445
Pine Avenue
Goleta,
California 93117-3709
________________________
PROXY
STATEMENT
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD MAY 28, 2009
________________________
SOLICITATION
AND VOTING OF PROXIES
Community
West Bancshares (Company or CWBC) is furnishing this Proxy Statement to its
shareholders in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors
(Board) of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting (Meeting) of Shareholders,
to be held on Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 6:00 P.M. PDT at La Cumbre
Country Club, 4015 Via Laguna, Santa Barbara, California 93110, and at any and
all adjournments and postponements thereof. The designated
proxyholders (Proxyholders) are members of the Company’s
management. Only shareholders of record (shareholders) on March 31,
2009 (Record Date) are entitled to notice of and to vote in person or by proxy
at the Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. This Proxy
Statement and the enclosed proxy card (Proxy) first will be mailed to
shareholders on or about April 14, 2009. The Company’s Annual Report
to Shareholders, including consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, accompanies this Proxy Statement.
Regardless
of the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company (Common Stock) owned, it
is important that the holders of a majority of shares be represented by proxy or
be present in person at the Meeting. Shareholders are requested to
vote by completing the enclosed Proxy and returning it signed and dated in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. Shareholders are to indicate their
vote in the spaces provided on the Proxy. Proxies solicited by the Board will
be voted in accordance with the directions given therein. Where no
instructions are indicated, signed Proxies will be voted “FOR all nominees” for
the election of the nominees named in this Proxy Statement. If
any other business is properly presented at the Meeting, the Proxy will be voted
in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.
Other
than the matters set forth on the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, the Board knows of no additional matters that will be presented
for consideration at the Meeting. Execution of a Proxy, however,
confers to the designated Proxyholders discretionary authority to vote the
shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board on such other
business, if any, which may properly come before the Meeting and at any
adjournments or postponements thereof, including whether or not to adjourn the
Meeting. In addition, the Proxy being solicited confers, and the
holders of each Proxy shall have, discretionary authority to vote with respect
to any matter if the Company did not have notice of such matter by February 21,
2009, which is at least 45 days before the date on which the Company first
mailed its proxy materials for the prior year’s Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
You may
revoke your Proxy at any time prior to its exercise by filing a written notice
of revocation with the Secretary of the Company, by delivering to the Company a
duly executed Proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Meeting and voting
in person. However, if you are a shareholder whose shares are not
registered in your own name, you will need to provide appropriate documentation
from the record holder to vote personally at the Meeting.
The
following matters will be considered and voted upon at the Meeting:
1. Election of
Directors. To elect eight persons to the Board of Directors of the
Company to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their
successors are elected and have qualified. The following persons are
the Board of Directors’ nominees:
Robert
H. Bartlein
|
William
R. Peeples
|
Jean
W. Blois
|
James
R. Sims, Jr.
|
John
D. Illgen
|
Kirk
B. Stovesand
|
Lynda
J. Nahra
|
C.
Richard Whiston
|
2. Shareholder Advisory (Non-Binding)
Vote on Executive Compensation. To consider and approve the
following advisory (non-binding) proposal:
“RESOLVED,
that the shareholders of Community West Bancshares approve the compensation of
executive officers as described under the heading “Executive Compensation”
including the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation
and the accompanying narrative disclosure.”
3. Other
Business. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Meeting and any adjournment thereof, including, without limitation,
approving an adjournment(s) of the Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional
proxies for the eight nominees for election.
This
solicitation of proxies is being made by the Board. The expense of
solicitation of proxies for the Meeting will be borne by the
Company. It is anticipated that proxies will be solicited primarily
through the use of the mail. Proxies may also be solicited personally
or by telephone by Directors, officers and employees of the Company, and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Community West Bank (CWB or Bank), without additional
compensation therefor. The Company will also request persons, firms
and corporations holding shares in their names, or in the name of their
nominees, that are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy materials to and
obtain proxies from such beneficial owners and will reimburse such holders for
their reasonable expenses in doing so. The total estimated cost of
the solicitation is $12,000.
VOTING
SECURITIES
The
securities that may be voted at the Meeting consist of shares of Common
Stock. The close of business on March 31, 2009 has been fixed by the
Board as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders of record
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and at any adjournments or
postponements thereof. The total number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding on the Record Date was 5,915,130 shares. Each shareholder
is entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share as of the Record
Date, except that in the election of Directors, each shareholder has the right
to cumulate votes provided that the candidates’ names have been properly placed
in nomination prior to commencement of voting and a shareholder has given notice
of their intention to cumulate votes prior to commencement of
voting. Cumulative voting entitles a shareholder to give one
candidate a number of votes equal to the number of Directors to be elected,
multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock held by that shareholder, or
to distribute such votes among as many candidates as the shareholder deems
fit. The candidates receiving the highest number of votes, up to the
number of Directors to be elected, will be elected.
Of the
shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date, 1,178,015 shares of
Common Stock (19.92%) of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock were
beneficially owned by Directors and executive officers of the
Company. Such persons have informed the Company that they will vote
“FOR” the election of the nominees to the Board. Under California law
and the Company’s Bylaws, a quorum consists of the presence in person or by
proxy of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Meeting, and a matter
(other than the election of Directors) voted on by shareholders will be approved
if it receives the vote of a majority of the shares both present and voting,
which shares also constitute a majority of the required quorum, unless the vote
of a greater number of shares is required. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be included in the number of shares present at the Meeting and
entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a
quorum. Accordingly, in the event the number of shares voted
affirmatively does not represent a majority of the required quorum, abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of a “no” vote. Abstentions
and broker non-votes do not have the effect of votes in opposition to any
nominee for election of Director.
Further,
the advisory proposal regarding the compensation of the Company’s Named
Executive Officers will be approved if a majority of the votes cast are “FOR”
the proposal. Abstentions and broker non votes will have no impact on
the approval of the advisory proposal.
If you
hold Common Stock in “street name” and you fail to instruct your broker or
nominee as to how to vote such Common Stock, your broker or nominee may, in its
discretion, vote such Common Stock “FOR” the election of the Board
nominees.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The
following table sets forth certain information as of the Record Date, concerning
the beneficial ownership of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock by persons
(other than depositories) known to the Company to own more than 5% of the
Company’s outstanding Common Stock, by the Company’s Directors and executive
officers, and by all Directors and executive officers of the Company as a
group. Management is not aware of any change in control of the
Company that has occurred since January 1, 2008, or any arrangement that may, at
a subsequent date, result in a change in control of the
Company.
Except as
indicated, the address of each of the persons listed below is c/o Community West
Bancshares, 445 Pine Avenue, Goleta, CA 93117.
