2014, GTECH made available to IGT and its advisors an electronic data room with due diligence materials regarding GTECH.
92
On June 19, 2014, IGT's advisors distributed a form of merger agreement to Company A and Company F, which provided for the leveraged buyout transaction structure being considered by such parties.
On June 20, 2014, GTECH requested a waiver of certain provisions of its confidentiality and standstill agreement in order to permit GTECH to enter into exclusive financing arrangements with certain commercial lenders. On June 21, IGT informed GTECH that it would not agree to any such request for financing exclusivity.
On June 22, 2014, Sidley distributed a form of merger agreement to GTECH, which provided for a transaction structure generally consistent with the terms proposed in GTECH's May 30 proposal, along with a draft agreement to be entered into by GTECH's controlling shareholders, whereby such shareholders would agree to vote in favor of the proposed transaction and in accordance with certain post-closing governance provisions set forth in the merger agreement.
Each of the draft merger agreements delivered to Company A, GTECH and Company F specified that (i) IGT would be required to pay a termination fee equal to 2.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT under certain circumstances, (ii) the acquirer would be required to pay a reverse termination fee equal to 8.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT under certain circumstances, (iii) the acquirer would generally be obligated to take any necessary actions in order to obtain certain antitrust approvals, and (iv) IGT would generally be entitled to specifically enforce the terms of the agreement. The form of merger agreement distributed to GTECH also specified that the share component of the consideration would be subject to a floating exchange ratio, with a 15% collar. The three draft forms of merger agreement contained identical IGT representations and warranties and interim operating covenants. The form distributed to GTECH proposed largely reciprocal provisions, due to the use of stock as part of the consideration.
On June 23 and 24, 2014, representatives of IGT, including Mr. Vandemore, and representatives of Morgan Stanley conducted on-site due diligence at GTECH facilities in Providence, Rhode Island and in Rome, Italy.
On June 25, 2014, IGT distributed to each bidder a draft of the disclosure schedules relating to the draft merger agreement.
On June 26, 2014, IGT and Morgan Stanley executed an updated engagement letter, which was subsequently amended, which confirmed the agreement of the parties in respect of a change of control transaction.
On June 30, 2014, each of Company A, GTECH and Company F submitted a written proposal to acquire IGT. Company A proposed to acquire the company at a price of $16.00 per share, in cash, and delivered a partial markup of the draft merger agreement. In its markup, Company A indicated that it may be willing to accept the covenant regarding actions to obtain antitrust approvals, and, in certain cases, the reverse termination fee equal to 8.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT, but conditioned IGT's right to specifically enforce the merger agreement upon the completion of a marketing period and the availability of debt financing for the proposed transaction.
GTECH proposed to acquire the company at a price of $17.00 per share, with 50% of the consideration payable to IGT stockholders consisting of shares of Holdco and 50% payable in cash, and with the share component of the consideration being subject to a floating exchange ratio, with a 12.5% collar. In its markup of the merger agreement, GTECH specified that the mid-point of the collar would be determined based on the trading price of GTECH shares during a period ending on June 9, 2014 (the date of the Reuters report referred to above), which, as a result of a decrease in the trading price of GTECH shares since that date, would reduce the amount of protection the collar would provide to IGT stockholders against further decreases in the trading price of GTECH shares, and reduce the likelihood that IGT stockholders would benefit from an increase in the trading price of GTECH shares.
93
In addition, GTECH's markup of the merger agreement (i) increased the size of the termination fee payable by IGT under certain circumstances to 4.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT from 2.0%, (ii) removed the obligation to pay a reverse termination fee, (iii) specified that the obligation to undertake actions to obtain antitrust approvals would not require GTECH to take certain actions that would have a material adverse effect on Holdco (measured relative to IGT and its subsidiaries), (iv) specified that Holdco's articles of association would include a loyalty share program, under which shareholders that hold Holdco shares continuously for at least three years would be granted the right to receive additional voting shares of Holdco, (v) added closing conditions regarding the exercise of rescission rights by GTECH shareholders under Italian law and the tax treatment of Holdco following the transactions, and (vi) removed IGT's right to terminate the merger agreement in order to accept a superior proposal. GTECH's markup also contained substantial changes to the representations and warranties and interim operating covenants.
