e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-12074
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
72-1235413 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
625 E. Kaliste Saloom Road
Lafayette, Louisiana
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
70508
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (337) 237-0410
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ |
|
Accelerated filer
o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of August 5, 2009, there were 48,033,551 shares of the registrants Common Stock, par value $.01
per share, outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
109,339 |
|
|
$ |
68,137 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
136,742 |
|
|
|
151,641 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
22,714 |
|
|
|
136,072 |
|
Current income tax receivable |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
31,183 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
12,546 |
|
|
|
35,675 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
283,198 |
|
|
|
424,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties United States full cost method of
accounting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization of $4,232,424 and $3,766,676, respectively |
|
|
857,972 |
|
|
|
1,130,583 |
|
Unevaluated |
|
|
454,657 |
|
|
|
493,738 |
|
Building and land, net |
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
47,484 |
|
|
|
46,620 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,656,528 |
|
|
$ |
2,106,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable to vendors |
|
$ |
114,228 |
|
|
$ |
144,016 |
|
Undistributed oil and gas proceeds |
|
|
15,555 |
|
|
|
37,882 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
17,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
32,416 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
62,284 |
|
|
|
70,709 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
233,729 |
|
|
|
300,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
725,000 |
|
|
|
825,000 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
85,729 |
|
|
|
193,924 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
177,135 |
|
|
|
186,146 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
11,661 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
12,428 |
|
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,245,682 |
|
|
|
1,518,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued 47,486,255 and 39,430,637 shares, respectively |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
Treasury stock (16,582 shares, respectively, at cost) |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
(860 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,320,384 |
|
|
|
1,257,633 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(953,685 |
) |
|
|
(754,987 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
44,532 |
|
|
|
84,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stone Energy Corporation stockholders equity |
|
|
410,846 |
|
|
|
587,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
410,846 |
|
|
|
587,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,656,528 |
|
|
$ |
2,106,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance sheet.
1
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production |
|
$ |
107,972 |
|
|
$ |
156,569 |
|
|
$ |
178,826 |
|
|
$ |
279,276 |
|
Gas production |
|
|
62,340 |
|
|
|
106,393 |
|
|
|
130,490 |
|
|
|
186,919 |
|
Derivative income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
170,312 |
|
|
|
262,962 |
|
|
|
312,512 |
|
|
|
466,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
41,122 |
|
|
|
34,900 |
|
|
|
99,276 |
|
|
|
65,153 |
|
Other operational expense |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Production taxes |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
4,903 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
57,052 |
|
|
|
70,831 |
|
|
|
117,670 |
|
|
|
134,218 |
|
Write-down of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,100 |
|
|
|
340,083 |
|
|
|
10,100 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
8,376 |
|
|
|
3,853 |
|
|
|
16,753 |
|
|
|
8,221 |
|
Salaries, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9,922 |
|
|
|
11,278 |
|
|
|
21,583 |
|
|
|
21,534 |
|
Incentive compensation expense |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Impairment of inventory |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative expenses, net |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
124,633 |
|
|
|
138,700 |
|
|
|
610,201 |
|
|
|
249,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
45,679 |
|
|
|
124,262 |
|
|
|
(297,689 |
) |
|
|
216,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,788 |
|
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
|
9,954 |
|
|
|
7,492 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(3,432 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(8,346 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
(2,253 |
) |
|
|
(2,409 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses |
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
(3,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
41,888 |
|
|
|
125,374 |
|
|
|
(305,536 |
) |
|
|
219,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,028 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
46,978 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
14,720 |
|
|
|
9,535 |
|
|
|
(106,888 |
) |
|
|
27,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
14,720 |
|
|
|
42,563 |
|
|
|
(106,865 |
) |
|
|
74,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
27,168 |
|
|
|
82,811 |
|
|
|
(198,671 |
) |
|
|
145,053 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Stone Energy
Corporation |
|
$ |
27,168 |
|
|
$ |
82,811 |
|
|
$ |
(198,698 |
) |
|
$ |
145,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Stone
Energy Corporation stockholders |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
(4.92 |
) |
|
$ |
5.10 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Stone
Energy Corporation stockholders |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
$ |
(4.92 |
) |
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
41,270 |
|
|
|
28,077 |
|
|
|
40,365 |
|
|
|
27,948 |
|
Average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
41,338 |
|
|
|
28,459 |
|
|
|
40,365 |
|
|
|
28,260 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
2
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(198,671 |
) |
|
$ |
145,053 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
117,670 |
|
|
|
134,218 |
|
Write-down of oil and gas properties |
|
|
340,083 |
|
|
|
10,100 |
|
Impairment of inventory |
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
16,753 |
|
|
|
8,221 |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(106,888 |
) |
|
|
27,731 |
|
Settlement of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
(28,249 |
) |
|
|
(33,651 |
) |
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Excess tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,950 |
) |
Non-cash derivative expense |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
Other non-cash expenses |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Unrecognized proceeds from unwound derivative contracts |
|
|
71,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in current income taxes |
|
|
30,435 |
|
|
|
(47,131 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
17,638 |
|
|
|
(4,722 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other current assets |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
Decrease in inventory |
|
|
15,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
Decrease in other current liabilities |
|
|
(27,765 |
) |
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
Investment in hedging contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
Other |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
273,543 |
|
|
|
239,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in oil and gas properties |
|
|
(197,001 |
) |
|
|
(177,955 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties, net of expenses |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
14,090 |
|
Sale of fixed assets |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in fixed and other assets |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(2,503 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(191,886 |
) |
|
|
(166,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
60,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of bank borrowings |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
17,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(40,455 |
) |
|
|
19,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
41,202 |
|
|
|
92,991 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
68,137 |
|
|
|
475,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
109,339 |
|
|
$ |
568,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.
3
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Interim Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Stone Energy Corporation (Stone) and its
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments),
which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
position and operating results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet
at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. The
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto, together with managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.
Note 2 Prior Period Restatement
During the second quarter of 2009, we determined that the first quarter 2009 financial
statements had misstatements caused by two errors that resulted in
the under-accrual of revenues. The net effect of
the misstatements on the individual financial statement line items for the first quarter of 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production |
|
$ |
60,202 |
|
|
$ |
10,652 |
|
|
$ |
70,854 |
|
Gas production |
|
|
69,277 |
|
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
68,150 |
|
Derivative income, net |
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
132,401 |
|
|
|
10,542 |
|
|
|
142,943 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
486,076 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
486,311 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(353,675 |
) |
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
(343,368 |
) |
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(357,731 |
) |
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
(347,424 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(125,216 |
) |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
(121,608 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(232,538 |
) |
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
(225,839 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Stone Energy
Corporation stockholders |
|
|
(232,565 |
) |
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
(225,866 |
) |
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to
Stone Energy Corporation stockholders |
|
$ |
(5.90 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(5.73 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to
Stone Energy Corporation stockholders |
|
$ |
(5.90 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(5.73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
113,085 |
|
|
$ |
10,542 |
|
|
$ |
123,627 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
288,950 |
|
|
|
10,542 |
|
|
|
299,492 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,685,816 |
|
|
|
10,542 |
|
|
|
1,696,358 |
|
Undistributed oil and gas proceeds |
|
|
14,208 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
14,443 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
248,128 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
248,363 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
70,255 |
|
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
73,863 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,325,102 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
1,328,945 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(987,552 |
) |
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
(980,853 |
) |
Total Stone Energy Corporation stockholders equity |
|
|
360,600 |
|
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
367,299 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
360,714 |
|
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
367,413 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
1,685,816 |
|
|
|
10,542 |
|
|
|
1,696,358 |
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(232,538 |
) |
|
$ |
6,699 |
|
|
$ |
(225,839 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(125,216 |
) |
|
|
3,608 |
|
|
|
(121,608 |
) |
Non-cash derivative income |
|
|
(653 |
) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(1,670 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
38,556 |
|
|
|
(9,525 |
) |
|
|
29,031 |
|
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities |
|
|
(28,378 |
) |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(28,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(227,370 |
) |
|
$ |
6,699 |
|
|
$ |
(220,671 |
) |
Note 3 Earnings Per Share
Basic net income per share of common stock was calculated by dividing net income applicable to
common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income per share of common stock was calculated by dividing net income applicable to
common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the
weighted-average number of dilutive stock options and restricted stock granted to outside directors
and employees. There were approximately 68,000 and 382,000 dilutive shares for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There were no dilutive shares for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 because we had a net loss for the period. There were approximately 312,000 dilutive
shares for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Stock options that were considered antidilutive because the exercise price of the option
exceeded the average price of our common stock for the applicable period totaled approximately
501,000 shares in the three months ended June 30, 2009. There were no antidilutive stock options
in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Stock options that were considered antidilutive totaled
501,000 and 65,000 shares in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 20,000 shares of common stock were
issued upon the vesting of restricted stock by employees and nonemployee directors. On June 10,
2009, 8,050,000 shares of common stock were issued in a public offering (see Note 4). During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 327,000 shares of common stock were issued upon the
exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock by employees and nonemployee directors.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 105,000 and 503,000 shares of
common stock, respectively, were issued upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of
restricted stock by employees and nonemployee directors and the awarding of employee bonus stock
pursuant to the 2004 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. During the six months ended June
30, 2009, 100,000 shares of common stock were repurchased under our stock repurchase program.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 addresses
whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior
to vesting and are therefore required to be included in the earnings allocation in calculating
earnings per share under the two-class method described in Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Under FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, companies are
required to treat unvested share-based payment awards with a right to receive non-forfeitable
dividends as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. We adopted FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009. The net effect of the
implementation of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 on our financial statements was immaterial.
5
Note 4 Public Offering of Common Stock
In June 2009, we sold 8.1 million shares of our common stock in a public offering at a price
of $8.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately $60.5 million after deducting the
underwriting discount and offering expenses. The net proceeds are reflected in the common stock
and additional paid-in capital accounts of our condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30,
2009.
Note 5 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Our hedging strategy is designed to protect our near and intermediate term cash flow from
future declines in oil and natural gas prices. This protection is essential to capital budget
planning which is sensitive to expenditures that must be committed to in advance such as rig
contracts and the purchase of tubular goods. We enter into hedging transactions to secure a
commodity price for a portion of future production that is acceptable at the time of the
transaction. These hedges are designated as cash flow hedges upon entering into the contract. We
do not enter into hedging transactions for trading purposes. We have no fair value hedges.
Under SFAS No. 133, the nature of a derivative instrument must be evaluated to determine if it
qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. If the instrument qualifies for hedge accounting
treatment, it is recorded as either an asset or liability measured at fair value and subsequent
changes in the derivatives fair value are recognized in equity through other comprehensive income
(loss), net of related taxes, to the extent the hedge is considered effective. Additionally,
monthly settlements of effective hedges are reflected in revenue from oil and gas production and
cash flows from operations. Instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in the
balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in earnings through derivative
expense (income). Typically, a small portion of our derivative contracts are determined to be
ineffective. This is because oil and natural gas price changes in the markets in which we sell our
products are not 100% correlative to changes in the underlying price basis indicative in the
derivative contract. Monthly settlements of ineffective hedges are recognized in earnings through
derivative expense (income) and cash flows from operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 became effective for
us on January 1, 2009.
