e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4879
Diebold, Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0183970 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio
|
|
44720-8077 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of July 22, 2011 was 64,206,266.
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
278,740 |
|
|
$ |
328,658 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
261,229 |
|
|
|
273,123 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $25,492
and $24,868, respectively |
|
|
446,402 |
|
|
|
404,501 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
496,864 |
|
|
|
444,575 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
101,982 |
|
|
|
106,160 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
29,609 |
|
|
|
32,111 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
175,605 |
|
|
|
124,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,790,431 |
|
|
|
1,714,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and other investments |
|
|
74,928 |
|
|
|
76,138 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
668,940 |
|
|
|
646,235 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
466,737 |
|
|
|
442,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
202,203 |
|
|
|
203,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
54,127 |
|
|
|
49,961 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
278,292 |
|
|
|
269,398 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
196,617 |
|
|
|
206,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,596,598 |
|
|
$ |
2,519,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
43,900 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
206,429 |
|
|
|
214,288 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
216,956 |
|
|
|
205,173 |
|
Payroll and other benefits liabilities |
|
|
65,297 |
|
|
|
78,515 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
275,803 |
|
|
|
296,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
808,385 |
|
|
|
809,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
644,661 |
|
|
|
550,368 |
|
Pensions and other benefits |
|
|
79,590 |
|
|
|
100,152 |
|
Postretirement and other benefits |
|
|
23,702 |
|
|
|
23,096 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
33,288 |
|
|
|
31,126 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
24,486 |
|
|
|
15,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, no par value, 1,000,000 authorized shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $1.25 par value, 125,000,000 authorized shares, 76,828,844 and 76,365,124
issued shares, 64,460,039 and 65,717,103 outstanding shares, respectively |
|
|
96,036 |
|
|
|
95,456 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
319,821 |
|
|
|
308,699 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
905,511 |
|
|
|
919,296 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost (12,368,805 and 10,648,021 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(493,513 |
) |
|
|
(435,922 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
123,453 |
|
|
|
73,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
951,308 |
|
|
|
961,155 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
31,178 |
|
|
|
28,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
982,486 |
|
|
|
989,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,596,598 |
|
|
$ |
2,519,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
273,431 |
|
|
$ |
298,884 |
|
|
$ |
523,214 |
|
|
$ |
556,629 |
|
Services |
|
|
388,951 |
|
|
|
366,296 |
|
|
|
753,325 |
|
|
|
727,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,382 |
|
|
|
665,180 |
|
|
|
1,276,539 |
|
|
|
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
204,769 |
|
|
|
221,742 |
|
|
|
393,632 |
|
|
|
414,019 |
|
Services |
|
|
288,123 |
|
|
|
265,294 |
|
|
|
564,013 |
|
|
|
534,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,892 |
|
|
|
487,036 |
|
|
|
957,645 |
|
|
|
948,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
169,490 |
|
|
|
178,144 |
|
|
|
318,894 |
|
|
|
336,154 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
122,051 |
|
|
|
110,791 |
|
|
|
243,162 |
|
|
|
209,768 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
19,375 |
|
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
38,799 |
|
|
|
34,850 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,388 |
|
|
|
131,289 |
|
|
|
284,923 |
|
|
|
248,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
|
46,855 |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
9,669 |
|
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
20,567 |
|
|
|
13,489 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,515 |
) |
|
|
(9,301 |
) |
|
|
(18,188 |
) |
|
|
(18,356 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(5,194 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
28,182 |
|
|
|
44,411 |
|
|
|
38,253 |
|
|
|
79,480 |
|
Taxes on income |
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
12,505 |
|
|
|
23,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
21,602 |
|
|
|
31,073 |
|
|
|
25,748 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
22,131 |
|
|
|
30,390 |
|
|
|
26,266 |
|
|
|
54,612 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
20,804 |
|
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
23,305 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
65,028 |
|
|
|
65,936 |
|
|
|
65,393 |
|
|
|
66,121 |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
65,482 |
|
|
|
66,636 |
|
|
|
65,842 |
|
|
|
66,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
20,275 |
|
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
22,787 |
|
|
$ |
55,308 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
20,804 |
|
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
23,305 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,266 |
|
|
$ |
54,612 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,034 |
|
|
|
36,261 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
Equity in earnings of an investee |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(1,425 |
) |
Cash flow from changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(28,284 |
) |
|
|
(97,317 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(36,452 |
) |
|
|
(35,531 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(34,952 |
) |
|
|
(34,929 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(13,392 |
) |
|
|
22,318 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
8,611 |
|
|
|
(3,462 |
) |
Certain other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(71,190 |
) |
|
|
24,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(99,974 |
) |
|
|
(17,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
139,020 |
|
|
|
157,630 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
26,761 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
Payments for purchases of investments |
|
|
(135,798 |
) |
|
|
(147,394 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(23,687 |
) |
|
|
(26,916 |
) |
Increase in certain other assets |
|
|
(9,183 |
) |
|
|
(11,769 |
) |
Collections on purchased finance receivables |
|
|
12,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
12,791 |
|
|
|
(16,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(37,090 |
) |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt borrowings |
|
|
350,679 |
|
|
|
193,438 |
|
Debt repayments |
|
|
(227,563 |
) |
|
|
(186,547 |
) |
Distribution of affiliates earnings to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
4,017 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
(57,591 |
) |
|
|
(21,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
31,064 |
|
|
|
(49,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,201 |
|
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(49,918 |
) |
|
|
(96,807 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
328,658 |
|
|
|
328,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
278,740 |
|
|
$ |
231,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Diebold, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles; however, such information reflects all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010. In addition, some of the Companys statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q may involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected future
results. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-year information to conform to the
current presentation.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) 2011-05 (ASU 2011-05), Presentation of Comprehensive Income, that eliminates the option to
present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) as part of the statement of changes in
stockholders equity. The amendments in this standard require that all non-owner changes in
stockholders equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income
or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under either method, adjustments must be displayed
for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income, in both net income and OCI. The standard
does not change the current option for presenting components of OCI gross or net of the effect of
income taxes, provided that such tax effects are presented in the statement in which OCI is
presented or disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. Additionally, the standard does
not affect the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be
applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update will not have
a material impact on the financial statements of the Company. The Company is in the process of
determining its method of presentation.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 amended Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to converge the fair
value measurement guidance in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
Some of the amendments clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements,
while other amendments change a particular principle in ASC 820. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires
additional fair value disclosures. The amendments are to be applied prospectively and are effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating the
effect that the provisions of ASU 2011-04 will have on the disclosures within the financial
statements of the Company.
6
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and
all potential dilutive common shares. Under the two-class method of computing earnings per share,
non-vested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are
considered participating securities. The Companys participating securities include restricted
stock units (RSUs), deferred shares and shares that were vested, but deferred by the employee. The
Company calculated basic and diluted earnings per share under both the treasury stock method and
the two-class method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there was no
impact in the per share amounts calculated under the two methods; therefore, the treasury stock
method is disclosed.
The following represents amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the
weighted-average number of shares of dilutive common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income used in basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
20,275 |
|
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
22,787 |
|
|
$ |
55,308 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
20,804 |
|
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
23,305 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share |
|
|
65,028 |
|
|
|
65,936 |
|
|
|
65,393 |
|
|
|
66,121 |
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share |
|
|
65,482 |
|
|
|
66,636 |
|
|
|
65,842 |
|
|
|
66,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares not used in calculating diluted weighted-average shares
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
7
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 3: EQUITY
The following tables present changes in shareholders equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
and the noncontrolling interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
947,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,358 |
|
|
$ |
961,155 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
20,804 |
|
|
|
29,731 |
|
|
|
23,305 |
|
|
|
53,655 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
33,817 |
|
|
|
(24,226 |
) |
|
|
48,491 |
|
|
|
(36,445 |
) |
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain, net on available for sale securities |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
55,950 |
|
|
|
6,337 |
|
|
|
73,132 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
2,865 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
11,122 |
|
|
|
11,108 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(36,140 |
) |
|
|
(9,773 |
) |
|
|
(57,591 |
) |
|
|
(21,128 |
) |
Dividends declared |
|
|
(18,440 |
) |
|
|
(17,981 |
) |
|
|
(37,090 |
) |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
951,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,237 |
|
|
$ |
951,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
30,254 |
|
|
$ |
25,808 |
|
|
$ |
28,659 |
|
|
$ |
25,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
31,178 |
|
|
$ |
26,581 |
|
|
$ |
31,178 |
|
|
$ |
26,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Companys share-based compensation payments to employees are recognized in the statement of
income based on their grant-date fair values during the period in which the employee is required to
provide services in exchange for the award. Share-based compensation is recognized as a component
of selling and administrative expense. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 was $3,181 and $6,617, respectively. Total share-based compensation
expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $3,139 and $6,365, respectively.