Name
and Title
|
|
Number
of Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned (1)
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
Subject
to Vested
Stock
Options (2)
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
Beneficially
Owned
(2)
|
|
Charles G. Baltuskonis,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, CWBC and
CWB
|
|
|
29,890 |
|
|
|
16,150 |
|
|
|
.78 |
% |
Robert H. Bartlein, Director, Chairman
of the Board, CWB
|
|
|
167,420 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
Jean W. Blois,
Director
|
|
|
56,324 |
|
|
|
23,545 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
% |
Richard M. Favor,
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer,
CWB
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John D. Illgen,
Director
|
|
|
35,510 |
|
|
|
23,545 |
|
|
|
.99 |
% |
Investors of America, Limited
Partnership and First Banks, Inc. (3)
|
|
|
1,428,172 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24.14 |
% |
Lynda J. Nahra,
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, CWBC and
CWB
|
|
|
30,330 |
|
|
|
55,500 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
William R. Peeples,
Director, Chairman of the Board, CWBC (4)
|
|
|
818,130 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
13.98 |
% |
James R. Sims, Jr.,
Director
|
|
|
26,845 |
|
|
|
23,545 |
|
|
|
.85 |
% |
Kirk B. Stovesand,
Director
|
|
|
10,003 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
C. Richard Whiston,
Director
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All Directors and Executive
Officers as a Group (10 in number)
|
|
|
1,178,015 |
|
|
|
192,785 |
|
|
|
22.44 |
% |
(1) Includes
shares beneficially owned, directly and indirectly, together with associates,
except for shares subject to vested stock options and outstanding
warrants. Also includes shares held as trustee and held by or as
custodian for minor children. Unless otherwise noted, all shares are
held as community property under California law or with sole investment and
voting power.
(2) Shares
subject to options held by Directors or executive officers that are exercisable
within 60 days after the Record Date (vested) are treated as issued and
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percent of the class owned by such
person, but not for the purpose of computing the percent of class owned by any
other person.
(3) Address
is: 135 North Meramec, Clayton, MO 63105.
Total
shares include 568,696 in name of Investors of America, Limited Partnership and
859,476 in name of First Banks, Inc.
· The
securities owned by First Banks, Inc. may be deemed to be indirectly owned by
Investors of America, Limited Partnership, First Securities America, Inc.,
General Partner. Members of the Dierberg Family and the Dierberg
Family Trusts are shareholders of First Securities America, Inc. and First
Banks, Inc. Investors of America, Limited Partnership disclaims
beneficial ownership of these securities.
· The
securities owned by Investors of America, Limited Partnership may be deemed to
be indirectly owned by First Banks, Inc. Members of the Dierberg
Family and the Dierberg Family Trusts are shareholders of First Securities
America, Inc., the General Partner of Investors of America, Limited Partnership,
and First Banks, Inc. First Banks, Inc. disclaims beneficial
ownership of these securities.
(4) Includes
173,922 shares held by Mr. Peeples’ spouse, concerning which Mr. Peeples
disclaims beneficial ownership.
PROPOSAL
1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
Company's Bylaws provide that the authorized number of Directors shall be not
less than six nor more than 11, with the exact number of Directors fixed from
time to time by resolution of a majority of the Board or by resolution of the
shareholders. The number of Directors is currently fixed at
eight.
At the
Meeting, eight persons will be elected to serve as Directors of the Company
until the 2010 Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and have
qualified. The eight persons named below, all of whom are currently
Directors of the Company, have been nominated by the Board for
re-election. A Proxy that is submitted with the instruction
“AUTHORITY GIVEN” or without instructions will be voted in such a way as to
effect the election of all eight nominees, or as many thereof as
possible. In the event that any of the nominees should be unable to
serve as a Director, it is intended that the Proxy will be voted for the
election of such substitute nominees, if any, as shall be designated by the
Board. Each nominee has consented to being named in the Proxy
Statement and has agreed to serve as a member of the Board, if
elected. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees
will be unable or unwilling to serve. Additional nominations can only
be made by complying with the notice provision set forth in the Bylaws of the
Company, an extract of which is included in the Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders accompanying this Proxy Statement. This Bylaw provision
is designed to give the Board advance notice of competing nominations, if any,
and the qualifications of nominees, and may have the effect of precluding
third-party nominations if the notice provisions are not followed.
Pursuant
to Nasdaq Stock Market (NASD) Rule 4200 (a) (15), the Board has made an
affirmative determination that the following members of the Board are
“independent” within the meaning of such rule: Robert H. Bartlein, Jean W.
Blois, John D. Illgen, William R. Peeples, James R. Sims, Jr., Kirk B. Stovesand
and C. Richard Whiston. As such, pursuant to NASD Rule 4350 (c) (1),
a majority of the members of the Board and all the members of the Audit
Committee are “independent” as so defined.
The
following persons have been nominated for election by the Board:
Robert
H. Bartlein
|
William
R. Peeples
|
Jean
W. Blois
|
James
R. Sims, Jr.
|
John
D. Illgen
|
Kirk
B. Stovesand
|
Lynda
J. Nahra
|
C.
Richard Whiston
|
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of the Board of
Directors’ nominees.
Information
about the Nominees
Robert
H. Bartlein (Age 61)
Mr.
Bartlein has been a member of the Board of CWBC since its inception in 1997 and
a founder and Director of CWB since 1989. Mr. Bartlein serves on
CWBC’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and is Chairman of the
Board of CWB, Chairman of the Loan Committee and a member of the Personnel /
Compensation, Executive, Legal and Management Succession
Committees. He is President and CEO of Bartlein & Company, Inc.,
founded in 1969, which is a property management company with four California
offices. He is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin – Madison,
with a degree in Finance, Investments and Banking, and did post-graduate study
at the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. Mr. Bartlein is past
President and Director of the American Lung Association of Santa Barbara and
Ventura Counties.
Jean W. Blois (Age 81)
Mrs.
Blois has been a member of the Board of CWBC since its inception in 1997 and of
CWB since 1989. She is Chairman of CWB’s Personnel / Compensation
Committee and a member of the Asset / Liability Committee. She
co-founded Blois Construction, Inc. and served in a financial capacity before
retirement. She formed her own consulting firm, Jean to the
Rescue. Mrs. Blois graduated with a BS from the Haas School of
Business at the University of California, Berkeley. She served as a
Trustee of the Goleta Union School District for 13 years, a Director of the
Goleta Water District for 10 years and a council member for the City of Goleta
for 6 years, including terms in 2005 and 2007 as Goleta Mayor.
John
D. Illgen (Age 64)
Mr.
Illgen has been a member of the Board of CWBC since its inception in 1997 and of
CWB since 1989. He is Secretary of the Board of CWBC and a member of
CWBC’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chairman of CWB’s Asset
/ Liability Committee and a member of the Personnel / Compensation and
Compliance Committees. Mr. Illgen is Sector Director and Vice
President for Modeling and Simulation with Northrop Grumman Simulation
Technologies (NGC). He was Founder (1988), President and Chairman of
Illgen Simulation Technologies, Inc. until its merger with NGC in December
2003. Mr. Illgen is Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
National Defense Industry Association and appears on television with General
Alexander Haig on “21st Century
Business and Health” as an industry expert in information systems, modeling and
simulation. Mr. Illgen is an honorary member of the Santa Barbara
Scholarship Foundation Board and a Past President of Goleta Rotary
Club.
Lynda J. Nahra (Age 58)
Ms. Nahra
has been President and Chief Executive Officer of CWB since 2000 and of CWBC
since February 2004, after serving in various positions of increasing
responsibility for CWB since 1997. Ms. Nahra is a member of CWB and
CWBC’s Boards and serves on CWB’s Loan, Asset / Liability, Compliance,
Management Succession and Disclosure Committees. Her banking career
began in 1970 with Bank of America and her banking experience has included
management positions in operations, consumer and commercial lending, sales,
private banking and corporate banking. Ms. Nahra serves on the Boards
of Directors of Partners in Education and Habitat for Humanity; is a Finance
Committee member for the Goleta Montessori Center School; and, is a member of
Montecito Rotary Club. Ms. Nahra’s educational background is from
California Western University in San Diego and Pacific Coast Banking
School.
