e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to
Commission file number: 0-49983
SAIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
48-1229851 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11465 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 400
Johns Creek, Georgia
|
|
30097 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(770) 232-5067
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.45 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding Shares at April 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
15,867,280 |
SAIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Item 1. Financial Statements
Saia, Inc. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,372 |
|
|
$ |
8,746 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
99,211 |
|
|
|
87,507 |
|
Prepaid expenses, including prepaid interest and fees of $6,374
and $6,998 in 2010 and 2009, and other |
|
|
40,003 |
|
|
|
38,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
145,586 |
|
|
|
134,553 |
|
Property and Equipment, at cost |
|
|
615,234 |
|
|
|
615,803 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation |
|
|
301,213 |
|
|
|
292,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
314,021 |
|
|
|
323,360 |
|
Identifiable Intangibles, net |
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
Other Noncurrent Assets |
|
|
6,111 |
|
|
|
6,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
467,851 |
|
|
$ |
466,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
49,798 |
|
|
$ |
46,997 |
|
Wages, vacation and employees benefits |
|
|
20,813 |
|
|
|
18,793 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
35,411 |
|
|
|
36,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
106,022 |
|
|
|
102,771 |
|
Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
41,867 |
|
|
|
41,867 |
|
Claims, insurance and other |
|
|
30,160 |
|
|
|
29,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
162,027 |
|
|
|
160,974 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
15,867,280 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
201,397 |
|
|
|
201,041 |
|
Deferred compensation trust, 170,370 and 168,360 shares of
common stock at cost at March 31, 2010 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(2,749 |
) |
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
199,802 |
|
|
|
202,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
467,851 |
|
|
$ |
466,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Saia, Inc. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
212,224 |
|
|
$ |
206,102 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
117,464 |
|
|
|
127,635 |
|
Purchased transportation |
|
|
17,435 |
|
|
|
13,861 |
|
Fuel, operating expenses and supplies |
|
|
55,902 |
|
|
|
45,486 |
|
Operating taxes and licenses |
|
|
9,214 |
|
|
|
8,990 |
|
Claims and insurance |
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
|
7,611 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,305 |
|
|
|
10,031 |
|
Operating gains, net |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
214,349 |
|
|
|
213,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Loss |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
(7,453 |
) |
Nonoperating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating expenses, net |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income Taxes |
|
|
(4,883 |
) |
|
|
(10,276 |
) |
Income Tax Benefit |
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
(3,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(3,223 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
15,697 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
15,697 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Saia, Inc. and Subsidiary
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,223 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,289 |
) |
Noncash items included in net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,210 |
|
|
|
10,228 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
(9,333 |
) |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities |
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(2,266 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(1,898 |
) |
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(2,374 |
) |
|
|
(15,111 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
8,746 |
|
|
|
27,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
6,372 |
|
|
$ |
11,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Saia, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Saia, Inc. and its wholly owned regional transportation subsidiary, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC
(together, the Company or Saia). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit by
the independent registered public accounting firm. In the opinion of management, all normal
recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated statements of the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods included herein
have been made. These interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information, the
instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted from these
statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Business
The Company provides regional and interregional less-than-truckload (LTL) services and selected
longer haul LTL, guaranteed and expedited service solutions to a broad base of customers across the
United States through its wholly owned subsidiary, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC (Saia Motor
Freight).
New Accounting Pronouncements
There are no new accounting pronouncements pending adoption as of March 31, 2010 which the Company
believes would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
(2) Computation of Loss Per Share
The calculation of basic loss per common share and diluted loss per common share was as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,223 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic loss per share weighted average common
shares |
|
|
15,697 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of other common stock equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted loss per share
adjusted weighted
average common shares |
|
|
15,697 |
|
|
|
13,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the net loss for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, options and other
common stock equivalents of 311,033 and 413,904 shares, which would have been dilutive, were
excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share. For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, options for 395,616 and 322,043 shares would have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share if the Company had net earnings because their effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
(3) Commitments and Contingencies
California Labor Code Litigation. The Company is a defendant in a lawsuit originally filed in July
2007 in California state court on behalf of California dock workers alleging various violations of
state labor laws. In August 2007, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the
Central District of California. The claims include the alleged failure of the Company to provide
rest and meal breaks and the alleged failure to reimburse the employees for the cost of work shoes,
among other claims. In January 2008, the parties negotiated a conditional class-wide settlement
under which the Company would pay $0.8 million to settle these claims. This pre-certification
settlement is subject to court approval. In March 2008, the District Court denied preliminary
approval and the named Plaintiff filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeal for the
Ninth Circuit seeking permission to appeal this ruling. The petition was granted and the appeal is
now pending. The proposed settlement is reflected as a liability of $0.8 million at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
Other. The Company is subject to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its
business. In the opinion of management, the aggregate liability, if any, with respect to these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position but could
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations in a quarter or annual period.