8
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2011 under the Companys 1991 Equity and
Performance Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of April 13, 2009) and changes during the
six months ended June 30, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
$ |
36.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
35.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
27.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
33.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
$ |
36.69 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
4,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
$ |
39.89 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest (2) at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
$ |
36.74 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
4,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the
Companys common shares on the last trading day of the second quarter of 2011 and the
exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30,
2011. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys common shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The options expected to vest are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate
assumption to total outstanding non-vested options. |
The following tables summarize information on non-vested RSUs, performance shares and deferred
shares for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
594 |
|
|
$ |
29.06 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
46.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
28.13 |
|
Granted |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
32.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
729 |
|
|
$ |
30.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
742 |
|
|
$ |
31.15 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
30.18 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
29.00 |
|
Granted |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
39.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
728 |
|
|
$ |
34.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Deferred Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
33.28 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
33.28 |
|
Granted |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
33.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
$ |
33.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
$ |
33.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
33.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-vested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares
granted at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout
level depending on achievement of performance share objectives. |
9
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 5: INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was 23.3
percent compared to 30.0 percent for the same period of 2010. The 6.7 percentage point decrease is
due mainly to various discrete items in the periods.
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 32.7
percent compared to 29.2 percent for the same period of 2010. The 3.5 percentage point increase is
due mainly to operating losses in certain Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) jurisdictions for
which no tax benefit is recognized, partially offset by various discrete items in the periods.
NOTE 6: INVESTMENTS
The Companys investments, primarily in Brazil, consist of certificates of deposit and U.S. dollar
indexed bond funds, which are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value based upon
quoted market prices and net asset values, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded
in OCI. Realized gains and losses are recognized in investment income and are determined using the
specific identification method. Realized (losses) gains, net from the sale of securities were
$(1,304) and $33 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized
(losses) gains, net from the sale of securities were $(1,468) and $33 for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were
$26,761 and $9,718 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company has deferred compensation plans that enable certain employees to defer receipt of a
portion of their cash or share-based compensation and non-employee directors to defer receipt of
director fees at the participants discretion. For deferred cash-based compensation, the Company
established a rabbi trust that is recorded at the fair value of the underlying securities within
securities and other investments. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair
value within other long-term liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on marketable
securities in the rabbi trust are recognized in investment income.
The Companys investments, excluding cash surrender value of insurance contracts of $66,528 and
$67,975 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
As of June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
229,532 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
229,532 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
|
(1,833 |
) |
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,062 |
|
|
$ |
(1,833 |
) |
|
$ |
261,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
52,714 |
|
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
274,420 |
|
|
$ |
(1,297 |
) |
|
$ |
273,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
8,068 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 7: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Trade Receivables The Company evaluates the collectability of trade receivables based on (1) a
percentage of sales related to historical loss experience and current trends and (2) periodic
adjustments for known events such as specific customer circumstances and changes in the aging of
accounts receivable balances. After all efforts at collection have been unsuccessful, the account
is deemed uncollectible and is written off.
Financing Receivables The Company evaluates the collectability of notes and finance lease
receivables (collectively, financing receivables) based on a specific customer circumstances,
credit risk changes and payment patterns and historical loss experience. When the collectability
is determined to be at risk based on the above criteria, the Company records the allowance for
credit losses which represents the Companys current exposure less estimated reimbursement from
insurance claims. After all efforts at collection have been unsuccessful, the account is deemed
uncollectible and is written off.
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for credit losses and recorded investment in
financing receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(5,956 |
) |
|
|
(6,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
Balance collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
1,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded investment in financing receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
117,205 |
|
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
|
$ |
133,745 |
|
Balance collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
117,205 |
|
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
|
$ |
133,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest income and any fees or costs related to financing receivables using
the effective interest method over the term of the lease or loan. The Company reviews the aging of
its financing receivables to determine past due and delinquent accounts. Credit quality is
reviewed at inception and is re-evaluated as needed based on customer specific circumstances.
Receivable balances greater than 60 days past due are reviewed and may be placed on nonaccrual
status based on customer specific circumstances. Upon receipt of payment on nonaccrual financing
receivables, interest income is recognized and accrual of interest is resumed once the account has
been made current or the specific circumstances have been resolved.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the recorded investment in past-due finance lease
receivables on nonaccrual status was $214 and $531, respectively. The recorded investment in
finance lease receivables past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest was $659 and $560 as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The recorded investment in impaired notes
receivable and the related allowance was $1,620 and $1,620, respectively, as of June 30, 2011. The
recorded investment in impaired notes receivable and the related allowance was $7,513 and $470,
respectively, as of December 31, 2010. The net investment in impaired notes receivable is expected
to be recovered from insurance claims. The following table summarizes the Companys aging of
past-due notes receivable balances as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
31-60 days past due |
|
$ |
|
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
|
|
> 90 days past due |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total past due |
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 8: INVENTORIES
Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
204,648 |
|
|
$ |
184,944 |
|
Service parts |
|
|
170,042 |
|
|
|
166,317 |
|
Raw materials and work in process |
|
|
122,174 |
|
|
|
93,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
496,864 |
|
|
$ |
444,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9: OTHER ASSETS
Included in other assets are net capitalized software development costs of $54,493 and $55,575 as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense on capitalized software
of $4,832 and $9,408 was included in product cost of sales for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, respectively, and $3,849 and $7,930 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. Other long-term assets also consist of patents, trademarks and other intangible
assets. Where applicable, other assets are stated at cost and, if applicable, are amortized ratably
over the relevant contract period or the estimated life of the assets. Fees to renew or extend the
term of the Companys intangible assets are expensed when incurred. Impairment of long-lived assets
is recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the
asset may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the
carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment loss may be recognized at that time to reduce the
asset to the lower of its fair value or its net book value.
The Company recorded $2,962 and $4,096 of intangible asset impairment charges within Diebold North
America (DNA) continuing operations in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The 2011
impairment related to a software intangible and the 2010 impairment related to customer contract
intangible assets.
Investment in Affiliate Investment in the Companys non-consolidated affiliate is accounted for
under the equity method and consists of a 50 percent ownership in Shanghai Diebold King Safe
Company, Ltd. The balance of this investment as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $12,977
and $12,118, respectively, and fluctuated based on equity earnings. Equity earnings from the
non-consolidated affiliate are included in miscellaneous, net in the condensed consolidated
statements of income and were $434 and $859 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, and $672 and $1,425 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
NOTE 10: DEBT
Outstanding debt balances were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Notes payable current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted lines of credit |
|
$ |
43,784 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Other |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,900 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Industrial development revenue bonds |
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
644,661 |
|
|
$ |
550,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit
with borrowing limits of $93,447. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings on
the short-term uncommitted lines of credit as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 2.74 and
3.01 percent, respectively. Short-term uncommitted lines mature in less than one year. The amount
available under the short-term uncommitted lines at June 30, 2011 was $49,663.
In June 2011, the Company entered into a new five-year credit facility, which replaced its existing
credit facility. The Company used borrowings of approximately $330,000 under the new credit
facility to repay all amounts outstanding under (and terminated) the
12
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
existing credit facility. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had borrowing limits under the new
credit facility totaling $500,000. Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company
has the ability, subject to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $250,000. Up to
$50,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The
weighted-average interest rate on outstanding credit facility borrowings as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was 1.26 and 2.71 percent, respectively, which is variable based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amount available under the new credit facility as of June 30,
2011 was $170,000. The Company incurred $1,733 of fees to its creditors in conjunction with the
new credit facility, which will be amortized as a component of interest expense over the term of
the facility.
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The proceeds
from the bond issuances were used to construct new manufacturing facilities in the United States.
The Company guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds by obtaining letters of
credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled to mature in 2017.
Each industrial development revenue bond carries a variable interest rate, which is reset weekly by
the remarketing agents. The weighted-average interest rate on the bonds was 0.83 and 0.57 percent
as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The Companys debt agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net debt
to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
NOTE 11: BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has pension plans covering certain U.S. employees. Plans that cover certain salaried
employees provide pension benefits based on the employees compensation during the ten years before
retirement. The Companys funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute annually based on
actuarial projections and applicable regulations. Plans covering certain hourly employees and union
members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Companys
funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by
applicable regulations. Employees of the Companys operations in countries outside of the United
States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not
significant.
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance
benefits (referred to as other benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be
entitled to these benefits based upon years of service with the Company, age at retirement and
collective bargaining agreements. Currently, the Company has made no commitments to increase these
benefits for existing retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the
future. There are no plan assets and the Company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys defined benefit
pension plans and other benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2,713 |
|
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,872 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10,184 |
) |
|
|
(9,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
$ |
4,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
15,744 |
|
|
|
15,362 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(20,367 |
) |
|
|
(19,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
5,732 |
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
There have been no significant changes to the 2011 plan year contribution amounts previously
disclosed. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, contributions of $21,500 and $13,381,
respectively, were made to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.
