As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2007

Registration No. 333-145213

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Amendment No. 1

to

Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

Royal Gold, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

with copies to:

 

Paul Hilton

Hogan & Hartson L.L.P.

One Tabor Center

1200 Seventeenth St., Suite 1500

Denver, CO 80202

Phone: (303) 899-7300

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective and upon consummation of the transactions described herein.

 

If the securities being registered on this form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:  o

 

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a) may determine.

 

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 2007

 

 

MERGER PROPOSED — YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

 

The board of directors of Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp. (“Battle Mountain”) has approved a merger agreement that would result in Battle Mountain becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold, Inc. (“Royal Gold”). In the merger, each outstanding share of Battle Mountain common stock would be converted into the right to receive, at the election of each Battle Mountain stockholder, either (i) between 0.0172 and 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common stock to be determined at closing (“Stock Election”) or (ii) approximately $0.55 in cash (“Cash Election”), in each case assuming 91,563,506 shares of Battle Mountain common stock will be issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. The per share consideration, if a holder of Battle Mountain common stock makes a Stock Election, will be based on the average price per share of Royal Gold common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the five trading day period up to and including the second business day preceding (but not including) the closing date of the merger transaction. If the average price is less than $29.00, the per share stock consideration will be determined based on an aggregate of 1,634,410 shares of Royal Gold common stock and the holders of shares of Battle Mountain common stock would receive 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock. If the average price of Royal Gold common stock is $30.18 or above, the per share stock consideration will be determined based on an aggregate of 1,570,507 shares of Royal Gold common stock and the holders of shares of Battle Mountain common stock would receive 0.0172 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock. If the average price is greater than or equal to $29.00 but less than $30.18, the per share consideration for each share of Battle Mountain common stock would be proportionally adjusted based on the average price of Royal Gold common stock, using $47,397,901.26 as the aggregate purchase price. The per share consideration if a holder of Battle Mountain common stock makes a Cash Election will be based on a maximum of $50,359,928 as the aggregate purchase price.

 

The stock consideration and cash consideration payable in the merger are subject to pro rata adjustment based on the number of issued and outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock immediately prior to the effective time of the merger and a potential reduction or holdback of approximately 0.0006 shares of Royal Gold common stock on a per share basis, in the case of a Stock Election, or approximately $0.017 on a per share basis, in the case of a Cash Election, based on the cost of settling certain Battle Mountain litigation.

 

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. We cannot complete the transaction unless, among other things, the holders of Battle Mountain common stock vote to approve and adopt the merger agreement. Battle Mountain will hold a special meeting of its stockholders on October 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time at the offices of Clark Wilson LLP, 800-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3H1, Canada. Whether or not you plan to attend Battle Mountain’s special meeting, please vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card to the address on the proxy card, or by submitting your proxy by telephone or Internet, using the procedures in the voting instructions included with the enclosed proxy card.

 

The Battle Mountain board of directors recommends that the Battle Mountain stockholders vote “FOR” the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and related items.

 

The securities offered in this prospectus involve certain risks. For a discussion of risk factors that you should consider in evaluating the offer, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 of this prospectus.

 

Royal Gold common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “RGLD” and on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “RGL.” The last reported sale of Royal Gold common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on September 20, 2007 was $33.35. Battle Mountain common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “BMGX.” The last reported sale of Battle Mountain common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on September 20, 2007 was $0.55.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

The date of this proxy statement/prospectus is September l, 2007, and it is first being mailed to Battle Mountain stockholders on or about September l, 2007.

 

BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD EXPLORATION CORP.

One East Liberty Street
Sixth Floor, Suite 9
Reno, Nevada 89504

 

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

October 24, 2007
10:00 A.M. LOCAL TIME

 

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD EXPLORATION CORP.:

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp., a Nevada corporation, will hold a special meeting of stockholders on October 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the offices of Clark Wilson LLP, 800-885 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3H1, Canada to consider and vote upon the following:

 

1. a proposal to approve and adopt the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “merger agreement”) by and among Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp., Royal Gold, Inc. and Royal Battle Mountain Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Royal Gold, Inc., dated July 30, 2007;

 

2. a proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to permit solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above proposal; and

 

3. any other business as may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponements of the special meeting.

 

Only holders of record of Battle Mountain common stock on the books of Battle Mountain as of the close of business on September 26, 2007, the record date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. The approval and adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Battle Mountain common stock outstanding on the record date.

 

The accompanying document describes the proposed transaction in more detail. We encourage you to read the entire document carefully, including the merger agreement, which is included as Annex A to the document.

 

The Battle Mountain board of directors has unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and recommends that Battle Mountain stockholders vote “FOR” approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

 

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please submit your proxy with voting instructions as soon as possible. If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record, please complete, sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope, or submit your proxy by telephone or Internet, using the procedures in the voting instructions included with the enclosed proxy card. If you hold your shares through a bank or broker, please use the voting instructions you have received from your bank or broker. Submitting your proxy will not prevent you from attending the special meeting and voting in person. Please note, however, that if you hold your shares through a bank or broker, and you wish to vote in person at the special meeting, you must obtain from your bank or broker a proxy issued in your name. You may revoke your proxy by attending the special meeting and voting your shares in person at the special meeting. You may also revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by giving written notice of revocation to Computershare Trust Company, N.A. at the address provided with the proxy card at or before the special meeting or by filing a properly executed proxy with a later date.

 

Battle Mountain stockholders who do not vote in favor of approving the merger agreement and who otherwise comply with the requirements of Nevada law will be entitled to the rights of a dissenting owner. A summary of the applicable Nevada law provision, including the requirements a Battle Mountain stockholder must follow in order to exercise his or her rights of a dissenting owner, is contained in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. A copy of the Nevada law provision relating to rights of a dissenting owner is attached as Annex B to the proxy statement/prospectus.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Mark Kucher

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

September l, 2007

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

This document, which is sometimes referred to as this proxy statement/prospectus, constitutes a proxy statement of Battle Mountain with respect to the solicitation of proxies for the special meeting of Battle Mountain stockholders to, among other things, approve and adopt the merger agreement and a prospectus of Royal Gold for the shares of Royal Gold common stock that Royal Gold will issue to Battle Mountain stockholders in the merger transaction. As permitted under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, this proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Royal Gold that is contained in documents filed with the SEC and that is not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus. Battle Mountain stockholders may obtain copies of these documents, without charge, excluding any exhibits to these documents unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference as an exhibit in this proxy statement/prospectus from the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov, as well as other sources. See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 100. You may also obtain copies of these documents, without charge, from Royal Gold and Battle Mountain by writing or calling the applicable department set forth below:

 

 

In order to obtain delivery of these documents prior to Battle Mountain’s special meeting of stockholders you should request the documents no later than October 17, 2007.

 

References to “Royal Gold” and “Battle Mountain” in this proxy statement/prospectus refer to Royal Gold, Inc. and Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp., respectively. Except as otherwise specifically noted, references to “shares of Royal Gold common stock,” “Royal Gold common stock” or “Royal Gold shares” refer to shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Royal Gold, and references to “shares of Battle Mountain common stock,” “Battle Mountain common stock” or “Battle Mountain shares” refer to shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Battle Mountain. Except as otherwise specifically noted, references to “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to both Royal Gold and Battle Mountain.

