SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☑ Filed by the Registrant | ☐ Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
Check the appropriate box: | ||
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ |
CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☑ |
Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Vulcan Materials Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||
☑ | No fee required. | |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(I)(1) and 0-11. | |
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| ||
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| ||
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| ||
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| ||
(5) Total fee paid:
| ||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: | |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 240.0-11 and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
| ||
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| ||
(3) Filing Party:
| ||
(4) Date Filed:
|
2017 PROXY STATEMENT & NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Fellow Shareholder,
I would like to extend a personal invitation for you to join us at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Friday, May 12, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Grand Bohemian Hotel, 2655 Lane Park Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35223. During the Annual Meeting, we will discuss each item of business described in the Notice of Annual Meeting and this proxy statement.
On or about March 27, 2017, we began mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including our 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders, via the Internet. Shareholders who did not receive the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will receive a paper copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders, which we also began mailing on or about March 27, 2017. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. Copies of our Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.
Your vote is important. Whether you own one share or many, your prompt vote is greatly appreciated. It is important that your shares of common stock be represented at the Annual Meeting so that a quorum may be established. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please read the proxy materials carefully and then vote your proxy as soon as possible. You may vote over the Internet, by telephone, or by mailing a completed proxy card. Additional information is provided in the proxy materials. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person.
Thank you for your ongoing support and continued interest in Vulcan, and I look forward to welcoming you to our Annual Meeting.
March 27, 2017
Sincerely yours,
J. THOMAS HILL
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
Meeting Date: Friday, May 12, 2017
Meeting Time: 9:00 a.m., local time
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Vulcan Materials Company will be held at the Grand Bohemian Hotel, 2655 Lane Park Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35223, on Friday, May 12, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:
| To elect four nominees as directors; |
| To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers; |
| To vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; |
| To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017; and |
| To conduct such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. |
Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 15, 2017 are entitled to receive notice of, to attend and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend, we urge you to review these materials carefully and to vote by Internet, or, if you have received a paper copy of the proxy card, you may choose to vote by telephone or by mailing your proxy card.
March 27, 2017
By Order of the Board of Directors,
JERRY F. PERKINS JR.
General Counsel and Secretary
PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||||||||
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and in our corporate governance documents on our website at www.vulcanmaterials.com. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read this entire proxy statement before voting.
VOTING YOUR SHARES
Your vote is important. You may vote if you were a shareholder at the close of business on March 15, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting. You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or submit a proxy over the Internet. If you have received a paper copy of the proxy card (or if you request a paper copy of the materials), you may submit a proxy by telephone or by mail.
|
VIA THE INTERNET www.proxyvote.com |
BY MAIL Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the envelope provided | ||||
|
BY TELEPHONE Call the number located on your proxy card |
IN PERSON Attend the Annual Meeting and vote by ballot |
If you submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card by mail.
PROPOSALS
Proposal For Your Vote | Board Voting Recommendation |
Vote Required | Page | |||
PROPOSAL 1: Election of Directors | FOR each nominee | Majority of Votes Cast | 5 | |||
PROPOSAL 2: Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers (Say on Pay) | FOR | Majority of Votes Cast | 12 | |||
PROPOSAL 3: Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation (Say on Pay Frequency) | 1 YEAR | Majority of Votes Cast | 13 | |||
PROPOSAL 4: Ratification of Appointment of Deloitte & Touche | FOR | Majority of Votes Cast | 14 |
2016 PERFORMANCE RESULTS
The following key metrics reflect our continued improvement in financial performance over the last three fiscal years. We manage and measure our business performance with a significant focus on Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Gross Profit per Ton for Aggregates. We emphasize these metrics because we believe they closely correlate to long-term shareholder value. We also believe that Total Net Earnings and Gross Profit for Aggregates are important metrics in evaluating the companys operational and financial performance.
|
Note: Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Gross Profit Per Ton for Aggregates are non-GAAP financial measures. We provide a reconciliation of each of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in Annex A to this proxy statement.
|
2
|
PROXY SUMMARY | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
2016 PERFORMANCE WAS STRONG IN 2016, OUR TOTAL NET EARNINGS GREW 90% WHILE ADJUSTED EBITDA GREW 16%, REFLECTING OUR FOCUS ON GROWING
CASH GROSS PROFIT PER TON FOR AGGREGATES. WHILE OUR BUSINESS IS BENEFITING FROM A GENERAL ECONOMIC AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RECOVERY, WE ARE LEVERAGING THIS TO PRODUCE MORE PROFIT PER TON.
Please see information relating to nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting beginning on page 7 of this proxy statement
BOARD REFRESHMENT AND DIVERSITY
The Board seeks a mix of directors with qualities that achieve the goal of a high-functioning, diverse Board. All of our directors, other than Tom Hill, our Chairman, President and CEO, are independent. Each of our directors has proven leadership, sound judgment, integrity and a commitment to the success of our company. Since 2009, we have had a number of members retire from the Board and have sought as replacements diverse leaders with skills in different areas important to oversee the management of our company.
2016 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 98% of votes cast were in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs). During 2016, the Compensation Committee made a number of enhancements to our compensation program, including (i) implementing a new peer group to better reflect companies that generally are impacted by the same economic factors affecting Vulcan and (ii) adding a double-trigger requirement for the vesting of long-term incentive awards under our 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2016 Plan) upon a change of control of the company.
We encourage you to read the more detailed description of our compensation program in Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 27 before voting on Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROXY SUMMARY | 3
| ||||||||
CEO COMPENSATION Compensation package at 41% of market and over 84% of compensation is performance-based Please see information relating to nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting beginning on page 6 of this proxy statement
2016 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Set forth below is the 2016 compensation for our NEOs. The table is not a substitute for, and should be read together with, the Summary Compensation Table on page 47, which presents 2016 NEO compensation in accordance with disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and includes additional compensation elements and other important information.
Name and Principal Position |
Base Salary ($) |
Short-Term Performance Bonus ($) |
Performance Share Units(1) ($) |
Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights(2) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
Tom Hill Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
941,670 | 2,264,000 | 2,826,194 | 937,320 | 6,969,184 | |||||||||||||||
John McPherson Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Strategy Officer |
773,334 | 1,778,000 | 2,124,034 | 706,640 | 5,382,008 | |||||||||||||||
Stan Bass Chief Growth Officer |
554,258 | (3) | 892,000 | 816,261 | 271,560 | 2,534,079 | ||||||||||||||
Michael Mills Chief Administrative Officer |
530,508 | 898,000 | 816,261 | 271,560 | 2,516,329 | |||||||||||||||
David Clement President, Central Division |
330,504 | 384,000 | 245,756 | 81,760 | 1,042,020 |
(1) | Dollar value of 2016 Performance Share Units (PSUs) at target. Actual pay delivered or realized for PSUs will be determined in the first quarter of 2020 and may range from zero to 200% of the target shares. PSUs vest at the end of a four-year period to the extent that the company has met the required performance goals. See footnote (1) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 47 for an explanation of determination of value for PSUs. |
(2) | Dollar value of 2016 Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs). SOSARs vest over 4 years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. See footnote (1) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 47 for explanation of determination of value for SOSARs. |
(3) | In 2016, Mr. Bass base salary included a regional supplement of $20,750. |
4
|
PROXY SUMMARY |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our constituent documents provide that our Board shall be divided into three classes, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. At the Annual Meeting, one individual will be elected to serve as a member of our Board for a two-year term expiring in 2019, and three individuals will be elected for three-year terms expiring in 2020, or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our Board, upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, has nominated David P. Steiner as a director to serve a two-year term expiring in 2019, and O.B. Grayson Hall, Jr., James T. Prokopanko and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson as directors to serve three-year terms expiring in 2020. Mr. Steiner was elected to the Board in February 2017 to fill a vacancy and, in accordance with New Jersey law, must stand for election at the Annual Meeting to continue his service. The terms of Douglas J. McGregor and Vincent J. Trosino will expire at the Annual Meeting and, in accordance with the companys director retirement policy in its bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, each will retire as a director of the company and will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected, and our Board has no reason to believe that any of the persons nominated will be unable to serve as a director. The Board believes that each of the four nominees is highly qualified and has experience, skills, backgrounds and attributes that qualify each of them to serve as a director of Vulcan.
In accordance with the bylaws of our company, our Board of Directors is required to be composed of not fewer than nine nor more than 13 directors. The number of directors may be set by a resolution adopted by a majority of our Board of Directors, and our charter provides that any vacancies on the Board, including vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of directors, shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors.
DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
Directors are responsible for reviewing and approving corporate strategy and overseeing the management of our company to assure that the long-term interests of the shareholders are being served. The Board believes that there are general skills and characteristics required for service on the Board of Directors that are applicable to all directors. Additionally, the Board needs a diverse skill set among its members to ensure that the Board is able to respond to the needs of management and the company. The Governance Committee believes that each director nominee has an established record of accomplishments and possesses the general qualifications set forth below.
GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
The Governance Committee, along with the Board, is responsible for reviewing on an annual basis the requisite skills and characteristics of Board members and nominees to the Board. The Governance Committee considers, among other factors:
| high ethical standards |
| independence |
| experience |
| sound business judgment |
| ability to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill responsibilities to the Board |
The Board and the Governance Committee require that each director be a person of high integrity with a proven record of success. The Board does not have specific diversity quotas, but considers race, ethnicity, gender, age, education and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for the Board.
INDIVIDUAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR DIRECTORS
The Board believes that a number of particular qualifications, attributes, skills and experiences are desirable for the Board as a whole. These include:
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 5
| ||||||||
Nominee for Election to the Board of Directors: Two-Year Term Expiring in 2019
DAVID P. STEINER
Director since 2017
Age: 57
Committees: Governance; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs
Other Public Company Directorships: FedEx Corporation |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Retired; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc., Houston, Texas (a leading provider of integrated waste management services in North America) from March 2004 to November 2016.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Steiner served as Chief Executive Officer of Waste Management, Inc. from March 2004 to November 2016. Prior to being named CEO, he served in a variety of capacities with Waste Management, Inc., including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2004, and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from 2001 to 2003.
He serves on the Board of Directors of FedEx Corporation, and formerly served on the boards of TE Connectivity Ltd. (previously known as Tyco Electronics, Ltd.) and Waste Management, Inc. |
Mr. Steiner earned his bachelors degree in accounting from Louisiana State University and holds a Juris Doctorate from University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law.
Mr. Steiner brings to our Board valuable insight into business, leadership and management issues facing large industrial companies. His experience as CEO of Waste Management, Inc. and as chair of the nominating and governance committee of FedEx Corporation makes him well qualified to serve on our Governance and Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Committees. Additionally, he brings to our Board a strong legal background with an exemplary record of operational excellence and performance. |
6
|
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors: Three-Year Term Expiring in 2020
O. B. GRAYSON HALL, JR.
Director since 2014
Age: 59
Committees: Executive; Finance; Governance
Other Public Company Directorships: Regions Financial Corporation |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama (one of the nations largest full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, mortgage and insurance products and services) and Regions Bank since 2013; President and Chief Executive Officer (20102013) and Vice Chairman (20082010).
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Hall is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Regions Financial Corporation, a leading commercial bank in the United States. Since joining Regions in 1980, he has served in roles of increasing responsibility, including operations, technology, and commercial banking.
Mr. Hall serves on the Board of Directors of Regions Financial Corporation. In addition, he is a Class A Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and serves on the board of Alabama Power Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Company. |
He is active in many civic and leadership organizations, including the Economic Development Partnership of Alabama and the Birmingham Business Alliance.
He graduated from the University of the South with a bachelors degree in economics. He also received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Alabama and is a graduate of the Stonier Graduate School of Banking, University of Pennsylvania.
Mr. Hall brings extensive management and business experience to our Board as well as a deep understanding of complex issues facing public companies. As chief executive officer of Regions, he provides our Board with valuable experience in banking, finance and capital markets. |
JAMES T. PROKOPANKO
Director since 2009
Age: 63
Committees: Compensation; Executive; Governance
Other Public Company Directorships: Regions Financial Corporation Xcel Energy Inc. |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Retired; Senior Advisor of The Mosaic Company, Plymouth, Minnesota (a leading producer and marketer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients for the global agriculture industry) from August 2015 to January 2016; President and Chief Executive Officer from 2007 until August 2015.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Prokopanko served as Senior Advisor of The Mosaic Company from August 2015 to January 2016. He joined Mosaic in 2006 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2007 to August 2015, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2006 to January 2007. Prior to that, he was with Cargill, Inc., where he served in a wide range of leadership positions, including as Corporate Vice President of Cargill Procurement, a leader of Cargills Ag Producer Services Platform, and Vice President of the North America crops inputs business. |
Mr. Prokopanko has a bachelors degree in computer science from the University of Manitoba and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Western Ontario.
