def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous
filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2010
To our Stockholders:
We are pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of
stockholders of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. to be held on
Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight
Time, at the Westin Stonebriar Resort Conference Center, 1549
Legacy Drive, Frisco, Texas 75034. For your convenience, we will
be offering a live webcast of the annual meeting at the Investor
Center section of our website at
www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com.
Details regarding the business to be conducted, information you
should consider in casting your vote and how you may vote are
more fully described in the accompanying Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement.
In accordance with rules approved by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, this year we are again furnishing proxy materials to
our stockholders primarily over the Internet. As a result, we
are mailing to many of our stockholders a notice instead of a
paper copy of our Proxy Statement and our 2009 Annual Report.
The notice contains instructions on how to access those
documents over the Internet. The notice also contains
instructions on how each of those stockholders can receive a
paper copy of our proxy materials, including our Proxy
Statement, our 2009 Annual Report and a proxy card or voting
instruction form. Stockholders who do not receive a notice will
receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the
annual meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible.
Please note that you will not be able to vote at the annual
meeting via the live webcast, and, unless you are otherwise
represented at the annual meeting via proxy, you will not be
deemed present or represented at the annual meeting by accessing
the webcast.
Thank you for your ongoing support of Dr Pepper Snapple Group.
Sincerely,
Wayne R. Sanders
Chairman of the Board
Larry D. Young
President and Chief Executive Officer
DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP,
INC.
5301 Legacy Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
Date and Time: |
|
May 20, 2010, 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time |
|
|
Place of Meeting: |
|
Westin Stonebriar Resort Conference Center
1549 Legacy Drive
Frisco, Texas 75034 |
|
|
Internet: |
|
Access the Annual Meeting online at the Investor Center section
of our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com. |
|
|
Business to be conducted: |
|
1. To elect Class II directors John L.
Adams, Terence D. Martin and Ronald G. Rogers to hold
office for a three-year term and until their respective
successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.
|
|
|
|
|
2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal year 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting.
|
|
|
Adjournments and Postponements: |
|
Any action on the business to be conducted may be considered at
the date and time of the Annual Meeting as specified above or at
any time or date to which the Annual Meeting may be properly
adjourned and postponed. |
|
|
Record Date: |
|
You are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a
stockholder of record as of the close of business on
March 22, 2010. |
|
|
Voting Rights: |
|
A holder of shares of our common stock is entitled to one vote,
in person or by proxy, for each share of our common stock on all
matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting. |
YOUR VOTE
IS VERY IMPORTANT.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we hope
you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares via
a toll-free telephone number or over the Internet. If you
received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction form
by mail, you may submit your proxy card or voting instruction
form for the Annual Meeting by completing, signing, dating and
returning your proxy card or voting instruction form in the
pre-addressed envelope provided. For specific instructions on
how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled
Questions and Answers How can I vote my shares
without attending the Annual Meeting? beginning on
page 3 of the Proxy Statement.
This Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy
Statement and form of proxy are being distributed on or about
April 1, 2010.
By Order of the Board of Directors
James L. Baldwin, Jr.
Corporate Secretary
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY
20, 2010
The
Companys Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders
for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 are available at
www.proxyvote.com.
DR PEPPER
SNAPPLE GROUP, INC.
5301 Legacy Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
for
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held on May 20, 2010
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Why did I
receive this Proxy Statement?
This Proxy Statement is being made available to you over the
Internet or paper copies of these materials are being delivered
to you by mail as a stockholder of record, as of March 22,
2010, of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(referred to in this Proxy Statement as the Company,
we, us and our), in
connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors
(referred to in this Proxy Statement as the Board)
of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(referred to in this Proxy Statement as the Annual
Meeting). As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the
Annual Meeting and are entitled to and are requested to vote on
the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.
When and
where is the Annual Meeting to be held?
The Annual Meeting will be held at Westin Stonebriar Resort
Conference Center, 1549 Legacy Drive, Frisco, Texas 75034, on
May 20, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, or
at any adjournments thereof, for the purposes stated in the
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Do I need
a ticket to attend the meeting?
You will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership of our
common stock to enter the meeting. If you hold shares directly
in your name as a stockholder of record and have received a copy
of our proxy materials, an admission ticket is attached to your
printed proxy card. If you plan to attend the meeting, please
vote your proxy prior to the meeting but keep the admission
ticket and bring it with you to the meeting.
If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker,
trustee or other nominee and you wish to be admitted to the
meeting, you will have to bring either a copy of the voting
instruction form provided by your broker or nominee, or a copy
of a brokerage statement showing your ownership of our common
stock as of March 22, 2010.
All stockholders must also present a form of photo
identification, such as a valid drivers license or
passport, in order to be admitted to the meeting.
Is there
a webcast of the Annual Meeting?
We are pleased to offer a webcast of the Annual Meeting. If you
choose to participate in the Annual Meeting by means of the
webcast, please go to the Investor Center section of our website
at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com shortly before the Annual
Meeting is scheduled to begin and follow the instructions
provided. Please note that you will not be able to vote at the
annual meeting via the live webcast, and, unless you are
otherwise represented at the annual meeting via proxy, you will
not be deemed present or represented at the annual meeting by
accessing the webcast.
Are Proxy
Materials available via the Internet?
Under rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), we primarily furnish proxy materials to our
stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies
of the materials (including our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed on
March 1, 2010) to each
stockholder. If you received a notice regarding the availability
of proxy materials (the Notice) by mail or
electronic mail, you will not receive a paper copy of these
proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice will
instruct you as to how you may vote your shares. The Notice will
also instruct you as to how you may access your proxy card to
vote over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail or
electronic mail and would like to receive a paper copy of our
proxy materials, free of charge, please follow the instructions
included in the Notice.
The Notice was mailed to our stockholders of record on the
record date on or about April 1, 2010.
What
information is contained in this Proxy Statement?
This Proxy Statement lets our stockholders know when and where
we will hold the Annual Meeting. Additionally, this Proxy
Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Includes information regarding the matters that will be
discussed and voted on at the Annual Meeting, and
|
|
|
|
Provides information about the Company that our stockholders
should consider in order to make an informed decision at the
Annual Meeting.
|
What
should I do if I receive more than one Notice about the Internet
availability of the proxy materials or more than one paper copy
of the proxy materials?
You may receive more than one Notice (either by mail or
electronic mail) or more than one paper or electronic copy of
the proxy materials, including multiple paper copies of this
Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction
forms. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one
brokerage account, you may receive a separate Notice or a
separate voting instruction form for each brokerage account in
which you hold shares. If you are a stockholder of record and
your shares are registered in more than one name, you may
receive more than one Notice or more than one proxy card. If you
hold your shares through a broker, bank, trustee or another
nominee, rather than owning shares registered directly in their
name, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in
street name. As the beneficial owner, you are entitled to direct
the voting of your shares by your intermediary. Your
intermediary will forward the proxy materials to you with a
voting instruction form or provide electronic access to the
materials and to voting facilities. To vote all of your shares
by proxy, you must complete, sign, date and return each proxy
card and voting instruction form that you receive and vote over
the Internet the shares represented by each Notice that you
receive (unless you have requested and received a proxy card or
voting instruction form for the shares represented by one or
more of those Notices).
How may I
obtain a copy of the Companys 2009
Form 10-K
and other financial information?
Stockholders may request a free copy of our 2009 Annual Report,
which includes our 2009
Form 10-K,
from:
Dr Pepper
Snapple Group, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
5301 Legacy Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
Alternatively, stockholders can access the 2009 Annual Report,
which includes our 2009
Form 10-K
and other financial information, on the Investor Center section
of our website at:
www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com
The Company also will furnish any exhibit to the 2009
Form 10-K
if specifically requested.
What
items of business will be voted on at the Annual
Meeting?
The items of business scheduled to be voted on at the Annual
Meeting are:
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1:
|
A proposal to elect Class II directors John L.
Adams, Terence D. Martin and Ronald G. Rogers to hold office for
a three-year term and until their respective successors shall
have been duly elected and qualified.
|
2
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2:
|
A proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP (Deloitte & Touche) as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2010.
|
We also will consider any other business that properly comes
before the Annual Meeting.
How does
the Board recommend that I vote?
Our Board recommends that you vote your shares FOR each
of the nominees for election to the Board and FOR
ratification of Deloitte & Touche as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010
fiscal year.
What
shares can I vote at the Annual Meeting?
Our Board has fixed the close of business on March 22, 2010
as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only holders of
record of the outstanding shares of our common stock at the
close of business on the record date are entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.
As of the close of business on the record date, we had
251,034,733 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value
per share, issued and outstanding. A holder of shares of our
common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of our
common stock, in person or by proxy, on all matters properly
brought before the Annual Meeting.
How can I
vote my shares at the Annual Meeting?
Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be
voted in person at the Annual Meeting. Shares for which you are
the beneficial owner but not the stockholder of record may be
voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal
proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares
giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also vote by
proxy as described below so that your vote will be counted if
you later decide not to attend the meeting. Voting in person
will replace any previous votes that you submitted by proxy.
How can I
vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?
Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or
through a broker, trustee or other nominee as the beneficial
owner, you may direct how your shares are voted without
attending the Annual Meeting. There are three ways to vote by
proxy:
By Internet Stockholders who have
received a Notice by mail may submit proxies over the Internet
by following the instructions on the Notice. Stockholders who
have received a Notice by
e-mail may
submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions
included in the
e-mail.
Stockholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or
voting instruction form by mail may submit proxies over the
Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or
voting instruction form.
By Telephone Stockholders of record
who live in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by
telephone by calling
(800) 690-6903
and following the instructions. Stockholders of record who have
received a Notice by mail must have the control number that
appears on their Notice available when voting. Stockholders of
record who received Notice by
e-mail must
have the control number included in the
e-mail
available when voting. Stockholders of record who have received
a proxy card by mail must have the control number that appears
on their proxy card available when voting. Most stockholders who
are beneficial owners of their shares living in the United
States or Canada and who have received a voting instruction form
by mail may vote by phone by calling the number specified on
voting instruction form provided by their broker, trustee or
nominee. Those stockholders should check the voting instruction
form for telephone voting availability.
By Mail Stockholders who have received
a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction form by mail
may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy
card or voting instruction form and mailing it in the
accompanying pre-addressed envelope.
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of
record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at
11:59 p.m. (EDT) on May 19, 2010. Votes cast by mail
must be received in sufficient time to allow processing. Votes
received by mail prior to the day of the meeting will be
processed, but votes received the day of the meeting may not be
processed depending on the time received. Shares represented by
duly executed proxies in the accompanying proxy card or voting
instruction form will be voted in accordance with the
instructions indicated on
3
such proxies or voting instruction forms, and, if no such
instructions are indicated thereon, will be voted FOR
each of the nominees for election to the Board and FOR
ratification of Deloitte & Touche as our
independent registered public accounting firm for the 2010
fiscal year.
How many
shares must be present or represented to conduct business at the
Annual Meeting?
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares of our common
stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment
thereof is necessary to constitute a quorum to transact business.
Abstentions and broker nonvotes (shares held by brokers or
nominees as to which they have no discretionary power to vote on
a particular matter and have received no instructions from the
beneficial owners of such shares or persons entitled to vote on
the matter) will be counted for the purpose of determining
whether a quorum is present. The election of directors is a
non-discretionary item and may not be voted on by brokers, banks
or other nominees who have not received specific voting
instructions from beneficial owners.
What is
the voting requirement to approve each of the
proposals?
Pursuant to our Amended and Restated By-laws (our
By-laws), the vote of the holders of a majority of
our common stock which has voting power present in person or
represented by proxy and which has actually voted shall decide
any proposal or question properly brought before the Annual
Meeting. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or
ABSTAIN on any proposal, including with respect to
each nominee for election as a director. In tabulating the
voting results for each proposal, including the election of
directors, only FOR and AGAINST votes
will be counted. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted as votes cast FOR or AGAINST any
proposal. Consequently, for each nominee for director to be
elected and for each of the other proposals to be approved, it
will require that more votes be cast FOR the nominee
or proposal than AGAINST the nominee or proposal.
What if I
want to change my vote?
If the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form is signed
and returned, you may, nevertheless, revoke it at any time prior
to the Annual Meeting, at your pleasure, either by (i) your
filing a written notice of revocation received by the person or
persons named therein, (ii) your attendance at the Annual
Meeting and voting the shares covered thereby in person, or
(iii) your delivery of another duly executed proxy card or
voting instruction form dated subsequent to the date thereof to
the addressee named in the enclosed proxy card or voting
instruction form.
How much
will this solicitation cost, and who will pay for it?
The cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this
Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card and the cost of
soliciting proxies related to the Annual Meeting will be borne
by us. We will request banks and brokers to solicit their
customers who are beneficial owners of shares of common stock
listed of record in names of nominees, and will reimburse such
banks and brokers for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for
such solicitation.
Who will
serve as inspector of elections?
The inspector of elections will be a representative from
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
What
happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual
Meeting?
Other than the two items of business described in this Proxy
Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted
upon at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons
named as proxy holders, Larry D. Young and James L. Baldwin will
have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional
matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If for any
reason any of our nominees are not available as a candidate for
director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your
proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated
by the Board.
4
PROPOSALS
Proposal 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board is divided into three classes, each serving three-year
terms. This years nominees for re-election to the Board
for a three-year term as Class II directors are {ages
are as of the date of the Annual Meeting}:
John L. Adams
Mr. Adams, age 65, has served as our director since
April 2008. Mr. Adams served as Executive Vice President of
Trinity Industries, Inc. from January 1999 to June 2005 and held
the position of Vice Chairman from July 2005 to March 2007.
