Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

Seagate Technology Public Limited Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

September 3, 2014

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Seagate Technology plc, which will be held at 9:30 a.m. local time on Wednesday, October 22, 2014, at the Four Seasons Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Details of the business to be presented at the meeting may be found in the Proxy Statement accompanying this letter.

We hope you are planning to attend the meeting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please take a moment and submit your proxy as soon as possible, so that your shares may be represented at the 2014 Annual General Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Seagate Technology plc, I thank you for your continued support.

    Sincerely,

 

 


GRAPHIC

Stephen J. Luczo
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

        The 2014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Seagate Technology plc ("Seagate" or the "Company"), a company incorporated under the laws of Ireland, will be held on October 22, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. local time, at the Four Seasons Hotel, Simmonscourt Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.

        The purposes of the 2014 Annual General Meeting are:

(a) Stephen J. Luczo   (b) Frank J. Biondi, Jr.   (c) Michael R. Cannon
(d) Mei-Wei Cheng   (e) William T. Coleman   (f) Jay L. Geldmacher
(g) Kristen M. Onken   (h) Dr. Chong Sup Park   (i) Gregorio Reyes
(j) Stephanie Tilenius   (k) Edward J. Zander    

        The board of Directors recommends that you vote "for" proposals 1 through 8. The full text of these proposals is set forth in the accompanying proxy statement.

        Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 26, 2014, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual General Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please provide your proxy by either using the Internet or telephone as further explained in the accompanying proxy statement or filling in, signing, dating, and promptly mailing a proxy card.


Table of Contents

        During the meeting, management will also present Seagate's Irish Statutory Accounts for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 and the reports of the Directors and auditors thereon.

    By order of the Board of Directors

 

 


GRAPHIC
    Kenneth M. Massaroni,
Secretary

September 3, 2014


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 2014:

        We will be relying on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to furnish Proxy Materials over the Internet instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, we are sending our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") instead of a paper copy of our Proxy Statement, our Irish Statutory Accounts for fiscal year 2014, the proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014 (collectively, the "Proxy Materials"). The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of the Proxy Materials. If you have previously elected to receive our Proxy Materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials via email unless you elect otherwise. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form.

        IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTEND AND VOTE, THEN YOU ARE ENTITLED TO APPOINT A PROXY OR PROXIES TO ATTEND AND VOTE ON YOUR BEHALF. A PROXY IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A SHAREHOLDER IN THE COMPANY. IF YOU WISH TO APPOINT AS PROXY ANY PERSON OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUALS SPECIFIED ON THE PROXY CARD, PLEASE CONTACT THE COMPANY SECRETARY AT OUR REGISTERED.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
 

GENERAL INFORMATION

    9  

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

   
13
 

Proposals 1(a) through 1(k) – Election of Directors

   
13
 

Proposal 2 – Grant Directors Authority to Issue Shares

   
19
 

Proposal 3 – Grant Directors Authority to Issue Shares for Cash Without First Offering Shares to Existing Shareholders

   
20
 

Proposal 4 – Determine the Price Range at Which the Company Can Re-Issue Shares Held as Treasury Shares

   
22
 

Proposal 5 – Approval of Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan

   
23
 

Proposal 6 – Non-Binding Advisory Vote on the Company's Executive Compensation

   
36
 

Proposal 7 – Authorization to Hold the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders at a Location Outside of Ireland

   
37
 

Proposal 8 – Non-binding Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young and Binding Authorization of Audit Committee to Set Auditors' Remuneration

   
38
 

Audit Committee Report

   
39
 

Fees of the Independent Auditors

   
40
 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   
41
 

Compensation of Directors

   
48
 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   
51
 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

   
54
 

Compensation Committee Report

   
72
 

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

   
73
 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

   
82
 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

   
83
 

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

   
84
 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

   
84
 

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

   
86
 

ANNUAL REPORT

   
86
 

HOUSEHOLDING

   
86
 

ANNEX A: AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC 2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

   
 

ANNEX B: IRISH STATUTORY ACCOUNTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

   
 

Table of Contents


SUMMARY INFORMATION

        This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. For more complete information about the topics summarized below, please review Seagate Technology plc's Annual Report on Form 10-K and the entire Proxy Statement.

2014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

  Date and Time:   October 22, 2014 at 9:30am local time

 

Place:

 

The Four Seasons Hotel
Simmonscourt Road
Dublin 4, Ireland

 

Record Date:

 

August 26, 2014

 

Voting:

 

Shareholders as of the Record Date are entitled to vote on the proxy proposals. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote for each Director nominee and each of the other proposals.

 

Attendance:

 

All shareholders as of the close of business on the Record Date may attend the meeting. You can attend and vote at the meeting even if you have completed and submitted a form of proxy.

 

Proxy Materials:

 

The Proxy Materials were first made available to shareholders on or about September 3, 2014.

1


Table of Contents

Proposals, voting recommendations and vote required:

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" each of the proposals that will be submitted for shareholder approval at the 2014 Annual General Meeting.

The proposals are:
  Vote required:   Page:  
1   Elect the 11 Director nominees named in the proxy statement.   Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast
    13  

2

 

To grant the Directors authority to issue shares.

 

Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast

 

 

19

 

3

 

To grant the Directors authority to issue shares for cash without first offering shares to existing shareholders.

 

Special Resolution
At least 75% of votes cast

 

 

20

 

4

 

To determine the price range at which the Company can re-issue shares that it holds as treasury shares.

 

Special Resolution
At least 75% of votes cast

 

 

22

 

5

 

To approve the Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to, among other things, increase the shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 25,000,000.

 

Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast

 

 

23

 

6

 

To approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the named executive officers.

 

Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast

 

 

36

 

7

 

To authorize holding the 2015 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company at a location outside of Ireland.

 

Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast

 

 

37

 

8

 

To ratify, in a non-binding vote, the appointment of Ernst & Young as the independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 ("fiscal year 2015") and to authorize, in a binding vote, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors' remuneration.

 

Ordinary Resolution
Majority of votes cast

 

 

38

 

2


Table of Contents

Seagate's Corporate Governance Highlights

The Board consists of a substantial majority of independent Directors.

 

The Board has a Lead Independent Director.

Directors must receive a majority of shareholder votes cast to be elected.

 

The non-executive Directors meet regularly in executive sessions.

Executives and Directors are subject to share ownership guidelines.

 

Executives are subject to a "clawback" policy.

All Directors are elected annually.

 

Maintain an anti-hedging policy for all Directors and employees.

The Board and each committee perform a self-evaluation annually.

 

The Board oversees enterprise risk management.

The Board undertakes succession planning for all executive levels, including CEO, and the Board.

   

Director Nominees

        Following is a summary about each Director nominee:

Nominee
  Age   Director
Since
  Principal Occupation   Independent   Current Committee
Membership
Stephen J. Luczo

GRAPHIC
  57   2000   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Seagate Technology plc   No  

None

                        
Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

GRAPHIC
  69   2005   Senior Managing Director of WaterView Advisors LLC   Yes  

Finance (Chair)

Compensation

                        
Michael R. Cannon

GRAPHIC
  61   2011   Former President, Global Operations, Dell, Inc.   Yes  

Finance

Nominating and Corporate Governance

                        

3


Table of Contents

Nominee
  Age   Director
Since
  Principal Occupation   Independent   Current Committee
Membership
Mei-Wei Cheng

GRAPHIC
  64   2012   Former CEO Siemens North East Asia and President and former CEO of Siemens Ltd., China   Yes  

Audit

Finance

                        
William Coleman

GRAPHIC
  66   2012   Partner with Alsop Louie Partners   Yes  

Audit

Nominating and Corporate Governance

                        
Jay L. Geldmacher

GRAPHIC
  58   2012   CEO of Artesyn Embedded Technologies   Yes  

Compensation

                        
Kristen M. Onken

GRAPHIC
  65   2011   Former Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Logitech International, SA   Yes  

Audit (Chair)

Finance

                        
Dr. Chong Sup Park

GRAPHIC
  66   2006   Former Chairman and CEO of Maxtor   Yes  

Audit

Nominating and Corporate Governance

                        

4


Table of Contents

Nominee
  Age   Director
Since
  Principal Occupation   Independent   Current Committee
Membership
Gregorio Reyes

GRAPHIC
  73   2004   Private Investor and Management Consultant   Yes  

Audit

Finance

                        
Stephanie Tilenius

GRAPHIC
  47   Nominee   Executive-in-Residence, Kleiner Perkins   Yes  

None

Edward J. Zander

GRAPHIC
  67   2009   Former Chairman and CEO of Motorola, Inc.   Yes  

Compensation (Chair)

        For further biographical information about our Director nominees see pages 13 through 18 of this Proxy Statement.

Grant the Directors authority to issue shares.

        We are asking you to grant our Directors authority to issue shares under Irish law. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland.

Grant the Directors authority to issue shares for cash without first offering shares to existing shareholders.

        We are asking you to grant the Directors authority to issue shares for cash without first offering shares to existing shareholders. This authority is fundamental to our business and granting the Board this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland. As required under Irish law, this must be approved by special resolution, and requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Determine the price at which the Company can reissue shares held as treasury shares.

        We are asking you to determine the price at which the Company can reissue shares held as treasury shares. From time to time the Company may acquire ordinary shares and hold them as treasury shares. The Company may reissue such treasury shares, and under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we may reissue any shares held in treasury. As required under

5


Table of Contents

Irish law, this must be approved by special resolution, and requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

Approval of Our Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

        We are asking you to approve our Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, which increases the number of shares reserved for issuance under the current plan by 25,000,000, modifies the fungible share counting provision so that shares issued in respect of full-value share awards granted thereunder will count against the share reserve as 2.5 for every one share granted, and makes certain changes to the performance criteria on which performance goals will be based. A detailed discussion about the amendments is included under Proposal 5, starting on page 23.

Advisory Approval of Our Executive Compensation.

        We are asking for your advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (our "NEOs."). While our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

        Before considering this proposal, please read our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which explains our executive compensation programs and the Compensation Committee's compensation decisions.

Approval to Hold 2015 AGM Outside Ireland.

        We are asking you to grant our Directors authority to hold the 2015 AGM outside of Ireland.

Ratification of Ernst & Young, and authorization to set auditors' remuneration.

        We are asking you to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our auditors, and to authorize the Audit Committee to set their remuneration.

Executive Compensation

Pay for Performance

        The general philosophy and structure of our executive compensation programs emphasize strong alignment between executive pay and corporate financial performance. In addition, our compensation philosophy is designed to align our executive compensation programs with long term shareholder interests. In fiscal year 2014, a majority of our long term equity incentive awards were granted in the form of performance based restricted share units, which vest dependent upon the achievement of pre-established performance objectives, including return on invested capital, relative total shareholder return and adjusted earnings per share, reflecting a strong emphasis on pay for performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders. In addition, over 86% of our NEO total annual targeted compensation is subject to the achievement of specific performance conditions.

        Highlights of the Company's fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 ("fiscal year 2014") financial performance include:

6


Table of Contents

        Please review our "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for additional information and definitions of financial metrics.

2015 AGM

Deadline for shareholder proposals for inclusion in the proxy statement:

  May 6, 2015

Period for shareholder nomination of directors:

  April 6, 2015 to May 6, 2015

Deadline for all other proposals:

  July 20, 2015

        For further information see the section entitled "Shareholder Proposals and Nominations" of this Proxy.

7


Table of Contents

LOGO



PROXY STATEMENT



        In this Proxy Statement, "Seagate Technology," "Seagate" the "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Seagate Technology plc, an Irish public limited company. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, are first being mailed to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 26, 2014 (the "Record Date") on or about September 3, 2014.

8


Table of Contents


GENERAL INFORMATION

        Following are questions and answers concerning Voting and Solicitation and other general information.

Why did I receive this Proxy Statement?

  We sent you this Proxy Statement or a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") on or around September 3, 2014 because our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Company's 2014 Annual General Meeting ("AGM").

 

This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote on an informed basis.

Why are there two sets of financial statements covering the same fiscal period?

 

U.S. securities laws require us to send you our 2014 Form 10-K, which includes our financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These financial statements are included in the mailing of this Proxy Statement. Irish law also requires us to provide you with our Irish Statutory Accounts for our fiscal year 2014, including the reports of our Directors and auditors thereon, which accounts have been prepared in accordance with Irish law. The Irish Statutory Accounts are included as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement, are available at www.proxyvote.com, and, as required as a matter of Irish law, will be laid before the 2014 AGM.

What do I need to do to attend the 2014 AGM?

 

All shareholders as of the Record Date are invited to attend the 2014 AGM. In order to be admitted, you must present a form of personal identification and evidence of share ownership. If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you may bring a bank or brokerage account statement as your proof of ownership of Seagate shares. Shareholders of record may provide identification matching that of a shareholder appearing on the Company's register, a copy of a share certificate or other evidence of share ownership.

Who may vote?

 

You are entitled to vote if you beneficially owned the Company's ordinary shares at the close of business on the Record Date. At that time, there were 326,035,446 of the Company's ordinary shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Each ordinary share that you own entitles you to one vote on all matters to be voted on a poll at the 2014 AGM.

How do I vote?

 

Shareholders of record can cast their votes by proxy by:

 

using the Internet and voting at www.proxyvote.com;

 

calling 1.800.690.6903 and following the telephone prompts; or

 

completing, signing and returning a proxy card by mail.

 

The Notice you receive will contain a control number that will allow you to access the Proxy Materials online, including a proxy card. If you receive a paper copy of our Proxy Materials, a printed proxy card will be enclosed. If you have not received a paper copy of our Proxy Materials and wish to vote by mail, please follow the instructions included in the Notice to obtain a paper proxy card. A full printed set of our Proxy Materials will be mailed to you automatically only if you have previously made a permanent election to receive our Proxy Materials in printed form.

9


Table of Contents

 

The Notice is not a proxy card and it cannot be used to vote your shares.

 

Shareholders of record may also vote their shares directly by attending the 2014 AGM and casting their vote in person or appointing one or more proxies (who do not have to be shareholders) to attend the 2014 AGM and cast votes on their behalf in accordance with the shareholder's instructions.

 

Street name holders must vote their shares in the manner prescribed by their bank, brokerage firm or nominee. If you do not receive the voting instructions, please contact your bank, brokerage firm or nominee directly. Street name holders who wish to vote in person at the 2014 AGM must obtain a legal proxy from their bank, brokerage firm or nominee. Street name holders will need to bring the legal proxy with them to the 2014 AGM and hand it in with a signed ballot that is available upon request at the meeting. Street name holders will not be able to vote their shares at the 2014 AGM without a legal proxy and a signed ballot.

 

Even if you plan to attend the 2014 AGM, we recommend that you vote by proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

 

In order to be timely processed, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. EST on October 20, 2014 (or, if you are a street name holder, such earlier time as your bank, brokerage firm or nominee may require).

May I revoke my proxy?

 

If you are a registered holder of the Company's shares you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the 2014 AGM by:

 

notifying the Company Secretary in writing: c/o Seagate Technology plc at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland, Attention: Corporate Secretary,

 

submitting another properly signed proxy card with a later date or another Internet or telephone proxy at a later date but prior to the close of voting described above; or

 

by voting in person at the 2014 AGM.

 

Merely attending the 2014 AGM does not revoke your proxy. To revoke a proxy, you must take one of the actions described above.

 

If you are not a registered holder but your shares are registered in the name of a nominee, you must contact the nominee to revoke your proxy.

10


Table of Contents

How will my proxy get voted?

 

If your proxy is properly submitted, you are legally designating the person or persons named in the proxy card to vote your shares as you have directed. Unless you name a different person to act as your proxy, Dr. Chong Sup Park and Kenneth M. Massaroni (the "Company Designees") shall act as your proxies. If you sign and return your proxy without indicating how your shares are to be voted and name anyone other than a Company Designee as your proxy, that person may vote your shares at their discretion. If you name a Company Designee as your proxy without indicating how your shares are to be voted, the Company Designees shall vote your shares as the Board recommends on each proposal in this Proxy Statement and at their discretion regarding any other matter properly presented for a vote at the 2014 AGM. The Board of Directors currently does not know of any matters to be raised at the 2014 AGM other than the proposals contained in this Proxy Statement.

 

If you are a street name holder, the rules of the NASDAQ permit your bank, brokerage firm or nominee to vote your shares at their discretion on "routine" matters, which are Proposals 4 (determination of price range), 7 (2015 AGM outside Ireland) and 8 (ratification of auditors) if it does not receive instructions from you. However, your bank, brokerage firm or nominee may not vote your shares on "non-routine" matters, which are Proposals 1(a)-(k) (director elections), 2 (authority to issue shares), 3 (authority to issue shares without first offering to existing holders), 5 (adoption of the Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan) and 6 (ratification of named executive officer compensation) if it does not receive instructions from you ("broker non-votes"). Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of a quorum, but will not be counted as votes for or against the non-routine matters, but rather will be regarded as votes withheld and will not be counted in the calculation of votes for or against the resolution.

What constitutes a quorum?

 

The presence (in person or by proxy) of shareholders entitled to exercise a majority of the voting power of the Company on the Record Date is necessary to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business. Abstentions and broker non-votes are treated as "shares present" for the purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

What vote is required to approve each of the proposals?

 

A majority of the votes cast at the 2014 AGM is required to approve each of Proposals 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 8. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast "for" a proposal must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that Proposal. Proposals 3 and 4 are special resolutions under Irish law and require at least 75% of the votes cast for approval.

 

Although abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as "shares present" at the 2014 AGM for the purpose of determining whether a quorum exists, they are not counted as votes cast either "for" or "against" the resolution and, accordingly, will not affect the outcome of the vote.

11


Table of Contents

Who pays the expenses of this proxy statement?

 

We have hired Morrow & Co to assist in the distribution of Proxy Materials and the solicitation of proxies. We expect to pay Morrow & Co a fee for these services estimated at $10,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses. Proxies will be solicited on behalf of our Board of Directors by mail, in person, by telephone and through the Internet. We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. We will also reimburse brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding Proxy Materials to the persons for whom they hold shares.

How will voting be counted on any other matters that may be presented at the 2014 AGM?

 

Although we do not know of any matters to be presented or acted upon at the 2014 AGM other than the items described in this Proxy Statement, if any other matter is proposed and properly and validly presented at the 2014 AGM, the proxy holders will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Board recommendations.

 

The Board recommends that you vote your shares "FOR" each of the proposals in this Proxy Statement.

Voting procedures and tabulation.

 

The Board has appointed an inspector of elections to act at the 2014 AGM and to make a written report thereof. Prior to the 2014 AGM, the inspector will sign an oath to perform her duties in an impartial manner and according to the best of her ability. The inspector will ascertain the number of ordinary shares outstanding, determine the ordinary shares represented at the 2014 AGM and the validity of proxies and ballots, count all votes and ballots, and perform certain other duties. The determination of the inspector as to the validity of proxies will be final and binding.

12


Table of Contents

PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

PROPOSALS 1(a) – 1(k) – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Ordinary Resolutions)

        The Company uses a majority of votes cast standard for the election of Directors. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of votes cast "for" a Director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "against" that Director nominee. Each of the Board's nominees is being nominated for election for a one-year term beginning at the end of the 2014 AGM to be held on October 22, 2014 and expiring at the end of the 2015 AGM.

        Under our Articles of Association, if a Director is not re-elected in a Director election, then that Director will not be appointed and the position on the Board that would have been elected or filled by the Director nominee will, except in limited circumstances, become vacant. The Board has the ability to fill the vacancy in accordance with the Articles of Association, subject to approval by the Company's shareholders at the next AGM of Shareholders.

        Notwithstanding the requirement that a Director nominee requires a majority of the votes cast, as Irish law requires a minimum of two Directors at all times, in the event that an election results in either only one or no Directors receiving the required majority vote, either the nominee or each of the two nominees, as appropriate, receiving the greatest number of votes in favor of his or her election shall, in accordance with the Company's Articles of Association, hold office until his or her successor shall be elected.

        The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" each of the following nominees:

(a)   Stephen J. Luczo—age 57, Director since 2000   Mr. Luczo has been our CEO since January 2009 and Chairman of the Board since 2002. Mr. Luczo joined Seagate in October 1993 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development. In September 1997, he was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer of Seagate Technology (Seagate Technology plc's predecessor) and, in July 1998, he was promoted to CEO at which time he joined the Board as a director of Seagate Technology. Mr. Luczo resigned as CEO effective as of July 2004, but remained as Chairman of the Board. He served as non-employee Chairman from October 2006 to January 2009. From October 2006 until he rejoined us in January 2009, Mr. Luczo was a private investor. Mr. Luczo also served as our President from January 2009 until October 2013. Prior to joining Seagate in 1993, Mr. Luczo was Senior Managing Director of the Global Technology Group of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm, from February 1992 to October 1993. Mr. Luczo served on the board of directors of Microsoft Corporation from May 2012 to March 2014.

 

 

 

 

As our CEO, Mr. Luczo brings to the Board significant financial, business development, technological and operations experience together with senior leadership experience, global experience and knowledge of competitive strategy, and competition. As CEO, Mr. Luczo has direct responsibility for the Company's strategy and operations. With his early career based in investment banking, Mr. Luczo also brings to the Board significant M&A and financial experience related to business and financial issues facing large companies.

13


Table of Contents

(b)   Frank J. Biondi, Jr.—age 69, Director since 2005   Mr. Biondi is Senior Managing Director of WaterView Advisors LLC, a private equity fund specializing in media, a position he has held since June 1999. He was Chairman and CEO of Universal Studios from April 1996 through November 1998. Mr. Biondi previously served as President and CEO of Viacom, Inc. from July 1987 through January 1996, and was a member of the Viacom board of directors. Mr. Biondi currently serves on the boards of directors of Amgen, Inc., Hasbro, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation and RealD, Inc. Within the past five years, Mr. Biondi has served as a member of the board of directors of Yahoo!, Inc.