(4) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximated fair value as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments. Based on the
borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities, the estimated fair value of total debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is
$104.0 million and $88.8 million, respectively, based upon level two in the fair value hierarchy.
7
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and our 2009 audited consolidated financial
statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009. Those financial statements include additional information about our significant accounting
policies, practices and the transactions that underlie our financial results.
Forward-Looking Statements
The Securities and Exchange Commission encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information
so that investors can better understand the future prospects of a company and make informed
investment decisions. This Form 10-Q contains these types of statements, which are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such
as anticipate, estimate, expect, project, intend, may, plan, predict, believe,
should and similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and the Company undertakes
no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements reflect the present expectation of future events of our management and are subject to a
number of important factors, risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements. These factors and
risks include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions including downturns in the
business cycle; the creditworthiness of our customers and their ability to pay for services;
competitive initiatives and pricing pressures, including in connection with fuel surcharge; the
Companys need for capital and uncertainty of the current credit markets; the possibility of
defaults under the Companys debt agreements (including violation of financial covenants); possible
issuance of equity which would dilute stock ownership; indemnification obligations associated with
the 2006 sale of Jevic Transportation, Inc.; the effect of on-going litigation including class
action lawsuits; cost and availability of qualified drivers, fuel, purchased transportation,
property, revenue equipment and other operating assets; governmental regulations, including but not
limited to Hours of Service, engine emissions, compliance with legislation requiring companies to
evaluate their internal control over financial reporting, changes in interpretation of accounting
principles and Homeland Security; dependence on key employees; inclement weather; labor relations,
including the adverse impact should a portion of the Companys workforce become unionized;
effectiveness of company-specific performance improvement initiatives; terrorism risks;
self-insurance claims and other expense volatility; and other financial, operational and legal
risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Companys SEC filings. These factors and
risks are described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as updated by Item 1A of this Quarterly Report or Form 10-Q.
As a result of these and other factors, no assurance can be given as to our future results and
achievements. Accordingly, a forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of
future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. You should
not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
Form 10-Q. The Company is under no obligation, and the Company expressly disclaims any obligation,
to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Executive Overview
The Companys business is highly correlated to non-service sectors of the general economy. The
Companys priorities are focused on increasing volume within existing geographies while managing
both the mix and yield of business to achieve increased profitability. The Companys business is
labor intensive, capital intensive and service sensitive. The Company looks for opportunities to
improve cost effectiveness, safety and asset utilization (primarily tractors and trailers).
Throughout 2009, the pricing environment became more challenging due to overcapacity in the
industry, which negatively impacted yield. While improved, the challenging macro-economic
environment remains. The Company plans to focus on initiatives to align costs with continued soft
volumes, including measured pricing decisions, targeted sales and marketing programs and efficiency
initiatives. Technology continues to be important in supporting service to our customers, operating
management and yield.
The Companys operating revenue increased by 3.0 percent in first quarter 2010 compared to first
quarter 2009. The increase resulted primarily from the increase in tonnage and higher fuel
surcharge.
8
Consolidated operating loss was $2.1 million for the first quarter of 2010 compared to consolidated
operating loss of $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2009. In the first quarter of 2010, LTL
tonnage was up 2.8 percent versus the prior-year quarter. Overcapacity in the LTL industry
continues to pressure yield in 2010. Loss per share was $0.21 in the first quarter of 2010,
compared to a loss per share of $0.47 in the prior-year quarter. The operating ratio (operating
expenses divided by operating revenue) was 101.0 percent in the first quarter of 2010 compared to
103.6 percent in the first quarter of 2009.