Prior to joining Trinity Industries, Mr. Adams spent
25 years in various positions with Texas Commerce Bank,
N.A. and its successor, Chase Bank of Texas, National
Association. From 1997 to 1998, he served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Chase Bank of Texas. Mr. Adams has
served on the board of directors of Trinity Industries, Inc.
since 2007 and Group 1 Automotive, Inc., since 1999, where he
has served as non-executive chairman since April 2005. He
previously served on the boards of directors of American Express
Bank Ltd. and Phillips Gas Company.
Terence D. Martin
Mr. Martin, age 67, has served as our director and
chairman of the Audit Committee since April 2008.
Mr. Martin served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Quaker Oats Company from 1998 until his
retirement in 2001. From 1995 to 1998, he was Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of General Signal
Corporation. Mr. Martin was Chief Financial Officer and
Member of the Executive Committee of American Cyanamid Company
from 1991 to 1995 and served as Treasurer from 1988 to 1991.
Since 2002, Mr. Martin has served on the board of directors
of Del Monte Foods Company.
Ronald G. Rogers
Mr. Rogers, age 61, has served as our director
since May 2008. Mr. Rogers served in various positions with
Bank of Montreal between 1972 and 2005. From 2002 until his
retirement in 2005, he served as Deputy Chair, Enterprise
Risk & Portfolio Management, BMO Financial Group, and
from 1994 to 2002, he served as Vice Chairman,
Personal & Commercial Client Group.
For a discussion of specific experience, qualifications,
attributes or skills that qualify each of the above members to
serve as one of our directors, see Selection,
Qualifications and Experience of Directors beginning on
page 9 of this Proxy Statement.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR SET FORTH ABOVE.
|
|
Proposal 2:
|
RATIFICATION
OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010
|
Deloitte & Touche has been selected by the Audit
Committee as our independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal year 2010, subject to ratification by the
stockholders. Deloitte & Touche was also our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal years
2008 and 2009. A representative of Deloitte & Touche
is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. That
representative will have an opportunity to make a statement, if
desired, and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche as our registered independent public
accounting firm as a matter of good corporate governance even
though ratification is not required by our
By-laws,
other governing documents or otherwise. If our stockholders fail
to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider
whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2010. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee
in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different
independent registered public accounting firm at any time during
fiscal year 2010 if it is determined that such a change would be
in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
5
The affirmative vote of the holders of shares of our common
stock having a majority of the voting power eligible to vote and
voting, either in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting will
be required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche.
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firms Fees
Fees for professional services provided by our independent
registered public accounting firm in each of the last two fiscal
years, in each of the following categories, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
4,665
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
4,476
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
4,665
|
|
|
$
|
4,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees primarily relate to auditing of our 2009 consolidated
financial statements and review of our registration statements
on
Forms S-3
and S-8,
reviewing our current reports on Form
8-K,
reviewing the revision of portions of the Annual Report for the
year ended December 31, 2008 to retrospectively reflect the
subsequent changes in our internal reporting and operating
segments, assessing the Companys compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(SOX) as it relates to internal controls over
financial reporting (called SOX implementation), and
statutory audits in Mexico. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit Fees primarily relate to auditing of our 2008 consolidated
financial statements, assistance and review of our registration
statements on
Forms S-4
and S-8 and
statutory audits in Mexico. |
The Audit Committee has approved all of our independent
registered public accounting firms engagements and fiscal
year 2009 fees presented above. All audit and non-audit services
provided to us by our independent registered public accounting
firm are required to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in
accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in the
current Audit Committee Charter available on our website at
www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION
OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010.
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Biographical
Information
In addition to the persons who are standing for re-election as
Class II directors (whose biographical information is
included in Proposal 1 above), the following is a
biographical summary of our other directors {ages are as of
the date of the Annual Meeting}:
Wayne R. Sanders, age 62, has served as our Chairman
of the Board and chairman of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee since May 2008. Mr. Sanders served as
the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of Kimberly-Clark
Corporation from 1992 until his retirement in 2003.
Mr. Sanders has served on the board of directors of Texas
Instruments Incorporated since 1997 and Belo Corp. since 2003.
He previously served on the board of directors of Adolph Coors
Company. Mr. Sanders is also a National Trustee and
Governor of the Boys & Girls Club of America and was a
member of the Marquette University Board of Trustees from 1992
to 2007, serving as Chairman from 2001 to 2003.
Larry D. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer and
Director, age 55, has served as our director since October
2007. Mr. Young has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer (our CEO) since October 2007.
Mr. Young joined Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages as
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bottling Group
segment and Head of Supply Chain in 2006 after our acquisition
of Dr Pepper/
6
Seven Up Bottling Group, Inc. (DPSUBG), where he had
been President and Chief Executive Officer since May 2005. From
1997 to 2005, Mr. Young served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. and
Executive Vice President of Corporate Affairs at PepsiAmericas,
Inc.
Pamela H. Patsley, age 53, has served as our
director since April 2008. Ms. Patsley has served as
Executive Chairman of MoneyGram International from January 2009
to September 2009 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from
September 2009 to present. Previously, Ms. Patsley served
as Senior Executive Vice President of First Data Corporation
from March 2000 to October 2007 and President of First Data
International from May 2002 to October 2007. She retired from
those positions in October 2007. From 1991 to 2000, she served
as President and Chief Executive Officer of Paymentech, Inc.,
prior to its acquisition by First Data. Ms. Patsley also
previously served as Chief Financial Officer of First USA, Inc.
Ms. Patsley served on the board of directors of Molson
Coors Brewing Company from 1996 to 2009; Pegasus Solutions, Inc.
from 2002 to 2006; and Paymentech, Inc. from 1995 to 1999. In
addition to her Chairmans role at MoneyGram International,
Ms. Patsley has served on the board of Texas Instruments
Incorporated since 2004.
Jack L. Stahl, age 57, has served as our director
and chairman of the Compensation Committee since May 2008.
Mr. Stahl served as Chief Executive Officer and President
of Revlon, Inc. from February 2002 until his retirement in
September 2006. From February 2000 to March 2001, he served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of The
Coca-Cola
Company and previously served as Group President of The
Coca-Cola
Companys Americas Group and as Chief Financial Officer of
The
Coca-Cola
Company. Mr. Stahl served on the board of directors of
Schering-Plough Corporation from 2007 to 2009 and has served on
the board of directors of Delhaize Group since 2008.
M. Anne Szostak, age 59, has served as
our director since May 2008. Since June 2004, Ms. Szostak
has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Szostak
Partners LLC, a consulting firm that advises executive officers
on strategic and human resource issues. From 1998 until her
retirement in 2004, she served as Corporate Executive Vice
President and Director Human Resources and Diversity
of FleetBoston Financial Corporation (now Bank of America). She
also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fleet
Bank Rhode Island from 2001 to 2003.
Ms. Szostak served on the board of directors of ChoicePoint
Corporation from 2006 to 2008. Ms. Szostak has served as a
director of Belo Corp. since 2004, Tupperware Brands Corporation
since 2000 and Spherion Corporation since 2005.
Michael F. Weinstein, age 61, has served as our
director since February 2009. Mr. Weinstein has served as
Chairman and was the co-founder of INOV8 Beverage Company from
January 2005 to present. Previously, Mr. Weinstein served
as President of Liquid Logic Consulting from January 2004 to
December 2004; and as President, Global Innovation and Business
Development, for Cadbury Schweppes plc (Cadbury)
from January 2003 to December 2003. Mr. Weinstein has
served on the board of directors of H.J. Heinz Company since
2006.
For a discussion of specific experience, qualifications,
attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that each of the
above members should serve as one of our directors, see
Selection, Qualifications and Experience of
Directors beginning on page 9 of this Proxy Statement.
Directors
Compensation
Non-employee directors receive compensation from us for their
services on our Board or its committees. Executive directors do
not receive compensation for their services as a director. In
2009 we compensated our non-employee directors as follows: an
annual cash retainer of $100,000 and an annual equity grant of
restricted stock units with a value of $100,000. In addition,
the chairperson of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
Committee received an annual equity grant of restricted stock
units with a value of $30,000 and $25,000, respectively. All of
the restricted stock units vest three years from the date of
grant.
Mr. Sanders, as Chairman, was entitled to an annual cash
retainer of $100,000. Mr. Sanders also received an annual
equity grant of restricted stock units with a value of $200,000
which vests three years from the date of grant.
7
Director Compensation paid in 2009 was as follows:
Director
Compensation in 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
in Cash
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Wayne R. Sanders
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Terence D. Martin
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,000
|
|
Jack L. Stahl
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Ronald G. Rogers
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
John L. Adams
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Pamela H. Patsley
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
M. Anne Szostak
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Michael F. Weinstein
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annual cash compensation paid to directors is $100,000. In
December 2008, the Company paid each director $25,000, which was
attributable to director compensation to be paid in the first
quarter of 2009. Of the amounts paid in 2009, $75,000 is for
director compensation earned in the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009 and the remaining $25,000 was paid for
the first quarter of 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column reflect the
grant date fair value associated with each respective
directors restricted stock units under the Dr Pepper
Snapple Group, Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008. Even
though the restricted stock units may be forfeited, the amounts
reported do not reflect this contingency. |
At December 31, 2009 Mr. Sanders owned and held
11,830 shares of our common stock and Mr. Adams owned
and held 20,000 shares of our common stock. Also, at
December 31, 2009 (i) Mr. Sanders held restricted
stock units equal to 46,380 shares, of which
11,829 shares vest and are issuable on May 7, 2010,
19,715 shares vest and are issuable on May 7, 2011 and
14,836 shares vest and are issuable on March 2, 2012;
(ii) Mr. Martin held restricted stock units equal to
14,769 shares, of which 5,126 shares vest and are
issuable on May 7, 2011 and 9,643 vest and are issuable on
March 2, 2012; (iii) Mr. Stahl held restricted
stock units equal to 14,201 shares, of which
4,929 shares vest and are issuable on May 7, 2011 and
9,272 vest and are issuable on March 2, 2012;
(iv) each of Mr. Adams, Ms. Patsley,
Mr. Rogers, and Ms. Szostak held restricted stock
units equal to 11,361 shares, of which 3,943 vest and are
issuable on May 7, 2011 and 7,418 vest and are issuable on
March 2, 2012; and (v) Mr. Weinstein held
restricted stock units equal to 7,418, all of which vest and are
issuable on March 2, 2012.
Based on a study performed by an independent consultant, the
Compensation Committee has recommended and the Board has
approved the same levels of compensation for our non-employee
directors in fiscal year 2010.
Communications
with Our Board
Any interested party may communicate with our Board, our
chairman of the Board (who is the presiding director of
executive sessions) or the non-employee directors as a group by
submitting an
e-mail
through the Companys website at
www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor Center and
Contact the Board captions or by sending a written communication
to: Corporate Secretary, Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 5301
Legacy Drive, Plano, Texas 75024.
8
SELECTION,
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF DIRECTORS
Selection
of Directors
Process
The Board is responsible for approving candidates for the Board
of Directors. As discussed in the section Corporate
Governance Board Committees and Meetings
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on
page 13 of this Proxy Statement, the Corporate Governance
and Nominating Committee is responsible for the identification
of candidates for the Board of Directors and making
recommendations to the Board. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee will also consider nominations by a
stockholder pursuant to the provisions of our By-laws relating
to stockholder nominations and as described under
Stockholders Proposals for 2010 Annual Meeting at
the end of this Proxy Statement.
Qualifications
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks director
candidates (including any candidate who may be recommended by a
stockholder) who have certain personal and professional
attributes including:
|
|
|
|
|
Sound personal and professional integrity,
|
|
|
|
An inquiring and independent mind,
|
|
|
|
Willingness to devote the required time to carrying out the
duties and responsibilities of Board membership,
|
|
|
|
Commitment to serve on the Board for several years to develop
knowledge about the Companys businesses, and
|
|
|
|
Willingness to represent the best interests of all stockholders
and observe the fiduciary duties that a director owes to the
stockholders.
|
In addition, a director candidate must have, when considered
with the collective experience of other Board members,
appropriate qualifications and skills that have been developed
through extensive business experience, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Practical wisdom and mature judgment,
|
|
|
|
Leadership,
|
|
|
|
Interpersonal skills,
|
|
|
|
Financial acumen,
|
|
|
|
Broad training and experience at the policy-making level in
business, finance and accounting, government, education or
technology, and
|
|
|
|
Expertise (including industry expertise) that is useful to the
Company and complementary to the background and experience of
other Board members, so that an optimal balance of Board members
can be achieved and maintained.
|
Diversity
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines,
diversity of viewpoints is one of the characteristics considered
by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in making
recommendations for nominations. The Board has not adopted any
policy on diversity with respect to our directors, but they seek
a balance of experience among the directors so that the Board as
a whole has experience and training from different disciplines
(including operations, accounting, finance, marketing and human
resources) and different industries (including the beverage
industry, consumer products, and banking) which creates the
balance sought.
9
Experience
of our Directors
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has reviewed
the background of all of our directors, including those who are
being proposed for election to the Board, and determined that
they individually possess the personal and professional
attributes to be a director. Further, the Corporate Governance
and Nominating Committee has reviewed the experience of the
Board and determined that they collectively possess the
qualifications and skills necessary for our Board of Directors.
Detailed biographical information for each of the directors is
set forth in Proposals Proposal 1:
Election of Directors on page 5 of this Proxy
Statement and Board of Directors Biographical
Information on page 6 of this Proxy Statement.