NOTE 12: GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The Company
guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds (refer to note 10) by obtaining
letters of credit. The carrying value of the bonds was $11,900 as of June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010.
The Company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various
financial institutions to suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the
Company is not able to make payment or fulfill contractual obligations, the suppliers, customers,
regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on the pertinent bank. At June 30, 2011, the
maximum future payment obligations related to these various guarantees totaled $77,690, of which
$22,735 represented standby letters of credit to insurance providers, and no associated liability
was recorded. At December 31, 2010, the maximum future payment obligations relative to these
various guarantees totaled $74,629, of which $23,202 represented standby letters of credit to
insurance providers, and no associated liability was recorded.
The Company provides its customers a manufacturers warranty and records, at the time of the sale,
a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due
to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time,
travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts. Changes in the
Companys warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
78,313 |
|
|
$ |
62,673 |
|
Current period accruals (a) |
|
|
30,066 |
|
|
|
24,609 |
|
Current period settlements |
|
|
(34,058 |
) |
|
|
(23,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
74,321 |
|
|
$ |
63,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
includes the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
NOTE 13: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At June 30, 2011, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal
course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate are considered material by
management in relation to the Companys financial position or results of operations. In
managements opinion, the condensed consolidated financial statements would not be materially
affected by the outcome of these legal proceedings, commitments or asserted claims. In addition to
these routine legal proceedings, the Company was a party to 401(k) and securities class actions,
labor and wage actions, and election systems actions which are described in note 15 of the
consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010. The Companys global Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) review
remains on schedule with no material developments during the three months ended June 30, 2011:
During the second quarter of 2010, while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential
acquisition in Russia, the Company identified certain transactions and payments by its subsidiary
in Russia (primarily during 2005 to 2008) that potentially implicate the FCPA, particularly the
books and records provisions of the FCPA. As a result, the Company is conducting an internal
review and collecting information related to its global FCPA compliance.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company identified certain transactions within
its Asia Pacific operation over the past several years which may also potentially
implicate the FCPA. The Companys current assessment indicates that the transactions
and payments in question to date do not materially impact or alter the Companys
consolidated financial statements in any year or in the aggregate. The Companys
internal review is ongoing, and accordingly, there can be no assurance that this
review will not find evidence of additional transactions that potentially implicate
the FCPA.
The Company has voluntarily self-reported its findings to the SEC and the DOJ and is
cooperating with these agencies in their review. The Company was previously
informed that the SECs inquiry has been converted to a formal, non-public
investigation. The Company also received a subpoena for documents from the SEC and a
voluntary request for documents from the DOJ in connection with the investigation.
The Company expects to complete its internal review of these matters by the end of
2011. Once the Company completes its internal review, it will begin discussions
with the SEC and the DOJ to resolve this matter. At this time, the Company cannot
predict the results of the government investigations and therefore cannot estimate
the potential loss or range of loss it may incur with respect to these
investigations or their potential impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Future resolution of these matters with the DOJ and SEC could result in a material
impact to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 14: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company uses derivatives to mitigate the economic consequences associated with the fluctuations
in currencies and interest rates.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
Non-Designated Hedges A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues are
international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The Companys policy allows the use of foreign exchange forward contracts with
maturities of up to 24 months to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on those foreign
currency asset and liability balances. The Company elected not to apply hedge accounting to its
foreign exchange forward contracts. Thus, spot-based gains/losses offset revaluation gains/losses
within foreign exchange loss, net and forward-based gains/losses represent interest expense. The
fair value of the Companys non-designated foreign exchange forward contracts was $300 and ($3,135)
as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
14
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the (loss) gain recognized on non-designated foreign-exchange
derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Income Statement Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2,028 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,573 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,059 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
|
4,478 |
|
|
|
15,211 |
|
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
|
|
22,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
$ |
13,638 |
|
|
$ |
(5,614 |
) |
|
$ |
19,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST RATE
Cash Flow Hedges The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges that fix a portion of future variable-rate interest
expense. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has a pay-fixed receive-variable interest rate swap, with
a total notional amount of $25,000, to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate
on a portion of the Companys LIBOR-based borrowings. Changes in value that are deemed effective
are accumulated in OCI and reclassified to interest expense when the hedged interest is accrued. To
the extent that it becomes probable that the Companys variable rate borrowings will not occur, the
gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges will be reclassified from OCI to interest expense.
In December 2005 and January 2006, the Company executed cash flow hedges by entering into
receive-variable and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $200,000,
related to the senior notes issuance in March 2006. Amounts previously recorded in OCI related to
the pre-issuance cash flow hedges will continue to be reclassified on a straight-line basis through
February 2016.
The fair value of the Companys interest rate contracts was ($3,441) and ($3,371) as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The gain (loss) recognized on designated derivative instruments for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 was not material. Gains and losses related to interest rate contracts that
are reclassified from accumulated OCI are recorded in interest expense on the statement of income.
The Company anticipates reclassifying $781 from OCI to interest expense within the next 12 months.
NOTE 15: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
The following table summarizes the impact of the Companys restructuring charges (benefits) on the
condensed consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of sales products |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
Cost of sales services |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
8,629 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
7,271 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
Research, development and
engineering expense |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,485 |
|
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
16,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring charges (benefits) within continuing
operations for its DNA and Diebold International (DI) reporting segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
795 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
14,449 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,485 |
|
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
16,286 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net other restructuring charges in the DI segment include legal
fees, accelerated depreciation, facility refurbishment and lease
termination costs. |
Restructuring charges of $3,452 and $15,032 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011
related to the Companys plan for the EMEA reorganization, which realigns resources and further
leverages the existing shared services center. As of June 30, 2011, the Company anticipates
additional restructuring costs in the range of $10,000 to $13,000 to be incurred into 2012 related
to its EMEA restructuring plan. As management concludes on certain aspects of the EMEA
restructuring plan, the anticipated future costs related to this plan are subject to change.
Restructuring charges related to reductions in the Companys global workforce were $172 and $552
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $279 and $1,930 for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These charges included realignment of the
organization and resources to better support opportunities in emerging growth markets as well as
consolidation of certain international facilities in efforts to optimize overall operational
performance. This plan resulted in a workforce reduction which primarily affected Canton, Ohio area
facilities. The Company does not expect any material remaining costs related to this workforce
reduction.
Restructuring charges related to the Companys strategic global manufacturing realignment plans
were $230 and $648 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and $344 and
$356 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Companys cumulative total restructuring costs for the
significant plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
|
Reorganization |
|
|
Reductions |
|
|
Realignment |
|
Costs incurred to date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,227 |
|
|
$ |
11,579 |
|
DI |
|
|
15,032 |
|
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
25,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred to date |
|
$ |
15,032 |
|
|
$ |
42,798 |
|
|
$ |
36,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring accrual balances and related activity:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
3,340 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
16,286 |
|
Liabilities paid |
|
|
(7,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
11,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Charges and Expense Reimbursements
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature. Net non-routine expense of $13,441 impacted the six months ended June 30,
2011 compared to net non-routine income of $3,073 in the same period of 2010. Net non-routine
expenses for 2011 consisted primarily of legal and compliance costs related to the FCPA investigation and were recorded in selling and administrative expense. Net
non-routine income for 2010 consisted
16
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
primarily of reimbursements from the Companys director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers and
was recorded in selling and administrative expense, partially offset by costs related to the FCPA
investigation.
NOTE 16: FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities using one or more of the following three
valuation techniques:
Market approach Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Cost approach Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement cost).
Income approach Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based
upon market expectations.
The hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value is
divided into three levels:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active or inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly
or indirectly.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value
Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
229,532 |
|
|
$ |
229,532 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
221,706 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration on sale
of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
271,170 |
|
|
$ |
237,932 |
|
|
$ |
33,238 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
284,241 |
|
|
$ |
229,869 |
|
|
$ |
52,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,082 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,682 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,594 |
|
|
$ |
8,163 |
|
|
$ |
7,431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments The Company has investments in certificates of deposit that are
recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Additionally, the Company has investments in U.S.
dollar indexed bond funds that are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. U.S.
dollar indexed bond funds are reported at net asset value, which is the practical expedient for
fair value as determined by banks where funds are held.
Assets Held in a Rabbi Trust / Deferred Compensation The fair value of the assets held in a rabbi
trust (refer to note 6) is derived from investments in a mix of money market, fixed income and
equity funds managed by Vanguard. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair
value.