 

 

 

 

As Senior Managing Director of a private equity firm, and as a former CEO of several companies with substantial media experience, Mr. Biondi brings to our Board significant financial, international, business development and operations expertise. Mr. Biondi's board service with other public companies provides cross-board experience.

(c)

 

Michael R. Cannon—age 61, Director since 2011

 

Mr. Cannon served as President, Global Operations of Dell Inc. from February 2007 until his retirement in January 2009, and as a consultant to Dell Inc. from January 2009 until January 2011. He was the President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Solectron Corp., an electronic manufacturing services company, from January 2003 until February 2007. From July 1996 until January 2003, Mr. Cannon served as the Chief Executive Officer of Maxtor Corporation ("Maxtor"), a disk drive and storage systems manufacturer. He served on Maxtor's board of directors from July 1996 until Seagate acquired Maxtor in May 2006. Prior to joining Maxtor, Mr. Cannon held senior management positions at IBM. Mr. Cannon served on the Board from October 2006 until February 2007 and on the board of directors of Elster Group SE from September 2010 through August 2012. He has served on the board of directors of Adobe Systems since 2003 and on the board of directors of Lam Research Corporation since February 2011. He was appointed to the board of directors of Dialog Semiconductor plc in February 2013 and serves on its Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Cannon has extensive industry expertise, including expertise in the disk drive business that is invaluable to our Board.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Cannon brings international, technological, operations and research and development expertise to our Board through his service as a public company President, CEO and member of boards of directors, and his previous senior management positions. In addition, he has significant leadership experience due to his experience as a senior executive with other companies.

14


Table of Contents

(d)   Mei-Wei Cheng—age 64, Director since 2012   Mr. Cheng served as CEO of Siemens North East Asia and President and CEO of Siemens Ltd., China from July 2010 until April 2014. Prior to joining Siemens in May 2010, he was Chairman and CEO of Ford Motor Company (China) Ltd. from 1998 to 2008, as well as a Corporate Vice President of Ford Motor Company, and served as Executive Chairman of Ford Motor Company (China), as well as Group Vice president of Ford Motor Company from 2009 to 2010. Previously, Mr. Cheng held executive positions at General Electric Corporation (GE), including Corporate Vice President, Regional Executive and President of GE Appliance—Asia, and Chairman and CEO of GE (China) Ltd. He began his career at AT&T, where he last served as President of AT&T China. Within the past five years, Mr. Cheng has served as a member of the board of directors of Diebold, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Cheng brings international, business development, technological and sales and marketing expertise to our Board through his service as a senior-level executive in the Asia region with several large multi-national corporations. In addition, his board service provides cross-board experience which supplements his significant international executive-level leadership experience.

(e)

 

William T Coleman—age 66, Director since 2012

 

Mr. Coleman has been a partner with Alsop Louie Partners, a venture capital firm that invests in early stage technology, since June of 2010. Mr. Coleman also served as the Chairman and CEO of Resilient Network Systems, Inc. from January 2013 until January 2014. Before joining Alsop Louie, Mr. Coleman was founder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Cassatt Corporation from September 2003 to June 2009. Between June 2009 and June 2010, Mr. Coleman was a private investor.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Coleman previously founded BEA Systems, Inc., an enterprise application and service infrastructure software provider, where he served as Chairman of the Board from 1995 until 2002 and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to October 2001. Prior to BEA, Mr. Coleman held various executive management positions at Sun Microsystems, Inc. He currently sits on the boards of directors of iControl, Inc. and Dreamfactory, Inc. Within the past five years, Mr. Coleman has also served on the boards of directors of Palm, Inc., Symantec Corp., Framehawk, Inc., and Resilient Network Systems, Inc.

 

 

 

 

As a partner of a private equity firm and former founder and/or CEO of several technology companies, Mr. Coleman brings to our Board significant business development, technological, sales & marketing and research & development expertise. Mr. Coleman's board service with other private and public companies provides cross-board experience.

15


Table of Contents

(f)   Jay L. Geldmacher—age 58, Director since 2012   Mr. Geldmacher has served as CEO of Artesyn Embedded Technologies, a spin-off from the Embedded Computing and Power business of Emerson Electric Co., since November, 2013. Between 2007 and November 2013, Mr. Geldmacher served as Executive Vice President of Emerson Electric Company and President of Emerson Network Power's Embedded Computing & Power Group, which designs, manufactures and distributes embedded computing and embedded power products, systems and solutions. From 2006 to 2007, he served as Group Vice President and President of Emerson Network Power's Embedded Computing & Power Group. From 1998 to 2006, he served as President of Astec Power Solutions, an Emerson subsidiary. Mr. Geldmacher currently serves as a director of Owens-Illinois, Inc., which position he has held since 2008; he also serves as a member of the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Owens-Illinois. Mr. Geldmacher has also served on the board of the University of Arizona Business School since 2002.

 

 

 

 

As a senior-level executive and public company board member, Mr. Geldmacher brings operational, international, technological and operational expertise to our Board. Mr. Geldmacher's board service with other public companies provides cross-board experience.

(g)

 

Kristen M. Onken—age 65, Director since 2011

 

Ms. Onken served on the board of Biosensors International Group, Ltd. from September 2006 through July 2008 and on the board of Silicon Laboratories Inc. from September 2007 through April 2013. Ms. Onken served as Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of Logitech International, S.A. from February 1999 through May 2006. From September 1996 to February 1999, Ms. Onken served as Vice President of Finance at Fujitsu PC Corporation. Ms. Onken held various positions at Sun Microsystems Inc. from 1991 through 1996.

 

 

 

 

Ms. Onken brings financial, international, technological and operational expertise to our Board through her service as a public company CFO and senior-level executive at several technology companies, as well as her service as a public company board member. Ms. Onken's board service with other public companies provides cross-board experience.

16


Table of Contents

(h)   Chong Sup Park—age 66, Director since 2006   Dr. Park served as Chairman and CEO of Maxtor from November 2004 until May 2006, as Chairman of Maxtor's board of directors from May 1998 until May 2006, and as a member of its board from February 1994 to May 2006. Maxtor was acquired by Seagate in May 2006. Dr. Park served as Investment Partner and Senior Advisor at H&Q Asia Pacific, a private equity firm, from April 2004 until September 2004, and as a Managing Director for the firm from November 2002 to March 2004. Prior to joining H&Q Asia Pacific, Dr. Park served as President and CEO of Hynix Semiconductor Inc. from March 2000 to May 2002, and from June 2000 to May 2002 he also served as its Chairman.

 

 

 

 

Within the past five years, Dr. Park has served as a member of the boards of directors of Computer Sciences Corporation, SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., Brooks Automation, Inc., Enphase Energy,  Inc. and Ballard Power Systems, Inc.

 

 

 

 

As a former board chair and CEO, and having held other senior management positions with other companies, Dr. Park brings to our Board significant international, business development, technological and sales & marketing experience. In addition, Dr. Park has extensive industry expertise, including expertise in the disk drive business that is invaluable to our Board. Dr. Park's board service with other public companies provides cross-board experience.

(i)

 

Gregorio Reyes—age 73, Director since 2004

 

Mr. Reyes has been a private investor and management consultant since 1994. Mr. Reyes began his career in the semiconductor industry with National Semiconductor Corporation in 1962, followed by executive positions with Motorola, Inc., Fairchild Semiconductor and Eaton Corporation. From 1981 to 1984, he was President and CEO of National Micronetics, Inc., a provider of hard disc magnetic recording head products for the data storage industry. Between 1986 and 1990, he was Chairman and CEO of American Semiconductor Equipment Technologies. Mr. Reyes co-founded Sunward Technologies in 1985 and served as its non-executive Chairman from 1985 to 1990, and its Chairman and CEO from 1990 until 1994. In the past 5 years, Mr. Reyes has served as non-executive Chairman of LSI Corporation, and non-executive Chairman of Dialog Semiconductor plc. Mr. Reyes currently serves on the board of directors of RiverMeadow.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Reyes brings international, technological, sales & marketing and operational expertise to our Board from his career as a senior executive of technology companies. He brings cross-board experience from his service on other public company boards.

17


Table of Contents

(j)   Stephanie Tilenius—age 47, Director nominee   Ms. Tilenius has been Executive-in-Residence at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm, since June 2012, primarily focusing on companies within its Digital Growth Fund. From February 2010 until June 2012, Ms. Tilenius was vice president of global commerce and payments at Google, Inc., where she oversaw digital commerce, product search and payments. Prior to joining Google, she was at eBay Inc. from March 2001 until October 2009, ultimately as Senior Vice President of eBay.com and global products. Ms. Tilenius was also a co-founder of PlanetRx.com and has worked at other technology and business enterprises. Ms. Tilenius has served as a member of Coach Inc.'s Board of Directors since August 2012. She is on the Boards of Tradesy, and RedBubble, and serves as Chair of the Advisory Board of the Harvard Business School California Research Center.

 

 

 

 

Ms. Tilenius would bring experience as a senior executive at several large public companies, in the consumer internet sector, including her varied digital and ecommerce expertise, along with strategic insight and leadership skills to our Board.

(k)

 

Edward J. Zander—age 67, Director since 2009

 

Mr. Zander served as Chairman and CEO of Motorola, Inc. from January 2004 until January 2008, when he retired as CEO and continued as Chairman. He resigned as Chairman in May 2008. Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Zander was a managing director of Silver Lake Partners, a leading private equity fund focused on investments in technology industries from July 2003 to December 2003. Mr. Zander was President and COO of Sun Microsystems Inc., a leading provider of hardware, software and services for networks, from October 1987 until June 2002. Mr. Zander has served as a member of the board of directors of NetSuite, Inc. since 2009. He previously served on our Board from November 2002 to October 2004. Within the past five years, Mr. Zander has served as a member of the board of directors of Netezza Corporation.

 

 

 

 

Mr. Zander brings financial, technological, sales & marketing and research & development expertise to our Board from his career as a senior executive of technology companies, and financial expertise from his prior private equity experience. He brings cross-board experience from his service on other public company boards.

        Ms. Lydia Marshall and Dr. Seh-Woong Jeong, each of whom currently serves as a member of our Board have notified the Board that they do not wish to stand for reelection at the 2014 AGM. Neither Ms. Marshall's nor Dr. Jeong's decision was due to any disagreement with the Company's management or Board.

        There is no family relationship between any of the Directors or our executive officers, nor are any of our Directors or executive officers party to any legal proceedings adverse to us.

18


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 – GRANT DIRECTORS AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SHARES
(Ordinary Resolution)

        Under Irish law, directors of an Irish company must have authority from its shareholders to issue any of its authorized but unissued share capital. Our shareholders provided the Directors with this authorization for a period of five years when our Articles of Association were adopted in 2010. Because this five-year share authorization period will expire on July 1, 2015, we are presenting this proposal to grant the Directors authority to issue our authorized shares but unissued on the terms set forth below.

        We are seeking approval to authorize our Directors, upon expiration of our existing authority to issue up to 33% of our issued ordinary share capital as of August 1, 2014 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement), for a period expiring 18 months from July 1, 2015, unless previously renewed.

        Granting the Directors this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. This authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares, including in connection with our equity compensation plans (where required) and, if applicable, funding acquisitions and raising capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital or to approve a specific issuance of shares. Instead, approval of this proposal will only grant the Directors the authority to issue shares that are already authorized under our articles upon the terms below. In addition, we note that, because we are a NASDAQ Global Select Market ("NASDAQ") listed company, our shareholders continue to benefit from the protections afforded to them under the rules and regulations of the NASDAQ and SEC, including those rules that limit our ability to issue shares in specified circumstances. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law only and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely place us on par with other NASDAQ-listed companies.

        As required under Irish law, the resolution in respect of Proposal No. 2 is an ordinary resolution that requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast.

        The text of this resolution is as follows:

        "That, on expiry of the existing authority contained in the Company's Articles of Association, the Directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorized to exercise all powers of the Company to allot relevant securities (within the meaning of Section 20 of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1983) up to an aggregate nominal amount of $1,080.65 (108,065,116 shares) (being equivalent to approximately 33% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 1, 2014 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement)), and the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless previously renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot relevant securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired."

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" granting the Directors authority to issue shares.

19


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 – GRANT DIRECTORS AUTHORITY TO ISSUE SHARES FOR CASH WITHOUT FIRST OFFERING SHARES TO EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS

(Special Resolution)

        Under Irish law, unless otherwise authorized, when an Irish company issues shares for cash, it is required first to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to existing shareholders of the company on a pro-rata basis (commonly referred to as the statutory pre-emption right). Our shareholders provided the Directors with the authority to issue shares as if this statutory pre-emption right did not apply for a period of five years when our Articles of Association were adopted in 2010. Because this five-year share authorization period will expire on July 1, 2015, we are presenting this proposal to grant the Directors authority to opt-out of the pre-emption right on the terms set forth below.

        We are seeking approval to authorize our Directors, upon expiration of our existing authority, to opt-out of the statutory pre-emption rights provision in the event of (1) the issuance of shares for cash in connection with any rights issue and (2) any other issuance of shares for cash, if the issuance is limited to up to 5% of our issued ordinary share capital as of August 1, 2014 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement), for a period expiring 18 months from the date this authority takes effect, unless renewed.

        Granting the Directors this authority is a routine matter for public companies incorporated in Ireland and is consistent with Irish market practice. Similar to the authorization sought for Proposal 2, this authority is fundamental to our business and enables us to issue shares under our equity compensation plans (where required) and if applicable, will facilitate our ability to fund acquisitions and otherwise raise capital. We are not asking you to approve an increase in our authorized share capital. Instead, approval of this Proposal will only grant the Directors the authority to issue shares in the manner already permitted under our articles upon the terms below. Without this authorization, in each case where we issue shares for cash, we would first have to offer those shares on the same or more favorable terms to all of our existing shareholders. This requirement could undermine the operation of our compensation plans and cause delays in the completion of acquisitions and capital raising for our business. Furthermore, we note that this authorization is required as a matter of Irish law and is not otherwise required for other U.S. companies listed on the NASDAQ with whom we compete. Accordingly, approval of this resolution would merely place us on par with other NASDAQ-listed companies.

        As required under Irish law, the resolution in respect of this Proposal is a special resolution that requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast.

        The text of the resolution in respect of this Proposal is as follows:

        "As a special resolution, that, subject to the passing of the resolution in respect of Proposal 2 as set out above, on expiry of the existing authority contained in the Company's Articles of Association, the directors be and are hereby empowered pursuant to Section 24 of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1983 to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 23 of that Act) for cash, pursuant to the authority conferred by Proposal No. 2 as if sub-section (1) of Section 23 did not apply to any such allotment, provided that this power shall be limited to:

        (a)   the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue in favor of the holders of ordinary shares (including rights to subscribe for, or convert into, ordinary shares) where the equity securities respectively attributable to the interests of such holders are proportional (as nearly as may be) to the respective numbers of ordinary shares held by them (but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the directors may deem necessary or expedient to deal with fractional entitlements that would otherwise arise, or with legal or practical problems under the laws of, or the requirements of any recognized regulatory body or any stock exchange in, any territory, or otherwise); and

20


Table of Contents

        (b)   the allotment (otherwise than pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above) of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal value of $163.74 (16,373,502 shares) (being equivalent to approximately 5% of the aggregate nominal value of the issued ordinary share capital of the Company as of August 1, 2014 (the latest practicable date before this proxy statement)) and the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire 18 months from date this authority takes effect, unless previously renewed, varied or revoked; provided that the Company may make an offer or agreement before the expiry of this authority, which would or might require any such securities to be allotted after this authority has expired, and in that case, the directors may allot equity securities in pursuance of any such offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired."

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" granting the Directors authority to opt-out of statutory pre-emption rights.

21


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4 – DETERMINE THE PRICE RANGE AT WHICH THE COMPANY
CAN RE-ISSUE SHARES HELD AS TREASURY SHARES

(Special Resolution)

        Our open-market share repurchases and other share buyback activities, all effected by way of redemptions in accordance with our Articles of Association, may result in ordinary shares being acquired and held by the Company as treasury shares. We may reissue treasury shares that we acquire through our various share buyback activities including in connection with our executive and director compensation programs.

        Under Irish law, our shareholders must authorize the price range at which we may reissue any shares held in treasury. In this Proposal, that price range is expressed as a minimum and maximum percentage of the closing market price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ the day preceding the day on which the relevant share is re-issued. Under Irish law, this authorization must expire no later than 18 months after its passing unless renewed.

        "RESOLVED, that for purposes of Section 209 of the Companies Act of 1990, the re-issue price at which any treasury shares (as defined by Section 209 of the Companies Act of 1990) held by the Company may be reissued off-market shall be as follows:

        (a)   The maximum price at which a treasury share may be re-issued off-market shall be an amount equal to 120% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share is re-issued by Seagate.

        (b)   The minimum price at which a treasury share may be re-issued shall be the nominal value of the share where such a share is required to satisfy an obligation under an employee share scheme (as defined under Section 2(1) of the Companies (Amendment) Act 1983) or any share incentive plan operated by Seagate or, in all other cases, an amount equal to 90% of the closing price on the NASDAQ for shares of that class on the day preceding the day on which the relevant share is re-issued by Seagate.

        (c)   The re-issue price range as determined by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall expire eighteen months from the date of the passing of this resolution, unless previously varied, revoked or renewed in accordance with the provisions of Section 209 of the Companies Act 1990."

        The affirmative vote of at least 75% of the votes cast by holders of ordinary shares represented in person or by proxy at the 2014 AGM is necessary to approve Proposal 2 regarding the price range at which Seagate may re-issue any Treasury Shares in off-market transactions.

        The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to determine the price at which the Company can reissue shares held as treasury shares.

22


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 5 – APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC 2012
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(Ordinary Resolution)

        We are seeking the approval by our shareholders of the Amended and Restated Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Amended and Restated Plan"), which amends and restates in its entirety the Seagate Technology plc 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2012 Plan") in the following material respects:

        The 2012 Plan was approved by our shareholders on October 26, 2011. Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our Board unanimously approved the Amended and Restated Plan on July 23, 2014, subject to shareholder approval. We are now seeking shareholder approval of the Amended and Restated Plan with respect to the amendments described in this Proposal.

        Unless and until the Amended and Restated Plan is approved by our shareholders, we will continue to grant awards under the 2012 Plan using the shares available for issuance thereunder, and no awards may be granted under the 2012 Plan with respect to the additional 25,000,000 shares reserved for issuance under the Amended and Restated Plan. If the Amended and Restated Plan is not approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan will not become effective, the 2012 Plan will continue in effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the 2012 Plan, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations, using the shares available for issuance thereunder.

Background of Amendment to Increase Share Reserve

        As of June 27, 2014, grants covering approximately 11,325,551 ordinary shares were outstanding under the 2012 Plan, and 15,683,936 ordinary shares were reserved for issuance and available for future awards under the 2012 Plan. As a result of the limited number of shares remaining available for issuance under our share plans, and in order to have an appropriate supply of shares available for future equity awards under the 2012 Plan to recruit, hire, and retain the talent necessary to achieve strong performance in the future, the Compensation Committee determined to recommend that the Board approve the Amended and Restated Plan which includes, among other amendments, an increase in the number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan by an additional 25,000,000 shares. Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board unanimously approved the Amended and Restated Plan on July 23, 2014, subject to shareholder approval.

        In its determination to recommend that the Board approve the Amendment, the Compensation Committee analyzed various metrics, including burn rate and dilution, and considered information

23


Table of Contents

published by Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS"), as well as the proxy voting guidelines of certain institutional advisors. In particular, the Compensation Committee considered:

Summary of the Amended and Restated Plan

        The following is a summary of the material terms of the Amended and Restated Plan and is not a complete description thereof. The description in this Proposal is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Amended and Restated Plan. A copy of the Amended and Restated Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and you are advised to review the actual terms of the Amended and Restated Plan.

Purpose

        The purpose of the Amended and Restated Plan is to promote our long-term growth and financial success by providing incentives to our employees, directors, and consultants through grants of share-based awards. These awards are intended to tie the Amended and Restated Plan participants' interests directly to shareholder interests and encourage individual and collective behavior that enhances our success. The provisions of the Amended and Restated Plan, which allow for the grant of various types of equity-based awards, are also intended to provide greater flexibility to maintain our competitive ability to attract, retain and motivate participants for the benefit of us and our shareholders.

Corporate Governance and Plan Design

        We have designed the Amended and Restated Plan in accordance with currently accepted corporate governance standards for the design and implementation of employee equity incentive programs. The Amended and Restated Plan is the sole active plan for providing future equity incentives to eligible employees, directors and consultants; the Board believes that the Amended and Restated Plan is in the best interest of our shareholders and Seagate, as it will assist Seagate in

24


Table of Contents

attracting and retaining talented employees, linking employee compensation with our performance and maintaining a culture based on employee share ownership.

        The Amended and Restated Plan contains a number of provisions that the Board believes are consistent with the interests of our shareholders and sound corporate governance principles, as follows:

Description of the Plan

        Eligibility.    All of our employees, including our executive officers, all of the members of the Board, and our consultants may participate in the Amended and Restated Plan.

        Types of Awards.    The types of awards that will be available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan are as follows:

25


Table of Contents

        Share Reserve.    Subject to certain adjustments set forth in the plan, the maximum number of ordinary shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2012 Plan, without giving effect to the Amended and Restated Plan increasing the number of shares available for grant thereunder, is 27,000,000, plus any shares remaining available for grant under the Seagate Technology plc 2004 Share Compensation Plan, as amended (the "2004 SCP") as of the effective date of the 2012 Plan. If the Amended and Restated Plan is approved by our shareholders, the maximum number of our ordinary shares that may be issued pursuant to awards thereunder will be increased by an additional 25,000,000 shares to an aggregate of 64,454,435 shares.