Company F proposed to acquire the company at a price of $17.25 per share, in cash, and delivered a markup of the draft merger agreement that (i) increased the size of the termination fee payable by IGT to 2.5% of the aggregate equity value of IGT from 2.0%, (ii) reduced the size of the reverse termination fee payable by Company F to 2.5% of the aggregate equity value of IGT from 8.0%, (iii) specified that the obligation to undertake actions to obtain antitrust approvals would not require Company F to make material divestitures or accept any material operating restrictions, and (iv) conditioned IGT's right to specifically enforce the merger agreement upon the completion of a marketing period and availability of debt financing for the proposed transaction.
On July 1, 2014, a representative of Company D advised Ms. Hart that it would not be submitting a proposal.
On July 1, 2014, representatives of IGT, representatives of Morgan Stanley and representatives of Sidley discussed the proposals and the markups of the draft merger agreements. Members of IGT senior management expressed the view that none of the proposals offered sufficient value to IGT stockholders. At the direction of IGT senior management, Morgan Stanley contacted each of the bidders on July 1 and July 2, 2014 to inform them that management would not be recommending its proposal to the IGT board. Each of the bidders was also invited to interact directly with Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart.
On July 2, 2014, Mr. McCann and Mr. Alves spoke telephonically regarding GTECH's proposal. Mr. Alves indicated that GTECH's bid was not well-positioned relative to the other bids.
On July 2, 2014, Company F submitted a letter to Morgan Stanley indicating that it would increase its offer to $17.75 per share from $17.25 per share, and that it was prepared to address IGT's antitrust concerns, including by significantly increasing the size of its reverse termination fee.
On July 2, 2014, Ms. Hart spoke with Mr. Sala by telephone. She advised Mr. Sala that GTECH was the only bidder that had not increased its bid on June 30 and that its markup of the draft merger agreement had raised many issues. She also reported on the results of due diligence by the IGT team and noted that GTECH had a significantly different compensation philosophy than IGT, and that any significant decrease in employee and management compensation could present a significant hurdle in connection with realizing potential synergies. Mr. Sala responded to Ms. Hart that he understood that GTECH intended to keep employee and management compensation the same as they had been at IGT for a period of twelve months after the completion of the proposed transaction.
On July 3, 2014, the IGT board met telephonically to review the proposals. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and representatives of Sidley also participated in the meeting. While the IGT board was meeting, Company A notified Morgan Stanley that it would be willing to increase its offer to $17.25 per share from $16.00 per share, which increase was communicated to the IGT board. Representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed the financial terms of the proposals and the
94
communications with the parties since the receipt of proposals on June 30. Representatives of Sidley then reviewed the proposed markups of the draft merger agreements, and discussed the fiduciary duties of the IGT board and other legal matters. Ms. Hart then presented management's view with respect to each of the proposals, and indicated that none of the proposals were within a range of value that management would recommend to the IGT board. Ms. Hart did not identify a specific range, but noted that there was potential for bidders to increase the amount of their offers to a range that management would recommend. The IGT board authorized IGT management to offer to principals of each of the three bidders an in-person meeting with Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart during the week of July 7 to review value and other key business terms, and to request best and final offers in advance of the IGT board's July 11 meeting. The IGT board also authorized the company's advisors to continue to engage with advisors of each of the three bidders. Following the meeting, Morgan Stanley invited each of the bidders to participate in the proposed meetings among principals, and Sidley delivered to Wachtell and to counsel for Company F, a list of material issues identified in their respective markups of the draft merger agreements. There were significantly more issues in the GTECH markup in part because of the complexity of the transaction structure.
On July 5, 2014, Sidley discussed the list of material issues identified in the draft merger agreements with counsel for GTECH and with counsel for Company F.
On July 7, 2014, Sidley discussed the draft merger agreement with counsel for Company A.