The Company had $2.3 million in cash used in operating activities through the first three months of
the year compared with cash provided in the amount of $7.0 million in the prior-year period. The
Company had net cash used in investing activities of $0.1 million during the first three months of
2010 for the purchase of property and equipment compared to $1.9 million in the first three months
of 2009. The Companys cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2010 was
zero compared to $20.2 million for debt repayments in the first three months of 2009. The Company
had no borrowings on its revolving credit agreement, outstanding letters of credit of $55.1 million
and cash and cash equivalents balance of $6.4 million as of March 31, 2010. The Company was in
compliance with its debt covenants at March 31, 2010.
General
The following managements discussion and analysis describes the principal factors affecting the
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, as well as the critical accounting policies
of Saia, Inc. (also referred to as Saia or the Company).
The Company is an asset-based transportation company based in Johns Creek, Georgia providing
regional and interregional LTL services and selected longer haul LTL, guaranteed and expedited
service solutions to a broad base of customers across the United States through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC.
Our business is highly correlated to non-service sectors of the general economy. It also is
impacted by a number of other factors discussed under Forward Looking Statements and Item 1A
Risk Factors. The key factors that affect our operating results are the volumes of shipments
transported through our network, as measured by our average daily shipments and tonnage; the prices
we obtain for our services, as measured by revenue per hundredweight (a measure of yield) and
average revenue per shipment; our ability to manage our cost structure for capital expenditures and
operating expenses such as salaries, wages and benefits; purchased transportation; claims and
insurance expense; fuel and maintenance; and our ability to match operating costs to shifting
volume levels. Fuel surcharges have remained in effect for several years and are a significant
component of revenue and pricing. Fuel surcharges are a more integral part of annual customer
contract renewals, blurring the distinction between base price increases and recoveries under the
fuel surcharge program.
9
Results of Operations
Saia, Inc. and Subsidiary
Selected Results of Operations and Operating Statistics
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except ratios and revenue per hundredweight)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
10 v. 09 |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
212,224 |
|
|
$ |
206,102 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
117,464 |
|
|
|
127,635 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
Purchased transportation |
|
|
17,435 |
|
|
|
13,861 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,305 |
|
|
|
10,031 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Fuel and other operating expenses |
|
|
70,145 |
|
|
|
62,028 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
(7,453 |
) |
|
|
(71.5 |
) |
Operating Ratio |
|
|
101.0 |
% |
|
|
103.6 |
% |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Nonoperating Expense |
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working Capital (as of March 31, 2010 and 2009) |
|
|
39,564 |
|
|
|
12,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows provided by (used in) Operations |
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Acquisitions of Property and Equipment |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Tonnage |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Total Tonnage |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Shipments |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shipments |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Revenue per hundredweight |
|
$ |
11.52 |
|
|
$ |
11.55 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Total Revenue per hundredweight |
|
$ |
10.41 |
|
|
$ |
10.47 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 vs. Quarter ended March 31, 2009
Revenue and volume
Consolidated revenue increased 3.0 percent to $212.2 million as a result of increased tonnage
tempered by lower yields resulting from the continuing weak economic conditions and the competitive
pricing environment. Due to continued overcapacity in the industry, the pricing environment
remains challenging. During the first quarter of 2010, the increase in fuel surcharge revenue was
less than the increase in fuel expense compared to the same quarter last year.
Saias LTL revenue per hundredweight (a measure of yield) decreased 0.2 percent to $11.52 per
hundredweight for the first quarter of 2010 primarily as a result of the continued competitive
pricing environment and overcapacity in the industry, partially offset by higher fuel surcharge.
Saias LTL tonnage increased 2.8 percent to 0.9 million tons and LTL shipments remained flat at 1.6
million shipments. Approximately 70 percent of Saias operating revenue is subject to individual
customer price adjustment negotiations that occur throughout the year. The remaining 30 percent of
operating revenue is subject to an annual general rate increase. On February 1, 2010, Saia
implemented a 4.8 percent general rate increase for customers comprising this 30 percent of
operating revenue. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes, among other things,
impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained over time.