His experience serving as the principal interface between management and the board at a New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) company facilitates his service as lead director of our company as well as our Boards performance of its oversight function. His executive management experience provides our Board with valuable insight into business, leadership and management issues. Additionally, he brings to our Board considerable knowledge of issues facing a company engaged in mineral extraction. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
7
| ||||||||
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors: Three-Year Term Expiring in 2020
KATHLEEN WILSON-THOMPSON
Director since 2009
Age: 59
Committees: Compensation; Executive; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Executive Vice President and Global Chief Human Resources Officer of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Deerfield, Illinois (a drugstore chain), since January 2015. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Walgreen Co. from January 2010 to December 2014. Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources of The Kellogg Company, Battle Creek, Michigan (a retail food manufacturer and distributor), from July 2005 to January 2010. Vice President and Chief Labor and Employment Counsel of U.S. Business Portfolio from 2000 to 2005.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Ms. Wilson-Thompson is responsible for strategy and delivery of all human resources-related activities at Walgreens, the nations largest drug store chain, and also is responsible for all strategy and delivery of HR related activities globally for Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., the global leader in pharmacy-led health and well-being retail with over 13,000 stores in 11 countries. |
Ms. Wilson-Thompson earned a bachelors degree in literature from the University of Michigan and a Juris Doctorate and a master of law from Wayne State University.
She serves on the NAACP Foundation. She was also named to Black Enterprises 2015 50 Most Powerful Women in America.
As a result of her senior leadership positions in human resources at both Walgreens and Kellogg, Ms. Wilson-Thompson brings to our Board valuable experience in executive compensation and managing personnel, human resource and organization issues that face a labor-intensive industry. |
8
|
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
Directors Continuing in Office: Terms Expiring in 2018
THOMAS A. FANNING
Director since 2015
Age: 60
Committees: Audit; Compensation
Other Public Company Directorships: Southern Company |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company, Atlanta, Georgia (a leading U.S. producer of energy) since 2010.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Fanning is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company, one of Americas largest producers of electricity. He has worked for Southern Company for more than 30 years and has held 15 different positions in eight different business units, including numerous officer positions with a variety of Southern Company subsidiaries in the areas of finance, strategy, international business development and technology.
Mr. Fanning previously was Chief Financial Officer of Southern Company, where he was responsible for the accounting, finance, tax, investor relations, treasury and risk management functions. |
He currently serves as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and as Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of the U.S. Council of Chairs. Mr. Fanning plays a national role in leading efforts to prevent and respond to cyber and physical terrorism for the U.S. electric system.
He has undergraduate and masters degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and has completed several executive education programs.
As CEO of a large public utility, Mr. Fanning provides our Board with valuable business, leadership, and management skills. His prior service as CFO of Southern Company and as a director of The St. Joe Company (20052011) makes him well qualified to serve on our Audit Committee. Additionally, he brings to our Board a deep understanding of key issues facing an industrial company, including governmental and regulatory issues, and safety, health and environmental matters. |
J. THOMAS HILL
Director since 2014
Age: 58
Committees: Executive |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman of the Board of the company since January 2016 and President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2014.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Hill is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company. He has been with the company for more than 25 years, serving in a variety of operations and general management assignments of increasing responsibility. Prior to being named Chairman, President and CEO, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2014 until July 2014, and Senior Vice PresidentSouth Region from December 2011 to December 2013. He also served as president of the companys former Florida Rock Division and its Southwest Division. |
Mr. Hill has served in leadership positions in a number of industry trade groups, including the Texas Concrete and Aggregates Association, the Florida Concrete and Products Association, and the National Stone, Sand and Gravel Association. In addition, he serves on the boards of the United Way of Central Alabama, the Birmingham Business Alliance, and the Economic Development Partnership of Alabama.
He is a graduate of the University of Pittsburgh and the Wharton School of Business, Executive Management Program.
Mr. Hill has over 30 years experience in the aggregates industry, including extensive experience with the company in operations and management over a wide variety of geographic regions. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 9
| ||||||||
Directors Continuing in Office: Terms Expiring in 2018
CYNTHIA L. HOSTETLER
Director since 2014
Age: 54
Committees: Audit; Executive; Finance |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Trustee of Aberdeen International Funds, New York, New York (international mutual funds) since 2013. Director of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC, Los Angeles, California (international investment fund) since 2013. Trustee of Invesco Ltd., Atlanta, Georgia (international mutual funds) since 2017. Director of Artio Global Funds, New York, New York (international mutual funds) from 2010 until 2013. Director of Edgen Group Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana (energy infrastructure) from 2012 to 2014.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Ms. Hostetler has served as a trustee of Aberdeen International Funds and as a director of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC since 2013. She also was elected as a trustee of Invesco Ltd. in 2017. She previously served as a director of Artio Global Funds and Edgen Group.
She is the former head of Private Equity and Vice President of Investment Funds at the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and a former president of a regional bank and bank holding company. |
Ms. Hostetler began her career as a corporate lawyer with Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett in New York.
Ms. Hostetler earned her bachelors degree from Southern Methodist University, and holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Virginia School of Law.
Ms. Hostetler brings to our Board significant financial, investment and audit committee experience, and has developed risk assessment skills through her bank, private equity and mutual fund leadership. She is an experienced public and investment company board member, having served on a number of public and private company boards, with committee chairmanships that include nominating and governance and investment management. |
RICHARD T. OBRIEN
Director since 2008
Age: 63
Committees: Audit; Executive; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs
Other Public Company Directorships: Xcel Energy Inc. |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Boart Longyear Limited, Salt Lake City, Utah (an international provider of drilling services, drilling equipment and performance tooling for mining and drilling companies) from April 2013 until October 2015. Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation, Greenwood Village, Colorado (an international gold production company) from 2007 until February 2013.
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. OBrien served as President and CEO of Boart Longyear Limited from April 2013 to October 2015. He previously served as CEO of Newmont Mining Corporation from July 2007 to February 2013, and before that as its President and CFO.
His work includes extensive experience with NYSE-listed companies in finance and accounting, operations and strategic business planning. |
Mr. OBrien previously served as a director of Newmont Mining Corporation (20072013) and Inergy L.P. (20062012).
Mr. OBrien earned his bachelors degree in economics from the University of Chicago and holds a Juris Doctorate from Lewis and Clark Law School.
Having served as CFO of four different public companies, Mr. OBrien provides the Board with considerable experience and acumen in financial reporting and accounting matters.
As a result of his tenure as CEO and CFO of Newmont Mining, Mr. OBrien brings to the Board significant experience and knowledge of the mining and mineral extraction industry. This gives him insight into the risks facing the company and provides him with the tools to effectively assist in managing those risks. |
10
|
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Director Continuing in Office: Term Expiring in 2019
LEE J. STYSLINGER, III
Director since 2013
Age: 56
Committees: Compensation; Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs
Other Public Company Directorships: Regions Financial Corporation Workday, Inc. |
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Altec, Inc., Birmingham, Alabama (a holding company for businesses that design, manufacture and market equipment for the electric and telecommunications industries globally) since 1997 (CEO) and 2011 (Chairman).
SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS:
Mr. Styslinger serves as Chairman and CEO of Altec, and has over 20 years experience leading companies engaged in the heavy equipment industry.
He serves on the boards of many educational, civic and leadership organizations, including the Harvard Business School, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Northwestern University College of Arts and Sciences. He was appointed to the Presidents Export Council, advising the President of the United States on international trade policy from 2006 to 2008. |
He received his Bachelor of Arts from Northwestern University and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard University.
Mr. Styslinger brings to our Board a wealth of management and business experience running a large company in todays global market. Additionally, his expertise in the heavy equipment industry greatly benefits Vulcan, which is a major purchaser of heavy machinery and equipment. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS | 11
| ||||||||
PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (SAY ON PAY)
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), we are asking shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers (NEOs) as disclosed in the Section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and the compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement. While this vote is advisory and not binding on our company, it provides information to our Compensation Committee regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices, which the Compensation Committee will consider when determining executive compensation in the future.
At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders indicated a preference that the advisory vote on the compensation for our NEOs occur on an annual basis. Therefore, our Board adopted a policy for annual Say on Pay advisory votes. In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, Proposal 3 in this proxy statement once again offers shareholders an opportunity to vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.
At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our shareholders voted over 98% in favor of our Say on Pay proposal. We believe this demonstrated strong support for our compensation program and policies. In 2016, we continued to review and make changes to our compensation program, considering new compensation trends and best practices. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section on pages 27 to 45 for an in-depth look at our compensation program and how it was applied to the performance of our NEOs in 2016.
Based on the foregoing, the Board recommends a vote FOR the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on our company. However, our Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the advisory vote when making future compensation decisions.
12
|
PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (SAY ON PAY) | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT
PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY ON PAY FREQUENCY)
As described in Proposal 2, in accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our shareholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. This Proposal 3 affords shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often they believe the advisory vote on executive compensation should occur in the future (a Say on Pay frequency proposal). Under this Proposal 3, shareholders may vote to have the Say on Pay vote every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years.
Our shareholders were last presented with a Say on Pay frequency proposal at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with the majority of shareholders voting to hold the Say on Pay vote every year. We continue to believe that Say on Pay votes should be conducted every year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program. It is expected that the next vote on a Say on Pay frequency proposal will occur at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Shareholders may cast their vote, on an advisory basis, to conduct advisory votes on executive compensation every 1 year, 2 years, or 3 years, or abstain. The frequency option that receives a majority of the votes cast (or the highest number of the votes cast if no frequency option receives a majority) will be considered the shareholders preference for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a Say on Pay vote.
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | PROPOSAL 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY ON PAY FREQUENCY) |
13
| ||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR 1 YEAR ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for our company and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The function of the independent registered public accounting firm is to audit our accounts and records; to report on the consolidated balance sheet and the related statements of consolidated comprehensive income, consolidated shareholders equity and consolidated statements of cash flows of our company and its subsidiaries; to audit our internal controls over financial reporting; and to perform such other appropriate accounting services as may be required and approved by the Audit Committee. Although shareholder ratification is not required, our Board is seeking shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. Even if the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP is ratified by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year, if it believes such appointment is in the best interests of the company and the shareholders. If a majority of the votes cast at the meeting fails to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will consider the selection of another independent registered public accounting firm for future years.
The firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP, or its predecessors, has audited our financial statements since 1956. A representative of that firm is expected to be present at the meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
14
|
PROPOSAL 4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2017
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 15
| ||||||||
16
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 17
| ||||||||
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors has established six standing committees as follows:
Director | Audit Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Executive Committee |
Finance Committee |
Governance Committee |
Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas A. Fanning |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
| | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Thomas Hill |
Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
| | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Douglas J. McGregor |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard T. OBrien |
Chair | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
James T. Prokopanko |
Chair | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David P. Steiner |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vincent J. Trosino |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
| | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of meetings held in 2016 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
18
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 19
| ||||||||
20
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF OUR COMPANY AND PRACTICES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS | 21
| ||||||||
22
|
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Aggregate fees billed to us for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, by Deloitte & Touche LLP, and its affiliates (all of which are subsidiaries of Deloitte, LLP, the United States member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited) were as follows:
PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | 23
| ||||||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following is information regarding persons known to us to have beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of our company, which is our only outstanding class of voting securities, as of the dates indicated in the footnotes below.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (# of shares) |
Percent of Class |
||||||
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Affiliates One State Farm Plaza Bloomington, IL 61710 |
12,757,367(1) | 9.6% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd Malvern, PA 19355 |
12,630,027(2) | 9.5% | ||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, MD 21202 |
11,019,583(3) | 8.3% | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 |
8,070,475(4) | 6.1% |
(1) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on January 23, 2017, by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and various affiliated entities (State Farm). State Farm reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) and dispose (or direct the disposition of) 12,680,600 shares. State Farm also reports shared power to vote (or direct the vote of) and dispose (or direct the disposition of) 76,767 shares. State Farm reports an aggregate amount of 12,757,367 beneficially owned shares. Each entity listed in the Schedule 13G expressly disclaims beneficial ownership as to all shares as to which such entity has no right to receive the proceeds of the sale of the security and disclaims that it is part of a group. |
(2) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017. The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) 207,940 shares and sole power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 12,405,772 shares. Vanguard also reports shared power to vote (or direct the vote of) 23,719 shares and shared power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 224,255 shares. Vanguard reports an aggregate amount of 12,630,027 shares beneficially owned. |
(3) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 2017. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates) reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) 4,036,705 shares and sole power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 11,006,583 shares. Price Associates reports an aggregate amount of 11,019,583 beneficially owned shares. These securities are owned by various individuals and institutional investors for which Price Associates serves as an investment adviser with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. Price Associates declares that the filing of the Schedule 13G/A shall not be construed as an admission that Price Associates is the beneficial owner of the securities referred to, which beneficial ownership is expressly denied. |
(4) | Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on January 27, 2017. BlackRock, Inc. reports sole power to vote (or direct the vote of) 6,906,266 shares, the shared power to vote (or direct the vote of) 13,827 shares, sole power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 8,056,648 shares, and the shared power to dispose (or direct the disposition of) 13,827 shares. Various persons have the right to receive, or the power to direct, the receipt of dividends from, the proceeds from the sale of the companys common stock. No one persons interest in the companys common stock is more than five percent of the total outstanding common shares. |
24
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information, unless otherwise indicated, as of March 1, 2017, regarding beneficial ownership of our companys common stock, our only outstanding class of equity securities, by each of our directors, each of our NEOs identified in the Summary Compensation Table on page 47 of this proxy statement, and our directors and executive officers as a group. We believe that, for each of the individuals set forth in the table below, such individuals financial interest is aligned with the interests of our other shareholders because the value of such individuals total holdings will increase or decrease in line with the price of our common stock.
