Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
{x} |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
{ } |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-09718
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
25-1435979 |
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
One PNC Plaza,
249 Fifth Avenue,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(412) 762-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer
and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:
Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X
As of July 31, 2007, there were
339,797,732 shares of the registrants common stock ($5 par value) outstanding.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cross-Reference Index to Second Quarter 2007 Form 10-Q
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
THE PNC
FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions, except per share data |
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
Unaudited |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, taxable-equivalent basis (b) |
|
$746 |
|
|
$562 |
|
|
$1,375 |
|
|
$1,125 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
975 |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
2,415 |
|
Total revenue |
|
$1,721 |
|
|
$1,792 |
|
|
$3,341 |
|
|
$3,540 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
$1,040 |
|
|
$1,145 |
|
|
$1,984 |
|
|
$2,307 |
|
Net income |
|
$423 |
|
|
$381 |
|
|
$882 |
|
|
$735 |
|
Per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings |
|
$1.22 |
|
|
$1.28 |
|
|
$2.67 |
|
|
$2.47 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$.63 |
|
|
$.55 |
|
|
$1.18 |
|
|
$1.05 |
|
SELECTED RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
2.90 |
% |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
2.93 |
% |
Noninterest income to total revenue (c) |
|
57 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
68 |
|
Efficiency (d) |
|
61 |
|
|
64 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
65 |
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shareholders equity |
|
11.61 |
% |
|
17.49 |
% |
|
13.39 |
% |
|
17.08 |
% |
Average assets |
|
1.38 |
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
1.60 |
|
See page 35 for a glossary of certain terms used in this Report.
(a) |
The Executive Summary and Consolidated Income Statement ReviewNoninterest Income-Summary portions of the Financial Review section of this Report provide information regarding
items impacting the comparability of the periods presented. |
(b) |
The interest income earned on certain assets is completely or partially exempt from federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than
taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of yields and margins for all earning assets, we also provide revenue on a taxable-equivalent basis by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent
to interest income earned on taxable investments. This adjustment is not permitted under GAAP in the Consolidated Income Statement. |
The
following is a reconciliation of net interest income as reported in the Consolidated Income Statement to net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
Six months
ended June 30 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net interest income, GAAP basis |
|
$ |
738 |
|
$ |
556 |
|
$ |
1,361 |
|
$ |
1,112 |
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
Net interest income, taxable-equivalent basis |
|
$ |
746 |
|
$ |
562 |
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
$ |
1,125 |
(c) |
Calculated as noninterest income divided by the sum of net interest income (GAAP basis) and noninterest income. Noninterest income for the 2006 periods presented above included the
impact of BlackRock on a consolidated basis, primarily consisting of asset management fees. Noninterest income for the 2007 periods presented above reflected income from our equity investment in BlackRock included in the Asset management
line item. |
(d) |
Calculated as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income (GAAP basis) and noninterest income. |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
March 31 2007 |
|
|
June 30 2006 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (dollars in millions, except per share data) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
125,651 |
|
|
$ |
122,563 |
|
|
$ |
94,914 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
64,714 |
|
|
|
62,925 |
|
|
|
50,548 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
25,903 |
|
|
|
26,475 |
|
|
|
21,724 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
8,658 |
|
|
|
8,668 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
Equity investments (b) |
|
|
5,584 |
|
|
|
5,408 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
77,221 |
|
|
|
77,367 |
|
|
|
63,493 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
24,516 |
|
|
|
20,456 |
|
|
|
15,651 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
14,504 |
|
|
|
14,739 |
|
|
|
8,827 |
|
Common shareholders equity |
|
|
14,497 |
|
|
|
14,732 |
|
|
|
8,820 |
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
42.36 |
|
|
|
42.63 |
|
|
|
29.92 |
|
Common shares outstanding (millions) |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
Loans to deposits |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
ASSETS ADMINISTERED (billions) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed (c) |
|
|
$77 |
|
|
|
$76 |
|
|
|
$506 |
|
Nondiscretionary |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
FUND ASSETS SERVICED (billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting/administration net assets |
|
|
$868 |
|
|
|
$822 |
|
|
|
$743 |
|
Custody assets |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
CAPITAL RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based (d) |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Total risk-based (d) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Leverage (d) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Tangible common equity |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Common shareholders equity to assets |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
.34 |
% |
|
|
.28 |
% |
|
|
.41 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets |
|
|
.38 |
|
|
|
.32 |
|
|
|
.46 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
Net charge-offs to average loans (for the three months ended) |
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.27 |
|
|
|
.24 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans |
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
(a) |
Amounts for 2007 reflect the impact of our March 2, 2007 acquisition of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (Mercantile). |
(b) |
Amounts for 2007 include our equity investment in BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock). |
(c) |
Amounts for 2007 do not include BlackRocks assets under management as we deconsolidated BlackRock effective September 29, 2006. |
(d) |
The regulatory minimums are 4.0% for Tier 1, 8.0% for Total, and 3.0% for Leverage ratios. The well-capitalized levels are 6.0% for Tier 1, 10.0% for Total, and 5.0% for Leverage
ratios. |
2
FINANCIAL REVIEW
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
This Financial Review should be read together with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and unaudited
Statistical Information included elsewhere in this Report and with Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A of our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2006 Form 10-K). We have reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform with the current period
presentation. For information regarding certain business and regulatory risks, see the Risk Management section in this Financial Review and Items 1A and 7 of our 2006 Form 10-K. Also, see the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information and Critical Accounting Policies And Judgments sections in this Financial Review for certain other factors that could cause actual results or future events to differ, perhaps materially, from those anticipated in the forward-looking
statements included in this Report or from historical performance. See Note 14 Segment Reporting in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a reconciliation of total business segment earnings
to total PNC consolidated net income as reported on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
PNC is one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States based on assets,
with businesses engaged in retail banking, corporate and institutional banking, asset management, and global fund processing services. We provide many of our products and services nationally and others in our primary geographic markets located in
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Washington, DC, Maryland, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and Delaware. We also provide certain global fund processing services internationally.
KEY STRATEGIC GOALS
Our strategy to enhance shareholder value centers on driving
positive operating leverage by achieving growth in revenue from our diverse business mix that exceeds growth in expenses as a result of disciplined cost management. In each of our business segments, the primary drivers of revenue growth are the
acquisition, expansion and retention of customer relationships. We strive to expand our customer base by providing convenient banking options, leading technology systems and a broad range of fee-based products and services and by focusing on
customer service. We also intend to grow revenue through appropriate and targeted acquisitions and, in certain businesses, by expanding into new geographical markets.
In recent years, we have maintained a moderate risk profile characterized by strong credit quality and limited exposure to earnings volatility resulting from interest rate fluctuations and the shape of the interest
rate yield curve. Our actions have created a balance sheet reflecting a strong capital position and investment flexibility to adjust, where appropriate, to changing interest rates and market conditions. We continue to invest capital in our
businesses while returning a portion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.
RECENTLY COMPLETED
OR ANNOUNCED ACQUISITIONS
STERLING FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
On July 19, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with Sterling Financial Corporation
(Sterling) for PNC to acquire
Sterling for approximately 4.5 million shares of PNC common stock and $224 million in cash. Based upon PNCs closing common stock price on
July 17, 2007, the consideration represents $565 million in stock and cash or approximately $19.00 per Sterling share.
Sterling, based in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania with approximately $3.3 billion in assets and $2.6 billion in deposits, provides banking and other financial services, including leasing, trust, investment and brokerage, to individuals and businesses through 67 branches in
Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware. The transaction is expected to close during the first quarter of 2008 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and the approval of Sterlings shareholders.
ARCS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
On July 2,
2007, we acquired ARCS Commercial Mortgage Co., L.P. (ARCS), a Calabasas Hills, California-based lender with 10 origination offices in the United States. ARCS has been a leading originator and servicer of multifamily loans for Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac for the past decade. It originated more than $2.1 billion of loans in 2006 and services approximately $13 billion of commercial mortgage loans.
YARDVILLE NATIONAL BANCORP
On June 6, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire
Hamilton, New Jersey-based Yardville National Bancorp (Yardville) for approximately 3.3 million shares of PNC common stock and $156 million in cash, subject to adjustment. Based upon PNCs closing common stock price on
June 6, 2007, the consideration represents $403 million in stock and cash or approximately $35.00 per Yardville share. Yardville is a commercial and consumer bank with approximately $2.6 billion in assets, $2.0 billion in deposits and 33
branches in central New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania. This acquisition is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2007, subject to customary closing conditions including regulatory approvals and approval by Yardville shareholders.
3
MERCANTILE BANKSHARES CORPORATION
As previously reported, we acquired Mercantile effective March 2, 2007 for approximately 53 million shares of PNC common stock and $2.1 billion in cash. Total consideration paid was approximately $5.9
billion in stock and cash.
Mercantile has added banking and investment and wealth management services through 235 branches in Maryland, Virginia, the
District of Columbia, Delaware and Southeastern Pennsylvania. This transaction has significantly expanded our presence in the mid-Atlantic region, particularly within the attractive Baltimore and Washington, DC markets.
The integration of Mercantile is on track for the technology systems conversions scheduled for September 2007. We refer you to our Form 8-K filed March 8, 2007 for
additional information on this transaction.
KEY FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
Our financial performance is substantially affected by several external factors outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
General economic conditions, |
|
|
|
Loan demand and utilization of credit commitments, |
|
|
|
Customer demand for other products and services, |
|
|
|
Movement of customer deposits from lower to higher rate accounts or to investment alternatives, |
|
|
|
The level of, direction, timing and magnitude of movement in interest rates, and the shape of the interest rate yield curve, and |
|
|
|
The performance of the capital markets. |
In
addition, our success in the remainder of 2007 will depend, among other things, upon:
|
|
|
Further success in the acquisition, growth and retention of customers, |
|
|
|
The successful integration of Mercantile and progress toward closing and integrating the Yardville and Sterling acquisitions, |
|
|
|
A sustained focus on expense management and creating positive operating leverage, |
|
|
|
Maintaining strong overall asset quality, and |
|
|
|
Prudent risk and capital management. |
SUMMARY FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
In millions, except per share data |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
June 30 2006 |
|
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
June 30 2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$423 |
|
|
$381 |
|
|
$882 |
|
|
$735 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$1.22 |
|
|
$1.28 |
|
|
$2.67 |
|
|
$2.47 |
|
Return on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shareholders equity |
|
11.61 |
% |
|
17.49 |
% |
|
13.39 |
% |
|
17.08 |
% |
Average assets |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.64 |
% |
|
1.54 |
% |
|
1.60 |
% |
Net income increased $147 million, or 20%, for the first six months of 2007 compared with the prior year period.
Diluted
earnings per share increased 8% and reflected the shares issued for the Mercantile acquisition in the first quarter of 2007. In addition, we delivered
positive operating leverage in the first half of 2007.
Earnings for the first six months of 2007 included the impact of the following items:
|
|
|
A first quarter after-tax gain of $53 million, or $.17 per diluted share, recognized in connection with the transfer of BlackRock shares to satisfy a portion of our
2002 BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP) shares obligation, |
|
|
|
An after-tax loss of $20 million, or $.06 per diluted share, from the net mark-to-market adjustments on our remaining BlackRock LTIP shares obligation, and
|
|
|
|
After-tax integration costs related to the Mercantile acquisition and the 2006 BlackRock/Merrill Lynch investment management business (MLIM) transaction
totaling $19 million, or $.07 per diluted share. |
Earnings for the first six months of 2006 included the after-tax impact of integration
costs related to the BlackRock/MLIM transaction totaling $8 million, or $.03 per diluted share.
Results for the second quarter of 2007 included the
following:
|
|
|
Taxable-equivalent net interest income grew 33% compared with the second quarter of 2006 and our net interest margin improved to 3.03% for the second quarter
compared with 2.90% for the prior year second quarter, although noninterest income was impacted by lower equity management gains and trading revenue. |
|
|
|
Asset quality remained very strong. Nonperforming assets to total assets were .20% at June 30, 2007 compared with .24% at June 30, 2006 and .17% at
December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
We successfully completed the execution of our One PNC initiative, achieving our goal of $400 million total annual pretax earnings benefit. We now have an ongoing
continuous improvement program that focuses on delivering positive operating leverage. |
|
|
|
Average total loans grew 27% for the second quarter of 2007 compared with the second quarter of 2006 and average total deposits increased 25% in the same
comparison. |
|
|
|
PNC returned capital to shareholders through a 15% increase in the common stock dividend, to $.63 per common share, and by purchasing 4 million common shares
during the quarter at a cost of $294 million under our repurchase program. |
BLACKROCK/MLIM
TRANSACTION
As further described in our 2006 Form 10-K, on September 29, 2006 Merrill Lynch contributed its investment
management business to BlackRock in exchange for
4
65 million shares of newly issued BlackRock common and preferred stock.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our Consolidated Income Statement included our former 69% ownership interest in BlackRock. However, our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 reflected the September 29, 2006 deconsolidation of BlackRocks balance sheet amounts and recognized our approximate 34% ownership interest in BlackRock as an investment accounted for under the equity method. This
accounting has resulted in a reduction in certain revenue and noninterest expense categories on our Consolidated Income Statement as our share of BlackRocks net income is now reported in asset management noninterest income. In addition,
beginning with fourth quarter 2006, we recognize gain or loss each quarter-end on our then-remaining liability to provide shares of BlackRock common stock to help fund BlackRock LTIP programs as that liability is marked to market based on changes in
BlackRocks common stock price. Similar to the first half of 2007, we will also continue to recognize gains or losses on the future transfer of shares for payouts under such LTIP programs.
BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS
Total assets were $125.7 billion at June 30, 2007 compared with $101.8 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase compared with December 31, 2006 was primarily due to the addition of approximately $21 billion of assets
related to Mercantile.
Total average assets were $115.4 billion for the first six months of 2007 compared with $92.8 billion for the first six months of
2006. This increase was primarily attributable to a $14.9 billion increase in average interest-earning assets and a $7.7 billion increase in average noninterest-earning assets. An increase of $9.4 billion in loans and a $3.8 billion increase in
securities available for sale were the primary factors for the increase in average interest-earning assets.
The increase in average noninterest-earning
assets for the first half of 2007 reflected our equity investment in BlackRock, which averaged $3.8 billion for the first six months of 2007 and which had been consolidated for the first six months of 2006, and an increase in average goodwill of
$2.9 billion related to the Mercantile acquisition.
Average total loans were $58.8 billion for the first six months of 2007 and $49.5 billion in the first
six months of 2006. The increase in average total loans included the effect of the Mercantile acquisition for four months of 2007, and higher commercial loans. The increase in average total loans included growth in commercial real estate loans of
approximately $4.5 billion and growth in commercial loans of approximately $3.3 billion. Loans represented 64% of average interest-earning assets for the first half of both 2007 and 2006.
Average securities available for sale totaled $24.9 billion for the first six months of 2007 and $21.2 billion for the first six months of 2006. The four-month impact of Mercantile contributed to the increase in
average securities for the 2007 period. By primary classification, the increase in average securities reflected a $6.6 billion increase in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, which was partially offset by a $3.0 billion decline in US
Treasury and government agencies securities. Securities available for sale comprised 27% of average interest-earning assets for the first half of 2007 and 28% for the first half of 2006.
Average total deposits were $74.0 billion for the first six months of 2007, an increase of $12.2 billion over the first six months of 2006. Average deposits grew from the prior year period primarily as a result of an
increase in money market, noninterest-bearing demand deposits and retail certificates of deposit. These increases reflect the four-month impact of the Mercantile acquisition.
Average total deposits represented 64% of average total assets for the first six months of 2007 and 67% for the first six months of 2006. Average transaction deposits were $49.2 billion for the first half of 2007
compared with $41.0 billion for the first half of 2006.
Average borrowed funds were $19.1 billion for the first six months of 2007 and $15.4 billion for
the first six months of 2006. Increases of $2.7 billion in federal funds purchased and $1.5 billion in bank notes and senior debt drove the increase in average borrowed funds compared with the first half of 2006.
Shareholders equity totaled $14.5 billion at June 30, 2007, compared with $10.8 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase resulted primarily from the
Mercantile acquisition completed in March 2007. See the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of this Financial Review for additional information.
BUSINESS SEGMENT HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
June 30 2006 |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
June 30 2006 |
Total segment earnings |
|
$ |
439 |
|
$ |
372 |
|
$ |
855 |
|
$ |
740 |
Total business segment earnings increased $115 million, or 16%, for the first half of 2007 compared with the first
half of 2006. We refer you to page 17 of this Report for a Results of Businesses Summary table, with further analysis of business segment results for the first six months of 2007 and 2006 provided on pages 18 through 24.
Second quarter 2007 business segment earnings of $439 million increased $67 million, or 18%, compared with the second quarter of 2006. Highlights of results for the
first six months and second quarter periods are included below.
5
We provide a reconciliation of total business segment earnings to total PNC consolidated net income as reported on a GAAP basis in Note 14 Segment Reporting in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report. The presentation
of BlackRock segment and total business segment earnings in this Financial Review differs from Note 14 in that these earnings exclude BlackRock/MLIM integration costs and prior year results reflect BlackRock as if it had been accounted for under the
equity method.
Retail Banking
Retail Bankings
earnings were $428 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $375 million for the same period in 2006. The 14% increase over the prior year was driven by the Mercantile acquisition, strong market-related fees, and continued customer and
balance sheet growth, partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses.
Retail Banking earned $227 million for the second quarter of
2007, an increase of $42 million, or 23%, compared with the second quarter of 2006. The increase over the second quarter of 2006 was primarily due to the same factors impacting the first half comparison.
Corporate & Institutional Banking
Corporate &
Institutional Banking earned $254 million in the first six months of 2007 compared with $217 million in the first six months of 2006. The increase compared with the first half of 2006 was largely the result of higher taxable-equivalent net interest
income and a lower provision for credit losses, partly offset by an increase in noninterest expense.
For the second quarter of 2007, earnings from
Corporate & Institutional Banking totaled $122 million compared with $115 million for the second quarter of 2006. The higher earnings in the 2007 quarter were primarily due to taxable-equivalent net interest income growth partially offset
by lower noninterest income.
BlackRock
Our BlackRock
business segment earned $110 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $95 million in the first six months of 2006. Second quarter earnings totaled $58 million in 2007 and $46 million in 2006. The higher earnings in both comparisons
reflected our approximate 34% ownership interest in a larger BlackRock entity during 2007 compared with the corresponding 2006 periods. The presentation of the 2006 period results has been modified to conform with our current business segment
reporting presentation in this Financial Review.
PFPC
PFPC earned $63 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $53 million in the year-earlier period. The 19% earnings increase from the first half of 2006 reflected new business, organic growth and market appreciation, partly
offset by client deconversions.
Earnings from PFPC totaled $32 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared with $26 million in the prior year second quarter. Higher earnings in 2007 reflected the
successful conversion of two new client services during the second quarter of 2007, growth from existing clients, market appreciation and an improved operating margin. A $20 million, or 10%, increase in servicing revenue compared with the
second quarter of 2006 was fueled by strong fee income growth in transfer agency, managed accounts, alternative investments, and offshore operations.
Other
Other earnings for the first six months of 2007 totaled $27 million, while Other for the first six
months of 2006 was a net loss of $5 million. The increase in Other in the comparison was primarily due to the impact of the $33 million after-tax net gain recognized during the first quarter of 2007 related to our BlackRock LTIP shares
obligation.
For the second quarter of 2007, Other resulted in a net loss of $16 million compared with earnings of $9 million in the second
quarter of 2006. Gains from equity management declined $34 million after-tax in the quarterly comparison.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME
STATEMENT REVIEW
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST
MARGIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
June 30 2006 |
|
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
June 30 2006 |
|
Taxable-equivalent net interest income |
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
We provide a reconciliation of net interest income as reported under GAAP to net interest income presented on a
taxable-equivalent basis in the Consolidated Financial Highlights section on page 1 of this Report.
Changes in net interest income and margin result from
the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields, interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid, and noninterest-bearing sources of funding. See Statistical Information-Average Consolidated Balance
Sheet And Net Interest Analysis included on pages 69 and 70 of this Report for additional information.
The 22% increase in taxable-equivalent net interest
income for the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006 was consistent with the $14.9 billion, or 19%, increase in average interest-earning assets over these periods. Similarly, the 33% increase in taxable-equivalent net
interest income for the second quarter of 2007 compared with the prior year quarter reflected the $20.9 billion, or 27%, increase in average interest-earning assets over these quarters. The reasons driving the higher interest-earning assets in these
comparisons are further discussed in the Balance Sheet Highlights portion of the Executive Summary section of this Report.
6
The net interest margin was 3.00% for the first six months of 2007 and 2.93% for the first six months of 2006. The following factors impacted the comparison:
|
|
|
The Mercantile acquisition. |
|
|
|
The yield on interest-earning assets increased 54 basis points. The yield on loans, the single largest component, increased 48 basis points.
|
|
|
|
The impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding increased 7 basis points for the first half of 2007 due to higher rates. |
|
|
|
These factors were partially offset by an increase in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 54 basis points. The rate paid on interest-bearing deposits,
the single largest component, increased 56 basis points. |
The net interest margin was 3.03% for the second quarter of 2007 and 2.90% for
the second quarter of 2006. The following factors impacted the comparison:
|
|
|
The Mercantile acquisition. |
|
|
|
An adjustment to our cross-border leases that lowered interest income on loans. |
|
|
|
The yield on interest-earning assets increased 51 basis points. The yield on loans, the single largest component, increased 43 basis points.
|
|
|
|
The impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding increased 4 basis points for the second quarter of 2007 due to higher rates. |
|
|
|
These factors were partially offset by an increase in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 42 basis points. The rate paid on interest-bearing deposits,
the single largest component, increased 41 basis points. |
For comparing to the broader market, during the first six months of 2007, the
average federal funds rate was 5.25% compared with 4.68% for the first six months of 2006. The average federal funds rate was 5.25% during the second quarter of 2007 compared with 4.91% for the second quarter of 2006.
We believe that net interest margins for our industry will continue to be challenged given the current yield curve, as competition for loans and deposits remains
intense, as customers continue to migrate from lower rate to higher rate deposits or other products, and as the benefit of adding or repricing investment securities is diminished. However, we expect that our taxable-equivalent net interest income
for full year 2007 will grow in the mid-20% range and the net interest margin will improve compared with full year 2006. These expected increases are primarily due to the Mercantile acquisition as well as projected earning asset growth and funding
composition and pricing.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The provision for credit losses totaled $62 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $66 million for the first six months of 2006. The provision for credit
losses for the second
quarter of 2007 increased $10 million, to $54 million, compared with the second quarter of 2006. The higher provision in the quarterly comparison was
primarily due to growth in total credit exposure and was more representative of expected near-term provision levels for PNC.
We do not expect to sustain
asset quality at its current level. However, based on the assets we currently hold and current business trends and activities, we believe that overall asset quality will remain strong by historical standards for the near term. To the extent actual
outcomes differ from our estimates, changes to the provision for credit losses may be required that may benefit or reduce future earnings. See the Credit Risk Management portion of the Risk Management section of this Financial Review for additional
information regarding factors that impact the provision for credit losses.
NONINTEREST INCOME
Summary
Noninterest income totaled $1.966 billion for the
first six months of 2007 compared with $2.415 billion for the first six months of 2006. Noninterest income was $975 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared with $1.230 billion for the second quarter of 2006.
Total noninterest income for the first half of 2007 and 2006 included the following items:
|
|
|
The first six months of 2007 included a net gain related to our equity investment in BlackRock of $51 million, representing an $82 million gain recognized
during the first quarter in connection with our transfer of BlackRock shares to satisfy a portion of our 2002 LTIP shares obligation, partially offset by a net mark-to-market adjustment totaling $31 million on our remaining BlackRock LTIP
shares obligation. |
|
|
|
The first half of 2006 included the impact of BlackRock on a consolidated basis in the amount of $767 million. Had our BlackRock investment been on the equity
method for the first six months of 2006, BlackRocks noninterest income reported by us would have been $101 million for that period, or lower by $666 million. |
Apart from the impact of these items, noninterest income increased $166 million, or 10%, for the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006 largely as a result of organic growth and the
acquisition of Mercantile.
A comparison of second quarter 2007 and 2006 noninterest income is impacted by the following:
|
|
|
The second quarter of 2006 included the impact of BlackRock on a consolidated basis in the amount of $361 million. Had our BlackRock investment been on the equity
method for the second quarter of 2006, BlackRocks noninterest income reported by us would have been $49 million for that quarter, or lower by $312 million. |
7
Apart from the impact of this item, PNCs total noninterest income would have increased $57 million, or 6%, during the second quarter of 2007 compared with the prior year second quarter despite significantly lower equity management and
trading revenue in the 2007 period.
Additional Analysis
Asset management fees totaled $355 million for the first six months of 2007 and $890 million for the first six months of 2006. Asset management fees totaled $190 million in the second quarter of 2007, a decrease of $239 million compared
with the second quarter of 2006. Our equity income from BlackRock was included in asset management fees for the first half and second quarter of 2007, while asset management fees in the corresponding prior year periods reflected the impact of
BlackRocks revenue on a consolidated basis.
Assets managed at June 30, 2007 totaled $77 billion compared with $506 billion at June 30,
2006. BlackRocks assets under management, which were no longer included in assets managed by us at June 30, 2007 due to our deconsolidation of BlackRock effective September 29, 2006, were included in the June 30, 2006 totals. We
refer you to the Retail Banking section of the Business Segments Review section of this Financial Review for further discussion of our assets under management.
Fund servicing fees declined $19 million, to $412 million, in the first half of 2007 compared with the prior year first half. Amounts for 2006 included $44 million of distribution fee revenue at PFPC. Effective January 1, 2007, we
refined our accounting and reporting of PFPCs distribution fee revenue and related expense amounts and present these amounts netted on a prospective basis. Prior to 2007, the distribution amounts were shown on a gross basis within fund
servicing fees and within other noninterest expense. These amounts offset each other entirely and have no impact on earnings.
Fund servicing fees total
$209 million for the second quarter of 2007, a $1 million decrease from the prior year period. Included in these amounts for the second quarter of 2006 was distribution fee revenue of $22 million at PFPC.
PFPC provided fund accounting/administration services for $868 billion of net fund investment assets and provided custody services for $467 billion of fund investment
assets at June 30, 2007, compared with $743 billion and $389 billion, respectively, at June 30, 2006. These increases were the result of new business obtained, organic growth from current customers and market appreciation.
Service charges on deposits of $169 million for the first half of 2007 represented a $16 million increase compared with the prior year first half. Service charges on
deposits grew $12 million, to $92 million, in the second quarter of 2007 compared with the second quarter of 2006. The increases in both comparisons can be attributed primarily to the 2007 impact of Mercantile and to customer growth.
Brokerage fees increased $16 million, to $138 million, for the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006. For the second quarter of 2007,
brokerage fees totaled $72 million compared with $63 million in the second quarter of 2006. In both comparisons, the increases were primarily due to higher mutual fund-related revenues, including a favorable impact from products related to the
fee-based fund advisory business and higher annuity income.
Consumer services fees grew $15 million, to $198 million, for the first half of 2007 compared
with the first half of 2006. Of that increase, $13 million occurred in the second quarter of 2007, as consumer service fees totaled $107 million in that period. This increase reflected the impact of Mercantile, higher debit card revenues resulting
from higher transaction volumes, and revenue from the credit card business that began in the latter part of 2006. These factors were partially offset by lower ATM surcharge revenue in 2007 compared with the prior year period as a result of changing
customer behavior and a strategic decision to reduce the out-of-footprint ATM network.
Corporate services revenue increased $43 million, to
$335 million, in the first half of 2007 compared with the first half of 2006. Corporate services revenue totaled $176 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared with $157 million in the second quarter of 2006. Higher revenue from various
sources, including treasury management, commercial mortgage servicing, and third party consumer loan servicing activities contributed to the increases in both comparisons.
Equity management (private equity) net gains on portfolio investments totaled $34 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $61 million for the first six months of 2006. For the second quarter of 2007,
such gains totaled $2 million compared with $54 million in the prior year second quarter. Based on the nature of private equity activities, net gains or losses may be volatile from period to period; however, we expect net gains of approximately
$60 million for full year 2007.
Noninterest revenue from trading activities totaled $81 million in the first half of 2007 and $112 million in the first
half of 2006. Noninterest revenue from trading activities was $29 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared with $55 million for the second quarter of 2006. Lower trading revenue in 2007, largely related to proprietary trading and
hedging activities, was the primary factor in the decline in both comparisons. We expect noninterest revenue from trading activities of approximately $45 million, on average, per quarter. We provide additional information on our trading activities
under Market Risk Management Trading Risk in the Risk Management section of this Financial Review.
Other noninterest income of $195 million for the
first six months of 2007 represented a $12 million increase compared with the first six months of 2006. Other noninterest income totaled $98
8
million for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $2 million from the second quarter of 2006. Other noninterest income typically fluctuates from period
to period depending on the nature and magnitude of transactions completed.
Due to the BlackRock/MLIM transaction, which resulted in a $2.1 billion pretax
gain in the third quarter of 2006, we expect that total noninterest income will decline significantly for full year 2007 compared with full year 2006. Changes in noninterest income compared with the prior year also will be impacted by the
deconsolidation of BlackRock and balance sheet repositioning actions in 2006, and our BlackRock LTIP shares obligation. Our remaining noninterest income sources are expected to increase, in the aggregate, by a low teens percentage for full year 2007
compared with 2006 as a result of organic growth and acquisitions.
Apart from the comparative impact on noninterest income of the 2006 items described
above, we expect that total revenue will increase by a high teens percentage for full year 2007 compared with 2006.