10
Operating expenses and operating loss
Consolidated operating loss of $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2010, compared to operating
loss of $7.5 million in the prior year quarter, was impacted by increased tonnage and cost
reduction efforts. The first quarter 2010 operating ratio (operating expenses divided by operating
revenue) was 101.0 compared to 103.6 for the same period in 2009. The Company implemented
reductions-in-force during first and fourth quarters of 2009 to bring the Companys workforce in
line with business levels and a reduced outlook. The Company suspended its 401(k) match effective
February 1, 2009. On April 1, 2009, the Company implemented a compensation reduction equal to 10
percent of salary for the Companys leadership team, five percent for hourly, linehaul and salaried
employees in operations, maintenance and administration and 10 percent in the annual retainer and
meeting fees paid to the non-employee members of the Companys Board of Directors. Estimated
savings compared to the first quarter of 2009 from the suspension of the 401(k) match is $1 million
and $5 million from the compensation and wage reductions. Claims and insurance in the first quarter
of 2010 was $2.5 million less than the first quarter of 2009 primarily reflecting favorable trends
in the severity of accidents incurred and reduced cargo claims. Purchased transportation expenses
increased 25.8 percent reflecting increased utilization due to higher volumes and adjustment to
change in freight flow.
Other
Substantially all non-operating expenses represent interest expense. The effective tax rate was
34.0 percent for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to 38.8 percent for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 reflecting the impact of forecasted earnings for 2010 and reduced tax credits.
Fluctuations in the Companys forecasted results for 2010 could potentially have a significant
impact on the Companys effective tax rate for an interim period.
Net loss was $3.2 million, or $0.21 per share, in the first quarter of 2010 compared to a net loss
of $6.3 million, or $0.47 per share, in the first quarter of 2009. Due to the equity issuance of
2.3 million shares in December 2009, the number of shares outstanding has increased to 15.7 million
for the first quarter, which compares to 13.3 million for prior year quarter. This change impacts
the comparative earnings per share calculation.
Working capital/capital expenditures
Working capital at March 31, 2010 was $39.6 million, which increased from working capital at March
31, 2009 of $12.5 million. This increase was due to a decrease in wages, vacation and employee
benefits of $17.7 million, other accrued liabilities of $7.7 million and $8.8 million due to the
current portion of long term debt. Cash flows used in operating activities were $2.3 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus $7.0 million provided by operating activities for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash used in
investing activities was $0.1 million versus $1.9 million in the prior-year period, due to lower
property and equipment purchases. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash used in
financing activities was zero
versus $20.2 million in the prior-year period. The $20.2 million used for financing activities in
first quarter 2009 was fully comprised of debt repayments including $11.5 million for the
redemption of subordinated debentures.
Outlook
Our business remains highly correlated to the general economy and competitive pricing pressures, as
well as the success of Company-specific improvement initiatives. While improved, there remains
uncertainty as to the timing of economic recovery through 2010. We are evaluating continued
initiatives to reduce costs and increase productivity. We plan to continue to focus on providing
top quality service and improving safety performance. If significant competitors were to cease
operations and their capacity leave the market, current industry excess capacity could improve.
However, there can be no assurance that any industry consolidation will indeed happen or if such
consolidation occurs that it will materially improve the excess industry capacity.
The Company plans to continue to pursue revenue and cost initiatives to improve profitability.
Planned revenue initiatives include, but are not limited to, building density in our current
geography, targeted marketing initiatives to grow revenue in more profitable segments, as well as
pricing and yield management. The extent of success of these revenue initiatives is impacted by
what proves to be the underlying economic trends, competitor initiatives and other factors
discussed under Forward- Looking Statements and Item 1A Risk Factors.
Planned cost management initiatives include, but are not limited to, seeking gains in productivity
and asset utilization that collectively are designed to offset anticipated inflationary unit cost
increases in healthcare, workers compensation and all the other expense categories. Specific cost
initiatives include linehaul routing optimization, reduction in costs of purchased transportation,
expansion of wireless dock technology and an
11
enhanced weight and inspection process. The Companys
vacation expense will return to historical levels in 2010. The following cost reductions taken in
2009 are subject to reinstatement in the future: the suspension of the Companys 401(k) match;
reduction in compensation equal to 10 percent of salary for the Companys leadership team and a
five percent wage reduction for hourly, linehaul and salaried employees in operations, maintenance
and administration; and the 10 percent reduction in the annual retainer and meeting fees paid to
the non-employee members of the Companys Board of Directors. If the Company builds market share,
there are potential numerous operating leverage cost benefits. Conversely, should the economy
soften from present levels, the Company plans to attempt to match resources and capacity to
shifting volume levels to lessen unfavorable operating leverage. The success of cost improvement
initiatives is also impacted by the cost and availability of drivers and purchased transportation,
fuel, insurance claims, regulatory changes, successful implementation of profit improvement
initiatives and other factors discussed under Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A Risk
Factors.
