e6vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
Pursuant to Section 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
March 30, 2007
Commission File Number: 001-14534
Precision Drilling Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
4200, 150 6th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
Canada T2P 3Y7
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F o Form 40-F þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1). o
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must
furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated,
domiciled or legally organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules of the home
country exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as the report or other
document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the
registrants security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of
a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- N/A
On
March 30, 2007, Precision Drilling Trust filed and mailed its Annual Report. The Annual Report is hereto attached as Exhibit A.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Dated: March 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRECISION DRILLING TRUST
By its Administrator PRECISION DRILLING CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Darren Ruhr
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Darren Ruhr |
|
|
|
Title: |
Corporate Secretary |
|
|
PRECISION DRILLING TRUST
Down to Earth | ANNUAL REPORT 2006
Precision Drilling Trust
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per diluted unit/share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
% change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,437,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,179 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
|
595,279 |
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
8,029 |
|
|
|
29,270 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Premium on redemption of bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,885 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Loss on disposal of
short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,992 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Other |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
587,658 |
|
|
|
293,231 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
15,146 |
|
|
|
72,383 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
572,512 |
|
|
|
220,848 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax (2) |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,409,715 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
579,589 |
|
|
|
1,630,563 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to unitholders declared |
|
|
471,524 |
|
|
|
70,510 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Net capital expenditures (3) |
|
|
233,693 |
|
|
|
140,077 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
140,880 |
|
|
|
96,838 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,761,186 |
|
|
|
1,718,882 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Per diluted unit/share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Distributions to unitholders declared |
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Number of units/shares outstanding,
end of year(000s) |
|
|
125,758 |
|
|
|
125,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes gain on disposition of discontinued operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes acquisitions and discontinued operations. |
|
n/m calculation not meaningful. |
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
The Annual and Special Meeting of the unitholders of Precision Drilling Trust will be held in
the Enmax Ballroom at the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, 100 6th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta at
3:00 p.m. (Calgary time) on Wednesday, May 9, 2007.
Unitholders are encouraged to attend and those unable to do so are requested to complete and return
the Form of Proxy.
Cover Photograph:
Super SingleTM drilling rig in slant position placing a centralizer on a joint of well casing.
Precision Drilling Trust
ANNUAL REPORT 2006
Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust or Precision) is Canadas largest oilfield services
company, providing contract drilling, well servicing and strategic support services to customers.
Precision returned to its Canadian drilling roots in 2005 after the sale of its energy services,
international contract drilling and industrial maintenance operations and today is a company
focused on what it does best.
Precision drills the wells that start the complex process of converting oil and natural gas into
the fuels, electricity and other products that provide a better life for people. Precision supplies
on-the-ground expertise people, equipment and knowledge to enable about one-third of western
Canadas conventional oil and gas production. Precision and its people are in the field 24 hours a
day, 365 days a year, playing a vital role in the North American economy.
Down to Earth is a theme that captures the nature of oilfield work as well as the straight-forward
approach that has described Precision for decades.
Down to Earth also signifies the global responsibility to manage non-renewable resources and
control the environmental impacts of resource development. Its down to earth. Its where we live.
After record financial results in recent years, North Americas oilfield services sector faces a
more challenging environment in 2007. Its Precisions Down to Earth strategy that sets it apart
from other companies and positions it for opportunities regardless of the operating cycle.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking information and statements, including
statements relating to matters that are not historical facts and statements of our beliefs,
intentions and expectations about developments, results and events which will or may occur in the
future, which constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian
securities legislation and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
information and statements are typically identified by words such as anticipate, could,
should, expect, seek, may, intend, likely, will, plan, estimate, believe and
similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook.
Forward-looking information and statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to
statements with respect to: 2007 capital expenditures, including the amount and nature thereof;
2007 distributions; performance of the oil and natural gas industry, including prices and supply
and demand; expansion, consolidation and other development trends of the oil and natural gas
industry; demand for and status of drilling rigs and other equipment in the oil and natural gas
industry; costs and financial trends for companies operating in the oil and natural gas industry;
world population and energy consumption trends; our business strategy, including the 2007 strategy
and outlook for our business segments; expansion and growth of our business and operations,
including diversification of our earnings base, the size and capabilities of our drilling and
service rig fleet, our market share and our position in the markets in which we operate; demand for
our products and services; our management strategy, including transitions in executive roles;
labour shortages; the maintenance of existing customer, supplier and partner relationships; supply
channels; accounting policies and tax liability; expected payments pursuant to contractual
obligations; the prospective impact of recent or anticipated
regulatory changes; financing strategy and compliance with debt covenants; credit risks; and other
such matters.
All such forward-looking information and statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses
made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and
expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are appropriate in the
circumstances. These statements are, however, subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties
and other factors. As a result, actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially
from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking information and statements and,
accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking
information and statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits will be
derived therefrom. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others: the impact
of general economic conditions in Canada and the United States; world energy prices and government
policies; industry conditions, including the adoption of new environmental, taxation and other laws
and regulations and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced; the impact of initiatives by
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries; the ability of oil and natural gas companies to
access external sources of debt and equity capital; the effect of weather conditions on operations
and facilities; the existence of operating risks inherent in well servicing, contract drilling and
ancillary oilfield services; volatility of oil and natural gas prices; oil and natural gas product
supply and demand; risks inherent in the ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations
to meet current and future obligations; increased competition; consolidation among our customers;
risks associated with technology; political uncertainty, including risks of war, hostilities, civil
insurrection, instability or acts of terrorism; the lack of availability of qualified personnel or
management; credit risks; increased costs of operations, including costs of equipment; fluctuations
in interest rates; stock market volatility; opportunities available to or pursued by us and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control.
These risk factors are discussed in our Annual Information Form and Form 40-F on file with Canadian
securities commissions and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and are available
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and the website of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
at www.sec.gov, respectively. Except as required by law, Precision Drilling Trust, Precision
Drilling Limited Partnership and Precision Drilling Corporation disclaim any intention or
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information or statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
The forward-looking information and statements contained herein are expressly qualified by this
cautionary statement.
Down to Earth EXECUTIVE CHAIRMANS MESSAGE
TIMES CHANGE BUT VALUES ENDURE
If there is one thing Ive learned in my 20 years as Chairman of Precision its the simple
principle that times will change but values endure. Whether we had four rigs or 475 rigs the belief
in that Down to Earth vision has driven this company forward. During 2006, Precision distributed
$445 million cash, or $3.54 per unit, directly to unitholders. Quite an accomplishment considering
we only had four rigs 20 years ago.
Oil and gas prices rise and fall, governments will rewrite policies and the economy will grow
at unpredictable rates. The environment we operate in constantly challenges us but Precision has
prospered in good times and bad because of the commitment to value our people, invest in quality
equipment and always stay financially prudent.
It is remarkable how closely our values today mirror the principles we stated in the first annual
report to shareholders in 1985 when we were Cypress Drilling Ltd.
Stringent
cost control, well-maintained equipment ... one of the best safety programs in the
drilling industry, minimal debt and reward for performance to employees will allow us to forge
ahead carefully in the years to come.
These principles have stood the test of time. Today, Precision is Canadas largest oilfield
services company and an industry leader in profitability, safety, technology and operating
efficiency.
We have branded our core values Down to Earth. It is a sentiment that reflects Precision. With all
our growth, we remained a company that kept its feet on the ground and focused on serving customers
and building relationships.
As we have seen before, this is a time of transition. We face a more traditional operating
environment after years of record activity but Precision has always been a company that created its
own opportunities. Volatility is the norm in this industry but with experience and discipline we
can manage it.
The succession of Precisions management continues as I assume the role of Executive Chairman in
2007. My day-to-day responsibilities have diminished as I relinquished the role of Chief Executive
Officer. I will continue to provide vision and guidance to the Board of Directors and a management
team that has grown up with this company and has the ability to build on Precisions legacy of
realizing value for unitholders.
I would like to acknowledge that Garth Wiggins will not stand for re-election as a trustee or
director in 2007. Mr. Wiggins is a long-standing board member whose financial expertise and steady
guidance has contributed greatly to Precisions success over the years.
I also want to welcome two new members to the Board of Directors Stephen Letwin, Executive Vice
President, Enbridge Inc., of Houston, and Allen Hagerman, Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Oil
Sands
Limited, of Calgary who will provide objective industry insight and guidance for Precision.
The cyclicality of the oilfield services business creates both challenges and opportunities. In the
future, Precisions down to earth values and strategy puts us in a position to maximize unitholder
value, just as in the past.
(signed)
HANK B. SWARTOUT
Executive Chairman
March 9, 2007
Down to Earth PRESIDENTS MESSAGE
FOCUS AND FLEXIBILITY TO DELIVER RESULTS
As we evaluate our performance in 2006 and look to the opportunities in 2007 the phrase Down
to Earth has come to stand for the attitude and business model that give Precision its competitive
advantage. It explains who we are, captures what we do and points to how our flexible operating
model is critical to Precisions ability to consistently create value for investors.
Precision delivered a third straight year of record operating earnings in 2006 and we kept
our feet firmly on the ground. The operating environment in western Canada has shifted from
overheated to uncertain during the second half of the year and we will rely upon our decades of
experience at every level of the company as we adjust to the conditions and challenges for 2007.
That is the essence of Down to Earth. Take a long-term approach that is flexible enough to adjust
to the day-to-day realities of the business while maintaining a focus on our core values. Commodity
prices and rig activity levels retreated from historic highs in 2006 but we did what we set out to
do in our 2005 annual report. We stayed focused on the fundamentals doing the job safely, on time
and on budget.
In 2006, we initiated our expansion into the U.S. market, continued with equipment upgrade
initiatives and launched an organic growth strategy that will increase our drilling rig fleet by
13% over the 2005 rig count of 230.
Rather than acquire assets in a high-price market, we focused on investing in-house to improve
our rig technology. Rigs are 30-year-plus assets and reinvesting profits into assets that perform
better has always been Precisions approach.
All our success comes from our people in the field. From Alberta to Texas, Precisions people are
on the job in all conditions 24/7 creating value for our customers.
We are in a more challenging period for the oilfield services sector and it goes beyond the swings
in oil and natural gas prices we saw last year. Surging energy demand in recent years triggered a
large increase in the supply of drilling rigs and other oilfield service equipment.
Rig capacity will exceed moderating demand in 2007. This could be the start of an industry
rationalization that effectively retires unproductive land drilling equipment in North America.
With this shift, we believe operating efficiency is paramount. Precision expects this trend will be
more prevalent in the United States land drilling market and presents opportunities to redeploy
excess supply from Canada.
The industry also faces technical challenges. As conventional oil and gas basins in North America
mature, it is increasingly difficult for our customers to maintain production. Energy demand,
however, is not declining and new supplies are increasingly focused on unconventional oil and gas
plays such as oil sands, coal bed
methane, tight gas and natural gas in shale.
Unconventional resources are complicated and expensive to develop. Customers require better
equipment and more innovative technology to deliver lower costs to make projects viable. Our
investments in people, equipment and relationships with customers make us a company that will
prosper at a time when the best performers are those who can do something better for the customer.
From our Super SingleTM and AC electric triple drilling rigs to proven delivery service systems,
Precisions investment in innovative technology gives us the ability to do a better job for
customers and positions us for long-term sustained growth. Our organizational structure is designed
to support our field operations and we create value by improving efficiency.
As customers demand more from suppliers, Precisions advantages come more sharply into focus.
Precision is already Canadas largest oilfield services company and among the industrys most
profitable enterprises. Our services include drilling and service rigs augmented by divisions that
provide camp and catering services, snubbing, wastewater treatment, procurement and distribution of
oilfield supplies, specialty equipment rentals and the manufacture and repair of rigs.
Delivering earnings growth will be a challenge in 2007, but as Precision has shown throughout its
history there are opportunities in any market.
The Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (CAODC) forecasts 19,023 wells will be
drilled in Canada in 2007 after 22,575 wells in 2006. The CAODC originally forecast 26,070 wells
would be drilled in 2006 but by summer it was clear commodity prices would not foster that level of
activity. By the fourth quarter, the landscape looked similar to 2001, when record activity and
earnings gave way to weakness in the final three months. Late in 2006, there were year-over-year
declines in key metrics such as rig activity and trends in spot market day rates.
The critical revenue generating winter drilling season in 2006/2007 saw more uncertainty over
commodity prices, producer budgets, government policies and the state of the economy than at any
time in the last five years.
However, with approximately 70% of drilling in Canada targeting natural gas and steep productivity
declines from North American gas wells, any near-term slowdown in drilling sets the stage for a
turnaround in prices and drilling. There are also opportunities from the close to 190,000 producing
wells in Canada that require workovers to offset production declines. Precisions expansion into
the United States gives us the ability to put rigs in locations with opportunities for
significantly higher annual utilization rates than are typical in Canada.
PRECISION IN 2006
In our last annual report, we said 2006 will be another year of significant demand for services
and strong performance for Precision. This proved to be accurate. Precisions revenues rose by 13%
to $1.44 billion while operating earnings rose 28% over 2005 to $595 million in 2006 on strong
activity levels in the first half of 2006 and pricing that was sustained throughout the year.
After reaching US$15.39 per million British Thermal Units in December 2005, natural gas prices slid
to US$3.62 by September and stayed depressed into the relatively warm start to the winter in North
America. Oil fell to nearly US$50 a barrel early this year from an all-time high of US$78.40 last
July and 2007 promises even more price volatility.
During 2006, we began to establish a track record of distributions. However, the announcement from
the Government of Canada on October 31, of its plan to tax distributions to investors in income
trusts, created confusion in the sector. We will continue to monitor these developments and will
adjust as required to provide the best value for Precisions unitholders. As when we converted to a
trust, our legal structure will have no
impact on operations.
Precision achieved solid fleet utilization in 2006. Our 241 drilling rigs posted 44,938 operating
days, or 53% utilization. Our 237 service rigs logged 480,137 operating hours, or 56% utilization.
With a slowdown in activity toward the end of the year and a 9% increase in the industry rig fleet,
Canadian drilling utilization rates decreased four percent from 2005. Service rig utilization rose
one percent year over year.
Contract drilling and its support business accounted for approximately 70% of Precisions revenues
in 2006. Well servicing and its supporting business divisions made up 30%.
2007 OUTLOOK
The industry in western Canada is clearly in transition from an overheated demand environment that
led to record financial results and put tremendous strains on infrastructure and personnel. There
appears to be a shift to a more normal operating environment.
For the first quarter of 2007, industry well licensing for natural gas in Canada is approximately
30% lower year over year and drilling rig utilization is 19% lower. The downward momentum will
compound the effects of the seasonally soft spring break-up in the second quarter and there will
be considerable pressure on customer pricing and Precisions profit margins.
Despite near-term weakness due to volatile natural gas pricing for customers, we remain confident
in the North American gas drilling market. Precisions growth outlook is focused on initiatives
that involve better technology and value to customers. Entry into the U.S. market is a key growth
factor. Weakness in the oilfield services sector also provides a greater opportunity to consider
acquisitions. We will evaluate acquisitions to consolidate current markets or provide growth in
new markets.
To solidify customer relations, we will focus on offering total well cost savings for the premium
day rates Precision traditionally commands. We will provide customers money-saving services,
cost-control systems, versatile equipment, proximity to locations and industry leading support
services.
Ultimately, we believe Precisions focus on our Down to Earth values and the service proposition
for customers creates wealth for our unitholders.
(Signed)
GENE C. STAHL
President and Chief Operating Officer
March 9, 2007
Precision Drilling Trust
DOWN TO EARTH VALUES
The goal of no workplace injuries was the origin for Precisions Target Zero vision. From the
top down, a commitment to that vision reinforces and improves upon the policies and practices that
make Precision a safety leader in the industry.
It is much the same with Down to Earth. The phrase is rooted in the company culture and brings
together a number of core values that have endured throughout Precisions history.
These Down to Earth values help assure that Precision is moving in the right direction with a
common sense of purpose.
Down to Earth Safety
TARGET ZERO
Precisions vision is zero injuries. Injuries are not acceptable so Precisions focus is on
continuous safety improvement through awareness and risk reduction. In 2006, 281 rigs, 20 snubbing
units, 86 camps and 12 shops achieved Target Zero!
Down to Earth Support
THE FIELD COMES FIRST
It all starts in the field. Precision succeeds because, even under some pretty tough
conditions, employees in the field get the job done. Precisions people know that, from continuous
training to the vast support services provided by Canadas largest drilling contractor, a
world-class company is behind them.
Down to Earth Technology
THE BEST EQUIPMENT
Precision believes in investing in and maintaining top quality equipment. Precision takes
advantage of the latest innovations and technology to provide customers the right equipment to
increase productivity and deliver lower total well costs. With its in-house engineering,
manufacturing and repair facilities Precision is able to improve its fleet with on-going rig
maintenance and upgrades.
Down to Earth Communication
FACE TO FACE
Precision believes that candid face-to-face conversation among people from across the company
produces common sense solutions. Management has continual presence in the field to promote and
encourage open dialogue.
Down to Earth Family
THE PRECISION FAMILY
Like a family, Precision has deep roots which promote a sense of loyalty and long-term
thinking. People come first at Precision. With teamwork and safety so critical on the job, people
look out for each other every day.
Down to Earth Solutions
EMPOWERED TO AFFECT CHANGE
Precision expects its employees to take the initiative and contribute ideas to move the
company forward. This attitude fosters the appropriate balance between people and processes in the
work place and makes even better use of Precisions key asset, its people.
Down to Earth Performance
DESIRE TO BE THE BEST
Precision strives to be a top performer in all its operations and wants its employees to
share that goal. Precisions commitment to its core values tells employees the company means what
it says and gives them the opportunity to make the company better.
Down to Earth Relationships
EMPLOYEE+CUSTOMER+SUPPLIER+UNITHOLDER
Precision is in the relationship business and seeks to develop mutually beneficial
partnerships with suppliers and customers with the goal of delivering superior returns to
investors.
Down to Earth POSITIONING
POSITIONED FOR GROWTH
Precision is Canadas largest oilfield service provider with a fleet of 240 drilling rigs and
237 service rigs geographically dispersed throughout the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB).
The vast and varied oil and natural gas resources in the WCSB have provided Precision the
opportunity to acquire unparalleled experience in meeting customer needs over a 55 year operating
history. Precision provides services which enable its customers to drill, complete and workover
wells for conventional oil and natural gas reservoirs as well as growing unconventional energy
sources such as heavy oil, oil sands, coal bed methane and tight natural gas.
Growing demand for natural gas and the steep production decline rates from maturing gas reservoirs
has led to sustained higher levels of drilling activity in Canada and the United States. In 2006,
approximately 75% of land drilling rig activity in North America targeted natural gas exploration
and development.
Precisions employees and equipment are products of a highly competitive environment for oilfield
services. Equipment, such as the successful Super SingleTM drilling rig, is highly versatile and
able to meet varied fit-for-purpose customer drilling requirements.
From its highly efficient operating platform in western Canada, Precision is working with core
customers in Canada to secure market expansion in areas of the United States that have growing
unconventional natural gas production and the supporting infrastructure to get the gas to
consumers. As part of its staged entry into the United States, Precision currently has operations
in Texas and Colorado.
Down to Earth PERFORMANCE
OPERATIONS AT A GLANCE
CONTRACT DRILLING SERVICES SEGMENT
The Contract Drilling Services segment includes Precision Drilling, LRG Catering, Columbia Oilfield
Supply and Rostel Industries and generates approximately 70% of Precisions annual revenue.
PRECISION DRILLING
Precision operates the largest fleet of drilling rigs in Canada and one rig in the United States.
The 240 rigs represent about 29% of the Canadian contract drilling industry.
LRG CATERING
LRG provides food and lodging for crews working in remote locations to improve operational
efficiency for customers and provides a home away from home for workers.
COLUMBIA OILFIELD SUPPLY
Columbia is an essential extension of the company-wide procurement process. It provides purchasing
power, standardized product selection and coordinated distribution of goods for all Precision
operations.
ROSTEL INDUSTRIES
Rostel enables Precision to design, build, refurbish and certify drilling and service rig
components. It also helps ensure better control of equipment specifications and delivery schedules.
COMPLETION AND PRODUCTION SERVICES SEGMENT
The Completion and Production Services segment includes Precision Well Servicing, Live Well
Service, Precision Rentals and Terra Water Systems and generates approximately 30% of Precisions
annual revenue.
PRECISION WELL SERVICING
Precision Well Servicing is Canadas largest service rig contractor with 237 rigs. The rigs conduct
completions and workovers and represent about 23% of the industry.
LIVE WELL SERVICE
Live Well operates 26 snubbing units that conduct completion and workover operations on producing
wells. It represents about 30% of the snubbing industry.
PRECISION RENTALS
Precision Rentals supplies specialty drill pipe, surface equipment and wellsite accommodations to
operators from stock points across western Canada. It represents about 10% of the oilfield rentals
industry.
TERRA WATER SYSTEMS
Terra Water provides portable wastewater treatment to reduce the environmental impact at remote
worksites. It represents about 10% of the industry.
Precision Drilling Trust
DOWN TO EARTH OPERATIONS
Equipment (December 31, 2006)
PRECISION DRILLING (241 DRILLING RIGS)
|
|
Singles: 14 |
|
|
|
Super SinglesTM: 29 |
|
|
|
Coiled tubing: 11 |
|
|
|
Doubles: 94 |
|
|
|
Light triples: 44 |
|
|
|
Heavy triples: 49 |
PRECISION WELL SERVICING (237 SERVICE RIGS)
|
|
Freestanding mobile singles: 92 |
|
|
|
Mobile singles: 12 |
|
|
|
Skid doubles: 65 |
|
|
|
Freestanding mobile doubles: 9 |
|
|
|
Mobile doubles: 44 |
|
|
|
Freestanding slants: 15 |
LIVE WELL SERVICE
|
|
Rig assist snubbing units: 25 |
|
|
|
Stand alone snubbing units: 1 |
LRG CATERING
|
|
Camps: 101 |
|
|
|
Dormitories: 3 |
PRECISION RENTALS
|
|
Specialty drill pipe joints: 10,000 |
|
|
|
Surface equipment: 3,700 |
|
|
|
Well control equipment: 1,100 |
|
|
|
Accommodation units: 315 |
TERRA WATER SYSTEMS
|
|
Extended aeration units: 50 |
|
|
|
Rotating biological contact units: 1 |
WORKFORCE: 6,500
PRECISION DRILLING
Oil and natural gas drilling in Canada and the United States requires specialized equipment
and knowledge to deal with the complex geology, often-harsh weather, a competitive marketplace and
stringent environmental and safety standards.
Most oil and gas producers do not own the equipment required to drill their wells. They find it
more efficient to utilize the workers, equipment, and technical skills of a service company like
Precision.
For more than five decades, Precision Drillings roots have been in the Western Canada Sedimentary
Basin; an area that spans from Virden, Manitoba, to Fort Nelson, British Columbia. Servicing such a
vast area can be a challenge but Precision has a fleet of 240 drilling rigs that are adaptable for
a variety of natural gas, crude oil and oil sands drilling prospects ranging in depths from 600 to
6,000 metres. The ability to get a rig to a job site quickly and efficiently is one of Precisions
key competitive advantages in delivering lower total well costs.
Operational efficiency and safety are critical for drilling contractors in North America and
Precision works closely with customers to ensure both. Once drilling starts, it typically continues
24/7 until the job is done. In 2006, the average well in western Canada took just over seven days
to drill but drilling time per well can range from less than a day to more than a year.
Precisions drilling rigs generally operate with three crews of five driller, derrickman, motor
man, floor hand and lease hand working two weeks on and one week off. Each rig essentially
operates as a self-contained business unit and while a well is being drilled the rig manager will
oversee operations onsite the entire time. The crew works with a representative from the operating
company to drill to a pre-determined target that can be the size of a single-car garage. The target
will vary in depth and direction depending on the well type vertical, directional or horizontal.
Relationships with customers have always been vital to Precisions success. In 2006 Precision
initiated U.S. operations in Texas and Colorado through some of its long-standing customer
relationships in Canada.
Precisions fleet can drill virtually all types of on-shore conventional and unconventional oil and
gas deposits in North America. It is particularly adept in developing unconventional resources such
as oil sands, coal bed methane and tight gas. The increase in drilling-intensive unconventional
resource plays is creating opportunities for technically innovative and operationally efficient
drillers like Precision.
INNOVATION:
To improve on its highly successful Super SingleTM drilling rig, Precision is applying state of the
art AC-powered drives to the new generation of this versatile rig as well as its new fast-moving
4,000-metre AC drive triple rigs.