The following is a summary of the qualifications and skills
demonstrated by the individual directors experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sanders, our Chairman, has: extensive
leadership experience as a board chairman, CEO and other
executive level positions in a public company, financial acumen
developed through his extensive executive experience,
operational and marketing experience, consumer product company
experience, and significant public company board experience
(including audit committee chairmanship experience).
|
|
|
|
Mr. Adams has: extensive leadership
experience as a vice chairman and CEO and other executive level
positions in public companies, financial acumen and risk
management experience developed through his CEO experience, been
designated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
as a financial expert under the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) listing standards, training as a lawyer, and
substantial public company board experience (including board
chairmanship, risk management, audit committee and compensation
committee experience).
|
|
|
|
Mr. Martin has: extensive leadership
experience as a CFO of a public company, financial acumen and
risk management experience developed through his public
accounting and CFO experience, been designated by the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee as a financial expert under
the NYSE listing standards, and other public company board
experience (including audit committee chairmanship and
compensation committee experience).
|
|
|
|
Ms. Patsley has: extensive leadership
experience as a chairman and CEO, CFO and other executive level
positions in public companies, financial acumen and risk
management experience developed through her experience in public
accounting and her CFO experience, been designated by the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee as a financial
expert under the NYSE listing standards, and extensive public
company board experience (including audit committee chairmanship
experience).
|
|
|
|
Mr. Stahl has: extensive leadership
experience as president, COO and CFO in public companies,
beverage industry experience, financial acumen from his CFO
experience, and broad public company board experience.
|
|
|
|
Ms. Szostak has: extensive senior level
executive leadership experience for a Fortune 100 company,
experience as a CEO of two major bank subsidiaries of public
companies, substantial banking experience, significant human
resource experience, experience in risk management, and
significant experience on other public company boards (including
compensation committee chairmanship and audit committee
experience).
|
|
|
|
Mr. Rogers has: extensive senior level
executive leadership experience, banking experience, financial
acumen developed from his banking experience, and experience in
enterprise risk management.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Weinstein has: senior level executive
experience as a CEO and COO, extensive experience in the
beverage industry, substantial experience in sales, advertising
and new product development and other public company board
experience (including compensation and audit committee
experience).
|
|
|
|
Mr. Young, our CEO, has: extensive senior
level executive experience as CEO and COO, substantial
experience in the beverage industry, and substantial sales and
marketing experience.
|
10
Corporate
Governance
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
On February 10, 2009, our Board adopted revised Corporate
Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines
include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
formation of an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee comprised solely
of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
Board requirement to annually assess the performance of our CEO;
|
|
|
|
Board stewardship of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
Insider Trading Policy;
|
|
|
|
assessment of Board and director performance;
|
|
|
|
power to retain outside advisors; and
|
|
|
|
Categorical Standards of Director Independence.
|
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website
at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor Center and
Corporate Governance captions.
Director
Independence
In connection with the adoption of the Corporate Governance
Guidelines, our Board adopted our Categorical Standards of
Director Independence, which are attached as Annex A to our
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Categorical Standards of
Director Independence are consistent with the independence
standards set forth in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE listing
standards. The Board has made an affirmative determination that
Mr. Sanders, Mr. Adams, Mr. Martin,
Ms. Patsley, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Stahl and
Ms. Szostak are independent and have no material
relationship with the Company.
Board
Committees and Meetings
We have five standing committees of our Board, including the
Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee, the Special Award Committee
and the Capital Transaction Committee. The charters for each of
the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are available on
our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor
Center and Corporate Governance captions.
Audit
Committee
Since its formation in 2008, the Audit Committee has consisted
of three independent directors Mr. Martin
(Chairman), Mr. Adams and Ms. Patsley. Mr. Martin
has served as Chairman since formation of the Audit Committee.
All of such Audit Committee members are independent in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations and as defined
in the current NYSE listing standards. Upon consideration of the
attributes of an audit committee financial expert as set forth
in Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated by the SEC, our Board determined that each of the
members of the Audit Committee possesses those attributes
through their experience and each was designated as an Audit
Committee Financial Expert.
The Audit Committee of our Board is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
appointing our independent auditors and monitoring their
performance, qualifications and independence;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the quality and integrity of our financial statements
and disclosures;
|
|
|
|
monitoring our system of internal controls;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the performance of our corporate audit department; and
|
|
|
|
monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
|
11
The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche as
our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
year 2010, subject to ratification by our stockholders. The
Audit Committee operates under a written charter that was
adopted by our Board on April 24, 2008 and is available on
our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor
Center and Corporate Governance captions. The Report of the
Audit Committee for fiscal year 2009 is included in this Proxy
Statement on page 40.
Compensation
Committee
Since its formation in 2008, the Compensation Committee has
consisted of three independent directors
Mr. Stahl (Chairman), Mr. Rogers and Ms. Szostak.
Mr. Stahl has served as the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee since its formation. All of such Compensation
Committee members are independent as defined in the current NYSE
listing standards. The Compensation Committee is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
setting the compensation of our CEO, after consideration of the
Boards evaluation of the performance of our CEO;
|
|
|
|
determining the compensation levels of our other executive
officers, after consultation with our CEO;
|
|
|
|
approving and administering our executive compensation program;
|
|
|
|
administering our equity-based and incentive compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
overseeing regulatory compliance with Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code) to maximize
deductibility of compensation paid; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management our Compensation
Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in our proxy statement or
annual report, in accordance with applicable regulations.
|
Information regarding the processes and procedures followed by
the Compensation Committee in considering and determining
executive compensation is provided below under the heading
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
On April 24, 2008, our Board approved the restated
Compensation Committee Charter, a copy of which is available on
our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor
Center and Corporate Governance captions. The Report of the
Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation for fiscal year
2009 is included in this Proxy Statement beginning on
page 26.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain
compensation consultants and other outside advisors to assist in
the evaluation of executive officer compensation. The
Compensation Committee has retained Mercer, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to
assist the Compensation Committee with its responsibilities
related to the Companys executive and board of director
compensation programs. For more information on the Compensation
Committees relationship with Mercer, see Role of
Compensation Consultant in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. Mercers fees for
executive compensation consulting to the Compensation Committee
in fiscal year 2009 were $215,000.
During 2009, the Compensation Committee requested that Mercer:
|
|
|
|
|
Conduct an analysis of compensation for our key executive
officers, including our CEO, and assess how target compensation
aligned with our philosophy and objectives;
|
|
|
|
Develop recommendations for the Compensation Committee on the
size and structure of long-term incentive awards for our CEO and
key executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Provide perspectives on the composition of our peer group for
2009-2010;
|
|
|
|
Assist the Compensation Committee in the review of incentive
plan design, severance programs and related benefit and
perquisite programs;
|
|
|
|
Assess the Boards compensation;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
Provide the Compensation Committee ongoing advice and counsel on
market compensation trends, legislative and regulatory updates
and their impact on our executive compensation programs; and
|
|
|
|
Assist in the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section of our proxy statement.
|
During 2009, the Company retained Mercer and other affiliates of
Marsh & McLennan Companies to provide services,
unrelated to executive compensation, which have been approved by
the Compensation Committee. The aggregate fees paid for these
other services were $738,000, consisting of $493,000 for pension
administration, $213,000 for administrative services related to
employee benefit communications, and $32,000 for a computer
software solution for tracking market data research.
Because of the policies and procedures Mercer and the
Compensation Committee have in place, the Compensation Committee
is confident that the advice it receives from the individual
executive compensation consultant is objective and not
influenced by Mercers or its affiliates
relationships with the Company. These policies and procedures
include:
|
|
|
|
|
The consultant receives no incentive or other compensation based
on the fees charged to the Company for other services provided
by Mercer or any of its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
The consultant is not responsible for selling other Mercer or
affiliate services to the Company;
|
|
|
|
Mercers professional standards prohibit the individual
consultant from considering any other relationships Mercer or
any of its affiliates may have with the Company in rendering his
or her advice and recommendations;
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and
terminate the executive compensation consultant;
|
|
|
|
The consultant has direct access to the Compensation Committee
without management intervention;
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee evaluates the quality and objectivity
of the services provided by the consultant each year and
determines whether to continue to retain the consultant; and
|
|
|
|
The protocols for the engagement (described below) limit how the
consultant may interact with management.
|
While it is necessary for the consultant to interact with
management to gather information, the Compensation Committee has
adopted protocols governing if and when the consultants
advice and recommendations can be shared with management. These
protocols are included in the consultants engagement
letter. This approach protects the Compensation Committees
ability to receive objective advice from the consultant so that
the Compensation Committee may make independent decisions about
executive pay at the Company.
Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee
Since its formation in 2008, the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee has consisted of three independent
directors Mr. Sanders (Chairman),
Mr. Martin and Mr. Stahl. Mr. Sanders has served
as the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee since its formation. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee is responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
assisting the Board by identifying individuals qualified to
become members of the Board and recommending to the Board
candidates to stand for election at the next annual meeting of
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
recommending committee assignments after consultation with the
Chairman;
|
|
|
|
assessing and reporting to the Board as to the independence of
each director;
|
|
|
|
monitoring significant developments in the law and practice of
corporate governance and of the duties and responsibilities of
directors of public companies; and
|
|
|
|
leading the Board in its annual performance self-evaluation and
evaluation of management, including establishing criteria to be
used in connection with such evaluation.
|
13
On April 24, 2008, our Board approved the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee Charter, a copy of which is
available on our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under
the Investor Center and Corporate Governance captions.
In fiscal year 2009, the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee considered our current directors and other candidates
to fill the slate of nominees for election to our Board. Based
on an evaluation of the background, skills and areas of
expertise represented by the various candidates against the
qualifications for directors as set forth in our Corporate
Governance Guidelines and as discussed in the section
Selection, Qualifications and Experience of
Directors on page 9 of this Proxy Statement, the
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee determined that
the following persons possess the appropriate skill level,
expertise and qualifications and recommended that John L. Adams,
Terence D. Martin and Ronald G. Rogers be re-elected to our
Board as Class II directors.
Special
Award Committee
On February 10, 2009, our Board formed a Special Award
Committee with our CEO, so long as he remains on our Board,
named as the sole member. The Special Award Committee has the
authority to make equity awards to employees (other than members
of our executive leadership team) under our Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan of 2009 in accordance with limitations as may,
from time to time, be established by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has set forth the following
limitations for the Special Award Committee: (i) awards may
be made to employees, other than members of the executive
leadership team, (ii) awards may be made to new hires, for
retention purposes, promotions, in connection with employee
relationship issues, or in the discretion of the Special Award
Committee for exceptional performance, (iii) awards are
limited to the aggregate of $2 million each calendar year,
(iv) awards shall not exceed $100,000 to any one
individual, and (v) awards must be granted at the closing
market price on the effective date of the award. The Special
Award Committee reports to the Compensation Committee at each
regularly scheduled meeting on the awards it has made under this
limited authority since its last report. For a description of
the equity award procedures that apply to the Special Award
Committee, see Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Long-Term Incentive Awards
Equity Award Procedures on page 24 of this Proxy
Statement.
Capital
Transaction Committee
On November 19, 2009, our Board formed a Capital
Transaction Committee, consisting of our Chairman of the Board
and our CEO, so long as our CEO remains on our Board. The Board
granted the authority to the Capital Transaction Committee to
approve note issuances, commercial paper transactions, and
interest rate swaps, but excluding any transaction which
includes the issuance of the Companys common stock or
preferred stock or a feature to convert debt to common stock or
preferred stock, provided that (i) the aggregate amount of
such transactions does not exceed $750 million initial
aggregate principal or notional amount in any calendar year and
(ii) our debt to EBITDA ratio immediately prior to a
contemplated transaction is at or below 2.25x and the
consummation of such transaction will not result in our adjusted
debt to EBITDA ratio exceeding 2.25x.
On November 19, 2009, the Board approved a transaction to
restructure certain of our indebtedness, which included note
issuances and interest rate swaps. The Board granted to the
Capital Transaction Committee the specific authority to approve
the final terms of that indebtedness restructure transaction.
Fiscal
Year 2009 Meetings
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, there were
fourteen (14) meetings of our Board. During the fiscal
year, there were ten (10) meetings held by the Audit
Committee and five (5) executive sessions of the Audit
Committee to meet with our independent registered public
accounting firm, our senior vice president-controller and the
vice president of corporate audit; eleven (11) meetings
held by the Compensation Committee; three (3) meetings held
by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; three
(3) meetings held by the Special Award Committee; and two
(2) meetings held by the Capital Transaction Committee.
Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the meetings of
the Board and the Board committees of which each was a member
during his or her respective tenures.
14
Executive
Sessions and Lead Independent Director
In compliance with the requirements of the NYSE, our Corporate
Governance Guidelines require the non-employee directors to meet
at least twice annually in regularly scheduled executive
sessions. Mr. Sanders, as lead independent director,
presides over non-employee director executive sessions. Five
(5) executive sessions were held in fiscal year 2009.
Attendance
at Annual Meeting
It is our policy that all directors attend the Annual Meeting.
We anticipate that all members of our Board will be present at
the Annual Meeting. In 2009, each director attended the annual
meeting of stockholders held on May 19, 2009.
Board
Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The Chairman of the Board and CEO titles are held by different
persons. Mr. Sanders, as Chairman of the Board, is also the
lead independent director. Mr. Young is our CEO. In 2008
the Company was spun-off by Cadbury and became a stand-alone
operation. At that time it was decided to separate the Chairman
and CEO position. Most important among the considerations was
that separation of the Chairman and CEO positions allowed our
CEO to direct his energy towards operational issues and the
Chairman could focus on governance and other related issues of
our new publicly held company. At this time, the Company
believes that separating the Chairman and CEO positions enhances
the independence of the Board, provides independent business
counsel for our CEO, and facilitates the discussion among Board
members.
The Board has overall responsibility for oversight of risk and
has delegated the responsibility for the process to the Audit
Committee. The Company is responsible for management of risk and
has formed an Enterprise Risk Management Committee, which
reports to the Audit Committee at each regularly scheduled
meeting. The Audit Committee reports on risk to the Board.