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

 

In the following questions and answers below, we highlight selected information from this proxy statement/prospectus but we have not included all of the information that may be important to you regarding the merger and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. To better understand the merger and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and for a complete description of their legal terms, you should carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the annexes, as well as the documents that we have incorporated by reference in this document. See “Important Note About this Proxy Statement/Prospectus” beginning on page iii and “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 100.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	•	four royalty interests at the Pipeline Mining Complex located in Nevada and operated by the Cortez Joint Venture, a joint venture between Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”) (60%) and Kennecott Explorations (Australia) Ltd. (40%), a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc;
	•	a royalty interest on the Robinson mine, located in eastern Nevada and operated by a subsidiary of Quadra Mining Ltd. (“Quadra”);
	•	a royalty interest on the SJ Claims, covering portions of the Betze-Post mine, located in Nevada and operated by a subsidiary of Barrick;
	•	a royalty interest on the Leeville Mining Complex, located in Nevada and operated by a subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”);
	•	a variable royalty interest on the Troy underground silver and copper mine, located in Montana and operated by Revett Silver Company;
	•	a royalty interest on the Bald Mountain mine, located in Nevada and operated by a subsidiary of Barrick;
	•	a royalty interest on the Mulatos mine, located in Sonora, Mexico, and operated by a subsidiary of Alamos Gold, Inc.; and
	•	a royalty interest on a number of properties in Santa Cruz Province, Argentina, including the Martha silver mine, operated by a subsidiary of Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation.

	•	Peñasquito:  A 2.0% net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty interest on the Peñasquito project, located in the State of Zacatecas, Mexico and under development by Goldcorp.

	•	Pascua-Lama:  There are two royalty interests on the Pascua-Lama project located in Chile and operated by a subsidiary of Barrick:

	•	A sliding-scale NSR royalty on gold derived from the Pascua-Lama project. The sliding-scale NSR royalty ranges from 0.16%, when the average quarterly gold price is $325 per ounce or less, to 1.08%, when the average quarterly gold price is $800 per ounce or more; and

	•	A 0.216% fixed-rate copper royalty that applies to Pascua-Lama copper reserves in Chile. This royalty does not take effect until after January 1, 2017.

	•	Taparko: Four royalty interests on the Taparko project are:

	•	TB-GSR1 — A production payment equivalent to a 15% gross smelter return (“GSR”) royalty on all gold produced from the Taparko project until either cumulative production of 804,420 ounces of gold is achieved or until we receive $35 million in cumulative payments;

	•	TB-GSR2 — A production payment equivalent to a GSR sliding-scale royalty on all gold produced from the Taparko project. TB-GSR2 remains in force until the termination of TB-GSR1;

	•	TB-GSR3 — A perpetual 2.0% GSR royalty on all gold contained in and produced from the Taparko project after the termination of TB-GSR1 and TB-GSR2; and

	•	TB-MR1 — A 0.75% milling fee royalty on all gold, subject to annual caps, processed through the Taparko project processing facilities, that is mined from any area outside the Taparko project area.

	•	Gold Hill:  A sliding-scale NSR royalty and unpatented mining claims on the Gold Hill deposit in Nye County, Nevada, controlled by Round Mountain Gold Corporation, a joint venture between Kinross Gold Corporation, the operator, and Barrick. The sliding-scale ranges from 1.0%, when the gold price is $350 per ounce or less, to 2.0% when the gold price is above $350 per ounce. Production on the Gold Hill deposit is expected to commence once permitting is completed and equipment from the Round Mountain pit becomes available.

	•	a royalty interest on the Williams mine, located in Ontario, Canada and operated by Teck Cominco Ltd. and Homestake Canada Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barrick;

	•	a royalty interest on the Don Mario mine, located in eastern Bolivia and operated by Orvana Minerals Corp., majority owned by Compania Minera del Sur (Comsur);
	•	a royalty interest on the El Limon mine and La India Project, located in northwestern Nicaragua and owned by Glencairn Gold Corporation; and
	•	a royalty interest on the Dolores project, located in Chihuahua, Mexico, and owned by Minefinders Corporation Ltd.

	•	absence of legal restrictions enjoining, restraining, prohibiting or making illegal the completion of the merger;
	•	Royal Gold shall have completed its due diligence investigation of Battle Mountain to its satisfaction;
	•	Battle Mountain’s stockholders will have approved the merger;
	•	the registration statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, relating to the shares of Royal Gold common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will have become effective under the Securities Act;
	•	the representations and warranties made by each party in the merger agreement will be true and correct at and as of the date of the closing with the same effect as though such representations and warranties were made at and as of the date of the closing, except in the case where the failure to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect;
	•	each party in the merger agreement will have performed or complied in all material respects with its agreements and covenants under the merger agreement;
	•	Battle Mountain will have obtained any required consents from third parties or governmental bodies in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement;
	•	since December 31, 2006, there will have not occurred or be continuing any event, occurrence, revelation or development of a state of circumstances or facts, which individually or in the aggregate, has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Battle Mountain; and
	•	Royal Gold shall have received a legal opinion from counsel to Battle Mountain satisfactory to Royal Gold.

 

RISK FACTORS

 

Risks Related to the Combined Company

 

As a result of the merger, Battle Mountain’s business will be subject to the following new or increased risks related to the structure of the merger and the combined company. In addition to the risks described below, the combined company will continue to be subject to the risks described in the documents that Royal Gold has filed with the SEC that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. If any of the risks described below or in the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus actually occur, the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the combined companies could be materially adversely affected. The risks below should be considered along with the other information included or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

 

The price of Royal Gold common stock could decline following the merger. The trading price of Royal Gold common stock may be affected by factors different than those factors affecting the price of Battle Mountain common stock.

 

If the merger is completed, holders of Battle Mountain common stock who make the Stock Election will become holders of Royal Gold common stock. The market price of Royal Gold common stock may decline as a result of the merger if the integration of Royal Gold and Battle Mountain is unsuccessful or takes longer than expected, the perceived benefits of the merger are not achieved as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by financial analysts or investors, or the royalty interests acquired in the merger do not produce the revenues expected. Furthermore, the merger agreement does not limit the conduct of Royal Gold’s business after the completion of the merger. Consequently, Royal Gold is permitted to engage in activities, such as material acquisitions of assets, royalties or businesses, that could affect the market price of its common stock. The market price of Royal Gold common stock may be affected by factors different from those affecting Battle Mountain common stock.

 

The number of shares of Royal Gold common stock that holders of Battle Mountain common stock who make the Stock Election will receive in the merger is subject to change.