PRECISION WELL SERVICING
After a well is initially drilled, the operator contracts a company such as Precision Well
Servicing to supply the crew and equipment to complete the well. A service rig helps to initiate
production, provide maintenance or re-completions to sustain or improve productivity during the
life of a well and abandon the well.
Well servicing requires its own unique skill set and in addition to the physical work, harsh
weather and other factors crews must deal with the potential dangers and safety concerns of
working with pressurized well bores.
Precision Well Servicing has a fleet of 237 service rigs deployed throughout the vast Western
Canada Sedimentary Basin. Precision deploys its fleet in the major producing centres in western
Canada to improve efficiency and reduce travel. The operations have two distinct functions
completions and workovers. Completions accounted for about 40% of total activity for Precision Well
Servicing in 2006 while workovers accounted for 60%.
Completions prepare a newly drilled well for production and can involve cleaning the well bore and
installing production tubing as well as wellheads and downhole equipment such as pumps. Workovers
take place over the producing life of the well and involve a variety of activities to restore or
enhance production.
Servicing wells often means coordinating activities of several companies so work normally takes
place in daylight hours. A typical service rig crew has four members (driller, derrickman and two
floor hands) in addition to the rig manager. Jobs are typically shorter in well servicing than
contract drilling so the ability of a service rig to move quickly from one site to another is
critical.
A typical gas well in western Canada is likely to require one or two workovers during its operating
life compared with four or five workovers for conventional oil wells. Wells for some heavy oil and
bitumen production could require many workovers during their lifecycle.
The number of wells drilled in Canada each year has doubled in this decade compared with the 1990s
with a particular increase in natural gas and heavy oil drilling. With close to 190,000 producing
wells currently in western Canada as potential candidates for workovers and 20,000 new wells
drilled each year that must be completed and maintained, well servicing has significant growth
potential for Precision.
INNOVATION:
Development of a versatile service rig that is multi-functional and able to adapt to a variety of
well designs in heavy oil applications. The rig will service wells from vertical or slant positions
and have the ability to add or remove various components to match the job specifications of our
customer.
LIVE WELL SERVICE
Precisions snubbing business, Live Well Service, complements traditional well servicing by
pro viding customers the ability to work on the well bore, under pressure, while production is
suspended. It eliminates the need for the use of fluids to stop production which can damage
delicate producing formations and which are costly to dispose of.
Safety is absolutely critical when working with a producing well and snubbing crews use specialty
pressure-control equipment to remove and replace downhole pipe. Since pressure is maintained, crews
can push (snub) the pipe into the wellbore in steps similar to how a boat moves through a water
lock system.
There are essentially two types of snubbing units rig assist and stand alone. Rig assist units
work with a rig to complete the snubbing activity for a well. Stand alone units do not require a
service rig on site and are capable of snubbing and many other services traditionally completed by
a service rig.
Snubbing is primarily used to enhance natural gas production and as more gas wells are drilled each
year in western Canada, producers are increasingly aware of the advantages of snubbing.
PRECISION RENTALS
Most operators do not own the specialty equipment used in oil and gas operations and rely on
suppliers such as Precision Rentals for access to large inventories of drilling, completion and
production equipment including specialty drill pipe, well control equipment and on site offices and
accommodations.
Precision Rentals allows operators to focus on their core business and avoid the cost and
infrastructure to buy, warehouse and maintain costly equipment for specific applications. Precision
has the resources to ensure it keeps up with the latest advances in technology so it can provide
customers with the right equipment at the right time to do the job.
Precision Rentals takes a one-stop-shopping approach to customer service with an inventory of
15,000 pieces of equipment from specialty drill pipe and blowout preventers to more than 300 on
site offices and living quarters for supervisors and technical staff.
Precision Rentals has 5 operating centres and 14 stock points throughout western Canada as well as
a central technical support centre in Nisku, Alberta. This logistical strength helps Precision
Rentals reduce transportation costs and ensures equipment is available where and when it is needed.
ROSTEL INDUSTRIES
The oil and gas industry is an equipment dependent business and Rostel provides Precision
with high quality in-house engineering, machining, fabrication, component manufacturing and repair
services for its drilling and service rigs.
About 70% of Rostels activities support Precision business units. Its ability to repair or provide
new components for either drilling or service rigs ensures Precisions fleet has the highest levels
of efficiency and reliability.
Rostel designs and builds more than 50% of the components for Precisions flagship Super SingleTM
drilling rigs and is currently developing a new AC-powered top drive that can be applied to both
new rigs and retro-fitted to improve the versatility of many of Precisions existing rigs.
Rostel is a key aspect of the companys vertical integration and competitive advantage in
delivering lower overall well costs for customers.
Operating around the clock, Rostels Calgary shop gives Precision the ability to control cost,
quality and production schedules. Rostel also provides important inspection and certification of
rig components such as masts, substructures, overhead equipment, well control equipment and
handling tools.
COLUMBIA OILFIELD SUPPLY
When Precision is running flat out during the winter drilling season, Columbias value is
most evident. Each day more than 50,000 pounds of consumables leave its warehouse on trucks for
deliveries to Precisions 475 drilling and service rigs.
From purchasing power and standardized product selection to coordinated distribution, Columbias
inventory management and demand anticipation contribute to Precisions competitive advantage.
Columbia gives Precision the ability to ensure that its rigs are supplied with standardized
products for all of its equipment. Precision has direct control over supply distribution to field
destinations to ensure that crews in the field will have the right supplies and equipment when and
where needed.
At the distribution hub in Edmonton, Columbia stocks more than 2,600 types of goods and materials
for the rigs. The product lines include every thing from valves and gaskets to steam heaters,
sledgehammers and pipe lubricant.
About 90% of Columbias activities support Precision operations and it plays a key role in supply
chain management for the company.
LRG CATERING
As the oil and gas industry in western Canada works in more remote locations in search of new
reserves there is increasing demand for crews to stay near the wellsite throughout the drilling
process.
The focus of LRG Catering is to provide workers a home away from home, with good food and
comfortable accommodations so they are ready to work their next shift.
LRG, which recently opened a new operations centre in Edmonton, serves Precision and other
companies in upstream oil and gas as well as other industries that operate in remote locations in
western Canada.
LRG has approximately 100 camps that include five or six units and can accommodate 20 to 25 crew
members. It can also provide food service for all field workers on a location. LRG also has the
ability to configure several of its camps and dormitories on a single site to create a base camp
for major projects, which can house as many as 200 workers and provide up to 1,000 meals a day.
TERRA WATER SYSTEMS
Terra Water Systems designs and builds treatment units that minimize the environmental impact
from camp generated wastewater. These treatment units are built for the rigors of remote work sites
and Canadas environmental conditions.
Precision acquired Terra Water in August 2006 to complement its existing camp and catering services
and augment its rental accommodation business. Terra Waters portable wastewater treatment units
address the increased focus by operators to minimize the environmental effects related to their
remote work activities.
The units are built to industry-leading standards. Terra Water provides regular servicing for all
of its equipment and tests treated effluent samples to ensure the units are producing high quality
treated effluent with no detectable odours.
Terra Waters large units can accommodate camp sites of up to 50 people and several units can be
combined to serve large-scale base camp con figurations. To meet specific requests from clients,
Terra Water has developed a smaller model which is better suited to lower volume requirements of
remote locations that accommodate less than 15 people.
Down to Earth SAFETY MANAGEMENT
As we have stated in the past, when it comes to safety, Precision wants to make it
personal. We want every employee to think about their personal safety on and off the job starting
with driving to the job site safely, working safely through the days activities and returning home
safely.
Equally, we want every employee to think about the safety of their co-workers, as well as the
safety of our contractors and customers.
For Precision, safety is all about our people our people taking ownership for their own safety,
and making the safety of the people around them their primary concern. As a leader in the Canadian
oilfield services industry, Precision believes that each of our employees can be a safety leader on
the job. Safety is a core value that our employees strive to apply to every aspect of their job,
every single day.
Building on the success of our people is a theme for Precision in 2007. The past year was the
safest in Precisions history and the success achieved by our employees resulted in fewer people
injured. The acknowledgement of 2006 accomplishments and the reinforcement of these safe work
successes is expected to move Precision closer to its Target Zero vision.
In a people-based industry like oilfield services, a companys performance is tied directly to the
health and safety of people in the field doing the job. Safety is a fundamental contributor to
operating performance and the financial results the company generates for its unitholders.
Target Zero sets an ambitious but straightforward objective for Precision and its people: achieve
zero incidents. That vision was laid out by Precisions Executive Chairman, Hank Swartout, years
ago with the message we will not budget to hurt less people, we will work toward hurting no one.
The focus on working safely is one of Precisions most enduring values. Working in the oil and gas
industry has always had inherent risks. It can be tough and physically demanding and often means
working in harsh weather conditions. As a result, a constant focus on working safely is required by
everyone on the job site.
Workplace safety accomplishments by Precisions employees in 2006 resulted in:
|
|
a 28% reduction in workplace injuries 124 fewer employees were injured; and |
|
|
|
5,637 employees achieved Target Zero in 2006 by working recordable free for the entire year. |
Improving on these accomplishments is our motivation for 2007. To meet the task, it is imperative
that all Precision employees, management and customers maintain the initiative to always make
safety awareness their highest priority. That is a cornerstone of
Target Zero Its People... Its
Personal.
Clearly, business units in 2006 remained vigilant and focused on Precisions safety awareness
principles. This led to numerous specific achievements in 2006:
|
|
90% of the Precision Drilling rigs and Precision Well Servicing rigs recorded no lost time incidents. |
|
|
|
281 Precision Drilling rigs and Precision Well Servicing rigs achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
86 of the LRG Catering camps achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
20 of the Live Well Service snubbing units achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
Columbia Oilfield Supply achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
Terra Water Systems achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
Precision Drilling Oilfield Services, Inc. in the U.S. achieved Target Zero. |
|
|
|
Precision Rentals operated with zero lost time incidents. |
|
|
|
Rostel Industries was awarded the Best Safety Performer Award by Alberta Human Resources and Employment. |
Precisions activities generated more than 13.7 million manhours in 2006, including 2.3 million in
the second quarter with not a single lost-time incident in any business unit.
A key improvement area for 2007 will be driving safety, both on and off the job, which is the
biggest threat to people working in the industry. Driving is the leading killer in the Canadian oil
and gas service industry. Precision has launched a number of initiatives to reinforce basic
principles associated with safe driving. For all of Precisions on-the-job success in 2006, there
were members of the Precision family who died in automobiles off the job.
Precision has worked to promote its safety ideals and practices throughout the oil and gas industry
through peer-to-peer learning. As a member of the Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling
Contractors, Petroleum Services Association of Canada and Canadian Petroleum Safety Council,
Precision shares its experiences and best practices with industry members while learning from their
experiences to improve workplace safety.
The Target Zero safety vision is the focal point for all of Precisions health and safety
activities.
Precision begins reinforcing the safety message to new drilling rig employees with its 20-hour
orientation program. The support continues through classroom and field training programs. Examples
of on-going training include technical support in gas detection, confined-space training, fall
protection, well control and environmental spill response.
Precision encourages safe behaviour and develops leaders through its two-day Observation and
Communication workshop. Each year Precision focuses on improving its existing safety programs in
the classroom and in the field.
Precisions Down to Earth values list safety as one of the unquestioned company values but the
reference does not end there. Precisions values also state that employees are empowered to effect
change. Nowhere is that more important than around safety. Precision expects all of its employees
to be leaders in promoting a culture of safety.
For 2007, Precision will build on the successes of its safety performance through its Down to Earth
values. As stated earlier in the Executive Chairmans message Times will change but values
endure. For Precision, there is no more enduring value than the commitment to the health and
safety of its people.
DOWN TO EARTH EXAMPLES OF PRECISIONS SAFETY CULTURE
|
|
Senior management supports safety through field visibility |
|
|
|
Safety initiatives are an important element of the annual budget process |
|
|
|
Support employees through ongoing education |
|
|
|
Investment in new technology includes focus on safety |
|
|
|
Safety department carried out 2,000 field visits in 2006 |
|
|
|
Rig crews conduct pre-tour meetings |
|
|
|
An employees right to refuse unsafe work conditions is tracked and supported |
|
|
|
Workers review safety analysis and safe work procedures before critical tasks |
|
|
|
Safety observations are conducted at worksites |
|
|
|
Learnings are shared at the work site |
|
|
|
High standards of housekeeping are maintained |
|
|
|
Drive to Survive safe driving is encouraged at all times |
|
|
|
Safety is motivated for the right reasons Its
People ... Its Personal |
Down to Earth ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY
ENVIRONMENT
Precision takes a consistent approach to environmental management and has developed systems to
ensure it meets or exceeds environmental standards. Precisions investment in environmental
management begins with equipment design and upgrade, for example:
|
|
rigs are designed with a small footprint to minimize ground disturbance; |
|
|
|
engine upgrades are made to improve fuel efficiency, reduce emissions and suppress noise; |
|
|
|
surface equipment, including well control, is designed to contain spills and leaks; and |
|
|
|
facilities have secondary containment for above ground storage compartments and environmental
spill response equipment and supplies. |
The investment in 2006 to acquire Terra Water Systems provided Precision with the ability to
deliver wastewater treatment services at remote locations to reduce the environmental impact of oil
and gas activity.
For Precision, environmental incidents are reported, investigated, analyzed and followed-up with
appropriate remedial response. Quarterly reports are submitted to senior management and the board
of directors. Precision initiated an environmental site assessment for each of its divisions and
expects a completed report on all properties in 2007.
To meet its commitments, Precision has developed environmental expertise in-house with a focus toward:
|
|
improving environmental management systems; |
|
|
|
field awareness and training; |
|
|
|
conducting environmental compliance audits; |
|
|
|
maintaining a high level of housekeeping standards on equipment and at facilities; |
|
|
|
environmental review during management field visits; and |
|
|
|
timely reporting and remedial measures. |
Environmental protection is a key component of Precisions broader commitment to the health and
safety of its employees and Down to Earth strategy.
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
Precision believes in creating a positive impact in the community by giving back with an emphasis
on charities that are important to its employees and customers.
In 2006, Precision offered financial support to many areas of need including arts, education,
health, community, sports, youth and the environment. Precision proudly sponsors a number of events
each year that provide proceeds to charitable organizations and funds for cultural and
environmental conservation. To provide ongoing support for organizations, certain donations are
made over a three or five-year period, including to organizations such as STARS (the Shock Trauma
Air Rescue Society).
Precision hosts an annual corporate United Way Campaign that yields generous support from the
company and its employees. Precision employees regularly demonstrate a commitment to their
communities through their participation as volunteers for local charities, fundraising events and
coaching youth.
Precision also recognizes the value of post-secondary education and provides opportunities for
children of its employees through the Employees Dependent Scholarship Program. These
scholarships are awarded to applicants pursuing studies at universities, colleges and technical or
arts facilities and who demonstrate superior academic performance, work experience and community
leadership.
Down to Earth GOVERNANCE
Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust) was created by a declaration of trust dated September
22, 2005 and is governed by a board of trustees comprised of three members. The board of trustees
has delegated a number of its duties to Precision Drilling Corporation (the Corporation),
administrator of the Trust. The Corporation is governed by a board of ten directors and managed by
our executive management team. Our investors hold units of the Trust or, if eligible to do so,
Class B Limited Partnership units of Precision Drilling Limited Partnership (PDLP), a subsidiary
of the Trust, whose units are the economic equivalent of, and exchangeable on a one-for-one basis
into, units of the Trust. Holders of units of the Trust and PDLP are herein referred to as
unitholders.
At Precision, corporate governance means more than simply complying with a code. We believe that a
strong culture of corporate governance and ethical behavior in decision-making is fundamental to
the way we do business. We therefore keep a close eye on best practices and constantly develop and
improve our own governance framework accordingly. Throughout 2006 we continued to enhance our focus
on good corporate governance by building on our existing practices.
Some examples of the Trusts governance include:
|
|
100% of the trustees of the Trust are independent (3 out of 3); |
|
|
|
90% of the directors of the Corporation are independent (9 out of 10); |
|
|
|
All members of the audit, compensation, and corporate governance and nominating committees are independent; |
|
|
|
An independent director serves as the lead director of the board of directors; |
|
|
|
The independent members of the board of directors meet regularly without the presence of management; |
|
|
|
The board of directors oversees and approves the annual strategic plan; |
|
|
|
The board of directors committees and chairs operate under written charters setting out their responsibilities; |
|
|
|
The Trust has unit ownership guidelines for trustees, directors, officers and senior management; |
|
|
|
The Trust has a joint code of business conduct and ethics policy to ensure that matters are
handled ethically and with integrity; |
|
|
|
The board of directors conducts an annual self-evaluation to determine whether it and its
committees are functioning effectively; |
|
|
|
The Trust has a whistleblower hotline to facilitate anonymous reporting of any questionable
activities; and |
|
|
|
The Trust continues to evaluate best practices in corporate governance and incorporate those that
are in the best interests of unitholders. |
The Trusts corporate governance structures, systems and practices conform with the applicable
governance rules and guidelines established by the Canadian Securities Administrators and the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The units of the Trust are listed for trading on
the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.
A complete description of the Trusts corporate governance practices is set out in the Trusts 2007
Information Circular which will be available online in April 2007 on Precisions website at
www.precisiondrilling.com.
Down to Earth TRUSTEES AND DIRECTORS
W.C. (MICKEY) DUNN(2)(3) Edmonton, Alberta
Director
Mr. Dunn is the Chairman of the Board of True Energy Trust, a founding shareholder and director of
Rentcash Inc., a director of Vero Energy Inc. and a director of Cork Exploration Inc. Previously,
Mr. Dunn was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cardium Service and Supply Limited, Cardium
Tool Services Inc. and Colorado Silica Sand Inc. He has been a Director of Precision since
September 1992.
BRIAN A. FELESKY(3) CM, Q.C. Calgary, Alberta
Director
Mr. Felesky is counsel to Felesky Flynn LLP, a law firm specializing in tax and trust law. Mr.
Felesky is a Co-Chair, Homefront (a domestic abuse charitable organization), Vice-Chair Canada West
Foundation, a member of the Senate of Athol Murray College of Notre Dame, a board member of the
Calgary Stampede Foundation and the Calgary Arts Development Authority. Mr. Felesky also serves on
the Board of Suncor Energy, Inc., EPCOR Power LP, Fairquest Energy Limited and Resin Systems Inc.
He has been a Director of Precision since December 2005.
ROBERT J.S. GIBSON(1)(3) Calgary, Alberta
Trustee and Director
Mr. Gibson has been President of a private investment firm, Stuart & Company Limited, since 1973
and is also Managing Director of Alsten Holdings Ltd. He has been a Director of Precision since
June 1996 and was appointed to the Board of Trustees in September 2005.
ALLEN R. HAGERMAN Cochrane, Alberta
Director
Mr. Hagerman currently holds the position of Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Oil Sands Limited.
Mr. Hagerman is a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. He also serves on the
Board of Syncrude Canada Limited and EPCOR Power LP. Mr. Hagerman has been a Director of Precision
since December 2006.
STEPHEN J.J. LETWIN Houston, Texas
Director
Mr. Letwin currently holds the position of Executive Vice President, Gas Transportation and
International, Enbridge Inc. Mr. Letwin also serves on the Board of Mancal Corporation, Gaz
Metropolitan, Enbridge Energy Partners, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA),
Canadian Gas Association (CGA) and the C.D. Howe Institute. He has been a Director of Precision
since December 2006.
PATRICK M. MURRAY(1) Dallas, Texas
Trustee and Director
Mr. Murray is Chairman and CEO of Dresser Inc., a member of the American Petroleum Institute, the
Society of Petroleum Engineers, the board of the World Affairs Council of Greater Dallas, the Valve
Manufacturers Association, the Petroleum Equipment Supplier Association, the McGuire Energy
Institute and is a director of Houston-based Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. Mr. Murray has been a
Director of Precision since July 2002 and was appointed to the Board of Trustees in September 2005.
FREDERICK W. PHEASEY(2) Edmonton, Alberta
Director
Mr. Pheasey is the founder and continues to be a director of Dreco Energy Services Ltd., which was
acquired by National Oilwell, Inc. in 1997. He served as Executive Vice President and a director of
National Oilwell, Inc. from 1997 to 2004 and continued to serve on the Board of National Oilwell,
Inc. to May 2005. Mr. Pheasey has been a Director of Precision since July 2002.
ROBERT L. PHILLIPS(2)(3) Vancouver, British Columbia
Director
Mr. Phillips was most recently President and Chief Executive Officer of BCR Group of Companies from
2001 to 2004. Previously, he was Executive Vice President at MacMillan Bloedel Limited (1999
2001), President and Chief Executive Officer of PTI Group Inc. (1998 1999) and President and
Chief Executive Officer of Dreco Energy Services Ltd. (1994 1998). Mr. Phillips has been a
Director of Precision since May 2004 and also serves on the boards of several other major Canadian
corporations.
HANK B. SWARTOUT Calgary, Alberta
Executive Chairman and Director
Mr. Swartout currently holds the position of Executive Chairman of Precision. From November 2005 to
December 2006, Mr. Swartout held the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. For the
period from 1985 through 2005, Mr. Swartout held the position of Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Precision. Previously, he held positions as Manager of Bawden Western Oceanic
Offshore, Vice President of Rig Design and Construction for Dreco, and Manager of Construction for
Nabors Drilling Canada.
H. GARTH WIGGINS(1) Calgary, Alberta
Trustee and Director
Mr. Wiggins is an Advisor to Investments at Lifewealth and President of a private investment firm,
Kamloops Money Management, since 1993. He has been a Principal at Kenway, Mack, Slusarchuk, Stewart
Chartered Accountants from 1995 until October 31, 2006. Previously, he was Vice President Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of Tri Link Resources Ltd. and a partner of Farvolden, Wiggins,
Balderston Chartered Accountants. He has been a Director of Precision since December 1997 and was
appointed to the Board of Trustees in September 2005. Mr. Wiggins will not be standing for
re-election as a Trustee or Director of Precision in 2007.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Committee Member |
|
(2) |
|
Compensation Committee Member |
|
(3) |
|
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Member |
Precision Drilling Trust
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), prepared as at March 9, 2007, focuses on
key statistics from the Consolidated Financial Statements, and pertains to known risks and
uncertainties relating to the oilfield services sector. This discussion should not be considered
all-inclusive, as it does not include all changes that may occur in general economic, political
and environmental conditions. Additionally, other events may or may not occur which could affect
Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust or Precision) in the future. In order to obtain an
overall perspective, this discussion should be read in conjunction with the material contained in
other parts of this annual report, including the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information and Statements on page 1, the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the
related notes. The effects on the Consolidated Financial Statements arising from differences in
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) between Canada and the United States are
described in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information relating to
the Trust, including the Annual Information Form, has been filed with SEDAR and is available at
www.sedar.com.
With the conversion of the continuing assets and businesses of Precision Drilling Corporation to
an income trust on November 7, 2005 pursuant to a plan of arrangement, the Trust, as the
successor in interest to Precision Drilling Corporation, has been accounted for as a continuity
of interest. Commencing with the year ended December 31, 2005 and the comparables for the
quarterly and annual periods for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Trust reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash
flows as if the Trust had always carried on the business formerly carried on by Precision
Drilling Corporation.
HIGHLIGHTS
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per diluted unit/share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,437,584 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,179 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
$ |
1,028,488 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
|
595,279 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
331,313 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
572,512 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
220,848 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
188,131 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax (2) |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
1,409,715 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
59,273 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
579,589 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
1,630,563 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
247,404 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Cash provided by continuing operations |
|
|
609,744 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
206,013 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
286,437 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Net capital spending from
continuing operations (3) |
|
|
233,693 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
140,077 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
113,897 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Distributions declared cash |
|
|
447,001 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
70,510 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared in-kind |
|
|
24,523 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per diluted unit/share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Distributions declared cash |
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared in-kind |
|
|
0.195 |
|
|
|
n/m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes gain on disposition of discontinued operations. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes acquisitions and discontinued operations. |
|
n/m calculation not meaningful. |
FINANCIAL POSITION AND
RATIOS
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
166,484 |
|
|
$ |
152,754 |
|
|
$ |
557,311 |
|
Working capital ratio |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
$ |
140,880 |
|
|
$ |
96,838 |
|
|
$ |
718,850 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,761,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,882 |
|
|
$ |
3,852,049 |
|
Long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity (1) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
Long-term debt to cash provided by continuing operations (1) |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
Interest coverage (2) |
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes current portion of long-term debt which is included in working capital.
|
|
(2) |
|
Operating earnings divided by net interest expense. |
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
Fiscal 2006 marked a new chapter in Precisions development. During the second half of 2005
there were certain events that changed the course of our company. Precision sold 55% of its asset
base, agreed to non-compete provisions restricting certain operational scope to Canada and the
United States through August 2008, realized a gain of $1.3 billion and used the proceeds to
eliminate $0.7 billion in public debt and to return $2.9 billion in cash and marketable
securities to its shareholders. Following these strategic transactions, Precision converted its
continuing Canadian operations into an income trust structure, pursuant to shareholder approval,
on November 7, 2005.