15
BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Other than Mr. Young, who is a director and whose business
experience is summarized under Board of
Directors Biographical Information beginning
on page 6 of this Proxy Statement, the following is a
summary of the business experience of our executive leadership
team {ages are as of the date of the Annual Meeting}:
James L. Baldwin, Jr., Executive Vice President, General
Counsel, age 49, has served as our Executive Vice
President and General Counsel since July 2003. From June 2002 to
July 2003, he served as Senior Vice President and General
Counsel of Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., and from August 1998 to
June 2002 as General Counsel of Motts LLP.
Tina S. Barry, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs,
age 53, has served as our Senior Vice President,
Corporate Affairs since September 2008. She served as our Vice
President, Corporate Communications from May 2008 until
September 2008. Prior to joining the Company in May 2008 she was
Vice President of Corporate Communications for Kimberly-Clark
Corporation, where she served for 23 years in various
management positions.
Rodger L. Collins, President, Packaged Beverages,
age 52, has served as our President, Packaged Beverages
since February 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Collins served in
various executive capacities with us, including President of
Bottling Group Sales and Finished Goods Sales (September
2008 February 2009); President of Sales for the
Bottling Group (October 2007 September 2008);
Midwest Division President for the Bottling Group (January
2005 October 2007); and Regional Vice President
(October 2001 December 2004).
Derry L. Hobson, Executive Vice President, Supply Chain,
age 59, has served as our Executive Vice President of
Supply Chain since October 2007. Mr. Hobson joined the
business as Senior Vice President of Manufacturing in 2006
through our acquisition of DPSUBG where he had been Executive
Vice President since 1999.
James J. Johnston, Jr., President, Beverage Concentrates
and Latin America Beverages, age 53, has served as our
President, Beverage Concentrates and Latin America Beverages
since September 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Johnston has
served in various executive capacities with us, including
President, Beverage Concentrates (November 2008
September 2009); President of Concentrate Sales (September
2008 November 2008); President of Finished Goods and
Concentrate Sales (October 2007 September 2008);
Executive Vice President of Sales (January 2005
October 2007); Executive Vice President of Strategy (December
2003 January 2005); and Senior Vice President of
Licensing (October 1997 December 2003).
Lawrence N. Solomon, Executive Vice President, Human
Resources, age 55, has served as our Executive Vice
President of Human Resources since March 2004. From May 1999 to
March 2004, he served as Senior Vice President of Human
Resources for Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., prior to which he served
on Cadburys global human resources team.
John O. Stewart, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, age 51, has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer from November 2006 and, pursuant to
a letter agreement described in the next paragraph, will
continue to serve until May 21, 2010. Mr. Stewart
served as one of our directors from October 2007 to May 19,
2009. From 1990 to 2004, Mr. Stewart worked for Diageo PLC
and its subsidiaries, serving as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Diageo North America from 2001 to 2004.
From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Stewart was an independent
consultant, providing mergers and acquisitions advice to Diageo
PLC.
On October 27, 2009, we announced that Mr. Stewart had
advised our Board that he had decided to take early retirement
and separate from the Company. To facilitate the transition of
his duties as CFO, Mr. Stewart agreed to remain with the
Company until May 21, 2010. The terms of
Mr. Stewarts separation are governed by a letter
agreement, dated October 26, 2009, as amended on
February 26, 2010, between us and Mr. Stewart. Under
the letter agreement, Mr. Stewart will receive certain
benefits, as if he were terminated without cause
under his executive employment agreement and certain equity
incentive awards with us will vest through his
16
separation date. In consideration of Mr. Stewarts
employment until his separation date and his meeting certain
performance requirements, certain remaining unvested restricted
stock unit awards and remaining unvested stock option grants
will fully vest on his separation date.
David J. Thomas, Ph.D., Senior Vice President,
Research & Development, age 48, has served as
our Senior Vice President, Research & Development
since November 2006. Dr. Thomas served as Vice
President Global Product Development for Gerber
Products from July 2005 until October 2006; as Vice
President Research and Development for Kerry Group
from July 2004 to July 2005; and in various R&D management
positions at Pillsbury/General Mills from June 1995 to June
2004. Dr. Thomas holds a Ph.D. Degree in Food Science, with an
emphasis in Flavor Biochemistry from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison.
James R. Trebilcock, Executive Vice President, Marketing,
age 52, has served as our Executive Vice President,
Marketing since September 2008. From February 2003 to September
2008, Mr. Trebilcock served as our Senior Vice
President Consumer Marketing. Prior to that time,
Mr. Trebilcock held various positions at the Company, which
he joined in July 1987.
Martin M. Ellen will join the Company on April 1, 2010 and
assume the role of Executive Vice President. Mr. Ellen will
assume the role of Chief Financial Officer after the filing of
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending March 31, 2010. Mr. Ellen,
age 56, has served as Snap-on Incorporateds Senior
Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer since
2002.
17
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of March 22, 2010, the
record date, certain information with respect to the shares of
our common stock beneficially owned by (i) stockholders
known to us to own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of
such classes, (ii) each of our directors and named
executive officers, and (iii) all of our executive officers
and directors as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
Voting Power
|
|
|
Ownership of
|
|
Stock Owned
|
|
Owned
|
Name
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF OUR COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC(1)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
20,335,585
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Franklin Mutual Advisors, LLC(2)
101 John F. Kennedy Parkway
Short Hills, New Jersey
07078-2789
|
|
|
17,754,819
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Blackrock, Inc.(3)
40 East
52nd
Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
14,222,094
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
Morgan Stanley(4)
1585 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
|
|
|
13,387,044
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
The Vanguard Group Inc.(5)
100 Vanguard Blvd
Malvern, PA 10355
|
|
|
13,359,774
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTORS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne R. Sanders
|
|
|
53,719
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John L. Adams
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Terence D. Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Pamela H. Patsley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ronald G. Rogers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jack L. Stahl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
M. Anne Szostak
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael F. Weinstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry D. Young(7)(8)
|
|
|
368,742
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John O. Stewart(7)
|
|
|
95,821
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Rodger D. Collins(7)
|
|
|
66,639
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James J. Johnston(7)
|
|
|
84,611
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Derry L. Hobson(7)
|
|
|
55,783
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All other Executive Officers (6 persons)(7)
|
|
|
198,920
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 persons)
|
|
|
946,735
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the
SEC on February 16, 2010. Such stockholder has indicated
that it has sole voting power to vote 1,982,012 shares and
sole dispositive power with respect to all shares. |
18
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the
SEC on January 22, 2010. Such stockholder has indicated
that it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with
respect to all shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the
SEC on January 29, 2010. Such stockholder has indicated
that it has sole voting power and sole dispositive power with
respect to all shares |
|
(4) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the
SEC on February 12, 2010. Such stockholder has indicated
that it has sole voting power to vote 12,071,286 shares,
shared voting power with respect to 281,505 shares and sole
dispositive power with respect to all shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the
SEC on February 8, 2010. Such stockholder has indicated
that it has sole voting power to vote 405,696 shares, sole
dispositive power with respect to 12,997,078 shares and
shared power to dispose of 362,696. |
|
(6) |
|
The shares shown include (i) 30,000 shares held in the
name of a family trust Mr. Sanders is a trustee
of the family trust and has a pecuniary interest in the shares
of the issuer held by the family trust and
(ii) 11,890 shares issuable under restricted stock
units granted May 7, 2008 pursuant to the Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan of 2008 that Mr. Sanders has the right to
acquire within 60 days after March 22, 2010. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes the following shares related to stock options granted
under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008 that the NEOs and
other executive officers have the right to exercise as of
March 22, 2010 or will have the right to exercise within
60 days after March 22, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
|
311,084
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
|
76,458
|
|
Rodger D. Collins
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
|
61,210
|
|
Derry L. Hobson
|
|
|
55,783
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
153,881
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Youngs shares also include 36,530 shares
under the Legacy Bonus Share Retention Plan and
8,127 shares under the Legacy Long Term Incentive Plan, all
of which shares are available for release. |
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) requires our directors,
certain officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10%
of our outstanding common stock to file with the SEC initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our
common stock held by such persons. These persons are also
required to furnish us with copies of all forms they file under
this regulation. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of
the copies of such reports furnished to us and without further
inquiry, all required forms for our current filing persons were
filed on time.
Code of
Conduct
We are dedicated to earning the trust of our clients and
investors and our actions are guided by the principles of
honesty, trustworthiness, integrity, dependability and respect.
Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all employees and directors. This Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at
www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the Investor Center and
Corporate Governance captions. We intend to satisfy the
disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our senior financial
officers, including our CEO, if any, by posting such information
on our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the
Investor Center and Corporate Governance captions.
19
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
We are a leading integrated brand owner, manufacturer and
distributor of non-alcoholic beverages in the United States,
Canada and Mexico with a diverse portfolio of flavored
(non-cola) carbonated soft drinks and non-carbonated beverages
(NCBs), including ready-to-drink teas, juices, juice
drinks and mixers. We have some of the most recognized beverage
brands in North America, with significant consumer awareness
levels and long histories that evoke strong emotional
connections with consumers. Approximately 75% of our volume is
from brands that are either #1 or #2 in their
categories.
We have built our business over the last three decades through a
series of strategic acquisitions. In the 1980s through the
mid-1990s, we began building on our then existing
Schweppes business by adding brands such as Motts, Canada
Dry and A&W and a license for Sunkist soda. We also
acquired the Peñafiel business in Mexico. In 1995, we
acquired Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., having previously made
minority investments in the company. In 1999, we acquired a 40%
interest in DPSUBG, which was then our largest independent
bottler, and increased our interest to 45% in 2005. In 2000, we
acquired Snapple and other brands, significantly increasing our
share of the United States NCB market. In 2003, we created
Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages by integrating the way we
managed our four North American businesses (Motts,
Snapple, Dr Pepper/Seven Up and Mexico). During 2006 and 2007,
we acquired the remaining 55% of DPSUBG, and also acquired
Southeast-Atlantic Beverage Corporation and several smaller
bottlers, and integrated them all into our Packaged Beverages
segment, thereby expanding our geographic coverage.
In 2008, Cadbury separated its beverage business in the United
States, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean (the Americas
Beverages business) from its global confectionery business
by contributing the subsidiaries that operated its Americas
Beverages business to us. The separation involved a number of
steps, and as a result of these steps we became an independent
publicly traded company listed on the NYSE under the symbol
DPS.
As of December 31, 2009 our operating structure consists of
three business segments: Beverage Concentrates, Packaged
Beverages and Latin America Beverages.
On February 26, 2010, we announced that we completed the
licensing of certain brands to PepsiCo, Inc.
(PepsiCo) upon the closing of PepsiCos
acquisitions of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (PBG)
and PepsiAmericas, Inc. (PAS). Under the new
licensing agreements, PepsiCo will distribute Dr Pepper, Crush
and Schweppes in the U.S. territories where these brands
were previously distributed by PBG and PAS. The same will apply
for Dr Pepper, Crush, Schweppes, Vernors and Sussex in Canada;
and Squirt and Canada Dry in Mexico. Under the agreements, we
received a one-time cash payment of $900 million before
taxes and related fees. The new licensing agreements have an
initial period of twenty years with automatic twenty year
renewal periods, and will require PepsiCo to meet certain
performance conditions. Additionally, in U.S. territories
where we have a distribution footprint, we will begin
distributing certain owned and licensed brands, including
Sunkist soda, Squirt, Vernors, Canada Dry and Hawaiian Punch,
that were previously distributed by PBG and PAS.
Maintaining these industry leading positions requires a talented
and motivated executive team. Our overall executive compensation
program is, therefore, designed to be competitive with those
companies in our industry, considering our size and scale, and
also to be competitive with other leading beverage and consumer
packaged goods companies of similar size and scale.
Objectives
of Our Program
Following the spin-off from Cadbury, we undertook a significant
review of our entire compensation program to ensure that its
design was compatible with our new position as a stand-alone,
NYSE-listed company, which is included in the S&P 500. As a
result of this review, the following objectives were established
as the basis for our program design:
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation targets are designed to be competitive with
the companies and markets in which we compete;
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Pay is performance-based, with our overall performance judged
both against internal goals and the performance of competitors;
|
|
|
|
A pay-for-performance culture links compensation to both
individual and collective performance and will result in
differentiated compensation;
|
|
|
|
A substantial percentage of total compensation is variable, or
at risk, both through annual incentive compensation
and the granting of long-term incentive awards; and
|
|
|
|
Equity incentive awards are used to align the interests of
management with those of our stockholders.
|
These objectives will continue to guide our programs in 2010 and
beyond.
Role of
the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee administers our executive
compensation program. The Compensation Committee establishes and
monitors our overall compensation strategy to ensure that
executive compensation supports our business objectives. In
carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee is
responsible for setting the compensation of our CEO and all of
our other executive officers. As part of this compensation
setting process, the Compensation Committee, with assistance
from its executive compensation consultant, Mercer, reviews the
compensation (including salary, annual incentives, long-term
incentives and other benefits) of similarly situated executive
officers in our peer group. The Compensation Committee also
consults with the other independent directors on the Board
before setting annual compensation for the executives. The
committee chair regularly reports on committee actions at Board
meetings.
For a more complete description of the responsibilities of the
Compensation Committee, see Corporate
Governance Board Committees and Meetings
Compensation Committee beginning on page 12 of this
Proxy Statement and the charter for the Compensation Committee
posted on our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under the
Investor Center and Corporate Governance captions.