 

The number of shares of Royal Gold common stock that the Battle Mountain stockholders will receive for each share of Battle Mountain common stock will depend on the average price of Royal Gold common stock for the five trading day period up to and including the second business day preceding (but not including) the closing date, and ranges from an aggregate of 1,634,410 shares of Royal Gold common stock, or 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock, if the average price of Royal Gold common stock is less than $29.00, to an aggregate of 1,570,507 shares of Royal Gold common stock, or 0.0172 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock, if the average price of Royal Gold common stock is $30.18 or above. See “The Merger Agreement — Consideration for Battle Mountain Stockholders” on page 50. Within this range, the number of shares of Royal Gold common stock to be issued in the merger is subject to fluctuation, such that as the average price of Royal Gold stock during the five trading day period decreases, more shares of Royal Gold stock will be issued in the merger, and as the average price increases, fewer shares will be issued. Changes in the market price of Royal Gold common stock during the business day prior to, and the day of, the closing will not affect the number of shares to be issued in the merger. Royal Gold and Battle Mountain encourage you to obtain current stock price quotations for Royal Gold common stock from a newspaper, the Internet or your broker.

 

There is a cap on the aggregate merger consideration that is different for the Stock Election and the Cash Election.

 

With respect to a Stock Election, the per share stock consideration is based on an aggregate purchase price of $47,397,901.26 and the average price per share of Royal Gold common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Select Global Market for the five trading day period up to and including the second business day preceding (but not including) the closing date of the merger transaction. If, at the effective time of the merger, for the five trading day period up to and including the second business day preceding (but not including) the closing date of the merger transaction, the average price per share of Royal Gold common stock is less than $29.00, the total number of Royal Gold shares to be issued in the merger will be capped at 1,634,410 shares or 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common

stock per each share of Battle Mountain common stock. Royal Gold will not issue any additional shares of common stock in the merger as a result of the average closing price of Royal Gold common stock falling below $29.00. With respect to a Cash Election, the per share cash consideration is based on an aggregate purchase price of $50,359,928. No additional cash will be paid if the price of Royal Gold common stock increases before or after the closing of the merger transaction. Each Battle Mountain stockholder must make a Stock Election or a Cash Election with respect to all of his or her Battle Mountain common stock. There can be no assurance that you will make an election that results in you receiving consideration that has the highest value.

 

The number of shares of Royal Gold common stock or the amount of cash that holders of Battle Mountain common stock will receive in the merger is subject to a potential reduction or holdback.

 

Both the stock consideration and the cash consideration payable in the merger is subject to a potential reduction or holdback of approximately 50,000 to 52,000 shares of Royal Gold common stock, or approximately 0.0006 shares of Royal Gold common stock on a per share basis, in the case of a Stock Election and $1,597,650, or approximately $0.017 on a per share basis, in the case of a Cash Election, based on the cost of settling certain Battle Mountain litigation in each case assuming 91,563,506 shares of Battle Mountain common stock are issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. If the litigation is settled prior to the effective time of the merger, then there will be a reduction in the number of shares of Royal Gold common stock that are issued or cash paid to Battle Mountain stockholders following the closing date based on the cost of settling the litigation. If the litigation is not settled and Royal Gold elects to waive the condition precedent and complete the merger, then Royal Gold will hold back a portion of the shares of Royal Gold common stock that otherwise would be issuable or a portion of the cash payable following the closing date until such time as such litigation is settled. If the value of the shares of Royal Gold stock or the amount of cash that are subject to the holdback is less than, or equal to, the cost of settling the litigation, then none of such shares of Royal Gold common stock or cash held back will be issued or paid to the former Battle Mountain stockholders. Battle Mountain stockholders will not have a say in the settlement of the litigation and may not receive the shares of Royal Gold common stock or the amount of cash held back at the effective time of the merger.

 

The board of directors and executive officers of Battle Mountain have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Battle Mountain stockholders.

 

Battle Mountain stockholders should be aware that some directors and executive officers of Battle Mountain may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Battle Mountain stockholders. These interests include, among others, the change of control payments of up to $3,288,662.40 and $555,968.40 to Mark Kucher, Battle Mountain’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and David Atkinson, Battle Mountain’s Chief Financial Officer, respectively, being made under employment agreements upon the completion of the merger. For additional information on the interests that Battle Mountain’s board members and executive officers may have in the merger, see “Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger” beginning on page 75.

 

Whether or not the merger is completed, the announcement and pendency of the merger could cause disruptions in the businesses of Royal Gold and Battle Mountain, which could have an adverse effect on their respective businesses, financial results and stock prices.

 

Whether or not the merger is completed, the announcement and pendency of the merger could cause disruptions in the businesses of Royal Gold and Battle Mountain. Specifically, managements’ attention has been focused on the merger, which may have diverted managements’ attention from the core business of the respective companies and other opportunities that could have been beneficial to the respective companies. These disruptions could be exacerbated by a delay in the completion of the merger or termination of the merger agreement and could have an adverse effect on the business, financial results or stock prices of Royal Gold or Battle Mountain if the merger is not completed or on Royal Gold if the merger is completed after significant delay.

If the proposed merger is not completed, Royal Gold and Battle Mountain will have incurred substantial costs that may adversely affect Royal Gold’s and Battle Mountain’s financial results and operations, the prices of Royal Gold common stock and Battle Mountain common stock could be negatively impacted, and there can be no assurance that Battle Mountain will continue to operate its business in the manner in which it is presently operated.

 

Royal Gold and Battle Mountain have incurred and will continue to incur substantial costs in connection with the proposed merger. These costs are primarily associated with the fees of attorneys, accountants and financial advisors. If the merger is not completed for any reason, Royal Gold and Battle Mountain will have incurred significant costs, including the diversion of management resources, for which they will have received little or no benefit.

 

In addition, if the merger is not completed, Royal Gold and Battle Mountain may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and Royal Gold’s and Battle Mountain’s collaborative partners and employees. Each of these factors may adversely affect the trading price of Royal Gold common stock and/or Battle Mountain common stock or Royal Gold’s and/or Battle Mountain’s financial results and operations. The price of Royal Gold common stock and Battle Mountain common stock may also decline to the extent that the current market price of Royal Gold common stock and Battle Mountain common stock reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed. In addition, if the merger is not completed, there can be no assurance that Battle Mountain will continue to operate its business in the manner in which it is presently operated. Battle Mountain’s lenders have security interests in most of Battle Mountain’s assets. If Battle Mountain is unable to pay its debt as it becomes due, its lenders may foreclose on Battle Mountain’s assets.

 

Royal Gold beneficially owns over 50% of Battle Mountain’s common stock and could become a controlling stockholder of Battle Mountain.

 

Royal Gold owns 16,189,834 shares of Battle Mountain common stock, has options to acquire approximately an additional 17,774,192 shares of Battle Mountain common stock, and has the right to convert the outstanding amounts as of September 20, 2007 on a convertible loan to Battle Mountain into an additional 25,157,880 shares of Battle Mountain common stock, giving Royal Gold beneficial ownership of over 50% of Battle Mountain’s issued and outstanding common stock as of September 14 2007. If Royal Gold exercised its options and conversion rights, Royal Gold would become a controlling stockholder of Battle Mountain and stockholders of Battle Mountain would not be able to affect the outcome of any stockholder vote. As a result, Royal Gold would control all matters affecting Battle Mountain, including the composition of Battle Mountain’s board of directors and, through it, determinations with respect to Battle Mountain’s business direction and policies, including the appointment and removal of officers, any determinations with respect to the merger of Battle Mountain with it or another entity, or Battle Mountain’s acquisition or disposition of assets. Concentration of voting power in Royal Gold could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control or other business combination that some Battle Mountain stockholders might consider beneficial. Furthermore, the effect of Royal Gold exercising its conversion rights would be to dilute Battle Mountain’s stockholders’ ownership and reduce earnings per share, as well as reduce the per share consideration payable to Battle Mountain stockholders in the merger.