See Item 1A Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements for a more complete discussion of
potential risks and uncertainties that could materially affect our future performance.
New Accounting Pronouncements
There are no new accounting pronouncements pending adoption as of March 31, 2010, which the Company
believes would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Financial Condition
The Companys liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investment in new equipment, land and
structures and information technology, letters of credit required under insurance programs, as well
as funding working capital requirements.
The Company is party to a revolving credit agreement (Restated Credit Agreement) with a group of
banks to fund capital investment and working capital needs. The facility provides up to $120
million in availability, subject to a borrowing base. The Company is also party to a long-term
note agreement (Restated Master Shelf Agreement), as discussed below. The Company entered into
amendments in June and December 2009 to the Revolving Credit Agreement and Master Shelf Agreement
obtaining financial covenant relief through March 31, 2011. Pursuant to those amendments, the
Company agreed to increases in interest rates, letter of credit fees and certain other fees and
pledged certain real estate and facilities, tractors and trailers, accounts receivable and other
assets to secure indebtedness under both agreements.
Simultaneously with the December 2009 amendments, the Company issued 2,310,000 shares of common
stock in a private placement, which generated approximately $24.9 million in net proceeds.
Proceeds were used primarily
to prepay in December 2009 approximately $17.5 million in indebtedness and $7.0 million in
scheduled interest payments in December 2009 that were otherwise due under the Master Shelf
Agreement in 2010.
On February 27, 2009, the Company fully redeemed the $11.5 million of the 7% Convertible
Subordinated Debentures due 2011.
Restated Credit Agreement
The December 2009 amendment to the Restated Credit Agreement reduced the revolving credit facility
from $160 million to $120 million and resulted in debt issuance cost expense of $0.5 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009. The Company also agreed as part of that amendment to prepay approximately
$2.0 million in letter of credit fees otherwise payable in 2010. The Restated Credit Agreement is
subject to a borrowing base described below, and matures on January 28, 2013.
Under the Restated Credit Agreement, interest rate margins on revolving credit loans, fees on
letters of credit and the unused portion fee increased from the interest rate margins and fees in
place prior to the 2009 amendments, but continued to be based on the Companys leverage ratio.
Prior to the June 2009 amendment, the LIBOR rate margin and letter of credit fee ranged from 62.5
basis points to 162.5 basis points, the base rate margin ranged from minus 100 basis points to zero
basis points and the unused portion fee ranged from 15 basis points to 25 basis points. As a
result of the June 2009 amendment (effective as of June 26, 2009), the LIBOR rate margin and letter
of credit fee range from 275 basis points to 400 basis points, the base rate margin ranges from 50
basis points to 175 basis points and the unused portion fee ranges from 40 basis points to 50 basis
points. The Restated Credit Agreement provides for a 3.0% interest rate floor.
12
The Restated Credit Agreement, as amended by the December 2009 amendment, provides relief from
certain financial covenants through March 31, 2011 after which time they return to previous levels.
Under the Restated Credit Agreement, the Company must maintain certain financial covenants
including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a leverage ratio, an adjusted leverage ratio and a
minimum tangible net worth, among others. The Restated Credit Agreement also provides for a
pledge by the Company of certain land and structures, certain tractors, trailers and other personal
property and accounts receivable. Total bank commitments under the Restated Credit Agreement are
$120 million subject to a borrowing base calculated utilizing certain property, equipment and
accounts receivable as defined in the Restated Credit Agreement.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had no borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement and $55.1
million in letters of credit outstanding under the Restated Credit Agreement. At March 31, 2009,
the Company had no borrowings under the Restated Credit Agreement and $53.7 million in letters of
credit outstanding under the Restated Credit Agreement. The available portion of the Restated
Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes, including future capital expenditures,
working capital and letter of credit requirements as needed.
Restated Master Shelf Agreement
On September 20, 2002, the Company issued $100 million in Senior Notes under a $125 million
(amended to $150 million in April 2005) Master Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment
Management, Inc. and certain of its affiliates. The Company issued another $25 million in Senior
Notes on November 30, 2007 and $25 million in Senior Notes on January 31, 2008 under the same
Master Shelf Agreement.
