COUSINS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 0-3576
COUSINS PROPERTIES
INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-0869052
|
(State or other
jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2500 Windy Ridge Parkway,
Suite 1600, Atlanta, Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30339-5683
(Zip Code)
|
(770) 955-2200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
7.75% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable
|
|
|
Preferred Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
7.50% Series B Cumulative
Redeemable
|
|
|
Preferred Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Exchange
Act. Yes o
No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer.
Large accelerated
filer þ
Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o
No þ
As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the
common stock of Cousins Properties Incorporated held by
non-affiliates was $1,207,847,739 based on the closing sale
price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. As of
February 23, 2007, 51,933,819 shares of common stock
were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants proxy statement for the annual
stockholders meeting to be held on May 14, 2007 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain matters contained in this report are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws and
are subject to uncertainties and risks. These include, but are
not limited to, general and local economic conditions, local
real estate conditions, the activity of others developing
competitive projects, the risks associated with development
projects (such as delay, cost overruns and leasing/sales risk of
new properties), the cyclical nature of the real estate
industry, the financial condition of existing tenants, interest
rates, the Companys ability to obtain favorable financing
or zoning, environmental matters, the effects of terrorism, the
ability of the Company to close properties under contract and
other risks detailed from time to time in the Companys
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including
this report on
Form 10-K.
The words believes, expects,
anticipates, estimates and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and
expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are
reasonable, the Company can give no assurance that such plans,
intentions or expectations will be achieved. Such
forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and
speak as of the date of such statements. The Company undertakes
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of future events, new information
or otherwise.
2
PART I
Item 1. Business
Corporate
Profile
Cousins Properties Incorporated (the Registrant or
Cousins) is a Georgia corporation, which since 1987
has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust
(REIT). Cousins Real Estate Corporation and its
subsidiaries (CREC) is a taxable entity wholly-owned
by the Registrant and is consolidated with the Registrant. CREC
owns, develops, and manages its own real estate portfolio and
performs certain real estate related services for other parties.
The Registrant and CREC combined are hereafter referred to as
the Company. The Company has been a public company
since 1962, and its common stock trades on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol CUZ.
The Companys strategy is to produce strong stockholder
returns by creating value through the acquisition, development
and redevelopment of high quality, well-located office,
multi-family, retail, industrial, and residential properties.
The Company has developed substantially all of the income
producing real estate assets it owns and operates. A key element
in the Companys strategy is to actively manage its
portfolio of investment properties and, at the appropriate
times, to engage in timely and strategic dispositions either by
sale or through contributions to ventures in which the Company
retains an ownership interest. These transactions seek to
maximize the value of the assets the Company has created,
generate capital for additional development properties and
return a portion of the value created to stockholders.
Unless otherwise indicated, the notes referenced in the
discussion below are the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
on pages F-7 through F-43.
The Company conducts its business through four divisions:
Office/Multi-Family, Retail, Industrial and Land. The following
is a summary of the strategy and 2006 activity in each of its
operating divisions:
Business
Description and Significant Changes in 2006
Office/Multi-Family
Division
The strategy of the Office/Multi-Family Division is to create
value through (1) the development and asset management of
Class A office projects with particular focus in Austin,
Dallas, Charlotte, Birmingham, and Atlanta; (2) the
development and sale of multi-family projects in urban locations
in the Southeastern United States targeted to buyers with
generally higher income and less sensitivity to interest rates;
and (3) the management and leasing of office properties
owned by third parties. In addition to traditional
office/multi-family projects, the Office/Multi-Family Division
is engaged in the development of mixed use projects that contain
multiple product types in communities where individuals live,
work and seek entertainment.
As of December 31, 2006, the Office/Multi-Family Division
owned directly or through joint ventures 20 operating office
properties totaling 4.9 million rentable square feet and
had five office or multi-family projects under active
development or redevelopment.
Significant activity within the Office/Multi-Family
Division in 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Formed a joint venture which is intended to construct Palisades
West, a 360,000 square foot, two building office
development in Austin, Texas.
|
|
|
|
Increased percentage leased of Terminus 100 from 41% at
December 31, 2005 to 64% at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
Completed the construction and closed the sale of all units at
905 Juniper, the Companys first multi-family project.
|
|
|
|
Acquired 191 Peachtree, a 1.2 million square foot,
Class A building in Downtown Atlanta.
|
|
|
|
Increased percentage of completion of 50 Biscayne from 26% at
December 31, 2005 to 70% at December 31, 2006. The
Company expects construction to be substantially complete and
unit closings to commence in the fourth quarter of 2007.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Had significant leasing activity, notably a 274,000 square
foot lease to the American Cancer Society at Inforum.
|
Retail
Division
The strategy of the Retail Division is to create stockholder
value through the development and management of retail shopping
centers, including
Avenue®
concept lifestyle centers and power centers. The Retail Division
focuses its efforts in demographically favorable markets in the
Sunbelt with a particular emphasis on Georgia, Tennessee, North
Carolina, Texas and Florida. In addition, the Retail Division is
partnering with other divisions for mixed-use developments such
as the Terminus project in the Buckhead district of Atlanta.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company owned directly or
through joint ventures 10 operating retail properties totaling
2.7 million rentable square feet and had three projects and
one expansion under active development totaling 1.5 million
square feet.
Significant activity within the Retail Division in 2006
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commenced operations of San Jose MarketCenter, a
363,000 square foot power center in San Jose,
California, of which the Company owns 220,000 square feet.
|
|
|
|
Commenced operations of The Avenue Webb Gin, a
381,000 square foot lifestyle center in suburban Atlanta.
|
|
|
|
Through a joint venture, commenced construction of The Avenue
Murfreesboro, an 810,000 square foot lifestyle center in
suburban Nashville, Tennessee.
|
Industrial
Division
The strategy of the Industrial Division is to create value
through the development of institutional quality warehouse and
distribution properties. The Industrial Division initially
focused its efforts on the metropolitan Atlanta area. In 2006,
it expanded into the Dallas market with a joint venture partner.
Over time, the Industrial Division expects to expand beyond the
Atlanta and Dallas market areas to port cities such as Savannah,
Jacksonville and Tampa as well as major distribution centers
that may include Central Florida, Memphis and Kansas City.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company owned through joint
ventures one operating industrial property totaling
417,000 rentable square feet and three projects under
active development totaling 1.6 million square feet.
Significant activity within the Industrial Division in
2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commenced construction of the first building at Jefferson Mill
Business Park, a 459,000 square foot industrial project in
Jackson County, Georgia. This project will contain
3.2 million square feet upon completion.
|
|
|
|
Through a joint venture commenced construction of the first
building in Lakeside Ranch Business Park in Dallas, Texas. The
first building will contain 749,000 square feet and the
project will contain 1.7 million square feet upon
completion.
|
|
|
|
Commenced operations of the first building in King Mill
Distribution Park containing 417,000 square feet.
|
|
|
|
Commenced construction of the second building in King Mill
Distribution Park containing 359,000 square feet.
|
Land
Division
The strategy of the Land Division is to create value through the
acquisition and entitlement of land, and the development and
sale of residential lots. In addition, the Land Division
acquires and sells certain undeveloped tracts of land to third
parties that are generally adjacent to or a part of its
residential lot developments. The Land Division conducts most of
its business through partnerships with Temple Inland and its
affiliates. This alliance has allowed the Company to share in
the capital invested in individual projects and to share
resources and expertise in the development and sale of
residential lots and land tracts.
4
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had 24 residential
communities under development directly or through joint ventures
in which approximately 11,600 lots remain to be developed
and/or sold.
In addition, the Company or its joint ventures had approximately
9,100 acres of undeveloped land.
Significant activity within the Land Division in 2006 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Commenced development of Blalock Lakes, a planned
3,000 acre residential community in Coweta County, Georgia
that is expected to include private hunting, equestrian,
fishing, swim and tennis facilities in a controlled access
community.
|
|
|
|
Entered into a joint venture with Callaway Gardens Resorts, Inc.
for the development of residential lots within the Callaway
Gardens Resort.
|
|
|
|
Sold 1,576 residential lots, either directly or through joint
ventures.
|
|
|
|
Sold 1,245 acres of land tracts, either directly or through
joint ventures.
|
Financing
Activities
The Companys financing strategy is to provide capital to
fund its development activities while maintaining a relatively
conservative debt level and managing the Companys size to
make the value created from its development activities more
accretive to its common stockholders. Historically, the Company
has accomplished this strategy by raising capital through bank
lines of credit, construction and mortgage loans secured by its
properties, sale of mature assets and distribution of the gains
on asset sales to stockholders, contribution of assets into
joint ventures, and the issuance of preferred stock.
During 2006, the Company had the following financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Formed a venture with an institutional investor for the
ownership, development, investment, management and leasing of
certain commercial real estate projects, including five of the
Companys retail properties. This transaction provided
$300 million in capital in 2006 and is expected to provide
$20 million of capital in 2007 for future investment.
|
|
|
|
Sold The Avenue of the Peninsula and its interests in Bank of
America Plaza and Frost Bank Tower for total proceeds of
$502 million.
|
|
|
|
Sold seven ground lease outparcels at its North Point property
generating proceeds of approximately $14.3 million.
|
|
|
|
Recast its credit facility resulting in $75 million in
additional capacity, a reduction in its interest spread over
LIBOR and additional flexibility in certain financial covenants.
|
|
|
|
Closed a $100 million unsecured construction facility for
funding the development of Terminus 100.
|
|
|
|
The joint venture developing The Avenue Murfreesboro closed a
$131 million construction loan, of which the Company
guarantees 20%.
|
|
|
|
Paid a special dividend to common stockholders of
$175.5 million or $3.40 per share.
|
Environmental
Matters
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and
regulations, an owner or operator of real estate is generally
liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain
hazardous or toxic substances on or in such property. Such laws
often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew
of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or
toxic substances. The presence of such substances, or the
failure to properly remediate such substances, may subject the
owner to substantial liability and may adversely affect the
owners ability to develop the property or to borrow using
such real estate as collateral. The Company is not aware of any
environmental liability that the Companys management
believes would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business, assets or results of operations.
5
Certain environmental laws impose liability on a previous owner
of property to the extent that hazardous or toxic substances
were present during the prior ownership period. A transfer of
the property does not relieve an owner of such liability. Thus,
although the Company is not aware of any such situation, the
Company may be liable in respect to properties previously sold.
In connection with the development or acquisition of certain
properties, the Company has obtained Phase One environmental
audits (which generally involve inspection without soil sampling
or ground water analysis) from independent environmental
consultants. The remaining properties (including the
Companys land held for investment or future development)
have typically also been so examined. No assurance can be given
that environmental liabilities do not exist, that the reports
revealed all environmental liabilities or that no prior owner
created any material environmental condition not known to the
Company.
The Company believes that it and its properties are in
compliance in all material respects with all federal, state and
local laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or
toxic substances.
Competition
The Company competes for tenants with similar properties located
in its markets primarily on the basis of location, rental rates,
services provided and the design and condition of the
facilities. The Company also competes with other real estate
companies, financial institutions, pension funds, partnerships,
individual investors and others when attempting to acquire and
develop properties. In addition, the Land and
Office/Multi-Family divisions compete with other lot and
multi-family developers.
Executive
Offices; Employees
The Registrants executive offices are located at 2500
Windy Ridge Parkway, Suite 1600, Atlanta,
Georgia 30339-5683.
Effective April 1, 2007, the Companys executive
offices will relocate to 191 Peachtree Street, Suite 3600,
Atlanta, Georgia
30303-1740.
At December 31, 2006, the Company employed 488 people.
Available
Information
The Company makes available free of charge on the Investor
Relations page of its Web site,
www.cousinsproperties.com, its filed and furnished
reports on
Forms 10-K,
10-Q and
8-K, and all
amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after the
reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC).
The Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, Director
Independence Standards, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and
the Charters of the Audit Committee and the Compensation,
Succession, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors are also available on the Investor
Relations page of the Companys Web site. The
information contained on the Companys Web site is not
incorporated herein by reference.
Copies of these documents (without exhibits, when applicable)
are also available free of charge upon request to the Company at
2500 Windy Ridge Parkway, Suite 1600, Atlanta, Georgia
30339-5683,
Attention: Investor Relations. Investor Relations may also be
reached by telephone at
(770) 955-2200
or by facsimile at
(770) 857-2368.
Effective April 1, 2007, the Companys headquarters
will relocate to 191 Peachtree Street, Suite 3600, Atlanta,
Georgia
30303-1740,
main telephone number
(404) 407-1000.
In addition, the SEC maintains an internet website that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers, including the Company, that file
electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Set forth below are the risks we believe investors should
consider carefully in evaluating an investment in the securities
of Cousins Properties Incorporated.
6
General
Real Estate Operating Risks
Our
ownership of commercial real estate involves a number of risks,
including general economic and market risks, leasing risk,
uninsured losses and condemnation costs, environmental issues,
joint venture structure risk and concentration of real estate,
the effects of which could adversely affect our
business.
General economic and market risks. Our
assets may not generate income sufficient to pay our expenses,
service debt or maintain our properties, and, as a result, our
results of operations may be adversely affected and we may need
to reduce our dividend in future periods. Several factors may
adversely affect the economic performance and value of our
properties. These factors include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the national, regional and local economic climate;
|
|
|
|
local conditions such as an oversupply of properties or a
reduction in demand for properties;
|
|
|
|
the attractiveness of our properties to tenants;
|
|
|
|
competition from other available properties;
|
|
|
|
changes in market rental rates; and
|
|
|
|
the need to periodically repair, renovate and re-lease space.
|
Our performance also depends on our ability to collect rent from
tenants and to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance and other
operating costs (including real estate taxes), which could
increase over time. Also, the expenses of owning and operating a
property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as
market factors and competition cause a reduction in income from
the property. If a property is mortgaged and we are unable to
meet the mortgage payments, the lender could foreclose on the
mortgage and take title to the property. In addition, interest
rate levels, the availability of financing, changes in laws and
governmental regulations (including those governing usage,
zoning and taxes) and financial distress or bankruptcies of
tenants may adversely affect our financial condition.
Leasing risk. Our operating revenues
are dependent upon entering into leases with and collecting
rents from tenants. National, regional and local economic
conditions may adversely impact tenants and potential tenants in
the various marketplaces in which projects are located, and
accordingly, could affect their ability to continue to pay rents
and possibly to occupy their space. Tenants sometimes experience
bankruptcies and pursuant to the various bankruptcy laws, leases
may be rejected and thereby terminated. When leases expire or
are terminated, replacement tenants may or may not be available
upon acceptable terms and conditions. In addition, our cash
flows and results of operations could be adversely impacted if
existing leases expire or are terminated and at such time,
market rental rates are lower than the previous contractual
rental rates. As a result, our distributable cash flow and
ability to make distributions to stockholders would be adversely
affected if a significant number of our tenants fail to pay
their rent due to bankruptcy, weakened financial condition or
otherwise.
Uninsured losses and condemnation
costs. Accidents, earthquakes, terrorism
incidents and other losses at our properties could materially
adversely affect our operating results. Casualties may occur
that significantly damage an operating property, and insurance
proceeds may be materially less than the total loss incurred by
us. Although we maintain casualty insurance under policies we
believe to be adequate and appropriate, some types of losses,
such as lease and other contract claims, generally are not
insured. Certain types of insurance may not be available or may
be available on terms that could result in large uninsured
losses. We own property in California and other locations where
property is subject to damage from earthquakes, as well as other
natural catastrophes. We also own property that could be subject
to loss due to terrorism incidents. The earthquake insurance and
terrorism insurance markets, in particular, tend to be volatile
and the availability and pricing of insurance to cover losses
from earthquakes and terrorism incidents may be unfavorable from
time to time. In addition, earthquakes and terrorism incidents
could result in a significant loss that is uninsured due to the
high level of deductibles or damage in excess of levels of
coverage. Property ownership also involves potential liability
to third parties for such matters as personal injuries occurring
on the property. Such losses may not be fully insured. In
addition to uninsured losses, various government authorities may
condemn all or parts of operating properties. Such condemnations
could adversely affect the viability of such projects.
7
Environmental issues. Environmental
issues that arise at our properties could have an adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. Federal,
state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection
of the environment may require a current or previous owner or
operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or
toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a property.
The owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or
third parties for property damage and for investigation and
clean-up
costs incurred by such parties in connection with the
contamination. These laws typically impose
clean-up
responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner
or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants.
Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the
contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may
be held responsible for all of the
clean-up
costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or
operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from
environmental contamination emanating from that site. We are not
currently aware of any environmental liabilities at locations
that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our
business, assets, financial condition or results of operations.
Unidentified environmental liabilities could arise, however, and
could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
Joint venture structure risks. Our
venture partners have rights to take some actions over which we
have no control, which could adversely affect our interests in
the related joint ventures and in some cases our overall
financial condition or results of operations. We have interests
in a number of joint ventures (including partnerships and
limited liability companies) and may in the future conduct our
business through such structures. These structures involve
participation by other parties whose interests and rights may
not be the same as ours. For example, a venture partner might
have economic
and/or other
business interests or goals which are unlike or incompatible
with our business interests or goals and those venture partners
may be in a position to take action contrary to our interests,
including maintaining our REIT status. In addition, such venture
partners may become bankrupt and such proceedings could have an
adverse impact on the operation of the partnership or joint
venture. Furthermore, the success of a project may be dependent
upon the expertise, business judgment, diligence and
effectiveness of our venture partners in matters that are
outside our control. Thus, the involvement of venture partners
could adversely impact the development, operation and ownership
of the underlying properties, including any disposition of such
underlying properties.
Regional concentration of
properties. Currently, a large percentage of
our properties are located in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. In
the future, there may be significant concentrations in
metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia
and/or other
markets. If there is deterioration in any market in which we
have significant holdings, our interests could be adversely
affected, including, without limitation, loss in value of
properties, decreased cash flows and inability to make or
maintain distributions to stockholders.
Compliance
or failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or
other safety regulations and requirements could result in
substantial costs.
The Americans with Disabilities Act generally requires that
public buildings, including office, retail and multi-family
buildings, be made accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance
could result in the imposition of fines by the federal
government or the award of damages to private litigants. If,
under the Americans with Disabilities Act, we are required to
make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in one or
more of our properties, including the removal of access
barriers, it could adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations, as well as the amount of cash available
for distribution to our stockholders.
Our properties are also subject to various federal, state and
local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and
life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these
requirements, we could incur fines or private damage awards. We
do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether
compliance with future requirements will require significant
unanticipated expenditures that will affect our cash flow and
results of operations.
8
Real
Estate Development Risks
We
face risks associated with the development of real estate, such
as delay, cost overruns and the possibility that we are unable
to lease a large portion of the space that we build, which could
adversely affect our results.
We generally undertake more commercial development activity
relative to our size than other public real estate companies.
Development activities contain certain inherent risks. Although
we seek to minimize risks from commercial development through
various management controls and procedures, development risks
cannot be eliminated. Some of the key factors affecting
development of commercial property are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The availability of sufficient development
opportunities. Absence of sufficient
development opportunities could result in our experiencing
slower growth in earnings and cash flows. Development
opportunities are dependent upon a wide variety of factors. From
time to time, availability of these opportunities can be
volatile as a result of, among other things, economic conditions
and product supply/demand characteristics in a particular market.
|
|
|
|
Abandoned predevelopment costs. The
development process inherently requires that a large number of
opportunities be pursued with only a few being developed and
constructed. We may incur significant costs for predevelopment
activity for projects that are abandoned that directly affect
our results from operations. We have procedures and controls in
place that are intended to minimize this risk, but it is likely
that there will be predevelopment costs charged to expense on an
ongoing basis.
|
|
|
|
Project costs. Construction and leasing
of a project involves a variety of costs that cannot always be
identified at the beginning of a project. Costs may arise that
have not been anticipated or actual costs may exceed estimated
costs. These additional costs can be significant and could
adversely impact our return on a project and the expected
results from operations upon completion of the project. Also,
construction costs rose significantly in 2006 due to increased
demand for building materials and are expected to increase
further in the near term. We attempt to mitigate construction
cost risks on our development projects through guaranteed
maximum price contracts and pre-ordering of certain materials,
but we may be adversely affected by increased construction costs
on our current and future projects.
|
|
|
|
Leasing risk. The success of a
commercial real estate development project is dependent upon,
among other factors, entering into leases with acceptable terms
within a predefined
lease-up
period. Although our policy is to achieve preleasing goals
(which vary by market, product type and circumstances) before
committing to a project, it is likely only some percentage of
the space in a project will be leased at the time we commit to
the project. If the space is not leased on schedule and upon the
expected terms and conditions, our returns, future earnings and
results of operations from the project could be adversely
impacted. Whether or not tenants are willing to enter into
leases on the terms and conditions we project and on the
timetable we expect will depend upon a large variety of factors,
many of which are outside our control. These factors may include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
general business conditions in the economy or in the
tenants or prospective tenants industries;
|
|
|
|
supply and demand conditions for space in the
marketplace; and
|
|
|
|
level of competition in the marketplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Governmental approvals. All necessary
zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required
governmental permits and authorization may not be obtained or
may not be obtained on a timely basis resulting in possible
delays, decreased profitability and increased management time
and attention.
|
9
Financing
Risks
If
interest rates or other market conditions for obtaining capital
become unfavorable, we may be unable to raise capital needed to
build our developments on a timely basis, or we may be forced to
borrow money at higher interest rates or under adverse terms,
which could adversely affect returns on our development
projects, our cash flow and results of operations.
We finance our development projects through one or more of the
following: our credit facility, permanent mortgages, proceeds
from the sale of assets, secured and unsecured construction
facilities, and joint venture equity. In addition, we have
raised capital through the issuance of perpetual preferred stock
to supplement our capital needs. Each of these sources may be
constrained from time to time because of market conditions, and
interest rates may be unfavorable at any given point in time.
These sources of capital, and the risks associated with each,
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facilities. Terms and conditions
available in the marketplace for credit facilities vary over
time. We can provide no assurance that the amount we need from
our credit facility will be available at any given time, or at
all, or that the rates and fees charged by the lenders will be
acceptable to us. We incur interest under our credit facility at
a variable rate. Variable rate debt creates higher debt service
requirements if market interest rates increase, which would
adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Our
credit facility contains customary restrictions, requirements
and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness,
including restrictions on total debt outstanding, restrictions
on secured debt outstanding, requirements to maintain minimum
debt service coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered
assets to unsecured debt. Our continued ability to borrow under
our credit facility is subject to compliance with our financial
and other covenants. In addition, our failure to comply with
such covenants could cause a default, and we may then be
required to repay such debt with capital from other sources.
Under those circumstances, other sources of capital may not be
available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.
|
|
|
|
Mortgage financing. The availability of
financing in the mortgage markets varies from time to time
depending on various conditions, including the willingness of
mortgage lenders to lend at any given point in time. Interest
rates may also be volatile and we may from time to time elect
not to proceed with mortgage financing due to unfavorable
interest rates. This could adversely affect our ability to
finance development activities. In addition, if a property is
mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to
make the mortgage payments, the lender may foreclose, resulting
in loss of income and asset value.
|
|
|
|
Property sales. Real estate markets
tend to experience market cycles. Because of such cycles the
potential terms and conditions of sales, including prices, may
be unfavorable for extended periods of time. In addition,
federal tax laws limit our ability to sell properties and this
may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely
affecting returns to our stockholders. These restrictions reduce
our ability to respond to changes in the performance of our
investments and could adversely affect our financial condition
and results of operations. This could impair our ability to
raise capital through property sales in order to fund our
development projects or other cash needs. In addition, mortgage
financing on a property may impose a prepayment penalty in the
event the financing is prepaid, which may decrease the proceeds
from a sale or refinancing or make the sale or refinancing
impractical.
|
|
|
|
Construction facilities. Construction
facilities generally relate to specific assets under
construction and fund costs above an initial equity amount
deemed acceptable to the lender. Terms and conditions of
construction facilities vary but they generally carry a term of
two to five years, charge interest at variable rates and require
the lender to be satisfied with the nature and amount of
construction costs prior to funding. While construction lending
is competitive and offered by many financial institutions, there
may be times when these facilities are not available or are only
available upon unfavorable terms which could have an adverse
effect on our ability to fund development projects or on our
ability to achieve the returns we expect.
|
|
|
|
Joint ventures. Joint ventures,
including partnerships or limited liability companies, tend to
be complex arrangements, and there are only a limited number of
parties willing to undertake such investment structures. There
is no guarantee that we will be able to undertake these ventures
at the times we need capital.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock. The availability of
preferred stock at favorable terms and conditions is dependent
upon a number of factors including the general condition of the
economy, the overall interest rate environment, the condition of
the capital markets and the demand for this product by potential
holders of the securities. We can provide no assurance that
conditions will be favorable for future issuances of perpetual
preferred stock (or other equity securities) when we need the
capital which could have an adverse effect on our ability to
fund development projects.
|
Although we believe that in most economic and market
environments we will be able to obtain necessary capital for our
operations from the foregoing financing activities, we can make
no assurances that the capital we need will be available when we
need it. If we cannot obtain capital when we need it, we may not
be able to develop and construct all the projects we could
otherwise develop which could result in a reduction in our
future earnings and cash flows. Lack of financing could also
result in an inability to repay maturing debt which could result
in defaults and, potentially, loss of properties, as well as an
inability to make distributions to stockholders. Unfavorable
interest rates could adversely impact both the cost of our
projects (through capitalized interest) and our current earnings
and cash flows.
Covenants
contained in our credit facility and mortgages could restrict or
hinder our operational flexibility, which could adversely affect
our results of operations.
Our credit facility imposes financial and operating covenants on
us. These covenants may be modified from time to time, but
covenants of this type typically include restrictions and
limitations on our ability to incur debt and certain forms of
equity capital, as well as limitations on the amount of our
unsecured debt, limitations on payments to stockholders, and
limitations on the amount of development and joint venture
activity in which we may engage. These covenants may limit our
flexibility in making business decisions. If we fail to meet
those covenants, our ability to borrow may be impaired, which
could potentially make it more difficult to fund our capital and
operating needs. Additionally, some of our properties are
subject to mortgages. These mortgages contain customary negative
covenants, including limitations on our ability, without the
lenders prior consent, to further mortgage that property,
to modify existing leases or to sell that property. Compliance
with these covenants could harm our operational flexibility and
financial condition.
Risks
Associated with Multi-Family Projects
Any
failure to timely sell the multi-family units developed by our
Office/Multi-Family Division or an increase in development costs
could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our Office/Multi-Family Division develops for-sale multi-family
residential projects currently in urban markets. Multi-family
unit sales can be highly cyclical and can be affected by
interest rates and local issues. Once a project is undertaken,
we can provide no assurance that we will be able to sell the
units in a timely manner which could result in significantly
increased carrying costs and erosion or elimination of profit
with respect to any project.
In addition, actual construction and development costs of the
multi-family residential projects can exceed estimates for
various reasons. As these projects are normally multi-year
projects, the market demand for multi-family residences may
change between commencement of a project and its completion. Any
estimates of sales and profits may differ substantially from our
actual sales and profits and, as a result, our results of
operations may differ substantially from any estimates.
Any
failure to receive cash corresponding to previously recognized
revenues could adversely affect our future results of
operations.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, we recognize revenues and profits from sales
of multi-family residential units during the course of
construction. Revenue is recorded when, among other factors,
(1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage,
(2) the buyer is committed to the extent of being unable to
require a full refund, except for nondelivery of the residence,
(3) a substantial percentage of units are under
non-cancelable contracts, (4) collection of the sales price
is reasonably assured and (5) costs can be reasonably
estimated. Due to various contingencies, such as delayed
construction and buyer defaults, we may
11
receive less cash than the amount of revenue already recognized
or the cash may be received at a later date than we expected,
which could affect amounts of revenue previously recognized and
our ultimate profitability on the project.
Risks
Associated with our Land Division
Any
failure to timely sell the lots developed by our Land Division
could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our land division develops residential subdivisions, primarily
in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. Our land division also
participates in joint ventures that develop or plan to develop
subdivisions in metropolitan Atlanta, as well as Texas, Florida
and other states. This division also from time to time
supervises sales of unimproved properties owned or controlled by
us. Residential lot sales can be highly cyclical and can be
affected by interest rates and local issues, including the
availability of jobs, transportation and the quality of public
schools. Once a development is undertaken, no assurances can be
given that we will be able to sell the various developed lots in
a timely manner. Failure to sell such lots in a timely manner
could result in significantly increased carrying costs and
erosion or elimination of profit with respect to any development.
In addition, actual construction and development costs with
respect to subdivisions can exceed estimates for various
reasons, including unknown site conditions. The timing of
subdivision lot sales and unimproved property sales are, by
their nature, difficult to predict with any precision.
Additionally, some of our residential properties are multi-year
projects, and market conditions may change between the time we
decide to develop a property and the time that all or some of
the lots or tracts may be ready for sale. Similarly, we often
hold undeveloped land for long periods of time prior to sale.
Any changes in market conditions between the time we acquire
land and the time we sell land, could cause the Companys
estimates of proceeds and related profits from such sales to be
lower or result in an impairment charge. Estimates of sales and
profits may differ substantially from actual sales and profits
and as a result, our results of operations may differ
substantially from these estimates.
Any
failure to timely sell or lease non-income producing land could
adversely affect our results of operations.
We maintain significant holdings of non-income producing land in
the form of land tracts and outparcels. Our strategy with
respect to these parcels of land include (1) developing the
land at a future date as a retail, office, industrial or
mixed-use income producing property or developing it for
single-family or multi-family residential uses; (2) ground
leasing the land to third parties; and (3) in certain
circumstances, selling the parcels to third parties. Before we
develop, lease or sell these land parcels, we incur carrying
costs, including interest expense and property tax expense.
If we are unable to sell this land or convert it into income
producing property in a timely manner, our results of operations
and liquidity could be adversely affected.
Risks
Associated with our Third Party Management
Business
Our
third party business may experience volatility based on a number
of factors, including termination of contracts, which could
adversely affect our results of operations.
We engage in third party development, leasing, property
management, asset management and property services to unrelated
property owners. Contracts for such services are generally
short-term in nature and permit termination without extensive
notice. Fees from such activities can be volatile due to
unexpected terminations of such contracts. Extensive unexpected
terminations could materially adversely affect our results of
operations. Further, the timing of the generation of new
contracts for services is difficult to predict.
12
General
Business Risks
We may
not adequately or accurately assess new opportunities, which
could adversely impact our results of operations.
Our estimates and expectations with respect to new lines of
business and opportunities may differ substantially from actual
results, and any losses from these endeavors could materially
adversely affect our results of operations. We conduct business
in an entrepreneurial manner. We seek opportunities in various
sectors of real estate and in various geographical areas and
from time to time undertake new opportunities, including new
lines of business. Not all opportunities or lines of business
prove to be profitable. We expect from time to time that some of
our business ventures may have to be terminated because they do
not meet our profit expectations. Termination of these ventures
may result in the write off of certain related assets
and/or the
termination of personnel, which would adversely impact results
of operations.
We are
dependent upon key personnel, the loss of any of whom could
adversely impair our ability to execute our
business.
One of our objectives is to develop and maintain a strong
management group at all levels. At any given time we could lose
the services of key executives and other employees. None of our
key executives or other employees are subject to employment
agreements or contracts. Further, we do not carry key person
insurance on any of our executive officers or other key
employees. The loss of services of any of our key employees
could have an adverse impact upon our results of operations,
financial condition and our ability to execute our business
strategy.
Our
restated and amended articles of incorporation contain
limitations on ownership of our stock, which may prevent a
change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests
of our stockholders.
Our restated and amended articles of incorporation impose
limitations on the ownership of our stock. In general, except
for certain individuals who owned stock at the time of adoption
of these limitations, no individual or entity may own more than
3.9% of the value of our outstanding stock. The ownership
limitation may have the effect of delaying, inhibiting or
preventing a transaction or a change in control that might
involve a premium price for our stock or otherwise be in the
best interest of our stockholders.
Federal
Income Tax Risks
Any
failure to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust
for federal income tax purposes could have a material adverse
impact on us and our stockholders.
Cousins intends to operate in a manner to qualify as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes. However, we can provide no
assurance that Cousins has qualified or will remain qualified as
a REIT. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of
highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code (the Code), for which there are only limited
judicial or administrative interpretations. Certain facts and
circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our
ability to qualify as a REIT. In addition, we can provide no
assurance that legislation, new regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions will not adversely affect
Cousins qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax
consequences of Cousins REIT status.
If Cousins were to fail to qualify as a REIT, it would not be
allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in
computing its taxable income. In this case, it would be subject
to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative
minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate rates.
Unless entitled to relief under certain Code provisions, it also
would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four
taxable years following the year during which qualification was
lost. As a result, the cash available for distribution to our
stockholders would be reduced for each of the years involved.
Although Cousins currently intends to operate in a manner
designed to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future
economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause
us to revoke the REIT election.