 

The combined company will operate on a broader geographical scope than either Royal Gold or Battle Mountain has operated individually, and will be exposed to a broader range of political, social and geographical risks than either company has been exposed to on an individual basis.

 

Royal Gold owns royalty interests in projects in a number of foreign countries, including Argentina, Burkina Faso, Chile, Finland, Mexico and Russia. Battle Mountain also has royalty interests in projects in foreign countries, including Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Canada, Colombia, Honduras, Mexico and Nicaragua. Accordingly, the business of the combined company is subject to the risks normally associated with conducting business in foreign countries, including controls and currency fluctuations, limitations on repatriation of earnings, foreign taxation, foreign environmental laws and enforcement, expropriation or nationalization of property, labor practices and disputes, and uncertain political and economic environments in a broader geographical scope than either company individually had been previously exposed.

The combined company presence in a broader geographic region will expose the combined company to greater market risks resulting from fluctuating currency exchange rates over a broader geographic region. The combined company will generally be less profitable when the U.S. dollar weakens in relation to the foreign currencies of the countries in which Royal Gold and Battle Mountain have royalty interests that are not paid in US Dollars. Royal Gold does not currently implement currency hedges, but may do so in the future. However, its hedging strategies may not be successful, and any of its un-hedged foreign exchange payments will continue to be subject to market fluctuations.

 

There can be no assurance that Royal Gold uncovered every item that could have a material adverse effect on the combined company.

 

Although Royal Gold conducted business, financial and legal due diligence in connection with the proposed merger transaction, there can be no assurance that due diligence will uncover every item, including relating to Battle Mountain’s financial statements, that could have a material adverse effect on the combined company. For example, Royal Gold has not been able to confirm each accounting item in Battle Mountain’s financial statements. Accordingly, there may be matters involving Battle Mountain and its financial statements that were not identified during Royal Gold’s due diligence. In addition, there may also be issues that Royal Gold did identify that may not be resolved prior to the effective time of the merger. Any of these issues, if left undiscovered and unresolved, could materially and adversely affect the combined company’s financial condition.

 

The royalty interests to be acquired in the merger may not produce anticipated royalty revenues and the combined company may not produce anticipated results.

 

The principal assets of Battle Mountain include royalty interests on a project not yet in production. Royal Gold and Battle Mountain entered into the merger agreement because each believes that the transaction will be beneficial to Royal Gold, Battle Mountain and their respective stockholders based on Battle Mountain’s anticipated royalty revenues. The success of the merger is based on Royal Gold’s and Battle Mountain’s ability to make accurate assumptions regarding the valuation and timing and amount of royalty payments, particularly with respect to royalties on a project not yet in production. If the operator of the project does not bring the project into production and operate in accordance with feasibility studies, the royalty interests acquired in the merger transaction may not yield royalty revenues or sufficient royalty revenues to be profitable. The failure of these projects to produce anticipated royalty revenues may materially and adversely affect the combined company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Resales of shares of Royal Gold common stock following the transaction and future issuances of equity or equity-linked securities by Royal Gold may cause the market price of shares of Royal Gold common stock to fall.

 

As of June 30, 2007, Royal Gold had approximately 28,663,756 shares of common stock outstanding and approximately 1,037,906 shares authorized for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, the vesting of restricted stock subject to achieving certain performance goals or continued service, or reserved for future issuance under Royal Gold’s equity compensation plans. Under the terms of the merger agreement Royal Gold could issue up to approximately 1.63 million shares of common stock in connection with the merger transaction assuming all Battle Mountain stockholders make a Stock Election and Royal Gold’s stock price is less than $29.00. The issuance of the shares in the merger transaction and the sale of additional shares that may become eligible for sale in the public market from time to time upon the exercise of options could have the effect of depressing the market price for shares of Royal Gold common stock.

 

Risks Related to Battle Mountain

 

Battle Mountain is currently subject to the risks described below. The risks below should be considered along with the other information included or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.

 

There are risks associated with relying on Battle Mountain’s historical financial statements.

 

Battle Mountain was required by the SEC to restate its financial statements for certain accounting and financial reporting matters during the first calendar quarter of 2007. Further, Battle Mountain’s auditors included a going

concern emphasis of a matter paragraph in their March 28, 2007 opinion on Battle Mountain’s financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 stating that there were factors that raised substantial doubt as to Battle Mountain’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Battle Mountain’s auditors previously issued going concern opinions on its financial statements.

 

In its reports dated March 28, 2007 and March 11, 2006, Chisholm, Bierwolf & Nilson, LLC, expressed an opinion that there is substantial doubt about Battle Mountain’s ability to continue as a going concern based on Battle Mountain’s history of operating losses since inception and Battle Mountain’s dependence on third-party financing. Battle Mountain’s financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty. The accompanying financial statements of Battle Mountain were prepared assuming that Battle Mountain will continue as a going concern. In spite of Battle Mountain’s recent financing activities, and availability of certain cash resources, its continuation as a going concern will continue to be dependent upon future events, including third party debt and equity financing and revenues generated from its acquired royalty assets. If Battle Mountain is unable to continue as a going concern, investors may lose their entire investment.

 

Battle Mountain heavily depends on Mark Kucher.

 

The success of Battle Mountain depends upon the personal efforts and abilities of Mark Kucher. Mark Kucher serves as a director, Chairman of the Board and Battle Mountain’s Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to an employment agreement. Mr. Kucher and Battle Mountain may voluntarily terminate the employment agreement at any time. The loss of Mr. Kucher could have a material adverse effect on Battle Mountain’s business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, the absence of Mr. Kucher will force Battle Mountain to seek a replacement who may have less experience or who may not understand Battle Mountain’s business as well, or Battle Mountain may not be able to find a suitable replacement.

 

Battle Mountain is involved in an industry that is inherently speculative and risky.

 

Because of the inherently speculative and risky nature of the mining industry, Battle Mountain could be negatively impacted by many factors in the mining industry, and specifically the mining companies, mining properties and ventures upon which Battle Mountain relies to derive its royalty payments. Such factors may include: political risk in the countries in which the properties are located from which Battle Mountain derives royalty payments, labor disputes at the mine sites at such properties, a decline in the price of gold, significant environmental or regulatory restrictions, insufficient reserves, and natural disasters such as floods or earthquakes, among other factors, and as a result investors could lose their entire investment.

 

Battle Mountain has had negative cash flows from operations.

 

Battle Mountain’s past and current operations have not been sufficient to fund its cash needs. As a result of this deficiency, Battle Mountain has been dependent on sales of its equity securities and debt financing to meet its cash requirements.

 

Battle Mountain’s operations may not be sufficient to meet its current obligations.