William
R. Peeples (Age 66)
Mr.
Peeples is Chairman of the Board of CWBC and a founder and Director of CWB since
1989. Mr. Peeples is Chairman of CWBC’s Audit and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees and serves on CWB’s Executive, Loan, Personnel /
Compensation and Management Succession Committees. Mr. Peeples served
in various financial capacities, including President and Chief Financial Officer
of Inamed Corporation from 1985 to 1987. He also was a founder and
Chief Financial Officer of Nusil Corporation and Imulok Corporation from 1980 to
1985. Mr. Peeples has been active as a private investor and currently
serves as Managing General Partner of two real estate partnerships and serves as
a member of the Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation Capital Campaign
Steering Committee. Mr. Peeples holds a BBA from the University of
Wisconsin – Whitewater, and an MBA from Golden Gate University, Air Force
on-base program.
James
R. Sims Jr. (Age 73)
Mr. Sims
has been a member of the Board of CWBC since its inception in 1997 and of CWB
since 1989. Mr. Sims serves on CWBC’s Audit Committee and Chairs
CWB’s Compliance Committee. Mr. Sims is a real estate broker whose
career began in 1970 in Santa Barbara. He is a past President of the
Santa Barbara Board of Realtors, Chairman of the Multiple Listing Service and
served as Regional Vice President of the California Association of
Realtors. Mr. Sims served on the Santa Barbara Coastal Housing
Association seeking affordable housing and he developed three Residential Care
Facilities for the elderly in Camarillo that he operated until his retirement in
2000.
Kirk
B. Stovesand (Age 46)
Mr.
Stovesand has been a member of the Board of CWBC and CWB since May
2003. Mr. Stovesand serves on CWBC's Audit Committee and CWB’s Asset
/ Liability Committees and is Secretary of CWB’s Board. He is a
partner of Walpole & Co., founded in 1974, which is a Certified Public
Accounting and Consulting firm. Mr. Stovesand has served on the
boards of both for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. He is a graduate of
the University of California Santa Barbara with a degree in Business
Economics. Mr. Stovesand received a Masters Degree in Taxation from
Golden Gate University and a Master Certificate in Global Business Management
from George Washington University. He is a Certified Financial
Planner, certified in mergers and acquisitions, and a member of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
C.
Richard Whiston (Age 72)
Mr.
Whiston has been a member of the Board of CWBC and CWB since June
2004. He serves on CWBC’s Audit Committee and on CWB’s Loan and
Compliance Committees. Mr. Whiston was a partner in the Santa Barbara
law firm of Mullen, McCaughey & Henzell. He served from 1983 to
1985 as Principal Deputy General Counsel and as Chief of Legal Services, U.S.
Army, and later returned to private practice of law. Mr. Whiston was
appointed as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and
Reserve Affairs in July 2001 and as Special Assistant to the Secretary of the
Army from October 2001 to August 2003. He received a BA and a JD from
the University of California, Berkeley and served in the U.S. Army as a
commissioned officer. He currently serves as a member of the Board of
Directors of the Westmont Foundation.
None of
the Directors or executive officers of the Company were selected pursuant to any
arrangement or understanding, other than with the Directors and executive
officers of the Company, acting within their capacities as such. The
Company knows of no family relationships between the Directors and executive
officers of the Company, nor do any of the Directors or executive officers of
the Company serve as Directors of any other company which has a class of
securities registered under, or which is subject to the periodic reporting
requirements of, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) or any
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board.
Executive Key Officers (not
members of the Board)
The
following sets forth, as of the Record Date, the names and certain other
information concerning current executive officers of the Company, in addition to
the executive officer who is nominated for election as a Director and whose
biographical information is provided above.
Charles
G. Baltuskonis (Age 58)
Mr.
Baltuskonis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CWBC and
CWB, has been with the Company since November 2002. He served as
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Mego Financial Corporation
from 1997 to 2002, and Senior Vice President and Controller of TAC Bancshares
from 1995 to 1997. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer of
F&C Bancshares and of First Coastal Corporation and a Senior Manager with
the public accounting firm of Ernst & Young, specializing in services to
financial institutions. Mr. Baltuskonis is a certified public
accountant; a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
Financial Managers Society, including a member of the Financial Institutions
Accounting Committee, and the Board of Directors of Goleta Valley Chamber of
Commerce; and, holds a BS from Villanova University.
Richard
M. Favor (Age 53)
Mr.
Favor, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, has been with the Bank
since September 2007. Prior to joining CWB, Mr. Favor was the Chief Credit
Officer at County Commerce Bank from February 2003 through August 2007, where he
managed all aspects of loan production and classified assets as well as
Community Reinvestment Act and compliance issues. From April 1995 to February
2003, Mr. Favor worked for Bank of Ventura/First Bank & Trust in various
capacities including Chief Credit Officer. Mr. Favor is the past chairman and
current board member of the Ventura Family YMCA, past president and current
board member of the Tri-Counties Risk Management Association and received a B.S.
degree in business administration from San Diego State University.
CERTAIN
INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Meetings
and Committees
The Board
met 17 times (12 regular meetings and five special meetings) during the year
ended December 31, 2008, and had the following standing committees that met
during the year: Audit Committee, Personnel / Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, the
Company’s Directors served on the Board of Directors of CWB, including the
various committees established by that subsidiary. During 2008, none
of the Company’s Directors attended less than 75% of the Company’s Board
meetings and meetings of committees on which they served. All Board
members attended the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The Audit
Committee is composed of four independent Directors: Messrs. Peeples,
Sims, Stovesand and Whiston. This Committee is responsible for review
of all internal and external examination reports and selection of the Company’s
independent auditors. The Audit Committee met five times during
2008.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of three independent
Directors: Messrs. Peeples, Bartlein and Illgen. The Committee is
responsible for recommendations regarding the Board’s composition and structure
and policies and processes regarding overall corporate
governance. The Committee met one time during 2008.
The
Personnel / Compensation Committee is composed of four independent Directors:
Mrs. Blois and Messrs. Bartlein, Illgen and Peeples. The Committee is
responsible for determining executive compensation. This Committee
met two times during 2008.
Shareholder
Communication with Directors
Shareholders
may communicate directly with the Board by writing to:
William
R. Peeples, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Community
West Bancshares
445 Pine
Avenue
Goleta,
CA 93117-3709
Audit
Committee Report
The
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board shall not be deemed filed under the
Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) or under the Exchange Act.
The Board
maintains an Audit Committee comprised of four of the Company’s Directors, who
each met the independence and experience requirements of NASD Rule 4200 (a)
(15). The Audit Committee assists the Board in monitoring the
accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices of the
Company. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, which
was last amended on December 20, 2007 and last ratified on December 18, 2008,
and is assessed annually for adequacy by the Audit Committee. A copy
of the Charter is included as Appendix A to the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement,
as filed with the SEC on April 7, 2008, and is available at
www.sec.gov.
Based on
the attributes, education and experience requirements required by NASD Rule 4350
(d) (2) (A), the requirements set forth in section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and associated regulations, the Board has identified William R. Peeples
as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined under Item 407 (d) (5) of
Regulation S-K, and has determined him to be independent.