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues
are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The foreign exchange contracts are valued using the market approach based on
observable market transactions of forward rates.
17
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest Rate Swaps The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows it to
periodically enter into derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to fix some portion
of future variable rate based interest expense. The Company has a pay-fixed receive-variable
interest rate swap to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a portion of
the Companys LIBOR-based borrowings. The fair value of the swap is determined using the income
approach and is calculated based on LIBOR rates at the reporting date.
Contingent Consideration on Sale of Business The Companys sale of its U.S. elections systems
business included contingent consideration related to 70 percent of cash collected on the accounts
receivable balance of the sold business as of August 31, 2009. The fair value of the contingent
consideration was determined based on collections on the accounts receivable as well as the
probability of future anticipated collections (level 3 inputs) and was recorded at the net present
value of the future anticipated cash flows. The following table summarized the changes in fair
value of the Companys level 3 assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
Cash collections |
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Carrying Value
The fair value of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accounts payable,
approximates the carrying value due to the relative short maturity of these instruments. The fair
value and carrying value of the Companys debt instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Notes payable current |
|
$ |
43,900 |
|
|
$ |
43,900 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
|
$ |
15,038 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
660,512 |
|
|
|
644,661 |
|
|
|
565,499 |
|
|
|
550,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
$ |
704,412 |
|
|
$ |
688,561 |
|
|
$ |
580,537 |
|
|
$ |
565,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys industrial development revenue bonds are measured using unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets categorized as level 1 inputs. The fair value
of the Companys current notes payable and credit facility debt instruments approximates the
carrying value due to the relative short maturity of the revolving borrowings under these
instruments. The fair values of the Companys long-term senior notes was estimated using market
observable inputs for the Companys comparable peers with public debt, including quoted prices in
active markets, market indices and interest rate measurements, considered level 2 inputs.
NOTE 17: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys segments are comprised of two sales channels: DNA and DI. The DNA segment sells and
services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada. The DI segment sells and
services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe as well as voting and lottery
solutions in Brazil. Each segment buys the goods it sells from the Companys manufacturing plants
or through external suppliers. Intercompany sales between legal entities are eliminated in
consolidation. Each year, intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives operating profit
contribution.
The reconciliation between segment information and the condensed consolidated financial statements
is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic area and product and service solutions are also
disclosed. Certain information not routinely used in the management of the DNA and DI segments,
information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not
shown. Items not allocated are as follows: investment income; interest expense; equity in the net
income of investees accounted for by the equity method; income tax expense or benefit; foreign
exchange gains and losses; miscellaneous, net; and discontinued operations.
18
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys segment information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
$ |
337,992 |
|
|
$ |
322,635 |
|
|
$ |
643,956 |
|
|
$ |
618,835 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
20,362 |
|
|
|
21,082 |
|
|
|
39,988 |
|
|
|
40,227 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
24,477 |
|
|
|
23,542 |
|
|
|
41,883 |
|
|
|
32,826 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
10,885 |
|
|
|
17,501 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
7,362 |
|
|
|
4,737 |
|
|
|
14,121 |
|
|
|
11,253 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
463,850 |
|
|
|
454,932 |
|
|
|
463,850 |
|
|
|
454,932 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,028,612 |
|
|
|
997,007 |
|
|
|
1,028,612 |
|
|
|
997,007 |
|
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
|
324,390 |
|
|
|
342,545 |
|
|
|
632,583 |
|
|
|
665,344 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
12,934 |
|
|
|
15,421 |
|
|
|
28,200 |
|
|
|
25,173 |
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
23,313 |
|
|
|
(7,912 |
) |
|
|
54,614 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
7,679 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
12,802 |
|
|
|
9,415 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5,225 |
|
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
10,449 |
|
|
|
11,554 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
205,090 |
|
|
|
160,966 |
|
|
|
205,090 |
|
|
|
160,966 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,567,986 |
|
|
|
1,444,910 |
|
|
|
1,567,986 |
|
|
|
1,444,910 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenues |
|
|
662,382 |
|
|
|
665,180 |
|
|
|
1,276,539 |
|
|
|
1,284,179 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
33,296 |
|
|
|
36,503 |
|
|
|
68,188 |
|
|
|
65,400 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
|
46,855 |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
12,785 |
|
|
|
15,813 |
|
|
|
23,687 |
|
|
|
26,916 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
24,570 |
|
|
|
22,807 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
668,940 |
|
|
|
615,898 |
|
|
|
668,940 |
|
|
|
615,898 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,596,598 |
|
|
|
2,441,917 |
|
|
|
2,596,598 |
|
|
|
2,441,917 |
|
The following table presents information regarding the Companys revenue by geographic region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Diebold North America |
|
$ |
337,992 |
|
|
$ |
322,635 |
|
|
$ |
643,956 |
|
|
$ |
618,835 |
|
Diebold International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America including Brazil |
|
|
124,206 |
|
|
|
175,800 |
|
|
|
277,094 |
|
|
|
325,327 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
96,122 |
|
|
|
90,416 |
|
|
|
180,011 |
|
|
|
188,858 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
104,062 |
|
|
|
76,329 |
|
|
|
175,478 |
|
|
|
151,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold International |
|
|
324,390 |
|
|
|
342,545 |
|
|
|
632,583 |
|
|
|
665,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer revenues |
|
$ |
662,382 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
1,276,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys revenue by product and service
solution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Financial self-service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
225,078 |
|
|
$ |
203,741 |
|
|
$ |
423,718 |
|
|
$ |
407,441 |
|
Services |
|
|
285,337 |
|
|
|
265,449 |
|
|
|
549,793 |
|
|
|
533,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service |
|
|
510,415 |
|
|
|
469,190 |
|
|
|
973,511 |
|
|
|
940,698 |
|
Security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
44,431 |
|
|
|
48,945 |
|
|
|
87,844 |
|
|
|
100,395 |
|
Services |
|
|
103,602 |
|
|
|
100,832 |
|
|
|
203,520 |
|
|
|
194,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total security |
|
|
148,033 |
|
|
|
149,777 |
|
|
|
291,364 |
|
|
|
294,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service & security |
|
|
658,448 |
|
|
|
618,967 |
|
|
|
1,264,875 |
|
|
|
1,235,366 |
|
Election and lottery systems |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
46,213 |
|
|
|
11,664 |
|
|
|
48,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customer revenues |
|
$ |
662,382 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
1,276,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 18: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Included in income (loss) from discontinued operations were accrual adjustment benefits and costs
related to the Companys U.S.-based elections systems business and the EMEA-based security
business, which were both previously discontinued.
20
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
Introduction
The Company reported a solid second quarter of 2011 as growth continues to accelerate in North
America, particularly in the U.S. regional bank space, driven by strong demand for advanced deposit
automation and new technology needed to meet pending regulatory and industry compliance standards.
The Company also drove operational progress in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) during the
quarter.
During the second quarter of 2011, increased order activity in Diebold North America (DNA)
continued to drive the business on a macro level. Much of the growth is occurring in the regional
bank space, where financial self-service (FSS) orders grew about 180 percent compared to the second
quarter of 2010. In DNA overall, orders grew 14 percent compared to the second quarter of 2010. In
addition, Asia Pacific orders increased 18 percent, compared to the second quarter of 2010, led by
strong performance in India and Southeast Asia. This was offset by decreases in orders within EMEA
and Latin America of 3 percent and 30 percent respectively compared to the second quarter of 2010.
The decrease in Latin America orders was primarily the result of a significant decrease in election
orders and the timing of major bank FSS orders.
Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 was $20,275 or $0.31 per share, a decrease of $10,139 and $0.15 per
share, respectively, from the same period in 2010. Total revenue for the three months ended June
30, 2011 was $662,382, a decrease of 0.4 percent from the same period in 2010.
Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 was $22,787 or $0.35 per share, a decrease of $32,521 and $0.49 per
share, respectively, from the same period in 2010. Total revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2011 was $1,276,539, a decrease of 0.6 percent from the same period in 2010.
Vision and strategy
The Companys vision is to be recognized as the essential partner in creating and implementing
ideas that optimize convenience, efficiency and security. This vision is the guiding principle
behind the Companys transformation to becoming a more services-oriented company. Services comprise
more than 50 percent of the Companys revenue. The Company expects that this percentage will
continue to grow over time as the Company continues to build on its strong base of maintenance and
advanced services to deliver world-class integrated services.
In the second quarter of 2011, the Company signed new integrated services contracts valued at more
than $75,000, significantly exceeding the prior-year period. By comparison, in all of 2010, the
Company signed about $150,000 in integrated services contracts. During the quarter, the Company
announced it is providing a variety of products and technological upgrades through integrated
services to First National Bank of Pennsylvania. The bank chose Diebold to help expand its
consumer banking options and enhance security by replacing 150 ATMs with Opteva and upgrading an
additional 100 ATMs. The bank is adding deposit automation to nearly a third of its fleet.