 

At December 31, 2006, Battle Mountain had a working capital deficiency, primarily related to its entry into short-term financing arrangements used to fund the purchase of certain gold royalty assets. In particular, as of December 31, 2006 Battle Mountain was required to pay off its bridge loan facility of $4,000,000 plus accrued interest on March 31, 2007. As discussed, Battle Mountain successfully refinanced its bridge loan facility with a portion of the proceeds received from Royal Gold.

 

As of December 31, 2006, Battle Mountain also had current obligations related to its gold facility of approximately $1,500,000 (assuming a spot gold price of $635.70 per ounce). Battle Mountain has only recently commenced operations that generate cash flow. There is no assurance that these operations will be sufficient to meet its current and short-term cash needs. Battle Mountain may need to raise additional capital through debt or equity financing arrangements in the event that:

 

 

 

The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events could adversely affect Battle Mountain’s ability to meet its business plans.

 

Battle Mountain will depend almost exclusively on outside capital to pay for any further royalty interest acquisitions or to increase its existing royalty interests. Such outside capital may include the sale of additional stock and/or commercial borrowing. Capital may not continue to be available, if necessary, to meet any further acquisition costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to Battle Mountain. The issuance of additional equity securities by Battle Mountain would result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of its current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase Battle Mountain’s liabilities and future cash commitments.

 

If Battle Mountain is unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to it, it may be unable to continue its business and as a result may be required to scale back or cease operations, the result of which would be that its stockholders would lose some or all of their investment.

 

A decline in the price of Battle Mountain’s common stock could affect its ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact its operations.

 

A prolonged decline in the price of Battle Mountain’s common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of its common stock and a reduction in its ability to raise capital. Because Battle Mountain’s operations have been primarily financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of its common stock could be especially detrimental to its liquidity and its continued operations. Any reduction in its ability to raise equity capital in the future would force it to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect on its business plans and operations, including its ability to acquire further royalty assets and continue its current operations. If Battle Mountain’s stock price declines, it may not be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet its obligations.

 

Battle Mountain has a history of losses and fluctuating operating results.

 

From inception through December 31, 2006, Battle Mountain has accumulated a comprehensive deficit of $4,659,840. Battle Mountain’s loss from operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 was $2,100,364. There is no assurance that Battle Mountain will operate profitably or will generate positive cash flow in the future. In addition, Battle Mountain’s operating results in the future may be subject to significant fluctuations due to many factors not within its control, most important of which is the prevailing market price of gold. If Battle Mountain cannot generate positive cash flows in the future, or raise sufficient financing to continue its operations, Battle Mountain may be forced to scale down or even close its operations.

 

Battle Mountain has a limited operating history and if Battle Mountain is not successful in continuing to grow its business, then it may have to scale back or even cease its ongoing business operations.

 

Prior to May 2006, Battle Mountain had no history of revenues from operations and, until recently, had no significant tangible assets. Battle Mountain has yet to generate positive earnings and there can be no assurance that it will ever operate profitably. Battle Mountain has a limited operating history and until recently was considered a development stage company for financial reporting purposes. The success of Battle Mountain is significantly dependent on a successful acquisition program. Battle Mountain’s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. If Battle Mountain’s business plan is not successful, and it is unable to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in Battle Mountain.

Battle Mountain owns passive interests in mining properties, and it is difficult or impossible for Battle Mountain to ensure properties are operated in its best interest.

 

All of Battle Mountain’s revenue will be derived from royalties on properties operated by third parties. The holder of a royalty interest typically has no executive authority regarding development or operation of a mineral property, therefore, Battle Mountain is not in control of basic decisions regarding development or operation of any of the properties in which its holds a royalty interest, and Battle Mountain has limited or no legal rights to influence those decisions.

 

Battle Mountain’s strategy of having others operate properties in which it retains a royalty or other passive interest puts it generally at risk to the decisions of others regarding all basic operating matters, including permitting, feasibility analysis, mine design and operation, processing, plant and equipment matters, and temporary or permanent suspension of operations, among others. These decisions may be motivated by the best interests of the operator rather than to maximize royalties. Although Battle Mountain attempts to secure contractual rights that will permit it to protect its interests, there can be no assurance that such rights will always be available or sufficient, or that its efforts will be successful in achieving timely or favorable results or in affecting the operations of the properties in which it has royalty interests in ways that would be beneficial to its stockholders.

 

Decreases in prices of precious metals would reduce Battle Mountain’s royalty revenues.

 

The profitability of precious metals mining operations (and thus the value of Battle Mountain’s royalty interests and exploration properties) is directly related to the market price of precious metals. The market price of various precious metals fluctuates widely and is affected by numerous factors beyond the control of any mining company. These factors include industrial and jewelry fabrication demand, expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and other currencies, interest rates, gold sales and loans by central banks, forward sales by gold producers, global or regional political, economic or banking crises, and a number of other factors. If the market price of precious metals should drop, Battle Mountain’s royalty revenues would also drop. In addition, if the price of gold drops dramatically, Battle Mountain might not be able to recover its investment in royalty interests or properties. The selections of a royalty investment or of a property for exploration or development, the determination to construct a mine and place it into production, and the dedication of funds necessary to achieve such purposes are decisions that must be made long before the first revenues from production will be received. Price fluctuations between the time that such decisions are made and the commencement of production can have a material adverse effect on the economics of a mine, and can eliminate or have a material adverse impact on the value of royalty interests.

 

The volatility in the gold price is illustrated by the following table, which sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low prices in U.S. dollars per ounce of gold, based on the London PM fix.

 

Gold Price Per Ounce ($)

 

Battle Mountain’s revenues are subject to operational risks of the mining industry.

 

Although Battle Mountain is not required to pay operating costs, its financial results are subject to all of the hazards and risks normally associated with developing and operating mining properties. These risks include:

 

(a) insufficient ore reserves;

 

(b) fluctuations in production costs that may make mining of ore uneconomic;

 

(c) declines in the price of gold;

 

(d) significant environmental and other regulatory restrictions;

 

(e) labor disputes;

 

(f) geological problems;

 

(g) pit walls or tailings dam failures;

 

(h) natural catastrophes such as floods or earthquakes;

 

(i) political risks associated with operations in developing countries; and

 

(j) the risk of injury to persons, property or the environment.

 

Operating cost increases can have a negative effect on the value of and income from Battle Mountain’s royalty interests, and may cause an operator to curtail, delay or close operations at a mine site.

 

Estimates of reserves and mineralization by the operators of mines in which Battle Mountain has royalty interests are subject to significant estimates which can change.

 

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating proven and probable reserves and mineralization, including many factors beyond Battle Mountain’s control or that of the operators of the mineral properties in which it has a royalty interest. Reserve estimates on Battle Mountain’s royalty interests are prepared by the operators of the mining properties, and Battle Mountain does not participate in the preparation of such reports. The estimation of reserves and of other mineralization is a subjective process and the accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production, and the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may cause revision of such estimates. The volume and grade of reserves recovered and rates of production may be less than anticipated. Assumptions about prices are subject to great uncertainty and the gold price has fluctuated widely in the past. Declines in the market price of gold or other precious metals also may render reserves or mineralization containing relatively lower grades of ore uneconomic to exploit. Changes in operating and capital costs and other factors including short-term operating factors, such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different ore grades, may materially and adversely affect reserves.