We have entered into zero-premium collars and fixed-price swaps with various counterparties
for a portion of our expected 2009, 2010 and 2011 oil and natural gas production from the Gulf
Coast Basin. The natural gas collar settlements are based on an average of New York Mercantile
Exchange (NYMEX) prices for the last three days of a respective month. The collar contracts
require payments to the counterparties if the average price is above the ceiling price or payment
from the counterparties if the average price is below the floor price. Some of our fixed-price gas
swap settlements are based on an average of NYMEX prices for the last three days of a respective
month and some are based on the NYMEX price for the last day of a respective month. The
fixed-price oil swap settlements are based upon an average of the NYMEX closing price for West
Texas Intermediate (WTI) during the entire calendar month. Swaps typically provide for monthly
payments by us if prices rise above the swap price or to us if prices fall below the swap price.
Our outstanding collar is with BNP Paribas. Our outstanding fixed-price swap contracts are with
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Barclays Bank PLC, BNP Paribas and The
Bank of Nova Scotia.
All of our derivative instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133. The following tables disclose the location and fair value
amounts of derivative instruments reported in our balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at June 30, 2009
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
Description |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Current assets: Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
$ |
22.7 |
|
|
Current liabilities: Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
$ |
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
Long-term assets: Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Long-term liabilities: Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at December 31, 2008
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
Description |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Current assets: Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
$ |
136.1 |
|
|
Long-term liabilities: Fair value
of hedging contracts |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
136.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables disclose the effect of derivative instruments in the statement of
operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 133 Cash |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion) |
|
Relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(45.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(83.3 |
) |
|
Operating revenue - oil/gas production |
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
(21.1 |
) |
|
Derivative income (expense), net |
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(45.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(83.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, effective hedging contracts increased oil
revenue by $19.4 million and increased gas revenue by $25.5 million. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, effective hedging contracts reduced oil revenue by $20.8 million and
reduced gas revenue by $0.3 million. |
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from |
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 133 Cash |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) (a) |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion) |
|
Relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(87.6 |
) |
|
Operating revenue - oil/gas production |
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) |
|
Derivative income (expense), net |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(87.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
|
$ |
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, effective hedging contracts increased
oil revenue by $37.7 million and increased gas revenue by $48.0 million. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, effective hedging contracts reduced oil revenue by $26.0
million and increased gas revenue by $0.5 million. |
On March 3, 2009, we unwound all of our then existing crude oil hedges for the period
from April 2009 through December 2009, resulting in proceeds of approximately $59 million. On
March 6, 2009, we unwound two of our natural gas hedges for the period from April 2009 through
December 2009, resulting in proceeds of approximately $54 million. These amounts (net of related
deferred income tax effect) were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. As the
original time periods for these contracts expire, applicable amounts are being reclassified into
earnings. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, $37.3 million (before related deferred income
tax effect) of the proceeds were reclassified into production revenue and $71.7 million (before
related deferred income tax effect) remains in other comprehensive income.
At June 30, 2009, we had accumulated other comprehensive income of $44.5 million, net of tax,
which related to the fair value of our 2009, 2010 and 2011 collar and swap contracts. A portion of
this amount relates to the contracts that were unwound. We believe that approximately $49.8
million of the accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings in the
next twelve months.
7
The following tables illustrate our hedging positions for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011
as of August 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero-Premium Collars |
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Floor |
|
|
Ceiling |
|
|
|
(MMBtus/d) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Price |
|
2009 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
14.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Price Swaps |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Oil |
|
|
Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
Daily |
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
Swap |
|
Volume |
|
Swap |
|
|
(MMBtus/d) |
|
Price |
|
(Bbls/d) |
|
Price |
2009 |
|
|
20,000 |
(a) |
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(b) |
|
$ |
50.00 |
|
2009 |
|
|
20,000 |
(b) |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
(b) |
|
|
50.45 |
|
2009 |
|
|
20,000 |
(b) |
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
(b) |
|
|
71.25 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
63.00 |
|
2010 |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
64.05 |
|
2010 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
60.20 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
75.00 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
75.25 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
(c) |
|
|
73.65 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
70.05 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
78.20 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
July September |
|
(b) |
|
October December |
|
(c) |
|
January March |
Note 6 Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
81/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
63/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Bank debt |
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
425.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
725.0 |
|
|
$ |
825.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 28, 2008, we entered into an amended and restated revolving credit facility totaling
$700 million, maturing on July 1, 2011, with a syndicated bank group. In December 2008, the
borrowing base was set at $625 million. On April 28, 2009, our bank credit facility was amended,
and on April 29, 2009, the borrowing base under our bank credit facility was reduced from $625
million to $425 million. At June 30, 2009, we had $325 million in borrowings under our bank credit
facility, letters of credit totaling $68.9 million had been issued pursuant to the facility, and
the weighted average interest rate under our bank credit facility was approximately 3.3%. As of
August 5, 2009, we had $313 million in borrowings and $68.9 million of outstanding letters of
credit, leaving $43.1 million of availability under our bank credit facility.
The amendment increased our borrowing base pricing grid by 75 basis points in respect of
London Interbank Offering Rate (Libor Rate) advances, by a range of 125 to 150 basis points in
respect of base rates advances and by a range of 0 to 12.5 basis points in respect of commitment
fees under the credit agreement. The facility is guaranteed by all of our material direct and
indirect subsidiaries, including Stone Energy Offshore, L.L.C. (Stone Offshore), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Stone.
The borrowing base under our bank credit facility is redetermined semi-annually, typically in
May and November, by the lenders taking into consideration the estimated value of our oil and gas
properties and those of our direct and indirect material subsidiaries in accordance with the
lenders customary practices for oil and gas loans. In addition, we and the lenders each have
discretion at any time, but not more than two additional times in any calendar year, to have the
borrowing base redetermined. If a reduction caused our borrowing base to fall below any
outstanding balances under our bank credit facility plus any outstanding letters of credit, our
agreement with the banks allows us one of three options to cure the borrowing base deficiency: (1)
repay amounts outstanding sufficient to cure the deficiency within 10 days after our written
election to do so; (2) add additional oil and
8
gas properties acceptable to the banks to the
borrowing base and take such actions necessary to grant the banks a mortgage in the properties
within thirty days after our written election to do so or (3) arrange to pay the deficiency in
monthly installments over ninety days or some longer period acceptable to the banks not to exceed
six months.
Our bank credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of Stones and Stone
Offshores assets. Stone and Stone Offshore are required to mortgage, and grant a security
interest in, their oil and gas reserves representing at least 80% of the discounted present value
of the future net cash flows from their oil and gas reserves reviewed in determining the borrowing
base. At Stones option, loans under our bank credit facility will bear interest at a rate based
on the adjusted Libor Rate plus an applicable margin, or a rate based on the prime rate or Federal
funds rate plus an applicable margin. Our bank credit facility provides for optional and mandatory
prepayments, affirmative and negative covenants, and interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio
maintenance covenants.
Note 7 Comprehensive Income
The following table illustrates the components of comprehensive income for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
$ |
82.8 |
|
|
$ |
(198.7 |
) |
|
$ |
145.1 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for fair value accounting of derivatives |
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
|
(83.3 |
) |
|
|
(40.4 |
) |
|
|
(87.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(239.1 |
) |
|
|
57.5 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Stone
Energy Corporation |
|
$ |
(18.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(239.1 |
) |
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Asset Retirement Obligations
The change in our asset retirement obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is
set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Asset retirement obligations as of the beginning of the period, including current portion |
|
$ |
256.9 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
Divestment of properties |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations as of the end of the period, including current portion |
|
$ |
239.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Impairments
Under the full cost method of accounting, we compare, at the end of each financial reporting
period, the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves (based on
period-end hedge adjusted commodity prices and excluding cash flows related to estimated
abandonment costs), to the net capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties net of related
deferred taxes. We refer to this comparison as a ceiling test. If the net capitalized costs of
proved oil and gas properties exceed the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved
reserves, we are required to write-down the value of our oil and gas properties to the value of the
discounted cash flows. At March 31, 2009, our ceiling test computation resulted in a write-down of
our oil and gas properties of $340.1 million based on a March 31, 2009 Henry Hub gas price of $3.63
per MMBtu and a West Texas Intermediate oil price of $44.92 per barrel. The benefit of hedges in
place at March 31, 2009 reduced the write-down by $85.0 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a write-down of our tubular inventory in
the amount of $7.2 million. This charge was the result of the market value of these tubulars
falling below historical cost.
9
Note 10 Fair Value Measurements
We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, on January 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The net
effect of the implementation of SFAS No. 157 on our financial statements was immaterial. SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy which has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs
used to determine the fair value. These levels include: Level 1, defined as inputs such as
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for use when little or no market data
exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of June 30, 2009, we held certain financial assets and liabilities that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including our commodity derivative instruments and our
investments in money market funds. We utilize the services of an independent third party to
assist us in valuing our derivative instruments. We used the income approach in determining the
fair value of our derivative instruments utilizing a proprietary pricing model. The model accounts
for the credit risk of Stone and its counterparties in the discount rate applied to estimated
future cash inflows and outflows. Our swap contracts are included within the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy and collar contracts are included within the Level 3 fair value hierarchy. Significant
unobservable inputs used in establishing fair value for the collars were the volatility impacts in
the pricing model as it relates to the call and put portions of the collar. For a more detailed
description of our derivative instruments, see Note 5 Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. We used the market approach in determining the fair value of our investments in money
market funds, which are included within the Level 1 fair value hierarchy.
The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Money market
funds |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Hedging
contracts |
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Liabilities |
|
Total |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging contracts |
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(29.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six months ended June
30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
|
|
Contracts, net |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
Total gains/(losses) (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
48.5 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
|
|
(81.8 |
) |
Transfers in and out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains/(losses) for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gain/(losses) relating to derivatives
still held at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
10
We have applied the fair value concepts indicated in SFAS No. 157 in recording the assets and
liabilities acquired in our acquisition of Bois dArc Energy, Inc. (Bois dArc) (see Note 11 -
Acquisitions and Divestitures). In determining the fair value of Bois dArcs most significant
assets, proved and unevaluated oil and gas properties, we used elements of both the income and
market approaches. Future income for oil and gas properties was estimated based on proved,
probable, possible and prospective reserve volumes and quoted commodity prices in the futures
markets. We then applied appropriate discount rates based on the risk profile of the respective
reserve categories. Resulting values from the income approach were compared to ranges of prices
paid in the acquisition of similar oil and gas properties in other transactions. Values determined
under the income approach were within market ranges.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (FSP FAS
107-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 amends
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 became effective for us on June 15, 2009.
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable to vendors
and our variable-rate bank debt approximated book value at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of our $200 million 81/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011 was $163 million and $145 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the fair value of our $200 million 63/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014
was $127 million and $101 million, respectively. The fair values of our outstanding notes were
determined based upon quotes obtained from brokers.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits entities
to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This
statement became effective for us on January 1, 2008. We did not elect the fair value option for
any of our existing financial instruments other than those mandated by other FASB standards and
accordingly the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on our financial statements was immaterial.
We have not determined whether or not we will elect this option for financial instruments we may
acquire in the future.