After more than 50 years of operating as either a private or public corporation with no regular
dividends to its owners, Precision commenced 2006 with a new capital structure geared toward the
flow-through of cash pursuant to a distribution policy managed by its Trustees. After almost a
decade of reinvesting a substantial amount of retained earnings toward growth in international
markets and certain downhole technologies, Precision returned to its core business segment,
contract drilling, and its dominant market position in Canada.
The strategy for the continuing business platform in Canada is an affirmation of Precisions
prior operational model and for the near term sets the focus on the Canadian marketplace. The
emphasis is to build upon our core group of people, augment the services we provide our
customers, passionately pursue our Target Zero safety vision and continue to grow and be
profitable. Precision set its growth objectives with a view to participate in market
opportunities throughout North America with a long-term objective to consolidate higher cost,
less efficient competitors and those with a common operational philosophy of providing safe
customer solutions through superior technology, process and personnel.
For 2006 this strategy took root with many noteworthy developments.
Profitability
|
|
Precision benefited from strong industry fundamentals carried over from a banner 2005 to
generate record earnings from continuing operations for 2006 of $573 million or $4.56 per unit. |
|
|
|
Precision generated operating earnings of $595 million, an increase of $130 million or 28% over
2005. |
Growth
|
|
Net capital spending in 2006 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment increased
67% or $94 million over the prior year to $234 million. Before considering proceeds on asset
disposals of $29 million, Precision spent $92 million toward the productive capacity maintenance
of its existing asset base and $171 million on expansionary initiatives. |
|
|
|
Precision established a contract drilling operation in the United States and currently
operates two rigs. |
|
|
|
|
Precision added 13 new and decommissioned two drilling rigs in its Canadian fleet. By the
end of the first quarter of 2008, Precision expects to be operating a North American drilling
fleet of 260 rigs, 13% more than at the end of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Precision commenced the construction of two service rigs under a long-term customer
arrangement, for deployment in the first half of 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The snubbing, camp and catering and rental divisions grew existing product lines in
response to market
conditions.
|
Augment Customer Services
|
|
On August 17, 2006 Precision acquired a wastewater treatment business for remote work sites
which complements our camp and catering and wellsite rental businesses and enhances our level of
customer service. |
Passionately Pursue Target Zero Safety Vision
|
|
Precision moved closer to its safety vision with a renewed focus on the basic elements of
its health, safety and environmental program. The improvement in safe work practices continued
for Precision, resulting in a 28% reduction in workplace injuries. |
Build Upon Our Core Group of People
|
|
A North American shortage of skilled and experienced oilfield employees carried into 2006.
Precision focused on the retention of existing employees through initiatives that provide a safe
and productive work environment, opportunity for advancement and added wage security through
programs such as our Designated Driller Program. |
|
|
|
The Canadian drilling industry has taken an important step forward with the 2006 commencement
of a compulsory journeyman trade program through the Alberta government, the rig technician
designation, the first of its kind in the world. Precision has been involved in the development
of this initiative from the beginning. |
|
|
|
Precision continued to transition executive roles through a succession process that began in
September 2005. Precision announced in October 2006 that its founder, Hank Swartout, would
relinquish his position as Chief Executive Officer and assume the role of Executive Chairman
effective January 1, 2007. Precision has initiated and continues to develop a more involved
strategic planning process. |
|
|
|
Precision completed its internal control certification over financial reporting pursuant to
Canadian and United States securities regulations. The initiative was led through internal
efforts that sharpened our awareness of the joint code of business conduct and ethics policy and
provided numerous opportunities for Precisions management to build upon its skill in identifying
and managing risk. |
Cash Distributions to Unitholders
|
|
With its conversion to an income trust on November 7, 2005 Precision converted from a cash
retention to a cash flow-through model. For 2006, Precisions first full year as an income trust,
Precision declared cash distributions of $447 million or $3.56 per unit. |
|
|
|
Distributable cash from operations of $495 million resulted in a cash distribution declared
payout ratio of 90% for 2006. This calculation starts with $610 million in cash provided from
operations less $92 million for productive capacity maintenance capital expenditures and $23
million for unfunded long-term incentive plan obligations. The remaining $48 million was retained
to fund other investing and financing activities. |
In summary, 2006 was a very successful year for Precision. We delivered record-setting financial
and safety results through our industry leading market position and operational processes. We
generated growth opportunities in our core Canadian market area and we established a new growth
platform in the United States drilling market.
In form, our new capital structure as an income trust had an excellent start in 2006. Strong
operating cash flow performance led to $472 million declared distributions to unitholders. At
this level, the maximum flow-through potential of Precisions underlying pre-tax income was
obtained. The remaining taxable income in the subsidiaries of Precision Drilling Trust led to a
2006 current income tax expense of $35 million.
By the fourth quarter of 2006, strong business fundamentals were showing clear signs of being
eroded as the volatility and declining trend in natural gas pricing slowed customer demand from
record levels and downward pressure on pricing for the oilfield service industry was experienced.
While customer pricing for Precision has held at record rates, declining demand and the
additional supply of new industry equipment resulted in lower utilization to begin 2007 and lower
pricing is expected to follow once the seasonal spring break-up begins in March. Through the
first two months of 2007 drilling rig operating days were 19% lower than 2006 even though
Precisions fleet was
5% larger. For Precisions service rig fleet in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB),
operating hours for the first two months of 2007 were 15% lower.
Deteriorating business conditions in Canada were compounded by the Government of Canadas tax
announcements on October 31, 2006 and its clarification regarding normal growth for income trusts
on December 15, 2006.
|
|
If the proposed measures are enacted into law, effective January 1, 2011, the current
underlying flow-through status of Precisions current income trust structure will be ended. The
proposed amendments have negative implications for certain unitholders of Precision commencing in
2011, particularly Canadian tax-exempt investors, foreign investors and tax-exempt entities. |
|
|
|
Nonetheless, Precisions operational business model remains intact. |
|
|
|
Precision originally converted to a trust because the tax rules of the day allowed the market
to place a higher value for unitholders on the flow-through structure than the traditional
corporate structure. In light of the proposed legislative changes, it is incumbent on the Board
of Trustees to examine whether changes in the current legal structure and capital structure are
appropriate and in the best interests of unitholders and, if so, when such changes should be
implemented. |
Monitoring of the current operating environment in North America is also warranted as a
significant quantity of new equipment is under construction and Precisions level of customer
demand uncertainty is higher than it has been in the past five years. This shift in momentum is
not new. Precision operates in the cyclical energy sector and our business model has evolved to
ensure that we are in a position to take advantage of opportunities through all stages. Given the
competitiveness and inherent risk factors involved, Precisions strategy is patience,
flexibility, financial prudence and opportunism.
A strong balance sheet has been a key performance driver for Precision over the years. Low debt
levels at the peak and bottom of a cycle enabled Precision to cope with lower operating cash
flows and provided the financial leverage to invest in meaningful growth as opportunities arose.
The Canadian oilfield service sector has undergone significant growth in equipment supply due to
a surge in natural gas well drilling over the past five years. Declining demand conditions in
2007 have created excess drilling rig capacity and a severe drop, or persistent decline in
demand, may result in opportunities for industry consolidation.
Currently, Precisions financial performance is heavily dependant on industry fundamentals within
Canada. These fundamentals are 70% weighted towards natural gas wells and the volatility that
exists with seasonal shifts and customer spending associated with the WCSB.
For 2007, Precisions strategy remains focused on opportunities in Canada and the United States
and 2006 developments are expected to move Precision forward in a more competitive marketplace.
Precisions growth strategy is to diversify our earnings base so that Precision is active in many
of the significant oil and natural gas basins in North America. Our participation in these basins
is focused on providing our customers with a level of service and capability that sets our
performance apart from the competition. Just as Precision has become a prominent SAGD driller for
major projects in Canadas oil sands, our participation in the United States through two drilling
rigs is setting the stage for further opportunity.
For the past two years, growth has been achieved through the construction of new drilling rigs.
The type of rig being built by Precision is a long-term investment geared toward performance and
the lowering of customer well costs. These versatile rigs are of a type and design that is
capable of drilling in North Americas unconventional resource areas and in many other areas of
the world.
The U.S. drilling rig count is about three times larger than Canadas. At present, Precision is a
substantial Canadian oilfield service company and the dominant player with 29% and 23% of the
drilling and service rig markets, respectively. For Precision, the United States is an untapped
growth area that has been renewed by unconventional natural gas production. For the first time in
Precisions history, the company is working to establish permanent operations in the United
States, a market that today has approximately 2,300 drilling rigs. We are moving in this
direction even though we expect rig demand in the United States to moderate. If this occurs, we
believe that rigs with poor mobility and old components will find it difficult to compete. This
high grading of equipment plays into Precisions operational strategy.
Drilling and service rigs make up approximately 90% of Precisions revenue and have always been
the core business platform and areas of expertise for the company. Precision is planning to work
within core customer relationships to broaden market opportunities in North America. We are
focused on equipment that moves technology and processes forward to minimize costs and enable
customers to exploit the full oil and natural gas potential of their land holdings.
SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Drilling Services |
|
$ |
1,009,821 |
|
|
$ |
916,221 |
|
|
$ |
727,710 |
|
Completion and Production Services |
|
|
441,017 |
|
|
|
369,667 |
|
|
|
313,386 |
|
Inter-Segment Elimination |
|
|
(13,254 |
) |
|
|
(16,709 |
) |
|
|
(12,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,437,584 |
|
|
|
1,269,179 |
|
|
|
1,028,488 |
|
|
Operating earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Drilling Services |
|
|
473,624 |
|
|
|
404,385 |
|
|
|
282,315 |
|
Completion and Production Services |
|
|
163,119 |
|
|
|
121,643 |
|
|
|
77,074 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(41,464 |
) |
|
|
(60,650 |
) |
|
|
(28,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
595,279 |
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
|
|
331,313 |
|
|
Interest, net |
|
|
8,029 |
|
|
|
29,270 |
|
|
|
46,280 |
|
Premium on redemption of bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
587,658 |
|
|
|
293,231 |
|
|
|
289,932 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
15,146 |
|
|
|
72,383 |
|
|
|
101,801 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
572,512 |
|
|
|
220,848 |
|
|
|
188,131 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,409,715 |
|
|
|
59,273 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
579,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,630,563 |
|
|
$ |
247,404 |
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2006, Precisions earnings from continuing operations were a
record $573 million or $4.56 per diluted unit compared to $221 million or $1.76 per diluted unit
in 2005. In the prior year, earnings from continuing operations were reduced by one-time charges
of $160 million or $1.04 per diluted unit, net of tax. The lower effective income tax rate as an
income trust and enacted tax rate reductions contributed an increase over the prior year of $1.21
per diluted unit. The remaining increase of $0.55 per diluted unit was due in large part to
pricing and activity strength in the first half of 2006. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude
oil averaged US$66.11 per barrel in 2006 versus US$56.49 in 2005 and Henry Hub natural gas
averaged US$6.73 per MMBtu in 2006 versus US$8.95 in 2005.
Natural gas prices in North America peaked in December 2005 at US$15.39 per MMBtu and declined to
about half that level by December 2006. There were 7% fewer wells (22,575) drilled in western
Canada from the record in 2005 and only the first quarter showed a year-over-year increase from
2005 drilling.
Despite a decline in wells drilled, the 158,416 industry operating days were slightly higher than
2005 and established a new record for Canadas drilling contractors. Deeper drilling and fewer
shallow gas and coal bed methane wells increased the average operating days per well by 8% from
6.5 to 7.0 in 2006.
Higher oil prices and lower gas prices prompted some customers to shift drilling dollars to oil
prospects in 2006
which led to the most oil completions since 1997. The increase in well licenses issued for oil
targets was not enough to offset a decline in conventional gas permits and an even bigger drop
for coal bed methane wells. Oil licenses reached 6,770, the most since 2000, while permits to
drill for gas declined 15% to 18,270.
The year ended on a weak note as the spot price for natural gas decreased amid concerns over high
gas storage levels and expectations of a warm winter in North America. Oil prices also retreated
in the fourth quarter from a record high in July but remained relatively strong. Henry Hub
natural gas spot prices ranged from a fourth quarter high of US$8.45 per MMBtu to a low of
US$3.62 on September 29, 2006, compared to a range of US$15.39 to US$8.79 in the same quarter of
the prior year. The one-year forward price for North American natural gas weakened to trade in a
range of approximately $6.50 to $8.50 on Canadian and U.S. exchanges in the quarter. During 2006,
the persistent downward trend in commodity prices, natural gas in particular, led to lower demand
in the fourth quarter for all of Precisions services in western Canada.
OUTLOOK
The oil and gas industry in Canada lost momentum as 2006 progressed after four years of
growth in operating and financial results. The hurricane devastation in the U.S. Gulf Coast in
September 2005 created a strong pricing environment for 2006 natural gas drilling activity,
however, a persistent downward trend in natural gas pricing adversely affected second half
activity levels in the WCSB. The backlog of drilling work quickly depleted and fourth quarter
activity was the lowest since 2002.
Fundamentally, we believe there is too much gas in storage in the short term and not enough
supply in the long term which should ultimately lead to a recovery in drilling activity.
Clearly, there is negative sentiment toward anticipated drilling levels in 2007. The year is
likely to yield far more uncertainty as companies reduce spending because lower cash flows in
conjunction with higher finding and development costs are undermining the economics of gas
drilling in the WCSB.
Increasingly, Precisions results are driven by the fundamentals for natural gas production and
consumption in North America. Moderate gas consumption during the past two winters has left
storage levels in the United States trending higher than the five-year average. This has caused
natural gas commodity prices to decline and generally customer cash flows have followed, with
significant declines reported in the fourth quarter of 2006 as compared to the fourth quarter of
2005. This downward trend has reduced drilling economics and many of Precisions large customers
with global operations have reduced their 2007 Canadian drilling budgets.
For 2007, the operating environment for Precision will be challenging. While customer pricing for
drilling rigs has held to begin the first quarter, there are signs of market deterioration. For
January and February 2007, industry gas well licensing in western Canada is down approximately
30% over 2006. In this same period, Precisions drilling and service rigs have been less active
by 19% and 15%, respectively. Customer pricing in the spot market for available equipment is
lower than winter 2006/2007 rates. The commissioning of previously announced new equipment will
increase industry capacity. With lower 2007 drilling budgets for many of Precisions large
customers, Precision will have a higher proportion of its drilling rig fleet available for spot
market work than it has had for the previous three years. Further, inflationary pressures from
Albertas strong economy and an active U.S. drilling industry are expected to increase operating
costs and maintenance capital expenditures per drilling operating day.
The shallow gas market was the most affected by the slowdown in activity but it also has the
potential to recover quickly in response to higher natural gas prices. Deeper drilling programs
tend to require more lead time and will typically react more slowly to a recovery in commodity
prices.
Drilling activity trends influence well completion work and commodity prices influence the
servicing or workover of existing oil and natural gas wells in production. For Precisions
service rigs in 2007, reduced drilling rig activity is expected to lower completion work. Early
indications are that workovers for conventional oil and heavy oil wells are reasonably firm,
however, Precision does not expect this to be enough to compensate for lower activity for
producing gas wells.
As of March 9, 2007, the supply and demand fundamentals for North American natural gas are
beginning to show
cause for optimism. Winter consumption of gas over the first two months of 2007 has lowered
United States natural gas storage from prior year levels by approximately 10%. The AECO spot
price for Alberta natural gas was 18% higher than a year ago at $7.44 per Mcf and the NYMEX
12-month strip natural gas price of US$8.09 was essentially flat.
While these developments are positive, Precision believes it will take time for its customers to
realize higher cash flows and increase their drilling and well servicing expenditures over prior
year levels. Looking ahead, high natural gas consumption for summer cooling, weather related
natural gas supply disruptions in the Gulf of Mexico and a slowing of U.S. gas drilling could
have a favourable impact on natural gas commodity prices and result in higher Canadian drilling
activity. To the extent that these events are unfavourable, the increasing rate of decline for
new producing wells in North America lowers the supply of gas and eventually should result in
higher drilling activity.
Precision remains positive on the medium to long term fundamentals for the North American onshore
drilling industry. With a strategy to broaden its market presence and diversify into the United
States, Precision intends to deploy rigs from its Canadian fleet for core customers to the major
producing basins.
As producers struggle to increase output and growth in oil and gas consumption exceeds new
supply, capital spending cutbacks will have a material impact on field productivity and set the
stage for recovery. With a recovery as early as winter 2007/2008, a continuing trend in deep
natural gas plays and expanding in-situ oil sands development, Precision is well positioned with
its large, versatile fleet of rigs and support services.
DYNAMICS OF THE OILFIELD SERVICES INDUSTRY
Through this report, management is presenting its views of Precisions business and the
industry in which it operates. Understanding the oil and gas industry and the factors that impact
demand for oilfield services is important to assess Precisions long-term strategy,
opportunities, financial performance and distribution potential.
GLOBAL MARKETS
For more than a century, global economic growth and prosperity has been largely driven by
energy consumption. In that time, crude oil and natural gas have proven to be the cheapest and
most versatile sources of energy. Oil and its by-products provide fuel for virtually all of the
worlds automobiles while oil and natural gas are primary fuel sources for generating heat and
electricity and are critical building blocks for countless consumer products.
With 6 billion people worldwide and the population expected to rise by another 1.5 billion in the
next 20 years, global energy demand is unprecedented and rising. Energy consumption is predicted
to rise 50% to 60% by 2030, as illustrated below, with oil, natural gas and coal meeting
approximately 80% of demand. World oil consumption is predicted to rise 1.6% in 2007 due largely
to growing demand in China, India and other developing countries. Delivering reliable and
affordable energy for these fast-growing and upwardly mobile populations is one of the major
challenges society faces in this century.
There is growing concern about the connection between burning fossil fuels and climate change. In
February 2007, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reiterated calls for
action on fossil fuel consumption citing the links to hotter temperatures and rising sea levels.
As environmental concerns over carbon dioxide emissions increase, natural gas becomes a more
appealing fuel choice, particularly for electricity generation as it is less carbon intensive
than traditional fuel sources such as coal. Despite the environmental challenges, crude oil and
natural gas are the worlds primary energy sources. History has proven it takes decades, if not
centuries, to displace energy sources and hydrocarbon production will remain crucial to the
worlds energy needs for the foreseeable future.
NORTH AMERICAN MARKETS
Economics of the oilfield service industry are aligned with global and regional fundamentals.
Important regional drivers for the industry in Canada include the underlying hydrocarbon make-up
of the WCSB and the existence of an established, competitive and efficient service
infrastructure. Natural gas production increasingly drives
economics in the WCSB as approximately 70% of new well completions in 2006 targeted natural gas.
Drilling activity in the WCSB is split between the provinces with approximately 75% in Alberta,
15% in Saskatchewan and 10% in British Columbia. Areas of Canadas north hold significant future
promise but remain largely untapped frontier opportunities pending government and community
support.
The hydrocarbon structure of the WCSB is diverse. Conventional oil and natural gas reservoirs
exist at a variety of depths which are comparatively shallow by global standards. These
conventional sources are accompanied by more costly and challenging unconventional reservoirs
associated with oil sands, heavy oil, coal bed methane and natural gas in deeper, low
permeability formations.
A vast natural resource base and next-door proximity to the worlds biggest energy consumer have
helped Canada to become the worlds eighth largest oil producer and third largest producer of
natural gas. With oil sands development, Canada is one of the few countries with growing
petroleum production.
A highly integrated continental energy transportation system and free-market access to U.S.
markets has made Canada one of the largest energy providers to the United States. Approximately
half of Canadian oil and gas production is exported to the United States.
ECONOMIC DRIVERS OF THE OILFIELD SERVICES BUSINESS
Providing oil and natural gas products to consumers involves a number of players, each taking
on different risks in the exploration, production, refining and distribution processes.
Exploration and production companies, Precisions customers, assume the risk of finding
hydrocarbons in reservoirs of sufficient size to economically develop and produce. The economics
are dictated by the current and expected future margin between the cost to find and develop
hydrocarbons and the eventual price of these products. The wider the margin, the greater the
incentive to undertake these risks.
Exploration and development activities include acquiring access to prospective lands, seismic
surveying to detect hydrocarbon bearing structures, drilling wells and completing successful
wells for production. Exploration and production companies hire oilfield service companies to
perform the majority of these jobs. The revenue for an oilfield service company is part of the
finding and development costs for an exploration and production company.
The economics of an oilfield service company are largely driven by the price of crude oil and
natural gas realized by its customers. Since oil can be transported relatively easily, it is
priced in a global market influenced by an array of economic and political factors. Natural gas
is priced in continental markets due to restrictions on overseas transportation capabilities.
The emergence of liquefied natural gas (LNG) is an important new source of supply to North
America that could offset production declines from mature reservoirs and help meet rising gas
demand. There are still technical, political and environmental challenges for significant LNG
developments to occur in North America, but it is widely projected to be a necessary source of
supply as demand for natural gas increases.
Over the past two years, rising demand, tight supply and concern over political and weather
factors disrupting supply have driven commodity pricing to record levels. The dramatic price rise
over a relatively short period has created uncertainty over the sustainability of high cash flows
in the industry. Cash flows are critical to replacing production in the upstream sector.
Oil prices, which rose above US$78 per barrel in July 2006, are impacted by global factors such
as worldwide economic growth, political and social unrest in major producing regions, global
weather patterns, policies of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, commodity market
speculation and industrialization in developing countries.
Natural gas, which peaked in North America at US$15.39 per MMBtu in December 2005, is impacted by
factors such as regional economic activity, oil prices, commodity market speculation and, most
significantly, the severity of weather in the major population centres across North America.
There is currently a narrow supply-demand balance. Many industry observers believe a new pricing
floor is being
set due to the combination of production declines and demand growth. New hydrocarbon reserves are
clearly more costly and difficult to discover and develop. It has taken record drilling activity
over the last three years in North America to maintain overall natural gas production levels. The
following illustration demonstrates declines in WCSB new well productivity.
The graph for western Canada above suggests more wells will be required to meet supply needs. In
the WCSB, incremental new gas well production has decreased with the development of shallow gas
reservoirs. With record drilling in the last two years (17,769 gas wells in 2005 and 15,640 in
2006) new gas wells only produced an average 215 Mcf per day in 2006 compared with 740 Mcf per
day in 1996. In the 1990s the industry drilled approximately 10,000 wells per year in Canada. In
this decade the number of wells has averaged approximately 20,000 per year. Natural gas drilling
represented approximately 38% of the wells drilled in the 1990s compared to 67% of the wells
drilled in the current decade.
Onshore North America is characterized by mature conventional oil and natural gas basins that
require substantial activity to maintain or enhance production.
Rising energy demand coupled with depletion of conventional resource basins has created an
historic shift in the oil and gas industry in North America to develop unconventional resources
such as oil sands, natural gas in shale and coal bed methane. Unconventional reservoirs tend to
be more challenging and expensive to develop than conventional oil and gas reservoirs and
generate more service activity. The biggest unconventional resource in Canada is the estimated
179 billion barrels of oil reserves in northern Albertas oil sands. There are also large
reserves of coal bed methane and shale gas in Canada and the United States. The economics of
unconventional resource plays require significant dependence upon technology such as multi-well
pad locations, slant drilling rigs and advanced reservoir stimulation techniques.
Reserves to production ratios, which indicate how quickly reserves are depleting, have flattened
after a period of decline starting in the 1990s. The result is drilling activity must stay level
or increase just to maintain current production and it is leading producers to drill deeper
resource plays looking for large gas fields to extend reserve life.
The graph above depicts the increase in natural gas completions over the past 10 years and the
correlation to gas pricing. Two successive mild winters have led to high levels of gas in storage
and a corresponding decline in price.
With growing energy demand, the supply of drilling rigs in Canada increased steadily over the
past 13 years to an all-time high of approximately 850. Customer demand, measured by drilling rig
operating day utilization, peaked at 71% in 1997 and has since ranged between 38% and 60%.