 

Battle Mountain may be unable to acquire additional royalty interests.

 

Battle Mountain’s future success depends upon its ability to acquire royalty interests to replace depleting reserves and to diversify its royalty portfolio. Battle Mountain anticipates that most of its revenues will be derived from royalty interests that it acquires or finances, rather than through exploration and development of properties. In addition, Battle Mountain faces competition in the acquisition of royalty interests. If Battle Mountain is unable to successfully acquire additional royalties, the reserves on properties currently covered by its royalties will decline as reserves are mined.

 

The mining industry is subject to significant environmental risks.

 

Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production. Laws and regulations in the United States and abroad intended to ensure the protection of the environment are constantly changing and generally are becoming more restrictive and costly. Insurance against environmental risks (including potential

liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) is not generally available to the companies within the mining industry, such as the operators of the mines in which Battle Mountain holds a royalty interest, at a reasonable price. If an operator is forced to incur significant costs to comply with environmental regulations or becomes subject to environmental restrictions that limit its ability to continue or expand operations, it could reduce Battle Mountain’s royalty revenues. To the extent that Battle Mountain becomes subject to environmental liabilities for the time period during which it was operating properties, the satisfaction of any liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available to it and could have a material adverse effect on Battle Mountain’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

If title to the properties is not properly maintained by the operators, Battle Mountain’s royalty revenues may be decreased.

 

The validity of and title to mining claims and concessions, which constitute a significant portion of the properties on which Battle Mountain holds royalties, is often uncertain and subject to contest. Mining claims and concessions are generally considered subject to greater title risk than real property interests that are owned in fee simple.

 

Battle Mountain’s bylaws contain provisions indemnifying its officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses incurred by them.

 

Battle Mountain’s bylaws contain provisions with respect to the indemnification of its officers and directors against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, actually and reasonably incurred by him, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment in a civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been one of Battle Mountain’s directors or officers.

 

Investors’ interests in Battle Mountain will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share if Battle Mountain issues additional shares or raises funds through the sale of equity securities.

 

Battle Mountain’s organizational documents authorize the issuance of 200,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001. In the event that Battle Mountain is required to issue any additional shares or enter into private placements to raise financing through the sale of equity securities, investors’ interests in Battle Mountain will be diluted and investors may suffer dilution in their net book value per share depending on the price at which such securities are sold. If Battle Mountain issues any such additional shares, such issuances also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other shareholders. Further, any such issuance may result in a change in control.

 

Battle Mountain’s bylaws do not contain anti-takeover provisions which could result in a change of its management and directors if there is a take-over of Battle Mountain.

 

Battle Mountain does not currently have a shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in its By-laws. Without any anti-takeover provisions, there is no deterrent for a take-over of Battle Mountain, which may result in a change in its management and directors.

 

Because some of Battle Mountain’s directors and officers are residents of Canada, investors may find it difficult to enforce, within the United States, any judgments obtained against these directors and officers.

 

Some of Battle Mountain’s directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against Battle Mountain or its officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.

The market price of Battle Mountain’s common stock historically has been volatile.

 

The market price of Battle Mountain’s common stock historically has fluctuated significantly based on, but not limited to, such factors as: general stock market trends, announcements of developments related to its business, actual or anticipated variations in its operating results, its inability to generate revenues, and conditions and trends in the mining industry, including the mineral exploration, development and production segments of such industry.

 

Battle Mountain’s common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. In recent years the stock market in general has experienced extreme price fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies. Similarly, the market price of Battle Mountain’s common stock may fluctuate significantly based upon factors unrelated or disproportionate to its operating performance. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions or interest rates may adversely affect the market price of Battle Mountain’s common stock.

 

Battle Mountain’s common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC which limits the trading in the market of its common stock, makes transactions in its common stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in its common stock.

 

The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Battle Mountain’s securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors.” The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade Battle Mountain’s securities. Battle Mountain believes that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of its common stock.

 

In addition, various state securities laws impose restrictions on transferring “penny stocks” and as a result, investors in Battle Mountain’s common stock may have the ability to sell their shares of common stock impaired.

 

Battle Mountain has not paid any cash dividends.

 

Battle Mountain has paid no cash dividends on its common stock to date and it is not anticipated that any cash dividends will be paid to holders of its common stock in the foreseeable future. While Battle Mountain’s dividend policy will be based on the operating results and capital needs of the business, it is anticipated that any earnings will be retained to finance the future expansion of Battle Mountain.

 

NASD sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell Battle Mountain’s common stock.

 

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the NASD has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-

institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the NASD believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The NASD requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy Battle Mountain’s common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell Battle Mountain’s stock and have an adverse effect on the market for Battle Mountain’s common stock.

 

Trading in Battle Mountain’s common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board is limited and sporadic, making it difficult for stockholders to sell their shares or liquidate their investments.

 

Battle Mountain’s common stock is currently listed for public trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. The trading price of Battle Mountain’s common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of Battle Mountain’s common shares may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond its control. The stock market has generally experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by Battle Mountain’s common shares will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of Battle Mountain’s common stock, regardless of its operating performance.

 

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for Battle Mountain and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

 

SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain or may contain certain forward-looking statements and information relating to Royal Gold or Battle Mountain that are based on our beliefs and assumptions as well as information currently available to the management of Royal Gold or Battle Mountain. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made by Royal Gold from time to time in filings with the SEC or otherwise. The words “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” and “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement is made. These statements are included or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. Such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding projected production and reserves from feasibility studies or received from the operators of Royal Gold’s or Battle Mountain’s royalty properties. In addition to other factors described elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, among others:

 

 

 

Forward-looking statements inherently are subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements. Statements in this proxy statement/prospectus, including those set forth in “Risk Factors,” describe factors, among others, that could contribute to or cause such differences. Royal Gold and Battle Mountain disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statement made herein. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

 

BATTLE MOUNTAIN’S SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

This section contains information for Battle Mountain stockholders about Battle Mountain’s special meeting of stockholders that Battle Mountain has called to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger transaction. Together with this document, Battle Mountain is also sending you a notice of the special meeting and a form of proxy that is being solicited by the Battle Mountain board of directors for use at the special meeting. The information and instructions contained in this section are addressed to Battle Mountain stockholders and all references to “you” in this section should be understood to be addressed to Battle Mountain stockholders.

 

Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting

 

This document is being furnished by the Battle Mountain board of directors in connection with the solicitation of proxies from holders of Battle Mountain common stock for use at Battle Mountain’s special meeting of stockholders to be held on October 24, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. local time at the offices of Clark Wilson LLP, 800-855 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3H1, Canada, and at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.

 

Purpose of the Special Meeting

 

Battle Mountain’s special meeting of stockholders will be held to consider and vote upon:

 

 

Record Date and Outstanding Shares

 

Battle Mountain’s board of directors has fixed the close of business on September 26, 2007 as the record date. Only holders of record of Battle Mountain common stock on the books of Battle Mountain as of the close of business on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the special meeting. As of September 14, 2007 there were 83,120,317 shares of Battle Mountain common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote held by approximately 51 stockholders of record. The number of record holders does not include persons whose stock is held in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.