Note 11 Acquisitions and Divestitures
Acquisitions
On August 28, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Bois dArc in a cash and stock transaction
totaling approximately $1.7 billion. Bois dArc was an independent exploration company engaged in
the discovery and production of oil and natural gas in the Gulf of Mexico. The primary factors
considered by management in making the acquisition included the belief that the merger would
position the combined company as one of the largest independent Gulf of Mexico-focused exploration
and production companies, with a solid production base, a strong portfolio for continued
development of proved and probable reserves, and an extensive inventory of exploration
opportunities. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreement and plan of merger, Stone
paid total merger consideration of approximately $935 million in cash and issued approximately 11.3
million common shares, valued at $63.52 per share. The per share value of the Stone common shares
issued was calculated as the average of Stones closing share price for the two days prior to
through the two days after the merger announcement date of April 30, 2008. The cash component of
the merger consideration was funded with approximately $510 million of cash on hand and $425
million of borrowings from our amended and restated bank credit facility.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations. The acquisition was preliminarily recorded in Stones consolidated financial
statements on August 28, 2008, the date the acquisition closed. The preliminary purchase price
allocation was adjusted in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of further analysis of the assets
acquired, principally proved and unevaluated oil and gas properties, and liabilities assumed,
principally asset retirement obligations and deferred taxes, which resulted in an adjustment to the
preliminary allocation to goodwill. The adjustments were the result of additional analysis of
proved, probable and possible reserves at the time of the acquisition. The following table
represents the allocation of the total purchase price of Bois dArc to the acquired assets and
liabilities of Bois dArc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Fair value of Bois dArcs net assets: |
|
| | |
Net working capital, including cash of $15.3 |
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,339.1 |
|
Unevaluated oil and gas properties |
|
|
422.2 |
|
Fixed and other assets |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
466.0 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(467.9 |
) |
Dismantlement reserve |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
(127.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of net assets |
|
$ |
1,656.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
The following table represents the breakdown of the consideration paid for Bois dArcs net
assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Consideration paid for Bois dArcs net assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid |
|
$ |
935.4 |
|
Stone common stock issued |
|
|
717.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase consideration issued to Bois dArc
stockholders |
|
|
1,653.3 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
Direct merger costs (1) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
1,656.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Direct merger costs include legal and accounting fees, printing
fees, investment banking expenses and other merger-related costs. |
The allocation of the purchase price included $466 million of asset valuation attributable to
goodwill. Goodwill was determined in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and
represents the amount by which the total purchase price exceeds the aggregate fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the merger, other than goodwill. Goodwill was not
deductible for tax purposes. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that we test
goodwill for impairment at least annually. We tested goodwill created in the Bois dArc
acquisition for impairment on December 31, 2008. A substantial reduction in commodity prices and
the existence of a full cost ceiling test write-down in the fourth quarter of 2008 were indications
of potential impairment. The reporting unit for the impairment test was Stone Energy Corporation
and its consolidated subsidiaries. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined using
average quoted market prices for Stone common stock for the two market days prior to through the
two market days after December 31, 2008. A control premium of 25% was applied to the market
capitalization. The control premium was based on a history of control premiums paid for the
acquisition of entities in similar industries. The resulting fair value of the reporting unit was
$504 million below the reporting units carrying value. Additional analysis indicated no implied
value of the recorded goodwill, resulting in the impairment of the entire amount of goodwill of
$466 million at December 31, 2008.
The following summary pro forma combined statement of operations data of Stone for the three
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 has been prepared to give effect to the merger as if it
had occurred on January 1, 2008. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative
of the results that might have occurred had the transaction taken place on January 1, 2008 and is
not intended to be a projection of future results. Future results may vary significantly from the
results reflected in the following pro forma financial information because of normal production
declines, changes in commodity prices, future acquisitions and divestitures, future development and
exploration activities, and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
411.0 |
|
|
$ |
727.5 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
170.2 |
|
|
|
279.6 |
|
Net income |
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
|
183.9 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.84 |
|
|
$ |
4.69 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
During the second quarter of 2009, we acquired the entire non-controlling interest in a
subsidiary. As a result of this transaction, all of our subsidiaries are now wholly-owned.
Divestitures
In the first quarter of 2008, we completed the divesture of a small package of Gulf of Mexico
properties which totaled 17.4 Bcfe of reserves at December 31, 2007 for a cash consideration of
approximately $14.1 million after closing adjustments. The properties that were sold had estimated
asset retirement obligations of $32.9 million. In the second quarter of 2009, we completed the
sale of an onshore Louisiana field for cash consideration of approximately $5.0 million. The
estimated asset retirement obligation for this field was $6.0 million. The sale of these
properties was accounted for as an adjustment of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized.
12
Note 12 Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 modifies the
definition of subsequent events and requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has
evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS No. 165 became effective for us on
June 15, 2009. We evaluated subsequent events through August 5, 2009, which represents the date
our financial statements were issued, and we have no subsequent events to report in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Note 13 Commitments and Contingencies
We have been served with several petitions filed by the Louisiana Department of Revenue
(LDR) in Louisiana state court claiming additional franchise taxes due of approximately $9.0
million plus accrued interest of approximately $4.2 million. These assessments all relate to the
LDRs assertion that sales of crude oil and natural gas from properties located on the Outer
Continental Shelf, which are transported through the state of Louisiana, should be sourced to the
state of Louisiana for purposes of computing the Louisiana franchise tax apportionment ratio. The
claims relate to franchise tax years from 1999 through 2006. The Company disagrees with these
contentions and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The franchise tax years
2007 through 2009 for Stone and franchise tax years 2006 through 2008 for Bois dArc remain subject
to examination.
In 2005, Stone received an inquiry from the Philadelphia Stock Exchange investigating matters
including trading prior to Stones October 6, 2005 announcement regarding the revision of Stones
proved reserves. Stone cooperated fully with this inquiry. Stone has not received any further
inquiries from the Philadelphia Exchange since the original request for information.
A consolidated putative class action is pending in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana (the Federal Court) against Stone, David Welch, Kenneth Beer, D.
Peter Canty and James Prince purporting to allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Securities Action). The consolidated complaint alleges a
putative class period to commence on May 2, 2001 and to end on March 10, 2006 and contends that,
during the putative class period, defendants, among other things, misstated or failed to disclose
(i) that Stone had materially overstated Stones financial results by overvaluing its oil reserves
through improper and aggressive reserve methodologies; (ii) that the Company lacked adequate
internal controls and was therefore unable to ascertain its true financial condition; and (iii)
that as a result of the foregoing, the values of the Companys proved reserves, assets and future
net cash flows were materially overstated at all relevant times.
On October 1, 2007, the Federal Court ordered that (i) the claims asserted against defendants
Kenneth Beer and James Prince pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and (ii) claims asserted on behalf of putative class members who
sold their Company shares prior to October 6, 2005 be dismissed. The remaining claims are still
pending.
On or about May 12, 2008, then Lead Plaintiff El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund filed
a motion to certify the Securities Action as a class action (Class Certification Motion).
Defendants filed an opposition to the Class Certification Motion on June 27, 2008. Defendants also
filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and a related Motion to Amend Answer to the
Consolidated Class Action Complaint on or about June 11, 2008. In a memorandum ruling filed on
February 27, 2009, the Court held that El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund did not have
capacity to sue or be sued and dismissed it from the lawsuit. Subsequently, the Court denied the
Class Certification Motion as moot. El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund is appealing its
dismissal. On April 13, 2009, the City of Knoxville Employees Pension System filed a motion to be
appointed as the new lead plaintiff, and on July 16, 2009, Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined
Benefit Plan also filed a motion to be appointed as the new lead plaintiff. Defendants are
opposing the motions by the City of Knoxville Employees Pension System and Pipefitters Local No.
636 Defined Benefit Plan, as well as El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Funds appeal.
In addition, pending in the Federal Court and in the 15th Judicial District Court,
Parish of Lafayette, Louisiana (the State Court) are actions purportedly alleging claims
derivatively on behalf of Stone. The operative complaints in these derivative actions name Stone as
a nominal defendant and David Welch, Kenneth Beer, D. Peter Canty, James Prince, James Stone, John
Laborde, Peter Barker, George Christmas, Richard Pattarozzi, David Voelker, Raymond Gary, B.J.
Duplantis and Robert Bernhard as defendants. The State Court action purports to allege claims of
breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets
against all defendants, and claims of unjust enrichment and insider selling against certain
individual defendants. The Federal Court derivative action purports to assert claims against all
defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate
assets and unjust enrichment and claims against certain individual defendants for breach of
fiduciary duty and violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Federal Court action has been
stayed since December 21, 2006.
The foregoing pending actions are at an early stage, and we cannot currently predict the
manner and timing of the resolution of these matters and are unable to estimate a range of possible
losses or any minimum loss from such matters.
13
Stones Certificate of Incorporation and/or its Restated Bylaws provide, to the extent
permissible under the law of the State of Delaware (Stones state of incorporation), for
indemnification of and advancement of defense costs to Stones current and former directors and
officers for potential liabilities related to their service to Stone. Stone has purchased directors
and officers insurance policies that, under certain circumstances, may provide coverage to Stone
and/or its officers and directors for certain losses resulting from securities-related civil
liabilities and/or the satisfaction of indemnification and advancement obligations owed to
directors and officers. These insurance policies may not cover all costs and liabilities incurred
by Stone and its current and former officers and directors in these regulatory and civil
proceedings.