Industry utilization was 55% for 2006. Higher utilization levels in 2005 and early 2006 prompted
drilling contractors to add rigs. Many of the new rigs are telescopic doubles, singles or hybrid
coil tubing rigs which are geared to shallow drilling and peak winter demand. In the long term,
the larger fleet provides capacity to drill more wells through better year-round utilization. In
order to sustain an industry operating day utilization rate of 55%, assuming seven operating days
per well and 850 available rigs, there would need to be almost 24,500 wells drilled in the WCSB
in 2007. The CAODC is currently estimating that only 19,023 wells will be drilled in 2007.
Approximately 72 drilling rigs were added to the Canadian fleet during 2006, a 9% increase to the
total. Despite market softness expected for much of 2007, long-term customer demand to drill
conventional oil and gas wells, in combination with improving commercialization of coal bed
methane, oil sands and tight gas formations will drive future rig demand.
Just as natural gas is a North American commodity so too are drilling rigs. Many rigs are able to
work in Canada or the United States and it is notable that the Canadian drilling rig count is at
an all time high and the U.S. rig count is approximately half the capacity of the early 1980s. As
illustrated above, Canadian rig activity fluctuates with the seasons, a phenomenon which
generally does not occur in the United States.
PRECISIONS DEVELOPMENT
PRECISIONS HISTORY OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Precisions history began in western Canada as a land drilling contractor in the 1950s.
Through a series of acquisitions over the years, along with organic growth in its service lines,
Precision has established itself as Canadas largest oilfield services provider.
Precision Drilling Corporation was founded in 1985 as Cypress Drilling Ltd. and grew from four
drilling rigs to 19 with the reverse takeover in 1987 of Precision Drilling Ltd., the company
originally formed in 1952.
In the decade following the takeover, a series of acquisitions expanded Precisions Canadian
drilling fleet to 106 rigs. With the acquisition of Kenting Energy Services Inc. in 1997,
Precision essentially doubled its fleet to 200 rigs representing approximately 40% of the
drilling fleet in Canada. The acquisitions of coil tubing drilling rigs and other shallow
drilling rigs in 2000 rounded out the drilling rig fleet. Today, after strategic new rig builds
and decommissioning, Precisions 240 drilling rigs in Canada comprise approximately 29% of the
market.
To support the expanded rig fleet Precision acquired a number of complementary businesses. In
1993, Precision entered the camp and catering business with the acquisition of LRG Oilfield
Services Ltd. Along with camps from the drilling rig business acquisitions and the purchase in
2003 of McKenzie Caterers (1984) Ltd., this division now has 101 camps. In 1996, Precision added
in-house capabilities for the design, fabrication and maintenance of rig components with the
acquisition of Rostel Industries Ltd. The acquisitions of Columbia Oilfield Supply Ltd. and a
number of other oilfield equipment companies followed in 1997.
Diversification into businesses that would become Precision Well Servicing, Live Well Service and
Precision Rentals began in 1996 with the acquisition of EnServ Corporation that set the stage for
a broadened asset base and future growth. In 2000, Precision became fully vested in the Canadian
service rig business with the acquisition of CenAlta Energy Services Inc. to create a combined
fleet of 257 service rigs and an industry-leading market share of 28%. Today, Precision has 237
service rigs and 26 snubbing units that account for approximately 23% and 30% of their respective
markets. Through additional acquisitions in the late 1990s the rental businesses grew and in 2002
were combined and branded as Precision Rentals. In 2006, Precision expanded into the business of
remote work site wastewater treatment with the acquisition of Terra Water Group Ltd.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION
Precision is tightly integrated in terms of operations, safety, engineering, information
technology, accounting and senior management. Each segment has experienced asset growth and
performs a lead market role. Communication is a skill that has been refined and ingrained in
Precisions operating culture while continuously focusing on safety initiatives to eliminate
workplace incidents. These attributes provide Precision with the ability to pursue the following
strategic initiatives as key factors in maximizing the value proposition for its unitholders:
|
|
maintain a flexible business that is responsive to market conditions; |
|
|
exploit technological advances where markets dictate; |
|
|
focus on organic growth opportunities to enhance and diversify service offerings; |
|
|
capitalize on strategic and accretive acquisitions both geographically and operationally; |
|
|
develop and enhance employee safety, recruitment and retention initiatives; |
|
|
upgrade equipment with customer needs and regulatory requirements in mind; and |
|
|
apply operational and financial discipline throughout all areas of the business. |
KEY PERFORMANCE DRIVERS
Customer economics are dictated by the current and expected margin between the price at which
hydrocarbons are sold and the cost to find and develop those products. Some of the key business,
customer and industry indicators that Precision focuses on to monitor its performance are:
Commodity Prices: Precision monitors the spot and forward prices for oil and
natural gas as these prices impact customer cash flow and funds for capital programs which govern
land acquisition, well licensing and future drilling,
and well servicing activities.
Customer Demand: Precision matches the availability of its equipment with customer
budgets and drilling programs. Precisions fleet is geographically dispersed to meet customer
demands. Relationships with its customers, industry knowledge and new well licenses provide
Precision with the necessary information to evaluate its marketing strategies. Industry rig
utilization statistics are tracked to evaluate Precisions performance against competitors.
Workforce: Precisions employees are its most important asset. Precision closely
monitors crew availability for field operations. Precision focuses on initiatives that provide a
safe and productive work environment, opportunity for advancement and added wage security through
programs to retain employees. Target Zero reinforces Precisions safety vision and safety
statistics are used to benchmark its performance. Precision relies heavily on its safety record
to attract new employees.
Operating Efficiency: Precisions revenue is a component of an oil and gas
companys finding and development costs. Precision maximizes the efficiency of its operations
through its proximity to work sites, its operating practices and its versatility. Precisions
reliable and well maintained equipment minimizes downtime during operations. These factors
contribute to lower customer well costs.
Financial Performance: Precision maximizes revenue without sacrificing operating
margins. Key financial information is unitized on a per day or per hour basis and compared to
established benchmarks and past performance. Precision evaluates the relative strength of its
financial position by monitoring its working capital and debt ratios. Low debt levels have
allowed Precision to manage the cyclical nature of the industry and provide the financial
leverage to invest in meaningful growth opportunities.
Expansion Capital Spending: Precision evaluates growth opportunities based on
internally established rate of return targets. New drilling rig expansion is typically based on
predetermined activity levels over a fixed term operating contract.
OPERATING SEGMENTS
Precision is divided into two operating segments to effectively manage its business, Contract
Drilling Services and Completion and Production Services.
The Contract Drilling Services segment is comprised of the following:
|
|
Precision Drilling which provides land drilling services utilizing 240 drilling rigs,
approximately 29% of the Canadian industry; |
|
|
|
Precision Drilling Oilfield Services, Inc. which provides land drilling services in the United
States and established operations in June 2006 with one rig; |
|
|
|
LRG Catering which supplies camp and catering services with 101 camps, approximately 16% of the
industry; |
|
|
|
Rostel Industries which provides engineering, machining, fabrication, component manufacturing
and repair services for drilling and service rigs; and |
|
|
|
Columbia Oilfield Supply which provides centralized procurement, standardized product
selection, and coordinated distribution of goods for Precisions operations. |
|
The Completion and Production Services segment is comprised of the following: |
|
|
|
Precision Well Servicing which provides well completions and workovers with 237 rigs,
approximately 23% of the industry service rigs; |
|
|
|
Live Well Service which performs well completions and workovers with 26 snubbing units,
approximately 30% of the industry; |
|
|
|
Precision Rentals which supplies approximately 15,000 rental equipment items including well
control equipment, surface equipment, specialty tubulars and wellsite accommodation units
representing approximately 10% of the
industry; and |
|
|
Terra Water Systems Limited Partnership which operates 51 wastewater treatment units,
representing approximately 10% of the industry. |
Precision Drilling
The following table lists the drilling depth capability of Precisions and industrys
Canadian drilling rigs in the WCSB as at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precision Fleet |
|
|
Industry Fleet(1) |
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depth Rating |
|
|
Number |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Number |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
Type of Drilling Rig |
|
(metres) |
|
|
of Rigs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Share (3) |
|
|
of Rigs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Change(4) |
|
|
Single |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Super SingleTM (2) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Double |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Light triple |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Heavy triple |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Coiled tubing |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Source: Daily Oil Bulletin Rig Locator Report as of January 2007. Precision has
allocated the industry rig fleet by rig type.
|
|
(2) |
|
Super SingleTM excludes single rigs that do not have automated pipe-handling systems, or do
not have a self-contained top drive, or cannot run range 3 drill pipe/casing. |
|
(3) |
|
Market share means Precisions rigs as a percent of the industrys rigs. |
|
(4) |
|
Change in number of industry rigs as compared to the prior year. |
The table below summarizes the capabilities of Precision Drillings North American drilling
rig fleet for the past four years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Depth Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Drilling Rig |
|
Metres |
|
|
Feet |
|
|
Horsepower |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Single |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
250-300 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Super SingleTM |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
400-600 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Double |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
300-500 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Light triple |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
500-750 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Heavy triple |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
1,000-2,000 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Coiled tubing |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
250-300 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
Precision Well Servicing
The configuration of Precision Well Servicings Canadian fleet for the past four years is illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Service Rig |
|
Horsepower |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Singles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
150-400 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Freestanding mobile |
|
|
150-400 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Doubles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
250-550 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Freestanding mobile |
|
|
200-550 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Skid |
|
|
300-860 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Slants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freestanding |
|
|
250-400 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
CAPACITY TO DELIVER
Precision is a major supplier of services to oil and gas companies and its success is
dependant on providing a complement of oilfield services that are cost effective to its
customers. Precision prides itself on providing quality equipment operated by highly experienced
and well trained crews. Maintaining customer relationships is fundamental to Precisions success
and based in large part upon the ability to deliver.
Large Diversified Rig Fleets
Precisions large diverse fleet of rigs is strategically deployed across the most active
regions of the WCSB. When an oil and gas company needs a specific type and size of rig in a given
area, there is a high likelihood that a Precision rig will be readily available. Geographic
proximity and fleet versatility make Precision a premium service provider.
Precisions drilling rigs have varying configurations and capabilities, with drilling depth
capacities of up to 6,700 metres. Rig categories where Precision dominates correlate well with
future drilling opportunities. Deeper depth rigs target foothills natural gas, while Super
SingleTM rigs are effective in shallow to medium depths including oil sands and heavy oil
drilling.
Precisions service rigs provide completion, workover, abandonment, well maintenance, high
pressure and critical sour well work and well re-entry preparation across the WCSB. The rigs are
supported by three field locations in Alberta, two in Saskatchewan and one in British Columbia.
Snubbing complements traditional natural gas well servicing by allowing customers to work on
wells while they are pressurized and production has been suspended. Precision has two types of
snubbing units rig assist and stand alone. Stand alone units do not require a service rig on
site and are capable of snubbing and performing many other well servicing procedures.
Inventory of Ancillary Equipment
Precision has a large inventory of equipment, including portable top drives, loaders,
boilers, tubulars and well control equipment, to support its fleet of drilling and service rigs
to meet customer requirements. Precision also maintains an inventory of key rig components to
minimize downtime due to equipment failures.
In support of drilling rig operations, LRG Catering supplies meals and provides accommodation for
rig crews at remote worksites. Terra Water Systems plays an essential role in providing
wastewater treatment services for LRG Catering and other camp facilities. Precision Rentals
supplies customers with an inventory of 15,000 pieces of specialized equipment and wellsite
accommodations.
Industry-leading Safety Program
Safety is critical for Precision and its customers. In 2006, almost 300 rigs and four
Precision business units achieved Target Zero, Precisions safety vision for eliminating
workplace incidents. Precision is a leader in adopting technological advancements which have made
drilling rigs, service rigs and snubbing units safer.
Well-maintained Equipment
Precision consistently reinvests capital to sustain and upgrade existing property, plant and
equipment its productive capacity maintenance.
In addition to capital expenditures as illustrated above, equipment repair and maintenance
expenses are benchmarked to activity levels in accordance with Precisions maintenance and
certification programs. Precision employs computer technology to track key preventative
maintenance indicators for major rig components to record equipment performance history, schedule
equipment certifications, reduce downtime and allow for better asset management.
Precision benefits from internal services for equipment certifications and component
manufacturing provided by Rostel Industries and for standardization and distribution of
consumable oilfield products through Columbia Oilfield Supply.
Employees
As a service company, Precision is only as good as its people. An experienced, competent crew
is a competitive strength and highly valued by customers. To recruit rig employees, Precision has
centralized personnel departments and orientation and training programs.
Information Systems
Precisions commitment to invest in a fully integrated enterprise-wide accounting system has
improved business performance through real-time access to information across all functional areas
of the company. All divisions operate on a common integrated system using standardized business
processes across finance, payroll, equipment maintenance, procurement and inventory control.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
CONTRACT DRILLING SERVICES SEGMENT
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except where indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,009,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
916,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
727,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
470,713 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
448,930 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
382,886 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
27,225 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
23,911 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
19,190 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
38,573 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
39,233 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
42,245 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
$ |
473,624 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
$ |
404,385 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
$ |
282,315 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Number of drilling rigs (end of year) |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Drilling operating days |
|
|
44,938 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
46,937 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
41,625 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Drilling revenue per operating day ($/day) |
|
|
20,518 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
18,034 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
16,494 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Drilling statistics: (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of wells drilled |
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
7,766 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Average days per well |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Number of metres drilled (000s) |
|
|
7,810 |
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
8,901 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
8,021 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Average metres per well |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
|
(2) |
|
Canadian operations only. |
2006 Compared to 2005
The Contract Drilling Services segment, in 2006, generated record financial results on
the strength of improved pricing and the third highest total drilling days in company history.
Revenue increased by $94 million or 10% over 2005 to $1.0 billion while operating earnings
increased by $69 million or 17% to $474 million. Operating earnings increased to 47% of revenue
in 2006 as compared to 44% in 2005. The operating earnings margin increase was primarily
attributable to pricing established in the fourth quarter of 2005 and other pricing increases
which held throughout 2006.
Operating costs declined from 49% of revenue in 2005 to 47% in 2006. On a per operating day
basis, costs increased slightly due to higher crew wages and cost of materials. Lower equipment
utilization increased the per operating day cost associated with fixed operating cost components.
Variable costs are controlled through extensive analysis and cost awareness. This combined with
the ability to mitigate cost escalations through volume purchasing and relationships with
suppliers further enhanced profitability.
The momentum in activity that started to build at the beginning of the third quarter of 2005
continued through the winter drilling season and the start of the 2006 spring break-up. The first
half of 2006 was one of the strongest drilling periods on record for the WCSB. However, a
persistent downward trend in the natural gas price over the second half of 2006 adversely
affected activity levels as the backlog of drilling work quickly depleted and the fourth quarter
saw the lowest fourth quarter activity since 2002.
Activity for drilling rigs was down 1,999 operating days, a 4% decline from the prior year. The
first half of 2006 showed increases in drilling levels over 2005 with the third quarter only
marginally lower due largely to wet weather in September. At the end of the third quarter,
Precision was on track to surpass the record drilling activity established in 1997. That would
not happen, however, as operators rig released only 5,484 wells in the final quarter of 2006,
down 25% from a year earlier.
The decline in natural gas prices contributed to lower active rig counts in the second half of
2006 compared with 2005. Coupled with the expanded industry fleet of 9%, to approximately 842 at
year end, the drilling rig operating day utilization fell to 43% in the fourth quarter of 2006
from 68% in the same period of 2005.
During the year, Precision commenced operations in the U.S. land based contract drilling market.
In June, Rig 297 was mobilized from the Canadian fleet to Texas to begin work under contract.
Capital expenditures for the Contract Drilling Services segment in 2006 were $220 million and
included $158 million to grow and expand the underlying asset base and $62 million to sustain and
upgrade existing equipment. The majority of the expansion capital expenditure was associated with
new drilling rig construction.
The Precision Drilling division set new financial benchmarks in 2006. Revenue increased
by $73 million or 9% over 2005 to $919 million. The decrease in activity for 2006 was more than
offset by increased rates. Precision commenced 2006 with 170 rigs drilling as operators shortened
the Christmas shutdown period to get an early start on winter drilling programs. The first
quarter provided the industry with ideal winter drilling conditions as cool temperatures kept the
frost in the ground but it was not cold enough to hinder field operations. This unprecedented rig
demand and near perfect weather conditions provided an excellent start to the year.
Cold weather in the latter part of March 2006 prolonged the winter drilling season. This enabled
rigs to spud late in March and allowed deeper-rated rigs to work into the spring. The first sign
of a slowing shallow gas market appeared in the second quarter, particularly with coil tubing and
single rigs in southeastern Alberta. The demand for triples was able to offset the shortfall in
shallow gas drilling as operating days in the second quarter reached the third highest level in
the last 10 years. The triple rig activity in the second quarter was more than 50% higher than
the prior year. Strength in the triple rig market at that time reflected customer commitment to
deeper gas drilling.
Warm dry weather in western Canada in the third quarter allowed drilling operations to run as
scheduled for most of the summer allowing the backlog of wells to be drilled. Drilling days for
July and August were 169 days ahead of the previous years pace going into September 2006. Wet
weather in September reduced the rig count and dampened drilling momentum. Precision still
reported its third highest activity level in any third quarter in the last 10 years.
Fourth quarter 2006 results were hampered by activity declines attributable to commodity price
uncertainties and constraints on customers 2006 exploration and production budgets. Rising costs
and lower cash flows meant many customers had spent their entire 2006 budget by the start of the
fourth quarter and they did not move 2007 drilling programs forward. The urgency to put rigs to
work diminished as cautious spending developed despite increased rig availability.
Operating earnings in the Precision Drilling division increased by 17% over 2005 due mainly to a
14% increase in the average rate offset by a 5% decline in activity. Depreciation expense for the
year was $3 million higher due to the change in rig mix in the year with increased deep rig
activity and new rig builds going into the field. Precision Drillings cost per operating day
increased by 7% mainly due to hourly crew labour rate increases in October 2005 and 2006 of 7%
and 4%, respectively. There were also cost escalations for third party labour and materials
associated with equipment maintenance programs. An important component of the success of the
division is the degree to which cost structures were developed to be as variable as possible with
activity levels. This flexibility allowed the division to respond quickly to sudden changes in
equipment utilization and produce superior returns in periods of high or low activity.
The Precision Drilling division continued its organic growth strategy with the addition of 13
versatile rigs backed by customer arrangements. Precision spent $203 million in capital
expenditures in 2006, close to twice the spending in 2005.
LRG Catering achieved a new record for activity and revenue in 2006. Activity grew by
11%, while revenue increased 25% due in part to rate increases implemented in the fourth quarter
of 2005. Over the first eight months of 2006 activity remained at record levels then slowed in
the last four months as commodity prices softened and deeper drilling programs were completed.
LRG experienced a higher average day rate as a result of increased base camp activity. LRG is
becoming a larger drilling camp and catering provider in western Canada, having expanded its
fleet by 10 camps in 2006 to end the year with 101, representing about 16% of the market in
western Canada.
Rostel Industries and Columbia Oilfield Supply divisions provided valuable support,
best measured by the efficiencies and contributions made to Precision through cost savings.
Rostels expertise provided Precision control over rig construction and enhanced cost control.
Columbia is an essential extension of the purchasing process and provided timely, reliable and
consistent quality supplies to keep Precisions rigs operating and allowed Precision to
standardize product use and quality.
Precision Drilling Oilfield Services, Inc. began operations in the United States in
June 2006, with one rig. The rig was active 100% of the time. Growth is planned in the U.S.
market through the construction of new rigs and by deploying additional rigs from Canada through
customer arrangements.
2005 Compared to 2004
The Contract Drilling Services segment generated record financial results in 2005 on
the strength of unprecedented drilling activity in western Canada and improved pricing for
related services. The rise in activity strengthened on a comparative quarterly basis year over
year for the prior three years. That demand enabled the Contract Drilling Services segment to
steadily increase revenue and underlying operating margins.
The segment reported revenues of $916 million, $189 million more than 2004, an increase of 26%.
These results were generated with an equipment fleet size that was relatively unchanged from the
prior year. Revenue growth in 2005 was due to a combination of increased activity and pricing.
Operating earnings increased by $122 million or 43% to $404 million. Operating earnings increased
to 44% of revenue in 2005 as compared to 39% in 2004. The margin increase was primarily
attributable to pricing improvements.
Operating expenses declined from 53% of revenue in 2004 to 49% in 2005, and on a per operating
day basis, remained flat despite crew wage rate increases. Higher equipment utilization lowered
the daily cost associated with fixed operating cost components.
Capital expenditures for the Contract Drilling Services segment in 2005 were $107 million and
included $54 million to expand the underlying asset base and $53 million to sustain and upgrade
existing equipment. The majority of the expansion capital expenditure was associated with new
drilling rig construction.
For the Precision Drilling division revenue increased by $160 million or 23% over 2004
to $846 million. Just over half of the revenue growth was due to increased activity and the
remainder to increased rates. The division entered the year with great anticipation as rig demand
exceeded rig availability by a wide margin. Disappointing activity results for the first half of
the year were strictly weather related. These activity levels caused customer drilling programs
to fall behind. As ground conditions dried in July, the impact of the pent-up demand led to an
outstanding third and fourth quarter in 2005.
Rig demand continued to build momentum through to the end of 2005. Overall, the industry
benefited from the pricing leverage established from strong third quarter activity. Accordingly,
increased pricing was established in the fourth quarter for the winter drilling season. Rig
shortages also created a large spot market for operators who did not have equipment booked for
the winter, enabling the division to raise rates.
Operating earnings for the Precision Drilling division increased by 46% due in part to the 13%
increase in operating activity combined with the 9% increase in revenue per operating day.
Depreciation expense for the year was $11 million lower due to the effects of a change in the
estimated life of rig assets to 5,000 utilization days in 2005 from 4,150 in 2004. Precision
Drilling was able to maintain its cost per operating day at its 2004 rate. Crew labour costs in
2005 comprised 52% of operating costs, up 2% from 2004. The 2005 cost of drilling, maintenance
and overhead on a per day basis was consistent with 2004.
In the fourth quarter, two Super SingleTM Light rigs were added to the fleet and one rig was sold
resulting in a rig count of 230 at the end of 2005.
LRG Catering experienced a 26% increase in camp days and a 40% increase in revenue over
the prior year. The growing number of field personnel in the industry put overwhelming pressure
on other accommodation sources, such as hotels. Customers compensated by utilizing camps in areas
where crews would normally have returned to town for lodging. LRG grew its fleet in 2005 by
adding five new six-unit camps.
COMPLETION AND PRODUCTION SERVICES SEGMENT
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except where indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
441,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
369,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
313,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
231,602 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
209,657 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
196,113 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,242 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
11,021 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12,708 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
32,013 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
27,402 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
27,508 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
$ |
163,119 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
$ |
121,643 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
77,074 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Number of service rigs (end of year) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service rig operating hours |
|
|
480,137 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
477,232 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
472,008 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Revenue per operating hour ($/hour) |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
2006 Compared to 2005
The Completion and Production Services segment generated another year of record results
on the strength of robust industry activity in western Canada and stronger pricing for services.
Improved pricing resulted in a revenue increase of $71 million or 19% over 2005 to $441 million
while operating earnings increased by $41 million or 34% to $163 million. Operating earnings
increased to 37% of revenue in 2006 compared to 33% in 2005. The margin increase was mainly
attributable to price increases established during the year.
Operating expenses declined from 57% of revenue in 2005 to 53% in 2006, but on a per operating
hour basis, increased due to higher crew labour costs and higher costs associated with repair and
maintenance.
The number of wells rig released in 2006 was 22,575, a decrease of 7% from the record of 24,351
established in 2005. However, with a lag between the drilling and completion of a well, the
industry reported a record 22,171 well completions for the year, an increase of 1% from 21,980 in
2005. The total well count for completions in western Canada was 97,164 for the last five years
adding to the ongoing maintenance demand to ensure continuous and efficient operation of
producing wells. There are currently about 190,000 producing wells within the WCSB.
Service rig contractors in western Canada have maintained the industry rig fleet count relatively
constant over the past several years at approximately 1,050 service rigs as market pricing
remained competitive.
The Completion and Production Services segment is also affected by seasonality in Canada. The
first and fourth quarters of the year are the most active as colder weather allows for the
unrestricted movement of heavy equipment on county and provincial roads. The first quarter
traditionally produces the highest utilization as customers are able to work in northern areas
that are only accessible at that time.
