HLTH COPORATION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number: 0-24975
HLTH CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
94-3236644
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
669 River Drive, Center 2
Elmwood Park, New Jersey
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
07407-1361
(Zip
code)
|
(201) 703-3400
(Registrants
telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of August 5, 2008, there were 184,375,049 shares of
HLTH Common Stock outstanding (including unvested shares of
restricted HLTH Common Stock issued under our equity
compensation plans).
HLTH
CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the period ended June 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WebMD®,
WebMD
Health®,
CME
Circle®,
eMedicine®,
MedicineNet®,
Medscape®,
MEDPOR®,
Medsite®,
POREX®,
RxList®,
Subimo®,
Summex®,
theheart.org®
and The Little Blue
Booktm
are among the trademarks of HLTH Corporation or its subsidiaries.
2
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains both historical and forward-looking statements. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, are or may
be, forward-looking statements. For example, statements
concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or
forecasts and statements that describe our objectives, future
performance, plans or goals are, or may be, forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements reflect
managements current expectations concerning future results
and events and can generally be identified by the use of
expressions such as may, will,
should, could, would,
likely, predict, potential,
continue, future, estimate,
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, plan, foresee, and
other similar words or phrases, as well as statements in the
future tense.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be different from any
future results, performance and achievements expressed or
implied by these statements. The following important risks and
uncertainties could affect our future results, causing those
results to differ materially from those expressed in our
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to achieve sufficient levels of usage of WebMDs
public portals;
|
|
|
|
inability to successfully deploy new or updated applications or
services;
|
|
|
|
failure to achieve sufficient levels of utilization and market
acceptance of new or updated products and services;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in forming and maintaining relationships with
customers and strategic partners;
|
|
|
|
inability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
anticipated benefits from acquisitions not being fully realized
or not being realized within the expected time frames;
|
|
|
|
general economic, business or regulatory conditions affecting
the healthcare, information technology, Internet and plastics
industries being less favorable than expected; and
|
|
|
|
the other risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
under the heading Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Factors That May Affect Our Future
Financial Condition or Results of Operations.
|
These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other
factors, including unknown or unpredictable ones, could also
have material adverse effects on our future results.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report. Except as required by law or regulation, we do not
undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
3
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,123,899
|
|
|
$
|
536,879
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
304,325
|
|
|
|
290,858
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,091 at June 30, 2008 and $1,165 at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
68,865
|
|
|
|
86,081
|
|
Due from EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
24,331
|
|
|
|
71,090
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
268,046
|
|
|
|
262,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,789,535
|
|
|
|
1,249,096
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
48,491
|
|
|
|
49,554
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
214,475
|
|
|
|
217,323
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
31,323
|
|
|
|
36,314
|
|
Investment in EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,261
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
62,330
|
|
|
|
71,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
2,148,697
|
|
|
$
|
1,651,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
44,807
|
|
|
$
|
49,598
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
87,401
|
|
|
|
76,401
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
124,788
|
|
|
|
123,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
256,996
|
|
|
|
249,130
|
|
1.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
31/8%
convertible notes due 2025
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
21,332
|
|
|
|
21,137
|
|
Minority interest in WHC
|
|
|
135,416
|
|
|
|
131,353
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 900,000,000 shares
authorized; 457,916,272 shares issued at June 30,
2008; 457,803,361 shares issued at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
12,492,931
|
|
|
|
12,479,574
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 274,802,648 shares at
June 30, 2008; 275,786,634 shares at December 31,
2007
|
|
|
(2,561,405
|
)
|
|
|
(2,564,948
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(8,860,457
|
)
|
|
|
(9,320,748
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
13,838
|
|
|
|
5,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,084,953
|
|
|
|
599,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
2,148,697
|
|
|
$
|
1,651,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
89,136
|
|
|
$
|
77,197
|
|
|
$
|
170,818
|
|
|
$
|
149,078
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
32,763
|
|
|
|
28,997
|
|
|
|
64,333
|
|
|
|
57,615
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
25,460
|
|
|
|
21,929
|
|
|
|
51,290
|
|
|
|
44,799
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,181
|
|
|
|
26,950
|
|
|
|
44,325
|
|
|
|
55,393
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,315
|
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
(4,810
|
)
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
provision
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
480,536
|
|
|
|
(7,566
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
26,944
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
(2,774
|
)
|
|
|
958
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
460,373
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(44,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
460,291
|
|
|
$
|
(39,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used in computing (loss)
income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
182,622
|
|
|
|
180,219
|
|
|
|
182,399
|
|
|
|
178,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
186,243
|
|
|
|
191,032
|
|
|
|
228,209
|
|
|
|
188,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
HLTH
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
460,291
|
|
|
$
|
(39,761
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
44,484
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
Minority interest in WHC (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,774
|
)
|
|
|
958
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
(4,007
|
)
|
|
|
(14,674
|
)
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
12,443
|
|
|
|
16,961
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC and 2006 EBS Sale
|
|
|
(538,024
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
17,216
|
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other, net
|
|
|
21,090
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(3,695
|
)
|
|
|
(44,070
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
10,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
56,537
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
17,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
56,194
|
|
|
|
18,980
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
106,586
|
|
|
|
194,096
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(177,150
|
)
|
|
|
(388,942
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(6,985
|
)
|
|
|
(10,217
|
)
|
Proceeds related to sales of EBS, EPS and ACS/ACP, net of
expenses
|
|
|
598,935
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
Decrease in net advances to EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
19,730
|
|
Other
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations
|
|
|
522,689
|
|
|
|
(182,435
|
)
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3,144
|
)
|
|
|
(2,341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
519,545
|
|
|
|
(184,776
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of HLTH and WHC common stock
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
103,263
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock under repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,906
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
60,814
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
9,488
|
|
|
|
60,713
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
587,020
|
|
|
|
(104,722
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
536,879
|
|
|
|
614,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,123,899
|
|
|
$
|
509,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
HLTH
CORPORATION
(In
thousands, except share and per share data, unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Background
and Basis of Presentation
|
Background
HLTH Corporation (HLTH or the Company)
is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in December 1995
and commenced operations in January 1996 as Healtheon
Corporation. HLTHs Common Stock began trading on the
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol HLTH on
February 11, 1999 and now trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. The Company changed its name to Healtheon/WebMD
Corporation in November 1999 and to WebMD Corporation in
September 2000. In October 2005, WebMD Corporation changed its
name to Emdeon Corporation in connection with the initial public
offering of equity securities of WebMD Health Corp.
(WHC). In connection with the November 2006 sale of
a 52% interest in the Companys Emdeon Business Services
segment, the Company transferred its rights to the name
Emdeon and related intellectual property to Emdeon
Business Services. Accordingly, in May 2007, the Company changed
its name to HLTH Corporation.
WHCs Class A Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol WBMD on
September 29, 2005 and now trades on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market. As of June 30, 2008, the Company owned
48,100,000 shares of WHC Class B Common Stock, which
represented 83.3% of the total outstanding Class A Common
Stock (after accounting for the impact of certain WHC shares to
be issued pursuant to the purchase agreement for the acquisition
of Subimo, LLC) and Class B Common Stock of WHC. WHC
Class A Common Stock has one vote per share, while WHC
Class B Common Stock has five votes per share. As a result,
the WHC Class B Common Stock owned by the Company
represented, as of June 30, 2008, 96.2% of the combined
voting power of WHCs outstanding Common Stock.
Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
consolidated accounts of HLTH Corporation and its subsidiaries
and have been prepared in United States dollars, and in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). The consolidated accounts include
100% of the assets and liabilities of the majority-owned WHC and
the ownership interests of minority stockholders of WHC are
recorded as minority interest in WHC in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
The Companys 48% ownership in EBS Master LLC was accounted
for under the equity method through February 8, 2008, the
date of the sale of the Companys investment in EBS Master
LLC. See Note 3 for further details.
On February 21, 2008, the Company announced its intention
to sell its ViPS and Porex businesses. Accordingly, the results
of the Companys ViPS and Porex segments are presented as
discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. See Note 2 for further details.
Interim
Financial Statements
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company
have been prepared by management and reflect all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) that, in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of
the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected
for any subsequent period or for the entire year ending
December 31, 2008. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted
under the Securities and Exchange Commissions (the
SEC) rules and regulations.
7
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes
included herein should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are
included in the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 27, 2008.
Accounting
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company bases
its estimates on historical experience, current business
factors, and various other assumptions that the Company believes
are necessary to consider to form a basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities, the
recorded amounts of revenue and expenses, and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. The Company is subject to
uncertainties such as the impact of future events, economic,
environmental and political factors, and changes in the
Companys business environment; therefore, actual results
could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the accounting
estimates used in the preparation of the Companys
financial statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained
and as the Companys operating environment changes. Changes
in estimates are made when circumstances warrant. Such changes
in estimates and refinements in estimation methodologies are
reflected in reported results of operations; if material, the
effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. Significant estimates and
assumptions by management affect: the allowance for doubtful
accounts, the carrying value of prepaid advertising, the
carrying value of long-lived assets (including goodwill and
intangible assets), the amortization period of long-lived assets
(excluding goodwill), the carrying value, capitalization and
amortization of software and Web site development costs, the
carrying value of short-term and long-term investments, the
provision for income taxes and related deferred tax accounts,
certain accrued expenses, revenue recognition, contingencies,
litigation and related legal accruals and the value attributed
to employee stock options and other stock-based awards.
Seasonality
The timing of the Companys revenue is affected by seasonal
factors. WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue within
the WebMD Online Services segment is seasonal, primarily as a
result of the annual budget approval process of the advertising
and sponsorship clients of the public portals. This portion of
revenue is usually the lowest in the first quarter of each
calendar year, and increases during each consecutive quarter
throughout the year. WebMDs private portal licensing
revenue is historically highest in the second half of the year
as new customers are typically added during this period in
conjunction with their annual open enrollment periods for
employee benefits. Finally, the annual distribution cycle within
the WebMD Publishing and Other Services segment results in a
significant portion of WebMDs revenue in this segment
being recognized in the second and third quarter of each
calendar year.
Net
(Loss) Income Per Common Share
Basic (loss) income per common share and diluted (loss) income
per common share are presented in conformity with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128,
Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128). In
accordance with SFAS 128, basic (loss) income per common
share has been computed using the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period, increased
to give effect to the participating rights of the convertible
redeemable exchangeable preferred stock. Diluted (loss) income
per common share has been computed using the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period,
increased to give effect to potentially dilutive securities and
assumes that any dilutive convertible notes were converted, only
in the periods in which such effect is dilutive. Additionally,
for purposes of calculating diluted (loss) income per common
share of the Company, the numerator has been adjusted to
consider the effect of potentially dilutive securities of WHC,
which can dilute the portion of
8
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
WHCs net income (loss) otherwise retained by the Company.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and
diluted (loss) income per common share (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
784
|
|
|
$
|
4,036
|
|
|
$
|
460,373
|
|
|
$
|
4,723
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations Basic
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
460,373
|
|
|
|
4,897
|
|
Interest expense on convertible notes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of WHC dilutive securities
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations Diluted
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
3,928
|
|
|
$
|
465,795
|
|
|
$
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax Basic
and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
182,622
|
|
|
|
169,745
|
|
|
|
182,399
|
|
|
|
167,559
|
|
Convertible redeemable exchangeable preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares Basic
|
|
|
182,622
|
|
|
|
180,219
|
|
|
|
182,399
|
|
|
|
178,115
|
|
Employee stock options, restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
|
|
10,813
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
10,578
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares after assumed
conversions Diluted
|
|
|
186,243
|
|
|
|
191,032
|
|
|
|
228,209
|
|
|
|
188,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has excluded convertible subordinated notes and
convertible notes, as well as certain outstanding warrants,
restricted stock and stock options, from the calculation of
diluted (loss) income per common share during the periods in
which such securities were anti-dilutive. The following table
presents the total number of shares that could potentially
dilute income (loss) per common share in the future that were
not included in the computation of diluted (loss) income per
common share during the periods presented (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Options, restricted stock and warrants
|
|
|
34,772
|
|
|
|
18,297
|
|
|
|
34,916
|
|
|
|
19,735
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,787
|
|
|
|
60,312
|
|
|
|
34,916
|
|
|
|
61,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
The income tax provision of $1,330 and $26,944 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $1,658
and $1,427 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, respectively, represents taxes for federal, state and
other jurisdictions. The Company recorded an income tax benefit
related to discontinued operations of $3,580 and $670 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and
an income tax benefit of $583 and provision of $638 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively,
included in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations. While the
majority of the gain on the 2008 EBSCo Sale (as defined in
Note 3) was offset by net operating loss
carryforwards, certain AMT and other state taxes were not offset
resulting in a provision of approximately $24,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2008. The income tax provision for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 excludes a benefit for
the impairment of auction rate securities, as it is currently
not deductible for tax purposes.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On May 9, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (FSP APB
14-1).
The FSP will require cash settled convertible debt to be
separated into debt and equity components at issuance and a
value to be assigned to each. The value assigned to the debt
component will be the estimated fair value, as of the issuance
date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature. The
difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated
fair value will be recorded as a debt discount and amortized to
interest expense over the life of the bond. Although FSP APB
14-1 would
have no impact on the Companys actual past or future cash
flows, it will require the Company to record a significant
amount of non-cash interest expense as the debt discount is
amortized. As a result, there will be a material adverse impact
on the results of operations and earnings per share. In
addition, if the convertible debt is redeemed or converted prior
to maturity, any unamortized debt discount will result in a loss
on extinguishment. FSP APB
14-1 will
become effective January 1, 2009, and will require
retrospective application.
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value
of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),
Business Combinations, and other U.S. GAAP.
This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15,
10
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early
adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact that this FSP will have on its operations, financial
position and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R), a replacement of SFAS
No. 141. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and applies to all
business combinations. SFAS 141R provides that, upon
initially obtaining control, an acquirer shall recognize
100 percent of the fair values of acquired assets,
including goodwill, and assumed liabilities, with only limited
exceptions, even if the acquirer has not acquired
100 percent of its target. As a consequence, the current
step acquisition model will be eliminated. Additionally,
SFAS 141R changes current practice, in part, as follows:
(1) contingent consideration arrangements will be fair
valued at the acquisition date and included on that basis in the
purchase price consideration; (2) transaction costs will be
expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized as part of the
purchase price; (3) pre-acquisition contingencies, such as
legal issues, will generally have to be accounted for in
purchase accounting at fair value; and (4) in order to
accrue for a restructuring plan in purchase accounting, the
requirements in SFAS No. 146, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, would
have to be met at the acquisition date. While there is no
expected impact to the Companys consolidated financial
statements on the accounting for acquisitions completed prior to
December 31, 2008, the adoption of SFAS 141R on
January 1, 2009 could materially change the accounting for
business combinations consummated subsequent to that date and
for tax matters relating to prior acquisitions settled
subsequent to December 31, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires the
recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as
equity in the financial statements and separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net
income on the face of the results of operations. SFAS 160
clarifies that changes in a parents ownership interest in
a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity
transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial
interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent
recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the
fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the
deconsolidation date. SFAS 160 also includes expanded
disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent
and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and is to be applied prospectively as of
the beginning of the fiscal year in which the statement is
applied. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 160 will have on
its operations, financial position and cash flows.
|
|
2.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
ViPS
and Porex
In November 2007, the Company announced its intention to propose
a transaction that would allow HLTHs stockholders to
participate more directly in the ownership of WHC stock. Also at
that time, the Company announced its intention to explore
potential sales transactions for its ViPS and Porex businesses,
as the cash proceeds from the potential sales of ViPS and Porex
would partially fund the cash necessary to consummate the
potential transaction with WHC.
In February 2008, the Company announced the WHC Merger (as
defined in Note 4) and its intention to divest the
ViPS and Porex segments. These divestitures are not dependent on
the WHC Merger and do not require shareholder approval. The ViPS
segment was sold on July 22, 2008 for $224,842 in cash (see
Note 14) and the Company expects the disposal of the
Porex entity will be completed within one year. As a result, the
financial information of these businesses has been reclassified
to discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
11
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
ViPS
Summarized operating results for ViPS for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
26,222
|
|
|
$
|
25,885
|
|
|
$
|
52,205
|
|
|
$
|
52,544
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
The major classes of assets and liabilities of ViPS as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
18,013
|
|
|
$
|
17,240
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
4,896
|
|
|
|
4,020
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
71,253
|
|
|
|
71,253
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
46,280
|
|
|
|
47,815
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
144,435
|
|
|
$
|
143,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,599
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
4,880
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,516
|
|
|
|
10,982
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
16,828
|
|
|
|
16,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
33,643
|
|
|
$
|
33,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porex
Summarized operating results for Porex for the three and months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
24,626
|
|
|
$
|
25,003
|
|
|
$
|
48,387
|
|
|
$
|
47,712
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
8,001
|
|
|
|
10,767
|
|
12
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The major classes of assets and liabilities of Porex as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
14,548
|
|
|
$
|
12,922
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
13,080
|
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
22,105
|
|
|
|
21,176
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
43,608
|
|
|
|
43,283
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
24,827
|
|
|
|
24,872
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,023
|
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
123,611
|
|
|
$
|
118,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
1,716
|
|
|
$
|
1,533
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
6,564
|
|
|
|
7,785
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
24,573
|
|
|
|
24,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
32,853
|
|
|
$
|
33,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACS/ACP
Business
As of December 31, 2007, the Company, through WHC, entered
into an Asset Sale Agreement and completed the sale of certain
assets and certain liabilities of its medical reference
publications business, including the publications ACP
Medicine and ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice.
The assets and liabilities sold are referred to below as
ACS/ACP Business. ACP Medicine and ACS
Surgery are official publications of the American College of
Physicians and the American College of Surgeons, respectively.
As a result of the sale, the historical financial information of
the ACS/ACP Business has been reclassified as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
for the prior year period. The Company will receive net cash
proceeds of $2,809, consisting of $1,734 received during the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 and the remaining $1,075 to be
received during the quarter ending September 30, 2008. The
Company incurred approximately $800 of professional fees and
other expenses associated with the sale of the ACS/ACP Business.
In connection with the sale, the Company recognized a gain of
$3,571 in the three months ended December 31, 2007.
Summarized operating results for the discontinued operations of
the ACS/ACP Business for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,209
|
|
|
$
|
2,227
|
|
Earnings before taxes
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
EPS
On September 14, 2006, the Company completed the sale (the
EPS Sale) of Emdeon Practice Services, Inc.
(together with its subsidiaries, EPS) to Sage
Software, Inc. (Sage Software). The Company has
certain indemnity obligations to advance amounts for reasonable
defense costs for initially ten, and now nine, former officers
and directors of EPS, who were indicted in connection with the
previously disclosed investigation by
13
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
(the Investigation), which is more fully described
in Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies. In
connection with the sale of EPS, the Company agreed to indemnify
Sage Software relating to these indemnity obligations. During
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, based on information it
had recently received at that time, the Company determined a
reasonable estimate of the range of probable costs with respect
to its indemnification obligation and accordingly, recorded a
pre-tax charge of $57,774, which represented the Companys
estimate of the low end of the probable range of costs related
to this matter. The Company had reserved the low end of the
probable range of costs because no estimate within the range was
a better estimate than any other amount. That estimate included
assumptions as to the duration of the trial and pre-trial
periods, and the defense costs to be incurred during these
periods. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the
Company updated the estimate of the range of its indemnification
obligation, and as a result, recorded an additional pre-tax
charge of $15,573, which reflects the increase in the low end of
the probable range of costs related to this matter. The Company
has recently been informed that a trial date has been set for
February 2, 2009. Based on this date and other information
recently received, the Company has updated its estimates of the
probable range of future costs with respect to this matter which
are estimated to be approximately $58,300 to $81,000, as of
June 30, 2008 which includes costs that have been incurred
prior to, but were not yet paid as of June 30, 2008. During
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded
a pre-tax charge of $16,980 which reflects an increase of the
accrual to the low end of this probable range of future costs
related to this matter because no estimate within the range was
a better estimate than any other amount. The ultimate outcome of
this matter is still uncertain, and the estimate of future costs
includes assumptions as to the duration of the trial and the
defense costs to be incurred during the remainder of the
pre-trial period and during the trial period. Accordingly, the
amount of cost the Company may ultimately incur could be
substantially more than the reserve the Company has currently
provided. If the recorded reserves are insufficient to cover the
ultimate cost of this matter, the Company will need to record
additional charges to its consolidated statement of operations
in future periods. The accrual related to this obligation was
$58,292 and $55,563 as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, and is reflected as
liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
3.
|
Emdeon
Business Services
|
On November 16, 2006, the Company completed the sale of a
52% interest in EBS (2006 EBS Sale) to an affiliate
of General Atlantic LLC (GA). The 2006 EBS Sale was
structured so that the Company and GA each own interests in a
limited liability company, EBS Master LLC (EBSCo),
which owns the entities comprising EBS through a wholly owned
limited liability company, Emdeon Business Services LLC. During
the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
recognized a gain of $399 which related to the finalization of
the working capital adjustment in connection with the 2006 EBS
Sale.
Beginning on November 17, 2006, the Companys
remaining 48% ownership interest in EBSCo was reflected as an
investment in the Companys consolidated financial
statements, accounted for under the equity method and the
Companys share of EBSCos net earnings was reported
as equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations through February 8,
2008.
On February 8, 2008, the Company entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) and
simultaneously completed the sale of its 48% minority ownership
interest in EBSCo (the 2008 EBSCo Sale) for $575,000
in cash to an affiliate of GA and affiliates of
Hellman & Friedman, LLC. In connection with the 2008
EBSCo Sale, the Company recognized a gain of $538,024. The
Company expects to utilize a portion of its federal net
operating loss carryforwards to offset a portion of the tax
liability that would otherwise result from the 2008 EBSCo Sale.
The Companys share of EBSCos net earnings is
reported as equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007 and
14
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the period January 1, 2008 through February 8,
2008, the closing date of the 2008 EBSCo Sale. The difference
between the equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations and 48% of
the net income of EBSCo is principally due to the amortization
of the excess of the fair value of EBSCos net assets as
adjusted for in purchase accounting, over the carryover basis of
the Companys investment in EBSCo. The following is
summarized financial information of EBSCo for the period
January 1, 2008 through February 8, 2008 and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2008 to
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
February 8, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
94,481
|
|
|
$
|
201,226
|
|
|
$
|
399,635
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
44,633
|
|
|
|
94,889
|
|
|
|
186,074
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,551
|
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
16,799
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Pending
Merger with WHC
|
On February 20, 2008, the Company and WHC entered into a
Merger Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will merge into
WHC (the WHC Merger), with WHC continuing as the
surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement was amended on
May 6, 2008 as described below. In the WHC Merger, each
outstanding share of the Companys Common Stock will be
converted into the following (Merger Consideration):
0.1979 shares of WHC Common Stock and between $6.63 and
$6.89 in cash (a portion of which may, instead, be paid in 11%
redeemable notes as described below), with the actual amount
depending on whether the Company sells certain auction rate
securities (ARS) that it owns and, if so, the amount
of the proceeds that it receives. The shares of WHC Class A
Common Stock currently outstanding will remain outstanding and
will be unchanged in the WHC Merger. The WHC Merger will
eliminate both the controlling class of WHC stock held by the
Company and WHCs existing dual-class stock structure. The
terms of the Merger Agreement were negotiated between the
Company and a Special Committee of the Board of Directors of
WHC. The Merger Agreement was approved by the Board of WHC,
based on the recommendations of the Special Committee, and by
the Board of the Company.