Another U.S. regional customer that signed an integrated services agreement during the quarter was
Teachers Credit Union. The Company is helping the credit union implement new technologies and
services, including ATM upgrades for deposit automation, monitoring and security to enhance the
credit unions operational efficiencies and improve convenience for its members.
Another area of focus within the FSS business is broadening the Companys deposit automation
solutions set, including check imaging, envelope-free currency acceptance, teller automation, and
payment and document imaging solutions. The Companys ImageWay® check-imaging solution
fulfills an industry-wide demand for cutting-edge technologies that enhance efficiencies and
greatly reduce operating costs for customers. For example, in North America, the Company is
experiencing increasing demand from regional and community financial institutions for deposit
automation terminals to maintain their competitive position and reduce their operating costs.
21
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Within the security business, the Companys solution set is comprehensive, including high-end
enterprise security solutions. The Companys goal is to better leverage its enterprise security
expertise in the financial market. Historically, Diebolds focus in this market was on the branch
side with an emphasis on product sales. As new branch growth is expected to be stagnant the next
several years, the Company is shifting its focus to enterprise solutions which are more oriented
toward services. As security systems have become increasingly complex, financial institutions are
showing more interest in outsourcing this area of its operations; particularly in the area of
monitoring, services and software. In addition, the Company is pursuing other means to effectively
grow its security business for the long term, including increased activity on the acquisition
front. During the second quarter of 2011, while overall security revenue decreased slightly due to
continued weakness in the branch business, enterprise security revenue grew more than 20 percent
compared to the same period of 2010. The Company intends to continue to leverage its experience to
capitalize on the opportunities in this space, particularly as it wins major projects such as the
new World Trade Center Transportation Hub in New York City. The Companys integrated system will
include the installation of video surveillance, access control and alarm devices throughout the
hub. In addition, the Company recently announced it is managing the integration of a complex
security software system for the new World Trade Center site. Diebolds integration efforts will
connect an array of systems to the World Trade Center security command center via a single
interface, giving operators unified control and views of the entire site.
Moving forward, the Company intends to create shareholder value by leveraging its growing advantage
in services, continuing to restructure its operations in EMEA, taking advantage of key market
opportunities around the world and leveraging opportunities in the security business. The focus
for the remainder of 2011 is to continue striking an appropriate balance between reducing costs and
investing in future growth. There are many opportunities that lie ahead, and the Company will
continue to invest in developing new software solutions, services and security solutions,
particularly in emerging markets to achieve the Companys stated goal of 15 percent return of
capital employed.
Cost savings initiatives, restructuring and other charges
Over the past several years, the Companys SmartBusiness (SB) initiatives have led to
rationalization of product development, streamlined procurement, realignment of the Companys
manufacturing footprint and improved logistics. Building on that success, the Company launched SB
300, which shifts the focus from cost of sales to operating expenses and is targeted to achieve an
additional $100,000 in efficiencies during the next three years. The Company is well on target to
reduce its cost structure by $30,000 in 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred pre-tax net restructuring
charges of $16,286 and $2,310, respectively. Restructuring charges in 2011 primarily related to
the Companys plan for the EMEA reorganization, which realigns resources and further leverages the
existing shared services center. Restructuring charges in 2010 primarily related to reductions in
the Companys global workforce within the Canton, Ohio area facilities.
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature. Net non-routine expense of $13,441 impacted the six months ended June 30,
2011 compared to net non-routine income of $3,073 in the same period of 2010. Net non-routine
expenses for 2011 consisted primarily of legal and compliance costs related to the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA) investigation and were recorded in selling and administrative expense. Net
non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of reimbursements from the Companys director and
officer (D&O) insurance carriers and was recorded in selling and administrative expense, partially
offset by costs related to the FCPA investigation.
Business Drivers
The business drivers of the Companys future performance include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
demand for new service offerings, including integrated services and outsourcing; |
|
|
|
demand for security products and services for the financial, enterprise, retail and
government sectors; |
|
|
|
timing of a self-service upgrade and/or replacement cycle, including deposit automation in
mature markets such as the United States; and |
|
|
|
high levels of deployment growth for new self-service products in emerging markets, such as
Asia Pacific. |
22
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations provides
information that will assist in understanding the financial statements and the changes in certain
key items in those financial statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction
with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes that appear
elsewhere in this quarterly report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
|
Dollars |
|
Net sales |
Net sales |
|
$ |
662,382 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,276,539 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
169,490 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
178,144 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
318,894 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
336,154 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
144,388 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
131,289 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
284,923 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
248,714 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
46,855 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
33,971 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
21,602 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
31,073 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
25,748 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
20,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2011 Comparisons to Second Quarter 2010
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales for the three months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
662,382 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
(2,798 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
FSS sales in the second quarter of 2011 increased by $41,225 or 8.8 percent compared to the same
period of 2010. The increase in FSS sales included a net favorable currency impact of $25,027, of
which approximately 45 percent related to the Brazilian real. DNA increased $15,992 or 8.4 percent
due to strong growth within the U.S. regional business. Diebold International (DI) sales increased
by $25,233 or 9.0 percent related to the following: Asia Pacific increased $9,074 or 11.2 percent,
EMEA increased $27,797 or 36.5 percent, and Latin America, including Brazil, decreased $11,638 or
9.5 percent. The increase in Asia Pacific resulted from improvement in several countries most
notably India and Indonesia. The increase in EMEA was influenced by higher volumes in Africa and
Western Europe as well as new market growth in the Middle East. The decrease in Latin America,
including Brazil, was driven mainly from lower volumes in Brazil, partially offset with an
improvement in Latin America.
Security solutions sales in the second quarter of 2011 decreased by $1,744 or 1.2 percent compared
to the same period of 2010. DNA remained relatively flat compared to the same period in the prior
year, while DI decreased by $1,109 or 6.6 percent. DI decrease was due to a decrease in Asia
Pacific, partially offset with higher sales in Latin America.
The Brazilian-based lottery and election systems sales decreased $42,279 or 91.5 percent in the
second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. This decrease was driven by a $46,201
reduction in election sales, partially offset with a $3,922 increase in lottery sales compared to
the second quarter 2010. Election sales decreased due to the cyclical purchasing decisions within
the country. There were no lottery sales in the second quarter of 2010.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit for the three months ended
June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit products |
|
$ |
68,662 |
|
|
$ |
77,142 |
|
|
$ |
(8,480 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Gross profit services |
|
|
100,828 |
|
|
|
101,002 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
169,490 |
|
|
$ |
178,144 |
|
|
$ |
(8,654 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin products |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin services |
|
|
25.9 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in product gross margin was due to higher volume in EMEA that included unfavorable
customer mix. This decline was partially offset by favorable revenue mix in DNA resulting from a
larger concentration of sales in the U.S. regional bank space and U.S. manufacturing favorability.
Additionally, product gross margin in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included
restructuring charges of $251 and $696, respectively.
The decrease in service gross margin resulted mainly from lower margins in DNA and EMEA, partially
offset with productivity improvements in Brazil. The decline in DNA was driven primarily from
higher fuel costs in the service operations. In EMEA, the margin decline was due to higher
restructuring charges in 2011 related to the reorganization. Service gross margin for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 included $2,555 of restructuring charges compared to restructuring
benefit of $524 in the same period of 2010.
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses for the three months
ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
$ |
122,051 |
|
|
$ |
110,791 |
|
|
$ |
11,260 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
19,375 |
|
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
(27.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
144,388 |
|
|
$ |
131,289 |
|
|
$ |
13,099 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense increased in the second quarter of 2011, compared to the same
period of 2010, largely due to higher non-routine and restructuring expenses, $4,424 of unfavorable
currency impact and increased benefit costs. Selling and administrative expense in the second
quarter of 2011 included $4,709 of non-routine expense, which included $4,159 in legal,
consultative, audit and severance costs related to the previously disclosed FCPA investigation.
The second quarter 2010 included $1,007 of non-routine expense also related to the FCPA
investigation. In addition, selling and administrative expense included $1,667 and $1,079 of
restructuring charges in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The second quarter 2011
restructuring charges were primarily associated with the EMEA reorganization.
Research, development and engineering expense as a percent of net sales in the second quarter of
2011 and 2010 was 2.9 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively. The increase as a percent of net sales
was due to higher project volume.
The impairment charges in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 resulted from non-cash intangible
asset impairments related primarily to prior acquisitions.
24
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit for the three months
ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Point Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
25,102 |
|
|
$ |
46,855 |
|
|
$ |
(21,753 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating profit in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010
resulted from higher operating expenses influenced by higher restructuring charges, higher
non-routine expenses, unfavorable currency impacts and increased benefit costs. Operating profit
also decreased due to lower product and service gross margins.