In order to qualify as a REIT, under current law, Cousins
generally is required each taxable year to distribute to its
stockholders at least 90% of its net taxable income (excluding
any net capital gain). To the extent that Cousins does not
distribute all of its net capital gain or it distributes at
least 90%, but less than 100%, of its other taxable
13
income, Cousins is subject to tax on the undistributed amounts
at regular corporate rates. In addition, Cousins is subject to a
4% nondeductible excise tax to the extent that distributions
paid by Cousins during the calendar year are less than the sum
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
85% of its ordinary income;
|
|
|
|
95% of its net capital gain income for that year, and
|
|
|
|
100% of its undistributed taxable income (including any net
capital gains) from prior years.
|
We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply
with the 90% distribution requirement, to avoid corporate-level
tax on undistributed taxable income and to avoid the
nondeductible excise tax. Differences in timing between taxable
income and cash available for distribution could require Cousins
to borrow funds to meet the 90% distribution requirement, to
avoid corporate-level tax on undistributed taxable income and to
avoid the nondeductible excise tax. Satisfying the distribution
requirements may also make it more difficult to fund new
development projects.
Certain
property transfers may be characterized as prohibited
transactions, resulting in a tax on any gain attributable to the
transaction.
From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some
of our properties. Under the Code, any gain resulting from
transfers or dispositions, from other than our taxable REIT
subsidiary, deemed to be prohibited transactions would be
subject to a 100% tax on any gain associated with the
transaction. Prohibited transactions generally include sales of
assets that constitute inventory or other property held for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of business. Since we
acquire properties primarily for investment purposes, we do not
believe that our occasional transfers or disposals of property
are deemed to be prohibited transactions. However, whether
property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact
that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the
particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend
that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are
prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal
Revenue Service would not prevail in any such dispute, if the
Internal Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a
transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited
transaction, we would be required to pay a tax equal to 100% of
any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In
addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely
affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification
as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
Disclosure
Controls and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Risks
Our
business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in
our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over
financial reporting.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While
management will continue to review the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal
control over financial reporting will be effective in
accomplishing all control objectives at all times. Deficiencies,
including any material weakness, in our internal control over
financial reporting which may occur in the future could result
in misstatements of our results of operations, restatements of
our financial statements, a decline in our stock price, or
otherwise materially adversely affect our business, reputation,
results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
14
Item 2. Properties
The following tables set forth certain information relating to
properties in which the Company has a 10% or greater ownership
interest. Information presented in Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of
this report provides additional information related to the
Companys joint ventures. All information presented is as
of December 31, 2006. Dollars are stated in thousands.
Table
of Major Operating Office, Retail and Industrial
Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
Economic
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
and
|
Description
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Debt
|
|
Interest
|
and Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
(2)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Rate
|
|
Office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 Peachtree Tower(3)
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
1,211,000
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
Wachovia Bank (2008/2023)
|
|
|
380,442
|
|
|
$
|
146,367
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Acres
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deloitte & Touche
(2008/2018)
|
|
|
99,465
|
|
|
$
|
144,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cousins Properties (2017/2022)
|
|
|
61,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inforum
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
994,000
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
American Cancer Society (2022)
|
|
|
273,745
|
|
|
$
|
79,835
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Acres
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BellSouth Corporation (5) (2009)
|
|
|
138,893
|
|
|
$
|
38,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Lottery Corp. (2013)
|
|
|
127,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co Space Services, LLC
|
|
|
120,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2020/2025)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner Broadcasting (2011/2016)
|
|
|
57,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sapient Corporation (2009/2019)
|
|
|
57,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Points at Waterview
Suburban Dallas, Texas
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
203,000
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
Bombardier Aerospace Corp.
|
|
|
97,740
|
|
|
$
|
30,394
|
|
|
$
|
18,183
|
|
|
|
1/1/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2013/2023)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liberty Mutual (2011/2021)
|
|
|
28,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NetHawk Acquisition Corp. (2009)
|
|
|
16,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeshore Park Plaza
Birmingham, AL
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Daniel Realty
|
|
|
100
|
%(6)
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
Synovus Mortgage (2014/2019)
|
|
|
28,932
|
|
|
$
|
18,097
|
|
|
$
|
9,082
|
|
|
|
11/1/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dent & Baker (2017)
|
|
|
11,331
|
|
|
$
|
13,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daxco (2009/2014)
|
|
|
9,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Services (2008)
|
|
|
7,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 University Park Place
Birmingham, AL
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Daniel Realty
|
|
|
100
|
%(6)
|
|
|
123,000
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
Southern Communications Services(5)
|
|
|
41,961
|
|
|
$
|
18,599
|
|
|
$
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
8/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2010/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O2 Ideas, Inc. (2014/2024)
|
|
|
25,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 North Point Center East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
128,000
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
Schweitzer-Mauduit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,603
|
|
|
$
|
22,365
|
(7)
|
|
|
8/1/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International, Inc. (2012)
|
|
|
32,655
|
|
|
$
|
9,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Med Assets HSCA, Inc. (2013/2018)
|
|
|
21,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Peanut Co. (2017)
|
|
|
18,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 North Point Center East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
Med Assets HSCA, Inc. (2013/2018)
|
|
|
67,015
|
|
|
$
|
10,764
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia (2008)
|
|
|
22,409
|
|
|
$
|
8,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley (2011)
|
|
|
15,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B2B Workforce, Inc. (2008/2013)
|
|
|
14,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
Economic
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
and
|
Description
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Debt
|
|
Interest
|
and Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
(2)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Rate
|
|
Office
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 North Point Center East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
Merrill Lynch (2014/2024)
|
|
|
35,949
|
|
|
$
|
13,456
|
|
|
$
|
29,571
|
(8)
|
|
|
11/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo Bank NA (2009/2012)
|
|
|
22,438
|
|
|
$
|
8,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip Morris (2008/2013)
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555 North Point Center East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
152,000
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
Kids II, Inc. (2016/2026)
|
|
|
51,059
|
|
|
$
|
17,592
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regus Business Centre
|
|
|
22,422
|
|
|
$
|
12,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2011/2016)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ace Mortgage (2008/2011)
|
|
|
11,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Baird (2011/2016)
|
|
|
11,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galleria 75
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
114,000
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
THD At-Home Services (2008)
|
|
|
24,259
|
|
|
$
|
11,734
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3301 Windy Ridge Parkway
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
107,000
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
Indus International, Inc.
|
|
|
45,557
|
|
|
$
|
12,413
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2012/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3100 Windy Hill Road
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%(9)
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,314
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cosmopolitan Center
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
City of Sandy Springs (2007/2009)
|
|
|
32,800
|
|
|
$
|
12,046
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Georgia Center
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Prudential (5)
|
|
|
88.5
|
%
|
|
|
344,000
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
Southern Christian Leadership (2007)
|
|
|
14,501
|
|
|
$
|
42,136
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roman Catholic Archdiocese (2009)
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
$
|
35,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton, Westby, Marshall (2017)
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gateway Village
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Bank of America (5)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
1,065,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Bank of America (5) (2016/2035)
|
|
|
1,065,000
|
|
|
$
|
211,142
|
|
|
$
|
144,654
|
|
|
|
12/1/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Peachtree Place
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Coca-Cola (5)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
259,000
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
AGL Services Co. (2013/2028)
|
|
|
226,779
|
|
|
$
|
40,594
|
|
|
$
|
28,849
|
|
|
|
4/1/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meridian Mark Plaza
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Northside Hospital (5)
|
|
|
57,614
|
|
|
$
|
25,957
|
|
|
$
|
23,602
|
|
|
|
9/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2013/2023) (10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scottish Rite Hospital for
|
|
|
31,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crippled Children, Inc.
(2013/2018)(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia Reproductive (2017)
|
|
|
13,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children Orthopedics (2009/2014)
|
|
|
12,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
Economic
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
and
|
Description
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Debt
|
|
Interest
|
and Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
(2)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Rate
|
|
Office
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AtheroGenics
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
AtheroGenics (2009/2019)
|
|
|
50,821
|
|
|
$
|
7,655
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhibitex
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Inhibitex (2015/2025)
|
|
|
50,933
|
|
|
$
|
6,634
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emory Crawford Long Medical Office
Tower
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Emory University
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
358,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
Emory University (2017/2047)
|
|
|
148,741
|
|
|
$
|
52,338
|
|
|
$
|
52,404
|
|
|
|
6/1/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resurgens (2014/2019)
|
|
|
26,581
|
|
|
$
|
40,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta Gastroenterology (2012)
|
|
|
17,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presbyterian Medical Plaza at
University
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Prudential (5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Novant Health, Inc.
|
|
|
63,862
|
|
|
$
|
8,622
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Acre (12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2012/2022) (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Lease
Expirations Office
As of December 31, 2006, the Companys office
portfolio included 20 commercial office buildings, excluding all
properties currently under development, held for redevelopment
and buildings in
lease-up
stage. The weighted average remaining lease term of these office
buildings was approximately seven years as of December 31,
2006. Most of the major tenant leases in these buildings provide
for pass through of operating expenses and contractual rents
which escalate over time. The leases expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 &
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2015
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Total (including
Companys % share of Joint Venture
Properties):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet
Expiring(14)
|
|
|
128,579
|
|
|
|
241,820
|
|
|
|
459,856
|
|
|
|
162,599
|
|
|
|
322,486
|
|
|
|
167,914
|
|
|
|
536,232
|
|
|
|
148,207
|
|
|
|
618,869
|
|
|
|
571,360
|
|
|
|
3,357,922
|
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s) (15)
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
$
|
3,815
|
|
|
$
|
7,147
|
|
|
$
|
2,576
|
|
|
$
|
4,838
|
|
|
$
|
2,813
|
|
|
$
|
9,944
|
|
|
$
|
3,158
|
|
|
$
|
11,749
|
|
|
$
|
12,446
|
|
|
$
|
60,129
|
|
Annual Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
12.78
|
|
|
$
|
15.78
|
|
|
$
|
15.54
|
|
|
$
|
15.85
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
16.75
|
|
|
$
|
18.54
|
|
|
$
|
21.31
|
|
|
$
|
18.98
|
|
|
$
|
21.78
|
|
|
$
|
17.91
|
|
Wholly Owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet Expiring(14)
|
|
|
86,433
|
|
|
|
221,670
|
|
|
|
426,278
|
|
|
|
146,984
|
|
|
|
296,059
|
|
|
|
112,074
|
|
|
|
402,262
|
|
|
|
143,413
|
|
|
|
56,794
|
|
|
|
493,837
|
|
|
|
2,385,804
|
(16)
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s)(15)
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
|
$
|
3,569
|
|
|
$
|
6,648
|
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,434
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
7,476
|
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
$
|
10,554
|
|
|
$
|
42,298
|
|
Annual Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
13.85
|
|
|
$
|
16.10
|
|
|
$
|
15.60
|
|
|
$
|
15.92
|
|
|
$
|
14.98
|
|
|
$
|
15.71
|
|
|
$
|
18.58
|
|
|
$
|
21.24
|
|
|
$
|
22.42
|
|
|
$
|
21.37
|
|
|
$
|
17.73
|
|
Joint Venture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet Expiring(14)
|
|
|
82,305
|
|
|
|
23,281
|
|
|
|
51,081
|
|
|
|
23,541
|
|
|
|
38,511
|
|
|
|
123,528
|
|
|
|
259,810
|
|
|
|
9,587
|
|
|
|
1,112,872
|
|
|
|
151,426
|
|
|
|
1,875,942
|
(17)
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s)(15)
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
4,841
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
20,795
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
$
|
35,320
|
|
Annual Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
13.52
|
|
|
$
|
12.40
|
|
|
$
|
16.73
|
|
|
$
|
17.06
|
|
|
$
|
17.17
|
|
|
$
|
19.59
|
|
|
$
|
18.63
|
|
|
$
|
23.30
|
|
|
$
|
18.69
|
|
|
$
|
24.58
|
|
|
$
|
18.83
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
Description
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Occupancy(1)
|
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
|
Amortization(2)
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Retail Centers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Carriage Crossing
Suburban Memphis, TN
|
|
2005
|
|
Jim Wilson &
|
|
|
100
|
%(6)
|
|
783,000 (18)
|
|
|
93
|
%(19)
|
|
|
89
|
% (19)
|
|
Dillards (20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
90,892
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associates(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parisian (2021/2051)(21)
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
85,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,000 owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linens n Things
(2016/2031)
|
|
|
28,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Carriage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barnes & Noble (2016/2026)
|
|
|
25,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avenue, LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Plus (2016/2031)
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Jose MarketCenter
San Jose, CA
|
|
2006
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
363,000(18)
|
|
|
89
|
%(19)
|
|
|
79
|
%(19)
|
|
Target (20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
79,958
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marshalls (2016/2036)
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
$
|
78,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(220,000 owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PetsMart (2017/2032)
|
|
|
27,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the Company)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michaels (2016/2031)
|
|
|
23,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Depot (2016/2026)
|
|
|
20,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Plus (2017/2032)
|
|
|
18,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trader Joes (2017/2032)
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Webb Gin
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
2006
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
381,000(18)
|
|
|
71
|
%(19)
|
|
|
50
|
%(19)
|
|
Barnes & Noble (2016/2026)
|
|
|
26,610
|
|
|
$
|
69,757
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan Allen (2021/2031)
|
|
|
18,511
|
|
|
$
|
68,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (2012/2022)
|
|
|
17,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Viera
Viera, FL
|
|
2005
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%(6)
|
|
406,000(18)
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
Rave Motion Pictures(20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
87,061
|
(22)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belk, Inc. (2024/2044)(21)
|
|
|
65,927
|
|
|
$
|
85,526
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332,000 owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond
(2015/2035)
|
|
|
24,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by CP Venture IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.C. Moore (2016/2036)
|
|
|
20,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Plus (2017/2037)
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Books a Million (2015/2035)
|
|
|
14,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Navy (2010/2020)
|
|
|
14,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue East Cobb
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
1999
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
231,000
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
Borders, Inc. (2015/2030)
|
|
|
24,882
|
|
|
$
|
97,429
|
(22)
|
|
$
|
39,364
|
(23)
|
|
|
8/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond
(2010/2025)
|
|
|
21,007
|
|
|
$
|
95,893
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (2010/2015)
|
|
|
19,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talbots (2010/2015)
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pottery Barn (5)(2012)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue West Cobb
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
2003
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
251,000(18)
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
Linens n Things
(2014/2029)
|
|
|
28,030
|
|
|
$
|
81,254
|
(22)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barnes & Noble (2014/2024)
|
|
|
24,025
|
|
|
$
|
79,635
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (2012/2022)
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Peachtree City
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
2001
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
183,000(18)
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
Books a Million (2008/2013)
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
|
$
|
57,642
|
(22)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 Acres (24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (2012/2022)
|
|
|
10,800
|
|
|
$
|
56,005
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebanc Mortgage Corporation
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2007/2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talbots (2012/2022)
|
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banana Republic (2012/2022)
|
|
|
8,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viera MarketCenter
Viera, FL
|
|
2005
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
11.5
|
%(6)
|
|
178,000(18)
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
|
|
|
88,248
|
|
|
$
|
17,075
|
(22)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2026/2056) (21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,838
|
(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Authority (2017/2032)
|
|
|
37,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Depot (2016/2036)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
Description
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Occupancy(1)
|
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
|
Amortization(2)
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
North Point MarketCenter
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
1994
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
10.32
|
%(25)
|
|
518,000 (18)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
Target (20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
58,173
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Babies R Us
(2012/2032)
|
|
|
50,275
|
|
|
$
|
41,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dicks Sporting Goods
(2017/2037)
|
|
|
48,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
square feet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marshalls (2010/2025)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 49 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hudsons Furniture (5)
(2011/2021)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linens n Things
(2010/2025)
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP Venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regal Cinemas (2014/2034)
|
|
|
34,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circuit City (2015/2030)
|
|
|
33,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PetsMart, Inc. (2009/2029)
|
|
|
25,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenbrier MarketCenter
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
1996
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
10.32
|
%(25)
|
|
493,000(18)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Target (20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
49,107
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harris Teeter, Inc. (2016/2036)
|
|
|
51,806
|
|
|
$
|
35,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376,000 square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Buy (2015/2030)
|
|
|
45,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feet and 36 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond
(2012/2027)
|
|
|
40,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Babies R Us
(2011/2021)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP Venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stein Mart, Inc. (2011/2026)
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barnes & Noble
Superstores, Inc. (2012/2022)
|
|
|
29,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PetsMart, Inc. (2011/2031)
|
|
|
26,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Max (2011/2026)
|
|
|
23,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Altos MarketCenter
Long Beach, CA
|
|
1996
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
10.32
|
%(25)
|
|
182,000
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Sears (20)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
32,864
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157,000 square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circuit City (2017/2037)
|
|
|
38,541
|
|
|
$
|
24,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feet and 17 acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borders, Inc. (2017/2037)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bristol Farms (5) (2012/2032)
|
|
|
28,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP Venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CompUSA, Inc. (2011/2021)
|
|
|
25,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansell Crossing Phase II
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
1996
|
|
Prudential(5)
|
|
|
10.32
|
%(25)
|
|
103,000
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond
(2012/2027)
|
|
|
40,787
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ross Stores Inc. (2014/2034)
|
|
|
32,144
|
|
|
$
|
9,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms To Go (2016/2036)
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stand Alone Retail Sites
Adjacent to Companys Retail Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Point (26)
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
1993
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
11 Acres
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,612
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Lease
Expirations Retail
As of December 31, 2006, the Companys retail
portfolio included 10 retail properties, excluding all
properties currently under development
and/or in
lease-up.
The weighted average remaining lease term of these retail
properties was approximately 11 years as of
December 31, 2006. Most of the major tenant leases in these
retail properties provide for pass through of operating expenses
and contractual rents which escalate over time. The leases
expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total (including only
Companys % share of Joint Venture
Properties):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet Expiring
|
|
|
18,997
|
|
|
|
10,311
|
|
|
|
8,652
|
|
|
|
28,515
|
|
|
|
64,822
|
|
|
|
34,146
|
|
|
|
14,895
|
|
|
|
23,718
|
|
|
|
73,376
|
|
|
|
417,003
|
|
|
|
694,435
|
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s)(15)
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
|
$
|
6,857
|
|
|
$
|
13,156
|
|
Annual Contractual
Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
19.69
|
|
|
$
|
25.21
|
|
|
$
|
21.86
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
$
|
19.66
|
|
|
$
|
18.71
|
|
|
$
|
25.61
|
|
|
$
|
21.23
|
|
|
$
|
27.84
|
|
|
$
|
16.44
|
|
|
$
|
18.95
|
|
Wholly Owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet Expiring
|
|
|
10,282
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,394
|
|
|
|
32,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,086
|
|
|
|
351,664
|
|
|
|
456,968(27
|
)
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s)(15)
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
716
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,550
|
|
|
$
|
5,793
|
|
|
$
|
8,652
|
|
Annual Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
16.84
|
|
|
$
|
33.88
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.80
|
|
|
$
|
22.33
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.58
|
|
|
$
|
16.47
|
|
|
$
|
18.93
|
|
Joint Venture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet Expiring
|
|
|
80,298
|
|
|
|
65,083
|
|
|
|
80,208
|
|
|
|
202,154
|
|
|
|
310,106
|
|
|
|
318,171
|
|
|
|
91,783
|
|
|
|
213,108
|
|
|
|
219,279
|
|
|
|
591,120
|
|
|
|
2,171,310(28
|
)
|
% of Leased Space
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Annual Contractual Rent
(000s)(15)
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
5,195
|
|
|
$
|
5,869
|
|
|
$
|
2,402
|
|
|
$
|
4,481
|
|
|
$
|
4,385
|
|
|
$
|
9,676
|
|
|
$
|
40,815
|
|
Annual Contractual Rent/Sq. Ft.(15)
|
|
$
|
22.92
|
|
|
$
|
21.63
|
|
|
$
|
21.55
|
|
|
$
|
18.95
|
|
|
$
|
16.75
|
|
|
$
|
18.44
|
|
|
$
|
26.18
|
|
|
$
|
21.03
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
16.37
|
|
|
$
|
18.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Major
|
|
Cost Less
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
Description
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
2006
|
|
Major Tenants (Lease
|
|
Tenants
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
and
|
and
|
|
Completed
|
|
Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Economic
|
|
Expiration/Options
|
|
Rentable
|
|
and
|
|
Debt
|
|
Interest
|
Location
|
|
or Acquired
|
|
Partner
|
|
Interest
|
|
and Acres
|
|
2006
|
|
Occupancy(1)
|
|
Expiration)
|
|
Sq. Feet
|
|
Amortization(2)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Rate
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Mill Distribution Park
Building 3A, Phase 1
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
2006
|
|
Weeks Properties Group
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
417,000
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
% (29)
|
|
Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.
|
|
|
417,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,610
|
|
|
$
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
8/30/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2012/2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
21
Lease
Expirations Industrial
As of December 31, 2006, the Companys industrial
portfolio included one fully operational building in the King
Mill Distribution Park Building 3A, Phase I.
The tenant lease in this building provides for pass through of
operating expenses and contractual rents which escalate over
time. The lease expires in 2012.
FOOTNOTES
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average economic occupancy is calculated as the percentage of
the property for which revenue was recognized during the year.
If the property was purchased during the year, average economic
occupancy is calculated from the date of purchase forward. If
the project has an expansion that was under construction during
the year, average economic occupancy for the expansion portion
is only included after it becomes partially operational. |
|
(2) |
|
Cost as shown in the accompanying table includes deferred
leasing costs and other tangible related assets. |
|
(3) |
|
191 Peachtree Tower is treated as an operational property for
financial reporting purposes, although the Company considers
this property as a redevelopment project in some of its external
reports and analyses. Also, the acreage numbers include
0.8 acres under a ground lease which expires in 2086. |
|
(4) |
|
Approximately 0.18 acres of the total four acres of land at
Inforum are under a ground lease expiring in 2068. |
|
(5) |
|
Actual tenant or venture partner is an affiliate of the entity
shown. |
|
(6) |
|
These projects are owned either (1) through a joint venture
with a third party providing a participation in operations and
on sale of the property or (2) subject to a contract with a
third party providing a participation in operations and on sale
of the property, even though they may be shown as 100% owned. |
|
(7) |
|
100 North Point Center East and 200 North Point Center East were
financed together as one non-recourse mortgage note payable. |
|
(8) |
|
333 North Point Center East and 555 North Point Center East were
financed together as one recourse mortgage note payable. |
|
(9) |
|
See Additional Information Related to Operating
Properties following this table for more information
related to 3100 Windy Hill Road. |
|
(10) |
|
At Meridian Mark Plaza, 8,718 square feet of the Northside
Hospital lease expires in 2008; 7,521 square feet of the
Scottish Rite Hospital lease expires in 2009. |
|
(11) |
|
Emory Crawford Long Medical Office Tower was developed on top of
a building within the Crawford Long Hospital campus. The venture
received a fee simple interest in the air rights above this
building in order to develop the medical office tower. |
|
(12) |
|
Presbyterian Medical Plaza at University is located on
1 acre, which is subject to a ground lease expiring in 2057. |
|
(13) |
|
Approximately 23,359 square feet of the Novant Health, Inc.
lease at Presbyterian Medical Plaza at University expires in
2007, with an option to renew through 2022. |
|
(14) |
|
Where a tenant has the option to cancel its lease without
penalty, the lease expiration date used in the Lease Expirations
tables reflect the cancellation option date rather than the
lease expiration date. |
|
(15) |
|
Annual Contractual Rent excludes the operating expense
reimbursement portion of the rent payable and percentage rents,
if applicable. If the lease does not provide for pass through of
such operating expense reimbursements, an estimate of operating
expenses is deducted from the rental rate shown. The contractual
rental rate shown is the estimated rate in the year of
expiration. |
|
(16) |
|
Rentable square feet leased as of December 31, 2006 out of
approximately 2,828,000 total rentable square feet. |
|
(17) |
|
Rentable square feet leased as of December 31, 2006 out of
approximately 2,095,000 total rentable square feet. |
|
(18) |
|
These retail centers also include outparcels which are ground
leased to freestanding users. |
22
|
|
|
(19) |
|
A portion of the project became partially operational in 2006,
but a portion remains under construction
and/or in
lease-up as
of December 31, 2006. |
|
(20) |
|
This anchor tenant owns its own store and land. |
|
(21) |
|
This tenant built and owns its own store and pays the Company
under a ground lease. |
|
(22) |
|
During 2006, these properties were contributed to CP
Venture IV Holdings LLC. Cost and cost less depreciation
and amortization reflects the ventures basis which was
adjusted to fair market value at the time of the contribution. |
|
(23) |
|
This loan was assumed by CP Venture IV Holdings LLC upon
contribution of this property to CP Venture IV Holdings LLC
and was adjusted to fair market value at the time of the
contribution. |
|
(24) |
|
Approximately 1.5 acres of the total acreage at The Avenue
Peachtree City is under a ground lease expiring in 2024. |
|
(25) |
|
The Companys economic interest in this property decreased
in 2006 as a result of Prudential satisfying in full a note
payable of CP Venture Two LLC. |
|
(26) |
|
This project is currently under contract to sell, and the sale
is anticipated to close in the first quarter of 2007. |
|
(27) |
|
Gross leasable area leased as of December 31, 2006 out of
approximately 492,000 total gross leasable area. |
|
(28) |
|
Gross leasable area leased as of December 31, 2006 out of
approximately 2,212,000 total gross leasable area. |
|
(29) |
|
This building became operational during 2006. |
23
Additional
Information Related to Operating Properties
The 3100 Windy Hill Road building, a 188,000 rentable
square foot building constructed as a training facility,
occupies a
13-acre
parcel of land which is wholly owned by the Company. The
building was sold in 1983 to a limited partnership of private
investors, at which time the Company received a leasehold
mortgage note. The training facility land was simultaneously
leased to the partnership for thirty years, along with certain
equipment for varying periods. The building was leased by the
partnership to IBM through November 30, 2006.
Effective January 1, 1997, based on the economics of the
training facility lease, the Company determined it would receive
substantially all of the economic risks and rewards from the
property, mainly due to the short term remaining on the land
lease and the mortgage note balance that would have to be paid
off, with interest, at maturity. As such, the Company began
consolidating the operations of the building and eliminated the
mortgage note balance and activity under the land lease
beginning January 1, 1997.
During 2006, the Company and the partnership amended the note
and ground lease to, among other things, extend both to expire
on January 1, 2010.
This property is currently vacant and the Company is attempting
to re-lease the space. There can be no guarantee as to rental
rates upon re-leasing or the period to
lease-up,
although the Company does not believe the property has any
impairment in value.
Projects
Under Development
The following details the office, multi-family, retail and
industrial projects under development at December 31, 2006.
Dollars are stated in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLA (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual or
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
Projected Dates for
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
(Fully
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Completion and Fully
|
Project(1)
|
|
GLA(2)
|
|
|
GLA(3)
|
|
|
Executed)
|
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
at 12/31/06
|
|
|
Operational/Sold
|
|
OFFICE/MULTI-FAMILY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminus 100
|
|
|
656,000
|
|
|
|
656,000
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
170,400
|
|
|
$
|
170,400
|
|
|
$
|
113,564
|
|
|
const. - 2Q-07
|
(Atlanta, GA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fully operational 2Q-08
|
191 Peachtree Tower(5)
|
|
|
1,211,000
|
|
|
|
1,211,000
|
|
|
|
60
|
%(4)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
231,500
|
|
|
|
231,500
|
|
|
|
155,070
|
|
|
fully stabilized - 4Q-10
|
(Atlanta, GA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palisades West(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Austin, TX)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building 1
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 2Q-08
fully operational 2Q-08
|
Building 2
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 1Q-09
fully operational 4Q-09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Palisades West
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,500
|
|
|
|
38,750
|
|
|
|
12,971
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 Biscayne(7)
|
|
|
529 units
|
|
|
|
529 units
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
161,500
|
|
|
|
64,600
|
|
|
|
45,130
|
|
|
const. - 4Q-07
|
(Miami, FL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fully sold 1Q-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
OFFICE/MULTI-FAMILY
|
|
|
2,227,000
|
|
|
|
2,227,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,900
|
|
|
|
505,250
|
|
|
|
326,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAIL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Carriage Crossing(8)
(Suburban Memphis, TN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase I Expansion
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 1Q-09
fully operational 1Q-10
|
Phase II
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 4Q-07
fully operational 2Q-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Avenue Carriage
Crossing
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLA (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual or
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
Projected Dates for
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Project
|
|
|
(Fully
|
|
|
Cousins
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Completion and Fully
|
Project(1)
|
|
GLA(2)
|
|
|
GLA(3)
|
|
|
Executed)
|
|
|
Ownership%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
at 12/31/06
|
|
|
Operational/Sold
|
|
The Avenue Webb Gin
(Suburban Atlanta, GA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phase I
|
|
|
359,000
|
|
|
|
359,000
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
const. - 3Q-07
fully operational 4Q-07
|
Phase II
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 3Q-08
fully operational 4Q-08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - Webb Gin
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
|
381,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,000
|
|
|
|
84,000
|
|
|
|
69,757
|
|
|
const. - 2Q-07
fully operational 2Q-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Jose MarketCenter
(San Jose, CA)
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
363,000
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
84,100
|
|
|
|
84,100
|
|
|
|
79,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avenue Murfreesboro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Suburban Nashville, TN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phases I and II
|
|
|
692,000
|
|
|
|
692,000
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 4Q-07
fully operational 4Q-08
|
Phase III
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. -2Q-08
fully operational 2Q-09
|
Phase IV
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 4Q-09
fully operational 4Q-09
|
Phase V
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const. - 1Q-10
fully operational 2Q-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total - Murfreesboro
|
|
|
810,000
|
|
|
|
810,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,100
|
|
|
|
76,550
|
|
|
|
11,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL RETAIL
|
|
|
1,481,000
|
|
|
|
1,645,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335,100
|
|
|
|
258,550
|
|
|
|
164,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDUSTRIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Mill Distribution Park
(Suburban Atlanta, GA)
Building 3 B
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
8,250
|
|
|
|
7,148
|
|
|
const. - 4Q-06
fully operational 2Q-07
|
Jefferson Mill Distribution
Center
(Suburban Atlanta, GA) Building A
|
|
|
459,000
|
|
|
|
459,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
14,900
|
|
|
|
11,175
|
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
|
const. - 1Q-07
fully operational 4Q-07
|
Lakeside Ranch Business Park
(Dallas, TX)
Building 20
|
|
|
749,000
|
|
|
|
749,000
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
96.5
|
%
|
|
|
26,400
|
|
|
|
25,476
|
|
|
|
17,766
|
|
|
const. - 2Q-07
fully operational 3Q-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL
|
|
|
1,587,000
|
|
|
|
1,587,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,300
|
|
|
|
44,901
|
|
|
|
31,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation on
Partially Operational Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
|
|
|
5,295,000
|
|
|
|
5,459,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,028,300
|
|
|
$
|
808,701
|
|
|
$
|
520,437
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Notes to Development Table)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This schedule includes all Office/Multi-Family, Retail and
Industrial projects under construction or redevelopment from the
commencement of construction or redevelopment until the projects
become fully operational pursuant to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Single-family
residential projects are included on a separate schedule in this
report. Amounts included in the total cost column represent the
estimated costs upon completion of the project and achievement
of fully operational status. Significant estimation is required
to derive these costs and the final costs may differ from these
estimates. The projected dates for completion and fully
operational status shown above are estimates and are subject to
change as the projects proceed through the development process. |
|
(2) |
|
Company Owned Gross Leasable Area (GLA) includes
square footage owned either directly by the Company or by a
joint venture in which the Company is a partner. |
25
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Total Project GLA includes anchor stores who may own their own
property and other non-owned property contained within the named
development. |
|
(4) |
|
Leased square footage includes a lease with the Company of
62,000 square feet. |
|
(5) |
|
191 Peachtree Tower was purchased in 2006 and is under
redevelopment and repositioning. It is treated as a development
property for the purpose of this schedule, although its cost
basis is included in operating properties on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(6) |
|
The Company is obligated to fund 50% of the project costs
for the Palisades West Joint Venture. The Company made the
majority of its initial equity contribution in the form of land;
therefore, the Companys investment in this project at
12/31/06 is more than 50% of the costs spent to date. |
|
(7) |
|
95% of the units at 50 Biscayne are under non-cancelable third
party contracts, 3% of the units are under cancelable contracts,
and the remaining 2% of the units are under non-cancelable
contracts to the Companys partner in the venture. |
|
(8) |
|
A third party will share in the results of operations and any
gain on sale of the property. |
|
(9) |
|
Reconciliation to Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cousins Investment per
above schedule
|
|
$
|
520,437
|
|
Less: Operating Property under
redevelopment/repositioning
|
|
|
(155,070
|
)
|
Less: Investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
50 Biscayne
|
|
|
(45,130
|
)
|
Palisades West
|
|
|
(12,971
|
)
|
Avenue Murfreesboro
|
|
|
(11,976
|
)
|
Add: Weeks 25% interest in King
Mill Distribution Park Bldg 3 B
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
Add: Weeks 25% interest in
Jefferson Mill Distribution Center Bldg A
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Add: Weeks 3.5% interest in
Lakeside Ranch Bldg 20
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated projects under
development per balance sheet
|
|
$
|
300,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
Projects Under Development
As of December 31, 2006, CREC, Temco Associates
(Temco) and CL Realty, L.L.C. (CL
Realty) owned the following parcels of land which are
being developed into residential communities. Information in the
table represents total amounts for the development as a whole,
not the Companys share. Dollars are stated in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Project Life
|
|
|
Total Lots to
|
|
|
Lots in
|
|
|
in Current
|
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
Lots
|
|
|
Lots to be
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Description
|
|
Commenced
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
be Developed(1)
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Basis(2)
|
|
|
Cousins Real Estate Corporation
(Consolidated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Lakes at Cedar
Grove(3)
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
5,468
|
|
Fulton County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callaway Gardens(4)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
Harris County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pine Mountain, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blalock Lakes
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
17,657
|
|
Coweta County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newnan, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longleaf at
Callaway(5)
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
Harris County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pine Mountain, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rivers Call
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
East Cobb County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
27,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Project Life
|
|
|
Total Lots to
|
|
|
Lots in
|
|
|
in Current
|
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
Lots
|
|
|
Lots to be
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Description
|
|
Commenced
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
be Developed(1)
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Basis(2)
|
|
|
Temco (50% owned)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bentwater
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Georgian (75%
owned)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
|
|
20,953
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Hills
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
14,039
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Happy Valley
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harris Place
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Temco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,276
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
36,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realty
(50% owned)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Meadow Farms (37.5%
owned)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
23,149
|
|
Fort Bend County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer Creek Ranch
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
Tarrant County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Worth, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bar C Ranch
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
8,316
|
|
Tarrant County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forth Worth, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer Lakes
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
4,531
|
|
Fort Bend County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenberg, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Lots Sold
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Project Life
|
|
|
Total Lots to
|
|
|
Lots in
|
|
|
in Current
|
|
|
Year to
|
|
|
Lots
|
|
|
Lots to be
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Description
|
|
Commenced
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
be Developed(1)
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Basis(2)
|
|
|
CL Realty continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Trails (80%
owned)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
$
|
12,082
|
|
Brazoria County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pearland, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village Park(7)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
Collin County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKinney, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waterford Park
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
Fort Bend County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenberg, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stonewall Estates (50%
owned)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
Bexar County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manatee River
Plantation
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
3,796
|
|
Manatee County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stillwater Canyon
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
Dallas County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DeSota, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creekside Oaks
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
Manatee County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradenton, FL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Valley (25%
owned)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
26,395
|
|
Cherokee & Fulton Counties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alpharetta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village Park North(7)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
Collin County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKinney, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridle Path Estates
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
Hillsborough County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Park
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
4,533
|
|
Cobb County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stonebridge(8)
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coweta County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newnan, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CL Realty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
3,361
|
|
|
|
8,689
|
|
|
|
140,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,443
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
6,882
|
|
|
|
11,561
|
|
|
$
|
204,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Share of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
$
|
93,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Weighted Average
Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This estimate represents the total projected development
capacity for a development on both owned land and land expected
to be purchased for further development. The numbers shown
include lots currently developed or to be developed over time,
based on managements current estimates, and lots sold to
date from inception of development. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes cost basis of land tracts as detailed on the Land Held
for Investment or Future Development schedule. |
|
(3) |
|
A third party has a participation in this project after certain
thresholds are met. |
|
(4) |
|
Callaway Gardens is owned in a venture, although the venture is
consolidated with the Company. The partner is entitled to a
share of the profits after the Companys capital is
recovered. |
|
(5) |
|
Longleaf at Callaway lots are sold to a home building venture,
of which CREC is a joint venture partner. As a result of this
relationship, the Company recognizes profits when houses are
built and sold, rather than at the |
28
|
|
|
|
|
time lots are sold, as is the case with the Companys other
residential developments. As of December 31, 2006, 108
houses have been sold. |
|
(6) |
|
CREC owns 50% of Temco Associates and CL Realty. |
|
(7) |
|
CL Realty purchased the partners interest in Village Park
and Village Park North on July 31, 2006. Prior to this
date, CL owned 60% and 75%, respectively, of the projects. |
|
(8) |
|
CL Realty owned a 10% interest in Stonebridge, which it sold on
July 18, 2006. |
Land
Held for Investment or Future Development
As of December 31, 2006, the Company owned or controlled
the following land holdings either directly or indirectly
through venture arrangements. The Company evaluates its land
holdings on a regular basis and may develop, ground lease or
sell portions of the land holdings if opportunities arise.