Role of
Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has retained Mercer as its outside
executive compensation consultant to advise the Compensation
Committee on executive compensation matters. Mercer regularly
attends Compensation Committee meetings, and reports directly to
the Compensation Committee on matters relating to compensation
for our executive officers, including our CEO. Please see
Corporate Governance Board Committees and
Meetings Compensation Committee beginning on
page 12 of this Proxy Statement for a list of Mercers
duties in 2009.
Role of
Company Management
Our CEO develops preliminary recommendations regarding
compensation matters with respect to all key executives other
than our CEO and provides these recommendations to the
Compensation Committee. The management team is responsible for
the administration of the compensation programs once
Compensation Committee decisions are finalized.
The
Compensation Program
The key components of our current compensation program for our
key executives are:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary;
|
|
|
|
Short-term (annual) cash incentives;
|
|
|
|
Long-term, equity-based incentives; and
|
|
|
|
Other benefits.
|
In 2009, the Compensation Committee reviewed our executive
compensation program to determine how well actual compensation
targets met our overall philosophy and the compensation in our
targeted markets. Overall, the Compensation Committee believes
the program remains aligned with our key objectives.
21
In the second half of 2008, our Compensation Committee, with the
assistance of Mercer, reviewed potential peers in light of our
new publicly-traded status. As a result, a set of peer companies
was identified that were used to calibrate our executive
compensation program for 2009. These companies represented
leading beverage and consumer packaged goods companies of
similar size and scale to us, and include:
|
|
|
|
|
Brown-Forman
|
|
Del Monte
|
|
McCormick
|
Campbell Soup
|
|
General Mills
|
|
Molson Coors
|
Chiquita Brands**
|
|
Heinz
|
|
PepsiAmericas*
|
Coca-Cola
Enterprises
|
|
Hershey
|
|
Pepsi Bottling Group*
|
ConAgra
|
|
Hormel
|
|
Ralcorp**
|
Constellation Brands
|
|
J.M. Smucker
|
|
Sara Lee
|
Dean Foods
|
|
Kellogg
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Pepsi Bottling Group and PepsiAmericas were eliminated from the
group during 2009 due to their pending acquisition by PepsiCo. |
|
** |
|
Chiquita Brands and Ralcorp were added during 2009 to replace
Pepsi Bottling Group and PepsiAmericas, since they had many
similarities to the existing peer group members. PepsiCo has not
been added to the peer group because its size and scale are not
similar to ours. This revised group of 18 companies served
as peers for decisions made in late 2009 and for 2010. |
Base
Salary
Base salary is designed to compensate our key executives in part
for their roles and responsibilities and also to provide a
stable level of compensation that serves as a retention tool
throughout the executives career. Salaries are targeted at
the median of the market for similar positions in the peer
companies. Adjustments are made annually based on individual
performance.
In general, base salary is the smallest component of the overall
compensation package, assuming that we are achieving or
exceeding targeted performance levels for our incentive
programs. On average, base salary currently represents 20% to
30% of the total compensation package for our CEO and key
executive officers. This is consistent with our philosophy to
have low fixed and high at risk compensation.
Salary increases for our NEOs (as defined in the first paragraph
of Historical Executive Compensation Information on
page 27 of this Proxy Statement) in 2009 were made by the
Compensation Committee selectively, considering the challenging
economic environment, the level of base salary relative to key
comparators and the performance of the given executive. The
Compensation Committee decided that, in light of the economic
environment, our CEO, the CFO, and the two Business Unit
Presidents would not receive an increase in 2009. As a result,
our CEOs base salary remains below the peer group median
and the CFOs and the two Business Unit Presidents
base salaries remain near the median. Based on a recommendation
from our CEO, the Compensation Committee approved an increase of
10% of base salary for Mr. Hobson which puts him slightly
above the median, recognizing his outstanding performance in
2008.
Management
Incentive Compensation
The Management Incentive Plan of 2009 (Management
Incentive Plan), our annual cash incentive program, is
designed to reward the achievement of specific pre-set financial
results typically measured over the fiscal year. Each
participant is assigned an annual incentive target expressed as
a percentage of base salary. For the NEOs, these targets ranged
from 65% to 125% of base salary. The actual awards are
calculated based on year-end salary. For any NEO promoted during
the year, the calculation is pro-rated and is based upon the
NEOs actual time in each position, the NEOs previous
base salary and Management Incentive Plan target percentage and
new base salary and Management Incentive Plan target percentage.
Specific
Plan for 2009
Awards under the Management Incentive Plan for 2009 were based
on a series of key financial metrics that reflected the
Companys key objectives for the year. The metrics vary
based on the roles and responsibilities of each executive. In
addition, a portion of the incentive plan was focused on our SOX
implementation, as one of the
22
significant administrative phases of our transition to a public
company following our spin-off from Cadbury in 2008.
In addition to overall financial performance, the Company
established a series of key operational measures to focus
various plan participants including some of our NEOs on
operational excellence in 2009. These metrics included the
following areas: trade spending effectiveness, new route
penetration, inventory break and shrink, inventory obsolescence,
overall equipment effectiveness, SKU rationalization, and market
share. The phrase operational metrics is used to
capture this portion of the annual incentive plan described
below.
The key metrics and weights for our NEOs and other senior
executives were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO and
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
Senior Staff
|
Metric
|
|
CFO
|
|
Presidents
|
|
Executives
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Net Sales
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Company Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Segment Operating Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Metrics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
SOX Implementation
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Results
for 2009
In 2009, the key financial goals at the corporate level, the
potential payouts for achieving these goals, and the actual 2009
results as determined by the Compensation Committee were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Payout as a Percentage
|
|
|
of Target
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Metric
|
|
100%
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
($ millions except EPS)
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
1.67
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Company Net Sales
|
|
$
|
5,590
|
|
|
$
|
5,531
|
|
Company Net Income
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
503
|
|
Company Gross Profit
|
|
$
|
3,178
|
|
|
$
|
3,297
|
|
The Compensation Committee also assessed performance against the
other financial and operational performance goals established at
the beginning of 2009. Regarding these goals, the Compensation
Committee determined the following based on overall 2009 results:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Profit: Results were 108.7%
of target for the Beverage Concentrates segment, 109.6% of
target for the Packaged Beverages segment, and 96.3% of target
for the Latin America Beverages segment.
|
|
|
|
Operational Metrics: Average results based on
various operational metrics were 112.6% of target for the
President, Packaged Beverages, 100.6% of target for the
President, Beverage Concentrates and Latin America Beverages,
and 107.7% of target for the Executive Vice President, Supply
Chain.
|
|
|
|
SOX Implementation: Overall results achieved
targeted performance.
|
Based on the results described above for 2009, bonus payouts as
a percent of target for each of the executives were 163.5% for
our CEO and CFO, 175.4% for the President, Packaged Beverages,
162.8% for the President, Beverage Concentrates and Latin
America Beverages, and 171.8% for the Executive Vice President,
Supply Chain.
23
Long-Term
Incentive Awards
Overview
Our long-term incentive awards are used to link our performance
and increases in stockholder value to the total compensation for
our key executives. These awards are also key components of our
ability to attract and retain our key executives. The annualized
value of the awards to our key executives is intended to be the
largest component of our overall compensation package. On
average, and assuming performance is on target, these awards
currently represent over 50% of the total compensation package
for our NEOs, consistent with our emphasis on linking executive
pay to stockholder value.
Specific
Programs for 2009
Our incentive plans allow for the granting of stock options,
restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs),
and performance share units, each linked to our stock price. For
2009, the Compensation Committee believed it was important to
continue using equity vehicles to provide alignment with
stockholder interests, consistent with our emphasis following
the spin-off from Cadbury in 2008. To provide an emphasis on
performance through the use of stock options and on retention
through the use of time-based RSUs, the Compensation Committee
made grants in 2009 to our key executives consisting of 30%
stock options and 70% time-based RSUs (weighted by value). The
higher weighting in 2009 on RSUs was done primarily to provide
additional emphasis on retention in the uncertain economic
environment. The Compensation Committee believes that these
awards to our key executives will focus attention on building
stockholder value over the long-term, reinforce the importance
of their roles as stewards of the business, and help to retain
the executives.
The following provides more detail about the various award
programs:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options: Stock options are granted with
an exercise price equal to the closing market price of our
common stock on the grant date. Options generally vest over a
period of three years with one third becoming exercisable on
each anniversary of the grant date as long as the recipient is
still employed by us on the date of vesting, and generally
expire after ten years. Stock options only have value if our
stock price appreciates after the options are granted.
|
|
|
|
RSUs: RSUs are equivalent in value to one
share of our common stock and generally vest on the third
anniversary of the grant date. RSUs do not generally entitle the
recipient to voting rights until the units vest. Holders of RSUs
will receive a dividend equivalent payment of additional RSUs.
These dividend equivalents are governed by the terms of the RSU
agreement, as amended. The additional RSUs will equal:
(i) the product of the per-share cash dividend payable with
respect to each share of common stock on that date, multiplied
by the total number of RSUs which have not been settled or
forfeited as of the record date for such dividend, divided by
(ii) the closing price of one share of common stock on the
payment date of that dividend.
|
Equity
Award Procedures
We have established equity award procedures to develop a
consistent practice with respect to the granting of equity-based
awards. Under these procedures, the Board, with respect to
equity awards to non-executive directors, and the Compensation
Committee, with respect to employee awards, may grant equity
awards at its first regularly-scheduled meeting in each calendar
year (or at any special meeting, so long as this special meeting
occurs on or before March 2 of each calendar year), and the
effective date of these equity awards will be March 2 (or if not
a NYSE trading day, the first NYSE trading day after March 2).
The Compensation Committee may also make equity awards to new
hires, employees receiving promotions, employees receiving
retention grants and persons becoming employees as a result of
an acquisition at any regularly scheduled meeting or at any
special meeting called for that purpose. The Board may also make
equity awards to persons who become new directors at any
regularly scheduled meeting or at any special meeting called for
that purpose. The Special Award Committee may make awards to
employees at any time, but the effective date of such awards is
the first business day of the next succeeding month after the
Special Award Committee selects employees for awards. Awards by
the Special Award Committee are also governed by the limitations
established by the Compensation Committee. For a more complete
description
24
of the authority and limitations of the Special Award Committee,
see Corporate Governance Board Committees and
Meetings Special Award Committee on
page 14 of this Proxy Statement.
Our equity award procedures require that the exercise or grant
price of an equity award equal the closing price of our common
stock on the effective date of the award. Our procedures also
set forth the procedural and control requirements for granting
equity awards.
Benefits
Our benefit programs are established based upon an assessment of
competitive market factors and a determination of what is needed
to attract and retain high caliber executives. Our primary
benefits for executives include participation in our broad-based
plans: retirement plans, savings plans, health and dental plans
and various insurance plans, including disability and life
insurance.
We also provide certain executives, including the NEOs, the
following benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Savings Plan: The only
nonqualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by us for NEOs
is the Supplemental Savings Plan (the SSP), a
non-tax qualified defined contribution plan. The SSP is for
employees who are actively enrolled in the Savings Incentive
Plan (SIP) and whose deferrals under the SIP are
limited by the Code compensation limitations. Employees may
elect to defer up to 75% of their base salary over the
compensation limit (established in the Code) to the SSP, and we
match 100% of the first 4% of base salary that is contributed by
these employees. Employees participating in the SSP are always
fully vested in their, as well as our, contributions to the plan.
|
|
|
|
Executive Service Allowance: All NEOs and
other key executives receive an annual allowance that can be
used for obtaining financial planning, tax preparation services
and other related benefits. The executive pays tax on this
allowance.
|
|
|
|
Automobile Allowance: We provide our NEOs with
an automobile allowance. This benefit provides eligible
executives with an opportunity to use their car for both
business and personal use in an efficient manner. The executive
pays tax on this allowance.
|
|
|
|
Executive Long Term Disability: We provide our
NEOs with an executive long term disability program that is
supplemental to our group disability program. The executive long
term disability program provides a benefit of up to 60% of total
target compensation. Total target compensation equals the sum of
base pay and target performance based incentive compensation.
Executives recognize imputed income for tax purposes for
premiums paid for the executive long term disability premiums.
|
|
|
|
Annual Physicals: We provide our NEOs with the
opportunity to have executive physicals on an annual basis.
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Usage: As a result of the
recommendations contained in an independent, third-party
security study, the Board has determined that Mr. Young
must travel by corporate jet (chartered or company-owned) for
all business and personal air travel. Per IRS regulations, our
CEO recognizes imputed income on the personal use of a corporate
jet at rates established by the IRS. The Company will gross up
Mr. Youngs base salary for up to $150,000 of income
that would be attributed to Mr. Young for personal air
travel to cover the taxes accruing to Mr. Young as a result
of this benefit.
|
Tax
Treatment
Under Section 162(m) of the Code, we generally receive an
annual federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to our
CEO and the other three most highly paid executives (excluding
the CFO) only if the compensation is less than $1 million
or is performance-based. The applicable awards granted under
both the Management Incentive Plan and the Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan of 2008 are fully tax-deductible for us. RSUs
granted under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2009 that vest
solely over time are not performance-based compensation and are
subject to the limitation of tax deductibility under
Section 162(m) of the Code. The Compensation Committee
intends to continue seeking a tax deduction to the extent
possible for all executive compensation, as long as it is in the
best interest of the Company and our stockholders.
25
REPORT OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation program on
behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and
discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis set forth in this Proxy Statement.
In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be incorporated in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and our Proxy
Statement to be filed in connection with our Annual Meeting.