Management
is responsible for the preparation of the Company’s financial statements and
financial reporting process, including its system of internal
controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit
Committee:
|
·
|
Reviewed
and discussed with management the audited financial statements contained
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2008;
and
|
|
·
|
Obtained
from management their representation that the Company’s financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United
States.
|
The
Company’s independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst), are responsible
for performing an audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with
the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and expressing an
opinion on whether the Company’s financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the Company’s financial position and results of operations
for the periods presented and conform with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Audit Committee:
|
·
|
Discussed
with Ernst the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61, as amended (Communication with Audit Committees),
as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in
Rule 3200T; and
|
|
·
|
Received
and discussed with Ernst the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst
required by applicable requirements of PCAOB regarding Ernst’s
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and
reviewed and discussed with Ernst whether the rendering of the non-audit
services provided by them to the Company during fiscal 2008 was compatible
with their independence.
|
In
addition, the Company received a letter from Ernst to the effect that Ernst’s
audit of the Company was subject to its quality control system for the United
States accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Ernst personnel working on the audit and the
availability of national office consultation.
In
performing its functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight
capacity. It is not the responsibility of the Audit Committee to
determine that the Company’s financial statements are complete and accurate, are
presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States or present fairly the results of operations of the Company for the
periods presented or that the Company maintains appropriate internal
controls. Nor is it the duty of the Audit Committee to determine that
the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards or that the Company’s
auditors are independent.
Based
upon the reviews and discussions described above, and the report of Ernst, the
Audit Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that
the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
|
THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
William
R. Peeples, Chairman
|
|
James
R. Sims, Jr.
|
|
Kirk
B. Stovesand
|
|
C.
Richard Whiston
|
Dated:
March 26, 2009
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The
Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (NCGC Committee) was
established in February 2004 and the committee charter (Charter) was
approved. The latest version was approved in December 2006 and is
included as Appendix A to the Company’s 2007 Proxy Statement, as filed with the
SEC on April 12, 2007, and is available at www.sec.gov. The NCGC
Committee, consisting of three independent Directors, makes recommendations to
the Board regarding the Board’s composition and structure, nominations for
elections of Directors and policies and processes regarding principles of
corporate governance to ensure the Board’s compliance with its fiduciary duties
to the Company and its shareholders. The NCGC Committee reviews the
qualifications of, and recommends to the Board, candidates as additions, or to
fill Board vacancies, if any were to occur during the year.
The NCGC
Committee will consider, as part of its nomination process, any Director
candidate recommended by a shareholder of the Company who follows the procedures
in this Proxy Statement shown under the heading “2009 Shareholder Proposals” set
forth below. The NCGC Committee will follow the processes in the
Charter when identifying and evaluating overall Board composition and individual
nominees to the Board.
Additional
information regarding (i) the NCGC Committee’s policy with regard to the
consideration of any Director candidates recommended by security holders and
related procedures to be followed by security holders in submitting such
recommendations, (ii) minimum qualifications of Director candidates, and (iii)
the NCGC Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees for
Directors, is incorporated herein by reference to the Charter.
Personnel
/ Compensation Committee
The
Personnel / Compensation Committee (PCC) is responsible for reviewing and
approving the Company’s overall compensation and benefit programs and for
administering the compensation of the Company’s executive and senior
officers. There currently is no formal charter enumerating the PCC’s
functions and objectives.
The PCC’s
functions and objectives are: (i) to determine the competitiveness of
current base salaries, annual and long-term incentives relative to specific
competitive markets for the President and Chief Executive Officer and other
senior management; (ii) to develop a performance review mechanism that has
written objectives and goals which are used to make salary increase
determinations; (iii) to develop an annual incentive plan for senior
management; and (iv) to provide guidance to the Board in its role in
establishing objectives regarding executive compensation. The PCC’s
overall compensation philosophy is as follows: (i) to attract and retain
quality talent which is critical to both short-term and long-term success;
(ii) to reinforce strategic performance objectives through the use of
incentive compensation programs; (iii) to create a mutuality of interest
between executive and senior officers and shareholders through compensation
structures that share the rewards and risks of strategic decision-making; and
(iv) to encourage executives to achieve substantial levels of ownership of stock
in the Company.
On
February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was signed
into law which amends several key provisions of the 2008 Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA). EESA, as amended by ARRA, applies
to the Company for so long as any obligation resulting from the Company's
participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program – Capital Purchase Program
remains outstanding and requires that: (i) the PCC be comprised entirely of
independent directors; (ii) the PCC meet at least semiannually to discuss and
evaluate employee compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed
to the Company from such plans; and (iii) provide certain certifications that
the PCC has reviewed with the Company’s senior risk officers the incentive
compensation arrangements and has made reasonable efforts to ensure that such
arrangements do not encourage such officers to take unnecessary or excessive
risks that threaten the value of the Company.
PROPOSAL
2
A
NON-BINDING RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF
THE
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
ARRA
requires the Company, during the period in which any obligation arising from the
Company's participation in the Trouble Asset Relief Program - Capital Purchase
Program (TARP-CPP) remains outstanding to submit to the Company's shareholders a
non-binding vote on the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers,
as described in the section entitled “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” below, including
the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation and the
accompanying narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.
This
proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-pay" proposal, gives the Company's
shareholders the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the Company's executive
pay program and policies through the following resolution:
"RESOLVED,
that the shareholders of Community West Bancshares approve the compensation of
executive officers as described under the heading "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION,"
including the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation
and the accompanying the narrative disclosure in this Proxy
Statement.”
This vote
shall not be binding on the Board of Directors and will not be construed as
overruling a decision by the Board nor create or imply any additional fiduciary
duty by the Board. However, the PCC will take into account the outcome of the
vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
In voting
to approve the above resolution, shareholders may vote for the resolution,
against the resolution or abstain from voting. This matter will be decided by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. On this
matter, abstentions will have no effect on the voting. The Board of Directors
believes that the compensation practices of the Company are designed to
accomplish the objectives of the PCC's compensation philosophy, and they are
appropriately aligned to the long-term success of the Company and the interests
of shareholders.
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" approval of the compensation of the
Named Executive Officers.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The
following table sets forth, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the compensation information for Lynda J. Nahra, the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer and the other two most highly compensated executive
officers who earned at least $100,000 during 2008 (collectively, the Named
Executive Officers) serving the Company in 2008.
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option
Awards (1)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
|
|
|
Change
to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Lynda J. Nahra,
President and Chief Executive Officer,
CWBC and CWB |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
12,748 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
20,916 |
|
|
$ |
273,664 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
26,963 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,558 |
|
|
|
324,521 |
|
Charles G. Baltuskonis,
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, CWBC and CWB |
|
2008
|
|
|
189,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,630 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
225,478 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
179,200 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16,982 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
|
|
238,062 |
|
Richard M. Favor,
Executive Vice President and
Credit Officer, CWB (3) |
|
2008
|
|
|
158,816 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,694 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
184,769 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
65,288 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
67,255 |
|
(1)
Column represents the dollar amount recognized by the Company for financial
statement reporting purposes related to stock option awards, disregarding for
this purpose the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. The grant date fair value of option awards granted was
determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123R (SFAS 123R) and is recognized as compensation cost over the requisite
service period. The terms of the 1997 and 2006 Plans are described in
“Employment Arrangements and Other Factors Affecting 2006
Compensation”. Furthermore, the amount recognized for these awards
was calculated based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. See
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, at Note 8 to the Company’s Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(2)
Column represents 401(k) Company match for all executives. All Other
Compensation in 2008 for Ms. Nahra also includes $8,316 401(k) Company match,
$6,000 rent subsidy to a Company owned by a relative of Ms. Nahra and country
club dues of $6,600, and All Other Compensation in 2007 for Ms. Nahra includes
$9,732 401(k) Company match, $6,000 rent subsidy to a company owned by a
relative of Ms. Nahra, Country Club dues of $6,600 and other miscellaneous
income of $226.