PRODUCT
REVENUE
In addition to credit products to commercial customers, Corporate & Institutional Banking offers treasury
management and capital markets-related products and services, commercial loan servicing and equipment financing products that are marketed by several businesses across PNC.
Treasury management revenue, which includes fees as well as net interest income from customer deposit balances, increased 9% to $224 million for the first half of 2007 compared with $205 million for the first half of
2006. Treasury management revenue increased 10% to $114 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared with $104 million for the second quarter of 2006. The higher revenue reflected continued expansion and client utilization of commercial payment
card services, strong revenue growth in various electronic payment and information services, and a steady increase in business-to-business processing volumes.
Revenue from capital markets-related products and services was $143 million for the first half of 2007 compared with $140 million in the first half of 2006, primarily driven by increased revenues from mergers and acquisitions advisory and
related services. Capital markets-related products and services revenues totaled $76 million for the second quarter of both 2007 and 2006.
Midland Loan
Services offers servicing, real estate advisory and technology solutions for the commercial real estate finance industry. Midlands revenue, which includes servicing fees and net interest income from servicing portfolio deposit balances,
totaled $110 million for first half of 2007 and $84 million for first half of 2006, an increase of 31%. Revenue from Midland totaled $56 million for the second quarter of 2007 compared with $42 million for the second
quarter of 2006, an increase of 33%. The revenue growth in both comparisons was primarily driven by growth in the commercial mortgage servicing portfolio and
related services.
As a component of our advisory services to clients, we provide a select set of insurance products to fulfill specific customer financial
needs. Primary insurance offerings include:
|
|
|
Commercial lines coverage. |
Client segments served
by these insurance products include those in Retail Banking and Corporate & Institutional Banking. Insurance products are sold by licensed PNC insurance agents and through licensed third-party arrangements. Revenue from these products
increased 17% to $41 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $35 million for the first six months of 2006. Insurance products revenue increased 28% to $23 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared with $18 million in the second
quarter of 2006.
PNC, through subsidiary companies Alpine Indemnity Limited and PNC Insurance Corp., participates as a direct writer for its general
liability, automobile liability, workers compensation, property and terrorism insurance programs.
In the normal course of business, Alpine Indemnity
Limited and PNC Insurance Corp. maintain insurance reserves for reported claims and for claims incurred but not reported based on actuarial assessments. We believe these reserves were adequate at June 30, 2007.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Total
noninterest expense was $1.984 billion for the first six months of 2007 and $2.307 billion for the first six months of 2006. Total noninterest expense was $1.040 billion for the second quarter of 2007 and $1.145 billion for the second quarter of
2006.
Noninterest expense for the 2007 and 2006 periods covered by this analysis included the following:
|
|
|
The first half of 2007 included integration costs of $26 million, of which $15 million were recognized in the second quarter, related to our acquisition of
Mercantile. |
|
|
|
First half 2006 noninterest expense included $542 million of expenses, including $251 million in the second quarter, related to BlackRock, which was still
consolidated during that time. |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense for the first six months 2006 also included $19 million of BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs, including $13 million in the second
quarter of that year. |
9
Apart from the impact of these items, noninterest expense increased $212 million, or 12%, compared with the first half of 2006. Similarly, noninterest expense increased $144 million, or 16%, in the second quarter of 2007 compared with the
prior year quarter. These increases were largely a result of the acquisition of Mercantile, increased compensation expenses and investments in growth initiatives.
We expect total noninterest expense to decline for full year 2007 compared with full year 2006 due to the impact of the deconsolidation of BlackRock. Apart from this impact and integration costs, we expect noninterest expense to grow by a
low teens percentage for full year 2007 compared with 2006 primarily as a result of acquisitions.
We expect to continue to incur integration costs related
to Mercantile. Such costs are currently estimated to be $45 million after-tax for the second half of 2007 and will be recognized within the noninterest expense and income tax categories. We also expect to recognize a one-time after-tax charge
of $27 million related to the pending Yardville acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2007. These costs will be incurred within the provision for credit losses, noninterest expense, and income tax categories.
PERIOD-END EMPLOYEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
Full-time |
|
25,026 |
|
21,455 |
|
23,791 |
Part-time |
|
3,028 |
|
2,328 |
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
28,054 |
|
23,783 |
|
26,032 |
Employees as of June 30, 2007 included approximately 3,300 full-time and approximately 500 part-time
Mercantile employees. BlackRock employees were included in these amounts at June 30, 2006.
EFFECTIVE TAX
RATE
Our effective tax rate for the first six months of 2007 was 31.1% compared with 32.8% for the first six months of 2006. The
lower effective rate for first half of 2007 was primarily due to the deconsolidation of BlackRock effective September 29, 2006. We expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 31% to 32% for the remainder of 2007 before considering the
previously mentioned integration costs related to higher state deferred tax liabilities from the Mercantile and Yardville acquisitions.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET REVIEW
SUMMARIZED BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
December 31 2006 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$64,714 |
|
$50,105 |
Securities available for sale |
|
25,903 |
|
23,191 |
Loans held for sale |
|
2,562 |
|
2,366 |
Equity investments |
|
5,584 |
|
5,330 |
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
8,658 |
|
4,043 |
Other |
|
18,230 |
|
16,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$125,651 |
|
$101,820 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Funding sources |
|
$101,737 |
|
$81,329 |
Other |
|
8,040 |
|
8,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
109,777 |
|
90,147 |
Minority and noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities |
|
1,370 |
|
885 |
Total shareholders equity |
|
14,504 |
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, minority and noncontrolling interests, and shareholders equity |
|
$125,651 |
|
$101,820 |
Our Consolidated Balance Sheet is presented in Part I, Item 1 on page 40 of this Report.
Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007 reflects the addition of approximately $21 billion of assets resulting from our Mercantile acquisition.
Various seasonal and other factors impact our period-end balances whereas average balances (discussed under the Balance Sheet Highlights section of this Financial
Review above and included in the Statistical Information section of this Report on pages 69 and 70) are more indicative of underlying business trends.
An
analysis of changes in certain balance sheet categories follows.
LOANS, NET OF UNEARNED
INCOME
Loans increased $14.6 billion, to $64.7 billion, at June 30, 2007 compared with the balance at December 31, 2006.
Our acquisition of Mercantile added $12.4 billion of loans including $6.0 billion of commercial real estate, $3.7 billion of commercial, $1.1 billion of residential mortgage and $1.6 billion of consumer loans.
10
Details Of Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/wholesale |
|
$5,908 |
|
|
$5,301 |
|
Manufacturing |
|
4,371 |
|
|
4,189 |
|
Other service providers |
|
2,963 |
|
|
2,186 |
|
Real estate related |
|
4,443 |
|
|
2,825 |
|
Financial services |
|
1,500 |
|
|
1,324 |
|
Health care |
|
1,023 |
|
|
707 |
|
Other |
|
4,538 |
|
|
4,052 |
|
Total commercial |
|
$24,746 |
|
|
$20,584 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate projects |
|
8,962 |
|
|
2,716 |
|
Mortgage |
|
567 |
|
|
816 |
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
9,529 |
|
|
3,532 |
|
Equipment lease financing |
|
3,587 |
|
|
3,556 |
|
Total commercial lending |
|
37,862 |
|
|
27,672 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
14,268 |
|
|
13,749 |
|
Automobile |
|
1,962 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
Other |
|
1,804 |
|
|
1,631 |
|
Total consumer |
|
18,034 |
|
|
16,515 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
9,440 |
|
|
6,337 |
|
Other |
|
382 |
|
|
376 |
|
Unearned income |
|
(1,004 |
) |
|
(795 |
) |
Total, net of unearned income |
|
$64,714 |
|
|
$50,105 |
|
Our total loan portfolio continued to be diversified among numerous industries and types of businesses. The loans
that we hold are also concentrated in, and diversified across, our principal geographic markets.
Commercial lending outstandings in the table above are
the largest category and are the most sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses. We have allocated approximately $497 million, or 71%, of the total allowance for loan
and lease losses at June 30, 2007 to these loans. This allocation also considers other relevant factors such as:
|
|
|
Actual versus estimated losses, |
|
|
|
Regional and national economic conditions, |
|
|
|
Business segment and portfolio concentrations, |
|
|
|
The impact of government regulations, and |
|
|
|
Risk of potential estimation or judgmental errors, including the accuracy of risk ratings. |
Net Unfunded Credit Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
December 31 2006 |
Commercial |
|
$ |
35,527 |
|
$ |
31,009 |
Consumer |
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
10,495 |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
2,752 |
Other |
|
|
361 |
|
|
579 |
Total |
|
$ |
50,678 |
|
$ |
44,835 |
Unfunded commitments are concentrated in our primary geographic markets. Net unfunded commitments at June 30, 2007 include $4.9 billion related to our acquisition of
Mercantile. Commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions. Commercial commitments are reported net of participations, assignments and syndications, primarily to
financial institutions, totaling $9.1 billion at June 30, 2007 and $8.3 billion at December 31, 2006.
Unfunded liquidity facility commitments
and standby bond purchase agreements totaled $6.9 billion at June 30, 2007 and $6.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and are included in the preceding table primarily within the Commercial and Consumer categories.
In addition to credit commitments, our net outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $4.9 billion at June 30, 2007 and $4.4 billion at
December 31, 2006. Standby letters of credit commit us to make payments on behalf of our customers if specified future events occur.
Leases and
Related Tax and Accounting Matters
The equipment lease portfolio totaled $3.6 billion at June 30, 2007. Aggregate residual value at risk on
the lease portfolio at June 30, 2007 was $1.2 billion. We have taken steps to mitigate $.6 billion of this residual risk, including residual value insurance coverage with third parties, third party guarantees, and other actions. The portfolio
included approximately $1.7 billion of cross-border leases at June 30, 2007. Cross-border leases are leveraged leases of equipment located in foreign countries, primarily in western Europe and Australia. We have not entered into cross-border
lease transactions since 2003.
Upon completing examinations of our 1998-2000 and 2001-2003 consolidated federal income tax returns, the IRS provided us
with examination reports which propose increases in our tax liability, principally arising from adjustments to the timing of tax deductions from our cross-border lease transactions.
While the situation with respect to these proposed adjustments remains unresolved, we believe our reserves for these exposures were appropriate at June 30, 2007.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 13-2, Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the
Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged Lease Transaction (FSP 13-2). FSP 13-2 became effective January 1, 2007 and requires a recalculation of the timing of income recognition for actual or
projected changes in the timing of tax benefits for leveraged leases. Any cumulative adjustment was to be recognized through retained earnings upon adoption of FSP 13-2. See Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial
Statements in
11
Part I, Item 1 of this Report and in Item 8 of our 2006 Form 10-K for additional information. Effective January 1, 2007, we recalculated our
leases and recorded a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings of $149 million, after-tax, as required by FSP 13-2. This adjustment was based on our best estimate as to the timing and amount of ultimate settlement of this exposure. Any
immediate or future reductions in earnings from our adoption of FSP 13-2 would be recovered in subsequent years.
In the second quarter of 2007, we reduced
after-tax earnings by $13 million based on the status of our discussions with the IRS Appeals Division in resolving this matter. Further adjustments may be required in future periods as our estimates of the timing and settlement of the dispute
change.
The adjustment to shareholders equity at January 1, 2007 included amounts related to three lease-to-service contract transactions that
we were party to that were structured as partnerships for tax purposes. The partnership tax returns, depending on the particular partnership, have either been examined or are under examination by the IRS. We do not believe that our exposure from
these transactions is material to our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Additional information on cross-border lease transactions
is included under Leases and Related Tax and Accounting Matters in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Review section of Item 7 of our 2006 Form 10-K.
SECURITIES
Details Of Securities (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
18,962 |
|
$ |
18,728 |
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
4,149 |
Asset-backed |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
2,144 |
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
285 |
|
|
278 |
State and municipal |
|
|
241 |
|
|
239 |
Other debt |
|
|
29 |
|
|
29 |
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
337 |
|
|
336 |
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
26,258 |
|
$ |
25,903 |
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
17,325 |
|
$ |
17,208 |
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
3,219 |
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
1,609 |
US Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
611 |
|
|
608 |
State and municipal |
|
|
140 |
|
|
139 |
Other debt |
|
|
90 |
|
|
87 |
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
321 |
|
|
321 |
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
23,333 |
|
$ |
23,191 |
(a) |
Securities held to maturity at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were less than $.5 million. |
Securities represented 21%
of total assets at June 30, 2007 and 23% of total assets at December 31, 2006. Our acquisition of Mercantile added approximately $3 billion of securities, of which approximately $1 billion we classified as trading and sold and the
remainder we classified as securities available for sale.
We evaluate our portfolio of securities available for sale in light of changing market
conditions and other factors and, where appropriate, take steps intended to improve our overall positioning.
At June 30, 2007, securities available
for sale included a net unrealized loss of $355 million, which represented the difference between fair value and amortized cost. The comparable amount at December 31, 2006 was a net unrealized loss of $142 million. Net unrealized gains and
losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in shareholders equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
The fair value of securities available for sale generally decreases when market interest rates increase and vice versa. Consequently, changes in interest rates after June 30, 2007, may adversely impact the fair value of securities
available for sale compared with June 30, 2007.
The expected weighted-average life of securities available for sale (excluding corporate stocks and
other) was 4 years and 2 months at June 30, 2007 and 3 years and 8 months at December 31, 2006.
We estimate that at June 30, 2007 the
effective duration of securities available for sale is 2.9 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates. Comparable amounts at
December 31, 2006 were 2.6 years and 2.2 years, respectively.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE
Education loans held for sale totaled $1.4 billion at June 30, 2007 and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2006. We classify substantially all
of our education loans as loans held for sale. Generally, we sell education loans when the loans are placed into repayment status. Gains on sales of education loans are reflected in the other noninterest income line item in our Consolidated Income
Statement and in the results for the Retail Banking business segment.
Loans held for sale also included commercial mortgage loans intended for
securitization totaling $758 million at June 30, 2007 and $698 million at December 31, 2006. The amount outstanding fluctuates based on the timing of securitization transactions.
12
FUNDING AND CAPITAL SOURCES
Details Of Funding Sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
December 31 2006 |
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
30,773 |
|
$ |
28,580 |
Demand |
|
|
20,505 |
|
|
16,833 |
Retail certificates of deposit |
|
|
17,106 |
|
|
14,725 |
Savings |
|
|
2,946 |
|
|
1,864 |
Other time |
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
1,326 |
Time deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
2,973 |
Total deposits |
|
|
77,221 |
|
|
66,301 |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
2,711 |
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
2,051 |
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
3,633 |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
3,962 |
Other |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
2,671 |
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
24,516 |
|
|
15,028 |
Total |
|
$ |
101,737 |
|
$ |
81,329 |
Total funding sources increased $20.4 billion at June 30, 2007 compared with the balance at December 31,
2006, as total deposits increased $10.9 billion and total borrowed funds increased $9.5 billion. Our acquisition of Mercantile added $12.5 billion of deposits and $2.1 billion of borrowed funds. Partially offsetting the Mercantile impact on deposits
compared with December 31, 2006 was a decline in retail certificates of deposit, which reflected a disciplined approach to pricing that product.
During the first quarter of 2007 we issued borrowings to fund the $2.1 billion cash portion of the Mercantile acquisition. The remaining increase in borrowed funds was the result of growth in loans and securities, a decline in retail
certificates of deposit, and the need to fund other net changes in our balance sheet.
Capital
We manage our capital position by making adjustments to our balance sheet size and composition, issuing debt, equity or hybrid instruments, executing treasury stock
transactions, maintaining dividend policies and retaining earnings.
Total shareholders equity increased $3.7 billion, to $14.5 billion, at
June 30, 2007 compared with December 31, 2006. This increase reflected a $2.6 billion reduction in treasury stock and a $1.0 billion increase in capital surplus, largely due to the issuance of shares for the Mercantile acquisition.
Common shares outstanding at June 30, 2007 were 342 million compared with 293 million at December 31, 2006. The increase in shares
outstanding during the first half of 2007 reflected the issuance of approximately 53 million shares in connection with the March 2007 Mercantile acquisition.
We purchased 5.4 million common shares under our common stock repurchase program during the first six months of 2007 at a total cost of $395 million. This total included 4.0 million shares repurchased during the second quarter of
2007. Our
current program, which permits us to purchase up to 20 million shares on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, will remain in effect
until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. As of June 30, 2007, remaining availability for purchases under this program was 9.1 million shares.
The extent and timing of additional share repurchases under this program will depend on a number of factors including, among others, market and general economic conditions, economic and regulatory capital
considerations, alternative uses of capital, regulatory limitations resulting from merger activity, and the potential impact on our credit rating. We expect to continue to be active in share repurchases and to have the capital flexibility to
complete a total of $800 million of share repurchases for full year 2007.
Risk-Based Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Capital components |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
14,497 |
|
|
$ |
10,781 |
|
Preferred |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Trust preferred capital securities |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
(8,153 |
) |
|
|
(3,566 |
) |
Eligible deferred income taxes on intangible assets |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Pension, other postretirement benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Net unrealized securities losses, after-tax |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on cash flow hedge derivatives, after-tax |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Equity investments in nonfinancial companies |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
|
8,381 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
1,954 |
|
Eligible allowance for credit losses |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
11,982 |
|
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets, including off-balance sheet instruments and market risk equivalent assets |
|
$ |
101,501 |
|
|
$ |
85,539 |
|
Adjusted average total assets |
|
|
115,098 |
|
|
|
95,590 |
|
Capital ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Total risk-based |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
Tangible capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
14,497 |
|
|
$ |
10,781 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
(8,153 |
) |
|
|
(3,566 |
) |
Eligible deferred taxes |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Tangible capital |
|
$ |
6,467 |
|
|
$ |
7,241 |
|
Total assets excluding goodwill and other intangible assets, net of eligible deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
117,621 |
|
|
$ |
98,280 |
|
Tangible common equity |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
The declines in capital ratios from December 31, 2006 were due to an increase in risk-weighted assets and
goodwill, primarily related to the Mercantile acquisition.
13
The access to, and cost of, funding new business initiatives including acquisitions, the ability to engage in expanded business activities, the ability to pay dividends, the level of deposit insurance costs, and the level and nature of
regulatory oversight depend, in part, on a financial institutions capital strength. At June 30, 2007, each of our banking subsidiaries was considered well-capitalized based on regulatory capital ratio requirements, as
indicated in the Capital Ratios section of Consolidated Financial Highlights on page 2 of this Report. We believe our current bank subsidiaries will continue to meet these requirements during the remainder of 2007.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
We engage in a variety of activities that involve unconsolidated entities or that are otherwise not reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheet that are generally
referred to as off-balance sheet arrangements. The following sections of this Report provide further information on these types of activities:
|
|
|
Commitments, including contractual obligations and other commitments, included within the Risk Management section of this Financial Review, and
|
|
|
|
Note 15 Commitments And Guarantees in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. |
The following provides a summary of variable interest entities (VIEs), including those in which we hold a significant variable interest but have not
consolidated and those that we have consolidated into our financial statements as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Additional information on our partnership interests in low income housing projects is included in our 2006 Form 10-K
under this same heading in Part I, Item 7 and in Note 3 Variable Interest Entities in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of that report.
Non-Consolidated VIEs - Significant Variable Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
|
PNC Risk of Loss |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$4,134 |
|
$4,134 |
|
$7,058 |
(a) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
529 |
|
442 |
|
8 |
|
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
42 |
|
30 |
|
66 |
|
Total |
|
$4,705 |
|
$4,606 |
|
$7,132 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$4,020 |
|
$4,020 |
|
$6,117 |
(a) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
815 |
|
570 |
|
22 |
|
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
33 |
|
30 |
|
8 |
|
Total |
|
$4,868 |
|
$4,620 |
|
$6,147 |
|
(a) |
PNCs risk of loss consists of off-balance sheet liquidity commitments to Market Street of $6.5 billion and other credit enhancements of $.6 billion at June 30, 2007. The
comparable amounts at December 31, 2006 were $5.6 billion and $.6 billion, respectively. |
Market Street
Market Street Funding LLC (Market Street), is a multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit that is owned by an independent third party. Market
Streets activities are limited to the purchasing of assets or making of loans secured by interests primarily in pools of receivables from US corporations that desire access to the commercial paper market. Market Street funds the purchases or
loans by issuing commercial paper which has been rated A1/P1 by Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively, and is supported by pool-specific credit enhancement, liquidity facilities and program-level credit enhancement.
PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank, N.A.) provides certain administrative services, a portion of the program-level credit enhancement,
and the majority of liquidity facilities to Market Street in exchange for fees negotiated based on market rates. All of Market Streets assets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 collateralized the commercial paper obligations. PNC
views its credit exposure for the Market Street transactions as limited. Facilities requiring PNC to fund for defaulted assets totaled $447 million at June 30, 2007. For 93% of the liquidity facilities at June 30, 2007, PNC is not
required to fund if the assets are in default. PNC may be liable for funding under liquidity facilities for events such as borrower bankruptcies, collateral deficiencies or covenant violations. Additionally, PNCs obligations under the
liquidity facilities are secondary to the risk of first loss provided by the borrower or another third party in the form of deal-specific credit enhancement for example, by the over-collateralization of the assets. Deal-specific credit
enhancement that supports the commercial paper issued by Market Street is generally structured to cover a multiple of the expected historical losses for the pool of assets and is sized to generally meet rating agency standards for comparably
structured transactions. Credit enhancement is provided in part by PNC Bank, N.A. in the form of a cash collateral account that is funded by a loan facility that expires March 23, 2012. See Note 15 Commitments And Guarantees included in Part I,
Item 1 of this Report for additional information. Neither creditors nor investors in Market Street have any recourse to our general credit. PNC recognized program administrator fees and commitment fees related to PNCs portion of the
liquidity facilities of $3.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Comparable amounts were $5.9 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
As more fully described in our 2006 Form 10-K, Market Street was restructured as a limited liability company in October 2005 and entered into a subordinated Note
Purchase Agreement (Note) with an unrelated third party.
14
The Note provides first loss coverage whereby the investor absorbs losses up to the amount of the Note, which was $6.9 million as of June 30, 2007. Proceeds from the issuance of the Note are held by Market Street in a first loss
reserve account that will be used to reimburse any losses incurred by Market Street, PNC Bank, N.A. or other providers under the liquidity facilities and the credit enhancement arrangements.
As a result of the Note issuance, we reevaluated the design of Market Street, its capital structure and relationships among the variable interest holders under the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, (Revised 2003) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R). Based on this analysis, we determined that we were no longer the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46R and
deconsolidated Market Street from our Consolidated Balance Sheet effective October 17, 2005. There have been no events or changes in the contractual terms of the Note since that date that would change this conclusion.
The aggregate assets and liabilities of VIEs that we have consolidated in our financial statements are as follows:
Consolidated VIEs PNC Is Primary Beneficiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
761 |
|
$ |
761 |
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
834 |
|
$ |
834 |
Investment Company Accounting Deferred Application
We also have subsidiaries that invest in and act as the investment manager for private equity funds organized as limited partnerships as part of our equity management
activities. The funds invest in private equity investments to generate capital appreciation and profits. As permitted by FIN 46R, we have deferred applying the provisions of the interpretation for these entities pending adoption of FASB Staff
Position No. (FSP) FIN 46(R)7, Application of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to Investment Companies. See Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of the Report.
These entities are not consolidated into our financial statements as of June 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006. Information on these entities follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
|
Aggregate Equity |
|
|
PNC Risk of Loss |
Private Equity Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
105 |
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
104 |
PNCs risk of loss in the table above includes both the value of our equity investments and any unfunded commitments to the respective entities. These equity
investments are included in our private equity portfolio discussed under Market Risk Management Equity and Other Investment Risk in this Financial Review.
Perpetual Trust Securities
We issue certain hybrid capital vehicles that qualify as capital for regulatory and rating agency
purposes.
In December 2006, one of our indirect subsidiaries, PNC REIT Corp., sold $500 million of 6.517% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative
Exchangeable Perpetual Trust Securities (the Trust Securities) of PNC Preferred Funding Trust I (Trust I) in a private placement. PNC REIT Corp. had previously acquired the Trust Securities from the trust in exchange for an
equivalent amount of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Securities (the LLC Preferred Securities), of PNC Preferred Funding LLC (the LLC), held by PNC REIT Corp. The LLCs initial material assets
consist of indirect interests in mortgages and mortgage-related assets previously owned by PNC REIT Corp. Our 2006 Form 10-K includes additional information regarding the Perpetual Trust Securities, including descriptions of replacement capital and
dividend restriction covenants.
In March 2007, PNC Preferred Funding LLC sold $500 million of 6.113% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Exchangeable
Perpetual Trust Securities of PNC Preferred Funding Trust II (Trust II) in a private placement. In connection with the private placement, Trust II acquired $500 million of LLC Preferred Securities.
PNC REIT Corp. owns 100% of the LLCs common voting securities. As a result, the LLC is an indirect subsidiary of PNC and is consolidated on our Consolidated
Balance Sheet. Trust I and Trust IIs investment in the LLC Preferred Securities is characterized as a minority interest on our Consolidated Balance Sheet since we are not the primary beneficiary of Trust I and Trust II. This minority interest
totaled approximately $980 million at June 30, 2007.
Each Trust II Security is automatically exchangeable into a share of Series I Non-Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock of PNC (the Series I Preferred Stock) under certain conditions relating to the capitalization or the financial condition of PNC Bank, N.A. and upon the direction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
15
Simultaneously with the closing of the Trust II Securities sale, we entered into a replacement capital covenant (the Covenant) for the benefit of holders of a specified series of our long-term indebtedness (the Covered
Debt). As of June 30, 2007, Covered Debt consists of our $200 million Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes issued on June 9, 1998. We agreed in the Covenant that until March 29, 2017, neither we nor our subsidiaries
would purchase or redeem the Trust Securities, the LLC Preferred Securities or the Series I Preferred Stock (collectively, the Covenant Securities) unless: (i) we have received the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, if
such approval is then required by the Federal Reserve Board and (ii) during the 180-day period prior to the date of purchase, PNC, PNC Bank, N.A. or PNC Bank, N.A.s subsidiaries, as applicable, have received proceeds from the sale of
Qualifying Securities in the amounts specified in the Covenant (which amounts will vary based on the type of securities sold). Qualifying Securities means debt and equity securities having terms and provisions specified in the Covenant
and that, generally described, are intended to contribute to our capital base in a manner that is similar to the contribution to our capital base made by the Covenant Securities. We filed a copy of the Covenant with the SEC as Exhibit 99.1 to
PNCs current report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2007.
We have also entered into an Exchange Agreement with Trust II in which we have agreed
that if full dividends are not paid in a dividend period on the Trust II Securities and the LLC Preferred Securities held by Trust II, PNC will not declare or pay dividends with respect to, or redeem, purchase or acquire, any of its equity capital
securities during the next succeeding dividend period, other than: (i) purchases, redemptions or other acquisitions of shares of capital stock of PNC in connection with any employment contract, benefit plan or other similar arrangement with or
for the benefit of employees, officers, directors or consultants, (ii) purchases of shares of common stock of PNC pursuant to a contractually binding requirement to buy stock existing prior to the commencement of the extension period, including
under a contractually binding stock repurchase plan, (iii) any dividend in connection with the implementation of a shareholders rights plan, or the redemption or repurchase of any rights under any such plan, (iv) as a result of an
exchange or conversion of any class or series of PNCs capital stock for any other class or series of PNCs capital stock, (v) the purchase of fractional interests in shares of PNC capital stock pursuant to the conversion or exchange
provisions of such stock or the security being converted or exchanged or (vi) any stock dividends paid by PNC where the dividend stock is the same stock as that on which the dividend is being paid. We filed a copy of the Exchange Agreement with
the SEC as Exhibit 4.16 to PNCs Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2007.
James Monroe Trust Preferred Securities
As a result of the Mercantile acquisition, we became liable with respect to $12 million in principal amount of junior subordinated debentures issued by one of the
Mercantile banks. Under the terms of these debentures, if there is an event of default under the debentures or PNC exercises its right to defer payments on the related trust preferred securities issued by two statutory trusts or there is a default
under PNCs guarantee of such payment obligations, PNC would be subject during the period of such default or deferral to restrictions on dividends and other provisions protecting the status of the debenture holders similar to those potentially
imposed under the Exchange Agreement with Trust II, as described above.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS REVIEW
We have four major businesses engaged in providing
banking, asset management and global fund processing products and services. Business segment results, including inter-segment revenues, and a description of each business are included in Note 14 Segment Reporting included in the Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of this Report. Certain revenue and expense amounts included in this Financial Review differ from the amounts shown in Note 14 due to the presentation in this Financial Review of business
revenue on a taxable-equivalent basis, the inclusion of BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs in the Other category in this Financial Review, and classification differences related to PFPC. Also, the presentation of BlackRock
results for the 2006 period have been modified in this Financial Review as described on page 22 to conform with our current period presentation.
Results
of individual businesses are presented based on our management accounting practices and our management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial
results of individual businesses are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We refine our methodologies from time to time as our management accounting practices are enhanced and our businesses and management
structure change. Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business, with the exception of our BlackRock segment, operated on a stand-alone basis. As permitted under GAAP, we have aggregated the business results for
certain operating segments for financial reporting purposes.
Assets receive a funding charge and liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on
a transfer pricing methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors. Capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to the banking and processing businesses using our risk-based economic capital model. We
have assigned capital equal to 6% of funds to Retail Banking to reflect the capital required for well-capitalized banks and to
16
approximate market comparables for this business. The capital assigned for PFPC reflects its legal entity shareholders equity.