Name of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (# of shares) | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-employee Directors(1) | Shares Owned Directly or Indirectly |
Phantom Shares Held Pursuant to Plans(2) |
Total | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas A. Fanning |
0 | 3,375 | 3,375 | * | ||||||||||||||||
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
0 | 4,744 | 4,744 | * | ||||||||||||||||
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
0 | 1,307 | 1,307 | * | ||||||||||||||||
Douglas J. McGregor |
11,564 | (3) | 86,993 | 98,557 | * | |||||||||||||||
Richard T. OBrien |
0 | 11,564 | 11,564 | * | ||||||||||||||||
James T. Prokopanko |
0 | 9,470 | 9,470 | * | ||||||||||||||||
David P. Steiner(4) |
0 | 0 | 0 | * | ||||||||||||||||
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
4,002 | 8,032 | 12,034 | * | ||||||||||||||||
Vincent J. Trosino |
11,585 | (5) | 42,356 | 53,941 | * | |||||||||||||||
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
0 | 9,470 | 9,470 | * |
CEO and other NEOs(6) |
Shares Owned Directly or |
Exercisable Options/ SOSARs |
Deferred LTI Payments |
Total | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||||
J. Thomas Hill |
44,024 | (7) | 63,065 | 5,634 | 112,723 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
John R. McPherson |
36,419 | (8) | 407,125 | 0 | 443,544 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Stanley G. Bass |
34,522 | (9) | 56,905 | 0 | 91,427 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
Michael R. Mills |
31,810 | (10) | 52,770 | 0 | 84,580 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
David P. Clement |
8,182 | (11) | 15,340 | 0 | 23,522 | * | |||||||||||||||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (24 persons) | 1,185,051 | 0.89% |
* | Less than 1% of issued and outstanding shares of our companys common stock. |
(1) | Beneficial ownership for our non-employee directors includes all shares held of record or in street name and, if noted, by trusts or family members. The amounts also include non-forfeitable phantom shares settled in stock accrued under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, and Deferred Stock Units (DSUs) awarded under the Deferred Stock Plan for Non-employee Directors, the 2006 Plan and the 2016 Plan. |
(2) | Column does not include the following forfeitable shares (settled in stock under the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan) owned by the following non-employee directors: |
Name | DSUs | |||
Thomas A. Fanning |
1,734 | |||
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
3,824 | |||
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
1,734 | |||
Richard T. OBrien |
3,824 | |||
James T. Prokopanko |
3,824 | |||
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
3,824 | |||
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
3,824 |
(3) | Includes 9,249 shares held in trusts of which Mr. McGregor is the trustee. |
(4) | Mr. Steiner was elected to the Board in February 2017. |
(5) | Includes 2,321 shares held in a trust of which Mr. Trosino is the trustee. |
(6) | Beneficial ownership for the executive officers includes shares held of record or in street name. The amounts also include shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options which are presently exercisable or that will become exercisable on or before April 30, 2017, shares credited to the executives accounts under our 401(k) Plan and long-term incentive (LTI) payments from Deferred Stock Units (DSUs), Performance Share Units (PSUs) and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) that have been deferred into the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. |
(7) | Includes 16,117 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(8) | Includes 6,760 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(9) | Includes 12,583 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(10) | Includes 7,938 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
(11) | Includes 5,917 shares held in 401(k) plan and excess benefit plan. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 25
| ||||||||
The table below sets forth information regarding the number of shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2016.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION | ||||||||||||
Plan Category | Number of securities (a) |
Weighted- Average (b) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1): |
||||||||||||
Deferred Stock Plan for Non-employee Directors(2) |
2,547 | 0(2) | ||||||||||
2000 Florida Rock Industries Amended & Restated Stock Plan(3) | ||||||||||||
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
30,910 | $ | 45.55 | |||||||||
Total 2000 Florida Rock Industries Stock Plan |
30,910 | 0(3) | ||||||||||
2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan(4) |
||||||||||||
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
2,361,521 | $ | 51.88 | |||||||||
Performance Share Units |
954,180 | |||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units |
134,590 | |||||||||||
Deferred Stock Units for Non-employee Directors |
127,761 | |||||||||||
Total 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan |
3,576,052 | 2,052,987(4) | ||||||||||
2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan |
||||||||||||
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights |
0 | $0 | ||||||||||
Performance Share Units |
2,340 | |||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units |
840 | |||||||||||
Deferred Stock Units for Non-employee Directors |
13,000 | |||||||||||
Total 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan |
16,180 | 7,970,876 | ||||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
NONE | NONE | ||||||||||
Total of All Plans |
3,625,689 | 10,023,863 |
26
|
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
PLEASE READ THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION FOLLOWING FOR AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND HOW IT WAS APPLIED TO THE PERFORMANCE OF OUR NEOS IN 2016.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Table of Contents | ||||
27 | ||||
27 | ||||
32 | ||||
35 | ||||
39 | ||||
45 |
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the companys executive compensation philosophy and programs for our named executive officers (NEOs). The companys NEOs for 2016 were:
Name
|
Principal Position | |
J. Thomas Hill | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | |
John R. McPherson | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Strategy Officer | |
Stanley G. Bass | Chief Growth Officer | |
Michael R. Mills | Chief Administrative Officer | |
David P. Clement | President, Central Division |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 27
| ||||||||
OUR MISSION OUR MISSION IS TO PROVIDE QUALITY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES WHICH CONSISTENTLY MEET OUR CUSTOMERS EXPECTATIONS; TO BE RESPONSIBLE STEWARDS WITH RESPECT TO THE SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF OUR OPERATIONS AND PRODUCTS; AND TO EARN SUPERIOR RETURNS FOR OUR SHAREHOLDERS.
2016 PERFORMANCE RESULTS
The following key metrics reflect our strong financial performance over the last three fiscal years. We manage and measure our business performance with a significant focus on Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Gross Profit per Ton for Aggregates. We emphasize these metrics because we believe they closely correlate to long-term shareholder value. We also believe that Total Net Earnings and Gross Profit for Aggregates are important metrics in evaluating the companys operational and financial performance.
Note: Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Gross Profit Per Ton for Aggregates are non-GAAP financial measures. We provide a reconciliation of each of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in Annex A to this proxy statement.
28
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
2016 PERFORMANCE WAS STRONG IN 2016, OUR TOTAL NET EARNINGS GREW 90%, WHILE ADJUSTED EBITDA GREW 16%, REFLECTING OUR FOCUS ON GROWING CASH GROSS PROFIT PER TON FOR AGGREGATES. WHILE OUR BUSINESS IS BENEFITING FROM A GENERAL ECONOMIC AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RECOVERY, WE ARE LEVERAGING THIS TO PRODUCE MORE PROFIT PER TON.
CEO PAY-AT-A-GLANCE
Each year, the Compensation Committee assesses our CEOs actual compensation relative to the companys performance. Our current Chairman, President and CEO, Tom Hill, was named President and CEO in July of 2014 and Chairman as of January 1, 2016. Mr. Hill has been with Vulcan for over 27 years, serving in a variety of operations and general management assignments.
The Compensation Committee set Mr. Hills base salary and total compensation for 2016 below the median pay of peer CEOs according to benchmarking data provided by Compensation Strategies, Inc. (CSI), our Compensation Committees independent compensation consultant. The percentile ranking of Mr. Hills compensation as compared to other CEOs in our peer group is as follows:
The following graph shows the relationship of our CEOs total compensation (as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 47), compared to our total shareholder return over the last three fiscal years. As illustrated, the compensation of our CEO has generally tracked total shareholder return over this period.
(1) | Mr. Hill was named President and Chief Executive Officer as of July 14, 2014. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 29
| ||||||||
COMPENSATION MIX
To ensure managements interests are aligned with those of shareholders and the performance of our company, a substantial portion of our NEOs compensation is at-risk and will vary above or below target levels depending on company performance. The chart below shows the percentage of our NEOs 2016 target compensation that was performance-based and at-risk.
1 | SOSARs means Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights calculated based on grant date fair value. See page 42 for more information. |
2 | Performance Shares refers to Performance Share Units (PSUs) calculated based on grant date fair value. See page 41 for more information. |
SAY ON PAY RESULTS AND 2016 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
At our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 98% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory vote to approve compensation of our NEOs (Say on Pay vote). We believe the results of the 2016 Say on Pay vote demonstrate continued strong shareholder support for our current compensation program.
In 2016, the Compensation Committee continued to review the changing market conditions for executive compensation and benefits and made the following compensation decisions:
| Set the CEO compensation package at the 41st percentile of the market |
| Implemented a new peer group for 2016 compensation decisions to better reflect companies that generally are impacted by the same economic factors affecting Vulcan |
| Added a double-trigger change of control requirement for all long-term incentive awards issued under the 2016 Plan. Specifically, the 2016 Plan provides that awards will not vest upon a change of control of Vulcan unless: (i) awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, or (ii) if such awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, only upon a participants qualifying termination of employment. |
30
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES
The table below highlights certain of our executive compensation practices, including practices we have implemented that drive performance as well as those not implemented because we do not believe they would serve our shareholders interests.
WHAT WE DO |
Pay for performance. Tie pay to performance by ensuring that a significant portion of NEO compensation is performance-based and at-risk
Median compensation targets. All compensation elements of our executives are generally targeted at the median (50th percentile) of our peer group companies. In 2016, the Compensation Committee set our CEOs total compensation at the 41st percentile of our peer group
PSUs are substantial portion of LTI. PSU grants, tied to our relative performance against the S&P 500, comprised approximately 75% of the total value of annual long-term incentive grants made to our NEOs in 2016. SOSARs comprised the remaining 25%
Double-Trigger change of control requirement for long-term incentive awards. Our new 2016 Plan provides that long-term incentive awards will not vest upon a change of control of Vulcan unless: (i) awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, or (ii) if such awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, only upon a participants qualifying termination of employment
Robust share ownership guidelines with an equity retention requirement. We have stock ownership guidelines of 7 times base salary for the CEO and 3 to 5 times base salary for our other NEOs and an equity retention requirement of 50% of net shares paid as incentive compensation until ownership guidelines are met
Clawback Policy. We have a compensation recovery (clawback) policy that requires officers to forfeit certain cash-based incentive compensation and/or equity-based incentive compensation if the company restates its financial statements due to the officers misconduct
No pledging of shares. Our directors and officers are not permitted to pledge Vulcan shares as collateral for loans or any other purpose
No hedging. We prohibit directors and officers from engaging in short sales of Vulcan stock or similar transactions intended to hedge or offset the market value of Vulcan stock owned by them
Independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee uses an independent compensation consultant that provides no other services to the company
Minimal executive perquisites. |
WHAT WE DONT DO |
No employment contracts. None of our NEOs or other executive officers have employment contracts that guarantee continued employment
No dividends on unvested PSUs. Our PSUs require 4 years to vest and dividends are neither paid nor accrued during such vesting period
No repricing. Stock options and SOSAR exercise prices are set equal to the grant date market price and may not be repriced
No excessive Change of Control Agreements. Neither our Change of Control Agreements nor our Change of Control Plan provide for: Single-trigger termination right Inclusion of long-term incentive value in the calculation of cash severance Excise tax gross-ups |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 31
| ||||||||
Executive Compensation Program in Detail
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
The dedication and performance of our employees, including our NEOs, enable us to accomplish our corporate goals. The compensation program for our NEOs is intended to motivate them to achieve Vulcans strategic goals and operational plans while adhering to our high ethical business standards.
Vulcans executive compensation program is centered on a pay-for-performance philosophy, which aligns executive compensation with shareholder value and ultimately impacts our compensation program design.
OUR THREE COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES | ||
Link a significant portion of compensation to performance.