Information in the table represents total amounts for the
developable land area as a whole, not the Companys share,
and for cost basis, reflects the ventures basis, if
applicable. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 8 of this report for further information
related to investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. Dollars
are stated in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Developable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Land Area
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Description and Location(1)
|
|
Zoned Use
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(Acres)
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Basis(2)
|
|
|
North Point
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1970-1985
|
|
|
$
|
5,200
|
|
Wildwood Office Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Office and Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1971-1989
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
King Mill Distribution
Park(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
12,035
|
|
Land Adjacent to The Avenue
Carriage Crossing(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memphis, TN
|
|
Retail and Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
Round Rock/Austin, Texas
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Retail and Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
17,085
|
|
The Lakes at Cedar
Grove(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Terminus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
24,565
|
|
505, 511, 555 & 557
Peachtree Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2004-2006
|
|
|
|
6,253
|
|
615 Peachtree
Street(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
Jefferson Mill Business
Park(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Industrial and Commercial
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
Lakeside Ranch Business
Park(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
Industrial and Commercial
|
|
|
96.5
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED LAND HELD FOR
INVESTMENT OR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEMCO TRACTS(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven Hills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Residential and Mixed Use
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
2002-2005
|
|
|
$
|
|
(6)
|
Happy Valley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Paulding County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Residential and Mixed Use
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
6,384
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
CL REALTY
TRACTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer Creek Ranch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forth Worth, TX
|
|
Residential and Mixed Use
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
$
|
|
(6)
|
Long Meadow Farms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
Residential and Mixed Use
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Waterford Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenberg, TX
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Summer Lakes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosenberg, TX
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Village Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKinney, TX
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2003-2005
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Padre Island
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corpus Christi, TX
|
|
Residential and Mixed Use
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
11,539
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
Developable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Land Area
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Description and Location(1)
|
|
Zoned Use
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(Acres)
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Basis(2)
|
|
|
OTHER JOINT
VENTURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Handy Road Associates,
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Large Lot Residential
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
$
|
5,251
|
|
Wildwood Office Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
Office and Commercial
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1971-1989
|
|
|
|
21,875
|
|
Austin Research Park
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Acres
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The following properties include adjacent building pads. The
aggregate cost of these pads is included in Operating Properties
in the Companys consolidated financial statements or the
applicable joint ventures financial statements. The square
footage of potential office buildings which could be built on
the land is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Footage
|
|
|
Ten Peachtree Place
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
One Georgia Center
|
|
|
88.5
|
%
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
The Points at Waterview
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For consolidated properties, amount reflects the Companys
basis. For joint venture properties, amount reflects the
ventures basis. |
|
(3) |
|
Weeks Properties Group, LLC has the option to invest up to 25%
of project equity of any future industrial development on a
portion of this land. |
|
(4) |
|
This land was sold subsequent to December 31, 2006. |
|
(5) |
|
This project is consolidated but a third party has a
participation in the results of operations of this project. |
|
(6) |
|
Residential communities with adjacent land that is intended to
be sold to third parties in large tracts for residential,
multi-family or commercial development. The basis of these
tracts as well as lot inventory are included on the Residential
Projects Under Development schedule. |
|
(7) |
|
This property included a building and parking deck that were
imploded in the third quarter of 2006. The cost basis includes
costs associated with the demolition and clearing of the land
for a future development. |
|
(8) |
|
This project is owned through a joint venture with a third party
who has contributed equity but the equity ownership and the
allocation of the results of operations
and/or gain
on sale may be disproportionate to the equity ownership. |
Other
Investments
Air Rights Near the CNN Center. The Company
owns a leasehold interest in the air rights over the
approximately 365,000 square foot CNN Center parking
facility in Atlanta, Georgia, adjoining the headquarters of
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. and Cable News Network. The air
rights are developable for additional parking or office use. The
Companys net carrying value of this interest is $0.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, claims and
administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability
insurance and all of which collectively are not expected to have
a material adverse effect on the liquidity, results of
operations, business or financial condition of the Company.
30
Item 4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted for a vote of the security holders
during the fourth quarter of the Registrants fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006.
Item X. Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The Executive Officers of the Registrant as of the date hereof
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Office Held
|
|
Thomas D. Bell, Jr.
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Daniel M. DuPree
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Company
|
R. Dary Stone
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Company
|
James A. Fleming
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
Craig B. Jones
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Investment Officer
|
Lawrence L. Gellerstedt III
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
President of the Office/Multi-Family Division
|
John D. Harris, Jr.
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary
|
Robert M. Jackson
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
John S. McColl
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
Office/Multi-Family Division
|
Joel T. Murphy
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
President of the Retail Division
|
Forrest W. Robinson
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
President of the Industrial Division
|
Bruce E. Smith
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
President of the Land Division
|
Family
Relationships:
Thomas G. Cousins was the Chairman of the Board of Directors
from January 1, 2006 until December 7, 2006, when he
retired. Lillian C. Giornelli, Mr. Cousins daughter,
is a director of the Company. There are no other family
relationships among the Executive Officers or Directors.
Term
of Office:
The term of office for all officers expires at the annual
stockholders meeting. The Board retains the power to
remove any officer at any time.
Business
Experience:
Mr. Bell has served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company since January 2002. He has also served as
Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chairman of the Board
since June 2000 and December 2006, respectively. Prior to
becoming Chairman of the Board in December 2006, he served as
Vice Chairman of the Board beginning in June 2000. He was a
Special Limited Partner with Forstmann Little & Co.
from January 2001 until January 2002. He was Worldwide Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Young & Rubicam, Inc.
from January 2000 to November 2000; President and Chief
Operating Officer of Young & Rubicam, Inc. from
August 1999 to December 1999; and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Young & Rubicam Advertising from
September 1998 to August 1999. Mr. Bell is also a director
of Regal Entertainment Group, AGL Resources, Inc., and the
United States Chamber of Commerce and a Trustee of Emory
University Healthcare.
31
Mr. DuPree rejoined the Company in March 2003 as Vice
Chairman of the Company. During his previous tenure with the
Company from October 1992 until March 2001, he became Senior
Vice President in April 1993, Senior Executive Vice President in
April 1995 and President and Chief Operating Officer in November
1995. From September 2002 until February 2003, Mr. DuPree
was Chief Executive Officer of Barry Real Estate Companies, a
privately held development firm.
Mr. Stone joined the Company in June 1999 as President of
Cousins Stone LP, a venture in which the Company purchased a 50%
interest in June 1999. In July 2000, the Company purchased an
additional 25% interest in Cousins Stone LP and in February
2001, the Company purchased the remaining 25% interest. The name
Cousins Stone LP was changed to Cousins Properties Services LP
in August 2001. Mr. Stone was President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company from February 2001 to January 2002 and
was a Director of the Company from 2001 to 2003. Effective
January 2002, he relinquished the positions of President and
Chief Operating Officer and assumed the position of
President Texas. In February 2003, he became Vice
Chairman of the Company.
Mr. Fleming joined the Company in July 2001 as Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary. He became Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in August 2004. He
was a partner in the Atlanta law firm of Fleming & Ray
from October 1994 until July 2001. Prior to that he was a
partner at Long Aldridge & Norman, where he served as
Managing Partner from 1991 through 1993.
Mr. Jones joined the Company in October 1992 and became
Senior Vice President in November 1995 and President of the
Office Division in September 1998. He became Executive Vice
President and Chief Administrative Officer in August 2004 and
served in that capacity until December 2006 when he assumed the
role of Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer.
From 1987 until joining the Company, he was Executive Vice
President of New Market Companies, Inc. and affiliates.
Mr. Gellerstedt joined the Company in July 2005 as Senior
Vice President and President of the Office/Multi-Family
Division. From 2003 to 2005, Mr. Gellerstedt was Chairman
and CEO of The Gellerstedt Group. From 2001 to 2003, he was
President and COO of The Integral Group, LLC.
Mr. Harris joined the Company in February 2005 as Senior
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. From 1994 to 2003,
Mr. Harris was employed by JDN Realty Corporation, most
recently serving as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer. Beginning in 2004,
Mr. Harris was the Vice President and Corporate Controller
for Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Prior to 1994, Mr. Harris
was employed by Ernst & Young LLP, most recently
serving as Senior Manager.
Mr. Jackson joined the Company in December 2004 as Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. From
February 1996 to December 2004, he was an associate and then a
partner with the Atlanta-based law firm of Troutman Sanders LLP.
Mr. McColl joined the Company in April 1996 as Vice
President. He joined the Cousins/Richmond Division in February
1997 and was promoted in May 1997 to Senior Vice President. He
joined the Office Division in September 2000.
Mr. Murphy joined the Company in October 1992 and became
Senior Vice President of the Company and President of the Retail
Division in November 1995. From 1990 until joining the Company,
he was Senior Vice President of New Market Companies, Inc. and
affiliates.
Mr. Robinson joined the Company in May 2004 as Senior Vice
President and President of the Industrial Division. Prior to
joining the Company, he was Senior Vice President and President
of Codina Group from March 2001 to April 2004. From 1999 to
2001, he was Senior Vice President of Duke Realty Company.
Mr. Smith joined the Company in May 1993 as Senior Vice
President and President of the Land Division. From 1983 until
joining the Company, he held several positions with Arvida
Company, including President of the Atlanta Division and
President of the Texas Division.
32
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Stock and Related Stockholder
Matters
|
Market
Information
The high and low sales prices for the Companys common
stock and cash dividends declared per common share were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Quarters
|
|
|
2005 Quarters
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
33.99
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
|
$
|
34.89
|
|
|
$
|
38.77
|
|
|
$
|
31.24
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
$
|
33.50
|
|
|
$
|
30.75
|
|
Low
|
|
|
27.87
|
|
|
|
29.02
|
|
|
|
29.64
|
|
|
|
33.13
|
|
|
|
25.28
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
27.70
|
|
|
|
27.04
|
|
Dividends Declared:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
|
|
.37
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular
|
|
|
2/22/06
|
|
|
|
5/30/06
|
|
|
|
8/25/06
|
|
|
|
12/22/06
|
|
|
|
2/22/05
|
|
|
|
5/27/05
|
|
|
|
8/25/05
|
|
|
|
12/22/05
|
|
Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/01/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders
The Companys common stock trades on the New York Stock
Exchange (ticker symbol CUZ). At February 23, 2007, there
were 1,166 common stockholders of record.
Purchases
of Equity Securities
The following table contains information about the
Companys purchases of its equity securities during the
fourth quarter of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases Outside Plan
|
|
|
|
Purchases Inside Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares That May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Purchased(1)
|
|
|
Paid per Share(1)
|
|
|
|
Announced Plan(2)
|
|
|
Plan(2)
|
|
October 1-31
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
$
|
35.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
November 1-30
|
|
|
66,664
|
|
|
|
35.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
December 1-31
|
|
|
45,890
|
|
|
|
36.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
117,676
|
|
|
$
|
35.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The purchases of equity securities that occurred during the
fourth quarter of 2006 related to shares remitted by employees
as payment for income taxes due in conjunction with restricted
stock grants or option exercises or as payment for option
exercises. |
|
(2) |
|
On May 9, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase plan, which expires May 9,
2009, of up to 5,000,000 shares of the Companys
common stock. No purchases were made under this plan in the
fourth quarter of 2006. |
33
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total
return of Cousins Properties Incorporated Common Stock with the
Hemscott Group Index, NYSE Market Index, S&P 500 Index and
NAREIT Equity REIT Index. The Hemscott Group Index, formerly the
CoreData Group Index, is published by Hemscott PLC and is
comprised of publicly-held REITs. The graph assumes a $100
investment in each of the indices on December 31, 2001 and
the reinvestment of all dividends.
COMPARISON
OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN OF ONE OR MORE
COMPANIES, PEER GROUPS, INDUSTRY INDICES AND/OR BROAD
MARKETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
Company/Index/Market
|
|
12/31/2001
|
|
12/31/2002
|
|
12/31/2003
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
12/31/2006
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
107.67
|
|
|
|
151.41
|
|
|
|
195.25
|
|
|
|
192.35
|
|
|
|
274.99
|
|
Hemscott Group Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
97.13
|
|
|
|
127.21
|
|
|
|
169.08
|
|
|
|
179.02
|
|
|
|
234.85
|
|
S&P Composite
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
|
|
100.25
|
|
|
|
111.15
|
|
|
|
116.61
|
|
|
|
135.03
|
|
NYSE Market Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
81.69
|
|
|
|
105.82
|
|
|
|
119.50
|
|
|
|
129.37
|
|
|
|
151.57
|
|
NAREIT Equity Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
103.82
|
|
|
|
142.37
|
|
|
|
187.33
|
|
|
|
210.12
|
|
|
|
283.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Item 6. Selected
Financial Data
The following selected financial data sets forth consolidated
financial and operating information on a historical basis. This
data has been derived from the Companys consolidated
financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Rental property revenues
|
|
$
|
90,305
|
|
|
$
|
79,223
|
|
|
$
|
84,384
|
|
|
$
|
89,814
|
|
|
$
|
87,705
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
35,465
|
|
|
|
35,198
|
|
|
|
29,704
|
|
|
|
29,001
|
|
|
|
28,853
|
|
Residential lot, multi-family and
outparcel sales
|
|
|
40,418
|
|
|
|
33,166
|
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
9,126
|
|
Interest and other
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
5,750
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
169,861
|
|
|
|
150,018
|
|
|
|
135,448
|
|
|
|
137,510
|
|
|
|
130,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental property operating expenses
|
|
|
36,103
|
|
|
|
30,173
|
|
|
|
28,389
|
|
|
|
28,879
|
|
|
|
27,227
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,415
|
|
|
|
27,289
|
|
|
|
30,115
|
|
|
|
33,599
|
|
|
|
31,815
|
|
Residential lot, multi-family and
outparcel cost of sales
|
|
|
32,154
|
|
|
|
25,809
|
|
|
|
12,007
|
|
|
|
10,022
|
|
|
|
7,309
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
11,119
|
|
|
|
9,094
|
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
|
22,576
|
|
|
|
27,041
|
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
18,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
General, administrative and other
expenses
|
|
|
61,401
|
|
|
|
57,141
|
|
|
|
48,877
|
|
|
|
42,673
|
|
|
|
40,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
191,399
|
|
|
|
149,506
|
|
|
|
134,011
|
|
|
|
137,749
|
|
|
|
137,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes from
operations
|
|
|
(4,193
|
)
|
|
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
|
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
Minority interest in income of
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(4,130
|
)
|
|
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
|
|
(1,613
|
)
|
|
|
(1,589
|
)
|
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
173,083
|
|
|
|
40,955
|
|
|
|
204,493
|
|
|
|
24,620
|
|
|
|
26,670
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
3,012
|
|
|
|
15,733
|
|
|
|
118,056
|
|
|
|
100,558
|
|
|
|
6,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
146,234
|
|
|
|
46,407
|
|
|
|
319,825
|
|
|
|
120,730
|
|
|
|
23,060
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
86,457
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
87,959
|
|
|
|
121,431
|
|
|
|
24,812
|
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(8,042
|
)
|
|
|
(3,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
217,441
|
|
|
$
|
34,491
|
|
|
$
|
399,742
|
|
|
$
|
238,803
|
|
|
$
|
47,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income from continuing
operations per common share
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
.62
|
|
|
$
|
6.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.43
|
|
|
$
|
.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
.69
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
4.94
|
|
|
$
|
.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income from continuing
operations per common share
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
|
$
|
6.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
4.14
|
|
|
$
|
.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
|
$
|
4.83
|
|
|
$
|
.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
|
$
|
3.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets (at year-end)
|
|
$
|
1,196,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,026,992
|
|
|
$
|
1,140,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,248,077
|
|
Notes payable (at year-end)
|
|
$
|
315,149
|
|
|
$
|
467,516
|
|
|
$
|
302,286
|
|
|
$
|
497,981
|
|
|
$
|
669,792
|
|
Stockholders investment (at
year-end)
|
|
$
|
625,915
|
|
|
$
|
632,280
|
|
|
$
|
659,750
|
|
|
$
|
578,777
|
|
|
$
|
408,884
|
|
Common shares outstanding (at
year-end)
|
|
|
51,748
|
|
|
|
50,665
|
|
|
|
50,092
|
|
|
|
48,835
|
|
|
|
48,386
|
|
In periods prior to 2006, the Company recorded reimbursements of
salary and benefits of
on-site
employees pursuant to management agreements with third parties
as reductions of general and administrative expenses. In 2006,
the Company began recording these reimbursements in Fee Income
on the Consolidated Statements of Income and reclassified prior
period amounts to conform to the 2006 presentation. As a result,
Fee Income and
35
General and Administrative Expenses have increased by
$15.1 million in 2005, $13.2 million in 2004,
$10.6 million in 2003 and $10.6 million in 2002, when
compared to amounts previously reported.
Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Selected Financial Data included in
Item 6 and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview of 2006 Performance and Company and Industry
Trends. During 2006, the Company continued
to execute its strategy of developing high quality real estate
and harvesting the value of more mature projects through sale or
contribution to joint ventures. The Company invested
approximately $494 million in development or predevelopment
projects, land acquisitions or operating properties including
eight new projects that upon completion are estimated to result
in an aggregate investment of $476 million. The Company or
its joint ventures also sold six properties, several land tracts
and contributed five properties to a joint venture that resulted
in proceeds of approximately $824 million. These proceeds
were used to fund current developments and acquisitions, to
reduce indebtedness, thereby creating additional capacity to
reinvest capital into new development projects, and to pay a
special dividend to common stockholders in the amount of
$3.40 per share. As a result of this activity, the
Companys consolidated aggregate indebtedness decreased
from $468 million at December 31, 2005 to
$315 million at December 31, 2006 and the consolidated
debt to total market capitalization ratio decreased from 22% at
December 31, 2005 to 13% at December 31, 2006. The
Company believes that these relatively low debt levels provide
it with the ability to fund its development pipeline for the
foreseeable future.
In 2006, the Company completed substantial construction and
commenced operations of San Jose MarketCenter, The Avenue
Webb Gin (Phase I), the second phase of The Avenue West
Cobb, and Building 3A of King Mill Distribution Park. In
addition, the Company completed construction and closed the sale
of all units in 905 Juniper, its first multi-family project. The
Company acquired land and commenced construction of projects in
each of the Companys operating divisions in 2006. The
Office/Multi-Family Division began construction of its Palisades
West project in Austin and acquired 191 Peachtree Tower, a
1.2 million square foot office building in Downtown
Atlanta. The Retail Division began construction of The Avenue
Murfreesboro near Nashville, with a joint venture partner and
received final approvals to commence the first phase of The
Avenue Forsyth, just north of Atlanta. The Industrial Division
began Jefferson Mill Distribution Center, just north of Atlanta
and, with a joint venture partner, commenced construction of
Lakeside Ranch, a project in Dallas. The Land Division began
construction of Blalock Lakes, a community south of Atlanta, and
an additional phase of its Callaway Gardens project with a joint
venture partner.
As these new products were being created, the Company and its
joint ventures sold three assets and contributed five assets
into a joint venture to capture the value of these properties in
what management believed to be favorable market conditions. From
its Office portfolio, the Company sold Bank of America Plaza and
Frost Bank Tower. The Retail Division sold The Avenue of the
Peninsula, a property in Southern California that it acquired
and converted into its Avenue format in 1999. The Company also
formed a venture with an institutional investor and contributed
five retail properties while the investor contributed cash to be
used for future development by the Company. This transaction
allowed the Company to realize a value for these assets
significantly in excess of their original cost.
Consistent with past practices, the Company returned a portion
of the proceeds from its 2006 sales transactions to common
stockholders in the form of a special dividend in the fourth
quarter. This dividend represents the third such dividend the
Company has paid since 2003, the total of which is
$12.62 per share. When combined with its regular quarterly
dividends of $0.37 per share over this same period, the
Company has paid an aggregate of $18.54 per share in
dividends to common stockholders since January of 2003.
Also in 2006, the Company experienced a decline in its
residential lot business as a result of an overall softening of
the housing markets in which the Company does business. The
Companys markets that were most affected were Tampa and
Texas. The Tampa area has recently experienced an expansion of
completed home inventories and a decline in new home closings.
While we expect housing demand to return to this market in the
future because of job growth and migration of retirees to the
area, the large inventories caused a slow down in builders
purchasing the Companys lots. The Texas markets were
adversely affected. Management expects these
36
adverse conditions to continue in 2007. While management is
optimistic about the long term profitability of its lot business
in general and in these markets in particular, it is unable to
determine when market conditions will turn more favorable for
the Company.
The Companys strategy is to annually invest
$200 million to $400 million in development projects.
Years such as 2006 provide more opportunities than others;
however, the Companys product diversity and the ability of
management to understand and react to changing trends in the
real estate markets should improve its ability to continue to
develop through the changing real estate cycles.
With its expanded development pipeline, the Company will need to
perform at a high level in order to deliver the projects
discussed above, and any future projects it undertakes, on
schedule and at the returns expected at the beginning of the
projects. The Company believes that it has developed appropriate
systems and that it has experienced development and construction
professionals managing these projects, which should help to
mitigate the risks inherent in the development and leasing
process. As a real estate company, the Company is dependent upon
certain conditions outside of its control to create value for
its stockholders through development. These conditions include
demand for its products as well as favorable interest rates and
the availability of capital to fund its projects. In addition,
the general economic environment for its customers may affect
the ability of the Company to complete sales or leasing of its
developments and may affect the amount of development that the
Company undertakes in future years and the ultimate results of
its current development projects.
Looking to 2007 and beyond, there are both positive and negative
macro economic factors that will likely affect the
Companys business. Management believes that above average
population and job growth in its core markets will have a
positive impact on future development opportunities and on the
profitability of these projects. In the near term, management
believes that additional supply of recently completed office,
retail, multi-family and industrial projects in its core markets
will put pressure on rent growth and unit sales prices for
multi-family product. In addition, the rise in land prices and
construction costs, without a corresponding rise in rental
rates, will make it more difficult to maximize returns on the
Companys projects.
The Company, however, sees opportunity in mixed use developments
as recent demographic trends show that individuals are seeking
locations where they can live, work and seek entertainment.
Management believes that the Company, with its multiple
divisions, is positioned to act on this demographic shift and
expects to add additional mixed use projects to its development
pipeline in the near term.
The Company intends to be cautious in 2007 about new
multi-family projects because of a recent slowdown in sales
activity in certain markets, but management is optimistic about
opportunities in this product type over the next five years as a
result of favorable demographics. Likewise management believes
that the problems in the housing sector that have caused the
Companys lot sales to slow will turn and that there will
continue to be opportunities for new residential lot
developments over the long term for which the Company is well
positioned.
Management also believes that in the event of rising
capitalization rates, its strategy of creating value through
development should allow it to compare favorably with other real
estate companies who acquire completed properties for income and
future market appreciation. Unlike these companies, management
believes that if it is successful in identifying development
opportunities that meet its underwriting criteria, it can
continue to create value for stockholders in higher
capitalization rate environments by capitalizing on the value it
creates above cost during the process. While this trend may make
it less profitable to dispose of mature income producing assets,
management believes that its conservative capital structure will
provide it with other opportunities to raise capital needed for
development.
Two of the traditional financial metrics for evaluating a REIT
are funds from operations (FFO) and FFO growth. As
the Company recycles capital from stabilized assets into
development projects in order to create value and enhance
stockholder returns over the long term, its FFO generally
decreases in the short run. This reduction in FFO results from
either the distribution of capital to stockholders or the
redeployment of capital into development assets that will
ultimately result in value creation and higher yields, but are
not yet producing income. Therefore, management believes that it
is important not to place too much emphasis on the traditional
FFO measures, but instead to look at the value the Company
creates through its development and leasing activities and the
impact this value creation will have on the Companys net
asset value.
37
For the foreseeable future, the Company expects to continue to
pursue its business model by focusing much of its efforts on
creating value through development. Management believes that
this strategy has been successful in the past and should
continue to maximize the total return to stockholders.
Critical Accounting Policies. The
Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, and the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 herein include a summary of
the significant accounting policies for the Company. A critical
accounting policy is one which is both important to the
portrayal of a companys financial condition and results of
operations and requires significant judgment or complex
estimation processes. The Company is in the business of
developing, owning and managing office, retail and industrial
real estate properties, developing multi-family residential
units, and developing single-family residential communities
which are parceled into lots and sold to various home builders.
The Companys critical accounting policies relate to its
long lived assets, including cost capitalization, acquisition of
operating property, depreciation and amortization, and
impairment of long-lived assets (including investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures); revenue recognition, including
residential lot sales, land tract sales, multi-family
residential unit sales and valuation of receivables; and to
accounting for investments in non-wholly owned entities.
Long-Lived
Assets
Cost Capitalization. The Company is involved
in all stages of real estate development. The Company expenses
predevelopment expenses incurred on a potential project until it
becomes probable (more likely than not at the point the decision
is made) that the project will go forward. After the Company
determines the project is probable, all subsequently incurred
predevelopment costs, as well as interest, real estate taxes and
certain internal personnel and associated costs directly related
to the project under development, are capitalized in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 34 Capitalization of
Interest Cost and SFAS No. 67
Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations
of Real Estate Properties. If the projects
probability comes into question, a reserve may be placed on the
assets. If the decision is made to abandon development of a
project that had been deemed probable, all previously
capitalized costs are expensed or charged against the reserve,
if one was established. Therefore, a change in the probability
of a project could result in the expensing of significant costs
incurred for predevelopment activity. The Company had
approximately $17.5 million of capitalized predevelopment
assets as of December 31, 2006.
At the time the Company determines that a development project is
probable, the Company estimates the time and cost of
construction to complete the project. A change in the estimated
time and cost of construction could adversely impact the return
on the project and the amount of value created from the
development of the project. Additionally, determination of when
construction of a project is substantially complete and held
available for occupancy requires judgment. In accordance with
SFAS Nos. 34 and 67, the Company capitalizes direct and
related indirect project costs associated with development
projects during the construction period. Once a project is
deemed substantially complete and held for occupancy, subsequent
carrying costs, such as real estate taxes, interest, internal
personnel and associated costs, are expensed as incurred. The
Company considers projects
and/or
project phases substantially complete and held for occupancy at
the earlier of the date on which the phase reached occupancy of
95% or one year from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
The Companys judgment of the date the project is
substantially complete has a direct impact on the Companys
operating expenses and net income for the period.
Acquisition of Operating Property. In addition
to developing properties for investment purposes, the Company
also occasionally acquires completed and operating properties.
The Company allocates the purchase price of operating properties
acquired to land, building, tenant improvements and identifiable
intangible assets and liabilities based upon relative fair value
at the date of acquisition in accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business
Combinations, which requires considerable judgment.
The Company assesses fair value based on estimated cash flow
projections that utilize appropriate discount
and/or
capitalization rates. Estimates of future cash flows are based
on a number of assumptions including hypothetical expected
lease-up
periods, known and anticipated trends, and local market and
economic conditions, including probability of lease renewal and
estimated lease terms. The fair value of the tangible assets of
an acquired operating property, including land, building and
tenant improvements, considers the value of the property as if
it were vacant. Intangible assets can consist of above
38
or below market tenant and ground leases, customer relationships
and the value of in-place leases. Tangible and intangible assets
are amortized over their respective expected lives. If
management uses incorrect assumptions, thereby incorrectly
allocating acquisition cost to the different components or
assigns an incorrect amortization period to any asset, then net
income may not be reflected properly.
Depreciation and Amortization. Real estate
assets are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful
lives using the straight-line method of depreciation. Management
uses its judgment when estimating the life of the real estate
assets and when allocating development project costs. Historical
data, comparable properties and replacement costs are some of
the factors considered in determining useful lives and cost
allocations. If management incorrectly estimates the useful
lives of the Companys real estate assets or if cost
allocations are not appropriate, then depreciation and
amortization may not be reflected properly in the Companys
results of operations.
Impairment. The Company periodically evaluates
its real estate assets to determine if there has been any
impairment in the carrying values of its held for use assets and
records impairment losses if the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the
assets carrying amounts. The evaluation of real estate
assets involves many subjective assumptions dependent upon
future economic events that affect the ultimate value of the
property. For example, future cash flows from properties are
estimated using expected market rental rates, anticipated
leasing results and potential sales results. A change in
assumptions concerning future economic events could result in an
adverse change in the value of a property and cause an
impairment to be recorded. The Company has analyzed all real
estate assets that had indicators of impairment and has
determined that the carrying value of all real estate assets on
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets does not exceed
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets. Based on this analysis, no impairment losses were
required to be recorded. Unconsolidated joint ventures follow
the same impairment assessment of their properties as the
Company. Additionally, the Company evaluates its investments in
joint ventures, if indicators warrant the need for a review,
utilizing a discounted cash flow calculation. If the calculation
results in a lower amount than the carrying value of the
investment, the Company determines whether the impairment is
other than temporary and records an adjustment, if needed. The
Company also evaluates its goodwill annually, which requires
certain estimates and judgments, specifically related to the
fair value of its reporting segments. Based on the
Companys analysis, no impairment losses were required to
be recorded.