Quorum Requirement

 

Under Battle Mountain’s amended and restated bylaws, one-third of the outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the special meeting. Votes of stockholders of record who are present at the special meeting in person or by proxy, abstentions and broker non-votes (as defined below) are counted as present or represented at the special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists.

 

If a quorum is not obtained, or if fewer shares of Battle Mountain common stock are voted in favor of the proposal for the approval and adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting than the number of shares necessary to approve the proposal, Battle Mountain may seek to adjourn the special meeting to allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies or votes. At any subsequent reconvening of the special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as those proxies would have been voted at the original convening of the special meeting, except for any proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn before the reconvened special meeting.

 

References to the Battle Mountain special meeting in this document are to that special meeting as adjourned or postponed.

 

Votes Required

 

Each holder of Battle Mountain common stock will be entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share of Battle Mountain common stock registered in the stockholder’s name on the books of Battle Mountain as of the record date on any matter submitted for the vote of Battle Mountain stockholders. The proposal for the approval and adoption of the merger agreement will be approved if holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock as of the record date are voted in favor of the proposal. If the proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting to permit the solicitation of additional proxies is presented for a vote, it will be approved, whether or not there is a quorum, if a majority of the Battle Mountain common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the special meeting are voted in favor of the adjournment proposal.

 

With respect to the proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. With respect to the proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting to permit the solicitation of additional proxies, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect. If a Battle Mountain stockholder fails to vote on the adjournment proposal, other than by abstention or broker non-vote, this will reduce the total number of shares voting with respect to the proposal and, as a result, the number of affirmative votes required to approve the proposal.

 

A “broker non-vote” may occur on a proposal when a broker is not permitted to vote on that proposal without instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares and no instruction is given by the beneficial owner. A broker is not permitted to vote on the proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement or on the proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting without instruction from the beneficial owner of the Battle Mountain shares held by the broker.

 

Each of the directors and officers have agreed to vote in favor of the proposal for the approval and adoption of the merger agreement. See “Battle Mountain’s Special Meeting of Stockholders — Shares Beneficially Owned as of the Record Date” below for more information.

 

Shares Beneficially Owned as of the Record Date

 

Shares Owned by Directors and Officers of Battle Mountain.  Based on the number of shares of Battle Mountain common stock issued and outstanding as of September 14, 2007, the directors and executive officers of Battle Mountain and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially own approximately 22,124,192 shares of Battle Mountain common stock, representing approximately 25.42% of the outstanding Battle Mountain common stock entitled to be voted at the special meeting. Battle Mountain’s directors and officers have agreed to vote their shares of Battle Mountain common stock in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement.

 

Shares Owned by Royal Gold.  Royal Gold beneficially owns 63,471,906 shares of Battle Mountain common stock (of which 16,189,734 are owned of record) representing approximately 56.58% of the outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock, as a result of the option and support agreements, the irrevocable proxies given to Royal Gold and bridge finance facility agreement as described further in this proxy statement/prospectus. Royal Gold has agreed to limit its voting with respect to these shares as described further in this section and further in this proxy statement/prospectus.

 

In anticipation of the merger transaction, on March 5, 2007, Royal Gold obtained a binding support agreement and option to purchase from Mark Kucher, Chairman of Battle Mountain, his shares of common stock of Battle Mountain. The support agreement with Mr. Kucher also provides that Mr. Kucher will vote for and support the merger transaction. Royal Gold also obtained irrevocable proxies, dated June 27, 2007, from David Atkinson, Chief Financial Officer of Battle Mountain, and each of the non-employee directors of Battle Mountain, Robert Connochie, Anthony E.W. Crews, Brian M. Labadie and Christopher E Herald, to vote in favor of the merger and against any proposal made in opposition to or in competition with, the consummation of the merger. As a result of the support agreement with Mr. Kucher, and the irrevocable proxies with Messrs. Atkinson, Connochie, Crews, Labadie and Herald, Royal Gold beneficially owns 22,124,192 shares of Battle Mountain common stock or 25.42% of the outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock.

 

Royal Gold also obtained a binding support agreement and option to purchase from IAMGOLD its shares of common stock of Battle Mountain, including shares of Battle Mountain common stock that IAMGOLD may acquire upon the conversion of a convertible debenture of Battle Mountain Gold (Canada) Inc., a subsidiary of Battle Mountain. On September 4, 2007, pursuant to the option and support agreement with IAMGOLD, Royal Gold issued 216,642 shares of its common stock to IAMGOLD and Repadre in connection with Royal Gold’s purchase of 12,102,940 shares of Battle Mountain common stock from IAMGOLD and Repadre and paid $2,242,002 in cash to IAMGOLD in connection with the purchase of the convertible debenture for IAMGOLD. On September 5, 2007, Royal Gold exercised its option to convert all of the outstanding principal and accrued interest as of September 4, 2007 under the convertible debenture into Battle Mountain common stock, for an aggregate of 4,086,794 shares of Battle Mountain common stock.

 

Battle Mountain has entered into a bridge finance facility agreement with Royal Gold whereby Royal Gold has agreed to make available to Battle Mountain and BMGX (Barbados) Corporation, Battle Mountain’s wholly-owned subsidiary, up to $20 million, which availability was reduced to $15 million on April 14, 2007 pursuant to the terms of the bridge facility. The bridge facility will mature on June 6, 2008. Outstanding principal, interest and expenses under the bridge facility may be converted at Royal Gold’s option into Battle Mountain common stock at a conversion price per share of $0.60 at any time during the term of the bridge facility provided Royal Gold gives notice of its election to convert on or before April 4, 2008. As of September 20, 2007, $15,094,728, of principal and accrued interest, was outstanding on the bridge facility. Based on the right to convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest under the bridge facility, Royal Gold beneficially owns approximately 25,157,880 shares of Battle Mountain common stock or 23.23% of the outstanding shares of Battle Mountain common stock.

 

On March 28, 2007, Royal Gold and Battle Mountain entered into a Voting Limitation Agreement pursuant to which Royal Gold agreed to limit its voting with respect to Battle Mountain common stock over which it had or could acquire voting power. Generally, Royal Gold agreed that, in the event of a superior proposal as defined in the merger agreement, under certain circumstances, Royal Gold would not vote more than 39.9% of the total number of shares of Battle Mountain common stock entitled to vote in favor of the merger transaction with Royal Gold or in opposition to a competing transaction.

 

See “Relationship with Battle Mountain” on page 73 for more information regarding Royal Gold’s agreements relating to Battle Mountain.

 

Voting at the Special Meeting

 

If you are a Battle Mountain stockholder of record on the record date and you attend the special meeting, you may vote in person by completing a ballot at the special meeting even if you already have signed, dated and returned a proxy card or you have submitted a vote by telephone or through the Internet. If your shares are held in the name of

a broker or nominee, you may not vote your shares in person at the special meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares.

 

Proxies

 

Voting instructions are attached to your proxy card. If you properly submit your proxy to Computershare Trust Company, N.A. in time to vote, one of the individuals named as your proxy will vote your shares as you have directed. You may vote for or against any or all of the proposals submitted at Battle Mountain’s special meeting of stockholders or abstain from voting.