(3) Mr.
Favor commenced his position as of 9/07.
EMPLOYMENT
ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING 2008 COMPENSATION
Employment
Arrangements
Ms. Nahra
and Messrs. Baltuskonis and Favor (Named Executive Officers) have entered into
written employment agreements with the Company. For a description of
the material terms of such employment agreement, please see “Potential Payments
upon Termination or Change-In-Control” herein.
In
connection with the Bank's participation in TARP-CPP, each Named Executive
Officer has entered into a written agreement with the Company pursuant to which
they have agreed to certain modifications to compensation, bonus, incentive and
other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements, including golden parachute,
severance and employment agreements (Benefit Plans). The
modifications to the Benefit Plans are intended to comply with the requirements
for executive compensation set forth in EESA pursuant to which the TARP-CPP was
authorized. These agreements modify Benefit Plans in the following
ways: (i) the payment of golden parachutes to the Named Executive Officers is
prohibited; (ii) any bonus and incentive compensation paid to a Named Executive
Officer is subject to recovery or “clawback” by the Company if the payments were
based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially
inaccurate performance metric criteria; and (iii) compensation incentives for
Named Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten
the value of the Company are prohibited.
In
addition, EESA, as subsequently amended by ARRA in February 2009, imposes
additional limitations on executive compensation which will apply for so long as
any obligation arising from the Company's participation in TARP-CPP remains
outstanding. Prior to the enactment of ARRA however, Treasury issued
Guidelines clarifying the executive compensation limitations on
EESA. To the extent these Guidelines conflict with the express
provisions of EESA, as now amended by ARRA, the provisions of ARRA
control. The following are some key features of the new executive
compensation restrictions in ARRA:
|
·
|
ARRA prohibits bonus and
similar payments to top employees. ARRA prohibits the
payment of any “bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation” to the
Company’s “most highly-compensated employee” for so long as any obligation
arising from the Company's participation in TARP-CPP remains
outstanding. The prohibition does not apply to bonuses payable
pursuant to “employment agreements” in effect prior to February 11,
2009. ARRA does not explain how to identify the "most
highly-compensated employee" and does not define “incentive
compensation.” The Treasury Guidelines do not contain a similar
limit on bonuses. Instead, the Treasury Guidelines impose a
$500,000 annual compensation cap for a company’s senior executive
officers, but allows the cap to be waived for all companies other than
those receiving “exceptional” assistance. The Company has not
received “exceptional assistance,” as this term is used in the Treasury
Guidelines. Waiver under the Treasury Guidelines is conditioned
on the Company’s full disclosure of compensation and allowing shareholders
a non-binding “say-on-pay” vote.
|
|
·
|
Limited amount of restricted
stock excluded from bonus prohibition. “Long-term”
restricted stock is excluded from ARRA’s bonus prohibition, but only to
the extent the value of the stock does not exceed one-third of the total
amount of annual compensation of the employee receiving the stock, the
stock does not “fully vest” until after all TARP-CPP-related obligations
have been satisfied, and any other conditions which the Treasury may
specify have been met. The Treasury Guidelines also exempt an
unlimited amount of restricted stock from the $500,000 annual compensation
cap described above. Neither ARRA nor the Treasury Guidelines
explain how to value various items, such as equity compensation, indirect
compensation such as benefits and taxes, when assessing this
limit.
|
|
·
|
Shareholder “say-on-pay” vote
required. ARRA requires every company receiving TARP-CPP
assistance to permit a non-binding shareholder vote to approve the
compensation of executives as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy
Statement. The Treasury Guidelines contain a similar
requirement but only for companies receiving “exceptional
assistance." ARRA directs the SEC to adopt regulations within 1
year to implement say-on-pay. The Company has included a
say-on-pay proposal as Item 2 in this Proxy
Statement.
|
|
·
|
Stricter restrictions on
“golden parachute” payments. EESA generally limited
“golden parachute” payments to senior executives to three times the
executives’ base compensation. ARRA prohibits any payment to a
senior executive officer or any of the next five most highly-compensated
employees upon termination of employment for any reason for as long as any
TARP-CPP-related obligations remain outstanding. For all
companies other than companies receiving “exceptional assistance,” the
Treasury Guidelines limit golden parachute payments to 1 time base
compensation and only apply the limit to the senior executive
officers.
|
|
·
|
Broader bonus clawback
requirements. EESA required TARP-CPP-participating
companies to recover any bonus or other incentive payment paid to a senior
executive officer on the basis of materially inaccurate financial or other
performance criteria. ARRA extends this recovery requirement to
the next 20 most highly-compensated employees in addition to the senior
executive officers. This extension is consistent with the
Treasury Guidelines.
|
|
·
|
Prohibition on compensation
plans that “encourage” earnings manipulation. ARRA
prohibits CPP participants from implementing any compensation plan that
would encourage manipulation of the reported earnings to enhance the
compensation of any of its employees. The Treasury Guidelines
do not contain a similar
requirement.
|
|
·
|
Board compensation committee
required. ARRA requires CPP participants to establish a
board compensation committee and requires the committee to meet at least
semiannually to discuss and evaluate employee compensation plans in light
of an assessment of any risk to us posed by such plans. The
Treasury Guidelines do not contain a similar
requirement.
|
|
·
|
New reporting and certification
requirements. ARRA requires the CEO and CFO of any
publicly-traded CPP-participating company to provide a written
certification of compliance with the executive compensation restrictions
in ARRA in the Company’s annual filings with the SEC (i.e. in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K or Proxy Statement). The Treasury
Guidelines require reporting and certification as well but do not detail
how the reporting and certification are to be accomplished. On
February 26, 2009, the SEC issued written guidance confirming that this
requirement is currently not in effect and will become effective following
the issuance of Treasury guidelines establishing the compensation and
corporate governance standards under
ARRA.
|
|
·
|
Policy on luxury
expenditures. ARRA requires each TARP-CPP-participating
company to implement a company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury
expenditures, including excessive expenditures on entertainment or events,
office and facility renovations, aviation or other transportation
services. This is consistent with the Treasury Guidelines which
contain a similar requirement.
|
|
·
|
Treasury review of prior
payments. ARRA directs the Treasury to review bonuses,
retention awards and other compensation paid to the senior executive
officers and the next 20 most highly-compensated employees of each company
receiving TARP-CPP assistance before ARRA was enacted, and to “seek to
negotiate” with the CPP recipient and affected employees for reimbursement
if it finds any such payments were inconsistent with CPP or otherwise in
conflict with the public interest.
|
In
addition to the above requirements, ARRA adopts and continues two requirements
from EESA essentially unchanged:
|
·
|
$500,000 annual deduction
limit. Like EESA, ARRA prohibits CPP participants from
deducting annual compensation paid to senior executive officers in excess
of $500,000. The Treasury Guidelines, in contrast, contain the
$500,000 annual compensation cap for senior executives described above
(which may be waived by all companies other than those receiving
“exceptional” assistance) but do not specifically address the deduction
limit.
|
|
·
|
No excessive
risks. Like EESA, ARRA requires the Treasury Department
to implement limits on compensation that exclude incentives for senior
executive officers of a CPP-participating company to take unnecessary and
excessive risks that threaten the value of the company for as long as any
CPP-related obligation remains outstanding. The Treasury
Department implemented this directive under EESA by requiring periodic
compensation committee review and certification of the risk
characteristics of a company’s incentive compensation arrangements, and
presumably these same review and certification requirements would apply
going forward under ARRA. ARRA requires that the compensation
committee perform such a review at least
semi-annually.
|
ARRA
requires both the Treasury Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission
to issue rules to implement these new executive compensation
restrictions.