Revenue
Recognition
Residential Lot and Land Tract Sales. In its
determination of the gross profit recognized on its residential
lot and land tract sales, the Company utilizes several
estimates. Gross profit percentages are calculated based on the
estimated lot sales prices and the estimated costs of the
development or on the estimated total land tract sales and any
estimated development or improvement costs. The Company must
estimate the prices of the lots or land tracts to be sold, the
costs to complete the development of the residential community
or the land improvements and the time period over which the lots
or land tracts will ultimately be sold. If the Companys
estimated lot or land tract sales, timing or costs of
development, or the assumptions underlying all, were to be
revised or be rendered inaccurate, it could affect the overall
profit recognized on these sales.
Multi-family Residential Unit Sales. If a
certain threshold of non-refundable deposits are obtained upon
sale of a multi-family residential unit and other factors are
met, the Company recognizes profits of multi-family residential
units on the percentage of completion method. Therefore, sales
on these units are recognized before the contract actually
closes and before the entire sales price is obtained. If the
Company determines there is a risk that the remaining sales
price is uncollectible, an allowance for doubtful accounts may
be created. The Company assesses the collectibility of the full
sales price at closing by reviewing the overall market
conditions in the specific area of each project as well as the
market for re-sales of individual units at each project. These
factors, combined with the amount of the non-refundable deposits
and an assessment of the buyers financial condition, allow
the Company to assess the likelihood that the buyer will
ultimately pay the contractual purchase price at closing.
Additionally, cost of sales are recognized using the estimated
profit percentage during construction of the project, which
percentage could change significantly during the course of
development. The percentage of completion method involves
significant estimates, particularly in determining the profit
percentage to be realized on the overall project, the percentage
that construction is complete at reporting periods during the
project, and judgments as to the
39
collectibility of unit purchase prices upon completion. If the
Company inaccurately estimates costs to construct the project,
the estimated profit percentage is ultimately incorrect or if
its judgments regarding collectibility are incorrect, actual
final results could differ from previously estimated results.
See Discussion of New Accounting Pronouncements below for a new
pronouncement affecting future sales recognition for
multi-family residential units.
Valuation of Receivables. Receivables,
including straight-line rent receivables, are reported net of an
allowance for doubtful accounts and may be uncollectible in the
future. The Company reviews its receivables regularly for
potential collection problems in computing the allowance
recorded against its receivables. This review process requires
the Company to make certain judgments regarding collectibility,
notwithstanding the fact that ultimate collections are
inherently difficult to predict. A change in the judgments made
could result in an adjustment to the allowance for doubtful
accounts with a corresponding effect on net income.
Accounting
for Non-Wholly Owned Entities
The Company holds ownership interests in a number of ventures
with varying structures. The Company evaluates all of its
partnership interests and other variable interests to determine
if the entity is a variable interest entity (VIE),
as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 R. If the venture
is a VIE and in its judgment the Company is determined to be the
primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the assets,
liabilities and results from operations of the VIE.
For entities that are not determined to be VIEs, the Company
evaluates whether or not the Company has control or significant
influence over the joint venture to determine the appropriate
consolidation and presentation. Non-VIEs under the
Companys control are consolidated and non-VIEs in which
the Company can exert significant influence over, but does not
control, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
The Company recognizes minority interest on its Consolidated
Balance Sheets for non-wholly owned entities which the Company
consolidates. The minority partners share of current
operations is reflected in Minority Interest in Income of
Consolidated Subsidiaries on the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures are recorded as
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently
adjusted for income from unconsolidated joint ventures and cash
contributions and distributions. Any difference between the
carrying amount of these investments on the Companys
balance sheet and the underlying equity in net assets on the
joint ventures balance sheet is amortized as an adjustment
to income from unconsolidated joint ventures over the life of
the related asset. If the Companys judgment as to the
existence of a VIE, the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and the
extent of influence and control over a non-VIE is incorrect, the
presentation of the balance sheet and results of operations
could be incorrect.
Discussion
of New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties
(FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold
for recognizing tax return positions in the financial statements
as those which are more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon examination by the taxing authority. FIN 48
also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and
classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any
related interest and penalties, accounting for income tax
uncertainties in interim periods and the level of disclosures
associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties.
FIN 48 is effective January 1, 2007 for the Company.
The Company does not anticipate the effect of adopting the
provisions of FIN 48 will be material to its financial
position or results of operations.
In November 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus in Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 06-08,
Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyers
Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66,
Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of
Condominiums, which provides guidance for determining
the adequacy of a buyers continuing investment and the
appropriate profit recognition in the sale of individual units
in a condominium project. This issue requires that companies
evaluate the adequacy of a buyers continuing investment in
recognizing condominium revenues on the percentage of completion
method by applying paragraph 12 of SFAS No. 66 to
the level and timing of deposits received on contracts for
condominium sales. This rule is
40
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 and earlier
adoption is permitted. While the Company has not analyzed in
detail the effects of adoption of this standard on future
results of operations or decided whether to elect early adoption
of the standard, management believes that some of its existing
condominium contracts would not meet the requirements for
percentage of completion accounting and would, under the new
standard, be accounted for on the completed contract method,
which would result in later recognition of revenues than the
Company has historically presented.
The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements
When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements, (SAB 108) in September
2006. This statement requires that registrants analyze the
effect of financial statement misstatements on both their
balance sheet and their income statement and contains guidance
on correcting errors under this approach. The Company adopted
SAB 108 on December 31, 2006 and, in accordance with
the initial application provisions of SAB 108, adjusted
retained earnings effective January 1, 2006. This
adjustment was comprised of an overstatement of deferred tax
liabilities, an overstatement of investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures and an understatement of accounts payable and
accrued liabilities for compensated absences. All of these
adjustments were considered immaterial individually and in the
aggregate in prior years based on the Companys historical
method of determining materiality. See Note 15 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more
information.
Results
of Operations For The Three Years Ended December 31,
2006.
General. Historically, the Companys
financial results have been significantly affected by sale
transactions and the fees generated by, and
start-up
operations of, major real estate developments. These types of
transactions and developments do not necessarily recur.
Accordingly, the Companys historical financial statements
may not be indicative of future operating results.
In addition, in periods prior to 2006, the Company recorded
reimbursements of salary and benefits of
on-site
employees pursuant to management agreements with third parties
and joint ventures as reductions of general and administrative
expenses. In 2006, the Company began recording these
reimbursements in Fee Income on the Consolidated Statements of
Income and reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the
2006 presentation. As a result, Fee Income and General and
Administrative Expenses have increased by $15.1 million in
2005 and $13.2 million in 2004 when compared to amounts
previously reported.
Rental Property Revenues.
Summary. Rental property revenues increased
$11.1 million between 2005 and 2006 and decreased by
$5.2 million between 2004 and 2005. The Company sold a
significant number of office buildings in 2004, some of whose
operations were not reclassified to discontinued operations due
to continuing involvement with the properties in the form of
property management. The Company also had declines during the
last three years in some of the leased percentages of its office
assets, although several leased percentages increased during
2006. In addition, the Company purchased a 1.2 million
square foot office building, 191 Peachtree Tower, during 2006.
The Company also opened several retail centers during 2006 that
increased rental property revenues. The retail increases were
partially offset by the contribution of five retail centers to a
joint venture with Prudential in June 2006, CP Venture IV
Holdings, LLC (CPV IV). The Companys share of
results of operations from these properties is reflected in
income from unconsolidated joint ventures on the statement of
income, since they are now accounted for using the equity method.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2006 to 2005.
Rental property revenues from continuing operations of the
office portfolio increased approximately $5.6 million
between 2005 and 2006 as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $5.5 million related to the purchase of 191
Peachtree Tower and the purchase of Cosmopolitan Center;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1.6 million related to One Georgia Center as
its average economic occupancy increased from 19% in 2005 to 37%
in 2006;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of approximately $1.5 million related to 615
Peachtree Street, which was taken out of service as an operating
property in 2006, the building imploded, and the land is now
held for potential future development or sale; and
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of approximately $1.2 million for 3301 Windy Ridge
Parkway, as its average economic occupancy decreased from 100%
in 2005 to 42% in 2006.
|
Rental property revenues from continuing operations of the
retail portfolio increased approximately $4.9 million
between 2005 and 2006 as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $15.4 million related to the openings of
San Jose MarketCenter and The Avenue Webb Gin in 2006, and
to the increased occupancy at The Avenue Carriage Crossing,
which opened in late 2005; and
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $10.5 million related to the contribution of
the five retail properties to the venture with Prudential, CPV
IV.
|
Rental property revenues of the industrial portfolio increased
approximately $555,000 between 2005 and 2006, as the
Companys first industrial building, King Mill
Building 3A, opened in 2006.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2005 to 2004.
Rental property revenues from continuing operations of the
Companys office portfolio decreased approximately
$12.7 million in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $10.6 million related to the sale of 333 John
Carlyle/1900 Duke Street and 101 Independence Center in 2004;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2.7 million from One Georgia Center, as its
average economic occupancy decreased from 48% in 2004 to 19% in
2005;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $902,000 at Lakeshore Park Plaza, as its average
economic occupancy decreased from 89% in 2004 to 51% in
2005; and
|
|
|
|
Increase of $737,000 at 555 North Point Center East due to the
commencement of a new lease in 2005.
|
Rental property revenues from continuing operations of the
retail portfolio increased approximately $7.5 million
between 2004 and 2005 as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $4.2 million as a result of the opening of The
Avenue Viera in 2004;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1.5 million as a result of the opening of The
Avenue Carriage Crossing in 2005;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $912,000 from The Avenue West Cobb, as its average
economic occupancy increased from 92% in 2004 to 99% in
2005; and
|
|
|
|
Increase of $920,000 from The Avenue Peachtree City, as its
average economic occupancy increased from 92% in 2004 to 96% in
2005.
|
Rental Property Operating Expenses. Rental
property operating expenses increased $5.9 million between
2005 and 2006 as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $4.7 million due to the openings of
San Jose MarketCenter and The Avenue Webb Gin, and the
increased occupancy of The Avenue Carriage Crossing, which
opened late in 2005;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3.6 million as a result of the 2006 purchases
of 191 Peachtree Tower and Cosmopolitan Center;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2.8 million due to the contribution of the
five retail centers to CPV IV; and
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $731,000 related to the cessation of operations at
615 Peachtree Street noted above.
|
Rental property operating expenses increased $1.8 million
between 2004 and 2005 primarily as a result of the 2005 opening
of and/or
increased occupancy at The Avenue Viera, The Avenue Carriage
Crossing, The Avenue West Cobb and The Avenue Peachtree City.
Fee Income. Fee income increased $267,000
between 2005 and 2006 and $5.5 million between 2004 and
2005. The increase between 2005 and 2006 is a result of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $940,000 related to reimbursements of salaries and
related benefits from third party and joint venture managed
properties;
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $776,000 in development fees from the Temco joint
venture;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1.8 million in leasing, development and
management fees from three joint ventures formed in 2006
(Palisades West, LLC; CF Murfreesboro Associates (CF
Murfreesboro), and CPV IV), offset by a decrease of
$846,000 of joint venture leasing fees from 2005 activity; and
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $2.1 million from the Companys Texas
subsidiary, which performs third party management and leasing,
mainly due to a decrease in land brokerage fees from the Las
Colinas project.
|
The increase between 2004 and 2005 is a result of increases in
reimbursements from third party and joint venture managed
properties and higher brokerage fees from the Las Colinas
project.
Multi-Family Residential Unit Sales and Cost of
Sales. In 2005, the Company began recognizing
revenue and cost of sales for its units at the 905 Juniper
project. This project, a
94-unit
multi-family residential building in midtown Atlanta, Georgia,
was owned in a joint venture, which the Company began
consolidating in June 2005 (see Note 6 905
Juniper Venture, LLC). Revenue and cost of sales were recognized
using the percentage of completion method as outlined in
SFAS No. 66 for certain units which qualified, while
other units were accounted for on the completed contract method.
All of the units in the 905 Juniper project closed in 2006,
which increased sales and cost of sales in 2006 compared to
2005. The Company expects multi-family residential unit sales
and cost of sales to decrease in 2007 due to the completion of
its 905 Juniper project in 2006.
Residential Lot and Outparcel Sales and Cost of
Sales. Residential lot and outparcel sales
decreased $4.6 million between 2005 and 2006 and increased
$5.2 million between 2004 and 2005. The decrease between
2005 and 2006 is the result of a decrease in lot sales of
$4.4 million and a decrease in outparcel sales of $217,000.
The decrease in lot sales is primarily the result of a decrease
in number of lots sold from 172 to 126. The increase between
2004 and 2005 is the result of an increase in outparcel sales of
$5.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in lot sales
of $400,000.
Consistent with current market trends, the Company anticipates
residential lot sales for 2007, like those in 2006, will be
lower than the Company experienced in 2005, both at consolidated
projects and at developments owned by Temco and CL Realty,
entities in which the Company is a joint venture partner. The
Company cannot currently quantify the effect of the current
slowdown on its results of operations for 2007 and forward.
Residential lot and outparcel cost of sales decreased by
$3.7 million between 2005 and 2006 and increased by
$4.4 million between 2004 and 2005. The change in
residential lot cost of sales was partially due to the number of
lots sold during the periods and partially to fluctuations in
gross profit percentages used to calculate the cost of sales for
residential lot sales in certain of the residential
developments. Furthermore, outparcel cost of sales were
approximately $5.1 million, $5.6 million and $929,000
in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, due to the aforementioned
outparcel sales.
The majority of the Companys residential lot sales are
conducted through the CL Realty and Temco joint ventures, which
are not consolidated and therefore not included in the above
numbers.
General and Administrative Expenses. General
and administrative expenses increased $2.8 million between
2005 and 2006. Salaries and related benefits increased
approximately $11.8 million in 2006 as a result of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3.4 million in salary and bonus expense, due
mainly to an increase in the number of employees and individual
compensation increases;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3.3 million related to stock options, which
the Company began expensing January 1, 2006 in conjunction
with the adoption of SFAS 123R;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $3.0 million in restricted stock units
(RSU) expense, which were granted for the first time
in December 2005.
|
|
|
|
Included in the above increases for RSUs and stock options was
additional expense totaling $1.2 million, after the effect
of capitalization to projects under development, related to the
adoption of a retirement feature, which allows for immediate
vesting in these instruments upon the meeting of certain
requirements.
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
The vesting period for stock options and RSUs also changed for
those employees who are estimated to meet the retirement feature
in less time than the original vesting period. See Note 7
in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 8 for more information; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously discussed in fee income above, general and
administrative expense for all periods presented reflect salary,
benefits and other expenses reimbursed by third party and joint
venture management contracts, which increased $940,000 between
2005 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
The salary and related benefits increase between 2005 and 2006
was partially offset by a $4.6 increase in capitalized salaries
of development and leasing personnel due to a larger number of
projects under development between 2005 and 2006.
|
Additionally, the increase in general and administrative
expenses between 2005 and 2006 was partially offset by a
decrease in charitable contributions of $4.5 million, as
the Company contributed this amount in 2005 toward establishment
of a charitable foundation.
General and administrative expenses increased $8.9 million
between 2004 and 2005 as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of $1.9 million in reimbursements from third party
and joint venture management contracts primarily due to an
increase in the Companys third-party and joint venture
managed properties;
|
|
|
|
Increase in salaries and related benefits due to increased
development personnel in the Retail and Industrial Divisions and
to increased personnel in the Office/Multi-Family Division
related to the acquisition of The Gellerstedt Group;
|
|
|
|
An expense of $350,000 recognized in 2005 associated with a
funding obligation for its 401(k) and profit sharing
plan; and
|
|
|
|
A $4.5 million charitable contribution expense, as
discussed above.
|
The increases in general and administrative expense between 2004
and 2005 were partially offset by increases in capitalized
salaries of development and leasing personnel due to a larger
number of projects under development between 2004 and 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization increased $5.1 million between 2005 and
2006 and decreased $2.8 million between 2004 and 2005. The
2006 increase was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increases resulting from the opening of The Avenue Carriage
Crossing, San Jose MarketCenter and The Avenue Webb Gin and
the acquisitions of 191 Peachtree Tower and Cosmopolitan Center;
|
|
|
|
Increase of $579,000 at 3301 Windy Ridge Parkway where
amortization of certain tenant costs was accelerated upon the
tenants partial lease termination;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $3.6 million related to the five retail
properties contributed to the venture with Prudential;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $858,000 at Inforum as first generation tenant
improvement and leasing costs which were assigned to these
assets upon purchase of this property in 1999 are now fully
amortized; and
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $650,000 from the transfer of 615 Peachtree Street
from operating properties to land held for investment or future
development.
|
The 2005 decrease was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease resulting from the 2004 sales of 333 John Carlyle, 1900
Duke Street and 101 Independence Center;
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $3.5 million at the Inforum related to the
fully amortized assets discussed above; and
|
|
|
|
Increase related to the aforementioned opening and acquisition
of office buildings and retail centers.
|
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$2.0 million between 2005 and 2006 and decreased
$5.5 million between 2004 and 2005. Interest expense before
capitalization increased $5.7 million in 2006 due to higher
average balances outstanding on the credit facility during 2006
over 2005, the new construction facility entered into during
44
2006, and to higher rates on its credit facility in 2006 as a
result of increases in LIBOR. The higher average debt balances
on the credit facility were a result of more development and
acquisition expenditures in 2006 than in 2005, and the result of
the Company having a large balance of unexpended cash at the
beginning of 2005 from property sales in 2004. Capitalized
interest increased $3.6 million, which partially offset the
increase in interest expense. Capitalized interest rose as a
result of the increased development activity in 2006.
Interest expense decreased between 2004 and 2005 due to a
decrease in interest before capitalization of $2.6 million.
Interest before capitalization decreased primarily because of
the 2004 sales and related disposition of debt for 333 John
Carlyle, 1900 Duke Street and 101 Independence. In addition, the
Company issued $100 million in preferred stock in 2004, the
proceeds of which were used to reduce indebtedness. Capitalized
interest increased $2.9 million in 2005 as compared to
2004, which contributed to the decrease in interest expense.
Capitalized interest increased as a result of the increased
development activity in 2005 over 2004.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on
extinguishment of debt of $18.2 million in 2006 was
comprised of defeasance charges related to the repayment of one
note and a mark to market charge on the contribution of another
note to a joint venture. CSC Associates, L.P. (CSC),
of which the Company owns a 50% interest, sold Bank of America
Plaza in the third quarter of 2006. This building was encumbered
by a mortgage note payable, the proceeds of which had been
loaned to the Company and, in turn, the Company was obligated in
full on the debt. The Company repaid the debt upon sale of Bank
of America Plaza and incurred a loss related to a defeasance fee
paid to terminate the note and to the unamortized closing costs
totaling approximately $15.4 million. The Company also
incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.8 million related to the assumption of The Avenue East
Cobb mortgage note payable by the venture formed with
Prudential, CPV IV.
Provision for Income Taxes from Operations. An
income tax provision is recorded for the Companys taxable
subsidiary, CREC. The income tax provision decreased
$3.6 million between 2005 and 2006 and increased
$5.0 million between 2004 and 2005. The 2006 decrease was a
result of a decrease in taxable income at CREC caused by a
reduction in lot and tract sales and to an adjustment to current
and deferred income tax liabilities (See Note 15 in Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The 2005 increase is
the result of an increase in residential lot and tract sales as
well as an increase in multi-family sales. CREC is the partner
in certain joint ventures, including CL Realty and Temco, which
sell residential lots and land tracts, and TRG Columbus
Development Venture, Ltd. (TRG), which sells
multi-family residential units. The consolidated results of 905
Juniper Venture, LLC, which sold multi-family residential units,
are also recorded in CREC.
Income from Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures. (All amounts reflect the Companys
share of joint venture income.) Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures increased $132.1 million between 2005 and 2006 and
decreased $163.5 million between 2004 and 2005. Overall,
these changes were the result of the recognition of gains on
sales of properties by certain joint ventures in 2004 and 2006.
A more detailed discussion by venture follows.
Income from CSC increased approximately $131.1 million in
2006 due to the sale of Bank of America Plaza in September 2006,
which generated a gain to the Company of $133.8 million.
Due to the disposition of CSCs sole asset in 2006, income
from this joint venture will decline in 2007 and forward.
Income from TRG increased approximately $3.7 million and
$6.7 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. TRG is
developing 50 Biscayne, a
529-unit
condominium project in Miami, Florida. TRG is recognizing income
utilizing the percentage of completion method for applicable
units which meet the criteria and commenced income recognition
in the fourth quarter of 2005. The Company recognizes 40% of
TRGs net income, after certain preferred returns to each
partner and, at December 31, 2006, had recognized income on
95% of the units, and the project was 70% complete for
construction. There have been recent reports about softening in
the Miami, Florida condominium market. The Company does not
believe that this softening market will affect this project, as
100% of the units are under contract for sale and some of the
contracts have been re-sold in the secondary market for prices
in excess of the original contract amount, but there can be no
guarantee of the estimated outcome until the sales of the units
close, which is expected to be complete by the first quarter of
2008.
Income from CL Realty decreased $2.4 million between 2005
and 2006 and increased $5.7 million between 2004 and 2005
due to the changes in the number of lots sold, plus the mix of
residential communities from which the lots were sold. CL Realty
is a venture in which the Company is a 50% partner, and CL
Realty is in the business of
45
residential lot development and land tract sales. CL Realty sold
973, 1,314 and 972 lots in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Income from Temco increased $3.5 million between 2005 and
2006 and decreased $1.2 million between 2004 and 2005. The
primary reason for the changes between periods is the result of
tract sales activities as the number of lots sold by Temco
remained consistent. Temco is a venture in which the Company is
a 50% partner and is in the business of residential lot
development and land tract sales. Temco sold 477, 467 and 491
lots in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which caused a
portion of the changes between years. Temco sold 1,088, 212 and
310 acres of land during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
which generated pre-tax gains to the Company of approximately
$5.0 million, $1.7 million and $2.2 million in
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Income from CPV IV increased approximately $1.8 million
between 2006 and 2005. In June 2006, the Company contributed
five retail properties to this venture, which is accounted for
on the equity method. The ownership of the venture decreased in
stages between June and December 2006, and the Company now owns
11.5% of the venture and will be recognizing income based on its
11.5% ownership going forward.
Income from Deerfield Towne Center, LLC, (Deerfield)
increased approximately $5.3 million between 2004 and 2005
and decreased approximately the same amount between 2005 and
2006. The Company had a 10% profits interest in Deerfield and
neither made nor was obligated to make any capital contributions
to the entity. The Company obtained this interest through a
predevelopment and leasing arrangement and recognized income as
distributions were received. Deerfield sold its operating retail
center in 2005 and distributed the proceeds, thus accounting for
the income recognition by the Company in 2005. No significant
income or loss was recognized in 2006.
Income from 285 Venture, LLC (285 Venture) decreased
approximately $1.4 million between 2005 and 2006. In 2005,
285 Venture sold 1155 Perimeter Center West, the single asset of
the venture, and the Company recognized a gain of approximately
$1.6 million on the sale. No significant income or loss was
recognized in 2006.
Income from Wildwood Associates decreased $101.2 million
between 2004 and 2005. The 2005 decrease was due to
approximately $99.4 million in gains on sales of investment
properties in 2004. Wildwood Associates sold all of its office
buildings and its 15 acres of stand-alone retail sites
under ground leases in 2004. In 2005 and 2006, Wildwood
Associates assets consisted mainly of undeveloped land. No
significant income or loss was recognized in 2005 or 2006.
Income from CPI/FSP I, L.P. decreased $14.1 million
between 2004 and 2005. The 2005 decrease was due to a
$12.4 million gain on sale of investment properties, as
CPI/FSP I, L.P. sold Austin Research Park
Buildings III and IV in the third quarter of 2004. The
assets that CPI/FSP I, L.P. currently owns consist mainly
of undeveloped land. No significant income or loss was
recognized in 2006.
Income from CC-JM II Associates decreased
$18.1 million between 2004 and 2005. In 2004, the John
Marshall II office building, the single asset which
CC-JM II Associates owned, was sold and a gain of
$19.2 million recognized. No significant income or loss was
recognized in 2005 or 2006.
The results for Cousins LORET Venture, L.L.C.
(LORET) decreased $45.6 million between 2004
and 2005 due to a $45.3 million gain on sale of investment
properties in 2004, as LORET sold its office buildings, The
Pinnacle and Two Live Oak Center, in the third quarter of 2004.
No significant income or loss was recognized in 2005 or 2006.
Gain on Sale of Investment Properties. Gain on
sale of investment properties, net of applicable income tax
provision, was $3.0 million, $15.7 million and
$118.1 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
2006 gain included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of undeveloped land at The Lakes of Cedar Grove
residential development $0.2 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of undeveloped land at the North Point/Westside mixed
use project $2.3 million; and
|
|
|
|
The recurring amortization of deferred gain from CP Venture, LLC
(CPV) $0.5 million (see Note 5
in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8).
|
46
The 2005 gain included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of undeveloped land at The Lakes of Cedar Grove
residential development $1.2 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of undeveloped land at the North Point/Westside mixed
use project $4.4 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of Company-owned land at Wildwood
$9.8 million; and
|
|
|
|
The recurring amortization of deferred gain from CPV
$0.3 million.
|
The 2004 gain included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The sale of the 333 John Carlyle and 1900 Duke Street office
buildings $34.5 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of Ridenour land $0.7 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of the 101 Independence Center office
building $35.8 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of undeveloped land at the North Point/Westside mixed
use project $9.6 million;
|
|
|
|
The recognition of deferred gain from the sale of Wildwood land
associated with the property sales
$29.3 million);
|
|
|
|
The sale of Company-owned land at Wildwood
$3.3 million;
|
|
|
|
The sale of a ground lease adjacent to North Point
MarketCenter $1.4 million;
|
|
|
|
A true-up of
gains from the 1996 sale of Lawrenceville MarketCenter, as
certain taxes were determined not to be owed on that
transaction $0.6 million; and
|
|
|
|
The recurring amortization of deferred gain from CPV, plus an
additional amount recognized from the sale of Wachovia
Tower, $2.8 million.
|
Discontinued
Operations. SFAS No. 144 requires that
certain office buildings and retail centers that were sold or
plan to be sold be treated as discontinued operations and that
the results of their operations and any gains on sales from
these properties be shown as a separate component of income in
the Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented.
The properties sold which qualified as discontinued operations
were as follows:
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Frost Bank Tower
|
|
|
|
The Avenue of the Peninsula
|
|
|
|
North Point Ground Leases
|
2005
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Rocky Creek Properties
|
|
|
|
Northside/Alpharetta I and II
|
|
|
|
101 Second Street
|
|
|
|
55 Second Street
|
|
|
|
The Shops of Lake Tuscaloosa
|
Income from Discontinued Operations decreased from
$6.0 million in 2004 to $2.3 million in 2005, and
further decreased to a loss of $38,000 in 2006. The difference
between the 2004, 2005 and 2006 amounts is the result of the
number and type of properties included in each year.
47
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, on
January 1, 2006 utilizing the modified prospective method.
This standard requires that companies recognize compensation
expense in the statement of income for the grant-date fair value
of share-based awards that vest during the period. The Company
calculates the grant-date fair value of its awards using the
Black-Scholes model, which it also utilized under
SFAS No. 123 in its pro forma disclosures for periods
prior to 2006. Assumptions used under SFAS No. 123 are
not materially different from those used under
SFAS No. 123R. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R
reduced 2006 net income by approximately $2.4 million
after accounting for the effect of capitalizing salaries and
related benefits of certain development and leasing personnel to
projects under development and after the effect of income taxes.
The total unrecognized compensation cost related to all
non-vested share-based payment arrangements was
$23.3 million, which will be recognized over a weighted
average period of 3.2 years.
Funds From Operations. The table below shows
Funds From Operations Available to Common Stockholders
(FFO) and the related reconciliation to net income
available to common stockholders for the Company. The Company
calculated FFO in accordance with the National Association of
Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT)
definition, which is net income available to common stockholders
(computed in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP)),
excluding extraordinary items, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle and gains or losses from sales of
depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization of real
estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same
basis. In 2005, the Company included $5.0 million in income
from a real estate venture related to the sale of real estate in
its NAREIT-defined calculation of FFO. The Company included this
amount in FFO because, based on the nature of the investment,
the Company believes this income should not be considered gain
on the sale of depreciable property. The Company presented the
NAREIT-defined calculation and also presented an adjusted
NAREIT-defined calculation of FFO to add back the losses on
extinguishment of debt recognized in 2006 in connection with the
venture formation on June 29, 2006 with Prudential and the
sale of Bank of America Plaza in September 2006. The Company
presented this additional measure of FFO because the losses on
extinguishment of debt that the Company recognized related to a
sale or an exchange of real estate, and all other amounts
related to a sale or an exchange of real estate are excluded
from FFO.
48
FFO is used by industry analysts and investors as a supplemental
measure of an equity REITs operating performance.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have
historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many
industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT
created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating
performance that excludes historical cost depreciation, among
other items, from GAAP net income. The use of FFO, combined with
the required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally
beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of
REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT
operating results more meaningful. Company management evaluates
the operating performance of its reportable segments and of its
divisions based on FFO. Additionally, the Company uses FFO and
FFO per share, along with other measures, to assess performance
in connection with evaluating and granting incentive
compensation to its officers and employees. The reconciliation
of net income available to common stockholders to funds from
operations, both NAREIT defined and as-adjusted, is
as follows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Income Available to Common
Stockholders
|
|
$
|
217,441
|
|
|
$
|
34,491
|
|
|
$
|
399,742
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated properties
|
|
|
32,415
|
|
|
|
27,289
|
|
|
|
30,115
|
|
Discontinued properties
|
|
|
11,275
|
|
|
|
9,297
|
|
|
|
12,414
|
|
Share of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
8,920
|
|
|
|
15,915
|
|
Depreciation of furniture,
fixtures and equipment and amortization of specifically
identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated properties
|
|
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
(2,951
|
)
|
|
|
(2,652
|
)
|
Share of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of applicable income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated properties
|
|
|
(3,012
|
)
|
|
|
(15,733
|
)
|
|
|
(118,056
|
)
|
Discontinued properties
|
|
|
(86,495
|
)
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
(81,927
|
)
|
Share of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
(135,618
|
)
|
|
|
(1,935
|
)
|
|
|
(176,265
|
)
|
Gain on sale of undepreciated
investment properties
|
|
|
14,348
|
|
|
|
15,483
|
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds From Operations Available
to Common Stockholders
|
|
|
56,262
|
|
|
|
73,746
|
|
|
|
108,878
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
18,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds From Operations Available
to Common Stockholders, Excluding Loss on Extinguishment of
Debt
|
|
$
|
74,469
|
|
|
$
|
73,746
|
|
|
$
|
108,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Shares
|
|
|
50,655
|
|
|
|
49,989
|
|
|
|
49,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Weighted Average
Shares
|
|
|
52,513
|
|
|
|
51,747
|
|
|
|
51,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources.
Financial
Condition.
The Company had a significant number of projects under
development and in the pre-development stage at
December 31, 2006 and does not expect the number of
projects or the amounts invested in development projects to
decrease in the near term. The Company also has a large amount
of undeveloped land, both consolidated and in unconsolidated
joint ventures, which may progress into development projects in
2007. In order to position the Company to fund these projects
and potential projects, the Company sold two office buildings,
one retail property and contributed five retail projects to a
venture with a third party that generated capital in 2006. As a
result, total indebtedness decreased during 2006 to
$315.1 million as of December 31, 2006, representing
13% of total market
49
capitalization at December 31, 2006, and the Company had
$11.5 million in cash on hand. The Company believes that it
has sufficient availability on its credit and construction
facilities and the capacity to generate additional capital to
fund its development expenditures through 2007. The financial
condition of the Company is discussed in further detail below.
At December 31, 2006, the Company was subject to the
following contractual obligations and commitments
($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Contractual
Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company long-term debt
Unsecured notes payable and construction loans
|
|
$
|
199,179
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
5,941
|
|
|
$
|
192,900
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
115,970
|
|
|
|
24,337
|
|
|
|
12,510
|
|
|
|
62,990
|
|
|
|
16,133
|
|
Interest commitments under notes
payable(1)
|
|
|
70,604
|
|
|
|
20,083
|
|
|
|
36,341
|
|
|
|
10,686
|
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
Operating leases (ground leases)
|
|
|
15,343
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
Operating leases (offices)
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
$
|
402,500
|
|
|
$
|
45,589
|
|
|
$
|
55,348
|
|
|
$
|
267,027
|
|
|
$
|
34,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
3,016
|
|
|
$
|
3,016
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Performance bonds
|
|
|
17,973
|
|
|
|
16,874
|
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated development commitments
|
|
|
286,360
|
|
|
|
186,664
|
|
|
|
76,358
|
|
|
|
23,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded tenant improvements
|
|
|
18,294
|
|
|
|
18,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commitments
|
|
$
|
325,643
|
|
|
$
|
224,848
|
|
|
$
|
77,457
|
|
|
$
|
23,338
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest on variable rate obligations is based on rates
effective as of December 31, 2006. |
As discussed above, the Company formed a new venture with
Prudential in 2006, and contributed its interests in five retail
properties. Through December 31, 2006, Prudential had
contributed $300 million in cash to this venture and may
make further contributions of up to $20.5 million to this
venture in 2007 based on future leasing and development
performed by the Company on the contributed properties. The cash
contributed by Prudential is expected to be used to fund
development projects of the development venture, and the current
funds are being used to reduce indebtedness of the Company until
the Company commences development of such projects.
