UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006
or
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number: 1-652
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia | 54-0414210 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
1501 North Hamilton Street, Richmond, Virginia |
23230 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
804-359-9311
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 1, 2006, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding was 25,774,990.
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Item No. |
Page | |||
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||
1. |
3 | |||
2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
23 | ||
3. |
28 | |||
4. |
29 | |||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
1. |
30 | |||
4. |
32 | |||
6. |
33 | |||
34 |
2
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
(In thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
$ | 629,656 | $ | 590,416 | $ | 1,154,343 | $ | 1,061,478 | |||||||
Costs and expenses |
|||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
500,224 | 470,403 | 935,770 | 859,851 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
73,587 | 64,698 | 143,398 | 127,412 | |||||||||||
Impairment charge |
| | 12,289 | | |||||||||||
Operating income |
55,845 | 55,315 | 62,886 | 74,215 | |||||||||||
Equity in pretax earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates |
(728 | ) | 838 | (4,268 | ) | (2,217 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
15,083 | 15,387 | 28,961 | 30,005 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes and other items |
40,034 | 40,766 | 29,657 | 41,993 | |||||||||||
Income taxes |
15,008 | 17,254 | 20,850 | 18,349 | |||||||||||
Minority interests |
(3,237 | ) | 432 | (4,380 | ) | (1,473 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
28,263 | 23,080 | 13,187 | 25,117 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Operating results of discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
8,101 | 3,434 | 20,829 | 13,216 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses, net of income taxes |
(33,285 | ) | | (33,285 | ) | | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(25,184 | ) | 3,434 | (12,456 | ) | 13,216 | |||||||||
Net income |
3,079 | 26,514 | 731 | 38,333 | |||||||||||
Dividends on convertible perpetual preferred stock |
(3,713 | ) | | (7,260 | ) | | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (634 | ) | $ | 26,514 | $ | (6,529 | ) | $ | 38,333 | |||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: |
|||||||||||||||
From continuing operations |
$ | 0.95 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.98 | |||||||
From discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Operating results |
0.31 | 0.13 | 0.81 | 0.51 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(1.29 | ) | | (1.29 | ) | | |||||||||
Total from discontinued operations |
(0.98 | ) | 0.13 | (0.48 | ) | 0.51 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 1.03 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 1.49 | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
|||||||||||||||
From continuing operations |
$ | 0.92 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.97 | |||||||
From discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Operating results |
0.26 | 0.13 | 0.81 | 0.51 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(1.09 | ) | | (1.29 | ) | | |||||||||
Total from discontinued operations |
(0.83 | ) | 0.13 | (0.48 | ) | 0.51 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 1.48 | ||||||
Retained earnings - beginning of period |
$ | 697,987 | $ | 733,763 | |||||||||||
Net income |
731 | 38,333 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared: |
|||||||||||||||
Common stock (2006 - $.86 per share; 2005 - $.84 per share) |
(22,153 | ) | (21,587 | ) | |||||||||||
Series B 6.75% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock |
(7,260 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Retained earnings - end of period |
$ | 669,305 | $ | 750,509 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
3
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of dollars)
September 30, 2006 |
September 30, 2005 |
March 31, 2006 |
||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 348,432 | $ | 73,956 | $ | 64,094 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
250,833 | 267,969 | 250,999 | |||||||||
Advances to suppliers, net |
78,647 | 144,329 | 119,131 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable - unconsolidated affiliates |
53,647 | 919 | 16,675 | |||||||||
Inventories - at lower of cost or market: |
||||||||||||
Tobacco |
755,768 | 797,516 | 666,708 | |||||||||
Agri-products |
47,584 | 92,807 | 71,885 | |||||||||
Other |
59,727 | 63,151 | 42,446 | |||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
3,287 | 8,250 | 3,943 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
28,698 | 6,935 | 22,078 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
64,938 | 47,786 | 52,296 | |||||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
| 450,044 | 492,343 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
1,691,561 | 1,953,662 | 1,802,598 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
||||||||||||
Land |
17,279 | 17,711 | 16,796 | |||||||||
Buildings |
249,893 | 242,865 | 252,148 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
526,467 | 609,093 | 541,392 | |||||||||
793,639 | 869,669 | 810,336 | ||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(401,712 | ) | (404,336 | ) | (395,816 | ) | ||||||
391,927 | 465,333 | 414,520 | ||||||||||
Other assets |
||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles |
106,274 | 106,067 | 106,179 | |||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
94,839 | 80,954 | 95,988 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
93,267 | 83,213 | 86,197 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
175,069 | 190,571 | 182,914 | |||||||||
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations |
| 200,445 | 212,945 | |||||||||
469,449 | 661,250 | 684,223 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,552,937 | $ | 3,080,245 | $ | 2,901,341 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of dollars)
September 30, 2006 |
September 30, 2005 |
March 31, 2006 |
||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Current |
||||||||||||
Notes payable and overdrafts |
$ | 169,962 | $ | 395,800 | $ | 318,724 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
214,047 | 238,217 | 208,385 | |||||||||
Accounts payable - unconsolidated affiliates |
2,220 | 1,411 | 2,727 | |||||||||
Customer advances and deposits |
177,853 | 144,152 | 98,750 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation |
14,825 | 13,318 | 17,564 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
25,262 | 6,305 | 11,890 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
18,526 | 113,432 | 8,537 | |||||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
| 248,771 | 271,229 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
622,695 | 1,161,406 | 937,806 | |||||||||
Long-term obligations |
752,781 | 835,267 | 762,201 | |||||||||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
44,422 | 44,117 | 45,560 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
126,025 | 125,001 | 123,591 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
24,768 | 31,589 | 31,072 | |||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations |
| 19,588 | 18,441 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,570,691 | 2,216,968 | 1,918,671 | |||||||||
Minority interests |
9,160 | 31,115 | 17,799 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock: |
||||||||||||
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value, 500,000 authorized shares, none issued or outstanding |
| | | |||||||||
Series B 6.75% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, no par value, 5,000,000 authorized shares, 220,000 issued and outstanding (none at September 30, 2005, and 200,000 at March 31, 2006) |
213,024 | | 193,546 | |||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 100,000,000 authorized shares, 25,770,306 issued and outstanding (25,715,109 at September 30, 2005, and 25,748,306 at March 31, 2006) |
124,601 | 118,933 | 120,618 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
669,305 | 750,509 | 697,987 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(33,844 | ) | (37,280 | ) | (47,280 | ) | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
973,086 | 832,162 | 964,871 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 2,552,937 | $ | 3,080,245 | $ | 2,901,341 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
5
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of dollars)
Six Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 731 | $ | 38,333 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations: |
||||||||
Net loss (income) from discontinued operations |
12,456 | (13,216 | ) | |||||
Depreciation |
24,163 | 25,597 | ||||||
Amortization |
1,005 | 1,875 | ||||||
Impairment charge |
12,289 | | ||||||
Other, net |
(1,083 | ) | 10,563 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net |
(18,861 | ) | (113,120 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities of continuing operations |
30,700 | (49,968 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(16,002 | ) | (38,060 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of businesses, less $20,345 cash of businesses sold |
379,379 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment and other |
7,762 | | ||||||
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities of continuing operations |
371,139 | (38,060 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Issuance (repayment) of short-term debt, net |
(128,052 | ) | 144,726 | |||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
| (13,554 | ) | |||||
Issuance of convertible perpetual preferred stock, net of issuance costs |
19,478 | | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
54 | 1,413 | ||||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
(22,153 | ) | (21,587 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on convertible perpetual preferred stock |
(7,260 | ) | | |||||
Other |
| (4,112 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities of continuing operations |
(137,933 | ) | 106,886 | |||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
263,906 | 18,858 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
10,898 | 71,832 | ||||||
Net cash used by investing activities of discontinued operations |
(7,927 | ) | (5,023 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities of discontinued operations |
14,836 | (62,416 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
17,807 | 4,393 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
87 | (498 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
281,800 | 22,753 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations at beginning of year |
64,094 | 55,596 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at beginning of year |
2,538 | 3,029 | ||||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at end of period |
| 7,422 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 348,432 | $ | 73,956 | ||||
Significant non-cash items from investing activities of continuing operations for the six months ended September 30, 2006, included the buyers assumption of $153,560 of notes payable and overdrafts with the sale of businesses.