14
Note 14 Guarantor Financial Statements
Stone Offshore is an unconditional guarantor (the Guarantor Subsidiary) of our 81/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2011 and 63/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. Our remaining subsidiaries
(the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) have not provided guarantees. The following presents condensed
consolidating financial information as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 on an issuer (parent company), guarantor subsidiary,
non-guarantor subsidiaries, and consolidated basis. Elimination entries presented are necessary to
combine the entities. There were no subsidiary guarantees of any of our debt for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
105,115 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,339 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
77,130 |
|
|
|
60,311 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,742 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
22,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,714 |
|
Current income tax receivable |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
11,184 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,546 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
217,950 |
|
|
|
65,324 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,198 |
|
Oil and gas properties United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved, net |
|
|
3,269 |
|
|
|
853,243 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857,972 |
|
Unevaluated |
|
|
261,668 |
|
|
|
192,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454,657 |
|
Building and land, net |
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,537 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
47,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,484 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
Investment in subsidiary |
|
|
568,794 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,112,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,113,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
(570,433 |
) |
|
$ |
1,656,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable to vendors |
|
$ |
25,167 |
|
|
$ |
88,981 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114,228 |
|
Undistributed oil and gas proceeds |
|
|
14,168 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,555 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
17,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,711 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,629 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
29,371 |
|
|
|
32,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,284 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
109,924 |
|
|
|
123,725 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233,729 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725,000 |
|
Deferred taxes * |
|
|
(161,132 |
) |
|
|
195,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,271 |
|
|
|
85,729 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
58,520 |
|
|
|
118,342 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,135 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
11,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,661 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
12,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
756,401 |
|
|
|
437,657 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
51,271 |
|
|
|
1,245,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(860 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,320,310 |
|
|
|
2,016,364 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
(2,017,929 |
) |
|
|
1,320,384 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(1,008,476 |
) |
|
|
(1,340,826 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
1,396,225 |
|
|
|
(953,685 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
44,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,981 |
|
|
|
675,538 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
(621,704 |
) |
|
|
410,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
355,981 |
|
|
|
675,538 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
(621,704 |
) |
|
|
410,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
1,112,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,113,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
(570,433 |
) |
|
$ |
1,656,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Deferred income taxes have been allocated to guarantor subsidiary where related oil and gas
properties reside. |
15
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
DECEMBER 31, 2008
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,122 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,137 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
119,918 |
|
|
|
32,080 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
151,641 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
136,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,072 |
|
Current income tax receivable |
|
|
29,480 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,183 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
32,965 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,675 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
386,913 |
|
|
|
37,368 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
424,121 |
|
Oil and gas properties United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved, net |
|
|
654,048 |
|
|
|
474,953 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130,583 |
|
Unevaluated |
|
|
218,297 |
|
|
|
275,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,738 |
|
Building and land, net |
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,326 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
46,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,620 |
|
Investment in subsidiary |
|
|
199,932 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,516,493 |
|
|
$ |
789,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,878 |
|
|
$ |
(201,863 |
) |
|
$ |
2,106,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable to vendors |
|
$ |
82,129 |
|
|
$ |
61,582 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
(456 |
) |
|
$ |
144,016 |
|
Undistributed oil and gas proceeds |
|
|
37,517 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,882 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
32,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,416 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
45,634 |
|
|
|
25,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,709 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
13,861 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
211,557 |
|
|
|
88,920 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
300,782 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825,000 |
|
Deferred taxes * |
|
|
25,315 |
|
|
|
117,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,271 |
|
|
|
193,924 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
133,109 |
|
|
|
52,787 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,146 |
|
Fair value of hedging contracts |
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,207,953 |
|
|
|
259,045 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
50,815 |
|
|
|
1,518,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(860 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,257,633 |
|
|
|
1,647,428 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
(1,648,902 |
) |
|
|
1,257,633 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(1,033,539 |
) |
|
|
(1,116,978 |
) |
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
1,396,224 |
|
|
|
(754,987 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
84,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,540 |
|
|
|
530,450 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
(252,678 |
) |
|
|
587,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
308,540 |
|
|
|
530,450 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(252,678 |
) |
|
|
587,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,516,493 |
|
|
$ |
789,495 |
|
|
$ |
1,878 |
|
|
$ |
(201,863 |
) |
|
$ |
2,106,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Deferred income taxes have been allocated to guarantor subsidiary where related oil and gas
properties reside. |
16
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production |
|
$ |
37,799 |
|
|
$ |
70,173 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
107,972 |
|
Gas production |
|
|
30,260 |
|
|
|
32,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
68,059 |
|
|
|
102,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
7,958 |
|
|
|
33,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,122 |
|
Other operational expense |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
Depreciation, depletion, amortization |
|
|
10,495 |
|
|
|
46,494 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,052 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,376 |
|
Salaries, general and administrative. |
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,922 |
|
Incentive compensation expense |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Derivative expense, net |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
Impairment of inventory |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
38,525 |
|
|
|
86,033 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
29,534 |
|
|
|
16,220 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,770 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,788 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses |
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
25,611 |
|
|
|
16,385 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
5,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
5,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,599 |
|
|
|
10,677 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,168 |
|
Less: Net loss attributable to
non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
16,599 |
|
|
$ |
10,677 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Operating revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production |
|
$ |
66,450 |
|
|
$ |
112,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
178,826 |
|
Gas production |
|
|
57,967 |
|
|
|
72,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,490 |
|
Derivative income, net |
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenue |
|
|
127,613 |
|
|
|
184,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
80,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,276 |
|
Other operational expense |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
3,296 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
Depreciation, depletion, amortization |
|
|
21,669 |
|
|
|
95,879 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,670 |
|
Write-down of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,083 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
11,602 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,753 |
|
Salaries, general and administrative |
|
|
21,411 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,583 |
|
Incentive compensation expense |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
Impairment of inventory |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
80,867 |
|
|
|
529,189 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
46,746 |
|
|
|
(344,290 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,913 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,954 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expenses |
|
|
8,077 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
38,669 |
|
|
|
(344,370 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
13,583 |
|
|
|
(120,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
(120,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,063 |
|
|
|
(223,899 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198,671 |
) |
Less: Net loss attributable to
non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
25,063 |
|
|
$ |
(223,899 |
) |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(198,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
25,063 |
|
|
$ |
(223,899 |
) |
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(198,671 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
21,669 |
|
|
|
95,879 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,670 |
|
Write-down of oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,083 |
|
Impairment of inventory |
|
|
6,359 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
11,602 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,753 |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
13,583 |
|
|
|
(120,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,888 |
) |
Settlement of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
|
|
(24,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,249 |
) |
Non-cash stock compensation expense |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
Non-cash derivative expense |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
Other non-cash expenses |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
Unrecognized proceeds from unwound
derivative contracts |
|
|
71,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,662 |
|
Change in current income taxes |
|
|
28,760 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,435 |
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
36,362 |
|
|
|
(19,066 |
) |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
17,638 |
|
Decrease in other current assets |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
Decrease in inventory |
|
|
15,422 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,950 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
|
|
16,976 |
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,397 |
|
Decrease in other current liabilities |
|
|
(27,332 |
) |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,765 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
194,292 |
|
|
|
79,280 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
273,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in oil and gas properties |
|
|
(120,964 |
) |
|
|
(76,492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(197,001 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties,
net of expenses |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,496 |
|
Sale of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Investment in fixed and other assets |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest in
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(115,844 |
) |
|
|
(76,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(191,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
60,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,456 |
|
Repayment of bank borrowings |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options
and vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(40,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
37,993 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
67,122 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
105,115 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION:
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Stone Energy Corporation as of June
30, 2009, and the related condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the condensed consolidated statement of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such
an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Stone Energy Corporation as of
December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, changes in
stockholders equity and comprehensive income for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in
our report dated February 26, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
August 5, 2009
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q and the information referenced herein contain statements that constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words plan, expect, project,
estimate, assume, believe, anticipate, intend, budget, forecast, predict and other
similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements appear
in a number of places and include statements regarding our plans, beliefs or current expectations,
including the plans, beliefs and expectations of our officers and directors. We use the terms
Stone, Stone Energy, Company, we, us and our to refer to Stone Energy Corporation.
When considering any forward-looking statement, you should keep in mind the risk factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statement. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements herein include the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices
for oil and gas, operating risks, liquidity risks and other risk factors as described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K in Part I, Item 1, Business Forward-Looking Statements, and Item 1A, Risk
Factors, and in this report under Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. Furthermore, the assumptions
that support our forward-looking statements are based upon information that is currently available
and is subject to change. We specifically disclaim all responsibility to publicly update any
information contained in a forward-looking statement or any forward-looking statement in its
entirety and therefore disclaim any resulting liability for potentially related damages. All
forward-looking statements attributable to Stone Energy Corporation are expressly qualified in
their entirety by this cautionary statement.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
contained in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the MD&A contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Overview
Stone Energy Corporation is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, exploitation, development and operation of oil and gas properties located primarily in
the Gulf of Mexico. On August 28, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Bois dArc Energy, Inc.
(Bois dArc) in a cash and stock transaction totaling approximately $1.7 billion. Bois dArc was
an independent exploration company engaged in the discovery and production of oil and natural gas
in the Gulf of Mexico. We are also active in the Appalachia region. Prior to November 30, 2008,
we participated in an exploratory joint venture in Bohai Bay, China. Our business strategy is to
increase reserves, production and cash flow through the acquisition, exploitation and development
of mature properties in the Gulf Coast Basin and exploring opportunities in the deep water
environment of the Gulf of Mexico, Appalachia and other potential areas. Throughout this document,
reference to our Gulf Coast Basin properties includes our onshore, shelf, deep shelf and deep
water properties.
Public Offering of Common Stock In June 2009, we sold 8.1 million of shares of our common
stock in a public offering at a price of $8.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately
$60.5 million after underwriters discounts and offering expenses. The net proceeds are being used
for general corporate purposes, including the reduction of outstanding bank debt.
Pyrenees Discovery In early June 2009, we announced a discovery on our deepwater Pyrenees
Prospect, located on Garden Banks Block 293. The well encountered approximately 125 feet of net
hydrocarbon pay in three zones. We have a 15% working interest in the prospect and a small
overriding royalty. Delineation drilling on the Pyrenees Discovery is planned for the second half
of 2009.
Bank Credit Facility Borrowing Base Redetermination In connection with the acquisition of
Bois dArc on August 28, 2008, we entered into an amended and restated revolving credit facility of
$700 million, maturing on July 1, 2011, with a syndicated bank group. Our bank credit facility had
a borrowing base of $625 million at December 31, 2008. On April 28, 2009, our bank credit facility
was amended, and on April 29, 2009, our borrowing base was reduced to $425 million. The next
borrowing base redetermination is expected by November 1, 2009. See Bank Credit Facility below for
additional information regarding the amended and restated credit facility.
Unwinding of 2009 Hedge Positions In March of 2009, we unwound all of our then existing
crude oil hedges for the period from April 2009 through December 2009 and two of our natural gas
hedges for the period from April 2009 through December 2009, resulting in proceeds of approximately
$113 million. These contracts were unwound to provide a source of liquidity to assist with funding
capital expenditures, which were heavily weighted toward the first two quarters of the year.
Declining Commodity Prices During the first quarter of 2009, we continued to experience
declines in oil and natural gas prices which resulted in a ceiling test write-down of $340.1
million.
21
Critical Accounting Policies
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K describes the accounting policies that we believe are critical
to the reporting of our financial position and operating results and that require managements most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Our most significant estimates are:
|
|
|
remaining proved oil and gas reserves volumes and the timing of their production; |
|
|
|
|
estimated costs to develop and produce proved oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
accruals of exploration costs, development costs, operating costs and production
revenue; |
|
|
|
|
timing and future costs to abandon our oil and gas properties; |
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness and estimated fair value of derivative positions; |
|
|
|
|
classification of unevaluated property costs; |
|
|
|
|
capitalized general and administrative costs and interest; |
|
|
|
|
insurance recoveries related to hurricanes; |
|
|
|
|
estimates of fair value in business combinations; |
|
|
|
|
current income taxes; and |
|
|
|
|
contingencies. |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read together with the discussion contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding these critical accounting policies.
Other Factors Affecting Our Business and Financial Results
In addition to the matters discussed above, our business, financial condition and results of
operations are affected by a number of other factors. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be
read in conjunction with the discussion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding these other
risk factors.
Known Trends and Uncertainties
Hurricanes Since the majority of our production originates in the Gulf of Mexico, we are
particularly vulnerable to the effects of hurricanes on production. During the first six months of
2009, we experienced deferrals of production due to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike of approximately 10.7
Bcfe. Production deferrals for Hurricanes Gustav and Ike amounted to 18.1 Bcfe in the second half
of 2008. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, we experienced deferrals of production due to Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita of approximately 3.6 Bcfe, 15.6 Bcfe and 16.4 Bcfe, respectively. Additionally,
affordable insurance coverage for property damage to our facilities for hurricanes is becoming more
difficult to obtain. We have narrowed our insurance coverage to selected properties, increased our
deductibles and are shouldering more hurricane related risk in the environment of rising insurance
rates.
Credit Crisis Beginning in the second half of 2008 and continuing into 2009, world financial
markets experienced a severe reduction in the availability of credit. It is difficult to predict
the impact of this condition on us in future quarters. Possible negative impacts could include
additional decreases in the borrowing base under our credit facility, limitations on our ability to
access the debt and equity capital markets and complete asset sales, a need to repay borrowings
sooner than expected, an increased counterparty credit risk on our derivatives contracts and under
our bank credit facility and the requirement by contractual counterparties of us to post collateral
guaranteeing performance. During April of 2009, we posted $22.9 million of letters of credit to
satisfy contractual parties.
Declining Commodity Prices We experienced a significant decline in oil and natural gas
prices in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. This resulted in a ceiling test write-down of our
oil and gas properties in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. It has also
caused a reduction in our planned capital expenditures budget for 2009. Should these restrained
pricing conditions persist it could severely impact future cash flows, result in further decreases
in our borrowing base under our credit facility, constrain capital budgets beyond 2009 and result
in additional ceiling test write-downs.