BlackRock business segment results for the six months ended June 30, 2006 reflected our majority ownership in BlackRock during that period. Subsequent to the
September 29, 2006 BlackRock/MLIM transaction closing, which had the effect of reducing our ownership interest to approximately 34%, our investment in BlackRock has been accounted for under the equity method but continues to be a separate
reportable business segment of PNC. We describe our presentation method for the BlackRock segment for this Financial Review on page 23.
We have allocated
the allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk inherent in the loan portfolios. Our allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other support areas not directly
aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.
Total business segment financial results differ from total
consolidated results. The impact of these differences is reflected in the Other category. Other for purposes of this Financial Review includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate
reportable business, such as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions including LTIP share distributions and obligations, Mercantile acquisition and BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs, asset and liability management activities,
net securities gains or losses, certain trading activities and equity management activities, differences between business segment performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), intercompany eliminations, and most corporate overhead.
Employee data as reported by each business segment in the tables that follow reflects staff directly employed by the respective business and excludes
corporate and shared services employees.
Results Of Businesses - Summary
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
Revenue (a) |
|
|
Average Assets (b) |
Six months ended June 30 - dollars in millions |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Retail Banking |
|
$ |
428 |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
1,817 |
|
$ |
1,535 |
|
$ |
39,662 |
|
$ |
29,326 |
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
254 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
713 |
|
|
27,471 |
|
|
24,181 |
BlackRock (c) (d) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
775 |
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
1,924 |
PFPC (e) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
382 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,416 |
Total business segments |
|
|
855 |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
73,581 |
|
|
57,847 |
Other (c) (f) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
135 |
|
|
41,834 |
|
|
34,945 |
Total consolidated |
|
$ |
882 |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
$ |
3,341 |
|
$ |
3,540 |
|
$ |
115,415 |
|
$ |
92,792 |
(a) |
Business segment revenue is presented on a taxable-equivalent basis. A reconciliation of total consolidated revenue on a book (GAAP) basis to total consolidated revenue on a
taxable-equivalent basis follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 (in millions) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
Total consolidated revenue, book (GAAP) basis |
|
$ |
3,327 |
|
$ |
3,527 |
Taxable-equivalent adjustment |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
Total consolidated revenue, taxable-equivalent basis |
|
$ |
3,341 |
|
$ |
3,540 |
(b) |
Period-end balances for BlackRock and PFPC. BlackRock was an equity investment at June 30, 2007 and was consolidated at June 30, 2006. |
(c) |
For our segment reporting presentation in this Financial Review, our after-tax share of BlackRock/MLIM transaction integration costs totaling $2 million and $8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 have been reclassified from BlackRock to Other. Other for the first six months of 2007 also includes $26 million of pretax Mercantile acquisition integration costs.
|
(d) |
For the first six months of 2007, revenue represents our equity income from BlackRock. For the first six months of 2006, revenue represents the sum of total operating revenue and
nonoperating income. |
(e) |
PFPC revenue represents the sum of servicing revenue and nonoperating income (expense) less debt financing costs. Prior period servicing revenue amounts have been reclassified to
conform with the current period presentation. |
(f) |
Other average assets are comprised primarily of securities available for sale and residential mortgage loans associated with asset and liability management activities.
|
17
RETAIL BANKING
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 Taxable-equivalent basis Dollars in millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$987 |
|
|
$832 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management |
|
224 |
|
|
174 |
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
164 |
|
|
148 |
|
Brokerage |
|
131 |
|
|
117 |
|
Consumer services |
|
190 |
|
|
174 |
|
Other |
|
121 |
|
|
90 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
830 |
|
|
703 |
|
Total revenue |
|
1,817 |
|
|
1,535 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
60 |
|
|
37 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
1,075 |
|
|
900 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
682 |
|
|
598 |
|
Income taxes |
|
254 |
|
|
223 |
|
Earnings |
|
$428 |
|
|
$375 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$14,060 |
|
|
$13,797 |
|
Indirect |
|
1,759 |
|
|
1,003 |
|
Other consumer |
|
1,544 |
|
|
1,225 |
|
Total consumer |
|
17,363 |
|
|
16,025 |
|
Commercial |
|
11,150 |
|
|
5,574 |
|
Floor plan |
|
995 |
|
|
967 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
1,715 |
|
|
1,612 |
|
Other |
|
233 |
|
|
243 |
|
Total loans |
|
31,456 |
|
|
24,421 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
4,369 |
|
|
1,584 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
1,558 |
|
|
1,706 |
|
Other assets |
|
2,279 |
|
|
1,615 |
|
Total assets |
|
$39,662 |
|
|
$29,326 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$9,974 |
|
|
$7,842 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
8,728 |
|
|
7,987 |
|
Money market |
|
16,385 |
|
|
14,671 |
|
Total transaction deposits |
|
35,087 |
|
|
30,500 |
|
Savings |
|
2,614 |
|
|
2,146 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
16,684 |
|
|
13,339 |
|
Total deposits |
|
54,385 |
|
|
45,985 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
702 |
|
|
549 |
|
Capital |
|
3,509 |
|
|
2,961 |
|
Total funds |
|
$58,596 |
|
|
$49,495 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
25 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
46 |
|
|
46 |
|
Efficiency |
|
59 |
|
|
59 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION, INCLUDING MERCANTILE (a) (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-related statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets (f) |
|
$140 |
|
|
$104 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$52 |
|
|
$33 |
|
Net charge-off ratio |
|
.33 |
% |
|
.27 |
% |
Other statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full-time employees |
|
11,804 |
|
|
9,674 |
|
Part-time employees |
|
2,360 |
|
|
1,526 |
|
ATMs |
|
3,917 |
|
|
3,553 |
|
Branches (c) |
|
1,084 |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30 Dollars in millions, except where noted |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION, INCLUDING MERCANTILE (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS UNDER ADMINISTRATION (in billions) (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
$55 |
|
|
$40 |
|
Institutional |
|
22 |
|
|
10 |
|
Total |
|
$77 |
|
|
$50 |
|
Asset Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$43 |
|
|
$31 |
|
Fixed income |
|
20 |
|
|
12 |
|
Liquidity/other |
|
14 |
|
|
7 |
|
Total |
|
$77 |
|
|
$50 |
|
Nondiscretionary assets under administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
$30 |
|
|
$25 |
|
Institutional |
|
81 |
|
|
60 |
|
Total |
|
$111 |
|
|
$85 |
|
Asset Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$47 |
|
|
$31 |
|
Fixed income |
|
28 |
|
|
26 |
|
Liquidity/other |
|
36 |
|
|
28 |
|
Total |
|
$111 |
|
|
$85 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION, NOT INCLUDING MERCANTILE (a)
(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity portfolio credit statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of first lien positions |
|
42 |
% |
|
45 |
% |
Weighted average loan-to-value ratios |
|
70 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
Weighted average FICO scores |
|
727 |
|
|
728 |
|
Loans 90 days past due |
|
.26 |
% |
|
.21 |
% |
Checking-related statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking checking relationships |
|
1,967,000 |
|
|
1,956,000 |
|
Consumer DDA households using online banking |
|
975,000 |
|
|
897,000 |
|
% of consumer DDA households using online banking |
|
55 |
% |
|
51 |
% |
Consumer DDA households using online bill payment |
|
505,000 |
|
|
305,000 |
|
% of consumer DDA households using online bill payment |
|
29 |
% |
|
17 |
% |
Small business loans and managed deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small business loans |
|
$5,292 |
|
|
$4,768 |
|
Managed deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$4,230 |
|
|
$4,338 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
1,585 |
|
|
1,423 |
|
Money market |
|
2,596 |
|
|
2,661 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
696 |
|
|
564 |
|
Off-balance sheet (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small business sweep checking |
|
1,884 |
|
|
1,493 |
|
Total managed deposits |
|
10,991 |
|
|
10,479 |
|
Brokerage statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin loans |
|
$162 |
|
|
$194 |
|
Financial consultants (h) |
|
767 |
|
|
775 |
|
Full service brokerage offices |
|
99 |
|
|
100 |
|
Brokerage account assets (billions) |
|
$47 |
|
|
$43 |
|
Other statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of education loans (i) |
|
$8 |
|
|
$11 |
|
(a) |
Presented as of June 30 except for net charge-offs, net charge-off ratio, gains on sales of education loans, and small business loans and managed deposits, which are for the
six months ended. |
18
(b) |
Amounts include the impact of Mercantile, which we acquired effective March 2, 2007. |
(c) |
Excludes certain satellite branches that provide limited products and service hours. |
(d) |
Excludes brokerage account assets. |
(e) |
Amounts do not include the impact of Mercantile, which we acquired effective March 2, 2007. |
(f) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $130 million at June 30, 2007 and $95 million at June 30, 2006. |
(g) |
Represents small business balances. These balances are swept into liquidity products managed by other PNC business segments, the majority of which are off-balance sheet.
|
(h) |
Financial consultants provide services in full service brokerage offices and PNC traditional branches. |
(i) |
Included in Noninterest income-Other. |
Retail Bankings
earnings were $428 million for the first six months of 2007 compared with $375 million for the same period in 2006. The 14% increase over the prior year was driven by the Mercantile acquisition, strong market-related fees, and continued customer and
balance sheet growth, partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses and in noninterest expense.
Highlights of Retail Bankings
performance during the first six months of 2007 include the following:
|
|
The acquisition of Mercantile in the first quarter added approximately $10.3 billion of loans and $12.0 billion in deposits to Retail Banking. The acquisition also:
|
|
|
|
Added 235 branches and 256 ATMs in the first quarter, |
|
|
|
Significantly increased our presence in Maryland, |
|
|
|
Added to our presence in Delaware, Virginia and the Washington, DC area, |
|
|
|
Significantly increased the size of our small business banking franchise, and |
|
|
|
Expanded our wealth management business with the addition of $22 billion in assets under management. |
|
|
PNC announced the pending acquisition of Yardville, which is expected to result in a leading deposit share in several wealthy counties in central New Jersey.
|
|
|
PNC announced the pending acquisition of Sterling, which is expected to result in a leading deposit share in the Central Pennsylvania footprint and to enhance our
presence in surrounding markets. |
|
|
Customer service and customer retention continues to be our focus. During the first quarter of 2007, we partnered with the Gallup organization to evaluate customer
and employee satisfaction at the branch level. |
|
|
Consumer and small business checking relationships increased 13,000 since December 31, 2006, not including the impact of Mercantile. The low-value account
closures resulting from One PNC pricing initiatives appear to have run their course. The new checking account product line has increased the average balance of new accounts by approximately 15%. |
|
|
Our investment in online banking capabilities continues to pay off. Since June 30, 2006, consumer checking households using online banking increased 9% and
consumer checking households using online bill payment increased 66%. |
|
|
In September 2006, we launched our PNC-branded credit card product. As of June 30, 2007, more than 106,000 cards have been issued and we have $221 million in
receivable balances. The results to date have exceeded our expectations. |
|
|
In addition to Mercantile, we opened 26 new branches and consolidated 23 branches since June 30, 2006, for a total of 1,084 branches at June 30, 2007. We
continue to optimize our network by opening new branches in high growth areas, relocating branches to areas of higher opportunity, and consolidating branches in areas of declining market opportunity. |
|
|
Our wealth management and brokerage businesses have benefited from market conditions and strong business development. |
|
|
|
Excluding the $22 billion of assets under management related to our acquisition of Mercantile in the first quarter, assets under management increased $5 billion
compared with June 30, 2006, |
|
|
|
Brokerage assets increased $4 billion, or 9%, from June 30, 2006, and |
|
|
|
Asset management and brokerage fees increased $64 million, or 22%, over the first six months of 2006. |
|
|
The small business area continued its positive momentum. Not including the impact of Mercantile, average small business loans increased 11% over the first six
months of 2006 on the strength of increased demand from both existing customers and new relationships. Small business checking relationships increased 3% and total managed deposits increased 5% over the first six months of 2006.
|
Total revenue for the first six months of 2007 was $1.817 billion compared with $1.535 billion for the same period last year.
Taxable-equivalent net interest income of $987 million increased $155 million, or 19%, compared with 2006 due to an 18% increase in average deposits and a 29% increase in average loan balances. Net interest income growth has been somewhat mitigated
by declining spreads on the loan portfolio. In the current rate environment, we expect the spreads we receive on both loans and deposits to continue to be under pressure.
Noninterest income increased $127 million, or 18%, compared with the first six months of 2006 primarily driven by increased asset management fees, consumer service fees, service charges on deposits and brokerage fees.
This growth can be attributed primarily to the following:
|
|
|
The Mercantile acquisition, |
|
|
|
Comparatively favorable equity markets, |
|
|
|
Increased assets under management, |
|
|
|
Increased brokerage account assets and activities, |
|
|
|
Increased third party loan servicing activities, |
|
|
|
New PNC-branded credit card product, |
|
|
|
Higher gains on asset sales, and |
19
The provision for credit losses increased $23 million in the first six months of 2007, to $60 million, compared with the 2006 period. Net charge-offs were $52 million for the first half of 2007, an increase of $19 million compared with the
first half of 2006. The increases in provision and net charge-offs were primarily a result of continued growth in our commercial loan portfolio and charge-offs returning to a more normal level. Charge-offs over the last few years have been low
compared to historical averages.
Noninterest expense in the first six months of 2007 totaled $1.075 billion, an increase of $175 million, or 19%, compared
with the first six months of 2006. Increases were primarily attributable to the Mercantile acquisition, higher volume-related expenses tied to noninterest income, continued growth of the companys branch network, expansion of the private client
group, and investments in various initiatives such as the new PNC-branded credit card.
Full-time employees at June 30, 2007 totaled 11,804, an
increase of 2,130 from June 30, 2006. Excluding the impact of the Mercantile acquisition, full-time employees declined by 48 and part-time employees have increased by 470 since June 30, 2006. The increase in part-time employees is a result
of various customer service enhancement and efficiency initiatives. These initiatives include utilizing more part-time customer-facing employees during peak business hours versus full-time employees.
Growing core checking deposits as a lower-cost funding source and as the cornerstone product to build customer relationships is the primary objective of our deposit
strategy. Average total deposits increased $8.4 billion, or 18%, compared with the first half of 2006. The deposit growth was driven by the Mercantile acquisition, the recapture of consumer certificate of deposit balances as interest rates have
risen, and increases in the number of checking relationships.
In the current rate environment, we expect the rate of growth in demand deposit balances to
be equal to or less than the rate of overall growth for customer checking relationships. Additionally, we continue to expect to see customers shift their funds from lower yielding interest-bearing deposits to higher yielding deposits or investment
products, and to pay off loans. The shift has been evident during the past year and has impacted the level of average demand deposits in that period.
|
|
Certificates of deposits increased $3.3 billion and money market deposits increased $1.7 billion. These increases were attributable to the Mercantile acquisition
and the current interest rate environment attracting customers to these products. |
|
|
Average demand deposit growth of $2.9 billion, or 18%, was almost solely due to the Mercantile acquisition as the core growth was impacted by customers shifting
funds into higher yielding deposits, small business sweep checking products, and investment products. |
|
|
Small business and consumer-related checking relationships retention remained strong and stable. Consumer-related checking relationship retention has benefited from
improved penetration rates of debit cards, online banking and online bill payment. |
Currently, we are focused on a relationship-based
lending strategy that targets specific customer sectors (homeowners, small businesses and auto dealerships) while seeking to maintain a moderate risk profile in the loan portfolio.
|
|
Average commercial loans grew $5.6 billion, or 100%, compared with the first six months of 2006. The increase is attributable to the Mercantile acquisition and
organic loan growth on the strength of increased loan demand from existing small business customers and the acquisition of new relationships through our sales efforts. |
|
|
Average home equity loans grew $263 million, or 2%, compared with the first six months of 2006. Consumer loan demand has slowed as a result of the current rate
environment. Our home equity loan portfolio is relationship based, with 92% of the portfolio attributable to borrowers in our primary geographic footprint. We monitor this portfolio closely and, to date, have seen no significant deterioration in
credit quality. |
|
|
Average indirect loans grew $756 million, or 75%, compared with the first half of 2006. The increase is attributable to the Mercantile acquisition and growth in our
core portfolio that has benefited from increased sales and marketing efforts. |
|
|
Average residential mortgage loans increased $103 million, or 6%, primarily due to the addition of loans from the Mercantile acquisition. Payoffs in our
existing portfolio, which will continue throughout 2007, partially offset the impact of the additional loans acquired. Additionally, our transfer of residential mortgages to held for sale and subsequent sale of those loans at the end of September
2006 reduced the size of this loan portfolio when compared to the first six months of 2006. |
Assets under management of $77 billion at
June 30, 2007 increased $27 billion compared with the balance at June 30, 2006. The Mercantile acquisition added $22 billion in assets under management in the first quarter and the remaining portfolio growth was a result of the effects of
comparatively higher equity markets.
Nondiscretionary assets under administration of $111 billion at June 30, 2007 increased $26 billion compared
with the balance at June 30, 2006. The growth included $23 billion from the Mercantile acquisition in the first quarter and the remaining growth was due primarily to the effect of comparatively higher equity markets.
20
CORPORATE & INSTITUTIONAL BANKING
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 Taxable-equivalent basis Dollars in millions except as noted |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$377 |
|
$339 |
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
Corporate service fees |
|
266 |
|
246 |
Other |
|
108 |
|
128 |
Noninterest income |
|
374 |
|
374 |
Total revenue |
|
751 |
|
713 |
Provision for credit losses |
|
1 |
|
29 |
Noninterest expense |
|
385 |
|
366 |
Pretax earnings |
|
365 |
|
318 |
Income taxes |
|
111 |
|
101 |
Earnings |
|
$254 |
|
$217 |
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
Corporate (a) |
|
$9,092 |
|
$8,552 |
Commercial real estate |
|
3,405 |
|
2,702 |
Commercial real estate related |
|
3,237 |
|
2,469 |
Asset-based lending |
|
4,538 |
|
4,353 |
Total loans |
|
20,272 |
|
18,076 |
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
1,669 |
|
1,321 |
Loans held for sale |
|
1,142 |
|
871 |
Other assets |
|
4,388 |
|
3,913 |
Total assets |
|
$27,471 |
|
$24,181 |
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$7,017 |
|
$6,524 |
Money market |
|
4,592 |
|
2,139 |
Other |
|
1,020 |
|
856 |
Total deposits |
|
12,629 |
|
9,519 |
Other liabilities |
|
2,906 |
|
2,692 |
Capital |
|
2,057 |
|
1,842 |
Total funds |
|
$17,592 |
|
$14,053 |
(a) |
Includes lease financing. |
Corporate & Institutional Banking
earned $254 million in the first six months of 2007 compared with $217 million in the first six months of 2006. The increase compared with the first half of 2006 was largely the result of higher taxable-equivalent net interest income and a lower
provision for credit losses, partly offset by an increase in noninterest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 Taxable-equivalent basis Dollars in millions except as noted |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average capital |
|
25 |
% |
|
24 |
% |
Noninterest income to total revenue |
|
50 |
|
|
52 |
|
Efficiency |
|
51 |
|
|
51 |
|
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SERVICING PORTFOLIO (in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
$200 |
|
|
$136 |
|
Acquisitions/additions |
|
44 |
|
|
32 |
|
Repayments/transfers |
|
(22 |
) |
|
(17 |
) |
End of period |
|
$222 |
|
|
$151 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue from: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Management |
|
$224 |
|
|
$205 |
|
Capital Markets |
|
$143 |
|
|
$140 |
|
Midland Loan Services |
|
$110 |
|
|
$84 |
|
Total loans (b) |
|
$21,662 |
|
|
$18,758 |
|
Nonperforming assets (b) (c) |
|
$100 |
|
|
$125 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$16 |
|
|
$16 |
|
Full-time employees (b) |
|
2,084 |
|
|
1,899 |
|
Net gains on commercial mortgage loan sales |
|
$24 |
|
|
$25 |
|
Net carrying amount of commercial mortgage servicing rights (b) |
|
$493 |
|
|
$385 |
|
(a) |
Represents consolidated PNC amounts. |
(c) |
Includes nonperforming loans of $87 million at June 30, 2007 and $112 million at June 30, 2006. |
Highlights of the first six months of 2007 for Corporate & Institutional Banking included:
|
|
Average total loan balances increased $2.2 billion from the prior year first half. In addition to the Mercantile acquisition in the first quarter of 2007, which
fueled growth in all loan categories, continuing customer demand was also a factor in the growth in corporate loans. Competitive pressures for risk-adjusted returns in 2007 have increased due to larger amounts of liquidity in the credit markets,
which has resulted in shrinking loan spreads and slowing loan growth. |
|
|
Asset quality continued to be strong as nonperforming assets declined $25 million, or 20%, at June 30, 2007 compared with June 30, 2006. Included in the
June 30, 2007 amount is $34 million of nonperforming assets associated with the Mercantile acquisition. The provision for credit losses declined $28 million in the comparison of the first six months of 2007 and 2006. The improvement in asset
quality reflected in PNC and industry experience led to a reduction in historical default factors used to determine required reserves during the first quarter of 2007. |
|
|
Average deposit balances for the first six months of 2007 increased $3.1 billion, or 33%, compared with the first six months of 2006. The increase in corporate
money
|
21
|
market deposits reflected PNCs action to avail itself of the opportunity to obtain funding from alternative sources. Noninterest-bearing deposit growth
was attributable to our commercial mortgage servicing portfolio. |
|
|
Total revenue increased $38 million, or 5%, for the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006. The increase was driven by higher net
interest income related to growth of noninterest bearing deposits as well as the increase in loans resulting from the Mercantile acquisition. Corporate service fees increased due to increased sales of treasury management products and services,
commercial mortgage servicing, and mergers and acquisitions advisory services. These increases in revenue were partially offset by a decline in other noninterest income. This decline primarily reflected the high level of gains recognized in 2006
from commercial mortgage securitization hedging activity compared with the first six months of 2007. However, our fee income may be impacted by the recent volatility in the financial markets. |
Commercial mortgage servicing revenue, which includes fees and net interest income, totaled $110 million for the first half
of 2007, compared with $84 million for the first six months of 2006. The 31% revenue growth over the first six months of 2006 was primarily driven by growth
in the commercial mortgage servicing portfolio, which increased to $222 billion. The associated increase in deposits has increased the net interest income portion of Midland Loan Services total revenue.
|
|
Noninterest expense increased by $19 million, or 5%, compared with the first six months of 2006 consistent with the growth in total revenue. This reflects the
continued investment in various growth and fee-based initiatives, customer growth, and increase in the commercial mortgage servicing portfolio. In addition, noninterest expense increases reflect our business of originating transactions whose returns
are heavily dependent on tax credits, whereby losses are taken through noninterest expense and the associated benefits result in a lower provision for income taxes. |
See the additional revenue discussion regarding treasury management and capital markets-related products and services and commercial loan servicing on page 9.
22
BLACKROCK
(Unaudited)
Our BlackRock business segment earned $110 million for the first six months of 2007 and $95 million for the first six months of 2006. Subsequent to the
September 29, 2006 deconsolidation of BlackRock, these business segment earnings are determined by taking our proportionate share of BlackRocks earnings and subtracting our additional income taxes recorded on our share of BlackRocks
earnings. Also, for this business segment presentation, we reclassify our after-tax share of BlackRock/MLIM integration costs ($2 million in 2007 and $8 million in 2006) from BlackRock to Other. In addition, these business segment
earnings for the first half of 2006 have been reduced by minority interest in income of BlackRock, excluding MLIM transaction integration costs, totaling $45 million.
We have modified the presentation of historical BlackRock business segment results as described above to conform with the current business segment reporting presentation in this Financial Review.
PNCs investment in BlackRock was $4.0 billion at June 30, 2007 and $3.9 billion at December 31, 2006. Based upon BlackRocks closing market price of
$156.59 per common share at June 30, 2007, the market value of our investment in BlackRock was approximately $6.8 billion at that date. As such, an additional $2.8 billion of pretax value was not recognized in our investment account at that
date.
In June 2007, BlackRock and Quellos Group, LLC (Quellos) announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement under which
BlackRock will acquire the fund of funds business of Quellos for up to $1.7 billion. The combined business will comprise one of the largest fund of funds platforms in the world, with over $25 billion in assets under management. Products, including
hedge, private equity and real asset fund of funds, as well as specialty and hybrid offerings, are managed on behalf of institutional and individual investors worldwide.
BlackRocks acquisition of Quellos fund of funds business is expected to close on or about October 1, 2007, pending regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Upon
closing, Quellos will receive $562 million in cash and $188 million in BlackRock common stock. PNC expects to recognize a pretax gain in the mid-$20 million range during the fourth quarter of 2007 resulting from BlackRocks issuance of shares
at closing. In addition, Quellos may receive up to an additional $970 million in cash and BlackRock common stock over 3.5 years contingent on certain measures.
BLACKROCK/MLIM TRANSACTION
As further described in our 2006 Form 10-K, on
September 29, 2006 Merrill Lynch contributed its investment management business (MLIM) to BlackRock in exchange for 65 million shares of newly issued BlackRock common and preferred stock.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, our Consolidated Income Statement included our former 69% ownership interest in BlackRock. However, our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 reflected the September 29, 2006 deconsolidation of BlackRocks balance sheet amounts and recognized our approximate 34% ownership interest in BlackRock as an investment accounted for under the equity method. This
accounting has resulted in a reduction in certain revenue and noninterest expense categories on our Consolidated Income Statement as our share of BlackRocks net income is now reported within asset management noninterest income.
BLACKROCK LTIP PROGRAMS
As further described in our 2006 Form 10-K, BlackRock adopted the 2002 LTIP program to help attract and retain qualified professionals. At that time, PNC agreed to transfer up to four million of the shares of BlackRock common stock then
held by us to help fund the 2002 LTIP and future programs approved by BlackRocks board of directors, subject to certain conditions and limitations. Prior to 2006, BlackRock granted awards of approximately $230 million under the 2002 LTIP
program, of which approximately $210 million were paid on January 30, 2007. The award payments were funded by approximately 17% in cash from BlackRock and approximately one million shares of BlackRock common stock transferred by PNC and
distributed to LTIP participants.
We recognized a pretax gain of $82 million in the first quarter of 2007 from the transfer of BlackRock shares to satisfy
the majority of our 2002 LTIP obligation. The gain was reflected in noninterest income and reflected the excess of market value over book value of the approximately one million shares transferred in January 2007.
PNCs noninterest income in the first six months of 2007 also included a $31 million pretax charge related to our commitment to fund additional BlackRock LTIP
programs. This charge represents the mark-to-market of our remaining BlackRock LTIP obligation as of June 30, 2007.
BlackRock granted awards of
approximately $260 million in January 2007 under an additional LTIP program, which were converted into approximately 1.5 million restricted stock units. All of these awards are subject to achieving earnings performance goals prior to the
vesting date of September 29, 2011. The maximum value of awards that may be funded by PNC during the award period ending in September 2011 is approximately $271 million, which includes the $260 million of awards granted in January 2007. Shares
remaining after that award period ends would be available for future awards.
While we may continue to see volatility in earnings as we mark to market our
LTIP shares obligation each quarter-end, we will not recognize additional gains, if applicable, for the difference between the market value and the book value of the committed BlackRock common shares until the shares are distributed to LTIP
participants.
23
PFPC
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 Dollars in millions except as noted |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing revenue (a) |
|
$424 |
|
|
$401 |
|
Operating expense (a) |
|
311 |
|
|
296 |
|
Operating income |
|
113 |
|
|
105 |
|
Debt financing |
|
19 |
|
|
21 |
|
Nonoperating income (b) |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
Pretax earnings |
|
97 |
|
|
86 |
|
Income taxes |
|
34 |
|
|
33 |
|
Earnings |
|
$63 |
|
|
$53 |
|
PERIOD-END BALANCE SHEET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
$1,005 |
|
|
$1,018 |
|
Other assets |
|
1,395 |
|
|
1,398 |
|
Total assets |
|
$2,400 |
|
|
$2,416 |
|
Debt financing |
|
$734 |
|
|
$852 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
1,109 |
|
|
1,137 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
557 |
|
|
427 |
|
Total funds |
|
$2,400 |
|
|
$2,416 |
|
PERFORMANCE RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity |
|
26 |
% |
|
29 |
% |
Operating margin (c) |
|
27 |
|
|
26 |
|
SERVICING STATISTICS (at June 30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting/administration net fund assets (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$765 |
|
|
$671 |
|
Offshore |
|
103 |
|
|
72 |
|
Total |
|
$868 |
|
|
$743 |
|
Asset type (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$286 |
|
|
$247 |
|
Equity |
|
373 |
|
|
317 |
|
Fixed income |
|
118 |
|
|
110 |
|
Other (d) |
|
91 |
|
|
69 |
|
Total |
|
$868 |
|
|
$743 |
|
Custody fund assets (in billions) |
|
$467 |
|
|
$389 |
|
Shareholder accounts (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer agency |
|
20 |
|
|
18 |
|
Subaccounting |
|
50 |
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
|
70 |
|
|
65 |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full-time employees (at June 30) |
|
4,522 |
|
|
4,314 |
|
(a) |
Certain out-of-pocket expense items which are then client billable are included in both servicing revenue and operating expense above, but offset each other entirely and therefore
have no net effect on operating income. Distribution revenue and expenses which relate to 12b-1 fees that PFPC receives from certain fund clients for the payment of marketing, sales and service expenses also entirely offset each other, but are
netted for presentation purposes above. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. |
(b) |
Net of nonoperating expense. |
(c) |
Total operating income divided by servicing revenue. |
(d) |
Includes alternative investment net assets serviced. |
PFPC earned $63 million for the first six months of 2007
compared with $53 million in the year-earlier period. The earnings increase from the first half of 2006 reflected new business, organic growth and market appreciation, partly offset by client deconversions.