During 2006, Precision acquired Terra Water Systems, a wastewater treatment business. Terra Water
had 41 treatment units at the time of the acquisition and closed the year with 51. The service
provided by Terra Water complements those provided by the LRG Catering and Precision Rentals
divisions and strengthened the diversity of Precisions services.
Reinvestment in equipment in recent years has helped to position the Completion and Production
Services segment as an industry leader. Excluding the business acquisition of Terra Water
Systems, capital spending in 2006 was $39 million, an increase of 11% over 2005. The total
included expansion capital of $13 million for new pump trucks, new slant service rigs, stand
alone snubbing unit fabrication, wellsite accommodations, storage tanks and wastewater treatment
units. Productive capacity maintenance expenditures of $26 million were incurred in the year and
included replacement pump and transporter trucks, snubbing unit trucks, drill pipe for rental and
tanks.
The Precision Well Servicing division increased revenue by $56 million or 20% over 2005
to $342 million. Higher rig rates and marginally improved activity levels over the prior year
contributed to the higher revenue. Price increases established in the fourth quarter of 2005 were
maintained with a slight upward adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Service rig activity was at record levels for the first three quarters of 2006 due to continued
strong industry activity carried over from 2005 and the backlog of new well completions. However,
wet weather in September and declining natural gas prices caused customers to reassess natural
gas completion and workover programs. Oil well servicing was steady throughout the year as crude
oil prices remained above US$50 per barrel. The strong first half of the year offset the activity
decline in the fourth quarter resulting in 2006 exceeding 2005 by 2,905 operating hours, for 56%
utilization.
Operating earnings for the division improved by $36 million, or 41%, over 2005, due mainly to
service price increases. Costs per operating hour were higher year over year due to increased
crew and rig manager labour expenses and equipment repair and maintenance costs.
Capital expenditures in 2006 were a continuation of long-term plans to upgrade and standardize
equipment. Pump trucks, transporters and mobile doghouse replacements were completed primarily to
replace aging units. The electronic upgrade of engines to include the latest emission control and
fuel conservation standards was also undertaken. Carrier modifications were completed to reduce
rig weights for travel during road ban periods. The construction of two new slant service rigs
under long-term contract commenced in 2006 and, when commissioned in 2007, will bring the fleet
to 239 rigs.
Live Well Services activity decreased by 14% over 2005 with revenues for the year of
$35 million. The decrease was due to the weakening of natural gas prices in 2006 which led to a
cost savings shift by customers away from rig assist and to stand alone snubbing services. Live
Wells snubbing fleet consists of 26 units of which 25 are rig assist with one stand alone unit.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, construction started on four stand alone units, two under
long-term customer contract, which will bring the total snubbing fleet to 30 units in 2007.
Precision Rentals generated revenues of $62 million, which was $11 million or 21%
higher than in 2005. Each of Precision Rentals three product categories; surface equipment,
tubulars and well control equipment, and wellsite accommodations, experienced year over year
revenue increases. Total capital expenditures for 2006 increased 26% from 2005 and included 79
tanks and 10 new wellsite trailers.
Terra Water Systems generated revenues of $2 million for the period subsequent to
August 17, 2006. Growth is expected through product and market diversification, leveraging its
synergies with LRG Caterings remote camp business and Precision Rentals wellsite
accommodations.
2005 Compared to 2004
The Completion and Production Services segment generated revenue of $370 million, 18%
higher than the $313 million in 2004 with operating earnings increasing by $45 million or 58% to
$122 million. Operating earnings increased to 33% of revenue in 2005 as compared to 25% in 2004.
The margin increase was attributable to the enhanced operating performance of the service rig
fleet as the division was able to increase rates throughout the year. Equipment demand provided
the ability to establish pricing levels based on possession rather than just usage.
Operating expenses declined from 63% of revenue in 2004 to 57% in 2005 and increased marginally
per operating hour due to higher labour costs. Centralization of personnel, accounting,
purchasing, and equipment management provided economies of scale and more effective deployment of
segment resources.
Capital spending in 2005 was $35 million, an increase of 9% over 2004. This included expansion
capital of $8 million for a stand alone snubbing unit, additional pump trucks, wellsite
accommodations and storage tanks. Maintenance capital included replacement trucks for
transporters, snubbing units and pump trucks as well as drill pipe for rental, snubbing equipment
and a facility upgrade in Grande Prairie, Alberta.
The Precision Well Servicing division increased revenue by $44 million or 18% over 2004
to $286 million due to a slight increase in activity and higher rates. Precision Well Servicing
achieved 55% utilization, a nominal
improvement over the prior year. Operating earnings improved by $38 million, a 79% improvement
over the prior year due mainly to price increases. In addition, operating costs were marginally
higher per operating hour year over year due to higher labour costs. Cost efficiencies were
achieved by the consolidation of operating centres in the latter part of the prior year. Capital
expenditures in 2005 emphasized the upgrading and standardization of equipment.
Live Well Services activity decreased slightly in 2005. The demand for snubbing, while
finishing strong, slowed early in the year. However, revenue increased by $4 million or 12% over
2004 to $32 million. The improvement was attributable to higher hourly operating and standby
rates established in the last half of the year. Live Well upgraded its fleet of hydraulic rig
assist snubbing units through scheduled truck chassis replacement and introduced its first stand
alone unit.
Precision Rentals reported a revenue increase of $8 million or 19% over 2004 to $51
million. The increase was attributable to higher drilling activity which led to higher demand and
improved pricing for rental equipment. Operating earnings increased by 37% over the prior year.
The division expanded its wellsite accommodation fleet in 2005 by 8% with the purchase of 24
units.
OTHER ITEMS
2006 Compared to 2005
Corporate and Other Expenses
Corporate and other expenses decreased by $19 million or 32% as compared to 2005. Included in
the 2005 expenses were $18 million in costs related to the conversion to an income trust.
Excluding these conversion costs, corporate and other expenses decreased $1 million or 4% year
over year. The introduction of the long-term incentive plan (LTIP) added an additional $4
million of costs during 2006 over the prior period stock option plan expense, while increased
accruals for recurring near-term incentive plans added another $3 million. Disposals of corporate
property, plant and equipment in 2005 and 2006 contributed to a $2 million reduction in
depreciation expense. Significant reductions in Precisions net foreign currency position related
to 2005 divestitures and the repayment of U.S. dollar debentures led to a $3 million reduction in
foreign exchange gains in 2006. The remaining $9 million reduction in costs were mostly
attributable to the absence of severance and retention bonuses incurred in 2005, lower legal,
advisory and support costs in 2006 and the recovery of certain liability provisions expensed in
prior periods.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense of $8 million declined by $21 million or 73% in 2006 compared to 2005.
This reduction was primarily attributable to the repayment of the outstanding bonds (debentures)
in October 2005 which resulted in lower subsequent debt levels. Also in 2005, Precision was in a
significant surplus cash position, to the date of trust conversion, which generated $10 million
in interest income. Monthly debt, net of cash, averaged $164 million in 2006.
Income Taxes
The Trusts effective tax rate, before enacted tax rate reductions, on earnings from
continuing operations before income taxes was 6% in 2006 compared to 25% in 2005. This
comparatively low effective tax rate was primarily a result of the conversion to an income trust
which had the effect of shifting the income tax burden of the Trust to its unitholders.
The Trust incurs taxes to the extent there are certain provincial capital taxes, as well as taxes
on any taxable income, of its underlying subsidiaries, not distributed to unitholders. In
addition, future income taxes arise from differences between the accounting and tax basis of the
operating entities assets and liabilities.
During 2006 the federal and certain provincial governments enacted various reductions to
corporate income tax rates. The Government of Canada passed legislation to eliminate the
corporate capital tax, reduce the federal
income tax rate from 21% to 19% over the next four years and eliminate the federal corporate
surtax in 2008. The Province of Alberta reduced the corporate income tax rate by 1.5% effective
April 1, 2006. Enacted tax rate reductions resulted in a $21 million future tax recovery in the
second quarter of 2006.
Discontinued Operations
A $7 million gain, net of tax, on discontinued operations was recorded in 2006. A $2 million
gain was recorded on the final payment of contingent consideration associated with the 2004
disposal of United Diamond Ltd. Gains of $4 million and $1 million were recorded for working
capital adjustments related to the 2005 disposals of CEDA International Corporation (CEDA) and
the Energy Services and International Contract Drilling divisions, respectively. The 2005
business divestitures contributed $74 million in net earnings and $1.3 billion in gains on
disposition towards the financial results in fiscal 2005.
2005 Compared to 2004
Corporate and Other Expenses
Corporate and other expenses increased by $33 million or 116% in 2005 as compared to 2004.
Included in these expenses are $18 million in costs associated with the conversion to an income
trust comprising a one-time severance payment of $13 million to a senior executive and $5 million
in legal, accounting and advisory fees. Excluding those costs, corporate and other expenses
increased by $15 million or 53% year over year of which $6 million was attributable to a
reduction in foreign exchange gains and the remaining $9 million to severance and retention bonus
payments, increased legal and advisory fees related to other internal reorganization activities,
examining strategic and financing alternatives, and increased internal and external audit costs
to comply with financial reporting requirements.
Interest Expense
Net interest expense of $29 million declined by 37% in 2005 compared to 2004. This reduction
was attributable to the repayment of the outstanding bonds (debentures) in October 2005 and from
being in a surplus cash position, to the date of trust conversion, which generated $10 million in
interest income.
Premium on Redemption of Bonds
In October 2005, the outstanding bonds were repaid, resulting in a charge of $72 million that
was absent in 2004.
Loss on Disposal of Short-term Investments
Precision received 26 million shares of Weatherford International Ltd. as part of the
consideration for the disposal of the Energy Services and International Contract Drilling
divisions. Substantially all of the shares were transferred to shareholders in conjunction with
the November 7, 2005 plan of arrangement and a $71 million loss was incurred.
Discontinued Operations
During the third quarter of 2005, Precision completed two significant business divestitures.
These businesses contributed $74 million in net earnings which have been included in discontinued
operations. Combined with the gains on disposition in the amount of $1.3 billion, discontinued
operations contributed net earnings of $1.4 billion towards the financial results in fiscal 2005.
First, Precision disposed of its Energy Services and International Contract Drilling divisions,
resulting in an after tax gain of $1.2 billion. Second, Precision disposed of the industrial
services business carried on by CEDA for an after tax gain of $132 million.
Income Taxes
Precisions effective tax rate on earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was
25% in 2005 compared to 35% in 2004. The decrease in the tax rate was primarily a result of the
conversion to an income trust in November 2005 which had the effect of shifting the income tax
burden of the Trust to its unitholders.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In 2006, strong operating results combined with lower net debt levels provided the Trust with
cash flows from operations of $610 million. Issuances of Trust units through the distribution
reinvestment plan and increases in long-term debt and bank indebtedness added $70 million. An
additional $7 million was provided from the settlement of matters relating to prior year
dispositions. Offsetting these sources of cash, the Trust incurred capital expenditures, net of
dispositions of capital assets and changes in related non-cash working capital, of $226 million
and spent $16 million to purchase all the outstanding shares of Terra Water Group Ltd. Total cash
distributions paid to unitholders during 2006 were $445 million.
The Trust exited 2006 with a long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity ratio of 10% and a
ratio of long-term debt to cash from operations of 23%.
In the 2005 MD&A, the Trust gave guidance as to the expected 2006 amounts for certain balance
sheet and cash flow items. Lower 2006 fourth quarter activity, which resulted in a reduction of
$184 million to the expected working capital and profitability, was the primary factor leading to
a positive variance of $260 million over estimated 2006 cash provided by continuing operations of
$350 million. This positive variance combined with lower net productive capacity maintenance
capital expenditures, which includes disposal proceeds of $29 million, led to long-term debt
being $294 million lower than the $435 million estimate.
Precision has a number of committed and uncommitted lines of credit available to finance its
activities. The committed facilities consist of a $700 million three-year revolving unsecured
credit facility with a syndicate led by a Canadian chartered bank. The borrowing capacity of the
facility was increased by $150 million in 2006 to assist in financing the expansionary growth
plans of Precision. The facility matures in November 2009, and is extendible annually with the
consent of lenders. The facility has three financial covenants which are tested quarterly: total
liabilities to equity of less than 1:1; total debt to the trailing four quarters cash flow of
less than 2.75:1; and total distributions to unitholders of less than 100% of consolidated cash
flow, as defined in the credit facility agreement. As at December 31, 2006, Precision was well
within the financial covenant levels, and is expected to remain so for 2007. There was $141
million outstanding under the committed facilities at December 31, 2006. In addition to the
committed facilities, Precision also has a number of uncommitted operating facilities which total
approximately $66 million equivalent and are utilized for working capital management and the
issuance of letters of credit.
The Corporations contractual obligations are outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars) |
|
Total |
|
|
Less Than 1 Year |
|
|
1 3 Years |
|
|
4 5 Years |
|
|
After 5 Years |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
140,880 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,880 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
26,538 |
|
|
|
7,858 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
7,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive plan |
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
190,117 |
|
|
$ |
7,858 |
|
|
$ |
174,950 |
|
|
$ |
7,309 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
The Trust instituted the LTIP in 2006 which compensates officers and key employees through
cash payments at the end of a three-year term. The compensation is comprised of two components, a
retention award and a performance award. The retention award is a lump sum amount determined at
the date of commencement in the LTIP. The retention component is accrued evenly over the
three-year term and is estimated to total $11 million with anticipated payment to occur in March
2009. The performance component is based on the growth in cash distributions measured against a
base distribution rate as determined by the Compensation Committee of Precision. The performance
component is accrued based on actual distributions compared to target distributions. There is no
assurance that the performance component will be paid.
Outstanding Unit Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Trust units |
|
|
125,570,432 |
|
|
|
125,536,329 |
|
|
|
124,352,921 |
|
Exchangeable LP units |
|
|
187,492 |
|
|
|
221,595 |
|
|
|
1,108,382 |
|
|
Total units outstanding |
|
|
125,757,924 |
|
|
|
125,757,924 |
|
|
|
125,461,303 |
|
|
DISTRIBUTIONS
Upon Precisions conversion to an income trust effective November 7, 2005, the Trust adopted
a policy of making monthly distributions to holders of Trust units and holders of exchangeable LP
units (together Unitholders). Precision has a legal entity structure whereby the trust entity,
Precision Drilling Trust, effectively must flow its taxable income to unitholders pursuant to its
Declaration of Trust. Distributions may be reduced, increased or suspended entirely depending on
the operations of Precision and the performance of its assets, or legislative changes in tax laws
by governments in Canada. The actual cash flow available for distribution to Unitholders is a
function of numerous factors, including the Trusts: financial performance; debt covenants and
obligations; working capital requirements; productive capacity maintenance expenditures and
expansion capital expenditure requirements for the purchase of property, plant and equipment; and
number of units outstanding. The Trust considers these factors on a monthly basis in determining
future distributions. In 2006 cash distributions declared were $447 million or $3.56 per diluted
unit. In December 2006, a special year-end in-kind distribution, as explained below, payable in
Trust or exchangeable LP units (together Units), of $25 million or $0.195 per diluted unit was
declared.
In the event that a distribution is declared in the form of in-kind Units, the terms of the
Declaration of Trust and the Limited Partnership Agreement require that the outstanding Units be
consolidated immediately subsequent to the distribution. Accordingly, the number of outstanding
Units would remain at the number outstanding immediately prior to the Unit distribution. As a
result, Unitholders would not receive additional Units and the declared amount of the in-kind
distribution would be retained in Precision.
Key factors for consideration in determining actual cash flow available for distribution, in an
historical context, are disclosed within the consolidated statements of cash flow. A
reconciliation of distributable cash from operations in 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per unit amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by continuing operations |
|
$ |
609,744 |
|
|
|
$ |
206,013 |
|
|
|
$ |
286,437 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive capacity maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
(92,123 |
) |
|
|
|
(92,214 |
) |
|
|
|
(82,014 |
) |
Unfunded long-term incentive plan obligation |
|
|
(22,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash from operations (A) (1) |
|
|
494,922 |
|
|
|
$ |
113,799 |
|
|
|
$ |
204,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash retained |
|
|
(47,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared (B) |
|
$ |
447,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout ratio (B)/(A) |
|
|
90.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash from operations per basic and diluted unit |
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
Fiscal 2006 was Precisions first full year as an income trust. Management believes that any
retained cash or payout ratio calculation for prior years would not be meaningful given the
Trusts November 2005 conversion.
Productive capacity maintenance capital expenditures allow the Trust to maintain its existing
service levels. These expenditures consist of betterments and replacements to existing assets and
capitalized costs relating to the underlying support infrastructure. The productive capacity
maintenance strategy of Precision also involves costs that are charged directly to the income
statement. These costs are related to the scheduled maintenance and certification processes
within the various operating divisions. The level of these expenditures is driven by activity
levels and can be scaled back in times of low activity without jeopardizing the long-term
productive capacity of
Precision and its underlying assets.
The Trust maintains a strong balance sheet and has sufficient debt facilities to manage
short-term funding needs as well as planned equipment additions. Part of the debt management
strategy involves retaining sufficient funds from available distributable cash to finance
productive capacity maintenance capital expenditures as well as working capital needs. Planned
asset growth will generally be financed through existing debt facilities or cash retained from
continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Units outstanding |
|
|
125,757,924 |
|
|
|
125,461,303 |
|
Year end unit price |
|
$ |
27.00 |
|
|
$ |
33.00 |
|
|
Units at market |
|
$ |
3,395,464 |
|
|
$ |
4,140,223 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
140,880 |
|
|
|
96,838 |
|
Less: Working capital |
|
|
(166,484 |
) |
|
|
(152,754 |
) |
|
Enterprise value |
|
$ |
3,369,860 |
|
|
$ |
4,084,307 |
|
|
Precision carried a long-term debt to unit market value ratio of 4% at December 31, 2006.
This represents a slight increase over the 2005 ratio of 2%.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars except per diluted unit/share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q3 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
536,408 |
|
|
$ |
223,569 |
|
|
$ |
349,558 |
|
|
$ |
328,049 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,584 |
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
|
245,909 |
|
|
|
74,543 |
|
|
|
142,431 |
|
|
|
132,396 |
|
|
|
595,279 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
224,183 |
|
|
|
88,303 |
|
|
|
133,552 |
|
|
|
126,474 |
|
|
|
572,512 |
|
Per diluted unit/share |
|
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
224,183 |
|
|
|
88,303 |
|
|
|
139,667 |
|
|
|
127,436 |
|
|
|
579,589 |
|
Per diluted unit/share |
|
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
|
|
40,940 |
|
|
|
339,619 |
|
|
|
74,952 |
|
|
|
154,233 |
|
|
|
609,744 |
|
Distributions to unitholders declared |
|
$ |
101,623 |
|
|
$ |
111,681 |
|
|
$ |
116,785 |
|
|
$ |
141,435 |
|
|
$ |
471,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q3 |
|
|
Q4 |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
383,407 |
|
|
$ |
157,895 |
|
|
$ |
300,016 |
|
|
$ |
427,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,179 |
|
Operating earnings (1) |
|
|
153,020 |
|
|
|
24,505 |
|
|
|
111,956 |
|
|
|
175,897 |
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
88,281 |
|
|
|
9,308 |
|
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
120,877 |
|
|
|
220,848 |
|
Per diluted unit/share |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
138,518 |
|
|
|
25,851 |
|
|
|
1,382,648 |
|
|
|
83,546 |
|
|
|
1,630,563 |
|
Per diluted unit/share |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
|
|
95,902 |
|
|
|
116,719 |
|
|
|
46,978 |
|
|
|
(53,587 |
) |
|
|
206,013 |
|
Distributions to unitholders declared |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,510 |
|
|
$ |
70,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. See page 66. |
The Canadian drilling industry is subject to seasonality with activity peaking during the
winter months in the fourth and first quarters. As temperatures rise in the spring, the ground
thaws and becomes unstable. Government road bans severely restrict activity in the second quarter
before equipment is moved for summer drilling programs in the third quarter. These seasonal
trends typically lead to quarterly fluctuations in operating results and working capital
requirements.
FOURTH QUARTER DISCUSSION
During 2006, the persistent downward trend in commodity prices, natural gas in particular,
led to lower fourth quarter demand for all of Precisions services in western Canada. For the
first time in five quarters, Precisions operating results were down from the comparable quarter
in the prior year as overall customer demand decreased due to the decline in natural gas prices.
Revenue of $328 million and operating earnings of $132 million in the fourth quarter of 2006
represented decreases of 23% and 25% respectively, compared to the same period in 2005. Despite
the decline in equipment activity, firm pricing helped maintain operating earnings at 40% of
revenue in the fourth quarter of 2006 versus 41% in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Earnings from continuing operations in the fourth quarter of 2006 were $126 million compared with
$121 million in 2005, an increase of $0.05 per diluted unit. Adjusted for the impact of one-time
charges against the prior year fourth quarter earnings from continuing operations of $75 million,
the current quarter represented a decrease of $0.48 per diluted unit, or 32%. These one-time
charges included $18 million for the reorganization of Precision into an income trust, $51
million for the loss on a short-term investment in Weatherford International Ltd., and $6 million
for the repayment of outstanding debentures. Precision realized the benefit of a lower effective
tax rate for the full quarter in 2006.
Activity for the quarter was down 33% for drilling rigs and 23% for service rigs from the prior
year, consistent with industry declines in the quarter of approximately 25% in the number of
wells rig released and the number of rigs working. Drilling rig operating days for the fourth
quarter of 2006 were also 18% lower than the third quarter of 2006.
Compared to 2005, Canadian industry drilling rig operating days decreased by approximately 27% in
the fourth quarter of 2006 to 35,682. Industry wells drilled, on a rig release basis, decreased
by 24% to 5,339 and the available rig count increased by 9% to approximately 842 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2005. New rig capacity in the industry adversely impacted overall equipment
utilization rates.
Contract Drilling Services segment revenue of $223 million and operating earnings of $104
million decreased by 28% and 33%, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the
same period in 2005. The decline in equipment activity was offset somewhat by an increase in
average day rates for contract drilling of 8%. LRG experienced an activity decrease, achieving
3,730 camp days for a 39% decline over the prior year.
Completion and Production Services segment revenue of $108 million and operating earnings of $40
million decreased by 13% and 22%, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the
same period in 2005. Precisions service rig operating hours during the fourth quarter of 2006
were 109,737 compared to 142,122 in 2005, a decrease of 23%. Well service rig operating hours
were down over the prior year due to the general decline in industry activity related to natural
gas. The decline in activity was somewhat offset by an increase in hourly service rig rates of
14% for the fourth quarter year over year. Demand for rental equipment followed downward industry
trends and was 15% lower than the prior year. For Precisions snubbing division, activity was
down 27% in the quarter over the prior year as a result of lower natural gas well activity.
Operating costs increased from 45% of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2005 to 47% in 2006. The
increase was mainly caused by a 13% rise in costs per operating day for contract drilling and 15%
per operating hour in well servicing including crew wage increases of 4% implemented in the
fourth quarter of 2006. There were also increases in third party labour and material costs.
Historically, on October 1, a winter rate adjustment for these costs is passed on to customers.
This year, in many cases Precision was unable to increase rates to absorb these costs. In
addition, equipment repair and maintenance costs were higher per day and per hour as scheduled
equipment maintenance was deferred from earlier in 2006 due to a shortage of maintenance
infrastructure. Further, lower activity in the fourth quarter of 2006 contributed to increase
fixed operating costs per day in contract drilling and per hour in well servicing.
The Trusts effective income tax rate before enacted tax rate reductions on earnings from
continuing operations before income taxes was 3% in the fourth quarter and 6% for the 2006 fiscal
year. The comparatively low effective income tax rate was primarily a result of the conversion to
an income trust part way through the comparative quarter of 2005 which had the effect of shifting
all or a portion of the income tax burden of the Trust to its unitholders.
In the fourth quarter, capital expenditures amounted to $72 million of which $44 million was for
the construction of new drilling rigs and an additional $2 million for expansion capital in the
Completions and Production Services segment. During the fourth quarter of 2006, four new drilling
rigs were released into the field. The remaining $26 million was spent to sustain and upgrade
existing equipment and infrastructure.
Fourth quarter monthly cash distributions declared were $0.31 per diluted unit for aggregate
distributions declared of $117 million or $0.93 per diluted unit. A special year-end in-kind
distribution of $25 million or $0.195 per diluted unit was also declared bringing total declared
distributions for the quarter to $141 million or $1.125 per diluted unit. The special in-kind
distribution was made to minimize debt levels and retain balance sheet strength to fund planned
asset growth. The distribution reinvestment plan generated cash of $4 million and on December 18,
2006 was suspended. Long-term debt decreased by $25 million during the quarter to $141 million
for a long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity ratio of 10%. Working capital decreased by $51
million during the quarter to $166 million as lower activity levels reduced revenue and
corresponding accounts receivable, while capital expenditures increased.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES, NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND BUSINESS RISKS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Precisions financial condition and results of
operations is based on Precisions consolidated financial statements which are prepared in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). These principles differ in certain respects from U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and these differences are described and quantified in Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements.