Other Income (Expense)
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense) for the three
months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
9,669 |
|
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,515 |
) |
|
|
(9,301 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
3,080 |
|
|
$ |
(2,444 |
) |
|
$ |
5,524 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in the second quarter of 2011 was favorable compared to the same period of 2010
driven primarily by Brazil with a combination of increased investment and favorable currency
impact. The improvement in foreign exchange was mainly related to the impact of currencies in India
and China.
Income from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations for the
three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Point Change |
|
% Change |
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
21,602 |
|
|
$ |
31,073 |
|
|
$ |
(9,471 |
) |
|
|
(30.5 |
) |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net income from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the
same period of 2010 resulted from a reduction in gross profit paired with higher operating
expenses. These decreases to net income from continuing operations were partially offset with
favorable other income (expense) and lower taxes on income compared to the same period of the prior
year. The 6.7 percentage point decrease in the effective tax rate was due mainly to various
discrete items in the periods.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income (loss) from discontinued operations
for the three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
(683 |
) |
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Second quarter 2011 and 2010 income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, included
accrual adjustment benefits and costs related to the U.S. elections systems business and the
EMEAbased security business, which were both previously discontinued.
25
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
The following table represents information regarding our net income for the three months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
20,804 |
|
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
(8,927 |
) |
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company
reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $20,804 and $29,731 for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
The following table represents information regarding our revenue by reporting segment for the three
months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
337,992 |
|
|
$ |
322,635 |
|
|
$ |
15,357 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
DI |
|
|
324,390 |
|
|
|
342,545 |
|
|
|
(18,155 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
662,382 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
(2,798 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in DNA net sales was due to higher FSS product volume in the U.S. regional business.
In addition, there was a FSS revenue improvement driven mainly from higher billed work and managed
and professional services, partially offset with lower service contract revenue. These improvements
were partially offset by a decline in the U.S. regional security business.
The decrease in DI net sales included a net favorable currency impact of $31,499, of which
approximately 55 percent related to Brazil. The decrease in DI was primarily a result of lower
election and FSS sales within Brazil, which was partially offset with increased FSS product volume
in EMEA.
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit by reporting segment for
the three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
24,477 |
|
|
$ |
23,542 |
|
|
$ |
935 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
DI |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
23,313 |
|
|
|
(22,688 |
) |
|
|
(97.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
$ |
25,102 |
|
|
$ |
46,855 |
|
|
$ |
(21,753 |
) |
|
|
(46.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA operating profit for the second quarter 2011 increased by $935 or 4.0 percent compared to the
second quarter 2010. Operating profit was favorable due to higher volume within the U.S. regional
business and U. S. manufacturing favorability, partially offset by higher costs in the service
business and higher operating expenses.
DI operating profit for the second quarter 2011 decreased by $22,688 or 97.3 percent compared
to the second quarter 2010. The decrease was driven primarily from the reduction in Brazil election
systems as well as higher operating expense within DI. The operating expenses increased as a
result of higher restructuring charges, the net impact of non-routine expenses, increased research
and development spending and unfavorable currency impact.
Refer to note 17 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment
revenue and operating profit.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Comparisons to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales for the six months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,276,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
$ |
(7,640 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
FSS sales in the first six months of 2011 increased by $32,813 or 3.5 percent compared to the same
period of 2010. The increase in FSS sales included a net favorable currency impact of $38,800, of
which approximately 50 percent related to the Brazilian real. DNA increased $24,713 or 7.0 percent
due to strong growth within the U.S. regional business. DI sales increased by $8,100 or 1.4 percent
related to the following: Asia Pacific decreased $2,509 or 1.4 percent, EMEA increased $24,543 or
16.3 percent, and Latin America,
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
including Brazil, decreased by $13,934 or 5.3 percent. The increase in EMEA was a result of new
market growth in the Middle East as well as higher volumes in Africa and Western Europe. The
decrease in Latin America, including Brazil, was primarily a result of lower volumes in Brazil,
partially offset with an increase in Latin America.
Security solutions sales in the first six months of 2011 decreased by $3,304 or 1.1 percent
compared to the same period of 2010. The variance was driven by a decrease of $3,712 or 11.9
percent within DI, resulting primarily from a decrease in Asia Pacific partially offset by higher
sales in Latin America.
The Brazilian-based lottery and election systems sales decreased $37,149 or 76.1 percent in the
first six months of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. This decrease was driven by a $46,206
reduction in election sales, partially offset with a $9,057 increase in lottery sales in the first
six months of 2011 compared to the first six months of 2010. Election sales were down due to the
cyclical purchasing decisions within the country. The improvement in lottery was related to higher
sales volume in the first six months of 2011.
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit for the six months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit products |
|
$ |
129,582 |
|
|
$ |
142,610 |
|
|
$ |
(13,028 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
Gross profit services |
|
|
189,312 |
|
|
|
193,544 |
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
318,894 |
|
|
$ |
336,154 |
|
|
$ |
(17,260 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin products |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin services |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in product gross margin was driven by DI, partially offset with favorable revenue mix
in DNA resulting from a larger concentration of sales in the U.S. regional bank space and U.S.
manufacturing favorability. The reduction in DI was primarily a result of higher volume in EMEA
that included unfavorable customer mix as well as lower margins in most other geographies.
Additionally, product gross margin in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 included
restructuring charges of $374 and $482, respectively.
The decrease in service gross margin resulted from lower margins in DNA as well as lower margins in
EMEA, due primarily from higher restructuring charges in 2011 related to the EMEA reorganization.
The decline in DNA was driven primarily from higher fuel costs in the service operations. Service
gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2011 included $8,629 of restructuring charges
compared to restructuring benefit of $210 in the same period of 2010.
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses for the six months
ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
$ |
243,162 |
|
|
$ |
209,768 |
|
|
$ |
33,394 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Research, development, and engineering expense |
|
|
38,799 |
|
|
|
34,850 |
|
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
(27.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
284,923 |
|
|
$ |
248,714 |
|
|
$ |
36,209 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense increased in the first six months of 2011 compared to the
same period of 2010 due to higher non-routine and restructuring expenses, increased benefit costs,
$6,067 of unfavorable currency impact and lower non-routine income. Selling and administrative
expense in the first six months of 2011 included $10,480 of non-routine expense, which included
$9,930 in legal, consultative, audit and severance costs related to the FCPA investigation. The
first six months of 2010 included $1,075 of non-routine expense also related to the FCPA
investigation. Non-routine income of $4,148 in the first six months of 2010 consisted primarily of
reimbursements from the Companys D&O insurance carriers. In addition, selling and administrative
expense included $7,271 and $2,236 of restructuring charges in the first six months of 2011 and
2010, respectively. The 2011 restructuring charges related primarily to the EMEA reorganization.
27
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Research, development and engineering expense as a percent of net sales in the first six months of
2011 and 2010 was 3.0 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively. The increase as a percent of net sales
was due to higher project volume.
The impairment charges in the first six months of 2011 and 2010 resulted from non-cash intangible
asset impairments related primarily to prior acquisitions.
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit for the six months ended
June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Point Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
33,971 |
|
|
$ |
87,440 |
|
|
$ |
(53,469 |
) |
|
|
(61.1 |
) |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating profit in the first six months of 2011 compared to the same period of
2010 resulted from higher operating expenses due to higher restructuring charges, higher
non-routine expenses, increased benefit costs, unfavorable currency impacts, and lower non-routine
income. Operating profit also decreased due to lower product and service gross margins.
Other Income (Expense)
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense) for the six months
ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
20,567 |
|
|
$ |
13,489 |
|
|
$ |
7,078 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(18,188 |
) |
|
|
(18,356 |
) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(5,194 |
) |
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
(7,960 |
) |
|
$ |
12,242 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in the first six months of 2011 was favorable compared to the same period of
2010, driven primarily by Brazil, with a combination of increased investment and favorable currency
impact. The improvement in foreign exchange was mainly related to the impact of 2010 currency
policies instituted in Venezuela.
Income from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations for the
six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
% Point Change |
|
% Change |
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
25,748 |
|
|
$ |
56,265 |
|
|
$ |
(30,517 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net income from continuing operations in the first six months of 2011 compared to
the same period of 2010 resulted from lower gross profit, higher operating expenses and higher
taxes on income. These decreases to net income from continuing operations were partially offset by
favorable other income (expense). The 3.5 percentage point increase in the effective tax rate is
due mainly to operating losses in certain EMEA jurisdictions for which no tax benefit is
recognized, partially offset by various discrete items in the periods.