Highlights of PFPCs performance in the first six months of 2007 included:
|
|
|
Successful conversion of 1.9 million open transfer agency shareholder accounts during the second quarter related to a new client. |
|
|
|
Total fund investment assets serviced exceeded the $100 billion threshold in the second quarter in both managed account services and offshore operations.
|
|
|
|
Revenue growth in securities lending, alternative investments, and managed account services was approximately 30% on a year to year comparison.
|
Servicing revenue for the first half of 2007 increased by $23 million, or 6%, over the first half of 2006, to $424 million.
Revenue increases related to managed accounts, transfer agency, alternative investments and securities lending drove the higher servicing revenue.
Operating expense increased $15 million, or 5%, to $311 million, in the first six months of 2007 compared with the first six months of 2006. The majority of this increase is attributable to increased headcount and technology costs to
support new business achieved over the past year.
PFPCs effective tax rate improved on a year to year comparison due to a change in providing for
earnings on its foreign subsidiaries in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in income taxes reflected higher pretax earnings.
Total assets serviced by
PFPC amounted to $2.4 trillion at June 30, 2007 compared with $1.9 trillion at June 30, 2006. This increase resulted from the new business, organic growth in existing business, and strong market appreciation experienced over the past year.
24
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND JUDGMENTS
Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and in Part II, Item 8 of our 2006 Form 10-K describe the most significant accounting
policies that we use. Certain of these policies require us to make estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate or subject to variations that may significantly affect our reported results and financial position for
the period or in future periods.
We must use estimates, assumptions, and judgments when financial assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at,
or adjusted to reflect, fair value. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value inherently result in a higher degree of financial statement volatility. Fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and
liabilities are based on either quoted market prices or are provided by other independent third-party sources, when available. When such third-party information is not available, we estimate fair value primarily by using cash flow and other
financial modeling techniques. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could materially impact our future financial condition and results of operations.
We discuss the following critical accounting policies and judgments under this same heading in Item 7 of our 2006 Form 10-K:
|
|
|
Allowances for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
Private Equity Asset Valuation |
Additional discussion and information
on the application of these policies is found in other portions of this Financial Review and in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. In particular, see Note 1 Accounting Policies and Note 11 Income
Taxes in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements regarding our first quarter 2007 adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 and the discussion under the heading Lease and Related Tax and Accounting Matters on page 11.
STATUS OF QUALIFIED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN
We have a noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plan (plan or pension plan) covering eligible employees. Benefits are derived from a
cash balance formula based on compensation levels, age and length of service. Pension contributions are based on an actuarially determined amount necessary to fund total benefits payable to plan participants. Plan assets are currently approximately
60% invested in equity investments with most of the remainder invested in fixed income instruments. Plan fiduciaries determine and review the plans investment policy.
We calculate the expense associated with the pension plan in accordance with SFAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, and we use assumptions and methods that are compatible with the
requirements of SFAS 87, including a policy of reflecting trust assets at their fair market value. On an annual basis, we review the actuarial assumptions related to the pension plan, including the discount rate, the rate of compensation increase
and the expected return on plan assets. Neither the discount rate nor the compensation increase assumptions significantly affects pension expense.
The
expected long-term return on assets assumption does significantly affect pension expense. The expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2007 was 8.25%, unchanged from 2006. Under current accounting rules,
the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods. Each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in
subsequent years to change by up to $4 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations.
The table below reflects the estimated effects on
pension expense of certain changes in assumptions, using 2007 estimated expense as a baseline.
|
|
|
|
Change in Assumption |
|
Estimated Increase to 2007 Pension Expense (In millions) |
.5% decrease in discount rate |
|
$ |
2 |
.5% decrease in expected long-term return on assets |
|
$ |
10 |
.5% increase in compensation rate |
|
$ |
2 |
We currently estimate a pretax pension benefit of $30 million in 2007 compared with a pretax benefit of $12
million in 2006. The primary reason for this change is 2006 investment returns in excess of the expected long-term return assumption. Actual pension benefit recognized for the first six months of 2007 was $16 million. The 2007 values and
sensitivities shown above also include the qualified defined benefit plan
25
maintained by Mercantile that we plan to integrate into the PNC plan as of December 31, 2007. See Note 8 Certain Employee Benefit And Stock-Based
Compensation Plans in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report for more information regarding these plans.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R). This statement affects the
accounting and reporting for our qualified pension plan, our nonqualified retirement plans, our postretirement welfare benefit plans, and our postemployment benefit plans. SFAS 158 requires recognition on the balance sheet of the overfunded or
underfunded position of these plans as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the related benefit obligations. To the extent that a plans net funded status differs from the amounts currently recognized on the balance sheet,
the difference, net of tax, will be recorded as a part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) within the shareholders equity section of the balance sheet. This guidance also requires the recognition of any
unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service costs to AOCI, net of tax. Post-adoption changes in unrecognized actuarial gains and losses as well as unrecognized prior service costs will be recognized in other comprehensive
income, net of tax. SFAS 158 was effective for PNC as of December 31, 2006, with no retrospective application permitted for prior year-end reporting periods, and resulted in an adjustment for all unamortized net actuarial losses and prior
service costs of $132 million after tax. See Note 1 Accounting Policies of our 2006 Form 10-K for further information regarding our adoption of this pronouncement.
Our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions. Investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future
years. Also, current law, including the provisions of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan. In any event, any large near-term contributions to the plan will be at our discretion, as
we expect that the minimum required contributions under the law will be minimal or zero for several years.
We maintain other defined benefit plans that
have a less significant effect on financial results, including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees.
RISK MANAGEMENT
We encounter risk as part of the normal course of our business and we
design risk management processes to help manage
these risks. The Risk Management section included in Item 7 of our 2006 Form 10-K provides a general overview of the risk measurement, control
strategies and monitoring aspects of our corporate-level risk management processes. Additionally, our 2006 Form 10-K provides an analysis of the risk management processes for what we view as our primary areas of risk: credit, operational, market and
liquidity, as well as a discussion of our use of financial derivatives as part of our overall asset and liability risk management process. In appropriate places within that section, historical performance is also addressed. The following information
in this Risk Management section updates our 2006 Form 10-K disclosures in these areas.
CREDIT RISK
MANAGEMENT
Credit risk represents the possibility that a customer, counterparty or issuer may not perform in accordance with
contractual terms. Credit risk is inherent in the financial services business and results from extending credit to customers, purchasing securities, and entering into financial derivative transactions. Credit risk is one of the most common risks in
banking and is one of our most significant risks.
Norperforming, Past Due And Potential Problem Assets
See Note 4 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report and included here by reference for details of the types
of nonperforming assets that we held at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. In addition, certain performing assets have interest payments that are past due or have the potential for future repayment problems.
Total nonperforming assets at June 30, 2007 increased $75 million, to $246 million, compared with December 31, 2006. Of this increase, $67 million related
to the Mercantile portfolio.
Foreclosed lease assets of $12 million at both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 primarily represent our
repossession of collateral related to a single airline industry credit. This repossessed collateral is currently being leased.
The amount of nonperforming
loans that was current as to principal and interest was $79 million at June 30, 2007 and $59 million at December 31, 2006. While we believe that overall asset quality will remain strong for the near term, the current level of asset quality
is very strong by historical standards and may not be sustainable for the foreseeable future, particularly in the event of deteriorating economic conditions or higher interest rates. This outlook, combined with expected loan or total credit exposure
growth, may result in an increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses in future periods.
26
Nonperforming Assets By Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
Dec. 31 2006 |
Retail Banking |
|
$ |
140 |
|
$ |
106 |
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
100 |
|
|
63 |
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
2 |
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
171 |
Change In Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
Transferred from accrual |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Acquisition Mercantile |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal activity including payoffs |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Charge-offs and valuation adjustments |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Returned to performing |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Asset sales |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
June 30 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days Or More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent of Total Outstandings |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
Dec. 31 2006 |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
Dec. 31 2006 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
.03 |
% |
|
.04 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
10 |
|
|
5 |
|
.10 |
|
|
.14 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
27 |
|
|
28 |
|
.15 |
|
|
.17 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
5 |
|
|
7 |
|
.05 |
|
|
.11 |
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
1.57 |
|
|
.27 |
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
.08 |
|
|
.10 |
|
The increase in Other accruing loans past due 90 days or more at June 30, 2007 compared with
December 31, 2006 is primarily due to a single credit which returned to current status subsequent to quarter end.
Loans that are not included in
nonperforming or past due categories but cause us to be uncertain about the borrowers ability to comply with existing repayment terms over the next six months totaled $60 million at June 30, 2007 compared with $41 million at
December 31, 2006.
Allowances For Loan And Lease Losses And Unfunded Loan Commitments And Letters Of Credit
We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. We determine the allowance based on quarterly assessments of the probable
estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. While we make allocations to specific loans and pools of loans, the total reserve is available for all loan and lease losses.
We refer you to Note 4 Asset Quality in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report regarding changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses and changes in the allowance
for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit for additional information which is included herein by reference.
Allocation Of Allowance For Loan And Lease Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Dollars in millions |
|
Allowance |
|
Loans to Total Loans |
|
|
Allowance |
|
Loans to Total Loans |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
497 |
|
38.1 |
% |
|
$ |
443 |
|
40.9 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
110 |
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
7.0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
45 |
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
33.1 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
10 |
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
12.7 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
38 |
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
5.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
.6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
.7 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
703 |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
560 |
|
100.0 |
% |
In addition to the allowance for loan and lease losses, we maintain an allowance for unfunded loan commitments and
letters of credit. We report this allowance as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We determine this amount using estimates of the probability of the ultimate funding and losses related to those credit exposures. This methodology is
similar to the one we use for determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan and lease losses.
The provision for credit losses for the first six
months of 2007 and the evaluation of the allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit as of June 30, 2007 reflected loan and total credit exposure growth, changes in loan portfolio composition,
refinements to model parameters, and changes in asset quality. The provision includes amounts for probable losses on loans and credit exposure related to unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.
The allowance as a percent of nonperforming loans was 322% and as a percent of total loans was 1.09% at June 30, 2007. The comparable percentages at
December 31, 2006 were 381% and 1.12%.
Charge-Offs And Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 Dollars in millions |
|
Charge- offs |
|
Recoveries |
|
Net Charge- offs |
|
|
Percent of Average Loans |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
.37 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
32 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
.29 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
.23 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
.36 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
24 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
.20 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
(.29 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
70 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
.20 |
|
27
We establish reserves to provide coverage for probable losses not considered in the specific, pool and consumer reserve methodologies, such as, but not limited to, industry concentrations and conditions; credit quality trends; recent loss
experience in particular sectors of the portfolio; ability and depth of lending management; changes in risk selection and underwriting standards and the timing of available information. The amount of reserves for these qualitative factors is
assigned to loan categories and to business segments primarily based on the relative specific and pool allocation amounts. The amount of reserve allocated for qualitative factors represented 5.7% of the total allowance and .06% of total loans, net
of unearned income, at June 30, 2007.
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
Credit default swaps provide, for a fee, an assumption by a third party of a portion of the credit risk related to the underlying financial instruments. We use these
contracts to mitigate credit risk associated with commercial lending activities as well as proprietary derivative and convertible bond trading. Credit default swaps are included in the Free-Standing Derivatives table in the Financial Derivatives
section of this Risk Management discussion. Net gains from credit default swaps, reflected in the Trading line item on our Consolidated Income Statement, totaled $8 million in the first six months of 2007. For the first six months of 2006, net
losses totaled $7 million.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Market risk is the risk of a loss in earnings or economic value due to adverse movements in market factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates,
and equity prices.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT INTEREST RATE
RISK
Interest rate risk results primarily from our traditional banking activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many
factors, including economic and financial conditions, movements in interest rates, and consumer preferences, affect the difference between the interest that we earn on assets and the interest that we pay on liabilities and the level of our
noninterest-bearing funding sources. Due to the repricing term mismatches and embedded options inherent in certain of these products, changes in market interest rates not only affect expected near-term earnings, but also the economic values of these
assets and liabilities.
PNCs Asset and Liability Management group centrally manages interest rate risk within limits and guidelines set forth in our
risk management policies approved by the Asset and Liability Committee and the Risk Committee of the Board.
Sensitivity estimates and market interest rate
benchmarks for the second quarter of 2007 and 2006 follow:
INTEREST SENSITIVITY
ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 |
|
|
Second Quarter 2006 |
|
Net Interest Income Sensitivity Simulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net interest income in first year from gradual interest rate change over following 12 months of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point increase |
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
(1.3 |
)% |
100 basis point decrease |
|
2.5 |
% |
|
1.2 |
% |
Effect on net interest income in second year from gradual interest rate change over the preceding 12 months of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point increase |
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
(3.6 |
)% |
100 basis point decrease |
|
4.4 |
% |
|
2.8 |
% |
Duration of Equity Model |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base case duration of equity (in years): |
|
3.2 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
Key Period-End Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-month LIBOR |
|
5.32 |
% |
|
5.33 |
% |
Three-year swap |
|
5.39 |
% |
|
5.62 |
% |
In addition to measuring the effect on net interest income assuming parallel changes in current interest rates, we
routinely simulate the effects of a number of nonparallel interest rate environments. The following Net Interest Income Sensitivity To Alternate Rate Scenarios table reflects the percentage change in net interest income over the next two 12-month
periods assuming (i) the PNC Economists most likely rate forecast, (ii) implied market forward rates, and (iii) a Two-Ten Inversion (a 200 basis point inversion between two-year and ten-year rates superimposed on current base
rates) scenario. We are inherently sensitive to a flatter or inverted yield curve.
Net Interest Income Sensitivity To Alternate Rate Scenarios
(Second Quarter 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Economist |
|
|
Market Forward |
|
|
Two-Ten Inversion |
|
First year sensitivity |
|
.5 |
% |
|
.2 |
% |
|
(8.0 |
)% |
Second year sensitivity |
|
5.8 |
% |
|
.9 |
% |
|
(7.6 |
)% |
All changes in forecasted net interest income are relative to results in a base rate scenario where current market
rates are assumed to remain unchanged over the forecast horizon.
When forecasting net interest income, we make assumptions about interest rates and the
shape of the yield curve, the volume and characteristics of new business, and the behavior of existing on- and off-balance sheet positions. These assumptions determine the future level of simulated net interest income in the base interest rate
scenario and the other interest rate scenarios presented in the following table. These simulations assume that as assets and liabilities mature, they are replaced or repriced at market rates.
28
The graph below presents the yield curves for the base rate scenario and each of the alternative scenarios one year forward.
Our risk position has become increasingly liability sensitive in part due to the continued flat yield curve and in part due to
our balance sheet management strategies. We believe that we have the deposit funding base and balance sheet flexibility to adjust, where appropriate, to changing interest rates and market conditions.
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT TRADING RISK
Our trading activities primarily include customer-driven trading in fixed income securities, equities, derivatives, and foreign exchange contracts. They also include the
underwriting of fixed income and equity securities and proprietary trading.
We use value-at-risk (VaR) as the primary means to measure and
monitor market risk in trading activities. The Risk Committee of the Board establishes an enterprise-wide VaR limit on our trading activities.
During the
first six months of 2007, our VaR ranged between $6.1 million and $9.3 million, averaging $7.6 million.
To help ensure the integrity of the models used to
calculate VaR for each portfolio and enterprise-wide, we use a process known as backtesting. The backtesting process consists of comparing actual observations of trading-related gains or losses against the VaR levels that were calculated at the
close of the prior day. We would expect a maximum of two to three instances a year in which actual losses exceeded the prior day VaR measure. During the first six months of 2007, there were no such instances at the enterprise-wide level.
The following graph shows a comparison of enterprise-wide trading-related gains and losses against prior day VaR for the period.
29
Total trading revenue for the first half and second quarter of 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 - in millions |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
81 |
|
|
112 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
109 |
|
Securities underwriting and trading (a) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
27 |
|
|
31 |
|
Financial derivatives |
|
|
38 |
|
|
58 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 - in millions |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
29 |
|
|
55 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
Securities underwriting and trading (a) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
13 |
|
|
17 |
|
Financial derivatives |
|
|
9 |
|
|
29 |
|
Total trading revenue |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes changes in fair value for certain loans accounted for at fair value. |
Average trading assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 - in millions |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Trading assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities (a) |
|
$ |
1,858 |
|
$ |
1,636 |
Resale agreements (b) |
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
350 |
Financial derivatives (c) |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
1,080 |
Loans at fair value (c) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
86 |
Total trading assets |
|
$ |
4,455 |
|
$ |
3,152 |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold short (d) |
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
$ |
716 |
Repurchase agreements and other borrowings (e) |
|
|
653 |
|
|
763 |
Financial derivatives (f) |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
1,052 |
Borrowings at fair value (f) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
24 |
Total trading liabilities |
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 - in millions |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Trading assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities (a) |
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
$ |
1,477 |
Resale agreements (b) |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
378 |
Financial derivatives (c) |
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
1,251 |
Loans at fair value (c) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
170 |
Total trading assets |
|
$ |
4,773 |
|
$ |
3,276 |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold short (d) |
|
$ |
1,431 |
|
$ |
769 |
Repurchase agreements and other borrowings (e) |
|
|
669 |
|
|
641 |
Financial derivatives (f) |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
1,200 |
Borrowings at fair value (f) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
48 |
Total trading liabilities |
|
$ |
3,370 |
|
$ |
2,658 |
(a) |
Included in Interest-earning assets-Other on the Average Consolidated Balance Sheet and Net Interest Analysis. |
(b) |
Included in Federal funds sold and resale agreements. |
(c) |
Included in Noninterest-earning assets-Other. |
(d) |
Included in Borrowed funds Other. |
(e) |
Included in Borrowed funds Repurchase agreements and Other. |
(f) |
Included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities. |
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT EQUITY AND OTHER INVESTMENT RISK
Equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both private and public equity markets.
BlackRock
PNC owns approximately 43 million shares of
BlackRock common stock, accounted for under the equity method. Our total investment in BlackRock was $4.0 billion at June 30, 2007 compared with $3.9 billion at December 31, 2006. The market value of our investment in BlackRock was $6.8
billion at June 30, 2007. The primary risk measurement, similar to other equity investments, is economic capital.
Low Income Housing Projects
Included in our equity investments are limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects. At June 30, 2007 these investments,
consisting of partnerships accounted for under the equity method as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships, totaled $763 million. The comparable amount at December 31, 2006 was $708 million. PNCs equity investment at
risk was $188 million at June 30, 2007 compared with $134 million at year-end 2006. We also had commitments to make additional equity investments in affordable housing limited partnerships of $108 million at June 30, 2007 compared with $71
million at December 31, 2006.
Private Equity
The private equity portfolio is comprised of equity and mezzanine investments that vary by industry, stage and type of investment. At June 30, 2007, private equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $533 million
compared with $463 million at December 31, 2006. As of June 30, 2007, approximately 46% of the amount was invested directly in a variety of companies and approximately 54% was invested in various limited partnerships. Our unfunded
commitments related to private equity totaled $267 million at June 30, 2007 compared with $283 million at December 31, 2006. At June 30, 2007, Mercantile private equity activities accounted for $32 million and $27 million of private
equity investments and private equity unfunded commitments, respectively.
Other Investments
We also make investments in affiliated and non-affiliated funds with both traditional and alternative investment strategies. The economic values could be driven by either
the fixed-income market or the equity markets, or both. At June 30, 2007, other investments totaled $375 million compared with $269 million at December 31, 2006. Approximately $73 million of other investments at June 30,
30
2007 related to Mercantile investment activities. Our unfunded commitments related to other investments totaled $64 million at June 30, 2007 compared
with $16 million at December 31, 2006. The amounts of other investments and related unfunded commitments at June 30, 2007 included those related to Steel City Capital Funding LLC (Steel City), as further described below.
On March 1, 2007, we entered into a joint venture with a third party to form Steel City for purposes of purchasing and originating second lien loans
and turnaround loans. Our primary reason for pursuing this venture was to leverage our strengths of origination and servicing, provide an additional product to our customers, and allow for us to moderate the risks associated with this asset class.
Additionally, we will earn fees for portfolio management services. Steel City is a limited liability company in which various PNC subsidiaries hold approximately a 31% equity ownership. At June 30, 2007, our capital contribution to Steel City
was approximately $28 million with a commitment to fund an additional $50 million. The third party investor has contributed capital of $63 million with a commitment to fund an additional $112 million. We evaluated the accounting for this
transaction under FIN 46R and other appropriate generally accepted accounting principles and determined that our aggregate investment will be accounted for under the equity method as described under Note 1 Accounting Policies in the Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. This transaction did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
One of our subsidiaries acts as manager of Steel City. In this capacity it performs investment management services and administers day-to-day operations for Steel City and is compensated for those services through a
monthly management fee. The manager also will receive certain performance-based fees. In addition, one of our subsidiaries is providing Steel City with a line of credit for purposes of short-term working capital needs at current market rates.
PNC Bank, N.A., sold $107 million of loans at fair value to Steel City at the inception of the entity. All the loans sold to Steel City were classified as
performing loans. This transfer was treated as a sale for accounting purposes.
LIQUIDITY RISK
MANAGEMENT
Liquidity risk is the risk of potential loss if we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost. We
manage liquidity risk to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal business as usual and stressful circumstances.
Our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the deposit base that comes from our retail and wholesale banking activities. Other borrowed funds come from a
diverse mix of short and long-term funding sources. Liquid assets and unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to maintain our liquidity position.
Liquid assets consist of
short-term investments (federal funds sold, resale agreements and other short-term investments, including trading securities) and securities available for sale. At June 30, 2007, our liquid assets totaled $31.4 billion, with $23.7 billion
pledged as collateral for borrowings, trust, and other commitments.
Bank Level Liquidity
PNC Bank, N.A. is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)-Pittsburgh. Certain Mercantile banks are members of the FHLB-Atlanta. As such, these banks
have access to advances from the FHLB secured generally by residential mortgages. PNC Bank, N.A. can also borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Clevelands discount window to meet short-term liquidity requirements. These borrowings are
secured by securities and commercial loans. Additionally, Mercantile banks can borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmonds discount window. At June 30, 2007, we maintained significant unused borrowing capacity from the Federal
Reserve Bank of Clevelands discount window and FHLB-Pittsburgh under current collateral requirements.
We can also obtain funding through alternative
forms of borrowing, including federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, and short-term and long-term debt issuances. In July 2004, PNC Bank, N.A. established a program to offer up to $20 billion in senior and subordinated unsecured debt
obligations with maturities of more than nine months. Through June 30, 2007, PNC Bank, N.A. had issued $5.4 billion of debt under this program, including the following second quarter 2007 bank note issuances:
|
|
|
On April 3, 2007, $500 million were issued that mature on October 3, 2008. Interest will be reset monthly to 1-month LIBOR minus 6 basis points and will
be paid monthly. |
|
|
|
On May 17, 2007, $1 billion were issued that mature June 17, 2008. Interest will be reset monthly to 1-month LIBOR minus 5 basis points and will be paid
monthly. |
|
|
|
On June 28, 2007, $1 billion were issued that mature on December 29, 2008. Interest will be reset monthly to 1-month LIBOR minus 4 basis points and will
be paid monthly. |
None of the second quarter issuances described above are redeemable by us or the holders prior to maturity.
PNC Bank, N.A. established a program in December 2004 to offer up to $3.0 billion of its commercial paper. As of June 30, 2007, $445 million of commercial paper
was outstanding under this program.
Parent Company Liquidity
Our parent companys routine funding needs consist primarily of dividends to PNC shareholders, share repurchases, debt service, the funding of non-bank affiliates, and acquisitions.
31
Parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet these requirements over the succeeding 12-month period. In managing parent company liquidity we consider funding sources, such as
expected dividends to be received from PNC Bank, N.A. and potential debt issuance, and discretionary funding uses, the most significant of which is the external dividend to be paid on PNCs stock.
The principal source of parent company cash flow is the dividends it receives from PNC Bank, N.A., which may be impacted by the following:
|
|
|
Contractual restrictions, and |
Also, there are statutory and
regulatory limitations on the ability of national banks to pay dividends or make other capital distributions or to extend credit to the parent company or its non-bank subsidiaries. Dividends may also be impacted by the banks capital needs and
by contractual restrictions. The amount available for dividend payments to the parent company by PNC Bank, N.A. without prior regulatory approval was approximately $628 million at June 30, 2007.
In addition to dividends from PNC Bank, N.A., other sources of parent company liquidity include cash and short-term investments, as well as dividends and loan repayments
from other subsidiaries and dividends or distributions from equity investments. As of June 30, 2007, the parent company had approximately $1.5 billion in funds available from its cash and short-term investments. As of June 30, 2007 there
were $855 million of parent company contractual obligations with maturities of less than one year.
We can also generate liquidity for the parent
company and PNCs non-bank subsidiaries through the issuance of securities in public or private markets.
On June 12, 2007, PNC Funding Corp
issued $500 million of Senior Notes that mature on June 12, 2009. Interest will be reset monthly to 1-month LIBOR plus 2 basis points. These notes are not redeemable by us or the holders prior to maturity.
On May 15, 2007, we redeemed Capital Securities totaling $300 million related to PNC Institutional Capital Trust B.
In July 2006, PNC Funding Corp established a program to offer up to $3.0 billion of commercial paper to provide the parent company with additional liquidity. As of
June 30, 2007, there were no issuances outstanding under this program.
Commitments
The following tables set forth contractual obligations and various other commitments representing required and potential cash outflows as of June 30, 2007.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 - in millions |
|
Total |
Remaining contractual maturities of time deposits |
|
$ |
22,996 |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
24,516 |
Minimum annual rentals on noncancellable leases |
|
|
1,171 |
Nonqualified pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
317 |
Purchase obligations (a) |
|
|
292 |
Total contractual cash obligations (b) |
|
$ |
49,292 |
(a) |
Includes purchase obligations for goods and services covered by noncancellable contracts and contracts including cancellation fees. |
(b) |
Excludes amounts related to our adoption of FIN 48 due to the uncertainty in terms of timing and amount of future cash outflows. Note 11 Income Taxes in our Notes To Consolidated
Financial Statements includes additional information regarding our adoption of FIN 48 in the first quarter of 2007. |
Other Commitments
(a)
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 - in millions |
|
Total |
Credit commitments |
|
$ |
50,678 |
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
4,882 |
Other commitments (b) |
|
|
439 |
Total commitments |
|
$ |
55,999 |
(a) |
Other commitments are funding commitments that could potentially require performance in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events. Loan commitments are reported net
of participations, assignments and syndications. |
(b) |
Includes private equity funding commitments related to equity management, low income housing projects and other investments. |
Financial Derivatives
We use a variety of financial
derivatives as part of the overall asset and liability risk management process to help manage interest rate, market and credit risk inherent in our business activities. Substantially all such instruments are used to manage risk related to changes in
interest rates. Interest rate and total return swaps, interest rate caps and floors and futures contracts are the primary instruments we use for interest rate risk management.
Financial derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. For interest rate swaps and total return swaps, options and futures contracts, only periodic cash payments and, with respect to
options, premiums are exchanged. Therefore, cash requirements and exposure to credit risk are significantly less than the notional amount on these instruments. Further information on our financial derivatives, including the credit risk amounts of
these derivatives as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, is presented in Note 1 Accounting Policies and Note 9 Financial Derivatives in the Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.
Not all elements of interest rate, market and credit risk are addressed through the use of financial or other derivatives, and such instruments may be ineffective for
their intended purposes due to unanticipated market characteristics, among other reasons.
32
The following tables provide the notional or contractual amounts and estimated net fair value of financial derivatives
used for risk management and designated as accounting hedges or free-standing derivatives at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Weighted-average interest rates presented are based on contractual terms, if fixed, or the implied forward
yield curve at each respective date, if floating.