        Shares that are subject to options or share appreciation rights granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will be counted against the share reserve as one share for every one share granted. Each share that is subject to a Full-Value Share Award granted under the 2012 Plan will count against the share reserve as 2.1 shares for every one share granted. If the Amended and Restated Plan is approved by our shareholders, each share that is subject to a Full-Value Share Award granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will count against the share reserve as 2.5 shares for every one share granted.

        Shares covered by awards that expire, are canceled or otherwise terminated without having been exercised or redeemed, or are settled for cash rather than shares, will again be available for grant under the Amended and Restated Plan. Each share that becomes available for the grant of awards in this manner (including awards under the 2004 SCP) will be added back to the aggregate share reserve under the Amended and Restated Plan as one share if such share was subject to an option or share appreciation right, and according to the applicable ratio described above if such share was subject to a Full-Value Share Award.

        However, the following shares will not be added back to the share reserve under the Amended and Restated Plan: (i) shares tendered by the participant or withheld by the Company (if and to the extent permitted by applicable law) to satisfy (A) the exercise price of a share option or share appreciation right and/or (B) tax withholding obligations with respect to an award; (ii) shares repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of the option exercise price; or (iii) shares not issued or delivered as a result of the net settlement of an outstanding share option or share appreciation right.

        No employee will be eligible to be granted awards under the Amended and Restated Plan covering more than 10 million ordinary shares during any fiscal year or options and/or share appreciation rights covering more than 8 million ordinary shares during any fiscal year.

        Adjustments by the Board.    In the event of a corporate transaction such as a merger, consolidation, reorganizations, recapitalization, reincorporation, share split, spinoff, share dividend, extraordinary dividend, liquidating dividend, combination or exchange of shares, changes in corporate structure or other transaction in which we do not receive any consideration, the Board will adjust the class and

26


Table of Contents

maximum number of shares subject to the plan, the share limits on grants to a participant, and the number of shares and, if applicable, the exercise price of outstanding awards.

        Administration of the Plan.    The Board has the authority to, and intends to, delegate administration of the Amended and Restated Plan to the Compensation Committee, except that the Board will retain the authority to make grants of equity-based awards to our non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee, or the Board if the delegation of authority to the Compensation Committee is terminated or limited in the future, has the authority to, among other things:

        Options.    The Amended and Restated Plan provides that share options must have an exercise price that is at least equal to 100% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date the option is granted. To the extent permitted in his or her option agreement, an option holder may exercise an option by payment of the exercise price (1) in cash, (2) according to a deferred payment or similar arrangement, (3) pursuant to a "same day sale" program, (4) by the surrender of shares already owned by the option holder or (5) by a combination approved by the Board. In the event of the option holder's termination, the option holder will generally have up to three months (up to one year if the termination is due to disability and one year for the beneficiary if due to death) from termination to exercise his or her vested options.

        Restricted Share Bonuses and Performance Share Bonuses.    Restricted share bonuses and performance share bonuses are grants of ordinary shares not requiring the payment of any monetary consideration, but subject to restrictions, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Generally, unless the participant's award agreement provides otherwise, the participant may not sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of the shares issued in the participant's name at the time of grant until those conditions are met. The vesting of restricted share bonus awards will generally be based on the participant's continuous service; the vesting of performance share bonus awards will be based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In the event a participant's continuous service terminates or a participant fails to meet performance criteria, all unvested shares as of the date of termination will be reacquired by us at no cost to us.

        Share Appreciation Rights.    The Compensation Committee may grant share appreciation rights independently of or in connection with an option grant. The base price per share of a share appreciation right shall be at least 100% of the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date of grant. Generally, each share appreciation right will entitle a participant upon redemption to an amount equal to (a) the excess of (1) the fair market value on the redemption date of one ordinary share over (2) the base price, times (b) the number of ordinary shares covered by the share appreciation right being redeemed. To the extent a share appreciation right is granted concurrently with an option grant, the redemption of the share appreciation right will proportionately reduce the number of ordinary shares subject to the concurrently granted option. Payment shall be made in shares or in cash, or a combination of both, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

        Phantom Share Units.    A phantom share unit is the right to receive the value of one ordinary share, redeemable upon terms and conditions set by the Compensation Committee. Distributions upon

27


Table of Contents

redemption of phantom share units may be in shares valued at fair market value on the date of redemption or in cash, or a combination of both, as determined by the Compensation Committee.

        Restricted Share Units and Performance Share Units.    The Compensation Committee may also award restricted share units or performance share units, both of which entitle the participant to receive the value of one ordinary share per unit at the time the unit vests, with delivery of such value (distributed in shares or in cash) on a date chosen by the participant to the extent permitted by law. For restricted share units, vesting will generally be based on the participant's continuous service; for performance share units, vesting will be based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, as determined by the Compensation Committee. In the event a participant's continuous service terminates or a participant fails to meet performance criteria, all unvested shares as of the date of termination will be forfeited.

        Deferred Share Units.    Participants who are not non-employee directors may receive deferred share units by electing to defer receipt of restricted share unit awards and performance share unit awards in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and the terms of our deferred compensation plan.

        Dividend Equivalent Rights.    The Compensation Committee may determine that, subject to complying with Section 409A of the Code and the rules of the Amended and Restated Plan, amounts equal to the dividends that would have been received on the number of shares subject to a Full-Value Share Award if they had been issued shares, shall be paid on the shares subject to such Full-Value Share Award in cash, shares or other property as determined by the Compensation Committee. If the award is a performance-based award, the dividend equivalent rights will be subject to the same performance conditions of the award and the participant shall not be entitled to such dividend equivalent rights unless the performance conditions of the underlying award have been met. The Compensation Committee may also provide that such dividend equivalent rights shall be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares or otherwise reinvested and may provide that such dividend equivalent rights are subject to the same vesting as the underlying award.

        Qualified Performance-Based Compensation Under Section 162(m).    The Amended and Restated Plan permits the Compensation Committee to specify that an award or a portion of an award is intended to satisfy the requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code, provided that the performance criteria for such award or portion of an award that is intended by the Compensation Committee to satisfy the requirements for "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code will be a measure based on one or more of the performance criteria described below, as selected by the Compensation Committee and specified at the time the award is granted. However, nothing in the Amended and Restated Plan would require that awards granted under it be designated to satisfy the requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code for "qualified performance-based compensation," and the Compensation Committee may in its discretion grant or amend awards that may not be deductible by us.

        The Amended and Restated Plan permits the Compensation Committee to grant Full-Value Share Awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements of "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m), the grant, vesting or retention of which must be based on any one or more of the performance criteria set forth below. The Compensation Committee may also base the grant, vesting or retention of such awards on derivations of such performance criteria, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to either Seagate as a whole or to a business unit or subsidiary, and measured either annually or cumulatively over a period of years, on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to previous years' results or to a designated comparison group, in each case as specified by the Compensation Committee. The performance criteria to be utilized under the Amended and Restated Plan consist of one or more of the following:

28


Table of Contents

        Without giving effect to the Amended and Restated Plan, the performance criteria to be utilized under the 2012 Plan are the same as described above, except with respect to (i) net operating profit (before or after taxes), (ii) return on net assets, (iii) days sales outstanding or working capital management, and (iv) inventory or inventory turns, each of which were newly added pursuant to the Amended and Restated Plan.

29


Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding satisfaction of any performance goals, the number of shares issued under or the amount paid under an award may, to the extent specified in the award agreement, be reduced by the Compensation Committee on the basis of such further considerations as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion shall determine.

        In addition, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Plan, the Compensation Committee may determine to adjust any of the performance criteria intended to satisfy the requirements of "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) as follows:

        Without giving effect to the Amended and Restated Plan, the permitted adjustments to the performance criteria under the 2012 Plan are generally the same as described above, except with respect to (i) exclusions for changes in accounting standards promulgated by other accounting standards setters to the extent applicable, and (ii) exclusions for the dilutive or accretive effects of any dispositions, each of which were newly added pursuant to the Amended and Restated Plan.

        Forfeiture Provisions.    The Compensation Committee may specify in an award agreement that a participant's rights, payments and/or benefits with respect to a share award will be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain events, including termination for cause, violation of applicable company policies, breach of an agreement between the participant and the company or any other conduct by the participant that is detrimental to our business interests or reputation.

        Transferability.    Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee or provided for in a written agreement evidencing an award, awards granted under the Amended and Restated Plan will not be transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.

30


Table of Contents

        Change of Control.    In the event of a "change of control" (as defined in the Amended and Restated Plan, other than a dissolution or liquidation), the Board may provide for the (1) assumption or continuation of any share awards outstanding under the Plan, (2) issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve the terms of any awards, (3) cash payment in exchange for the cancellation of an award or (4) termination of an award upon the consummation of the change of control, but only if the participant has been permitted to exercise or redeem an option or share appreciation right prior to the change of control. Furthermore, at any time the Board may provide for the acceleration of exercisability and/or vesting of an award. In the event of the dissolution of the Company, all outstanding awards will terminate immediately prior to dissolution.

        No Repricing without Shareholder Approval.    The Amended and Restated Plan prohibits the Board from repricing options or share appreciation rights, or cashing out any such awards other than in connection with a change of control as described above, without first obtaining the approval of our shareholders.

        Amendment or Termination.    The Board may amend, suspend, or terminate the Amended and Restated Plan in any respect at any time, subject to shareholder approval, if such approval is required by applicable law of stock exchange rules. However, no amendment to the Amended and Restated Plan may materially impair any of the rights of a participant under any awards previously granted, without his or her consent.

        Term.    Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the Amended and Restated Plan will expire on July 27, 2021. No awards will be granted under the Amended and Restated Plan after that date.

        Share Price.    On August 26, 2014 the closing price of our ordinary shares on NASDAQ was $60.66 per share.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences

        We believe that, based on the laws as in effect on the date of this proxy statement, the following is a summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences to participants and to us of options and other awards granted under the Amended and Restated Plan. This summary is not a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences relevant to participants and to us and does not describe tax consequences based on particular circumstances. The laws governing the tax consequences of these awards are highly technical and such laws are subject to change. State, local, and foreign tax laws are not discussed.

        Share Options.    When a nonstatutory share option is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the option holder or us. When a nonstatutory share option is exercised, in general, the option holder recognizes compensation equal to the excess of the fair market value of the underlying ordinary shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the option holder for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year in which the option holder recognized the compensation.

        When an incentive stock option is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the option holder or us. When an incentive stock option is exercised, the option holder does not recognize income and we do not receive a deduction. The option holder, however, must treat the excess of the fair market value of the underlying ordinary shares on the date of exercise over the option price as an item of adjustment for purposes of the alternative minimum tax.

        If the option holder disposes of the underlying shares after the option holder has held the shares for at least two years after the incentive stock option was granted and one year after the incentive stock option was exercised, the amount the option holder receives upon the disposition over the exercise price is treated as long-term capital gain for the option holder. We are not entitled to a deduction. If

31


Table of Contents

the option holder makes a "disqualifying disposition" of the underlying shares by disposing of the shares before they have been held for at least two years after the date the incentive stock option was granted and one year after the date the incentive stock option was exercised, the option holder recognizes compensation income equal to the excess of (1) the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date the incentive option was exercised or, if less, the amount received on the disposition over (2) the exercise price. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the option holder for our taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year in which the option holder recognized the compensation.

        Share Appreciation Rights and Phantom Share Units.    When a share appreciation right or phantom share unit is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. When a phantom share unit vests, generally the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or shares received, with the shares valued at fair market value as of the date of receipt. When a share appreciation right is redeemed, the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received upon redemption. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.

        Share Units and Restricted Share Awards.    Generally, when a share unit (whether as a restricted share unit or performance share unit) or a restricted share (whether as a restricted share bonus or performance share bonus) is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. Upon the payment to the participant of shares in respect of share units or the lapse of restrictions on restricted share awards, the participant, generally, recognizes compensation equal to the fair market value of the shares as of the date of delivery or release. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.

        Dividend Equivalent Rights.    When a dividend equivalent right is granted, there are no income tax consequences for the participant or us. When a dividend equivalent right is paid, the participant recognizes compensation equal to the cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received. We are entitled to a deduction equal to the compensation recognized by the participant.

        Section 162(m) of the Code.    Under Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation paid to our chief executive officer and the three most highly paid executive officers other than our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer (collectively, the "covered employees") in a particular year is limited to $1 million per person, except that compensation that constitutes "qualified performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) will be excluded for purposes of calculating the amount of compensation subject to this $1 million limitation. Our ability to deduct compensation paid to any executive officer or employee who is not a covered employee is not affected by this provision.

        If approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan will permit the Compensation Committee to grant awards which will qualify as "qualified performance-based compensation." Even if approved by our shareholders, the Amended and Restated Plan allows the Compensation Committee to make awards that would not be performance-based for purposes of the exemption from the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code, and nothing precludes the Compensation Committee from making any payments or granting any awards that do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code.

        Section 280G of the Code.    Awards that are granted, accelerated or enhanced upon the occurrence of a change in control may give rise, in whole or in part, to excess parachute payments within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code to the extent that such payments, when aggregated with other payments subject to Section 280G of the Code, exceed the limitations contained in that provision. Such excess parachute payments are not deductible by us and are subject to an excise tax of 20% payable by the recipient.

32


Table of Contents

        Section 409A of the Code.    Certain awards under the Amended and Restated Plan may be considered "non-qualified deferred compensation" for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, which imposes additional requirements on the payment of deferred compensation. Generally, if at any time during a taxable year a non-qualified deferred compensation plan fails to meet the requirements of Section 409A, or is not operated in accordance with those requirements, all amounts deferred under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan for the current taxable year and all preceding taxable years, by or for any participant with respect to whom the failure relates, are includible in the gross income of the participant for the taxable year to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in gross income. If a deferred amount is required to be included in income under Section 409A, the amount also is subject to an additional income tax equal to 20% of the compensation required to be included in gross income, plus interest.

New Plan Benefits

        The number of awards that our employees, officers and consultants may receive under the Amended and Restated Plan is in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and therefore, is not determinable at this time. As described above, pursuant to our director compensation program:

        By way of background, please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and related compensation tables for a discussion of our executive compensation philosophy and for information regarding equity awards to our NEOs in fiscal year 2014. In addition, the table below sets forth the estimated awards of all types to be made under the Amended and Restated Plan during the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015.

        Except with respect to the annual grants to our non-employee directors, awards under the Amended and Restated Plan are subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has not made any determination with respect to future grants to any individuals under the Amended and Restated Plan as of the date of this proxy statement. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the future benefits that will be received by participants, except for the annual non-employee director grants.

33


Table of Contents


New Plan Benefits
Under Amended and Restated Plan
in 2015 Fiscal Year

Name
  Dollar
Value ($)
  Number of
Shares/Units
Covered by
Awards
 

Stephen J. Luczo,

               (1)              (1)

Chairman and CEO

             

Patrick J. O'Malley,

               (1)              (1)

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

             

James J. Lerner,

               (1)              (1)

President, Cloud Systems and Solutions

             

William D. Mosley,

               (1)              (1)

President, Operations and Technology

             

Albert A. Pimental,

               (1)              (1)

President, Global Markets and Customers

             

All Current Executive Officers as a Group

               (1)              (1)

All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group

  $ 2,500,000 (2)              (1)

All Employees Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group

               (1)              (1)

(1)
Not determinable at this time.

(2)
Assumes that each non-employee director nominee is elected and will receive an annual restricted share unit award with a value of $250,000 on the date of the AGM.

Grants under the 2012 Plan

        As of August 25, 2014, awards covering 13,643,742 shares of the Company's ordinary shares had been granted under the 2012 Plan since its inception on October 27, 2011. The following table shows information regarding the grants of such awards among the persons and groups identified below.

34


Table of Contents


Awards Granted under 2012 Plan
Since Inception Through August 25, 2014

Name and Position
  Number of Shares
Underlying
Option Grants
  Number of Shares
Underlying
Restricted Share
Unit Grants
 

Stephen J. Luczo
Chairman and CEO

    398,160     486,260  

Patrick J. O'Malley
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

    75,000     120,000  

James J. Lerner
President, Cloud Systems and Solutions

    125,000     150,000  

William D. Mosley
President, Operations and Technology

    90,000     144,000  

Albert A. Pimental
President, Global Markets and Customers

    75,000     120,000  

All Current Executive Officers as a Group

    967,320     1,316,272  

All Current Directors Who Are Not Executive Officers as a Group

          266,360  

Each Nominee for Election as a Director:

             

Frank J. Biondi, Jr. 

        29,905  

Michael R. Cannon

        29,905  

Mei-Wei Cheng

        16,044  

William Coleman

        18,238  

Jay L. Geldmacher

        18,238  

Kristen M. Onken

        28,311  

Dr. Chong Sup Park

        29,905  

Gregorio Reyes

        29,905  

Stephanie Tilenius

        0  

Edward J. Zander

        29,905  

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the approval of the Amended and Restated Plan.

35


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 6 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPANY'S
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(Ordinary Resolution)

        The Board is presenting the following Proposal, commonly known as a "Say-on-Pay" proposal, which gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the compensation of our named executive officers, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC. The Board currently intends to hold such votes annually. Accordingly, the next such vote will be held at the Company's 2015 AGM. You may endorse or not endorse, respectively, the compensation paid to our named executive officers by voting for or against the following resolution:

        RESOLVED, that, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related disclosure contained in the Company's proxy statement is hereby approved."

        While our Board of Directors intends to carefully consider the shareholder vote resulting from the proposal, the final vote will not be binding, and is advisory in nature.

        In considering your vote, please be advised that our compensation program for our named executive officers is guided by our design principles, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this Proxy Statement:

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related disclosure contained in this Proxy Statement.

36


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 7 – AUTHORIZATION TO HOLD THE 2015 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS OF SEAGATE AT A LOCATION OUTSIDE OF IRELAND

(Ordinary Resolution)

        Under Section 140 of the Companies Act, 1963 and in accordance with Article 71 of the Company's Articles of Association, the shareholders of the Company may authorize the holding of any AGM of Shareholders at a location outside of Ireland. The Board may determine to hold the AGM of Shareholders for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 (the "2015 AGM") outside of Ireland, and is therefore asking our shareholders to authorize holding the 2015 AGM of Shareholders at a location outside of Ireland.

        The text of the resolution in respect of Proposal 7 is as follows:

        "RESOLVED, that the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015 may be held at such place, including outside Ireland, as may be determined by the Directors."

        The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the authorization to hold the 2015 AGM at a location outside of Ireland.

37


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 8 – NON-BINDING RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG
AND BINDING AUTHORIZATION OF AUDIT COMMITTEE TO SET AUDITORS' REMUNERATION

(Ordinary Resolution)

        At the 2014 AGM, shareholders will be asked to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending July 3, 2015, and to authorize the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors to set the independent auditors' remuneration. Ernst & Young has been acting as our independent auditors for many years and, both by virtue of its long familiarity with the Company's affairs and its ability, is considered best qualified to perform this important function.

        Representatives of Ernst & Young will be present at the 2014 AGM and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.

        The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young as independent auditors of the Company and to authorize the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to set the auditors' remuneration.

38


Table of Contents

        Our management is responsible for preparing and presenting our financial statements, and our independent auditors, Ernst & Young, are responsible for performing an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and for auditing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year. One of the Audit Committee responsibilities is to monitor and oversee these processes. In connection with the preparation of the financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, the Audit Committee performed the following tasks:

        Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended, and the Board approved, that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, for filing with the SEC.

    Respectfully submitted,
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

Kristen M. Onken, Chair
Mei-Wei Cheng
William T. Coleman
Dr. Chong Sup Park
Gregorio Reyes

39


Table of Contents

Fees of the Independent Auditors

        The aggregate fees paid or accrued by us for professional services provided by Ernst & Young in fiscal years ended June 27, 2014 and June 28, 2013 are set forth below.

 
  Fiscal Year  
 
  2014   2013  
 
  (In thousands)
 

Audit Fees

  $ 6,438   $ 5,555  

Audit-Related Fees

    869     276  

Tax Fees

    309     148  

All Other Fees

    8     7  
           

Total

  $ 7,624   $ 5,986  
           
           

        Audit Fees.    This category consists of professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of our unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements, and audit services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. The fees for fiscal year 2014 included audit activities related to the acquisition of Xyratex Ltd. and services in connection with our debt offerings, and in fiscal year 2013 included audit activities related to the acquisition of LaCie SA.

        Audit-Related Fees.    This category consists of assurance and related services provided by Ernst & Young that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and which are not reported above under "Audit Fees". For fiscal years 2014 and 2013, this category includes: pension plan and grant or similar audits, agreed upon procedures engagements, and advisement on accounting matters that arose during those years in connection with the preparation of our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements and fees related to due diligence procedures.

        Tax Fees.    This category consists primarily of professional services provided by Ernst & Young primarily for tax compliance for fiscal years 2014 and 2013.

        All Other Fees.    This category consists of fees for the use of Ernst & Young's online accounting research tool and iXBRL tagging services performed for fiscal years 2014 and 2013.

        In fiscal years 2014 and 2013, all audit, audit related, tax and all other fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Under the SEC rules, subject to certain permitted de minimis criteria, pre-approval is required for all professional services rendered by the Company's principal accountant. We are in compliance with these SEC rules. In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2015, the Audit Committee considered whether the services provided to us by Ernst & Young are compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young from us. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of these services by Ernst & Young is compatible with maintaining that independence.

Pre-Approval of Services by Independent Auditors

        The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and other permitted non-audit services provided to us by our independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other permissible non-audit services. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to grant pre-approvals to the Audit Committee Chair when the full Audit Committee is unable to do so. These pre-approvals are reviewed by the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. Our independent auditors and senior management periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors.