Bank Credit Facility Borrowing Base Redetermination On April 29, 2009, our borrowing base
under our bank credit facility was reduced from $625 million to $425 million. As of August 5,
2009, we had $313 million of outstanding borrowings under the facility and $69 million in letters
of credit had been issued pursuant to the facility, leaving $43 million of availability under the
facility. Stones cash position at August 5, 2009 is approximately $140 million. If a lower
commodity price environment were to persist (see discussions above), we could experience a further
reduction in the borrowing base under our bank credit facility. If our borrowing base is reduced
below any outstanding balances under our bank credit facility plus any outstanding letters of
credit, our bank credit facility allows us one of three options to cure the borrowing base
deficiency: (1) repay amounts outstanding sufficient to cure the deficiency within 10 days after
our written election to do so; (2) add additional oil and gas properties acceptable to the banks to
the borrowing base and take such actions necessary to grant the banks a mortgage in the properties
within thirty days after our written election to do so or (3) arrange to pay the deficiency in
monthly installments over ninety days or some longer period acceptable to the banks not to exceed
six months.
22
Louisiana Franchise Taxes We have been involved in litigation with the state of Louisiana
over the proper computation of franchise taxes allocable to the state. This litigation relates to
the states position that sales of crude oil and natural gas from properties located on the Outer
Continental Shelf, which are transported through the state of Louisiana, should be sourced to
Louisiana for purposes of computing franchise taxes. We disagree with the states position.
However, if the states position were to be upheld, we could incur additional expense for alleged
underpaid franchise taxes in prior years and higher franchise tax expense in future years. See
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. As of June 30, 2009, the state of Louisiana had asserted claims of
additional franchise taxes in the amount of $9.0 million plus accrued interest of $4.2 million.
There are open franchise tax years which the state has not yet audited.
Regulatory Inquiries and Stockholder Lawsuits We have been named as a defendant in certain
regulatory inquiries and stockholder lawsuits resulting from our reserve restatement. The ultimate
resolution of these matters and their impact on us is uncertain. See Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As described above in Known Trends and Uncertainties, the significant decline in oil and
natural gas prices in early 2009 has materially adversely affected our cash flow from operations
and liquidity. We have experienced a material reduction in the borrowing base under our bank
credit facility. Absent an improvement in commodity prices or the addition of material reserves,
we could experience a further reduction in the borrowing base by November 2009 at the time of the
next scheduled redetermination. Our capital expenditure budget has been set at $300 million, which
we intend to finance with cash flow from operations. If we do not have sufficient cash flow from
operations or availability under our bank credit facility, we may be forced to reduce our capital
expenditures. Although the Board has authorized a capital expenditure budget of $300 million,
management has targeted a lesser amount of $250 million given the lower commodity price environment
and the focus on liquidity. The remaining $50 million will remain as discretionary. We are
considering alternatives for increasing our liquidity, which alternatives may include asset sales,
issuances of debt securities, and other transactions. There is no assurance that we will be able
to consummate any of these alternative financing transactions on terms acceptable to us or at all.
To the extent that 2009 cash flow from operations exceeds our estimated 2009 capital expenditures,
we may pay down a portion of our existing debt, expand our capital budget, repurchase shares of
common stock, or invest in
the money markets.
Cash Flow and Working Capital. Net cash flow provided by operating activities totaled $273.5
million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to $239.4 million in the comparable
period in 2008. Net cash flow provided by operating activities during the six months ended June
30, 2009 includes $71.7 million of proceeds from the unwinding of derivative contracts which will
be recognized in production revenue over the remaining two quarters of 2009.
Net cash flow used in investing activities totaled $191.9 million and $166.4 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which primarily represents our
investment in oil and natural gas properties offset by proceeds from the sale of oil and natural
gas properties.
Net cash flow used in financing activities totaled $40.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009, which primarily represents repayments of borrowings under our bank credit facility of
approximately $100 million net of proceeds from the sale of common stock of approximately $60.5
million. Net cash flow provided by financing activities totaled $20.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, which primarily represents proceeds from the exercise of stock options and
vesting of restricted stock.
We had working capital at June 30, 2009 of $49.5 million.
Capital Expenditures. Second quarter 2009 additions to oil and gas property costs of $47.8
million included $3.6 million of lease acquisition costs, $4.2 million of capitalized salaries,
general and administrative expenses (inclusive of incentive compensation) and $6.5 million of
capitalized interest. Year-to-date 2009 additions to oil and gas property costs of $154.1 million
included $2.3 million of lease acquisition costs, $8.8 million of capitalized salaries, general and
administrative expenses (inclusive of incentive compensation) and $12.8 million of capitalized
interest. These investments were financed by cash flow from operating activities and proceeds from
the stock offering.
Bank Credit Facility. On August 28, 2008, we entered into an amended and restated revolving
credit facility totaling $700 million, maturing on July 1, 2011, with a syndicated bank group. At
December 31, 2008, our bank credit facility had a borrowing base of $625 million. On April 28,
2009, the credit facility was amended, and on April 29, 2009, the borrowing base was reduced to
$425 million. At June 30, 2009, we had $325 million of outstanding borrowings under our bank
credit facility, letters of credit totaling $69 million had been issued under the facility, and the
weighted average interest rate was 3.3%. As of August 5, 2009, we had $313 million of outstanding
borrowings under our bank credit facility and $69 million in letters of credit had been issued
pursuant to the facility, leaving $43 million of availability under the facility. The facility is
guaranteed by all of our material direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Stone Energy
Offshore, L.L.C. (Stone Offshore), a wholly owned subsidiary of Stone.
23
The borrowing base under our bank credit facility is redetermined semi-annually, in May and
November, by the lenders taking into consideration the estimated value of our oil and gas
properties and those of our direct and indirect material subsidiaries in accordance with the
lenders customary practices for oil and gas loans. In addition, we and the lenders each have
discretion at any time, but not more than two additional times in any calendar year, to have the
borrowing base redetermined. If the lower commodity price environment were to persist (see
discussions above), we could experience a further reduction in the borrowing base under our bank
credit facility. The next borrowing base redetermination is expected by November 1, 2009.
Our bank credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of Stones and Stone
Offshores assets. Stone and Stone Offshore are required to mortgage, and grant a security
interest in, their oil and gas reserves representing at least 80% of the discounted present value
of the future net cash flows from their oil and gas reserves reviewed in determining the borrowing
base. At Stones option, loans under the credit facility will bear interest at a rate based on the
adjusted London Interbank Offering Rate plus an applicable margin, or a rate based on the prime
rate or Federal funds rate plus an applicable margin. Our bank credit facility provides for
optional and mandatory prepayments, affirmative and negative covenants, and interest coverage ratio
and leverage ratio maintenance covenants. Stone has been and remains in compliance with all of the
financial covenants under our bank credit facility.
Share Repurchase Program. On September 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a share
repurchase program for an aggregate amount of up to $100 million. The shares may be repurchased
from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase
program is subject to business and market conditions, and may be suspended or discontinued at any
time. Through June 30, 2009, 300,000 shares had been repurchased under this program at a total
cost of $7.1 million.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
We are contingently liable to surety insurance companies relative to bonds issued on our
behalf to the United States Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service (MMS), federal
and state agencies and certain third parties from which we purchased oil and gas working interests.
At June 30, 2009, we were contingently liable in the aggregate amount of $63.4 million, a reduction
from our contingent liability at December 31, 2008 of $84.4 million. This redetermination was
accomplished by the posting of additional letters of credit in April of 2009. The bonds represent
guarantees by the surety insurance companies that we will operate in accordance with applicable
rules and regulations and perform certain plugging and abandonment obligations as specified by
applicable working interest purchase and sale agreements.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth certain information with respect to our oil and gas operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
% Change |
|
Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
9,723 |
|
|
|
9,284 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Oil and natural gas (MMcfe) |
|
|
18,987 |
|
|
|
17,816 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Revenue data (in thousands) (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil revenue |
|
$ |
107,972 |
|
|
$ |
156,569 |
|
|
$ |
(48,597 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
%) |
Natural gas revenue |
|
|
62,340 |
|
|
|
106,393 |
|
|
|
(44,053 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
170,312 |
|
|
$ |
262,962 |
|
|
$ |
(92,650 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
%) |
Average prices (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
69.93 |
|
|
$ |
110.10 |
|
|
$ |
(40.17 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
%) |
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
|
6.41 |
|
|
|
11.46 |
|
|
|
(5.05 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
%) |
Oil and natural gas (per Mcfe) |
|
|
8.97 |
|
|
|
14.76 |
|
|
|
(5.79 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
%) |
Expenses (per Mcfe): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Salaries, general and administrative expenses (b) |
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
%) |
DD&A expense on oil and gas properties |
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
(1.01 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
%) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the cash settlement of effective hedging contracts. |
|
(b) |
|
Exclusive of incentive compensation expense. |
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
% Change |
|
Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
19,382 |
|
|
|
18,417 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Oil and natural gas (MMcfe) |
|
|
36,410 |
|
|
|
34,641 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Revenue data (in thousands) (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil revenue |
|
$ |
178,826 |
|
|
$ |
279,276 |
|
|
$ |
(100,450 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
%) |
Natural gas revenue |
|
|
130,490 |
|
|
|
186,919 |
|
|
|
(56,429 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas revenue |
|
$ |
309,316 |
|
|
$ |
466,195 |
|
|
$ |
(156,879 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Average prices (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
$ |
63.01 |
|
|
$ |
103.28 |
|
|
$ |
(40.27 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
%) |
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
|
|
(3.42 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
%) |
Oil and natural gas (per Mcfe) |
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
13.46 |
|
|
|
(4.96 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
%) |
Expenses (per Mcfe): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Salaries, general and administrative expenses (b) |
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
DD&A expense on oil and gas properties |
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
%) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes the cash settlement of effective hedging contracts. |
|
(b) |
|
Exclusive of incentive compensation expense. |
During the second quarter of 2009, we reported net income totaling $27.2 million, or $0.65 per
share, compared to net income for the second quarter of 2008 of $82.8 million, or $2.88 per share.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we reported a net loss totaling $198.7 million, or $4.92
per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we reported net income of $145.1 million, or
$5.08 per share. All per share amounts are on a diluted basis. On August 28, 2008, we completed
the acquisition of Bois dArc. The revenues and expenses associated with Bois dArc have been
included in Stones Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements since August 28, 2008.
We follow the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. At the end of the
first quarter of 2009, we recognized a ceiling test write-down of our oil and gas properties
totaling $340.1 million ($221.1 million after taxes). The write-down did not impact our cash flow
from operations but did reduce net income and stockholders equity.
The variance in the three and six-month periods results was due to the following components:
Production. During the second quarter of 2009, total production volumes increased 7% to 19.0
Bcfe compared to 17.8 Bcfe produced during the second quarter of 2008. Oil production during the
second quarter of 2009 totaled approximately 1,544,000 barrels compared to 1,422,000 barrels
produced during the second quarter of 2008, while natural gas production totaled 9.7 Bcf during the
second quarter of 2009 compared to 9.3 Bcf produced during the second quarter of 2008.
Year-to-date production totaled 2,838,000 barrels of oil and 19.4 Bcf of natural gas compared to
2,704,000 barrels of oil and 18.4 Bcf of natural gas produced during the comparable 2008 period.
Production rates were negatively impacted during the second quarter of 2009 by Gulf Coast
shut-ins due to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, amounting to volumes of approximately 4.4 Bcfe (49 MMcfe
per day). Without the effects of hurricane production deferrals, production volumes increased
approximately 5.6 Bcfe for the second quarter of 2009 compared to the comparable 2008 quarter.