Financial Derivatives - 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 - dollars in
millions |
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity |
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Received |
|
Accounting Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed |
|
$7,305 |
|
|
$ |
(15) |
|
4 yrs. 3 mos. |
|
5.69 |
% |
|
5.55 |
% |
Interest rate floors (b) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 yrs. 9 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Forward purchase commitments |
|
500 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 mo. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total asset rate conversion |
|
7,811 |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (a) Receive fixed |
|
5,195 |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
6 yrs. 8 mos. |
|
5.50 |
|
|
5.41 |
|
Total liability rate conversion |
|
5,195 |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate risk management |
|
13,006 |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage banking risk management Pay fixed interest rate swaps (a) |
|
716 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
9 yrs. 7 mos. |
|
5.22 |
|
|
5.57 |
|
Total commercial mortgage banking risk management |
|
716 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounting hedges (c) |
|
$13,722 |
|
|
$ |
(85) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free-Standing Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$50,719 |
|
|
$52 |
|
|
5 yrs. 2 mos. |
|
5.18 |
% |
|
5.19 |
% |
Caps/floors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold |
|
2,668 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
7 yrs. 1 mo. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Purchased |
|
1,841 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 yrs. 5 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Futures |
|
2,232 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
9 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
6,997 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Equity |
|
2,071 |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
1 yr. 7 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Swaptions |
|
4,061 |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
12 yrs. 5 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total customer-related |
|
70,589 |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other risk management and proprietary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
28,135 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
4 yrs. 11 mos. |
|
4.98 |
% |
|
5.11 |
% |
Caps/floors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold |
|
7,250 |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
2 yrs. 5 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Purchased |
|
8,760 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
2 yrs. 4 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Futures |
|
25,534 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
1 yr. 2 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
2,855 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 yrs. 2 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
4,922 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
8 yrs. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Risk participation agreements |
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 yrs. 6 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Commitments related to mortgage-related assets |
|
3,394 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
1 mo. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
29,079 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
6 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Swaptions |
|
23,265 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
7 yrs. 7 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total other risk management and proprietary |
|
133,945 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total free-standing derivatives |
|
$204,534 |
|
|
$6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The floating rate portion of interest rate contracts is based on money-market indices. As a percent of notional amount, 63% were based on 1-month LIBOR, 30% on 3-month LIBOR and 7%
on Prime Rate. |
(b) |
Interest rate floors have a weighted-average strike of 3.20%. |
(c) |
Fair value amounts include net accrued interest receivable of $106 million. |
NM Not meaningful
33
Financial Derivatives - 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 - dollars in millions |
|
Notional/ Contract Amount |
|
Estimated Net Fair Value |
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity |
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Received |
|
Accounting Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed |
|
$7,815 |
|
$62 |
|
|
3 yrs. 9 mos. |
|
5.30 |
% |
|
5.43 |
% |
Interest rate floors (b) |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
4 yrs. 3 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total asset rate conversion |
|
7,821 |
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability rate conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (a) Receive fixed |
|
4,245 |
|
6 |
|
|
6 yrs. 11 mos. |
|
5.15 |
|
|
5.43 |
|
Total liability rate conversion |
|
4,245 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate risk management |
|
12,066 |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage banking risk management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed interest rate swaps (a) |
|
745 |
|
(7 |
) |
|
9 yrs. 11 mos. |
|
5.25 |
|
|
5.09 |
|
Total commercial mortgage banking risk management |
|
745 |
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounting hedges (c) |
|
$12,811 |
|
$61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free-Standing Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
$48,816 |
|
$9 |
|
|
4 yrs. 11 mos. |
|
5.00 |
% |
|
5.01 |
% |
Caps/floors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold |
|
1,967 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
7 yrs. 4 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Purchased |
|
897 |
|
3 |
|
|
7 yrs. 2 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Futures |
|
2,973 |
|
2 |
|
|
9 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
5,245 |
|
|
|
|
6 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Equity |
|
2,393 |
|
(63 |
) |
|
1 yr. 6 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Swaptions |
|
8,685 |
|
16 |
|
|
6 yrs. 10 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Other |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
10 yrs. 6 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total customer-related |
|
70,996 |
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other risk management and proprietary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
19,631 |
|
4 |
|
|
7 yrs. 8 mos. |
|
4.81 |
% |
|
4.97 |
% |
Caps/floors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold |
|
6,500 |
|
(50 |
) |
|
2 yrs. 11 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Purchased |
|
7,010 |
|
59 |
|
|
3 yrs. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Futures |
|
13,955 |
|
(3 |
) |
|
1 yr. 4 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
5 yrs. 2 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Credit derivatives |
|
3,626 |
|
(11 |
) |
|
7 yrs. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Risk participation agreements |
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
5 yrs. 5 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Commitments related to mortgage-related assets |
|
2,723 |
|
10 |
|
|
2 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
63,033 |
|
(2 |
) |
|
8 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Swaptions |
|
25,951 |
|
54 |
|
|
6 yrs. 10 mos. |
|
NM |
|
|
NM |
|
Total other risk management and proprietary |
|
145,173 |
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total free-standing derivatives |
|
$216,169 |
|
$25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
The floating rate portion of interest rate contracts is based on money-market indices. As a percent of notional amount, 67% were based on 1-month LIBOR, 27% on 3-month LIBOR and 6%
on Prime Rate. |
(b) |
Interest rate floors have a weighted-average strike of 3.21%. |
(c) |
Fair value amounts include net accrued interest receivable of $94 million. |
NM Not meaningful
34
INTERNAL CONTROLS AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of June 30, 2007, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and of changes in our internal control over financial reporting.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of June 30, 2007, and that there has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Accounting/administration net fund assets - Net
domestic and foreign fund investment assets for which we provide accounting and administration services. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Adjusted average total assets - Primarily comprised of total average quarterly (or annual) assets plus (less) unrealized losses (gains) on available-for-sale debt securities, less goodwill and certain other
intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes).
Annualized - Adjusted to reflect a full year of activity.
Assets under management - Assets over which we have sole or shared investment authority for our customers/clients. We do not include these assets on our
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Basis point - One hundredth of a percentage point.
Charge-off - Process of removing a loan or portion of a loan from our balance sheet because it is considered uncollectible. We also record a charge-off when a loan is transferred to held for sale by reducing
the carrying amount by the allowance for loan losses associated with such loan or if the market value is less than its carrying amount.
Common
shareholders equity to total assets - Common shareholders equity divided by total assets. Common shareholders equity equals total shareholders equity less the liquidation value of preferred stock.
Credit derivatives - Contractual agreements that provide protection against a credit event of one or more referenced credits. The nature of a credit event is
established by the
protection buyer and protection seller at the inception of a transaction, and such events include bankruptcy, insolvency and failure to meet payment
obligations when due. The buyer of the credit derivative pays a periodic fee in return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of a credit event.
Credit spread - The difference in yield between debt issues of similar maturity. The excess of yield attributable to credit spread is often used as a measure of relative creditworthiness, with a reduction in
the credit spread reflecting an improvement in the borrowers perceived creditworthiness.
Custody assets - Investment assets held on behalf of
clients under safekeeping arrangements. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Investment assets held in custody at other institutions on our behalf are included in the appropriate asset categories on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet as if physically held by us.
Derivatives - Financial contracts whose value is derived from publicly traded securities, interest
rates, currency exchange rates or market indices. Derivatives cover a wide assortment of financial contracts, including forward contracts, futures, options and swaps.
Duration of equity - An estimate of the rate sensitivity of our economic value of equity. A negative duration of equity is associated with asset sensitivity (i.e., positioned for rising interest rates),
while a positive value implies liability sensitivity (i.e., positioned for declining interest rates). For example, if the duration of equity is +1.5 years, the economic value of equity declines by 1.5% for each 100 basis point increase in
interest rates.
Earning assets - Assets that generate income, which include: federal funds sold; resale agreements; other short-term investments,
including trading securities; loans held for sale; loans, net of unearned income; securities; and certain other assets.
Economic capital -
Represents the amount of resources that a business segment should hold to guard against potentially large losses that could cause insolvency. It is based on a measurement of economic risk, as opposed to risk as defined by regulatory bodies. The
economic capital measurement process involves converting a risk distribution to the capital that is required to support the risk, consistent with our target credit rating. As such, economic risk serves as a common currency of risk that
allows us to compare different risks on a similar basis.
Economic value of equity (EVE) - The present value of the expected cash flows
of our existing assets less the present value of the expected cash flows of our existing liabilities, plus the present value of the net cash flows of our existing off-balance sheet positions.
35
Effective duration - A measurement, expressed in years, that, when multiplied by a change in interest rates, would approximate the percentage change in value of on- and off- balance sheet positions.
Efficiency - Noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income (GAAP basis) and noninterest income.
Foreign exchange contracts - Contracts that provide for the future receipt and delivery of foreign currency at previously agreed-upon terms.
Funds transfer pricing - A management accounting methodology designed to recognize the net interest income effects of sources and uses of funds provided by the
assets and liabilities of a business segment. We assign these balances LIBOR-based funding rates at origination that represent the interest cost for us to raise/invest funds with similar maturity and repricing structures.
Futures and forward contracts - Contracts in which the buyer agrees to purchase and the seller agrees to deliver a specific financial instrument at a
predetermined price or yield. May be settled either in cash or by delivery of the underlying financial instrument.
GAAP - Accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Interest rate floors and caps - Interest rate protection instruments that involve payment from
the protection seller to the protection buyer of an interest differential, which represents the difference between a short-term rate (e.g., three-month LIBOR) and an agreed-upon rate (the strike rate) applied to a notional principal amount.
Interest rate swap contracts - Contracts that are entered into primarily as an asset/liability management strategy to reduce interest rate risk.
Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest rate payments, such as fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments, based on notional principal amounts.
Intrinsic value - The amount by which the fair value of an underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of an option on that stock.
Leverage ratio - Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by adjusted average total assets.
Net interest margin - Annualized
taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets.
Nondiscretionary assets under administration - Assets we hold for our
customers/clients in a non-discretionary, custodial capacity. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Noninterest income to total revenue - Noninterest income
divided by the sum of net interest income (GAAP basis) and noninterest income.
Nonperforming assets - Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual
loans, troubled debt restructured loans, foreclosed assets and other assets. We do not accrue interest income on assets classified as nonperforming.
Nonperforming loans - Nonperforming loans include loans to commercial, commercial real estate, equipment lease financing, consumer, and residential mortgage customers as well as troubled debt restructured loans. Nonperforming loans
do not include loans held for sale or foreclosed and other assets. We do not accrue interest income on loans classified as nonperforming.
Notional
amount - A number of currency units, shares, or other units specified in a derivatives contract.
Operating leverage - The period to period
percentage change in total revenue (GAAP basis) less the percentage change in noninterest expense. A positive percentage indicates that revenue growth exceeded expense growth (i.e., positive operating leverage) while a negative percentage
implies expense growth exceeded revenue growth (i.e., negative operating leverage).
Options - Contracts that grant the purchaser, for a
premium payment, the right, but not the obligation, to either purchase or sell the associated financial instrument at a set price during a period or at a specified date in the future.
Recovery - Cash proceeds received on a loan that we had previously charged off. We credit the amount received to the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Return on average capital - Annualized net income divided by average capital.
Return on average assets - Annualized net income divided by average assets.
Return on average common equity
- Annualized net income divided by average common shareholders equity.
Risk-weighted assets - Primarily computed by the assignment of
specific risk-weights (as defined by The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System) to assets and off-balance sheet instruments.
Securitization - The process of legally transforming financial assets into securities.
Swaptions - Contracts that grant the
purchaser, for a premium payment, the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an interest rate swap agreement during a period or at a specified date in the future.
36
Tangible common equity ratio - Period-end common shareholders equity less goodwill and other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes), and excluding mortgage servicing rights, divided by period-end assets less
goodwill and other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes), and excluding mortgage servicing rights.
Taxable-equivalent interest - The
interest income earned on certain assets is completely or partially exempt from federal income tax. As such, these tax-exempt instruments typically yield lower returns than taxable investments. To provide more meaningful comparisons of yields and
margins for all interest-earning assets, we also provide revenue on a taxable-equivalent basis by increasing the interest income earned on tax-exempt assets to make it fully equivalent to interest income earned on other taxable investments. This
adjustment is not permitted under GAAP on the Consolidated Income Statement.
Tier 1 risk-based capital - Tier 1 risk-based capital equals: total
shareholders equity, plus trust preferred capital securities, plus certain minority interests that are held by others; less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (net of eligible deferred taxes), less equity investments in nonfinancial
companies and less net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale equity securities. Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale equity securities, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net
unrealized holding gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives are excluded from total shareholders equity for tier 1 risk-based capital purposes.
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio - Tier 1 risk-based capital divided by period-end risk-weighted assets.
Total fund assets serviced
- Total domestic and offshore fund investment assets for which we provide related processing services. We do not include these assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Total return swap - A non-traditional swap where one party agrees to pay the other the total return of a defined underlying asset (e.g., a loan), usually in return for receiving a stream of
LIBOR-based cash flows. The total returns of the asset, including interest and any default shortfall, are passed through to the counterparty. The counterparty is therefore assuming the credit and economic risk of the underlying asset.
Total risk-based capital - Tier 1 risk-based capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and trust preferred securities, other minority interest not qualified as
tier 1, and the allowance for loan and lease losses, subject to certain limitations.
Total risk-based capital ratio - Total risk-based capital
divided by period-end risk-weighted assets.
Transaction deposits - The sum of money market and interest-bearing demand deposits and demand and other noninterest-bearing deposits.
Value-at-risk (VaR) - A statistically-based measure of risk which describes the amount of potential loss which may be incurred due to severe and
adverse market movements. The measure is of the maximum loss which should not be exceeded on 99 out of 100 days.
Yield curve - A graph showing the
relationship between the yields on financial instruments or market indices of the same credit quality with different maturities. For example, a normal or positive yield curve exists when long-term bonds have higher yields
than short-term bonds. A flat yield curve exists when yields are the same for short-term and long-term bonds. A steep yield curve exists when yields on long-term bonds are significantly higher than on short-term bonds. An
inverted or negative yield curve exists when short-term bonds have higher yields than long-term bonds.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
We make statements in this Report, and we may from time to time make other statements, regarding our outlook or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses and/or other matters regarding or affecting PNC that are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
outlook, estimate, forecast, project and other similar words and expressions.
Forward-looking statements
are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. We do not assume any duty and do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. Actual
results or future events could differ, possibly materially, from those that we anticipated in our forward-looking statements, and future results could differ materially from our historical performance.
Our forward-looking statements are subject to the following principal risks and uncertainties. We provide greater detail regarding some of these factors in our 2006 Form
10-K and in our current year Form 10-Qs, including in the Risk Factors and Risk Management sections of those reports. Our forward-looking statements may also be subject to other risks and uncertainties, including those discussed elsewhere in this
Report or in our other filings with the SEC.
|
|
|
Our business and operating results are affected by business and economic conditions generally or specifically in the principal markets in which we do business. We
are affected by changes in our
|
37
|
customers and counterparties financial performance, as well as changes in customer preferences and behavior, including as a result of changing
business and economic conditions. |
|
|
|
The value of our assets and liabilities, as well as our overall financial performance, is also affected by changes in interest rates or in valuations in the debt
and equity markets. Actions by the Federal Reserve and other government agencies, including those that impact money supply and market interest rates, can affect our activities and financial results. |
|
|
|
Our operating results are affected by our liability to provide shares of BlackRock common stock to help fund BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP)
programs, as our LTIP liability is adjusted quarterly (marked-to-market) based on changes in BlackRocks common stock price and the number of remaining committed shares, and we recognize gain or loss on such shares at such times as
shares are transferred for payouts under the LTIP programs. |
|
|
|
Competition can have an impact on customer acquisition, growth and retention, as well as on our credit spreads and product pricing, which can affect market share,
deposits and revenues. |
|
|
|
Our ability to implement our business initiatives and strategies could affect our financial performance over the next several years. |
|
|
|
Legal and regulatory developments could have an impact on our ability to operate our businesses or our financial condition or results of operations or our
competitive position or reputation. Reputational impacts, in turn, could affect matters such as business generation and retention, our ability to attract and retain management, liquidity, and funding. These legal and regulatory developments could
include: (a) the unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or regulatory and other governmental inquiries; (b) increased litigation risk from recent regulatory and other governmental developments; (c) the results of the regulatory
examination process, our failure to satisfy the requirements of agreements with governmental agencies, and regulators future use of supervisory and enforcement tools; (d) legislative and regulatory reforms, including changes to laws and
regulations involving tax, pension, education lending, and the protection of confidential customer information; and (e) changes in accounting policies and principles. |
|
|
|
Our business and operating results are affected by our ability to identify and effectively manage risks inherent in our businesses, including, where appropriate,
through the effective use of third-party insurance and capital management techniques. |
|
|
|
Our ability to anticipate and respond to technological changes can have an impact on our ability to respond to customer needs and to meet competitive demands.
|
|
|
|
The adequacy of our intellectual property protection, and the extent of any costs associated with obtaining rights in intellectual property claimed by others, can
impact our business and operating results. |
|
|
|
Our business and operating results can also be affected by widespread natural disasters, terrorist activities or international hostilities, either as a result of
the impact on the economy and financial and capital markets generally or on us or on our customers, suppliers or other counterparties specifically. |
|
|
|
Also, risks and uncertainties that could affect the results anticipated in forward-looking statements or from historical performance relating to our equity interest
in BlackRock, Inc. are discussed in more detail in BlackRocks 2006 Form 10-K, including in the Risk Factors section, and in BlackRocks other filings with the SEC, accessible on the SECs website and on or through BlackRocks
website at www.blackrock.com. |
We grow our business from time to time by acquiring other financial services companies, including our
pending Yardville and Sterling acquisitions. Acquisitions in general present us with risks other than those presented by the nature of the business acquired. In particular, acquisitions may be substantially more expensive to complete (including as a
result of costs incurred in connection with the integration of the acquired company) and the anticipated benefits (including anticipated cost savings and strategic gains) may be significantly harder or take longer to achieve than expected. In some
cases, acquisitions involve our entry into new businesses or new geographic or other markets, and these situations also present risks resulting from our inexperience in these new areas. As a regulated financial institution, our pursuit of attractive
acquisition opportunities could be negatively impacted due to regulatory delays or other regulatory issues. Regulatory and/or legal issues related to the pre-acquisition operations of an acquired business may cause reputational harm to PNC following
the acquisition and integration of the acquired business into ours and may result in additional future costs arising as a result of those issues. Post-closing acquisition risk continues to apply to Mercantile as we complete the integration.
38
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
In millions, except per share data Unaudited |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Other |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Total interest income |
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Net interest income less provision for credit losses |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Fund servicing |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Service charges on deposits |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Brokerage |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Consumer services |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Corporate services |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Equity management gains |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Trading |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Net gains (losses) related to BlackRock |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
Noninterest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Other |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Income before minority interests and income taxes |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
Minority interest in income of BlackRock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
Earnings Per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except par value Unaudited |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
3,177 |
|
|
$ |
3,523 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
Other short-term investments, including trading securities |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,366 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
25,903 |
|
|
|
23,191 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income of $1,004 and $795 |
|
|
64,714 |
|
|
|
50,105 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
Net loans |
|
|
64,011 |
|
|
|
49,545 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
7,745 |
|
|
|
3,402 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
5,584 |
|
|
|
5,330 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,265 |
|
|
|
8,929 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
125,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,820 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
18,302 |
|
|
$ |
16,070 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
58,919 |
|
|
|
50,231 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
77,221 |
|
|
|
66,301 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
7,537 |
|
|
|
3,633 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
3,962 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
24,516 |
|
|
|
15,028 |
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
109,777 |
|
|
|
90,147 |
|
|
|
|
Minority and noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock - $5 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 800 shares, issued 353 shares |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
11,339 |
|
|
|
10,985 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
Common stock held in treasury at cost: 11 and 60 shares |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(3,377 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
14,504 |
|
|
|
10,788 |
|
Total liabilities, minority and noncontrolling interests, and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
125,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,820 |
|
(a) |
Less than $.5 million at each date. |
See accompanying Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 - in millions Unaudited |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
735 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Net gains related to BlackRock |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of BlackRock |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
340 |
|
Other short-term investments, including trading securities |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
529 |
|
Other |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
1,554 |
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of securities |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
Loans |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
(8,058 |
) |
|
|
(6,460 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
(2,615 |
) |
|
|
(658 |
) |
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(913 |
) |
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
Net cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(1,890 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Purchases of corporate and bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(6,890 |
) |
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
3,770 |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
(808 |
) |
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Other short-term borrowed funds |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
Sales/issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
4,273 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term borrowed funds |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Perpetual trust securities |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments/maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term borrowed funds |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(328 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
6,754 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
Net Decrease In Cash And Due From Banks |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
3,177 |
|
|
$ |
3,438 |
|
Cash Paid For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Non-cash Items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for Mercantile acquisition |
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in investment in BlackRock |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer from loans to loans held for sale, net |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Impact of FSP 13-2 |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements.
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
BUSINESS
We are one of the largest diversified financial services companies in the United States based on assets, with businesses engaged in:
|
|
|
Corporate and institutional banking, |
|
|
|
Global fund processing services. |
We provide many of
our products and services nationally and others in our primary geographic markets located in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Washington, DC, Maryland, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky, and Delaware. We also provide certain global fund processing services
internationally. We are subject to intense competition from other financial services companies and are subject to regulation by various domestic and international authorities.
NOTE 1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent
company and its subsidiaries, most of which are wholly owned, and certain partnership interests and variable interest entities. See Note 2 Acquisitions in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2006 Form 10-K) regarding the deconsolidation
of BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock) from PNCs Consolidated Balance Sheet effective September 29, 2006. Our investment in BlackRock has been accounted for under the equity method of accounting since that date. We prepared these
consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP). We have eliminated intercompany accounts and
transactions. We have also reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform with the 2007 presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In our opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments needed to present fairly our results for the interim
periods.
When preparing these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, we have assumed that you have read the audited consolidated financial
statements included in our 2006 Form 10-K.
SPECIAL PURPOSE ENTITIES
Special purpose entities are broadly defined as legal entities structured for a particular purpose. We use special purpose entities in various legal forms to conduct
normal business
activities. Special purpose entities that meet the criteria for a Qualifying Special Purpose Entity (QSPE) as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. (SFAS) 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, are not required to be consolidated. We review special purpose entities that are not QSPEs
for consolidation under the guidance contained in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R) and Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, as appropriate.
In general, a variable interest entity (VIE) is
a special purpose entity formed as a corporation, partnership, limited liability corporation, or any other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either:
|
|
|
Does not have equity investors with voting rights that can directly or indirectly make decisions about the entitys activities through those voting rights or
similar rights, or |
|
|
|
Has equity investors that do not provide sufficient equity for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support.
|
A VIE often holds financial assets, including loans or receivables, real estate or other property.
We consolidate a VIE if we are considered to be its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is subject to absorbing the majority of the expected losses from the
VIEs activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the entitys residual returns, or both. Upon consolidation of a VIE, we recognize all of the VIEs assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests, with future changes based upon
consolidation accounting principles. See Note 6 Variable Interest Entities for more information about VIEs that we do not consolidate but in which we hold a significant interest.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
We record the net assets of companies that we acquire at their
estimated fair value at the date of acquisition and we include the results of operations of the acquired companies in our consolidated income statement from the date of acquisition. We recognize as goodwill the excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of the net assets acquired.
USE OF ESTIMATES
We prepare the consolidated financial statements using financial information available at the time, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported. Actual results may differ from these estimates and the differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements.
42
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We earn net interest income and noninterest income from various sources, including:
|
|
|
Asset management and fund servicing, |
|
|
|
Brokerage services, and |
|
|
|
Securities and derivatives trading activities, including foreign exchange. |
We also earn revenue from selling loans and securities, and we recognize income or loss from certain private equity activities. We earn fees and commissions from:
|
|
|
Issuing loan commitments, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees, |
|
|
|
Selling various insurance products, |
|
|
|
Providing treasury management services, |
|
|
|
Providing merger and acquisition advisory and related services, and |
|
|
|
Participating in certain capital markets transactions. |
Revenue earned on interest-earning assets is recognized based on the effective yield of the financial instrument.
We recognize asset management
and fund servicing fees primarily as the services are performed. Asset management fees are generally based on a percentage of the fair value of the assets under management and performance fees are generally based on a percentage of the returns on
such assets. Certain performance fees are earned upon attaining specified investment return thresholds and are recorded as earned. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006, asset management fees also includes our ownership share of the earnings of
BlackRock under the equity method of accounting.
Fund servicing fees are primarily based on a percentage of the fair value of the fund assets and the
number of shareholder accounts we service.
Service charges on deposit accounts are recognized as charged. Brokerage fees and gains on the sale of
securities and certain derivatives are recognized on a trade-date basis.
We record private equity income or loss based on changes in the valuation of the
underlying investments or when we dispose of our interest. Dividend income from private equity investments is generally recognized when received.
We
recognize revenue from loan servicing; securities, derivatives and foreign exchange trading; and securities underwriting activities as they are earned based on contractual terms, as transactions occur or as services are provided. We recognize
revenue from the sale of loans upon cash settlement of the transaction.
In certain circumstances, revenue is reported net of associated expenses in
accordance with GAAP.
INVESTMENTS
We have interests in various types of
investments. The accounting for these investments is dependent on a number of factors including, but not limited to, items such as:
|
|
|
Marketability of the investment, |
|
|
|
Our plans for the investment, and |
|
|
|
The nature of the investment. |
Investment in
BlackRock
We deconsolidated the assets and liabilities of BlackRock from our Consolidated Balance Sheet effective September 29, 2006 and now
account for our investment in BlackRock under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, our investment in BlackRock is reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet in the caption equity investments, while our equity in earnings of
BlackRock is reported on our Consolidated Income Statement in the caption asset management.
We mark to market our obligation to transfer BlackRock shares
related to the BlackRock long-term incentive plan (LTIP) programs. As we transfer the shares for payouts under such LTIP programs, we recognize a gain or loss on those shares. The impact of those transactions are shown on a net basis on
our Consolidated Income Statement in net gains related to BlackRock. Our obligation to transfer BlackRock shares related to the LTIP programs and the resulting accounting are described in more detail in our 2006 Form 10-K and our current report on
Form 8-K filed June 14, 2007.
Private Equity Investments
We report private equity investments, which include direct investments in companies, interests in limited partnerships, and affiliated partnership interests, at estimated fair values. These estimates are based on
available information and may not necessarily represent amounts that we will ultimately realize through distribution, sale or liquidation of the investments. The valuation procedures applied to direct investments include techniques such as multiples
of cash flow of the entity, independent appraisals of the entity or the pricing used to value the entity in a recent financing transaction. We value affiliated partnership interests based on the underlying investments of the partnership using
procedures consistent with those applied to direct investments. We generally value limited partnership investments based on the financial statements we receive from the general partner. We include all private equity investments on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet in the caption equity investments. Changes in the fair value of these assets are recognized in noninterest income.
We consolidate private
equity funds when we are the sole general partner in a limited partnership and have determined that we have control of the partnership. The portion we do not own is reflected in the caption minority and noncontrolling interests in consolidated
entities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
43
Equity Securities and Partnership Interests
We
account for equity investments other than BlackRock and private equity investments under one of the following methods:
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities are recorded on a trade-date basis and are accounted for based on the securities quoted market prices from a national securities
exchange. Dividend income on these securities is recognized in net interest income. Those purchased with the intention of recognizing short-term profits are classified as trading and included in other short-term investments. Both realized and
unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are included in noninterest income. Marketable equity securities not classified as trading are designated as securities available for sale with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes,
reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any unrealized losses that we have determined to be other-than-temporary are recognized in current period earnings. |
|
|
|
Nonmarketable equity securities are recorded using the cost method of accounting since we do not have significant influence over the investee. Under this method,
there is no change to the cost basis unless there is an other-than-temporary decline in value. If the decline is determined to be other than temporary, we write down the cost basis of the investment to a new cost basis that represents realizable
value. The amount of the write-down is accounted for as a loss included in noninterest income. Distributions received from income on cost method investments are included in interest income or noninterest income depending on the type of investment.
We include our investment in nonmarketable equity securities in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
For investments in
limited partnerships, limited liability companies and other minor investments that are not required to be consolidated, we use either the cost method or the equity method. The cost method is described above for nonmarketable equity securities. We
use the cost method for minor investments in which we have no influence over the operations of the investee and when cost appropriately reflects our economic interest in the underlying investment. We use the equity method for all other general and
limited partner ownership interests and limited liability company investments. Under the equity method, we record our equity ownership share of net income or loss of the investee in noninterest income. Investments described above are included in the
caption equity investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Debt Securities
Debt securities are recorded on a trade-date basis. We classify debt securities as held to maturity and carry them at amortized cost if we have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Debt
securities that we purchase for
short-term appreciation or other trading purposes are carried at market value and classified as other short-term investments. Realized and unrealized gains
and losses on trading securities are included in noninterest income.
Debt securities not classified as held to maturity or other short-term investments
are designated as securities available for sale and carried at market value with unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We review all debt securities that are in an unrealized
loss position for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Declines in the market value of available for sale debt securities that are deemed other-than-temporary are recognized as a securities loss included in noninterest income in the
period in which the determination is made.
We include all interest on debt securities, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using
the interest method, in net interest income. We compute gains and losses realized on the sale of debt securities available for sale on a specific security basis and include them in noninterest income.
LOANS AND LEASES
Except
as described below, loans held for investment are stated at the principal amounts outstanding, net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on loans purchased. Interest related to loans
other than nonaccrual loans is accrued based on the principal amount outstanding and credited to net interest income as earned using the interest method. Loan origination fees, direct loan origination costs, and loan premiums and discounts are
deferred and amortized to net interest income, over periods not exceeding the contractual life of the loan, using methods that are not materially different from the interest method.
Certain loans are accounted for at fair value in accordance with SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, with changes in
the fair value reported in trading revenue. The fair value of these loans was $167 million, or less than .5% of the total loan portfolio, at June 30, 2007.
We also provide financing for various types of equipment, aircraft, energy and power systems, and rolling stock through a variety of lease arrangements. Direct financing leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments plus estimated
residual value of the leased property, less unearned income. Leveraged leases, a form of financing lease, are carried net of nonrecourse debt. We recognize income over the term of the lease using the interest method. Lease residual values are
reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Gains or losses on the sale of leased assets are included in noninterest income while valuation adjustments on lease residuals are included in noninterest expense.
44
LOAN SALES, SECURITIZATIONS AND RETAINED INTERESTS
We recognize the sale of loans or other financial assets when the transferred assets are legally isolated from our creditors and the appropriate
accounting criteria are met. We also sell mortgage and other loans through secondary market securitizations. In certain cases, we may retain a portion or all of the securities issued, interest-only strips, one or more subordinated tranches,
servicing rights and, in some cases, cash reserve accounts, all of which are considered retained interests in the transferred assets. Our loan sales and securitizations are generally structured without recourse to us and with no restrictions on the
retained interests. In the event we are obligated for recourse liabilities in a sale, our policy is to record such liabilities at fair value upon closing of the transaction. Specific reserves and allocated pooled reserves included in the allowance
for loan and lease losses are charged-off and reduce the basis of the loans when the loans are designated as held for sale. Gains or losses recognized on the sale of the loans depend on the allocation of the carrying value between the loans sold and
the retained interests, based on their relative fair market values at the date of sale. We generally estimate fair value based on the present value of future expected cash flows using assumptions as to discount rates, interest rates, prepayment
speeds, credit losses and servicing costs, if applicable. Gains or losses on these transactions are reported in noninterest income.