Many
aspects of the foregoing restrictions will not be clear until Treasury and the
SEC publish new rules.
The
foregoing restrictions imposed by ARRA implement many, but not all, of the
restrictions of the Treasury Guidelines. At the present time,
Treasury has not announced whether it intends to publish rules to implement the
aspects of the Treasury Guidelines that were not addressed by ARRA.
We have
already implemented the prior requirements of EESA. The PCC will
consider the new limits on executive compensation of ARRA, the Treasury
Guidelines (to the extent they apply to us), and any forthcoming
regulations. When Treasury publishes such regulations, the PCC
promptly will make appropriate changes to our executive compensation
program.
Stock Option
Plans
In
connection with the bank holding company reorganization, the Company adopted the
Community West Bancshares 1997 Stock Option Plan (1997 Plan) providing for the
issuance, as amended at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, of up to
1,292,014 option shares. This Plan expired on January 23,
2007.
On March
23, 2006, the Company’s Board adopted the 2006 Stock Option Plan (2006 Plan),
and the 2006 Plan was approved by the shareholders at the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. The 2006 Plan provides for the issuance of up to
500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (Common Stock) to Directors,
officers and key employees of the Company and CWB. See separate table
for grants made to date. See tables entitled “OUTSTANDING EQUITY
AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE” and “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE” for more
information regarding options outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
Eligibility. Full-time
employees, officers and Board members of the Company and subsidiaries, including
CWB, are eligible to receive awards under the 2006 Plan at the discretion of the
Board.
Plan Term. The
2006 Plan’s term commenced on May 25, 2006 and will terminate on March 23, 2016
(subject to early termination is described herein).
Administration. The
2006 Plan is administered by the Board, serving as the “Stock Option Committee”,
one or more of whom may also be executive officers and therefore may not be
deemed to be “independent,” as that term is defined in the listing standards of
the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Members of the Board receive no
additional compensation for their administration of the Plans. Each
Director will abstain from approving the grant of any options to
themselves. Options may be granted only to Directors, officers and
key employees of the Company and any subsidiary, including
CWB. Subject to the express provisions of the 2006 Plan, the Board is
authorized to construe and interpret the 2006 Plan, and make all the
determinations necessary or advisable for administration of the 2006
Plan. The full text of the 2006 Plan is available as Appendix A to
the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 13, 2006.
Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock
Options. The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of both
incentive stock options and non-qualified options. Incentive stock
options are available only to persons who are employees of the Company, and are
subject to limitations imposed by applicable sections of the Code, including a
$100,000 limit on the aggregate fair market value (determined on the date the
options are granted) of shares of Common Stock with respect to which incentive
stock options are exercisable for the first time by an optionee during any
calendar year (under the 2006 Plan and all other “incentive stock option” plans
of the Company). Any options granted under the 2006 Plan which do not
meet the limitations for incentive stock options, or which are otherwise not
deemed to be incentive stock options, shall be deemed
“non-qualified”.
Amendment and Termination of the
2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan, and all stock options previously
granted under the 2006 Plan, shall terminate upon the dissolution or liquidation
of the Company, upon a consolidation, reorganization, or merger as a result of
which the Company is not the surviving corporation, or upon a sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Company. However, all options
theretofore granted shall become immediately exercisable in their entirety upon
the occurrence of any of the foregoing, and any options not exercised
immediately upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events will terminate,
unless provision is made for the assumption or substitution
thereof. As a result of these acceleration provisions, even if an
outstanding option were not fully vested as to all increments at the time of the
event, that option will become fully vested and exercisable. The
Board may at any time suspend, amend or terminate the 2006 Plan, and may, with
the consent of the respective optionee, make such modifications to the terms and
conditions of outstanding options as it shall deem advisable. Certain
amendments to the 2006 Plan may also require shareholder approval if such
amendment or modification would: (a) materially increase the number of shares of
Common Stock which may be issued under the 2006 Plan; (b) materially increase
the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued at any time under the
2006 Plan to all Directors who are not also officers or key employees of the
Company; (c) materially modify the requirements as to eligibility for
participation in the 2006 Plan; (d) increase or decrease the exercise price of
any option granted under the 2006 Plan; (e) increase the maximum term of options
provided for in the 2006 Plan; (f) permit options to be granted to any person
who is not an eligible participant; or (g) change any provision of the 2006 Plan
which would affect the qualification as an incentive stock option under the 2006
Plan. The amendment, suspension or termination of the 2006 Plan will
not, without the consent of the optionee, alter or impair any rights or
obligations under any outstanding option under the 2006 Plan.
Adjustments Upon Changes in
Capitalization. The total number of shares covered by the 2006
Plan and the price, kind and number of shares subject to outstanding options
thereunder, will be appropriately and proportionately adjusted if the
outstanding shares of Common Stock are increased, decreased, changed into or
exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities of the Company
through reorganization, merger, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split,
stock dividend, stock consolidation or otherwise, without consideration to CWBC
as provided in the 2006 Plan. Fractional share interests of such
adjustments may be accumulated, although no fractional shares of stock will be
issued under the 2006 Plan.
Holdings of Previously
Awarded Equity Outstanding Equity Awards
The
following table sets forth certain information, pursuant to SEC rules, regarding
stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008 for the Named Executive
Officers and Other Key Officers.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable (1)
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)
|
|
|
Option Exercise Price
($)
|
|
Option Expiration Date
|
Charles
G. Baltuskonis
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
7/24/13
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
8.75 |
|
2/26/14
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
12.50 |
|
7/26/17
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
8.65 |
|
2/28/18
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3.995 |
|
7/29/18
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
11/20/18
|
Richard
M. Favor
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
11.75 |
|
10/30/17
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
11/20/18
|
Lynda
J. Nahra
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
1/27/10
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
5.25 |
|
9/28/10
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
4.64 |
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
4/23/13
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
7/24/13
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
1/25/17
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
1/24/18
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
11/20/18
|
(1) Each
option grant generally vests 20% on each anniversary of the grant
date. Each stock option expires 10 years after the date the stock
option was granted.
Pension
Benefits
Excluding
any tax-qualified contribution plan and any nonqualified defined contribution
plan, none of the Named Executive Officers or Other Key Officers participates in
any plan that provides for payments or other benefits at, following, or in
connection with retirement.
Potential Payments upon
Retirement, Termination or Change-In-Control
Employment Arrangements for
Lynda J. Nahra
Ms. Nahra
has an employment contract, effective January 1, 2007. For 2008, Ms.