40


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

        Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, together with the Board Committee charters, provide the framework for the corporate governance of the Company. Following is a summary of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as the charters of each of our Board committees, are available on our website at www.seagate.com, under "Investors—Corporate Governance."

Role of the Board of Directors

        The Board, elected annually by our shareholders, directs and oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company. In this oversight role, the Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to the shareholders.

        The Board and its Committees have the primary responsibilities of:

Board Leadership Structure

        The Board generally believes that the offices of Chairman and CEO should be held by separate persons to aid in the oversight of management, unless it is in the best interests of the Company that the same person holds both offices. The Board believes that having Mr. Luczo serving in the combined role of Chairman and CEO is the most effective structure for the Company at this time, and that it has worked well for the Company. It is the Board of Directors' view that the Company's corporate governance principles, the quality, stature and substantive business knowledge of the members of the Board, as well as the Board's culture of open communication with the CEO and senior management are conducive to Board effectiveness with a combined Chairman and CEO position.

        In addition, the Board of Directors has a Lead Independent Director and it believes this role addresses the need for independent leadership and an organizational structure for the independent directors. The Board of Directors appoints the Lead Independent Director each year after the AGM for a one-year term from among the Board's independent directors. The Lead Independent Director coordinates the activities of the other non-employee directors, presides over meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present and at each executive session, facilitates the CEO evaluation process, serves as liaison between the Chairman of the Board and the independent directors, approves meeting schedules and agendas for the Board, has authority to call meetings of the independent directors, and is available for consultation and direct communication if requested by major shareholders.

        Dr. Park has served as our Lead Independent Director since October 26, 2011.

41


Table of Contents

Board Risk Oversight

        The Board of Directors has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for material risks applicable to the Company. The Board and its committees focus on the Company's general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing the Company and ensure that appropriate risk mitigation strategies are implemented by management. The full Board is responsible for considering strategic risks and succession planning, and the committees oversee other categories of risk including:

        Finally, as part of its oversight of the Company's executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers the impact of the Company's executive compensation program and the incentives created by the compensation awards that it administers on the Company's risk profile. In addition, the Company reviews all of its compensation policies and procedures, including the incentives that they create and factors that may reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking, to determine whether they present a significant risk to the Company. Based on this review, the Company has concluded that its compensation policies and procedures are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Director Compensation and Share Ownership

        It is the Board's practice to maintain a fair and straightforward compensation program at the Board level, which is designed to be competitive with compensation programs from comparable companies. The Compensation Committee recommends and administers the policies that govern the level and form of director compensation, with oversight from the independent directors. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that a substantial portion of the total director compensation package should be in the form of equity in the Company in order to better align the interests of the Company's directors with the long-term interests of its shareholders. As such, the directors are subject to a share ownership requirement of four times the annual cash retainer paid to the directors as described in more detail later in this Proxy Statement.

Board Composition

        The Board of Directors consists of a substantial majority of independent, non-employee directors. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that all members of the standing committees of the Board must be independent directors. The Board of Directors has the following four standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Finance Committee. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of each of these committees is "independent" as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and that each member of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee meet applicable NASDAQ and SEC independence standards for such committees. Committee memberships and chairs are rotated periodically.

Board Diversity

        While the Board has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the

42


Table of Contents

skills, expertise and background that would complement the existing Board and ensure that its members are appropriately diverse and consists of members with various and relevant backgrounds, skills, knowledge and experience.

Board Advisors

        The Board of Directors and its committees may, under their respective charters, retain their own advisors to carry out their responsibilities.

Executive Sessions

        The Company's independent directors meet privately in regularly scheduled executive sessions of the Board and Committees, without management present, to consider such matters as the independent directors deem appropriate. These executive sessions are typically held at each Board and Committee meeting.

Board Evaluation

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in evaluating its performance and the performance of the Board committees. Each committee also conducts an annual self-evaluation. The effectiveness of individual directors is considered each year when the directors stand for re-nomination.

Director Orientation and Education

        The Company has developed an orientation program for new directors and provides continuing education for directors. In addition, the directors are given full access to management and corporate staff as a means of providing additional information.

Director Nomination Process

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the composition of the full Board to identify the qualifications and areas of expertise needed to further enhance the composition of the Board, makes recommendations to the Board concerning the appropriate size and needs of the Board and, on its own, with the assistance of other Board members or management, a search firm or others, identifies candidates with those qualifications. In considering candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, including breadth of experience, understanding of business and financial issues, ability to exercise sound judgment, diversity, leadership, and achievements and experience in matters affecting business and industry. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate's credentials and believes that at a minimum each nominee should satisfy the following criteria: highest character and integrity, experience and understanding of strategy, sufficient time to devote to Board matters, and no conflict of interest that would interfere with performance as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to ensure that the Board is composed of members whose particular expertise, qualifications, attributes and skills, when taken together, allow the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. Shareholders may recommend candidates for consideration for Board membership by sending the recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, care of the Company Secretary. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.

43


Table of Contents

Term Limits and Retirement

        The Board does not have a mandatory retirement age for directors and, because the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates director nominees for the following year, the Board has decided not to adopt arbitrary term limits for its directors.

Director Independence

        The Board of Directors has determined that all of our current directors and director nominees, except Stephen J. Luczo, who is an employee of the Company and Dr. Jeong, who will retire at our 2014 AGM, are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are consistent with the NASDAQ listing standards. When assessing director independence, the Board considers the various commercial, charitable and employment transactions and relationships known to the Board (including those identified through annual directors' questionnaires) that exist between the Company and the entities with which our directors or members of their immediate families are, or have been, affiliated. The Board evaluated certain transactions that arose in the ordinary course of business between the Company and such entities and which occurred on the same terms and conditions available to other customers and suppliers. After reviewing these transactions and such other information as the Board deemed advisable, the Board determined that Messrs. Biondi, Cannon, Cheng, Coleman and Geldmacher, Mses. Marshall and Onken, Dr. Park, Mr. Reyes, Ms. Tilenius and Mr. Zander are independent under both the Company's Governance Guidelines and the applicable NASDAQ rules.

Director Changes

        On July 22, Lydia Marshall and Dr. Seh-Woong Jeong each informed the board that they would not stand for reelection at the 2014 AGM. Both Ms. Marshall and Dr. Jeong will serve out the remainder of their terms, retiring effective as of the 2014 AGM. There were no other changes to our board's membership during the year.

Communications with Directors

        Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors, the non-employee directors or any individual director (including our Lead Independent Director and any Committee Chair) may do so by sending a communication to the Board and/or a particular Board member, care of the Company Secretary. Depending upon the nature of the communication and to whom it is directed, the Company Secretary will: (a) forward the communication to the appropriate director or directors; (b) forward the communication to the relevant department within the Company; or (c) attempt to handle the matter directly (for example, a communication dealing with a share ownership matter).


Code of Ethics

        The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our CEO, CFO, and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code is available at www.seagate.com, under "Investors". Amendments to, or waivers of the provisions of, the Code of Conduct, if any, made with respect to any of our directors and executive officers will be posted on our website or on a current report on Form 8-K. No such waivers were requested or granted in the fiscal year 2014.


Securities Trading Policy and Other Restrictions

        The Company prohibits its directors and executive officers from (i) purchasing any financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Company securities and

44


Table of Contents

(ii) engaging in any form of short-term speculative trading in Company securities. Directors and executive officers are also prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan unless the Senior Vice President and General Counsel provides pre-clearance after the director or executive officer clearly demonstrates the financial capability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.


Committees of the Board

Audit Committee

Members:    Kristen M. Onken, Chair
Bill Coleman
Mei-Wei Cheng
Gregorio Reyes
C.S. Park

Key Functions:

        The Board of Directors has determined that all current members of the Audit Committee meet the applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membership on the Audit Committee, and that each of Mr. Coleman, Dr. Park and Ms. Onken is an audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined by rules of the SEC.

        A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on our website, www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate Governance."

Compensation Committee

Members:    Edward J. Zander, Chair
Frank J. Biondi, Jr.
Jay Geldmacher
Lydia Marshall

45


Table of Contents

Key Functions:

        For a discussion concerning the processes and procedures for determining executive and director compensation and the role of executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of compensation, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and "Compensation of Directors," respectively.

        The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets all applicable NASDAQ and SEC standards for membership on the Compensation Committee. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as a "Non-Employee Director" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and an "outside director" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

        A copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available on our website, www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate Governance."

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Members:    Lydia M. Marshall, Chair
C.S. Park
Michael R. Cannon
Bill Coleman

Key Functions:

        The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is "independent" as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines.

46


Table of Contents

        A copy of the charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is available on our website, www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate Governance."

Finance Committee

Members:    Frank J. Biondi, Jr., Jr, Chair
Michael R. Cannon
Gregorio Reyes
Mei-Wei Cheng
Kristen M. Onken

Key Functions:

        The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Finance Committee is "independent" as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines.

        A copy of the charter of the Finance Committee is available on our website, www.seagate.com, under the heading "Investors—Corporate Governance."

Board, Committee and Annual Meeting Attendance

        The Board of Directors and its committees held the following number of meetings during the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014:

Board

    5  

Audit Committee

    5  

Compensation Committee

    9  

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

    6  

Finance Committee

    4  

        Each incumbent director attended over 90% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees on which he or she served during the year. The Company's non-employee directors held 4 executive sessions without management present during the fiscal year 2014. It is the Board's general practice to hold executive sessions of the independent directors in connection with regularly scheduled Board meetings.

        The Company expects all Board members to attend the AGM, but from time to time other commitments prevent all directors from attending the meeting. Five of our directors attended the most recent AGM (the "2013 AGM"), which was held on October 30, 2013 in Cupertino, California. Certain of our directors faced logistical challenges attending the 2013 AGM due to the close proximity of the 2013 AGM to a Board meeting which was held in Ireland. The Company expects all Board members will be in attendance at the 2014 AGM, except Ms. Marshall and Dr. Jeong, each of whom will retire as of the 2014 AGM.

47


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

        Our director compensation program is designed to compensate non-employee directors fairly for work required for a company of our size and scope and align their interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The program reflects our desire to attract, retain and use the expertise of highly qualified people serving on the Company's Board of Directors. Employee-directors do not receive any additional compensation for serving as a director.

        Our 2014 director compensation program for non-employee directors consisted of the following elements:

Board or Board Committee
  Membership   Retainer as of
October 22, 2014
 

Board of Directors

  Non-executive Chairperson   $ 150,000  

  Member   $ 80,000  

Audit Committee

 

Chairperson

 
$

35,000
 

  Member   $ 15,000  

Compensation Committee

 

Chairperson

 
$

30,000
 

  Member   $ 10,000  

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

Chairperson

 
$

20,000
 

  Member   $ 10,000  

Finance Committee

 

Chairperson

 
$

20,000
 

  Member   $ 10,000  

Lead Independent Director

     
$

30,000
 

Annual Restricted Share Unit Award

     
$

250,000
 

        Each newly appointed or elected non-employee director (including non- employee directors reelected at the AGM) receives an initial restricted share unit award equal in number to $250,000 divided by the average closing share price for the quarter prior to the award, rounded to the nearest whole share. If the appointment occurred other than in connection with the annual election of directors at an AGM this dollar amount would be pro-rated for the year of appointment. If, prior to commencement of Board service, the new director was an officer or member of the board of directors of an entity acquired by Seagate, the Board could award a lesser number of restricted share units. The grant date for each such award is the date of the director's election or appointment. Generally, each restricted share unit award will vest on the earlier of the one year anniversary of the grant date or the day prior to the next election of directors at an AGM. All restricted share unit awards will become fully vested in the event of a "Change of Control" of Seagate (as such term is defined in the 2012 Plan).

        In addition to the cash compensation and equity awards, all members of the Board are reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings.

Share Ownership Requirement

        To align the interests of directors with shareholders, the Board adopted a share ownership requirement of four times the annual board cash retainer for non-executive directors. Until a director satisfies the mandatory ownership level, he or she may not sell more than that number of (i) shares that vest pursuant to any outstanding restricted share award or restricted share unit award or (ii) shares that are obtained upon the exercise of any option as is necessary, in each case, to cover the tax liability associated with the vesting or exercise of the equity award. Once attaining the minimum level of Company share ownership, a director must retain this minimum level of Company share ownership

48


Table of Contents

until his or her resignation or retirement from the Board. In setting the share ownership requirement, the Board of Directors considered the input of the independent compensation consultant, the Company's current share price and the period of time it would take a director to reach the required ownership level. Executive directors are subject to the share ownership requirements described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.


2014 Director Compensation

        The compensation paid or awarded to our non-management directors for fiscal year 2014 is summarized in the table below:

 
  Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Total
($)
 

Frank J. Biondi, Jr. 

    110,000     294,684     404,684  

Michael R. Cannon

    100,000     294,684     394,684  

Mei Wei Cheng

    99,931     294,684     394,615  

William T. Coleman

    101,621     294,684     396,305  

Jay L. Geldmacher

    90,000     294,684     384,684  

Seh-Woong Jeong(2)

    54,945     301,750     356,695  

Lydia M. Marshall

    110,000     294,684     404,684  

Kristen M. Onken

    119,931     294,684     414,615  

Chong Sup Park

    135,000     294,684     429,684  

Gregorio Reyes

    105,000     294,684     399,684  

Edward J. Zander

    106,621     294,684     401,305  

(1)
The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted share unit awards granted in fiscal year 2013 for financial reporting purposes pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). Such amounts do not represent amounts paid to or realized by the non employee director. See Note 11, "Compensation" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 K for fiscal year 2014 regarding assumptions underlying valuation of equity awards. Additional information regarding the restricted share units awarded to or held by each non management director on the last day of fiscal year 2014 is set forth in the table below.

(2)
Dr. Jeong received no payment for his Board service through October 20, 2013 pursuant to the terms of a shareholders agreement that was terminated on that date. He received pro rata cash fees, an equity award for his services for the remainder of fiscal year 2014.

49


Table of Contents

        The aggregate number of awards outstanding for each of our non-employee directors as of the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014 is set forth in the table below:

Director
  Number of
RSUs
Granted in
fiscal year 2014
  Aggregate
Number of
RSUs
  Aggregate
Number of
Restricted
Shares
  Aggregate
Number of
Options
 

Frank J. Biondi, Jr. 

    5,952     5,952         1,251  

Michael R. Cannon

    5,952     5,952          

Mei Wei Cheng

    5,952     5,952          

William T. Coleman

    5,952     5,952          

Jay L. Geldmacher

    5,952     5,952          

Seh-Woong Jeong

    6,099     5,952          

Lydia M. Marshall

    5,952     5,952          

Kristen M. Onken

    5,952     5,952          

Chong Sup Park

    5,952     5,952         1,251  

Gregorio Reyes

    5,952     5,952         1,459  

Edward J. Zander

    5,952     5,952         65,000  

50


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth as of August 25, 2014, the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by (i) each director and director nominee of the Company, (ii) each executive officer of the Company named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group:

Name of Beneficial Owner
  Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percentage
of Class
Beneficially
Owned(1)
 

Directors and named executive officers:

             

Stephen J. Luczo

    1,557,111 (2)   *  

Patrick J. O'Malley

    517,660 (3)   *  

Albert A. Pimentel

    701,561 (4)   *  

James J. Lerner

    0 (5)   *  

David Mosley

    279,280 (6)   *  

Frank J. Biondi, Jr. 

    37,549 (7)   *  

Michael R. Cannon

    12,837 (8)   *  

Mei-Wei Cheng

    10,858 (9)   *  

William T. Coleman

    16,718 (10)   *  

Jay L. Geldmacher

    9,798 (11)   *  

Seh-Woong Jeong

    6,060 (12)   *  

Lydia M. Marshall

    26,678 (13)   *  

Kristen M. Onken

    19,846 (14)   *  

Chong Sup Park

    35,518 (15)   *  

Gregorio Reyes

    9,155 (16)   *  

Stephanie Tilenius

    0     *  

Edward J. Zander

    121,938 (17)   *  

All directors, director nominees and executives as a group (22 persons)

    3,727,148 (18)   1.14 %

*
Less than 1% of Seagate's ordinary shares outstanding.

        The following table sets forth each shareholder which is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company as of August 25, 2014 based solely

51


Table of Contents

on the information filed by such shareholder on Schedule 13D or filed by such shareholder in 2014 for the year ended December 31, 2013 on Schedule 13G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Number of
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
  Percentage
of Class
Beneficially
Owned(1)
 

Greater than five percent holders:

             

FMR LLC

    31,505,930 (19)   9.66 %

245 Summer Street

             

Boston, MA 02210

             

Vanguard Group, Inc. 

    22,822,971 (20)   7.00 %

100 Vanguard Blvd.,

             

Malvern, PA 19355

             

Clearbridge Investments, LLC

    20,109,079 (21)   6.17 %

620 8th Ave.

             

New York, NY 10018

             

*
Less than 1% of Seagate's ordinary shares outstanding.

(1)
Percentage of class beneficially owned is based on 326,035,446 ordinary shares outstanding as of August 26, 2014. Each ordinary share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, RSUs and PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and all restricted shares and performance shares, are deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, RSUs, PSUs, restricted shares and/or performance shares, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or group.

(2)
Includes 54,361 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 65,000 PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 112,130 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Luczo, and 1,325,620 ordinary shares held by the Stephen J. Luczo Revocable Trust. Mr. Luczo holds PSUs pursuant to which he is eligible to vest in up to an additional 481,400 ordinary shares within 60 days of August 25, 2014.

(3)
Includes 13,230 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 25,875 PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 4,000 performance shares, and 33,892 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. O'Malley, and 440,663 ordinary shares held by the Patrick J. O'Malley III Separate Property Trust. Mr. O'Malley holds PSUs pursuant to which he is eligible to vest in up to an additional 108,400 ordinary shares within 60 days of August 25, 2014.

(4)
Includes 621,874 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 11,250 PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 19,789 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Pimentel and 48,648 ordinary shares held by the Pimentel Family Trust.

(6)
Includes 188,698 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 28,125 PSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 5,500 performance shares and 56,957 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Mosely. Mr. Mosely holds PSUs pursuant to which he is eligible to vest in up to an additional 108,400 ordinary shares within 60 days of August 25, 2014.

(7)
Includes 1,251 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 30,346 ordinary shares held by the Biondi, Jr. Family Trust.

(8)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 6,885 ordinary shares held by the Michael R. Cannon Trust.

(9)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014 and 4,906 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Cheng.

(10)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 10,313 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Coleman and 453 ordinary shares held through Mr. Coleman's 401(k) plan.

(11)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014 and 3,846 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Geldmacher.

(12)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014 and 108 ordinary shares held directly by Mr. Jeong.

52


Table of Contents

(13)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 20,726 ordinary shares held directly by Ms. Marshall.

(14)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014 and 13,894 ordinary shares held directly by Ms. Onken.

(15)
Includes 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 29,566 ordinary shares held by the Park Family Trust.

(16)
Includes 1,459 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 1,744 ordinary shares held by the Gregorio & Vanessa Reyes Trust.

(17)
Includes 65,000 ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within 60 days of August 25, 2014, 5,952 RSUs vesting within 60 days of August 25, 2014, and 41,196 ordinary shares held by Zanadu Capital Partners, LLC and 9,790 ordinary shares held by the Edward and Mona Zander Living Trust.

(18)
Executives, other than our NEOs, as a group, hold PSUs pursuant to which they are eligible to vest in up to an additional 274,200 ordinary shares within 60 days of August 25, 2014.

(19)
Based solely on information reported by FMR LLC ("FMR") on the fifth amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2013. FMR has sole voting power over 125,254 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 31,505,930 ordinary shares.

(20)
Based solely on information reported by The Vanguard Group, Inc. ("Vanguard") on the first amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2014, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2013. Vanguard has sole voting power over 482,673 ordinary shares, sole dispositive power over 22,375,941 ordinary shares and shared dispositive power over 447,030 ordinary shares.

(21)
Based solely on information reported by Clearbridge Investments, LLC ("Clearbridge") on the first amendment to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014, and reporting ownership as of December 31, 2013. Clearbridge has sole voting power over 19,621,074 ordinary shares and sole dispositive power over 20,109,079 ordinary shares.

53


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

        On October 28, 2013, Mr. William D. Mosley, who recently served as Executive Vice President of Operations and R&D, was named President, Operations and Technology and Mr. Albert "Rocky" Pimentel, who recently served as Executive Vice President and Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, was named President, Global Markets and Customers;

        On December 23, 2013, Seagate announced the acquisition of Xyratex, a leading provider of data storage technology. The acquisition of this business will further strengthen Seagate's vertically integrated supply and manufacturing chain for disk drives and ensure uninterrupted access to important capital equipment. It also expands Seagate's storage solutions portfolio by adding Xyratex's industry-leading enterprise data storage systems and high-performance computing business;

        On March 10, 2014, Mr. James J. Lerner joined us as President, Cloud Systems and Solutions.

        Please see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report for a more detailed description of our fiscal year 2014 financial results.