The cash portion of the Merger Consideration will be funded from
cash and investments at WHC and the Company, and proceeds from
the Companys anticipated sale of its Porex business. If
Porex has not been sold at the time the WHC Merger is ready to
be consummated, WHC may issue up to $250,000 in redeemable notes
to the stockholders of the Company in lieu of a portion of the
cash consideration otherwise payable in the WHC Merger. The
notes would bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum, payable in
kind annually in arrears. The notes would be subject to
mandatory redemption by WHC from the proceeds of the divestiture
of Porex. The redemption price would be equal to the principal
amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued but unpaid
interest through the date of the redemption.
Completion of the WHC Merger is subject to: the Company and WHC
receiving required stockholder approvals; a requirement that the
surviving company have an amount of cash, as of the closing, at
least equal to an agreed upon threshold, calculated in
accordance with a formula contained in the Merger Agreement;
completion of the sale of the Companys ARS holdings (or
the availability of certain alternatives described below); and
other customary closing conditions. The Company, which owns
shares of WHC constituting approximately 96% of the total number
of votes represented by outstanding shares, has agreed to vote
its shares of WHC in favor of the WHC Merger. On July 22,
2008, the Company completed the sale of its ViPS business, which
satisfied one of the original closing conditions of the WHC
Merger.
15
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Following the WHC Merger, WHC as the surviving corporation, will
assume the obligations of the Company under the Companys
31/8% Convertible
Notes due September 1, 2025 and the Companys
1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 15, 2023
(Convertible Notes). In the event a holder of these
Convertible Notes converts these Convertible Notes into shares
of the Companys Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the
applicable indenture prior to the effective time of the WHC
Merger, those shares would be treated in the WHC Merger like all
other shares of the Companys Common Stock. In the event a
holder of the Convertible Notes converts those Convertible Notes
pursuant to the applicable indenture following the effective
time of the WHC Merger, those Convertible Notes would be
converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration
payable in respect of the shares of the Companys Common
Stock into which such Convertible Notes would have been
convertible.
On May 6, 2008, the Company and WHC entered into an
amendment (the Amendment) to the Merger Agreement,
which modifies certain provisions of the Merger Agreement to
reflect the flexibility and additional liquidity afforded by the
credit facility that the Company has entered into, which is
described in Note 9. Under the Merger Agreement, as amended, the
Company is not required to sell its ARS holdings as a condition
to closing if the outstanding loan amount, under the credit
facility, is equal to 75% of the face amount of the ARS
investments held by the Company at the effective time of the
Merger or if the Company would be capable of satisfying, as of
that time, all of the conditions to making a drawdown of that
amount. In either such case, the maximum reduction in the
aggregate cash consideration payable in the WHC Merger, as
contemplated by the Amendment, would be $48,075 (which is 25% of
the face amount of the Companys ARS holdings as of the
date of this Quarterly Report, excluding WHCs ARS
holdings), or approximately $0.26 per share (based on the number
of shares of the Companys Common Stock outstanding as of
the date of this Quarterly Report). To the extent that the
Company, instead, sells some or all of its ARS holdings for
greater than 75% of the face amount, the reduction in the
aggregate cash portion of the Merger Consideration with respect
to the ARS holdings that are sold would be based on the actual
sale price for those holdings. The Amendment was approved by the
Boards of Directors of the Company and WHC and by a Special
Committee of the Board of Directors of WHC.
On June 18, 2008, the Company received a letter from a law
firm purporting to represent certain purported holders of the
Companys
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025 (the
31/8% Notes)
enclosing a purported notice of default (the
Notice Letter). The Notice Letter, which was also
sent to the Indenture Trustee, expresses the view that a default
under the Indenture for the
31/8% Notes
has occurred because of (i) the Companys stated
intention not to issue a change-of-control notice to the
Notes holders in connection with the proposed WHC Merger,
and (ii) the Companys stated intention not to adjust
the
31/8% Notes
conversion rate under Section 10.06(c) of the Indenture
following the proposed WHC Merger.
The Company believes that the Notice Letter is without merit and
defective for several reasons including, without limitation, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the WHC Merger will not constitute a change of control under the
Indenture because WHC is a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH
Corporation, and the Indenture expressly excludes mergers
between HLTH Corporation and any of its subsidiaries from the
change-in-control
definition;
|
|
|
|
the WHC Merger will not trigger a conversion-rate adjustment
under Section 10.06(c) of the Indenture because:
Section 10.06(c) applies specifically to
distributions, not to merger consideration, even if
it is paid in cash; and holders of the
31/8% Notes
will be entitled to a conversion-rate adjustment under
Section 10.13 of the Indenture which, unlike
Section 10.06(c), explicitly provides the mechanism for
adjusting the conversion rate in the event of a merger,
including for merger consideration paid in cash; and
|
|
|
|
any notice of default related to the Proposed
Mergers effect on the
31/8% Notes
is premature under the Indentures terms because the
Company continues to be in compliance with its obligations under
the terms of the Indenture.
|
16
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company believes that it is not in default under the
Indenture and will vigorously contest any attempt to declare an
event of default under the Indenture based on the allegations
set forth in the Notice Letter. The Company does not expect the
Notice Letter to affect its ability to complete the proposed WHC
Merger or the timing thereof.
5. WebMD
Health Corp.
Gain
Upon Sale of WHC Class A Common Stock
The Companys WHC subsidiary issues its Class A Common
Stock in various transactions from time to time, which result in
the dilution of the Companys percentage ownership in WHC.
The Company accounts for the issuance of WHC Class A Common
Stock in accordance with the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 51, Accounting for Sales of Stock
by a Subsidiary. The issuances of WHC Class A Common
Stock resulted in an aggregate gain to equity of $1,190 and
$1,947 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, related to the exercise of stock options and the
release of restricted stock awards. As a result, the
Companys ownership in WHC decreased to 83.3% as of
June 30, 2008, from 83.5% as of December 31, 2007
(after accounting for the impact of certain WHC shares to be
issued pursuant to the purchase agreement for the acquisition of
Subimo, LLC).
Segment information has been prepared in accordance with
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information
(SFAS 131). The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as the accounting policies for the
consolidated Company. Inter-segment revenue represents certain
services provided by the WebMD Online Services segment and WebMD
Publishing and Other Services segment (WebMD
Segments) to the Corporate segment. The performance of the
Companys business is monitored based on earnings before
interest, taxes, non-cash and other items. Other items include:
legal expenses incurred by the Company, which reflect costs and
expenses related to the investigation by the United States
Attorney for the District of South Carolina and the SEC; income
related to the reduction of certain sales and use tax
contingencies; professional fees in 2008, primarily consisting
of legal, accounting and financial advisory services, related to
the WHC Merger; the gain on the 2008 EBSCo Sale; the gain
recognized in connection with the working capital adjustment
associated with the 2006 EBS Sale; and the impairment charge
related to the Companys auction rate securities.
Reclassification of Segment Information. As a
result of the Companys intention to divest the ViPS and
Porex segments and due to the December 31, 2007 sale of
WHCs ACS/ACP business, the financial information for these
businesses has been reclassified to discontinued operations for
the current and prior year periods. As a result of the
discontinued operations presentation for ViPS and Porex, the
Companys only remaining operating segment would have been
WebMD. Accordingly, the Company expanded its segment disclosure
for WebMD to provide additional information related to the WebMD
Online Services segment and the WebMD Publishing and Other
Services segment. This additional information for WebMD has been
provided for all periods presented.
The WebMD Segments and Corporate segment are described as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services provides health information
services to consumers, physicians, healthcare professionals,
employees and health plans through its public and private online
portals. WebMDs public portals for consumers enable them
to obtain health and wellness information (including information
on specific diseases and conditions), check symptoms, locate
physicians, store individual healthcare information, receive
periodic
e-newsletters
on topics of individual interest, enroll in interactive courses
and participate in online communities with peers and experts.
WebMDs public portals for physicians and healthcare
professionals make it easier for them to access clinical
reference
|
17
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
sources, stay abreast of the latest clinical information, learn
about new treatment options, earn continuing medical education
credit and communicate with peers. WebMDs private portals
enable employers and health plans to provide their employees and
plan members with access to personalized health and benefit
information and decision-support technology that helps them make
more informed benefit, provider and treatment choices. WebMD
provides related services for use by such employees and members,
including lifestyle education and personalized telephonic health
coaching. WebMD also provides
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services publishes The
Little Blue Book, a physician directory, and WebMD the
Magazine, a consumer magazine distributed to physician
office waiting rooms. WebMD also published medical reference
textbooks until it divested this business on December 31,
2007. See Note 2 for further details.
|
|
|
|
Corporate includes personnel costs and other expenses
related to functions that are not directly managed by one of the
Companys segments or by the Porex and ViPS businesses
included in discontinued operations. The personnel costs include
executive personnel, legal, accounting, tax, internal audit,
risk management, human resources and certain information
technology functions. Other corporate costs and expenses include
professional fees including legal and audit services, insurance,
costs of leased property and facilities, telecommunication costs
and software maintenance expenses. Corporate expenses are net of
$861 and $1,734 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, and $821 and $1,625 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, which are costs
allocated to WebMD for services provided by the Corporate
segment. In connection with the 2006 EBS Sale and EPS Sale, the
Company entered into transition services agreements whereby the
Company provided EBSCo and Sage Software certain administrative
services, including payroll, accounting, purchasing and
procurement, tax, and human resource services, as well as
information technology support. Additionally, EBSCo provided
certain administrative services to the Company. These services
were provided through the Corporate segment, and the related
transition services fees that the Company charged to EBSCo and
Sage Software, net of the fee the Company paid to EBSCo, were
also included in the Corporate segment, which were intended to
approximate the cost of providing these services. The transition
services agreement with Sage Software was terminated on
December 31, 2007 and, therefore, net transition services
fees are solely for services related to EBSCo for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
18
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized financial information for the WebMD Segments and
Corporate segment and a reconciliation to income from continuing
operations are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and sponsorship
|
|
$
|
62,383
|
|
|
$
|
52,436
|
|
|
$
|
118,448
|
|
|
$
|
99,857
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
19,799
|
|
|
|
43,789
|
|
|
|
39,914
|
|
Content syndication and other
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total WebMD Online Services
|
|
|
84,594
|
|
|
|
72,888
|
|
|
|
162,999
|
|
|
|
141,308
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
7,859
|
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,136
|
|
|
$
|
77,197
|
|
|
$
|
170,818
|
|
|
$
|
149,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services
|
|
$
|
18,800
|
|
|
$
|
14,042
|
|
|
$
|
35,331
|
|
|
$
|
27,034
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(5,573
|
)
|
|
|
(6,337
|
)
|
|
|
(10,632
|
)
|
|
|
(13,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
8,568
|
|
|
|
24,972
|
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
Interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,628
|
)
|
|
|
(4,616
|
)
|
|
|
(9,235
|
)
|
|
|
(9,325
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
(26,944
|
)
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,315
|
)
|
|
|
(7,239
|
)
|
|
|
(14,203
|
)
|
|
|
(13,564
|
)
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(6,471
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
(12,443
|
)
|
|
|
(16,961
|
)
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
Minority interest in WHC
|
|
|
(1,071
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
460,373
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(44,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
460,291
|
|
|
$
|
(39,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company has various stock-based compensation plans
(collectively, the Plans) under which directors,
officers and other eligible employees receive awards of options
to purchase HLTH Common Stock and restricted shares of HLTH
Common Stock. Additionally, WHC has two similar stock-based
compensation plans that provide for stock options and restricted
stock awards based on WHC Class A Common Stock. The Company
also maintained an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, through April
30, 2008, which provided employees with the ability to buy
shares of HLTH Common Stock at a discount. The following
sections of this note summarize the activity for each of these
plans.
HLTH
Plans
The Company had an aggregate of 5,784,648 shares of HLTH
Common Stock available for future grants under the Plans as of
June 30, 2008. In addition to the Plans, the Company has
granted options to certain directors, officers and key employees
pursuant to individual stock option agreements. At June 30,
2008, there were options to purchase 4,139,881 shares of
HLTH Common Stock outstanding to these individuals. The terms of
these grants are similar to the terms of the options granted
under the Plans and accordingly, the stock option activity of
these individuals is included in all references to the Plans.
Beginning in April 2007, shares are issued from treasury stock
when options are exercised or restricted stock is granted. Prior
to this time, new shares were issued in connection with these
transactions.
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the Plans vest and become exercisable
ratably over a three to five year period based on their
individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the
applicable vesting dates. The majority of options granted under
the Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant.
Options are granted at prices not less than the fair market
value of HLTH Common Stock on the date of grant. The following
table summarizes activity for the Plans for the six months ended
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
47,293,577
|
|
|
$
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(934,861
|
)
|
|
|
7.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(685,891
|
)
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
45,792,825
|
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
37,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
40,736,973
|
|
|
$
|
14.97
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
30,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of HLTHs Common Stock on
June 30, 2008, which was $11.32, less the applicable
exercise price of the underlying option. This aggregate
intrinsic value represents the amount that would have been
realized if all of the option holders had exercised their
options on June 30, 2008.
|
20
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
considering the assumptions noted in the following table.
Expected volatility is based on implied volatility from traded
options of HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility
of HLTH Common Stock. Prior to January 1, 2006, only
historical volatility was considered. The expected term
represents the period of time that options are expected to be
outstanding following their grant date, and was determined using
historical exercise data. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected
term of the options on the grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
3.92
|
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
HLTH Restricted Stock consists of shares of HLTH Common Stock
which have been awarded to employees with restrictions that
cause them to be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture and
restrict their sale or other transfer by the employee until they
vest. Generally, HLTH Restricted Stock awards vest ratably over
a three to five year period from their individual award dates
subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates.
The following table summarizes the activity of non-vested HLTH
Restricted Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
1,240,297
|
|
|
$
|
10.74
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(141,767
|
)
|
|
|
9.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(35,617
|
)
|
|
|
11.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,062,913
|
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock were $5,689 and $7,277 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $38,146 and $98,814
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively. The intrinsic value related to the exercise of
these stock options, as well as the fair value of shares of HLTH
Restricted Stock that vested was $2,952 and $5,327 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and
$13,811 and $50,932 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively.
WebMD
Plans
During September 2005, WHC adopted the 2005 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the WHC Plan). In connection with the
acquisition of Subimo, LLC, in December 2006, WHC adopted the
WebMD Health Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan for Employees of
Subimo, LLC (the Subimo Plan). The terms of the
Subimo Plan are similar to the terms of the WHC Plan but it has
not been approved by WHC stockholders. Awards under the Subimo
Plan were made on the date of the Companys acquisition of
Subimo, LLC in reliance on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
exception to shareholder approval for equity grants to new
hires. No additional grants will be made under the Subimo Plan.
The WHC Plan and the Subimo Plan are included in all references
as the WebMD Plans. The maximum number of shares of
WHC Class A Common Stock that may be subject to options or
restricted stock awards under the WebMD Plans is 9,480,574,
subject to
21
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
adjustment in accordance with the terms of the WebMD Plans. WHC
had an aggregate of 2,578,530 shares of Class A Common
Stock available for future grants under the WebMD Plans at
June 30, 2008.
Stock
Options
Generally, options under the WebMD Plans vest and become
exercisable ratably over a four year period based on their
individual grant dates subject to continued employment on the
applicable vesting dates. The options granted under the WebMD
Plans expire within ten years from the date of grant. Options
are granted at prices not less than the fair market value of
WHCs Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The
following table summarizes activity for the WebMD Plans for the
six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Value (1)
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
5,020,551
|
|
|
$
|
27.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
416,250
|
|
|
|
33.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(136,558
|
)
|
|
|
17.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(292,027
|
)
|
|
|
29.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
5,008,216
|
|
|
$
|
28.20
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
27,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
1,434,369
|
|
|
$
|
23.66
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is
based on the market price of WHCs Class A Common
Stock on June 30, 2008, which was $27.90, less the
applicable exercise price of the underlying option. This
aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount that would have
been realized if all of the option holders had exercised their
options on June 30, 2008.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
considering the assumptions noted in the following table. Prior
to August 1, 2007, expected volatility was based on implied
volatility from traded options of stock of comparable companies
combined with historical stock price volatility of comparable
companies. Beginning on August 1, 2007, expected volatility
is based on implied volatility from traded options of WHC
Class A Common Stock combined with historical volatility of
WHC Class A Common Stock. The expected term represents the
period of time that options are expected to be outstanding
following their grant date, and was determined using historical
exercise data of WHC employees who were previously granted HLTH
stock options. The risk-free rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected
term of the options on the grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$
|
11.02
|
|
|
$
|
18.64
|
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
WHC Restricted Stock consists of shares of WHC Class A
Common Stock which have been awarded to employees with
restrictions that cause them to be subject to substantial risk
of forfeiture and restrict their sale or other transfer by the
employee until they vest. Generally, WHC Restricted Stock awards
vest ratably over a
22
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
four year period from their individual award dates subject to
continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. The
following table summarizes the activity of non-vested WHC
Restricted Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
307,722
|
|
|
$
|
29.46
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
35.22
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(13,212
|
)
|
|
|
44.91
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(12,500
|
)
|
|
|
21.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
286,010
|
|
|
$
|
29.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of options to purchase WHC
Class A Common Stock were $1,803 and $2,392 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and
$1,265 and $5,723 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively. The intrinsic value related to
the exercise of these stock options, as well as the fair value
of shares of WHC Restricted Stock that vested was $1,499 and
$2,470 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, and $2,045 and $7,088 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
from time to time (the ESPP), allowed eligible
employees the opportunity to purchase shares of HLTH Common
Stock through payroll deductions, up to 15% of a
participants annual compensation with a maximum of
5,000 shares available per participant during each purchase
period. The purchase price of the stock was 85% of the fair
market value on the last day of each purchase period. The ESPP
provided for annual increases equal to the lesser of
1,500,000 shares, 0.5% of the outstanding common shares, or
a lesser amount determined by the Board of Directors. There were
49,125 and 34,610 shares issued under the ESPP during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. In accordance with the WHC Merger, the ESPP was
terminated after the purchase period that ended on
April 30, 2008.
Other
At the time of the WHC initial public offering and each year on
the anniversary of the initial public offering, WHC issued
shares of WHC Class A Common Stock to each non-employee
director with a value equal to their annual board and committee
retainers. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense
of $85 during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
and $170 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
in connection with these issuances.
Additionally, the Company recorded stock-based compensation
expense of $279 for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, and $558 and $536 for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, in connection with a
stock transferability right for shares required to be issued in
connection with the acquisition of Subimo, LLC by WHC.
23
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summary
of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the components and classification
of stock-based compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
HLTH Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
1,672
|
|
|
$
|
2,993
|
|
|
$
|
3,616
|
|
|
$
|
6,249
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
WHC Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
7,292
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
6,817
|
|
|
$
|
8,554
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
|
$
|
19,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
984
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
2,562
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
8,096
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
7,990
|
|
|
|
12,443
|
|
|
|
17,760
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
6,817
|
|
|
$
|
8,554
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
|
$
|
19,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, approximately $17,319 and $34,122 of
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
0.9 years and 1.3 years, related to the HLTH Plans and
the WebMD Plans, respectively.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In December 2006, the Company announced the authorization of a
stock repurchase program (the Program), at which
time the Company was authorized to use up to $100,000 to
purchase shares of HLTH Common Stock from time to time beginning
on December 19, 2006, subject to market conditions. As of
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the Company had
repurchased 4,280,931 and 3,949,970 shares at an aggregate
cost of approximately $58,447 and $54,230 under the Program. No
shares were repurchased during the six months ended
June 30, 2008. Repurchased shares are recorded under the
cost method and are reflected as treasury stock in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
9.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Facilities
|
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), for assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 establishes a
common definition for fair value to be applied to existing GAAP
that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about
such fair value
24
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have an
impact on the Companys financial position or operating
results, but did expand certain disclosures.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Additionally, SFAS 157 requires the use
of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs
are prioritized below:
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities, such as the Companys
equity securities reflected in the table below.
|
|
Level 2:
|
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are
corroborated by market data.
|
|
Level 3:
|
Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data,
which require the use of the reporting entitys own
assumptions.
|
The Company did not have any Level 2 assets as of
June 30, 2008. The following table sets forth the
Companys Level 1 and Level 3 financial assets
that were measured at fair value as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
297,970
|
|
|
$
|
297,970
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances
of the Companys Level 3 assets which consist of the
Companys ARS:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
363,700
|
|
Redemptions
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)
|
Impairment charge included in earnings
|
|
|
(60,108
|
)
|
Unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(3,019
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value as of June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
297,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company holds investments in ARS which have been classified
as Level 3 assets as described above. The types of ARS
holdings the Company owns are backed by student loans, 97% of
which are guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan
Program (FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. Historically, the fair value of the Companys
ARS holdings approximated face value due to the frequent auction
periods, generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided
liquidity to these investments. However, since February 2008,
virtually all auctions involving these securities have failed.
The result of a failed auction is that these ARS holdings will
continue to pay interest in accordance with their terms at each
respective auction date; however, liquidity of the securities
will be limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer
redeems the securities, the securities mature or until such time
as other markets for these ARS holdings develop. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company concluded
that the estimated fair value of the ARS holdings no longer
approximated the face value due to the lack of liquidity. The
securities have been classified within Level 3 as their
valuation requires substantial judgment and estimation of
factors that are not currently observable in the market due to
the lack of trading in the securities.
The Company estimated the fair value of its ARS holdings using
an income approach valuation technique. Using this approach,
expected future cash flows were calculated over the expected
life of each security and were discounted to a single present
value using a market required rate of return. Some of the more
significant assumptions made in the present value calculations
were (i) the estimated weighted average lives for the loan
portfolios underlying each individual ARS, which range from 4 to
14 years and (ii) the required rates of return used to
discount the estimated future cash flows over the estimated life
of each security, which considered both the credit quality for
each individual ARS and the market liquidity for these
investments. As of March 31,
25
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008, the Company concluded the fair value of its ARS holdings
was $302,842 (of which $141,044 relates to WHC), compared to a
face value of $362,950 (of which $168,450 relates to WHC). The
impairment in value, or $60,108 (of which $27,406 relates to
WHC), was considered to be other-than-temporary, and
accordingly, was recorded as an impairment charge within the
statement of operations during the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
In making the determination that the impairment was
other-than-temporary the Company considered (i) the current
market liquidity for ARS, particularly student loan backed ARS,
(ii) the long-term maturities of the loan portfolios
underlying each ARS owned by the Company which, on a weighted
average basis, extend to as many as 14 years and
(iii) the ability and intent of the Company to hold its ARS
investments until sufficient liquidity returns to the auction
rate market to enable the sale of these securities or until the
investments mature.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the
Company received $2,050 (of which $950 relates to WHC) and
$2,800 (of which $1,700 relates to WHC), respectively,
associated with the partial redemption of certain of its ARS
holdings, which represented 100% of their face value. As a
result, as of June 30, 2008, the total face value of the
Companys ARS holdings was $360,900, of which $167,500
relates to WHC. During the three months ended June 30,
2008, the Company reduced the carrying value of its ARS holdings
by $3,019. The Company assessed this decline in fair market
value to be temporary and, therefore, recorded this decline as
unrealized loss in other comprehensive income in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company continues to monitor the market for ARS as well as
the individual ARS holdings it owns. The Company may be required
to record additional losses in future periods if the fair value
of its ARS holdings deteriorates further.