See accompanying notes.
6
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Universal Corporation, with its subsidiaries (the Company or Universal), has operations in tobacco and agri-products. Previously, the Company also had operations in lumber and building products; however, those businesses, along with a portion of its agri-products operations, were sold on September 1, 2006 (see Note 4). Because of the seasonal nature of its businesses, the results of operations for any fiscal quarter will not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for other quarters or a full fiscal year. All adjustments necessary to state fairly the results for the period have been included and were of a normal recurring nature. Certain amounts in prior year statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.
NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Universal adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) effective April 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires that share-based payments, such as grants of stock options, restricted shares, restricted share units, and stock appreciation rights, be measured at fair value and reported as expense in a companys financial statements over the requisite service period. Disclosures related to the adoption of the Statement and the Companys share-based compensation programs are provided in Note 6.
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company also adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151 amended Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 (ARB 43) to clarify that abnormal amounts of production-related costs, such as idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials, should be recognized as current-period charges rather than being recorded as inventory cost. SFAS 151 also requires that allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory cost be based on the normal capacity of a companys production facilities. The impact of adopting SFAS 151 was not material to the Companys financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 requires that positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns meet a more-likely-than-not threshold in order to be recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on measuring the amount of a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not criterion. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and will be adopted by Universal in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending March 31, 2008. Universal has not yet determined the impact that FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.
7
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No, 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is reviewing the guidance in SFAS 157, but currently does not expect that it will have a material effect on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158). This Statement requires employers who sponsor defined benefit pension or postretirement plans to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of each plan as an asset or liability in the balance sheet and to recognize changes in funded status through comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. The Statement also requires that the funded status of plans be measured as of the balance sheet date, thereby eliminating the option allowed under the prior guidance to measure the funded status at a date up to 90 days before the balance sheet date. SFAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006, except for the requirement to measure funded status as of the balance sheet date, which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Universal is currently reviewing the guidance in SFAS 158. The effect of SFAS 158 on the Companys financial statements will depend on the funded status of its plans at the respective future measurement dates.
NOTE 3. GUARANTEES, OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, AND OTHER MATTERS
Guarantees and Other Contingent Liabilities
Guarantees of bank loans to growers for crop financing and construction of curing barns or other tobacco producing assets are industry practice in Brazil and support the farmers production of tobacco there. At September 30, 2006, total exposure under subsidiaries guarantees issued for banking facilities of Brazilian farmers was approximately $177 million. About 70% of these guarantees expire within one year, and nearly all of the remainder expire within five years. The Company withholds payments due to the farmers on delivery of tobacco and forwards those payments to the third-party bank. Failure of farmers to deliver sufficient quantities of tobacco to the Company to cover their obligations to third-party banks could result in a liability for the Company under the related guarantee; however, in that case, the Company would have recourse against the farmers. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Companys subsidiary could be required to make is the face amount, $177 million, and any unpaid accrued interest. The accrual recorded for the value of the guarantees was approximately $9 million and $6 million at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and approximately $8 million at March 31, 2006. In addition to these guarantees, the Company has contingent liabilities related to European Commission fines in Italy and other legal matters, as discussed below.
8
European Commission Fines and Other Legal Matters
European Commission Fines in Spain
In October 2004, the European Commission (the Commission) imposed fines on five companies active in the raw Spanish tobacco processing market totaling 20 million (approximately $25 million) for colluding on the prices paid to, and the quantities bought from, the tobacco growers in Spain. Two of the Companys subsidiaries, including Deltafina, S.p.A. (Deltafina), an Italian subsidiary, were among the five companies assessed fines. In its decision, the Commission imposed a fine of 11.88 million (approximately $14.8 million) on Deltafina. Deltafina did not and does not purchase or process raw tobacco in the Spanish market, but was and is a significant buyer of tobacco from some of the Spanish processors. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $14.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 to accrue the full amount of the fines assessed against the Companys subsidiaries.
In January 2005, Deltafina filed an appeal in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. The appeal process is likely to take several years to complete, and the ultimate outcome is uncertain. The Company has deposited funds in an escrow account with the Commission in the amount of the fine in order to stay execution during the appeal process.
European Commission Fines in Italy
In 2002, the Company reported that it was aware that the Commission was investigating certain aspects of the leaf tobacco markets in Italy. Deltafina buys and processes tobacco in Italy. The Company reported that it did not believe that the Commission investigation in Italy would result in penalties being assessed against it or its subsidiaries that would be material to the Companys earnings. The reason the Company held this belief was that it had received conditional immunity from the Commission because Deltafina had voluntarily informed the Commission of the activities that were the basis of the investigation.
On December 28, 2004, the Company received a preliminary indication that the Commission intended to revoke Deltafinas immunity for disclosing in April 2002 that it had applied for immunity. Neither the Commissions Leniency Notice of February 19, 2002, nor Deltafinas letter of provisional immunity, contains a specific requirement of confidentiality. The potential for such disclosure was discussed with the Commission in March 2002, and the Commission never told Deltafina that disclosure would affect Deltafinas immunity. On November 15, 2005, the Company received notification from the Commission that the Commission had imposed fines totaling 30 million (about $36 million) on Deltafina and the Company jointly for infringing European Union antitrust law in connection with the purchase and processing of tobacco in the Italian raw tobacco market.
The Company does not believe that the decision can be reconciled with the Commissions Statement of Objections and facts. The Company and Deltafina each have appealed the decision to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. Based on consultation with outside legal counsel, the Company believes it is probable that it will prevail in the appeals process and has not accrued a charge for the fine. Deltafina has provided a bank guarantee to the Commission in the amount of the fine in order to stay execution during the appeal process.
9
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
As a result of a posting to the Companys Ethics Complaint hotline alleging improper activities that involved or related to certain of the Companys tobacco subsidiaries, the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation of the alleged activities. That investigation revealed that there have been payments that may have violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. At this time, the payments involved appear to have approximated $1 million over a five-year period. In addition, the investigation revealed activities in foreign jurisdictions that may have violated the competition laws of such jurisdictions, but the Company believes those activities did not violate U.S. antitrust laws. The Company voluntarily reported these activities to the appropriate U.S. authorities. On June 6, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission notified the Company that a formal order of investigation has been issued. The Company has initiated corrective actions, and such actions are continuing.