In addition to capital generated from this venture formation,
the Company received cash from the sales of Bank of America
Plaza, Frost Bank Tower, The Avenue of the Peninsula and from
the sale of seven ground leased outparcels at its North Point
property. These sales created taxable income that the Company
distributed to common stockholders in the form of a special
dividend in the fourth quarter of 2006 of $175.5 million
(see Cash Flows section below). The Company may consider selling
other income producing assets in 2007 as a result of the
continued strategic review and analysis of assets it holds.
With the relatively low leverage created by the capital
generated from these transactions, the Company expects to
utilize indebtedness to fund a portion of its commitments in
2007. In the first quarter of 2006, the Company created
additional borrowing capacity by expanding its existing
revolving credit facility and by adding a construction facility.
The revised credit facility can be expanded to $500 million
under certain circumstances, although the availability of the
additional capacity is not guaranteed. The revised credit
facility also reduced the spread over LIBOR when compared to the
previous facility, removed any restrictions on dividend payments
provided the Companys Debt to Total Assets, as defined, is
less than 55% and provided additional flexibility in some of the
financial covenants. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
had $128.2 million drawn on its $400 million credit
facility. The amount available under this credit facility is
reduced by outstanding letters of credit, which were
approximately $3.0 million at December 31, 2006. The
Companys interest rate on its credit
50
facility is variable based on LIBOR plus a spread based on
certain of the Companys ratios and other factors. As of
December 31, 2006, the spread over LIBOR was 0.80%.
The Company also entered into an unsecured $100 million
construction facility in the first quarter of 2006. While this
facility is unsecured, advances under the facility are to be
used to fund the construction costs of the Terminus 100 project.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had $64.7 million
drawn on its construction facility.
The Companys mortgage debt is primarily non-recourse
fixed-rate mortgage notes payable secured by various real estate
assets. In addition, many of the Companys non-recourse
mortgages contain covenants which, if not satisfied, could
result in acceleration of the maturity of the debt. The Company
expects that it will either refinance the non-recourse mortgages
at maturity or repay the mortgages with proceeds from other
financings. As of December 31, 2006, the weighted average
interest rate on all of the Companys debt was 6.64%.
In 2007, the Company may enter into other unsecured or secured
construction facilities to provide funding to specific
development projects. In addition, the Company may enter into
mortgage notes payable with stabilized properties and utilize
the proceeds to fund its development commitments. The Company
may also sell additional income- and non-income-producing
properties to generate capital or contribute additional assets
to joint ventures.
The Company may also generate capital through the issuance of
securities that includes, but is not limited to, preferred stock
under an existing shelf registration statement. As of
December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately
$100 million available for issuance under this registration
statement.
Over the long term, the Company will continue to actively manage
its portfolio of income-producing properties and strategically
sell mature assets held for investment to capture value for
stockholders and to recycle capital for future development
activities. The Company will continue to utilize indebtedness to
fund future commitments and expects to place long-term permanent
mortgages on selected assets as well as utilize construction
facilities for other development assets. The Company may enter
into additional joint venture arrangements to help fund future
developments and may enter into additional structured
transactions with third parties. While the Company does not
foresee the need to issue common equity in the future, it will
evaluate all capital sources and select the most appropriate
options as capital is required.
The Companys business model is highly dependent upon
raising capital to meet development obligations. If one or more
sources of capital are not available when required, the Company
may be forced to raise capital on potentially unfavorable terms
which could have an adverse effect on the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
Cash Flows. Cash Flows from Operating
Activities. Cash flows provided by operating
activities increased approximately $169.2 million between
2006 and 2005. Approximately $133.8 million of the increase
related to the receipt of proceeds, to the extent of cumulative
earnings, from CSC related to the sale of Bank of America Plaza.
The other significant reason for this increase was approximately
$34.9 million in cash received from the closing of units in
the 905 Juniper multi-family residential project during 2006.
Changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities caused
operating cash to increase by approximately $5.4 million,
mainly due to the timing of the payment of property taxes. Cash
flows from operating activities also increased as a result of
net cash provided by recently developed income producing
properties net of a reduction in such revenue as a result of the
contribution of certain retail properties to CPV IV and the sale
of other properties. Partially offsetting the increase in net
cash provided by operating activities was a decrease in cash
received from residential lot and outparcel sales and an
increase in expenditures for multi-family development due to the
aforementioned 905 Juniper project.
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased
approximately $199.4 million between 2004 and 2005 due
mainly to a decrease in net income before gain on sale of
investment properties of approximately $171.1 million. The
Company had significant operating distributions, to the extent
of cumulative earnings, from unconsolidated joint ventures in
2004 due to property sales at the ventures. Also contributing to
the decrease was an increase in residential lot, outparcel and
multi-family acquisition and development expenditures of
$6.9 million due mainly to the 905 Juniper project.
Partially offsetting the decrease was increased proceeds
received from residential lot and outparcel sales due to an
increase in volume of lot and outparcel sales activity in 2005
compared to 2004.
51
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities. Cash flows from investing
activities increased approximately $393.3 million between
2006 and 2005. Of this increase, approximately
$297.3 million represents proceeds received from the CPV IV
formation and approximately $299.4 represents proceeds received
mainly from the sales of Frost Bank Tower, The Avenue of the
Peninsula and seven ground leased sites at the Companys
North Point property. In addition, distributions in excess of
income from unconsolidated joint ventures were approximately
$57.5 million higher during 2006 mainly due to the return
of the Companys investment in CSC Associates from the sale
of Bank of America Plaza. Offsetting these increases was the
purchase of two office buildings in 2006 for an aggregate
purchase price of $165.7 million; an increase in land
acquisitions related to the Companys second industrial
project in Jackson County, Georgia and land in Austin, Texas for
the Palisades West office development; and increased development
expenditures for projects under construction. Also partially
offsetting the increases in cash flows from investing activities
in 2006 was approximately $24.1 million more expenditures
for other assets, mainly due to increased predevelopment
expenditures in 2006.
Net cash from investing activities decreased approximately
$583.9 million between 2004 and 2005, mainly due to a
decline of approximately $501.7 million in sales proceeds
from consolidated properties in 2004. The Company sold one
operating center in 2005, which was a significantly lower volume
of sales than in 2004. The Company also expended
$81.9 million more in 2005 on development and acquisition
of property due to a deeper development pipeline in 2005
compared to 2004, and because the Company purchased additional
land tracts in 2005 that are being held for investment or future
development. The Companys investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures increased in 2005 due to increased contributions
to the CL Realty and Temco residential joint ventures and
distributions from joint ventures in excess of income decreased
as a result of less asset sales activity in 2005. Both of these
factors contributed to the decrease in cash flows from investing
activities. Partially offsetting the decrease was an increase in
proceeds from notes receivable of approximately
$16.2 million, as the Company collected an $8 million
note receivable in 2005.
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities. Cash flows used in financing
activities increased approximately $480.1 million between
2006 and 2005. The primary reason for the increase was a
reduction in indebtedness of $278.2 million with proceeds
from the property sales and the formation of CPV IV and from the
repayment of the note payable related to CSC. In addition, the
Company paid $15.4 million in defeasance costs associated
with the Bank of America Plaza sale that increased cash flows
used in financing activities. The Company also paid
$21.2 million to minority partners during 2006 mainly
related to the formation of CPV IV, the sale of Frost Bank Tower
and the closing of units at 905 Juniper. Also during 2006, the
Company paid $177.0 million more in common and preferred
dividends, mainly due to the special dividend to common
stockholders of $175.5 million paid in the fourth quarter
of 2006, which distributed tax gains from the property sales
discussed above.
Net cash from financing activities increased approximately
$626.8 million in 2005. Common dividends paid decreased
approximately $354.7 million due to the payment of a
special dividend in 2004. Repayment of other notes payable
decreased approximately $171.4 million due to the repayment
or assumption of debt in 2004 related to the property sales. The
Company borrowed more in 2005 which caused net borrowings on the
credit facility to be approximately $158.0 million higher.
Proceeds from other notes payable increased by approximately
$28.9 million due to proceeds received from the
construction loan on 905 Juniper and to a non-recourse mortgage
note payable obtained on The Points at Waterview in 2005. The
Company also had a preferred stock offering in 2004 which raised
approximately $96.5 million. The Company did not have a
similar level of property sales or offering proceeds in 2005
compared to 2004 and expended more on development, necessitating
the increased borrowings.
Dividends. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the
Company funded its dividend payments from cash provided by
operating activities and from proceeds from the sale of
investment property. For the foreseeable future, the Company
intends to fund its quarterly distributions to common and
preferred stockholders with cash provided by operating
activities, a portion of proceeds from investment property sales
and a portion of distributions from unconsolidated joint
ventures in excess of income.
Effects of Inflation. The Company attempts to
minimize the effects of inflation on income from operating
properties by using rents tied to tenants sales, periodic
fixed-rent increases or increases based on the Consumer Price
Index and/or
pass-through of certain operating expenses of properties to
tenants.
52
Other Matters. The events of
September 11, 2001 adversely affected the pricing and
availability of property insurance. In particular, premiums
increased and terrorism insurance coverage became harder to
obtain. The availability of coverage has improved and, at this
time, management believes that the Company and its
unconsolidated joint ventures are adequately insured on all of
their assets. While the Companys cost of property
insurance coverage has increased, management believes the costs
are currently reasonable and should not have a material impact
on the Companys financial condition or results of
operations in 2007. There can be no assurance that this
situation will continue beyond 2007.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Company
has a number of off balance sheet joint ventures with varying
structures. At December 31, 2006, the Companys joint
ventures had aggregate outstanding indebtedness to third parties
of approximately $408.7 million of which the Companys
share was $172.1 million. These loans are generally
mortgage loans or construction loans that are non-recourse to
the Company. One of the Companys ventures, CF
Murfreesboro, has a $131 million construction loan that
matures on July 20, 2010, of which the venture has drawn
approximately $21 million. In July 2006, the Company formed
CF Murfreesboro, a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and an affiliate of Faison
Associates, to develop The Avenue Murfreesboro, an
810,000 square foot retail center in suburban Nashville,
Tennessee. Upon formation, the joint venture acquired
approximately 100 acres of land for approximately
$25 million, obtained a construction loan and commenced
construction of the center. The Company guarantees 20% of the
amount outstanding under the construction loan, which equals
$4.3 million at December 31, 2006. The retail center
serves as collateral against the construction loan, and the
Company is liable for 20% of any difference between the proceeds
from the sale of the retail center and the amounts due under the
loan in the event of default. The Company has not recorded a
liability as of December 31, 2006, as it estimates no
obligation is or will be required.
Several of these ventures are involved in the active acquisition
and development of real estate. As capital is required to fund
the acquisition and development of this real estate, the Company
must fund its share of the costs not funded by operations or
outside financing. Based on the nature of the activities
conducted in these ventures, management cannot estimate with any
degree of accuracy amounts that the Company may be required to
fund in the short or long-term. However, management does not
believe that additional funding of these ventures will have an
adverse effect on its financial condition.
The Company does not expect to make significant capital
contributions to any of its remaining joint ventures.
Item 7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Much of the Companys debt obligations have fixed interest
rates which limit the risk of fluctuating interest rates. The
Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes
through its variable rate credit and construction facilities. As
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, $122.2 million and
$298.2 million of the total outstanding debt was fixed-rate
debt and $192.9 million and $169.3 million was
variable-rate debt, respectively. Based on the Companys
variable rate debt balances as of December 31, 2006,
interest expense, before capitalization to projects under
development, would have increased by approximately
$2.0 million in 2006 if short-term interest rates were 1%
higher.
The following table summarizes the Companys market risk
associated with notes payable as of December 31, 2006. The
information presented below should be read in conjunction with
Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company did not have a significant level of notes receivable
at either December 31, 2006 or 2005, and the table does not
include information related to notes
53
receivable. The table presents scheduled principal repayments
and related weighted average interest rates by expected year of
maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Year of Maturity
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Notes Payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
$
|
24,675
|
|
|
$
|
13,240
|
|
|
$
|
5,211
|
|
|
$
|
23,829
|
|
|
$
|
39,161
|
|
|
$
|
16,133
|
|
|
$
|
122,249
|
|
|
$
|
120,168
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
7.27
|
%
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
|
|
8.17
|
%
|
|
|
7.10
|
%
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
7.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
192,900
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
192,900
|
|
|
$
|
192,900
|
|
Average Interest Rate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest rates on variable rate notes payable are equal to the
variable rates in effect on December 31, 2006. |
Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
The Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements and Reports of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm are incorporated herein on pages F-1
through F-43.
The following Selected Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto included herein ($ in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
44,886
|
|
|
$
|
49,922
|
|
|
$
|
33,104
|
|
|
$
|
41,949
|
|
Income from unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
|
|
12,123
|
|
|
|
8,404
|
|
|
|
142,355
|
|
|
|
10,201
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
Income from continuing
operations
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
123,456
|
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
54,811
|
|
|
|
32,868
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,208
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
178,267
|
|
|
|
41,887
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders
|
|
|
8,395
|
|
|
|
(3,483
|
)
|
|
|
174,455
|
|
|
|
38,074
|
|
Basic income (loss) from
continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per
common share
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
Diluted income (loss) from
continuing operations per common share
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per
common share
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
27,985
|
|
|
$
|
31,570
|
|
|
$
|
44,875
|
|
|
$
|
45,588
|
|
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
5,175
|
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
6,827
|
|
|
|
5,578
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
8,742
|
|
|
|
9,714
|
|
|
|
12,102
|
|
|
|
15,848
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,338
|
|
|
|
10,278
|
|
|
|
13,735
|
|
|
|
16,390
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
|
5,525
|
|
|
|
6,466
|
|
|
|
9,923
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
Basic income from continuing
operations per common share
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Diluted income from continuing
operations per common share
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Note: The above per share quarterly
information may not sum to full year per share numbers due to
rounding.
Certain components of quarterly net income (loss) available to
common stockholders disclosed above differ from those as
reported on the Companys respective quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 9 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 8 herein, gains and losses from
the disposition of certain real estate assets and the related
historical operating results were reclassified as Discontinued
Operations for all periods presented. Additionally, as discussed
in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 8 herein, reimbursements from our third party
management business and joint ventures which we manage have been
reclassified to reflect reimbursements and expenses on a gross
basis for all periods presented.
Other financial statements and financial statement schedules
required under
Regulation S-X
are filed pursuant to Item 15 of Part IV of this
report.
55
Item 9. Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls
and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management
necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and
benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their
nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding
managements control objectives. We also have investments
in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not always control
or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures
with respect to such entities are necessarily more limited than
those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.
As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including the Chief Executive
Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness, design and operation of our disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(b)
and
15d-15(b).
Based upon the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer along with
the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective at providing reasonable
assurance that all material information required to be included
in our Exchange Act reports is reported in a timely manner. In
addition, based on such evaluation we have identified no changes
in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Report
of Management on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Management, under the supervision of and with the participation
of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. The framework
on which the assessment was based is described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, we concluded that we
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report.
56
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Stockholders of
Cousins Properties Incorporated:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting that Cousins Properties Incorporated and
subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in
our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
57
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 of the Company and our report dated
February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule and includes explanatory paragraphs relating
to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment on January 1,
2006, and the adoption of SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements on December 31, 2006.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 28, 2007
Item 9B. Other
Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors
and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by Items 401 and 405 of
Regulation S-K
is presented in Item X in Part I above and is included
under the captions Election of Directors and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2007
Annual Meeting of the Registrants Stockholders, and is
incorporated herein by reference. The Company has a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) applicable to
its Board of Directors and all of its employees. The Code is
publicly available on the Investor Relations page of
its Web site at www.cousinsproperties.com. Section 1
of the Code applies to the Companys senior executive and
financial officers and is a code of ethics as
defined by applicable SEC rules and regulations. If the Company
makes any amendments to the Code other than technical,
administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grants
any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of the
Code to the Companys senior executive or financial
officers, the Company will disclose on its Web site the nature
of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it
applies. The Company did make an amendment to its Code in 2005,
as noted on its Web site.
Item 11. Executive
Compensation
The information under the captions Executive
Compensation (other than the Committee Report on
Compensation) and Compensation of Directors in the
Proxy Statement relating to the 2007 Annual Meeting of the
Registrants Stockholders is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information under the captions Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock and Equity Compensation Plan
Information in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2007
Annual Meeting of the Registrants Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
The information under the caption Certain
Transactions in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2007
Annual Meeting of the Registrants Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
58
Item 14. Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
The information under the caption Summary of Fees to
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2006
and 2005 in the Proxy Statement relating to the 2007
Annual Meeting of the Registrants Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) 1. Financial Statements
A. The following Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Registrant, together with the applicable Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, are filed as a part of this
report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Investment for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedule
The following financial statement schedule for the Registrant is
filed as a part of this report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Numbers
|
|
A.
|
|
Schedule III-
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2006
|
|
S-1
through S-5
|
NOTE: Other schedules are omitted because of
the absence of conditions under which they are required or
because the required information is given in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated and Amended Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended December 15,
2005, filed as Exhibit 3(a)(i) to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
3.2
|
|
By-laws of Registrant, as amended
April 29, 1993, filed as Exhibit 3.2 in the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
4(a)
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan as
restated as of March 27, 1995, filed in the
Registrants
Form S-3
dated March 27, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10(a)(i)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
1989 Stock Option Plan, as renamed the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan
and approved by the Stockholders on May 6, 1996, filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form S-8
dated December 1, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(ii)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
1999 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended and restated, approved by
the Stockholders on May 9, 2006, filed as Annex B to
the Registrants Proxy Statement dated April 4, 2006,
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10(a)(iii)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
2005 Restricted Stock Unit Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 9, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(iv)*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Cousins
Properties Incorporated 2005 Restricted Stock Unit Plan, filed
as Exhibit 10(a)(iii) to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
59
|
|
|
10(a)(v)*
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock
Certificate (with Performance Criteria), filed as
Exhibit 10(a)(iv) to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
10(a)(vi)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
1999 Incentive Stock Plan Form of Key Employee
Non-Incentive Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right
Certificate, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(vii)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
1999 Incentive Stock Plan Form of Key Employee
Incentive Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right Certificate,
filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(viii)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
2005 Restricted Stock Unit Plan Form of Restricted
Stock Unit Certificate, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 11, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(ix)*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Cousins Properties Incorporated 2005 Restricted Stock Unit Plan,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 18, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(a)(x)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
2005 Restricted Stock Unit Plan Form of Restricted
Stock Unit Certificate for Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.2
to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 18, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(b)(i)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
Profit Sharing Plan, as amended and restated effective as of
January 1, 2002, filed as Exhibit 10(b)(i) to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
10(b)(ii)*
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
Profit Sharing Trust Agreement effective as of
January 1, 1991, filed as Exhibit 10(b)(ii) to the
Registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
10(d)
|
|
Cousins Properties Incorporated
Stock Plan for Outside Directors, as approved by the
Stockholders on April 29, 1997, filed as Exhibit 10(d)
to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
10(e)
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2006 among Cousins
Properties Incorporated as Principal Borrower; The Consolidated
Entities of the Borrower from time to time designated by the
Borrower as Co-Borrowers hereunder, collectively, with the
Borrower, as the Borrower Parties; The Consolidated Entities of
the Borrower from time to time party hereto, as the Guarantors;
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line
Lender and L/C Issuer; Banc of America Securities LLC, as Sole
Lead Arranger and Sole Book Manager; Commerzbank AG, New York
Branch, as Syndication Agent; PNC Bank, National Association and
Wells Fargo Bank, as Documentation Agents; Wachovia Bank
National Association, as Managing Agent and the Other Lenders
Party hereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(f)
|
|
Construction Facility Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2006 among Cousins
Properties Incorporated as Borrower; The Consolidated Entities
of the Borrower from time to time party hereto, as the
Guarantors; Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent; Banc
of America Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book
Manager; Commerzbank AG, New York Branch, as Syndication Agent;
PNC Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, as
Documentation Agents; Wachovia Bank National Association, as
Managing Agent and the Other Lenders Party hereto, filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(g)
|
|
Contribution and Formation
Agreement by and between Cousins Properties Incorporated, CP
Venture Three LLC and The Prudential Insurance Company of
America, including Exhibit U thereto, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on May 4, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
10(h)
|
|
First Amendment to Contribution
and Formation Agreement by and between Cousins Properties
Incorporated, CP Venture Three LLC and The Prudential Insurance
Company of America, dated June 16, 2006, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on June 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
60
|
|
|
10(i)
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between Cousins Properties Texas LP and TX-Frost Tower Limited
Partnership with respect to Frost Bank Tower, Austin, Texas,
dated August 2, 2006, filed as exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(j)
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between CPI 191 LLC and GA-191 Peachtree, L.L.C. with respect to
191 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia, dated August 2,
2006, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
10(k)
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement
between CSC Associates, L.P. and BentleyForbes Acquisitions, LLC
with respect to Bank of America Plaza, Atlanta, Georgia, dated
July 14, 2006; First Amendment to Purchase and Sale
Agreement dated August 3, 2006; and Reinstatement and
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
August 11, 2006, all filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 4, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
11
|
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings.
Data required by SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share, is provided in Note 2 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
12**
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of
Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends.
|
21**
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
|
23**
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
31.1**
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
31.2**
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Filed herewith. |
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Cousins Properties Incorporated
(Registrant)
James A. Fleming
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: February 28, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Thomas
D. Bell, Jr.
Thomas
D. Bell, Jr.
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
A. Fleming
James
A. Fleming
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
D.
Harris, Jr.
John
D. Harris, Jr.
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Erskine
B. Bowles
Erskine
B. Bowles
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
W. Courts, II
Richard
W. Courts, II
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lillian
C. Giornelli
Lillian
C. Giornelli
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ S.
Taylor Glover
S.
Taylor Glover
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
H. Hance, Jr.
James
H. Hance, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ William
B. Harrison
William
B. Harrison
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Boone
A. Knox
Boone
A. Knox
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
Porter Payne
William
Porter Payne
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2007
|
63
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Cousins
Properties Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Stockholders Investment for the Years Ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cousins Properties Incorporated:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Cousins Properties Incorporated and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our
audits also included the consolidated financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated
financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Also, in our opinion, such consolidated
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share Based
Payment, on January 1, 2006, based on the modified
prospective application transition method.
Also as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements, on December 31, 2006.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28,
2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 28, 2007
F-2
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
PROPERTIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating properties, net of
accumulated depreciation of $115,723 and $158,700 in 2006 and
2005, respectively
|
|
$
|
472,375
|
|
|
$
|
572,466
|
|
Operating properties
held-for-sale
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land held for investment or future
development
|
|
|
101,390
|
|
|
|
62,059
|
|
Projects under development
|
|
|
300,382
|
|
|
|
241,711
|
|
Residential lots under development
|
|
|
27,624
|
|
|
|
11,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total properties
|
|
|
903,241
|
|
|
|
887,813
|
|
CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
11,538
|
|
|
|
9,336
|
|
RESTRICTED CASH
|
|
|
2,824
|
|
|
|
3,806
|
|
NOTES AND OTHER
RECEIVABLES, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $501 and
$781 in 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
32,138
|
|
|
|
40,014
|
|
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED
JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
181,918
|
|
|
|
217,232
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
65,094
|
|
|
|
30,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,196,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
NOTES PAYABLE
|
|
$
|
315,149
|
|
|
$
|
467,516
|
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
55,538
|
|
|
|
55,791
|
|
DEFERRED GAIN
|
|
|
154,104
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
DEPOSITS AND DEFERRED
INCOME
|
|
|
2,062
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
526,853
|
|
|
|
531,809
|
|
MINORITY INTERESTS
|
|
|
43,985
|
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS
INVESTMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
20,000,000 shares authorized, $1 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.75% Series A cumulative
redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation preference;
4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
7.50% Series B cumulative
redeemable preferred stock, $25 liquidation preference;
4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value,
150,000,000 shares authorized, 54,439,310 and
53,357,151 shares issued in 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
54,439
|
|
|
|
53,357
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
336,974
|
|
|
|
321,747
|
|
Treasury stock at cost,
2,691,582 shares
|
|
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
|
(64,894
|
)
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,495
|
)
|
Cumulative undistributed net income
|
|
|
99,396
|
|
|
|
130,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS
INVESTMENT
|
|
|
625,915
|
|
|
|
632,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
$
|
1,196,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental property revenues
|
|
$
|
90,305
|
|
|
$
|
79,223
|
|
|
$
|
84,384
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
35,465
|
|
|
|
35,198
|
|
|
|
29,704
|
|
Multi-family residential unit sales
|
|
|
23,134
|
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel sales
|
|
|
17,284
|
|
|
|
21,933
|
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
Interest and other
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,861
|
|
|
|
150,018
|
|
|
|
135,448
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental property operating expenses
|
|
|
36,103
|
|
|
|
30,173
|
|
|
|
28,389
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
58,592
|
|
|
|
55,819
|
|
|
|
46,929
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
32,415
|
|
|
|
27,289
|
|
|
|
30,115
|
|
Multi-family residential unit cost
of sales
|
|
|
19,403
|
|
|
|
9,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel cost
of sales
|
|
|
12,751
|
|
|
|
16,404
|
|
|
|
12,007
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
11,119
|
|
|
|
9,094
|
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
18,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,809
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,399
|
|
|
|
149,506
|
|
|
|
134,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES, MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME FROM
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
|
|
|
(21,538
|
)
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES FROM
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(4,193
|
)
|
|
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME OF
CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
(4,130
|
)
|
|
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
INCOME FROM UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT
VENTURES
|
|
|
173,083
|
|
|
|
40,955
|
|
|
|
204,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS BEFORE GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
143,222
|
|
|
|
30,674
|
|
|
|
201,769
|
|
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES, NET OF APPLICABLE INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
3,012
|
|
|
|
15,733
|
|
|
|
118,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
146,234
|
|
|
|
46,407
|
|
|
|
319,825
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF
APPLICABLE INCOME TAX PROVISION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
6,032
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of minority interest
|
|
|
86,495
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
81,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,457
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
87,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
232,691
|
|
|
|
49,741
|
|
|
|
407,784
|
|
DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED
STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(8,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
217,441
|
|
|
$
|
34,491
|
|
|
$
|
399,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE
INFORMATION BASIC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
6.36
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE
INFORMATION DILUTED:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
6.11
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
4.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER
COMMON SHARE
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES
|
|
|
50,655
|
|
|
|
49,989
|
|
|
|
49,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES
|
|
|
52,513
|
|
|
|
51,747
|
|
|
|
51,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years
Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2003
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
51,527
|
|
|
$
|
298,542
|
|
|
$
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,803
|
)
|
|
$
|
199,405
|
|
|
$
|
578,777
|
|
Net income, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,784
|
|
|
|
407,784
|
|
Preferred stock issued pursuant to
4,000,000 share Series B stock offering, net of
expenses
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,471
|
|
Common stock issued pursuant to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options and director
stock plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120
|
|
Restricted stock grant and related
amortization, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
5,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
Preferred dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,750
|
)
|
|
|
(7,750
|
)
|
Common dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429,362
|
)
|
|
|
(429,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2004
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
52,784
|
|
|
|
311,943
|
|
|
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
|
(10,160
|
)
|
|
|
170,077
|
|
|
|
659,750
|
|
Net income, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,741
|
|
|
|
49,741
|
|
Common stock issued pursuant to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options and director
stock plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
7,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
Restricted stock grant and related
amortization, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
Gain on stock issuance at equity
method investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Preferred dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,604
|
)
|
|
|
(14,604
|
)
|
Common dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,649
|
)
|
|
|
(74,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31,
2005 As previously reported
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
53,357
|
|
|
|
321,747
|
|
|
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
|
(8,495
|
)
|
|
|
130,565
|
|
|
|
632,280
|
|
Cumulative effect of adjustments
resulting from the adoption of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31,
2005 As adjusted
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
53,357
|
|
|
|
321,747
|
|
|
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
|
(8,495
|
)
|
|
|
132,919
|
|
|
|
634,634
|
|
Net income, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,691
|
|
|
|
232,691
|
|
Transfer of unearned
compensation to additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued pursuant
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options and director
stock plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
16,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,906
|
|
Shares withheld for taxes
related to stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(3,135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,225
|
)
|
Amortization of stock options
and restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
7,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
Gain on stock issuance at equity
method investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
Income tax benefit from
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
Preferred dividends
paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
Common dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250,964
|
)
|
|
|
(250,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31,
2006
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
54,439
|
|
|
$
|
336,974
|
|
|
$
|
(64,894
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,396
|
|
|
$
|
625,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
232,691
|
|
|
$
|
49,741
|
|
|
$
|
407,784
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
properties, net of income tax provision
|
|
|
(89,507
|
)
|
|
|
(16,770
|
)
|
|
|
(199,983
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
18,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,690
|
|
|
|
36,586
|
|
|
|
42,529
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing
costs
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
7,044
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
Effect of recognizing rental
revenues on a straight-line or market basis
|
|
|
(1,372
|
)
|
|
|
(4,220
|
)
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures in excess of operating distributions
|
|
|
(3,602
|
)
|
|
|
(6,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Residential lot, outparcel and
multi-family cost of sales
|
|
|
31,566
|
|
|
|
23,794
|
|
|
|
11,393
|
|
Residential lot, outparcel and
multi-family acquisition and development expenditures
|
|
|
(32,697
|
)
|
|
|
(16,305
|
)
|
|
|
(9,429
|
)
|
Income tax benefit from stock
options
|
|
|
(2,643
|
)
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
Minority interest in income
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
Changes in other operating assets
and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in other receivables
|
|
|
11,470
|
|
|
|
(17,052
|
)
|
|
|
(3,257
|
)
|
Change in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
226,282
|
|
|
|
57,076
|
|
|
|
256,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from investment property
sales
|
|
|
299,389
|
|
|
|
35,758
|
|
|
|
537,477
|
|
Proceeds from venture formation
accounted for as a sale
|
|
|
297,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition and
development expenditures
|
|
|
(460,913
|
)
|
|
|
(256,428
|
)
|
|
|
(174,512
|
)
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
(23,747
|
)
|
|
|
(33,910
|
)
|
|
|
(27,754
|
)
|
Distributions from unconsolidated
joint ventures in excess of income
|
|
|
87,144
|
|
|
|
29,615
|
|
|
|
43,039
|
|
Proceeds from (investment in) notes
receivable
|
|
|
(1,283
|
)
|
|
|
7,984
|
|
|
|
(8,250
|
)
|
Change in other assets, net
|
|
|
(20,866
|
)
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
(3,805
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
178,001
|
|
|
|
(215,251
|
)
|
|
|
368,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of credit and
construction facilities
|
|
|
(1,396,136
|
)
|
|
|
(625,349
|
)
|
|
|
(435,150
|
)
|
Borrowings under credit and
construction facilities
|
|
|
1,431,001
|
|
|
|
783,384
|
|
|
|
435,150
|
|
Payment of loan issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(2,628
|
)
|
Defeasance costs paid
|
|
|
(15,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of other notes payable or
construction loans
|
|
|
(161,886
|
)
|
|
|
(24,273
|
)
|
|
|
(195,695
|
)
|
Proceeds from other notes payable
or construction loans
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
|
28,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued, net of expenses
|
|
|
14,664
|
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
9,120
|
|
Income tax benefit from stock
options
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common dividends paid
|
|
|
(250,964
|
)
|
|
|
(74,649
|
)
|
|
|
(429,362
|
)
|
Preferred stock issued, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,471
|
|
Preferred dividends paid
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(14,604
|
)
|
|
|
(7,750
|
)
|
Contributions from minority partners
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to minority partners
|
|
|
(21,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
(18,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
(402,081
|
)
|
|
|
78,021
|
|
|
|
(548,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
(80,154
|
)
|
|
|
76,429
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
9,336
|
|
|
|
89,490
|
|
|
|
13,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END
OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
11,538
|
|
|
$
|
9,336
|
|
|
$
|
89,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
ORGANIZATION
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
Organization: Cousins Properties Incorporated
(Cousins), a Georgia corporation, is a
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust
(REIT). Cousins Real Estate Corporation and its
subsidiaries (CREC) is a taxable entity wholly-owned
by and consolidated with Cousins. CREC owns, develops, and
manages its own real estate portfolio and performs certain real
estate related services for other parties.
Description of Business: Cousins, CREC and
their subsidiaries (collectively, the Company)
actively invest in office, multi-family, retail, industrial and
land development projects. As of December 31, 2006, the
Companys portfolio consisted of interests in
7.2 million square feet of office space, 4.2 million
square feet of retail space, 2.0 million square feet of
industrial space, a
529-unit
for-sale multi-family project under development, interests in 24
residential communities under development, over 9,000 acres
of strategically located land tracts held for investment or
future development, and significant land holdings for
development of single-family residential communities. The
Company also provides leasing and management services to
third-party investors; its client-services portfolio comprises
14.8 million square feet of office and retail space.