Credit
Facilities
On May 6, 2008, the Company and WHC each entered into a
non-recourse credit facility (each a Credit
Facility) with Citigroup that is secured by their
respective ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances,
interest payable on the ARS holdings), that will allow the
Company and WHC to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of the
ARS holdings pledged as collateral under the respective Credit
Facilities. The Credit Facilities are each governed by a loan
agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, containing customary
representations and warranties of the borrower and certain
affirmative covenants and negative covenants relating to the
pledged collateral. Under each of the loan agreements, the
borrower and the lender may, in certain circumstances, cause the
pledged collateral to be sold, with the proceeds of any such
sale required to be applied in full immediately to repayment of
amounts borrowed. No borrowings have been made under either
Credit Facility to date. The Company and WHC can each make
borrowings under the Credit Facility until May 2009. The
interest rate applicable to such borrowings will be one-month
LIBOR plus 250 basis points. Any borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Facility after March 2009 become demand loans,
subject to 60 days notice, with recourse only to the
pledged collateral.
|
|
10.
|
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
|
Comprehensive (loss) income is comprised of net (loss) income
and other comprehensive (loss) income. Other comprehensive
(loss) income includes foreign currency translation adjustments
and certain changes in equity that are excluded from net (loss)
income, such as changes in unrealized holding gains and losses
on
26
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
available-for-sale marketable securities and 48% of the
comprehensive income (loss) of EBSCo. The following table
presents the components of other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation (losses) gains
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
(2,629
|
)
|
|
|
534
|
|
EBSCo interest rate swap agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
3,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,348
|
)
|
|
|
4,520
|
|
|
|
7,985
|
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
|
460,291
|
|
|
|
(39,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(5,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,943
|
)
|
|
$
|
468,276
|
|
|
$
|
(34,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in comprehensive (loss) income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 is the Companys share of
unrealized gains on the fair value of EBSCos interest rate
swap agreements, and for the six months ended June 30, 2008
is the reversal, in connection with the 2008 EBSCo Sale, of the
net cumulative loss related to these agreements.
Deferred taxes are not included within accumulated other
comprehensive income because a valuation allowance was
maintained for substantially all net deferred tax assets.
Accumulated other comprehensive income includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities
|
|
$
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
|
15,557
|
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
Comprehensive loss of EBSCo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
13,838
|
|
|
$
|
5,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and the six months ended
June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD
|
|
|
Publishing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Online
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
212,439
|
|
|
$
|
11,045
|
|
|
$
|
223,484
|
|
Reversal of income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,793
|
)
|
Adjustments to finalize purchase price allocations
|
|
|
(3,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
206,278
|
|
|
|
11,045
|
|
|
|
217,323
|
|
Reversal of income tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
Adjustments to finalize purchase price allocations
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
203,430
|
|
|
$
|
11,045
|
|
|
$
|
214,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life (a)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Useful Life (a)
|
|
|
Content
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(13,561
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(12,581
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,373
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
33,191
|
|
|
|
(11,963
|
)
|
|
|
21,228
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
33,191
|
|
|
|
(10,183
|
)
|
|
|
23,008
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
|
|
(11,961
|
)
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
|
|
(10,126
|
)
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
|
|
(3,121
|
)
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
|
|
(2,725
|
)
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71,929
|
|
|
$
|
(40,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,323
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
71,929
|
|
|
$
|
(35,615
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,314
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The calculation of the weighted
average remaining useful life is based on the net book value and
the remaining amortization period (reflected in years) of each
respective intangible asset.
|
Amortization expense was $2,443 and $4,991 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and $3,319 and
$6,533 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively. Aggregate amortization expense for intangible
assets is estimated to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 (July 1st to December 31st)
|
|
$
|
4,724
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6,401
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,337
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Investigations
by United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and
the SEC
As previously disclosed, the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina is conducting an investigation of the
Company, which the Company first learned about on
September 3, 2003. Based on the information available to
the Company, it believes that the investigation relates
principally to issues of financial accounting improprieties
relating to Medical Manager Corporation, a predecessor of the
Company (by its merger into the Company in September 2000), and,
more specifically, its Medical Manager Health Systems, Inc.
subsidiary. Medical Manager Health Systems was a predecessor to
Emdeon Practice Services, Inc., a subsidiary that the Company
sold to Sage Software in September 2006. The Company has been
cooperating and intends to continue to cooperate fully with the
U.S. Attorneys Office. As previously reported, the
Board of Directors of the Company has formed a special committee
consisting solely of independent directors to oversee this
matter with the sole authority to direct the Companys
response to the allegations that have been raised. As previously
disclosed, the Company understands that the SEC is also
conducting a formal investigation into this matter. In
connection with the EPS Sale, the Company agreed to indemnify
Sage Software with respect to this matter.
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
announced on January 10, 2005, that three former employees
of Medical Manager Health Systems each had agreed to plead
guilty to one count of mail fraud and that one such employee had
agreed to plead guilty to one count of tax evasion for acts
committed while they were employed by Medical Manager Health
Systems. The three former employees include a Vice President of
Medical Manager Health Systems responsible for acquisitions who
was terminated for cause in January 2003; an executive who
served in various accounting roles at Medical Manager Health
Systems until
28
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
his resignation in March 2002; and a former independent Medical
Manager dealer who was a paid consultant to Medical Manager
Health Systems until the termination of his services in 2002.
According to the Informations, Plea Agreements and Factual
Summaries filed by the United States Attorney in, and available
from, the District Court of the United States for the District
of South Carolina Beaufort Division, on
January 7, 2005, the three former employees and other then
unnamed co-schemers were engaged in schemes between 1997 and
2002 that included causing companies acquired by Medical Manager
Health Systems to pay the former vice president in charge of
acquisitions and co-schemers kickbacks which were funded through
increases in the purchase price paid by Medical Manager Health
Systems to the acquired companies and that included fraudulent
accounting practices to inflate artificially the quarterly
revenues and earnings of Medical Manager Health Systems when it
was an independent public company called Medical Manager
Corporation from 1997 through 1999, when and after it was
acquired by Synetic, Inc. in July 1999 and when and after it
became a subsidiary of the Company in September 2000. A fourth
former officer of Medical Manager Health Systems pled guilty to
similar activities later in 2005.
The fraudulent accounting practices cited by the government in
the January 7, 2005 District Court filings included:
causing companies acquired by Medical Manager Health Systems to
reclassify previously recognized sales revenue as deferred
income so that such deferred income could subsequently be
reported as revenue by Medical Manager Health Systems and its
parents in later periods; fabricating deferred revenue entries
which could be used to inflate earnings when Medical Manager
Health Systems acquired companies; causing companies acquired by
Medical Manager Health Systems to inflate reserve accounts so
that these reserves could be reversed in later reporting periods
in order to artificially inflate earnings for Medical Manager
Health Systems and its parents; accounting for numerous
acquisitions through the pooling of interests method in order to
fraudulently inflate Medical Manager Health Systems
quarterly earnings, when the individuals involved knew the
transactions failed to qualify for such treatment; causing
companies acquired by Medical Manager Health Systems to enter
into sham purchases of software from Medical Manager Health
Systems in connection with the acquisition which purchases were
funded by increasing the purchase price paid by Medical Manager
Health Systems to the acquired company and using these
round trip sales to create fraudulent revenue for
Medical Manager Health Systems and its parents; and causing
Medical Manager Health Systems to book and record sales and
training revenue before the revenue process was complete in
accordance with GAAP and thereby fraudulently inflating Medical
Manager Health Systems reported revenues and earnings. According
to the Informations to which the former employees have pled
guilty, the fraudulent accounting practices resulted in the
reported revenues of Medical Manager Health Systems and its
parents being overstated materially between June 1997 and at
least December 31, 2001, and reported quarterly earnings
being overstated by at least one cent per share in every quarter
during that period.
The documents filed by the United States Attorney in January
2005 stated that the former employees engaged in their
fraudulent conduct in concert with senior
management, and at the direction of senior Medical
Manager officers. In its statement at that time, the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina stated
that the senior management and officers referred to in the
Court documents were members of senior management of the Medical
Manager subsidiary during the relevant time period.
On December 15, 2005, the United States Attorney announced
indictments of the following former officers and employees of
Medical Manager Health Systems: Ted W. Dorman, a former Regional
Vice President of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was
employed until March 2003; Charles L. Hutchinson, a former
Controller of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed
until June 2001; Maxie L. Juzang, a former Vice President of
Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed until August
2005; John H. Kang, a former President of Medical Manager Health
Systems, who was employed until May 2001; Frederick B.
Karl, Jr., a former General Counsel of Medical Manager
Health Systems, who was employed until April 2000;
Franklyn B. Krieger, a former Associate General
Counsel of Medical Manager Health Systems, who was employed
until February 2002; Lee A. Robbins, a former Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Medical Manager Health
Systems, who was employed until September 2000; John P.
Sessions, a former President and Chief Operating Officer of
Medical
29
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Manager Health Systems, who was employed until September 2003;
Michael A. Singer, a former Chief Executive Officer of Medical
Manager Health Systems and a former director of the Company, who
was most recently employed by the Company as its Executive Vice
President, Physician Software Strategies until February 2005;
and David Ward, a former Vice President of Medical Manager
Health Systems, who was employed until June 2005. The indictment
charges the persons listed above with conspiracy to commit mail,
wire and securities fraud, a violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 371 and conspiracy to commit money
laundering, a violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1956(h). The indictment charges
Messrs. Sessions and Ward with substantive counts of money
laundering, violations of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1957. The allegations set forth in the indictment
describe activities that are substantially similar to those
described above with respect to the January 2005 plea
agreements.
On February 27, 2007, the United States Attorney filed a
Second Superseding Indictment with respect to the former
officers and employees of Medical Manager Health Systems charged
under the prior Indictment, other than Mr. Juzang. The
allegations set forth in the Second Superseding Indictment are
substantially similar to those described above. The trial of the
indicted former officers and directors of Medical Manager Health
Systems has been scheduled for February 2, 2009.
Based on the information it has obtained to date, including that
contained in the court documents filed by the United States
Attorney in South Carolina, the Company does not believe that
any member of its senior management whose duties were not
primarily related to the operations of Medical Manager Health
Systems during the relevant time periods engaged in any of the
violations or improprieties described in those court documents.
The Company understands, however, that in light of the nature of
the allegations involved, the U.S. Attorneys office
has been investigating all levels of the Companys
management. The Company has not uncovered information that it
believes would require a restatement for any of the years
covered by its financial statements. In addition, the Company
believes that the amounts of the kickback payments referred to
in the court documents have already been reflected in the
financial statements of the Company to the extent required.
The Company has certain indemnity obligations to advance amounts
for reasonable defense costs for the initial ten, and now nine,
former officers and directors of EPS. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of
$73,347, related to its estimated liability with respect to
these indemnity obligations. During the three months ended
June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an additional pre-tax
charge of $16,980 which reflects an increase to the
Companys estimated liability related to this matter. See
Note 2 for a more detailed discussion regarding this charge.
Directors &
Officers Liability Insurance Coverage Litigation
On July 23, 2007, the Company commenced litigation (the
Coverage Litigation) in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware in and for New Castle County against ten
insurance companies in which the Company is seeking to compel
the defendant companies (collectively, the
Defendants) to honor their obligations under certain
directors and officers liability insurance policies (the
Policies). The Company is seeking an order requiring
the Defendants to advance
and/or
reimburse expenses that the Company has incurred and expects to
continue to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense
costs of initially ten and now nine former officers and
directors of the Companys former EPS subsidiary who were
indicted in connection with the Investigation described above in
this Note 12. The Company subsequently has settled with two
of the insurance companies during January 2008, through which
the Company received an aggregate amount of $14,625. This amount
was included within (loss) income from discontinued operations
in the statement of operations during the three months ended
December 31, 2007 and was included within prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.
Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, the Coverage
Litigation was transferred on September 13, 2007 to the
Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle
County. The Policies were issued to the Company and to EPS, a
former subsidiary of the Company, which is a co-plaintiff with
the Company in
30
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the Coverage Litigation (collectively, the
Plaintiffs). EPS was sold in September 2006 to Sage
Software and has changed its name to Sage Software Healthcare,
Inc. (SSHI). In connection with the Companys
sale of EPS to Sage Software, the Company retained certain
obligations relating to the Investigation and agreed to
indemnify Sage Software and SSHI with respect to certain
expenses in connection with the Investigation. The Company
retained the right to assert claims and recover proceeds under
the Policies on behalf of SSHI.
The Policies at issue in the Coverage Litigation consist of two
separate groups of insurance policies. Each group of policies
consists of several layers of coverage, with different insurers
having agreed to provide specified amounts of coverage at
various levels. The first group of policies was issued to EPS in
the amount of $20,000 (the EPS Policies) and the
second group of policies was issued to Synetic, Inc. (the former
parent of EPS, which merged into the Company) in the amount of
$100,000, of which approximately $3,600 was paid by the primary
carrier with respect to another unrelated matter (the
Synetic Policies). To date, $31,000 has been paid by
insurance companies representing the EPS Policies and the
Synetic Policies through a combination of payment under the
terms of the Policies, payment under reservation of rights and
settlement. As a result of these payments, the Company has
exhausted its coverage under the EPS Policies. Additionally, as
of December 31, 2007, $16,414 has been paid under the
Synetic Policies and the Company has remaining coverage under
such policies of approximately $80,000. The Companys
insurance policies provide that under certain circumstances,
amounts advanced by the insurance companies in connection with
the defense costs of the indicted individuals, may have to be
repaid by the Company, although the $14,625 that the Company has
received in settlement from certain carriers is not subject to
being repaid. The Company has obtained an undertaking from each
indicted individual pursuant to which, under certain
circumstances, such individual has agreed to repay defense costs
advanced on such individuals behalf.
The carrier with the third level of coverage in the Synetic
Policies has filed a motion for summary judgment in the Coverage
Litigation, which most of the carriers who have issued the
Synetic policies have joined, seeking summary judgment that any
liability to pay defense costs should be allocated among the
three sets of policies available to the Company (including the
policies with respect to which the Coverage Litigation relates
and a third set of policies the issuers of which have not been
named by the Company) such that the Synetic Policies would only
be liable to pay about $23,000 of the $96,400 total coverage
available under such policies. The Company believes that such
assertion is without merit. The Company filed its opposition to
the motion together with its motion for summary judgment against
such carrier and several other carriers who have issued the
Synetic Policies seeking to require such carriers to advance
payment of the defense costs that the Company is obligated to
pay while the Coverage Litigation is pending. On July 31,
2008, the Superior Court for the State of Delaware denied the
motion filed by the carriers seeking allocation and granted the
Companys motion for partial summary judgment to enforce
the duty of such carriers to advance and reimburse these costs.
While an appeal by the carriers is a possibility, the Company
expects to collect from these carriers the $14,631 that it has
advanced without reimbursement and the additional costs that it
is obligated to pay for the advancement of the reasonable
defense costs of the indicted individuals. However, there can be
no assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in the
Coverage Litigation or that the Defendants will be required to
provide funding on an interim basis pending the resolution of
the Coverage Litigation. The Company intends to continue to
satisfy its legal obligations to the indicted individuals with
respect to advancement of amounts for their defense costs.
Porex
Corporation v. Kleanthis Dean Haldopoulos, Benjamin T.
Hirokawa and Micropore Plastics, Inc.
On September 24, 2005, the Companys subsidiary, Porex
Corporation, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Fulton
County against two former employees of Porex, Dean Haldopoulos
and Benjamin Hirokawa, and their corporation, Micropore
Plastics, Inc. (Micropore), alleging
misappropriation of Porexs trade secrets and breaches of
Haldopoulos and Hirokawas employment agreements, and
seeking monetary and injunctive relief. The lawsuit was
subsequently transferred to the Superior Court of DeKalb County,
Georgia. On October 24, 2005, the defendants filed an
Answer and Counterclaims against Porex. In the Answer and
Counterclaims, the defendants allege that Porex breached
non-disclosure and standstill agreements in connection with a
proposed
31
HLTH
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transaction between Porex and Micropore and engaged in fraud.
The defendants also seek punitive damages and expenses of
litigation. On February 13, 2006, the Superior Court
granted a motion by the defendants for summary judgment with
respect to Porexs trade secret claims, ruling that those
claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Porex appealed
that ruling to the Georgia Court of Appeals and, on
March 27, 2007, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the
ruling of the Superior Court. On April 16, 2007, the
defendants filed a petition for certiorari with the Georgia
Supreme Court, requesting that the Georgia Supreme Court review
and reverse the March 27, 2007 decision of the Court of
Appeals. On June 25, 2007, the Georgia Supreme Court denied
the defendants petition for certiorari. On or about
July 31, 2007, the Georgia Court of Appeals formally
returned the case to the Superior Court for further proceedings,
and the parties thereafter proceeded with discovery. Porex is
currently engaging in settlement discussions with respect to
this matter. If a settlement is not reached, Porex plans to
vigorously seek to enforce its rights in this litigation.
Other
In the normal course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are involved in various other claims and legal
proceedings. While the ultimate resolution of these matters has
yet to be determined, including those discussed in Note 12
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on June 27, 2008, the Company does not
believe that their outcome will have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results
of operations or liquidity.
|
|
13.
|
Other
(Expense) Income, Net
|
Other (expense) income, net consists of the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Transition service fees (a)
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
1,468
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
Reduction of tax contingencies (b)
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Legal expense (c)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
Gain on 2006 EBS Sale (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Advisory expense (e)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
$
|
(666
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,396
|
|
|
$
|
(4,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Represents the net fees received
from Sage Software and EBSCo in relation to their respective
transition services agreements.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the reduction of certain
sales and use tax contingencies resulting from the expiration of
various statutes.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the costs and expenses
incurred by the Company related to the investigation by the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and
the SEC.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Represents a gain recognized in
connection with the working capital adjustment associated with
the 2006 EBS Sale on November 16, 2006.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Represents professional fees,
primarily consisting of legal, accounting and financial advisory
services incurred by the Company related to the potential merger
of HLTH into WHC.
|
On July 22, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its
ViPS segment to an affiliate of General Dynamics Corporation for
$224,842 in cash, which reflects the effect of a preliminary
estimate of the amount of a customary working capital adjustment
to the contractual purchase price of $225,000 in cash. The
actual amount of the working capital adjustment has not yet been
determined. The Company estimates that professional fees, taxes
and other expenses associated with the sale of the ViPS segment
will be approximately $5,000.
32
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Item 2 contains forward-looking statements with
respect to possible events, outcomes or results that are, and
are expected to continue to be, subject to risks, uncertainties
and contingencies, including those identified in this Item. See
Forward-Looking Statements on page 3.
Overview
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations, or MD&A, is provided as a
supplement to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and to
provide an understanding of our results of operations, financial
condition and changes in financial condition. Our MD&A is
organized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction. This section provides a general
description of our company, a brief discussion of our operating
segments, a description of pending corporate transactions and
other recent transactions, other significant developments and
trends, and a discussion on how our business is impacted by
seasonality.
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates. This section discusses those
accounting policies that both are considered important to our
financial condition and results of operations, and require us to
exercise subjective or complex judgments in making estimates and
assumptions. In addition, all of our significant accounting
policies, including our critical accounting policies, are
summarized in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in our Current Report on Form
8-K filed
with the SEC on June 27, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. This section
provides a summary of the most recent authoritative accounting
standards and guidance that have either been recently adopted or
may be adopted in the future.
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations and Results of Operations by Operating
Segment. These sections provide our analysis and
outlook for the significant line items on our consolidated
statements of operations, as well as other information that we
deem meaningful to understand our results of operations on both
a company-wide and a
segment-by-segment
basis.
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources. This section
provides an analysis of our liquidity and cash flows and
discussions of our contractual obligations and commitments, as
well as our outlook on our available liquidity as of
June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Factors That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or
Results of Operations. This section describes
circumstances or events that could have a negative effect on our
financial condition or results of operations, or that could
change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of our
businesses. The factors discussed in this section are in
addition to factors that may be described elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report.
|
In this MD&A, dollar amounts are in thousands, unless
otherwise noted.
Introduction
Our
Company
HLTH Corporation is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated
in December 1995 and commenced operations in January 1996 as
Healtheon Corporation. We changed our name to Healtheon/WebMD
Corporation in November 1999, to WebMD Corporation in September
2000, to Emdeon Corporation in October 2005 and to HLTH
Corporation in May 2007. Our common stock began trading on the
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol HLTH on
February 11, 1999 and now trades under that symbol on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market.
As of June 30, 2008, we owned 83.3% of the aggregate amount
of outstanding shares of WHC Class A Common Stock (after
accounting for the impact of certain WHC shares to be issued
pursuant to the purchase
33
agreement for the acquisition of Subimo, LLC) and
Class B Common Stock and, accordingly, our consolidated
financial statements reflect the minority shareholders
16.7% share of equity and net income (loss) of WHC.
HLTHs 48% ownership in EBS Master LLC (which we refer to
as EBSCo) was accounted for under the equity method through
February 8, 2008, the date of the sale of our investment in
EBS Master LLC. See Other Recent
Transactions Sale of EBSCo below.
Segments
As a result of our announcement of our intentions to sell our
ViPS and Porex segments, see Pending Corporate
Transactions below, our remaining operating segments are
WebMD Online Services and WebMD Publishing and Other Services
(which we refer to together, as our WebMD Segments). The
following is a description of each of our operating segments and
our corporate segment:
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services. WebMD owns and operates
both public and private online portals. WebMDs public
portals enable consumers to become more informed about
healthcare choices and assist them in playing an active role in
managing their health. The public portals also enable physicians
and other healthcare professionals to improve their clinical
knowledge and practice of medicine, as well as their
communication with patients. WebMDs public portals
generate revenue primarily through the sale of advertising and
sponsorship products, including continuing medical education
(which we refer to as CME) services. WebMDs sponsors and
advertisers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device and consumer products companies. Through its private
portals for employers and health plans. WebMD provides
information and services that enable employees and members,
respectively, to make more informed benefit, treatment and
provider decisions. WebMD also provides related services for use
by such employees and members, including lifestyle education and
personalized telephonic health coaching. WebMD generates revenue
from its private portals through the licensing of these portals
to employers and health plans either directly or through
distributors, as well as through the fees charged for its
coaching services. WebMD also distributes its online content and
services to other entities and generates revenue from these
arrangements through the sale of advertising and sponsorship
products and content syndication fees. WebMD also provides
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services for use by
pharmaceutical, medical device and healthcare companies.
|
|
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services. WebMD
provides several offline products and services: The Little
Blue Book, a physician directory; and WebMD the
Magazine, a consumer-targeted publication that WebMD
distributes free of charge to physician office waiting rooms.
WebMD generates revenue from sales of The Little Blue
Book directories and advertisements in those directories,
and sales of advertisements in WebMD the Magazine. Until
December 31, 2007, WebMD published ACP Medicine
and ACS Surgery: Principles of Practice, its medical
reference textbooks. WebMD sold this business in 2007 and it has
now been reflected as a discontinued operation in our financial
statements. WebMDs Publishing and Other Services segment
complements the WebMD Online Services segment and extends the
reach of WebMDs brand and WebMDs influence among
health-involved consumers and clinically-active physicians.
|
|
|
|
Corporate. Corporate includes personnel costs
and other expenses related to functions that are not directly
managed by one of our segments, or by the ViPS and Porex
businesses which are reflected within discontinued operations.
The personnel costs include executive personnel, legal,
accounting, tax, internal audit, risk management, human
resources and certain information technology functions. Other
corporate costs and expenses include professional fees including
legal and audit services, insurance, costs of leased property
and facilities, telecommunication costs and software maintenance
expenses. Corporate expenses are net of $861 and $1,734 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and
$821 and $1,625 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, respectively, which are costs allocated to WebMD for
services provided by the Corporate segment. In connection with
the sale of our Emdeon Business Services (which we refer to as
EBS) and Emdeon Practice Services (which we refer to as EPS)
segments during the second half of 2006, we entered into
transition services agreements whereby we provided EBSCo and
Sage Software, Inc. (which we refer to as Sage
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
Software) certain administrative services, including payroll,
accounting, purchasing and procurement, tax, and human resource
services, as well as information technology support.