If the U.S. authorities determine that there have been violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or if the U.S. authorities or the authorities in foreign jurisdictions determine there have been violations of other laws, they may seek to impose sanctions on the Company or its subsidiaries that may include injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, and modifications to business practices. It is not possible to predict at this time whether the authorities will determine that violations have occurred, and if they do, what sanctions they might seek to impose. It is also not possible to predict how the governments investigation or any resulting sanctions may impact the Companys business, financial condition, results of operations, or financial performance, although such sanctions, if imposed, could be material to its results of operations in any quarter. The Company will continue to cooperate with the authorities in these matters.
Employment Litigation Verdict
In September 2006, a California jury decided a case involving an employment matter at one of the Companys agri-products subsidiaries in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded them compensatory damages of approximately $0.2 million and punitive damages of $25 million. The Company believes the jury verdict is flawed and is taking appropriate steps to have it set aside or substantially reduced. Management and outside legal counsel believe this result is likely because both California law and recent United States Supreme Court decisions generally provide that punitive damages must be reasonably related to the amount awarded for compensatory damages. The Company has accrued outside counsels estimate of the probable liability that will ultimately be incurred in this case. While that amount is not material to Universals consolidated financial statements, the Company could incur additional charges in a future period, which could be material, if the ultimate liability exceeds the amount accrued.
10
Other Legal Matters
In addition to the above-mentioned matters, various subsidiaries of the Company are involved in other litigation incidental to their business activities. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management is vigorously defending the claims and does not currently expect that any of them will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position. However, should one or more of these matters be resolved in a manner adverse to managements current expectation, the effect on the Companys results of operations for a particular fiscal reporting period could be material.
Investment in Zimbabwe Operations
The Company deconsolidated its operations in Zimbabwe as of January 1, 2006, under U.S. accounting requirements that apply under certain conditions to foreign subsidiaries that are subject to foreign exchange controls and other government restrictions. After deconsolidation, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, to adjust the investment in those operations to estimated fair value. The investment is now accounted for using the cost method and is reported on the balance sheet in investments in unconsolidated affiliates. Business operations in Zimbabwe were not impacted by the financial reporting change or the non-cash charge, and the Company intends to continue its operations there. At September 30, 2006, the remaining investment in the Zimbabwe operations was approximately $8.6 million. In addition to that investment, the Company has a net foreign currency translation loss associated with those operations of approximately $7.2 million, which remains a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.
NOTE 4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 1, 2006, Universal completed the sale of the non-tobacco businesses managed by its wholly owned subsidiary, Deli Universal, Inc. (Deli) to NVDU Acquisition B.V. (NVDU), a newly-formed entity owned by affiliates of a Netherlands-based merchant bank, a Netherlands-based private company, and managers of the businesses that were sold. The businesses sold comprised the Companys entire lumber and building products segment and a portion of its agri-products segment. The total value of the transaction was approximately $567 million. After selling and other expenses, Universal realized a net value of $552 million, consisting of net cash proceeds of $398 million and the buyers assumption of $154 million of debt with the acquired businesses. The Company recorded a net loss on the sale of $33.3 million, consisting of a pretax loss of $32.8 million and income tax expense of $0.5 million primarily related to net deferred tax assets that will not be realized as a result of the sale. The sales price and loss on sale are subject to adjustment based on final settlement under the terms of the agreement with the buyer.
11
The results of operations for the Companys discontinued non-tobacco operations were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2006* | 2005 | 2006* | 2005 | ||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
$ | 233,150 | $ | 328,888 | $ | 651,672 | $ | 717,970 | |||||
Costs and expenses |
220,594 | 323,568 | 618,472 | 696,604 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes and other items |
12,556 | 5,320 | 33,200 | 21,366 | |||||||||
Income taxes |
4,437 | 1,900 | 11,786 | 7,628 | |||||||||
Minority interest |
18 | (14 | ) | 585 | 522 | ||||||||
Operating results of discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
$ | 8,101 | $ | 3,434 | $ | 20,829 | $ | 13,216 | |||||
* | Reflects results for the two- and five-month periods ended September 1, 2006. |
As required under the applicable accounting guidance, the results shown above for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006 do not reflect depreciation expense after July 6, 2006, the date the agreement to sell the businesses was reached and they were classified as held for sale. This increased the earnings for the two- and five-month periods ended September 1, 2006, by approximately $3.3 million before taxes and $2.1 million after taxes. In addition, as permitted under the accounting standards, the Company has allocated interest expense to the discontinued operations for all periods based on the ratio of the net assets of those operations to consolidated net assets. Total interest allocated in addition to direct third-party interest incurred by the businesses sold was $1.9 million and $4.8 million for the two months and five months ended September 1, 2006, respectively, and $3.1 million and $6.2 million for the three and six months ended September 30, 2005.
12
The assets and liabilities of the discontinued non-tobacco operations reflected in the prior period consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2005 and March 31, 2006, were composed of the following:
September 30, 2005 |
March 31, 2006 | |||||
Assets |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,422 | $ | 2,538 | ||
Accounts receivable, net |
207,899 | 215,014 | ||||
Inventories: |
||||||
Lumber and building products |
139,797 | 170,331 | ||||
Agri-products |
72,041 | 94,237 | ||||
Other current assets |
22,885 | 10,223 | ||||
Total current assets |
450,044 | 492,343 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
155,232 | 167,577 | ||||
Goodwill and other intangibles |
29,097 | 29,951 | ||||
Other noncurrent assets |
16,116 | 15,417 | ||||
Total noncurrent assets |
200,445 | 212,945 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 650,489 | $ | 705,288 | ||
Liabilities |
||||||
Notes payable and overdrafts |
$ | 99,635 | $ | 129,877 | ||
Accounts payable |
124,417 | 124,347 | ||||
Other current liabilities |
24,719 | 17,005 | ||||
Total current liabilities |
248,771 | 271,229 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
9,220 | 12,491 | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,368 | 5,950 | ||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
19,588 | 18,441 | ||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 268,359 | $ | 289,670 | ||
NOTE 5. IMPAIRMENT CHARGE
Since fiscal year 2002, Universal has invested in various tobacco growing projects in several African countries. Some of these projects involve the establishment and operational start-up of medium or large-scale farms. The primary objective of the projects was to replace a portion of the volumes lost in recent years from the significant decline in production of flue-cured tobacco in Zimbabwe and thus continue to meet customer demand for African-origin flue-cured tobacco. Normally, several crop years are required to assess whether a growing project will be able to consistently meet planned production levels. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, progress toward completion of the latest crop cycle allowed the Company to begin evaluating those growing projects with sufficient history to make a reliable assessment. In connection with that review, the Company reduced its estimates of expected longer-term crop yields and related future cash flows for certain growing projects in Zambia based on actual yields achieved since inception of the projects and other operational factors. Carrying values of the assets were also reviewed for potential impairment using the undiscounted cash flow estimates. Based on its review, the Company determined that those growing project investments were impaired and recorded a charge of $12.3 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 to reduce the carrying values of the related long-lived assets to estimated fair value based on the discounted cash flows. Based on the Companys outlook on its overall tax position, no income tax benefit was recorded on the charge, and therefore, it reduced the Companys net income by $12.3 million, or $0.48 per share. Also as a result of this review, the Company recorded a valuation
13
allowance in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 for deferred tax assets related to prior year operating losses in Zambia that reduced net income by an additional $4.9 million, or $0.19 per share. Additional discussion of this valuation allowance is provided in Note 12.