28
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income (loss) from discontinued operations
for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(1,653 |
) |
|
$ |
2,171 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
The first six months of 2011 and 2010 income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax,
included accrual adjustment benefits and costs related to the U.S. elections systems business and
the EMEAbased security business, which were both previously discontinued.
Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
The following table represents information regarding our net income for the six months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
23,305 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
$ |
(30,350 |
) |
|
|
(56.6 |
) |
Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company
reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $23,305 and $53,655 for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
The following table represents information regarding our revenue by reporting segment for the six
months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
643,956 |
|
|
$ |
618,835 |
|
|
$ |
25,121 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
DI |
|
|
632,583 |
|
|
|
665,344 |
|
|
|
(32,761 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
1,276,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
$ |
(7,640 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in DNA net sales was due primarily to the increase in FSS revenue driven from higher
product volume in the U.S. regional business as well as higher FSS service revenue. The improvement
was partially offset with a reduction in the security business due to lower product volumes.
The decrease in DI net sales was due primarily to lower election systems and FSS product volumes in
Brazil, partially offset by net favorable currency impact of $45,513, of which approximately 56
percent related to Brazil.
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit (loss) by reporting
segment for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
DNA |
|
$ |
41,883 |
|
|
$ |
32,826 |
|
|
$ |
9,057 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
DI |
|
|
(7,912 |
) |
|
|
54,614 |
|
|
|
(62,526 |
) |
|
|
(114.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
$ |
33,971 |
|
|
$ |
87,440 |
|
|
$ |
(53,469 |
) |
|
|
(61.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA operating profit for the first six months of 2011 increased by $9,057 or 27.6 percent compared
to the first six months of 2010. The increase was driven primarily by higher FSS product volume in
the U.S. regional business as well as U.S. manufacturing favorability. These increases were
partially offset with higher restructuring and non-routine expenses, lower non-routine income and
lower service gross profit.
DI operating profit for the first six months of 2011 decreased by $62,526 or 114.5 percent
compared to the first six months of 2010. The decrease was driven from lower election systems
volume in Brazil as well as lower product margins throughout DI. In addition, higher restructuring
and non-routine expenses as well as increased operating expenses negatively impacted operating
profit.
Refer to note 17 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment
revenue and operating profit.
29
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, borrowings under the Companys
senior notes, committed and uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and
operating and capital leasing arrangements. Management expects that the Companys capital resources
will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, research and development activities,
investments in facilities or equipment, pension contributions, dividends and any purchase of the
Companys common shares for at least the next 12 months. A vast majority of the Companys of cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments reside in international tax jurisdictions.
Repatriation of these funds could be negatively impacted by potential foreign and domestic taxes.
Part of the Companys growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company has made
acquisitions in the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The Company intends to
finance any future acquisitions with either cash and short-term investments, cash provided from
operations, borrowings under available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings
and/or the issuance of common shares.
The following table summarizes the results of our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows
for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash flow (used in) provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(99,974 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,472 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
12,791 |
|
|
|
(16,924 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
31,064 |
|
|
|
(49,348 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
6,201 |
|
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(49,918 |
) |
|
$ |
(96,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $99,974 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an
increase of $82,502 from $17,472 for the same period in 2010. Cash flows from operating activities
are generated primarily from operating income and managing the components of working capital. Cash
flows from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same
period of 2010 were negatively affected by a $28,346 decrease in net income and changes in accounts
payable and certain other assets and liabilities, including $84,906 of unfavorable changes in
refundable income taxes and an increase of $8,119 in contributions to the qualified and
non-qualified pension plans. These changes were partially offset by favorable changes in trade
receivables and deferred revenue.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $12,791 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a
change of $29,715 from cash used in investing activities of $16,924 for the same period in 2010.
The change was primarily due to $12,976 in collections on purchased finance receivables, $10,029
increase in net investment proceeds and a $3,229 decrease in capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $31,064 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a
change of $80,412 from cash used in financing activities of $49,348 for the same period of 2010.
The change was primarily due to an $116,225 increase in net borrowings and a $3,245 increase in
issuance of common shares related to stock compensation activity. This was partially offset by an
increase of $36,463 in cash used to repurchase common shares.
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents for the six months included June
30, 2010 included $7,000 of devaluation related to Venezuela.
Under the Companys share repurchase program, 2,382,890 common shares remained available as of June
30, 2011 for additional share repurchases.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit
with borrowing limits of $93,447. The amount available under the short-term uncommitted lines at
June 30, 2011 was $49,663.
In June 2011, the Company entered into a new five-year credit facility, which replaced its existing
credit facility. The Company used borrowings of approximately $330,000 under the new credit
facility to repay all amounts outstanding under (and terminated) the existing credit facility. As
of June 30, 2011, the Company had borrowing limits under the new credit facility totaling $500,000.
Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject to various
approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $250,000. Up to $50,000 of the revolving credit
facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The weighted-average interest rate on
outstanding credit facility borrowings as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 1.26 and 2.71
percent, respectively, which is variable based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The
amount available under the new credit
30
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
facility as of June 30, 2011 was $170,000. The Company incurred $1,733 of fees to its
creditors in conjunction with the new credit facility, which will be amortized as a component of
interest expense over the term of the facility.
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
The Companys financing agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net
debt to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
Dividends The Company paid dividends of $37,090 and $36,076 in the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. Quarterly dividends were $0.28 and $0.27 per share for the first six months
of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Contractual Obligations In the first six months of 2011, the Company entered into direct
purchasing agreements for materials through a contract manufacturing agreement for a total
negotiated price of $6,881. The following table summarizes the Companys approximate commitment
to make future payments related to these agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
Direct purchasing agreements |
|
$ |
4,927 |
|
|
$ |
4,450 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
Except for the direct purchasing agreement noted above, all contractual cash obligations with
initial and remaining terms in excess of one year and contingent liabilities remained generally
unchanged at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Company does not participate in transactions that facilitate
off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations
are based upon the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.
These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities
reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valuation of trade
receivables, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, other long-lived assets, legal
contingencies, guarantee obligations, indemnifications and assumptions used in the calculation of
income taxes, pension and postretirement benefits and customer incentives, among others. These
estimates and assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the economic difficulties in the U.S. credit markets and the global markets.
Management monitors the economic conditions and other factors and will adjust such estimates and
assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be
determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes
in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected
in the financial statements in future periods.
Management believes there have been no significant changes during the six months ended June 30,
2011 to the items that the Company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
31
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2011
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported financial results or other
historical information are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give current
expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These
forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the Companys future operating
performance, the Companys share of new and existing markets, the Companys short- and long-term
revenue and earnings growth rates, the Companys implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and
measures to improve pricing, including the optimization of the Companys manufacturing capacity.
The use of the words will, believes, anticipates, expects, intends and similar
expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the
future be made by or on behalf of the Company.
Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key
performance indicators that impact the Company, these forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments; |
|
|
changes in the Companys relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or
partners in its business ventures; |
|
|
changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation
rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the
worldwide business in each of the Companys operations, including Brazil, where a significant
portion of the Companys revenue is derived; |
|
|
the amount of cash and non-cash charges in connection with the restructuring of the
Companys EMEA operations; |
|
|
the continuing effects of the economic downturn and the disruptions in the financial
markets, including the bankruptcies, restructurings or consolidations of financial
institutions, which could reduce our customer base and/or adversely affect our customers
ability to make capital expenditures, as well as adversely impact the availability and cost of
credit; |
|
|
acceptance of the Companys product and technology introductions in the marketplace; |
|
|
the Companys ability to maintain effective internal controls; |
|
|
changes in the Companys intention to repatriate cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments residing in international tax jurisdictions could negatively impact foreign and
domestic taxes; |
|
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments, as well as the impact of any current or
pending lawsuits; |
|
|
variations in consumer demand for financial self-service technologies, products and
services; |
|
|
potential security violations to the Companys information technology systems; |
|
|
the investment performance of the Companys pension plan assets, which could require the
Company to increase its pension contributions, and significant changes in health care costs,
including those that may result from government action such as the recently enacted U.S.
health care legislation; |
|
|
the amount and timing of repurchases of the Companys common shares, if any; |
|
|
the outcome of the Companys global FCPA review and any actions taken by government
agencies in connection with the Companys self disclosure, including the pending SEC
investigation; and |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other
strategic changes. |
32
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Refer to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There
has been no material change in this information since December 31, 2010.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
This quarterly report includes the certifications of our chief executive officer (CEO) and
chief financial officer (CFO) required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. See Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to
in those certifications.
Based on the performance of procedures by management, designed to ensure the reliability of
financial reporting, management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Companys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented. Refer to Note 1 in the
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under
the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, management, under the supervision and
with the participation of the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.