        Highlights of the Company's fiscal year 2014 financial performance include:

        The following table presents certain key financial metrics for the past three fiscal years:

 
  Fiscal 2014
(in millions except EPS)
  Fiscal 2013
(in millions except EPS)
  Fiscal 2012
(in millions except EPS)
 

Units shipped

    220     226     224  

Revenues

  $ 13,724   $ 14,351   $ 14,939  

Gross margin

  $ 3,846   $ 3,940   $ 4,684  

Operating income

  $ 1,776   $ 2,091   $ 3,108  

Net income

  $ 1,570   $ 1,838   $ 2,862  

Diluted earnings per share

  $ 4.52   $ 4.81   $ 6.49  

        The key executive compensation decisions for fiscal year 2014 were as follows:

54


Table of Contents

        Our compensation philosophy is designed to align our executive compensation programs with long-term shareholder interests, which include the following:

55


Table of Contents

        In addition to implementing performance-based pay practices designed to align our compensation programs with shareholder interests, we also endeavor to maintain good governance standards, including the oversight of our executive compensation policies and practices. The following key policies and practices were in effect during the fiscal year 2014:

56


Table of Contents

        The NEOs for fiscal year 2014 are:

Name
  Job Title

Stephen J. Luczo

  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Patrick J. O'Malley

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

James J. Lerner

 

President, Cloud Systems and Solutions

William D. Mosley

 

President, Operations and Technology

Albert A. Pimentel

 

President, Global Markets and Customers

Our Executive Compensation Strategy

        Our executive compensation strategy is designed to drive high performance, strengthen our market position, and increase shareholder value. The goals of our executive compensation programs are to:

Our Executive Compensation Programs

Compensation Element
  Designed to Reward   Relationship to Compensation Strategy
Base Salary   Related job experience, knowledge of Seagate and our industry, and continued dedicated employment with sustained performance   Attract and retain talented Executives through competitive pay programs

Annual Incentive
Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan

 

Achievement of Company annual financial and operational goals and attainment of management-based objectives for Presidents

 

Motivate Executives to achieve and exceed annual business objectives

Manage total compensation costs in support of financial performance

Long-term Equity Incentives
Equity Awards

 

Increased shareholder value through achievement of long-term strategic goals such as EPS, return on invested capital and total shareholder return relative to peers

 

Align Executive and shareholder interests to optimize shareholder return

Motivate Executives to achieve and exceed long-term business objectives

Role of Our Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee is responsible to our Board for overseeing the development and administration of our compensation and benefits policies and programs. The Compensation Committee,

57


Table of Contents

which consists of independent directors, is responsible for the review and approval of all aspects of our executive compensation programs and approving all compensation recommendations for our Executives, including:

        The Compensation Committee recommends to the independent directors of the Board the compensation, compensation plans and equity grants specific to our CEO, and the independent directors of the Board determine the overall compensation package of our CEO. The Compensation Committee is supported in its work by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, her staff and an executive compensation consultant, as described below.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

        The Compensation Committee retained F.W. Cook, its own independent consultant, for advice and counsel throughout fiscal year 2014 to provide an external review of compensation proposals and to help align compensation to our executive compensation strategy. F.W. Cook's consulting during fiscal year 2014 included oversight on the risk assessment of compensation programs directed by the Compensation Committee, as well as consultation in support of the Compensation Committee's decisions regarding compensation programs involving NEOs, including salary changes, determination of equity awards, annual incentive plan design, and annual review of our severance plan and share ownership guidelines. F.W. Cook also developed recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the compensation of our CEO.

        F.W. Cook also provided advice to the Compensation Committee regarding non-employee director compensation. F.W. Cook is not permitted to provide services to Company management except as directed by the Compensation Committee, and did not provide any such services in fiscal year 2014. The Compensation Committee retains sole authority to hire the compensation consultant, approve its compensation, determine the nature and scope of its services, evaluate its performance and terminate its engagement.

        In connection with its engagement of F.W. Cook, the Compensation Committee considered various factors in determining F.W. Cook's independence including, but not limited to, the amount of fees received by F.W. Cook from Seagate as a percentage of F.W. Cook's total revenue, F.W. Cook's policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest, and the existence of any business or personal relationship that could impact F.W. Cook's independence. After reviewing these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined that F.W. Cook was independent and that its engagement did not present any conflicts of interest.

58


Table of Contents

Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process

        Within the framework of the compensation programs approved by the Compensation Committee and based on management's review of market competitive practices, each year our CEO, Mr. Luczo, recommends the amount of base salary increase (if any), the amount of the annual incentive bonus opportunity and the long-term incentive award value for our Executives, including the other NEOs. These recommendations are based upon his assessment of each Executive's performance, as well as the Company's performance as a whole, and individual retention considerations. The Compensation Committee reviews Mr. Luczo's recommendations and approves our Executives' compensation, including any changes to such compensation, as it determines in its sole discretion. Mr. Luczo does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting his own compensation.

        Our Senior Vice President of Human Resources, along with members of her staff, assists the Compensation Committee in its review of our executive compensation plans and programs, including providing market data on competitive pay practices, program design and changes in the corporate governance landscape concerning executive compensation matters.

Prior Year's Shareholder Advisory Vote

        At the 2013 AGM, the Company's shareholders cast a non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the 2013 Proxy Statement. Shareholders overwhelmingly approved the proposal with approximately 95% of the votes cast in favor of our executive compensation programs (excluding abstentions). The Compensation Committee appreciates the shareholders' continued strong support of the Company's compensation philosophy and objectives, which reaffirms to the Board the appropriateness and effectiveness of the Company's executive compensation programs, including continued emphasis on programs that reward our Executives for generating sustainable profitability and delivering long-term value for our shareholders. No significant changes were made to the Company's executive compensation strategy in fiscal year 2014. The Board and the Compensation Committee will continue to consider the results of the Company's shareholder advisor votes when making future compensation decisions for the NEOs. The shareholder advisory vote occurs on an annual basis. We currently expect to hold the next shareholder vote on the frequency of "Say-on-Pay" proposals at the Company's 2017 AGM of Shareholders.

Executive Market Comparison Peer Group

        The Compensation Committee reviews NEO assignments and establishes ranges for each element of executive pay after reviewing similar information for a defined group of companies (the "NEO Peer Group") that compete for comparable executive talent. The Compensation Committee relies on analyses of disclosures and published surveys of compensation among the NEO Peer Group companies when considering compensation for Executives in similar roles.

        As part of our annual review cycle, the Compensation Committee reviewed the NEO Peer Group and made no changes to the selection criteria for fiscal year 2014. Peer group companies were selected based on a similar industry classification (as defined by Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) 4520 Technology Hardware and Equipment or 4530 Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment, excluding companies that are not subject to U.S. securities reporting requirements and wholesale

59


Table of Contents

distributors), having a minimum market value of $3 billion, and $4-$35 billion in trailing twelve-month sales. Specifically, for fiscal year 2014, the NEO Peer Group included the following companies:


Peer Group for Fiscal Year 2014(1)

 
  Sales    
 
Company Name
  TTM
($M)
  FYE
($M)
  Market
Value
($M)
 

Amphenol Corp. 

  $ 4,095   $ 3,940   $ 9,680  

Applied Materials Inc. 

  $ 9,254   $ 10,517   $ 13,117  

Broadcom Corp. 

  $ 7,746   $ 7,389   $ 16,148  

Corning Inc. 

  $ 7,753   $ 7,890   $ 17,365  

EMC Corp. 

  $ 21,258   $ 20,008   $ 51,445  

Flextronics International Ltd. 

  $ 25,946   $ 29,388   $ 3,827  

Harris Corp. 

  $ 5,253   $ 5,451   $ 5,157  

Jabil Circuit Inc. 

  $ 17,152   $ 17,152   $ 3,564  

Juniper Networks Inc. 

  $ 4,345   $ 4,449   $ 8,726  

Micron Technology Inc. 

  $ 8,292   $ 8,292   $ 5,520  

Motorola Solutions Inc. 

  $ 8,557   $ 8,203   $ 14,496  

NCR Corp

  $ 5,726   $ 5,443   $ 3,403  

NetApp Inc. 

  $ 6,220   $ 6,233   $ 9,777  

QUALCOMM Inc. 

  $ 18,368   $ 14,556   $ 99,833  

SanDisk Corp. 

  $ 5,088   $ 5,662   $ 10,092  

TE Connectivity Ltd. 

  $ 13,829   $ 14,312   $ 13,767  

Texas Instruments Inc. 

  $ 13,115   $ 13,697   $ 31,960  

Western Digital Corp. 

  $ 13,819   $ 12,478   $ 8,393  

Xerox Corp. 

  $ 22,431   $ 22,626   $ 8,195  

Peer Group Median

  $ 8,557   $ 8,292   $ 9,777  

Peer Group Average

  $ 11,487   $ 11,457   $ 17,603  

Seagate Technology plc

  $ 14,939   $ 14,939   $ 10,715  

(1)
The following table is based on information available as of October 31, 2012.

How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts

        As discussed above in greater detail under the heading "Role of our CEO and Management in the Decision-Making Process," Mr. Luczo and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources review with the Compensation Committee all compensation elements for our NEOs at least annually, and the Compensation Committee determines the value of each compensation element as described below. The proportion of each pay element value (i.e., the compensation mix) relative to total compensation varies by individual, although for all NEOs the largest portion of pay is variable and contingent on our financial performance. Variations in the compensation mix among NEOs reflect differences in scope of responsibility as well as NEO Peer Group market data. For fiscal year 2014, Mr. Luczo's total annual target compensation is lower than the other NEOs' total annual target compensation, reflecting the fact that he did not receive an equity award in fiscal year 2014. As a result, for fiscal year 2014, the mix of total annual target compensation for Mr. Luczo was 40% annual base salary and 60% target annual incentive, and the average mix of total annual target compensation for our other NEOs was 12% annual base salary, 14% target annual incentives and 74% long-term equity incentives.

60


Table of Contents


Total Annual Target Compensation Mix

Mr. Luczo


GRAPHIC

Other NEOs
(Average)

           
GRAPHIC

        We do not benchmark the total annual compensation of our Executives to a specific market percentile, although the total annual target compensation (including base salary, target annual incentive and long-term incentives) for the NEOs generally falls near the median for similar positions within the NEO Peer Group. We believe the total executive pay opportunity is appropriate to attract and retain top leadership talent in a competitive labor market in our industry segment, particularly given our size relative to the Peer Group and in light of the uncertainty of the actual amount of pay that each NEO can earn given the volatility of our business. Due to our emphasis on performance-based pay, the amounts actually received by our NEOs are heavily dependent on the Company's financial performance.

        While we consider the pay practices of our NEO Peer Group companies in determining target compensation for our Executives, we did not compare our performance with the performance of the NEO Peer Group companies when evaluating salary levels or determining the size of particular incentive awards. The target amounts and compensation mix vary for each NEO on the basis of various factors, none of which is specifically weighted, including the importance of the position to our organization, length of service, overall retention value, internal pay equity, and projected future value of the total compensation package.

        We entered into an employment letter with Mr. James J. Lerner in connection with his hiring as our President, Cloud Systems and Solutions, effective March 10, 2014. The Compensation Committee approved an annual base salary of $525,012, a target bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary and an additional MBO Bonus opportunity (as described in the section below entitled "Compensation

61


Table of Contents

Discussion and Analysis—How We Determine Individual Compensation Amounts—Management-Based Objectives") of up to 25% of base salary. In addition, Mr. Lerner was granted 150,000 threshold performance share units and options to acquire 125,000 of the Company's ordinary shares under the Company's 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In negotiating the new hire equity awards for Mr. Lerner, the Committee considered multiple factors, including Mr. Lerner's experience and background, his broad base of expertise in Cloud systems and solutions and the market value of new hire compensation packages offered by companies in the Company's NEO Peer Group for executive positions. Additional terms of Mr. Lerner's employment can be found in the section titled "Severance and Change in Control Benefits" below.

Base Salary

        Base salaries are the fixed annual cash amounts paid to our NEOs on a biweekly basis. In reviewing and determining base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers:

        The strategic positioning for our NEOs' base salaries is at or near the 50th percentile of the NEO Peer Group. Salaries are reviewed annually and may be revised to reflect significant changes in the scope of an NEO's responsibilities and/or market conditions. Our goal is to be competitive with respect to base salary while distinguishing ourselves from the NEO Peer Group by providing a greater emphasis on compensating our Executives through the use of performance-based incentives that are consistent with our strategy of motivating Executives to achieve and exceed annual and multi-year business objectives.

        During fiscal year 2014, Mr. Luczo's base salary was increased from $1,050,000 to $1,200,000, Mr. O'Malley's base salary was increased from $549,000 to $565,000 and Mr. Mosley's base salary was increased from $524,000 to $600,000. These increases were made to maintain a competitive market salary at approximately the median range for their respective positions and to recognize Mr. Mosley's promotion to the position of President, Operations and Technology. The base salaries of the other NEOs were not changed during fiscal year 2014.

Annual Bonus Plan

        All NEOs participate in our shareholder-approved Executive Officer Performance Bonus Plan ("EOPB"), which is designed to promote achievement of our annual financial and operational goals as approved by the Compensation Committee. The general target bonus for each NEO reflects competitive market levels for comparable positions in the NEO Peer Group at or near the 60th percentile, as well as taking internal pay equity into consideration. Actual payments under the EOPB may be above or below this level, based on performance results. Individual awards paid to each NEO following the end of the performance period are determined by the Compensation Committee after certifying our financial and operational performance. The Compensation Committee, together with the other independent directors of the Board, determine the material terms of Mr. Luczo's bonus opportunity under the EOPB, including the amount of Mr. Luczo's target bonus opportunity, and the payout level based on performance results.

62


Table of Contents

        On August 23, 2013, the Compensation Committee approved the performance metrics and funding targets to be used for calculating annual bonus awards for each Executive for fiscal year 2014 under the EOPB. Funding of the EOPB for fiscal year 2014 was determined based on the Company's performance with respect to the following metrics:

While we track many operational and strategic performance goals throughout the year, operating margin and revenue together are considered an important measure of our success in achieving profitable growth and were selected for fiscal year 2014 to continue to align payouts under the EOPB with the Company's profitability year over year. Adjustments to earnings for purposes of determining the operating margin excluded the impact of non-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not budgeted and/or foreseen at the time the performance targets were established, and included estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable cash compensation. The adjustments are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. RQC BiC was retained as a modifier to the overall bonus funding calculation for fiscal year 2014 because quality is considered a critical part of our overall business performance.

        The combination of the three performance metrics noted above was used to determine the applicable percentage of our annual revenues that would be allocated to the overall bonus pool to be used for the payment of bonuses to all eligible employees, including to our Executives under the EOPB. For purposes of illustration, the range of overall bonus funding as a percentage of target for fiscal year 2014, assuming annual revenues of $15 billion and the achievement of the minimum level of RQC BiC of 80%, would be as indicated below for the achievement of operating margin at the threshold, target and maximum levels for fiscal year 2014:

Performance Level
  Operating
Margin
  Funding
as % of Target
 

Threshold

    12.0 %   50 %

Target

    15.8 %   99 %

Maximum

    21.8 %   200 %

        Actual funding is determined based on the adjusted operating margin, the level of revenues and RQC BiC actually achieved during fiscal year 2014. Once the Company achieves or exceeds the threshold operating margin, the combination of actual operating margin and revenues determines preliminary funding. This amount is then reduced by 1.25% for each of our five key markets each quarter that does not achieve the minimum RQC BiC, with up to 25% of the funding subject to quality performance.

        The funded amount, once approved by the Committee, is allocated among eligible participants. Funding for individual bonuses paid to our NEOs is based upon each executive's target bonus expressed as a percentage of base salary. For fiscal year 2014, Mr. Luczo had a target bonus equal to 150% of his annual base salary (reflecting that a larger portion of his total annual target compensation is subject to performance conditions than is the case for the other NEOs) and the other NEOs had a target bonus equal to 100% of their individual annual base salaries. The Compensation Committee, with respect to all NEOs except our CEO, and the independent directors of the Board, with respect to our CEO, retain the discretion to reduce the amount of the bonus payout based on their overall

63


Table of Contents

assessment of the Company's performance generally, including factors such as revenues, profitability, product quality, cost containment and expense management, market share, strategic objectives and legal and regulatory compliance.

        Based on our actual performance for fiscal year 2014, funding was set at 81% of target, on the basis of our adjusted operating margin of 15.5%, revenues of $13.7 billion and an RQC BiC modifier of 95%. Based on the funded amount, the Compensation Committee determined to award the following bonuses for fiscal year 2014: Mr. Luczo, $1,458,068; Mr. O'Malley, $457,659; Mr. Lerner, $128,272; Mr. Mosley, $486,014; and Mr. Pimentel, $486,014.

        As part of our strategic performance-based cash incentive program, in fiscal year 2014 the Committee approved a cash bonus opportunity for each of our Presidents, Messrs. Lerner, Mosley and Pimentel to earn up to 25% of the executive's annual base salary based on achievement of key operational goals (the "MBO Bonus"). The payout was based on the level of funding of the EOPB for the Company's fiscal year 2014, up to target, as well as the CEO's assessment of achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each President's organization during the fiscal year 2014 as follows:

In each case, we did not specify a quantitative target that must be achieved, but we considered the goals aggressive yet attainable within the fiscal year.

        Based on the achievement of the applicable goals, the Compensation Committee determined to award the following MBO Bonuses for fiscal year 2014: Mr. Lerner, $28,861; Mr. Mosley, $87,483; and Mr. Pimentel, $97,203.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

        In fiscal year 2014, the Compensation Committee awarded equity awards to the NEOs (other than the CEO) under the terms of the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan is designed to:

64


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee approves annual guidelines to help determine the type and size of equity awards for all Executives, and considers median, 60th and 75th percentiles for comparable positions in the NEO Peer Group. Our equity award guidelines and mix of the type of awards granted are based on an analysis of unvested equity, the practices of NEO Peer Group companies in awarding equity for similar positions (including equity mix and award values), potential impact on earnings, and the pool of available shares. In determining the award for each NEO, the Compensation Committee also considers the Company's goals for retaining the NEO for the long term and the following factors related to each NEO including:

        NEOs are generally awarded equity on an annual basis, typically in mid-September, as part of our annual award cycle. Mr. Luczo was not awarded equity in fiscal year 2014, as his fiscal year 2013 equity awards were intended to serve as the equity incentive awards for a period of two fiscal years. For fiscal year 2014, all NEOs' annual equity awards, excluding Messrs. Luczo and Lerner, consisted of a mix of Time Vesting Options, Threshold Performance Share Units and Performance Share Units (as defined and described more fully below), reflecting a strong emphasis on pay for performance and the alignment of interests between our NEOs and our shareholders.

        For all NEOs, except Mr. Luczo (who did not receive an award) and Mr. Lerner, the mix of long-term equity incentives, 20% options and 80% performance-based restricted share units, reflected the Compensation Committee's review and assessment of market practices at peer companies, as well as its determination that a mix of options and full-value equity awards would provide an appropriate blend of incentives to sustain and improve the Company's financial performance and shareholder value. The equity incentives awarded to Mr. Lerner reflected a grant of full-value equity awards that were intended to replace the value of RSUs that he forfeited from his prior employer. As a result, the mix of Mr. Lerner's long-term equity incentive was 25% options and 75% performance-based restricted share units.

Options

        Options generally vest over four years and have a seven-year term. Options are awarded with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company's ordinary shares on the grant date. Fair market value is defined as the closing price of the Company's ordinary shares on NASDAQ on the grant date. The grant date and vesting schedule for options granted to our NEOs are generally the same as for other employees receiving options during the annual award process, but may be different in the case of a new hire or change in position.

        In fiscal year 2013, we granted our CEO performance-vesting options (the "TSR Options") that cliff vest after three years, contingent on continued service and the attainment of at least a 40% total shareholder return ("TSR"), inclusive of dividends and share price appreciation, over the three-year performance period from August 1, 2012 through July 31, 2015. The minimum 40% TSR must be sustained for a minimum of 30 consecutive trading days for the performance condition to be satisfied. The TSR Options have a seven-year term. On July 23, 2013, the Compensation Committee certified

65


Table of Contents

that the performance target for the TSR Options had been achieved; therefore, subject to our CEO's continuous service through the end of the three-year vesting period, the TSR Options will vest on the third anniversary of their grant date.

Share Awards

        Restricted share units ("RSUs") generally vest in equal annual installments over four years, contingent on continued service. Due to the strong emphasis on pay for performance, our NEOs are not eligible to receive RSUs. We believe that long-term equity awards made to our NEOs should consist only of options and performance-vesting shares or units.

        Threshold performance shares ("TPS") and threshold performance share units ("TPSUs") are equity awards with a maximum seven-year vesting period, contingent on continued service and the achievement of specified performance goals. TPS awards were granted in fiscal year 2011, with 25% annual vesting starting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 25% per year thereafter, subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance goal, as discussed below. Beginning in fiscal year 2012, our NEOs were granted TPSU awards in lieu of TPS awards in order to facilitate the global administration of our equity programs; however, the vesting criteria for this type of award remained the same as in prior years. Each TPSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares. Under the terms of the TPSU award agreement, no dividend equivalent payments will be made on any of the ordinary shares underlying the TPSUs.

        For each tranche of a TPS or TPSU award that is eligible to vest on a vesting date, vesting is contingent on the Company achieving a threshold adjusted earnings per share ("AEPS") goal of $1.00 for the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the vesting date occurs. If the threshold goal is not achieved, vesting of that tranche is delayed to the next scheduled vesting date for which the AEPS goal is achieved. Unvested awards from prior years may vest cumulatively on the scheduled vesting date for a future year within the seven-year vesting period if the annual AEPS threshold for that year is achieved. For example, if AEPS performance prior to the first vesting date is below threshold, then vesting will be delayed. If the AEPS threshold is achieved prior to the second vesting opportunity, then 50% of the award will vest (25% from the first vesting date and 25% from the second vesting date due to the cumulative feature of the award). TPS and TPSU awards may become fully vested as early as four years from the grant date and, as noted above, remain eligible to vest for up to seven years following the grant date. If the AEPS threshold level has not been met by the end of the seven-year period, any unvested TPS or TPSUs will be forfeited. While still uncertain, vesting for these awards is considered likely if the NEO remains employed throughout the seven-year performance period due to the cumulative vesting feature. For market comparison purposes, we compare the value of TPS and TPSU awards for our NEOs with time-based RS or RSUs awarded by other companies in the NEO Peer Group. For purposes of the TPS and TPSU awards, AEPS is based on diluted earnings per share, calculated in accordance with US GAAP, excluding the impact of non-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not foreseen at the time the performance target was established, and includes estimated interest expenses, taxes and variable compensation.