As of January 1,
2006, we adopted SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS 156 was issued in March 2006 and requires all newly recognized servicing rights and obligations to be
initially measured at fair value. For each class of recognized servicing rights and obligations, the standard permits the election of either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method for subsequent measurement of the asset or
obligation. For separately recognized servicing rights and obligations retained or purchased related to commercial loans and commercial mortgages, we have elected to account for subsequent adjustments under the amortization method, which requires us
to amortize the servicing assets or liabilities in proportion to and over the periods of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss. For servicing rights or obligations related to residential mortgage loans, we have elected to account for
subsequent adjustments using the fair value method with changes in the value of the right or obligation reflected in noninterest income.
Each quarter, we
evaluate our servicing assets that are being carried at amortized cost for impairment by categorizing the pools of assets underlying servicing rights by product type. A valuation allowance is recorded and reduces current income when the carrying
amount of a specific asset category exceeds its fair value.
We classify securities retained as debt securities available for sale or other assets,
depending on the form of the retained
interests. Retained interests that are subject to prepayment risk are reviewed on a quarterly basis for impairment. If the fair value of the retained
interests is below its carrying amount and the decline is determined to be other-than-temporary, then the decline is reflected in noninterest income. We recognize other adjustments to the fair market value of retained interests classified as
available for sale securities through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets include:
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings, and |
Other than consumer loans, we
generally classify loans as nonaccrual when we determine that the collection of interest or principal is doubtful or when a default of interest or principal has existed for 90 days or more and the loans are not well-secured or in the process of
collection. When the accrual of interest is discontinued, any accrued but uncollected interest credited to income is reversed. We charge off these loans based on the facts and circumstances of the individual loan.
Consumer loans well-secured by residential real estate, including home equity installment loans and lines of credit, are classified as nonaccrual at 12 months past due.
These loans are considered well secured if the fair market value of the property, less 15% to cover potential foreclosure expenses, is greater than or equal to the principal balance including any superior liens. A fair market value assessment of the
property is initiated when the loan becomes 80 to 90 days past due. The procedures for foreclosure of these loans is consistent with our general foreclosure process discussed below. The classification of consumer loans well-secured by residential
real estate as nonaccrual loans at 12 months past due is in accordance with Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council guidelines. We charge off these loans based on the facts and circumstances of the individual loan.
Consumer loans in the process of collection but not well-secured are classified as nonaccrual at 120 days past due if they are home equity installment loans and at 180
days past due if they are home equity lines of credit. These loans are recorded at the lower of cost or market value, less liquidation costs and the unsecured portion of these loans is generally charged off when they become nonaccrual.
A loan is categorized as a troubled debt restructuring if a significant concession is granted due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower.
Nonperforming loans are generally not returned to performing status until the obligation is brought current and the borrower
45
has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and collection of the contractual principal and interest is no longer
doubtful. Nonaccrual commercial and commercial real estate loans and troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired loans. We recognize interest collected on these loans on the cost recovery method.
Foreclosed assets are comprised of any asset seized or property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Depending on
various state statutes, legal proceedings are initiated on or about the 65th day of delinquency. If no other remedies arise from the legal proceedings, the final outcome will result in the sheriffs sale of the property. When PNC acquires the
deed, the transfer of loans to other real estate owned (OREO) will be completed. These assets are recorded on the date acquired at the lower of the related loan balance or market value of the collateral less estimated disposition costs.
We estimate market values primarily based on appraisals, when available, or quoted market prices on liquid assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are valued at the lower of the amount recorded at acquisition date or the current market value less
estimated disposition costs. Valuation adjustments on these assets and gains or losses realized from disposition of such property are reflected in noninterest expense.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
We maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that we believe to be adequate to absorb estimated probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Our determination of the adequacy of the
allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the loan and lease portfolios and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change, including,
among others:
|
|
|
Expected default probabilities, |
|
|
|
Exposure at date of default, |
|
|
|
Amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, |
|
|
|
Historical loss exposure on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and |
|
|
|
Amounts for changes in economic conditions and potential estimation or judgmental imprecision. |
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, we make specific allocations to impaired loans, allocations to pools of watchlist and
nonwatchlist loans, and allocations to consumer and residential mortgage loans. We also allocate reserves to provide coverage for probable losses not covered in specific, pool and consumer reserve methodologies related to qualitative and
quantitative factors. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of loans, the total reserve is available for all credit losses.
Specific allocations are made to significant individual impaired
loans and are determined in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, with impairment measured based on the present value of the loans expected cash flows, the loans observable market price
or the fair value of the loans collateral. We establish a specific allowance on all other impaired loans based on their loss given default credit risk rating.
Allocations to loan pools are developed by business segment based on probability of default and loss given default risk ratings by using historical loss trends and our judgment concerning those trends and other
relevant factors. These factors may include, among others:
|
|
|
Actual versus estimated losses, |
|
|
|
Regional and national economic conditions, and |
|
|
|
Business segment and portfolio concentrations. |
Loss
factors are based on industry and/or internal experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, based on our judgment, impact the collectibility of the portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Consumer and residential mortgage loan
allocations are made at a total portfolio level based on historical loss experience adjusted for portfolio activity.
While our pool reserve methodologies
strive to reflect all risk factors, there continues to be a certain element of uncertainty associated with, but not limited to, potential estimation errors and imprecision in the estimation process due to the inherent lag of information. We provide
additional reserves that are designed to provide coverage for expected losses attributable to such risks. In addition, these reserves include factors which may not be directly measured in the determination of specific or pooled reserves. These
factors include:
|
|
|
Industry concentration and conditions, |
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, |
|
|
|
Ability and depth of lending management, |
|
|
|
Changes in risk selection and underwriting standards, and |
|
|
|
Bank regulatory considerations. |
ALLOWANCE FOR UNFUNDED LOAN COMMITMENTS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT
We maintain the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit at a level we believe is adequate to absorb estimated probable losses related to these
unfunded credit facilities. We determine the adequacy of the allowance based on periodic evaluations of the unfunded credit facilities including an assessment of the probability of commitment usage, credit risk factors for loans outstanding to these
same customers, and the terms and expiration dates of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit are included in the provision for credit losses.
46
MORTGAGE AND OTHER LOAN SERVICING RIGHTS
We
provide servicing under various commercial, consumer and residential loan servicing contracts. These contracts are either purchased in the open market or retained as part of a commercial mortgage loan securitization, residential mortgage loan sale
or other commercial loan sale transactions. Prior to January 1, 2006, purchased contracts were recorded at cost and the servicing rights retained from the sale or securitization of loans were recorded based on their relative fair value to all
of the assets securitized or sold. As a result of the adoption of SFAS 156, beginning January 1, 2006 all newly acquired servicing rights are initially measured at fair value. Fair value is based on the present value of the expected future
servicing cash flows, including assumptions as to:
|
|
|
Interest rates for escrow and deposit balance earnings, |
|
|
|
Estimated interest rates, and |
|
|
|
Estimated servicing costs. |
For subsequent
measurements of our servicing rights, we have elected to account for our commercial mortgage and commercial loan servicing rights as a class of assets under the amortization method. This determination was made based on the unique characteristics of
the commercial mortgages and commercial loans underlying these servicing rights with regard to market inputs used in determining fair value and how we manage the risks inherent in the commercial servicing rights assets. Specific risk characteristics
of commercial mortgages include loan type, currency or exchange rate, interest rates and expected cash flows. Specific risk characteristics of commercial loans include interest rates and credit quality factors which could impact expected cash flows.
We record these servicing assets as other intangible assets and amortize them over their estimated lives in proportion to estimated net servicing income or loss. On a quarterly basis, we test the assets for impairment using various valuation models.
If the estimated fair value of the assets is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized. Servicing fees are recognized as they are earned and are reported net of amortization expense in noninterest income.
For residential mortgage servicing rights, we have elected to account for these subsequent measurements of our servicing rights under the fair value method. The primary
risk of changes to the value of the residential mortgage servicing rights resides in the potential volatility in the economic assumptions used, primarily the interest rates. The pricing methodology used by PNC to value residential mortgage servicing
rights uses a combination of securities market data observations, model cash flow projections, and anecdotal servicing observations and surveys. Changes in the fair values of these assets are reflected in noninterest income.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
For financial reporting purposes, we depreciate premises and equipment net of salvage value principally using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
We use estimated useful
lives for furniture and equipment ranging from one to 10 years, and depreciate buildings over an estimated useful life of up to 40 years. We amortize leasehold improvements over their estimated useful lives of up to 15 years or the respective lease
terms, whichever is shorter.
We purchase, as well as internally develop and customize, certain software to enhance or perform internal business functions.
Software development costs incurred in the planning and post-development project stages are charged to noninterest expense. Costs associated with designing software configuration and interfaces, installation, coding programs and testing systems are
capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over periods ranging from one to seven years.
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We use a variety of financial derivatives as part of our
overall asset and liability risk management process to manage interest rate, market and credit risk inherent in our business activities. We use substantially all such instruments to manage risk related to changes in interest rates. Interest rate and
total return swaps, interest rate caps and floors, and futures contracts are the primary instruments we use for interest rate risk management.
Financial
derivatives involve, to varying degrees, interest rate, market and credit risk. We manage these risks as part of our asset and liability management process and through credit policies and procedures. We seek to minimize counterparty credit risk by
entering into transactions with only high-quality institutions, establishing credit limits, and generally requiring bilateral netting and collateral agreements.
We recognize all derivative instruments at fair value as either other assets or other liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a
hedging relationship. For derivatives not designated as an accounting hedge, the trading gain or loss is recognized in noninterest income.
For those
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as accounting hedging instruments, we must designate the hedging instrument, based on the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. We have no derivatives that hedge the
net investment in a foreign operation.
We formally document the relationship between the hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk
management objective and strategy before undertaking a hedge. To qualify for hedge accounting, the derivatives and related hedged items must be designated as a hedge at inception of the hedge relationship. For hedging relationships in which
effectiveness is measured, we formally assess, both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, if the derivatives are highly
47
effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. If it is determined that the derivative instrument is not highly
effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued.
For derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to changes in
the fair value of an asset or a liability attributable to a particular risk), changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative are recognized in earnings and offset by recognizing changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the
hedged risk. To the extent the hedge is ineffective, the changes in fair value will not offset and the difference is reflected in the same financial statement category as the hedged item.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows), the effective portions of the gain or loss on
derivatives are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified in interest income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. As a result, the change in
fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.
We discontinue hedge accounting when it is
determined that the derivative is no longer qualifying as an effective hedge; the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; or the derivative is de-designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge or it is no longer probable that the
forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period. If we determine that the derivative no longer qualifies as a fair value or cash flow hedge and therefore hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative will
continue to be recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value with changes in fair value included in current earnings. For a discontinued fair value hedge, the previously hedged item is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and changes of
the fair value of the derivative are recorded in trading noninterest income.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that a
forecasted transaction will occur, the derivative will continue to be recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value with changes in fair value included in current earnings, and the gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
will be recognized immediately into earnings. When we discontinue hedge accounting because the hedging instrument is sold, terminated or no longer designated, the amount reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) up to the date of
sale, termination or de-designation continues to be reported in other comprehensive income or loss until the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
We
occasionally purchase or originate financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative. Prior to January 1, 2006,
we assessed at the inception of the transaction if economic characteristics of the embedded derivative were clearly and closely related to the economic
characteristics of the financial instrument (host contract), whether the financial instrument that embodied both the embedded derivative and the host contract were measured at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, and whether a
separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would not meet the definition of a derivative. If the embedded derivative did not meet these three conditions, the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative and be recorded
apart from the host contract and carried at fair value with changes recorded in current earnings. On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 155, which, among other provisions, permits a fair value election for hybrid financial instruments requiring
bifurcation on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Beginning January 1, 2006, we elected to account for certain previously bifurcated hybrid instruments and certain newly acquired hybrid instruments under this fair value election on an
instrument-by-instrument basis. As such, certain previously reported embedded derivatives are now reported with their host contracts at fair value in loans or other borrowed funds.
We enter into commitments to make loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to funding (interest rate lock commitments). We also enter into commitments to purchase mortgage loans (purchase commitments).
Both interest rate lock commitments and purchase commitments on mortgage loans that will be held for resale are accounted for as free-standing derivatives. Interest rate lock commitments and purchase commitments that are considered to be derivatives
are recorded at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. Fair value of interest rate lock commitments and purchase commitments is determined as the change in value that occurs after the inception of the commitment considering the projected
security price, fees collected from the borrower and costs to originate, adjusted for anticipated fallout risk. We recognize any gain or loss from the change in fair value of these derivatives, as appropriate, in trading noninterest income.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method
Investors for Investments in Investment Companies (SOP 07-1). This statement provides guidance for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies
(Guide) and whether the specialized industry accounting principles of the Guide should be retained in the financial statements of a parent company or an equity method investor in an investment company. This guidance is effective for PNC
beginning January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the application of this guidance to our private equity investment activities but do not anticipate that the adoption of the guidance will have a significant impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
48
In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. (FSP) FIN 46(R) 7, Application of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to Investment
Companies. This guidance amends paragraph 4(e) of FIN 46(R) to provide a scope exception from the consolidation provisions for investments accounted for at fair value in accordance with the specialized accounting guidance of the Guide
referenced above. This guidance is effective for PNC upon adoption of SOP 07-1.
In May 2007, the FASB issued FSP FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement
in FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48. This FSP amended FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, to provide guidance as to the determination of whether a tax position is deemed effectively settled for
purposes of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48. This guidance was adopted effective January 1, 2007 in connection with our adoption of FIN 48. See Note 11 Income Taxes for additional information.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis with a few exceptions. The election
is irrevocable and must be applied to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. We will adopt SFAS 159 beginning January 1, 2008.
During
2006, the FASB issued the following:
|
|
|
SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value which includes permissible valuation
techniques and a hierarchy of inputs utilized in the measurement process. This statement applies whenever other accounting standards require or permit fair value measurement. As required, we will adopt SFAS 157 prospectively beginning
January 1, 2008. While we are continuing to evaluate the possible impact of this new standard, we currently do not expect the adoption to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position. |
|
|
|
FIN 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements and sets forth recognition, derecognition and measurement criteria for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax filing. For PNC, this guidance is effective for all tax
positions taken or expected to be taken beginning on January 1, 2007. See Note 11 Income Taxes. |
|
|
|
FSP FAS 13-2, Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged Lease
Transaction, requires a recalculation of the |
|
timing of income recognition for a leveraged lease under SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases, when a change in the timing of income tax deductions
directly related to the leveraged lease transaction occurs or is projected to occur. Any tax positions taken regarding the leveraged lease transaction must be recognized and measured in accordance with FIN 48 described above. This guidance is
effective for PNC beginning January 1, 2007 with the cumulative effect of applying the provisions of this FSP being recognized through an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Any immediate or future reductions in earnings from the change in
accounting would be recovered in subsequent years. Our adoption of the guidance in FSP FAS 13-2 resulted in an after-tax charge to beginning retained earnings at January 1, 2007 of approximately $149 million. |
NOTE 2 ACQUISITIONS
MERCANTILE BANKSHARES
CORPORATION
Effective March 2, 2007, we acquired Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (Mercantile) under an Agreement and
Plan of Merger dated as of October 8, 2006. Mercantile shareholders received .4184 shares of PNC common stock and $16.45 in cash for each share of Mercantile, or in the aggregate approximately 53 million shares of PNC common stock and $2.1
billion in cash. Total consideration paid was approximately $5.9 billion in stock and cash.
Mercantile has added banking and investment and wealth
management services through 235 branches in Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia, Delaware and southeastern Pennsylvania. This transaction has significantly expanded our presence in the mid-Atlantic region, particularly within the attractive
Baltimore and Washington, DC markets.
Our acquisition of Mercantile added approximately $21 billion of assets to our Consolidated Balance Sheet, including
$12.4 billion of loans, $4.3 billion of goodwill and $3.0 billion of available for sale and trading securities. Loans added with this acquisition included $6.0 billion of commercial real estate, $3.7 billion of commercial, $1.1 billion of
residential mortgage and $1.6 billion of consumer loans. In addition, we added $12.5 billion of deposits and $2.1 billion of borrowed funds in connection with this acquisition. Our Consolidated Income Statement includes the impact of Mercantile
subsequent to our March 2, 2007 acquisition.
YARDVILLE NATIONAL BANCORP
On June 6, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Hamilton, New Jersey-based Yardville National Bancorp (Yardville) for approximately
3.3 million shares of PNC common stock and $156 million in cash, subject to adjustment. Based upon PNCs closing common stock price on June 6, 2007, the consideration represents $403 million in stock and cash or approximately $35.00
per Yardville share. Yardville is a commercial and consumer bank with
49
approximately $2.6 billion in assets, $2.0 billion in deposits and 33 branches in central New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania. This acquisition is expected
to close in the fourth quarter of 2007, subject to customary closing conditions including regulatory approvals and approval by Yardville shareholders.
See Note 16 Subsequent Events regarding additional information on other recently completed or announced acquisitions.
NOTE 3 SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
|
June 30, 2007 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
18,962 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
(248 |
) |
|
$ |
18,728 |
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
4,149 |
Asset-backed |
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
2,144 |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
278 |
State and municipal |
|
|
241 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
239 |
Other debt |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
Total debt securities |
|
|
25,921 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
25,567 |
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
336 |
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
26,258 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
(371 |
) |
|
$ |
25,903 |
December 31, 2006 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
17,325 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
17,208 |
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
3,219 |
Asset-backed |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,609 |
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
608 |
State and municipal |
|
|
140 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
139 |
Other debt |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
87 |
Total debt securities |
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
22,870 |
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
321 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
321 |
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
23,333 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
23,191 |
(a) |
Securities held to maturity at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 totaled less than $.5 million at each date. |
We evaluate our securities available for sale
portfolio in light of changing market conditions and other factors and, where appropriate, take steps intended to improve our overall positioning.
At
June 30, 2007, securities available for sale included a net unrealized loss of $355 million, which represented the difference between fair value and amortized cost. The comparable amount at December 31, 2006 was a net unrealized loss of
$142 million.
The fair value of securities available for sale generally decreases when interest rates increase and vice versa. Net unrealized gains and
losses in the securities available for sale portfolio are included in shareholders equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
Of the $371 million gross unrealized loss amount at June 30, 2007, $191 million related to securities that had been in a loss position for 12 months or more. The fair value of those securities totaled approximately $6.7 billion. Of
those securities in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more as of June 30, 2007, PNC held 26 residential mortgage-backed security positions with fair value totaling $338 million that had an unrealized loss of more than 5% when
compared with
their amortized cost. The unrealized loss on these positions totaled $31 million and, the unrealized loss amount on any individual position did not exceed $5
million. These securities are primarily collateralized mortgage obligations where amortized cost closely approximates the par value of the security. At June 30, 2007, these securities are either US government agency issued or rated
AAA. PNC also held 14 commercial mortgage-backed security positions with fair value totaling $283 million that had an unrealized loss of more than 5% when compared to their amortized cost and had been in an unrealized loss position for
12 months or more. The unrealized loss on these positions totaled $17 million and, the unrealized loss amount on any individual position did not exceed $3 million. At June 30, 2007, these securities were all rated AAA. At
June 30, 2007, PNC also held certain other securities included in the other categories in the preceding table that had an unrealized loss of more than 5% when compared with their amortized cost. The approximate fair value of these other
securities at June 30, 2007 was $5 million and the aggregate unrealized loss on these securities positions was not significant. The majority of the reported unrealized loss related to these securities and the remaining other available for sale
securities is attributable to changes in interest rates and not from the deterioration in the credit quality of the issuer.
50
The expected weighted-average life of securities available for sale (excluding corporate stocks and other) was 4 years and 2 months at June 30, 2007 and 3 years and 8 months at December 31, 2006.
Information relating to securities sold is set forth in the following table:
Securities Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 In millions |
|
Proceeds |
|
Gross Gains |
|
Gross Losses |
|
|
Net Gains (Losses) |
|
|
Income Tax Expense/ (Benefit) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
3,872 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
2006 |
|
|
3,433 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
The fair value of securities pledged to secure public and trust deposits and repurchase agreements and for other purposes was $23.7 billion at June 30, 2007 and
$10.6 billion at December 31, 2006. The increase is due primarily to an increase in securities pledged as collateral for the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. The pledged securities include positions held in our
portfolio of securities available for sale, trading securities, and securities accepted as collateral from others that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge.
The fair value of securities accepted as collateral that we are permitted by contract or custom to sell or repledge was $1.4 billion at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and is a component of Federal funds
sold and Resale agreements on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Of the permitted amount, $1.1 billion was repledged to others at June 30, 2007 and $1.3 billion was repledged to others at December 31, 2006.
NOTE 4 ASSET QUALITY
The following table sets forth nonperforming assets and
related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Foreclosed and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Total foreclosed and other assets |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Total nonperforming assets (a) (b) |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
.34 |
% |
|
|
.29 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets |
|
|
.38 |
|
|
|
.34 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
(a) |
Excludes equity management assets carried at estimated fair value of $13 million at June 30, 2007 and $11 million at December 31, 2006 (amounts include troubled debt
restructured assets of $4 million at both June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006). |
(b) |
Excludes loans held for sale carried at lower of cost or market value of $17 million at June 30, 2007. |
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Allowance at January 1 |
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Net recoveries (charge-offs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Acquired allowance Mercantile |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Allowance at June 30 |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
611 |
|
Changes in the allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
Allowance at January 1 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
Acquired allowance Mercantile |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
Net change in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
3 |
Allowance at June 30 |
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
51
NOTE 5 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A summary of the changes in goodwill by business segment for the six months ended June 30, 2007 follows:
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Additions/ Adjustments |
|
|
June 30 2007 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
$ |
3,952 |
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
|
938 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
PFPC |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
968 |
|
BlackRock |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
3,402 |
|
$ |
4,343 |
|
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
We added $4.3 billion of goodwill and $288 million of other intangible assets in connection with our March 2007
acquisition of Mercantile. Assets and liabilities of acquired entities are recorded at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date and are subject to refinement as information relative to the fair values at that date becomes available. We are
awaiting certain information relating to our valuations and any pre-acquisition contingencies. Revisions may result in subsequent adjustments to goodwill. As of June 30, 2007, the goodwill and other intangible assets related to Mercantile are
reported in the Retail Banking and Corporate & Institutional Banking business segments.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and
net carrying amount of other intangible assets by major category consisted of the following:
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
June 30 2007 |
|
|
December 31 2006 |
|
Customer-related and other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
Mortgage and other loan servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
751 |
|
|
$ |
689 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
Most of our other intangible assets have finite lives and are amortized primarily on a straight-line basis or, in
the case of mortgage and other loan servicing rights and certain core deposit intangibles, on an accelerated basis.
For customer-related intangibles, the
estimated remaining useful lives range from less than 1 year to 12 years, with a weighted-average remaining useful life of approximately 8 years. Our mortgage and other loan servicing rights are amortized primarily over a period of 5 to 10 years in
proportion to the estimated net servicing cash flows from the related loans.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and net other
intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows:
Changes in Goodwill and Other Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Customer- Related |
|
|
Servicing Rights |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
3,402 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
Additions/adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercantile acquisition |
|
|
4,315 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
BlackRock |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
Our investment in BlackRock changes when BlackRock repurchases its shares in the open market or issues shares for
an acquisition or pursuant to its employee compensation plans. We record goodwill when BlackRock repurchases its shares at an amount greater than book value per share and this results in an increase in our percentage ownership interest.
Servicing revenue from both commercial and residential mortgage servicing assets and liabilities generated contractually specified servicing fees, net interest income
from servicing portfolio deposit balances and ancillary fees totaling $88 million and $64 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Comparable amounts for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2006 totaled $45 million and $31 million, respectively. We also generate servicing revenue from fee-based activities provided to others.
Amortization expense on intangible assets for the first half of 2007 was $71 million. Amortization expense on existing intangible assets for the remainder of 2007 and for 2008 through 2012 is estimated to be as follows:
|
|
|
Remainder of 2007: $115 million, |
NOTE 6 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
As discussed in our 2006 Form
10-K, we are involved with various entities in the normal course of business that may be deemed to be VIEs. We consolidated certain VIEs as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 for which we were determined to be the primary beneficiary.
These consolidated VIEs and relationships with PNC are described in our 2006 Form 10-K.
52
We hold significant variable interests in VIEs that have not been consolidated because we are not considered the primary beneficiary. Information on these
VIEs follows:
Non-Consolidated VIEs Significant Variable Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
|
PNC Risk of Loss |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
$ |
4,134 |
|
$ |
7,058 |
(a) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
529 |
|
|
442 |
|
|
8 |
|
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
|
42 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
66 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,705 |
|
$ |
4,606 |
|
$ |
7,132 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Street |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
6,117 |
(a) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
815 |
|
|
570 |
|
|
22 |
|
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
|
33 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
8 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,868 |
|
$ |
4,620 |
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
(a) |
PNCs risk of loss consists of off-balance sheet liquidity commitments to Market Street of $6.5 billion and other credit enhancements of $.6 billion at June 30, 2007. The
comparable amounts at December 31, 2006 were $5.6 billion and $.6 billion, respectively. |
MARKET
STREET
Market Street Funding LLC (Market Street) is a multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper conduit that is owned
by an independent third party. Market Streets activities are limited to the purchasing of assets or making of loans secured by interests primarily in pools of receivables from US corporations that desire access to the commercial paper market.
Market Street funds the asset purchases or loans by issuing commercial paper which has been rated A1/P1 by Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively, and is supported by pool-specific credit enhancement, liquidity facilities and
program-level credit enhancement.
PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank, N.A.) provides certain administrative services, a portion of the
program-level credit enhancement, and the majority of liquidity facilities to Market Street in exchange for fees negotiated based on market rates. All of Market Streets assets at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 collateralized the
commercial paper obligations. PNC views its credit exposure for the Market Street transactions as limited. Facilities requiring PNC to fund for defaulted assets totaled $447 million at June 30, 2007. For 93% of the liquidity facilities at
June 30, 2007, PNC is not required to fund if the assets are in default. PNC may be liable for funding under liquidity facilities for events such as borrower bankruptcies, collateral deficiencies or covenant violations. Additionally, PNCs
obligations under the liquidity facilities are secondary to the risk of first loss provided by the borrower or another third party in the form of deal-specific credit enhancement for example, by the over-collateralization of the assets.
Deal-specific credit enhancement that supports the commercial paper issued by Market Street is generally structured to cover
a multiple of the expected historical losses for the pool of assets and is sized to generally meet rating agency standards for comparably structured
transactions. Credit enhancement is provided in part by PNC Bank, N.A. in the form of a cash collateral account that is funded by a loan facility that expires March 23, 2012. Neither creditors nor investors in Market Street have any
recourse to our general credit. PNC recognized program administrator fees and commitment fees related to PNCs portion of the liquidity facilities of $3.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
Comparable amounts were $5.9 million and $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
As more fully described in our 2006 Form 10-K, Market
Street was restructured as a limited liability company in October 2005 and entered into a subordinated Note Purchase Agreement (Note) with an unrelated third party.
The Note provides first loss coverage whereby the investor absorbs losses up to the amount of the Note, which was $6.9 million as of June 30, 2007. Proceeds from the issuance of the Note are held by Market Street
in a first loss reserve account that will be used to reimburse any losses incurred by Market Street, PNC Bank, N.A. or other providers under the liquidity facilities and the credit enhancement arrangements.
As a result of the Note issuance, we reevaluated the design of Market Street, its capital structure and relationships among the variable interest holders under the
provisions of FIN 46R. Based on this analysis, we determined that we were no longer the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46R and deconsolidated Market Street from our Consolidated Balance Sheet effective October 17, 2005. There have been
no events or changes in the contractual terms of the Note since that date that would change this conclusion.
The aggregate assets and liabilities of VIEs
that we have consolidated in our financial statements are as follows:
Consolidated VIEs PNC Is Primary Beneficiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
Aggregate Liabilities |
Partnership interests in low income housing projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
761 |
|
$ |
761 |
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
834 |
|
$ |
834 |
Investment Company Accounting Deferred Application
We also have subsidiaries that invest in and act as the investment manager for private equity funds organized as limited partnerships as part of our equity management
activities. The funds invest in private equity investments to generate capital appreciation and profits. As permitted by FIN 46R, we have deferred applying the provisions of the interpretation for these entities pending adoption of FASB Staff
Position No. (FSP) FIN 46(R)7, Application of FASB
53
Interpretation No. 46(R) to Investment Companies. See Note 1 Accounting Policies. These entities are not consolidated into our financial
statements as of June 30, 2007 or December 31, 2006. Information on these entities follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
Aggregate Assets |
|
Aggregate Equity |
|
PNC Risk of Loss |
Private Equity Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
105 |
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
102 |
|
$ |
104 |
PNCs risk of loss in the table above includes both the value of our equity investments and any unfunded
commitments to the respective entities. The value of our investment in these entities is included in equity investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
PERPETUAL TRUST SECURITIES
We issue certain hybrid capital vehicles that qualify as
capital for both regulatory and tangible ratios.