Additionally, EBSCo provides us certain administrative services,
including telecommunication infrastructure and management
services, data center support and purchasing and procurement
services. Some of the services provided by EBSCo to HLTH are, in
turn, used to fulfill HLTHs obligations to provide
transition services to Sage Software. These services are
provided through the Corporate segment, and the related
transition services fees we charge to EBSCo and Sage Software,
net of the fee we pay to EBSCo, is also included in the
Corporate segment, which were intended to approximate the cost
of providing these services. The transition services agreement
with Sage Software was terminated on December 31, 2007 and,
therefore, net transition services fees are for services related
to EBSCo for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
Pending
Corporate Transactions
Merger with WHC. On February 20, 2008,
HLTH and WHC entered into a merger agreement, pursuant to which
HLTH will merge into WHC (which we refer to as the WHC Merger),
with WHC continuing as the surviving company (which we refer to
as Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement was amended on
May 6, 2008. In the WHC Merger, each outstanding share of
HLTH Common Stock will be converted into the following (which we
refer to as Merger Consideration) 0.1979 shares of WHC
Common Stock and between $6.63 and $6.89 in cash (a portion of
which may, instead, be paid in 11% redeemable notes as described
below), with the actual amount depending on whether HLTH sells
certain auction rate securities (which we refer to as ARS) that
it owns and, if so, the amount of the proceeds that it receives.
The shares of WHC Class A Common Stock currently
outstanding will remain outstanding and will be unchanged in the
WHC Merger. The WHC Merger will eliminate both the controlling
class of WHC stock held by HLTH and WHCs existing
dual-class stock structure. The terms of the Merger Agreement
were negotiated between HLTH and a Special Committee of the
Board of Directors of WHC. The Merger Agreement was approved by
the Board of WHC, based on the recommendations of the Special
Committee, and by the Board of HLTH.
The cash portion of the Merger Consideration will be funded from
cash and investments at WHC and HLTH, and proceeds from
HLTHs anticipated sale of its Porex business. If Porex has
not been sold at the time the WHC Merger is ready to be
consummated, WHC may issue up to $250,000 in redeemable notes to
the stockholders of HLTH in lieu of a portion of the cash
consideration otherwise payable in the WHC Merger. The notes
would bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum, payable in kind
annually in arrears. The notes would be subject to mandatory
redemption by WHC from the proceeds of the divestiture of Porex.
The redemption price would be equal to the principal amount of
the notes to be redeemed plus accrued but unpaid interest
through the date of the redemption.
Completion of the WHC Merger remains subject to: HLTH and WHC
receiving required stockholder approvals; a requirement that the
surviving company have an amount of cash, as of the closing, at
least equal to an agreed upon threshold, calculated in
accordance with a formula contained in the Merger Agreement;
completion of the sale of HLTHs ARS holdings (or the
availability of certain alternatives described below); and other
customary closing conditions. HLTH, which owns shares of WHC
constituting approximately 96% of the total number of votes
represented by outstanding shares, has agreed to vote its shares
of WHC in favor of the WHC Merger. On July 22, 2008, HLTH
completed the sale of its ViPS business, which satisfied one of
the original closing conditions of the WHC Merger.
Following the WHC Merger, WHC as the surviving corporation will
assume the obligations of HLTH under its
31/8% Convertible
Notes due September 1, 2025 and its 1.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes due June 15, 2023 (which we refer to
collectively as Convertible Notes). In the event a holder of
these Convertible Notes converts these Convertible Notes into
shares of HLTH Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the
applicable indenture prior to the effective time of the WHC
Merger, those shares would be treated in the WHC Merger like all
other shares of HLTH Common Stock. In the event a holder of the
Convertible Notes converts those Convertible Notes pursuant to
the applicable indenture following the effective time of the WHC
Merger, those Convertible Notes would be converted into the
right to receive the Merger Consideration
35
payable in respect of the shares of HLTH Common Stock into which
such Convertible Notes would have been convertible.
On May 6, 2008, HLTH and WHC entered into an amendment
(which we refer to as the Amendment) to the Merger Agreement,
which modifies certain provisions of the Merger Agreement to
reflect the flexibility and additional liquidity afforded by the
credit facility that HLTH has entered into, which is described
below under Other Recent
Transactions Credit Facilities. Under the
Merger Agreement, as amended, HLTH is not required to sell its
ARS holdings as a condition to closing if the outstanding loan
amount, under the credit facility, is equal to 75% of the face
amount of the ARS investments held by HLTH at the effective time
of the Merger or if HLTH would be capable of satisfying, as of
that time, all of the conditions to making a drawdown of that
amount. In either such case, the maximum reduction in the
aggregate cash consideration payable in the WHC Merger, as
contemplated by the Amendment, would be $48,075 (which is 25% of
the face amount of HLTHs ARS holdings as of the date of
this Quarterly Report, excluding WHCs ARS holdings), or
approximately $0.26 per share (based on the number of shares of
HLTH Common Stock outstanding as of the date of this Quarterly
Report). To the extent that HLTH, instead, sells some or all of
its ARS holdings for greater than 75% of the face amount, the
reduction in the aggregate cash portion of the Merger
Consideration with respect to the ARS holdings that are sold
would be based on the actual sale price for those holdings. The
Amendment was approved by the Boards of Directors of HLTH and
WHC and by a Special Committee of the Board of Directors of WHC.
On June 18, 2008, we received a letter from a law firm
purporting to represent certain purported holders of our
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025 (which we refer to as the
31/8% Notes)
enclosing a purported notice of default (which we
refer to as the Notice Letter). The Notice Letter, which was
also sent to the Indenture Trustee, expresses the view that a
default under the Indenture for the
31/8% Notes
has occurred because of (i) our stated intention not to
issue a
change-of-control
notice to the Notes holders in connection with the
proposed WHC Merger, and (ii) our stated intention not to
adjust the
31/8% Notes
conversion rate under Section 10.06(c) of the Indenture
following the proposed WHC Merger.
We believe that the Notice Letter is without merit and defective
for several reasons including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the WHC Merger will not constitute a change of control under the
Indenture because WHC is a majority-owned subsidiary of HLTH
Corporation, and the Indenture expressly excludes mergers
between HLTH Corporation and any of its subsidiaries from the
change-in-control
definition;
|
|
|
|
the WHC Merger will not trigger a conversion-rate adjustment
under Section 10.06(c) of the Indenture because:
Section 10.06(c) applies specifically to
distributions, not to merger consideration, even if
it is paid in cash; and holders of the
31/8% Notes
will be entitled to a conversion-rate adjustment under
Section 10.13 of the Indenture which, unlike
Section 10.06(c), explicitly provides the mechanism for
adjusting the conversion rate in the event of a merger,
including for merger consideration paid in cash; and
|
|
|
|
any notice of default related to the Proposed
Mergers effect on the
31/8% Notes
is premature under the Indentures terms because we
continue to be in compliance with its obligations under the
terms of the Indenture.
|
We believe that it is not in default under the Indenture and
will vigorously contest any attempt to declare an event of
default under the Indenture based on the allegations set forth
in the Notice Letter. We do not expect the Notice Letter to
affect our ability to complete the proposed WHC Merger or the
timing thereof.
Proposed Divestiture of Porex. On
February 21, 2008, we announced our intention to divest our
Porex segment. This divestiture is not dependent on the WHC
Merger and does not require shareholder approval. As a result of
our intention to divest this segment and our expectation that
the divestiture will be completed within one year, we reflected
this segment as a discontinued operation within the consolidated
financial statements contained elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
36
Strategic Considerations Relating to the WHC Merger and the
Decisions to Sell ViPS, Porex and HLTHs Interest in
EBSCo. In late 2007, HLTHs Board of
Directors initiated the process leading to the entry into the
Merger Agreement with WHC because it believed that the primary
reason of many of the holders of HLTH Common Stock for owning
those shares was HLTHs controlling interest in WHC and
that the value of HLTHs other businesses was not
adequately reflected in the trading price of HLTH Common Stock.
Accordingly, HLTH sought to negotiate a transaction with the
Special Committee of the Board of WHC that would allow
HLTHs stockholders to participate more directly in the
ownership of WHC and would unlock the value of the other HLTH
assets. Cash on hand at HLTH and WHC (including proceeds from
the sales of ViPS, Porex and HLTHs remaining 48% interest
in EBS) would be used as a portion of the consideration in the
WHC Merger, reducing the need for issuance of shares of WHC
Common Stock. Upon completion of the WHC Merger, as structured
in the definitive Merger Agreement, HLTH stockholders will own
approximately 80% of the outstanding common stock of WHC, based
on shares currently outstanding at HLTH and WHC. The WHC Merger
will eliminate HLTHs controlling interest in WHC, and is
expected to enhance the liquidity of WHC shares by significantly
increasing the public float. In connection with the entry by
HLTH and WHC into the Merger Agreement, the HLTH Board made a
determination to divest Porex and ViPS (which divestitures would
not, however, be dependent on the merger occurring). The
decisions relating to the divestitures of ViPS, Porex and
HLTHs 48% interest in EBS were based on the corporate
strategic considerations described above and not the performance
of, or underlying business conditions affecting, the respective
businesses.
Other
Recent Transactions
ViPS Sale. On February 21, 2008, we
announced our intention to divest our ViPS segment. This
divestiture was not dependent on the WHC Merger and did not
require shareholder approval. On June 3, 2008, we entered
into a stock purchase agreement for the sale of our ViPS segment
to an affiliate of General Dynamics Corporation. On
July 22, 2008, we completed the sale of our ViPS business.
The purchase price was approximately $225,000 in cash. We have
reflected ViPS as a discontinued operation within the
consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report.
Credit Facilities. As of June 30, 2008,
we held investments in certain ARS backed by student loans with
a face amount of approximately $360,900, of which approximately
$167,500 were held by WHC. HLTH and WHC have each entered into a
non-recourse credit facility (which we refer to as the Credit
Facilities) with Citigroup that is secured by their respective
ARS holdings (including, in some circumstances, interest payable
on the ARS holdings), that will allow HLTH and WHC to borrow up
to 75% of the face amount of the ARS holdings pledged as
collateral under the respective Credit Facilities. The Credit
Facilities are each governed by a loan agreement, dated as of
May 6, 2008, containing customary representations and
warranties of the borrower and certain affirmative covenants and
negative covenants relating to the pledged collateral. Under
each of the loan agreements, the borrower and the lender may, in
certain circumstances, cause the pledged collateral to be sold,
with the proceeds of any such sale required to be applied in
full immediately to repayment of amounts borrowed.
No borrowings have been made under either of the Credit
Facilities to date. HLTH and WHC can each make borrowings under
their respective Credit Facilities until May 2009. The interest
rate applicable to such borrowings will be one-month LIBOR plus
250 basis points. Any borrowings outstanding under the
respective Credit Facilities after March 2009 become demand
loans, subject to 60 days notice, with recourse only to the
pledged collateral.
Sale of EBSCo. On February 8, 2008, we
entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (which we refer to
as the Purchase Agreement) and simultaneously completed the sale
of our 48% minority ownership interest in EBSCo (which we refer
to as the 2008 EBSCo Sale) for $575,000 in cash to an affiliate
of General Atlantic LLC and affiliates of Hellman &
Friedman, LLC. For additional information, see
Pending Corporate Transactions
Strategic Considerations Relating to the WHC Merger and the
Decision to Sell ViPS, Porex and HLTHs Interest in
EBSCo above. In connection with the 2008 EBSCo Sale, we
recognized a gain of $538,024.
37
Sale of ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery. As of
December 31, 2007, through our WebMD Publishing and Other
Services segment, WHC entered into an Asset Sale Agreement and
completed the sale of certain assets and certain liabilities of
our medical reference publications business, including the
publications ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery: Principles
and Practice (which we collectively refer to as the ACS/ACP
Business). ACP Medicine and ACS Surgery are
official publications of the American College of Physicians and
the American College of Surgeons, respectively. WebMD received
net cash proceeds of $2,809, consisting of $1,734 received
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and the
remaining $1,075 to be received in the quarter ending
September 30, 2008. WebMD incurred approximately $800 of
professional fees and other expenses associated with the sale of
the ACS/ACP Business. In connection with the sale, WebMD
recognized a gain of $3,571 as of December 31, 2007. The
decision to divest ACS/ACP Business was made because management
determined that it was not a good fit with WebMDs core
business.
Other
Significant Developments and Trends
Impairment of Auction Rate Securities. We hold
investments in ARS backed by student loans, 97% of which are
guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program
(FFELP), and all had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. Historically, the fair value of our ARS holdings
approximated face value due to the frequent auction periods,
generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided liquidity to
these investments. However, since February 2008, virtually all
auctions involving these securities have failed. The result of a
failed auction is that these ARS holdings will continue to pay
interest in accordance with their terms at each respective
auction date; however, liquidity of the securities will be
limited until there is a successful auction, the issuer redeems
the securities, the securities mature or until such time as
other markets for these ARS develop. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008, we concluded that the estimated fair
value of the ARS holdings no longer approximated the face value
due to the lack of liquidity.
As of March 31, 2008, we concluded the fair value of our
ARS holdings was $302,842 (of which $141,044 relates to WHC),
compared to a face value of $362,950 (of which $168,450 relates
to WHC). The impairment in value, or $60,108 (of which $27,406
relates to WHC), was considered to be other-than-temporary, and
accordingly, was recorded as an impairment charge within the
statement of operations during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, we received $2,050 (of which $950 relates to
WHC) and $2,800 (of which $1,700 relates to WHC) associated with
the partial redemption of certain of our ARS holdings which
represented 100% of their face value. Also during the three
months ended June 30, 2008, we reduced the carrying value
of our ARS holdings by $3,019. We assessed this decline in fair
market value to be temporary and therefore recorded this decline
as an unrealized loss in our stockholders equity.
We continue to monitor the market for ARS as well as the
individual ARS holdings we own. We may be required to record
additional losses in future periods if the fair value of our ARS
holdings deteriorates further.
Directors & Officers Liability Insurance Coverage
Litigation. On July 23, 2007, we commenced
litigation (which we refer to as the Coverage Litigation) in the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle
County against ten insurance companies in which we are seeking
to compel the defendant companies (which we refer to
collectively as the Defendants) to honor their obligations under
certain directors and officers liability insurance policies
(which we refer to as the Policies). We are seeking an order
requiring the Defendants to advance
and/or
reimburse expenses that we have incurred and expect to continue
to incur for the advancement of the reasonable defense costs of
initially ten and now nine former officers and directors of our
former EPS subsidiary who were indicted in connection with the
previously disclosed investigation by the United States Attorney
for the District of South Carolina (which we refer to as the
Investigation) described in Note 12, Commitments and
Contingencies located in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We
subsequently settled with two of the insurance companies during
January 2008, through which we received an aggregate amount of
$14,625. This amount was included within (loss) income from
discontinued operations in the accompanying statement of
operations during the three months ended December 31,
2007 and is included within prepaid expenses and other current
assets in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2007.
38
Pursuant to a stipulation among the parties, the Coverage
Litigation was transferred on September 13, 2007 to the
Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle
County. The Policies were issued to our company and to EPS, our
former subsidiary, which is our co-plaintiff in the Coverage
Litigation (which we refer to collectively as the Plaintiffs).
EPS was sold in September 2006 to Sage Software and has changed
its name to Sage Software Healthcare, Inc. (which we refer to as
SSHI). In connection with our sale of EPS to Sage Software, we
retained certain obligations relating to the Investigation and
agreed to indemnify Sage Software and SSHI with respect to
certain expenses in connection with the Investigation. We
retained the right to assert claims and recover proceeds under
the Policies on behalf of SSHI.
The Policies at issue in the Coverage Litigation consist of two
separate groups of insurance policies. Each group of policies
consists of several layers of coverage, with different insurers
having agreed to provide specified amounts of coverage at
various levels. The first group of policies was issued to EPS in
the amount of $20,000 (which we refer to as the EPS Policies)
and the second group of policies was issued to Synetic, Inc.
(the former parent of EPS, which merged into HLTH) in the amount
of $100,000, of which approximately $3,600 was paid by the
primary carrier with respect to another unrelated matter (which
we refer to as the Synetic Policies). To date, $31,000 has been
paid by insurance companies representing the EPS Policies and
the Synetic Policies through a combination of payment under the
terms of the Policies, payment under reservation of rights and
settlement. As a result of these payments, we have exhausted our
coverage under the EPS Policies. Additionally, as of
December 31, 2007, $16,414 has been paid under the Synetic
Policies and we have remaining coverage under such policies of
approximately $80,000. Our insurance policies provide that under
certain circumstances, amounts advanced by the insurance
companies in connection with the defense costs of the indicted
individuals, may have to be repaid by our company, although the
$14,625 that we received in settlement from certain carriers is
not subject to being repaid. We have obtained an undertaking
from each indicted individual pursuant to which, under certain
circumstances, such individual has agreed to repay defense costs
advanced on such individuals behalf.
The carrier with the third level of coverage in the Synetic
Policies filed a motion for summary judgment in the Coverage
Litigation, which most of the carriers who have issued the
Synetic policies joined, seeking summary judgment that any
liability to pay defense costs should be allocated among the
three sets of policies available to our company (including the
policies with respect to which the Coverage Litigation relates
and a third set of policies the issuers of which have not been
named by our company) such that the Synetic Policies would only
be liable to pay about $23,000 of the $96,400 total coverage
available under such policies. We believe that such assertion is
without merit. We filed our opposition to the motion together
with our motion for summary judgment against such carrier and
several other carriers who have issued the Synetic Policies
seeking to require such carriers to advance payment of the
defense costs that we are obligated to pay while the Coverage
Litigation is pending. On July 31, 2008 the Superior Court
for the State of Delaware denied the motion filed by the
carriers seeking allocation and granted HLTHs motion for
partial summary judgment to enforce the duty of such carriers to
advance and reimburse these costs. While an appeal by the
carriers is a possibility, we expect to collect from these
carriers the $14,631 that we have advanced without reimbursement
and the additional costs that we are obligated to pay for the
advancement of the reasonable defense costs of the indicted
individuals. However, there can be no assurance that we will
ultimately prevail in the Coverage Litigation or that the
Defendants will be required to provide funding on an interim
basis pending the resolution of the Coverage Litigation. We
intend to continue to satisfy our legal obligations to the
indicted individuals with respect to advancement of amounts for
their defense costs.
Indemnification Obligations. We have certain
indemnity obligations to advance amounts for reasonable defense
costs for initially ten, and now nine, former officers and
directors of EPS, who were indicted in connection with the
Investigation. In connection with the sale of EPS, we agreed to
indemnify Sage Software relating to these indemnity obligations.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, based on
information we had recently received at that time, we determined
a reasonable estimate of the range of probable costs with
respect to our indemnification obligation and recorded a pre-tax
charge of $57,774, which represented our estimate of the low end
of the probable range of costs related to this matter. We
reserved the low end of the probable range of costs because no
estimate within the range was a better estimate than any other
amount. That estimate included assumptions as to the duration of
the trial and pre-trial periods, and the defense costs to be
incurred
39
during these periods. During the quarter ended December 31,
2007, we updated the estimate of the range of our
indemnification obligation, and as a result, recorded an
additional pre-tax charge of $15,573, which reflects the
increase in the low end of the probable range of costs related
to this matter. We have recently been informed that a trial date
has been set for February 2, 2009. Based on this date and
other information recently received, we have updated our
estimates of the probable range of future costs with respect to
this matter which are estimated to be approximately $58,300 to
$81,000, as of June 30, 2008 which includes costs that have
been incurred prior to but were not yet paid as of June 30,
2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we
recorded a pre-tax charge of $16,980 which reflects an increase
of the accrual to the low end of this probable range of future
costs related to this matter because no estimate within the
range was a better estimate than any other amount. The ultimate
outcome of this matter is still uncertain, and the estimate of
future costs includes assumptions as to the duration of the
trial and the defense costs to be incurred during the remainder
of the pre-trial period and during the trial period.
Accordingly, the amount of cost we may ultimately incur could be
substantially more than the reserve we have currently provided.
If the recorded reserves are insufficient to cover the ultimate
cost of this matter, we will need to record additional charges
to our consolidated statement of operations in future periods.
The accrual related to this obligation was $58,292 and $55,563
as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively, and is reflected as liabilities of discontinued
operations in our consolidated financial statements.
Use of the Internet by Consumers and
Physicians. The Internet has emerged as a major
communications medium and has already fundamentally changed many
sectors of the economy, including the marketing and sales of
financial services, travel, and entertainment, among others. The
Internet is also changing the healthcare industry and has
transformed how consumers and physicians find and utilize
healthcare information. As consumers are required to assume
greater financial responsibility for rising healthcare costs,
the Internet serves as a valuable resource by providing them
with immediate access to searchable and dynamic interactive
content to check symptoms, assess risks, understand diseases,
find providers and evaluate treatment options. The Internet has
also become a primary source of information for physicians
seeking to improve clinical practice and is growing relative to
traditional information sources, such as conferences, meetings
and offline journals.
Increased Online Marketing and Education Spending for
Healthcare Products. Pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies spend large amounts
each year marketing their products and educating consumers and
physicians about them; however, only a small portion of this
amount is currently spent on online services. WebMD believes
that these companies, which comprise the majority of
WebMDs advertisers and sponsors, are becoming increasingly
aware of the effectiveness of the Internet relative to
traditional media in providing health, clinical and
product-related information to consumers and physicians, and
this increasing awareness will result in increasing demand for
WebMDs services. However, notwithstanding our general
expectation for increased demand, WebMDs advertising and
sponsorship revenue may vary significantly from quarter to
quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are not in
WebMDs control, and some of which may be difficult to
forecast accurately, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship
contracts are for terms of approximately four to twelve months.
WebMD has relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship
contracts. In addition, WebMD has noted a trend this year, among
some of its advertisers and sponsors, of seeking to enter into
shorter term contracts than they had entered into in the past.
|
|
|
|
The time between the date of initial contact with a potential
advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and the
execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for that
program may be subject to delays over which WebMD has little or
no control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of
the advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal approvals.
|
Other factors that may affect the timing of contracting for
specific programs with advertisers and sponsors, or receipt of
revenue under such contracts, include: the timing of FDA
approval for new products or for new approved uses for existing
products; the timing of FDA approval of generic products that
compete with existing brand name products; the timing of
withdrawals of products from the market; seasonal factors
relating to the prevalence of specific health conditions and
other seasonal factors that may affect the timing of
40
promotional campaigns for specific products; and the scheduling
of conferences for physicians and other healthcare professionals.
Changes in Health Plan Design; Health Management
Initiatives. In a healthcare market where a
greater share of the responsibility for healthcare costs and
decision-making has been increasingly shifting to consumers, use
of information technology (including personal health records) to
assist consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare
has also increased. We believe that, through WebMDs Health
and Benefits Manager tools, including WebMDs personal
health record application, WebMD is well positioned to play a
role in this consumer-directed healthcare environment, and these
services will be a significant driver for the growth of
WebMDs private portals during the next several years.
However, WebMDs growth strategy depends, in part, on
increasing usage of WebMDs private portal services by
WebMDs employer and health plan clients employees
and members, respectively. Increasing usage of WebMDs
services requires WebMD to continue to deliver and improve the
underlying technology and develop new and updated applications,
features and services. In addition, WebMD faces competition in
the area of healthcare decision-support tools and online health
management applications and health information services. Many of
WebMDs competitors have greater financial, technical,
product development, marketing and other resources than WebMD
does, and may be better known than WebMD is.