No change was made to the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the Companys
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2011, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal
course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by
management in relation to the Companys financial position or results of operations. In
managements opinion, the Companys consolidated financial statements would not be materially
affected by the outcome of those legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.
In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above the Company was a party to the lawsuits
described below at June 30, 2011:
Securities Class Actions
On June 30, 2010, a shareholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio alleging violations of the federal securities laws
against the Company, certain current and former officers, and the Companys independent auditors
(Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. KPMG et al., No. 10-CV-1461).
The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages on behalf of a class of persons who purchased
the Companys stock between June 30, 2005 and January 15, 2008 and fees and expenses related to the
lawsuit. The complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by
the SEC in June 2010 finalizing the settlement of civil charges stemming from the investigation of
the Company conducted by the Division of Enforcement of the SEC (SEC Settlement).
On October 19, 2010, an alleged shareholder of the Company filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit
in the Stark County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, alleging claims on behalf of the Company against
certain current and former officers and directors of the Company for breach of fiduciary duty,
unjust enrichment and corporate waste (Levine v. Geswein et al., Case No. 2010-CV-3848).
The complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC in
June 2010 in connection with the SEC Settlement, and asserts that the defendants are liable to the
Company for alleged damages associated with the SEC investigation, settlement, and related
litigation. It also asserts that alleged misstatements in the Companys publicly issued financial
statements caused the Companys common stock to trade at artificially inflated prices between 2004
and 2006, and that defendants harmed the Company by causing it to repurchase its common stock in
the open market at inflated prices during that period. The complaint seeks an award of money
damages against the defendants and in favor of the Company in an unspecified amount, as well as
unspecified equitable and injunctive relief and attorneys fees and expenses.
33
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the putative
federal securities class action and the shareholder derivative lawsuit.
Labor and Wage Actions
On August 28, 2009, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California alleging that a class of all California technicians
employed by the Company who were scheduled to be on standby were: (a) not paid for all hours that
they worked; (b) not paid overtime compensation at the correct rate of pay; (c) not properly paid
for missed meal and rest breaks; and (d) not given correct paycheck stubs (Francisco v.
Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. CV 1889 WQH WMC). The complaint seeks additional overtime and
other compensation under the California Labor Code, various civil penalties and attorneys fees and
expenses, and a request for an injunction for future compliance with the California Labor Code
provisions that were alleged to have been violated. A mediation was held in the first quarter of
2011, which resulted in a tentative settlement (subject to agreement on final settlement terms and
court approval) which was not material to the consolidated financial statements. In May 2011, the
court approved the settlement agreement.
On May 7, 2010, a purported collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act was filed in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida alleging that field service
employees of the Company nationwide were not paid for the time spent logging into the Companys
computer network in the morning, for travel to their first jobs and for meal periods that were
supposedly automatically deducted from the employees pay but, allegedly, not taken (Nichols v.
Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. 3:10cv150/RV/MD). The lawsuit seeks unpaid overtime, liquidated
damages equal to the amount of unpaid overtime and attorneys fees. In December 2010, the
plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit, which resulted in a tentative settlement in the amount
of $9,500 subject to agreement on final settlement terms and court approval. This tentative
settlement was recorded in selling and administrative expense in the fourth quarter of 2010. In
July 2011, the parties agreed upon the final terms of the settlement, which remains subject to
court approval.
Election Business Related Actions
The Company, including certain of its subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit on May 30, 2008 (Premier
Election Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, et al., Case No.
08-CV-05-7841 (Franklin Cty. Ct Common Pleas)) against Cuyahoga County, the Board of Elections of
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio (collectively,
Cuyahoga County), and Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (Secretary) regarding several Ohio
contracts under which certain of the Companys subsidiaries provided voting equipment and related
services to the State of Ohio and a number of its counties. The lawsuit was precipitated by
Cuyahoga Countys threats to sue the Company for unspecified damages. The complaint sought a
declaration that the Company met its contractual obligations.
In response, Cuyahoga County and the Secretary filed several claims against the Company and its
former subsidiaries alleging that the voting system was defective and seeking declaratory relief
and unspecified damages under several theories of recovery. In addition, Cuyahoga County and the
Secretary sought to pierce the Companys corporate veil and hold Diebold, Incorporated directly
liable for acts and omissions alleged to have been committed by its subsidiaries (even though
Diebold, Incorporated is not a party to the contracts). In connection with the Companys subsequent
sale of those subsidiaries, the Company agreed to indemnify the former subsidiaries and their
purchaser from any and all liabilities arising out of the lawsuit. The Secretary also added or
sought to add to the case all of the Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries voting equipment.
While many of the Ohio counties opposed the Secretarys actions, the Butler County Board of
Elections joined the Secretarys claims.
In March 2010, the Company and Cuyahoga County agreed to settle their claims for $7,500, which was
paid out of the Companys insurance policies, and the court has dismissed that portion of the
lawsuit
Since then, the Company has also reached settlement agreements with the Secretary and all of the
Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries voting equipment, except Butler County. The
settlements are for immaterial amounts, which were paid out of the Companys insurance policies,
and free or discounted products and services, to be provided by the Companys former subsidiaries
or third parties. On November 1, 2010, all of the claims in the lawsuit, except those of Butler
County, were dismissed. For procedural purposes, simultaneously with the dismissal entry on
November 1, 2010, the Company and its former subsidiaries filed a claim against Butler County
seeking a declaration that it is not entitled to relief on its claims. Settlement discussions with
Butler County are ongoing.
34
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
Global FCPA Review
During the second quarter of 2010, while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential
acquisition in Russia, the Company identified certain transactions and payments by its subsidiary
in Russia (primarily during 2005 to 2008) that potentially implicate the FCPA, particularly the
books and records provisions of the FCPA. As a result, the Company is conducting an internal
review and collecting information related to its global FCPA compliance.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company identified certain transactions within its Asia Pacific
operation over the past several years which may also potentially implicate the FCPA. The Companys
current assessment indicates that the transactions and payments in question to date do not
materially impact or alter the Companys consolidated financial statements in any year or in the
aggregate. The Companys internal review is ongoing, and accordingly, there can be no assurance
that this review will not find evidence of additional transactions that potentially implicate the
FCPA.
The Company has voluntarily self-reported its findings to the SEC and the DOJ and is cooperating
with these agencies in their review. The Company was previously informed that the SECs inquiry
has been converted to a formal, non-public investigation. The Company also received a subpoena for
documents from the SEC and a voluntary request for documents from the DOJ in connection with the
investigation. The Company expects to complete its internal review of these matters by the end of 2011. Once the
Company completes its internal review, it will begin discussions with the SEC and the DOJ to
resolve this matter. At this time, the Company cannot predict the results of the government
investigations and therefore cannot estimate the potential loss or range of loss it may incur with
respect to these investigations or their potential impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Future resolution of these matters with the DOJ and SEC could result in a material impact to the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Refer to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Information concerning the Companys share repurchases made during the second quarter of 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
Announced Plans (2) |
|
the Plans (2) |
April |
|
|
348,467 |
|
|
$ |
35.27 |
|
|
|
339,910 |
|
|
|
3,137,090 |
|
May |
|
|
356,568 |
|
|
|
32.78 |
|
|
|
356,500 |
|
|
|
2,780,590 |
|
June |
|
|
397,829 |
|
|
|
30.57 |
|
|
|
397,700 |
|
|
|
2,382,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,102,864 |
|
|
|
32.77 |
|
|
|
1,094,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 8,557, 68 and 129 shares in April, May and June, respectively, surrendered or
deemed surrendered to the Company in connection with the Companys share-based compensation
plans. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company purchased 1,094,110 common shares in the second quarter of 2011 pursuant to its
share repurchase plan. The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly
announced share repurchase plan since its inception was 11,494,059 as of June 30, 2011. The
plan was approved by the Board of Directors in April 1997 and authorized the repurchase of up
to 2.0 million shares. The plan was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an
additional 2.0 million shares, and was further amended in August and December 2005 to
authorize the repurchase of an additional 6.0 million shares. In February 2007, the Board of
Directors approved an increase in the Companys share repurchase program by authorizing the
repurchase of up to an additional 2.0 million of the Companys outstanding common shares. In
February 2011, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Companys share repurchase
program by authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional 1.9 million of the Companys
outstanding common shares. The Company may purchase shares from time to time in open market
purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or part of the
purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans. The plan has no
expiration date. |
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4: [REMOVED AND RESERVED]
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
35
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold,
Incorporated incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2011, by and among Diebold, Incorporated, the Subsidiary
Borrowers (as defined therein) party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and a lender, and the other lender party thereto incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2011 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
*101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
*101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a
part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
36
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Swidarski |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Bradley C. Richardson
|
|
|
|
Bradley C. Richardson |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
37
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2011
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
*101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
*101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these
sections. |
38