In December 2006, one of our indirect subsidiaries, PNC REIT Corp., sold $500 million of 6.517%
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Exchangeable Perpetual Trust Securities (the Trust Securities) of PNC Preferred Funding Trust I (Trust I) in a private placement. PNC REIT Corp. had previously acquired the Trust
Securities from the trust in exchange for an equivalent amount of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Securities (the LLC Preferred Securities), of PNC Preferred Funding LLC, (the LLC), held by PNC REIT
Corp. The LLCs initial material assets consist of indirect interests in mortgages and mortgage-related assets previously owned by PNC REIT Corp. Our 2006 Form 10-K includes additional information regarding the Trust Securities, including
descriptions of replacement capital and dividend restriction covenants.
In March 2007, PNC Preferred Funding LLC sold $500 million of 6.113%
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Exchangeable Perpetual Trust Securities of PNC Preferred Funding Trust II (Trust II) in a private placement. In connection with the private placement, Trust II acquired $500 million of LLC Preferred
Securities. Our first quarter 2007 Form 10-Q and our current report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2007 include additional information regarding the Trust II Securities, including descriptions of replacement capital and dividend restriction
covenants.
PNC REIT Corp. owns 100% of the LLCs common voting securities. As a result, the LLC is an indirect subsidiary of PNC and is consolidated
on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Trust I and Trust IIs investment in the LLC Preferred Securities is characterized as a minority interest on our Consolidated Balance Sheet since we are not the primary beneficiary of Trust I and Trust II.
This minority interest totaled approximately $980 million at June 30, 2007.
NOTE 7 CAPITAL SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUSTS
In March 2007, we redeemed all of the underlying Capital Securities relating to UNB Capital Trust I and Riggs Capital Trust II. The total outstanding Capital Securities redeemed were $216 million. In May 2007, we
redeemed all of the underlying Capital Securities, totaling $300 million, relating to PNC Institutional Capital Trust B.
As part of the Mercantile
acquisition, we acquired the James Monroe Statutory Trust II (Monroe Trust II) and the James Monroe Statutory Trust III (Monroe Trust III).
On July 31, 2003, Monroe Trust II was formed and issued $4 million of capital securities which are due July 31, 2033 and redeemable beginning July 31, 2008 at par. On October 3, 2005, Monroe Trust III was formed and
issued $8 million of capital securities which are due December 15, 2035 and are redeemable beginning December 15, 2010 at par. Aggregate junior subordinated debt of $12 million owed by PNC to Monroe Trust II and Monroe Trust III is
included on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007.
At June 30, 2007, our remaining Capital Securities represent non-voting preferred
beneficial interests in the assets of PNC Capital Trusts C and D (as further described in Note 14 Capital Securities of Subsidiary Trusts of our 2006 Form 10-K) and Monroe Trusts II and III. All of these trusts are wholly owned finance
subsidiaries of PNC. The financial statements of the Trusts are not included in PNCs consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
The
obligations of the respective parent of each Trust described above, when taken collectively, are the equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee of the obligations of such Trust under the terms of the Capital Securities. Such guarantee is
subordinate in right of payment in the same manner as other junior subordinated debt. There are certain restrictions on PNCs overall ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries. For additional disclosure on these funding restrictions,
including an explanation of dividend and intercompany loan limitations, see Note 4 Regulatory Matters in our 2006 Form 10-K.
NOTE 8 CERTAIN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Pension and Post-Retirement Plans
As more fully described in
our 2006 Form 10-K, we have a noncontributory, qualified defined benefit pension plan covering eligible employees. Benefits are derived from a cash balance formula based on compensation levels, age and length of service. Pension contributions are
based on an actuarially determined amount necessary to fund total benefits payable to plan participants.
54
We also maintain nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees. We also provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for
qualifying retired employees (post-retirement benefits) through various plans. The nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans are unfunded.
The components of our net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost for the second quarter and first six months of 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Pension Plan |
|
|
Nonqualified Pension Plan |
|
Post- retirement Benefits |
|
Three months ended June 30 In millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Pension Plan |
|
|
Nonqualified Pension Plan |
|
Post- retirement Benefits |
|
Six months ended June 30 In millions |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
During the first quarter of 2007, we added another defined benefit pension plan as a result of the Mercantile
acquisition. Plan assets and benefit obligations of the Mercantile plan were approximately $242 million and $246 million, respectively, at acquisition date. The $4 million funding deficit was recognized as part of the Mercantile acquisition purchase
price allocation. We plan to integrate the Mercantile plan into the PNC plan as of December 31, 2007.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
We have long-term incentive award plans (Incentive Plans) that provide for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights, incentive shares/performance units, restricted stock, other share-based awards and dollar-denominated awards to executives and, other than incentive stock options, to non-employee directors. We grant a substantial portion
of our stock-based compensation awards during the first quarter of the year. As of
June 30, 2007, no incentive stock options or stock appreciation rights were outstanding. The Incentive Plans are more fully described in Note 18
Stock-Based Compensation Plans of our 2006 Form 10-K.
Nonqualified Stock Options
Options are granted at exercise prices not less than the market value of common stock on the grant date. Generally, options granted since 1999 become exercisable in
installments after the grant date. Options granted prior to 1999 are mainly exercisable 12 months after grant date. No option may be exercisable after 10 years from its grant date. Payment of the option exercise price may be in cash or previously
owned shares of common stock at market value on the exercise date.
Generally, options granted under the Incentive Plans vest ratably over a three-year
period as long as the grantee remains an employee or, in certain cases, retires from PNC. For all options granted prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), we recognized compensation expense over the
three-year vesting period. If an employee retired prior to the end of the three-year vesting period, we accelerated the expensing of all unrecognized compensation costs at the retirement date. As required under SFAS 123R, we recognize compensation
expense for options granted to retirement-eligible employees after January 1, 2006 in the period granted, in accordance with the service period provisions of the options. Total compensation expense recognized related to PNC stock options during
the first six months of 2007 and 2006 was approximately $12 million and $13 million, respectively.
For purposes of computing stock option expense, we
estimated the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The model requires the use of numerous assumptions, many of which are very subjective.
We used the following assumptions in the option-pricing model to determine 2007 and 2006 stock option expense:
|
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the US Treasury yield curve, |
|
|
|
The dividend yield represents average yields over the previous three-year period, |
|
|
|
Volatility is measured using the fluctuation in month-end closing stock prices over a period which corresponds with the average expected option life, but in no case
less than a five-year period, and |
|
|
|
The expected life assumption represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and is based on a weighted average of historical
option activity. |
Option Pricing Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average for the six months ended June 30 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
4.8 |
% |
|
4.4 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
3.4 |
% |
|
3.7 |
% |
Volatility |
|
19.2 |
% |
|
20.6 |
% |
Expected life |
|
4.4 yrs. |
|
|
5.5 yrs. |
|
55
The following table summarizes PNC stock option information as of and for the six month period ending June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (thousands) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
14,950 |
|
|
$ |
59.29 |
Granted |
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
73.16 |
Exercised |
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
55.03 |
Forfeited |
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
68.41 |
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
14,698 |
|
|
$ |
61.65 |
Exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
10,627 |
|
|
$ |
59.18 |
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the first half of 2007 and 2006 was $10.65
and $10.01, respectively. During the first half of 2007 we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity. As with past exercise activity, we intend to utilize treasury stock for
future stock option exercises.
Incentive/Performance Unit Share Awards and Restricted Stock/Unit Awards
The fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market
value of our common stock price on the date of grant. Incentive/performance unit share awards are subsequently valued subject to the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals over a three-year period. The Personnel and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards. Restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods ranging from 24 months to 60 months. There are no
financial or performance goals associated with any of our restricted stock/unit awards.
We recognize compensation expense for incentive/performance unit
share awards and restricted stock/unit awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program. Total compensation expense recognized related to PNC incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted
stock/unit awards during the first half of 2007 was approximately $21 million, compared with $24 million during the first half of 2006.
The following table
summarizes PNC nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards as of and for the six month period ending June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares in thousands |
|
Nonvested Incentive/ Performance Unit Shares |
|
|
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock/
Units |
|
|
Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Dec. 31, 2006 |
|
186 |
|
|
$64.15 |
|
2,425 |
|
|
$57.45 |
Granted |
|
133 |
|
|
69.04 |
|
590 |
|
|
70.01 |
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
60.83 |
Forfeited |
|
(8 |
) |
|
64.31 |
|
(73 |
) |
|
61.11 |
June 30, 2007 |
|
311 |
|
|
$66.24 |
|
2,052 |
|
|
$59.47 |
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is measured by reducing the grant date price by the
present value of dividends expected to be paid on the underlying shares and for estimated forfeitures on restricted stock/unit awards.
At June 30,
2007, there was $59 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Incentive Plans. This cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than
5 years.
NOTE 9 FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
We use a variety of derivative financial
instruments to help manage interest rate, market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income, fair value of assets and liabilities, and cash flows. These instruments include interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and floors, futures contracts, and total return swaps.
Fair Value Hedging Strategies
We enter into interest rate and total return swaps, interest rate caps, floors and futures derivative contracts to hedge designated commercial mortgage loans held for
sale, commercial loans, bank notes, senior debt and subordinated debt for changes in fair value primarily due to changes in interest rates. Adjustments related to the ineffective portion of fair value hedging instruments are recorded in interest
income, interest expense or noninterest income depending on the hedged item.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
We enter into interest rate swap contracts to modify the interest rate characteristics of designated commercial loans from variable to fixed in order to reduce the impact
of interest rate changes on future interest income. We are hedging our exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions for a maximum of 10 years for hedges converting floating-rate commercial loans to fixed. The fair
value of these derivatives is reported in other assets or other liabilities and offset in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the effective portion of the derivatives. When the hedged transaction culminates, any unrealized gains or
losses related to these swap contracts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings and are included in interest income.
Ineffectiveness of the strategy, if any, is reported in interest income.
During the next twelve months, we expect to reclassify to earnings $30 million of
pretax net losses, or $19 million after-tax, on cash flow hedge derivatives currently reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates and the addition of
other hedges subsequent to
56
June 30, 2007. These net losses are anticipated to result from net cash flows on receive fixed interest rate swaps that would impact interest income
recognized on the related floating rate commercial loans.
As of June 30, 2007 we have determined that there were no hedging positions where it was
probable that certain forecasted transactions may not occur within the originally designated time period.
For those hedge relationships that require
testing for ineffectiveness, any ineffectiveness present in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in value of these derivatives resulted in a $1 million net loss for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and a $2 million net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Free-Standing Derivatives
To accommodate customer needs, we also enter into financial derivative transactions primarily consisting of interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, futures,
swaptions, and foreign exchange and equity contracts. We primarily manage our market risk exposure from customer positions through transactions with third-party dealers. The credit risk associated with derivatives executed with customers is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to normal credit policies. We may obtain collateral based on our assessment of the customer. For derivatives not designated as an accounting hedge, the gain or loss is
recognized in trading noninterest income.
Also included in free-standing derivatives are transactions that we enter into for risk management and
proprietary purposes that are not designated as accounting hedges, primarily interest rate, basis and total rate of return swaps, interest rate caps, floors and futures contracts, credit default swaps, option and foreign exchange contracts and
certain interest rate-locked loan origination commitments as well as commitments to buy or sell mortgage loans.
Basis swaps are agreements involving the
exchange of payments, based on notional amounts, of two floating rate financial instruments denominated in the same currency, one pegged to one reference rate and the other tied to a second reference rate (e.g., swapping payments tied to one-month
LIBOR for payments tied to three-month LIBOR). We use these contracts to mitigate the impact on earnings of exposure to a certain referenced interest rate.
We purchase and sell credit
default swaps to mitigate the economic impact of credit losses on specifically identified existing lending relationships or to generate revenue from proprietary trading activities. The fair value of these derivatives typically are based on the
change in value, due to changing credit spreads.
Interest rate lock commitments for, as well as commitments to buy or sell, mortgage loans that we intend
to sell are considered free-standing derivatives. Our interest rate exposure on certain commercial mortgage interest rate lock commitments is economically hedged with pay-fixed interest rate swaps and forward sales agreements. These contracts
mitigate the impact on earnings of exposure to a certain referenced rate.
Free-standing derivatives also include positions we take based on market
expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments and the market based on stated risk management objectives.
Derivative
Counterparty Credit Risk
By purchasing and writing derivative contracts we are exposed to credit risk if the counterparties fail to perform. Our credit
risk is equal to the fair value gain in the derivative contract. We minimize credit risk through credit approvals, limits, monitoring procedures and collateral requirements. We generally enter into transactions with counterparties that carry high
quality credit ratings.
We enter into risk participation agreements to share some of the credit exposure with other counterparties related to interest
rate derivative contracts or to take on credit exposure to generate revenue. We will make/receive payments under these guarantees if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain credit agreements. Risk participation agreements
entered into prior to July 1, 2003 were considered financial guarantees and therefore are not included in derivatives. Agreements entered into subsequent to June 30, 2003 are included in the derivatives table that follows. We determine
that we meet our objective of reducing credit risk associated with certain counterparties to derivative contracts when the participation agreements share in their proportional credit losses of those counterparties.
We generally have established agreements with our major derivative dealer counterparties that provide for exchanges of marketable securities or cash to collateralize
either partys positions. At June 30, 2007 we held cash and US government and mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $136 million and pledged cash with a fair value of $172 million under these agreements.
57
The total notional or contractual amounts, estimated net fair value and credit risk for derivatives at June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
In millions |
|
Notional/ Contract amount |
|
Estimated net fair value |
|
|
Credit risk |
|
|
|
Notional/ Contract amount |
|
Estimated net fair value |
|
|
Credit risk |
ACCOUNTING HEDGES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges |
|
$5,917 |
|
$(72 |
) |
|
$60 |
|
|
|
$4,996 |
|
$(1 |
) |
|
$51 |
Cash flow hedges |
|
7,805 |
|
(13 |
) |
|
32 |
|
|
|
7,815 |
|
62 |
|
|
72 |
Total |
|
$13,722 |
|
$(85 |
) |
|
$92 |
|
|
|
$12,811 |
|
$61 |
|
|
$123 |
FREE-STANDING DERIVATIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$127,139 |
|
$77 |
|
|
$728 |
|
|
|
$101,749 |
|
$21 |
|
|
$533 |
Equity contracts |
|
2,071 |
|
(100 |
) |
|
153 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
(63 |
) |
|
134 |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
9,852 |
|
10 |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
|
61 |
Credit derivatives |
|
4,922 |
|
(1 |
) |
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,626 |
|
(11 |
) |
|
5 |
Options |
|
56,405 |
|
30 |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
97,669 |
|
68 |
|
|
306 |
Risk participation agreements |
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments related to mortgage-related assets |
|
3,394 |
|
(10 |
) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
10 |
|
|
15 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$204,534 |
|
$6 |
|
|
$1,232 |
|
|
|
$216,169 |
|
$25 |
|
|
$1,054 |
NOTE 10 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per common
share calculations follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
In millions, except share and per share data |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
CALCULATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON
SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to basic earnings per common share (a) |
|
$423 |
|
$381 |
|
|
|
$882 |
|
$735 |
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
342,315 |
|
292,674 |
|
|
|
325,341 |
|
292,352 |
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$1.24 |
|
$1.30 |
|
|
|
$2.71 |
|
$2.51 |
(a) Preferred dividends declared were less than $.5 million for each period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALCULATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON
SHARe (b) (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$423 |
|
$381 |
|
|
|
$882 |
|
$735 |
Less: BlackRock adjustment for common stock equivalents |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
3 |
Net income applicable to diluted earnings per common share |
|
$421 |
|
$380 |
|
|
|
$878 |
|
$732 |
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
342,315 |
|
292,674 |
|
|
|
325,341 |
|
292,352 |
Conversion of preferred stock Series A and B |
|
65 |
|
72 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
73 |
Conversion of preferred stock Series C and D |
|
551 |
|
588 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
591 |
Conversion of debentures |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
Exercise of stock options |
|
1,841 |
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
2,136 |
Incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards |
|
1,175 |
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
1,583 |
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
345,949 |
|
296,912 |
|
|
|
329,120 |
|
296,737 |
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$1.22 |
|
$1.28 |
|
|
|
$2.67 |
|
$2.47 |
(b) Excludes stock options considered to be anti-dilutive (in thousands) |
|
4,389 |
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,389 |
|
4,610 |
(c) Excludes exchangeable senior notes considered to be anti-dilutive (in thousands) |
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
58
NOTE 11 INCOME TAXES
As described in Note 1, we adopted FIN 48 effective
January 1, 2007. Our adoption of FIN 48 did not result in a cumulative adjustment to equity.
Upon adoption at January 1, 2007, we had $49
million of unrecognized tax benefits. The unrecognized tax benefits were composed of the following three broad categories.
|
|
|
|
In millions |
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits related to acquired companies tax positions |
|
$ |
10 |
Unrecognized tax benefits related to temporary differences |
|
|
20 |
Unrecognized tax benefits related to permanent differences |
|
|
19 |
Total |
|
$ |
49 |
Under existing accounting rules, any changes in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to acquired
companies tax positions would result in an adjustment to the goodwill associated with the particular acquisition; any changes in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to temporary differences would result in a reclassification to
deferred tax liability; and any changes in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to permanent differences would result in an adjustment to income tax expense and therefore our effective tax rate. The unrecognized tax benefits included
above that if recognized would affect the effective tax rate total $13 million. This is less than the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit related to permanent differences because a portion of those unrecognized benefits relate to state tax
matters.
During the first six months of 2007, unrecognized tax benefits increased by $41 million primarily due to our acquisition of Mercantile.
It is difficult to project the positions for which unrecognized tax benefits will change over the next 12 months, but it is reasonably possible that they could change
significantly due to events such as completion of taxing authority audits and expirations of the statutes of limitations. However, we do not expect that any changes in unrecognized tax benefits would have a material impact on income tax expense
during the next 12 months.
Our consolidated federal income tax returns through 2003 have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. Tax years 1998-2003
are currently before the IRS Appeals Division with the only issue to be resolved being the tax treatment of our cross-border leases. We continue to discuss a resolution of this matter with the IRS. The Internal Revenue Service is in the preliminary
stages of examining our 2004 and 2005 consolidated federal income tax returns.
The states of New York, New Jersey and Maryland (following our acquisition
of Mercantile) and New York City are principally where we are subject to state and local income tax. The State of New York is currently auditing our 2002 to 2004 filings. Subsequent years remain subject to examination in that jurisdiction. Through
2006, BlackRock was included in our New York combined tax filings and constituted most of the tax liability. Years subsequent to 2002 remain subject to examination by New Jersey and New York City and years subsequent to 2003 remain subject to
examination by Maryland.
Our policy is to classify interest and penalties associated with income taxes as income taxes. Upon adoption of FIN 48 at
January 1, 2007, we had accrued $72 million of interest related to tax positions, most of which related to our cross- border leasing transactions. The total accrued interest through June 30, 2007 increased to $95 million, primarily due to
the Mercantile acquisition.
59
NOTE 12 SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Activity in shareholders equity for the first six months of 2007 follows. Our preferred stock outstanding as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
totaled less than $.5 million at each date and, therefore, is excluded from the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions, except per share data |
|
Shares Outstanding Common Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Capital Surplus |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
293 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
10,985 |
|
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,377 |
) |
|
$ |
10,788 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized securities losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Pension, other postretirement and postemployment benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($1.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
Net effect of adopting FSP FAS 13-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
Treasury stock activity-acquisitions |
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
Treasury stock activity-all other |
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Stock options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Effect of BlackRock equity transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Restricted stock/unit and incentive/performance unit share transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
|
$ |
(439 |
) |
|
$ |
(766 |
) |
|
$ |
14,504 |
|
Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $492 million.
A summary of the components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2007 In millions |
|
Pretax |
|
|
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Change in net unrealized securities losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized losses on securities held at period end |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
Less: Net losses realized in net income (b) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Change in net unrealized securities losses |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Change in net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
Less: Net losses realized in net income |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Change in net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Change in pension, other postretirement and postemployment benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Change in other (a) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
(204 |
) |
The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
In millions |
|
Pretax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
Pretax |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Net unrealized securities gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(350 |
) |
|
$ |
(222 |
) |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Pension, other postretirement and postemployment benefit plan adjustments |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Other, net (a) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(680 |
) |
|
$ |
(439 |
) |
|
$ |
(361 |
) |
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
(a) |
Consists of interest-only strip valuation adjustments, foreign currency translation adjustments and deferred tax adjustments on BlackRocks other comprehensive income.
|
(b) |
The pretax amount represents net unrealized losses at December 31, 2006 that were realized in 2007 when the related securities were sold. This amount differs from net
securities losses included in the Consolidated Income Statement primarily because it does not include gains or losses realized on securities that were purchased and then sold during 2007. |
60
NOTE 13 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Adelphia
Some of our subsidiaries are defendants (or have potential contractual contribution obligations to other defendants) in several pending lawsuits brought during late 2002
and 2003 arising out of the bankruptcy of Adelphia Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries. There also are threatened additional proceedings arising out of the same matters.
One of the lawsuits was brought on Adelphias behalf by the unsecured creditors committee and equity committee in Adelphias consolidated bankruptcy proceeding and was removed to the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York by order dated February 9, 2006. Pursuant to Adelphias plan of reorganization, this lawsuit will be prosecuted by a contingent value vehicle, known as the Adelphia Recovery Trust. The
other lawsuits, one of which is a putative consolidated class action, were brought by holders of debt and equity securities of Adelphia and have been consolidated for pretrial purposes in that district court.
These lawsuits arise out of lending and securities underwriting activities engaged in by PNC subsidiaries together with other financial services companies. In the
aggregate, more than 400 other financial services companies and numerous other companies and individuals have been named as defendants in one or more of the lawsuits. Collectively, with respect to some or all of the defendants, the lawsuits allege
federal law claims, including violations of federal securities and other federal laws, violations of common law duties, aiding and abetting such violations, voidable preference payments, and fraudulent transfers, among other matters. The lawsuits
seek unquantified monetary damages, interest, attorneys fees and other expenses, and a return of the alleged voidable preference and fraudulent transfer payments, among other remedies.
The bank defendants, including the PNC defendants, have entered into a settlement of the consolidated class action referred to above. This settlement was approved by the
district court in November 2006. In December 2006, a group of class members appealed the order approving the settlement agreement to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The amount for which we would be responsible under this
settlement is insignificant.
We believe that we have defenses to the claims against us in these lawsuits, as well as potential claims against third
parties, and intend to defend the remaining lawsuits vigorously. These lawsuits involve complex issues of law and fact, presenting complicated relationships among the many financial and other participants in the events giving rise to these lawsuits,
and have not progressed to the point where we can predict the outcome of the non-settled lawsuits. It is not possible to determine what the likely aggregate recoveries on the part of the plaintiffs in these remaining matters might be or the portion
of any such recoveries for which we would ultimately be responsible, but the final consequences to PNC could be material.
Data Treasury
In March 2006, a first amended complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas by Data Treasury Corporation against PNC and PNC
Bank, N.A., as well as more than 50 other financial institutions, vendors, and other companies, claiming that the defendants are infringing, and inducing or contributing to the infringement of, the plaintiffs patents, which allegedly involve
check imaging, storage and transfer. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and interest and trebling of both, attorneys fees and other expenses, and injunctive relief against the alleged infringement. We believe that we have defenses to the
claims against us in this lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously. In January 2007, the district court entered an order staying the claims asserted against PNC under two of the four patents allegedly infringed by PNC, pending reexamination of
these patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Patent Office has since issued a final office action in the reexamination of one of the patents allowing all but two of the pending claims in that patent. Data Treasury has filed an
amendment addressing the two rejected claims. We expect Data Treasury to move to lift the stay once that amendment has been acted upon by the Patent Office. The lawsuit has been proceeding with respect to the other patents.
CBNV Mortgage Litigation
Between 2001 and 2003, on behalf of
either individual plaintiffs or a putative class of plaintiffs, several separate actions were filed in state and federal court against Community Bank of Northern Virginia (CBNV) and other defendants challenging the validity of second
mortgage loans the defendants made to the plaintiffs. CBNV was merged into one of Mercantiles banks. That bank became a subsidiary of PNC when we acquired Mercantile. All of the cases were either filed in, or removed to, the United States
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
In June 2003, the parties to the various actions informed the court that they had reached an
agreement in principle to settle the various actions. In July 2003, the court conditionally certified a class for settlement purposes, preliminarily approved the class settlement, and directed the issuance of notice to the class. Thereafter, certain
plaintiffs who had initially opted out of the proposed settlement and other objectors challenged the validity of the settlement in the district court. The district court denied their arguments and approved the settlement. These opt out
plaintiffs and other objectors appealed the district courts approval of the settlement to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In August 2005, the court of appeals reversed the district courts approval of the
settlement and remanded the case to the district court with instructions to consider and address certain specific issues when re-evaluating the settlement. In August 2006, the settling parties submitted a modified settlement agreement to the
district court for its approval.
61
In addition, several individuals have filed actions on behalf of themselves or a putative class of plaintiffs alleging claims involving CBNVs second
mortgage loans. These actions also were filed in, or transferred for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings, to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits seek unquantified
monetary damages, interest, attorneys fees and other expenses, and a refund of all origination fees and fees paid for title services.
PAGIC
In May 2007, the settlement of the securities class action lawsuit related to our three 2001 PAGIC transactions became final. Several lawsuits had
been filed in 2002 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. They were then consolidated as a class action on behalf of buyers of our common stock between July 19, 2001 and July 18, 2002. In their
consolidated amended complaint, the plaintiffs alleged violations of federal securities laws related to disclosures about the PAGIC transactions. The complaint named PNC, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, our former Chief Financial Officer,
our Controller, and our former independent auditors for 2001 as defendants.
In March 2005, PNC and the three individual defendants reached a settlement
agreement with the plaintiffs and filed it with the court. The settlement also covered claims by three unrelated entities that were involved in the PAGIC transactions but were not parties to the lawsuit. The court approved our settlement in July
2006. Our former auditors appealed the courts approval of our settlement. While the appeal was pending, our former auditors filed their own settlement agreement with the court in December 2006. When the auditors settlement became final
in May 2007, they dismissed their appeal of our settlement. At that point, our settlement of the securities lawsuit became final, as did several settlements of related claims as described below.
Described below are the key terms of the various settlements that have become final.
|
|
|
Settlement Fund. The insurers under our Executive Blended Risk insurance coverage funded a $30 million settlement fund to be used for the benefit of
the class. Other parties have funded additional amounts to be used for the same purpose. Neither PNC nor any of our current or former officers, directors or employees was required to contribute any amounts to this settlement fund.
|
Previously, a subsidiary of PNC had entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the United States Department of
Justice related to the PAGIC transactions. Under this agreement, we paid $90 million to establish a Restitution Fund. The Restitution Fund is available to settle claims, including those in the securities lawsuit. Louis W. Fryman, chair emeritus of
Fox Rothschild LLP in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is administering the Restitution Fund. The plaintiffs and Mr. Fryman are coordinating the administration and distribution of
the settlement fund and the Restitution Fund.
|
|
|
Assignment of Claims. We assigned to the plaintiffs claims arising from the PAGIC transactions that we may have had against our former independent
auditors for 2001 and other unaffiliated third parties. This assignment did not include claims against AIG Financial Products and related parties (collectively, AIG). We settled our claims against AIG Financial Products and its
affiliate, American International Surplus Lines Insurance Company (AISLIC) in connection with our settlement of the securities lawsuit. AIG Financial Products was our counterparty in the PAGIC transactions. AISLIC is one of the insurers
under our Executive Blended Risk insurance coverage. |
|
|
|
Insurance Claims. We have settled our claims against four of the insurers under our Executive Blended Risk insurance coverage (including, as noted
above, AISLIC) related to our contribution to the Restitution Fund. We reached these settlements in December 2004, January 2005, March 2005 and May 2007. Under the March 2005 settlement, we had agreed to return the settlement amount
($11.25 million) if the settlement of the securities lawsuit did not become final. As the settlement of the securities lawsuit is now final, we no longer could be required to return this amount. We have pending litigation against other insurers with
which we have not settled. |
|
|
|
IFS Claims. Because our Incentive Savings Plan holds shares of our common stock, the Administrative Committee of this Plan retained Independent
Fiduciary Services, Inc. (IFS) in 2003 to act as independent fiduciary on behalf of the Plan and represent its interests in connection with the securities lawsuit and in evaluating other potential claims related to the PAGIC
transactions. On behalf of the Plan and its participants and beneficiaries, IFS opted to participate in the settlement of the securities lawsuit, and negotiated a special payment to the Plan from the Restitution Fund. We have entered into a
Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims with IFS relating to claims the Plan and its participants and beneficiaries may have in connection with the PAGIC transactions. |
The United States Department of Labor had previously begun a formal investigation of PNC and the Administrative Committee with respect to its conduct
relating to our common stock held by the Plan. The Department of Labor is not a party to our settlement with IFS. IFS has routinely communicated with the Department of Labor in connection with IFSs actions on behalf of the Plan and its
participants.
62
|
|
|
Other Claims. The derivative claims asserted by one of our shareholders related to the PAGIC transactions were resolved as a result of the settlement
of the securities lawsuit. |
|
|
|
Other Releases. We have released the insurers providing our Executive Blended Risk insurance coverage from any further liability to PNC arising out of
the events that gave rise to the securities lawsuit, with certain exceptions. These releases do not cover our claims against these insurers relating to the $90 million payment to the Restitution Fund. As noted above, we have settled these claims
against four of our insurers. In addition, PNC has exchanged releases with the plaintiffs in the securities lawsuit, AIG and our former independent auditors, with respect to claims arising out of the PAGIC transactions. |
We are responsible for the costs of administering the settlement fund and the Restitution Fund. We do not expect such costs to be material.