        Our AEPS performance for fiscal year 2014 was above the $1.00 AEPS threshold; therefore, an additional 25% of each of the outstanding TPS and TPSU awards will vest on their next scheduled vesting date following the end of fiscal year 2014.

66


Table of Contents

        Performance share units ("PSUs") are performance-based RSUs that vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to continued employment and the achievement of annual return on invested capital ("ROIC") over the performance period, modified by a factor based on the Company's relative total shareholder return percentile compared with a selected peer group, defined below. ROIC was selected as a key metric because of its ability to measure the efficiency of our use of capital and delivery of earnings above investment, considered a critical factor in the Company's long-term success. In addition, the relative TSR metric rewards financial performance as measured by the change in our share price and the dividends declared during the performance period relative to the performance of the select group of peers. Payout of the targeted number of PSUs will occur if target ROIC is attained over the three-year measurement period and relative TSR is at least at the median of the selected peer group. For PSUs awarded for fiscal years 2010 through 2013, the number of PSUs that will be earned will be determined on the basis of actual ROIC achieved, calculated by linear interpolation between a preset minimum and maximum, and increased or decreased on the basis of whether the relative TSR achieved is below median, between the 50th to 75th percentile, or above the 75th percentile in relation to the selected peer group. For PSUs awarded beginning fiscal year 2014, ROIC achieved will be calculated based on a range rather than by linear interpolation between a preset minimum and maximum. The final ROIC metric is calculated as the average annual ROIC over the prior three fiscal years. Annual ROIC is calculated as (i) adjusted operating income multiplied by 1 minus the average tax rate, divided by (ii) (x) net plant, property and equipment plus total current assets minus cash, minus (y) total current liabilities. Adjustments to operating income exclude the impact of non-operating activities and material, unusual or nonrecurring gains and losses, accounting charges or other extraordinary events which were not foreseen at the time the performance target was established.

        Each PSU represents the right to receive one of our ordinary shares. The Compensation Committee will determine the number of PSUs that will vest at the end of the three-year performance period according to a pre-established vesting matrix. Assuming the minimum performance threshold is achieved, the actual number of ordinary shares that may vest ranges from 38% of the target number of PSUs (for an ROIC of approximately 50% of target and relative TSR below the selected peer group median) to 200% of the target number of PSUs (for an ROIC in excess of approximately 143% of target and relative TSR equal to or above the 75th percentile of the selected peer group). Under the terms of the PSU award agreement, no dividend equivalent payments will be made on any of the ordinary shares underlying the PSUs.

        The selected peer group for PSUs awarded in September 2013 included a broader range of companies than the NEO Peer Group to allow for comparison of our performance against a wider range of technology companies than the companies with whom we frequently compete for executive talent. The selected peer group for purposes of measuring our relative TSR performance consisted of the 27 companies listed in the table below, meeting the following criteria:

67


Table of Contents


PSU Peer Group


 

 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

 

Jabil Circuit Inc.

 

 
    Amphenol Corp.   Juniper Networks, Inc.    
    Apple Inc.   Micron Technology Inc.    
    Applied Materials Inc   Motorola Solutions In.    
    Broadcom Corp.   NCR Corp    
    Cisco Systems, Inc.   NetApp, Inc.    
    Corning Inc.   QUALCOMM Incorporated    
    Dell Inc.   SanDisk Corp.    
    EMC Corporation   Sanmina-Sci Corp    
    Flextronics International Ltd.   TE Connectivity Ltd.    
    Freescale Semiconductor Holding   Texas Instruments Inc.    
    Harris Corp.   Western Digital Corp.    
    Hewlett-Packard Company   Xerox Corp.    
    Intel Corporation        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        As the certification of our financial performance could not be completed in advance of the filing date of this Proxy Statement, the vesting of these awards (if any) will be disclosed on Form 8-K within four business days following written certification by the Compensation Committee.

        In fiscal year 2013, in addition to the TSR Options, we granted our CEO performance-vesting restricted share units (the "TSR PSUs") that cliff vest after three years, contingent on continued service and the attainment of at least a 40% TSR, inclusive of dividends and share price appreciation, over the three-year performance period from August 1, 2012 through July 31, 2015. The minimum 40% TSR must be sustained for a minimum of 30 consecutive trading days for the performance condition to be satisfied. On July 23, 2013, the Compensation Committee certified that the performance target for the TSR PSUs had been achieved; therefore, subject to our CEO's continuous service through the end of the three-year vesting period, the TSR PSUs will vest on the third anniversary of their grant date.

Share Ownership Guidelines

        We established share ownership guidelines to ensure that our NEOs hold a meaningful equity stake in the Company and, by doing so, to link their interests with those of our shareholders. Shares directly or indirectly owned (for example, through a trust), along with unvested RSUs that do not have a performance requirement, are included in the calculation of ordinary shares owned for purposes of the ownership guidelines, but time-based and performance-based options, unvested TPS, unvested TPSUs, unvested performance shares, unvested PSUs and unvested TSR PSUs are not counted until they are exercised or vested, as applicable. NEOs are expected to meet the ownership requirements within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. NEOs are measured against the applicable guideline on the last day of each fiscal year, and the results are reported to the Compensation Committee.

        Executives will be required to own shares in an amount equal to an applicable target value based on a multiple of annual salary. Our NEOs are required to meet the guidelines by July 1, 2015, with the

68


Table of Contents

exception of Mr. Lerner who is required to meet the guidelines by March 10, 2019. The share ownership guidelines are as follows:

Role
  Ownership
Guideline–
Multiple of Salary
  Equivalent
Dollar Value(1)
 

CEO

    6x   $ 7,200,300  

President

    4x   $ 2,400,000  

Other NEOs

    3x   $ 2,260,000  

(1)
Based on average salaries of Executives in each roll for fiscal year 2014.

        All of the NEOs are on track to meet ownership guidelines by the applicable deadline.

Benefits and Perquisites

        Our NEOs are eligible to participate in a broad range of benefits in the same manner as non-executive employees. Seagate does not offer separate benefits for Executives, other than vacation and severance benefits (see "Severance and Change in Control Benefits," below).

        We do not generally provide perquisites to our NEOs except that we provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs which may be used for travel with a personal element, provided they fully reimburse us for the aggregate incremental cost of any such usage. We do however consider the value of perquisites, to the extent provided at the NEO Peer Group companies, in assessing the competitiveness of our total compensation package for our NEOs. Two of our NEOs continue to participate in a group replacement life insurance plan that was closed to new participants as of January 2002.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

        Seagate's Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (the "SDCP") allows our NEOs (and other eligible employees with an annual base pay rate of more than $165,000) to defer on a pre-tax basis up to 70% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus. Deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on the Company's books as an unfunded obligation of the Company. We do not make any contributions to the SDCP, and notional earnings on deferrals are based on the performance of investment funds selected by each participant from a menu of investment options offered pursuant to the SDCP. Deferral amounts, earnings and year-end balances for our NEOs are set forth in the table titled "Fiscal Year 2014 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation," below.

International (Expatriate) Assignment Policies

        Our global business needs require, from time to time, the temporary short- or long-term relocation of certain employees with special or unique skills to countries where those skills may not be available. To meet this need, we utilize the benefits available under our Short-Term Assignment Policy ("STA") and Long-Term International Assignment Policy ("LTIA"). Specifically, we provide certain benefits and allowances to our international assignees, including our NEOs, in accordance with the terms of the STA or LTIA, as applicable, which include housing and transportation allowances, living and travel expense reimbursements and tax preparation services. In addition, we make tax equalization payments on behalf of our international assignees to ensure that the assignment is tax neutral to the employee.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

        We provide severance benefits to assist in aligning NEO and shareholder interests during the evaluation of an ownership change, to remain competitive in attracting and retaining NEOs and to

69


Table of Contents

support organizational changes necessary to achieve our business strategy. The purpose of the Fifth Amended and Restated Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (the "Severance Plan") is to:

        (1)   provide for the payment of severance benefits to our NEOs in the event their employment with the Company or any applicable subsidiary is involuntarily terminated;

        (2)   encourage our NEOs to continue employment in the event of a potential "change in control" (as such term is defined in the section titled "Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," below); and

        (3)   ensure that our NEOs generally receive the same severance benefits in connection with a qualifying termination of employment.

        All of our NEOs, except our CEO and, solely if his termination occurs within two years of his date of hire, Mr. Lerner, receive the same level and type of severance benefits; the level of severance benefits payable to our CEO under the terms of the Severance Plan is higher than for the other NEOs to reflect his level of responsibility within our organization, the strategic importance of his position and a market-competitive level of severance for comparable positions within the NEO Peer Group.

        The Severance Plan provisions were developed based on a comparison of severance benefits typically available at the NEO Peer Group companies, in consultation with F.W. Cook, following review by the independent directors of the Board. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Severance Plan provides for severance only in the event of an involuntary termination (i.e., a termination by us without "cause" or by the Executive for "good reason"). The Severance Plan includes the following features:

        In the event that the benefits payable following a change in control exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we cap benefits at the safe harbor limit if the after-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than the after-tax benefit of the full amount (which would otherwise be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code). We do not provide a gross-up for any taxes payable on severance benefits and the NEO is responsible for the payment of all personal taxes, including any excise taxes imposed on change in control payments and benefits.

        For further details on the Severance Plan, see the section titled "Compensation of Named Executive Officers—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control."

        In connection with the hiring of Mr. Lerner as President, Cloud Systems and Solutions, we agreed that if Mr. Lerner is terminated without "cause" or resigns for "good reason" outside of a "change in control period" but within two years of his date of hire, he will be eligible for the following benefits in lieu of the benefits he would receive under the Severance Plan: (a) 24 months of base salary, (b) his target annual bonus and MBO Bonus for the year of termination and (c) with respect to the unvested portion of 100,000 of the TPSUs awarded to him, pro-rata vesting based on the days he worked from the last vesting date through his termination date (with Mr. Lerner being deemed to have worked for

70


Table of Contents

an additional two years following his termination for purposes of calculating such pro rata vesting). We sometimes refer to the 100,000 TPSUs mentioned in the preceding sentence as the "Transition Award."

Other Company Policies and Compensation Considerations

Impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

        The Compensation Committee seeks to qualify NEO compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws to the greatest extent possible. Section 162(m) of the Code (as interpreted by IRS Notice 2007-49) places a limit of $1 million on the amount that a public company may deduct for compensation in any taxable year to any of the CEO and each of the next three most highly compensated NEOs employed at the end of the year (other than the Company's CFO), unless such compensation is considered "performance-based" under Section 162(m).

        Both the EOPB and the 2012 Plan have been approved by our shareholders and are administered by the Compensation Committee. Each plan has been structured such that compensation paid or awarded thereunder may qualify as "performance-based" and therefore not be subject to the Section 162(m) limit. We received shareholder approval for the EOPB at the 2013 AGM in order to preserve the Company's ability to pay annual incentive bonuses to our executive officers that may qualify as "performance-based" compensation under Section 162(m). However, in order to maintain flexibility in compensating our NEOs in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to pay compensation that may not be tax deductible. Due to the timing of Mr. Lerner's hire, the first tranche of his TPSU award does not qualify as "performance-based" compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) because the performance condition was satisfied at the time of grant. Additionally, due to the accelerated vesting provisions that apply if Mr. Lerner is terminated without "cause" or resigns for "good reason" within two years of his date of hire, his Transition Award, does not qualify as "performance-based" compensation for purposes of Section 162(m).

        The Board believes that short-term investment activity in our securities (such as trading in or writing options, arbitrage trading or "day trading") is not appropriate under any circumstances; therefore, such conduct is prohibited by Seagate's Securities Trading Policy. In addition, all employees (including our NEOs) and Board members are prohibited from taking "short" positions in our securities or engaging in hedging or other monetization transactions with respect to our securities. We discourage our executives from using our shares in margin accounts or otherwise pledging shares as collateral. We have also amended our Securities Trading Policy to, among other things, require the first trade under a new plan established pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act take place after a reasonable "seasoning period" has passed from the time of adoption of the plan; in addition, an insider will only be permitted to use one 10b5-1 plan at a time.

Pay Recovery Policy

        Our Pay Recovery Policy is intended to eliminate any reward for fraudulent accounting. It provides standards for recovering compensation from an NEO where such compensation was based on incorrectly reported financial results due to the fraud or willful misconduct of such NEO. The NEO's repayment obligation applies to any bonus paid, share award issued (whether or not vested) or options exercised during the period commencing with the date that is four years prior to the beginning of the fiscal year in which a restatement is announced, and ending on the date recovery is sought. We intend to review our Pay Recovery Policy following the enactment of regulations pursuant to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

71


Table of Contents

Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and the Board. In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in the Company's Proxy Statement for fiscal year 2014.

    COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

 

Edward J. Zander, Chairman
Frank J. Biondi, Jr.
Jay L. Geldmacher
Lydia M. Marshall

72


Table of Contents


COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The following tables show fiscal year 2014, 2013 and 2012 compensation awarded to and earned by our CEO, CFO and our three most highly compensated Executives other than our CEO and CFO:


Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(2)(4)
  Total
($)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    2014     1,153,886             1,458,068     3,563     2,615,517  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    2013     1,037,015     12,920,085     3,577,285     2,220,761     3,260     19,758,406  

    2012     1,024,026     5,320,635         2,726,468     114,955     9,186,084  

Patrick J. O'Malley

   
2014
   
560,710
   
2,156,210
   
346,172
   
457,659
   
7,860
   
3,528,611
 

Executive Vice President and Chief

    2013     549,037     1,796,880     363,611     774,142     5,582     3,489,251  

Financial Officer

    2012     549,037     1,197,570         974,540     5,503     2,726,650  

James J. Lerner(3)

   
2014
   
141,350
   
8,353,500
   
1,671,382
   
157,133
   
1,817
   
10,325,182
 

President, Cloud Systems and Solutions

                                           

William D. Mosley

   
2014
   
579,561
   
3,080,300
   
494,532
   
573,497
   
4,500
   
4,732,389
 

President, Operations and Technology

    2013     524,035     1,796,880     363,611     738,890     4,500     3,427,916  

    2012     524,035     1,197,570         930,162     3,500     2,655,268  

Albert A. Pimentel

   
2014
   
600,018
   
2,156,210
   
346,172
   
583,217
   
23,428
   
3,709,045
 

President, Global Markets and

    2013     600,018     1,796,880     363,611     846,025     24,866     3,631,400  

Customers

    2012     600,018             1,065,031     5,340     1,670,389  

(1)
Share Awards and Option Awards: These amounts do not reflect the actual value realized by the NEO. In accordance with SEC rules, these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all performance share units whose vesting is subject to performance conditions as defined by ASC 718, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions at target levels. The aggregate grant date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $4,955,800 for Mr. Mosley, $3,469,060 for each of Messrs. O'Malley and Pimentel, and $8,353,500 for Mr. Lerner. See the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" table for further information. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, "Compensation" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014.

(2)
All Other Compensation: The amounts shown in this column consist of the following:


All Other Compensation Table

Name
  Personal
Guest
Travel
($)(a)
  401k Match
($)(b)
  Other
Comp
($)(c)
  Executive
Life
Insurance
($)
  Total
($)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

                3,563     3,563  

Patrick J. O'Malley

        5,188     385     2,287     7,860  

James J. Lerner

        1,817             1,817  

William D. Mosley

        4,500             4,500  

Albert A. Pimentel

    19,528     3,900             23,428  

(a)
Personal guest travel consists of travel costs incurred for the executive's spouse in connection with a sales incentive program offered to all eligible sales personnel.

(b)
401(k) match is for the 401(k) Plan contribution provided to all U.S. employees who participate in the 401(k) Plan. The maximum amount is $4,500 per calendar year, but it may be higher for a particular fiscal year.

(c)
Other compensation consists of incentives paid to employees participating in the Seagate Healthy Journeys Wellness Program offered to all eligible U.S. employees. The maximum incentive is $450 per calendar year.

73


Table of Contents

(3)
Mr. Lerner commenced his employment with us on March 10, 2014.

(4)
We provide the use of our corporate aircraft to our NEOs primarily so that they can travel to business functions and different facilities in the course of their duties. Certain trips taken by Mr. Luczo in fiscal year 2014 may have had a personal element. To the extent that a travel leg has a personal element to it, Mr. Luczo has fully reimbursed the company for the aggregate incremental cost of such leg to us. Such reimbursement includes the costs of "wheels up time", a portion of fuel and insurance costs, catering, excise taxes, and crew expenses.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for Fiscal Year 2014

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
  Estimated Future
Payments Under
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
   
   
   
 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
   
   
 
 
   
   
   
  Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
   
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(6)
($)
 
 
   
   
   
  Exercise or
Base Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 
 
   
  Date of
Compensation
Committee
Action
   
 
Name
  Type of
Award
  Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

  Cash Bonus                 900,000     1,800,000     3,600,000                                

Patrick J. O'Malley

 

Cash Bonus

               
282,500
   
565,000
   
1,130,000
                               

  Time Option     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (2)                                 35,000     40.16     346,172  

  PSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (3)                     35,000     70,000                 1,312,850  

  TPSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (4)                     21,000                       843,360  

James J. Lerner

 

Cash Bonus

               
70,675
   
176,687
   
318,037
                               

  Time Option     2/24/2014     4/21/2014 (2)                                 125,000     55.69     1,671,382  

  TPSU     2/24/2014     4/21/2014 (4)(5)                     150,000                       8,353,500  

William D. Mosley

 

Cash Bonus

               
300,000
   
750,000
   
1,350,000
                               

  Time Option     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (2)                                 50,000     40.16     494,532  

  PSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (3)                     50,000     100,000                 1,875,500  

  TPSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (4)                     30,000                       1,204,800  

Albert A. Pimentel

 

Cash Bonus

               
300,000
   
750,000
   
1,350,000
                               

  Time Option     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (2)                                 35,000     40.16     346,172  

  PSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (3)                     35,000     70,000                 1,312,850  

  TPSU     7/23/2013     9/9/2013 (4)                     21,000                       843,360  

(1)
Amounts shown were the potential range of payments for fiscal year 2014 for the NEOs under the EOPB. This range varied based on the individual's position and bonus target as a percentage of fiscal year 2014 ending base salary, or a pro-rata salary in the case of Mr. Lerner (150% percent of base salary for Mr. Luczo, 100% for Messrs. Lerner, Mosley and Pimentel, and 100% for Messrs. O'Malley). Messrs. Lerner, Mosley and Pimentel can earn up to an additional 25% of their annual base salary based on the achievement of individual goals tied to strategic objectives for each their organization during fiscal year 2014. For a description of the EOPB, refer to the section above entitled "Annual Bonus Plan."

(2)
Options awarded during fiscal year 2014 under the 2012 Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. After one year of continuous service, the NEO will vest in 25% of the shares subject to the option on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date. Thereafter, the remaining 75% of the shares subject to option will vest proportionally on a monthly basis for the next three years, contingent on continuous service. For a description of the options, refer to the section entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long Term Equity Incentives—Options".

(3)
PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2014 under the 2012 Plan. These units vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of the applicable performance criteria. For a description of the PSUs, refer to the section entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units".

(4)
TPSUs awarded during fiscal year 2014 under the 2012 Plan. Vesting is contingent on continuous service and satisfaction of performance vesting requirements. The first tranche vests no sooner than one year after the vesting commencement date, subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria. The awards will continue to vest annually thereafter if the annual performance goals are achieved. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. For a description of the TPSUs, refer to the section entitled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Shares and Threshold Performance Share Units".

(5)
Mr. Lerner was awarded threshold performance share units as part of his new hire compensation package, of which 100,000 units (the Transition Award) are subject to accelerated vesting on certain terminations of employment. For a description of this accelerated vesting, refer to the section entitled "Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside of a Change in Control Period" below.

(6)
In accordance with SEC rules, this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For all performance share units, we have assumed the probable outcome of related performance conditions as defined by ASC 718 at target levels. The aggregate grant date fair value for these PSUs and TPSUs, assuming the achievement of the highest level of performance, is $4,955,800 for Mr. Mosley, $3,469,060 for each of Messrs. O'Malley and Pimentel, and $8,353,500 for Mr. Lerner. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 11, "Compensation" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014.