Production associated with the Bois dArc acquisition totaled approximately 6.0 Bcfe for the second
quarter of 2009. Production deferrals due to hurricanes for the six months ended June 30, 2009
amounted to 10.7 Bcfe (59 MMcfe per day). Without the effects of hurricane production deferrals,
year-to-date 2009 production volumes increased approximately 12.5 Bcfe from year-to-date 2008
production volumes. Production associated with the Bois dArc acquisition totaled approximately
12.5 Bcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Prices. Prices realized during the second quarter of 2009 averaged $69.93 per Bbl of oil and
$6.41 per Mcf of natural gas, or 39% lower, on an Mcfe basis, than second quarter 2008 average
realized prices of $110.10 per Bbl of oil and $11.46 per Mcf of natural gas. Average realized
prices during the first half of 2009 were $63.01 per Bbl of oil and $6.73 per Mcf of natural gas
compared to $103.28 per Bbl of oil and $10.15 per Mcf of natural gas realized during the first half
of 2008. All unit pricing amounts include the cash settlement of effective hedging contracts.
We enter into various hedging contracts in order to reduce our exposure to the possibility of
declining oil and gas prices. Our effective hedging transactions increased our average realized
natural gas price by $2.62 per Mcf and increased our average realized oil price by $12.57 per Bbl
in the second quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2008, our effective hedging
transactions decreased our average realized natural gas price by $0.03 per Mcf and decreased our
average realized oil price by $14.63 per Bbl. Effective hedging transactions for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 increased our average realized natural gas price by $2.48 per Mcf and increased
our average realized oil price by $13.28 per Bbl. For the six months ended June 30, 2008,
effective hedging transactions increased our average realized gas price by $0.03 per Mcf and
decreased our average realized oil price by $9.62 per Bbl.
25
Income. Oil and natural gas revenue decreased 35% to $170.3 million in the second quarter of
2009 from $263.0 million during the second quarter of 2008. The decrease is attributable to a 39%
decrease in average realized prices on a gas equivalent basis. Slightly offsetting this decrease
is oil and natural gas revenue related to the properties acquired from Bois dArc totaling $35.2
million in the second quarter of 2009. Year-to-date 2009 oil and natural gas revenue totaled
$309.3 million compared to $466.2 million during the comparable 2008 period. The decrease was due
to a 37% decrease in average realized prices on a gas equivalent basis, slightly offset by oil and
natural gas revenue related to the properties acquired from Bois dArc, totaling $72.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Interest income totaled $0.1 million during the second quarter of 2009 compared to $3.4
million during the comparable quarter of 2008 and $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to $8.3 million during the comparable 2008 period. The decrease in interest income
is the result of a decrease in our cash balances during the periods after the acquisition of Bois
dArc.
Derivative Income/Expense. During the year-to-date periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
certain of our derivative contracts were determined to be partially ineffective because of
differences in the relationship between the fixed price in the derivative contract and actual
prices realized. Net derivative expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, totaled $0.7 million,
consisting of $1.5 million of cash settlements on the ineffective portion of derivative contracts,
less $2.2 million of changes in the fair market value of the ineffective portion of derivative
contracts. Net derivative expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, totaled $3.4 million,
representing changes in the fair market value of the ineffective portion of derivatives. Net
derivative income for the six months ended June 30, 2009, totaled $3.2 million, consisting of $7.6
million of cash settlements on the ineffective portion of derivative contracts, less $4.4 million
of changes in the fair market value of the ineffective portion of derivative contracts. Net
derivative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008, totaled $3.6 million, representing
changes in the fair market value of the ineffective portion of derivatives.
Expenses. Lease operating expenses during the second quarter of 2009 totaled $41.1 million
compared to $34.9 million for the second quarter of 2008. For the first six months of 2009 and
2008, lease operating expenses totaled $99.3 million and $65.2 million, respectively. The increase
in lease operating expenses is primarily the result of $38.9 million of lease operating expenses
associated with the properties acquired from Bois dArc and $16.6 million of repairs in excess of
estimated insurance recoveries related to damage from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. On a unit of production basis, lease operating expenses were $2.73 per Mcfe
and $1.88 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily a
result of the production disruption from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike and the related repair work.
The other operational expense charge of $2.4 million for the three and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 relates to the cancellation of a drilling contract based on declining commodity
prices and the current economic environment.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) on oil and gas properties for the second
quarter of 2009 totaled $55.6 million, or $2.93 per Mcfe, compared to $70.2 million, or $3.94 per
Mcfe, for the second quarter of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, DD&A
expense totaled $114.7 million and $132.9 million, respectively. The decrease from 2008 is
primarily due to the 2008 year-end and first quarter 2009 ceiling test write-downs, which reduced
the carrying value of the full cost pool for our oil and gas properties.
Accretion expense for the second quarter of 2009 was $8.4 million compared to $3.9 million for
the comparable period of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, accretion expense
totaled $16.8 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Due to falling commodity prices and
hurricanes, the timing on a substantial portion of our asset retirement obligations was revised in
the fourth quarter of 2008 leading to a redetermination of the present value of these obligations.
In this redetermination, our credit adjusted risk free interest rate was increased to account for
current credit conditions, resulting in a material increase in
accretion expense in 2009. Also contributing to the increase was the
addition of liabilities associated with properties acquired from Bois
dArc.
Salaries, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses (exclusive of incentive compensation)
for the second quarter of 2009 were $9.9 million compared to $11.3 million in the second quarter of
2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, SG&A totaled $21.6 million and $21.5
million, respectively. The decrease in SG&A for the second quarter of 2009 from the comparable
2008 quarter is primarily due to a decrease in stock compensation expense for restricted stock.
The impairment of inventory for the second quarter of 2009 totaling $1.3 million relates to
the write-down of our tubular inventory. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the impairment
charge totaled $7.2 million. This charge was the result of the market value of these tubulars
falling below historical cost. We consider only tubular goods not
committed to capital projects to be inventory items.
Interest expense for the second quarter of 2009 totaled $4.8 million, net of $6.5 million of
capitalized interest, compared to interest expense of $3.6 million, net of $4.7 million of
capitalized interest, during the second quarter of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
interest expense totaled $10.0 million, net of capitalized interest of $12.8 million, compared to
interest expense of $7.5 million, net of capitalized interest of $8.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. The increase is primarily the result of interest expense associated with an
increase in borrowings under our bank credit facility in 2009 compared to the first six months of
2008.
26
We estimate that we have incurred approximately $23,000 of current federal income tax expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We have a $748,000 current income tax receivable at June
30, 2009 as a result of current year estimated tax payments exceeding our current estimated federal
income tax liability. Our previous estimate of current taxes was adjusted downward primarily as a
result of production deferrals associated with the hurricanes as well as a decline in commodity
prices.
Recent Accounting Developments
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating
Securities. In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and are therefore required to be included in the earnings allocation in
calculating earnings per share under the two-class method described in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Under FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, companies
are required to treat unvested share-based payment awards with a right to receive non-forfeitable
dividends as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. We adopted FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 effective January 1, 2009. The net effect of the
implementation of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 on our financial statements was immaterial.
Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments. In April 2009, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (FSP FAS 107-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for
interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
FSP FAS 107-1 became effective for us on June 15, 2009.
Subsequent Events. In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No.
165 modifies the definition of subsequent events and requires disclosure of the date through which
an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS No. 165 became
effective for us on June 15, 2009.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The FASB has voted to approve the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) as of July 1, 2009. The Codification will
be effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification
reorganizes the many U.S. GAAP pronouncements into approximately 90 accounting topics, with all
topics using a consistent structure. It also includes relevant authoritative content issued by the
Securities and Exchange (SEC), as well as selected SEC staff interpretations and administrative
guidance. The Codification will be effective for our September 30, 2009 Current Report on Form
10-Q.
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. In December 2008, the SEC issued a final rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, which adopts revisions to the SECs oil and gas reporting
requirements. It is effective January 1, 2010 for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for years ending on
or after December 31, 2009, with early adoption prohibited. The revisions are designed to modernize
and update the oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes
in technology. Among other things, the revisions will: replace the single-day year-end pricing
with a twelve-month average pricing assumption; permit the reporting of probable and possible
reserves in addition to the existing requirement to disclose proved reserves; allow the use of new
technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies have been demonstrated empirically
to lead to reliable conclusions about reserve volumes; require the disclosure of the independence
and qualifications of third party preparers of reserves; and require the filing of reports when a
third party is relied upon to prepare reserve estimates. We will adopt the provisions of the new
rule as of December 31, 2009 for our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are currently evaluating
the potential impact of the new rule on our financial statements and disclosures.
Defined Terms
Oil and condensate are stated in barrels (Bbls) or thousand barrels (MBbls). Natural gas
is stated herein in billion cubic feet (Bcf), million cubic feet (MMcf) or thousand cubic feet
(Mcf). Oil and condensate are converted to natural gas at a ratio of one barrel of liquids per
six Mcf of gas. Bcfe, MMcfe, and Mcfe represent one billion cubic feet, one million cubic feet and
one thousand cubic feet of gas equivalent, respectively. MMBtu represents one million British
Thermal Units and BBtu represents one billion British Thermal Units. An active property is an oil
and gas property with existing production. A primary term lease is an oil and gas property with no
existing production, in which we have a specific time frame to establish production without losing
the rights to explore the property. Liquidity is defined as the ability to obtain cash quickly
either through the conversion of assets or incurrence of liabilities.
27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Commodity Price Risk
Our major market risk exposure continues to be the pricing applicable to our oil and natural
gas production. Our revenues, profitability and future rate of growth depend substantially upon
the market prices of oil and natural gas, which fluctuate widely. Oil and natural gas price
declines and volatility could adversely affect our revenues, cash flows and profitability. Price
volatility is expected to continue. In order to manage our exposure to oil and natural gas price
declines, we occasionally enter into oil and natural gas price hedging arrangements to secure a
price for a portion of our expected future production.
Our hedging policy provides that not more than 50% of our estimated production quantities can
be hedged without the consent of the board of directors. We believe our current hedging positions
have hedged approximately 23% of our estimated 2009 production, 42% of our estimated 2010
production, and 10% of our estimated 2011 production. See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 5
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for a detailed discussion of hedges in place to
manage our exposure to oil and natural gas price declines.
Since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, there
have been no material changes in reported market risk as it relates to commodity prices.
Interest Rate Risk
We had long-term debt outstanding of $725 million at June 30, 2009, of which $400 million, or
approximately 55%, bears interest at fixed rates. The $400 million of fixed-rate debt is comprised
of $200 million of 81/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 and $200 million of 63/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014. At June 30, 2009, the remaining $325 million of our outstanding
long-term debt bears interest at a floating rate and consists of borrowings outstanding under our
bank credit facility. At June 30, 2009, the weighted average interest rate under our bank credit
facility was approximately 3.3% per annum. We currently have no interest rate hedge positions in
place to reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates.