Basis of Presentation: The Consolidated
Financial Statements include the accounts of Cousins, its
consolidated partnerships and wholly owned subsidiaries and CREC
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company evaluates all partnership interests or other
variable interests to determine if the venture is a variable
interest entity (VIE), as defined in Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 46R. If a venture is a VIE and the Company is
determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company
consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations
of the VIE.
In December 2006, the Company formed a joint venture with
Callaway Gardens Resorts, Inc. for the development of
residential lots within the Callaway Gardens Resort. The joint
venture is considered a VIE, and the Company was determined to
be the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2006, the
VIE has total assets of $1.6 million, which are
consolidated in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2006.
Additionally, the Company holds a 50% ownership interest in
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC (Gateway), a VIE
which owns and operates an office building complex in Charlotte,
North Carolina. The Company determined it is not the primary
beneficiary. The Companys investment in Gateway was
$10.5 million at December 31, 2006, which is its
maximum exposure. See Note 6 for further discussion of Gateway.
For entities that are not considered VIEs, the Company uses
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries, Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, and Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF)
No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights
to determine the appropriate consolidation and presentation. A
description of the Companys investments accounted for
under the equity method is included in Note 6.
The Company recognizes Minority Interest on its Consolidated
Balance Sheets for non-wholly owned entities that the Company
consolidates. The minority partners share of current
operations is reflected in Minority Interest in Income of
Consolidated Subsidiaries on the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
|
|
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Long-Lived
Assets
Cost Capitalization: Costs related to
planning, developing, leasing and constructing a property are
capitalized and classified with Properties in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets, in accordance with SFAS No. 67,
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects. Costs for development personnel
who work directly on projects under construction are capitalized
during the construction period. An estimate of time is obtained
directly from such personnel and the Company applies a
percentage of their actual salaries plus an estimate
F-7
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of payroll-related benefits to each project under construction
based on time spent on each such project. Interest is
capitalized to qualifying assets under development in accordance
with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest
Costs, and SFAS No. 58,
Capitalization of Interest Cost in Financial Statements
That Include Investments Accounted for by the Equity
Method. The Company capitalizes interest on average
accumulated expenditures outstanding during a period on
qualifying projects based first on interest incurred on specific
project debt, if any, and next using the weighted average
interest rate for non-project specific debt. The amount of
interest capitalized does not exceed the actual interest
incurred by the Company during any period presented. Interest is
also capitalized to investments accounted for under the equity
method when the investee has property under development with a
carrying value in excess of the investees borrowings. To
the extent that there is debt at the venture during the
construction period, the venture capitalizes interest using the
specifics of that debt.
Interest, real estate taxes and operating expenses of properties
are also capitalized based on the percentage of the project
available for occupancy from the date a project receives its
certificate of occupancy, to the earlier of the date on which
the project achieves 95% economic occupancy or one year
thereafter.
Leasing costs capitalized include commissions paid to outside
brokers and outside legal costs to negotiate and document a
lease agreement. These costs are capitalized as a cost of the
tenants lease and amortized over the related lease term.
Internal leasing costs are capitalized utilizing guidance in
SFAS No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable
Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans
and Initial Direct Costs of Leases. Leasing personnel
are queried monthly, and the Company capitalizes their
compensation and payroll-related fringe benefits directly
related to time spent performing initial direct leasing
activities.
Impairment: Long-lived assets include
property, goodwill and other assets which are held and used by
an entity. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its
long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets. Management reviews the
carrying value of long-lived assets for the existence of any
other-than-temporary
indicators of impairment. For long-lived assets other than
goodwill, the Company recognizes impairment losses, if any, on
held for use assets when the fair value, calculated as the
expected undiscounted future operating cash flows derived from
such assets, are less than their carrying value. In such cases,
the carrying value of the long-lived asset is reduced to its
fair value. Additionally, the Company recognizes impairment
losses if the fair value of a property held for sale, as defined
in SFAS No. 144, net of selling costs, is less than
its carrying value. The Company ceases depreciation of a
property when it is categorized as held for sale. The Company
has recorded no such impairment losses within its consolidated
entities during 2006, 2005 or 2004. The accounting for
long-lived assets is the same at the Companys
unconsolidated joint ventures, one of which recorded an
impairment loss in 2004 on a held for sale property (see
Note 6 CP Venture LLC and CP Venture Two
LLC). No impairment losses were recorded by the Companys
unconsolidated joint ventures in 2005 or 2006.
The Company evaluates the carrying value of its investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 18,
The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in
Common Stock. The Company utilizes a discounted cash
flow analysis and evaluates the results of that calculation to
determine if an
other-than-temporary
impairment exists. The Company concluded that it did not have an
impairment in any of its investments in joint ventures in 2006,
2005 or 2004.
The Company evaluates the carrying value of its goodwill in
accordance with SFAS No. 142. The Company records no
amortization of goodwill, but it is tested annually, at the same
time each year (or at any point during the year if indicators of
impairment exists), for impairment using a discounted cash flow
analysis. For all periods presented, the tests for impairment of
goodwill did not result in any impairment. The goodwill relates
entirely to the office reporting unit. As office assets are
sold, either by the Company or at its joint ventures, goodwill
is allocated to the cost of each sale.
Acquisition of Operating Properties: The
Company allocates the purchase price of operating properties
acquired to land, building, tenant improvements and identifiable
intangible assets and liabilities based upon relative
F-8
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fair values at the date of acquisition in accordance with
SFAS No. 141, Accounting for Business
Combinations. The Company assesses fair value based on
estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate
discount
and/or
capitalization rates, as well as available market information.
Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors
including the historical operating results, known and
anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The
values assigned to the tangible assets of an acquired property
are based on the market values for land and tenant improvements
and an analysis of the fair value of the building as if it were
vacant. Intangible assets can consist of above or below market
tenant and ground leases, customer relationships or the value of
in-place leases. The values of the above and below market tenant
and ground leases are recorded within Other Assets or Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities, in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Above or below market tenant leases are amortized into
rental revenues over the individual remaining lease terms, and
above or below market ground leases are amortized into ground
rent expense over the remaining term of the associated lease.
The value associated with in-place leases is recorded in Other
Assets and amortized to depreciation and amortization expense
over the expected term (see Note 10 for further detail on
Intangible Assets). On operating properties it has acquired to
date, the Company has not recorded any value to customer
relationships. Tangible assets acquired are depreciated using
the methodology detailed below in the Depreciation and
Amortization section.
Depreciation and Amortization: Real estate
assets are stated at the lower of fair value or depreciated
cost. Buildings are depreciated over their estimated useful
lives, which approximates
15-40 years
depending upon a number of factors including whether the
building was developed or acquired and the condition of the
building upon acquisition. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives of three to five
years. Tenant improvements, leasing costs and leasehold
improvements are amortized over the term of the applicable
leases or the estimated useful life of the assets, whichever is
shorter. Deferred expenses are amortized over the period of
estimated benefit. The Company uses the straight-line method for
all depreciation and amortization.
Discontinued
Operations: SFAS No. 144 also requires
that assets and liabilities of held for sale properties be
separately categorized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in the
period that they are deemed to be held for sale. The Company
separately classified the cost basis of five ground leased
outparcels in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, which were under
contract for sale, to Property Held for Sale in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006. The Company had no
properties classified as held for sale at December 31,
2005. Also, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, the
Company records gains and losses from the disposition of certain
real estate assets and the related historical operating results
in a separate section, Discontinued Operations, in the
Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented. The
Company considers operating properties sold or held for sale to
be discontinued operations if the Company has no significant
continuing involvement, as evaluated under EITF
No. 03-13,
Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB
Statement No. 144 in Determining Whether to Report
Discontinued Operations.
Revenue
Recognition
Fee Income: Development and leasing fees are
recognized when earned in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements. Development and
leasing fees received from unconsolidated joint ventures and
related salaries and other direct costs incurred by the Company
are recognized as income and expense based on the percentage of
the joint venture which the Company does not own.
Correspondingly, the Company adjusts Investment in
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures when fees are paid to the Company
by a joint venture in which the Company has an ownership
interest.
Under management agreements, the Company receives management
fees, as well as expense reimbursements, which are comprised
primarily of
on-site
personnel salaries and benefits, from third party property
owners and joint venture properties, in which the Company has an
ownership interest. The Company expenses salaries and other
direct costs related to these management agreements. Management
fees and expense reimbursements are recorded in Fee Income on
the Consolidated Statements of Income in the same period as the
related expenses are incurred, in accordance with EITF
No. 99-19
Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent
(EITF 99-19).
F-9
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reimbursements from third party and unconsolidated joint venture
management contracts were $16.1 million, $15.1 million
and $13.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Rental Property Revenues: In accordance with
SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases,
income on leases which include scheduled increases in rental
rates over the lease term (other than scheduled increases based
on the Consumer Price Index)
and/or
periods of free rent is recognized on a straight-line basis. The
Company recognizes revenues for recoveries from tenants of
operating expenses the Company paid on the tenants behalf.
These operating expenses include items such as real estate
taxes, insurance and other property operating costs. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized $13.3 million,
$10.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively, in
revenues for recoveries from tenants.
The Company makes valuation adjustments to all tenant-related
revenue based upon the tenants credit and business risk.
The Company generally suspends the accrual of income on specific
tenants where rental payments or reimbursements are delinquent
90 days or more.
Residential Lot Sales: Sales and related cost
of sales of developed lots to homebuilders are recognized in
accordance with the full accrual method as outlined in
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate. If a substantial continuing obligation exists
related to the sale or any other criteria for the full accrual
method is not met, the Company would use the percentage of
completion method to recognize revenues on lot sales.
Multi-Family Residential Sales: Sales and
related cost of sales of multi-family residential units are
recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 66. Individual
unit sales that meet the criteria in paragraph 37 of
SFAS No. 66 are accounted for under the percentage of
completion method. The Company recognizes profits on
multi-family residential unit sales under the percentage of
completion method when, among other factors,
(1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage, which
usually coincides with completion of the buildings
foundation and (2) buyers make sufficient non-refundable
deposits under their contracts (5% of the sales price for
primary residences and 10% of the sales price for secondary
residences is generally considered sufficient). Sales and
related cost of sales for all other unit sales are recognized as
deposits until all criteria for sales recognition under
SFAS No. 66 are met.
In November 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus in EITF
No. 06-08,
Applicability of the Assessment of a Buyers
Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No. 66,
Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of
Condominiums (EITF
06-08),
which provides guidance for determining the adequacy of a
buyers continuing investment and the appropriate profit
recognition in the sale of individual units in a condominium
project. EITF
06-08
requires that companies evaluate the adequacy of a buyers
continuing investment in recognizing condominium revenues on the
percentage of completion method by applying paragraph 12 of
Statement No. 66 to the level and timing of deposits
received on contracts for condominium sales. This rule is
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008, although
earlier adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate
the impact of adopting EITF
06-08 will
have a material effect on its financial position or results of
operations for current projects, but anticipates that the
accounting under EITF
06-08 will
have a material effect on the timing of revenue recognition for
any future multi-family residential projects the Company
undertakes.
Gain on Sale of Investment Properties: The
Company recognizes gain on sale of investment properties in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 66.
SFAS No. 66 requires that the sale be consummated, the
buyers initial and continuing investment be adequate to
demonstrate commitment to pay, any receivable obtained not be
subject to future subordination and the usual risks and rewards
of ownership be transferred. SFAS No. 66 also requires
that the seller not have a substantial continuing involvement
with the property. If the Company has a commitment to the buyer
and that commitment is a specific dollar amount, this commitment
is accrued and the gain on sale that the Company recognizes is
reduced. If the Company has a construction commitment to the
buyer, an estimate is made of this commitment and a portion of
the sale is deferred until the commitment has been fulfilled.
F-10
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income
Taxes
Cousins has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). To
qualify as a REIT, Cousins must distribute annually at least 90%
of its adjusted taxable income, as defined in the Code, to its
stockholders and satisfy certain other organizational and
operating requirements. It is managements current
intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain
Cousins REIT status. As a REIT, Cousins generally will not
be subject to federal income tax at the corporate level on the
taxable income it distributes to its shareholders. If Cousins
fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be
subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not
be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years.
Cousins may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its
income and property, and to federal income taxes on its
undistributed taxable income.
CREC uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities result from temporary
differences. Temporary differences are differences between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts
in the financial statements that will result in taxable or
deductible amounts in future periods.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties
(FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold for
recognizing tax return positions in the financial statements as
those which are more-likely-than-not to be sustained
upon examination by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognition, measurement and
classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any
related interest and penalties, accounting for income tax
uncertainties in interim periods and the level of disclosures
associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties.
FIN 48 is effective January 1, 2007 for the Company.
The Company does not anticipate the effect of adopting the
provisions of FIN 48 will be material to its financial
position or results of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company has several types of stock-based compensation plans
which are described in Note 7. In December 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004)
(SFAS 123R), Share-Based
Payment. This standard requires the recognition of
compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of all
share-based awards granted after the date the standard is
adopted, and for the fair value of the unvested portion of
awards issued prior to the date the standard is adopted. The
Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective
method of adoption in the fiscal quarter beginning
January 1, 2006. Additional disclosures related to
stock-based compensation are included in Note 7. For
periods prior to 2006, the Company accounted for its stock-based
compensation under APB No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations
as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. APB No. 25 required the
recording of compensation expense for some stock-based
compensation, including restricted stock, but did not require
companies to record compensation expense on stock options where
the exercise price was equal to the market value of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, the Company
did not record compensation expense for stock options in the
Consolidated Statements of Income prior to January 1, 2006,
as all stock options granted have an exercise price equal to the
market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. Compensation expense for stock-based compensation
previously expensed under APB No. 25 did not materially
change under SFAS 123R.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to value its new stock
option grants under SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R also requires
the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense
related to stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS 123R
requires the Company to reflect the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as both
a financing cash inflow and an operating cash outflow upon
adoption. The effect on operating and financing cash flows was
approximately $2.6 million in 2006 related to these tax
benefits. The Company adopted the transition method described in
FSP
FAS 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax
Effect of Share-Based Payment Awards.
F-11
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recognizes compensation expense arising from
share-based payment arrangements (stock options, restricted
stock and restricted stock units) granted to employees in
general and administrative expense in the 2006 Consolidated
Statements of Income over the related awards vesting
period. A portion of share-based payment expense is capitalized
to projects under development in accordance with
SFAS No. 67. Compensation expense related to the
adoption of SFAS 123R is shown in the Stock Options
Only column below. Information for the Companys
share-based payment arrangements for the year ended
December 31, 2006 are as follows ($ in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Share-Based
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Only
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expensed
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
9,983
|
|
Amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
(2,945
|
)
|
Effect on provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on income from continuing
operations and net income
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
$
|
6,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Effect on diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
If the Company had applied fair value recognition provisions to
options granted under the Companys stock option plans
prior to January 1, 2006, pro forma results would have been
as follows for 2005 and 2004 ($ in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders, as reported
|
|
$
|
34,491
|
|
|
$
|
399,742
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included in reported net income, net of
related tax effect
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method
for all awards, net of related tax effect
|
|
|
(4,907
|
)
|
|
|
(4,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
32,080
|
|
|
$
|
397,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
8.11
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
7.82
|
|
Earnings
per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS represents net income available to common stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS represents net income
available to common stockholders divided by the diluted weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted weighted average number of common shares is calculated
to reflect the potential dilution that would occur if stock
options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised
and resulted in additional common stock
F-12
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
outstanding. The income amounts used in the Companys EPS
calculations are reduced for the effect of preferred dividends
and are the same for both basic and diluted EPS. Share data is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares-basic
|
|
|
50,655
|
|
|
|
49,989
|
|
|
|
49,005
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
1,630
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares-diluted
|
|
|
52,513
|
|
|
|
51,747
|
|
|
|
51,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive options at period
end not included
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid money
market instruments. Highly liquid money market instruments
include securities and repurchase agreements with original
maturities of three months or less, money market mutual funds
and United States Treasury Bills with maturities of 30 days
or less. Restricted cash primarily represents amounts restricted
under debt agreements for future capital expenditures or amounts
restricted under purchase agreements to be expended only for
prescribed use.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In addition to the new FASB pronouncement, FIN 48,
previously discussed in the Income Tax section, the Securities
and Exchange Commission issued SAB No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements
When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements, in September 2006. This statement requires
that registrants analyze the effect of financial statement
misstatements on both their balance sheet and their income
statement and contains guidance on correcting errors under this
approach. The Company adopted SAB 108 on December 31,
2006 and, in accordance with the initial application provisions
of SAB 108, adjusted retained earnings as of
January 1, 2006. All of these adjustments were considered
to be immaterial individually and in the aggregate in prior
years based on the Companys historical method of
determining materiality. See Note 15 for further discussion.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial
statements and notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications
In periods prior to 2006, the Company recorded reimbursements of
salary and benefits of
on-site
employees pursuant to management agreements with third parties
and unconsolidated joint ventures as reductions of general and
administrative expenses. In 2006, the Company determined that
these amounts should have been recorded as revenues in
accordance with EITF
No. 99-19
and, accordingly, began recording these reimbursements in Fee
Income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Prior period
amounts have been revised to conform to the 2006 presentation.
As a result, Fee Income and General and Administrative Expenses
have increased by $15.1 million in 2005 and
$13.2 million in 2004 when compared to amounts previously
reported.
F-13
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
NOTES AND
OTHER RECEIVABLES
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, notes and other receivables
included the following ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
$
|
4,114
|
|
|
$
|
2,831
|
|
Cumulative rental revenue
recognized on a straight-line basis in excess of revenue accrued
in accordance with lease terms (see Note 2)
|
|
|
7,918
|
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
Other receivables, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $501 in 2006 and $781 in 2005
(see Note 2)
|
|
|
20,106
|
|
|
|
28,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes and Other Receivables
|
|
$
|
32,138
|
|
|
$
|
40,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value At December 31, 2006 and
2005, the estimated fair value of the Companys notes
receivable was $4.0 million and $2.7 million,
respectively, calculated by discounting future cash flows from
the notes receivable at estimated rates at which similar loans
would have been made at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
F-14
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
NOTES PAYABLE,
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
The following table summarizes the terms of notes payable
outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005 ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Final
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Description
|
|
Rate
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Credit facility (a maximum of
|
|
LIBOR +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$400,000), unsecured
|
|
0.8% to 1.3%
|
|
|
4/N/A
|
|
|
|
3/07/10
|
|
|
$
|
128,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Construction facility (a maximum
|
|
LIBOR +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of $100,000), unsecured
|
|
0.8% to 1.3%
|
|
|
4/N/A
|
|
|
|
3/07/10
|
|
|
|
64,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility (replaced by above
|
|
Floating based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
facility in 2006)
|
|
on LIBOR
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,035
|
|
Note secured by Companys
interest in CSC Associates, L.P.
|
|
6.958%
|
|
|
10/20
|
|
|
|
3/01/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,125
|
|
The Avenue East Cobb mortgage note
|
|
8.39%
|
|
|
10/30
|
|
|
|
8/01/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,058
|
|
333/555 North Point Center East
mortgage note
|
|
7.00%
|
|
|
10/25
|
|
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
|
29,571
|
|
|
|
30,232
|
|
Meridian Mark Plaza mortgage note
|
|
8.27%
|
|
|
10/28
|
|
|
|
9/01/10
|
|
|
|
23,602
|
|
|
|
23,975
|
|
100/200 North Point Center East
mortgage note (interest only through 2006)
|
|
7.86%
|
|
|
10/25
|
|
|
|
8/01/07
|
|
|
|
22,365
|
|
|
|
22,365
|
|
The Points at Waterview mortgage
note
|
|
5.66%
|
|
|
10/25
|
|
|
|
1/01/16
|
|
|
|
18,183
|
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
600 University Park mortgage note
|
|
7.38%
|
|
|
10/30
|
|
|
|
8/10/11
|
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
13,350
|
|
905 Juniper construction loan (a
maximum of $20,500)
|
|
LIBOR + 2.0%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,252
|
|
Lakeshore Park Plaza mortgage note
|
|
6.78%
|
|
|
10/30
|
|
|
|
11/01/08
|
|
|
|
9,082
|
|
|
|
9,359
|
|
King Mill Project I member loan (a
maximum of $2,849)
|
|
9.00%
|
|
|
3/N/A
|
|
|
|
8/30/08
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
King Mill Project I second member
loan (a maximum of $2,349)
|
|
9.00%
|
|
|
3/N/A
|
|
|
|
6/26/09
|
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferson Mill Project member loan
(a maximum of $3,156)
|
|
9.00%
|
|
|
3/N/A
|
|
|
|
9/13/09
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous notes
|
|
Various
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
Various
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
315,149
|
|
|
$
|
467,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through March 7, 2006, the Company had an unsecured
revolving credit facility with Bank of America and several other
banks of up to $325 million (which could have been
increased to $400 million under certain circumstances),
with a maturity date of September 14, 2007. The credit
facility bore interest at a rate equal to the
F-15
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread
which was based on the Companys ratio of total debt to
total assets, as defined by the credit facility, according to
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
Spread
|
|
|
£
to 35%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
>35% but
£ 45%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
>45% but
£ 50%
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
>50% but
£ 55%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
>55%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
On March 7, 2006, the Company recast its unsecured
revolving credit facility (Revolver), increasing the
size by $75 million to $400 million and extending the
maturity date to March 7, 2010, with an additional one-year
extension. The Revolver can be expanded to $500 million
under certain circumstances, although the availability of the
additional capacity is not guaranteed. The Revolver provides for
additional flexibility in some of the financial covenants as
compared to the previous facility. Additionally, the Revolver
imposes restrictions on the level of common and preferred
dividends only if the Companys leverage ratio, as defined
by the Revolver, is greater than 55%. Generally interest is
calculated under the Revolver equal to LIBOR plus an additional
spread based on the ratio of total debt to total assets, as
defined according to the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable
|
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
Spread
|
|
|
£
to 35%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
>35% but
£ 45%
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
>45% but
£ 50%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
>50% but
£ 55%
|
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
>55%
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
On March 7, 2006 and simultaneous with the recast of the
Revolver, the Company entered into an unsecured
$100 million construction facility. While this facility is
unsecured, advances under the facility are to be used to fund
the construction costs of the Terminus 100 project. This
facility has the same maturity date and key provisions as the
Revolver.
The Company had $128.2 million drawn on the Revolver as of
December 31, 2006 and, net of $3.0 million reserved
for outstanding letters of credit, the Company had
$268.8 million available for future borrowings under the
Revolver. At December 31, 2006, the interest rate on the
borrowings outstanding under the Revolver was 6.12%. The Company
had $64.7 million drawn on its construction facility as of
December 31, 2006.
In conjunction with the venture formation on June 29, 2006,
as described in Note 5 herein, The Avenue East Cobb
mortgage note payable was assumed by CP Venture IV Holdings
LLC (CPV IV). The Company recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.8 million in
2006 in conjunction with this loan assumption.
In conjunction with the sale of Bank of America Plaza in
September 2006 discussed in Note 9 herein, the Company
repaid its note payable to CSC Associates, L.P.
(CSC) secured by its interest in CSC. CSC had a
corresponding note payable to a third party secured by Bank of
America Plaza which was also repaid in conjunction with the
sale. CSC incurred defeasance costs that the Company was
obligated to fund. The defeasance costs and the unamortized
balance of deferred loan costs totaled approximately
$15.4 million and were recorded as a loss on extinguishment
of debt in 2006 in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Income.
The 905 Juniper construction loan was repaid in full in 2006 as
all of the multi-family residential units in the project
underlying the loan were sold. Also in 2006, two ventures which
the Company consolidates obtained loans from the ventures
minority partner. One was for construction of the second
building at the King Mill industrial project, which has a
maximum available of $2.3 million, an interest rate of 9.0%
and a maturity of June 26, 2009.
F-16
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The second loan was for construction of the first building at
the Jefferson Mill industrial project, which has a maximum
available of $3.2 million, an interest rate of 9.0% and a
maturity of September 13, 2009.
The aggregate maturities of the indebtedness of the Company at
December 31, 2006 detailed above are as follows ($ in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
24,675
|
|
2008
|
|
|
13,240
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5,211
|
|
2010
|
|
|
216,729
|
|
2011
|
|
|
39,161
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
16,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
315,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, the Company had outstanding letters
of credit totaling approximately $3.0 million and
performance bonds totaling approximately $18.0 million. The
majority of the Companys debt is fixed-rate long-term
mortgage notes payable, most of which is non-recourse to the
Company. The 333/555 North Point Center East note payable and
the credit and construction facilities are recourse to the
Company, which in total equal approximately $222.5 million
at December 31, 2006. Assets with carrying values of
$104.7 million were pledged as security on the
$92.7 million non-recourse debt of the Company. As of
December 31, 2006, the weighted average maturity of the
Companys consolidated debt was 3.5 years.
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
interest was recorded as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expensed
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
11,119
|
|
|
$
|
20,554
|
|
|
$
|
31,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
9,094
|
|
|
$
|
16,916
|
|
|
$
|
26,010
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,094
|
|
|
$
|
17,193
|
|
|
$
|
26,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
14,623
|
|
|
$
|
13,987
|
|
|
$
|
28,610
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
6,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,098
|
|
|
$
|
14,028
|
|
|
$
|
35,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has future lease commitments under ground leases and
operating leases for office space aggregating approximately
$16.7 million over weighted average remaining terms of 76
and 1.7 years, respectively.
F-17
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recorded lease expense of approximately
$2.1 million, $2.2 million and $1.6 million, net
of amounts capitalized, in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Amounts due under these lease commitments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
2008
|
|
|
293
|
|
2009
|
|
|
263
|
|
2010
|
|
|
266
|
|
2011
|
|
|
185
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
14,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, outstanding commitments for the
construction and design of real estate projects, including an
estimate for unfunded tenant improvements at operating
properties, totaled approximately $304.7 million. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the estimated fair value of the
Companys notes payable was approximately
$313.1 million and $487.2 million, respectively,
calculated by discounting future cash flows at estimated rates
at which similar loans would have been obtained at
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The deferred gain of $154.1 million and $6.0 million
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, arose from two
transactions with The Prudential Insurance Company of America
(Prudential) discussed as follows.
CP
Venture LLC (CPV)
As discussed in Note 6 below, in 1998 the Company and
Prudential entered into an agreement whereby the Company
contributed interests in certain operating properties it owned
to a venture and Prudential contributed an equal amount of cash.
The venture was structured such that the operating properties
were owned by CP Venture Two LLC (CPV Two) and the
cash was held by CP Venture Three LLC (CPV Three).
Upon formation, the Company owned an effective interest in CPV
Two of 11.5%, and an effective interest in CPV Three of 88.5%,
with Prudential owning the remaining effective interests of each
entity. The Companys effective interest in CPV Two was
reduced to 10.4% in 2006. The Company accounts for its interest
in CPV Two under the equity method (see Note 6), and the
Company consolidates CPV Three.
At the time of the formation of the ventures, the Company
determined that the transaction qualified for accounting
purposes as a sale of the properties to the venture pursuant to
SFAS No. 66. However, because the legal consideration
the Company received from this transaction was a controlling
interest in CPV Three as opposed to cash, the Company determined
that the gain on the transaction should be deferred. The Company
reduces the deferred gain as properties are sold or depreciated
by CPV Two and as distributions are made by CPV Three.
The balances in deferred gain related to this venture were
approximately $5.4 million and $6.0 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2006, CPV sold
Grandview II, which resulted in recognition of deferred
gain of approximately $0.3 million, and in 2004, CPV sold
Wachovia Tower, which resulted in recognition of deferred gain
of approximately $2.5 million, both of which were
recognized in gain on sale of investment property in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
CPV
IV
On June 29, 2006, the Company formed CPV IV with
Prudential. Upon formation, the Company contributed its
interests in five properties (the Properties) to CPV
IV valued initially at $340.9 million. Prudential agreed to
contribute cash to CPV IV of $300.1 million (the Base
Contribution Amount) and to assume mortgage debt valued
F-18
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
at $40.8 million on one of the Properties. The Base
Contribution Amount was contributed in three installment amounts
and as of December 31, 2006, all of the Base Contribution
Amount had been received.
In addition, Prudential is obligated to contribute to CPV IV up
to an additional $20.5 million (the Contingent
Contribution Amounts) if certain conditions are satisfied
with respect to the expansions of two Properties which are still
partially under development. The Contingent Contribution Amounts
would be funded on or about June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2007. The Company also agreed to master lease
a portion of the unleased space at one of the Properties during
2007. Pursuant to this master lease, the maximum amount of rent
payable would be $1.6 million for rent, plus tenant
improvement costs and commissions of up to $2.6 million. To
the extent that any space subject to the master lease is
actually leased to third parties pursuant to a qualifying lease,
the Company would no longer be obligated under the master lease
with respect to such space.
Upon formation of CPV IV, the Company and Prudential formed two
additional entities that are wholly-owned by CPV IV: CP Venture
Five LLC (CPV Five) and CP Venture Six LLC
(CPV Six). CPV IV made a contribution of the
Properties to CPV Five, and CPV Six holds rights to the Base
Contribution Amounts and the Contingent Contribution Amounts.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company, through its interest
in CPV IV and CPV IVs interest in CPV Five, has an 11.5%
interest in the cash flow and capital proceeds of the
Properties, and Prudential has an 88.5% interest therein.
The cash contributed by Prudential will be used by CPV Six
primarily to develop commercial real estate projects or to make
acquisitions of real estate; however, as of December 31,
2006, no such investments have been made and the Base
Contribution Amount has been loaned to the Company, as permitted
in the CPV IV documents. Prudential receives a priority current
return of 6.5% per annum on an amount equal to 11.5% of its
capital contributions to the venture, in addition to a
liquidation preference. After these preferences, the Company is
entitled to certain priority distributions related to the
properties developed or acquired by CPV Six after which, the
Company and Prudential share residual distributions, if any,
with respect cash flows from CPV Six, 88.5% to the Company and
11.5% to Prudential.
The Company provides property management and leasing services
with respect to each of the Properties and the Company and
Prudential have certain discretionary decision rights and
approval rights with respect to properties owned by CPV Six and
the Properties. The Company serves as Administrative Manager of
CPV IV.
The Company is accounting for its interest in CPV Five under the
equity method of accounting in accordance with APB No. 18
(see Note 6) and is consolidating the assets and
results of operations of CPV Six, with Prudentials share
in this entity recorded as minority interest. The net book value
of the Properties was removed from operating properties and
projects under development on June 29, 2006, and an
investment in unconsolidated joint venture was recorded using
11.5% of the Companys original basis in the Properties.
The Company recognized equity income from the operations of the
Properties in beginning on June 29, 2006 based on its
percentage interest in CPV Five.
The contribution of the Properties was treated as a sale for
accounting purposes using guidance outlined in
SFAS No. 66. However, the Company did not recognize
any gain in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to this
transaction as the consideration received was a partnership
interest, as opposed to cash and, therefore, did not meet the
rules in SFAS No. 66 for income statement gain
recognition. The gain was included in Deferred Gain on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets and was calculated as
88.5% of the difference between the book value of the Properties
and the fair value as detailed above. The balance in Deferred
Gain related to this transaction equaled approximately
$148.7 million at December 31, 2006 and may be
recognized if cash distributed by CPV IV to the Company exceeds
10% of the aggregate value of the Properties.
F-19
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
INVESTMENT
IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
|
The following information summarizes financial data and
principal activities of unconsolidated joint ventures in which
the Company had ownership interests. During the development or
construction of an asset, the Company and its partners may be
committed to provide funds pursuant to a development plan.