74


Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2014

Name
  Stock Option
Grant Date
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Stock
Award Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That have not
Vested
(#)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
that have not
Vested
($)(1)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
unearned
shares, units or
other rights
that have not
Vested
(#)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
that have not
Vested
($)(1)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    9/13/2010 (2)   8,593     25,782     11.065     9/13/2017                                

                                  9/12/2011 (4)               240,700     13,700,644  

                                  9/12/2011 (5)               130,000     7,399,600  

    8/1/2012 (2)   3,997     103,925     30.230     8/1/2019                                

    8/1/2012 (3)       206,300     30.230     8/1/2019                                

                                  8/1/2012 (4)               287,790     16,381,007  

                                  8/1/2012 (5)               64,755     3,685,855  

                                  8/1/2012 (6)   112,130     6,382,440              

Patrick J. O'Malley

    9/13/2010 (2)   39,583     6,251     11.065     9/13/2017                                

                                  9/13/2010 (5)               4,000     227,680  

                                  9/12/2011 (4)               54,200     3,085,064  

                                  9/12/2011 (5)               29,250     1,664,910  

    9/10/2012 (2)   17,499     22,501     29.870     9/10/2019                                

                                  9/10/2012 (4)               40,000     2,276,800  

                                  9/10/2012 (5)               18,000     1,024,560  

    9/9/2013 (2)       35,000     40.160     9/9/2020                                

                                  9/9/2013 (4)               35,000     1,992,200  

                                  9/9/2013 (5)               21,000     1,195,320  

James J. Lerner

    4/21/2014 (2)         125,000     55.690     4/21/2021                                

                                  4/21/2014  (5)(7)               150,000     8,538,000  

William D. Mosley

    9/12/2008     1,459         13.730     9/12/2015                                

    1/30/2009 (2)   81,250         4.045     1/30/2016                                

    9/13/2010 (2)   63,021     8,594     11.065     9/13/2017                                

                                  9/13/2010 (5)               5,500     313,060  

                                  9/12/2011 (4)               54,200     3,085,064  

                                  9/12/2011 (5)               29,250     1,664,910  

    9/10/2012 (2)   17,499     22,501     29.870     9/10/2019                                

                                  9/10/2012 (4)               40,000     2,276,800  

                                  9/10/2012 (5)               18,000     1,024,560  

    9/9/2013 (2)       50,000     40.160     9/9/2020                                

                                  9/9/2013 (4)               50,000     2,846,000  

                                  9/9/2013 (5)               30,000     1,707,600  

Albert A. Pimentel

    3/3/2009 (2)   15,000         3.845     3/3/2016                                

    10/28/2009 (2)   10,000         14.825     10/28/2016                                

    4/6/2011 (2)   512,604     134,896     14.810     4/6/2018                                

                                  4/6/2011 (5)               27,750     1,579,530  

    9/10/2012 (2)   17,499     22,501     29.870     9/10/2019                                

                                  9/10/2012 (4)               40,000     2,276,800  

                                  9/10/2012 (5)               18,000     1,024,560  

    9/9/2013 (2)         35,000     40.160     9/9/2020                                

                                  9/9/2013 (4)               35,000     1,992,200  

                                  9/9/2013 (5)               21,000     1,195,320  

(1)
Value based on the closing price of our ordinary shares on June 27, 2014 of $56.92.

(2)
Options vest as to 25% of the shares subject thereto one year after the vesting commencement date, and then with respect to 1/48th of the shares subject to monthly thereafter see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long Term Equity Incentives—Options—Time-Vesting Options").

(3)
The TSR Options granted to our CEO cliff vest three years following their grant date, contingent on continuous service. The performance condition associated with these options was satisfied as of July 23, 2013 (see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Options—TSR Performance-Vesting Options").

(4)
These PSUs were issued under the 2004 SCP and the 2012 Plan. The PSUs vest after the end of a three-year performance period, subject to both continuous service and the achievement of performance criteria. If the minimum performance threshold is not achieved, no PSUs will vest and the PSUs will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The PSUs are described in more detail above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Performance Share Units".

(5)
These TPS and TPSU awards, issued under the 2004 SCP and the 2012 Plan, are subject to both continuous service and the satisfaction of applicable performance vesting requirements. The first tranche may vest no sooner than one year after the grant date, with vesting subject to satisfying specified performance criteria. Potential vesting for these awards is annually thereafter according to specific performance requirements. If threshold performance is not achieved, no awards will vest and the shares underlying the award will be forfeited at the end of the performance period. The TPS and TPSU awards are described in more detail above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—Threshold Performance Shares and Threshold Performance Share Units".

(6)
The TSR PSUs granted to our CEO cliff vest three years following their grant date, contingent on continuous service. The performance condition associated with these PSUs was satisfied as of July 23, 2013 (see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives—Share Awards—TSR Performance Share Units").

(7)
Mr. Lerner was awarded TPSUs as part of his new hire compensation package, of which 100,000 units (the Transition Award) are subject to accelerated vesting on certain terminations of employment. For a description of this accelerated vesting, refer to the section entitled "Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside of a Change in Control Period" below.

75


Table of Contents


Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2014

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
  Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
  Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    629,408     24,984,931     380,687     18,383,123  

Patrick J. O'Malley

    109,683     5,082,293     67,399     3,235,323  

James J. Lerner

                 

William D. Mosley

            84,953     4,089,852  

Albert A. Pimentel

    30,000     1,184,102     35,000     1,723,630  


Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Name
  Executive
Contributions
in FY2014
($)
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in FY2014
($)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  Aggregate
Balance
in FY2014
($)(a)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

                     

Patrick J. O'Malley

    888,908         438,661         3,878,477  

James J. Lerner

                     

William D. Mosley

            21,192         534,906  

Albert A. Pimentel

                     

Kenneth M. Massaroni

                     

(a)
The amounts reported as Executive contributions represent compensation already reported in the Summary Compensation Table, with the exception of earnings on contributions, as such earnings are not considered at above-market rates.

        The SDCP is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan allowing participants to defer on a pre-tax basis up to 70% of their base salary and up to 100% of their annual performance-based cash bonus, and to select from several mutual fund investment options used to determine notional earnings on the deferred amounts. The deferrals and notional earnings related to those deferrals are reflected on our books as an unfunded obligation of the Company, and remain part of our general assets. We have established a grantor (or rabbi) trust for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy our obligations and process payments due under the SDCP.

        Participants may elect to receive distributions upon retirement or termination of employment or at a specified time while still employed. Participants may elect to receive distributions following retirement or termination in a lump sum or in quarterly installments over 3, 5, 10, or 15 years. Participants may elect to receive in-service distributions in a lump sum or annual installments payable over 2, 3, 4 or 5 years. Upon disability, a participant's account will be distributed in accordance with his or her retirement/termination distribution elections. Additionally, upon death, a participant's accounts will be paid to his or her beneficiary or beneficiaries in a cash lump-sum payment payable before the later of the end of the calendar year in which the participant dies, and two and one-half months after the participant dies. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee prior to a change in control, the SDCP will be terminated upon the occurrence of a change in control and the aggregate balance credited to and held in a participant's account shall generally be distributed to him or her in a lump sum not later than the thirtieth day following the change in control.

76


Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Qualifying Termination or Change in Control

        As discussed above under the heading titled "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Change in Control Benefits," the Compensation Committee adopted the Severance Plan to provide, among other things, consistent severance benefits to NEOs who are terminated without cause or resign for good reason, in lieu of severance protections that might otherwise have been included in individually negotiated employment agreements. In addition to severance, participating NEOs are entitled to receive payment of deferred amounts in the event of a termination of employment or a change in control, as described under the immediately preceding heading titled "Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans".

Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason Outside of a Change in Control Period

        Under the Severance Plan in effect during fiscal year 2014, if an NEO's employment were to have been terminated by the Company without "cause" (as defined below) or by the NEO for "good reason" (as defined below), the NEO would have been entitled to receive a severance payment equal to a pre-determined number of months of base salary, based on the NEO's job level. In the event of such an involuntary termination outside of a "change in control period" (as defined below), the CEO would be entitled to receive 24 months of base salary and the other NEOs (except Mr. Lerner, whose severance arrangement is described below) would be entitled to receive 20 months of base salary, as well as a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination based on the number of days elapsed from the beginning of the fiscal year until the termination date at the most recent accrued performance level, and, if applicable, the prior year bonus (if earned but unpaid at the time of termination). The severance benefits are generally payable within 20 business days following the "payment confirmation date" (as defined in the Severance Plan) in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 50% of the severance benefit and (b) $510,000 (for calendar year 2014), with the remaining amount payable twelve months following the date of termination. The Company would also provide paid outplacement services for a period of two years following termination. The receipt of these severance benefits would generally be subject to the NEO's execution of an effective release of claims against the Company and compliance with certain non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants during the applicable severance period.

        Under the Severance Plan, "cause" means (i) an NEO's continued failure to substantially perform the material duties of his or her office, (ii) fraud, embezzlement or theft by an NEO of Company property, (iii) the conviction of an NEO of, or plea of nolo contendere by the NEO to, a felony, (iv) an NEO's willful malfeasance or willful misconduct in connection with such NEO's duties or any other act or omission which is materially injurious to the financial condition or business reputation of Seagate, or (v) a material breach by an NEO of any of the provisions of (A) the Severance Plan, (B) any non-compete, non-solicitation or confidentiality provisions to which such NEO is subject or (C) any company policy or other agreement to which such NEO is subject. If an NEO is involuntarily terminated for any reason outside a change in control period, the Severance Plan does not provide for any accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards. Instead, the terms of any vesting acceleration are governed by the applicable award agreement (including, without limitation, the accelerated vesting provided to Mr. Lerner in connection with his Transition Award, as described below). Other than in connection with Mr. Lerner's Transition Award, upon termination of an NEO's continuous service for any reason (other than death or disability): (i) the award agreements (including TPS and TPSU) provide that vesting will cease and, where applicable, Seagate will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration and (ii) the option agreements provide that all unvested options will be cancelled effective as of the termination date, although NEOs, as all other option holders, would have three months to exercise options that are vested as of the date of termination.

        If Mr. Lerner is terminated without "Cause" or resigns for "Good Reason" outside of a "Change in Control Period" (as each such term is defined in the Severance Plan) within two years of his date of

77


Table of Contents

hire, he will be eligible for the following severance benefits instead of the benefits he would receive under the Severance Plan: (a) 24 months of base salary, (b) the EOPB Target Bonus and the MBO Target Bonus for the year of termination, and (c) for the unvested portion of the Transition Award, pro-rata vesting based on the days Mr. Lerner worked from the last vesting date (if any) through his termination date (with Mr. Lerner being deemed to have worked an additional two years following his termination for purposes of such calculation).

Involuntary Termination Without Cause or For Good Reason During a Change in Control Period

        The Severance Plan provides for enhanced severance benefits if an NEO is terminated by the Company without cause or resigns for good reason during a "change in control period". This period is defined as the period commencing six months prior to the effective date of a "change in control" (as defined below) and ending 24 months following such date. In the event of an involuntary termination within a change in control period (often called a "double trigger"), the NEO would be entitled to receive the following: (i) 36 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the CEO, or 24 months of base salary and target bonus in the case of the other NEOs, (ii) a lump sum cash payment equal to two times the before-tax annual cost of the applicable COBRA premiums for the NEO and his or her eligible dependents, if any, (iii) paid outplacement services for a period of two years, and (iv) full vesting of all unvested equity-based awards (whether or not awarded prior to or following the adoption of the Severance Plan). All other rights and obligations imposed under the Severance Plan upon such a termination of employment outside of the context of a change in control (as described above) would also be generally applicable in the event of a termination during a change in control period, except that the severance benefits would generally be payable within 20 business days following the "payment confirmation date" in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 100% of the severance benefit and (b) $510,000 (for calendar year 2014), with the remainder, if any, payable six months and one day following the termination date.

        Under the Severance Plan, "change in control" or "CIC" means the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events: (i) the sale, exchange, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Seagate to a person or group of related persons; (ii) a merger, reorganization, recapitalization, consolidation or other similar transaction involving Seagate in which the voting securities of Seagate owned by the shareholders of Seagate immediately prior to such transaction do not represent more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving controlling entity outstanding immediately after such transaction; (iii) any person or group of related persons is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting securities of Seagate; (iv) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination for election by the shareholders of Seagate was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of Seagate then still in office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board then in office; or (v) a dissolution or liquidation of Seagate.

        In addition, under the terms of our equity award agreements with each NEO and consistent with the treatment of equity awards under the Severance Plan, if a change in control (which is generally defined in a similar manner as under the Severance Plan) occurs and the successor company does not assume or replace the awards with alternatives that preserve both the intrinsic value and the rights and benefits of the award immediately prior to the CIC, then all awards accelerate and become fully vested at least 10 days prior to the consummation of the CIC. The PSU award agreement further provides that the number of shares that will vest on the later of the closing of a CIC and an NEO's involuntary termination within the change in control period will be based on the Company's performance through the closing date of the CIC, with relative TSR performance measured by using the average closing

78


Table of Contents

prices over the 30-day trading period preceding the CIC. The vesting of the TSR Options and TSR PSUs issued to our CEO will accelerate in full upon the later of a CIC and a qualifying termination of employment,.

        In the event that the benefits payable following a CIC exceed the safe harbor limits established in Section 280G of the Code, we cap benefits at the safe harbor limit if the after-tax benefit to the NEO of the capped amount is greater than the after-tax benefit of the full amount (which would be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code). We do not provide any gross-up for excise taxes and the NEO is responsible for payment of all personal taxes, including excise taxes.

Termination due to Death or Disability

        In the event a termination of employment occurs due to an NEO's death or disability, the NEO would not be entitled to any benefits under the Severance Plan. Under the Severance Plan, "disability" means that the NEO is physically or mentally incapacitated and therefore unable to substantially perform his duties for six consecutive months or an aggregate of nine months in any consecutive 24-month period. However, in the event of termination of employment due to an NEO's death or disability, the Compensation Committee has the discretion under the terms of the EOPB to pay to the NEO or the NEO's estate a pro-rated target bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs.

        The terms of the restricted share and performance share award agreements for our NEOs provide that vesting will cease upon a termination due to disability (as defined above), and the Company will automatically reacquire all unvested shares without payment of consideration. However, for a termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service as of the termination date so that an additional 25% of the award will vest immediately.

        Similarly, the option agreements provide that upon termination due to death, the NEO will be deemed to have completed an additional year of service for purposes of determining the portion of an option award that will be vested at termination. For our CEO, both the TSR Option agreement and the TSR PSU award agreement provides that the CEO will vest pro-rata in the option or award based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date upon termination due to death or disability. Additionally, the PSU agreements for our NEOs provide that in the event of a termination due to death or disability, the awards will vest pro-rata based on the number of days from the beginning of the performance period until the termination date, based on actual Company performance, and will be settled in ordinary shares after the end of the performance period.

        Finally, for those Executives who participate in the group replacement life insurance plan, the Company will continue to pay its portion of the insurance premiums through the end of the calendar year in which the Executive becomes disabled.

79


Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination

        The following table sets forth the estimated value of the potential payments and benefits to each NEO assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on June 27, 2014.

Name
  Monthly
Base
Salary
($)
  Months of
Base Pay
(#)
  Prior Year
Bonus
($)(1)
  Outplacement
Benefit
($)
  Total
($)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    100,005     24     1,458,068     15,000     1,458,068  

Patrick J. O'Malley

    47,084     20     457,659     15,000     457,659  

James J. Lerner

    43,751     20     157,133     15,000     157,133  

William D. Mosley

    50,001     20     573,497     15,000     573,497  

Albert A. Pimentel

    50,001     20     583,217     15,000     583,217  

(1)
Represents full-year bonus earned but unpaid at the time of termination.

        The following table sets forth the estimated value as of June 27, 2014 of the potential payments and benefits to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO due to death on such date.

Name
  Target
Bonus
($)(1)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Options
($)(2)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
  Total
($)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    1,800,000     5,957,181     32,126,103     39,883,285  

Patrick J. O'Malley

    565,000     813,769     6,462,697     7,841,466  

James J. Lerner

    656,265     48,046     2,134,500     2,838,811  

William D. Mosley

    750,000     1,031,203     6,903,030     8,684,233  

Albert A. Pimentel

    750,000     6,207,600     4,111,161     11,068,761  

(1)
Amounts for the bonus component of the death benefit assume that the Compensation Committee elects to exercise its discretion to pay the NEO's estate a bonus for the fiscal year in which death occurs. In addition, the amount has been calculated assuming that the Compensation Committee elects to award the bonus at the NEO's target bonus opportunity for that year. However, the EOPB does not obligate the Compensation Committee to pay a bonus at the target bonus level or otherwise in the event of an NEO's death.

(2)
Amounts for the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination are calculated assuming that the market price per share of Seagate's ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 27, 2014, or $56.92 per share, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts shown do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price greater than $56.92 or for options that were already vested as of June 27, 2014. Under the terms of the TSR Options issued to our CEO, the same number of options would accelerate in the event of disability as in the event of death because the performance condition was satisfied as of July 23, 2013; the value of the acceleration of such TSR Options is set forth in the table below (see footnote 3 below).

(3)
Amounts for the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination are calculated assuming that the market price per share of Seagate's ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 27, 2014. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle. In the event of disability, the NEOs would receive the same number of shares under the terms of the PSU award agreements as in the event of death, as set forth below. In addition, under the terms of the TSR PSUs issued to our CEO, the same number of

80


Table of Contents

 
Name
  Accelerated
Vesting of
PSU
Awards
($)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Options
($)
 
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    32,126,103     3,494,762  
 

Patrick J. O'Malley

    6,462,697      
 

James J. Lerner

    2,134,500      
 

William D. Mosley

    6,903,030      
 

Albert A. Pimentel

    4,111,161      
(4)
In the event of the death of either of Messrs. Luczo or O'Malley, their beneficiary(ies) would be entitled to a death benefit of $450,000 under the terms of the group replacement life insurance plan, in addition to any accrued cash value. Further, under the terms of this plan, each of Messrs. Luczo and O'Malley would be entitled to continued payment of the Company's portion of the insurance premiums through December 31, 2014, in the aggregate amount of $3,563 and $2,287, respectively, in the event the Executive became disabled on June 27, 2014.

        The following table sets forth the estimated value calculated as of June 27, 2014 of the potential payments to each NEO, assuming termination of the NEO by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason on such date in connection with a change in control, during a change in control period, as defined in the Severance Plan.

Name
  Monthly
Base
Salary
($)
  Monthly
Target
Bonus
($)
  Months
of Pay
(#)
  Total
Severance
Pay
($)
  Total
Health
Care
Benefit
($)
  Outplacement
Benefit
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Options
($)(1)
  Accelerated
Vesting of
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Total
($)(3)
 

Stephen J. Luczo

    100,000     150,000     36     9,000,000     40,241     15,000     9,462,139     47,549,545     66,067,345  

Patrick J. O'Malley

    47,083     47,083     24     2,260,000     24,991     15,000     1,481,892     11,466,534     15,248,417  

James J. Lerner

    43,751     54,689     24     2,362,554     42,266     15,000     153,750     8,538,000     11,111,570  

William D. Mosley

    50,000     62,500     24     2,700,000     42,456     15,000     1,840,730     12,917,994     17,516,179  

Albert A. Pimentel

    50,000     62,500     24     2,700,000     42,456     15,000     6,875,723     8,068,410     17,701,588  

(1)
Amounts for the value of options that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination are calculated assuming that the market price per share of Seagate's ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 27, 2014, or $56.92 per share, and are based on the difference between this price and the exercise price of options held by the NEO. As a result, the amounts shown do not include any value for the acceleration of options that have an exercise price greater than $56.92 or for options that were already vested as of June 27, 2014.

(2)
Amounts for the value of share awards that receive accelerated vesting as a result of the termination are calculated assuming that the market price per share of Seagate's ordinary shares on the date of termination of employment was equal to the closing price on June 27, 2014. In addition, the value of accelerated PSUs is calculated assuming that we would have achieved the target level of performance at the end of the three-year performance measurement cycle, except for the TSR PSUs issued to our CEO which would accelerate in full because the performance condition had been satisfied as of July 23, 2013.

(3)
Calculations do not include the impact of any potential cutback pursuant to the application of the Code Section 280G safe harbor limit under the relevant provisions of the Severance Plan.

81


Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth information concerning the Company's equity compensation plans as of June 27, 2014.

Equity compensation plans
  Number of Securities
to be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
under Equity
Compensation Plans
 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

    6,400,381 (1) $ 19.82 (2)   25,914,007 (3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

    18.719 (4) $ 14.09 (5)      
                 

Total

    6,419,100   $ 19.80     25,914,007  

(1)
This number includes 417,731 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under our Seagate Technology plc 2001 Share Option Plan (the "SOP"), 3,390,664 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of share options granted under the 2004 SCP and 2,591,986 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance upon the exercise of shares options granted under the 2012 Plan.

(2)
This value is calculated based on the exercise price of options outstanding under the SOP, the 2004 SCP and the 2012 Plan.

(3)
This number includes 15,683,937 ordinary shares available for future issuance under the 2012 Plan and 10,230,070 ordinary shares available for issuance under our ESPP.

(4)
This number includes 7,498 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance under the Maxtor Corporation 2005 Performance Incentive Plan (the "Maxtor 2005 Plan") and 11,221 ordinary shares that were subject to issuance under the Maxtor Corporation Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "Maxtor 1996 Plan").

(5)
This value is calculated based on the exercise price of options outstanding under the Maxtor 2005 Plan and the Maxtor 1996 Plan.

82


Table of Contents


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        Our Board has adopted a written policy for approval of transactions with our directors, director nominees, executive officers, shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of our shares and immediate family members of such persons (each, a "Related Person"). Pursuant to the policy, if any Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest in a transaction or potential transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, he or she must promptly report it to the General Counsel of the Company or his designee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then reviews any such transactions and determines whether or not to approve or ratify them. In doing so, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems to be appropriate, the extent of the Related Person's interest; whether the transaction would interfere with the Related Person's judgment in fulfilling his or her duties to the Company; whether the transaction is fair to the Company and on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under similar circumstances; whether the transaction is in the interest of the Company and its shareholders; and whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.

        In addition, if the transaction involves a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider whether such transaction would impact such director's independence under NASDAQ rules or qualifications to serve on committees under the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NASDAQ and SEC rules. The Board has delegated authority to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review and approve or ratify transactions where the aggregate amount is expected to be less than $1 million. A summary of any new transactions approved by the Chair is provided to the full Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its review at the next scheduled committee meeting after such approval.