Zambia and other African countries remain important sources of flue-cured tobacco. The Company will continue to evaluate its growing project investments on an ongoing basis. Based on current crop yield and cash flow estimates, no other impaired assets have been identified. However, if any of the growing projects produce yields significantly below expectations in the future, it is possible that additional impairments would be indicated.
NOTE 6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Adoption of FASB Statement No. 123R
As discussed in Note 2, Universal adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) effective April 1, 2006. Previously, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation awards in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), as permitted under SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and made required disclosures of the pro forma effect of fair value recognition for those awards. Prior to the fiscal year that ended March 31, 2006, stock options with an exercise price equal to the market price of the underlying common stock at grant date were the primary form of stock-based compensation awarded. These instruments had no intrinsic value at grant date under APB 25 and therefore did not result in compensation expense being recognized in the financial statements. During fiscal year 2006, the Company revised its compensation program to substitute annual grants of restricted stock units (RSUs) and restricted stock for a portion of the customary stock option grants awarded in prior years. The program was further revised in the current fiscal year to provide annual grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs) in place of the remaining portion of the customary stock option grants. These changes represent refinements in program design only, and the Company is still authorized to award stock options and other forms of share-based compensation under its shareholder-approved executive stock plans.
Under SFAS 123R, the Company is required to recognize the cost of services received from employees and outside directors in exchange for stock-based compensation based on the fair value of the awards. The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, the Company began recognizing fair value compensation expense on April 1, 2006, but did not restate prior periods. The amount of compensation expense was based on the guidance in SFAS 123R for SARs, RSUs, and restricted stock granted after the April 1, 2006, adoption date, and on the guidance in SFAS 123 for all unvested RSUs granted before that date.
Awards Granted During the Six Months Ended September 30, 2006
In June 2006, Universal issued grants of 265,500 SARs and 66,400 RSUs to officers of the Company. The SARs have a 10-year term, vest in equal one-third tranches one, two, and three years after grant date, and have an exercise price of $36.03, which was the market price at
14
grant date. The RSUs vest five years from grant date and are then paid out in shares of common stock. Under the terms of those awards, grantees receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs which vest and are paid out on the same date as the original RSU grant. The Companys outside directors automatically receive shares of restricted stock following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Determination of the Fair Value of Stock-Based Compensation
The grant date fair value of the SARs awarded in June 2006 was estimated to be $8.11 per SAR using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:
Expected term |
6.0 years | |
Expected volatility |
31.6% | |
Expected dividend yield |
4.77% | |
Risk-free interest rate |
4.67% |
The expected term of the SARs was based on the Companys historical stock option exercise data for instruments with comparable features and economic characteristics. The expected volatility was estimated based on historical volatility of the Companys common stock using weekly closing prices. The expected dividend yield was based on the annualized quarterly dividend rate and the market price of the common stock at grant date. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date for securities with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the SARs.
The fair value of the RSUs and restricted stock is based on the market price of the common stock on the grant date.
Recognition of Compensation Expense
Fair value expense for stock-based compensation is recognized ratably over the period from grant date to the earlier of (1) the vesting date of the award, or (2) the date the grantee is eligible to retire without forfeiting the award. For employees who are already eligible to retire at the date an award is granted, the total fair value of the award is recognized as expense at the date of grant. For RSUs granted prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company is recognizing expense based on the fair value method under SFAS 123R; however, consistent with its prior pro forma disclosures, that expense is recognized ratably over the full vesting period of the award, with acceleration of the remaining unrecognized expense in the event an employee elects to retire before the stated vesting date.
For the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively. A significant portion of the expense recorded in the six-month period represented recognition of the full fair value of SARs and RSUs granted in June to employees who were already retirement-eligible. For the remainder of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007, the Company expects that it will record additional stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.1 million. The effect of adopting SFAS 123R on the Companys results from continuing operations, which represents the effect of higher expense than would have been recognized under the provisions of APB 25, for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, was as follows:
15
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
Six Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|||||||
(In thousands of dollars, except per share data) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and other items |
$ | (254 | ) | $ | (2,743 | ) | ||
Income from continuing operations |
(165 | ) | (1,783 | ) | ||||
Basic earnings per share |
| (0.07 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings per share |
| (0.07 | ) |
SFAS 123R requires the presentation of excess tax benefits realized from the exercise or payment of stock-based awards in the financing section of the cash flow statement, which is a change from previous guidance. Awards exercised or paid during the six months ended September 30, 2006 were not significant, so the adoption of the new standard did not materially affect net cash flows from operating or financing activities. At September 30, 2006, the Company had $4.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock-based awards, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.6 years.
There were no grants, exercises, or cancellations of stock options after March 31, 2006. The weighted average remaining contractual life of stock options currently outstanding and exercisable is as follows:
Range of Exercise Prices, Per Share | ||||||
$20-$30 | $30-$40 | $40-$50 | ||||
Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years) |
3.41 | 3.76 | 5.25 |
16
Pro Forma Effect of Fair Value-Based Method on Prior Comparative Periods
Had the Company adopted the fair value-based recognition provisions of SFAS 123 for comparative periods prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the pro forma effect on income from continuing operations and earnings per share would have been as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
Six Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|||||||
(In thousands of dollars, except per share data - all amounts net of income taxes) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 23,080 | $ | 25,117 | ||||
Stock-based compensation cost under fair value accounting |
(1,010 | ) | (2,627 | ) | ||||
Pro forma income from continuing operations under fair value method |
$ | 22,070 | $ | 22,490 | ||||
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.98 | ||||
Per share stock-based compensation cost under fair value accounting |
(0.04 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||||
Pro forma basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.86 | $ | 0.88 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.97 | ||||
Per share stock-based compensation cost under fair value accounting |
(0.04 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||||
Pro forma diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
$ | 0.86 | $ | 0.87 | ||||
17
NOTE 7. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Numerator for basic earnings (loss) per share |
||||||||||||||
From continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 28,263 | $ | 23,080 | $ | 13,187 | $ | 25,117 | ||||||
Less: Dividends on convertible perpetual preferred stock |
(3,713 | ) | | (7,260 | ) | | ||||||||
Earnings available to common shareholders from continuing operations |
24,550 | 23,080 | 5,927 | 25,117 | ||||||||||
From discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||
Operating results |
8,101 | 3,434 | 20,829 | 13,216 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(33,285 | ) | | (33,285 | ) | | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders from discontinued operations |
(25,184 | ) | 3,434 | (12,456 | ) | 13,216 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | (634 | ) | $ | 26,514 | $ | (6,529 | ) | $ | 38,333 | ||||
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share |
||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
25,760 | 25,709 | 25,754 | 25,690 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||
From continuing operations |
$ | 0.95 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.98 | ||||||
From discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||
Operating results |
0.31 | 0.13 | 0.81 | 0.51 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(1.29 | ) | | (1.29 | ) | | ||||||||
Total from discontinued operations |
(0.98 | ) | 0.13 | (0.48 | ) | 0.51 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 1.03 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 1.49 | ||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
||||||||||||||
Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per share |
||||||||||||||
From continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||
Earnings available to common shareholders from continuing operations |
$ | 24,550 | $ | 23,080 | $ | 5,927 | $ | 25,117 | ||||||
Add: Dividends on convertible perpetual preferred stock (if conversion assumed) |
3,713 | | | | ||||||||||
Earnings available to common shareholders from continuing operations for calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share |
28,263 | 23,080 | 5,927 | 25,117 | ||||||||||
From discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||
Operating results |
8,101 | 3,434 | 20,829 | 13,216 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(33,285 | ) | | (33,285 | ) | | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) available to common shareholders from discontinued operations |
(25,184 | ) | 3,434 | (12,456 | ) | 13,216 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
$ | 3,079 | $ | 26,514 | $ | (6,529 | ) | $ | 38,333 | |||||
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
25,760 | 25,709 | 25,754 | 25,690 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities (if conversion or exercise assumed) |
||||||||||||||
Convertible perpetual preferred stock |
4,709 | | | | ||||||||||
Employee share-based awards |
146 | 133 | 130 | 130 | ||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share |
30,615 | 25,842 | 25,885 | 25,820 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||
From continuing operations |
$ | 0.92 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.97 | ||||||
From discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||
Operating results |
0.26 | 0.13 | 0.81 | 0.51 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(1.09 | ) | | (1.29 | ) | | ||||||||
Total from discontinued operations |
(0.83 | ) | 0.13 | (0.48 | ) | 0.51 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 1.03 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 1.48 | |||||
18
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, conversion of the Companys outstanding Series B 6.75% Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock was assumed since the effect is dilutive to earnings per share from continuing operations. For the related six-month period, the effect was antidilutive and conversion was not assumed. The Preferred Stock was not outstanding during the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the effect of Preferred Stock and employee share-based awards is antidilutive to the per-share loss on sale of businesses in discontinued operations. Under the applicable financial reporting guidelines, this antidilutive effect is shown since these securities are dilutive to earnings per share from continuing operations for that period.