On July 7, 2014, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart met with representatives of GTECH; on July 8, 2014, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart met with representatives of Company A; and on July 9, 2014, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart met with representatives of Company F. Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart emphasized the need for each of the bidders to maximize the value to be received by IGT stockholders and the importance of certainty of closing. Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart did not make a counteroffer to any of the three bidders, although GTECH was informed that its offer was lower than those of the other bidders with respect to price and that its transaction terms involved greater complexity than terms from other bidders. Each of the three bidders was informed that final markups of the draft merger agreement were to be submitted by 5:00 pm ET on July 10, 2014, and that final financial proposals would be due by 9:00 am ET on July 11, 2014.
On July 8, 2014, Sidley delivered revised drafts of the merger agreements to counsel for Company A, GTECH and Company F, respectively.
On July 9 and 10, 2014, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart had a call and a meeting, respectively, with Mr. Pellicioli and Mr. Sala to discuss the progress being made in resolving the issues that had been identified by Sidley to Wachtell and that had been discussed in the meeting on July 7, 2014 and repeated the fact that GTECH was behind on price.
In the early hours of July 10, 2014, Wachtell distributed a revised draft of the merger agreement and shareholder support agreement to Sidley, and engaged in further discussions with Sidley regarding the terms of the agreements later that day. Wachtell distributed further revised drafts of the merger and shareholder support agreements later that evening, which (i) revised the terms of the collar provision, (ii) reduced the amount of the termination fee payable by IGT in certain circumstances to 3.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT from 4.0% proposed in GTECH's prior draft, (iii) provided for the payment of a reverse termination fee payable by GTECH in certain circumstances equal to 6.0% of the aggregate equity value of IGT, (iv) generally obligated GTECH to undertake necessary actions to obtain antitrust approvals, and (v) permitted IGT to terminate the merger agreement in order to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
On the morning of July 11, 2014, GTECH notified IGT that it would increase the financial terms of its offer to $18.10 per share from $17.00 per share, with 25% of the consideration payable to IGT stockholders in a possible transaction consisting of shares of Holdco, and 75% in cash, and requested
95
that IGT enter into exclusive negotiations with GTECH. Company A notified Morgan Stanley that it would continue to offer consideration of $17.25 per share, in cash, and submitted a revised draft of the merger agreement.
In the afternoon of July 11, 2014, the IGT board met in person. Representatives of Morgan Stanley, representatives of Sidley and representatives of Allen & Overy LLP, tax and international counsel to IGT, and which we refer to as Allen & Overy, also participated in the meeting. Ms. Hart reported on events that had transpired since the July 3 board meeting, including the meetings with each of the three bidders and the parties' respective proposals. A representative of Sidley reviewed certain issues identified in GTECH's proposed draft of the merger agreement, and representatives of Allen & Overy reviewed certain tax aspects of the GTECH proposal. While the IGT board was meeting, Company F delivered a letter to Morgan Stanley, which indicated dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the due diligence process and did not modify Company F's prior proposal of $17.75 per share, in cash. Representatives of Morgan Stanley shared the letter from Company F with the IGT board, and discussed its implication that Company F did not intend to submit a revised proposal. Morgan Stanley also reviewed its valuation summary for the company. Mr. Vandemore then reviewed financial projections for the company, and informed the board that management now viewed the delayed recovery case as the base case for the company, rather than the case reflected in the long range plan for the company. The IGT board determined that, since the deadline for final proposals had passed and GTECH's proposal was the most favorable, it would be in IGT's best interest to maximize the value and certainty of GTECH's offer. Accordingly, the IGT board determined to notify GTECH that, while IGT would not grant GTECH's request for exclusivity, if GTECH were willing to increase the value of its offer to a total of $18.25 per share, then IGT would not initiate further contact with other bidders for a period of up to ten days, during which period it would work with GTECH to finalize and enter into a definitive agreement with respect to the proposed transaction. The IGT board directed that this message not be communicated to GTECH until Company F's counsel had been given the opportunity to complete its review of certain antitrust-related materials.
On July 11, 2014, after Company F's counsel had been given access to certain antitrust-related materials, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart notified GTECH of IGT's proposal. GTECH agreed to increase the value of its offer to $18.25 per share, and the parties engaged in confirmatory due diligence and commenced intensive negotiations to finalize the merger agreement, shareholder support agreements and related documents.
On July 12 through 15, 2014, negotiations proceeded on the merger agreement, shareholder support agreements and related documents.