        On December 19, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.'s ("Samsung"; references to "Samsung" hereafter include Samsung affiliates) hard disk drive business (the "Acquisition"), in consideration for which the Company transferred cash and 45,239,490 ordinary shares to Samsung, giving them approximately 9.7% of our then outstanding ordinary shares. In connection with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a number of agreements with Samsung during fiscal year 2012 which remained in effect in fiscal year 2014. These included (i) a Shareholders Agreement, dated April 19, 2011 (the "Shareholders Agreement"), pursuant to which Samsung had the right to appoint one member of the Board so long as it held more than 7% of the Company's outstanding ordinary shares and provided for certain share registration rights; (ii) a warranty agreement to assume specified warranty liabilities for Samsung products following the closing of the Acquisition, (iii) an intellectual property agreement in relation to certain intellectual property sold and licensed as well as an amended cross-license agreement in relation to certain of the Company's and Samsung's patents, neither of which required any additional payment to be made by either the Company or Samsung, and iv) a trademark license agreement with Samsung pursuant to which the Company accrued approximately $9 million during fiscal year 2014. In addition, in connection with the Acquisition, the Company and Samsung also negotiated certain supply arrangements pursuant to which the parties entered into (i) a new hard disk drive supply agreement under which the Company supplies disk drives to Samsung for its personal computer, notebook, consumer electronics and other businesses, and (ii) a new NAND flash memory supply agreement (the "NAND Agreement") under which Samsung provides the Company with semiconductor products for use in the Company's enterprise solid state drives, solid state hybrid drives and other products, in each case on terms that may be made available to each party's largest customers. In addition to agreements related the Acquisition, there were also a number of ongoing relationships and transactions between the Company and Samsung during fiscal year 2014.

        During fiscal year 2014, the Company recorded revenues of $216 million in relation to the sale of hard disk drives to Samsung, and made payments of approximately $318 million for the purchase of NAND flash and other memory products under the terms of the NAND Agreement and other solid

83


Table of Contents

state memory supply agreements with Samsung. During that period, the Company and Samsung also continued to jointly develop certain storage technologies under the terms of a joint development and license agreement entered into in July 2010. In addition, in fiscal year 2012, the Company and Samsung entered into a contract for the construction of a new Seagate design center in Korea, pursuant to which the Company paid Samsung approximately $0.6 million in fiscal year 2014.

        On October 7, 2013, the Company and Samsung, entered into a Share Redemption Agreement (the "Share Redemption Agreement") pursuant to which the Company repurchased 32,700,000 ordinary shares by way of redemption from Samsung at a price of $46.03 per share, for a total redemption price of approximately $1.51 billion (the "Share Redemption Transaction"). Immediately prior to the Share Redemption Transaction, Samsung beneficially owned approximately 12.6% of the Company's outstanding shares. Immediately following the close of the Share Redemption Transaction on October 21, 2013, Samsung beneficially owned approximately 3.9% of the Company's outstanding shares. The Share Redemption Transaction was part of the Company's previously announced share repurchase program.

        In connection with the entry into the Share Redemption Agreement, the Company and Samsung entered into an Amendment and Termination Agreement (the "Amendment and Termination Agreement") amending and terminating the Shareholders Agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment and Termination Agreement, Samsung's right to appoint one member of the Board was terminated as were certain transfer restrictions, standstill provisions and voting provisions.

        In accordance with the Company's policy on Related Person transactions, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approved the participation of the Company in the Acquisition, the Share Redemption Transaction and the Company's participation in all transactions with Samsung during the period when it was a Related Person were in accordance with the Company's policy on Related Person transactions.

        Josip Relota, Mr. Luczo's brother-in-law, has been employed as a software engineer by one of our majority-owned subsidiaries since June 24, 2013. In connection with such employment, Mr. Relota receives total annual cash compensation from such subsidiary of approximately $165,000. In addition, Mr. Relota is eligible to participate in such subsidiary's general employee benefit plans, including vacation and health plans. In fiscal year 2014, Mr. Relota was granted 9,000 stock options of such subsidiary with an exercise price of $0.09 per share. Mr. Relota's compensation is commensurate with that of other employees of such subsidiary in similar positions. The Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has ratified the terms of Mr. Relota's employment and compensation.


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company's ordinary shares, to file reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. To the Company's knowledge, based solely on its review of such forms received by the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with for the fiscal year 2014 other than one Form 4 reporting one transaction for Mr. Reyes and one transaction filed on a form 4/A for Mr. Morton.


SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

        Any proposal by a shareholder intended to be included in our proxy statement for the 2015 AGM must be received by the Company at its registered office at 38/39 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2, Ireland, Attn: Company Secretary, no later than May 6, 2015. Any such proposal must meet the requirements

84


Table of Contents

set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC, including Rule 14a-8, to be eligible for inclusion in our 2015 proxy statement.

        The Company's Articles of Association set forth procedures to be followed by shareholders who wish to nominate candidates for election to the Board of Directors in connection with annual general meetings of shareholders or who wish to bring other business before a shareholders' general meeting. All such nominations must be accompanied by certain background and other information specified in the Articles of Association. A shareholder wishing to nominate a director for the 2015 AGM must provide written notice to the Company Secretary of their intention to make such nomination no earlier than April 6, 2015 and no later than May 6, 2015, that is by a date not less than 120 nor more than 150 days before the date of the proxy statement for our prior year's annual general meeting. If the date of the 2015 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 2014 AGM, then the written notice must be provided to the Company Secretary earlier than the 150th day prior to the date of the 2015 AGM and not later than the later of the 120th day prior to the date of the 2015 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

        Unless a shareholder who wishes to bring business before the 2015 AGM outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 (other than a nomination as outlined above, and subject to applicable rules) provides written notice of such business received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, no later than July 20, 2015, the Company Designees will have discretionary authority to vote on any such proposal at the 2015 AGM with respect to all proxies submitted to us, even when we do not include in our proxy statement advice on the nature of the matter and how the Company Designees intend to exercise their discretion to vote on the matter. If the date of the 2015 AGM occurs more than 30 days before or after the anniversary of the 2014 AGM, then such notice must be received by the Company Secretary, at the address specified above, not later than the later of the 75th day prior to the date of the 2015 AGM or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. The notice must include a description of the proposed item and the reasons the proposing Shareholder believes its position concerning the item. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in our 2015 proxy statement.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all shareholder recommendations for candidates for Board membership, which should be sent to that Committee, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above. In addition to considering candidates recommended by shareholders, the Committee considers potential candidates recommended by current directors, Seagate officers, employees and others. As stated in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, all candidates for Board membership are selected based upon their professional experience, recognized achievement in his or her respective field, willingness to make the commitment of time and effort required, good judgment, strength of character, reputation for integrity and personal and professional ethics, and an independent mind. Candidates recommended by shareholders are evaluated in the same manner as director candidates identified by any other means.

        Irish law provides that any shareholder or shareholders holding not less than 10% of the paid-up share capital carrying voting rights may requisition the directors to call an extraordinary general meeting at any time. The shareholders who wish to requisition an extraordinary general meeting must deposit a written notice at Seagate's registered office, which is signed by the shareholders requisitioning the meeting and states the objects of the meeting. If the directors do not within 21 days of the date of deposit of the requisition proceed to convene a meeting to be held within two months of that date, those shareholders (or any of them representing more than half of the total voting rights of all of them) may themselves convene a meeting but any meeting so convened cannot be held after the expiration of three months from the date of deposit of the requisition. These provisions of Irish law are

85


Table of Contents

in addition to, and separate from, the requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a proposal included in the proxy statement under the rules of the SEC.

        If a shareholder wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors for any other reason, all such communications should be sent in writing, care of the Company Secretary, at the address set forth above.


INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

        To the extent that this Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled "Report of the Compensation Committee" and "Report of the Audit Committee" (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in that other filing.

        Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement and is not deemed incorporated by reference hereunder for any purpose.


ANNUAL REPORT

        A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (excluding exhibits) and our Irish Statutory Accounts, both for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2014, accompany this Proxy Statement. A printed copy of either document, including exhibits, will be furnished without charge to beneficial shareholders or shareholders of record upon request to Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014, or upon calling 1+ (408) 658-1222.


HOUSEHOLDING

        SEC rules permit a single set of annual reports and proxy statements to be sent to any household at which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each shareholder continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure is referred to as householding. While the Company does not household in mailings to its shareholders of record, a number of brokerage firms with account holders who are Company shareholders have instituted householding. In these cases, a single proxy statement and annual report will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once a shareholder has received notice from his or her broker that the broker will be householding communications to the shareholder's address, householding will continue until the shareholder is notified otherwise or until the shareholder revokes his or her consent. If at any time a shareholder no longer wishes to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report, he or she should notify his or her broker. Any shareholder can receive a copy of the Company's proxy statement and annual report by contacting the Company at Investor Relations, Seagate Technology plc, 10200 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014. Shareholders who hold their shares through a broker or other nominee who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement and annual report at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 


SIGNATURE
    Kenneth M. Massaroni
Executive Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Company Secretary

September 3, 2014

86


Table of Contents


APPENDIX A

AMENDED AND RESTATED

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

Adopted by Board on July 27, 2011, and amended on July 23[    ], 2014

Approved by Shareholders on October 26, 2011, and on October 22, 2014

Termination Date: July 27, 2021


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
   
  Page  
I   PURPOSES     A-1  

II

 

DEFINITIONS

 

 

A-1

 


 

2.1

 

"Affiliate"

 

 

A-1

 


 

2.2

 

"Beneficial Owner"

 

 

A-1

 


 

2.3

 

"Board"

 

 

A-1

 


 

2.4

 

"Change of Control"

 

 

A-1

 


 

2.5

 

"Code"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.6

 

"Committee"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.7

 

"Company"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.8

 

"Consultant"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.9

 

"Continuous Service"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.10

 

"Covered Employee"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.11

 

"Director"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.12

 

"Deferred Share Unit"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.13

 

"Disability"

 

 

A-2

 


 

2.14

 

"Dividend Equivalent"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.15

 

"Eligible Individual"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.16

 

"Employee"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.17

 

"Exchange Act"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.18

 

"Fair Market Value"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.19

 

"Full-Value Share Award"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.20

 

"Incentive Stock Option"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.21

 

"Nominal Value"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.22

 

"Non-Employee Director"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.23

 

"Nonstatutory Share Option"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.24

 

"Officer"

 

 

A-3

 


 

2.25

 

"Option"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.26

 

"Option Agreement"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.27

 

"Optionholder"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.28

 

"Ordinary Share" or "Share"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.29

 

"Other Share-Based Award"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.30

 

"Other Share-Based Award Agreement"

 

 

A-4

 

A-i


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page  
  2.31   "Outside Director"     A-4  


 

2.32

 

"Participant"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.33

 

"Performance Goal"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.34

 

"Performance Period"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.35

 

"Performance Share Bonus"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.36

 

"Performance Share Bonus Agreement"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.37

 

"Performance Share Unit"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.38

 

"Performance Share Unit Agreement"

 

 

A-4

 


 

2.39

 

"Phantom Share Unit"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.40

 

"Phantom Share Unit Agreement"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.41

 

"Plan"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.42

 

"Predecessor Plan"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.43

 

"Qualifying Performance Criteria"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.44

 

"Restricted Share Bonus"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.45

 

"Restricted Share Bonus Agreement"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.46

 

"Restricted Share Unit"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.47

 

"Restricted Share Unit Agreement"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.48

 

"Rule 16b-3"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.49

 

"Section 162(m)"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.50

 

"Securities Act"

 

 

A-5

 


 

2.51

 

"Share Appreciation Right" or "SAR"

 

 

A-6

 


 

2.52

 

"Share Appreciation Right Agreement"

 

 

A-6

 


 

2.53

 

"Share Award"

 

 

A-6

 


 

2.54

 

"Share Award Agreement"

 

 

A-6

 


 

2.55

 

"Ten Percent Shareholder"

 

 

A-6

 

III

 

ADMINISTRATION

 

 

A-6

 


 

3.1

 

Administration by Board

 

 

A-6

 


 

3.2

 

Powers of Board

 

 

A-6

 


 

3.3

 

Delegation to Committee

 

 

A-7

 


 

3.4

 

Effect of Board's Decision

 

 

A-7

 

IV

 

SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

 

 

A-7

 


 

4.1

 

Share Reserve

 

 

A-7

 


 

4.2

 

Adjustments to the Share Reserve

 

 

A-8

 

A-ii


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page  
  4.3   Source of Shares     A-8  

V

 

ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION

 

 

A-8

 


 

5.1

 

Eligibility

 

 

A-8

 


 

5.2

 

Participation

 

 

A-8

 


 

5.3

 

Non-U.S. Participants

 

 

A-8

 

VI

 

OPTION PROVISIONS

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.1

 

Incentive Stock Option $100,000 Limitation

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.2

 

Term

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.3

 

Vesting

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.4

 

Exercise Price of an Option

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.5

 

Consideration

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.6

 

Termination of Continuous Service

 

 

A-9

 


 

6.7

 

Extension of Option Termination Date

 

 

A-10

 


 

6.8

 

Disability of Optionholder

 

 

A-10

 


 

6.9

 

Death of Optionholder

 

 

A-10

 


 

6.10

 

Transferability of an Incentive Stock Option

 

 

A-10

 


 

6.11

 

Transferability of a Nonstatutory Share Option

 

 

A-10

 

VII

 

SHARE AWARDS PROVISIONS OTHER THAN OPTIONS

 

 

A-11

 


 

7.1

 

Restricted Share Bonus Awards

 

 

A-11

 


 

7.2

 

Share Appreciation Rights

 

 

A-11

 


 

7.3

 

Phantom Share Units

 

 

A-12

 


 

7.4

 

Restricted Share Units

 

 

A-13

 


 

7.5

 

Performance Share Bonus Awards

 

 

A-14

 


 

7.6

 

Performance Share Units

 

 

A-14

 


 

7.7

 

Other Share-Based Awards

 

 

A-15

 

VIII

 

QUALIFYING PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION

 

 

A-15

 


 

8.1

 

General

 

 

A-15

 


 

8.2

 

Adjustments

 

 

A-16

 


 

8.3

 

Discretionary Adjustments and Limits

 

 

A-17

 


 

8.4

 

Annual Section 162(m) Limitation

 

 

A-17

 

IX

 

USE OF PROCEEDS FROM SHARES

 

 

A-17

 

X

 

CANCELLATION AND RE-GRANT OF OPTIONS

 

 

A-17

 

A-iii


Table of Contents

 
   
   
  Page  
XI   MISCELLANEOUS     A-17  


 

11.1

 

Shareholder Rights

 

 

A-17

 


 

11.2

 

No Employment or other Service Rights

 

 

A-17

 


 

11.3

 

Investment Assurances

 

 

A-18

 


 

11.4

 

Withholding Obligations

 

 

A-18

 


 

11.5

 

Forfeiture Provisions

 

 

A-18

 


 

11.6

 

Compliance with Laws

 

 

A-18

 

XII

 

ADJUSTMENTS UPON CHANGES IN SHARES

 

 

A-19

 


 

12.1

 

Capitalization Adjustments

 

 

A-19

 


 

12.2

 

Adjustments Upon a Change of Control

 

 

A-19

 

XIII

 

AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN AND SHARE AWARDS

 

 

A-20

 


 

13.1

 

Amendment of Plan

 

 

A-20

 


 

13.2

 

Shareholder Approval

 

 

A-20

 


 

13.3

 

Contemplated Amendments

 

 

A-20

 


 

13.4

 

Amendment of Share Awards

 

 

A-20

 

XIV

 

TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE PLAN

 

 

A-20

 


 

14.1

 

Termination or Suspension

 

 

A-20

 


 

14.2

 

No Material Impairment of Rights

 

 

A-20

 

XV

 

EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATE OF PLAN

 

 

A-20

 


 

15.1

 

Effective Date

 

 

A-20

 


 

15.2

 

Expiration Date

 

 

A-21

 

XVI

 

CHOICE OF LAW

 

 

A-21

 

A-iv


Table of Contents


I.    PURPOSES.

        The Company, by means of this Plan, seeks to provide incentives for the group of persons eligible to receive Share Awards to align their long-term interests with those of the Company's shareholders and to perform in a manner individually and collectively that enhances the success of the Company. The Plan is further intended to provide a means by which eligible recipients of Share Awards may be given an opportunity to benefit from increases in value of the Ordinary Shares through the granting of Share Awards including, but not limited to: (i) Incentive Stock Options, (ii) Nonstatutory Share Options, (iii) Restricted Share Bonuses, (iv) Share Appreciation Rights, (v) Phantom Share Units, (vi) Restricted Share Units, (vii) Performance Share Bonuses, (viii) Performance Share Units, (ix) Deferred Share Units, and (x) Other Share-Based Awards.


II.    DEFINITIONS.

        2.1  "Affiliate" means generally with respect to the Company, any entity directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlling or controlled by (but not under common control with) the Company. Solely with respect to the granting of any Incentive Stock Options, Affiliate means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code. Solely with respect to the granting of any Nonstatutory Share Options or Share Appreciation Rights, Affiliate means any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of the Company, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(b)(5)(iii)(E).

        2.2  "Beneficial Owner" means the definition given in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

        2.3  "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company.

        2.4  "Change of Control" means the consummation or effectiveness of any of the following events:

A-1


Table of Contents

        In addition, if a Change of Control constitutes a payment event with respect to any Share Award which provides for the deferral of compensation and is subject to Section 409A of the Code, the transaction or event described above with respect to such Share Award must also constitute a "change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or a "change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets" of the Company," as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.409A-3(i)(5).

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, a restructuring of the Company for the purpose of changing the domicile of the Company (including, but not limited to, any change in the structure of the Company resulting from the process of moving its domicile between jurisdictions), reincorporation of the Company or other similar transaction involving the Company (a "Restructuring Transaction") will not constitute a Change of Control if, immediately after the Restructuring Transaction, the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such Restructuring Transaction represent, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the surviving entity.

        2.5  "Code" means the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

        2.6  "Committee" means a committee of one or more Directors (or other individuals who are not members of the Board to the extent allowed by applicable law) appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Plan.

        2.7  "Company" means Seagate Technology Public Limited Company, a public company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Ireland with limited liability under registered number 480010, or any successor thereto.

        2.8  "Consultant" means any person, including an advisor engaged by the Company or an Affiliate, to render consulting or advisory services and who is compensated for such services.

        2.9  "Continuous Service" means that the Participant's active service with the Company or an Affiliate, whether as an Employee, Director or Consultant, is not interrupted or terminated. The Participant's Continuous Service shall not be deemed to have terminated merely because of a change in the capacity in which the Participant renders service to the Company or an Affiliate as an Employee, Consultant or Director or a change in the entity for which the Participant renders such service, provided, that there is no interruption or termination of the Participant's Continuous Service. For example, a change in status from an Employee of the Company to a Consultant of an Affiliate or a Director will not constitute an interruption of Continuous Service. The Board Committee or the chief executive officer of the Company, in such party's sole discretion, may determine whether Continuous Service shall be considered interrupted in the case of any leave of absence approved by the Company or an Affiliate, including sick leave, military leave or any other personal leave.

        2.10  "Covered Employee" means the chief executive officer and the three (3) other highest compensated officers of the Company (other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer) for whom total compensation is required to be reported to shareholders under the Exchange Act, as determined for purposes of Section 162(m), and as such definition may be amended from time to time.

        2.11  "Director" means a member of the Board.

        2.12  "Deferred Share Unit" means any Share Award for which a valid deferral election is made.

        2.13  "Disability" means the permanent and total disability of a person within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code for all Incentive Stock Options. For all other Share Awards, "Disability" means physical or mental incapacitation such that for a period of six (6) consecutive months or for an aggregate of nine (9) months in any twenty-four (24) consecutive month period, a person is unable to substantially perform his or her duties. Any question as to the existence of that person's physical or mental incapacitation shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion.

A-2


Table of Contents

        2.14  "Dividend Equivalent" means a right granted to a Participant pursuant to Sections 7.3(iii), 7.4(iv) and 7.6(iv) of the Plan to receive the equivalent value (in cash or in Shares) of dividends paid on the Ordinary Shares.

        2.15  "Eligible Individual" means any person who is an Employee, Director or Consultant, as determined by the Board.

        2.16  "Employee" means any person on the payroll records of the Company or an Affiliate and actively providing services as an employee. Service as a Director or compensation by the Company or an Affiliate solely for services as a Director shall not be sufficient to constitute "employment" by the Company or an Affiliate.

        2.17  "Exchange Act" means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        2.18  "Fair Market Value" means, as of any date, the value of an Ordinary Share determined as follows:

        2.19  "Full-Value Share Award" shall mean any of a Restricted Share Bonus, Restricted Share Units, Phantom Share Units, Performance Share Bonus, or Performance Share Units.

        2.20  "Incentive Stock Option" means an Option intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

        2.21  "Nominal Value" means US$0.00001 per Share.

        2.22  "Non-Employee Director" means a Director who either (i) is not a current Employee or Officer of the Company or its parent or a subsidiary, does not receive compensation (directly or indirectly) from the Company or its parent or a subsidiary for services rendered as a consultant or in any capacity other than as a Director (except for an amount as to which disclosure would not be required under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act ("Regulation S-K")), does not possess an interest in any other transaction as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K and is not engaged in a business relationship as to which disclosure would be required under Item 404(b) of Regulation S-K; or (ii) is otherwise considered a "non-employee director" for purposes of Rule 16b-3.

        2.23  "Nonstatutory Share Option" means an Option not intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option.

        2.24  "Officer" means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

A-3


Table of Contents

        2.25  "Option" means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Share Option granted pursuant to the Plan.

        2.26  "Option Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and an Optionholder evidencing the terms and conditions of an Option grant. Each Option Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

        2.27  "Optionholder" means a person to whom an Option is granted pursuant to the Plan or, if applicable, such other person who holds an outstanding Option.

        2.28  "Ordinary Share" or "Share" means an ordinary share of the Company, nominal value US$0.00001.

        2.29  "Other Share-Based Award" means a Share Award (other than an Option, a Restricted Share Bonus, a Share Appreciation Right, a Phantom Share Unit, a Restricted Share Unit, a Performance Share Bonus, a Performance Share Unit or a Deferred Share Unit) subject to the provisions of Section 7.7 of the Plan.

        2.30  "Other Share-Based Award Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company and a holder of an Other Share-Based Award setting forth the terms and conditions of an Other Share-Based Award grant. Each Other Share-Based Award Agreement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

        2.31  "Outside Director" means a Director who either (i