NOTE 8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income for each period presented in the consolidated statements of income and retained earnings is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars - all amounts net of income taxes) | ||||||||||||||||
From continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 28,263 | $ | 23,080 | $ | 13,187 | $ | 25,117 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
1,553 | 439 | 4,318 | (2,895 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency hedge adjustment |
28 | (157 | ) | 221 | 3 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
29,844 | 23,362 | 17,726 | 22,225 | ||||||||||||
From discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating results |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations - operating results |
8,101 | 3,434 | 20,829 | 13,216 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(2,296 | ) | (552 | ) | 4,010 | (5,512 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign currency hedge adjustment |
(371 | ) | (388 | ) | (470 | ) | 20 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income from discontinued operations - operating results |
5,434 | 2,494 | 24,369 | 7,724 | ||||||||||||
Sale of businesses |
||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of businesses |
(33,285 | ) | | (33,285 | ) | | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(7,609 | ) | | (7,609 | ) | | ||||||||||
Minimum pension liability |
8,301 | | 8,301 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency hedge adjustment |
4,665 | | 4,665 | | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss from discontinued operations - sale of businesses |
(27,928 | ) | | (27,928 | ) | | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 7,350 | $ | 25,856 | $ | 14,167 | $ | 29,949 | ||||||||
19
NOTE 9. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segments are based on product categories. The Company evaluates performance based on segment operating income and equity in pretax earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | |||||||||||||||
SALES AND OTHER OPERATING REVENUES |
|||||||||||||||
Tobacco |
$ | 545,832 | $ | 504,727 | $ | 993,443 | $ | 900,119 | |||||||
Agri-products |
83,824 | 85,689 | 160,900 | 161,359 | |||||||||||
Consolidated total from continuing operations |
$ | 629,656 | $ | 590,416 | $ | 1,154,343 | $ | 1,061,478 | |||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|||||||||||||||
Tobacco |
$ | 69,210 | $ | 59,736 | $ | 94,580 | $ | 77,607 | |||||||
Agri-products |
(8,368 | ) | 2,265 | (8,559 | ) | 4,429 | |||||||||
Total segment operating income |
60,842 | 62,001 | 86,021 | 82,036 | |||||||||||
Less: |
|||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses |
5,725 | 5,848 | 15,114 | 10,038 | |||||||||||
Equity in pretax earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates |
(728 | ) | 838 | (4,268 | ) | (2,217 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment charge |
| | 12,289 | | |||||||||||
Consolidated total from continuing operations |
$ | 55,845 | $ | 55,315 | $ | 62,886 | $ | 74,215 | |||||||
20
NOTE 10. PENSION PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering U.S. and foreign salaried employees and certain other employee groups. These plans provide retirement benefits based primarily on employee compensation and years of service. The Company also provides postretirement health and life insurance benefits for eligible U.S. employees attaining specific age and service levels.
The components of the Companys net periodic benefit cost for continuing operations are as follows:
Foreign Pension Benefits |
Domestic Pension Benefits |
Other Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 232 | $ | 227 | $ | 1,252 | $ | 963 | $ | 307 | $ | 301 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
377 | 395 | 2,796 | 2,631 | 868 | 728 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(191 | ) | (184 | ) | (2,520 | ) | (2,445 | ) | (44 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Settlement cost |
| | 365 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net amortization and deferral |
72 | (74 | ) | 593 | 540 | 168 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 490 | $ | 364 | $ | 2,486 | $ | 1,689 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 973 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Pension Benefits |
Domestic Pension Benefits |
Other Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 483 | $ | 453 | $ | 2,524 | $ | 2,200 | $ | 613 | $ | 603 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
775 | 793 | 5,553 | 5,270 | 1,735 | 1,455 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(385 | ) | (363 | ) | (5,019 | ) | (4,895 | ) | (87 | ) | (89 | ) | ||||||||||||
Settlement cost |
| | 1,345 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net amortization and deferral |
159 | (148 | ) | 1,559 | 1,252 | 336 | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 1,032 | $ | 735 | $ | 5,962 | $ | 3,827 | $ | 2,597 | $ | 1,945 | ||||||||||||
During the six months ended September 30, 2006, the Company made contributions of $0.6 million to foreign plans and $4.8 million to domestic plans. Additional contributions of $1.4 million to foreign plans and $2.3 million to domestic plans are expected during the remaining six months of the fiscal year.
NOTE 11. RESTRUCTURING LIABILITY
During the second half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the Company recorded restructuring and impairment costs associated with decisions to close a leaf tobacco processing facility in Danville, Virginia, and to reduce costs through voluntary and involuntary staff reductions in the United States and the closure of two administrative offices overseas. The
21
restructuring costs totaled approximately $7.1 million and consisted of approximately $6.4 million in one-time and special termination benefits and approximately $700 thousand in lease costs on vacated office space and employee relocation costs. The termination benefits related to 353 employees whose positions were involuntarily eliminated and 31 employees who accepted voluntary separation offers. Through March 31, 2006, only a portion of the restructuring costs had been paid. The activity in the Companys liability for restructuring costs for the six months ended September 30, 2006, was as follows:
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 5,046 | ||
Payments: |
||||
One-time and special termination benefits |
(2,426 | ) | ||
Other costs |
(122 | ) | ||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 2,498 | ||
The payments for termination benefits during the six months ended September 30, 2006 were made to 32 employees. Of the remaining restructuring liability, approximately $1.6 million will be paid during the next twelve months, and the majority of the remaining balance will be paid by the end of fiscal year 2008.
NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES
Universals consolidated effective income tax rates for continuing operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, were approximately 37% and 70%, respectively. As discussed in Note 5, based on a review of the Companys tobacco growing projects in Africa during the first quarter, a $12.3 million impairment charge was recorded to reduce the carrying value of certain growing project assets in Zambia to estimated fair value. In connection with that review, the Company determined that it is unlikely to realize an income tax benefit on that charge and also unlikely to realize approximately $4.9 million in deferred tax assets related to prior years operating losses in Zambia. As a result, no tax benefit was provided on the impairment charge and a valuation allowance was recorded for the total amount of the deferred tax assets, generating the unusually high effective tax rate for the six-month period. Income tax expense for the six months ended September 30, 2006, was approximately $9.2 million higher than it would have been at the approximately 37% effective tax rate applicable to pretax earnings excluding the charge. The consolidated effective income tax rates for continuing operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2005, were approximately 42% and 44%, respectively. The effective tax rate expected for the remainder of the fiscal year is lower than the prior fiscal year primarily because of the deconsolidation of the Zimbabwe operations.
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, these statements relate to the Companys financial condition, results of operation, and future business plans, operations, opportunities, and prospects. In addition, the Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in reports to shareholders. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by the use of words such as we expect, believe, anticipate, could, should, may, plan, will, predict, estimate, and similar expressions or words of similar import. These forward-looking statements are based upon managements current knowledge and assumptions about future events and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated results, prospects, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include: anticipated levels of demand for and supply of its products and services; costs incurred in providing these products and services; timing of shipments to customers; changes in market structure; and general economic, political, market, and weather conditions. For a further description of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, see Item 1A, Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as these statements speak only as of the date when made and undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this report. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
On September 1, 2006, we completed the sale (the Deli Sale) of the non-tobacco businesses managed by our wholly owned subsidiary Deli Universal Inc. (the Deli Operations). Those businesses were our entire lumber and building products distribution segment and a portion of our agri-products segment. The total value of the transaction was $567 million. After selling and other expenses, we realized a net value of approximately $552 million, consisting of net cash proceeds of $398 million and the buyers assumption of $154 million in debt of the acquired businesses. Our financial statements now report the results and financial position of the Deli operations as discontinued operations.
Our liquidity and capital resource requirements are predominantly short term in nature and primarily relate to working capital required for tobacco crop purchases. Working capital needs are seasonal within each geographic region. The geographic dispersion and the timing of working capital needs permit us to predict our general level of cash requirements. The marketing of the crop in each geographic area is heavily influenced by weather conditions and follows the
23
cycle of buying, processing, and shipping of the tobacco crop. The timing of individual customer shipping requirements may change the level or the duration of crop financing. Despite a predominance of short-term needs, we maintain a relatively large portion of our total debt as long-term to reduce liquidity risk.
Working Capital
Working capital at September 30, 2006, was $1.1 billion, up $204 million and $277 million from the levels at March 31, 2006, and September 30, 2005, respectively. The cash proceeds from the Deli Sale increased working capital by $398 million. That increase was partially offset by the elimination of the working capital of the Deli Operations of about $221 million and $201 million, at March 31, 2006, and September 30, 2005, respectively. We have temporarily invested a portion of the proceeds pending its use to retire long-term debt. The balance of that investment at September 30, 2006, was approximately $264 million, and is classified in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet. We used the remainder of the proceeds to repay short-term debt.
Our tobacco inventories increased by about $89 million since March 31, 2006, primarily due to seasonal increases in Africa. Inventory is usually financed with a mix of cash, notes payable, and customer deposits, depending on our borrowing capabilities, interest rates, and exchange rates, as well as those of our customers. In addition, advances to suppliers represent prepayments against the crops. Those advances were reduced by $40 million largely due to seasonal decreases in Africa as tobacco was delivered. Since the beginning of the fiscal year, customer deposits increased by about $79 million, which also funded the seasonal inventory increase. Our nut businesses saw inventory reductions of $24 million during the six months due to inventory sales and lower prices, which caused some lower of cost or market adjustments. Accounts receivable from unconsolidated affiliates increased by $37 million as we continued to fund our crop purchases in Zimbabwe, where our operations have been deconsolidated.
We generally do not purchase material quantities of tobacco on a speculative basis. However, as of September 30, 2006, our uncommitted inventories were $138 million, or about 18% of our inventory compared to $118 million, or about 15% of our September 30, 2005, inventory. The level of uncommitted inventories has fallen from $168 million, or about 21% of our June 30, 2006, inventory. Most of the decline was in Brazil. Management plans to continue to reduce the level of uncommitted inventories as production of tobacco is lowered.
Tobacco inventory as of September 30, 2006, is down $42 million from the balance at September 30, 2005, primarily due to the deconsolidation of Zimbabwe operations, which also caused an increase of $53 million in accounts receivable from unconsolidated affiliates. Advances to suppliers declined $66 million year over year due to provisions for uncollectible advances recorded during the last 12 months and the elimination of certain supplier relationships in Africa. Agri-products inventories fell by $45 million since September 30, 2005, due to lower inventory levels and lower average unit costs.
24
Investing Activities
During the six-month period ended September 30, 2006, we invested about $16 million in our fixed assets which was $8 million less than our depreciation expense for the six months of $24 million. The reduction in spending is part of our plan to improve cash flow. In the first six months of fiscal year 2006, capital spending was $38 million as we completed the construction of a processing facility in Mozambique which began processing tobacco in the quarter ended September 30, 2005.
The balance of machinery and equipment decreased by about $83 million relative to September 30, 2005, because of the deconsolidation of Zimbabwe operations, the sale of some assets, last years restructuring charge for the closure of the Danville factory, and last quarters impairment charge related to our Zambian operations. The asset sales and the Zambian charges also caused a decline in the balance compared to March 31, 2006.
Financing Activities
Debt decreased during the six months because we used the proceeds from the Deli Sale to reduce notes payable and strengthen our balance sheet. We intend to use the remaining proceeds, which we are currently holding in cash investments, to further reduce debt. Total debt decreased by $148 million, but assuming the use of all of the increase cash balances since March 31, 2006, to reduce debt, the decrease would have been about $436 million. Total debt as a percentage of capitalization (including total debt, deferred taxes, minority interests, and shareholders equity) was approximately 48% at September 30, 2006, down from approximately 60% at September 30, 2005. The reduction is due to both the issuance of $220 million of convertible preferred stock in March and April 2006, and the use of the proceeds from the Deli Sale. We expect that ratio to be further reduced as more debt is retired with the remaining proceeds.
As of September 30, 2006, we were in compliance with the covenants of our debt agreements. We had $500 million available under a committed revolving credit facility that expires on January 10, 2010, and $348 million in cash. Our short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt totaled $188 million. In addition, we had over $500 million in unused, uncommitted credit lines. Thus, we believe that our liquidity and capital resources at September 30, 2006, remained adequate to support our foreseeable operating needs.
Results of Operations
Income from continuing operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, was $28.3 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, compared to $23.1 million, or $0.90 per diluted share, last year. After accounting for a loss on the sale of the Dutch non-tobacco businesses on September 1, 2006, and the results of their operations prior to the sale, net income for the quarter was $3.1 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, compared to $26.5 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, last year. Revenues in the quarter were $630 million, up 6.7% from the same period last year principally due to higher sales prices in Brazil, which were mostly related to currency changes there.