However, in general, the Company does not have any obligation to
fund the working capital needs of its unconsolidated joint
ventures. The partners may elect in their discretion to fund
cash needs if the venture required additional funds to effect
re-leasing or had other specific needs. Additionally, at
December 31, 2006, the Company generally does not guarantee
the outstanding debt of any of its unconsolidated joint
ventures, except for customary non-recourse
carve-out guarantees of certain mortgage notes, and 20% of
the CF Murfreesboro Associates (CF Murfreesboro)
construction loan. The information included in the following
table entitled Summary of Financial Position is as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005. The information included in the
Summary of Operations table is for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. All dollars are in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL
POSITION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP Venture IV LLC entities
|
|
$
|
352,798
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,364
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
294,169
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,610
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
TRG Columbus Development Venture,
Ltd.
|
|
|
154,281
|
|
|
|
60,921
|
|
|
|
76,861
|
|
|
|
29,086
|
|
|
|
55,724
|
|
|
|
28,207
|
|
|
|
27,619
|
|
|
|
16,628
|
|
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC
|
|
|
178,784
|
|
|
|
184,469
|
|
|
|
144,654
|
|
|
|
154,775
|
|
|
|
32,912
|
|
|
|
29,072
|
|
|
|
10,502
|
|
|
|
10,536
|
|
CP Venture LLC entities
|
|
|
118,861
|
|
|
|
138,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,187
|
|
|
|
117,716
|
|
|
|
112,792
|
|
|
|
5,157
|
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
CL Realty, L.L.C.
|
|
|
117,820
|
|
|
|
108,611
|
|
|
|
5,357
|
|
|
|
45,174
|
|
|
|
108,316
|
|
|
|
105,828
|
|
|
|
66,979
|
|
|
|
63,238
|
|
CF Murfreesboro Associates
|
|
|
54,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temco Associates, LLC
|
|
|
66,001
|
|
|
|
68,178
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
60,786
|
|
|
|
61,163
|
|
|
|
31,223
|
|
|
|
31,356
|
|
Crawford Long CPI, LLC
|
|
|
42,524
|
|
|
|
45,630
|
|
|
|
52,404
|
|
|
|
53,201
|
|
|
|
(10,664
|
)
|
|
|
(10,710
|
)
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)
|
|
|
(3,077
|
)
|
Ten Peachtree Place Associates
|
|
|
27,312
|
|
|
|
29,213
|
|
|
|
28,849
|
|
|
|
29,300
|
|
|
|
(1,796
|
)
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
(2,411
|
)
|
|
|
(1,734
|
)
|
Palisades West, LLC
|
|
|
26,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wildwood Associates
|
|
|
21,816
|
|
|
|
22,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,730
|
|
|
|
21,917
|
|
|
|
(1,385
|
)
|
|
|
(1,291
|
)
|
Handy Road Associates, LLC
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC
|
|
|
3,999
|
|
|
|
8,386
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
CPI/FSP I, L.P.
|
|
|
3,307
|
|
|
|
3,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
3,236
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
CSC Associates, LP
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
152,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
145,883
|
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
74,701
|
|
Brad Cous Golf Venture, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
285 Venture, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
CC-JM II Associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Cousins LORET Venture, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,177,193
|
|
|
$
|
837,886
|
|
|
$
|
376,481
|
|
|
$
|
344,999
|
|
|
$
|
734,743
|
|
|
$
|
512,665
|
|
|
$
|
181,918
|
|
|
$
|
217,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CP Venture IV LLC entities
|
|
$
|
15,326
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,095
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,831
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
CP Venture LLC entities
|
|
|
20,546
|
|
|
|
22,907
|
|
|
|
23,115
|
|
|
|
15,577
|
|
|
|
9,154
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Charlotte Gateway Village, LLC
|
|
|
30,753
|
|
|
|
30,586
|
|
|
|
30,153
|
|
|
|
5,048
|
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
TRG Columbus Development Venture,
Ltd.
|
|
|
96,737
|
|
|
|
59,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,494
|
|
|
|
16,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,344
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realty, L.L.C.
|
|
|
24,922
|
|
|
|
45,836
|
|
|
|
24,760
|
|
|
|
11,144
|
|
|
|
13,354
|
|
|
|
6,030
|
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
8,902
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
Temco Associates, LLC
|
|
|
46,796
|
|
|
|
30,063
|
|
|
|
32,095
|
|
|
|
15,574
|
|
|
|
8,801
|
|
|
|
11,107
|
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
|
|
5,106
|
|
Crawford Long
CPI, LLC
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
|
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
8,781
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Palisades West, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Peachtree Place Associates
|
|
|
6,871
|
|
|
|
6,950
|
|
|
|
6,635
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Wildwood Associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
39,808
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
204,838
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
101,066
|
|
CSC Associates, L.P.
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
42,027
|
|
|
|
42,603
|
|
|
|
289,464
|
|
|
|
22,071
|
|
|
|
23,122
|
|
|
|
142,108
|
|
|
|
10,963
|
|
|
|
11,486
|
|
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC
|
|
|
17,829
|
|
|
|
15,541
|
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Handy Road Associates, LLC
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI/FSP I, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14,127
|
|
Brad Cous Golf Venture, Ltd.
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
285 Venture, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
CC-JM II Associates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
39,315
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
18,476
|
|
Cousins LORET Venture, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
90,268
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
45,514
|
|
905 Juniper Venture, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
270,835
|
|
|
$
|
270,189
|
|
|
$
|
251,789
|
|
|
$
|
372,788
|
|
|
$
|
80,702
|
|
|
$
|
423,667
|
|
|
$
|
173,083
|
|
|
$
|
40,955
|
|
|
$
|
204,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPV IV See Note 5.
TRG Columbus Development Venture, Ltd.
(TRG) TRG is 40% owned by 50
Biscayne Ventures, LLC (Biscayne), and 60% owned by
The Related Group of Florida (Related). Biscayne is
88.25% owned by the Company. TRG is constructing a
529-unit
condominium project in Miami, Florida and has a construction
loan on the project allowing it to borrow up to approximately
$132 million, at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% and a maturity
of June 9, 2008. Biscayne is the limited partner in the
venture and recognizes 40% of the income, after a preferred
return to each partner on their equity investment. Biscayne is
consolidated with the Company, and the Company records minority
interest for Biscaynes minority partners 11.75%
interest.
Gateway Gateway is a joint venture between
the Company and Bank of America Corporation (BOA)
and owns and operates Gateway Village, a 1.1 million
rentable square foot office building complex in downtown
Charlotte, North Carolina. The project is 100% leased to BOA
through 2016. Gateways net income or loss and cash
distributions are allocated to the members as follows: first to
the Company so that it receives a cumulative compounded return
equal to 11.46% on its capital contributions, second to BOA
until it has received an amount equal to the aggregate amount
distributed to the Company and then 50% to each member. Gateway
has a mortgage note payable with an original principal of
$190 million, a maturity of December 1, 2016 and an
interest rate of 6.41%.
CPV and CPV Two In 1998, the Company and
Prudential formed CPV and CPV Two to own and operate certain
retail and office properties. Through December 29, 2006,
the Company owned an 11.5% interest in the properties owned by
CPV Two through its interest in CPV and CPV Two. On
December 29, 2006, Prudential contributed equity in order
to repay a maturing mortgage note payable on one of CPV
Twos retail centers. The Company did not contribute
equity, and therefore the ownership interests in CPV Two changed
to 89.63% for
F-21
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prudential and 10.3% for the Company. As of December 31,
2006, CPV Two owned one office building totaling
69,000 rentable square feet and four retail properties
totaling 1.0 million rentable square feet.
In 2004, CPV sold Wachovia Tower to an unrelated third party for
approximately $36.0 million. CPV recognized an impairment
loss of approximately $1.5 million, which represented the
difference between the book value of the asset and the sales
price. The Company recorded 11.5% of this impairment loss
through Income from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. In 2006, CPV
sold Grandview II to an unrelated third party for
approximately $22.8 million, and recorded a gain on this
sale of approximately $6.4 million. The Company recorded
its share (11.5%) of the gain through Income from Unconsolidated
Joint Ventures.
CL Realty, L.L.C. (CL Realty) CL
Realty is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and a subsidiary of Temple-Inland
Inc., and is in the business of developing and investing
primarily in single-family residential lot development
properties. As of December 31, 2006, CL Realty was
developing, either directly or through investments in joint
ventures, 15 residential developments, 10 of which are in Texas,
two in Georgia and three in Florida. CL Realty sold 973, 1,314
and 972 lots in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and 8,689
lots remain to be developed or sold at December 31, 2006.
The venture also sold 134 acres of land in 2006 and has
interests in approximately 554 remaining acres of land, which it
intends to develop or sell as undeveloped tracts. CL Realty has
construction loans at various projects, detailed as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CL Realtys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Rate End of
|
|
Description (Interest Rate Base, if not fixed)
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
CL Realty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer Lakes (Prime + 3%)
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
3/30/2007
|
|
|
|
11.25
|
%
|
Southern Trails (LIBOR + 0.25%;
$13 million construction line)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
%
|
Village Park (> of 10% or
Prime + 2%)
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
5/15/2007
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
%
|
Village Park North (Prime + 1%)
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
1/14/2008
|
|
|
|
9.25
|
%
|
Long Meadow Farms (Prime + 0.5%)
|
|
|
7,737
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
6/08/2007
|
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
Stonewall Estates (Prime)
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
5/31/2010
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
Blue Valley (Prime)
|
|
|
15,912
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
5/11/2007
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
Blue Valley (> of Prime or
5.5%)
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
3/05/2007
|
|
|
|
8.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
37,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CF Murfreesboro In July 2006, the Company
formed CF Murfreesboro, a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and an affiliate of Faison
Associates, to develop The Avenue Murfreesboro, an
810,000 square foot retail center in suburban Nashville,
Tennessee. Upon formation, the joint venture acquired
approximately 100 acres of land for approximately
$25 million, obtained a construction loan and commenced
construction of the center. The construction loan has a maximum
available of $131 million, an interest rate of LIBOR plus
1.15% and expires July 20, 2010. Approximately
$21.4 million has been drawn on the construction loan as of
December 31, 2006. The Company guarantees 20% of the amount
outstanding under the construction loan, which equals
$4.3 million at December 31, 2006. The retail center
serves as collateral against the construction loan, and the
Company is liable for 20% of any difference between the proceeds
from the sale of the retail center and the amounts due under the
loan in the event of default. The Company has not recorded a
liability as of December 31, 2006, as it estimates no
obligation is or will be required.
Temco Associates, LLC (Temco)
Temco is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and a subsidiary of Temple-Inland
Inc. As of December 31, 2006, Temco was developing, either
directly or through investments in joint ventures, four
single-family residential communities in Georgia with 1,638
total projected lots remaining to be developed or sold. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, Temco sold 477, 467 and 491 lots,
respectively. Temco sold
F-22
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
1,088 acres of land during 2006, and has interests in
approximately 6,682 remaining acres of land, which it intends to
develop or sell as undeveloped tracts or develop. Temco has a
construction loan at one of its joint ventures with a balance
outstanding of $164,000, a maturity date of
February 14, 2007 and an interest rate of Prime plus
0.25%. Additionally, Temco has debt of $3.6 million secured
by the golf course at one of its residential developments. This
debt matures January 2009 and carries a weighted average
interest rate of 7.94%.
Crawford Long-CPI, LLC (Crawford
Long) Crawford Long is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and Emory University and owns the
Emory Crawford Long Medical Office Tower, a
358,000 rentable square foot medical office building
located in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia. Crawford Long has a
mortgage note payable with an original principal of
$55 million, a maturity of June 1, 2013 and an
interest rate of 5.9%.
Ten Peachtree Place Associates
(TPPA) TPPA is
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of The
Coca-Cola
Company, and owns Ten Peachtree Place, a 259,000 rentable
square foot office building located in midtown Atlanta, Georgia.
TPPA has a mortgage note payable for an original principal of
$30 million with a maturity of April 1, 2015 and an
interest rate of 5.39%.
TPPA pays cash flows from operating activities, net of note
principal amortization, to repay additional capital
contributions made by the partners plus 8% interest on these
contributions until July 1, 2011. After July 1, 2011,
the Company and its partner are entitled to receive 15% and 85%
of the cash flows (including any sales proceeds), respectively,
until the two partners have received combined distributions of
$15.3 million. Thereafter, each partner is entitled to
receive 50% of cash flows.
Palisades West, LLC (Palisades)
In 2006, the Company formed Palisades in which it holds a 50%
interest, with Dimensional Fund Advisors as a 25% partner
and Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group as the other 25% partner.
Upon formation, the Company contributed land and the other
partners contributed an equal amount in cash, and Palisades
commenced construction of two office buildings totaling
360,000 square feet in Austin, Texas. The partnership
intends to fund the development of the buildings through equity
contributions.
Wildwood Associates (Wildwood)
Wildwood is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and IBM, that owns or has rights to
own approximately 32 acres of undeveloped land in Wildwood
Office Park, of which an estimated 16 acres are committed to be
contributed to Wildwood by the Company. The estimated
16 acres of land which are committed to be contributed by
the Company are not included in Land Held for Investment
or Future Development in the Companys financial
statements. In addition to undeveloped land as described above,
Wildwood owned six office buildings consisting of approximately
2.2 million square feet and approximately 15 acres of
stand-alone retail sites ground leased to various users.
Wildwood sold these office buildings and retail sites in 2004
for $420 million to unrelated third parties, and recognized
gains of approximately $200.8 million on the transactions
(see Note 9). The Company and IBM each leased office space
from buildings owned by Wildwood Associates during 2004 at rates
comparable to those charged to third parties.
Through December 31, 2006, the Company had contributed
$84,000 in cash plus properties having an
agreed-upon
value of $54.5 million for its interest in Wildwood and is
obligated to contribute the estimated 16 acres of
additional land discussed above with an
agreed-upon
value of $8.3 million. The Companys investment in
Wildwood was a negative $1.3 million at December 31,
2006. This negative balance has resulted from the fact that
cumulative distributions from Wildwood Associates have exceeded
the basis of its contributions. The Companys contributions
were recorded at historical cost of the properties at the time
they were contributed to Wildwood but it was given equity credit
by Wildwood for the fair value of the property at the time of
the contribution, which exceeded historical cost. In accordance
with
SOP 78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,
this basis differential is being reduced as the underlying land
contributed is sold by the venture. As a result of the 2004 sale
by Wildwood Associates of all its office buildings and retail
sites, approximately $29.3 million of this basis
differential was recognized and included in Gain on Sale of
Investment Properties in the accompanying 2004 Consolidated
Statement of Income.
F-23
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Generally, the Company does not have any obligation to
fund Wildwoods working capital needs, and there was
no debt at Wildwood Associates at December 31, 2006 or 2005.
Handy Road Associates, LLC (Handy
Road) Handy Road is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and Handy Road Managers, LLC, that
owns 1,187 acres of land in suburban Atlanta, Georgia for future
development
and/or sale.
Handy Road has a $3.2 million note payable that is
guaranteed by the partners of Handy Road Managers, LLC, has a
maturity of November 2, 2007 and an interest rate of Prime
plus 0.5%.
Pine Mountain Builders, LLC (Pine Mountain
Builders) Pine Mountain Builders is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and Fortress Construction Company
and constructs homes at one of the Companys residential
communities. During 2006 and 2005, Pine Mountain Builders sold
39 and 42 homes, respectively. Pine Mountain Builders has loans
related to speculative houses constructed with a balance of
approximately $614,000, a maturity of December 19, 2007 and
an interest rate of Prime.
CPI/FSP I, L.P. (CPI/FSP)
CPI/FSP is a
50-50
limited partnership between the Company and CommonWealth Pacific
LLC and CalPERS. CPI/FSP developed Austin Research
Park Buildings III and IV, two 174,000 and
184,000 rentable square foot office buildings,
respectively, in Austin, Texas. Austin Research Park
Buildings III and IV were sold for $78.7 million
to an unrelated third party in 2004. CPI/FSP recognized a gain
of approximately $27.2 million on the transaction, and the
majority of equity was distributed to the partners. CPI/FSP
continues to own an adjacent pad of approximately 6 acres
for potential future development.
CSC CSC is a
50-50
limited partnership between the Company and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. In September 2006,
CSC sold its single asset, the 1.3 million square foot Bank
of America Plaza in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia for a sales price
of $436 million. CSC recognized a gain of approximately
$273 million and distributed a majority of the equity of
the venture to each partner. Prior to the sale, CSC had a note
payable secured by Bank of America Plaza and a note receivable
to the Company in equal amounts which have been netted in the
table presented above, as well as associated interest expense
and interest income.
Brad Cous Golf Venture, Ltd. (Brad
Cous) Brad Cous is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and W.C. Bradley Co. that developed
and owned The Shops at World Golf Village, an 80,000 square
foot retail center in St. Augustine, Florida. In 2006, Brad Cous
sold World Golf Village for $13.5 million to an unrelated
third party, and the majority of equity at the venture was
distributed to the partners.
285 Venture, LLC (285 Venture)
285 Venture is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and a commingled trust fund advised
by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. that developed
and owned 1155 Perimeter Center West, a 365,000 rentable
square foot office building complex in Atlanta, Georgia. In
2005, 285 Venture, LLC sold 1155 Perimeter Center West to an
unrelated third party for $49.3 million, and recognized a
gain of approximately $7.2 million on the transaction, and
the majority of equity at the venture was distributed to the
partners. This venture was dissolved in 2006.
CC-JM II Associates
(CC-JM II) CC-JM II is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and an affiliate of CarrAmerica
Realty Corporation that developed and owned John Marshall-II, a
224,000 rentable square foot office building in suburban
Washington, D.C. John Marshall-II was sold in October 2004
for $59.3 million to an unrelated third party.
CC-JM II Associates recognized a gain of approximately
$40.7 million on the transaction, and the majority of
equity at the venture was distributed to the partners.
Cousins LORET Venture, L.L.C. (Cousins
LORET) Cousins LORET is a
50-50 joint
venture between the Company and LORET Holdings, L.L.C.
(LORET) that owned two office buildings in Atlanta,
Georgia. Cousins LORET sold these two buildings for
$200 million to an unrelated third party in 2004,
recognized a gain of approximately $90.0 million on the
transaction, and distributed the majority of equity to the
partners.
905 Juniper Venture, LLC (905
Juniper) 905 Juniper is a joint venture
between the Company and GDL Juniper, LLC (GDL) that
developed and sold a
94-unit
condominium complex in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia. 905 Juniper
sold all of the units in the project in 2006. Income and cash
distributions were allocated 72% to the
F-24
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company and 28% to GDL, after each partner received a 10%
preferred return on their investment. On June 30, 2005, the
Company entered into a business combination with several
entities, collectively called The Gellerstedt Group.
On that date, the Company began consolidating its investment in
905 Juniper, which was previously accounted for on the equity
method, and GDLs interest was recorded as a minority
interest. Therefore, results of operations of 905 Juniper in the
accompanying table only reflect the period that the Company
accounted for the venture on the equity method. Results of
operations after consolidation were recorded in the multi-family
residential unit sales and multi-family residential unit costs
of sales line items, with GDLs share of operations
recorded as minority interest, in the accompanying Consolidated
Statement of Income. GDL is an entity affiliated with Lawrence
L. Gellerstedt III, the Companys Senior Vice
President and President of the Office/Multi-Family Division.
Other This category consists of several other
joint ventures including:
Deerfield Towne Venture, LLC
(Deerfield) Deerfield is a joint
venture between Casto Realty of Southern Ohio LLC, Anderson
Deerfield, LLC and the Company that developed and sold a
shopping center near Cincinnati, Ohio. The Company has a 10%
profits interest in Deerfield and made no capital contributions
nor has any obligations to fund the entity. Deerfield sold the
shopping center in 2005, and the Company received cash
distributions in 2005 and 2006.
Verde Group, L.L.C. (Verde) The
Company invested $10 million, which represented less than
5% of equity at December 31, 2006, in Verde, a real estate
development company. Verde issued additional equity subsequent
to the Companys investment at a higher price than the
Companys per unit ownership. As a result, the Company
recognized a gain, net of tax, which was recorded in additional
paid-in capital. This gain was calculated according to
provisions as outlined in SAB No. 51 for newly-formed,
start-up or
development-stage entities. Prior to 2006, the Company accounted
for its investment in Verde under the equity method, and Verde
was included in the other row in the above tables.
In the third quarter of 2006, the Company began accounting for
Verde on the cost method and therefore transferred its basis in
Verde from investment in joint ventures to other assets.
Additional Information The Company recognized
$9.3 million, $9.3 million, and $13.0 million of
development, leasing, and management fees from unconsolidated
joint ventures in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. See
Note 2, Fee Income, for a discussion of the accounting
treatment for fees from unconsolidated joint ventures.
|
|
7.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
INVESTMENT
|
Preferred
Stock:
The Company has 4 million shares outstanding of 7.75%
Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (liquidation
preference of $25 per share). The Company also has
4 million shares outstanding of 7.50% Series B
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (liquidation preference of
$25 per share). The Series A preferred stock may be
redeemed on or after July 24, 2008 and the Series B
preferred stock may be redeemed on or after
December 17, 2009, both at the Companys option
at $25 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends
through the date of redemption. Dividends on both the
Series A and Series B preferred stock are payable
quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15
and November 15.
1999
Incentive Stock Plan:
The Company maintains the 1999 Incentive Stock Plan (the
1999 Plan), which allows the Company to issue awards
of stock options, stock grants or stock appreciation rights. As
of December 31, 2006, 508,745 shares were authorized
to be awarded pursuant to the 1999 Plan, which allows awards of
stock options, stock grants or stock appreciation rights. The
Company also maintains the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, the Stock
Plan for Outside Directors and the Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan (collectively, the Predecessor Plans) under
which stock awards have been issued.
F-25
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock Options At December 31, 2006,
6,117,402 stock options awarded to key employees and outside
directors pursuant to both the 1999 Plan and the Predecessor
Plans were outstanding. The Company typically uses authorized,
unissued shares to provide shares for option exercises. All
stock options have a term of 10 years from the date of
grant. Key employee stock options granted prior to
December 28, 2000 had a vesting period of five years under
both the 1999 Plan and the Predecessor Plans. Options granted on
or after December 28, 2000 have a vesting period of four
years. Outside director stock options are fully vested on the
date of grant under the 1999 Plan but had a vesting period of
one year under the Predecessor Plans.
In 2006, the Company amended the stock option certificates to
add a retirement feature. Employees who meet the requirements of
the retirement feature vest immediately in their stock options
outstanding, and the vesting periods for shares outstanding were
also changed to reflect accelerated expense for employees who
become retirement-eligible within the next four years. The
Company recognized additional compensation expense of $716,000,
before any capitalization to projects under development or
income tax benefit, in 2006 related to this modification. In
addition, for all grants after December 11, 2006, an
employee who meets the requirements of the retirement feature
will have the remaining original term to exercise their stock
options after retirement. The certificates currently allow for
an exercise period of one year after termination, which remains
in force for grants prior to December 11, 2006 for
retirement-eligible employees and for all other employees. Also
in 2006, the stock option certificates for grants after
December 11, 2006 were amended to include a stock
appreciation right. A stock appreciation right permits an
employee to waive his or her right to exercise the stock option
and to instead receive the value of the option, net of the
exercise price and tax withholding, in stock, without requiring
the payment of the exercise.
The Company estimates the fair value of each option grant on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
risk free interest rate utilized in the Black-Scholes
calculation is the interest rate on U.S. Treasury Strips
having the same life as the estimated life of the Companys
option awards. The assumed dividend yield is based on the annual
dividend rate for regular dividends at the time of grant.
Expected life of the options granted was computed using
historical data for certain grant years reflecting actual hold
periods plus an estimated hold period for unexercised options
outstanding using the mid-point between 2006 and the expiration
date. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility
of the Companys stock over a period relevant to the
related stock option grant. For grants occurring after adoption
of SFAS 123R, the Company expenses stock options with
graded vesting using the straight line method over the vesting
period.
For purposes of the 2005 and 2004 pro forma disclosures shown in
Note 2 required by SFAS No. 123 and
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure,
and for SFAS 123R expense recognition in 2006, the Company
has computed the value of all stock options granted using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions and results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
Assumed dividend yield
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
Assumed lives of option awards (in
years)
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Assumed volatility
|
|
|
0.193
|
|
|
|
0.203
|
|
|
|
0.195
|
|
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
options granted
|
|
$
|
4.93
|
|
|
$
|
3.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.09
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there was $5.6 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost included in additional
paid-in capital related to stock options, which will be
recognized over a weighted average period of 3.2 years. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006 was
$22.5 million. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the
amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds
the exercise price of the option. In 2006, cash received from
the exercise of options equaled $21.1 million.
F-26
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In 2006, the Company or its joint ventures sold properties that
generated taxable gains of approximately $231 million.
Primarily as a result of these sales (more fully discussed in
Note 9), the Company paid a special cash dividend of
$3.40 per share, which totaled $175.5 million on
December 1, 2006, and represented a portion of the taxable
gains on the sales of investment properties to its common
stockholders. The Company was effectively recapitalized through
the special dividend which caused the market value per share of
the Companys stock underlying options to decrease by
approximately the amount of the special dividend on the
ex-dividend date. Stock options outstanding were correspondingly
adjusted to keep the aggregate intrinsic value of the option
equal to the value immediately prior to the special dividend by
decreasing the option prices per share and increasing the number
of options outstanding by 484,391. In accordance with the
guidelines set forth in FAS 123R paragraph 51 for
accounting for modifications to equity awards, no incremental
compensation expense was recorded in 2006 as the result of these
option adjustments.
The following is a summary of stock option activity under the
1999 Plan and the Predecessor Plans for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts
and years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1999 Plan and Predecessor
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of year
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
|
$
|
22.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
35.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
|
$
|
18.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
27.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for special dividend
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
$
|
23.27
|
|
|
$
|
73,379
|
|
|
|
6.63 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
$
|
19.62
|
|
|
$
|
60,346
|
|
|
|
5.48 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Grants As indicated above, the 1999
Plan provides for stock grants, which may be subject to
specified performance and vesting requirements.
In 2000 and 2001, the Company issued 189,777 shares of
performance accelerated restricted stock (PARS) to
certain key employees, which PARS were entitled to vote and
receive dividends. The PARS outstanding of 143,310 vested on
November 14, 2006. Upon issuance, the shares were recorded
in Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital, with the offset
recorded in Unearned Compensation. On January 1, 2006, in
accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R,
Unearned Compensation was reclassified to Additional Paid-in
Capital, and these amounts were amortized into compensation
expense over their vesting period. After the adoption of 123R,
the Company estimated a forfeiture rate for PARS. Before the
adoption of SFAS 123R, the actual compensation expense
previously recognized was reversed in the year of forfeiture.
Compensation expense related to the PARS, before any
capitalization to projects under development and income tax
benefit, was approximately $449,000, $655,000 and $655,000 in
2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The total fair value of PARS
which vested during 2006 was $5.1 million.
In 2005 and 2004, the Company issued 58,407 and
196,667 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to
certain key employees, which restricted stock is entitled to
vote and receive dividends. The stock was issued on the grant
date and recorded in Common Stock and Additional Paid-in
Capital, with the offset recorded in Unearned Compensation.
Unearned Compensation was reclassified to Additional Paid-in
Capital on January 1, 2006, upon the adoption of
SFAS 123R, and the amounts related to restricted stock are
being amortized into compensation expense over the vesting
periods of four years. After the adoption of 123R, the Company
estimated a forfeiture rate for restricted stock. Before the
adoption of SFAS 123R, the actual compensation expense
previously recognized was
F-27
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reversed in the year of forfeiture. Compensation expense related
to the restricted stock, before any capitalization to projects
under development or income tax benefit, was approximately
$2,944,000, $2,450,000 and $1,059,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. As of December 31, 2006, there was
$4.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
included in additional paid-in capital related to restricted
stock, which will be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.0 years. The total fair value of restricted stock
which vested during 2006 was $3.2 million. The following
table summarizes restricted stock activity during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested stock at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
29.44
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
28.73
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
30.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested stock at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
30.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside directors may elect to receive any portion of their
director fees in stock, based on 95% of the average market price
on the date of service. Outside directors elected to receive
9,678, 9,329, and 7,342 shares of stock in lieu of cash for
director fees in 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Restricted
Stock Unit Plan:
In 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Restricted Stock Unit
(RSU) Plan, under which 197,506 and 87,202 RSUs were
issued in 2006 and 2005, respectively. An RSU is a right to
receive a payment in cash equal to the fair market value of one
share of the Companys stock upon vesting. The Company is
expensing and recording a liability based on the current market
value as the RSUs vest. Employees with RSUs receive payments
during the vesting period equal to the common dividends per
share paid by the Company times the number of RSUs held. The
Company also records the effect of these additional payments in
compensation expense. The RSU Plan was amended in 2006 to permit
issuances to directors. During 2006 and 2005, approximately
$3.0 million (including dividend payments) and $36,000,
respectively, was recognized as compensation expense related to
the RSUs for employees and directors, before capitalization to
projects under development or income tax benefit.
In 2006, the Company amended the RSU certificates to add a
retirement feature. Employees who meet the requirements of the
retirement feature vest immediately in their RUSs outstanding,
and the vesting period was changed for employees who will become
eligible under this feature before the end of their original
vesting period. The 2006 compensation expense amount above
included $786,000 of expense, before capitalization to projects
under development or income tax benefit, related to this
modification. In 2006, the Company also amended the RSU Plan to
allow for grants of Performance Based RSUs and issued 220,000 of
these units. The Performance Based RSUs do not receive dividends
and, if certain performance measures are met, these units vest
five years from the date of grant. The Company is expensing the
fair value of these RSUs over the vesting period and recognized
approximately $1.1 million in 2006, before capitalization
to projects under development or income tax benefit.
F-28
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had recorded
approximately $13.2 million of unrecognized compensation
related to RSUs, which will be recognized over a weighted
average period of 3.6 years. The total fair value of RSUs
and dividends paid in 2006 was $1.1 million. The following
table summarizes RSU activity for 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2005
|
|
|
87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
418
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Repurchase Plan:
In 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a
stock repurchase plan, which expires May 9, 2009, which
allows the Company to purchase up to five million shares of its
common stock. This replaces the 2004 authorization, which
expired April 15, 2006 and was also for up to five million
shares of the Companys common stock. No common stock was
repurchased in 2006. Prior to 2006, the Company purchased
2,691,582 shares of its common stock for an aggregate price
of approximately $64,894,000 under previous plans.
Ownership
Limitations:
In order to maintain Cousins qualification as a REIT,
Cousins Articles of Incorporation include certain
restrictions on the ownership of more than 3.9% of the
Companys total common and preferred stock.
Distribution
of REIT Taxable Income:
The following is a reconciliation between dividends paid and
dividends applied in 2006, 2005 and 2004 to meet REIT
distribution requirements ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Common and preferred dividends paid
|
|
$
|
266,214
|
|
|
$
|
89,253
|
|
|
$
|
437,112
|
|
That portion of dividends declared
in current year, and paid in current year, which was applied to
the prior year distribution requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
(5,577
|
)
|
That portion of dividends declared
in subsequent year, and paid in subsequent year, which will
apply to current year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
Dividends in excess of current
year REIT distribution requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends applied to meet current
year REIT distribution requirements
|
|
$
|
266,214
|
|
|
$
|
60,941
|
|
|
$
|
436,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Tax
Status of Dividends:
Distributions to stockholders are characterized for federal
income tax purposes as ordinary income, capital gains,
non-taxable return of capital, or a combination of the three.
Distributions to stockholders that exceed the Companys
current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for
federal income tax purposes) constitute a return of capital
rather than a dividend and generally reduce the
stockholders basis in the stock. To the extent that a
distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and
profits and the stockholders basis in the stock, it will
generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that
stockholders stock. The following summarizes the
taxability of stock distributions for the Company for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Gain
|
|
|
Total Ordinary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
25% Unrecaptured
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Non-Taxable
|
|
|
|
Date Paid
|
|
|
Capital Gain
|
|
|
Section 1250 gain
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
2006 Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
2/22/2006
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/30/2006
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2006
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2006
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2006
|
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred A
|
|
|
2/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred B
|
|
|
2/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Dividends
Common
|
|
|
2/22/2005
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/27/2005
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/25/2005
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Also in 2005, the Company designated 20% of the preferred
dividends paid as capital gain dividends, 1% as 25% unrecaptured
Section 1250 gain dividends, 27% as ordinary, and 52% as
qualified dividends. In 2006 and 2005, an amount calculated as
0.14% and 0.57%, respectively, for each year of total dividends
was an adjustment attributed to depreciation of tangible
property placed in service after 1986 for alternative
minimum tax purposes. In addition, in 2006, an amount calculated
as 2.98% of total dividends was a favorable adjustment to
gain or loss for alternative minimum tax purposes. These
amounts were passed through to stockholders and must be used as
an item of adjustment in determining each stockholders
alternative minimum taxable income.
F-30
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CREC is a taxable entity and its consolidated provision for
income taxes is composed of the following for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Current tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
6,167
|
|
|
$
|
7,411
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
State
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,891
|
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(2,703
|
)
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
State
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
9,196
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
Benefit (provision) applicable to
discontinued operations and sale of investment property
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
(1,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes from
operations
|
|
$
|
4,193
|
|
|
$
|
7,756
|
|
|
$
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net income tax provision differs from the amount computed by
applying the statutory federal income tax rate to CRECs
income before taxes for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Federal income tax provision
|
|
$
|
4,466
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,228
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,073
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
State income tax provision, net of
federal income tax effect
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cousins benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Deferred tax adjustments
|
|
|
(1,184
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREC provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
9,196
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Benefit (provision) applicable to
discontinued operations and sale of investment property
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated provision applicable
to income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
4,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effect of significant temporary differences representing
CRECs deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are
included in the Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities line
item on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capitalized salaries
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,821
|
|
Property sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
Charitable contributions
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
Other
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
5,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
(8,126
|
)
|
Residential lots basis differential
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
Interest capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
|
(11,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
liability
|
|
$
|
(925
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
Sales and
Held-for-Sale
Property
SFAS No. 144 requires that the gains and losses from
the disposition of certain real estate assets and the related
historical operating results be included in a separate section,
Discontinued Operations, in the Consolidated Statements of
Income for all periods presented.