The initial $100 million Senior Notes have an initial fixed interest rate of 7.38 percent.
Payments due under the $100 million Senior Notes were interest only until June 30, 2006 and at that
time semi-annual principal payments began with the final payment due December 2013. The November
2007 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes has an initial fixed interest rate of 6.14 percent. The
January 2008 issuance of $25 million Senior Notes has an initial fixed interest rate of 6.17
percent. Payments due for both $25 million issuances will be interest only until June 30, 2011 and
at that time semi-annual principal payments will begin with the final payments due January 1, 2018.
Under the terms of the Senior Notes, the Company must maintain certain financial covenants
including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a leverage ratio, an adjusted leverage ratio and a
minimum tangible net worth, among others.
In connection with the December 2009 amendment of the Master Shelf Agreement, the Company prepaid
the principal and interest on the Senior Notes in December 2009 otherwise due and payable during
2010, at the current interest rates. This resulted in no current portion due and prepaid interest
included in prepaid expenses. In addition, the interest rate on the Senior Notes will increase to
9.75% in the first quarter of 2011. The interest rate
on those notes may return to the original rates, when the Company is in compliance with the
original financial covenants on or after the second quarter of 2011.
Other
At December 31, 2009, Yellow Corporation, now known as YRC Worldwide (Yellow), provided guarantees
on behalf of Saia primarily for open workers compensation claims and casualty claims incurred
prior to March 1, 2000. Under the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into in
connection with the 100 percent tax-free distribution of Saia shares to Yellow shareholders, Saia
pays Yellows actual cost of any collateral it provides to insurance underwriters in support of
these claims at cost plus 100 basis points. At March 31, 2010, the portion of collateral allocated
by Yellow to Saia in support of these claims was $1.7 million.
Projected net capital expenditures for 2010 are approximately $10 million, which is below
historical levels due to the uncertain economic environment and will be reevaluated as tonnage
improves. This represents an approximately $2.4 million increase from 2009 net capital
expenditures of $7.6 million for property and equipment. Approximately $0.7 million of the 2010
capital budget was committed at March 31, 2010. Net capital expenditures pertain primarily to
investments in revenue equipment, information technology, land and structures.
The Company has historically generated cash flows from operations that have funded its capital
expenditure requirements. Cash flows from operations were $14.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, while net cash used in investing activities was $7.6 million. As such, the cash
flows from operations funded the majority of the $24.8 million cash used in financing activities in
2009. Cash flows used in operations were $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31,
13
2010 were $9.3 million
lower than the prior year period primarily due to the increased working capital requirements. The
timing of capital expenditures can largely be managed around the seasonal working capital
requirements of the Company. The Company believes it has adequate sources of capital to meet
short-term liquidity needs through its cash and cash equivalents of $6.4 million at March 31, 2010
and availability under its revolving credit facility, subject to the satisfaction of existing debt
covenants. Future operating cash flows are primarily dependent upon the Companys profitability
and its ability to manage its working capital requirements, primarily accounts receivable, accounts
payable and wage and benefit accruals. The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants at
March 31, 2010.
In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, our operating leases are not
recorded in our balance sheet; however, the future minimum lease payments are included in the
Contractual Cash Obligations table below. See the notes to our audited consolidated financial
statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for
additional information. In addition to the principal amounts disclosed in the tables below, the
Company has interest obligations of approximately $6.9 million for 2010 and decreasing for each
year thereafter, based on borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2010.
Contractual Cash Obligations
The following tables set forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial
commitments as of March 31, 2010 (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by year |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Contractual cash obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations |
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
$ |
159.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of commitment expiration by year |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Other commercial commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available line of credit (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64.9 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
commitments |
|
$ |
60.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subject to the satisfaction of existing debt covenants and borrowing base requirements. |
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $2.9 million and accrued interest and
penalties of $1.2 million related to the unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2010. The
Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of cash settlement with respective taxing authorities
beyond one year and accordingly has not included the amounts within the above contractual cash
obligation and other commercial commitment tables.