On April 28, 2009, our bank credit facility was amended, and on April 29, 2009, the borrowing
base under the credit facility was reduced from $625 million to $425 million. In connection with
this redetermination, our borrowing base pricing grid was increased by 75 basis points in respect
of Libor rate advances, by a range of 125 to 150 basis points in respect of base rate advances and
by a range of 0 to 12.5 basis points in respect of commitment fees payable under the credit
facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to Stone Energy Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively Stone) is
made known to the officers who certify Stones financial reports and the Board of Directors. There
are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures,
including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls and
procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide
reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, with the participation of other
members of our senior management, reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of Stones disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009. Based on this
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer believe:
|
|
|
Stones disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by Stone in the reports it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms; and |
|
|
|
|
Stones disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by Stone in the reports that it files or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was accumulated and communicated
to Stones management, including Stones chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On December 30, 2004, Stone was served with two petitions (civil action numbers 2004-6227 and
2004-6228) filed by the Louisiana Department of Revenue (LDR) in the 15th Judicial District Court
(Parish of Lafayette, Louisiana) claiming additional franchise taxes due. In one case, the LDR is
seeking additional franchise taxes from Stone in the amount of $640,000, plus accrued interest of
$352,000 (calculated through December 15, 2004), for the franchise tax year 2001. In the other
case, the LDR is seeking additional franchise taxes from Stone (as successor to Basin Exploration,
Inc.) in the amount of $274,000, plus accrued interest of $159,000 (calculated through December 15,
2004), for the franchise tax years 1999, 2000 and 2001. On December 29, 2005, the LDR filed another
petition in the 15th Judicial District Court claiming additional franchise taxes due for
the taxable years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 in the amount of $2.6 million plus accrued
interest calculated through December 15, 2005 in the amount of $1.2 million. Also, on January 2,
2008, Stone was served with a petition (civil action number 2007-6754) claiming $1.5 million of
additional franchise taxes due for the 2004 franchise tax year, plus accrued interest of $800,000
calculated through November 30, 2007. Further, on January 7, 2009, Stone was served with a
petition (civil action number 2008-7193) claiming additional franchise taxes due for the taxable
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 in the amount of $4.0 million plus accrued interest
calculated through October 21, 2008 in the amount of $1.7 million. These assessments all relate to
the LDRs assertion that sales of crude oil and natural gas from properties located on the Outer
Continental Shelf, which are transported through the State of Louisiana, should be sourced to the
State of Louisiana for purposes of computing the Louisiana franchise tax apportionment ratio. The
Company disagrees with these contentions and intends to vigorously defend itself against these
claims. The franchise tax years 2007 through 2009 for Stone and franchise tax years 2006 through
2008 for Bois dArc remain subject to examination.
In 2005, Stone received an inquiry from the Philadelphia Stock Exchange investigating matters
including trading prior to Stones October 6, 2005 announcement regarding the revision of Stones
proved reserves. Stone cooperated fully with this inquiry. Stone has not received any further
inquiries from the Philadelphia Exchange since the original request for information.
On or around November 30, 2005, George Porch filed a putative class action in the United
States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
(the Federal Court) against Stone, David Welch, Kenneth Beer, D. Peter Canty and James
Prince purporting to allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Three similar complaints were filed soon thereafter. All complaints had asserted a
putative class period commencing on June 17, 2005 and ending on October 6, 2005. All complaints
contended that, during the putative class period, defendants, among other things, misstated or
failed to disclose (i) that Stone had materially overstated Stones financial results by
overvaluing its oil reserves through improper and aggressive reserve methodologies; (ii) that Stone
lacked adequate internal controls and was therefore unable to ascertain its true financial
condition; and (iii) that as a result of the foregoing, the values of Stones proved reserves,
assets and future net cash flows were materially overstated at all relevant times. On March 17,
2006, these purported class actions were consolidated, with El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension
Fund designated as lead plaintiff (Securities Action). El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund
filed a consolidated class action complaint on or about June 14, 2006. The consolidated complaint
alleges claims similar to those described above and expands the putative class period to commence
on May 2, 2001 and to end on March 10, 2006. On September 13, 2006, Stone and the individual
defendants filed motions seeking dismissal of that action.
On August 17, 2007, a Federal Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation (the
Report) recommending that the Federal Court grant in part and deny in part the Motions to
Dismiss. The Report recommended that (i) the claims asserted against defendants Kenneth Beer and
James Prince pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder and (ii) claims asserted on behalf of putative class members who sold their Company
shares prior to October 6, 2005 be dismissed and that the Motions to Dismiss be denied with respect
to the other claims against Stone and the individual defendants.
On October 1, 2007, the Federal Court issued an Order directing that judgment on the Motions
to Dismiss be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Report. On October 23, 2007,
Stone and the individual defendants filed a motion seeking permission to appeal the denial of the
Motions to Dismiss to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which motion was denied. The discovery
process began, and the parties exchanged initial disclosures, document requests, and
interrogatories and also began producing documents.
On or about May 12, 2008, El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund filed a motion to certify
the Securities Action as a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
(Class Certification Motion). Defendants filed their opposition to the Class Certification
Motion on June 27, 2008. Defendants also filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and a
related Motion to Amend Answer to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint on or about June 11,
2008. The trial date and deadlines previously set by the parties agreed Joint Plan of Work and
Proposed Scheduling Order were vacated by the Court on December 1, 2008. In a memorandum ruling
filed on February 27, 2009, the Court dismissed El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund from the
lawsuit, holding that El Paso Fireman & Policemans Pension Fund did not have capacity to sue or be
sued, and subsequently, the Court denied the Class Certification Motion as moot. El Paso Fireman &
Policemans Pension Fund is appealing its dismissal. On April 13, 2009, the City of Knoxville
Employees Pension System filed a motion to be appointed as the new lead plaintiff, and on July 16,
2009, Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan also filed a motion to be appointed as
29
the new
lead plaintiff. Defendants are opposing the motions by the City of Knoxville Employees Pension
System and Pipefitters Local No. 636 Defined Benefit Plan, as well as El Paso Fireman & Policemans
Pension Funds appeal.
In addition, on or about December 16, 2005, Robert Farer and Priscilla Fisk filed respective
complaints in the Federal Court purportedly alleging claims derivatively on behalf of Stone.
Similar complaints were filed thereafter in the Federal Court by Joint Pension Fund, Local No. 164,
I.B.E.W., and in the 15th Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette, Louisiana (the
State Court) by Gregory Sakhno. Stone was named as a nominal defendant and David Welch, Kenneth
Beer, D. Peter Canty, James Prince, James Stone, John Laborde, Peter Barker, George Christmas,
Richard Pattarozzi, David Voelker, Raymond Gary, B.J. Duplantis and Robert Bernhard were named as
defendants in these actions. The State Court action purportedly alleged claims of breach of
fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets against all
defendants, and claims of unjust enrichment and insider selling against certain individual
defendants. The Federal Court derivative actions asserted purported claims against all defendants
for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and
unjust enrichment and claims against certain individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty and
violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
On March 30, 2006, the Federal Court entered an order consolidating the Federal Court
derivative actions and naming Robert Farer, Priscilla Fisk and Joint Pension Fund, Local No. 164,
I.B.E.W. as co-lead plaintiffs in the consolidated Federal Court derivative action. On December 21,
2006, the Federal Court stayed the Federal Court derivative action at least until resolution of the
then-pending motion to dismiss the Securities Action after which time a hearing was to be conducted
by the Federal Court to determine the propriety of maintaining that stay. As of the date hereof,
the Federal Court has yet to consider any potential modification of the stay.
Stones Certificate of Incorporation and/or its Restated Bylaws provide, to the extent
permissible under the law of the State of Delaware (Stones state of incorporation), for
indemnification of and advancement of defense costs to Stones current and former directors and
officers for potential liabilities related to their service to Stone. Stone has purchased directors
and officers insurance policies that, under certain circumstances, may provide coverage to Stone
and/or its officers and directors for certain losses resulting from securities-related civil
liabilities and/or the satisfaction of indemnification and advancement obligations owed to
directors and officers. These insurance policies may not cover all costs and liabilities incurred
by Stone and its current and former officers and directors in these regulatory and civil
proceedings.
The foregoing pending actions are at an early stage and subject to substantial uncertainties
concerning the outcome of material factual and legal issues relating to the litigation and the
regulatory proceedings. Accordingly, based on the current status of the litigation and inquiries,
we cannot currently predict the manner and timing of the resolution of these matters and are unable
to estimate a range of possible losses or any minimum loss from such matters. Furthermore, to the
extent that our insurance policies are ultimately available to cover any costs and/or liabilities
resulting from these actions, they may not be sufficient to cover all costs and liabilities
incurred by us and our current and former officers and directors in these regulatory and civil
proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors update the Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Except as set forth below, there have been no material
changes to the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
The continuing financial crisis may impact our business and financial condition. We may not be
able to obtain funding in the capital markets on terms we find acceptable, or obtain funding under
our current bank credit facility because of the deterioration of the capital and credit markets and
our borrowing base.
The current credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial systems have had an
impact on our business and our financial condition, and we may face challenges if economic and
financial market conditions do not improve. Historically, we have used our cash flow from
operations and borrowings under our bank credit facility to fund our capital expenditures and have
relied on the capital markets and asset monetization transactions to provide us with additional
capital for large or exceptional transactions. A continuation of the economic crisis could further
reduce the demand for oil and natural gas and continue to put downward pressure on the prices for
oil and natural gas, which have declined significantly since reaching historic highs in July 2008.
These price declines have negatively impacted our revenues and cash flows. In 2009, we expect to
finance our capital expenditures with cash flow from operations.
We have an existing bank credit facility with lender commitments totaling $700 million. The
borrowing base under the credit facility was reduced from $625 million to $425 million on April 29,
2009. As of August 5, 2009, we had $43 million of availability under the credit facility. Stones
cash position at August 5, 2009 is approximately $140 million. The borrowing base is determined by
the lenders periodically and is based on the estimated value of our oil and gas properties using
pricing models determined by the lenders at such time. Our bank credit facility is redetermined
semi-annually. The next borrowing base redetermination is expected by November 1, 2009. In the
future, we may not be able to access adequate funding under our bank
30
credit facility as a result of
(i) a decrease in our borrowing base due to the outcome of a borrowing base redetermination, or
(ii) an unwillingness or inability on the part of our lending counterparties to meet their funding
obligations. A continuation of the declines in commodity prices could result in a determination to
further lower the borrowing base in the future and, in such case, we could be required to repay any
indebtedness in excess of the borrowing base. The turmoil in the financial markets has adversely
impacted the stability and solvency of a number of large global financial institutions.
The current credit crisis makes it difficult to obtain funding in the public and private
capital markets. In particular, the cost of raising money in the debt and equity capital markets
has increased substantially while the availability of funds from those markets generally has
diminished significantly. Also, as a result of concerns about the general stability of financial
markets and the solvency of specific counterparties, the cost of obtaining money from the credit
markets has increased as many lenders and institutional investors have increased interest rates,
imposed tighter lending standards, refused to refinance existing debt at maturity at all or on
terms similar to existing debt or at all, and reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide any new
funding.
The credit crisis also has impacted the level of activity in the oil and gas property sales
market. The lack of available credit and access to capital has limited and will likely continue to
limit the parties interested in any proposed asset transactions and will likely reduce the values
we could realize in those transactions.
The distressed economic conditions also may adversely affect the collectability of our trade
receivables. For example, our accounts receivable are primarily from purchasers of our oil and
natural gas production and other exploration and production companies which own working interests
in the properties that we operate. This industry concentration could adversely impact our overall
credit risk, because our customers and working interest owners may be similarly affected by changes
in economic and financial market conditions, commodity prices, and other conditions. Further, the
credit crisis and turmoil in the financial markets could cause our commodity derivative instruments
to be ineffective in the event a counterparty were to be unable to perform its obligations or seek
bankruptcy protection.
Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that funding, if needed, will be available to the
extent required and, on acceptable terms. If we are unable to access funding when needed on
acceptable terms, we may not be able to fully implement our business plans, complete new property
acquisitions to replace our reserves, take advantage of business opportunities, respond to
competitive pressures, or refinance our debt obligations as they come due, any of which could have
a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.