The Trusts significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to its consolidated financial
statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires that certain estimates and
judgments be made that affect the reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These
estimates and judgments are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Anticipating future events cannot be done
with certainty, therefore, these estimates may change as new events occur, more experience is
acquired and as the Trusts operating environment changes.
Following are the accounting estimates believed to require the most difficult, subjective or
complex judgments and which are the most critical to Precisions reporting of results of
operations and financial positions.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
Precision performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and grants credit based upon
past payment history, financial condition and anticipated industry conditions. Customer payments
are regularly monitored and a provision for doubtful accounts is established based upon specific
situations and overall industry conditions. Precisions history of bad debt losses has been
within expectations and generally limited to specific customer circumstances. However, given the
cyclical nature of the oil and natural gas industry and the inherent risk of successfully finding
hydrocarbon reserves, a customers ability to fulfill its payment obligations can change suddenly
and without notice. In cases where creditworthiness is uncertain, services are provided for cash
in advance.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment, intangibles and goodwill,
comprise the majority of Precisions assets. The carrying value of these assets is periodically
reviewed for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. This requires Precision to forecast future cash flows to
be derived from the utilization of these assets based upon assumptions about future business
conditions and technological developments. Significant, unanticipated changes to these
assumptions could require a provision for impairment in the future. During the fourth quarter of
2006, Precision completed its assessment and concluded that there was no impairment of the
carrying value.
Depreciation and Amortization
Precisions property, plant and equipment and its intangible assets are depreciated and
amortized based upon estimates of useful lives and salvage values. These estimates may change as
more experience is gained, market conditions shift or new technological advancements are made.
Effective January 1, 2005, Precision changed the useful life of its drilling rigs for purposes of
determining depreciation expense to 5,000 utilization days from 4,150 utilization days (3,650
operating days), and its drill strings to 1,500 from 1,100 operating days. Utilization days
include both operating and rig move days. This change in accounting estimate has been applied
prospectively and resulted in an $11 million reduction of depreciation expense or $0.09 per
diluted unit for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Income Taxes
The corporate subsidiaries of the Trust use the liability method which takes into account the
differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions,
assets and liabilities. The Trust, itself, does not have any significant temporary tax
differences. Future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Valuation allowances are established to reduce
future tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the asset will not
be realized. Estimates of future taxable income and the continuation of ongoing prudent tax
planning arrangements have been considered in assessing the utilization of available tax losses.
Changes in circumstances and assumptions and clarifications of uncertain tax regimes may require
changes to the valuation allowances associated with Precisions future tax assets.
The business and operations of Precision are complex and Precision has executed a number of
significant financings, business combinations, acquisitions and dispositions over the course of
its history. The computation of income taxes payable as a result of these transactions involves
many complex factors as well as Precisions interpretation of relevant tax legislation and
regulations. Precisions management believes that the provision for income tax is adequate.
During 2006, the Government of Canada released for comment draft legislation which would result
in a tax structure for trusts similar to that of corporate entities. If the proposed legislation
is implemented, the Trust would be required to recognize, on a prospective basis, future income
taxes on temporary differences in the Trust.
Long-term Incentive Plan Compensation
The Trust instituted a long-term incentive plan which compensates officers and key employees
through cash payments at the end of a three-year term. The compensation includes two components,
a retention component and a performance award. The performance component is based on growth in
distributions measured against a distribution rate as determined by the Compensation Committee of
Precision. As a result of actual distributions in the subsequent two years, the accrued amount
for the performance component may be reduced or increased depending on the actual amounts
distributed.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants issued certain new accounting standards which
will be in effect for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006 for recognition and
measurement of financial instruments, disclosure of comprehensive income, and hedge accounting.
Section 3855, Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement, provides guidance on when
a financial instrument must be recognized on the balance sheet and how it must be measured. It
also provides guidance on the presentation of gains and losses on financial instruments.
Section 3865, Hedges, provides guidance on the application of hedge accounting and related
disclosures.
Section 1530, Comprehensive Income, requires an entity to recognize certain gains and losses
in a separate statement, until such gains and losses are recognized in the statement of income.
The Trust does not expect that the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
BUSINESS RISKS
The discussion of risk that follows is not a complete representation. Refer to the
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements on page 1.
Certain activities of Precision are affected by factors that are beyond its control or influence.
The drilling rig, camp and catering, service rig, snubbing, wastewater treatment, rentals, and
related service businesses and activities of Precision in Canada and the drilling rig, camp and
catering and rentals businesses and activities of Precision in the United States are directly
affected by fluctuations in the levels of exploration, development and production activity
carried on by its customers which, in turn, is dictated by numerous factors, including world
energy prices and government policies. The addition, elimination or curtailment of government
regulations and incentives could have a significant impact on the oil and gas business in Canada
and the United States. These factors could lead to a decline in the demand for Precisions
services, resulting in a material adverse effect on revenues, cash flows, earnings and cash
distributions to unitholders. The majority of Precisions operating costs are variable in nature
which minimizes the impact of downturns on its operational results.
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices
Precisions revenue, cash flow and earnings are substantially dependent upon, and affected
by, the level of activity associated with oil and natural gas exploration and production. Both
short-term and long-term trends in oil and natural gas prices affect the level of such activity.
Oil and natural gas prices and, therefore, the level of drilling,
exploration and production activity have been volatile over the past few years and likely will
continue to be volatile. WTI crude oil prices in 2006 ranged from a low of US$56 per barrel to a
high of US$78 per barrel. Military, political, weather, economic and other events in certain
parts of the world, including initiatives by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries,
may affect both the demand for, and the supply of, oil and natural gas. North American petroleum
service activity is largely focused on natural gas. In 2006 the natural gas spot price, as
measured at Henry Hub, averaged almost US$7 per MMBtu and ranged from an approximate low and high
of US$4 to US$10 per MMBtu, respectively. Weather conditions, governmental regulation (both in
Canada and elsewhere), levels of consumer demand, the availability of pipeline capacity, storage
levels and other factors beyond Precisions control may also affect the supply of and demand for
oil and natural gas and thus lead to future price volatility. Precision believes that any
prolonged reduction in oil and natural gas prices would depress the level of exploration and
production activity. Lower oil and natural gas prices could also cause Precisions customers to
seek to terminate, renegotiate or fail to honour Precisions drilling contracts which: could
affect the fair market value of its rig fleet which in turn could trigger a write-down for
accounting purposes; could affect Precisions ability to retain skilled rig personnel; and could
affect Precisions ability to obtain access to capital to finance and grow its businesses. There
can be no assurance that the future level of demand for Precisions services or future conditions
in the oil and natural gas industry will not decline.
Workforce Availability
Precisions ability to provide reliable services is dependent upon the availability of
well-trained, experienced crews to operate its field equipment. Precision must also balance the
requirement to maintain a skilled workforce with the need to establish cost structures that
fluctuate with activity levels.
Within Precision, the most experienced people are retained during periods of low utilization by
having them fill lower level positions on field crews. Precision has established training
programs for employees new to the oilfield service sector and works closely with industry
associations to ensure competitive compensation levels and to attract new workers to the industry
as required. Many of Precisions businesses regularly experience manpower shortages in peak
operating periods. These shortages are likely to be further challenged by the number of rigs
being added to the industry along with the entrance and expansion of start-up oilfield service
companies. In the near-term, anticipated declines in activity will offset challenges due to rig
expansion.
Business is Seasonal
In Canada, the level of activity in the oilfield service industry is influenced by seasonal
weather patterns. During the spring months, wet weather and the spring thaw make the ground
unstable. Consequently, municipalities and provincial transportation departments enforce road
bans that restrict the movement of rigs and other heavy equipment, thereby reducing activity
levels and placing an increased level of importance on the location of Precisions equipment
prior to imposition of road bans. The timing and length of road bans is dependant upon the
weather conditions leading to the spring thaw and the weather conditions during the thawing
period.
Additionally, certain oil and natural gas producing areas are located in sections of the WCSB
that are inaccessible, other than during the winter months, because the ground surrounding or
containing the drilling sites in these areas consists of terrain known as muskeg. Until the
muskeg freezes, the rigs and other necessary equipment cannot cross the terrain to reach the
drilling site. Moreover, once the rigs and other equipment have been moved to a drilling site,
they may become stranded or otherwise be unable to relocate to another site should the muskeg
thaw unexpectedly. Precisions business results depend, at least in part, upon the severity and
duration of the Canadian winter.
Technology
Technological innovation by oilfield service companies has improved the effectiveness of the
entire exploration and production sector over the industrys more than 140-year history. Drilling
time has been reduced due to improvements in drill bits, logging and measurement while drilling
tools, as well as innovative changes in other areas such as mud systems and top drives.
Precisions ability to deliver services that are more efficient in reducing
customer development costs is critical to continued success.
Customer Merger and Acquisition Activity
Merger and acquisition activity in the oil and natural gas exploration and production sector
can impact demand for Precisions services as customers focus on internal reorganization
activities prior to committing funds to significant drilling and maintenance projects.
Competitive Industry
The oilfield services industry in which Precision operates is, and will continue to be, very
competitive. There is no assurance that Precision will be able to continue to compete
successfully or that the level of competition and pressure on pricing will not affect its
margins.
Capital Overbuild in the Drilling Industry
As at December 31, 2006 there were an estimated 842 industry drilling rigs in Canada, an
increase of 9% from December 31, 2005. There is no assurance that the level of demand for
drilling rigs in the future will be able to support the size of the current industry drilling rig
fleet in Canada. Any decline in demand for drilling services within the services industry,
directly or indirectly related to the current drilling rigs available, could also lead to a
decline in the demand for Precisions services, resulting in a material adverse effect on
Precisions revenues, cash flows, earnings and cash distributions to unitholders.
Tax Consequences of Previous Transactions Completed by Precision
The business and operations of Precision prior to completion of the Plan of Arrangement were
complex and Precision has executed a number of significant financings, business combinations,
acquisitions and dispositions over the course of its history. The computation of income taxes
payable as a result of those transactions involves many complex factors as well as Precisions
interpretation of relevant tax legislation and regulations. Precisions management believes that
the provision for income tax is adequate and in accordance with GAAP and applicable legislation
and regulations. However, there are a number of tax filing positions that can still be the
subject of review by taxation authorities who may successfully challenge Precisions
interpretation of the applicable tax legislation and regulations, with the result that additional
taxes could be payable by Precision and the amount payable could be up to $300 million. Any
increase in Precisions tax liability would reduce the funds available for distributions on Trust
units.
Credit Risk
Precisions accounts receivable are with customers involved in the oil and natural gas
industry, whose revenues may be impacted by fluctuations in commodity prices. Although collection
of these receivables could be influenced by economic factors affecting this industry, management
considers the risk of a significant loss due to uncollectible receivables to be remote at this
time.
Capital Expenditures
The timing and amount of capital expenditures by Precision will directly affect the amount of
cash available for distribution to unitholders. The cost of equipment has escalated over the past
several years as a result of, among other things, high input costs. There is no assurance that
Precision will be able to recover higher capital costs through rate increases to its customers,
in which case cash distributions may be reduced.
Access to Additional Financing
Precision may find it necessary in the future to obtain additional debt or equity financing
through the Trust to support ongoing operations, to undertake capital expenditures or undertake
acquisitions or other business combination transactions. There can be no assurance that
additional financing will be available to Precision when needed or on terms acceptable to
Precision. Precisions inability to raise financing to support ongoing operations or to fund
capital expenditures or acquisitions or other business combination transactions could limit
Precisions growth and may
have a material adverse effect upon Precision.
Taxation of Distributions
On October 31, 2006, the Government of Canada announced a Tax Fairness Plan containing its
intentions to bring about new tax measures including a Distribution Tax on distributions from
publicly traded income trusts and limited partnerships. The government is proposing a four-year
transition period for existing income trusts and limited partnerships whereby the new measures
will not apply until their 2011 taxation year. Under the proposals, flow-through entities will
be taxed more like corporations and their investors will be treated more like shareholders. The
proposed new tax measures will impair the flow-through nature of Precision Drilling Trusts
current tax structure. If enacted into law, these tax measures would result in a distribution tax
to the Trust which will reduce the cash distributed to unitholders by the amount of distribution
tax paid.
Environmental
There is growing concern about the apparent correlation between the burning of fossil fuels
and climate change. In February 2007, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change released a report reiterating calls for action on the basis that man-made activities,
particularly burning fossil fuels, were very likely behind global warming. The issue of energy
and the environment has created intense public debate in Canada and around the world in recent
years that is likely to continue for the foreseeable future and could potentially have a
significant impact on all aspects of the economy including the demand for hydrocarbons and the
resulting lower demand for Precisions services.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, securities
regulatory authorities is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified under Canadian and United States securities laws. The information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial and
accounting officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of December 31, 2006, an evaluation was carried out, under the supervision of and with the
participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial
and accounting officer, of the effectiveness of Precisions disclosure controls and procedures as
defined under the rules adopted by the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and by the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on that evaluation, the principal
executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that the design and
operation of Precisions disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at December 31,
2006.
During the
2006 fiscal year, there have been no changes in internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
Precisions internal control over financial reporting.
NON-GAAP MEASURES
Precision uses certain measures that are not recognized under Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles to assess performance and believes these non-GAAP measures provide useful
supplemental information to investors. Following are the non-GAAP measures Precision uses in
assessing performance.
Precisions method of calculating these measures may differ from other entities and, accordingly,
may not be comparable to measures used by other entities. Investors should be cautioned that
these measures should not be construed as an alternative to measures determined in accordance
with GAAP as an indicator of Precisions performance.
OPERATING EARNINGS
Management believes that in addition to net earnings, operating earnings as reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Retained Earnings (Deficit) is a useful supplemental
measure as it provides an indication of the results generated by Precisions principal business
activities prior to consideration of how those activities are financed or how the results are
taxed.
DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FROM OPERATIONS
Management believes that in addition to cash provided by (used in) continuing operations,
distributable cash from operations is a useful supplemental measure. It provides an indication of
the funds available for distribution to unitholders after consideration of the impacts of capital
expenditures to maintain the existing productive capacity of Precisions assets and other
operational related funding requirements.
Precision Drilling Trust
MANAGEMENTS REPORT TO THE UNITHOLDERS
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and all information in the Annual Report
are the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
management in accordance with the accounting policies in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements. When necessary, management has made informed judgments and estimates in accounting
for transactions which were not complete at the balance sheet date. In the opinion of management,
the consolidated financial statements have been prepared within acceptable limits of materiality,
and are in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) appropriate
in the circumstances. The financial information elsewhere in the Annual Report has been reviewed
to ensure consistency with that in the consolidated financial statements.
Management has prepared Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). The MD&A is based upon
Precision Drilling Trusts (the Trust) financial results prepared in accordance with Canadian
GAAP. The MD&A compares the audited financial results for the years ended December 31, 2006 to
December 31, 2005 and the years ended December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2004. Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements describes the impact on the consolidated financial statements
of significant differences between Canadian and United States GAAP.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the
Trusts financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with direction from our principal executive officer and principal
financial and accounting officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Trusts internal control over financial reporting. Managements evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting was based on the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that the Trusts internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2006.
The Trust has documented its assessment of internal control over financial reporting and has made
this assessment available to our auditors KPMG LLP. Managements assessment of the effectiveness
of the Trusts internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, has been
audited by KPMG LLP, as stated in their report included herein, which expresses an unqualified
opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006.
KPMG LLP, an independent firm of Chartered Accountants, was engaged, as approved by a vote of
unitholders at the Trusts most recent annual meeting, to audit the consolidated financial
statements and provide an independent professional opinion.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of three independent directors
who are not employees of the Trust, provides oversight to the financial reporting process.
Integral to this process is the Audit Committees review and discussion with management and the
external auditors of the quarterly and annual financial statements and reports prior to their
respective release. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing and discussing with
management and the external auditors major issues as to the adequacy of the Trusts internal
controls. The consolidated financial statements have been approved by the Board of Trustees on
the recommendation of the Board of Directors of Precision Drilling Corporation and its Audit
Committee.
|
|
|
(Signed) |
|
(Signed) |
|
|
|
Gene C. Stahl
|
|
Doug J. Strong |
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Precision Drilling Corporation,
|
|
Precision Drilling Corporation, |
Administrator to Precision Drilling Trust
|
|
Administrator to Precision Drilling Trust |
March 9, 2007
|
|
March 9, 2007 |
Precision Drilling Trust
AUDITORS REPORT TO THE UNITHOLDERS
To the Unitholders of Precision Drilling Trust
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust) as
at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the consolidated statements of earnings and retained earnings
(deficit) and cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trusts management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. With
respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, we also
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Trust as at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its
operations and its cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2006 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Trusts internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated February 13, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements
assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
(Signed: KPMG LLP)
Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta
February 13, 2007
Precision Drilling Trust
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of Precision Drilling Corporation, as Administrator of Precision
Drilling Trust and the Unitholders of Precision Drilling Trust
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying managements report,
that Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust) maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Trusts management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment
and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
An entitys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. An
entitys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the entity; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the entity are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the entity; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the entity assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Trust maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, the Trust
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have conducted our audits on the consolidated financial statements in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. With respect to the year ended December 31, 2006,
we also have conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our report dated February 13, 2007, expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
(Signed: KPMG LLP)
Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta
February 13, 2007
Precision Drilling Trust
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(Note 19) |
|
$ |
354,671 |
|
|
$ |
500,655 |
|
Income taxes recoverable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,445 |
|
|
|
507,690 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
(Note 5) |
|
|
1,107,617 |
|
|
|
943,900 |
|
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $503 (2005 $413) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,749 |
|
|
|
266,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,761,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness |
|
(Note 6) |
|
$ |
36,774 |
|
|
$ |
20,468 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(Note 19) |
|
|
130,202 |
|
|
|
134,303 |
|
Incomes taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,530 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
(Note 7) |
|
|
38,985 |
|
|
|
36,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,961 |
|
|
|
354,936 |
|
Long-term incentive plan payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
(Note 8) |
|
|
140,880 |
|
|
|
96,838 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
(Note 9) |
|
|
174,571 |
|
|
|
192,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,111 |
|
|
|
644,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
(Notes 12 and 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders capital |
|
(Note 10) |
|
|
1,412,294 |
|
|
|
1,377,875 |
|
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,219 |
) |
|
|
(303,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,217,075 |
|
|
|
1,074,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,761,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,882 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Approved by the Board of Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
(Signed) |
|
(Signed) |
|
|
|
Robert J.S. Gibson
|
|
Patrick M. Murray
|
|
|
Trustee
|
|
Trustee |
|
|
Precision Drilling Trust
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per unit/share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,437,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,269,179 |
|
|
$ |
1,028,488 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,207 |
|
|
|
641,805 |
|
|
|
566,297 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,217 |
|
|
|
76,397 |
|
|
|
64,149 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,234 |
|
|
|
71,561 |
|
|
|
74,829 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(3,474 |
) |
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
Reorganization costs |
|
(Note 23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842,305 |
|
|
|
803,801 |
|
|
|
697,175 |
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
595,279 |
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
|
|
331,313 |
|
Interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
38,735 |
|
|
|
46,575 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
(10,023 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
Premium on redemption of bonds |
|
(Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of short-term investments |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,658 |
|
|
|
293,231 |
|
|
|
289,932 |
|
Income taxes: |
|
(Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,526 |
|
|
|
241,402 |
|
|
|
53,698 |
|
Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,380 |
) |
|
|
(169,019 |
) |
|
|
48,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
|
|
72,383 |
|
|
|
101,801 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
572,512 |
|
|
|
220,848 |
|
|
|
188,131 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,335,382 |
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
|
|
59,889 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,589 |
|
|
|
1,630,563 |
|
|
|
247,404 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit), beginning of year |
|
(Note 4) |
|
|
(303,284 |
) |
|
|
1,041,683 |
|
|
|
794,279 |
|
Adjustment on cash purchase of employee stock options,
net of tax of $22,060 |
|
(Note 23(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification from contributed surplus on cash
buy-out of employee stock options |
|
(Note 23(c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of disposal proceeds |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,851,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares of
dissenting shareholders |
|
(Note 23(a)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared |
|
(Note 7) |
|
|
(471,524 |
) |
|
|
(70,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit), end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(195,219 |
) |
|
$ |
(303,284 |
) |
|
$ |
1,041,683 |
|
|
Earnings per unit/share from continuing operations: |
|
(Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
Earnings per unit/share: |
|
(Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
13.22 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Precision Drilling Trust
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
572,512 |
|
|
$ |
220,848 |
|
|
$ |
188,131 |
|
Adjustments and other items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive plan compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,234 |
|
|
|
71,561 |
|
|
|
74,829 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,380 |
) |
|
|
(169,019 |
) |
|
|
48,103 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,229 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss in market value of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain on long-term monetary items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
(4,284 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,899 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital balances |
|
(Note 19) |
|
|
(38,913 |
) |
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
(25,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,744 |
|
|
|
206,013 |
|
|
|
286,437 |
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,330 |
|
|
|
187,018 |
|
Changes in non-cash working capital balances
of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,310 |
) |
|
|
(26,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,020 |
|
|
|
160,221 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
(Notes 15 and 24) |
|
|
(16,428 |
) |
|
|
(30,421 |
) |
|
|
(679,814 |
) |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263,030 |
) |
|
|
(155,231 |
) |
|
|
(122,692 |
) |
Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,337 |
|
|
|
15,174 |
|
|
|
8,795 |
|
Proceeds on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
7,337 |
|
|
|
1,306,799 |
|
|
|
49,299 |
|
Proceeds on disposal of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
14,569 |
|
|
|
8,665 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment of
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,214 |
) |
|
|
(159,532 |
) |
Proceeds on sale of property, plant and equipment
of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,785 |
|
|
|
21,145 |
|
Purchase of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangibles of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital balances |
|
(Note 19) |
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
(2,912 |
) |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234,723 |
) |
|
|
1,037,529 |
|
|
|
(873,160 |
) |
Financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid |
|
(Note 7) |
|
|
(444,651 |
) |
|
|
(33,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204,910 |
) |
|
|
(703,970 |
) |
|
|
(173,260 |
) |
Increase in long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,338 |
|
|
|
96,826 |
|
|
|
522,136 |
|
Issuance of Trust units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Trust units on exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Trust units on purchase of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of disposal proceeds |
|
(Note 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(844,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash buy-out of employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares of dissenting shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares on exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,930 |
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
Issuance of common shares, net of costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,428 |
|
Deferred financing costs on long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,612 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in bank indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,306 |
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
|
|
(147,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375,021 |
) |
|
|
(1,462,574 |
) |
|
|
527,144 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,012 |
) |
|
|
100,642 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,012 |
|
|
|
21,370 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122,012 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Precision Drilling Trust
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts are stated in thousands of Canadian dollars except unit/share numbers and per unit/share amounts)
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Precision Drilling Trust (the Trust) is a provider of contract drilling, service rig and
ancillary services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in Canada and the
United States.
The Trust is an unincorporated open-ended investment trust governed by the laws of Alberta and
created pursuant to the Declaration of Trust dated September 22, 2005. On September 29, 2005, the
Trust, Precision Drilling Limited Partnership (PDLP), 1194312 Alberta Ltd., 1195309 Alberta
ULC., and Precision Drilling Corporation (Precision) entered into an Arrangement Agreement
(Plan of Arrangement or the Plan) to convert Precision to an income trust. As part of the
Plan of Arrangement, on November 7, 2005, Precision Drilling Corporation and certain of its
subsidiaries amalgamated, and continued as one corporation (PDC). After giving effect to the
Plan, and related transactions, all of the shares of PDC are owned by PDLP and indirectly by the
Trust.
Prior to the Plan of Arrangement effective date of November 7, 2005, the consolidated financial
statements included the accounts of Precision, its subsidiaries and its partnerships,
substantially all of which were wholly-owned. The conversion to a trust has been accounted for on
a continuity of interest basis and accordingly, the consolidated financial statements reflect the
financial position, results of operations and cash flows as if the Trust had always carried on
the business formerly carried on by Precision. Due to the conversion to a trust, certain
information included in the financial statements for prior periods may not be directly
comparable.
Pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement, shareholders ultimately received either Trust units or a
combination of Trust units and exchangeable LP units of PDLP for each previously held common
share of Precision (other than dissenting shareholders, who received cash equal to the fair value
of their shares). After giving effect to the Plan, the consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Trust, its subsidiaries and its partnerships.
NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of presentation
The Trusts accounting policies are in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). These policies are consistent with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States in all material respects except as outlined in Note 16.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and the disclosure of contingencies. Significant estimates used in the preparation of the
financial statements include, but are not limited to, depreciation of property, plant and
equipment, valuation of long-lived assets and goodwill, allowance for doubtful accounts, accrual
for long-term incentive plan, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from these and other
estimates, the impact of which would be recorded in future periods.
Certain of the prior periods figures have been reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation.
(b) Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Trust and all of its
subsidiaries and partnerships substantially all of which are wholly-owned. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The Trust does not hold investments in any companies where it exerts significant influence and
does not hold interests in any variable interest entities.
(c) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term investments with original maturities of
three months or less.
(d) Inventory
Inventory is primarily comprised of operating supplies and is carried at the lower of average
cost, being the cost to acquire the inventory, and replacement cost. Inventory is charged to
operating expenses as items are sold or consumed at the amount of the average cost of the item.
(e) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, including costs of direct material and labour.
Where costs are incurred to extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment or to
increase its capabilities, the amounts are capitalized to the related asset. Costs incurred to
repair or maintain property, plant and equipment are expensed as incurred.
Property, plant, and equipment are depreciated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life |
|
Salvage value |
|
Basis of depreciation |
|
Drilling rig equipment
|
|
5,000 (1) utilization days
|
|
20%
|
|
unit-of-production |
Drill pipe and drill collars
|
|
1,500 (1) operating days
|
|
|
|
unit-of-production |
Service rig equipment
|
|
24,000 service hours
|
|
20%
|
|
unit-of-production |
Drilling rig spare equipment
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
Rental equipment
|
|
10 to 15 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
Other equipment
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
Light duty vehicles
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
Heavy duty vehicles
|
|
7 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
Buildings
|
|
10 to 20 years
|
|
|
|
straight-line |
|
(f) Intangibles
Intangibles, which are comprised primarily of patents, are recorded at cost and amortized by the
straight-line method over their useful lives ranging from 10 to 12 years. The weighted average
amortization period is 12 years, and amortization over the next five years is anticipated to be
$90,000 per year for years one through four and $9,000 for year five.
(g) Goodwill
Goodwill is the amount that results when the purchase price of an acquired business exceeds the
sum of the amounts allocated to the assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, based on their
fair values. Goodwill is allocated as of the date of the business combination to the Trusts
reporting segments that are expected to benefit from the business combination.
Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The
impairment test is carried out in two steps.
In the first step, the carrying amount of the reporting segment is compared with its fair value.
When the fair value of a reporting segment exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting
segment is considered not to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is
unnecessary. The second step is carried out when the carrying amount of a reporting segment
exceeds its fair value, in which case the implied fair value of the reporting segments goodwill
is compared with its carrying amount to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The
implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the value of goodwill is
determined in a business combination, as described in the preceding paragraph, using the fair
value of the reporting segment as if it was the purchase price. When the carrying amount of a
reporting segments goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss
is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.
(h) Long-lived assets
On a periodic basis, management assesses the carrying value of long-lived assets for indications
of impairment. Indications of impairment include an ongoing lack of profitability and significant
changes in technology. When an indication of impairment is present, the Trust tests for
impairment by comparing the carrying value of the asset to its net recoverable amount. If the
carrying amount is greater than the net recoverable amount, the asset is written down to its
estimated fair value.
(i) Income taxes
Income earned directly by PDLP is not subject to income taxes as its income is taxed directly to
the PDLP partners. The Trust is a taxable entity under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and income
earned is taxable only to the extent it is not distributed or distributable to its holders of
Trust units and exchangeable LP units (together Unitholders). As the Trust
distributes all of its taxable income to its respective Unitholders pursuant to the requirements
of the Declaration of Trust, it does not make a provision for future income taxes.
PDC and its subsidiaries follow the liability method of accounting for future income taxes. Under
the liability method, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary
differences (differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the assets and
liabilities), and are measured using current or substantively enacted tax rates and laws expected
to apply when these differences reverse. The effect of a change in income tax rates on future tax
liabilities and assets is recognized in income in the period in which the change occurs.
During 2006 the Government of Canada released for comment draft legislation which would result in
a tax structure for trusts similar to that of corporate entities. If the proposed legislation is
implemented, the Trust would be required to recognize, on a prospective basis, future income
taxes on temporary differences in the Trust.
(j) Revenue recognition
The Trusts services are generally sold based upon purchase orders or contracts with a customer
that include fixed or determinable prices based upon daily, hourly or job rates. Customer
contract terms do not include provisions for significant post-service delivery obligations.
Revenue is recognized when services and equipment rentals are rendered and only when
collectability is reasonably assured.
(k) Employee benefit plans
At December 31, 2006, approximately 37% (2005 44%) of the employees of the Trusts subsidiaries
were enrolled in defined contribution retirement plans.
Employer contributions to defined contribution plans are expensed as employees earn the
entitlement and contributions are made.
(l) Long-term incentive plan
In 2006, the Trust instituted a long-term incentive plan (the LTIP) which compensates officers
and key employees through cash payments at the end of a three-year term. The compensation is
comprised of two components, a retention award and a performance award. The retention award is a
lump sum amount determined at the date of commencement in the LTIP and is accrued and charged to
earnings on a straight-line basis over the three-year term. The performance component is based on
the growth in cash distributions measured against a base distribution rate as determined by the
Compensation Committee of Precision. The estimated cost of the performance component is accrued
over the three-year term of the plan.
(m) Foreign currency translation
Accounts of the Trusts integrated foreign operations are translated to Canadian dollars using
average exchange rates for the month of the respective transaction for revenue and expenses.
Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end current exchange rate and
non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using historical rates of exchange. Gains or
losses resulting from these translation adjustments are included in net earnings.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at rates in effect at the time of the
transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates. Gains and losses
are included in net earnings.
(n) Stock-based compensation plans
The Trust had equity incentive plans in 2005 and prior periods, which are described in Note
23(c). The fair value of common share purchase options was calculated at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model and that value was recorded as compensation expense on a
straight-line basis over the grants vesting period with an offsetting credit to contributed
surplus. Upon exercise of the equity purchase option, the associated amount was reclassified from
contributed surplus to Unitholders capital as appropriate. Consideration paid by employees upon
exercise of equity purchase options was credited to Unitholders capital as appropriate.
(o) Exchangeable LP units
Exchangeable LP units are presented as equity of the Trust as their features make them
economically equivalent to Trust units.
(p) Per unit amounts
Basic per unit amounts are calculated using the weighted average number of Trust units
outstanding during the year. Diluted per unit amounts are calculated based on the treasury stock
method, which assumes that any proceeds obtained
on exercise of options would be used to purchase Trust units at the average market price during
the period. The weighted average number of units outstanding is then adjusted by the difference
between the number of units issued from the exercise of options and units repurchased from the
related proceeds.
The Trust had no dilutive instruments outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2006.
NOTE 3. ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Effective January 1, 2005, the Trust changed the useful life of its drilling rigs for
purposes of determining depreciation expense to 5,000 utilization days from 4,150 utilization
days (3,650 operating days), and its drill string to 1,500 from 1,100 operating days. Utilization
days include both operating and rig move days. This change in accounting estimate was applied
prospectively and resulted in a $10.7 million reduction in depreciation expense, or $0.09 per
diluted unit/share, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
NOTE 4. ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Stock-based compensation plans
Effective January 1, 2004, the Trust adopted the revised Canadian accounting standards with
respect to accounting for stock-based compensation. Under those standards, the fair value of
common share purchase options is calculated at the date of the grant and that value is recorded
as compensation expense over the vesting period of those grants. Under the previous standard, no
compensation expense was recorded when stock options were issued with any consideration received
upon exercise credited to share capital.
The Trust has retroactively applied this standard, with restatement of prior years, to all common
share purchase options granted since January 1, 2002. This has resulted in a charge to net
earnings for the year ended December 31, 2004 of $13.8 million or $0.11 diluted earnings per
share and a reduction to opening retained earnings of $14.5 million at January 1, 2004.
NOTE 5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
2006 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Rig equipment |
|
$ |
1,294,289 |
|
|
$ |
434,491 |
|
|
$ |
859,798 |
|
Rental equipment |
|
|
94,184 |
|
|
|
40,658 |
|
|
|
53,526 |
|
Other equipment |
|
|
95,137 |
|
|
|
61,317 |
|
|
|
33,820 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
78,675 |
|
|
|
24,461 |
|
|
|
54,214 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
29,583 |
|
|
|
9,673 |
|
|
|
19,910 |
|
Assets under construction |
|
|
76,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,239 |
|
Land |
|
|
10,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,110 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,678,217 |
|
|
$ |
570,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,107,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
2005 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Rig equipment |
|
$ |
1,143,786 |
|
|
$ |
386,191 |
|
|
$ |
757,595 |
|
Rental equipment |
|
|
81,099 |
|
|
|
35,307 |
|
|
|
45,792 |
|
Other equipment |
|
|
102,727 |
|
|
|
62,852 |
|
|
|
39,875 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
68,911 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
|
|
48,208 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
9,580 |
|
|
|
23,250 |
|
Assets under construction |
|
|
20,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,184 |
|
Land |
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,458,533 |
|
|
$ |
514,633 |
|
|
$ |
943,900 |
|
|
NOTE 6. BANK INDEBTEDNESS
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Trust had available $60.0 million and US$5.0 million
under uncommitted, unsecured credit facilities, of which $36.8 million had been drawn (2005 -
$20.5 million). Availability of these facilities were reduced by outstanding letters of credit in
the amount of $4.0 million (2005 $8.4 million). Advances under the facilities are available at
the banks prime lending rate, U.S. base rate, U.S. Libor plus applicable margin or Bankers
Acceptance plus applicable margin, or in combination. As at December 31, 2006, the amounts drawn
under these facilities were at the banks prime lending rate of 6% (2005 5%).
NOTE 7. DISTRIBUTIONS
The beneficiaries of the Trust are the holders of Trust units and the partners of PDLP are
the holders of exchangeable LP units and the Trust. The monthly distributions made by the Trust
to Unitholders are determined by the Trustees. PDLP earns interest income from a promissory note
issued by its subsidiary PDC at a rate which is determined by the terms of the promissory note.
PDLP in substance pays distributions to holders of exchangeable LP units in amounts equal to the
distributions paid to the holders of Trust units. All distributions are made to Unitholders of
record on the last business day of each calendar month.
The Declaration of Trust provides that an amount equal to net income of the Trust not already
paid to Unitholders in the year will become payable on December 31 of each year such that the
Trust will not be liable for ordinary income taxes for such year.
A distribution reinvestment plan (the DRIP) was approved by the Board of Trustees in February
2006, and implemented in March 2006. The DRIP allows certain holders of Trust units, at their
option, to reinvest monthly cash distributions to acquire additional Trust units at the average
market price as defined in the DRIP. Unitholders who are not resident in Canada or hold
exchangeable LP units are not eligible to participate in the DRIP. The Trust reserved the right
to amend, suspend, or terminate the DRIP at any time. The DRIP was suspended in December 2006.
A summary of the distributions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Declared |
|
$ |
471,524 |
|
|
$ |
70,510 |
|
Paid |
|
$ |
444,651 |
|
|
$ |
33,875 |
|
Payable in cash at December 31 |
|
$ |
38,985 |
|
|
$ |
36,635 |
|
Payable in units at December 31 |
|
$ |
24,523 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Included in the 2006 distributions declared is a special non-cash distribution of $24.5
million ($0.195 per unit). This special distribution was settled on January 16, 2007 through the
issuance of units. Immediately following the issuance of these units, the Trust consolidated the
units such that the number of Trust units and exchangeable LP units remained unchanged from the
number outstanding prior to the special distribution.
NOTE 8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Extendible revolving unsecured facility:
At December 31, 2006, PDC, a subsidiary of the Trust, has available a three-year revolving
unsecured facility of $700.0 million (or U.S. equivalent) (2005 $550.0 million) with a
syndicate led by a Canadian chartered bank, which is guaranteed by the Trust. The facility
matures on November 2, 2009 and is renewable annually at the option of the lenders. Advances are
available to PDC under this facility either at the banks prime lending rate, U.S. base rate,
U.S. Libor plus applicable margin or Bankers Acceptance plus applicable margin or in
combination. The applicable margin is dependent on the Trusts consolidated debt to cash flow
ratio and the percentage of the total facility outstanding, which at December 31, 2006 and 2005
was 75 basis points. The facility requires that the Trust maintain a ratio of total liabilities
to total equity of less than 1:1, a trailing 12 month ratio of consolidated debt to cash flow of
less than 2.75:1 and total distributions to Unitholders of less than 100% of consolidated cash
flow as defined in the facility agreement. As at December 31, 2006, the Trust had drawn $140.9
million (2005 $96.8 million) under this facility.
Unsecured debentures and notes:
During the fourth quarter of 2005, Precision repaid all of its outstanding debentures and notes
pursuant to the early redemption provisions of the related agreements. The difference between the
$766.7 million redemption price and the carrying value of the debentures was charged to
income.
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes differs from that which would be expected by applying
Canadian statutory income tax rates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
587,658 |
|
|
$ |
293,231 |
|
|
$ |
289,932 |
|
Federal and provincial statutory rates |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
Tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
193,927 |
|
|
$ |
99,699 |
|
|
$ |
104,375 |
|
Adjusted for the effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
Non-deductible stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
2,948 |
|
Income to be distributed to Unitholders, not subject to
tax in the Trust |
|
|
(155,354 |
) |
|
|
(23,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Utilization of losses and surcharge credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(2,896 |
) |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
(7,600 |
) |
|
Income tax expense before tax rate reductions |
|
|
35,974 |
|
|
|
72,383 |
|
|
|
104,688 |
|
Reduction of future income tax balances due to
enacted tax rate reductions |
|
|
(20,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,887 |
) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
15,146 |
|
|
$ |
72,383 |
|
|
$ |
101,801 |
|
|
Effective income tax rate before enacted tax rate reductions |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
In 2006 the federal and certain provincial governments enacted various reductions to
corporate income tax rates. The Government of Canada introduced tax rate reductions to be
implemented over the next four years that will decrease the federal corporate income tax rate
from 21% to 19%. The federal corporate capital tax was eliminated effective January 1, 2006 and
the federal corporate surtax will be eliminated in 2008. The Province of Alberta reduced the
corporate income tax rate by 1.5% (2004 1.0%) effective April 1, 2006. These and other
provincial corporate income tax rate reductions have been reflected as a reduction of future tax
expense.
The net future tax liability is comprised of the tax effect of the following temporary differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Future income tax liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment and intangibles |
|
$ |
213,281 |
|
|
$ |
232,277 |
|
|
Future income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond redemption premium |
|
|
13,314 |
|
|
|
20,820 |
|
Losses carried forward |
|
|
9,884 |
|
|
|
14,586 |
|
Share issue costs |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
Long-term incentive plan |
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,937 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
38,710 |
|
|
|
39,760 |
|
|
Net future income tax liability |
|
$ |
174,571 |
|
|
$ |
192,517 |
|
|
PDC and its subsidiaries have available net capital losses of $33.6 million of which, after
valuation allowances, the benefit of $33.6 million has been recognized. These capital losses can
be carried forward indefinitely.
During 2004, $7.5 million representing future tax expense on foreign exchange gains
associated with the Trusts U.S.$300 million unsecured notes was charged to the cumulative
translation account in Unitholders equity. This amount was related to the Trusts discontinued
operations.
NOTE 10. UNITHOLDERS CAPITAL
(a) Authorized unlimited number of voting Trust units
unlimited number of voting exchangeable LP units
(b) Unitholders capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust units |
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance, November 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issued pursuant to the Plan |
|
|
122,512,799 |
|
|
|
1,339,646 |
|
Options
exercised cash consideration |
|
|
1,676,616 |
|
|
|
8,263 |
|
reclassification from contributed surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,342 |
|
Issued for cash |
|
|
163,506 |
|
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
124,352,921 |
|
|
|
1,365,755 |
|
Issued pursuant to distribution reinvestment plan (Note 7) |
|
|
296,621 |
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
Issued on retraction of exchangeable LP units |
|
|
886,787 |
|
|
|
9,697 |
|
Issued and
consolidated pursuant to special distribution (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,480 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
125,536,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,409,828 |
|
|
Trust units are redeemable at the option of the holder, at which time all rights with
respect to such units are cancelled. Upon redemption, the unitholder is entitled to receive a
price per unit equal to the lesser of 90% of the average market price of the Trusts units for
the 10 trading days just prior to the date of redemption, and the closing market price of the
Trusts units on the date of redemption. The maximum value of units that can be redeemed for cash
is $50,000 per month. Redemptions, if any, in excess of this amount are satisfied by issuing a
note from PDC to the unitholder, payable over 15 years and bearing interest at a market rate set
by the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable LP units |
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance, November 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issued pursuant to the Plan |
|
|
1,108,382 |
|
|
|
12,120 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,108,382 |
|
|
|
12,120 |
|
Redeemed on retraction of exchangeable LP units |
|
|
(886,787 |
) |
|
|
(9,697 |
) |
Issued and consolidated pursuant to special distribution (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
221,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,466 |
|
|
Exchangeable LP units have voting rights and were exchangeable, after May 6, 2006, for
Trust units on a one-for-one basis at the option of the holder. Holders are entitled to monthly
cash distributions equal to those paid to holders of Trust units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Summary as at December 31, |
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Trust units |
|
|
125,536,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,409,828 |
|
|
|
124,352,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,365,755 |
|
Exchangeable LP units |
|
|
221,595 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
1,108,382 |
|
|
|
12,120 |
|
|
Unitholders capital |
|
|
125,757,924 |
|
|
$ |
1,412,294 |
|
|
|
125,461,303 |
|
|
$ |
1,377,875 |
|
|
NOTE 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Trust has registered pension plans covering a significant number of its employees.
(a) Defined contribution plan
Under the defined contribution plan, the Trust matches individual contributions up to 5% of the
employees compensation. Total expense under the defined contribution plan in 2006 was $5.5
million (2005 $8.5 million; 2004
$7.3 million), of which $nil (2005 $3.2 million; 2004 $3.0 million) relates to discontinued operations.
(b) Retirement allowance
The Trust had entered into an employment agreement with a senior officer, which provided for a
one-time payment upon
retirement. The amount of this retirement allowance increased by a fixed amount for each
year of service over a ten year period commencing April 30, 1996. The estimated cost of this
benefit was being accrued and charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the ten year
period. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Trust charged $201,000 (2004 $335,000) and
paid $2.9 million as final settlement of this liability.
NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS
The Trust has commitments for operating lease agreements, primarily for vehicles and office
space, in the aggregate amount of $26.5 million. Payments over the next five years are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
7,858 |
|
2008 |
|
|
6,551 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,820 |
|
2010 |
|
|
4,044 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
Rent expense included in the statements of earnings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
4,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,189 |
|
2005 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
11,983 |
|
|
|
15,819 |
|
2004 |
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
17,284 |
|
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
NOTE 13. PER UNIT/SHARE AMOUNTS
The following table summarizes the units, adjusted retroactively for a 2 for 1 stock split
on May 18, 2005, used in calculating earnings per unit/share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Weighted average units/shares outstanding basic |
|
|
125,545 |
|
|
|
123,304 |
|
|
|
115,654 |
|
Effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,108 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
Weighted average units/shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
125,545 |
|
|
|
125,412 |
|
|
|
117,210 |
|
|
NOTE 14. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
During the year ended December 31, 2006 no customers (2005 no customers; 2004 one
customer) accounted for more than 10% of the Trusts revenue.
NOTE 15. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions have been accounted for by the purchase method with results of operations
acquired included in the consolidated financial statements from the closing date of acquisition.
Acquisitions relating to discontinued operations are reflected in Note 24.
On August 17, 2006, the Trust acquired all of the shares of Terra Water Group Ltd. (Terra), a
privately owned provider of wastewater treatment units for the traditional drilling rig camp
market in western Canada. The Terra operations are included in the Completion and Production
Services segment. The acquisition has been accounted for by the purchase method with the results
of operations included in the financial statements from the date of acquisition. The details of
the acquisition are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at assigned values: |
|
|
|
|
Working capital (1) |
|
$ |
207 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,168 |
|
Goodwill (no tax basis) |
|
|
13,922 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(614 |
) |
Future income taxes |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
16,471 |
|
|
Consideration: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
16,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Working capital includes cash of $43 |
NOTE 16. UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP which
conform with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) in all material
respects, except as follows:
(a) Income taxes
In 2000 the Trust adopted the liability method of accounting for future income taxes without
restatement of prior years. As a result, the Trust recorded an adjustment to retained earnings
and future tax liability in the amount of $70.0 million at January 1, 2000. U.S. GAAP required
the use of the liability method prescribed in the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, which substantially conforms to the Canadian GAAP accounting standard adopted in
2000. Application of U.S. GAAP in years prior to 2000 would have resulted in $70.0 million of
additional goodwill being recognized at January 1, 2000 as opposed to an implementation
adjustment to retained earnings allowed under Canadian GAAP. Prior to 2002 goodwill was amortized
under Canadian and U.S. GAAP. As a result, $7.0 million of amortization was recorded on the
additional goodwill in 2000 and 2001 under U.S. GAAP. In 2005 and 2006 the U.S. GAAP financial
statements would reflect an increase in goodwill of $63.0 million and a corresponding increase in
retained earnings.
(b) Stock-based compensation
In 2004, under Canadian GAAP, the Trust adopted the fair value of accounting for stock-based
compensation with restatement of prior years for share purchase options granted after January 1,
2002. U.S. GAAP allows the use of either the intrinsic method, as prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25, or the fair value method as prescribed by SFAS 123. Where
companies elect to use the intrinsic method, disclosure of the impact of using the fair value
method is required.
Application of the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion 25 would have resulted in an
increase in net earnings of $21.3 million for 2005 (2004 $13.8 million) with a corresponding
increase in Unitholders equity. Had the Trust determined compensation based on the fair value at
the date of grant for its options under SFAS 123, net earnings in accordance with U.S. GAAP would
have decreased to $1,588.5 million in 2005 (2004 decreased to $247.8 million). Basic earnings
per unit/share would have been $12.88 in 2005 (2004 $2.14).
Under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 44 (FIN 44) Accounting
for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, compensation expense is required to be
recognized on certain modifications to stock-based compensation plans. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, employee stock options (options) were subjected to a variety of changes or
restructurings which included accelerated vesting, repricing on the date of conversion to an
income trust to reflect the distribution of disposal consideration to Precisions shareholders
just prior to conversion, or repurchase for cash depending on elections made by the option
holders. Under Canadian GAAP, even with repricing, the options were treated as equity awards and
were not accounted for under a variable accounting method. However, under U.S. GAAP, the
accelerated vesting represents a restructuring in the form of a modification that would result in
a new measurement of compensation expense on the date of the modification to the date of exercise
using the intrinsic method. For award repricing, this restructuring only results in additional
expense provided that the aggregate intrinsic value of the awards immediately after the change is
not greater than that immediately before, and the ratio of exercise price per unit/share to the
market value per unit/share is not reduced. To the extent that both criteria are not met, the
awards are accounted for under ABP Opinion 25 as a variable award from the date of restructuring
to the date the award was exercised. For restructuring in the form of cash buy-out of the
options, the intrinsic value was charged to retained earnings under Canadian GAAP, however, under
U.S. GAAP the amount was charged to earnings.
(c) Redemption of Trust units
Under the Declaration of Trust, Trust units are redeemable at any time on demand by the
unitholder for cash and notes
(see Note 10). Under U.S. GAAP, the amount included on the consolidated balance sheet for
Unitholders equity would be moved to temporary equity and recorded at an amount equal to the
redemption value of the Trust units as at the balance sheet date. The same accounting treatment
would be applicable to the exchangeable LP units. The redemption value of the Trust units and the
exchangeable LP units is determined with respect to the trading value of the Trust units as at
each balance sheet date, and the amount of the redemption value is classified as temporary
equity. Changes (increases and decreases) in the redemption value during a period results in a
change to temporary equity and is charged to retained earnings.