 

1. How to Vote by Proxy.  If your shares are registered in your name, you may vote by mail using the proxy card attached hereto, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. You may also vote by submitting your proxy by telephone or through the Internet by following the telephone or Internet voting instructions that are included with your proxy card.

 

Only the latest dated proxy received from you, whether by mail, telephone or Internet, will be voted at the special meeting. If you vote by telephone or Internet, please do not mail your proxy form.

 

If your shares are held in “street name” (through a broker, bank or other nominee), you may receive a separate voting instruction form with voting instructions, or you may need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote electronically using the telephone or Internet.

 

A Battle Mountain stockholder whose shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee should follow the instructions provided by that broker or nominee on how to direct the voting of the stockholder’s shares.

 

2. How Proxies will be Voted.  All Battle Mountain common stock represented by proxies properly executed and received by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. before or at the special meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxies. If the proxy is properly completed, signed and returned but no instructions are indicated, the shares will be voted:

 

 

Battle Mountain common stock represented by a proxy that has been returned with instructions to vote against the proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement but which does not include instructions with respect to the adjournment proposal will not be voted in favor of the adjournment proposal.

 

3. Revoking Your Proxy.  You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:

 

 

 

If you have instructed your broker to vote your shares, you must follow directions you receive from your broker in order to change or revoke your vote.

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

Battle Mountain will pay the expenses incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this document. Battle Mountain will request banks, brokers and other intermediaries holding Battle Mountain common shares

beneficially owned by others to send this document to, and obtain proxies from, the beneficial owners and will reimburse holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, email and other electronic means, advertisements and personal solicitation by the directors, officers and employees of Battle Mountain. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers or employees for such solicitation efforts.

 

Other Business

 

The Battle Mountain board of directors currently is not aware of any business to be acted upon at the special meeting other than as described in this document. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting, in the absence of instructions to the contrary, persons appointed as proxies will have discretion to vote or act on those matters in their best judgment.

 

Communications by Battle Mountain Stockholders with Battle Mountain

 

Any written revocation of a proxy or other communications in connection with this document and requests for additional copies of this document or the proxy card should be addressed to Battle Mountain at One East Liberty Street, Sixth Floor, Suite 9, Reno, NV 89504, phone number (775) 686-6081.

 

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ROYAL GOLD

 

We are providing the following selected financial information to assist you in analyzing the financial aspects of the merger. The selected Royal Gold financial data set forth below are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements, and related notes contained in the annual, quarterly and other reports filed by Royal Gold with the SEC, which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 100.

 

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial data derived from Royal Gold’s consolidated financial statements for each of the five fiscal years in the periods ended June 30, 2003 to June 30, 2007, which have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Royal Gold’s independent registered public accountants. The following summary consolidated financial data should be read together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Royal Gold’s consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information contained in Royal Gold’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. Royal Gold derived the summary consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 from its audited consolidated financial statements. The audit report related to the audited consolidated financial statements for years ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future.

 

Statement of Operations Data

 

Balance Sheet Data

 

 

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA, COMBINED, CONDENSED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ROYAL GOLD

 

The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information as of June 30, 2007 and for the year then ended is presented to show the results of operations and financial position of Royal Gold as if the merger with Battle Mountain had occurred as of July 1, 2006, and as of the balance sheet date, June 30, 2007, as applicable.

 

This unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the selected historical financial information included in this proxy statement/prospectus and the financial statements of Royal Gold and accompanying notes that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus and the financial statements of Battle Mountain included in this proxy statement/prospectus. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information as an indication of the results of operations or financial position that would have been achieved if the merger with Battle Mountain had taken place on the dates indicated. It should be noted that Battle Mountain has historically reported its financial results on a calendar year basis. Royal Gold management compiled the Battle Mountain historical financial information from Quarterly and Annual Reports filed with the SEC in order to conform them to Royal Gold’s June 30 fiscal year presentation.

 

The following Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Data of Royal Gold consists of an Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007 and Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statements of Operations for the year then ended (collectively, the “Pro Forma Statements”). The Pro Forma Statements reflect the Battle Mountain acquisition described herein under each of the following two forms of consideration available to shareholders of Battle Mountain: (i) cash consideration up to an aggregate of $50,359,928, which is equal to approximately $0.55 per share of Battle Mountain common stock or (ii) between an aggregate of 1,570,507 and 1,634,410 shares of Royal Gold common stock, which is equal to 0.0172 or 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common stock per share of Battle Mountain common stock, in each case assuming 91,563,506 shares of Battle Mountain common stock outstanding at the time of the closing. If the average price per share of Royal Gold common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the five day trading period up to and including the second day preceding (but not including) the closing date of the merger is less than $29.00, the per share stock consideration will be determined based on an aggregate of 1,634,410 shares of Royal Gold common stock and the holders of shares of Battle Mountain common stock would receive 0.0179 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock. If the average price of Royal Gold common stock is $30.18 or above, the per share stock consideration will be determined based on an aggregate of 1,570,507 shares of Royal Gold common stock and the holders of shares of Battle Mountain common stock would receive 0.0172 shares of Royal Gold common stock for each share of Battle Mountain common stock. If the average closing price is greater than or equal to $29.00 but less than $30.18, the per share consideration for each share of Battle Mountain common stock would be proportionally adjusted based on the average price of Royal Gold common stock, using $47,397,901 as the aggregate purchase price. Total consideration ranges from approximately $57.8 million (assumes 100% stock consideration) to $67.2 million (assumes 100% cash consideration), including approximately $14.8 million of cash bridge financing provided and including estimated acquisition costs of approximately $2.0 million. The actual purchase price may differ based on (i) each Battle Mountain stockholder’s election as to whether to receive cash or Royal Gold common stock in the merger and (ii) fluctuations in the price of Royal Gold common stock.

 

Royal Gold management believes that, on the basis set forth herein, the Pro Forma Statements reflect a reasonable estimate of the Battle Mountain acquisition based on currently available information. The acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and the allocation of purchase price will be based upon the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Certain of the purchase price allocations reflected in the Pro Forma Statements are preliminary and may be different from the final allocation of the purchase price and such differences may be material.

The following Pro Forma Statements reflect an assumption that all Battle Mountain stockholders elect to receive cash in the merger.

 

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2007
Assumes 100% Cash Purchase Consideration

 

 

Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2007
Assumes 100% Cash Purchase Consideration

 

 

The following adjustments have been reflected in the Pro Forma Statements (assuming an all cash transaction):

 

 

 

 

 

Cash consideration		$	50,359,928	(a)
Bridge financing advanced			14,823,236
Estimated transaction costs			2,000,000
Total purchase price		$	67,183,164

 

 

Current assets		$	6,397,149
Royalty interests in mineral properties			60,875,691
Deferred tax assets			1,597,022
Current liabilities			(111,040	)
Deferred and other tax liabilities			(12,724,959	)
Gold loan payable			(4,704,219	)
Employment agreements payable			(4,073,630	)
Goodwill			19,927,150	(b)
Total purchase price		$	67,183,164