We believe that compensation levels should reflect performanceboth the performance of Vulcan and the performance of the recipient. This is accomplished by:
Motivating, recognizing and rewarding individual excellence
Paying short-term cash bonuses based upon company financial performance and individual performance
Linking long-term compensation to our companys stock performance through the use of Performance Share Units (PSUs) and Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs)
|
Maintain competitive compensation levels.
We strive to offer programs and levels of compensation that are competitive with those offered by industrial companies of similar size, value and complexity in order to attract, retain and reward our NEOs.
Align managements interests with those of shareholders.
We seek to implement programs that will encourage NEOs to remain with us and to increase long-term shareholder value by providing competitive compensation and granting long-term equity-based awards each year. |
BENCHMARKING COMPENSATION AND PEER GROUP DEVELOPMENT
On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee conducts a benchmarking study and analysis of total compensation paid to our CEO and other NEOs against a relevant composite group of companies (our peer group).
SELECTION OF PEERS WE SELECT PEERS EITHER BASED ON THEIR SIZE OR THEIR INDUSTRY (CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS AND MINING). IN THE EVENT THAT INDUSTRY PEERS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY LARGER OR SMALLER THAN OUR COMPANY, WE USE STATISTICAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS TO MAKE THEIR COMPENSATION DATA COMPARABLE TO OURS.
32
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Our new peer group is comprised of 28 companies from the following industries: Construction Materials, Building Products, Construction Equipment, Engineering and Construction, Forest Products, Coal Mining, Metals Mining, and Metals Producers/ Manufacturers. Our peer group (whose median market capitalization at year end was $10.0 billion as compared to our market capitalization at year end of $16.6 billion) consists of the following companies:
The diagram below compares Vulcans previous peer group of 18 companies to its new peer group of 28 companies:
Some peer companies were removed due to acquisitions. Others were removed because the Compensation Committee determined the peers were no longer a good match due to increased size, low market capitalization or concerns about industry fit. The Compensation Committee decided to include additional companies whose operations were impacted by similar external factors as Vulcan or which have similar operating structures.
PREVIOUS PEER GROUP REMOVED Arch Coal, Inc. Danaher Corp. Peabody Energy Corp. U.S. Steel Corp. CONSOL Energy Inc. Cummins Inc. Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Granite Construction Inc. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Masco Corp. Newmont Mining Corp. Nucor Corp. PPG Industries, Inc. Sherwin-Williams Co. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Weyerhaeuser Co. ADDED Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Compass Minerals International, Inc. D.R. Horton, Inc. Eagle Materials, Inc. Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. Joy Global, Inc. Lennar Corp. Owens Corning PulteGroup, Inc. Terex Corp. The Mosaic Company USG Corp. Waste management, Inc. WestRock Co. NEW PEER GROUP
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 33
| ||||||||
KEY PAY ELEMENTS
The following chart summarizes the key pay elements for our NEOs. Each element is described in detail beginning on page 39 in the Section Elements of Compensation.
(1) | EBITDA EP is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Annex A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP. |
Compensation Element Form Purpose How it Links to Performance FIXED Base Salary Cash To provide a stable, reliable source of income Reviewed annually in light of perfor-mance factors (company and individual) and market compensation practices AT-RISK Short-Term Performance-Based Bonus Cash To reward the achievement of annual financial and other performance goals Variable and based on preestablished company performance goals as measured by EBITDA EP LoNg-Term Incentive (LTI) Awards Equity To reward long-term company performance Variable and based on our corporate performance. PSUs comprise 75% of LTI award for 2016; only pay if the applicable performance goal, total shareholder ruturn over the four year performance period, is met SOSARs comprise 25% of LTI award for 2016; value is determined by the increase in the value of the companys stock
34
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
|
Composed entirely of independent directors
|
Annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEOs compensation
Reviews CEOs performance and independent compensation consultants recommendations and, accordingly, determines CEOs compensation
Presents CEOs overall compensation package to the entire Board of Directors for ratification
Determines and sets base salary and short- and long-term incentives for other NEOs
Administers Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), 2006 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2006 Plan), and 2016 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2016 Plan)
Makes regular reports to the Board, including an annual report and the approval or disapproval of managements recommendations for material changes in NEOs existing retirement and benefit plans
| ||
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
The Compensation Committee administers our executive compensation program in accordance with our Compensation Committee Charter. The current charter is available at www.vulcanmaterials.com. On our website, select Investor Relations, then Corporate Governance. From there, you can visit our Committees page, which lists the composition of our board committees as well as their respective charters.
|
INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT |
Compensation Strategies, Inc. (CSI)
|
In 2016, CSI:
Provided the Compensation Committee with observations and recommendations on compensation and benefits for our CEO and other NEOs
Advised and assisted the Compensation Committee in the implementation of a new peer group and a formal written evaluation process for our CEO
Provided its recommendations with respect to Board compensation, as well as its advice on regulatory compliance and development of new programs
Conducted a benchmarking market study and analysis of executive compensation practices to ensure that compensation programs are reasonable and competitive
Representatives of CSI attended four meetings of the Compensation Committee in 2016
| ||
ABOUT CSI
CSI is engaged by and reports to the Compensation Committee, and occasionally meets with management to discuss compensation initiatives and issues. CSI does not provide any other services to the company. The Compensation Committee determined that CSIs work as the Compensation Committees compensation consultant does not present any conflicts of interest.
In 2016, the company paid CSI $332,226 for executive compensation consulting services.
|
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 35
| ||||||||
MANAGEMENT
|
Supports the Compensation Committee by making recommendations and providing analyses, and occasionally meets with CSI to discuss compensation initiatives and competitive practices
The CEO is responsible for establishing annual performance goals for each of the other NEOs
The CEO is responsible for conducting an annual performance evaluation of each of the other NEOs against pre-established goals
Based on performance and competitive benchmarking reports, the CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the compensation of the other NEOs
|
36
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
Each NEOs base salary and annual bonus is determined through thoughtful consideration of individual performance, company performance and competitive market pay.
With respect to our CEO, the independent members of our Board of Directors use a formal process for evaluating his performance. Each Board member provides a written evaluation in the areas of leadership, strategic planning, financial performance, safety performance, customer relations, personnel management, communications, board relations and overall performance. In its performance deliberations, the Compensation Committee has access to the input from the full Board and independently assesses the CEOs performance achievements.
For our other NEOs, the Compensation Committee reviews a performance report, as prepared by our CEO, for each NEO. Individual performance is based primarily on the extent to which each NEO achieves a series of set goals throughout the period.
Together, Vulcans NEOs made impactful contributions to the continued success of the organization as evidenced through the following major accomplishments:
| Achieved total shareholder return of 32.7% in 2016 |
| Achieved Net Earnings of $419 million and Adjusted EBITDA* of $966 million, a $198 million improvement in Net Earnings and a $131 million improvement in Adjusted EBITDA* over the prior year |
| Expanded both aggregates gross profit margin and aggregates gross profit as a percentage of freight-adjusted revenues* by 230 basis points from the prior year |
| Continued to actively pursue strategic bolt-on acquisitions in aggregates and associated downstream products in key markets along with identification of greenfield aggregate sites and distribution yards |
* | Adjusted EBITDA and aggregates gross profit as a percentage of freight-adjusted revenues are non-GAAP financial measures. See Annex A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP. |
Following are the notable accomplishments of each NEO in 2016.
TOM HILL
Chairman, President and |
Mr. Hills accomplishments during the year included:
Providing thoughtful and proactive capital stewardship, as demonstrated by the companys achieving investment grade credit status and an all-time high company enterprise value
Leading the improved performance of the company, achieving significant growth in revenues, EBITDA and earnings per share
Strengthening the organizations effectiveness through focus on One Vulcan process improvements
Reinforcing the strategic vision for the organization, focusing on building a leadership culture that values continuous improvement, talent development and winning The Vulcan Way
| |||||
JOHN MCPHERSON
Executive Vice President |
Mr. McPhersons accomplishments during the year included:
Improving underlying profitability of the business and exceeding targets for gross margin, aggregates gross profit per ton and flow-through profit percentage
Continuing to improve the organizations financial strength and flexibility; decreasing overall cost of capital and further positioning the company to fund growth investment
Securing the organizations ability to deliver against expectations through the continued development of key talent, execution of financial excellence initiatives and sustained focus on continuous improvement
Leading effective capital market communications efforts including the execution of a successful Investors Day and further cultivation of supportive market relationships |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 37
| ||||||||
STAN BASS
Chief Growth Officer |
Mr. Bass accomplishments during the year included:
Successfully organizing and integrating the teams of commercial excellence, business development and land managers to drive commercial excellence and strategic growth
Leading our commercial excellence efforts to increase organic revenue growth, improve our competitive advantages and our sales organizations capabilities
Working with the senior management team to focus and execute the companys growth strategy, including greenfield development projects and the acquisition of quarries and additional reserves in key markets
Providing oversight for the development of Vulcan technology applications, focused on improving the customer experience and competitive differentiation | |||||
MICHAEL MILLS
Chief Administrative Officer |
Mr. Mills accomplishments during the year included:
Continuing to build a high performance/high value and talent management culture through the development and support of initiatives focused on improving safety, enhancing diversity and inclusion and performance management
Further supporting efforts to build and develop a pool of high potential talent for the organization
Enhancing the HR organization through development of key talent and capabilities
Providing leadership for the international priorities of the company, including the companys Mexican quarry and shipping network | |||||
DAVID CLEMENT
President, Central Division |
Mr. Clements accomplishments during the year included:
Exceeding the prior year Central Division EBIT performance by 7.4 percent
Reducing the Central Divisions overall recordable injury rate by 25 percent
Continuing the prior years momentum in price growth and implementing key market strategies to improve overall Central Division market performance
Providing leadership among the Division Presidents to support execution of the companys business plan and strategy |
38
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Our elements of compensation, all of which are discussed in greater detail below, include:
BASE SALARY
The base salary element of our compensation program is designed to be competitive with compensation paid to similarly-situated, competent, and skilled executives.
The Compensation Committee uses the information and procedures described below to set base salaries tied to individual performance, contribution to business results, and market compensation comparisons. The Compensation Committee determines if base salary adjustments are appropriate for our NEOs after considering all of the following factors:
| NEOs performance relative to the pre-established goals and objectives in his areas of responsibility |
| NEOs overall managerial effectiveness with respect to planning, personnel development, communications, regulatory compliance and similar matters |
| Competitive pay levels for similarly situated executives set forth in compensation surveys and our peer group |
| Marketplace trends in salary increases |
| NEOs potential for future contributions to the company, retention risks, fairness in view of our overall salary increases, and the ability of our company to pay the increased salaries |
| Economic environment and its impact on the company |
We review annually the base salaries of the NEOs, and also at the time of a promotion or change in responsibilities. The following table sets forth the base salary of each NEO at December 31, 2016:
NAME | POSITION | 2016 SALARY | ||||
Tom Hill |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | $950,000 | ||||
John McPherson |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Strategy Officer | $780,000 | ||||
Stan Bass |
Chief Growth Officer | $550,000 | ||||
Michael Mills |
Chief Administrative Officer | $550,000 | ||||
David Clement |
President, Central Division | $332,000 |
PAY FOR PERFORMANCE To further our goal of aligning the executives interests with those of our shareholders, we generally reward superior performance through our short-term cash bonus program and long-term equity-based incentives rather than through base salary.
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 39
| ||||||||
SHORT-TERM PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUS
Our short-term cash bonus incentive program is designed to motivate our executives, including the NEOs, and reward them with cash payments for achieving quantifiable, pre-established business results. We pay short-term incentives to our NEOs under the shareholder-approved Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), which is intended to yield cash bonus payments that constitute qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Meeting the Minimum Performance Threshold under the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP)
In order for the NEOs to be eligible to receive a cash bonus, the company must attain a minimum performance threshold for the year, as established by the Compensation Committee. The minimum performance threshold is used only to determine a NEOs eligibility for a bonus payment under the EIP. If the minimum performance threshold is met, the actual amount of bonus payable is calculated in accordance with the process described in Determining Bonus Payable. For 2016, the minimum threshold was either: (1) cash earnings in the amount of $300 million; or (2) EBITDA in the amount of $500 million. Company performance exceeded each of these established minimum thresholds.
If the Compensation Committee determines that either of the minimum performance thresholds are met, our NEOs may receive a bonus under the EIP, subject to the Compensation Committees discretion to adjust the bonus downward from the maximum bonus amount set under the EIP. The Compensation Committee cannot exercise upward discretion.
Determining Bonus Payable
We use EBITDA Economic Profit (EBITDA EP), which incorporates Return on Capital Employed (ROCE), as our short-term incentive metric. We believe this metric provides an incentive for management to carefully consider deployment of capital as the company increases capital expenditures during the current construction up cycle.