The Company sold the stock of Jevic Transportation, Inc. (Jevic) on June 30, 2006 and remains a
guarantor under indemnity agreements, primarily with certain insurance underwriters with respect to
Jevics self-insured retention (SIR) obligation for workers compensation, bodily injury and
property damage and general liability claims against Jevic arising out of occurrences prior to the
transaction date. The SIR obligation was estimated to be approximately $15.3 million as of the
June 30, 2006 transaction date. In connection with the transaction, Jevic provided collateral in
the form of a $15.3 million letter of credit with a third party bank in favor of the Company. The
amount of the letter of credit was reduced to $13.2 million following draws by the Company on the
letter of credit to fund the SIR portion of settlements of claims against Jevic arising prior to
the transaction date. Jevic filed
14
bankruptcy in May 2008 and the Company recorded liabilities for
all residual indemnification obligations in claims, insurance and other current liabilities, based
on the current estimates of the indemnification obligations as of June 30, 2008. The income
statement impact of $0.9 million, net of taxes, was reflected as discontinued operations in the
second quarter of 2008.
In September 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the debtors of Jevic, which
was approved by the bankruptcy court, under which the Company assumed Jevics SIR obligation on the
workers compensation, bodily injury and property damage, and general liability claims arising
prior to the transaction date in exchange for the draw by the Company of the entire $13.2 million
remaining on the Jevic letter of credit and a payment by the Company to the bankruptcy estate of
$750,000. In addition, the settlement agreement included a mutual release of claims, except for
the Companys responsibility to Jevic for certain outstanding tax liabilities in the states of New
York and New Jersey for the periods prior to the transaction date and for any potential fraudulent
conveyance claims. The income statement impact of the September 2008 settlement of $0.1 million,
net of taxes, was reflected as discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2008 and includes a
$0.3 million net reduction in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to Jevic. In
2009, the Company recorded an adjustment of $1.2 million; net of taxes to the assumed SIR
obligations as a result of reduction in the required reserve for claims incurred but not reported
and was reflected as discontinued operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company makes estimates and assumptions in preparing the consolidated financial statements that
affect reported amounts and disclosures therein. In the opinion of management, the accounting
policies that generally have the most significant impact on the financial position and results of
operations of the Company include:
|
|
Claims and Insurance Accruals. The Company has self-insured retention limits
generally ranging from $250,000 to $2.0 million per claim for medical, workers compensation,
auto liability, casualty and cargo claims. For the policy year March 2003 through February
2004 only, the Company has an aggregate exposure limited to an additional $2.0 million above
its $1.0 million per claim deductible under its auto liability program. The liabilities
associated with the risk retained by the Company are estimated in part based on historical
experience, third-party actuarial analysis with respect to workers compensation claims,
demographics, nature and severity, past experience and other assumptions. The liabilities for
self-funded retention are included in claims and insurance reserves based on claims incurred
with liabilities for
unsettled claims and claims incurred but not yet reported being actuarially determined with
respect to workers compensation claims and with respect to all other liabilities, estimated
based on managements evaluation of the nature and severity of individual claims and
historical experience. However, these estimated accruals could be significantly affected if
the actual costs of the Company differ from these assumptions. A significant number of these
claims typically take several years to develop and even longer to ultimately settle. These
estimates tend to be reasonably accurate over time; however, assumptions regarding severity of
claims, medical cost inflation, as well as specific case facts can create short-term
volatility in estimates. |
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances. Revenue is recognized on a
percentage-of-completion basis for shipments in transit while expenses are recognized as
incurred. In addition, estimates included in the recognition of revenue and accounts
receivable include estimates of shipments in transit and estimates of future adjustments to
revenue and accounts receivable for billing adjustments and collectability. |
|
|
|
Revenue is recognized in a systematic process whereby estimates of shipments in transit are
based upon actual shipments picked up, scheduled day of delivery and current trend in average
rates charged to customers. Since the cycle for pick up and delivery of shipments is
generally 1-3 days, typically less than 5 percent of a total months revenue is in transit at
the end of any month. Estimates for credit losses and billing adjustments are based upon
historical experience of credit losses, adjustments processed and trends of collections.
Billing adjustments are primarily made for discounts and billing corrections. These estimates
are continuously evaluated and updated; however, changes in economic conditions, pricing
arrangements and other factors can significantly impact these estimates. |
|
|
|
Depreciation and Capitalization of Assets. Under the Companys accounting policy
for property and equipment, management establishes appropriate depreciable lives and salvage
values for the Companys revenue equipment (tractors and trailers) based on their estimated
useful lives and estimated fair values to |
15
|
|
be received when the equipment is sold or traded in.