The healthcare industry in the United States and relationships
among healthcare payers, providers and consumers are very
complicated. In addition, the Internet and the market for online
services are relatively new and still evolving. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the trends identified above will
continue or that the expected benefits to WebMDs
businesses from WebMDs responses to those trends will be
achieved. In addition, the market for healthcare information
services is highly competitive and not only are WebMDs
existing competitors seeking to benefit from these same trends,
but the trends may also attract additional competitors.
Seasonality
The timing of our revenue is affected by seasonal factors.
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue within the
WebMD Online Services segment is seasonal, primarily due to the
annual budget approval process of the advertising and
sponsorship clients of WebMDs public portals. This portion
of WebMDs revenue is usually the lowest in the first
quarter of each calendar year, and increases during each
consecutive quarter throughout the year. WebMDs private
portal licensing revenue is historically highest in the second
half of the year as new customers are typically added during
this period in conjunction with their annual open enrollment
periods for employee benefits. Additionally, the annual
distribution cycle within the WebMD Publishing and Other
Services segment results in a significant portion of
WebMDs revenue in this segment being recognized in the
second and third quarter of each calendar year. The timing of
revenue in relation to WebMDs expenses, much of which do
not vary directly with revenue, has an impact on cost of
operations, sales and marketing and general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue in each calendar quarter.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which
were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements
requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on
historical experience, current business factors, and various
other assumptions that we believe are necessary to consider in
order to form a basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities, the recorded amounts of
revenue and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. We are subject to uncertainties such as the impact
of future events, economic, environmental and political factors,
and changes in our business environment; therefore, actual
results could differ from these estimates. Accordingly, the
accounting estimates used in preparation of our financial
statements will change as new events occur, as more experience
is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as our
operating environment changes. Changes in estimates are made
when circumstances warrant. Such changes in estimates and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
41
reported results of operations; if material, the effects of
changes in estimates are disclosed in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those
related to revenue recognition, short-term and long-term
investments, income taxes and tax contingencies, collectibility
of customer receivables, long-lived assets including goodwill
and other intangible assets, software and Web site development
costs, prepaid advertising services, certain accrued expenses,
contingencies, litigation and related legal accruals and the
value attributed to employee stock options and other stock-based
awards.
We believe the following reflects our critical accounting
policies and our more significant judgments and estimates used
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition Revenue from advertising
is recognized as advertisements are delivered or as publications
are distributed. Revenue from sponsorship arrangements, content
syndication and distribution arrangements, and licenses of
healthcare management tools and private portals as well as
related health coaching services are recognized ratably over the
term of the applicable agreement. Revenue from the sponsorship
of CME is recognized over the period WebMD substantially
completes its contractual deliverables as determined by the
applicable agreements. When contractual arrangements contain
multiple elements, revenue is allocated to each element based on
its relative fair value determined using prices charged when
elements are sold separately. In certain instances where fair
value does not exist for all the elements, the amount of revenue
allocated to the delivered elements equals the total
consideration less the fair value of the undelivered elements.
In instances where fair value does not exist for the undelivered
elements, revenue is recognized when the last element is
delivered.
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets Our long-lived assets
consist of property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible
assets. Goodwill and other intangible assets arise from the
acquisitions we have made. The amount assigned to intangible
assets is subjective and based on our estimates of the future
benefit of the intangible asset using accepted valuation
techniques, such as discounted cash flow and replacement cost
models. Our long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, are amortized
over their estimated useful lives, which we determine based on
the consideration of several factors, including the period of
time the asset is expected to remain in service. We evaluate the
carrying value and remaining useful lives of long-lived assets,
excluding goodwill, whenever indicators of impairment are
present. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually, or
whenever indicators of impairment are present. We use a
discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of
goodwill. Long-lived assets held for sale are reported at the
lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. There was no
impairment of goodwill noted as a result of our impairment
testing in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Investments We hold investments
in ARS which are backed by student loans, 97% of which are
guaranteed under the Federal Family Education Loan Program
(FFELP), and all of which had credit ratings of AAA or Aaa when
purchased. Historically, the fair value of our ARS holdings
approximated face value due to the frequent auction periods,
generally every 7 to 28 days, which provided liquidity to
these investments. However, since February 2008, virtually all
auctions involving these securities have failed. The result of a
failed auction is that these ARS will continue to pay interest
in accordance with their terms at each respective auction date;
however, liquidity of the securities will be limited until there
is a successful auction, the issuer redeems the securities, the
securities mature or until such time as other markets for these
ARS develop. We cannot be certain regarding the amount of time
it will take for an auction market or other markets to develop.
Accordingly, during the three months ended March 31, 2008,
we concluded that the estimated fair value of the ARS holdings
no longer approximates the face value due to the lack of
liquidity.
|
We estimated the fair value of our ARS holdings using an income
approach valuation technique. Using this approach, expected
future cash flows were calculated over the expected life of each
security and were discounted to a single present value using a
market required rate of return. Some of the more significant
assumptions made in the present value calculations include
(i) the estimated weighted average lives for the loan
portfolios underlying each individual ARS, which range from 4 to
14 years
42
and (ii) the required rates of return used to discount the
estimated future cash flows over the estimated life of each
security, which considered both the credit quality for each
individual ARS and the market liquidity for these investments.
As of March 31, 2008, we concluded the fair value of our
ARS holdings was $302,842 (of which $141,044 relates to WHC),
compared to a face value of $362,950 (of which $168,450 relates
to WHC). The impairment in value, or $60,108 (of which $27,406
relates to WHC), was considered to be other-than-temporary, and
accordingly, was recorded as an impairment charge within the
statement of operations during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, we received $2,050 (of which $950 relates to
WHC) and $2,800 (of which $1,700 relates to WHC) associated with
the partial redemption of certain of our ARS holdings which
represented 100% of their face value. Also during the three
months ended June 30, 2008, we reduced the carrying value
of our ARS holdings by $3,019. We assessed this decline in fair
market value to be temporary and therefore recorded this decline
as unrealized loss in other comprehensive income.
Our ARS have been classified as Level 3 assets in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(which we refer to as SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, as their valuation requires substantial
judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently
observable in the market due to the lack of trading in the
securities. If different assumptions were used for the various
inputs to the valuation approach including, but not limited to,
assumptions involving the estimated lives of the ARS
investments, the estimated cash flows over those estimated
lives, and the estimated discount rates applied to those cash
flows, the estimated fair value of these investments could be
significantly higher or lower than the fair value we determined.
We continue to monitor the market for ARS as well as the
individual ARS investments we own. We may be required to record
additional losses in future periods if the fair value of our ARS
deteriorate further.
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Subsidiary Stock Our WHC subsidiary
issues its Class A Common Stock in various transactions,
which results in a dilution of our percentage ownership in WHC.
We account for the sale of WHC Class A Common Stock in
accordance with the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 51, Accounting for Sales of Stock by a
Subsidiary. The difference between the carrying amount of
our investment in WHC before and after the issuance of WHC
Class A Common Stock is considered either a gain or loss
and is reflected as a component of our stockholders
equity. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2008. WHC stock options were exercised and restricted stock
awards were released in accordance with WHCs equity plans.
The issuance of these shares resulted in an aggregate gain of
$1,190 and $1,947 during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and our ownership in WHC decreased to 83.3%
as of June 30, 2008 from 83.5% as of December 31, 2007
(after accounting for the impact of certain WHC shares to be
issued pursuant to the purchase agreement for the acquisition of
Subimo, LLC). We expect to continue to record gains in the
future related to future issuances of WHC Class A Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation On January 1,
2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123, (Revised 2004):
Share-Based Payment (which we refer to as SFAS 123R),
which replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (which we refer to as
SFAS 123) and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (which we
refer to as APB 25). SFAS 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the
service period (generally the vesting period) in the
consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. We
elected to use the modified prospective transition method. Under
the modified prospective transition method, awards that were
granted or modified on or after January 1, 2006 are
measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R.
Unvested stock options and restricted stock awards that were
granted prior to January 1, 2006 will continue to be
accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123, using the same
grant date fair value and same expense attribution method used
under SFAS 123, except that all awards are recognized in the
results of operations over the remaining vesting periods. The
impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also
estimated and considered in the amount recognized for all
stock-based compensation beginning January 1, 2006. As of
June 30, 2008, approximately $17,319 and $34,122 of
unrecognized stock-based
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
compensation expense related to unvested awards (net of
estimated forfeitures) is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately .9 years and
1.3 years, related to the HLTH and WHC stock-based
compensation plans, respectively. The total recognition period
for the remaining unrecognized stock-based compensation expense
for both the HLTH and WHC stock-based compensation plans is
approximately four years; however, the majority of this cost
will be recognized over the next two years, in accordance with
our vesting provisions.
|
The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used in this model are expected dividend yield,
expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term.
The expected volatility for stock options to purchase HLTH
Common Stock is based on implied volatility from traded options
of HLTH Common Stock combined with historical volatility of HLTH
Common Stock. Prior to August 1, 2007, the expected
volatility for stock options to purchase WHC Class A Common
Stock was based on implied volatility from traded options of
stock of comparable companies combined with historical stock
price volatility of comparable companies. Beginning on
August 1, 2007, expected volatility is based on implied
volatility from traded options of WHC Class A Common Stock
combined with historical volatility of WHC Class A Common
Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes Our deferred tax assets are
comprised primarily of net operating loss (which we refer to as
NOL) carryforwards. At December 31, 2007, we had NOL
carryforwards of approximately $1.3 billion, which expire
at varying dates from 2011 through 2028. These NOL carryforwards
may be used to offset taxable income in future periods, reducing
the amount of taxes we might otherwise be required to pay. Based
on information available at the time of this filing, we
currently estimate that the NOL carryforwards that were
available as of December 31, 2007 will be reduced by an
aggregate of approximately $550,000 as a result of offsetting
our gains on the sale of ViPS on July 22, 2008 and the 2008
EBSCo Sale on February 8, 2008. Approximately $120,000 of
this amount will be NOL carryforwards attributable to WHC. These
estimates are based on various assumptions and are subject to
material change. The actual amount of the NOL carryforwards we
utilize, including the portion attributable to WHC, will not be
finalized until we complete the calculation of our 2008 federal
income taxes.
|
Substantially all of our NOL carryforwards are reserved for by a
valuation allowance. In determining the need for a valuation
allowance, management determined the probability of realizing
deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including
historical operating results, expectations of future earnings
and taxable income. Management will continue to evaluate the
need for a valuation allowance, and in the future, should
management determine that realization of the net deferred tax
asset is more likely than not, some or all of the remaining
valuation allowance will be reversed, and our effective tax rate
may be reduced by such reversal.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Contingencies Our tax contingencies are
recorded to address potential exposures involving tax positions
we have taken that could be challenged by tax authorities. These
potential exposures result from applications of various
statutes, rules, regulations and interpretations. Our estimates
of tax contingencies reflect assumptions and judgments about
potential actions by taxing jurisdictions. We believe that these
assumptions and judgments are reasonable; however, our accruals
may change in the future due to new developments in each matter
and the ultimate resolution of these matters may be greater or
less than the amount that we have accrued. Consistent with our
historical financial reporting, we have elected to reflect
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as
part of the income tax provision.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
On May 9, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(or FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (which we refer to as FSP)
Accounting Principles Board (which we refer to as APB) Opinion
No. 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (which we refer to as FSP APB
14-1). The
FSP will require cash settled convertible
44
debt to be separated into debt and equity components at issuance
and a value to be assigned to each. The value assigned to the
debt component will be the estimated fair value, as of the
issuance date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature.
The difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated
fair value will be recorded as a debt discount and amortized to
interest expense over the life of the bond. Although FSP APB
14-1 would
have no impact on our actual past or future cash flows, it will
require us to record a significant amount of non-cash interest
expense as the debt discount is amortized. As a result, there
will be a material adverse impact on the results of operations
and earnings per share. In addition, if the convertible debt is
redeemed or converted prior to maturity, any unamortized debt
discount will result in a loss on extinguishment. FSP APB
14-1 will
become effective January 1, 2009, and will require
retrospective application.
On April 25, 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (which we refer to as SFAS 142).
The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142
and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of the asset under SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007),
Business Combinations, and other U.S. GAAP.
This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited.
We are currently evaluating the impact that this FSP will have
on our operations, financial position and cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations (which we
refer to as SFAS 141R), a replacement of SFAS No. 141.
SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 and applies to all business
combinations. SFAS 141R provides that, upon initially
obtaining control, an acquirer shall recognize 100 percent
of the fair values of acquired assets, including goodwill, and
assumed liabilities, with only limited exceptions, even if the
acquirer has not acquired 100 percent of its target. As a
consequence, the current step acquisition model will be
eliminated. Additionally, SFAS 141R changes current
practice, in part, as follows: (1) contingent consideration
arrangements will be fair valued at the acquisition date and
included on that basis in the purchase price consideration;
(2) transaction costs will be expensed as incurred, rather
than capitalized as part of the purchase price;
(3) pre-acquisition contingencies, such as legal issues,
will generally have to be accounted for in purchase accounting
at fair value; and (4) in order to accrue for a
restructuring plan in purchase accounting, the requirements in
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities, would have to be met at
the acquisition date. While there is no expected impact to our
consolidated financial statements on the accounting for
acquisitions completed prior to December 31, 2008, the
adoption of SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009 could
materially change the accounting for business combinations
consummated subsequent to that date and for tax matters relating
to prior acquisitions settled subsequent to December 31,
2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(which we refer to as SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires the
recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as
equity in the financial statements and separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net
income on the face of the results of operations. SFAS 160
clarifies that changes in a parents ownership interest in
a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity
transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial
interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent
recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the
fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the
deconsolidation date. SFAS 160 also includes expanded
disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent
and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and is to be applied prospectively as of
the beginning of the fiscal year in which the statement is
applied. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently
evaluating the impact that SFAS 160 will have on our
operations, financial position and cash flows.
45
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of
operations data and expresses that data as a percentage of
revenue for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
89,136
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
77,197
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
170,818
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
$
|
149,078
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
|
32,763
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
28,997
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
|
64,333
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
57,615
|
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
25,460
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
21,929
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
51,290
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
44,799
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
23,181
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26,950
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
|
|
|
44,325
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
55,393
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,315
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
14,203
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
13,564
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,628
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
315.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,108
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
(4,810
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax
provision
|
|
|
3,185
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
(1,038
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
480,536
|
|
|
|
281.3
|
|
|
|
(7,566
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
26,944
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Minority interest in WHC income (loss)
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(2,774
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
460,373
|
|
|
|
269.5
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(64.1
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,484
|
)
|
|
|
(29.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
|
(58.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
460,291
|
|
|
|
269.5
|
|
|
$
|
(39,761
|
)
|
|
|
(26.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue is derived from the WebMD Segments. The WebMD Online
Services segment derives revenue from advertising, sponsorship
(including online CME services),
e-detailing
promotion and physician recruitment services, content
syndication and distribution, and licenses of private online
portals to employers, healthcare payers and others, along with
related services including lifestyle education and personalized
telephonic coaching. The WebMD Publishing and Other Services
segment derives revenue from sales of, and advertising in, its
physician directories, and advertisements in WebMD the
Magazine. Additionally, WebMD sold its ACS/ACP Business as
of December 31, 2007 and the revenue and expenses of this
business are shown as discontinued operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007.
WebMDs customers include pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
medical device and consumer products companies, as well as
employers and health plans. WebMDs customers also include
physicians and other healthcare providers who buy its physician
directories.
Cost of operations consists of costs related to services and
products WebMD provides to customers and costs associated with
the operation and maintenance of WebMDs public and private
portals. These costs relate to editorial and production
operations, Web site operations, non-capitalized Web site
development costs, and costs related to the production and
distribution of WebMDs publications. These costs consist
of expenses related to salaries and related expenses, non-cash
stock-based compensation, creating and licensing content,
telecommunications, leased properties, printing and distribution.
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising,
product and brand promotion, salaries and related expenses, and
non-cash stock-based compensation. These expenses include items
related to salaries and related expenses of account executives,
account management and marketing personnel, costs and expenses
for marketing programs, and fees for professional marketing and
advertising services. Also included in sales and marketing
expense are the non-cash advertising expenses, which are
discussed below.
46
General and administrative expense consists primarily of
salaries, non-cash stock-based compensation and other
salary-related expenses of administrative, finance, legal,
information technology, human resources and executive personnel.
These expenses include costs of general insurance and costs of
accounting and internal control systems to support our
operations.
Our discussions throughout this MD&A make references to
certain non-cash expenses. We consider non-cash expenses to be
those expenses that result from the issuance of our equity
instruments. The following is a summary of our principal
non-cash expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash advertising expense. Expense related
to the use of WebMDs prepaid advertising inventory that
WHC received from News Corporation in exchange for equity
instruments we issued in connection with an agreement we entered
into with News Corporation in 1999 and subsequently amended in
2000. This non-cash advertising expense is included in cost of
operations when WebMD utilizes this advertising inventory in
conjunction with offline advertising and sponsorship programs
and is included in sales and marketing expense when WebMD uses
the asset for promotion of WebMDs brand.
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
expense. Expense related to the awards of all
share-based payments to employees and non-employee directors,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as
compensation expense over the service period (generally the
vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based
on their fair values. Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
is reflected in the same expense captions as the related salary
cost of the respective employee.
|
The following table is a summary of our non-cash expenses
included in the respective statements of operations captions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Advertising expense included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,558
|
|
|
$
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
984
|
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
2,562
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
8,096
|
|
|
|
11,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,471
|
|
|
$
|
7,779
|
|
|
$
|
12,443
|
|
|
$
|
16,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
The following discussion is a comparison of our results of
operations on a consolidated basis for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Revenue
Our revenue increased 15.5% and 14.6% to $89,136 and $170,818
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 from
$77,197 and $149,078 in the prior year periods. These increases
were primarily due to higher advertising and sponsorship revenue
from WebMDs public portals. WebMD Online Services
accounted for $11,706 and $21,691 of the revenue increases for
the three and six months June 30, 2008. WebMD Publishing
and Other Services accounted for $200 of the revenue increase
for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, the revenue increases were
offset by a decrease of $47 within WebMD Publishing and Other
Services. A more detailed discussion regarding changes in
revenue is included below under Results of
Operations by Operating Segment.
47
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of Operations. Cost of operations was
$32,763 and $64,333 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to $28,997 and $57,615 in the prior
year periods. Our cost of operations represented 36.8% and 37.7%
of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to 37.6% and 38.6% of revenue in the prior year
periods. Included in cost of operations are non-cash expenses
related to stock-based compensation of $826 and $1,945 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $984
and $2,562 in the prior year periods. These decreases in
non-cash stock-based compensation expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the prior year
periods were primarily related to the graded vesting methodology
used in determining stock-based compensation expense relating to
WebMDs stock options and restricted stock awards granted
at the time of its initial public offering.
Cost of operations, excluding the non-cash stock-based
compensation expense discussed above, was $31,937 and $62,388,
or 35.8% and 36.5% of revenue, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to $28,013 and $55,053, or
36.3% and 36.9% of revenue, in the prior year periods. These
increases in absolute dollars were primarily attributable to
increases in compensation-related costs due to higher staffing
levels relating to WebMDs Web site operations and
development. These decreases as a percentage of revenue were
primarily due to WebMDs ability to achieve the increase in
revenue without incurring a proportional increase in cost of
operations expense.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing
expense was $25,460 and $51,290 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to $21,929 and $44,799 in the
prior year periods. Our sales and marketing expense represented
28.6% and 30.0% of revenue for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to 28.4% and 30.1% of revenue in
the prior year periods. Included in sales and marketing expense
were non-cash expense related to advertising of $1,558 for the
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $2,320 in the
prior year period. There were no non-cash expenses related to
advertising for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007. Non-cash advertising expense decreased during the six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the prior year
period, due to lower utilization of WebMD prepaid advertising
inventory. Also included in sales and marketing expense were
non-cash expenses related to stock-based compensation of $1,264
and $2,402 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $1,379 and $2,637 in the prior year periods.
The decreases in non-cash stock-based compensation expense were
primarily related to the graded vesting methodology used in
determining stock-based compensation expense relating to
WebMDs stock options and restricted stock awards granted
at the time of its initial public offering.
Sales and marketing expense, excluding the non-cash expenses
discussed above, was $24,196 and $47,330, or 27.1% and 27.7% of
revenue, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to $20,550 and $39,842, or 26.6% and 26.7% of revenue
in the prior year periods. The increases in absolute dollars, as
well the increases as a percentage of revenue, were primarily
attributable to increases of approximately $2,600 and $5,400 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively,
in compensation-related costs due to increased staffing and
sales commissions related to higher revenue. The increases were
also attributable to approximately $600 and $1,600 of increased
expenses related to marketing and advertising programs for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expense was $23,181 and $44,325 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $26,950 and
$55,393 in the prior year periods. Our general and
administrative expenses represented 25.9% and 26.0% of revenue
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared
to 34.8% and 37.2% of revenue in the prior year periods.
Included in general and administrative expense were non-cash
stock-based compensation expense of $4,381 and $8,096 in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
$5,416 and $11,762 in the prior year periods. Non-cash
stock-based compensation expense was lower for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, when compared to the prior year
periods, in our WebMD Segments by approximately $800 and $1,900,
respectively, due to the graded vesting methodology used in
determining stock-based compensation expense relating to
WebMDs stock options and restricted stock awards granted
at the time of its initial public offering, as well as
48
lower non-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$200 and $1,800, respectively, in our Corporate segment.
General and administrative expense, excluding the non-cash
stock-based compensation expense discussed above, was $18,800
and $36,229, or 21.1% and 21.2% of revenue for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $21,534 and
$43,631, or 27.9% and 29.3% of revenue in the prior year
periods. The decreases in absolute dollars were primarily
attributable to lower costs in our Corporate segment as a result
of the sales of EPS and EBS during the latter part of 2006. In
the aggregate, expenses related to the Corporate segment
represented approximately $2,100 and $6,200 of the
year-over-year decrease, and costs related to outside services
and contractors in our WebMD Segments decreased by approximately
$600 and $1,200 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expense was $7,315 and $14,203, or 8.2% and
8.3% of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $7,239 and $13,564, or 9.4% and 9.1% of
revenue, in the prior year periods. The increases over the prior
year periods were due to increases of approximately $1,100 and
$2,600 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, in depreciation expense resulting from WHCs
capital expenditures in 2007 and 2008, which was partially
offset by a decrease in amortization expense of approximately
$900 and $1,500 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, respectively, resulting from certain WHC intangible assets
becoming fully amortized.
Interest Income. Interest income was $8,062
and $19,998 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $10,100 and $19,774 in the prior year periods.
The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2008,
primarily relates to a decrease in the average rates of return
for the period, partially offset by higher average investment
balances. The increase in interest income for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 relates to higher average investment
balances, offset by lower average rates of return.
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $4,628
and $9,235 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
was consistent with interest expense of $4,616 and $9,325 in the
prior year periods. Interest expense in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 primarily included the
interest expense and the amortization of debt issuance costs for
our $350,000 of 1.75% Convertible Subordinated Notes due
2023 and our $300,000 of
31/8% Convertible
Notes due 2025.
Gain on Sale of EBS Master LLC. The gain on
sale of EBS Master LLC of $538,024 represented a gain recognized
in connection with the 2008 EBSCo Sale on February 8, 2008.
See Introduction Other Recent
Transactions Sale of EBSCo with respect to
this matter.
Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities. Impairment of auction rate securities
represents a charge of $60,108 related to an
other-than-temporary reduction of the fair value of our ARS
during the three months ended March 31, 2008. For
additional information, see Other Significant
Developments and Trends Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities above.
Other (Expense) Income, Net. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, other expense, net was $666
and $4,810 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to other income, net of $1,396 and $4,278 in the
prior year periods. Other (expense) income, net for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008 includes $765 and $5,024
of advisory expenses for professional fees, primarily consisting
of legal, accounting and financial advisory services related to
our exploration of strategic alternatives for WHC in 2008. See
Introduction Pending Corporate
Transactions for more information on the WHC Merger. Also
included in other (expense) income, net was $389 and $761 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
$471 and $791 in the prior year periods of external legal costs
and expenses we incurred related to the investigation by the
United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and
the SEC. Transition services income of $51 and $101 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to
$1,468 and $3,924 in the prior year periods, represents amounts
earned from the service fee charged to EBSCo and Sage Software,
net of services EBSCo provides to us, for services rendered
under each of their respective transition services agreements.
The transition services agreement with Sage Software was
terminated during
49
the fourth quarter of 2007, therefore, net transition services
fees are for services related to EBSCo for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision
of $1,330 and $26,944 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, and $1,658 and $1,427 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively,
represents taxes related to federal, state and other
jurisdictions. While the majority of the gain on the 2008 EBSCo
Sale was offset by net operating loss carryforwards, certain AMT
and other state taxes were not offset resulting in a provision
of approximately $24,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The income tax provision for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 excludes a benefit for the impairment of ARS,
as it is currently not deductible for tax purposes.
Minority Interest in WHC Income
(Loss). Minority interest expense of $1,071 and
income of $2,774 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to expense of $843 and $958 in the
prior year periods represents the minority stockholders
proportionate share of net income or loss for WHC. The ownership
interest of minority shareholders fluctuates based on the net
income or loss reported by WHC, combined with changes in the
percentage ownership of WHC held by the minority interest
shareholders. The minority interest shareholders percentage
ownership changes as a result of the issuance of WHC
Class A Common Stock for the exercise of stock options and
the release of restricted awards.
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of
Tax. Loss from discontinued operations, net of
tax, was $3,651 and $82 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to $49,499 and $44,484 in the prior
year periods. Income from discontinued operations includes the
aggregate pre-tax operating results of our ViPS and Porex
segments of $9,525 and $15,852 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, and $7,523 and $13,782 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2007. Also included in loss
from discontinued operations are pre-tax charges of
approximately $17,000 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and $57,800 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 related to our indemnity obligations to
advance amounts for reasonable defense costs for initially ten
and now nine former officers and directors of EPS, who were
indicted in connection with the investigation by the United
States Attorney for the District of South Carolina and the SEC.
Results
of Operations by Operating Segment
We monitor the performance of our business based on earnings
before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items. Other items
include: legal expenses we incurred, which reflect costs and
expenses related to the investigation by the United States
Attorney for the District of South Carolina and the SEC; income
related to the reduction of certain sales and use tax
contingencies; professional fees in 2008, primarily consisting
of legal, accounting and financial advisory services, related to
the WHC Merger; the gain on the 2008 EBSCo Sale; the gain
recognized in connection with the working capital adjustment
associated with the 2006 EBS Sale; and the impairment charge
related to our ARS. Inter-segment revenue primarily represents
certain services provided by our WebMD Segments to our Corporate
segment.
Reclassification of Segment Information. As a
result of our intention to divest the ViPS and Porex segments
and due to the December 31, 2007 sale of WHCs ACS/ACP
business, the financial information for these businesses has
been reclassified to discontinued operations for the current and
prior year periods. As a result of the discontinued operations
presentation for ViPS and Porex, our only remaining operating
segment is WebMD. We expanded our segment disclosure for WebMD
to provide additional information related to the WebMD Online
Services segment and the WebMD Publishing and Other Services
segment. This additional information for WebMD has been provided
for all periods presented.
50
Summarized financial information for our WebMD Segments and
Corporate segment and a reconciliation to income from continuing
operations are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising and sponsorship
|
|
$
|
62,383
|
|
|
$
|
52,436
|
|
|
$
|
118,448
|
|
|
$
|
99,857
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
19,799
|
|
|
|
43,789
|
|
|
|
39,914
|
|
Content syndication and other
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total WebMD Online Services
|
|
|
84,594
|
|
|
|
72,888
|
|
|
|
162,999
|
|
|
|
141,308
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
7,859
|
|
|
|
7,906
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,136
|
|
|
$
|
77,197
|
|
|
$
|
170,818
|
|
|
$
|
149,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash and other
items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WebMD Online Services
|
|
$
|
18,800
|
|
|
$
|
14,042
|
|
|
$
|
35,331
|
|
|
$
|
27,034
|
|
WebMD Publishing and Other Services
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(5,573
|
)
|
|
|
(6,337
|
)
|
|
|
(10,632
|
)
|
|
|
(13,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,254
|
|
|
|
8,568
|
|
|
|
24,972
|
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
Interest, taxes, non-cash and other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
8,062
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
19,774
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(4,628
|
)
|
|
|
(4,616
|
)
|
|
|
(9,235
|
)
|
|
|
(9,325
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
(26,944
|
)
|
|
|
(1,427
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,315
|
)
|
|
|
(7,239
|
)
|
|
|
(14,203
|
)
|
|
|
(13,564
|
)
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(6,471
|
)
|
|
|
(7,779
|
)
|
|
|
(12,443
|
)
|
|
|
(16,961
|
)
|
Non-cash advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
Minority interest in WHC
|
|
|
(1,071
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
Gain on sale of EBS Master LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
460,373
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
|
(49,499
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(44,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
460,291
|
|
|
$
|
(39,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion is a comparison of the results of
operations for our WebMD Segments and Corporate segment for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
WebMD Online Services. Revenue was $84,594 and
$162,999 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
an increase of $11,706 or 16.1% and $21,691 or 15.4%, compared
to the prior year periods. Advertising and sponsorship revenue
increased $9,947 or 19.0% and $18,591 or 18.6% for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the prior year
periods. The increases in advertising and sponsorship revenue
were attributable to an increase in the number of unique
sponsored programs on WebMDs sites, including both brand
sponsorship and educational programs. The number of such
programs grew to approximately 700 compared to approximately 500
last year. In general, pricing remained relatively stable for
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship programs and was not a
significant source of the revenue increase. Licensing revenue
increased $2,067 or 10.4% and $3,875 or 9.7% for the three and
six months ended June 30,
51
2008, compared to the prior year periods. These increases were
due to an increase in the number of companies using WebMDs
private portal platform to 123 from 108 last year. In general,
pricing remained relatively stable for WebMDs private
portal licenses and was not a significant source of the revenue
increase. WebMD also had approximately 140 additional customers
who purchase stand-alone decision-support services from them.
Content syndication and other revenue decreased to $345 and $762
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 from $653
and $1,537 in the prior year periods, primarily as a result of
the completion of certain contracts and WebMDs decision
not to seek new content syndication business.
WebMD Online Services earnings before interest, taxes, non-cash
and other items was $18,800 and $35,331 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $14,042 and $27,034
in the prior year periods. As a percentage of revenue, earnings
before interest, taxes, non-cash and other items was 22.2% and
21.7% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to 19.3% and 19.1% in the prior year periods. These
increases as a percentage of revenue were due to higher revenue
from the increase in the number of brands and sponsored programs
in WebMDs public portals as well as the increase in
companies using WebMDs private online portal without
incurring a proportionate increase in overall expenses.
WebMD Publishing and Other Services. Revenue
was $4,582 and $7,859 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, compared to $4,382 and $7,906 in the prior
year periods. The increase for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 was attributable to $436 of higher
advertising revenue in WebMD the Magazine, offset by $236
of lower advertising in The Little Blue Book. In general,
pricing remained relatively stable for advertising in both
The Little Blue Book and WebMD the Magazine and
was not a significant source for changes in revenue.
WebMD Publishing and Other Services earnings before interest,
taxes, non-cash and other items was $1,027 and $273 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $863
and $505 in the prior year periods. These changes were primarily
attributable to a change in mix of revenues.
Corporate. Corporate includes costs and
expenses for functions not directly managed by one of our
segments, including the Porex and ViPS businesses which are
reflected within discontinued operations. Corporate expenses
decreased to $5,573 or 6.3% of revenue and $10,632 or 6.2% of
revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to $6,337 or 8.2% of revenue and $13,063 or 8.8% of
revenue in the prior year periods. The decreases in our
Corporate segment, in whole dollars, are due to lower personnel
and other costs and expenses associated with our overall
management of HLTH and subsidiaries, including certain
insurance, professional and information technology costs. These
lower costs and expenses were attributable to the sales of EPS
and EBS during the third and fourth quarters of 2006. Offsetting
the reduction in expenses is a net reduction of transition
service income of $1,417 and $3,800 when comparing the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 to the same periods in 2007.
The transition services income is lower for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the prior years
as a result of the termination of the transition services
agreement with Sage Software during the fourth quarter of 2007
as well as fewer services are being performed under the EBSCo
agreement in the current year periods as compared to the prior
year periods.
Inter-Segment Eliminations. Inter-segment
eliminations primarily represents certain services provided by
the WebMD Segments to our Corporate segment.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $1.1 billion
in consolidated cash and cash equivalents, and we owned
investments in ARS with a face value of $360,900 and a fair
value of $297,970. While liquidity for our ARS investments is
currently limited, HLTH and WHC recently entered into
non-recourse credit facilities with Citigroup that will allow us
to borrow up to 75% of the face amount of our ARS holdings. See
Introduction Other Significant
Developments and Trends Impairment of Auction Rate
Securities and Introduction
Other Recent Transactions Credit Facilities
above. Our working capital, including discontinued operations,
as of June 30, 2008 was approximately $1.5 billion.
52
Cash provided by operating activities from our continuing
operations was $56,537 for the six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $1,551 for the prior year period. The $54,986
increase in cash provided by operating activities from our
continuing operations when compared to a year ago primarily
relates to the timing of tax payments for the sale of our EBS
segment in the latter part of 2006 that were paid during the six
months ended June 30, 2007. In addition, the
period-over-period increase in cash provided by operating
activities from continuing operations is due to the continuing
operating activities of our WebMD Segments in the amount of
$17,914 and the receipt, in the current year period, of $14,625
of insurance settlements related to our Director & Officer
insurance policies described above under
Introduction Other Significant Developments
and Trends Directors & Officers Liability
Insurance Coverage Litigation.
Cash provided by investing activities from our continuing
operations was $522,689 for the six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to cash used in investing activities from our
continuing operations of $182,435 for the prior year period.
Cash provided by investing activities from our continuing
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 included
$574,617 of proceeds received from the 2008 EBSCo Sale, as well
as the $23,333 we received, which was released from escrow, from
the sale of our EPS segment, which was sold in the latter part
of 2006. Also included in cash provided by investing activities
from our continuing operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 is net disbursements of $70,564 from
purchases, net of maturities and sales, of available for sale
securities, compared to net purchases of $194,846 in the prior
year period.
Cash provided by financing activities from our continuing
operations was $9,564 for the six months ended June 30,
2008, compared to $60,814 for the prior year period. Cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 principally related to proceeds of
$9,644 and $103,263, respectively, from the issuance of HLTH
Common Stock and WHC Class A Common Stock resulting from
the exercises of employee stock options, partially offset by the
repurchases of HLTH Common Stock for $42,906 in the prior year
period.
Included in our consolidated statements of cash flows are cash
flows from discontinued operations of the ViPS and Porex
segments and the ACS/ACP Business. Our cash flows provided by
operating activities from discontinued operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 included an aggregate of $13,907
related to our ViPS and Porex segments while cash flows provided
by operating activities from discontinued operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 primarily included an aggregate
of $19,058 related to our ViPS segment, Porex segment and the
ACS/ACP Business. Also included in cash flows from discontinued
operations used in operating activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 is $14,250 in payments made in connection
with legal costs and expenses incurred related to the
investigation by the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina and the SEC.
Our liquidity during 2008 is expected to be significantly
impacted as a result of the planned WHC Merger, and also as a
result of the divestiture of ViPS on July 22, 2008 for
approximately $225,000 in cash and the planned divestiture of
Porex, see Introduction Pending
Corporate Transactions Merger with WHC and
Introduction Pending Corporate
Transactions Planned Divestiture of Porex
above. The planned merger with WHC will result in the payment of
up to $6.89 in cash for each outstanding share of HLTH Common
Stock as of the closing date of the WHC Merger. We expect the
combined company to use available cash on hand, as well as cash
proceeds to be received from the divestitures of Porex and ViPS
to fund the cash portion of the Merger Consideration.
Additionally, if Porex has not been sold at the time the WHC
Merger is ready to be consummated, WHC could issue up to
$250,000 in redeemable notes to the HLTH stockholders in lieu of
a portion of the cash consideration otherwise payable in the WHC
Merger, or HLTH or WHC could drawdown proceeds from the
respective non-recourse credit facilities they have entered into
with Citigroup.
We believe that our available cash resources and future cash
flow from operations, will provide sufficient cash resources to
meet the commitments described above and to fund our currently
anticipated working capital and capital expenditure
requirements, for up to twenty-four months. Our future liquidity
and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors,
including retention of customers at current volume and revenue
levels, WebMDs existing and new application and service
offerings, competing technological and market developments, and
potential future acquisitions. In addition, our ability to
generate cash flow is subject
53
to numerous factors beyond our control, including general
economic, regulatory and other matters affecting us and
WebMDs customers. We plan to continue to enhance
WebMDs online services and to continue to invest in
acquisitions, strategic relationships, facilities and
technological infrastructure and product development. We intend
to grow each of our existing businesses and enter into
complementary ones through both internal investments and
acquisitions. We may need to raise additional funds to support
expansion, develop new or enhanced applications and services,
respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary
businesses or technologies or take advantage of unanticipated
opportunities. If required, we may raise such additional funds
through public or private debt or equity financing, strategic
relationships or other arrangements. We cannot assure that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or
that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
Future indebtedness may impose various restrictions and
covenants on us that could limit our ability to respond to
market conditions, to provide for unanticipated capital
investments or to take advantage of business opportunities.
Factors
That May Affect Our Future Financial Condition or Results of
Operations
This section describes circumstances or events that could have a
negative effect on our financial results or operations or that
could change, for the worse, existing trends in some or all of
our businesses. The occurrence of one or more of the
circumstances or events described below could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows or on the trading prices of the common stock and
convertible notes that we have issued or securities we may issue
in the future. The risks and uncertainties described in this
Quarterly
Report are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and
uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we
currently believe are immaterial may also adversely affect our
business and operations.
Risks
Related to WebMD
If WebMD
is unable to provide content and services that attract and
retain users to The WebMD Health Network on a consistent basis,
its advertising and sponsorship revenue could be
reduced
Users of The WebMD Health Network have numerous other
online and offline sources of healthcare information services.
WebMDs ability to compete for user traffic on its public
portals depends upon its ability to make available a variety of
health and medical content, decision-support applications and
other services that meet the needs of a variety of types of
users, including consumers, physicians and other healthcare
professionals, with a variety of reasons for seeking
information. WebMDs ability to do so depends, in turn, on:
|
|
|
|
|
its ability to hire and retain qualified authors, journalists
and independent writers;
|
|
|
|
its ability to license quality content from third
parties; and
|
|
|
|
its ability to monitor and respond to increases and decreases in
user interest in specific topics.
|
We cannot assure you that WebMD will be able to continue to
develop or acquire needed content, applications and tools at a
reasonable cost. In addition, since consumer users of
WebMDs public portals may be attracted to The WebMD
Health Network as a result of a specific condition or for a
specific purpose, it is difficult for WebMD to predict the rate
at which they will return to the public portals. Because WebMD
generates revenue by, among other things, selling sponsorships
of specific pages, sections or events on The WebMD Health
Network, a decline in user traffic levels or a reduction in
the number of pages viewed by users could cause WebMDs
revenue to decrease and could have a material adverse effect on
its results of operations.
54
Developing
and implementing new and updated applications, features and
services for WebMDs public and private portals may be more
difficult than expected, may take longer and cost more than
expected and may not result in sufficient increases in revenue
to justify the costs
Attracting and retaining users of WebMDs public portals
and clients for its private portals requires WebMD to continue
to improve the technology underlying those portals and to
continue to develop new and updated applications, features and
services for those portals. If WebMD is unable to do so on a
timely basis or if WebMD is unable to implement new
applications, features and services without disruption to its
existing ones, it may lose potential users and clients.
WebMD relies on a combination of internal development, strategic
relationships, licensing and acquisitions to develop its portals
and related applications, features and services. WebMDs
development
and/or
implementation of new technologies, applications, features and
services may cost more than expected, may take longer than
originally expected, may require more testing than originally
anticipated and may require the acquisition of additional
personnel and other resources. There can be no assurance that
the revenue opportunities from any new or updated technologies,
applications, features or services will justify the amounts
spent.
WebMD
faces significant competition for its products and
services
The markets in which WebMD operates are intensely competitive,
continually evolving and, in some cases, subject to rapid change.
|
|
|
|
|
WebMDs public portals face competition from numerous other
companies, both in attracting users and in generating revenue
from advertisers and sponsors. WebMD competes for users with
online services and Web sites that provide health-related
information, including commercial sites as well as public sector
and not-for-profit sites. WebMD competes for advertisers and
sponsors with: health-related Web sites; general purpose
consumer Web sites that offer specialized health sub-channels;
other high-traffic Web sites that include both
healthcare-related and non-healthcare-related content and
services; search engines that provide specialized health search;
and advertising networks that aggregate traffic from multiple
sites.
|
|
|
|
WebMDs private portals compete with: providers of
healthcare decision-support tools and online health management
applications; wellness and disease management vendors; and
health information services and health management offerings of
healthcare benefits companies and their affiliates.
|
|
|
|
WebMDs offline publications compete with numerous other
offline publications, some of which have better access to
traditional distribution channels than WebMD has, and also
compete with online information sources.
|
Many of WebMDs competitors have greater financial,
technical, product development, marketing and other resources
than it does. These organizations may be better known than WebMD
and have more customers or users than WebMD does. WebMD cannot
provide assurance that it will be able to compete successfully
against these organizations or any alliances they have formed or
may form. Since there are no substantial barriers to entry into
the markets in which WebMDs public portals participate, we
expect that competitors will continue to enter these markets.
Failure
to maintain and enhance the WebMD brand could have a
material adverse effect on WebMDs business
We believe that the WebMD brand identity that WebMD
has developed has contributed to the success of its business and
has helped it achieve recognition as a trusted source of health
and wellness information. We also believe that maintaining and
enhancing that brand is important to expanding the user base for
WebMDs public portals, to its relationships with sponsors
and advertisers and to its ability to gain additional employer
and healthcare payer clients for our private portals. WebMD has
expended considerable resources on establishing and enhancing
the WebMD brand and its other brands, and it has
developed policies and procedures designed to preserve and
enhance its brands, including editorial procedures designed to
provide
55
quality control of the information it publishes. WebMD expects
to continue to devote resources and efforts to maintain and
enhance its brand. However, WebMD may not be able to
successfully maintain or enhance awareness of its brands and
circumstances or events, including ones outside of its control,
may have a negative effect on its brands. If WebMD is unable to
maintain or enhance awareness of its brand, and do so in a
cost-effective manner, its business could be adversely affected.
WebMDs
online businesses have a limited operating history
WebMDs online businesses have a limited operating history
and participate in relatively new markets. These markets, and
WebMDs online businesses, have undergone significant
changes during their short history and can be expected to
continue to change. Many companies with business plans based on
providing healthcare information and related services through
the Internet have failed to be profitable and some have filed
for bankruptcy
and/or
ceased operations. Even if demand from users exists, we cannot
assure you that WebMDs businesses will continue to be
profitable.
WebMDs
success depends, in part, on its attracting and retaining
qualified executives and employees
The success of WebMD depends, in part, on its ability to attract
and retain qualified executives, writers and editors, software
developers and other technical and professional personnel and
sales and marketing personnel. WebMD anticipates a continuing
need to hire and retain qualified employees in these areas.
Competition for qualified personnel in the healthcare
information technology and healthcare information services
industries is intense, and we cannot assure you that WebMD will
be able to hire or retain a sufficient number of qualified
personnel to meet its requirements, or that it will be able to
do so at salary, benefit and other compensation costs that are
acceptable to it. Failure to do so may have an adverse effect on
its business.
If WebMD
is unable to provide healthcare content for its offline
publications that attracts and retains users, its revenue will
be reduced
Interest in WebMDs offline publications, such as The
Little Blue Book, is based upon WebMDs ability to make
available up-to-date health content that meets the needs of its
physician users. Although WebMD has been able to continue to
update and maintain the physician practice information that it
publishes in The Little Blue Book, if WebMD is unable to
continue to do so for any reason, the value of The Little
Blue Book would diminish and interest in this publication
and advertising in this publication would be adversely affected.
WebMD the Magazine was launched in April 2005 and, as a
result, has a very short operating history. We cannot assure you
that WebMD the Magazine will be able to attract and
retain the advertisers needed to make this publication
successful in the future.
The
timing of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may
vary significantly from quarter to quarter
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue may vary
significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of
factors, many of which are not in WebMDs control, and some
of which may be difficult to forecast accurately. The majority
of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship programs are for
terms of approximately four to twelve months. WebMD has
relatively few longer term advertising and sponsorship programs.
In addition, WebMD has noted a trend this year, among some of
its advertisers and sponsors, of seeking to enter into shorter
term contracts than they had entered into in the past. We cannot
assure you that WebMDs current advertisers and sponsors
will continue to use its services beyond the terms of their
existing contracts or that they will enter into any additional
contracts.
In addition, the time between the date of initial contact with a
potential advertiser or sponsor regarding a specific program and
the execution of a contract with the advertiser or sponsor for
that program may be lengthy, especially for larger contracts,
and may be subject to delays over which WebMD has little or no
control, including as a result of budgetary constraints of the
advertiser or sponsor or their need for internal
56
approvals. Other factors that could affect the timing of
contracting for specific programs with advertisers and sponsors,
or receipt of revenue under such contracts, include:
|
|
|
|
|
the timing of FDA approval for new products or for new approved
uses for existing products;
|
|
|
|
the timing of FDA approval of generic products that compete with
existing brand name products;
|
|
|
|
the timing of withdrawals of products from the market;
|
|
|
|
seasonal factors relating to the prevalence of specific health
conditions and other seasonal factors that may affect the timing
of promotional campaigns for specific products; and
|
|
|
|
the scheduling of conferences for physicians and other
healthcare professionals.
|
Lengthy
sales and implementation cycles for WebMDs private online
portals make it difficult to forecast revenues from these
applications and may have an adverse impact on that
business
The period from WebMDs initial contact with a potential
client for a private online portal and the first purchase of its
solution by the client is difficult to predict. In the past,
this period has generally ranged from six to twelve months, but
in some cases has been longer. These sales may be subject to
delays due to a clients internal procedures for approving
large expenditures and other factors beyond WebMDs
control. The time it takes to implement a private online portal
is also difficult to predict and has lasted as long as six
months from contract execution to the commencement of live
operation. Implementation may be subject to delays based on the
availability of the internal resources of the client that are
needed and other factors outside of WebMDs control. As a
result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing of
revenue from new clients. This, in turn, makes it more difficult
to predict WebMDs financial performance from quarter to
quarter.