Submitted by the
Compensation Committee of the Board
Jack L. Stahl, Chairman
Ronald G. Rogers
M. Anne Szostak
26
Historical
Executive Compensation Information
The executive compensation disclosure contained in this section
reflects compensation information for 2009. The following
disclosure tables provide information for
(1) Mr. Young, our President and CEO;
(2) Mr. Stewart, our Chief Financial Officer;
(3) Mr. Collins, our President, Packaged Beverages;
(4) Mr. Johnston, our President, Beverage Concentrates
and Latin America Beverages; and (5) Mr. Hobson, our
Executive Vice President, Supply Chain. These persons are
sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as Named
Executive Officers or NEOs and individually as
NEO.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding the
compensation earned by NEOs in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
($)(5)
|
|
($)(6)
|
|
($)
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
934,616
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
2,519,992
|
|
|
|
1,079,998
|
|
|
|
1,839,488
|
|
|
|
30,619
|
|
|
|
114,665
|
|
|
|
6,519,378
|
|
President & CEO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
867,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,399,994
|
|
|
|
2,328,073
|
|
|
|
1,643,155
|
|
|
|
229,831
|
|
|
|
206,130
|
|
|
|
7,674,491
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
672,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,400
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
197,411
|
|
|
|
3,050,476
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
532,212
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
|
|
670,392
|
|
|
|
13,957
|
|
|
|
76,723
|
|
|
|
2,193,270
|
|
Chief Financial
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
509,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,992
|
|
|
|
567,463
|
|
|
|
874,120
|
|
|
|
94,132
|
|
|
|
104,339
|
|
|
|
2,749,181
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
425,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,266
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
85,288
|
|
|
|
1,016,683
|
|
Rodger L. Collins
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
510,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
|
|
715,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,638
|
|
|
|
2,221,257
|
|
Pres., Packaged
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
452,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,987
|
|
|
|
398,682
|
|
|
|
658,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,224
|
|
|
|
2,167,072
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
376,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,463
|
|
|
|
747,470
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
519,231
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
|
|
651,121
|
|
|
|
70,036
|
|
|
|
78,370
|
|
|
|
2,218,744
|
|
Pres., Beverage Concentrates
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
454,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
419,987
|
|
|
|
398,682
|
|
|
|
513,791
|
|
|
|
57,314
|
|
|
|
54,690
|
|
|
|
1,898,887
|
|
& Latin America Beverages
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
435,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,497
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
52,151
|
|
|
|
1,094,708
|
|
Derry L. Hobson
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
430,578
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
1,059,991
|
|
|
|
239,998
|
|
|
|
474,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,108
|
|
|
|
2,283,329
|
|
EVP, Supply
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
376,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,986
|
|
|
|
369,576
|
|
|
|
514,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,009
|
|
|
|
1,709,036
|
|
Chain
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
314,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,325
|
|
|
|
741,499
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Salary disclosed reflects 27 biweekly pay periods that occurred
in 2009, excluding Mr. Collins who received the typical 26
biweekly pay periods because he is on a different payroll system. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column reflect the
grant date fair value associated with awards of restricted stock
units to each of the NEOs. Even though the awards may be
forfeited, the amounts do not reflect this contingency.
Assumptions used to calculate these amounts (disregarding
forfeiture assumptions) are included in Note 16
Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. For further
information on the stock awards granted in 2009, see the Grants
of Plan-Based Awards table. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the
grant date fair value associated with option grants to each of
the NEOs. Even though the awards may be forfeited, the amounts
do not reflect this contingency. Assumptions used to calculate
these amounts (disregarding forfeiture assumptions) are included
in Note 16 Stock-Based Compensation, to our
audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. For further
information on the stock option grants awarded in 2009, see the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation column reflect the amounts earned by each NEO under
the Companys Management Incentive Plan for 2009. In 2008
these amounts include amounts earned under the Annual Incentive
Plan for 2008 and a performance- based cash award related to the
successful spin-off from Cadbury. |
27
|
|
|
(5) |
|
The amounts reported in the Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column represent an
estimate of the aggregate change during fiscal year 2009 in the
actuarial present value of accumulated benefits under the
Personal Pension Account Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan
(as applicable), as described in more detail in the Pension
Benefits table on page 30 of this Proxy Statement. The
change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated
benefits under the plans was determined in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 715, Retirement Benefits (ASC 715).
Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are included in
Note 15 Employee Benefit Plans, to our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
All Other Compensation for 2009 is summarized as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
Service
|
|
Income
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Premiums(a)
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Mr. Young
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
6,778
|
|
|
|
37,385
|
|
|
|
11,402
|
|
|
|
114,665
|
|
Mr. Stewart
|
|
|
28,600
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
76,723
|
|
Mr. Collins
|
|
|
27,879
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
39,663
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
95,638
|
|
Mr. Johnston
|
|
|
33,936
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
4,665
|
|
|
|
20,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,370
|
|
Mr. Hobson
|
|
|
22,594
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
7,825
|
|
|
|
33,216
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
78,108
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the gross up for taxes to be paid by the NEO on the
premium that was included in the NEOs income. |
|
(b) |
|
The amounts reported in the Company Contributions column
represent our matching contributions to the tax-qualified
defined contribution plans and non-tax qualified defined
contribution plans. The contributions to the tax qualified
defined contribution plans for 2009 is $9,800 for each of
Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Johnston and
$16,700 for each of Mr. Collins and Mr. Hobson. The
contributions to the non-tax qualified defined contributions
plans for 2009 are as follows: for Mr. Young, $27,585; for
Mr. Stewart, $11,488; for Mr. Collins, $22,963; for
Mr. Johnston, $10,969; and for Mr. Hobson, $16,516. |
|
(c) |
|
The amounts reported in the Other column represent the following
costs for 2009: for Mr. Young, $11,402 for corporate jet
personal use (including gross up for applicable taxes); for
Mr. Stewart, $1,667 for executive physical; for
Mr. Collins, $2,302 for executive physical; and for
Mr. Hobson, $473 for corporate jet personal use (which did
not include a gross up for applicable taxes). For SEC purposes,
the cost of personal use of a corporate jet is calculated based
on the incremental cost to us. To determine the incremental
cost, we calculate the variable costs for fuel on a per mile
basis, plus any direct trip expenses such as on-board catering,
landing/ramp fees and crew expenses. Fixed costs which do not
change based on usage, such as pilot salaries, depreciation of
aircraft and cost of maintenance are excluded. |
28
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding equity plan
awards and non-equity incentive plan awards by us to our NEOs in
2009. For a discussion of the material terms of these awards,
see Compensation Discussion and Analysis The
Compensation Program and Historical Executive
Compensation Information Summary Compensation
Table.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
or
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Options
|
|
Base
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Number
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Price
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
Under Equity Incentive
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Number of
|
|
of
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards(1)
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
of Stock or
|
|
Securities
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)(2)
|
|
Option (#)(3)
|
|
($/Sh)(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,250
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519,992
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,334
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
1,079,998
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,500
|
|
|
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
820,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
Rodger L. Collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
|
816,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,988
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
269,998
|
|
Derry L. Hobson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,063
|
|
|
|
276,250
|
|
|
|
552,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
|
5/18/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,991
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,185
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
239,998
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reported in the Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards column represent the potential
payouts of annual cash incentive awards granted to our NEOs in
fiscal year 2009 under the Management Incentive Plan subject to
the achievement of certain performance measures. The actual
amount of the awards made to the NEOs and paid in cash is
included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the number of shares subject to restricted stock unit
awards made in 2009 under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of
2008. All of these awards vest three years from their respective
grant dates. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the number of shares subject to stock option grants
made in 2009 under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008. All
options granted in 2009 to NEOs have a term of ten years from
the grant date and vest one-third on the first, second and third
anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on the NEO
continuing his employment with the Company through each date. |
|
(4) |
|
The exercise price for the option awards, which were determined
based on the closing share price of a share of our common stock
on the date of grant. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the grant date fair value of the equity incentive
plan awards, which generally reflects the amount we would
expense in our financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC
718 (Compensation Stock Compensation)
over the awards vesting schedule, and does not correspond
to the actual value that may be realized by or paid to the NEOs. |
29
Outstanding
Equity Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding exercisable
and unexercisable stock options and vested and unvested equity
awards held by each NEO as of December 31, 2009. All such
awards relate to shares of our common stock.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Market
|
|
Number of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Stock
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
That
|
|
Rights
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
That
|
|
Have Not
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Vested
|
|
Not
|
|
Not
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
105,153
|
|
|
|
210,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
5/7/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
3/2/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,637
|
|
|
|
2,678,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,943
|
|
|
|
5,290,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
25,632
|
|
|
|
51,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
5/7/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
3/2/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,659
|
|
|
|
669,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
1,322,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodger L. Collins
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
18,008
|
|
|
|
36,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
5/7/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
3/2/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
|
|
468,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
1,322,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
18,008
|
|
|
|
36,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
5/7/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
3/2/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
|
|
468,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,735
|
|
|
|
1,322,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derry L. Hobson
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
16,694
|
|
|
|
33,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.36
|
|
|
|
5/7/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
3/2/2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/7/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,378
|
|
|
|
435,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/2/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,543
|
|
|
|
1,175,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/18/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,331
|
|
|
|
631,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Determined by multiplying the total number of shares or other
rights awarded under an equity incentive plan that have not
vested times the closing price of $28.30 of a share of our
common on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2009. |
Pension
Benefits
The following table sets forth information regarding pension
benefits accrued by each NEO under our defined benefit plans and
supplemental contractual arrangements for 2009.
Pension
Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years
|
|
Present Value
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
of Credited Service
|
|
of Accumulated
|
|
During Last
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
Benefit ($)(1)
|
|
Fiscal Year ($)
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
Personal Pension Account Plan
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
35,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Equalization Plan
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
260,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
Personal Pension Account Plan
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
15,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Equalization Plan
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
97,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
Personal Pension Account Plan
|
|
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
273,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Equalization Plan
|
|
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
334,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The actuarial present value of benefits accumulated under the
respective plans in accordance with the assumptions included in
Note 15 Employee Benefit Plans, to our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in our
Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. These amounts assume that
each NEO retires at age 65. The discount rate used to
determine the present value of accumulated benefits is 5.90%.
The present values assume no pre-retirement mortality and
utilize the RP2000 healthy white collar male and female tables,
projected to calendar year 2015. |
Personal
Pension Account Plan
NEOs, other than Mr. Collins and Mr. Hobson, are
provided with retirement benefits under our personal pension
account plan (the PPA Plan), a tax-qualified defined
benefit pension plan covering full-time and part-time employees
with at least one year of service who were actively employed
(other than former bottling group employees) as of
December 31, 2006. The PPA Plan was closed to employees who
were hired after December 31, 2006. Further, as of
December 31, 2008, all future pay and service credits to
the PPA Plan have been frozen. However, the PPA Plan does
provide a minimum annual interest credit on individual account
balances of 5%.
Participants fully vest in their retirement benefits after three
years of service or upon attaining age 65. Participants are
also eligible for early retirement benefits if they separate
from service on or after attaining age 55 with
10 years of service. Participants who leave the Company
before they are fully vested in their retirement benefit forfeit
their accrued benefit under the PPA Plan.
The Code places limitations on compensation and pension benefits
for tax-qualified defined benefit plans such as the PPA Plan. We
have established a non-qualified supplemental defined benefit
pension program (our Pension Equalization Plan), as discussed
below, to restore some of the pension benefits limited by the
Code.
Pension
Equalization Plan
We sponsor a pension equalization plan (the PEP), an
unfunded, non-tax qualified excess defined benefit plan covering
key employees who were actively employed as of December 31,
2006 and whose base salary exceeded certain statutory limits
imposed by the Code. As with the PPA Plan, the PEP was closed to
employees who were hired after December 31, 2006 and as of
December 31, 2008, all future pay and service credits to
the PEP have been frozen. However, the PEP does provide a
minimum annual interest credit on individual account balances of
5%.
The purpose of the PEP is to restore to PEP participants any PPA
Plan benefits that are limited by statutory restrictions imposed
by the Code that are taken into consideration when determining
their PPA Plan benefits. Participants fully vest in their
benefits under the PEP after three years of service.
Participants who voluntarily resign from service before they are
vested in their benefits under the PEP forfeit their unvested
accrued benefit. Participants who are terminated without
cause or resign for good reason are
entitled to have their unvested accrued benefits under the PEP
automatically vested.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of the executive employment
agreements, if any NEO is terminated without cause
or resigns for good reason and is not vested in his
accrued benefit under the PPA Plan, such NEO will be entitled to
have his accrued and unvested benefits under the PPA Plan paid
under the PEP. As of December 31, 2009, all NEOs (other
than Mr. Collins and Mr. Hobson who do not participate
in the PPA Plan) have vested in their accrued benefits under the
PPA Plan. Since Mr. Collins and Mr. Hobson are not
participants in the PPA Plan, they receive no benefits under the
PEP.
Deferred
Compensation
Savings
Incentive Plan
We sponsor a savings incentive plan (the SIP), a
tax-qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan. The plan permits
participants to contribute up to 75% of their base salary in the
SIP within certain statutory limitations under the Code and we
match 100% of the first 4% of base salary, on a per paycheck
basis, that is deferred to the SIP by a participant. Employees
participating in the SIP are always fully vested in their, as
well as our, contributions to the
31
plan. Participants self-direct the investment of their account
balances among various mutual funds. All of our NEOs participate
in the SIP.
Also as part of the SIP, we offer an enhanced defined
contribution component (the EDC) on a tax-qualified
basis to the SIP plan account. The EDC provides a contribution
equal to 3% of eligible compensation to individual accounts
annually. EDC contributions are 100% vested after three years of
service with the Company.
Supplemental
Savings Plan
The supplemental savings plan (the SSP) is a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by the Company
in 2009 for NEOs, and is a non-tax qualified defined
contribution plan. The SSP is for employees who are actively
enrolled in the SIP and whose deferrals under the SIP are
limited by Code compensation limitations. Employees may elect to
defer up to 75% of their base salary over the Code compensation
limit to the SSP, and we match 100% of the first 4% of base
salary, on a per paycheck basis, that is contributed by these
employees. Employees participating in the SSP are always fully
vested in their, as well as our, contributions to the plan.