On July 15, 2014, the IGT board met telephonically. Representatives of Morgan Stanley and representatives of Sidley also participated in the meeting. Ms. Hart reviewed the status of negotiations with GTECH, and reported that no further communication had been received from Company A or Company F following the July 11 board meeting. Representatives of Morgan Stanley reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction, and representatives of Sidley reviewed the material legal terms of the proposed transaction, highlighting a discrete number of remaining issues that had not been resolved by the parties. The IGT board recessed pending further negotiation of the merger agreement. During the recess, Mr. Satre spoke to Mr. Pellicioli and Ms. Hart spoke to Mr. Sala. After the IGT board had reconvened, Ms. Hart notified the board that the remaining issues had been resolved in a conversation between her and Mr. Sala, and representatives of Morgan Stanley delivered Morgan Stanley's oral opinion that, as of the date of the opinion, and based upon and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the scope of review undertaken by Morgan Stanley set forth in its written opinion, the merger consideration to be received by IGT's stockholders, taken in the aggregate, pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to the holders of IGT's common stock, which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing. Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart recommended to the IGT board that
96
IGT should accept the proposal from GTECH. In connection with the IGT board's consideration of this recommendation, Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart reminded the board of the roles they would play in a combined company. After discussion and deliberation, and after considering all of the factors that it deemed relevant, including the factors specified under "Reasons for the Mergers and Recommendation of the IGT Board" beginning on page 111, the IGT board unanimously approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the mergers contemplated thereby.
Later that evening, representatives of IGT and GTECH, along with Sidley and Wachtell, finalized the language of the merger agreement and the shareholder support agreements in keeping with the resolution of issues described to the IGT board by Ms. Hart. After execution of the debt commitment letter, a copy of which was provided to IGT, Morgan Stanley and Sidley, each of IGT, GTECH and the other parties to the merger agreement and shareholder support agreements executed and delivered the merger agreement and shareholder support agreements, effective as of July 15, 2014.
At midnight ET on July 16, 2014, IGT and GTECH each issued a press release announcing the transaction. On July 16, 2014, IGT furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC disclosing the execution of the merger agreement and filing the press release as an exhibit. On July 18, 2014, IGT filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC summarizing the material terms of the merger agreement and the shareholder support agreements, and filing the merger agreement and shareholder support agreements as exhibits.
Following the announcement by the parties on July 16, 2014 that they had entered into the merger agreement, certain putative stockholder class action lawsuits were filed by purported stockholders of IGT challenging the transaction. The complaints in the actions name as defendants IGT, the members of the IGT board of directors, GTECH and, in some cases, certain of GTECH's subsidiaries. IGT intends to vigorously defend against the claims asserted in these lawsuits. See "Litigation Related to the Mergers."
Subsequent to the announcement of the transaction, the parties approached the Financial Conduct Authority acting in its capacity as the U.K. Listing Authority, which we refer to as the UKLA, to confirm if the UKLA was of the view that the IGT Merger or the Holdco Merger would require the parties to publish a prospectus approved by the UKLA pursuant to section 85(1) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, which we refer to as the UK prospectus. While the UKLA expressed the view that the Holdco Merger would not require the publication of a UK prospectus, the UKLA considered that the inclusion of the cash/stock election feature in the IGT Merger meant that the IGT Merger would require the publication of a UK prospectus. The parties agreed that the preparation and approval of the UK prospectus could cause a meaningful delay in the completion of the transactions.
On September 9, 2014, representatives of IGT (including Mr. Satre and Ms. Hart) and GTECH (including Mr. Sala and Mr. Pellicioli) met in Rome, Italy to discuss integration planning, as well as the consequences of being required to publish a UK prospectus. In that meeting, GTECH requested that IGT agree to eliminate the cash/stock election from the merger agreement as a result of the expected delay associated with that requirement. IGT requested that GTECH agree to reflect a reduction in the number of gaming approvals that would be a condition to closing.
On September 12, 2014, Wachtell distributed a proposed amendment to the merger agreement, among other things, to eliminate the cash/stock election from the merger agreement and to confirm a reduction in the number of gaming approvals that would be a condition to closing.