Our debt level and the covenants in the current and any future agreements governing our debt
could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
At August 5, 2009, the principal amount of our outstanding debt was $713 million, including
$313 million outstanding under our bank credit facility. The terms of the current agreements
governing our debt impose significant restrictions on our ability to take a number of actions that
we may otherwise desire to take, including:
|
|
|
incurring additional debt; |
|
|
|
|
paying dividends on stock, redeeming stock or redeeming subordinated debt; |
|
|
|
|
making investments; |
|
|
|
|
creating liens on our assets; |
|
|
|
|
selling assets; |
|
|
|
|
guaranteeing other indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
entering into agreements that restrict dividends from our subsidiary to us; |
|
|
|
|
merging, consolidating or transferring all or substantially all of our assets; and |
|
|
|
|
entering into transactions with affiliates. |
Our level of indebtedness, and the covenants contained in current and future agreements
governing our debt, could have important consequences on our operations, including:
|
|
|
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the indentures or
other debt and increasing the risk that we may default on our debt obligations; |
|
|
|
|
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operating
activities to required payments on debt, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow
for working capital, capital expenditures and other general business activities; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working
capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general business activities; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
detracting from our ability to successfully withstand a downturn in our business or
the economy generally; |
|
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage against other less leveraged competitors;
and |
|
|
|
|
making us vulnerable to increases in interest rates, because debt under our credit
facility is at variable rates. |
31
We may be required to repay all or a portion of our debt on an accelerated basis in certain
circumstances. If we fail to comply with the covenants and other restrictions in the agreements
governing our debt, it could lead to an event of default and the acceleration of our repayment of
outstanding debt. Our ability to comply with these covenants and other restrictions may be affected
by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic and financial conditions. Our
borrowing base under our bank credit facility, which is redetermined semi-annually, is based on an
amount established by the bank group after its evaluation of our proved oil and gas reserve values.
On April 29, 2009, our borrowing base was reduced from $625 million to $425 million. At August 5,
2009, we had $43 million of availability under our bank credit facility. The next borrowing base
redetermination is expected by November 1, 2009. Due to current credit conditions and lower
commodity prices, we could experience further reductions of our borrowing base. Upon a
redetermination, if borrowings in excess of the revised borrowing capacity were outstanding, we
could be forced to repay a portion of our bank debt.
We may not have sufficient funds to make such repayments. If we are unable to repay our debt
out of cash on hand, we could attempt to refinance such debt, sell assets or repay such debt with
the proceeds from an equity offering. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate
sufficient cash flow from operating activities to pay the interest on our debt or that future
borrowings, equity financings or proceeds from the sale of assets will be available to pay or
refinance such debt. The terms of our debt, including our credit facility and our indentures, may
also prohibit us from taking such actions. Factors that will affect our ability to raise cash
through an offering of our capital stock, a refinancing of our debt or a sale of assets include
financial market conditions and our market value and operating performance at the time of such
offering or other financing. We cannot assure you that any such offering, refinancing or sale of
assets can be successfully completed.
Certain U.S. federal income tax deductions currently available with respect to oil and gas
exploration and development may be eliminated as a result of future legislation.
President Obamas Proposed Fiscal Year 2010 Budget includes proposed legislation that would,
if enacted into law, make significant changes to United States tax laws, including the elimination
of certain key U.S. federal income tax incentives currently available to oil and natural gas
exploration and production companies. These changes include, but are not limited to, (i) the repeal
of the percentage depletion allowance for oil and natural gas properties, (ii) the elimination of
current deductions for intangible drilling and development costs, (iii) the elimination of the
deduction for certain domestic production activities, and (iv) an extension of the amortization
period for certain geological and geophysical expenditures. It is unclear whether any such changes
will be enacted or how soon any such changes could become effective. The passage of any
legislation as a result of these proposals or any other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax
laws could eliminate certain tax deductions that are currently available with respect to oil and
gas exploration and development, and any such change could negatively affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
32
The adoption of climate change legislation by Congress could result in increased operating
costs and reduced demand for the oil and natural gas we produce.
On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved adoption of the American Clean
Energy and Security Act of 2009, also known as the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation or
ACESA. The purpose of ACESA is to control and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, or GHGs,
in the United States. GHGs are certain gases, including carbon dioxide and methane, that may be
contributing to warming of the Earths atmosphere and other climatic changes. ACESA would
establish an economy-wide cap on emissions of GHGs in the United States and would require an
overall reduction in GHG emissions of 17% (from 2005 levels) by 2020, and by over 80% by 2050.
Under ACESA, most sources of GHG emissions would be required to obtain GHG emission allowances
corresponding to their annual emissions of GHGs. The number of emission allowances issued each
year would decline as necessary to meet ACESAs overall emission reduction goals. As the number of
GHG emission allowances declines each year, the cost or value of allowances is expected to escalate
significantly. The net effect of ACESA will be to impose increasing costs on the combustion of
carbon-based fuels such as oil, refined petroleum products, and natural gas.
The U.S. Senate has begun work on its own legislation for controlling and reducing emissions
of GHGs in the United States. If the Senate adopts GHG legislation that is different from ACESA,
the Senate legislation would need to be reconciled with ACESA and both chambers would be required
to approve identical legislation before it could become law. President Obama has indicated that he
is in support of the adoption of legislation to control and reduce emissions of GHGs through an
emission allowance permitting system that results in fewer allowances being issued each year but
that allows parties to buy, sell and trade allowances as needed to fulfill their GHG emission
obligations. Although it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the Senate may
act on climate change legislation or how any bill approved by the Senate would be reconciled with
ACESA, any laws or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of GHGs would
likely require us to incur increased operating costs, and could have an adverse effect on demand
for the oil and natural gas we produce.
The adoption of derivatives legislation by Congress could have an adverse impact on our
ability to hedge risks associated with our business.
Congress is currently considering legislation to impose restrictions on certain transactions
involving derivatives, which could affect the use of derivatives in hedging transactions. ACESA
contains provisions that would prohibit private energy commodity derivative and hedging
transactions. ACESA would expand the power of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC,
to regulate derivative transactions related to energy commodities, including oil and natural gas,
and to mandate clearance of such derivative contracts through registered derivative clearing
organizations. Under ACESA, the CFTCs expanded authority over energy derivatives would terminate
upon the adoption of general legislation covering derivative regulatory reform. The CFTC is
considering whether to set limits on trading and positions in commodities with finite supply,
particularly energy commodities, such as crude oil, natural gas and other energy products. The
CFTC also is evaluating whether position limits should be applied consistently across all markets
and participants. In addition, the Treasury Department recently has indicated that it intends to
propose legislation to subject all OTC derivative dealers and all other major OTC derivative market
participants to substantial supervision and regulation, including by imposing conservative capital
and margin requirements and strong business conduct standards. Derivative contracts that are not
cleared through central clearinghouses and exchanges may be subject to substantially higher capital
and margin requirements. Although it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when
Congress may act on derivatives legislation or how any climate change bill approved by the Senate
would be reconciled with ACESA, any laws or regulations that may be adopted that subject us to
additional capital or margin requirements relating to, or to additional restrictions on, our
trading and commodity positions could have an adverse effect on our ability to hedge risks
associated with our business or on the cost of our hedging activity.
Federal and state legislation and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing
could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays.
Congress is currently considering legislation to amend the federal Safe Drinking Water Act to
require the disclosure of chemicals used by the oil and gas industry in the hydraulic fracturing
process. Hydraulic fracturing involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure
into rock formations to stimulate natural gas production. Sponsors of bills currently pending
before the Senate and House of Representatives have asserted that chemicals used in the fracturing
process could adversely affect drinking water supplies. The proposed legislation would require the
reporting and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing process, which could make it
easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings
based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect
groundwater. In addition, these bills, if adopted, could establish an additional level of
regulation at the federal level that could lead to operational delays or increased operating costs
and could result in additional regulatory burdens that could make it more difficult to perform
hydraulic fracturing and increase our costs of compliance and doing business.
33
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On September 24, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for an
aggregate amount of up to $100 million. The shares may be repurchased from time to time in the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program is subject to
business and market conditions, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Additionally,
shares were withheld from certain employees to pay taxes associated with the employees vesting of
restricted stock. The following table sets forth information regarding our repurchases or
acquisitions of common stock during the second quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares (or Units) that May |
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Yet be Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Share
Repurchase Program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,928,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2009 |
|
|
620 |
(a) |
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2009 |
|
|
469 |
(a) |
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts include shares withheld from employees upon the vesting of restricted stock in order
to satisfy the required tax withholding obligations. |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the annual meeting of stockholders held on May 28, 2009, six Directors, Robert A. Bernhard,
Peter D. Kinnear, Donald E. Powell, Kay G. Priestly, David R. Voelker and David H. Welch were
elected to serve as directors of the Company until the annual meeting of stockholders in the year
2010. Robert A. Bernhard received the vote of 35,287,412 shares with the vote of 1,025,283 shares
withheld, Peter D. Kinnear received the vote of 35,083,758 shares with the vote of 1,228,937 shares
withheld, Donald E. Powell received the vote of 35,325,868 shares with the vote of 986,827 shares
withheld, Kay G. Priestly received the vote of 35,351,265 shares with the vote of 961,430 shares
withheld, David R. Voelker received the vote of 35,142,509 shares with the vote of 1,170,186 shares
withheld, and David H. Welch received the vote of 35,152,483 shares with the vote of 1,160,212
shares withheld. No other director was standing for election. George R. Christmas, B. J.
Duplantis, John P. Laborde and Richard A. Pattarozzi are Class II Directors whose terms expire with
the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders. Beginning with the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders,
each Director will stand for election each year.
A proposal to ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent registered public accountants to the Company for the year 2009 was approved by the
stockholders. The vote was 35,706,581 shares for, 407,502 shares against, and 198,612 shares
abstained.
A proposal to approve the adoption of the Companys 2009 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive
Plan was approved by the stockholders. The vote was 23,731,423 shares for, 2,344,857 shares
against, and 460,769 shares abstained.
34
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62362)). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of Stone Energy Corporation, dated
February 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 8-K, filed
February 7, 2001). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended & Restated Bylaws of Stone Energy Corporation, dated May 15, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2008 (File No.
001-12074)). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 28, 2009, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of August 28, 2008, among Stone Energy Corporation, Stone Energy Offshore, L.L.C. and the
financial institutions named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2009 (File No. 001-12074)). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation 2009 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix A to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for Stones 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (File No. 001-12074)). |
|
|
|
*15.1
|
|
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP dated August 5, 2009, regarding unaudited interim financial information. |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Stone Energy Corporation as required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Stone Energy Corporation as required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*#32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stone Energy Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
# |
|
Not considered to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. |
35
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
STONE ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 5, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ J. Kent Pierret
|
|
|
|
J. Kent Pierret |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
(On behalf of the Registrant and as
Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62362)). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of Stone Energy Corporation, dated
February 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 8-K, filed
February 7, 2001). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended & Restated Bylaws of Stone Energy Corporation, dated May 15, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2008 (File No.
001-12074)). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 28, 2009, to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated
as of August 28, 2008, among Stone Energy Corporation, Stone Energy Offshore, L.L.C. and the
financial institutions named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2009 (File No. 001-12074)). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation 2009 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Appendix A to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for Stones 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders (File No. 001-12074)). |
|
|
|
*15.1
|
|
Letter from Ernst & Young LLP dated August 5, 2009, regarding unaudited interim financial information. |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Stone Energy Corporation as required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Stone Energy Corporation as required by Rule
13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
*#32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Stone Energy Corporation
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
# |
|
Not considered to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. |
37