25
For the six months ended September 30, 2006, income from continuing operations was $13.2 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, including the effect of a $12.3 million impairment charge on long-lived assets in Zambia, on which no tax benefit was recognized, and a $4.9 million valuation allowance on deferred tax assets there. The total effect of these issues related to Zambia was a reduction of net income of $17.2 million, or $0.67 per diluted share. Net income for the six months was $0.7 million including the loss on the sale of the Dutch non-tobacco businesses and the results of their operations prior to sale. After accounting for preferred dividends, the net loss per diluted share was $0.25. Revenues for the six months increased by about 9%, to $1.15 billion, due to strong carryover sales in the current years first quarter in the United States and higher sales prices in Brazil.
On September 1, 2006, we completed the sale (the Deli Sale) of the non-tobacco businesses managed by our wholly owned subsidiary, Deli Universal Inc. (the Deli Operations). Those businesses were our lumber and building products distribution segment and a portion of our agri-products segment. The total value of the transaction was $567 million. After selling and other expenses, we realized a net value of approximately $552 million, consisting of net cash proceeds of $398 million and the buyers assumption of $154 million in debt of the acquired businesses. Our financial statements now report the results and financial position of the businesses that were sold as discontinued operations. Those operations earned $8 million after taxes during the portion of the quarter that we owned them and $20.8 million for the five-month period before the sale. During fiscal year 2007, these earnings were a result of improved performance by the lumber and building products distribution group offset by lower results in agri-products. As required by the accounting rules, those results reflect the cessation of depreciation effective July 6, 2006. We also allocated interest expense to these operations for all periods presented. We recorded a net loss on the sale of approximately $33 million, which stems primarily from transaction costs, a small discount to book value, and the recognition in earnings of items previously recorded in other comprehensive income. The loss, net of earnings to the date of sale, was $0.83 per diluted share for the quarter and $0.48 per diluted share for the six months. The value of the transaction is subject to refinement, which could result in future adjustments. Those adjustments could also affect the loss on the sale.
Tobacco segment earnings improved by $9 million, or 16% in the second fiscal quarter. That improvement occurred despite the effect of approximately $15 million in additional provisions for farmer receivables caused by our reduction of primarily flue-cured crops in Brazil and Africa and short deliveries by poor performing farmers. We also recorded $14 million in lower of cost or market inventory adjustments in Africa related to the high cost of flue-cured growing projects there. In addition, shipment delays reduced results of our oriental tobacco joint venture during this seasonally low period. The increase in tobacco segment earnings was primarily due to improved sales mix and volumes, as well as benefits from our prior actions to reduce costs. An improved sales mix of South American tobaccos and increased volumes of leaf handled in or sold from the United States, Asia, and Europe increased our earnings. Dark tobacco operations improved on generally higher volumes and some pricing improvement. The quarter also benefited from $3 million in gains on the sale of property and equipment, as well as from cost savings from last years closure of a processing facility and two administrative and
26
sales offices. Finally, our results reflect the favorable resolution of a tax case in South America that resulted in the recovery of $8.5 million in revenue taxes and interest in the quarter. The recovery was recorded as part of sales and other operating revenues.
The six-month results for our tobacco segment were largely influenced by the effect of the second quarter performance although we also recognized benefits from carryover sales of tobaccos from Europe, Asia, and the United States that were partially offset by last years sales of old crop tobacco from Malawi. Losses incurred in our Zimbabwe operations last year prior to their deconsolidation also contributed to the favorable earnings comparisons. Excluding Zimbabwes losses last year, lower foreign exchange remeasurement gains nearly offset the effect of the $8.5 million tax recovery in South America for the six-month period.
The agri-products segment, which is now composed of our dried fruits and nuts business, has continued to post losses in the quarter related to inventory write-downs and legal costs at our California nut processing subsidiary. The net loss for this segment totaled $8.4 million for the quarter and $8.6 million for the six months compared to prior year income of $2.3 million for the quarter and $4.4 million for the six months.
Corporate overhead increased by about $5 million in the six-month period primarily because of the combined effect of increased costs due to new stock-based compensation accounting rules, professional fees, and last years exchange gain on withholding taxes. The increased costs were partially mitigated by the increase in investment income from the temporary investment of proceeds of the Deli Sale.
Our consolidated effective income tax rates for continuing operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, were approximately 37% and 70%, respectively. The tax rate for the six months is substantially higher than that of the second quarter because of the effect of the Zambian impairment charge, which had no tax benefit, and the write-off of deferred tax assets related to those operations. Income tax expense for the six months ended September 30, 2006, was approximately $9.2 million higher than it would have been at the approximately 37% effective tax rate applicable to pretax earnings excluding the charge. The consolidated effective income tax rates for continuing operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2005, were approximately 42% and 44%, respectively. The effective tax rate expected for the remainder of the fiscal year is lower than the prior fiscal year primarily because of the deconsolidation of the Zimbabwe operations.
The remainder of the fiscal year is expected to benefit from stronger shipments from Africa and continued strong results in the United States, especially as we realize more of the savings from the Danville plant closure which was completed in fiscal year 2006. We are reducing our 2007 crop production in Brazil, which caused an increase in bad debt provisions related to accounts receivable from farmers during the first six months of the fiscal year. These provision increases in Brazil should not continue during the second half of the current fiscal year. We will continue our efforts to improve operations and to eliminate unproductive operations and assets worldwide. While it will take time to restore our profitability to prior levels, we continue to believe that these steps are essential, and we have made significant progress.
27
Stock-based Compensation
As we discussed in Notes 2 and 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R) effective April 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we are required to recognize the cost of services received from employees and outside directors in exchange for stock-based compensation based on the fair value of the awards. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded total stock-based compensation expense of approximately $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively. A significant portion of the expense for the six-month period represented recognition of the full fair value of SARs and RSUs granted in June to employees who were already retirement-eligible. For the remainder of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007, we expect to record additional stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.1 million.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rates
Interest rate risk is limited in the tobacco business because major customers usually pre-finance purchases or pay market rates of interest for inventory purchased for their accounts. Our tobacco customers pay interest on tobacco purchased for their order. That interest is paid at rates based on current markets for variable-rate debt. If we fund our committed tobacco inventory with fixed-rate debt, we may not be able to recover interest at that fixed rate if current market interest rates were to fall. As of September 30, 2006, tobacco inventory of $756 million included about $617 million in inventory that was committed for sale to customers and about $138 million that was not committed. Committed inventory, after deducting $178 million in customer deposits, represents our net exposure of $439 million. We maintain a substantial portion of our debt at variable interest rates either directly or through interest rate exchange agreements in order to mitigate substantially interest rate risk related to carrying fixed-rate debt. Debt carried at variable interest rates was about $367 million at September 30, 2006. Although a hypothetical 1% change in short-term interest rates would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $3.4 million, all of that amount should be offset with changes in customer charges.
Currency
The international tobacco trade generally is conducted in U.S. dollars, thereby limiting foreign exchange risk to that which is related to production costs, overhead, and income taxes in the source country. Most of the operations are accounted for using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Because there are no forward foreign exchange markets in many of our major countries of tobacco origin, we manage our foreign exchange risk by matching funding for inventory purchases with the currency of sale, which is usually the U.S. dollar, and by minimizing our net investment in individual countries. In these countries, we are vulnerable to
28
currency gains and losses to the extent that any local currency net monetary balances do not offset each other. In addition, changes in local currency exchange rates make tobacco more or less attractive in U.S. dollar terms.