EBITDA EP measures the extent to which Adjusted EBITDA exceeds an operating capital charge. Adjusted EBITDA EP is based on Adjusted EBITDA, but includes other performance adjustments, such as business acquisition performance versus planned performance. The operating capital charge is based on our companys average assets and liabilities associated with Adjusted EBITDA EP multiplied by the estimated pretax cost of capital. We believe that changes in EBITDA EP positively correlate with changes in shareholder value better than other commonly used financial performance measures.
The 2016 EBITDA EP target of $223 million was based on performance during the preceding three years, weighted most heavily on the most recent fiscal year, less certain gains on sales of property or assets. The Compensation Committee determined to pay cash bonuses for 2016 financial performance (as reflected in the table below) based on EBITDA EP of $476 million, which was $253 million above the target.
Note: EBITDA EP is a non-GAAP measure. See Annex A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP.
Target and Actual Bonus
The table below shows for each NEO the target bonus, the maximum bonus payable under the EIP, and the actual cash bonus paid to each NEO based on 2016 financial performance. The maximum bonuses payable, referenced in the table below, are established under the shareholder-approved EIP. The EIP permits the payment of bonuses based on financial performance of up to 4 times a NEOs target bonus, but not to exceed $7 million. In 2016, the Compensation Committee took action to limit the maximum cash bonuses for 2016 financial performance to 2.5 times each NEOs target bonus as set in February 2016.
Name | Base Salary | Target Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary |
Target Bonus Amount |
Maximum Bonus Per EIP(1) |
Cash Bonus Paid Based on 2016 Performance |
|||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
$ | 950,000 | 115% | $ | 1,092,500 | $ | 2,731,000 | $ | 2,264,000 | |||||||||||
John McPherson |
$ | 780,000 | 110% | $ | 858,000 | $ | 2,145,000 | $ | 1,778,000 | |||||||||||
Stan Bass |
$ | 550,000 | 80% | $ | 440,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 892,000 | |||||||||||
Michael Mills |
$ | 550,000 | 80% | $ | 440,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 898,000 | |||||||||||
David Clement |
$ | 332,000 | 60% | $ | 199,200 | $ | 498,000 | $ | 384,000 |
(1) | The amounts in this column equal 2.5 times the target bonus, which is the maximum bonus as set by the Compensation Committee. |
40
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 41
| ||||||||
a member of the S&P 500. The following table shows the payout percentage of 2016 PSUs that will vest over the four-year period based on levels of performance achieved.
PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT PAYMENT TABLE (1) | ||||||
Grant Value |
4-Year Average TSR Percentile Rank Relative to S&P 500 Index |
% of PSUs Payable(2) |
||||
50th percentile level of awards made to similar executives, based upon a market analysis |
75th or more | 200 | ||||
50th | 100 | |||||
25th or less | 0 |
(1) | The 2016 grant amount was set at a level that approximated the 50th percentile level of awards made to similarly situated executives. Therefore, if the companys 4-year average TSR relative to the S&P 500 Index is at the 50th percentile, the full award is paid. The payout is adjusted incrementally for performance above and below the 50th percentile and can range from 0% to 200%. |
(2) | Payouts interpolated for returns between 25th and 50th percentile and 50th and 75th percentile. |
Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs)
SOSARs entitle the recipient to receive, at the time of exercise, shares of Vulcan stock with a market value equal to the difference between the exercise price (the closing price of Vulcan stock on the date of grant) and the market price of Vulcan stock on the date the SOSARs are exercised. SOSARs have a ten-year term and vest at a rate of 25% annually over the first four years of their term.
2016 Long-Term Incentive Payments of Prior Grants
In February 2016, our NEOs received payment for PSUs that were granted in 2012 which vested on December 31, 2015 because the applicable performance criteria were satisfied. These PSUs were paid out at 152.1% of the amount of the original grant made in 2012. The PSU payment percentage of 152.1% was based on TSR performance of our common stock relative to the TSR performance of the companies that comprise the S&P 500 Index.
Payment Calculation for PSUs Granted in 2012 Paid February 16, 2016 | ||||||
Executive | Units Granted in 2012 |
Percentage Payable |
Units Payable | |||
Tom Hill |
10,200 | 152.1% | 15,515 | |||
John McPherson |
13,200 | 152.1% | 20,078 | |||
Stan Bass |
10,200 | 152.1% | 15,515 | |||
Michael Mills |
10,200 | 152.1% | 15,515 | |||
David Clement |
1,780 | 152.1% | 2,708 |
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
In order to align the interests of the NEOs with our shareholders interests and to promote a long-term focus for these officers, our company has executive stock ownership guidelines for the officers of our company. The guidelines are based on managements and the compensation consultants assessment of market practice. The stock ownership requirements are higher for the CEO than for the other NEOs.
42
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 43
| ||||||||
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Our company provides the following retirement benefits to our NEOs:
Benefit | Background | |
Retirement Plan* | This pension plan covers all salaried employees of our company hired prior to July 15, 2007. | |
Supplemental Plan* | The Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan provides for benefits that are curtailed under the Retirement Plan and the 401(k) Plan due to Internal Revenue Service pay and benefit limitations for qualified plans. This Plan is designed to provide retirement income benefits, as a percentage of pay, which are similar for all employees regardless of compensation levels. The Unfunded Supplemental Benefit Plan eliminates the effect of tax limitations on the payment of retirement benefits, except to the extent that it is an unfunded plan and a general obligation of our company. | |
401(k) Plan | This plan has two components: (1) an employee contribution feature with company matching, and (2) a profit-sharing feature. | |
*A discussion of all retirement benefits provided to the NEOs is set forth under the heading Retirement and Pension Benefits beginning on page 51. |
* IMPORTANT PENSION INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013, BENEFITS UNDER THE RETIREMENT PLAN AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN WERE FROZEN. These plans were amended to freeze service accruals effective December 31, 2013 and pay accruals effective December 31, 2015
44
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Considering Risk, Accounting and Tax Considerations
Our compensation programs are balanced, focused and give considerable weight to the long-term performance of our company. Under this structure, the highest amount of compensation can only be achieved through consistent superior performance over sustained periods of time. Goals and objectives reflect a balanced mix of quantitative and qualitative performance measures to avoid excessive weight on a single performance measure. Likewise, the elements of compensation are balanced among current cash payments and long-term equity-based incentive awards. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust compensation for quality of performance and adherence to our companys values.
Based on the foregoing features of our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee has concluded that risks arising from compensation policies and practices for employees of the company and its affiliates are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company as a whole.
COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 162(m)
In administering the compensation program for NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers the applicability of Section 162(m) of the Code, the consequences under financial accounting standards, the tax consequences in our analysis of total compensation and the mix of compensation elements, base salary, bonus and long-term incentives. Section 162(m) prohibits public companies from taking a tax deduction for compensation that is paid to any one of certain employees in excess of $1,000,000, unless the compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation within the meaning of the Code. To preserve the deductibility of compensation, we intend that bonus payments made according to the EIP and grants of long-term incentives under our 2016 Plan are intended to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to design and implement compensation elements that may not be deductible under Section 162(m) if the Compensation Committee determines that, despite the tax consequences, those elements are in our companys best interest to adopt. For example, we do not issue incentive stock options (ISOs), even though ISOs provide potential tax advantages to the recipient, because of the negative tax and accounting consequences to our company.
TAX & ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS WE CONSIDER THE TAX AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS TO OUR COMPANY IN ALLOCATING AWARDS AMONG VARIOUS COMPENSATION VEHICLES AND SEEK TO PRESERVE THE TAX DEDUCTION FOR COMPENSATORY AWARDS.
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 45
| ||||||||
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis as set forth above with management and, based on such review and discussions, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
Dated: February 9, 2017
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
James T. Prokopanko, Chair
Thomas A. Fanning
Lee J. Styslinger, III
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson
46
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
The following table sets forth, for the three most recently completed fiscal years, information concerning the compensation of our NEOs employed as of December 31, 2016:
Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards(1) ($) |
Option Awards(1) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) |
Change in Value
And ($) |
All
Other Compen- sation(4) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Thomas Hill Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
2016 2015 2014 |
|
|
941,670 891,668 668,917 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
2,826,194 2,312,865 792,750 |
|
|
937,320 775,236 274,250 |
|
|
2,264,000 1,923,000 1,590,000 |
|
|
289,682 2,195,294 805,186 |
|
|
272,587 163,523 74,358 |
|
|
7,531,453 8,261,586 4,205,461 |
| |||||||||
John R. McPherson EVP and Chief Financial and Strategy Officer |
|
2016 2015 2014 |
|
|
773,334 733,338 598,808 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
2,124,034 1,901,190 792,750 |
|
|
706,640 639,318 274,250 |
|
|
1,778,000 1,581,000 1,310,000 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
288,256 286,743 118,646 |
|
|
5,670,264 5,141,319 3,094,454 |
| |||||||||
Stanley G. Bass Chief Growth Officer |
|
2016 2015 2014 |
|
|
554,258 562,800 545,134 |
(5) (5) (5) |
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
816,261 1,511,970 443,940 |
|
|
271,560 156,054 153,580 |
|
|
892,000 665,000 567,000 |
|
|
157,618 501,706 653,327 |
|
|
408,898 98,711 96,175 |
|
|
3,100,595 3,496,241 2,459,156 |
| |||||||||
Michael R. Mills Chief Administrative Officer |
|
2016 2015 2014 |
|
|
530,508 429,508 410,008 |
|
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
816,261 531,435 456,624 |
|
|
271,560 178,707 157,968 |
|
|
898,000 601,000 573,000 |
|
|
178,516 522,763 581,778 |
|
|
110,257 78,028 61,314 |
|
|
2,805,102 2,341,441 2,240,692 |
| |||||||||
David P. Clement President, Central Division |
|
2016 2015 2014 |
|
|
330,504 371,888 357,924 |
(6) (6) |
|
0 0 0 |
|
|
245,756 247,005 228,312 |
|
|
81,760 83,061 78,984 |
|
|
384,000 507,000 542,000 |
|
|
130,558 506,675 374,968 |
|
|
168,575 85,252 37,324 |
|
|
1,341,153 1,800,881 1,619,512 |
|
(1) | Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we have provided a grant date fair value for Stock Awards and Option Awards in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. For Option Awards (including SOSARs), the fair value is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of certain assumptions, including the risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield at the date of grant of a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity period equal to or approximating the options expected term. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical dividend payouts adjusted for current expectations of future dividend payouts. The volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility, and expectations regarding future volatility, of our common stock over a period equal to the options expected term. The expected term of options granted is based on historical experience and expectations about future exercises and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. For Performance Share Awards, the fair value is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model. For the highest performance level the maximum number of shares payable and the estimated grant date value are 64,400 shares ($5,652,388) for Mr. Hill; 48,400 shares ($4,248,068) for Mr. McPherson; 18,600 shares ($1,632,522) for Mr. Bass; 18,600 shares ($1,632,522) for Mr. Mills; and 5,600 shares ($491,512) for Mr. Clement. We do not believe that the fair values estimated on the grant date, either by the Black-Scholes model or any other model, are necessarily indicative of the values that might eventually be realized by an executive. |
(2) | The Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) payments were made on March 13, 2017 for the previous years performance. See discussion of the EIP under heading Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. |
(3) | Includes only the amount of change in pension value because our company does not provide any above market earnings on deferred compensation balances. The year over year change in pension value was attributable to three primary factors which were: (i) aging (one year closer to retirement), (ii) shift in the accrued benefit (from nonqualified plan to qualified plan), and (iii) change in actuarial assumptions (change in interest rate from 3.84% to 3.66%, and mortality table to RP-2014 Health Employee & Annuitant Mortality White Collar Table, adjusted to 2006 base rates, with generational improvements projected using Scale MP-2016). |
FOOTNOTE 3 Breakout detail of change in pension value shown in table below: |
Name | Aging (one year closer to retirement) ($) |
Shift in Accrued Benefit ($) |
Change in Assumptions ($) |
Total Change ($) |
||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
202,184 | 6,291 | 81,207 | 289,682 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson(a) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
104,090 | 4,491 | 49,037 | 157,618 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
119,849 | 5,904 | 52,763 | 178,516 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
87,967 | 5,534 | 37,057 | 130,558 |
(a) | Mr. McPherson was hired after 2007 and is not eligible to participate in the companys defined benefit plan. |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 47
| ||||||||
(4) | Includes qualified defined contribution plan contributions, company-paid life insurance premiums, commuting expenses, relocation expenses and personal use of company automobile, as set forth in the following table. |