During the sales cycle and the implementation period, we may
expend substantial time, effort and money preparing contract
proposals, negotiating contracts and implementing the private
online portal without receiving any related revenue. In
addition, many of the expenses related to providing private
online portals are relatively fixed in the short term, including
personnel costs and technology and infrastructure costs. Even if
WebMDs private portal revenue is lower than expected, it
may not be able to reduce related short-term spending in
response. Any shortfall in such revenue would have a direct
impact on its results of operations.
WebMDs
ability to provide comparative information on hospital cost and
quality depends on its ability to obtain the required data on a
timely basis and, if it is unable to do so, its private portal
services would be less attractive to clients
WebMD provides, in connection with its private portal services,
comparative information about hospital cost and quality.
WebMDs ability to provide this information depends on its
ability to obtain comprehensive, reliable data. WebMD currently
obtains this data from a number of public and private sources,
including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
24 individual states and the Leapfrog Group. We cannot provide
assurance that WebMD would be able to find alternative sources
for this data on acceptable terms and conditions. Accordingly,
WebMDs business could be negatively impacted if CMS or
WebMDs other data sources cease to make such information
available or impose terms and conditions for making it available
that are not consistent with WebMDs planned usage. In
addition, the quality of the comparative information services
that WebMD provides depends on the reliability of the
information that it is able to obtain. If the information WebMD
uses to provide these services contains errors or is otherwise
unreliable, WebMD could lose clients and its reputation could be
damaged.
WebMDs
ability to renew existing licenses with employers and health
plans will depend, in part, on WebMDs ability to continue
to increase usage of our private portal services by their
employees and plan members
In a healthcare market where a greater share of the
responsibility for healthcare costs and decision-making has been
increasingly shifting to consumers, use of information
technology (including personal health records) to assist
consumers in making informed decisions about healthcare has also
increased. We believe that
57
through WebMDs Health and Benefits Manager tools,
including WebMDs personal health record application, WebMD
is well positioned to play a role in this consumer-directed
healthcare environment, and these services will be a significant
driver for the growth of WebMDs private portals during the
next several years. However, WebMDs growth strategy
depends, in part, on increasing usage of WebMDs private
portal services by WebMDs employer and health plan
clients employees and members, respectively. Increasing
usage of WebMDs services requires WebMD to continue to
deliver and improve the underlying technology and develop new
and updated applications, features and services. In addition,
WebMD faces competition in the area of healthcare
decision-support tools and online health management applications
and health information services. Many of WebMDs
competitors have greater financial, technical, product
development, marketing and other resources than WebMD does, and
may be better known than WebMDs. We cannot provide
assurance that WebMD will be able to meet its development and
implementation goals, nor that WebMD will be able to compete
successfully against other vendors offering competitive services
and, as a result, may experience static or diminished usage for
WebMDs private portal services and possible non-renewals
of WebMDs license agreements.
WebMD may
be unsuccessful in its efforts to increase advertising and
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies
Most of WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue has, in
the past, come from pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical
device companies. WebMD has been focusing on increasing
sponsorship revenue from consumer products companies that are
interested in communicating health-related or safety-related
information about their products to WebMDs audience.
However, while a number of consumer products companies have
indicated an intent to increase the portion of their promotional
spending used on the Internet, we cannot assure you that these
advertisers and sponsors will find WebMDs consumer Web
sites to be as effective as other Web sites or traditional media
for promoting their products and services. If WebMD encounters
difficulties in competing with the other alternatives available
to consumer products companies, this portion of WebMDs
business may develop more slowly than we expect or may fail to
develop.
WebMD
could be subject to breach of warranty or other claims by
clients of our online portals if the software and systems we use
to provide them contain errors or experience failures
Errors in the software and systems WebMD uses could cause
serious problems for clients of its online portals. WebMD may
fail to meet contractual performance standards or client
expectations. Clients of WebMDs online portals may seek
compensation from WebMD or may seek to terminate their
agreements with WebMD, withhold payments due to WebMD, seek
refunds from WebMD of part or all of the fees charged under
those agreements or initiate litigation or other dispute
resolution procedures. In addition, WebMD could face breach of
warranty or other claims by clients or additional development
costs. WebMDs software and systems are inherently complex
and, despite testing and quality control, we cannot be certain
that they will perform as planned.
WebMD attempts to limit, by contract, its liability to its
clients for damages arising from its negligence, errors or
mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not
be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not
provide sufficient protection to WebMD from liability for
damages. WebMD maintains liability insurance coverage, including
coverage for errors and omissions. However, it is possible that
claims could exceed the amount of WebMDs applicable
insurance coverage, if any, or that this coverage may not
continue to be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient
amounts. Even if these claims do not result in liability to
WebMD, investigating and defending against them could be
expensive and time consuming and would divert managements
attention away from WebMDs operations. In addition,
negative publicity caused by these events may delay or hinder
market acceptance of WebMDs services, including unrelated
services.
58
Any
service interruption or failure in the systems that WebMD uses
to provide online services could harm WebMDs
business
WebMDs online services are designed to operate
24 hours a day, seven days a week, without interruption.
However, WebMD has experienced and expects that it will in the
future experience interruptions and delays in services and
availability from time to time. WebMD relies on internal systems
as well as third-party vendors, including data center providers
and bandwidth providers, to provide its online services. WebMD
may not maintain redundant systems or facilities for some of
these services. In the event of a catastrophic event with
respect to one or more of these systems or facilities, WebMD may
experience an extended period of system unavailability, which
could negatively impact its relationship with users. To operate
without interruption, both WebMD and its service providers must
guard against:
|
|
|
|
|
damage from fire, power loss and other natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
communications failures;
|
|
|
|
software and hardware errors, failures and crashes;
|
|
|
|
security breaches, computer viruses and similar disruptive
problems; and
|
|
|
|
other potential interruptions.
|
Any disruption in the network access or co-location services
provided by third-party providers to WebMD or any failure by
these third-party providers or WebMDs own systems to
handle current or higher volume of use could significantly harm
WebMDs business. WebMD exercises little control over these
third-party vendors, which increases its vulnerability to
problems with the services they provide.
Any errors, failures, interruptions or delays experienced in
connection with these third-party technologies and information
services or WebMDs own systems could negatively impact
WebMDs relationships with users and adversely affect its
brand and its business and could expose WebMD to liabilities to
third parties. Although WebMD maintains insurance for its
business, the coverage under its policies may not be adequate to
compensate it for all losses that may occur. In addition, we
cannot provide assurance that WebMD will continue to be able to
obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
WebMDs
online services are dependent on the development and maintenance
of the Internet infrastructure
WebMDs ability to deliver its online services is dependent
on the development and maintenance of the infrastructure of the
Internet by third parties. The Internet has experienced a
variety of outages and other delays as a result of damages to
portions of its infrastructure, and it could face outages and
delays in the future. The Internet has also experienced, and is
likely to continue to experience, significant growth in the
number of users and the amount of traffic. If the Internet
continues to experience increased usage, the Internet
infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on
it. In addition, the reliability and performance of the Internet
may be harmed by increased usage or by denial-of-service
attacks. Any resulting interruptions in WebMDs services or
increases in response time could, if significant, result in a
loss of potential or existing users of and advertisers and
sponsors on WebMDs Web sites and, if sustained or
repeated, could reduce the attractiveness of WebMDs
services.
Customers who utilize WebMDs online services depend on
Internet service providers and other Web site operators for
access to WebMDs Web sites. All of these providers have
experienced significant outages in the past and could experience
outages, delays and other difficulties in the future due to
system failures unrelated to WebMDs systems. Any such
outages or other failures on their part could reduce traffic to
WebMDs Web sites.
59
Implementation
of additions to or changes in hardware and software platforms
used to deliver WebMDs online services may result in
performance problems and may not provide the additional
functionality that was expected
From time to time, WebMD implements additions to or changes in
the hardware and software platforms that it uses for providing
its online services. During and after the implementation of
additions or changes, a platform may not perform as expected,
which could result in interruptions in operations, an increase
in response time or an inability to track performance metrics.
In addition, in connection with integrating acquired businesses,
WebMD may move their operations to its hardware and software
platforms or make other changes, any of which could result in
interruptions in those operations. Any significant interruption
in WebMDs ability to operate any of its online services
could have an adverse effect on its relationships with users and
clients and, as a result, on its financial results. WebMD relies
on a combination of purchasing, licensing, internal development,
and acquisitions to develop its hardware and software platforms.
WebMDs implementation of additions to or changes in these
platforms may cost more than originally expected, may take
longer than originally expected, and may require more testing
than originally anticipated. In addition, we cannot provide
assurance that additions to or changes in these platforms will
provide the additional functionality and other benefits that
were originally expected.
If the
systems WebMD uses to provide online portals experience security
breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, WebMDs
business could suffer
WebMD retains and transmits confidential information, including
personal health records, in the processing centers and other
facilities it uses to provide online services. It is critical
that these facilities and infrastructure remain secure and be
perceived by the marketplace as secure. A security breach could
damage WebMDs reputation or result in liability. WebMD may
be required to expend significant capital and other resources to
protect against security breaches and hackers or to alleviate
problems caused by breaches. Despite the implementation of
security measures, this infrastructure or other systems that
WebMD interfaces with, including the Internet and related
systems, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers,
improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses,
programming errors, denial-of-service attacks or other attacks
by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise
of WebMDs security, whether as a result of its own systems
or the systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for
its services and could subject WebMD to legal claims from its
clients and users, including for breach of contract or breach of
warranty.
WebMD
faces potential liability related to the privacy and security of
personal information it collects from or on behalf of users of
its services
Privacy of personal health information, particularly personal
health information stored or transmitted electronically, is a
major issue in the United States. The Privacy Standards under
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(or HIPAA) establish a set of basic national privacy standards
for the protection of individually identifiable health
information by health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and
healthcare providers (referred to as covered entities) and their
business associates. Only covered entities are directly subject
to potential civil and criminal liability under the Privacy
Standards. Accordingly, the Privacy Standards do not apply
directly to WebMD. However, portions of WebMDs business,
such as those managing employee or plan member health
information for employers or health plans, are or may be
business associates of covered entities and are bound by certain
contracts and agreements to use and disclose protected health
information in a manner consistent with the Privacy Standards.
Depending on the facts and circumstances, WebMD could
potentially be subject to criminal liability for aiding and
abetting or conspiring with a covered entity to violate the
Privacy Standards. We cannot assure you that WebMD will
adequately address the risks created by the Privacy Standards.
In addition, we are unable to predict what changes to the
Privacy Standards might be made in the future or how those
changes could affect our business. Any new legislation or
regulation in the area of privacy of personal information,
including personal health information, could also affect the way
WebMD operates its business and could harm its business.
In addition, Internet user privacy and the use of consumer
information to track online activities are major issues both in
the United States and abroad. For example, in December 2007, the
Federal Trade Commission
60
(FTC) published for comment proposed principles to govern
tracking of consumers activities online in order to
deliver advertising targeted to the interests of individual
consumers. WebMD has privacy policies posted on its Web sites
that it believes comply with applicable laws requiring notice to
users about WebMDs information collection, use and
disclosure practices. However, whether and how existing privacy
and consumer protection laws in various jurisdictions apply to
the Internet is still uncertain. WebMD also notifies users about
its information collection, use and disclosure practices
relating to data it receives through offline means such as paper
health risk assessments. We cannot assure you that the privacy
policies and other statements WebMD provides to users of its
products and services, or WebMDs practices will be found
sufficient to protect it from liability or adverse publicity in
this area. A determination by a state or federal agency or court
that any of WebMDs practices do not meet applicable
standards, or the implementation of new standards or
requirements, could adversely affect WebMDs business.
Failure
to comply with regulations related to advertising and promotion
may result in enforcement action and loss of
sponsorship
The WebMD Health Network provides services involving
advertising and promotion of prescription and over-the-counter
drugs and medical devices. If the Food & Drug
Administration (FDA) or the FTC finds that any information on
The WebMD Health Network or in the WebMD the Magazine
violates FDA or FTC regulations, they may take regulatory or
judicial action against WebMD
and/or the
advertiser or sponsor of that information. State attorneys
general may also take similar action based on their states
consumer protection statutes. Any increase or change in
regulation of drug or medical device advertising and promotion
could make it more difficult for WebMD to contract for
sponsorships and advertising. Members of Congress, physician
groups and others have criticized the FDAs current
policies, and have called for restrictions on advertising of
prescription drugs and medical devices to consumers and
increased FDA enforcement. We cannot predict what actions the
FDA or industry participants may take in response to these
criticisms. It is also possible that new laws will be enacted
that impose restrictions on such advertising and promotion.
WebMDs advertising and sponsorship revenue could be
materially reduced by additional restrictions on the advertising
of prescription drugs and medical devices to consumers, whether
imposed by law or regulation or required under policies adopted
by industry members.
Failure
to maintain its CME accreditation could adversely affect
WebMDs ability to provide online CME offerings
Medscapes continuing medical education (CME) activities
are planned and implemented in accordance with the current
Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education, or ACCME, which oversees providers
of CME credit, and other applicable accreditation standards. In
2007, ACCME revised its standards for commercial support of CME.
The revised standards are intended to ensure, among other
things, that CME activities of ACCME-accredited providers, such
as Medscape, are independent of commercial
interests, which are now defined as entities that produce,
market, re-sell or distribute health care goods and services,
excluding certain organizations. Commercial
interests, and entities owned or controlled by
commercial interests, are ineligible for
accreditation by ACCME. The revised standards also provide that
accredited CME providers may not place their CME content on Web
sites owned or controlled by a commercial interest.
In addition, accredited CME providers may no longer ask
commercial interests for speaker or topic
suggestions, and are also prohibited from asking
commercial interests to review CME content prior to
delivery.
As a result of the revised standards, WebMD has made certain
adjustments to its corporate structure, management and
operations intended to ensure that Medscape will continue to
provide CME activities that are developed independently from
those programs developed by its sister companies, which may not
be independent of commercial interests. ACCME
required accredited providers to implement changes relating to
placing CME content on websites owned or controlled by
commercial interests by January 1, 2008, and is
requiring accredited providers to implement any corporate
structural changes necessary to meet the revised standards
regarding the definition of commercial interest by
August 2009. We believe that the adjustments that it and
Medscape have made to their structure and operations satisfy the
revised standards.
61
In June 2008, the ACCME announced a
call-for-comments on several ACCME proposals,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Potential New Paradigm for Commercial
Support: The ACCME has stated that it believes
that due consideration should be given to the possibility of
eliminating commercial support of CME. The ACCME has requested
the medical profession, the public and CME providers to weigh in
on the debate on this subject. To frame the debate, the ACCME
has proposed several possible scenarios: (a) maintaining
the current system of commercial support; (b) completely
eliminating commercial support; (c) a new paradigm that
provides for commercial support if the following conditions are
met: (1) educational needs are identified and verified by
organizations that do not receive commercial support and are
free of financial relationships with industry; (2) if the
CME addresses a professional practice gap of a particular group
of learners that is corroborated by bona fide performance
measurements of the learners own practice; (3) the
CME content is from a continuing education curriculum specified
by a bona fide organization or entity; and (4) the CME is
verified as free of commercial bias; and (d) an alternative
new paradigm in which the four conditions described above would
provide a basis for a mechanism to distribute commercial support
derived from industry-donated, pooled funds.
|
|
|
|
Defining Appropriate Interactions between ACCME Accredited
Providers and Commercial Supporters. The ACCME
has proposed that: (a) accredited providers must not
receive communications from commercial interests announcing or
prescribing any specific content that would be a preferred, or
sought-after, topic for commercially supported CME (e.g.,
therapeutic area, product-line, patho-physiology); and
(b) receiving communications from commercial interests
regarding a commercial interests internal criteria for
providing commercial support would also not be permissible.
|
The ACCME is currently seeking comments on the above, with the
comment period scheduled to end on September 12, 2008. We
expect that comments submitted to the ACCME will indicate
significant backing from the medical profession for
commercially-supported CME and, accordingly, believe it is
unlikely that a proposal for complete elimination of such
support would be adopted. However, we cannot predict the
ultimate outcome of the process, including what other
alternatives may be considered by ACCME as result of comments it
receives. The elimination of, or restrictions on, commercial
support for CME could adversely affect the volume of sponsored
online CME programs implemented through our Web sites.
Medscapes current ACCME accreditation expires at the end
of July 2010. In order for Medscape to renew its accreditation,
it will be required to demonstrate to the ACCME that it
continues to meet ACCME requirements. If Medscape fails to
maintain its status as an accredited ACCME provider (whether at
the time of such renewal or at an earlier time as a result of a
failure to comply with existing additional ACCME standards), it
would not be permitted to accredit ACCME activities for
physicians and other healthcare professionals. Instead, it would
be required to use third parties to provide such CME-related
services. That, in turn, could discourage potential sponsors
from engaging Medscape to develop CME or education-related
activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Government
regulation and industry initiatives could adversely affect the
volume of sponsored online CME programs implemented through
WebMDs Web sites or require changes to how WebMD offers
CME
CME activities may be subject to government regulation by
Congress, the FDA, the OIG, HHS, the federal agency responsible
for interpreting certain federal laws relating to healthcare,
and by state regulatory agencies. Medscape
and/or the
sponsors of the CME activities that Medscape accredits may be
subject to enforcement actions if any of these CME activities
are deemed improperly promotional, potentially leading to the
termination of sponsorships.
During the past several years, educational activities, including
CME, directed to physicians have been subject to increased
governmental scrutiny to ensure that sponsors do not influence
or control the content of the activities. In response,
pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies have
developed and implemented internal controls and procedures that
promote adherence to applicable regulations and requirements. In
implementing these controls and procedures, Medscapes
various sponsors may interpret the
62
regulations and requirements differently and may implement
varying procedures or requirements. These controls and
procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
may discourage pharmaceutical companies from providing grants
for independent educational activities;
|
|
|
|
may slow their internal approval for such grants;
|
|
|
|
may reduce the volume of sponsored educational programs that
Medscape produces to levels that are lower than in the past,
thereby reducing revenue; and
|
|
|
|
may require Medscape to make changes to how it offers or
provides educational programs, including CME.
|
In addition, future changes to laws and regulations, or to the
internal compliance programs of supporters or potential
supporters, may further discourage, significantly limit or
prohibit supporters or potential supporters from engaging in
educational activities with Medscape, or may require Medscape to
make further changes in the way it offers or provides
educational programs.
Risks
Related to Porex
Porexs
success depends upon demand for its products, which in some
cases ultimately depends upon end-user demand for the products
of its customers
Demand for our Porex products may change materially as a result
of economic or market conditions and other trends that affect
the industries in which Porex participates. In addition, because
a significant portion of our Porex products are components that
are eventually integrated into or used with products
manufactured by customers for resale to end-users, the demand
for these product components is dependent on product development
cycles and marketing efforts of these other manufacturers, as
well as variations in their inventory levels, which are factors
that we are unable to control. Accordingly, the amount of
Porexs sales to manufacturer customers can be difficult to
predict and subject to wide quarter-to-quarter variances.
Porex
faces significant competition for its products
Porex operates in competitive markets and its products are, in
general, used in applications that are affected by technological
change and product obsolescence. The competitors for
Porexs porous plastic products include other producers of
porous plastic materials as well as companies that manufacture
and sell products made from materials other than porous plastics
that can be used for the same purposes as Porexs products.
For example, Porexs porous plastic pen nibs compete with
felt and fiber tips manufactured by a variety of suppliers
worldwide. Other Porex porous plastic products compete,
depending on the application, with membrane material, porous
metals, metal screens, fiberglass tubes, pleated paper,
resin-impregnated felt, ceramics and other substances and
devices. Some of Porexs competitors may have greater
financial, technical, product development, marketing and other
resources than Porex does. We cannot provide assurance that
Porex will be able to compete successfully against these
companies or against particular products they provide or may
provide in the future.
Porexs
product offerings must meet changing customer
requirements
A significant portion of our Porex products are integrated into
end products used by manufacturing companies in various
industries, some of which are characterized by rapidly changing
technology, evolving industry standards and frequent new product
introductions. Accordingly, to satisfy its customers, Porex must
develop and introduce, in a timely manner, products that meet
changing customer requirements at competitive prices. To do
this, Porex must:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new uses of existing porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
|
|
|
innovate and develop new porous plastics technologies and
applications;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
commercialize those technologies and applications;
|
|
|
|
manufacture at a cost that allows it to price its products
competitively;
|
|
|
|
manufacture and deliver its products in sufficient volumes and
on time;
|
|
|
|
accurately anticipate customer needs; and
|
|
|
|
differentiate its offerings from those of its competitors.
|
We cannot assure you that Porex will be able to develop new or
enhanced products or that, if it does, those products will
achieve market acceptance. If Porex does not introduce new
products in a timely manner and make enhancements to existing
products to meet the changing needs of its customers, some of
its products could become obsolete over time, in which case
Porexs customer relationships, revenue and operating
results would be negatively impacted.
Potential
new or enhanced Porex products may not achieve sufficient sales
to be profitable or justify the cost of their
development
We cannot be certain, when we engage in Porex research and
development activities, whether potential new products or
product enhancements will be accepted by the customers for whom
they are intended. Achieving market acceptance for new or
enhanced products may require substantial marketing efforts and
expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand
by potential customers. In addition, sales and marketing efforts
with respect to these products may require the use of additional
resources for training our existing Porex sales forces and
customer service personnel and for hiring and training
additional salespersons and customer service personnel.
There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from
new or enhanced products will justify amounts spent for their
development and marketing. In addition, there can be no
assurance that any pricing strategy that we implement for any
new or enhanced Porex products will be economically viable or
acceptable to the target markets.
Porex may
not be able to source the raw materials it needs or may have to
pay more for those raw materials
Some of Porexs products require high-grade plastic resins
with specific properties as raw materials. While Porex has not
experienced any material difficulty in obtaining adequate
supplies of high-grade plastic resins that meet its
requirements, it relies on a limited number of sources for some
of these plastic resins. If Porex experiences a reduction or
interruption in supply from these sources, it may not be able to
access alternative sources of supply within a reasonable period
of time or at commercially reasonable rates, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business and financial results.
In addition, the prices of some of the raw materials that Porex
uses depend, to a great extent, on the price of petroleum. As a
result, increases in the price of petroleum could have an
adverse effect on Porexs margins and on the ability of
Porexs porous plastics products to compete with products
made from other raw materials.
Disruptions
in Porexs manufacturing operations could have a material
adverse effect on its business and financial results
Any significant disruption in Porexs manufacturing
operations, including as a result of fire, power interruptions,
equipment malfunctions, labor disputes, material shortages,
earthquakes, floods, computer viruses, sabotage, terrorist acts
or other force majeure, could have a material adverse effect on
Porexs ability to deliver products to customers and,
accordingly, its financial results.
64
Porex may
not be able to keep third parties from using technology it has
developed
Porex uses proprietary technology for manufacturing its porous
plastics products and its success is dependent, to a significant
extent, on its ability to protect the proprietary and
confidential aspects of its technology. Although Porex owns
certain patents, it relies primarily on non-patented proprietary
manufacturing processes. To protect its proprietary processes,
Porex relies on a combination of trade secret laws, license
agreements, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions and
technical measures, including designing and manufacturing its
porous molding equipment and most of its molds in-house. Trade
secret laws do not afford the statutory exclusivity possible for
patented processes. There can be no assurance that the legal
protections afforded to Porex or the steps taken by Porex will
be adequate to prevent misappropriation of its technology. In
addition, these protections do not prevent independent
third-party development of competitive products or services.