In certain tobacco markets that are primarily domestic, we use the local currency as the functional currency. Examples of these domestic markets are Canada, Hungary, and Poland. In each case, reported earnings are affected by the translation of the local currency into the U.S. dollar.
Derivatives Policies
Hedging interest rate exposure using swaps and hedging foreign exchange exposure using forward contracts are specifically contemplated to manage risk in keeping with managements policies. We may use derivative instruments, such as swaps, forwards, or futures, which are based directly or indirectly upon interest rates and currencies to manage and reduce the risks inherent in interest rate and currency fluctuations.
We do not utilize derivatives for speculative purposes, and we do not enter into market risk-sensitive instruments for trading purposes. Derivatives are transaction specific so that a specific debt instrument, contract, or invoice determines the amount, maturity, and other specifics of the hedge. Counterparty risk is limited to institutions with long-term debt ratings of A or better.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of other members of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
29
European Commission Fines in Spain
In October 2004, the European Commission (the Commission) imposed fines on five companies active in the raw Spanish tobacco processing market totaling 20 million (approximately $25 million) for colluding on the prices paid to, and the quantities bought from, the tobacco growers in Spain. Two of the Companys subsidiaries, including Deltafina, S.p.A. (Deltafina), an Italian subsidiary, were among the five companies assessed fines. In its decision, the Commission imposed a fine of 11.88 million (approximately $14.8 million) on Deltafina. Deltafina did not and does not purchase or process raw tobacco in the Spanish market, but was and is a significant buyer of tobacco from some of the Spanish processors. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $14.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 to accrue the full amount of the fines assessed against the Companys subsidiaries.
In January 2005, Deltafina filed an appeal in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. The appeal process is likely to take several years to complete, and the ultimate outcome is uncertain. The Company has deposited funds in an escrow account with the Commission in the amount of the fine in order to stay execution during the appeal process.
European Commission Fines in Italy
In 2002, the Company reported that it was aware that the Commission was investigating certain aspects of the leaf tobacco markets in Italy. Deltafina buys and processes tobacco in Italy. The Company reported that it did not believe that the Commission investigation in Italy would result in penalties being assessed against it or its subsidiaries that would be material to the Companys earnings. The reason the Company held this belief was that it had received conditional immunity from the Commission because Deltafina had voluntarily informed the Commission of the activities that were the basis of the investigation.
On December 28, 2004, the Company received a preliminary indication that the Commission intended to revoke Deltafinas immunity for disclosing in April 2002 that it had applied for immunity. Neither the Commissions Leniency Notice of February 19, 2002, nor Deltafinas letter of provisional immunity, contains a specific requirement of confidentiality. The potential for such disclosure was discussed with the Commission in March 2002, and the Commission never told Deltafina that disclosure would affect Deltafinas immunity. On November 15, 2005, the Company received notification from the Commission that the Commission had imposed fines totaling 30 million (about $36 million) on Deltafina and the Company jointly for infringing European Union antitrust law in connection with the purchase and processing of tobacco in the Italian raw tobacco market.
The Company does not believe that the decision can be reconciled with the Commissions Statement of Objections and facts. The Company and Deltafina each have appealed the decision
30
to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities. Based on consultation with outside legal counsel, the Company believes it is probable that it will prevail in the appeals process and has not accrued a charge for the fine. Deltafina has provided a bank guarantee to the Commission in the amount of the fine in order to stay execution during the appeal process.
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
As a result of a posting to the Companys Ethics Complaint hotline alleging improper activities that involved or related to certain of the Companys tobacco subsidiaries, the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors engaged an outside law firm to conduct an investigation of the alleged activities. That investigation revealed that there have been payments that may have violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. At this time, the payments involved appear to have approximated $1 million over a five-year period. In addition, the investigation revealed activities in foreign jurisdictions that may have violated the competition laws of such jurisdictions, but the Company believes those activities did not violate U.S. antitrust laws. The Company voluntarily reported these activities to the appropriate U.S. authorities. On June 6, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission notified the Company that a formal order of investigation has been issued. The Company has initiated corrective actions, and such actions are continuing.
If the U.S. authorities determine that there have been violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or if the U.S. authorities or the authorities in foreign jurisdictions determine there have been violations of other laws, they may seek to impose sanctions on the Company or its subsidiaries that may include injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties, and modifications to business practices. It is not possible to predict at this time whether the authorities will determine that violations have occurred, and if they do, what sanctions they might seek to impose. It is also not possible to predict how the governments investigation or any resulting sanctions may impact the Companys business, financial condition, results of operations, or financial performance, although such sanctions, if imposed, could be material to its results of operations in any quarter. The Company will continue to cooperate with the authorities in these matters.
Employment Litigation Verdict
In September 2006, a California jury decided a case involving an employment matter at one of the Companys agri-products subsidiaries in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded them compensatory damages of approximately $0.2 million and punitive damages of $25 million. The Company believes the jury verdict is flawed and is taking appropriate steps to have it set aside or substantially reduced. Management and outside legal counsel believe this result is likely because both California law and recent United States Supreme Court decisions generally provide that punitive damages must be reasonably related to the amount awarded for compensatory damages. The Company has accrued outside counsels estimate of the probable liability that will ultimately be incurred in this case. While that amount is not material to Universals consolidated financial statements, the Company could incur additional charges in a future period, which could be material, if the ultimate liability exceeds the amount accrued.
31
Other Legal Matters
In addition to the above-mentioned matters, various subsidiaries of the Company are involved in other litigation incidental to their business activities. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management is vigorously defending the claims and does not currently expect that any of them will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position. However, should one or more of these matters be resolved in a manner adverse to managements current expectation, the effect on the Companys results of operations for a particular fiscal reporting period could be material.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the Meeting) was held on August 1, 2006.
At the Meeting, the shareholders elected four directors to serve three-year terms. The Company had outstanding, as of June 23, 2006, 25,748,306 shares of Common Stock, each of which is entitled to one vote. The majority of the shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum. Each of the four directors received more than an 87% majority of the outstanding shares. The voting with respect to each nominee was as follows:
Nominee |
Votes For | Votes Withheld |
Broker Non-votes | |||
John B. Adams, Jr. |
23,189,218 | 450,895 | 0 | |||
Joseph C. Farrell |
23,550,903 | 89,210 | 0 | |||
Walter A. Stosch |
22,510,225 | 1,129,888 | 0 | |||
Eugene P. Trani |
23,184,477 | 455,636 | 0 |
The terms of office of the following directors continued after the Meeting: Chester A. Crocker, Charles H. Foster, Jr., Thomas H. Johnson, Allen B. King, Eddie N. Moore, Jr., Jeremiah J. Sheehan, and Hubert R. Stallard.
No other matters were voted upon at the Meeting or during the quarter for which this report is filed.
32
12 | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, and Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends.* | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.* | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.* |
* | Filed herewith |
33
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION | ||
(Registrant) | ||
Date: November 8, 2006 | ||
/s/ Hartwell H. Roper | ||
Hartwell H. Roper, Vice President and | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
/s/ Robert M. Peebles | ||
Robert M. Peebles, Controller | ||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
34