Nahra’s annual base salary was $225,000. In addition, she has a
deferred compensation account established and maintained at CWB for her
benefit. To this account, the Company credited $50,000 each on
December 31, 2006 and on March 31, 2007. In addition, $2,000 per
month will also be credited to this account during the term of Ms. Nahra’s
employment. Monthly interest credits will be earned throughout the
term of the agreement at the then-current CWB six-month certificate of deposit
rate. No funds in this account will vest prior to the date Ms. Nahra
attains age 65, and normal payments would not commence until such time as Ms.
Nahra attains age 66, whether or not she is employed by the
Company. In the event of a change of control before Ms. Nahra attains
age 65, Ms. Nahra will vest 50% of the account balance.
Ms.
Nahra’s new contract specifies that, in the event of termination without cause,
she would continue to receive salary and benefits plus deferred compensation for
a period of three months. Also, the contract contains a change of
control (as defined) clause whereby, if she is terminated within one year
following such event, she would be entitled to base salary and benefits for a
period of one year.
Under
this contract, Ms. Nahra was granted options covering 5,000 shares in January
2007 and 2008, and will be granted options covering 5,000 shares in
2009.
Under Ms.
Nahra’s former agreement, she also earned a base salary of $225,000 and received
6% of this base salary per annum credited to her deferred compensation plan,
plus the monthly interest. The CWB contributions to this old plan
were discontinued as of 2007, but interest will continue to be credited until
Ms. Nahra’s termination. Ms. Nahra is also eligible for an annual
bonus at the sole discretion of CWB’s Board Personnel / Compensation
Committee. For 2008 and 2007, such bonus amount awarded was $15,000
and $50,000, respectively.
Employment Arrangements for
Charles G. Baltuskonis
Mr.
Baltuskonis has an employment contract, effective July 1, 2007. For
2008, Mr. Baltuskonis’ annual base salary was $190,512. In addition,
he has a deferred compensation account established and maintained at CWB for his
benefit. To this account, the Company credited $40,000 each on July
1, 2007 and on December 31, 2007. In addition, $1,600 per month will
also be credited to this account during the term of Mr. Baltuskonis’
employment. Monthly interest credits will be earned throughout the
term of the agreement at the then-current CWB six-month certificate of deposit
rate. No funds in this account will vest prior to the date Mr.
Baltuskonis attains age 65, and normal payments would not commence until such
time as Mr. Baltuskonis attains age 66, whether or not he is employed by the
Company. In the event of a change of control before Mr. Baltuskonis
attains age 65, Mr. Baltuskonis will vest 50% of the account
balance.
Mr.
Baltuskonis’ contract specifies that, in the event of termination without cause,
he would continue to receive salary and benefits plus deferred compensation for
a period of three months. Also, the contract contains a change of
control (as defined) clause whereby, if he is terminated within one year
following such event, he would be entitled to base salary and benefits for a
period of one year. Mr. Baltuskonis is also eligible for an annual
bonus which is determined by the Board in its sole discretion. For
2008 and 2007, such bonus amount awarded was $15,000 and $35,000,
respectively.
Mr.
Baltuskonis was granted options covering 3,750 shares in July 2007 and 2008, and
will be granted options covering 3,750 shares in July 2009.
Employment Arrangements for
Richard M. Favor
Mr. Favor
has an employment contract, effective September 6, 2007. Mr. Favor’s
annual base salary is $175,000. Under the terms of his
contract, if within one year after a change in control, Mr. Favor terminates his
employment for “Good Reason” (as defined) or he is terminated other than “for
cause” (as defined), he would be entitled to base salary and benefits for a
period of one year. Mr. Favor is also eligible for an annual bonus
which is determined by the Board in its sole discretion.
Mr. Favor
will be granted options covering 3,750 shares in each of September 2009 and July
2010.
Employment Arrangements for
Former Chief Executive Officer and President
A former
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company is a party to an Executive
Salary Continuation Agreement (ESC) with the Company dated January 1, 1994.
The purpose of the ESC was to provide an incentive for the former executive’s
continuing employment with CWB on a long-term basis. The ESC provides
the former executive with a salary continuation benefit of $50,000 per year for
15 years after retirement. Normal retirement under the ESC was age
61. The present value of the contractual liability has been
recognized in the Company’s audited financial statements. Beginning
in March 2004, benefit payments under the ESC commenced.
Modification of Compensation
Arrangements as a result of TARP-CPP
As noted
above, in connection with the Company’s participation in TARP-CPP, the Company’s
named executive officers have entered into written agreements with the Company
which modify their Benefit Plans to comply with the limitations on executive
compensation as set forth in EESA, ARRA and Treasury guidelines issued or to be
issued thereunder. One requirement of ARRA is the prohibition on any
payment to a senior executive officer for departure from the Company for any
reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued during
the period in which any obligation of the Company as a result of its
participation in TARP-CPP remains outstanding. For more information
on these agreements and the other limitations on executive compensation imposed
by EESA, ARRA and the Treasury guidelines issued thereunder, please refer to the
section entitled “Employment Arrangements,” above.
Treatment of Outstanding
Stock Options upon Retirement, Termination or Change of
Control
Termination
of Employment or Affiliation. Under the terms of the 1997 and
2006 Plans, in the event an optionee ceases to be affiliated with the Company or
a subsidiary for any reason other than disability, death or termination for
cause, the stock options granted to such optionee will expire at the earlier of
the expiration dates specified for the options, or 90 days after the optionee
ceases to be so affiliated. During such period after cessation of
affiliation, the optionee may exercise the option to the extent it was
exercisable as of the date of such termination, and thereafter the option
expires in its entirety. If an optionee’s stock option agreement so
provides, and if an optionee’s status as an eligible participant is terminated
for cause, the options held by such person will expire 30 days after
termination, although the Board may, in its sole discretion, within 30 days of
such termination, reinstate the option. If the option is reinstated,
the optionee will be permitted to exercise the option only to the extent, for
such time, and upon such terms and conditions as if the optionee’s status as an
eligible participant had been terminated for a reason other than cause,
disability or death, as described above.
Liquidation
or Change of Control. The Plans, and all stock options
previously granted under the plans, terminate upon the dissolution or
liquidation of the Company, upon a consolidation, reorganization or merger as a
result of which the Company is not the surviving corporation, or upon a sale of
all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. However, all
options heretofore granted become immediately exercisable in their entirety upon
the occurrence of any of the foregoing, and any options not exercised
immediately upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events will terminate
unless provision is made for the assumption or substitution
thereof. As a result of the acceleration provisions, even if an
outstanding option were not fully vested as to all increments at the time of the
event, that option will become fully vested and exercisable. All
options outstanding at the time of completion of the merger(s) will survive and
not become immediately exercisable.
Profit
Sharing and 401(k) Plan
The
Company has established a 401(k) plan for the benefit of its
employees. Employees are eligible to participate in the plan after
three months of consecutive service. Employees may make contributions
to the plan under the plan’s 401(k) component and the Company may make
contributions under the plan’s profit sharing component, subject to certain
limitations. The Company’s contributions were determined by the Board and
amounted to $260,000, $255,000 and $169,000, respectively, in 2008, 2007 and
2006.
Directors’
Compensation
CWB’s
non-employee Directors are paid for attendance at Board meetings at the rate of
$1,000 for each regular Board meeting and $200 for each committee
meeting. If a Director attends a meeting by telephone, only 25% of
the above fee is received. In 2008, no additional discretionary
compensation was awarded to the non-employee Directors.