The
nature of Porexs products exposes it to product liability
claims that may not be adequately covered by indemnity
agreements or insurance
The products sold by Porex, whether sold directly to end-users
or sold to other manufacturers for inclusion in the products
that they sell, expose it to potential risk of product liability
claims, particularly with respect to Porexs life sciences,
clinical, surgical and medical products. In addition, Porex is
subject to the risk that a government authority or third party
may require it to recall one or more of its products. Some of
Porexs products are designed to be permanently implanted
in the human body. Design defects and manufacturing defects with
respect to such products sold by Porex or failures that occur
with the products of Porexs manufacturer customers that
contain components made by Porex could result in product
liability claims
and/or a
recall of one or more of Porexs products. Porex believes
that it carries adequate insurance coverage against product
liability claims and other risks. We cannot assure you, however,
that claims in excess of Porexs insurance coverage will
not arise. In addition, Porexs insurance policies must be
renewed annually. Although Porex has been able to obtain
adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost in the past,
we cannot assure you that Porex will continue to be able to
obtain adequate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost.
In most instances, Porex enters into indemnity agreements with
its manufacturing customers. These indemnity agreements
generally provide that these customers would indemnify Porex
from liabilities that may arise from the sale of their products
that incorporate Porex components to, or the use of such
products by, end-users. While Porex generally seeks contractual
indemnification from its customers, any such indemnification is
limited, as a practical matter, to the creditworthiness of the
indemnifying party. If Porex does not have adequate contractual
indemnification available, product liability claims, to the
extent not covered by insurance, could have a material adverse
effect on its business and its financial results.
Porexs
manufacturing of medical devices is subject to extensive
regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and its
failure to meet strict regulatory requirements could require it
to pay fines, incur other costs or close facilities
Porexs Surgical Products Group manufactures and markets
medical devices, such as reconstructive and aesthetic surgical
implants used in craniofacial applications and post-surgical
drains. In addition, Porex manufactures and markets blood serum
filters as a medical device for use in laboratory applications.
These products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA
under the FDC Act. The FDAs regulations govern, among
other things, product development, testing, manufacturing,
labeling, storage, premarket clearance (referred to as 510(k)
clearance), premarket approval (referred to as PMA approval),
advertising and promotion, and sales and distribution. In
addition, the Porex facilities and manufacturing techniques used
for manufacturing medical devices generally must conform to
standards that are established by the FDA and other government
agencies, including those of European and other foreign
governments. These regulatory agencies may conduct periodic
audits or inspections of such facilities or processes to monitor
Porexs compliance with applicable regulatory standards. If
the FDA finds that Porex has failed to comply with applicable
regulations, the agency can institute a wide variety of
enforcement actions, including: warning letters or untitled
letters; fines and civil penalties; unanticipated expenditures
to address or defend such actions; delays in clearing or
approving, or refusal to clear or approve, products; withdrawal
or suspension of approval of products; product
65
recall or seizure; orders for physician notification or device
repair, replacement or refund; interruption of production;
operating restrictions; injunctions; and criminal prosecution.
Any adverse action by an applicable regulatory agency could
impair Porexs ability to produce its medical device
products in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet
customer demands. Porex may also be required to bear other costs
or take other actions that may have a negative impact on its
future sales of such products and its ability to generate
profits.
Economic,
political and other risks associated with Porexs
international sales and geographically diverse operations could
adversely affect Porexs operations and financial
results
Since Porex sells its products worldwide, its business is
subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
In addition, Porex has manufacturing facilities in the United
Kingdom, Germany and Malaysia. Accordingly, Porexs
operations and financial results could be harmed by a variety of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic conditions, particularly in emerging markets;
|
|
|
|
trade protection measures and import or export licensing
requirements;
|
|
|
|
changes in tax laws;
|
|
|
|
differing protection of intellectual property rights in
different countries; and
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements.
|
Environmental
regulation could adversely affect Porexs
business
Porex is subject to foreign and domestic environmental laws and
regulations and is subject to scheduled and random checks by
environmental authorities. Porexs business involves the
handling, storage and disposal of materials that are classified
as hazardous. Although Porexs safety procedures for
handling, storage and disposal of these materials are designed
to comply with the standards prescribed by applicable laws and
regulations, Porex may be held liable for any environmental
damages that result from Porexs operations. Porex may be
required to pay fines, remediation costs and damages, which
could have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations.
Risks
Related to Providing Products and Services to the Healthcare
Industry
Developments
in the healthcare industry and its funding could adversely
affect our businesses
Most of the revenue of WebMD is derived from healthcare industry
participants and could be affected by changes affecting
healthcare spending. In addition, a significant portion of
Porexs revenue comes from products used in healthcare or
related applications. WebMDs advertising and sponsorship
revenue is particularly dependent on pharmaceutical,
biotechnology and medical device companies. General reductions
in expenditures by healthcare industry participants could result
from, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
government regulation or private initiatives that affect the
manner in which healthcare providers interact with patients,
payers or other healthcare industry participants, including
changes in pricing or means of delivery of healthcare products
and services;
|
|
|
|
consolidation of healthcare industry participants;
|
|
|
|
reductions in governmental funding for healthcare or in tax
benefits applicable to healthcare expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in business or economic conditions affecting
healthcare payers or providers, pharmaceutical companies,
medical device manufacturers or other healthcare industry
participants.
|
66
Even if general expenditures by healthcare industry participants
remain the same or increase, developments in the healthcare
industry may result in reduced spending in some or all of the
specific markets we serve. For example, use of our products and
services could be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the design of health insurance plans;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the number of new drugs or medical devices coming
to market; and
|
|
|
|
decreases in marketing expenditures by pharmaceutical companies
or medical device manufacturers, including as a result of
governmental regulation or private initiatives that discourage
or prohibit promotional activities by pharmaceutical or medical
device companies.
|
In addition, healthcare industry participants expectations
regarding pending or potential industry developments may also
affect their budgeting processes and spending plans with respect
to products and services of the types we provide.
The healthcare industry has changed significantly in recent
years and we expect that significant changes will continue to
occur. However, the timing and impact of developments in the
healthcare industry are difficult to predict. We cannot provide
assurance that the markets for our products and services will
continue to exist at current levels or that we will have
adequate technical, financial and marketing resources to react
to changes in those markets.
Government
regulation of healthcare creates risks and challenges with
respect to our compliance efforts and business
strategies
The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to
changing political, legislative, regulatory and other
influences. Existing and new laws and regulations affecting the
healthcare industry could create unexpected liabilities for us,
could cause us to incur additional costs and could restrict our
operations. Many healthcare laws are complex and their
application to specific products and services may not be clear.
In particular, many existing healthcare laws and regulations,
when enacted, did not anticipate the online services that WebMD
provides. However, these laws and regulations may nonetheless be
applied to our products and services. Our failure to accurately
anticipate the application of these laws and regulations, or
other failure to comply, could create liability for us, result
in adverse publicity and negatively affect our businesses. Some
of the risks that we face from healthcare regulation are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
because WebMDs public portals business involves
advertising and promotion of prescription and over-the-counter
drugs and medical devices, any increase in regulation of these
areas could make it more difficult for WebMD to contract for
sponsorships and advertising;
|
|
|
|
because WebMD is the leading distributor of online CME to
healthcare professionals, any failure to maintain its status as
an accredited CME provider or any change in government
regulation of CME or in industry practices could adversely
affect WebMDs business;
|
|
|
|
because Porex manufactures medical devices for implantation, it
is subject to extensive FDA regulation, as well as foreign
regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
because we provide products and services to healthcare
providers, our sales and promotional practices must comply with
federal and state anti-kickback laws; and
|
|
|
|
in providing health information to consumers, we must not engage
in activities that could be deemed to be practicing medicine and
a violation of applicable laws.
|
67
Risks
Applicable to Our Entire Company and to Ownership of Our
Securities
The
ongoing investigations by the United States Attorney for the
District of South Carolina and the SEC could negatively impact
our company and divert management attention from our business
operations
The United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina is
conducting an investigation of our company. Based on the
information available to HLTH as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q,
we believe that the investigation relates principally to issues
of financial accounting improprieties for Medical Manager
Corporation, a predecessor of HLTH (by its merger into HLTH in
September 2000), and Medical Manager Health Systems, a former
subsidiary of HLTH; however, we cannot be sure of the
investigations exact scope or how long it may continue. In
addition, HLTH understands that the SEC is conducting a formal
investigation into this matter. Adverse developments in
connection with the investigations, if any, including as a
result of matters that the authorities or HLTH may discover,
could have a negative impact on our company and on how it is
perceived by investors and potential investors and customers and
potential customers. In addition, the management effort and
attention required to respond to the investigations and any such
developments could have a negative impact on our business
operations.
HLTH intends to continue to fully cooperate with the authorities
in this matter. We believe that the amount of the expenses that
we will incur in connection with the investigations will
continue to be significant and we are not able to determine, at
this time, what portion of those amounts may ultimately be
covered by insurance or may ultimately be repaid to us by
individuals to whom we are advancing amounts for their defense
costs. In connection with the sale of Emdeon Practice Services
to Sage Software, we have agreed to indemnify Sage Software with
respect to this matter.
If
certain transactions occur with respect to our capital stock,
limitations may be imposed on our ability to utilize our net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to reduce our
income taxes
As of December 31, 2007, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $1.3 billion for federal
income tax purposes and federal tax credits of approximately
$35.7 million, which excludes the impact of any
unrecognized tax benefits. If certain transactions occur with
respect to our capital stock, including issuances, redemptions,
recapitalizations, exercises of options, conversions of
convertible debt, purchases or sales by 5%-or-greater
shareholders and similar transactions, that result in a
cumulative change of more than 50% of the ownership of our
capital stock, over a three-year period, as determined under
rules prescribed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and
applicable Treasury regulations, an annual limitation would be
imposed with respect to our ability to utilize our net operating
loss carryforwards and federal tax credits. We expect the WHC
Merger to result in a cumulative change of more than 50% of the
ownership of our capital, as determined under rules prescribed
by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury
regulations. However, we are currently unable to calculate the
annual limitation that would be imposed on our ability to
utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and federal tax
credits.
We may
not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and
proprietary rights
Intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to
our businesses. The steps that we take to protect our
intellectual property, proprietary information and trade secrets
may prove to be inadequate and, whether or not adequate, may be
expensive. We rely on a combination of trade secret, patent and
other intellectual property laws and confidentiality procedures
and non-disclosure contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be able
to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement
of our intellectual property, proprietary information or trade
secrets. Even if we detect misappropriation or infringement by a
third party, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
enforce our rights at a reasonable cost, or at all. In addition,
our rights to intellectual property, proprietary information and
trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party
development and commercialization of competing products or
services.
68
Third
parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual
property, and we could suffer significant litigation or
licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products or
services
We could be subject to claims that we are misappropriating or
infringing intellectual property or other proprietary rights of
others. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be
expensive to defend and divert managements attention from
our operations. If we become liable to third parties for
infringing these rights, we could be required to pay a
substantial damage award and to develop non-infringing
technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products or
services that use or contain the infringing intellectual
property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing products or
services or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms,
or at all. We may also be required to indemnify our customers if
they become subject to third-party claims relating to
intellectual property that we license or otherwise provide to
them, which could be costly.
Acquisitions,
business combinations and other transactions may be difficult to
complete and, if completed, may have negative consequences for
our business and our securityholders
We may seek to acquire or to engage in business combinations
with companies engaged in complementary businesses. In addition,
we may enter into joint ventures, strategic alliances or similar
arrangements with third parties. These transactions may result
in changes in the nature and scope of our operations and changes
in our financial condition. Our success in completing these
types of transactions will depend on, among other things, our
ability to locate suitable candidates and negotiate mutually
acceptable terms with them, as well as the availability of
financing. Significant competition for these opportunities
exists, which may increase the cost of and decrease the
opportunities for these types of transactions.
Financing for these transactions may come from several sources,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
cash and cash equivalents on hand and marketable securities;
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the incurrence of indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
proceeds from the issuance of additional common stock, preferred
stock, convertible debt or other securities.
|
Our issuance of additional securities could:
|
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of the percentage ownership of our
stockholders at the time of the issuance;
|
|
|
|
cause substantial dilution of our earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
subject us to the risks associated with increased leverage,
including a reduction in our ability to obtain financing or an
increase in the cost of any financing we obtain;
|
|
|
|
subject us to restrictive covenants that could limit our
flexibility in conducting future business activities; and
|
|
|
|
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our outstanding
securities.
|
We do not intend to seek securityholder approval for any such
acquisition or security issuance unless required by applicable
law or regulation or the terms of existing securities.
Our
business will suffer if we fail to successfully integrate
acquired businesses and technologies or to assess the risks in
particular transactions
We have in the past acquired, and may in the future acquire,
businesses, technologies, services, product lines and other
assets. The successful integration of the acquired businesses
and assets into our operations, on a cost-effective basis, can
be critical to our future performance. The amount and timing of
the expected benefits of any acquisition, including potential
synergies between HLTH and the acquired business, are subject to
significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain relationships with the customers of the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to cross-sell products and services to customers
with which we have established relationships and those with
which the acquired businesses have established relationships;
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain or replace key personnel;
|
|
|
|
potential conflicts in payer, provider, strategic partner,
sponsor or advertising relationships;
|
|
|
|
our ability to coordinate organizations that are geographically
diverse and may have different business cultures; and
|
|
|
|
compliance with regulatory requirements.
|
We cannot guarantee that any acquired businesses will be
successfully integrated with our operations in a timely or
cost-effective manner, or at all. Failure to successfully
integrate acquired businesses or to achieve anticipated
operating synergies, revenue enhancements or cost savings could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Although our management attempts to evaluate the risks inherent
in each transaction and to value acquisition candidates
appropriately, we cannot assure you that we will properly
ascertain all such risks or that acquired businesses and assets
will perform as we expect or enhance the value of our company as
a whole. In addition, acquired companies or businesses may have
larger than expected liabilities that are not covered by the
indemnification, if any, that we are able to obtain from the
sellers.
We will
incur significant additional non-cash interest expense upon the
adoption of FASB Staff Position No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement)
On May 9, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (or
FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments that May be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) that will significantly impact the accounting
for convertible debt when it is adopted during the first quarter
of 2009. The FSP will require cash settled convertible debt to
be separated into debt and equity components at issuance and a
value to be assigned to each. The value assigned to the debt
component will be the estimated fair value, as of the issuance
date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature. The
difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated
fair value will be recorded as a debt discount and amortized to
interest expense over the life of the bond. Although FSP APB
14-1 will
have no impact on our actual past or future cash flows, it will
require us to record a significant amount of non-cash interest
expense as the debt discount is amortized. As a result, there
will be an adverse impact on our results of operations and
earnings per share and that impact could be material.
We may
not be able to raise additional funds when needed for our
business or to exploit opportunities
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon
numerous factors, including the success of the integration of
our businesses, our existing and new applications and service
offerings, competing technologies and market developments,
potential future acquisitions and dispositions of companies or
businesses, and additional repurchases of our common stock. We
may need to raise additional funds to support expansion, develop
new or enhanced applications and services, respond to
competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or
technologies or take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.
If required, we may raise such additional funds through public
or private debt or equity financing, strategic relationships or
other arrangements. There can be no assurance that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or
that such financing will not be dilutive to our stockholders.
Negative
conditions in the market for certain auction rate securities may
result in us incurring a loss on such investments
As of June 30, 2008, HLTH had a total of approximately
$360.9 million (face value) of investments in certain
auction rate securities (ARS) of which $167.5 million (face
value) relate to WHC. Those ARS had a fair value of
$298.0 million of which ($138.3 million relates to
WHC). The types of ARS investments that HLTH owns are backed by
student loans, 97% of which are guaranteed under the Federal
Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), and all had credit
ratings of AAA or Aaa when purchased. HLTH and its subsidiaries
do not own any other type of ARS investments.
70
Since February 2008, negative conditions in the regularly held
auctions for these securities have prevented holders from being
able to liquidate their holdings through that type of sale. In
the event HLTH needs to or wants to sell its ARS investments, it
may not be able to do so until a future auction on these types
of investments is successful or until a buyer is found outside
the auction process. If potential buyers are unwilling to
purchase the investments at their carrying amount, HLTH would
incur a loss on any such sales.
The WHC
Merger will result in a substantial increase in the number of
shares of WHC Common Stock available for trading, which could
depress the price of such stock and/or increase the volatility
of the price of such stock, both before and after completion of
the WHC Merger
Upon completion of the WHC Merger, shares of HLTH Common Stock
will be converted into the right to receive cash and shares of
WHC Common Stock. Although the WHC Merger is expected to reduce
the total number of outstanding shares of WHC Common Stock, the
WHC Merger will greatly increase the number of such shares
available for sale in the public markets. Currently, all
48,100,000 outstanding shares of WHC Class B Common Stock
are held by HLTH and do not trade in the public markets. As of
June 30, 2008, approximately 9,259,000 shares of WHC
Class A Common Stock (the class traded publicly) were
outstanding. In the WHC Merger, the WHC Class B Common
Stock will become treasury stock of WebMD and will cease to be
outstanding, but more than 36,000,000 new shares of WHC Common
Stock will be issued to holders of HLTH Common Stock and become
immediately available for sale. Additional shares could become
available for sale at or after that time depending upon:
|
|
|
|
|
whether holders of options to purchase HLTH Common Stock
exercise those options and the timing of such exercises; and
|
|
|
|
whether holders of convertible notes issued by HLTH convert
those notes and the timing of any such conversions.
|
Sales of large amounts of WHC Common Stock could depress the
market price of WHC Common Stock. In addition, the potential
that such sales may occur could depress prices even in advance
of such sales. We cannot predict the effect that the HLTH Merger
will have on the price of WebMD Common Stock, either before or
after completion of the HLTH Merger.
The WHC
Merger is subject to closing conditions that, if not satisfied
or waived, will result in the WHC Merger not being completed,
which may cause the market price of HLTH Common Stock to
decline
The WHC Merger is subject to customary conditions to closing,
including the receipt of required approvals of the stockholders
of HLTH and WHC and receipt of opinions of counsel relating to
tax matters. In addition, the WHC Merger is subject to
deal-specific closing conditions, including: (a) the
combined company having a sufficient amount of available cash at
closing to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration
while leaving an agreed upon amount of cash in the combined
company, calculated pursuant to a formula contained in the
Merger Agreement; and (b) HLTH having (i) sold its
holdings of auction rate securities (excluding any ARS
investments held by WHC) prior to closing, (ii) borrowed
75% of the principal amount of its ARS investments pursuant to
the HLTH Loan Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, between
HLTH and Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. or
(iii) having satisfied all conditions precedent under the
HLTH Loan Agreement to permit HLTH to borrow 75% of the
principal amount of its ARS investments at the effective time of
the WHC Merger. If any condition to the WHC Merger is not
satisfied or, if permissible, waived, the WHC Merger will not be
completed. Generally, waiver by WHC of a condition to closing
will require approval of the Special Committee of the WHC Board
that negotiated the transaction with HLTH. We cannot predict
what the effect on the market price of HLTH Common Stock would
be if the WHC Merger is not able to be completed, but depending
on market conditions at the time, it could result in a decline
in that market price. In addition, if there is uncertainty
regarding whether the WHC Merger will be completed (including
uncertainty regarding whether the conditions to closing will be
met), that could result in a decline in the market price of HLTH
Common Stock or an increase in the volatility of that market
price.
71
Our
decision to sell Porex may have a negative impact on that
business
As a result of our announcement that we plan to divest Porex,
the financial results and operations of that business may be
adversely affected by the diversion of management resources to
the sale process and by uncertainty regarding the outcome of the
process. For example, the uncertainty of who will own Porex in
the future could lead Porex to lose or fail to attract
employees, customers or business partners. Although we have
taken steps to address these risks, there can be no assurance
that any such losses or distractions will not adversely affect
the operations or financial results of Porex and, as a result,
the sale price that we may receive for Porex.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve principal and maintain adequate liquidity, while at the
same time maximizing the yield we receive from our investment
portfolio.
Changes in prevailing interest rates will cause the fair value
of certain of our investments to fluctuate, such as our
investments in auction rate securities that generally bear
interest at rates indexed to LIBOR. As of June 30, 2008,
the fair market value of our auction rate securities was
approximately $298 million. However, the fair values of our
cash and money market investments, which approximated
$1.1 billion at June 30, 2008 are not subject to
changes in interest rates.
The
31/8% Notes
and the 1.75% Notes that we have issued have fixed interest
rates; changes in interest rates will not impact our financial
condition or results of operations as it relates to these Notes.
HLTH and WHC have each entered into a non-recourse credit
facility (each a Credit Facility) with Citigroup
that is secured by their respective ARS holdings (including, in
some circumstances, interest payable on the ARS holdings), that
will allow HLTH and WHC to borrow up to 75% of the face amount
of the ARS holdings pledged as collateral under the respective
Credit Facilities. The interest rate applicable to such
borrowings will be one-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points.
No borrowings have been made under either Credit Facility to
date.
Exchange
Rate Sensitivity
Currently, substantially all of our sales and expenses are
denominated in United States dollars; however, certain of our
Porex subsidiaries (currently reflected as discontinued
operations) are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates, primarily the rate of exchange of the United
States dollar against the Euro. This exposure arises primarily
as a result of translating the results of Porexs foreign
operations to the United States dollar at exchange rates
that have fluctuated from the beginning of the accounting
period. Porex has not engaged in foreign currency hedging
activities to date. Foreign currency translation (losses) gains
were ($0.1) million and $3.3 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and foreign
currency translation gains were $0.4 million and
$0.8 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively. We believe that future
exchange rate sensitivity related to Porex will not have a
material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b),
HLTH management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness
of HLTHs disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e),
as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that
HLTHs disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of June 30, 2008.
In connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(d),
HLTH management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that no changes in HLTHs
internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
second quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, HLTHs internal
control over financial reporting.
72
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information relating to legal proceedings contained in
Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report is
incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(c) The following table provides information about
purchases by HLTH during the three months ended June 30,
2008 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to
Section 12 of the Exchange Act:
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased (1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
Programs (2)
|
|
|
Programs (2)
|
|
|
4/01/08 - 4/30/08
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
10.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,553,120
|
|
5/01/08 - 5/31/08
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,553,120
|
|
6/01/08 - 6/30/08
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
$
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,553,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,117
|
|
|
$
|
11.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,553,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents shares withheld from
HLTH Restricted Stock that vested during the respective periods
in order to satisfy withholding tax requirements related to the
vesting of the awards. The value of these shares was determined
based on the closing price of HLTH Common Stock on the date of
vesting.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Relates to the repurchase program
that we announced in December 2006, at which time HLTH was
authorized to use up to $100 million to purchase shares of
its common stock from time to time. For additional information,
see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report.
|
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index on
page E-1
are filed or furnished as part of this Quarterly Report.
73
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HLTH
Corporation
Mark D. Funston
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 11, 2008
74
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20,
2008, between HLTH Corporation and the Registrant (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 1, filed on
February 25, 2008, to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on February 21, 2008)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 6, 2008, to Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 20, 2008, between
HLTH Corporation and WebMD Health Corp. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by WebMD Health Corp. on May 7, 2008)
|
|
2
|
.3*
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2008, between
SNTC Holding, Inc. and General Dynamics Information Technology,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment
No. 1, filed on June 10, 2008, to the Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed by the Registrant on June 4, 2008)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Eleventh Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger Amending the
Registrants Eleventh Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to Change the Registrants Name to HLTH
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 21, 2007)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant, as currently in
effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, between Citigroup
Global Markets Holdings Inc. and HLTH Corporation
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2008, between Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. SB and WebMD Health Corp. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of WebMD Health Corp.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Registrant
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Registrant
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of
Registrant
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain of the exhibits and schedules to this agreement have
been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The
Registrant will furnish copies of any of the exhibits and
schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
E-1