On September 15, 2014, the IGT board met telephonically. Representatives of Morgan Stanley attended the meeting. Representatives of IGT described the proposed amendment, including the benefits and potential detriments of entering into the amendment. Morgan Stanley confirmed orally to the IGT board that, based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions described, had Morgan
97
Stanley issued its written opinion referred to above on July 15, 2014 on the basis of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, as amended by the amendment, the conclusion set forth in its opinion would not have changed, which oral confirmation was subsequently confirmed in writing. The confirmatory letter did not address any circumstances, developments or events occurring after the date of Morgan Stanley's written opinion on July 15, 2014 and Morgan Stanley's written opinion is provided only as of such date. After discussion and deliberation, and after considering all of the factors that it deemed relevant, the IGT board unanimously approved and declared advisable the amendment to the merger agreement, subject to satisfactory confirmation from the UKLA that it did not consider that a UK prospectus would be required for the transactions as amended.
Upon receiving confirmation from the UKLA that it did not consider that a UK prospectus would be required for the transactions as amended, each of IGT, GTECH and the other parties to the merger agreement executed and delivered the amendment to the merger agreement, effective as of September 23, 2014.
After the announcement of the transaction, Morgan Stanley discovered that it had omitted a provision for taxes in its calculation of GTECH's projected unlevered free cash flows used in connection with its discounted cash flow valuation for GTECH. Following the calculation of the corrected unlevered free cash flows for GTECH, Morgan Stanley determined that, in the case of the unadjusted GTECH management forecasts, the derived range of implied values per share was €24.85 to €31.63 instead of €29.32 to €36.18, and that, in the case of the adjusted GTECH management forecasts, the derived range of implied values per share was €22.26 to €28.60 instead of €26.47 to €32.88.
Promptly after discovery, Morgan Stanley informed management of IGT on November 5, 2014 of the corrected analysis. The results of the updated analysis relating to GTECH had no impact on the financial analyses performed in respect of IGT. On November 11, 2014, Morgan Stanley orally confirmed to the IGT board of directors, which was subsequently confirmed in writing on November 11, 2014, that, had Morgan Stanley used the corrected unlevered free cash flows projected for GTECH, there would have been no change to the conclusion set forth in its fairness opinion delivered on July 15, 2014.
At its meeting on July 13, 2014, the GTECH Board authorized GTECH's entry into the Merger Agreement and concluded that, taking into account the then-current circumstances, the Mergers are fair to the shareholders of GTECH from a financial point of view.
The GTECH Board considered many factors in reaching the conclusion that, taking into account the then-current circumstances, the Mergers are fair to the shareholders of GTECH from a financial point of view, and that the Mergers will result in enhanced value for GTECH shareholders relative to GTECH continuing as a standalone company. In arriving at its conclusion, the GTECH board of directors consulted with GTECH's management, legal advisors and financial advisor, reviewed a significant amount of information, considered a number of factors in its deliberations and concluded that the Mergers are likely to result in significant strategic and financial benefits to GTECH and its shareholders, including:
98
These beliefs are based in part on the following factors that the GTECH board of directors considered:
99
The GTECH board of directors weighed these factors against a number of uncertainties, risks and potentially negative factors relevant to the Mergers, including the following:
100
The GTECH Board concluded that the uncertainties, risks and potentially negative factors relevant to the Mergers were outweighed by the potential benefits that it expected GTECH and the GTECH shareholders would achieve as a result of the Mergers.
This discussion of the information and factors considered by the GTECH Board includes the principal positive and negative factors considered by the GTECH Board, but is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the GTECH Board. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Mergers, and the complexity of these matters, the GTECH Board did not find it useful and did not attempt to quantify or assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the Mergers. Rather, the GTECH Board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the information presented to it and the factors it considered. In addition, individual members of the GTECH Board may have given differing weights to different factors.
Opinion of Credit Suisse as Financial Advisor to GTECH
GTECH retained Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited ("Credit Suisse") as its financial advisor in connection with the proposed Mergers. On July 13, 2014, at a meeting of the GTECH Board held to evaluate the proposed Mergers, Credit Suisse delivered to the GTECH Board its oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated July 15, 2014, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to various assumptions, matters considered and limitations described in such opinion, the Holdco Exchange Ratio, after giving effect to the aggregate merger consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger, was fair, from a financial point of view, to GTECH shareholders.