The
following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to each
of the Company’s Directors during 2008. Compensation paid to Lynda J.
Nahra, President and Chief Executive Officer, is not included in this table
because she was an employee during 2008 and, therefore, received no additional
compensation for her service as a Director.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
(1)
|
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Robert
H. Bartlein (3)
|
|
$ |
33,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
39,807 |
|
Jean
W. Blois
|
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,507 |
|
John
D. Illgen
|
|
|
17,380 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23,687 |
|
William
R. Peeples
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37,107 |
|
James
R. Sims Jr.
|
|
|
18,715 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,022 |
|
Kirk
B. Stovesand
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,807 |
|
C.
Richard Whiston
|
|
|
31,150 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37,457 |
|
(1)
Outstanding stock options held by each non-employee Director at December 31,
2008 are as follows: Robert H. Bartlein, 10,000; Jean W. Blois,
23,545; John D. Illgen, 23,545; William R. Peeples, 10,000; James R. Sims, Jr.,
23,545; Kirk B. Stovesand, 14,000; C. Richard Whiston, 15,000.
(2)
Column represents the 2008 compensation cost of option awards granted, net of
the Company’s estimate of forfeitures. The grant date fair value of
option awards granted was determined in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R (SFAS 123R) and is recognized as compensation cost
over the requisite service period. The terms of the 1997 and 2006
Plans are described in “Employment Arrangements and Other Factors Affecting 2007
Compensation”. Furthermore, the amount recognized for these awards
was calculated based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
(3) In
accordance with an Agreement with the Bank, in lieu of cash, Mr. Bartlein’s fees
are deferred and maintained in an account at the Bank and earn monthly interest
at the Bank’s then current six-month certificate of deposit rate. The
balance in this account will be paid to Mr. Bartlein in 2011 upon his attainment
of age 64.
There
were no CWBC Director fees paid during 2008.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
Some of
the Directors and executive officers of the Company, as well as the companies
with which such Directors and executive officers are associated, are customers
of and have had banking transactions with CWB in the ordinary course of
business. CWB expects to have such ordinary banking transactions with
such persons in the future. In the opinion of CWB management, all loans and
commitments to lend included in such transactions were made in compliance with
applicable laws on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing for comparable transactions with other persons
of similar creditworthiness and did not involve more than a normal risk of
collectibility or present other unfavorable features. Although CWB
does not have any limits on the aggregate amount it would be willing to lend to
Directors and officers as a group, loans to individual Directors and officers
must comply with CWB’s internal lending policies and statutory lending
limits.
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
The
Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
were Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst). The Company has engaged Ernst as
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009. Representatives of Ernst will be invited to attend the
Meeting. The Company will afford the representatives an opportunity
to make a statement, should they desire to do so, and expect that the
representatives will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
Audit
Fees
During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the aggregate fees billed by Ernst
for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such fiscal
year and for the review of the Company’s interim financial statements were
$247,000 and $232,000, respectively. These amounts include fees
related to the fiscal year audit and interim reviews, notwithstanding when the
fees were billed or when the services were rendered. Expenses
included were billed from January through December of the fiscal year, not
withstanding when the expenses were incurred.
Audit-Related
Fees
During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no fees billed by Ernst
for other audit-related services.
Tax
Fees
During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the aggregate fees billed by
Ernst for professional services related to recurring state and federal tax
preparation, compliance and consulting were $44,000 and $29,000,
respectively.
Other
Fees
During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no fees billed by Ernst
for information technology consulting services.
The Audit
Committee of the Company reviewed and discussed with Ernst whether the rendering
of the non-audit services provided by them to the Company during fiscal 2008 was
compatible with their independence. The Audit Committee pre-approves
all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by Ernst and the
estimated fees for these services.
Policy
on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent
Auditor
The Audit
Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided
by the Company’s independent auditor. These services may include
audit, audit-related, tax and other services. Pre-approval is
generally provided for up to one year and is detailed as to a particular service
or category of service. The independent auditor and management are
required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of
services provided by the independent auditor in accordance with the pre-approval
and the fees for services performed to date. All services performed
by Ernst for which fees were billed to the Company during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 as disclosed herein were approved by the Audit
Committee pursuant to the procedures outlined herein. All of the
services of Ernst in auditing the Company’s Financial Statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008 were performed by Ernst or its full-time, permanent
employees.
2010
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholder
proposals to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the
Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (2010 Meeting) must be received by
the Company at its offices at 445 Pine Avenue, Goleta, California 93117, no
later than December 15, 2009. The proposals must also satisfy the
conditions and procedures prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in Rule 14a-8 for such proposals to be included in the Company’s Proxy
Statement for the 2010 Meeting, and must be limited to 500 words. To
be included in the Proxy Statement, the shareholder must be a holder of record
or beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value or 1% of the Company’s
securities entitled to be voted on the proposal, and have held the shares for at
least one year and will continue to hold the shares through the date of the 2010
Meeting. Either the proposer, or a representative qualified under
California law to present the proposal on the proposer’s behalf, must attend the
meeting to present the proposal. Shareholders may not submit more
than one proposal.
The SEC
has in effect a rule governing a company's ability to use discretionary proxy
authority with respect to proposals that were not submitted in time to be
included in the Proxy Statement (i.e., outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 as
described herein under the heading "2009 Shareholder Proposals"). As
a result, in the event a proposal is not submitted to the Company prior to
February 27, 2010, and the proxy materials delivered in connection with the 2010
Meeting contain a statement conferring discretionary authority (such statement
is set forth in the third paragraph of this Proxy Statement), the proxies
solicited by the Board for the 2010 Annual Meeting will confer authority on the
Proxyholders to vote the shares in accordance with their best judgment and
discretion if the proposal is presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting without any
discussion of the proposal in the Proxy Statement for such meeting.
Whether
or not you intend to be present at the Meeting, you are urged to return your
Proxy promptly. If you are then present at the Meeting and wish to
vote your shares in person, your original Proxy may be revoked by voting at the
Meeting. However, if you are a shareholder whose shares are not
registered in your own name, you will need the Proxy obtained from your
recordholder to vote personally at the Meeting.
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers (as defined in regulations
promulgated by the SEC thereunder), Directors and persons who own more than ten
percent of the Common Stock to file reports of stock ownership and changes in
stock ownership with the SEC. The officers, Directors and greater
than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based
solely on its review of the copies of all reports of ownership furnished to the
Company, or written representations that no forms were necessary, the Company
believes that during the last year its officers, Directors and greater than ten
percent beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements except as
follows: (i) Director Whiston filed late a Form 4 on April 28, 2008 reporting a
purchase of Common Stock on December 15, 2005; (ii) Director Peeples filed late
a Form 4 on June 13, 2008 reporting purchases of Common Stock on June 4, June 6,
June 10 and June 12, 2008 and filed late a Form 4 on December 12, 2008 reporting
purchases of Common Stock on December 9 and December 10, 2008; and (iii)
Director Stovesand filed late a Form 4 on December 17, 2008 reporting a purchase
of Common Stock on December 12, 2008.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
COMMUNITY
WEST BANCSHARES
|
|
|
|
William
R. Peeples,
|
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
Dated: April 14,
2009
Goleta,
California