FOOTNOTE 4 Breakout detail of all other compensation shown in table below: |
Name |
Non-Qualified SERP Contributions ($) |
Qualified 401(k) Contributions ($) |
Company Paid Life Insurance Premiums ($) |
Personal Use of Company Automobile ($) |
Commuting Expenses ($) |
Personal Use of Company Aircraft ($) |
Relocation Expenses ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
244,647 | 26,500 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 272,587 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
John McPherson |
196,494 | 26,500 | 1,440 | 4,458 | 59,364 | 0 | 0 | 288,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
91,847 | 26,500 | 1,440 | 4,257 | 0 | 1,950 | 282,904 | 408,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
81,491 | 26,500 | 1,440 | 826 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 110,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Clement |
60,306 | 26,500 | 1,440 | 1,028 | 0 | 0 | 79,301 | 168,575 |
(5) | Includes a regional supplement in the amount of $20,750 for 2016, $114,000 for 2015, and $109,500 for 2014. |
(6) | Includes a regional supplement in the amount of $51,000 for 2015 and $51,000 for 2014. |
The following table sets forth the grants of plan-based awards in 2016 to our NEOs:
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER NON-EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS |
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (# OF SHARES) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securi- ties Un- derlying Options (#) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards(1) ($/Sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2) ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Threshold ($)
|
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
2/12/2016 | 0 | 1,092,500 | 2,731,250 | 0 | 32,200 | 64,400 | 0 | 32,100 | 92.02 | 3,763,514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John McPherson |
2/12/2016 | 0 | 858,000 | 2,145,000 | 0 | 24,200 | 48,400 | 0 | 24,200 | 92.02 | 2,830,674 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
2/12/2016 | 0 | 440,000 | 1,100,000 | 0 | 9,300 | 18,600 | 0 | 9,300 | 92.02 | 1,087,821 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
2/12/2016 | 0 | 440,000 | 1,100,000 | 0 | 9,300 | 18,600 | 0 | 9,300 | 92.02 | 1,087,821 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Clement |
2/12/2016 | 0 | 199,200 | 498,000 | 0 | 2,800 | 5,600 | 0 | 2,800 | 92.02 | 327,516 |
(1) | Exercise price was determined using the closing price of our common stock on the grant date as required under the 2006 Plan. |
(2) | Amount represents the grant date fair values calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of $87.77 for the PSUs granted on 2/12/2016 was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The grant date fair value of $29.20 for the SOSARs granted on 2/12/2016 was calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Fair value was calculated on the number of units granted. |
48
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
Certain information concerning unexercised options, stock awards that have not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each of the NEOs outstanding as of December 31, 2016, is set forth in the table below:
Name | OPTION AWARDS |
STOCK AWARDS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Exercisable Options (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unexercisable Options (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(13) ($) |
Equity Rights That (#) |
Equity Value of Rights That |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
2/7/2008 | 2,280 | 0 | 70.69 | 2/7/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2009 | 9,285 | 0 | 47.47 | 2/12/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2010 | 6,200 | 0 | 43.05 | 2/11/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2011 | 4,900 | 0 | 43.63 | 3/1/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/2012 | 0(1) | 0 | 0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/2013 | 5,250(2) | 1,750 | 55.41 | 2/7/2023 | 10,507(6) | 1,314,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/20/2013 | 20,000(10) | 2,503,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/13/2014 | 6,250(3) | 6,250 | 66.00 | 2/13/2024 | 12,500(7) | 1,564,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2015 | 7,700(4) | 23,100 | 79.41 | 2/12/2025 | 30,900(8) | 3,867,135 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2016 | 0(5) | 32,100 | 92.02 | 2/12/2026 | 32,200(9) | 4,029,830 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John McPherson |
11/9/2011 | 355,600 | 0 | 29.05 | 11/9/2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/9/2011 | 15,300 | 0 | 29.05 | 11/9/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/2012 | 0(1) | 0 | 0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/2013 | 6,075(2) | 2,025 | 55.41 | 2/7/2023 | 12,158(6) | 1,521,574 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/20/2013 | 20,000(10) | 2,503,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/13/2014 | 6,250(3) | 6,250 | 66.00 | 2/13/2024 | 12,500(7) | 1,564,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2015 | 6.350(4) | 19,050 | 79.41 | 2/12/2025 | 25,400(8) | 3,178,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2016 | 0(5) | 24,200 | 92.02 | 2/12/2026 | 24,200(9) | 3,028,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
2/7/2008 | 5,760 | 0 | 70.69 | 2/7/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2009 | 18,570 | 0 | 47.47 | 2/12/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/11/2010 | 9,300 | 0 | 43.05 | 2/11/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2011 | 5,600 | 0 | 43.63 | 3/1/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/2012 | 0(1) | 0 | 0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/2013 | 5,250(2) | 1,750 | 55.41 | 2/7/2023 | 10,507(6) | 1,314,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/13/2014 | 3,500(3) | 3,500 | 66.00 | 2/13/2024 | 7,000(7) | 876,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2015 | 1,550(4) | 4,650 | 79.41 | 2/12/2025 | 14,000(11) | 1,752,100 | 6,200(8) | 775,930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2016 | 0(5) | 9,300 | 92.02 | 2/12/2026 | 9,300(9) | 1,163,895 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
2/7/2008 | 4,425 | 0 | 70.69 | 2/7/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2009 | 20,970 | 0 | 47.47 | 2/12/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/11/2010 | 3,500 | 0 | 43.05 | 2/11/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2011 | 5,600 | 0 | 43.63 | 3/1/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/2012 | 0(1) | 0 | 0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/2013 | 5,250(2) | 1,750 | 55.41 | 2/7/2023 | 10,507(6) | 1,314,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/20/2013 | 20,000(10) | 2,503,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/13/2014 | 3,600(3) | 3,600 | 66.00 | 2/13/2024 | 7,200(7) | 901,080 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2015 | 1,755(4) | 5,325 | 79.41 | 2/12/2025 | 7,100(8) | 888,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2016 | 0(5) | 9,300 | 92.02 | 2/12/2026 | 9,300(9) | 1,163,895 |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 49
| ||||||||
Name | OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant Date |
Number
of (#) |
Number
of (#) |
Equity (#) |
Option ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(13) ($) |
Equity Rights That (#) |
Equity Value of Rights That |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David Clement |
2/7/2008 | 1,890 | 0 | 70.69 | 2/7/2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2009 | 4,520 | 0 | 47.47 | 2/12/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/11/2010 | 1,430 | 0 | 43.05 | 2/11/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/1/2011 | 1,370 | 0 | 43.63 | 3/1/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/9/2012 | 0(1) | 0 | 0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/7/2013 | 810(2) | 270 | 55.41 | 2/7/2023 | 1,636(6) | 204,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/13/2014 | 1,800(3) | 1,800 | 66.00 | 2/13/2024 | 3,600(7) | 450,540 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2015 | 825(4) | 2,475 | 79.41 | 2/12/2025 | 3,300(8) | 412,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/12/2016 | 0(5) | 2,800 | 92.02 | 2/12/2026 | 2,800(9) | 350,420 |
Options in footnotes 2, 3, 4, and 5 vest at a rate of 25% per year in years 1 4.
(1) | No Options (SOSARs) were granted in 2012. |
(2) | Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/7/2014, 2/7/2015, 2/7/2016, and 2/7/2017. |
(3) | Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/13/2015, 2/13/2016, 2/13/2017, and 2/13/2018. |
(4) | Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/12/2016, 2/12/2017, 2/12/2018, and 2/12/2019. |
(5) | Options (SOSARs) with vesting dates 2/12/2017, 2/12/2018, 2/12/2019, and 2/12/2020. |
PSUs in footnotes 6, 7, 8 and 9 cliff vest 100% after a four-year performance period.
(6) | PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2016. |
(7) | PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2017. |
(8) | PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2018. |
(9) | PSUs with vesting date of 12/31/2019. |
(10) | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) cliff vest 100% after a four-year period, with a vesting date of 12/20/2017. |
(11) | RSUs cliff vest 100% after a four-year period, with a vesting date of 2/12/2019. |
(12) | Vested PSUs adjusted for company performance through 12/31/2016. Unvested PSUs reported at target. |
(13) | Based on closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on 12/30/2016, $125.15. |
Deferred Compensation Plan
Our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was established in 1998 to allow executives to defer a portion of their current years compensation in a tax-efficient manner. We believe that providing a tax deferral plan gives our executives flexibility in tax and financial planning and provides an additional benefit at little cost to our shareholders. Our company does not make any contributions to the plan on behalf of the participants. Because our company purchases assets that mirror, to the extent possible, participants deemed investment elections under the plan, the only costs to our company related to the plan are administrative costs and any contributions that may be necessary to true-up account balances with deemed investment results. The plan allows executives with annual compensation (base salary and target annual short-term bonus) of $200,000 or more to defer receipt of up to 50% of base salary, up to 100% of annual cash bonus and up to 100% (net of FICA and any applicable local taxes) of long-term incentive awards, which are not excluded from deferral eligibility by the Code (or regulations thereunder), until a date selected by the participant. The amounts deferred are deemed invested as designated by participants in our companys common stock (a phantom stock account) or in dollar-denominated accounts that mirror the gains or losses of the various investment options available under our companys 401(k) plan. The plan does not offer any guaranteed return to participants.
The plan is funded by a rabbi trust arrangement owned by our company, which holds assets that correspond to the deemed investments of the plan participants and pays benefits at the times elected by the participants. Participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from our company for payment when the amounts accrue. Upon the death or disability of a participant or upon a change of control of our company, all deferred amounts and all earnings related thereto will be paid to the participant or participants beneficiaries in a single lump sum cash payment.
Effective for deferrals made after January 1, 2007, the plan permits executives to defer payouts of PSUs and DSUs into the plan, which would, absent such deferral, be distributed to the executives and immediately taxable. The PSU and DSU deferrals generally will be credited to the plan participant accounts in the form of phantom stock and an equal number of
50
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
shares of our common stock will be deposited by our company into the rabbi trust. Deferrals of long-term incentive compensation payments are also invested in phantom stock of our company and may not be reallocated to an alternative investment option while in the plan.
The following table shows the contributions, earnings, distributions and year-end account values for the NEOs under the plan:
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN | ||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Executive Contributions |
Registrant Contributions |
Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal |
|||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
0 | 0 | 413,057 | 0 | 1,167,382 | |||||||||||||||
John McPherson |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
David Clement |
50,700 | 0 | 31,855 | 0 | 141,542 |
(1) | Includes both the executive contributions and the earnings on those contributions. Cash-based salary and cash annual bonus amounts contributed by the executives are included in the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the year of deferral. PSU and DSU deferrals are included as compensation in the year of the grant. Above-market earnings are not reported as our company does not provide for such earnings on deferred compensation. |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
Certain information concerning each exercise of stock options and each vesting of stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, for each of the NEOs on an aggregate basis is set forth in the table below:
Name | OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise(1) ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting(2) (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting(3) ($) |
|||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
24,875 | 1,302,662 | 15,515 | 1,396,195 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson |
0 | 0 | 20,078 | 1,806,819 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
8,910 | 99,436 | 15,515 | 1,396,195 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
10,995 | 187,165 | 15,515 | 1,396,195 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
3,790 | 142,070 | 2,708 | 243,693 |
(1) | Calculated by multiplying the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise and the option exercise price by the number of options exercised. |
(2) | Represents the payment of Performance Share Units (PSUs). PSUs were paid 100% in stock. |
(3) | Calculated by multiplying the number of units vested by the closing price of our common stock for PSUs on the vesting date (2/11/2016). |
RETIREMENT AND PENSION BENEFITS
Generally, most full-time salaried employees of our company that were hired prior to July 15, 2007, including all of the NEOs except Mr. McPherson, participate in our companys pension plans. Our NEOs are also eligible for supplemental retirement programs, as described on the following page. Retirement benefits become payable as early as the date on which participants both attain age 55 and complete one year of service.
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 51
| ||||||||
The following table provides for each NEO the number of years of credited service and the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2016, under each plan in which the NEO participates. The narrative that follows this table provides a description of the material features of each plan.