These estimates are routinely evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant. However,
actual depreciation and salvage values could differ from these assumptions based on market
conditions and other factors. |
|
|
|
Equity-based Incentive Compensation. The Company maintains long-term incentive
compensation arrangements in the form of stock options, restricted stock, cash-based awards
and stock-based awards. The criteria for the stock-based awards are total shareholder return
versus a peer group of companies over a three-year performance period. As required by the
Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic of FASB ASC 718, the Company accounts for its
stock-based awards with the expense amortized over the three-year vesting period based on the
Monte Carlo fair value method at the date the stock-based awards are granted. The Company
accounts for stock options in accordance with FASB ASC 718 with option expense amortized over
the three-year vesting period based on the Black-Scholes-Merton fair value at the date the
options are granted. See discussion of adoption of FASB ASC 718 Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. |
These accounting policies and others are described in further detail in the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant judgments and
estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. In
many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. We maintain
a thorough process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the
appropriateness of the many estimates that are required to prepare the consolidated financial
statements. However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based
on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of interest rates and
fuel prices. The detail of the Companys debt structure is more fully described in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements set forth in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. To help mitigate our risk to rising fuel prices, the Company has
implemented a fuel surcharge program. This program is well
established within the industry and customer acceptance of fuel surcharges remains high. Since the
amount of fuel surcharge is based on average national fuel prices and is reset weekly, exposure of
the Company to fuel price volatility is significantly reduced. However, the fuel surcharge may not
fully offset fuel price fluctuations during periods of rapid increases or decreases in the price of
fuel and is also subject to overall competitive pricing negotiations.
The following table provides information about the Companys third-party financial instruments as
of March 31, 2010. The table presents principal cash flows (in millions) and related weighted
average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. The fair value of the fixed rate debt was
estimated based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar
terms and remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
|
$ |
104.0 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
7.38 |
% |
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
6.93 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
6.78 |
% |
|
|
6.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Quarterly Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications
As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure
Controls). The controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO).
Based upon the controls evaluation, the Companys CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the
limitations noted below, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Companys
Disclosure Controls are effective to ensure that information the Company is required to disclose in
reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in SEC rules and forms.
During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, there were no changes in internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Form 10-Q are certifications of the CEO and the CFO,
which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This Controls and Procedures
section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the
certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Companys reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported timely. Disclosure Controls are also designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Companys Disclosure Controls include
components of its internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the
Companys financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that its Disclosure Controls
or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system
must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,
by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may
occur and not be detected.
17
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings For a description of all material pending legal proceedings, see Note
3 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors Risk Factors are described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and there have been no material
changes.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number |
|
|
Number(or |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
|
Price Paid per |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
Units) that May Yet |
|
|
|
Units) |
|
|
Share (or |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Be Purchased under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
Unit) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
thePlans or Programs |
|
January 1, 2010 through January 31, 2010 |
|
|
910 |
(2) |
|
$ |
13.10 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
February 1, 2010 through February 28, 2010 |
|
|
1,100 |
(3) |
|
|
11.96 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares purchased by the Saia, Inc.Executive Capital Accumulation Plan were open market
purchases. For more information on the Saia Executive Capital Accumulation Plan see the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No.333-155805) filed on December 1, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
The Saia, Inc. Executive Capital Accumulation Plan had no sales of Saia stock on the open
market during the period of January 1, 2010 through January 31, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
The Saia, Inc. Executive Capital Accumulation Plan had no sales of Saia stock on the open
market during the period of February 1, 2010 through February 28, 2010 |
|
(4) |
|
The Saia, Inc. Executive Capital Accumulation Plan had no sales of Saia stock on the open
market during the period of March 1, 2010 throughMarch 31, 2010. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other InformationNone
18
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Saia, Inc. as amended (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on
July 26, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on July 29, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between Saia, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC dated as of
September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Saia, Inc.s
Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
19
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAIA, INC.
|
|
Date: April 30, 2010 |
/s/ James A. Darby
|
|
|
James A. Darby |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
20
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Saia, Inc., as amended (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on
July 26, 2006). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Saia, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 of Saia, Inc.s Form 8-K (File No. 0-49983) filed on July 29, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between Saia, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC dated as of
September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Saia, Inc.s
Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
E-1