The full text of Credit Suisse's written opinion, dated July 15, 2014, to the GTECH Board, which sets forth, among other things, the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the scope of review undertaken, is attached as Annex G hereto and is incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference in its entirety. The description of the opinion set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Credit Suisse's opinion was provided to the GTECH Board for its information in connection with its evaluation of the Holdco Exchange Ratio and did not address any other aspect of the proposed Mergers, including the relative merits of the Mergers as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might be available to GTECH or the underlying business decision of GTECH to proceed with the Mergers. The opinion does not constitute advice or a recommendation to any shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed Mergers or otherwise.
101
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse:
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any responsibility to independently verify any of the foregoing information and Credit Suisse assumed and relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. Without limitation to the foregoing, with respect to the financial forecasts for GTECH and IGT referred to above, the management of GTECH advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, with GTECH's consent, that such forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of GTECH's management as to the future financial performance of GTECH and IGT, respectively. Credit Suisse expressed no opinion with respect to such forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. With respect to the estimates provided to Credit Suisse by the management of GTECH with respect to the cost savings and synergies, including revenue synergies and tax benefits, anticipated to result from the Mergers, the management of GTECH advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, with GTECH's consent, that such forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of GTECH as to such cost savings and synergies and that the same would be realized in the amounts and the times and at the costs indicated thereby.
Credit Suisse also assumed, with GTECH's consent, that in the course of obtaining necessary regulatory or third-party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the Mergers, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed that would have an adverse effect on GTECH, IGT or the contemplated benefits of the Mergers and that the Mergers would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement therein. Representatives of GTECH advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, with GTECH's consent, that the terms of the Merger Agreement, when signed, would conform in all material respects to the terms reflected in the draft merger agreement reviewed by Credit Suisse. In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to, and did not, make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of GTECH or IGT, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals.
102
Credit Suisse's opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of its opinion, to GTECH shareholders of the Holdco Exchange Ratio (after giving effect to the aggregate merger consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger) and did not address any other aspect or effect of the Mergers or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the Mergers or otherwise, including, without limitation, the form or structure of the Mergers or any other aspect relating to any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any party to the Mergers, or class of such persons, relative to the Holdco Exchange Ratio or otherwise.
Credit Suisse's opinion was necessarily based upon information made available to Credit Suisse as of the date of its opinion and upon financial, economic, regulatory (including tax), market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on that date. It was Credit Suisse's understanding that the Holdco shares would be listed and traded solely on the New York Stock Exchange. Credit Suisse did not express any opinion as to what the value of the Holdco ordinary shares actually would be when issued to GTECH shareholders pursuant to the Mergers or the prices at which such Holdco ordinary shares would trade subsequent to the Mergers, nor did Credit Suisse express any opinion as to the prices at which GTECH shares or IGT shares would trade at any time. Except as described in this summary, the GTECH board of directors imposed no other limitations on Credit Suisse with respect to the investigations made or procedures followed in rendering its opinion.
In preparing its opinion to the GTECH board of directors, Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit Suisse's analyses described below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Credit Suisse's opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Credit Suisse arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond GTECH's control. No company, transaction or business used in Credit Suisse's analyses is identical to GTECH, IGT or the proposed Mergers, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisse's analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold or acquired. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, Credit Suisse's analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisse was not requested to, and it did not, recommend the specific consideration payable in the proposed Mergers, which consideration was determined through negotiations between GTECH and IGT, and the decision to enter into the Mergers was solely that of the GTECH board of directors. Credit Suisse's opinion and financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by the GTECH board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed Mergers and should not be viewed as determinative
103
of the views of the GTECH board of directors or GTECH's management with respect to the Mergers or the Holdco Exchange Ratio.