PENSION BENEFITS | ||||||||||||||
Name | Plan Name |
Number of Years (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated ($) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||||||
Tom Hill |
Retirement Income Plan | 23 3/12 | 1,151,255 | 0 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan | 23 3/12 | 4,001,965 | 0 | |||||||||||
John McPherson |
Retirement Income Plan | n/a | n/a | 0 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan | n/a | n/a | 0 | |||||||||||
Stan Bass |
Retirement Income Plan | 17 7/12 | 819,849 | 0 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan | 17 7/12 | 1,748,808 | 0 | |||||||||||
Michael Mills |
Retirement Income Plan | 22 9/12 | 1,073,727 | 0 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan | 22 9/12 | 1,841,478 | 0 | |||||||||||
David Clement |
Retirement Income Plan | 21 9/12 | 1,018,345 | 0 | ||||||||||
Supplemental Benefit Plan | 21 9/12 | 1,023,749 | 0 |
(1) | The present value of accumulated benefits are based on benefits payable at age 62, the earliest age under the plans at which benefits are not reduced, or current age if the participant is older than age 62. The following FASB ASC Topic 715 CompensationRetirement Benefits assumptions as of December 31, 2016, were used to determine the present values: |
(i) | discount rate of 3.66%; |
(ii) | mortality based on the RP-2014 Healthy Employee & Annuitant Mortality White Collar Table, and generational improvements projected using Scale MP-2016; |
(iii) | present values for lump sums are based on projected segmented interest rates and the prescribed 2016 IRS Mortality Table; |
(iv) | Supplemental Benefit Plan benefits assumed to be paid as a 10 Year Term Certain Annuity; and |
(v) | for the Retirement Income Plan, 40% of the benefit accrued before December 31, 2000, is assumed to be paid as a lump sum, with the remainder of the accrued benefit assumed to be paid as a single life annuity. |
52
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 53
| ||||||||
The table below reflects an estimate of the severance payments that would be made to our NEOs if they were terminated as of December 31, 2016, in connection with a COC:
Name | Severance Multiple |
2016 Base Salary ($) |
Greater of 3-Year Avg or Target Bonus ($)
|
Total Cash Severance Payments ($) |
Pro-rata Bonus ($) |
Cash Severance Amount(1) ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
3 | 950,000 | 1,301,000 | 6,753,000 | 1,301,000 | 8,054,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
John McPherson |
3 | 780,000 | 1,072,000 | 5,556,000 | 1,072,000 | 6,628,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
3 | 550,000 | 600,000 | 3,450,000 | 600,000 | 4,050,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
3 | 550,000 | 508,667 | 3,176,001 | 508,667 | 3,684,668 | ||||||||||||||||||
David Clement |
2.5 | 332,000 | 402,667 | 1,836,668 | 402,667 | 2,239,335 |
(1) | These amounts represent cash severance payments to be paid to the NEOs under the COC Agreements (and, in the case of Mr. Clement, under the COC Plan) in the event of a COC and do not include the value of other COC benefits. |
Termination Pay and Benefits Programs
The following chart describes the treatment of different pay and benefit elements in connection with these employment termination events for NEOs:
Program | Retirement/ Retirement Eligible |
Involuntary Termination Not For Cause |
Resignation | Death Or Disability | Involuntary Termination For Cause | |||||
Pension: Retirement Plan Supplemental Plan |
Participant may commence benefit payment | Participant is considered Terminated Vested(1) | Participant is considered Terminated Vested(1) | In death, spouse may commence survivor benefit on or after the date that the Participant would have attained age 55 | Participant may commence benefit payment or will be Terminated Vested(1) depending on age | |||||
Executive Deferred Compensation |
Payment made in accordance with deferral election | Payout made the year following the year of termination in a lump sum | Payout made the year following the year of termination in a lump sum | Payment commences the year after death or disability in the form elected | Payout made the year following the year of termination in a lump sum | |||||
EIP |
Eligible to receive prorated payment | No payment | No payment | Eligible to receive prorated payment | No payment | |||||
Stock Options/ SOSARs |
Full term to exercise vested options; if 62 or older, non-vested options continue to vest; noncompetition agreement may be required for exercising vested options | Non-vested options forfeited; 30 days to exercise vested options | Non-vested options forfeited; 30 days to exercise vested options |
Vesting accelerated. Under death, estate has one year to exercise. Under disability, have full remaining term to exercise. | Forfeit all, vested and non-vested | |||||
PSUs |
If age 62 or older, vesting is accelerated, otherwise pro-rata vesting | Non-vested units are forfeited | Non-vested units are forfeited | Vesting is accelerated | Forfeit all, vested and non-vested |
(1) | Terminated Vested means the participant is no longer employed with our company but continues to have a vested interest in the applicable plan. |
54
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Program | Retirement/ Retirement Eligible |
Involuntary Termination Not For Cause |
Resignation | Death or Disability | Involuntary Termination For Cause | |||||
RSUs |
Non-vested units are forfeited | Non-vested units are forfeited | Non-vested units are forfeited |
Vesting is accelerated | Non-vested units are forfeited | |||||
401(k) Plan |
May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | Beneficiary may take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | |||||
Supplemental Plan (Defined Contribution) |
May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | Account distributed by March 1 of the following year | May take payment or defer until age 70 1⁄2 | |||||
Severance Benefits | None | None | None | None | None | |||||
Health Benefits |
May continue to age 65 if eligibility rules are met | Coverage ceases; eligible for coverage extension under COBRA | Coverage ceases; eligible for coverage extension under COBRA | 3 months spousal extension, then COBRA; if eligibility rules are met may continue up to age 65 | 3 months spousal extension, then COBRA; if eligibility rules are met may continue up to age 65 |
COC-Related Events
| A COC occurs under certain of our companys award agreements executed in connection with the grant of equity awards under the 2006 Plan upon: |
(i) | acquisition by any person or group of more than 50% of the total fair market value or voting power of our common stock. A transfer or issuance of our stock is counted only if the stock remains outstanding after the transaction. An increase in stock ownership as a result of the companys acquisition of its own stock in exchange for property is counted for purposes of the change in ownership standard; or |
(ii) | (a) acquisition by a person or group during a 12-month period of stock possessing 30% of the total voting power of our stock, or |
(b) replacement of a majority of our Board of Directors during any 12-month period by directors not endorsed by a majority of the members of our Board prior to the date of the appointment or election; or |
(iii) | acquisition by a person or group during a 12-month period of assets from our company having a total gross fair market value of 40% of the total gross fair market value of our assets immediately prior to such acquisition. An exception exists for a transfer of our assets to a shareholder controlled entity, including transfer to a person owning 50% or more of the total value or voting power of our shares. |
| For purposes of our COC Agreements, the COC Plan and the 2016 Plan, a COC is defined as: (i) the acquisition by a person or group of 30% or more of the then outstanding common stock or voting securities of our company; or (ii) a change in the majority of members of the Board of Directors; or (iii) consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our companys assets unless our companys shareholders before such business combination or sale own more than 50% of the outstanding common stock following the business combination or sale; or (iv) approval by the shareholders of the company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the company. |
| Involuntary COC Termination or Voluntary COC Termination for Good ReasonEmployment is terminated within two years of a COC, other than for cause, or the employee voluntarily terminates for Good Reason. |
Good Reason would generally be considered to have occurred if there were a reduction in certain types of compensation, a relocation under certain circumstances or a diminution in duties and responsibilities.
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 55
| ||||||||
COC Pay and Benefits Programs
The following table describes treatment of payments under pay and benefit programs upon a COC, and upon an employment termination (voluntary or involuntary) upon a COC:
Plan or Program | COC | COC with Termination (other than cause) | ||
Pension: Retirement Plan Supplemental Plan |
No payment to NEOs solely upon the COC | No payment to NEOs solely upon the COC | ||
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan | Accelerate all deferred amounts and pay lump sum within 10 business days | Accelerate all deferred amounts and pay lump sum within 10 business days | ||
EIP | The amount paid will be equal to the greater of (i) the average bonus during the three preceding years, (ii) the target bonus, or (iii) the bonus determined under the Plan for the year in which the COC occurs | The amount paid will be equal to the greater of (i) the average bonus during the three preceding years, (ii) the target bonus, or (iii) the bonus determined under the Plan for the year in which the COC occurs | ||
SOSARs(1) | Immediately deemed fully vested and exercisable; remaining term to exercise | Immediately deemed fully vested and exercisable; remaining term to exercise | ||
PSUs(1) | Vesting is accelerated; pay within 2 1/2 months after end of the year in which the COC occurs | Vesting is accelerated; pay within 2 1/2 months after end of the year in which the COC occurs | ||
RSUs(1) | All immediately deemed non-forfeitable; pay within 90 days following the COC | All immediately deemed non-forfeitable; pay within 90 days following the COC | ||
401(k) Plan | No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC | Service ceases except to the extent that additional service is provided under the terms of the COC Agreements; participant is entitled to distribution | ||
Supplemental Plan (Defined Contribution) |
No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC | Participant is entitled to distribution | ||
Severance Benefits | No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC | For NEOs with COC Agreements, payment is 3 times the NEOs annual base salary and short-term bonus. For NEOs under the COC Plan, payment is 2.5 times the NEOs annual base salary and short-term bonus. | ||
Health Benefits | No payment to the NEOs solely upon the COC | 3 year coverage extension provided under the terms of the COC Agreements and 2.5 year coverage extension provided under the terms of the COC Plan |
(1) | The accelerated vesting and payment benefits shown in this table relate to awards of SOSARs, PSUs and RSUs granted under the 2006 Plan. Effective May 13, 2016, all long-term incentive awards are granted under the new 2016 Plan, which contains a double-trigger change of control requirement for all awards issued under the 2016 Plan. Specifically, the 2016 Plan provides that awards will not vest upon a change of control of Vulcan unless: (i) awards are not assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, or (ii) if such awards are assumed, substituted or continued by the surviving company, only upon a participants qualifying termination of employment. |
Potential Payments
This section describes and estimates payments that would have become payable to the NEOs upon a termination or COC as of December 31, 2016.
Pension Benefits
The monthly amounts that would have become payable to our NEOs if the termination event occurred as of December 31, 2016, under the Retirement Plan and the Supplemental Plan are itemized in the chart set forth on the following page. The amounts shown in the chart are monthly benefit amounts (other than with respect to the accrued benefits payable upon a COC, which would be paid in a lump sum) whereas the pension values shown in the Summary Compensation and Pension Benefits Tables are present values of all the monthly values anticipated to be paid over the lifetimes of our NEOs and their spouses in the event of their death while actively employed. These plans are described in the notes following the Pension Benefits Table. Messrs. Hill, Bass, Mills and Clement were retirement eligible on December 31, 2016. The benefits were determined using the same assumptions used to compute benefit values in the Pension Benefit Table with three exceptions. First, the benefit payments were assumed to commence as soon as possible following December 31, 2016, instead of at normal retirement. Second, approximate early retirement reductions were applied. Finally, the benefits were not adjusted to reflect optional forms of payment. All benefits are the amounts that would be paid monthly over the NEOs life, except for the value of COC-enhanced benefits which would be paid in a lump sum.
56
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Pension Benefits Table
Name | Retirement (Monthly Payments) ($) |
Resignation or Involuntary Retirement (monthly payments) ($) |
Death (monthly payments to a spouse) ($) |
COC (Value of Enhanced Benefits)(1) ($) |
||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
Retirement Plan | 7,118 | Terminated Vested(2) | n/a | 0 | |||||||||||
Supplemental Plan | 33,639 | Terminated Vested(2) | n/a | 0 | ||||||||||||
Defined Contribution | 0 | None | 0 | 607,770 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson |
Retirement Plan | n/a | n/a(3) | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||
Supplemental Plan | n/a | n/a(3) | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||
Defined Contribution | 0 | None | 0 | 500,040 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
Retirement Plan | 5,403 | Terminated Vested(2) | 4,803 | 0 | |||||||||||
Supplemental Plan | 15,795 | Terminated Vested(2) | 14,042 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Defined Contribution | 0 | None | 0 | 310,502 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
Retirement Plan | 6,908 | Terminated Vested(2) | 6,107 | 0 | |||||||||||
Supplemental Plan | 16,093 | Terminated Vested(2) | 14,226 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Defined Contribution | 0 | None | 0 | 285,842 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
Retirement Plan | 6,597 | Terminated Vested(2) | 5,832 | 0 | |||||||||||
Supplemental Plan | 9,109 | Terminated Vested(2) | 8,052 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Defined Contribution | 0 | None | 0 | 165,300 |
(1) | Value of defined contribution enhancement is payable in a lump sum in the event of a COC. The defined contribution amounts represent either 2.5 or 3 years, depending on the NEO, of company matching contributions for each executive. |
(2) | Eligible for reduced payments as early as age 55 and unreduced payments at age 62. |
(3) | Participation in the Retirement Plan was frozen in 2007. Therefore, Mr. McPherson is not eligible to participate in that Plan. |
Performance Share Units (PSUs)
The chart below shows the number of PSUs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events. Unvested PSUs were adjusted to the maximum allowed under the agreements because the performance was unknown at December 31, 2016.