Participants self-direct the investment of their account
balances among various mutual funds. All of our NEOs participate
in the SSP.
Also as part of the SSP, we offer an enhanced defined
contribution component (the Non-qualified EDC) on a
non-tax qualified basis to the SSP plan account. The
Non-qualified EDC provides a contribution equal to 3% of
eligible compensation over statutory pay limits to individual
accounts annually. The Non-qualified EDC contributions are 100%
vested after three years of service with the Company or prior
affiliates.
The SSP also offers our executive officers the opportunity to
defer up to 100% of their annual bonus. Participants will make
yearly elections on payout options of bonus deferrals under the
plan. Vesting is immediate and the participant has multiple
distribution options available during each annual enrollment
period. Participants self-direct the investment of their account
balances among various mutual funds.
The following table sets forth information regarding the
nonqualified deferred compensation under the SSP for each NEO in
2009.
Nonqualified
Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Contributions
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
in Last
|
|
Earnings in Last
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
Balance at
|
Name
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
Fiscal Year ($)(2)
|
|
Fiscal Year($)(3)
|
|
Distributions ($)
|
|
Last FYE ($)
|
|
Larry D. Young
|
|
|
82,754
|
|
|
|
27,585
|
|
|
|
62,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,395
|
|
John O. Stewart
|
|
|
445,518
|
|
|
|
11,488
|
|
|
|
226,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,304
|
|
Rodger L. Collins
|
|
|
111,594
|
|
|
|
22,963
|
|
|
|
48,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,214
|
|
James J. Johnston
|
|
|
24,681
|
|
|
|
10,969
|
|
|
|
29,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,521
|
|
Derry L. Hobson
|
|
|
142,822
|
|
|
|
16,516
|
|
|
|
14,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,903
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Aggregate amount of contributions made by our NEOs to the SSP in
fiscal year 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate amount of the Companys contributions to the
NEOs accounts under the SSP in fiscal year 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Aggregate amount of earnings credited to the NEOs accounts
under the SSP in fiscal year 2009. |
Post-Termination
Compensation
Executive
Employment Agreements
Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Hobson have
executive employment agreements with us. Each of these executive
employment agreements has a term of 10 years and includes
non-competition and non-solicitation provisions, which provide
that the executive will not, for a period of one year after
termination of employment, (i) become engaged with
companies that are in competition with us, including but not
limited to a predetermined list of companies or
(ii) solicit or attempt to entice away any of our employees
or customers.
32
The executive employment agreements of Mr. Young,
Mr. Stewart and Mr. Hobson each provide that severance
payments occur and salary and benefits continue if termination
of employment occurs without cause or if the
executive leaves for good reason. Under the
executive employment agreements:
(A) cause is defined as termination of the
executives employment for his:
|
|
|
|
|
willful failure to substantially perform his duties,
|
|
|
|
breach of a duty of loyalty toward the Company,
|
|
|
|
commission of an act of dishonesty toward the Company, theft of
our corporate property, or usurpation of our corporate
opportunities,
|
|
|
|
unethical business conduct including any violation of law
connected with the executives employment, or
|
|
|
|
conviction of any felony involving dishonest or immoral
conduct; and
|
(B) good reason is defined as a resignation by
the executive for any of the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to perform any of our material obligations under the
employment agreement,
|
|
|
|
a relocation by us of the executives principal place of
employment to a site outside a 50 mile radius of the
current site of the principal place of employment, or
|
|
|
|
the failure by a successor acquirer to assume the employment
agreement.
|
In the event we terminate Mr. Youngs employment
without cause or he resigns for good
reason during the employment term, he is entitled to the
equivalent of 5.625 times base salary made up as follows:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
salary continuation for up to 15 months equal to his annual
base salary and his target award under the Management Incentive
Plan (subject to mitigation for new employment);
|
|
|
(2)
|
a lump sum salary payment equal to 15 months of his annual
base salary; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
a lump sum cash payment equal to 125% of his target award under
the Management Incentive Plan.
|
In addition, Mr. Young will receive a lump sum cash payment
equal to his Management Incentive Plan payment, pro-rated
through the employment termination date and based on the actual
performance targets achieved for the year in which such
termination of employment occurred and payable when such awards
are paid under the plan to all employees.
Mr. Young will continue to receive medical, dental and
vision benefits until other employment is obtained, but not to
exceed the salary continuation period. Mr. Young will also
be entitled to receive outplacement services and certain
payments under the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.
See discussion of pension benefits to be paid under the PPA Plan
under Pension Benefits Personal Pension
Account Plan on page 31 of this Proxy Statement and
the PEP under Pension Benefits Pension
Equalization Plan on page 31 of this Proxy Statement.
In the event we terminate Mr. Stewarts employment
without cause or he resigns for good
reason during the employment term, he is entitled to the
equivalent of approximately 3.6 times base salary made up as
follows:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
salary continuation for up to 12 months equal to his annual
base salary and his target award under the Management Incentive
Plan (subject to mitigation for new employment);
|
|
|
(2)
|
a lump sum salary payment equal to 12 months of his annual
base salary; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
a lump sum cash payment equal to 100% of his target award under
the Management Incentive Plan.
|
In addition, Mr. Stewart will receive a lump sum cash
payment equal to his Management Incentive Plan payment,
pro-rated through the employment termination date and based on
the actual performance targets achieved for the year in which
such termination of employment occurred and payable when such
awards are paid under the plan to all employees.
33
Mr. Stewart will continue to receive medical, dental and
vision benefits until other employment is obtained, but not to
exceed the salary continuation period. Mr. Stewart will
also be entitled to receive outplacement services and certain
payments under the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.
See discussion of pension benefits to be paid under the PPA Plan
under Pension Benefits Personal Pension
Account Plan on page 31 of this Proxy Statement and
the PEP under Pension Benefits Pension
Equalization Plan on page 31 of this Proxy Statement.
On October 27, 2009, we announced that Mr. Stewart
advised our Board that he decided to take early retirement and
separate from the Company. To facilitate the transition of his
duties as CFO, Mr. Stewart has agreed to remain with the
Company until May 21, 2010. For a discussion of
Mr. Stewarts separation see Business Experience
of Executive Officers on page 16 of this Proxy
Statement.
In the event we terminate Mr. Hobsons employment
without cause or he resigns for good
reason during the employment term, he is entitled to the
equivalent of approximately 2.475 times base salary made up as
follows:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
salary continuation for up to nine months equal to his annual
base salary and 75% of his target award under the Management
Incentive Plan (subject to mitigation for new employment);
|
|
|
(2)
|
a lump sum salary payment equal to nine months of his annual
base salary; and
|
|
|
(3)
|
a lump sum cash payment equal to 75% of his target award under
the Management Incentive Plan.
|
In addition, Mr. Hobson will receive a lump sum cash
payment equal to his Management Incentive Plan payment,
pro-rated through the employment termination date and based on
the actual performance targets achieved for the year in which
such termination of employment occurred and payable when such
awards are paid under the plan to all employees.
Mr. Hobson will continue to receive medical, dental and
vision benefits until other employment is obtained, but not to
exceed the salary continuation period. Mr. Hobson will also
be entitled to receive outplacement services and certain
payments under the qualified and non-qualified plans.
Letters
of Understanding
Historically, we have entered into executive employment
agreements with our executive officers. During our review of our
compensation program following the spin-off from Cadbury, we
decided that we will not be entering into executive employment
agreements with future executive officers. As a result, when we
hire a new executive or a current executive is promoted, the
executive will receive an offer letter which we refer to as
letters of understanding. When Mr. Collins and
Mr. Johnston received promotions in 2008, each received a
letter of understanding in replacement for his executive
employment agreement with us. The letters of understanding have
no term.
In the event Mr. Collins or Mr. Johnstons
employment is involuntarily terminated, they are entitled to
receive severance benefits under our Severance Pay Plan for
Salaried Employees (Severance Pay Plan), which
benefits include:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
a lump sum severance payment equal to 3.5 times their annual
base salary; and
|
|
|
(2)
|
a lump sum cash payment equal to their Management Incentive Plan
payment, pro-rated through the employment termination date and
based on the actual performance targets achieved for the year in
which such termination of employment occurred and payable when
such awards are paid under the plan to all employees.
|
Under the Severance Pay Plan, Mr. Johnston is entitled to
outplacement services and certain payments under the qualified
and non-qualified pension plans. See discussion of pension
benefits to be paid under the PPA Plan under Pension
Benefits Personal Pension Account Plan on
page 31 of this Proxy Statement and the PEP under
Pension Benefits Pension Equalization
Plan on page 31 of this Proxy Statement.
Under the Severance Pay Plan, Mr. Collins is entitled to
outplacement services and certain payments under the qualified
and non-qualified savings plans.
Neither Mr. Collins nor Mr. Johnston would be eligible
for severance under the Severance Pay Plan, if either were
terminated (i) for cause, (ii) because of inadequate
or unsatisfactory performance, (iii) as the result of
34
misconduct (including mismanagement of a position of employment
by action or inaction, neglect that jeopardizes the life or
property of another, intentional wrongdoing or malfeasance,
intentional violation of a law, or violation of a policy or rule
adopted to ensure the orderly work and the safety of employees),
(iv) for gross neglect in job performance or
(v) because his position is eliminated and he refuses to
accept another position, with generally comparable base salary
and incentive compensation, that is located no more than
50 miles from their former office, or it does not cause a
significant detrimental impact to the executives that commute.
(These items are hereinafter referred to as Disqualifying
Conditions.)
Mr. Collins and Mr. Johnston have each also signed
non-compete agreements, which provide they will not, for a
period of one year after termination of employment,
(i) become engaged with companies that are in competition
with us, including but not limited to a predetermined list of
companies or (ii) solicit or attempt to entice away any of
our employees or customers.
Change
in Control
The Compensation Committee believes that severance benefits
and/or
change of control benefits are necessary in order to attract and
retain the caliber and quality of executive that we need in our
most senior positions. The Compensation Committee approved a
Change in Control Severance Plan in February 2009. The Change in
Control Severance Plan generally provides that a payment will be
made to a plan participant if there is a change in control of
the Company and, within two years after the change in control,
the participants employment is terminated or the
participant voluntarily terminates his employment under certain
adverse circumstances, including a significant adverse change in
responsibilities of his position. The Compensation Committee
determined that Mr. Young, Mr. Collins,
Mr. Johnston and Mr. Hobson should participate in the
Change in Control Severance Plan. The levels of payments and
benefits available upon termination were set to be comparable to
those provided within our peer group, and are as follows: (a)
Mr. Young, as CEO, is entitled to a payment equal to three
(3) times the sum of his base salary, plus his annual
bonus; (b) Mr. Collins and Mr. Johnston would
each be entitled to a payment equal to two and one-half (2.5)
times the sum of their respective base salary, plus their
respective annual bonus; and (c) Mr. Hobson would be
entitled to a payment equal to two (2) times the sum of his
base salary, plus his annual bonus. Payments under the Change in
Control Severance Plan will be grossed up to cover any
applicable excise taxes under section 4999 of the Code (the
280G gross up payment). Termination payments may be
reduced by 10% to avoid the excise tax and 280G gross up payment.
In addition, plan participants also receive other benefits,
including benefit continuation for the number of years equal to
their payment multiplier, payment of unvested and vested
qualified and non-qualified pension benefits and outplacement
services.
Tables
of Potential Payments and Assumptions
The following tables below outline the potential payments to
Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Collins,
Mr. Johnston and Mr. Hobson upon the occurrence of
various termination events, including termination for
cause or not for good reason,
termination without cause or for good
reason or termination due to death or
disability or voluntary termination or
with Disqualifying Conditions. Also, the table
reflects potential payments related to
change-in-control
and subsequent qualified termination within a specified window.
The following assumptions apply with respect to the tables below
and any termination of employment of a NEO:
|
|
|
|
|
The tables include estimates of amounts that would have been
paid to: (i) Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart and
Mr. Hobson assuming a termination event occurred on
December 31, 2009 and (ii) Mr. Collins and
Mr. Johnston in the event they terminate their employment
voluntarily or with Disqualifying Conditions or their employment
is terminated involuntarily without Disqualifying Conditions on
December 31, 2009. The employment of these NEOs did not
actually terminate on December 31, 2009, and as a result,
these NEOs did not receive any of the amounts shown in the
tables below. The actual amounts to be paid to a NEO in
connection with a termination event can only be determined at
the time of such termination event.
|
|
|
|
The tables assume that the price of a share of our common stock
is $28.30 per share, the closing market price per share on
December 31, 2009.