On October 1, 2014, in accordance with Italian market practice and to assist the GTECH board of directors with its approval of the merger plan regarding the Holdco Merger, Credit Suisse delivered to the GTECH board of directors a "bring-down" written opinion (the "Bring-Down Opinion") stating that, on the basis of the same criteria upon which the initial written opinion, dated July 15, 2014 (the "Initial Opinion"), was given, and on the basis of the same premises, qualifications and assumptions set out therein, as of October 1, 2014, nothing had come to Credit Suisse's attention which would cause it to alter its opinion that the Holdco Exchange Ratio, after giving effect to the aggregate merger consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders in the IGT Merger, was fair, from a financial point of view, to GTECH shareholders. The full text of Credit Suisse's Bring-Down Opinion is attached as Annex H hereto.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses undertaken by Credit Suisse in connection with its Bring-Down Opinion. Except to reflect events that occurred between July 15, 2014 and October 1, 2014, there were no material changes to the financial analyses summarized below from those undertaken by Credit Suisse in connection with its Initial Opinion. The following summary does not purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Credit Suisse, nor does the order of analyses described represent the relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Credit Suisse. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit Suisse's financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse's financial analyses.
For purposes of the financial analyses summarized below, the term "implied IGT merger consideration" refers to the total implied value of the merger consideration to be paid to IGT shareholders of $18.25 per share, calculated as the sum of (i) the $13.69 per share cash consideration to be paid in the Mergers plus (ii) the $4.56 per share implied value of Holdco ordinary shares stock consideration to be paid in the Mergers, subject to the terms of the collar as described in the Merger Agreement.
IGT Comparable Trading Multiples Analysis. Credit Suisse reviewed certain financial and stock market information of IGT and the following four selected publicly traded companies with operations in whole or in part in the gaming industry (including gaming machine suppliers), which is the industry in which IGT operates:
Selected Company | Enterprise Value (in millions) | |
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. (pre-leak of VGT transaction on 6/24/14) | $3,049 | |
Bally Technologies, Inc. (pre-announcement of Scientific Games transaction on 7/31/14) | $4,207 | |
Multimedia Games Holding Company, Inc. (pre-announcement of Global Cash Access transaction on 9/7/14) | $738 | |
Scientific Games Corporation (pre-announcement of Bally transaction on 7/31/14) | $3,758 |
104
The above peer group companies were chosen based on Credit Suisse's knowledge of the industry and because they operate in and are exposed to similar lines of business as IGT, namely companies in the gaming equipment supplier industry generally. Although none of such companies are identical or directly comparable to IGT, these companies are publicly traded companies with operations and/or other criteria, such as lines of business, markets, business risks, growth prospects, maturity of business and size and scale of business, that for purposes of its analysis Credit Suisse considered similar to IGT.
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, enterprise values of the selected companies, calculated as equity values based on closing stock prices on September 16, 2014 (unless otherwise noted), plus debt, less cash and other adjustments, as a multiple of calendar years 2014 and 2015 estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. Credit Suisse then applied ranges derived from the selected companies of selected multiples of calendar year 2015 estimated EBITDA of 6.8x to 8.0x to corresponding data of IGT. Financial data of the selected companies were based on the mean of selected publicly available research analysts' estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Financial data of IGT were based on public filings and estimates of GTECH's management.
The foregoing analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share reference range for IGT as compared to the implied IGT merger consideration:
Implied Per Share Reference Range | Implied IGT Merger Consideration | |
$10.40 - $13.70 | $18.25 |
Similarly, Credit Suisse applied ranges derived from the selected companies of selected multiples of calendar year 2015 estimated EBITDA minus capital expenditures of 8.0x to 10.0x to corresponding data of IGT, which analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share reference range for IGT as compared to the implied IGT merger consideration:
Implied Per Share Reference Range | Implied IGT Merger Consideration | |
$9.80 - $14.00 | $18.25 |
IGT Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Credit Suisse performed a discounted cash flow analysis of IGT to calculate the estimated present value of the standalone (excluding synergies) unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that IGT was forecasted to generate during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 through the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 based on estimates of GTECH's management. Credit Suisse calculated terminal values for GTECH by applying to IGT's estimated normalized EBITDA for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 a range of terminal value EBITDA multiples of 7.0x to 8.0x. The present value (as of June 30, 2014) of the cash flows and terminal values was then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 9.25%, representing IGT's estimated weighted average cost of capital.