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company sold three, one and six
properties, respectively, that met the criteria for discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Rentable
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue of the Peninsula
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
373,000
|
|
North Point Ground Leases
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Frost Bank Tower
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
531,000
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanover Square South
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 Second Street
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
387,000
|
|
55 Second Street
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
Northside/Alpharetta I
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
103,000
|
|
Northside/Alpharetta II
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
198,000
|
|
The Shops of Lake Tuscaloosa
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
Rocky Creek Properties
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
F-32
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table details the components of Income (Loss) from
Discontinued Operations for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Rental property revenues
|
|
$
|
18,493
|
|
|
$
|
21,311
|
|
|
$
|
38,021
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Rental property operating expenses
|
|
|
(8,109
|
)
|
|
|
(9,893
|
)
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(11,275
|
)
|
|
|
(9,297
|
)
|
|
|
(12,414
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,475
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,297
|
|
|
$
|
6,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gain on sale of the properties included in Discontinued
Operations described above is as follows for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (amounts are net of income
taxes and minority interest and $ are in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
The Avenue of the Peninsula
|
|
$
|
20,053
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
North Point Ground Leases
|
|
|
11,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frost Bank Tower
|
|
|
54,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanover Square South
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 Second Street
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
45,489
|
|
55 Second Street
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
21,632
|
|
Northside/Alpharetta I and II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12,564
|
|
The Shops of Lake Tuscaloosa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
Rocky Creek Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
AT&T/Cerritos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,495
|
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
$
|
81,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property sales at joint ventures or sales where the Company has
continuing involvement, as defined in EITF
03-13, do
not qualify for treatment as discontinued operations. One of the
ventures in which the Company has a 50% ownership interest, CSC,
sold Bank of America Plaza in September 2006. Another venture in
which the Company has a 50% ownership interest, 285 Venture,
sold 1155 Perimeter Center West in July 2005. Neither the gain
on sale nor the results of operations of Bank of America Plaza
or 1155 Perimeter Center West were treated as discontinued
operations.
F-33
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The properties sold during 2004 which did not qualify for
treatment as discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Rentable
|
|
Property Name
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
333 John Carlyle
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
153,000
|
|
1900 Duke Street
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
101 Independence Center
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
526,000
|
|
The Pinnacle
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
423,000
|
|
Two Live Oak Center
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
279,000
|
|
Austin Research Park
Buildings III & IV
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
358,000
|
|
2500 Windy Ridge Parkway
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
316,000
|
|
4100 Wildwood Parkway
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
4200 Wildwood Parkway
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
4300 Wildwood Parkway
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
2300 Windy Ridge Parkway
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
635,000
|
|
3200 Windy Hill Road
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
698,000
|
|
Wildwood 15 acres
of stand-alone retail sites
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
CC-JM II Associates
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
224,000
|
|
Wachovia Tower
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
324,000
|
|
Purchases
of Property
On September 13, 2006, the Company purchased the remaining
interests in 191 Peachtree Tower (191 Peachtree), a
1.2 million square foot office building in downtown
Atlanta, Georgia, for $153.2 million. The Company allocated
the purchase price based on the fair value of assets and
liabilities acquired. Assets are categorized for 191 Peachtree
as land, building, tenant improvements and identifiable
intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 141. The
following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities acquired ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
Building
|
|
|
128,976
|
|
Tenant Improvements and FF&E
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Above market leases
|
|
|
10,644
|
|
In-place leases
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
13,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Below market leases
|
|
|
(747
|
)
|
Above market ground lease
|
|
|
(727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
153,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the purchase date, the $13.1 million of acquired
intangible assets and $1.5 million of acquired intangible
liabilities related to 191 Peachtree had an aggregate weighted
average amortization period of 11 years.
F-34
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following supplemental pro forma financial information is
presented for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The pro forma financial information is based upon the
Companys historical Consolidated Statements of Income,
adjusted as if the acquisition of the remaining interests in 191
Peachtree occurred at the beginning of each of the periods
presented. The supplemental pro forma financial information is
not necessarily indicative of future results or of actual
results that would have been achieved had the acquisition of the
remaining interests in 191 Peachtree been consummated at the
beginning of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
($ In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share)
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
186,831
|
|
|
$
|
192,805
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
152,185
|
|
|
|
71,662
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
86,457
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
Net income available to common
shareholders
|
|
|
223,392
|
|
|
|
59,746
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
In September 2006, the Company acquired a
102,000-square-foot
office project in Sandy Springs, Georgia, Cosmopolitan Center,
which is on 9.5 acres of land and has long-term
redevelopment opportunities, for approximately
$12.5 million.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, Other Assets included the
following ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Investment in Verde
|
|
$
|
9,376
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
FF&E and leasehold
improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $16,429 and
$14,404 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
9,674
|
|
Predevelopment costs and earnest
money
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
|
|
4,732
|
|
Prepaids and other assets
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,602
|
|
|
|
8,324
|
|
Above market leases, net of
accumulated amortization of $1,447 as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
9,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-place leases, net of
accumulated amortization of $472 as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,094
|
|
|
$
|
30,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As noted in Note 6, the Company began accounting for its
Investment in Verde on the cost basis in the third quarter of
2006, at which time the basis was transferred from Investments
in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures to Other Assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Intangible assets relate primarily to the acquisitions of the
interests in 191 Peachtree and Cosmopolitan Center in 2006 (see
Note 9). In addition to the intangible assets shown above,
the Company also acquired intangible liabilities related to the
purchases, including below market leases and an above market
ground lease. These intangible liabilities are recorded within
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance
F-35
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Sheets. Above and below market leases are amortized into rental
revenues over the individual remaining lease terms. The value
associated with in-place leases is amortized into depreciation
and amortization expense, also over individual remaining lease
terms. Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible
assets and liabilities was $1.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Aggregate amortization expense related
to these intangible assets and liabilities is anticipated to be
approximately $5.6 million, $4.0 million,
$1.0 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011, respectively.
The Company has goodwill recorded on its Consolidated Balance
Sheets, which relates entirely to the office reporting unit. As
office assets are sold, either by the Company or at its joint
ventures, goodwill is allocated to the cost of each sale. The
following is a summary of goodwill activity for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
8,324
|
|
|
$
|
8,131
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
5,602
|
|
|
$
|
8,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATION
|
Supplemental information related to cash flows, including
significant non-cash activity affecting the Statements of Cash
Flows, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
is as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Interest paid, including
defeasance costs, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
25,220
|
|
|
$
|
8,295
|
|
|
$
|
21,097
|
|
Income taxes paid (received), net
of refunds
|
|
|
7,386
|
|
|
|
6,757
|
|
|
|
(1,487
|
)
|
Non-cash
Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from land to projects
under development
|
|
|
4,783
|
|
|
|
20,336
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
Transfer from land to investment
in joint venture
|
|
|
12,569
|
|
|
|
14,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from land to operating
properties
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from projects under
development to operating properties
|
|
|
100,740
|
|
|
|
51,539
|
|
|
|
169,937
|
|
Transfer from projects under
development to land
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
7,005
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Transfer from operating properties
to land
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from operating properties
to
held-for-sale
property
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers related to venture
formation (see Note 5 herein):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects under development to
investment in joint venture
|
|
|
4,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating properties to investment
in joint venture
|
|
|
15,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
excluded from development and acquisition expenditures
|
|
|
4,964
|
|
|
|
19,897
|
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
Transfer from other assets to land
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from other assets to
projects under development
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from other assets to
investment in joint ventures, net of tax
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from investment in joint
ventures to other assets
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAB 51 gain, net of tax,
recorded in investment in joint ventures and additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipt of promissory note for
expense reimbursement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from common stock and
additional paid-in capital to unearned compensation for
restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
Transfer from land to residential
lots under development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
Transfer from investment in joint
venture upon consolidation of 905 Juniper to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects under development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and other receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,077
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
RENTAL
PROPERTY REVENUES
|
The Companys leases typically contain escalation
provisions and provisions requiring tenants to pay a pro rata
share of operating expenses. The leases typically include
renewal options and are classified and accounted for as
operating leases.
At December 31, 2006, future minimum rentals to be received
by consolidated entities under existing non-cancelable leases,
excluding tenants current pro rata share of operating
expenses, are as follows ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
52,527
|
|
|
$
|
19,953
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
$
|
73,553
|
|
2008
|
|
|
58,680
|
|
|
|
20,682
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
80,508
|
|
2009
|
|
|
46,467
|
|
|
|
20,773
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
68,409
|
|
2010
|
|
|
41,686
|
|
|
|
20,871
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
63,749
|
|
2011
|
|
|
37,308
|
|
|
|
20,104
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
58,628
|
|
Subsequent to 2011
|
|
|
184,107
|
|
|
|
98,183
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
282,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
420,775
|
|
|
$
|
200,566
|
|
|
$
|
5,999
|
|
|
$
|
627,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has four reportable segments: Office/Multi-Family,
Retail, Land and Industrial. The Office division entered the
multi-family development business in the fourth quarter of 2004
and changed its name to the Office/Multi-Family Division in the
second quarter of 2005. The Office/Multi-Family Division
develops leases and manages owned and third-party owned office
buildings and invests in
and/or
develops for-sale multi-family real estate products. The Retail
and Industrial Divisions develop, lease and manage retail and
industrial centers, respectively. The Land Division owns various
tracts of land that are held for investment or future
development. The Land Division also develops single-family
residential communities that are parceled into lots and sold to
various home builders or sold as undeveloped tracts of land. A
majority of the Companys properties are located within the
Southeastern United States. The Companys reportable
segments are categorized based on the type of product the
division provides and the expertise of the divisions
management and personnel. The divisions are managed separately
because each product they provide has separate and distinct
development issues, leasing
and/or sales
strategies and management issues. The divisions also match the
manner in which the chief operating decision maker reviews
results and information and allocates resources. The unallocated
and other category in the following table includes general
corporate overhead costs not specific to any segment and also
includes interest expense, as financing decisions are not
generally made at the reportable segment level.
In periods prior to 2006, the Company recorded reimbursements of
salary and benefits of
on-site
employees pursuant to management agreements with third parties
and unconsolidated joint ventures as reductions of general and
administrative expenses. In 2006, the Company began recording
these reimbursements in Fee Income on the Consolidated
Statements of Income and reclassified prior period amounts to
conform to the 2006 presentation. As a result, Fee Income and
General and Administrative Expenses in total have increased by
$15.1 million in 2005 and $13.2 million in 2004 when
compared to amounts previously reported. Fee Income and General
and Administrative Expenses from the Office/Multi-Family
Division have increased by $15.0 million in 2005 and
$13.2 million in 2004 when compared to amounts previously
reported. Fee Income and General and Administrative Expenses
from the Retail Division have increased by approximately
$100,000 in 2005 and approximately $24,000 in 2004 when compared
to amounts previously reported.
Company management evaluates the operating performance of its
reportable segments based on funds from operations available to
common stockholders (FFO). FFO is a supplemental
operating performance measure used in the real estate industry.
Prior to 2006, the Company calculated FFO in accordance with the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT) definition of FFO, which is net income
available to common
F-38
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
stockholders (computed in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP)), excluding extraordinary items, cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle and gains or losses
from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and
amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures to reflect FFO on
the same basis. In 2005, the Company included $5.0 million
in income from a real estate venture related to the sale of real
estate in its NAREIT-defined calculation of FFO. The Company
included this amount in FFO because based on the nature of the
investment, the Company believes this income should not be
considered gain on the sale of depreciable property. The Company
presented the NAREIT-defined calculation and also presented an
adjusted NAREIT-defined calculation of FFO to add back the
losses on extinguishment of debt recognized in 2006 as described
in Note 4 herein. The Company presented this additional
measure of FFO because the losses on extinguishment of debt that
the Company recognized related to a sale or an exchange of real
estate, and all other amounts related to a sale or an exchange
of real estate are excluded from FFO.
FFO is used by industry analysts, investors and the Company as a
supplemental measure of an equity REITs operating
performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets
implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets
diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market
conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered
presentation of operating results for real estate companies that
use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.
Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of a
REITs operating performance that excludes historical cost
depreciation, among other items, from GAAP net income.
Management believes that the use of FFO, combined with the
required primary GAAP presentations, has been fundamentally
beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of
REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT
operating results more meaningful. In addition to Company
management evaluating the operating performance of its
reportable segments based on FFO results, management uses FFO
and FFO per share, along with other measures, to assess
performance in connection with evaluating and granting incentive
compensation to its officers and employees.
The tables below present information about the Companys
reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Reconciliation to Consolidated Revenues
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Total revenues from consolidated
entities for segment reporting
|
|
$
|
189,209
|
|
|
$
|
171,631
|
|
|
$
|
173,723
|
|
Less: rental property revenues
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(19,348
|
)
|
|
|
(21,613
|
)
|
|
|
(38,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenues
|
|
$
|
169,861
|
|
|
$
|
150,018
|
|
|
$
|
135,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office/Multi-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Family Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Rental property
revenues continuing
|
|
$
|
60,325
|
|
|
$
|
29,425
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
90,305
|
|
Rental property
revenues discontinued
|
|
|
9,825
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,493
|
|
Multi-family residential unit sales
|
|
|
23,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,134
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
10,497
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,284
|
|
Leasing and management fees
|
|
|
29,334
|
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,881
|
|
Development fees
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
Other income continuing
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
Other income
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues from consolidated
entities
|
|
|
126,470
|
|
|
|
48,666
|
|
|
|
12,645
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
189,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental property operating
expenses continuing
|
|
|
(26,957
|
)
|
|
|
(8,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,103
|
)
|
Rental property operating
expenses discontinued
|
|
|
(5,238
|
)
|
|
|
(2,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,109
|
)
|
Multi-family residential unit cost
of sales
|
|
|
(19,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,403
|
)
|
Residential lot and outparcel cost
of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,287
|
)
|
|
|
(7,248
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,751
|
)
|
Third party leasing and management
direct operating expenses
|
|
|
(18,717
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,121
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(7,548
|
)
|
|
|
(5,830
|
)
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(23,055
|
)
|
|
|
(39,472
|
)
|
Other expenses
continuing
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
(1,644
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(13,837
|
)
|
|
|
(16,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
(78,730
|
)
|
|
|
(25,033
|
)
|
|
|
(10,374
|
)
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
(36,892
|
)
|
|
|
(151,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income
taxes continuing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,193
|
)
|
|
|
(4,193
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes from
operations discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Minority interest in income from
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,130
|
)
|
Funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated joint venture
revenues less operating expenses
|
|
|
16,100
|
|
|
|
5,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,467
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel
sales, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,892
|
|
Multi-family residential sales, net
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
Other joint venture income, net
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
26,420
|
|
|
|
5,592
|
|
|
|
14,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
46,285
|
|
Gain on sale of undepreciated
investment properties continuing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
Gain on sale of undepreciated
investment properties discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,867
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available
to common stockholders, excluding loss on extinguishment of
debt
|
|
|
70,817
|
|
|
|
40,229
|
|
|
|
18,979
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(55,692
|
)
|
|
|
74,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,207
|
)
|
|
|
(18,207
|
)
|
Funds from operations available
to common stockholders, as defined
|
|
|
70,817
|
|
|
|
40,229
|
|
|
|
18,979
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(73,899
|
)
|
|
|
56,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
(18,555
|
)
|
|
|
(10,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,504
|
)
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
(4,070
|
)
|
|
|
(7,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,275
|
)
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(5,659
|
)
|
|
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(28,284
|
)
|
|
|
(20,456
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,598
|
)
|
Gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
54,721
|
|
|
|
19,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,628
|
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
134,561
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
189,282
|
|
|
|
20,964
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
231,815
|
|
|
$
|
40,737
|
|
|
$
|
18,928
|
|
|
$
|
(140
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
217,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets (at
year-end)
|
|
$
|
614,135
|
|
|
$
|
323,064
|
|
|
$
|
149,996
|
|
|
$
|
77,624
|
|
|
$
|
31,934
|
|
|
$
|
1,196,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures (at year-end)
|
|
$
|
43,881
|
|
|
$
|
34,814
|
|
|
$
|
103,223
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
181,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Capital
Expenditures
|
|
$
|
267,375
|
|
|
$
|
115,551
|
|
|
$
|
75,914
|
|
|
$
|
35,780
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
494,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office/Multi-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
Family Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Rental property
revenues continuing
|
|
$
|
54,733
|
|
|
$
|
24,490
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,223
|
|
Rental property
revenues discontinued
|
|
|
11,162
|
|
|
|
10,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,311
|
|
Multi-family residential unit sales
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,233
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,004
|
|
|
|
14,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,933
|
|
Leasing and management fees
|
|
|
31,529
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,142
|
|
Development fees
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
Other income continuing
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
Other income
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues from consolidated
entities
|
|
|
111,127
|
|
|
|
43,719
|
|
|
|
16,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
171,631
|
|
Rental property operating
expenses continuing
|
|
|
(23,046
|
)
|
|
|
(7,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,172
|
)
|
Rental property operating
expenses discontinued
|
|
|
(5,774
|
)
|
|
|
(4,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,893
|
)
|
Multi-family residential unit cost
of sales
|
|
|
(9,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,405
|
)
|
Residential lot and outparcel cost
of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,638
|
)
|
|
|
(10,766
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,404
|
)
|
Third party leasing and management
direct operating expenses
|
|
|
(16,486
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,628
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
|
(3,205
|
)
|
|
|
(1,774
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(27,113
|
)
|
|
|
(39,191
|
)
|
Other expenses
continuing
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(691
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(11,917
|
)
|
|
|
(13,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
(62,067
|
)
|
|
|
(20,568
|
)
|
|
|
(13,231
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(39,030
|
)
|
|
|
(135,061
|
)
|
Provision for income
taxes continuing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|
|
(7,756
|
)
|
Provision for income
taxes discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Minority interest in income from
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,037
|
)
|
Funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated joint venture
revenues less operating expenses
|
|
|
22,764
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,836
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel
sales, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,688
|
|
Multi-family residential sales, net
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
Other joint venture income, net
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
29,881
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
13,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
47,862
|
|
Gain on sale of undepreciated
investment properties
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,483
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
(15,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available
to common stockholders
|
|
|
76,494
|
|
|
|
30,540
|
|
|
|
31,060
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(64,183
|
)
|
|
|
73,746
|
|
Real estate depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
(16,173
|
)
|
|
|
(8,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,338
|
)
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
(5,233
|
)
|
|
|
(4,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,297
|
)
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(7,467
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(28,873
|
)
|
|
|
(13,050
|
)
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,477
|
)
|
Gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
49,671
|
|
|
$
|
18,662
|
|
|
$
|
30,506
|
|
|
$
|
(165
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets (at
year-end)
|
|
$
|
572,684
|
|
|
$
|
435,924
|
|
|
$
|
130,862
|
|
|
$
|
21,303
|
|
|
$
|
27,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures (at year-end)
|
|
$
|
98,850
|
|
|
$
|
11,062
|
|
|
$
|
107,320
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
217,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Capital
Expenditures
|
|
$
|
79,381
|
|
|
$
|
164,557
|
|
|
$
|
8,971
|
|
|
$
|
19,824
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
272,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office/Multi-
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
Family Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Rental property
revenues continuing
|
|
$
|
67,387
|
|
|
$
|
16,997
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,384
|
|
Rental property
revenues discontinued
|
|
|
28,265
|
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,021
|
|
Multi-family residential unit sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
15,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
Leasing and management fees
|
|
|
25,884
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,394
|
|
Development fees
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
Other income continuing
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
Other income
discontinued
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues from consolidated
entities
|
|
|
124,811
|
|
|
|
29,720
|
|
|
|
16,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
173,722
|
|
Rental property operating
expenses continuing
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(3,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,389
|
)
|
Rental property operating
expenses discontinued
|
|
|
(9,648
|
)
|
|
|
(3,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,353
|
)
|
Multi-family residential unit cost
of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel cost
of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
|
|
(11,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,007
|
)
|
Third party leasing and management
direct operating expenses
|
|
|
(13,414
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,438
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(15,603
|
)
|
|
|
(6,639
|
)
|
|
|
(2,710
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
|
(7,865
|
)
|
|
|
(33,491
|
)
|
Other expenses
continuing
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(17,219
|
)
|
|
|
(19,223
|
)
|
Other expenses
discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,475
|
)
|
|
|
(6,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
(63,665
|
)
|
|
|
(15,947
|
)
|
|
|
(14,462
|
)
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
(31,559
|
)
|
|
|
(126,376
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
Minority interest in income from
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
Funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated joint venture
revenues less operating expenses
|
|
|
46,865
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,876
|
|
Residential lot and outparcel
sales, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
Multi-family residential sales, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment loss on depreciable
property
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
Other joint venture income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,428
|
)
|
|
|
(13,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funds from operations from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
46,656
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,428
|
)
|
|
|
44,108
|
|
Gain on sale of undepreciated
investment properties
|
|
|
14,796
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
13,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,627
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,042
|
)
|
|
|
(8,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations available
to common stockholders
|
|
|
121,187
|
|
|
|
17,164
|
|
|
|
24,515
|
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
(53,245
|
)
|
|
|
108,878
|
|
Real estate depreciation and
amortization Continuing
|
|
|
(21,698
|
)
|
|
|
(5,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,463
|
)
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
(7,160
|
)
|
|
|
(5,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,414
|
)
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(14,900
|
)
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,880
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(43,758
|
)
|
|
|
(11,910
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,757
|
)
|
Gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
|
80,587
|
|
|
|
7,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
88,429
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
79,725
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,927
|
|
Unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
176,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on sale of depreciated
investment properties, net of applicable income tax provision
|
|
|
336,577
|
|
|
|
9,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
346,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
414,006
|
|
|
$
|
14,687
|
|
|
$
|
24,426
|
|
|
$
|
(743
|
)
|
|
$
|
(52,634
|
)
|
|
$
|
399,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets (at
year-end)
|
|
$
|
528,752
|
|
|
$
|
283,778
|
|
|
$
|
105,822
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
$
|
108,256
|
|
|
$
|
1,026,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated
joint ventures (at year-end)
|
|
$
|
115,584
|
|
|
$
|
12,320
|
|
|
$
|
71,329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
199,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Capital
Expenditures
|
|
$
|
67,434
|
|
|
$
|
87,756
|
|
|
$
|
28,751
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
PROFIT
SHARING/401(K) PLAN
|
The Company has a 401(k) plan which covers active regular
employees. Employees are eligible under this plan immediately
upon hire, and pre-tax contributions are allowed up to the
limits set by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company has a
profit sharing plan which covers active regular employees who
work a minimum of 1,000 hours per year. The Compensation,
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
makes an annual, discretionary determination of the percentage
contribution of an eligible employees compensation that
will be made by the Company into the profit sharing plan. In
order to be an eligible employee, the employee must, among other
factors, be an active employee on both January 1 and
December 31 of that plan year. The Company contributed or
plans to contribute approximately $3.2 million,
$2.7 million and $2.6 million to the profit sharing
plan for the 2006, 2005 and 2004 plan years, respectively.
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted SAB 108
effective December 31, 2006. As permitted by SAB 108,
the Company adjusted retained earnings as of January 1,
2006 for the cumulative effect of the following misstatements
from prior years:
Deferred
Tax Liability
In prior years, the Company did not reduce its taxable income at
CREC for goodwill written off in connection with the sale of
certain office properties. These errors resulted in an
overstatement of the Companys deferred tax liability.
Investment
in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
In 2004, the Company maintained its investment in Verde under
the cost method and, accordingly, did not record the
Companys share of losses incurred by Verde. The Company
later determined that it should account for Verde under the
equity method, and began recognizing equity in earnings from
this entity in 2005 but did not adjust for the Companys
share of Verdes losses in 2004. As a result, the
Companys investment in Verde was overstated.
Compensated
Absences
In prior years, the Company had no established accrual for
earned but unpaid compensated absences. As a result, the
Companys accrued liabilities were understated.
Impact
of Adjustments
The impact of each of the items noted above on retained earnings
as of January 1, 2006 is presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
|
|
|
Vacation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Joint Ventures
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint
ventures, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(260
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(260
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative undistributed net income
|
|
$
|
2,827
|
|
|
$
|
(260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
******
F-43
SCHEDULE III
(PAGE 1 of 5)
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
REAL
ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Carried at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Company
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which De-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
Construc-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Deprecia-
|
|
|
tion/
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
of Income
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
tion(a)
|
|
|
Renovation
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
is Computed(b)
|
|
|
LAND HELD FOR INVESTMENT OR
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
|
North Point Land
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,004
|
|
|
$
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,298
|
|
|
$
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1970-1985
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminus Land
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Mill Distribution
Park
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferson Mill Business
Park
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
14,223
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeside Ranch Business
Park
Dallas, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,925
|
)
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wildwood Land
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
(14,292
|
)
|
|
|
15,175
|
|
|
|
(14,292
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1971-1989
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round Rock/ Austin, Texas
Land
Austin, TX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Adjacent to The Avenue
Carriage Crossing Memphis, TN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
6,184
|
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
505, 511, 555 and 557 Peachtree
Street Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Held for
Investment or Future Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,943
|
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
41,014
|
|
|
|
(45,796
|
)
|
|
|
145,261
|
|
|
|
(43,871
|
)
|
|
|
101,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office & Medical
Office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inforum Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,226
|
|
|
|
67,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
5,226
|
|
|
|
74,609
|
|
|
|
79,835
|
|
|
|
41,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
Galleria 75 Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,673
|
|
|
|
4,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
6,673
|
|
|
|
5,061
|
|
|
|
11,734
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
The Points of Waterview
Dallas, TX
|
|
|
18,183
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
22,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,926
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
27,836
|
|
|
|
30,394
|
|
|
|
8,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
S-1
SCHEDULE III
(PAGE 2 of 5)
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
REAL
ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Carried at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Company
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which De-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
Construc-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Deprecia-
|
|
|
tion/
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
of Income
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
tion(a)
|
|
|
Renovation
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
is Computed(b)
|
|
|
Office and Medical Office
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeshore Park Plaza
Birmingham, AL
|
|
$
|
9,082
|
|
|
$
|
3,362
|
|
|
$
|
12,261
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,474
|
|
|
$
|
3,362
|
|
|
$
|
14,735
|
|
|
$
|
18,097
|
|
|
$
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
600 University Park
Place
Birmingham, AL
|
|
|
13,168
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
|
|
18,599
|
|
|
|
4,331
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
333 North Point Center
East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
29,571
|
(c)
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
13,456
|
|
|
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
555 North Point Center
East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
(c
|
)
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,224
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
17,224
|
|
|
|
17,592
|
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
One Georgia Center
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,267
|
|
|
|
27,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,790
|
|
|
|
9,267
|
|
|
|
32,869
|
|
|
|
42,136
|
|
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
3100 Windy Hill Road
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
17,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
17,005
|
|
|
|
17,314
|
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
3301 Windy Ridge
Parkway
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
11,915
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
11,915
|
|
|
|
12,413
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
|
|
40 Years
|
|
100 North Point Center
East
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
22,365
|
(d)
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
11,128
|
|
|
|
12,603
|
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
200 North Point Center
East
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
(d
|
)
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
10,764
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
25 Years
|
|
Cosmopolitan Center
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,465
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,465
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
12,046
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
24 Years
|
|
191 Peachtree Tower(e)
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
|
141,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
|
141,012
|
|
|
|
146,367
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
40 Years
|
|
Meridian Mark Plaza
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
23,602
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23,738
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
23,738
|
|
|
|
25,957
|
|
|
|
8,474
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
Inhibitex
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
6,634
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
AtheroGenics
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,455
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
7,455
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
4,149
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Office and Medical Office
|
|
|
115,971
|
|
|
|
51,329
|
|
|
|
312,506
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
119,264
|
|
|
|
51,826
|
|
|
|
431,770
|
|
|
|
483,596
|
|
|
|
110,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-2
SCHEDULE III
(PAGE 3 of 5)
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
REAL
ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31,
2006
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Carried at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Company
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which De-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
Construc-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Deprecia-
|
|
|
tion/
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
of Income
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
tion(a)
|
|
|
Renovation
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
is Computed(b)
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Carriage
Crossing
Memphis, TN
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,425
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,467
|
|
|
$
|
10,425
|
|
|
$
|
80,467
|
|
|
$
|
90,892
|
|
|
$
|
5,421
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
North Point Stand Alone Retail
Sites
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
3,077
|
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
10-24 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
79,002
|
|
|
|
13,502
|
|
|
|
79,002
|
|
|
|
92,504
|
|
|
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Mill Distribution
Park Building A
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
2,138
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
30 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating
Properties
|
|
|
118,596
|
|
|
|
68,256
|
|
|
|
312,506
|
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
209,738
|
|
|
|
67,466
|
|
|
|
522,244
|
|
|
|
589,710
|
|
|
|
115,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROJECTS UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminus 100
Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,091
|
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
99,091
|
|
|
|
113,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Avenue Webb Gin
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,174
|
|
|
|
11,583
|
|
|
|
58,174
|
|
|
|
69,757
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
30 years
|
|
The Avenue Carriage
Crossing
Phase I Expansion
Memphis, TN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Jose
MarketCenter
San Jose, CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,837
|
|
|
|
39,121
|
|
|
|
40,837
|
|
|
|
79,958
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
30 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,002
|
|
|
|
51,517
|
|
|
|
101,002
|
|
|
|
152,519
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
SCHEDULE III
(PAGE 4 of 5)
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2006
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized
|
|
|
Gross Amount at Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
Carried at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Company
|
|
|
to Acquisition
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which De-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
Construc-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Improve-
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
of Sales
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Deprecia-
|
|
|
tion/
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
of Income
|
|
Description
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
ments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
tion(a)
|
|
|
Renovation
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
is Computed(b)
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lakeside Ranch Business
Park Building 20
Dallas, TX
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,241
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,168
|
|
|
$
|
5,241
|
|
|
$
|
13,168
|
|
|
$
|
18,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Mill Distribution
Park Building 3B
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1,815
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
7,588
|
|
|
|
9,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jefferson Mill Business Park
Building A
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
6,976
|
|
|
|
8,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Industrial
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,732
|
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
27,732
|
|
|
|
36,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Projects
Under Development
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
74,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,825
|
|
|
|
74,461
|
|
|
|
227,825
|
|
|
|
302,286
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESIDENTIAL LOTS UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
|
Rivers Call
Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,904
|
|
|
|
(12,078
|
)
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
(12,078
|
)
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
1971-1989
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Lakes at Cedar
Grove Suburban Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,988
|
|
|
|
(28,240
|
)
|
|
|
33,708
|
|
|
|
(28,240
|
)
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blalock Lakes
Newnan, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longleaf at Callaway
Pine Mountain, GA
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,594
|
|
|
|
(6,604
|
)
|
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
(6,604
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callaway Gardens
Pine Mountain, GA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential Lots
Under Development
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
28,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,486
|
|
|
|
(46,922
|
)
|
|
|
74,546
|
|
|
|
(46,922
|
)
|
|
|
27,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,152
|
|
|
$
|
269,720
|
|
|
$
|
319,735
|
|
|
$
|
86,710
|
|
|
$
|
344,845
|
|
|
$
|
361,734
|
|
|
$
|
659,276
|
|
|
$
|
1,021,010
|
|
|
$
|
117,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-4
SCHEDULE III
(PAGE 5 of 5)
COUSINS
PROPERTIES INCORPORATED AND CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2006
($ in thousands)
NOTES:
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reconciliations of total real estate carrying value and
accumulated depreciation for the three years ended
December 31, 2006 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,047,139
|
|
|
$
|
815,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,041,964
|
|
|
$
|
159,326
|
|
|
$
|
140,352
|
|
|
$
|
163,203
|
|
Additions during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements and other capitalized
costs
|
|
|
480,705
|
|
|
|
292,630
|
|
|
|
186,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,898
|
|
|
|
33,763
|
|
|
|
39,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,705
|
|
|
|
292,630
|
|
|
|
186,753
|
|
|
|
40,898
|
|
|
|
33,763
|
|
|
|
39,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of real estate sold
|
|
|
(456,250
|
)
|
|
|
(43,075
|
)
|
|
|
(411,700
|
)
|
|
|
(63,306
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(62,482
|
)
|
Write-off of fully depreciated
assets
|
|
|
(15,849
|
)
|
|
|
(15,423
|
)
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
(15,849
|
)
|
|
|
(15,423
|
)
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
Transfers between account
categories(f)
|
|
|
(34,735
|
)
|
|
|
(2,791
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(3,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of rent adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506,834
|
)
|
|
|
(61,289
|
)
|
|
|
(412,919
|
)
|
|
|
(82,455
|
)
|
|
|
(14,789
|
)
|
|
|
(62,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period
|
|
$
|
1,021,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,047,139
|
|
|
$
|
815,798
|
|
|
$
|
117,769
|
|
|
$
|
159,326
|
|
|
$
|
140,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Buildings and improvements are depreciated over 25 to
40 years. Leasehold improvements and other capitalized
leasing costs are depreciated over the life of the asset or the
term of the lease, whichever is shorter. |
|
(c) |
|
333 and 555 North Point Center East were financed together with
such properties being collateral for one recourse mortgage note
payable. |
|
(d) |
|
100 and 200 North Point Center East were financed together with
such properties being collateral for one non-recourse mortgage
note payable. |
|
(e) |
|
191 Peachtree Tower is treated as an operating property for
financial reporting purposes, but is treated as a redevelopment
project by the Company. Therefore this property is included on
both the list of development projects and operating properties
included in Item 2 of this
Form 10-K,
but included only as an operating property in this
Schedule III. In addition, certain intangible assets
related to the purchase of this property are included in other
assets and not in the above table. |
|
(f) |
|
Transfers between account categories in 2006 were mainly
comprised of assets which the Company owned and which were
recorded within properties in the prior years but were
contributed to joint ventures in 2006. |
S-5