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Each NEO is entitled to receive amounts earned during the term
of his employment regardless of the manner of termination. These
amounts include accrued base salary, accrued vacation time and
other employee benefits to which the NEO was entitled on the
date of termination, and are not shown in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
For purposes of the tables below, the specific definitions of
cause and good reason are defined in the
executive employment agreements for Messrs. Young, Stewart
and Hobson and are described in the section entitled
Executive Employment Agreements.
|
|
|
|
To receive the benefits under the executive employment
agreements, Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart and Mr. Hobson
are each respectively required to provide a general release of
claims against us and our affiliates. The benefits are also
subject to mitigation for new employment. In addition, if
Mr. Young, Mr. Stewart or Mr. Hobson receives
severance payments under his executive employment agreement, he
will not be entitled to receive any severance benefits under our
Severance Pay Plan.
|
|
|
|
The tables are as of December 31, 2009 and reflect any
potential payments under the Change in Control Severance Plan
that went into effect in February 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or for
|
|
|
Control
|
|
|
following
|
|
Name
|
|
Compensation Element
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
(CIC)
|
|
|
CIC(8)
|
|
|
Larry Young
|
|
Salary Continuation Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,531,250
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,075,000
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Target Award MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,250
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum 2009 MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,125,000(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,125,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,839,488
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical, Dental and Vision Benefits Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,330
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,592
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,968,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,942,294
|
|
|
$
|
2,942,294
|
|
|
$
|
7,968,714
|
|
|
$
|
7,968,714
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,098,884
|
|
|
$
|
1,444,369
|
|
|
$
|
1,444,369
|
|
|
$
|
5,098,884
|
|
|
$
|
5,098,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,192,598
|
|
|
$
|
5,511,663
|
|
|
$
|
11,375,981
|
|
|
$
|
13,067,598
|
|
|
$
|
19,247,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Stewart
|
|
Salary Continuation Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
922,500
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
922,500
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,500
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,500
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Target Award MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum 2009 MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
670,392
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
670,392
|
|
|
|
Medical, Dental and Vision Benefits Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,652
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,652
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,992,150
|
|
|
$
|
735,574
|
|
|
$
|
735,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,992,150
|
|
|
$
|
1,992,150
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,844
|
|
|
$
|
359,832
|
|
|
$
|
359,832
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,672,994
|
|
|
$
|
1,505,406
|
|
|
$
|
3,623,700
|
|
|
$
|
3,262,994
|
|
|
$
|
5,791,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or for
|
|
|
|
|
|
following
|
|
Name
|
|
Compensation Element
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
CIC
|
|
|
CIC(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodger Collins
|
|
Salary Continuation Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,785,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,295,000
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Target Award MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum 2009 MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
408,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
715,633
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical, Dental and Vision Benefits Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,140
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
$
|
624,949
|
|
|
$
|
624,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
$
|
345,220
|
|
|
$
|
345,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,425,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,378,169
|
|
|
$
|
3,478,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,017,298
|
|
|
$
|
5,359,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Johnston
|
|
Salary Continuation Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,750,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Target Award MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum 2009 MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
651,121
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical, Dental and Vision Benefits Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,560
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
$
|
624,949
|
|
|
$
|
624,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
$
|
1,791,277
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
$
|
345,220
|
|
|
$
|
345,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,417,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,370,169
|
|
|
$
|
3,378,540
|
|
|
$
|
3,017,298
|
|
|
$
|
5,309,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derry Hobson
|
|
Salary Continuation Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
525,939
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Cash Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
318,751
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,402,503
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum Target Award MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
207,188
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lump Sum 2009 MIP Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
276,251
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
276,251
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
474,654
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical, Dental and Vision Benefits Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,398
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,728
|
|
|
|
Outplacement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
Accelerated Equity Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,242,832
|
|
|
$
|
696,633
|
|
|
$
|
696,633
|
|
|
$
|
2,242,832
|
|
|
$
|
2,242,832
|
|
|
|
Stock Options(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,831
|
|
|
$
|
308,167
|
|
|
$
|
308,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,831
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,612,914
|
|
|
$
|
1,281,051
|
|
|
$
|
2,545,980
|
|
|
$
|
3,336,663
|
|
|
$
|
4,766,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts shown in the Termination Without Cause or for
Good Reason column represent salary continuation in an
amount equal to (x) annual base salary and (y) target
award under the Management |
37
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan. The amounts shown represent 125% for
Mr. Young, 100% for Mr. Stewart and 75% for
Mr. Hobson, in each case, according to the terms of their
respective executive employment agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in the Termination Without Cause or for
Good Reason column represent lump sum cash payments equal
(a) 125% of the annual base salary for Mr. Young, 100%
of the annual base salary for Mr. Stewart, and 75% of the
annual base salary for Mr. Hobson under their executive
employment agreements and (b) 350% of the annual base
salary for each of Mr. Collins and Mr. Johnston under
the Companys Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown represent lump sum payments under the
Management Incentive Plan equal to 125% of the target award for
Mr. Young, 100% of the target award for Mr. Stewart
and 75% of the target award for Mr. Hobson under their
respective executive employment agreements. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts shown under the Death and
Disability columns represent each NEOs target
award under the Management Incentive Plan, pro-rated through the
assumed employment termination date. The amounts shown under the
Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason column
represent lump sum cash payments equal to each NEOs 2009
Management Incentive Plan payment, pro-rated through the assumed
employment termination date and based on the actual performance
targets achieved for the year in which such assumed termination
of employment occurred. The amounts are paid to
Messrs. Young, Stewart and Hobson under their executive
employment agreements and to Messrs. Collins and Johnston
under the Companys Severance Pay Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts shown represent the combined cash value of benefits
continuation over the salary continuation period under the
executive employment agreements of Mr. Young,
Mr. Stewart and Mr. Hobson. |
|
(6) |
|
The amounts shown represent the value of unvested restricted
stock unit awards under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008
that vest under the occurrence of the specific event. |
|
(7) |
|
The amounts shown represent the value of the unvested stock
options under the Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008 that vest
under the occurrence of the specific event. These stock options
remain exercisable for 90 days from the employment
termination date. |
|
(8) |
|
Except for Mr. Stewart, the amounts shown represent the
value to be delivered to an executive upon a termination without
cause by the employer or a termination for good reason by the
employee within a
2-year
period following a CIC under the Change in Control Severance
Plan. The amounts shown in the lump sum cash payments row equal
300%, 250%, 250%, and 200% of annual base salary and target
award under the Management Incentive Plan for Mr. Young,
Mr. Collins, Mr. Johnston and Mr. Hobson,
respectively. The full acceleration value of equity awards is
also included due to the CIC event that preceded the termination
under this scenario. The amounts shown represent the value to be
delivered to Mr. Stewart upon a termination without cause
by the employer or a termination for good reason by him under
his executive employment agreement since he does not participate
in the Change In Control Severance Plan. |
38
SECURITIES
AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table summarizes certain information related to
our equity award plans as of December 31, 2009.
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
|
|
|
under Equity
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Reflected in Initial
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Column)
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2009(1)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,999,564
|
(4)
|
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan of 2008(2)
|
|
|
4,866,326
|
|
|
$
|
8.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Plans(3)
|
|
|
191,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,058,063
|
|
|
$
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
19,999,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 436 RSUs that have been awarded under the Omnibus
Stock Incentive Plan of 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 2,688,115 RSUs that have been awarded and 2,178,211
stock options that have been granted under the Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan of 2008. The stock options have a weighted
average exercise price of $18.97 and weighted average
contractual term of 8.79 years. |
|
(3) |
|
These plans consist of the Legacy International Share Award
Plan, Legacy Long-Term Incentive Plan and Legacy Bonus Share
Retention Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents awards authorized for future grants under the Omnibus
Stock Incentive Plan of 2009. |
39
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee of our Board was comprised of
Mr. Martin, Ms. Patsley and Mr. Adams during
fiscal year 2009. All of such Audit Committee members are
independent as defined in the current New York Stock Exchange
listing standards.
The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter, which was
approved by our Board on April 24, 2008, setting forth the
duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee. In addition
to the activities described in this report, in 2009 the Audit
Committee has performed the duties set forth in its written
charter.
Management has primary responsibility for the financial
statements, financial reporting and the overall system of
internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee
has reviewed and discussed the Companys financial
statements with management and managements evaluation and
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche, LLP (Deloitte), our independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2009, is
responsible for auditing the financial statements and expressing
an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements and their
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and for
auditing of internal control over financial reporting and
expressing an opinion on its effectiveness. The Audit Committee
has discussed with Deloitte the financial statement audit, its
evaluation of effectiveness of internal controls, the overall
quality of financial reporting and all other matters related to
the conduct of the audit that are required to be communicated by
Deloitte to the Audit Committee under the requirements of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
Deloitte has provided to the Audit Committee the written
disclosures and the letter regarding its independence as set
forth in the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the Audit
Committee has discussed Deloittes independence with
Deloitte. The Audit Committee also concluded that
Deloittes provision of non-audit services is compatible
with Deloittes independence.
Based on the considerations referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to our Board that the audited financial
statements be included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and that Deloitte
be appointed our independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
Submitted by the
Audit Committee of our Board:
Terence D. Martin (Chairman)
John L. Adams
Pamela H. Patsley
THE ABOVE REPORTS OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE AND AUDIT
COMMITTEE WILL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE SOLICITING MATERIAL OR TO BE
FILED WITH OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING BY US
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE EXCHANGE ACT, EXCEPT TO
THE EXTENT THAT WE SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATE EITHER SUCH REPORT
BY REFERENCE.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal year 2009, the Compensation Committee was composed
of Jack L. Stahl, Ronald G. Rogers and M. Anne Szostak. No
member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee
of ours or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive
officers served on our Board or on the compensation committee of
any other entity, for which any officers of such other entity
served either on our Board or on our Compensation Committee. For
information on insider participation, see Certain
Transactions.
40
CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS
All new or continuing related party transactions will be
reviewed by our Board, the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee or the Compensation Committee, as appropriate, to
ensure the transactions are fair to us.
Michael F. Weinstein is a co-founder of INOV8 Beverage Company
LLC (INOV8), owning in excess of forty percent of
the equity in INOV8. INOV8 owns a majority of the equity in
Hydrive Energy LLC (the LLC) which has developed the
energy drink HYDRIVE. The Company distributes HYDRIVE and owns a
minority interest in the LLC. In fiscal year 2009, the Company
paid the LLC in excess of $2.9 million for product, which
the Company resold. As a result of this relationship,
Mr. Weinstein is not an independent director and will not
serve on any committee which requires independent directors.
DELIVERY
OF PROXY MATERIALS TO HOUSEHOLDS WITH MULTIPLE
STOCKHOLDERS
If you have consented to the delivery of only one Notice, Annual
Report or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to multiple Dr
Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. stockholders who share your address,
then only one Notice, Annual Report or set of proxy materials,
as applicable, is being delivered to your household unless we
have received contrary instructions from one or more of the
stockholders sharing your address. We will deliver promptly upon
oral or written request a separate copy of the Notice, Annual
Report or set of proxy materials, as applicable, to any
stockholder at your address. If you wish to receive a separate
copy of the Notice, Annual Report or set of proxy materials, as
applicable, you may call us at
(972) 673-7000
(please ask for Investor Relations) or write to us at Dr Pepper
Snapple Group, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 5301 Legacy
Drive, Plano, Texas 75024. Stockholders sharing an address who
now receive multiple copies of the Notice, Annual Report or set
of proxy materials, as applicable, may request delivery of a
single copy by calling us at the above number or writing to us
at the above address.
STOCKHOLDERS
PROPOSALS FOR 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
We currently expect to hold our annual meeting after the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2010 (2010 Annual
Meeting) on or around May 19, 2011, and mail the
Proxy Statement for that meeting in April 2011, subject to any
changes we may make. If any of our stockholders intends to
present a proposal for consideration at the 2010 Annual Meeting,
including the nomination of directors, without inclusion of such
proposal in the proxy statement and form of proxy, such
stockholder must provide notice to us of such proposal.
Pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act, stockholder proposals will need to be
received by us not later than December 2, 2010, in order to
be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of
proxy distributed by our Board with respect to the 2010 Annual
Meeting. With respect to any notice of a proposal that a
stockholder intends to present for consideration at the 2010
Annual Meeting, without inclusion of such proposal in the proxy
statement and form of proxy, in accordance with Article II,
Section 6(c) or 7(b) of our By-laws, as applicable,
stockholder proposals will need to be received by us not sooner
than January 20, 2011, but not later than February 19,
2011, in order to be presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting.
Stockholder proposals must be sent to our principal executive
offices, 5301 Legacy Drive, Plano, Texas 75024, Attention: James
L. Baldwin, Jr., Corporate Secretary.
By Order of the Board of Directors
James L. Baldwin, Jr.
Corporate Secretary
March 30, 2010
41
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.
5301 Legacy Drive
Plano, TX75024
VOTE BY INTERNET www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up
until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 19, 2010. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web
site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting
instruction form.
Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can
consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via
e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to
vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy
materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59
P.M. Eastern Time on May 19, 2010. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the
instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or
return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 |
|
John L. Adams |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 |
|
Terence D. Martin |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 |
|
Ronald G. Rogers |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal(s): |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as the Corporations
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010. |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners
should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in
full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
Date |
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
Date |
ADMISSION TICKET
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Thursday, May 20, 2010
10:00 a.m. (CDT)
Westin Stonebriar Resort Conference Center
1549 Legacy Drive
Frisco, TX 75034
If you wish to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person,
please present this admission ticket and a valid picture identification for admission. Cameras,
recording equipment and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.
Directions to the Annual Meeting are on our website at www.drpeppersnapplegroup.com under Investor
Center and Events & Presentations captions.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The
Notice & Proxy Statement, 10K Wrap is/are available at www.proxyvote.com.
DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP, INC.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - MAY 20, 2010
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Larry D. Young and James L. Baldwin, Jr., or any of them, as
proxies for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to act
and to vote all shares of common stock of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. held of record or in an
applicable plan by the undersigned at the close of business on March 22, 2010, at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Westin Stonebriar Resort Conference Center, 1549 Legacy
Drive, Frisco, Texas 75034, at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Thursday, May 20, 2010, or any
postponement or adjournment thereof.
In their discretion the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly
come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any
postponement or adjournment thereof.
This proxy, when properly executed and returned, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. If this proxy is properly
executed and returned but no direction is made, this proxy will be voted for all of the nominees
for Class II directors in proposal 1 and for proposal 2. Whether or not direction is made, this
proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the discretion of the proxy holders upon such other
business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. The undersigned hereby revokes all proxies previously given by the
undersigned to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
PLEASE REFER TO THE REVERSE SIDE FOR TELEPHONE AND INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTIONS.
IMPORTANT - THIS PROXY CARD MUST BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.