Regulatory and Governmental Inquiries
In connection with
industry-wide investigations of practices in the mutual fund industry including market timing, late day trading, employee trading in mutual funds and other matters, several of our subsidiaries have received requests for information and other
inquiries from state and federal governmental and regulatory authorities. These subsidiaries are fully cooperating in all of these matters. In addition, as a result of the regulated nature of our business and that of a number of our subsidiaries,
particularly in the banking and securities areas, we and our subsidiaries are the subject from time to time of investigations and other forms of regulatory inquiry, often as part of industry-wide regulatory reviews of specified activities. Our
practice is to cooperate fully with these investigations and inquiries.
Other
In addition to the proceedings or other matters described above, PNC and persons to whom we may have indemnification obligations, in the normal course of business, are subject to various other pending and threatened
legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages and other relief are asserted. We do not anticipate, at the present time, that the ultimate aggregate liability, if any, arising out of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse
effect on our financial position. However, we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations, whether in the proceedings or other matters specifically described above or
otherwise, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period.
NOTE 14 SEGMENT REPORTING
We have four major businesses engaged in providing
banking, asset management and global fund processing products and services:
|
|
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking, |
Results of individual businesses are
presented based on our management accounting practices and our management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to GAAP; therefore, the financial results of individual businesses
are not
necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. We refine our methodologies from time to time as our management accounting
practices are enhanced and our businesses and management structure change. Financial results are presented, to the extent practicable, as if each business, with the exception of our BlackRock segment, operated on a stand-alone basis. As permitted
under GAAP, we have aggregated the business results for certain operating segments for financial reporting purposes.
Assets receive a funding charge and
liabilities and capital receive a funding credit based on a transfer pricing methodology that incorporates product maturities, duration and other factors. Capital is intended to cover unexpected losses and is assigned to the banking and processing
businesses using our risk-based economic capital model. We have assigned to Retail Banking capital equal to 6% of funds to reflect the capital required for well-capitalized banks and to approximate market comparables for this business. The capital
assigned for PFPC reflects its legal entity shareholders equity.
BlackRock business segment results for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2006 reflected our majority ownership in BlackRock during that period. Subsequent to the September 29, 2006 BlackRock/MLIM transaction closing, which had the effect of reducing our ownership interest to approximately 34%, our
investment in BlackRock has been accounted for under the equity method but continues to be a separate reportable business segment of PNC. The fair value of our investment in BlackRock at June 30, 2007 was approximately $6.8 billion. Our
BlackRock business segment information for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 included in this Note 14 was not restated.
63
We have allocated the allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit based on our assessment of risk inherent in the loan portfolios. Our allocation of the costs incurred by operations and other
support areas not directly aligned with the businesses is primarily based on the use of services.
Total business segment financial results differ from
total consolidated results. The impact of these differences is reflected in the Intercompany Eliminations and Other categories. Intercompany Eliminations reflects activities conducted among our businesses that are
eliminated in the consolidated results. Other includes residual activities that do not meet the criteria for disclosure as a separate reportable business, such as gains or losses related to BlackRock transactions including LTIP
distributions and obligations, Mercantile acquisition integration costs, asset and liability management activities, related net securities gains or losses, certain trading activities, equity management activities and minority interest in income of
BlackRock for the second quarter and first half of 2006, differences between business segment performance reporting and financial statement reporting (GAAP), and most corporate overhead.
Assets, revenue and earnings attributable to foreign activities were not material in the periods presented.
BUSINESS SEGMENT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Retail Banking provides deposit, lending, brokerage, trust, investment management, and cash
management services to approximately 2.9 million consumer and small business customers within our primary geographic area. Our customers are serviced through 1,084 offices in our branch network, the call center located in Pittsburgh and the
Internet www.pncbank.com. The branch network is located primarily in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Washington, DC, Maryland, Virginia, Ohio, Kentucky and Delaware. Brokerage services are provided through PNC Investments, LLC, and J.J.B.
Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc. Retail Banking also serves as investment manager and trustee for employee benefit plans and charitable and endowment assets and provides nondiscretionary defined contribution plan services and investment options through
its Vested Interest® product. These services are provided to individuals and corporations primarily within our primary geographic markets.
Corporate & Institutional Banking provides lending, treasury management, and capital markets-related products and services to mid-sized corporations, government entities, and selectively to
large corporations. Lending products include secured and unsecured loans, letters of credit and equipment leases. Treasury management services include cash and investment management, receivables management, disbursement services, funds transfer
services, information reporting, and global trade services. Capital markets-related products and services include foreign exchange, derivatives, loan syndications, mergers and acquisitions advisory and related services to middle-market companies,
securities underwriting, and securities sales and trading. Corporate & Institutional Banking also provides commercial loan servicing, real estate advisory and technology solutions for the commercial real estate finance industry.
Corporate & Institutional Banking provides products and services generally within our primary geographic markets, with certain products and services provided nationally.
BlackRock is one of the worlds largest publicly traded investment management firms. As of
June 30, 2007, BlackRocks assets under management were approximately $1.23 trillion. The firm manages assets on behalf of institutions and individuals worldwide through a variety of equity, fixed income, cash management and alternative
investment products. In addition, BlackRock provides BlackRock Solutions® investment system, risk management, and financial advisory services to a growing number of institutional investors.
The firm has a major presence in key global markets, including the United States, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Middle East.
PFPC is a
leading full service provider of processing, technology and business solutions for the global investment industry. Securities services include custody, securities lending, and accounting and administration for funds registered under the 1940 Act and
alternative investments. Investor services include transfer agency, managed accounts, subaccounting, and distribution. PFPC serviced $2.4 trillion in total assets and 70 million shareholder accounts as of June 30, 2007 both domestically
and internationally through its Ireland and Luxembourg operations.
64
Business Segment Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30 In millions |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
BlackRock |
|
PFPC |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Intercompany Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
2007 INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
533 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
738 |
Noninterest income |
|
|
443 |
|
|
187 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
975 |
Total revenue |
|
|
976 |
|
|
378 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,713 |
Provision for (recoveries of) credit losses |
|
|
37 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
546 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
964 |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
360 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
619 |
Income taxes |
|
|
133 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
196 |
Earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
227 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
423 |
Inter-segment revenue |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
AVERAGE ASSETS (a) |
|
$ |
44,774 |
|
$ |
28,477 |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
47,367 |
|
|
$ |
(3,746 |
) |
|
$ |
123,320 |
2006 INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
423 |
|
$ |
167 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
556 |
Noninterest income |
|
|
358 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,230 |
Total revenue |
|
|
781 |
|
|
376 |
|
|
365 |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,786 |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
28 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
443 |
|
|
185 |
|
|
254 |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,073 |
Earnings (loss) before minority interest in BlackRock and income taxes |
|
|
293 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
597 |
Minority interest in BlackRock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
Income taxes |
|
|
108 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
Earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
185 |
|
$ |
115 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
381 |
Inter-segment revenue |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
AVERAGE ASSETS (a) |
|
$ |
29,283 |
|
$ |
24,569 |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
$ |
2,416 |
|
|
$ |
38,470 |
|
|
$ |
(3,215 |
) |
|
$ |
93,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 In millions |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Corporate & Institutional Banking |
|
BlackRock |
|
PFPC |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Intercompany Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
2007 INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
984 |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,361 |
Noninterest income |
|
|
830 |
|
|
374 |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,966 |
Total revenue |
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
745 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
3,327 |
Provision for (recoveries of) credit losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
55 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
1,842 |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
679 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1,281 |
Income taxes |
|
|
251 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
399 |
Earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
428 |
|
$ |
254 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
882 |
Inter-segment revenue |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
AVERAGE ASSETS (a) |
|
$ |
39,662 |
|
$ |
27,471 |
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
45,637 |
|
|
$ |
(3,803 |
) |
|
$ |
115,415 |
2006 INCOME STATEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
830 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,112 |
Noninterest income |
|
|
703 |
|
|
374 |
|
|
756 |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
2,415 |
Total revenue |
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
708 |
|
|
774 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
3,527 |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
37 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
34 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
866 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
542 |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
2,163 |
Earnings (loss) before minority interest in BlackRock and income taxes |
|
|
596 |
|
|
313 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,154 |
Minority interest in BlackRock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
Income taxes |
|
|
221 |
|
|
96 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
378 |
Earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
375 |
|
$ |
217 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
735 |
Inter-segment revenue |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
AVERAGE ASSETS (a) |
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
$ |
24,181 |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
$ |
2,416 |
|
|
$ |
37,647 |
|
|
$ |
(2,702 |
) |
|
$ |
92,792 |
(a) |
Period-end balances for BlackRock and PFPC. |
65
Certain revenue and expense amounts shown in the preceding table differ from amounts included in the Business Segments Review section of Part I, Item 2
of this Form 10-Q due to the presentation in Item 2 of business revenues on a taxable-equivalent basis, the inclusion of BlackRock/MLIM acquisition integration costs in Other in the Item 2 presentation, and classification
differences related to PFPC. PFPC income classified as net interest income (expense) in the preceding table represents the interest components of other nonoperating income (net of nonoperating expense) and debt financing as disclosed in the Business
Segments Review section.
NOTE 15 COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
EQUITY
FUNDING AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
Our unfunded commitments related to private equity
investments, affordable housing limited partnerships and other investments were $267 million, $108 million and $64 million, respectively, at June 30, 2007. The amount of other investments at June 30, 2007 included those related to Steel
City Capital Funding LLC (Steel City) as further discussed below.
On March 1, 2007, we entered into a joint venture with a third party to
form Steel City for purposes of purchasing and originating second lien loans and turnaround loans. Our primary reason for pursuing this venture was to leverage our strengths of origination and servicing, provide an additional product to our
customers, and allow for us to moderate the risks associated with this asset class. Additionally, we will earn fees for portfolio management services. Steel City is a limited liability company in which various PNC subsidiaries hold approximately a
31% equity ownership. At June 30, 2007, our capital contribution to Steel City was approximately $28 million with a commitment to fund an additional $50 million. The third party investor has contributed $63 million with a commitment to fund an
additional $112 million. We evaluated the accounting for this transaction under FIN 46R and Account Research Bulletins 51 (ARB 51) and other appropriate generally accepted accounting principles and determined that our aggregate
investment will be accounted for under the equity method. This transaction did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
On May 24, 2007, we entered into a joint venture with Vornado Realty Trust to construct a new headquarters
building for the Washington, DC market. The joint venture is expected to close in December 2007. We will contribute approximately $64 million in property in exchange for a 51% ownership interest. At closing, the joint venture entity will be named
PNC VNO 17th Street LLC.
STANDBY
LETTERS OF CREDIT
We issue standby letters of credit and have risk participations in standby letters of
credit and bankers acceptances issued by other financial institutions, in each case to support obligations
of our customers to third parties. If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract,
then upon the request of the guaranteed party, we would be obligated to make payment to them. The standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers acceptances outstanding on June 30, 2007 had
terms ranging from less than one year to 10 years. The aggregate maximum amount of future payments we could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers
acceptances was $6.9 billion at June 30, 2007.
Assets valued as of June 30, 2007 of approximately $.8 billion secured certain specifically
identified standby letters of credit. Approximately $2.1 billion in recourse provisions from third parties was also available for this purpose as of June 30, 2007. In addition, a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit and letter of
credit risk participations issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers other obligations to us. The carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby
letters of credit and risk participations in standby letters of credit and bankers acceptances was $58 million at June 30, 2007.
STANDBY BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER LIQUIDITY FACILITIES
We enter into standby bond purchase agreements to support municipal bond obligations. At June 30, 2007, the aggregate of PNCs commitments under these
facilities was $240 million. PNC also enters into certain other liquidity facilities to support individual pools of receivables acquired by commercial paper conduits including Market Street. At June 30, 2007, our total commitments under these
facilities were $6.7 billion, of which $6.5 billion was related to Market Street.
INDEMNIFICATIONS
We are a party to numerous acquisition or divestiture agreements under which we have purchased or sold, or agreed to purchase or sell, various types of assets. These
agreements can cover the purchase or sale of:
|
|
|
Partial interests in companies, or |
These agreements generally
include indemnification provisions under which we indemnify the third parties to these agreements against a variety of risks to the indemnified parties as a result of the transaction in question. When PNC is the seller, the indemnification
provisions will generally also provide the buyer with protection relating to the quality of the assets we are selling and the extent of any liabilities being assumed by the buyer. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot
quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.
66
We provide indemnification in connection with securities offering transactions in which we are involved. When we are the issuer of the securities, we provide
indemnification to the underwriters or placement agents analogous to the indemnification provided to the purchasers of businesses from us, as described above. When we are an underwriter or placement agent, we provide a limited indemnification to the
issuer related to our actions in connection with the offering and, if there are other underwriters, indemnification to the other underwriters intended to result in an appropriate sharing of the risk of participating in the offering. Due to the
nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot quantify the total potential exposure to us resulting from them.
We enter into certain types of
agreements that include provisions for indemnifying third parties, such as:
|
|
|
Agreements relating to providing various servicing and processing functions to third parties, |
|
|
|
Agreements relating to the creation of trusts or other legal entities to facilitate leasing transactions, commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions (loan
securitizations) and certain other off-balance sheet transactions, |
|
|
|
Confidentiality agreements, |
|
|
|
Syndicated credit agreements, as a syndicate member, |
|
|
|
Sales of individual loans and equipment leases, |
|
|
|
Arrangements with brokers to facilitate the hedging of derivative and convertible arbitrage activities, and |
|
|
|
Litigation settlement agreements. |
Due to the nature
of these indemnification provisions, we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under them.
We enter into certain types of agreements, including
leases, assignments of leases, and subleases, in which we agree to indemnify third parties for acts by our agents, assignees and/or sublessees, and employees. While we do not believe these indemnification liabilities are material, either
individually or in total, we cannot calculate our potential exposure.
We enter into contracts for the delivery of technology service in which we indemnify
the other party against claims of patent and copyright infringement by third parties. Due to the nature of these indemnification provisions, we cannot calculate our aggregate potential exposure under this type of indemnification.
We engage in certain insurance activities which require our employees to be bonded. We satisfy this bonding requirement by issuing letters of credit in a total amount of
approximately $3 million.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contracts with third parties under which the third parties provide services on
behalf of PNC. In many of these contracts, we agree to indemnify the third party service provider under certain
circumstances. The terms of the indemnity vary from contract to contract and the amount of the indemnification liability, if any, cannot be determined.
We are a general or limited partner in certain asset management and investment limited partnerships, many of which contain indemnification provisions that
would require us to make payments in excess of our remaining funding commitments. While in certain of these partnerships the maximum liability to us is limited to the sum of our unfunded commitments and partnership distributions received by us, in
the others the indemnification liability is unlimited. As a result, we cannot determine our aggregate potential exposure for these indemnifications.
Pursuant to their bylaws, PNC and its subsidiaries provide indemnification to directors, officers and, in some cases, employees and agents against certain liabilities incurred as a result of their service on behalf of or at the request of
PNC and its subsidiaries. PNC and its subsidiaries also advance on behalf of covered individuals costs incurred in connection with certain claims or proceedings, subject to written undertakings by each such individual to repay all amounts advanced
if it is ultimately determined that the individual is not entitled to indemnification. We generally are responsible for similar indemnifications and advancement obligations that companies we acquire, including Riggs and Mercantile, had to their
officers, directors and sometimes employees and agents at the time of acquisition. We advanced such costs on behalf of several such individuals (including some from Riggs) with respect to pending litigation or investigations during the first six
months of 2007. It is not possible for us to determine the aggregate potential exposure resulting from the obligation to provide this indemnity or to advance such costs.
In connection with the lending of securities held by PFPC as an intermediary on behalf of certain of its clients, we provide indemnification to those clients against the failure of the borrowers to return the
securities. The market value of the securities lent is fully secured on a daily basis; therefore, the exposure to us is limited to temporary shortfalls in the collateral as a result of short-term fluctuations in trading prices of the loaned
securities. At June 30, 2007, the total maximum potential exposure as a result of these indemnity obligations was $15.7 billion, although we held collateral at the time in excess of that amount.
OTHER GUARANTEES
We write caps and
floors for customers, risk management and proprietary trading purposes. At June 30, 2007, the fair value of the written caps and floors liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was $31 million. Our ultimate obligation under written options
is based on future market conditions and is only quantifiable at settlement. We manage our market risk exposure from customer positions through transactions with third-party dealers.
We also enter into credit default swaps under which we buy loss protection from or sell loss protection to a counterparty
67
for the occurrence of a credit event of a reference entity. The fair value of the contracts sold on our Consolidated Balance Sheet was a net liability of $1
million at June 30, 2007. The maximum amount we would be required to pay under the credit default swaps in which we sold protection, assuming all reference obligations experience a credit event at a total loss, without recoveries, was $1.7
billion at June 30, 2007.
We have entered into various contingent performance guarantees through credit risk participation arrangements with terms
ranging from less than one year to 10 years. We will be required to make payments under these guarantees if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under certain credit agreements with third parties. Our exposure under these agreements is
approximately $396 million at June 30, 2007.
CONTINGENT PAYMENTS IN CONNECTION
WITH CERTAIN ACQUISITIONS
A number of the acquisition agreements to which we are a party and under which
we have purchased various types of assets, including the purchase of entire businesses, partial interests in companies, or other types of assets, require us to make additional payments in future years if certain predetermined goals are achieved or
not achieved within a specific time period. Due to the nature of the contract provisions, we cannot quantify our total exposure that may result from these agreements.
NOTE 16 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
STERLING FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
On July 19, 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement with Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) for
PNC to acquire Sterling for approximately 4.5 million shares of PNC common stock and $224 million in cash. Based upon PNCs closing common stock price on July 17, 2007, the consideration represents $565 million in stock and cash or
approximately $19.00 per Sterling share.
Sterling, based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania with approximately $3.3 billion in assets and $2.6 billion in
deposits, provides banking and other financial services, including leasing, trust, investment and brokerage, to individuals and businesses through 67 branches in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware. The transaction is expected to close during the
first quarter of 2008 and is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and the approval of Sterlings shareholders.
ARCS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
On July 2, 2007, we acquired ARCS Commercial Mortgage Co. L.P.
(ARCS), a Calabasas Hills, California-based lender with 10 origination offices in the United States. ARCS has been a leading originator and servicer of multifamily loans for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the past decade. It originated
more than $2.1 billion of loans in 2006 and services approximately $13 billion of commercial mortgage loans.
68
STATISTICAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
THE PNC FINANCIAL
SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Taxable-equivalent basis Dollars in millions |
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
18,245 |
|
|
$ |
490 |
|
5.37 |
% |
|
$ |
14,066 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
4.74 |
% |
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,492 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
4.51 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
5.05 |
|
U.S. Treasury and government agencies |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
4.37 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
5.20 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
7.02 |
|
Corporate stocks and other |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
6.97 |
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
24,915 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
21,162 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
4.71 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
23,246 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
7.30 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
6.87 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7,540 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
7.72 |
|
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
6.86 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
4.49 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
17,378 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
16,037 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
6.12 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
7,649 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
7,313 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
5.38 |
|
Other |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
6.83 |
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
58,832 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
49,464 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
6.27 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
5.71 |
|
Federal funds sold and resale agreements |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
4.43 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
2,970 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
4.76 |
|
Total interest-earning assets/interest income |
|
|
91,664 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
6.29 |
|
|
|
76,724 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
5.75 |
|
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
21,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
115,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Minority and Noncontrolling Interests, and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
23,245 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
3.57 |
|
|
$ |
18,752 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
3.06 |
|
Demand |
|
|
9,085 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
.92 |
|
Savings |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
.47 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
.50 |
|
Retail certificates of deposit |
|
|
16,637 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
13,466 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
3.85 |
|
Other time |
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
4.46 |
|
Time deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
4.69 |
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
57,153 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
47,852 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
2.96 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
4.71 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
4.28 |
|
Bank notes and senior debt |
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
4.78 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
4,418 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
6.06 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
5.85 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
3.86 |
|
Total borrowed funds |
|
|
19,083 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
15,377 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
4.85 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities/interest expense |
|
|
76,236 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
63,229 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
3.42 |
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities, minority and noncontrolling interests, and shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and other noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
7,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority and noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
13,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, minority and noncontrolling interests, and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
115,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.33 |
|
Impact of noninterest-bearing sources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.60 |
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,375 |
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
2.93 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans are included in loans, net of unearned income. The impact of financial derivatives used in
interest rate risk management is included in the interest income/expense and average yields/rates of the related assets and liabilities. Basis adjustments related to hedged items are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing
liabilities. Average balances of securities are based on amortized historical cost (excluding SFAS 115 adjustments to fair value, which are included in other assets). Average balances for certain loans and borrowed funds accounted for at fair value,
with changes in fair value recorded in trading noninterest income, are included in noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities.
69
Average Consolidated Balance Sheet And Net Interest Analysis (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter 2007 |
|
|
First Quarter 2007 |
|
|
Second Quarter 2006 |
|
Average Balances |
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Interest Income/ Expense |
|
Average Yields/ Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$19,280 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
5.40 |
% |
|
$ |
17,198 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
5.33 |
% |
|
$ |
14,247 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
4.79 |
% |
|
3,646 |
|
|
54 |
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
4.62 |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
28 |
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
5.52 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
5.16 |
|
|
344 |
|
|
4 |
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
4.38 |
|
|
203 |
|
|
2 |
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
5.24 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
1 |
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
7.12 |
|
|
383 |
|
|
5 |
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
6.34 |
|
|
26,420 |
|
|
355 |
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
23,394 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
21,416 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,652 |
|
|
456 |
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
21,479 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
20,348 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
7.00 |
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
190 |
|
7.91 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
7.40 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
7.17 |
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
12 |
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
4.47 |
|
|
17,886 |
|
|
296 |
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
16,865 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
16,049 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
6.20 |
|
|
8,527 |
|
|
127 |
|
5.95 |
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
7,353 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
5.39 |
|
|
411 |
|
|
7 |
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
6.80 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
7.04 |
|
|
63,555 |
|
|
1,088 |
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
54,056 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
49,936 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
6.38 |
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
39 |
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
5.99 |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
23 |
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
4.72 |
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
57 |
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
4.70 |
|
|
98,024 |
|
|
1,562 |
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
85,232 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
77,171 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(692) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$23,979 |
|
|
213 |
|
3.55 |
|
|
$ |
22,503 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
3.60 |
|
|
$ |
19,019 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
3.20 |
|
|
9,494 |
|
|
26 |
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
8,229 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
.98 |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
3 |
|
.47 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
.46 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
.49 |
|
|
17,426 |
|
|
205 |
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
15,691 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
13,686 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
3.97 |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
31 |
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
4.63 |
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
54 |
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
4.89 |
|
|
60,404 |
|
|
532 |
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
53,867 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
48,710 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,102 |
|
|
83 |
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
5.15 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
4.93 |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
29 |
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
4.48 |
|
|
5,681 |
|
|
76 |
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
5.36 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
5.04 |
|
|
4,466 |
|
|
67 |
|
5.95 |
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
6.05 |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
29 |
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
3.96 |
|
|
21,321 |
|
|
284 |
|
5.28 |
|
|
|
16,820 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
15,027 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
5.06 |
|
|
81,725 |
|
|
816 |
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
70,687 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
63,737 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$123,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.62 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
562 |
|
2.90 |
% |
Loan fees for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 were $19 million and $18 million,
respectively. Loan fees for the three months ended June 30, 2007, March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006 were $10 million, $9 million and $9 million, respectively. Interest income includes the effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments
using a marginal federal income tax rate of 35% to increase tax-exempt interest income to a taxable-equivalent basis. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006 were $14
million and $13 million, respectively. The taxable-equivalent adjustments to interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2007, March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006 were $8 million, $6 million and $6 million, respectively.
Average securities held to maturity totaled less than $.5 million for each of the periods presented and are included in the Other debt category.
70
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 13 Legal Proceedings in the Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, of this Report, which is incorporated by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
No material changes from the risk factors previously
disclosed in PNCs 2006 Form 10-K in response to Part I, Item 1A.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Details of our repurchases of PNC common stock during the second quarter of 2007 are included in the following table:
In thousands, except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 period |
|
Total shares purchased (1) |
|
Average price paid per share |
|
Total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs (2) |
|
Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs (2) |
April 1 April 30 |
|
1,084 |
|
$ |
73.40 |
|
900 |
|
12,203 |
May 1 May 31 |
|
1,190 |
|
$ |
73.99 |
|
988 |
|
11,215 |
June 1 June 30 |
|
2,237 |
|
$ |
72.66 |
|
2,125 |
|
9,090 |
Total |
|
4,511 |
|
$ |
73.19 |
|
4,013 |
|
|
(1) |
Includes PNC common stock purchased under the program referred to in note (2) to this table and PNC common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit
plans. |
(2) |
Our current stock repurchase program, which was authorized as of February 16, 2005, allows us to purchase up to 20 million shares on the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions. This program will remain in effect until fully utilized or until modified, superseded or terminated. |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibit index lists Exhibits filed, or in the case of
Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 furnished, with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
Second Amendment to Share Surrender Agreement made and entered into as of June 11, 2007 by and between the Corporation, BlackRock, Inc. and PNC Bancorp, Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.50 of the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 11, 2007 (filed June 14, 2007). |
|
|
10.51 |
|
2006-2007 Forms of employee incentive performance units agreements. |
|
|
10.52 |
|
First Amendment to the Corporations 2006 Incentive Award Plan. Incorporated by reference to Ex. 99.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-143182) filed by the
Corporation (Commission File No. 001-09718) with the SEC on May 23, 2007. |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
12.2 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
99.1 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 20, 2006, by and among PNC Funding Corp, as Issuer, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., as Guarantor, and Morgan Stanley & Co
Incorporated, as Initial Purchaser. |
|
|
99.2 |
|
Form of Floating Rate Exchangeable Senior Notes. |
|
|
99.3 |
|
Form T-1 Statement of Eligibility Under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 of The Bank of New York to act as Trustee under the Indenture dated December 20, 2006. |
You can receive copies of these Exhibits electronically at the SECs home page at www.sec.gov or by mail from
the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549 at prescribed rates. The Exhibits are also available as part of this Form 10-Q on or through PNCs corporate website at www.pnc.com under About
PNCInvestor RelationsFinancial Information. Shareholders may also receive copies of Exhibits, without charge, by contacting Shareholder Relations at 800-843-2206 or via e-mail at investor.relations@pnc.com.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on August 8, 2007 on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
|
/s/ Richard J. Johnson |
Richard J. Johnson |
Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
71
CORPORATE INFORMATION
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC.
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
One PNC Plaza
249 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707
412-762-2000
STOCK LISTING
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PNC.
INTERNET INFORMATION
The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc.s financial reports and information about its products and services are available on the internet at www.pnc.com.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Therefore, we file annual, quarterly and current reports as well as proxy materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You can obtain copies of these and other filings, including exhibits, electronically at the
SECs Internet website at www.sec.gov or on or through PNCs corporate Internet website at www.pnc.com in the About PNC Investor Relations-Financial Information section. Copies may also be obtained without charge by
contacting Shareholder Services at
800-982-7652 or via e-mail at web.queries@computershare.com.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT PNC
Information about our Board of Directors (Board) and its committees and about corporate governance at PNC is available on PNCs corporate website at www.pnc.com under About PNC Investor
Relations Corporate Governance. Shareholders who would like to request printed copies of the PNC Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or our Corporate Governance Guidelines or the charters of our Boards Audit, Nominating &
Governance, and Personnel & Compensation Committees (all of which are posted on the PNC corporate website) may do so by sending their requests to George P. Long, III, Corporate Secretary, at corporate headquarters at the above address.
Copies will be provided without charge to shareholders.
INQUIRIES
For financial services call 888-PNC-2265. Individual shareholders should contact Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.
Analysts and institutional investors should contact William H. Callihan, Senior Vice President, Director of Investor Relations, at 412-762-8257 or via e-mail at
investor.relations@pnc.com.
News media representatives and others seeking general information should contact Brian E. Goerke, Director of External Communications, at 412-762-4550 or via e-mail at
corporate.communications@pnc.com.
COMMON STOCK PRICES/DIVIDENDS DECLARED
The table below sets forth by quarter the range of high and low sale and quarter-end closing prices for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
common stock and the cash dividends declared per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
Cash Dividends Declared |
2007 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
76.41 |
|
$ |
68.60 |
|
$ |
71.97 |
|
$ |
.55 |
Second |
|
|
76.15 |
|
|
70.31 |
|
|
71.58 |
|
|
.63 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
$ |
71.42 |
|
$ |
61.78 |
|
$ |
67.31 |
|
$ |
.50 |
Second |
|
|
72.00 |
|
|
65.30 |
|
|
70.17 |
|
|
.55 |
Third |
|
|
73.55 |
|
|
68.09 |
|
|
72.44 |
|
|
.55 |
Fourth |
|
|
75.15 |
|
|
67.61 |
|
|
74.04 |
|
|
.55 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
DIVIDEND POLICY
Holders of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by the Board out of funds legally available for this
purpose. The Board presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends. However, the amount of future dividends will depend on earnings, the financial condition of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and other factors,
including applicable government regulations and policies and contractual restrictions.
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT
AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment
and Stock Purchase Plan enables holders of our common and preferred stock to purchase additional shares of common stock conveniently and without paying brokerage commissions or service charges. You can obtain a prospectus and enrollment form by
contacting Shareholder Services at 800-982-7652.
REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
Computershare Investor Services, LLC
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
800-982-7652
72