RETIREMENT | COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Performance Share Units with Accelerated Vesting |
Total Number of Performance Share Units Following Accelerated Vesting |
Number of Performance Share Units with |
Total Number of Units Following Accelerated Vesting |
||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
65,750 | 76,257 | 151,200 | 161,707 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson |
0 | 12,158 | 124,200 | 136,358 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
21,350 | 31,857 | 45,000 | 55,507 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
22,550 | 33,057 | 47,200 | 57,707 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
10,100 | 11,736 | 19,400 | 21,036 |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 57
| ||||||||
Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights (SOSARs)
The chart below shows the number of SOSARs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events:
RETIREMENT | COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of SOSARs with Accelerated Vesting |
Total Number of SOSARs Following Accelerated Vesting |
Number of SOSARs with Accelerated Vesting |
Total Number of SOSARs Following Accelerated Vesting |
||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
20,600 | 63,065 | 63,200 | 105,665 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson |
0 | 389,575 | 51,525 | 441,100 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
7,375 | 56,905 | 19,200 | 68,730 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
7,650 | 52,770 | 19,975 | 65,095 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
2,695 | 15,340 | 7,345 | 19,990 |
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
The chart below shows the number of RSUs for which vesting would be accelerated under certain events.
RETIREMENT | COC (WITH OR WITHOUT TERMINATION) | |||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Restricted Stock Units with Accelerated Vesting |
Total Number of Restricted Stock Units Following Accelerated Vesting |
Number of Restricted Stock Units with Accelerated Vesting |
Total Number of Restricted Stock Units Following Accelerated Vesting |
||||||||||||
Tom Hill |
0 | 0 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
John McPherson |
0 | 0 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Stan Bass |
0 | 0 | 14,000 | 14,000 | ||||||||||||
Michael Mills |
0 | 0 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
David Clement |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
The aggregate balances reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table would be payable to the NEOs as described in the termination events and COC-Related Events chart above. There is no enhancement or acceleration of payments under these plans associated with termination or COC events, other than the lump sum payment opportunity described in the above charts. The lump sums that would be payable are those that are reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan Table.
Health Benefits
Because Messrs. Hill, Bass, Mills and Clement met the age and service eligibility requirement for health care benefits provided to early retirees, there is no incremental payment associated with the termination or COC events. Mr. McPherson did not meet the eligibility requirement; therefore, his incremental cost for health benefits would be approximately $72,547.
58
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | DIRECTOR COMPENSATION | 59
| ||||||||
DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by our company to non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
Stock ($) |
Option ($) |
Non-Equity sation ($) |
Change
in Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other Compen- sation(5) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Elaine L. Chao(1) |
110,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,163 | 263,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas A. Fanning |
110,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,163 | 263,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
120,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,828 | 274,810 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
120,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,163 | 273,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Douglas J. McGregor(2) |
110,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16,939 | 277,921 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Richard T. OBrien |
130,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,999 | 292,981 | |||||||||||||||||||||
James T. Prokopanko |
150,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,330 | 311,312 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Donald B. Rice(3) |
55,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15,321 | 70,321 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
110,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5,162 | 266,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vincent J. Trosino(2) |
110,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15,095 | 276,077 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
120,000 | 150,982 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,330 | 281,312 |
(1) | Ms. Chao resigned from the Board effective as of January 31, 2017, upon her confirmation as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation. |
(2) | The terms of Mr. McGregor and Mr. Trosino will expire at the Annual Meeting. |
(3) | Dr. Rices term expired at the 2016 Annual Meeting. |
(4) | This column represents the accounting expense for the awards granted in 2016; therefore, the values shown are not representative of the amounts that may eventually be realized by a director. Pursuant to SEC rules, we have provided a grant date fair value for stock awards in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718. For DSUs, the fair value is estimated on the date of grant based on the closing market price of our stock ($116.14) on the grant date (May 16, 2016). At December 31, 2016, the aggregate number of DSUs accumulated on account for all years of service, including dividend equivalent units, were: |
AGGREGATE ACCUMULATED DSUs
Name | Units | |||
Elaine L. Chao |
3,041 | |||
Thomas A. Fanning |
3,041 | |||
O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. |
5,131 | |||
Cynthia L. Hostetler |
3,041 | |||
Douglas J. McGregor |
21,591 | |||
Richard T. OBrien |
15,388 | |||
James T. Prokopanko |
13,294 | |||
Donald B. Rice |
17,969 | |||
Lee J. Styslinger, III |
6,806 | |||
Vincent J. Trosino |
19,275 | |||
Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
13,294 |
(5) | None of our directors received perquisites or other personal benefits in excess of $10,000. The amounts set forth in this column represent the accounting expense for the dividend equivalents earned in 2016 by our directors for deferred stock and DSUs which earn dividend equivalents. |
60
|
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
Why am I receiving these materials?
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. This proxy statement is being made available to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 15, 2017, for use at the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card and our 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders are being first mailed or made available to our shareholders on or about March 27, 2017. The meeting will be held at the Grand Bohemian Hotel, 2655 Lane Park Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35223 on Friday, May 12, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time.
Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the mail instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials?
We are using the SECs rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All shareholders receiving such notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and may request to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet or obtain a paper copy?
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card or voting instruction card will contain instructions on how to:
view our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting on the Internet; and
obtain a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
Your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will also provide instructions on how to receive your future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically. If you choose to receive future proxy materials electronically, we will provide instructions, containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials electronically will remain in effect until you revoke it.
What should I do if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or more than one paper copy of the proxy materials?
You may receive more than one notice of this proxy statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate notice or a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a shareholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one notice or more than one proxy card. To vote all of your shares by proxy, you must either (i) complete, date, sign and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you |
receive or (ii) vote over the Internet or telephone the shares represented by each notice that you receive (unless you have requested and received a proxy card or voting instruction card for the shares represented by one or more of the notices).
What proposals are to be presented at the Annual Meeting?
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to (i) elect four nominees as directors, (ii) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, (iii) vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, (iv) ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017, and (v) conduct such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Who can attend the Annual Meeting?
Only shareholders as of the close of business on March 15, 2017 (the record date for the Annual Meeting), their authorized representatives and invited guests of our company will be permitted to attend the Annual Meeting. Proof of ownership of Vulcan common stock as of the record date, along with personal identification (such as a drivers license or passport), must be presented in order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, trustee or nominee and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you must bring a brokerage statement, and a legal proxy from your bank, broker, trustee or nominee entitling you to vote the shares held as of the record date at the Annual Meeting, along with personal identification, to be admitted to the Annual Meeting.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting. |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 12, 2017 THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, PROXY STATEMENT, FORM OF PROXY AND 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION | 61
| ||||||||
62
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION | 63
| ||||||||
OUR ANNUAL REPORT A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 WILL BE PROVIDED TO YOU WITHOUT CHARGE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MARK D. WARREN, DIRECTOR, INVESTOR RELATIONS, VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, 1200 URBAN CENTER DRIVE, BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35242.
64
|
ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | GENERAL INFORMATION | 65
| ||||||||
66
|
GENERAL INFORMATION | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) does not define Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) and it should not be considered as an alternative to earnings measures defined by GAAP. We present this metric for the convenience of investment professionals who use such metrics in their analyses and for shareholders who need to understand the metrics we use to assess performance. We use this metric to assess the operating performance of our business and for a basis of strategic planning and forecasting. We do not use this metric as a measure to allocate resources. We adjust EBITDA for certain items to provide a more consistent comparison of earnings from period to period. Reconciliations of this metric to its nearest GAAP measure are presented below:
EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA
EBITDA is an acronym for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization and excludes discontinued operations.
IN MILLIONS | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net earnings |
$419.5 | $221.2 | $204.9 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
124.9 | 94.9 | 91.7 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest income |
133.3 | 220.3 | 242.4 | |||||||||
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax |
2.9 | 11.7 | 2.2 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization |
284.9 | 274.8 | 279.5 | |||||||||
EBITDA |
$965.5 | $822.9 | $820.7 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate and businesses |
(16.2) | (6.3) | (238.5) | |||||||||
Business interruption claims recovery, net of incentives |
(11.0) | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
Charges associated with divested operations |
16.9 | 7.1 | 11.9 | |||||||||
Fair market value adjustments for acquired inventory |
0.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | |||||||||
Asset impairment |
10.5 | 5.2 | 3.1 | |||||||||
Restructuring charges |
0.3 | 5.0 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$966.0 | $834.9 | $600.1 |
Adjusted EBITDA for 2015 and 2014 has been revised to conform with the 2016 presentation which no longer includes an adjustment for amortization of deferred revenue and charges associated with business development. Adjusting for amortization of deferred revenue is no longer meaningful as all periods presented include amortization of deferred revenue at amounts that are substantially equivalent.
Unlike many of our competitors, we do not exclude share-based compensation from our Adjusted EBITDA earnings metric, as we view it as a recurring operating expense. Refer to our statements of cash flows for the expense incurred related to our share-based compensation plans.
EBITDA EP CALCULATION
EBITDA EP is Adjusted EBITDA less capital charge (average operating capital employed x pretax cost of capital).
IN MILLIONS | 2016 | |||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$966.0 | |||
Performance adjustments |
(1.7) | |||
EP Adjusted EBITDA |
$964.3 | |||
Average operating capital employed |
3,694.4 | |||
Pretax cost of capital |
13.2% | |||
Capital charge |
(488.2) | |||
EBITDA EP |
$476.1 |
Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES | 67
| ||||||||
GAAP does not define cash gross profit and it should not be considered as an alternative to earnings measures defined by GAAP. We present this metric for the convenience of investment professionals who use such metrics in their analyses and for shareholders who need to understand the metrics we use to assess performance. We and the investment community use this metric to assess the operating performance of our business. We do not use this metric as a measure to allocate resources. Reconciliation of this metric to its nearest GAAP measure is presented below.
CASH GROSS PROFIT
Cash gross profit adds back noncash charges for depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization to gross profit.
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER TON DATA | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Aggregates segment |
||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$873.1 | $755.7 | $544.1 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion, accretion and amortization |
$236.5 | $228.5 | $227.0 | |||||||||
Aggregates segment cash gross profit |
$1,109.6 | $984.2 | $771.1 | |||||||||
Unit shipmentstons |
181.4 | 178.3 | 162.4 | |||||||||
Aggregates segment cash gross profit per ton |
$6.12 | $5.52 | $4.75 |
We present Aggregates segment gross profit margin as a percentage of freight-adjusted revenues as it is consistent with the basis by which we review our operating results. We believe that this presentation is consistent with our competitors and meaningful to our investors as it excludes freight, delivery and transportation revenues, which are pass-through activities. It also excludes immaterial other revenues related to services, such as landfill tipping fees, that are derived from our aggregates business. Reconciliation of this metric to its nearest GAAP measure is presented below.
AGGREGATES SEGMENT GROSS PROFIT MARGIN AS A PERCENTAGE OF FREIGHT-ADJUSTED REVENUES
Freight-adjusted revenues excludes pass-through freight, delivery and transportation revenues as well as immaterial other revenues related to services, such as landfill tipping fees.
IN MILLIONS | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Aggregates segment gross profit |
$873.1 | $755.7 | $544.1 | |||||||||
Segment sales |
2,961.8 | 2,777.8 | 2,346.4 | |||||||||
Excluding |
||||||||||||
Freight, delivery and transportation revenues |
651.9 | 644.7 | 532.2 | |||||||||
Other revenues |
15.7 | 20.6 | 20.2 | |||||||||
Freight-adjusted revenues |
$2,294.2 | $2,112.5 | $1,794.0 | |||||||||
Gross profit as a percentage of freight-adjusted revenues |
38% | 36% | 30% |
68
|
ANNEX A: RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES | Vulcan 2017 Proxy Statement | ||||||||
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com | ||
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY |
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
| |
1200 URBAN CENTER DR BIRMINGHAM, AL 35242 |
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS | |
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. | ||
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 | ||
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. | ||
VOTE BY MAIL | ||
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E19948-P88273 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the director nominees listed in proposal 1. |
The Board of Directors recommends you vote for 1 YEAR on proposal 3. |
1 Year |
2 Years |
3 Years |
Abstain |
|||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Election of Directors
Nominees:
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
3. Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|||||||||||||||||
1a. O. B. Grayson Hall, Jr. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1b. James T. Prokopanko
|
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 4. | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||||||
1c. David P. Steiner
1d. Kathleen Wilson-Thompson |
☐
☐ |
☐
☐ |
☐
☐ |
4. Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ |
|||||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 2.
2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. |
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
V.1.1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
| ||||
E19949-P88273
| ||||
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY | ||||
Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 12, 2017 This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
| ||||
The undersigned hereby appoints Cynthia L. Hostetler, Richard T. OBrien and Lee J. Styslinger, III, each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of Vulcan Materials Company common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Friday, May 12, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Grand Bohemian Hotel, 2655 Lane Park Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35223, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the Annual Meeting.
Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the undersigned. If this proxy is signed and no such directions are indicated, the proxies have authority to vote FOR election of all director nominees, FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, for 1 YEAR on the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, and FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017. |
||||
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
|
V.1.1