(d) Acquisitions
Under U.S. GAAP, when significant acquisitions have occurred, supplemental disclosure is required
on a pro forma basis of the results of operations for the current prior periods as though the
business combination had occurred at the beginning of the period unless it is not practicable to
do so. At December 31, 2005, the Trust did not have access to sufficient information to provide
this disclosure for acquisitions completed in 2004. No significant acquisitions occurred in 2006.
(e) Recently issued accounting pronouncements
On September 15, 2006, FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. The statement provides
enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, but does not expand the
use of fair value in any new circumstances. The new standard is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and will be effective for the Trusts December 31, 2008 year
end. Management does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a consistent recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006, and will be effective for the Trusts December 31, 2007 year end. The
impact of this interpretation is yet to be determined by management.
On February 16, 2006, FASB issued SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments -
an amendment of FASB Statements no. 133 and 140. The statement clarifies and simplifies the
financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments by requiring more consistent
accounting that eliminates exemptions. The new standard is effective for financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins after
September 15, 2006, and will be effective for the Trusts first quarter of the December 31, 2007
year end. Management does not expect this statement to have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
The application of U.S. GAAP accounting principles would have the following impact on the
consolidated financial statements:
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
572,512 |
|
|
$ |
220,848 |
|
|
$ |
188,131 |
|
Adjustments under U.S. GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,229 |
|
|
|
8,190 |
|
Cash buy-out of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value recognized on options exercised and/or repriced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations under U.S. GAAP |
|
|
572,512 |
|
|
|
207,688 |
|
|
|
196,321 |
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations under Canadian GAAP |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,409,715 |
|
|
|
59,273 |
|
Adjustments under U.S. GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
5,647 |
|
Cash buy-out of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value recognized on options exercised and/or repriced |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations under U.S. GAAP |
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,388,060 |
|
|
|
64,920 |
|
|
Net earnings under U.S. GAAP |
|
|
579,589 |
|
|
|
1,595,748 |
|
|
|
261,241 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,933 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income under U.S. GAAP |
|
$ |
579,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,595,748 |
|
|
$ |
240,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations per unit/share under U.S. GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
Earnings per unit/share under U.S. GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
12.94 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.62 |
|
|
$ |
12.72 |
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit) under U.S. GAAP, beginning of year |
|
$ |
(3,167,045 |
) |
|
$ |
1,133,030 |
|
|
$ |
871,789 |
|
Net earnings under U.S. GAAP |
|
|
579,589 |
|
|
|
1,595,748 |
|
|
|
261,241 |
|
Distributions declared |
|
|
(471,524 |
) |
|
|
(70,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution of disposal proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,851,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares of dissenting shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Opening temporary equity on conversion to an income trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,560,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in redemption value of temporary equity |
|
|
1,185,490 |
|
|
|
(378,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit) under U.S. GAAP, end of year |
|
$ |
(1,873,490 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,167,045 |
) |
|
$ |
1,133,030 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
As at December 31, |
|
As reported |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
As reported |
|
|
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
372,445 |
|
|
$ |
372,445 |
|
|
$ |
507,690 |
|
|
$ |
507,690 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,107,617 |
|
|
|
1,107,617 |
|
|
|
943,900 |
|
|
|
943,900 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
280,749 |
|
|
|
343,778 |
|
|
|
266,827 |
|
|
|
329,856 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,761,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,824,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,781,911 |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
205,961 |
|
|
$ |
205,961 |
|
|
$ |
354,936 |
|
|
$ |
354,936 |
|
Long-term incentive plan payable |
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
22,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
140,880 |
|
|
|
140,880 |
|
|
|
96,838 |
|
|
|
96,838 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
174,571 |
|
|
|
174,571 |
|
|
|
192,517 |
|
|
|
192,517 |
|
Temporary equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,153,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,304,665 |
|
Unitholders capital |
|
|
1,412,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,377,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(195,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,873,490 |
) |
|
|
(303,284 |
) |
|
|
(3,167,045 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
1,761,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,824,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,781,911 |
|
|
NOTE 17. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
The Trust operates primarily in Canada, in two industry segments; Contract Drilling
Services and Completion and Production Services. Contract Drilling Services includes drilling
rigs, procurement and distribution of oilfield supplies, camp and catering services, and
manufacture, sale and repair of drilling equipment. Completion and Production Services includes
service rigs, snubbing units, wastewater treatment units, and oilfield equipment rental.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Completion and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Production |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,009,821 |
|
|
$ |
441,017 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(13,254 |
) |
|
$ |
1,437,584 |
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
473,624 |
|
|
|
163,119 |
|
|
|
(41,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
595,279 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,573 |
|
|
|
32,013 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,234 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,198,284 |
|
|
|
507,510 |
|
|
|
55,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,761,186 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
172,440 |
|
|
|
108,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,749 |
|
Capital expenditures* |
|
|
220,397 |
|
|
|
39,273 |
|
|
|
3,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,030 |
|
|
* Excludes business acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Completion and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Production |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
916,221 |
|
|
$ |
369,667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16,709 |
) |
|
$ |
1,269,179 |
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
404,385 |
|
|
|
121,643 |
|
|
|
(60,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,378 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,233 |
|
|
|
27,402 |
|
|
|
4,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,561 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,159,687 |
|
|
|
486,701 |
|
|
|
72,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718,882 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
172,440 |
|
|
|
94,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,827 |
|
Capital expenditures* |
|
|
106,986 |
|
|
|
34,576 |
|
|
|
13,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Completion and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Production |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
727,710 |
|
|
$ |
313,386 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,608 |
) |
|
$ |
1,028,488 |
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
282,315 |
|
|
|
77,074 |
|
|
|
(28,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,313 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
42,245 |
|
|
|
27,508 |
|
|
|
5,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,829 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
971,863 |
|
|
|
461,191 |
|
|
|
180,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,613,063 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
172,440 |
|
|
|
94,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,827 |
|
Capital expenditures* |
|
|
74,975 |
|
|
|
31,759 |
|
|
|
15,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,692 |
|
|
* Excludes business acquisitions
NOTE 18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Fair value
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, income taxes recoverable,
bank indebtedness, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, income tax payable and distributions
payable approximate their fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity of the
instruments.
(b) Credit risk
Accounts receivable includes balances from a large number of customers primarily operating in the
oil and gas industry. The Trust assesses the creditworthiness of its customers on an ongoing
basis as well as monitoring the amount and age of balances outstanding. Accordingly, the Trust
views the credit risks on these amounts as normal for the industry. As at December 31, 2006 the
Trusts allowance for doubtful accounts was $5.6 million (2005 $5.1 million).
(c) Interest rate risk
The Trust is exposed to interest rate risk with respect to interest expense on its credit
facilities.
(d) Foreign currency risk
The Trust was exposed to foreign currency fluctuations in relation to its international
operations prior to their disposal in 2005 (see Note 24). To manage a portion of this exposure,
the Trust designated US$300.0 million notes as a hedge against foreign currency fluctuations of
its investment in self-sustaining foreign operations. A net foreign exchange gain of $10.1
million associated with these notes was included in the cumulative translation account during
2005 (2004 gain of $43.1 million). The cumulative translation account at August 31, 2005 of
$24.8 million was charged to the gain on disposal of discontinued operations in 2005.
NOTE 19. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Interest paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continuing operations |
|
$ |
8,929 |
|
|
$ |
43,232 |
|
|
$ |
45,338 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,929 |
|
|
$ |
43,536 |
|
|
$ |
46,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
continuing operations |
|
$ |
207,160 |
|
|
$ |
91,496 |
|
|
$ |
38,759 |
|
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,176 |
|
|
|
35,935 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
207,160 |
|
|
$ |
126,672 |
|
|
$ |
74,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of change in non-cash working capital balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
148,046 |
|
|
$ |
(171,363 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,714 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(2,038 |
) |
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
(2,017 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
5,964 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(172,634 |
) |
|
|
149,906 |
|
|
|
14,939 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(31,362 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,828 |
) |
|
The components of accounts receivable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Trade |
|
$ |
220,623 |
|
|
$ |
306,264 |
|
Accrued trade |
|
|
93,308 |
|
|
|
148,537 |
|
Prepaids and other |
|
|
40,740 |
|
|
|
45,854 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
354,671 |
|
|
$ |
500,655 |
|
|
The components of accounts payable and accrued liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
60,650 |
|
|
$ |
71,027 |
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll |
|
|
47,001 |
|
|
|
30,351 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,551 |
|
|
|
32,925 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
130,202 |
|
|
$ |
134,303 |
|
|
NOTE 20. CONTINGENCIES
The business and operations of the Trust are complex and the Trust has executed a number of
significant financings, business combinations, acquisitions and dispositions over the course of
its history. The computation of income taxes payable as a result of these transactions involves
many complex factors as well as the Trusts interpretation of relevant tax legislation and
regulations. The Trusts management believes that the provision for income tax is adequate and in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legislation and
regulations. However, there are a number of tax filing positions that can still be the subject of
review by taxation authorities who may successfully challenge the Trusts interpretation of the
applicable tax legislation and regulations, with the result that additional taxes could be
payable by the Trust and the amount payable could be up to $300 million.
The Trust, through the performance of its services, product sales and business arrangements, is
sometimes named as a defendant in litigation. The outcome of such claims against the Trust is not
determinable at this time, however, their ultimate resolution is not expected to have a material
adverse effect on the Trust.
The Trust maintains a level of insurance coverage deemed appropriate by management for matters
for which insurance coverage can be acquired.
NOTE 21. GUARANTEES
The Trust has entered into agreements indemnifying certain parties primarily with respect
to tax and specific third party claims associated with businesses sold by the Trust. Due to the
nature of the indemnifications, the maximum exposure under these agreements cannot be estimated.
No amounts have been recorded for the indemnities as the Trusts obligations under them are not
probable or estimable.
NOTE 22. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Trust incurred a total of $6.1 million in
legal fees with a law firm for various legal matters where a director of Precision Drilling
Corporation was a partner. These transactions were incurred in the normal course of business and
were recorded at the exchange amounts.
NOTE 23. REORGANIZATION INTO A TRUST
To effect the reorganization into a trust, for the year ended December 31, 2005, the Trust
incurred $17.5 million of reorganization costs comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
12,600 |
|
Legal, accounting, financial advisory services and other |
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,512 |
|
|
Share capital of Precision prior to reorganization into the Trust included:
(a) Common shares
On November 7, 2005, Precision converted to an unincorporated, open-ended investment trust
pursuant to the Plan, which resulted in shareholders receiving one Trust unit or one exchangeable
LP unit or a combination thereof, for each previously held common share. Common shares held by
shareholders who dissented to the Plan were repurchased and cancelled on the effective date of
the Plan. All outstanding common share purchase options were converted to options to acquire
Trust units. The holder then had three options; exercise the options, have the Trust repurchase
them for cash using the closing market price of the Trust one day prior to cash-out, or have the
Trust repurchase the options as set-out above and use the proceeds to purchase an equivalent
number of Trust units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
54,845,678 |
|
|
$ |
936,744 |
|
Issuance of common shares, net of costs and related tax effect |
|
|
4,400,000 |
|
|
|
280,783 |
|
Options exercised cash consideration |
|
|
1,544,534 |
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
reclassification from contributed surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
60,790,212 |
|
|
|
1,274,967 |
|
Options exercised cash consideration |
|
|
578,346 |
|
|
|
24,516 |
|
reclassification from contributed surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
Balance, May 18, 2005 |
|
|
61,368,558 |
|
|
|
1,301,004 |
|
Issued on 2:1 stock split |
|
|
61,368,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised cash consideration |
|
|
1,679,110 |
|
|
|
49,414 |
|
reclassification from contributed surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,284 |
|
Adjustment to number of shares outstanding |
|
|
21,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares owned by dissenting shareholders |
|
|
(817,005 |
) |
|
|
(8,936 |
) |
|
Balance, November 7, 2005, before conversion to units |
|
|
123,621,181 |
|
|
|
1,351,766 |
|
Conversion to Trust units |
|
|
(122,512,799 |
) |
|
|
(1,339,646 |
) |
Conversion to exchangeable LP units |
|
|
(1,108,382 |
) |
|
|
(12,120 |
) |
|
Balance, November 7, 2005, after conversion to units |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Plan, any shareholders of Precision could dissent and be paid the fair
value of the shares, being the trading price at the close of business on the last business day prior to the Special Meeting of
Securityholders on October 31, 2005. As a result, the Trust repurchased for cancellation a total
of 817,005 shares for $43.3 million, of which a premium of $34.4 million over the stated capital
was charged to retained earnings.
In the third quarter of 2004, the Trust issued 4,400,000 common shares at US $49.80 for net
proceeds of approximately $276.5 million.
(b) Contributed surplus:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
14,266 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
13,837 |
|
Reclassification to common shares on exercise of options |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
26,024 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
13,077 |
|
Accelerated vesting of options on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
5,205 |
|
Reclassification to common shares on exercise of options prior to the Plan |
|
|
(11,805 |
) |
Accelerated vesting of options pursuant to the Plan |
|
|
3,056 |
|
Reclassification to Trust units on exercise of options |
|
|
(12,342 |
) |
Reclassification to retained earnings on cash buy-out of options |
|
|
(23,215 |
) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
(c) Equity incentive plans
Prior to conversion to a Trust, Precision had equity incentive plans under which the exercise
price of each option equaled the market value of the Corporations stock on the date of grant and
an options maximum term was 10 years. Options vested over a period of 1 to 4 years from the date
of grant as employees or directors rendered continuous service to Precision.
Options held by employees of the Energy Services and International Contract Drilling Divisions
and of CEDA International Corporation (CEDA) became fully vested when these businesses were
sold during the third quarter of 2005 (see Note 24). Pursuant to the Plan, the remaining
outstanding options were exchanged for newly vested options to acquire Trust units. The exercise
prices of the options to acquire Trust units were adjusted downward to reflect the value of the
distribution of certain assets to shareholders as part of the Plan. The options to acquire Trust
units expired on November 22, 2005.
Upon acceleration of the vesting of options, options holders were given the choice to pay the
exercise price and receive a common share or Trust unit, as applicable, or to surrender their
option for a cash payment equal to the difference between the closing market value of the common
share or Trust unit one day prior to cash buy-out and the exercise price. All outstanding options
were exercised prior to December 31, 2005.
A summary of the equity incentive plans, adjusted retroactively to reflect the 2 for 1 stock
split on May 18, 2005, as at December 31, 2004 and 2005 and changes during the periods then ended
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Common Share Purchase Options |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
6,786,388 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 32.95 |
|
|
$ |
20.85 |
|
|
|
4,076,396 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,381,000 |
|
|
|
20.13 36.32 |
|
|
|
31.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(3,089,068 |
) |
|
|
6.75 28.78 |
|
|
|
17.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(383,200 |
) |
|
|
15.53 32.95 |
|
|
|
25.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
6,695,120 |
|
|
|
15.53 36.32 |
|
|
|
27.44 |
|
|
|
2,580,302 |
|
Granted |
|
|
696,200 |
|
|
|
37.76 48.29 |
|
|
|
41.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,835,802 |
) |
|
|
15.53 48.29 |
|
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(141,650 |
) |
|
|
15.53 31.87 |
|
|
|
30.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(1,105,018 |
) |
|
|
15.53 45.25 |
|
|
|
31.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchanged for Trust unit purchase options |
|
|
(3,308,850 |
) |
|
|
15.53 48.29 |
|
|
|
30.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Trust Unit Purchase Options |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Outstanding at November 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted in exchange for common share
purchase options pursuant to the Plan |
|
|
3,308,850 |
|
|
nil 27.25 |
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
3,308,850 |
|
Granted on repricing of common share options |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
nil |
|
nil |
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,676,616 |
) |
|
nil 27.25 |
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
(1,637,834 |
) |
|
nil 27.25 |
|
|
13.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the Trusts stock option plans, options had an initial exercise price
equal to the market price at date of grant. The per share weighted average fair value of stock
options granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 was $8.30 (2004 $7.83) based on the
date of grant valuation using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: average risk-free interest rate of 3.28% (2004 3.44%), average expected life of
2.92 years (2004 2.97 years) and expected volatility of 28.04% (2004 32.33%).
For the year ended December 31, 2005 stock-based compensation costs included in net earnings
totaled $21.3 million (2004 $13.8 million), of which $10.1 million (2004 $5.6 million)
related to discontinued operations.
NOTE 24. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
A summary of discontinued operations is presented below including: disposal transactions;
financial information with respect to amounts included in the statements of earnings and
statements of cash flows; significant accounting policies relating specifically to discontinued
operations; and business acquisitions included in discontinued operations.
The details of disposals of discontinued operations are as follows:
2006
In January 2007, the Trust received $21.3 million as final payment of the working capital
adjustment related to the 2005 disposition of its Energy Services and International Contract
Drilling divisions to Weatherford International Ltd. (Weatherford). This amount had been
recorded in accounts receivable at December 31, 2006 (2005 $20.0 million).
In August 2006, the Trust received $4.8 million as settlement of the working capital adjustment
arising from the 2005 disposal of CEDA and $2.5 million as final payment of the contingent
consideration associated with the 2004 disposal of United Diamond Ltd.
In total these amounts resulted in a gain of $8.3 million ($7.1 million net of tax).
2005
On August 31, 2005, the Trust sold its Energy Services and International Contract Drilling
divisions to Weatherford International Ltd. for proceeds of approximately $1.13 billion cash and
26 million common shares of Weatherford, valued at $2.1 billion. In conjunction with the Plan of
Arrangement, the Trust then distributed a total of $2.9 billion of this consideration to
Unitholders, being $844.3 million in cash and 25.7 million Weatherford common shares, valued at
$2.0 billion which represented the fair value of the shares at the date of distribution. Included
in the statement of earnings for the year ended December 31, 2005 was a loss on disposal of these
shares of $71.0 million. In conjunction with this sale, a working capital adjustment was included
as part of the purchase and sale agreement. This adjustment was settled in January 2007.
In addition on September 13, 2005, the Trust sold its industrial plant maintenance business
carried on by CEDA to Borealis Investments Inc., an investment entity of the Ontario Municipal
Employees Retirement System, for proceeds of approximately $274.0 million. Included in the CEDA
proceeds was $26.8 million for the purchase of CASCA Electric Ltd. and CASCA Tech Inc., a
transaction undertaken by CEDA on July 29, 2005. A working capital adjustment relating to this
disposal was received in August 2006.
The Energy Services, International Contract Drilling and CEDA assets were included in the Energy
Services, Contract Drilling and Rental and Production segments respectively and were disposed in
accordance with an extensive process undertaken by the Trusts Board of Directors to investigate
avenues of value creation for the Trusts Unitholders.
2004
On February 12, 2004, the Trust sold substantially all of the assets of Fleet Cementers, Inc. for
proceeds of $25.7 million. On May 7, 2004, the Trust sold the assets of the Polar Completions
division for proceeds of $15.0 million, subject to working capital adjustments. On August 31,
2004, the Trust sold its 65% interest in United Diamond Ltd. for proceeds of $8.5 million.
Additional proceeds in the amount of up to $9.5 million was receivable with respect to the sale
of United Diamond Ltd., contingent upon the extent of future business undertaken between the
Trust and United Diamond Ltd. In August 2006 this adjustment was finalized. These assets were
included in the Energy Services segment and were disposed of as they were not a core component,
at that time, to the energy services globalization strategy.
Results of the operations of these businesses have been classified as results of discontinued
operations.
The following table provides additional information with respect to amounts included in the
statements of earnings related to discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy services |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
689,319 |
|
|
$ |
898,199 |
|
International contract drilling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,987 |
|
|
|
246,612 |
|
Industrial plant maintenance (CEDA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,371 |
|
|
|
175,802 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,043,677 |
|
|
$ |
1,320,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of Fleet Cementers assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal of United Diamond |
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
Gain on disposal of Energy services and International contract drilling |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
1,203,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of Industrial plant maintenance |
|
|
4,045 |
|
|
|
132,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
1,335,382 |
|
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,607 |
|
|
|
33,060 |
|
International contract drilling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,171 |
|
|
|
65,043 |
|
Industrial plant maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,135 |
|
|
|
19,658 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,298 |
) |
|
|
(20,251 |
) |
Writedown of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,615 |
|
|
|
91,393 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,282 |
|
|
|
28,824 |
|
|
Results of operations, before non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
|
|
62,569 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
Results of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,333 |
|
|
|
59,889 |
|
|
Net earnings of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
7,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,409,715 |
|
|
$ |
59,273 |
|
|
The following table provides additional information with respect to amounts included in the
statements of cash flow related to discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Net earnings of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
7,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,409,715 |
|
|
$ |
59,273 |
|
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
(7,077 |
) |
|
|
(1,335,382 |
) |
|
|
616 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,794 |
|
|
|
130,163 |
|
Writedown of assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
5,647 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,735 |
) |
|
|
(17,383 |
) |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on long-term monetary items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,829 |
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
Funds provided by discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,330 |
|
|
$ |
187,018 |
|
|
Components of changes in non-cash working capital balances of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(60,912 |
) |
|
$ |
(93,743 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,463 |
) |
|
|
5,725 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
52,861 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,623 |
) |
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(86,310 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,797 |
) |
|
Significant accounting policies relating to discontinued operations included:
(a) Employee benefit plans
At December 31, 2004, approximately 36% of employees of discontinued operations were enrolled in
retirement plans. Of that, approximately 6% of participating employees were enrolled in the
defined benefit plan and approximately 94% in the defined contribution plan.
Employer contributions to defined contribution plans were expensed as employees earned the
entitlement and contributions were made.
The Trust accrued the cost of pensions earned by employees under its defined benefit plan, which
was actuarially determined using the projected benefit method pro-rated on services and
managements best estimate of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation and
retirement ages of employees. For the purpose of calculating the expected return on plan assets,
those assets were valued at quoted market value at the balance sheet date. The discount rate used
to calculate the interest cost on the accrued benefit obligation was the long-term market rate at
the balance sheet date. Past service costs from plan amendments were amortized on a straight-line
basis over the average remaining service period of employees active at the date of amendment
(EARSL). The excess of the net cumulative unamortized actuarial gain or loss over 10% of the
greater of the accrued benefit obligation and the market value of plan assets was amortized over
EARSL.
(b) Foreign currency translation
Accounts of the Trusts self-sustaining operations were translated to Canadian dollars using
average exchange rates for the year for revenue and expenses. Assets and liabilities were
translated at the year-end current exchange rate.
Gains or losses resulting from these translation adjustments were included in the cumulative
translation account in Unitholders equity.
Gains and losses arising on translation of long-term debt designated as a hedge of
self-sustaining foreign operations were deferred and included in the cumulative translation
account in Unitholders equity on a net of tax basis.
(c) Hedging relationships
The Trust utilized foreign currency long-term debt to hedge its exposure to changes in the
carrying values of the Trusts net investment in certain self-sustaining foreign operations as a
result of changes in foreign exchange rates.
To be accounted for as a hedge, the foreign currency long-term debt must be designated and
documented as a hedge, and must be effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. The
documentation defined the relationship between the foreign currency long-term debt and the net
investment in the foreign operations, as well as the Trusts risk management objective and
strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction. The Trust formally assessed, both at the
hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the changes in fair value of the foreign
currency long-term debt was highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the net
investment in the foreign operations. If the hedging relationship was terminated or ceased to be
effective, hedge accounting was not applied to subsequent gains or losses. Any previously
deferred amounts were carried forward and recognized in earnings in the same period as the hedged
item.
(d) Research and engineering
Research and engineering costs were charged to income as incurred. Costs associated with the
development of new operating tools and systems were expensed during the period unless the
recovery of these costs could be reasonably assured given the existing and anticipated future
industry conditions. Upon successful completion and field testing of the tools, any deferred
costs were transferred to the related capital asset accounts.
The details of business acquisitions included in discontinued operations are as follows:
2005
On July 29, 2005, the Trust completed the acquisition of all the issued and outstanding shares of
CASCA Electric Ltd. and CASCA Tech Inc. for $30.4 million. No value was assigned to intangibles
or goodwill.
2004
During the year ended December 31, 2004, in accordance with the Trusts then globalization and
technology advancement strategies, the Trust completed several acquisitions, the most significant
of which were:
(a) On May 14, 2004, the Trust acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Reeves
Oilfield Services Ltd. (Reeves), including a 56.5% interest in Allegheny Wireline Services, Inc.
(Allegheny). On October 14, 2004, the Trust acquired the remaining 43.5% interest in Allegheny.
In the intervening period from the date of acquisition of Reeves to the acquisition of the
remaining interest in Allegheny, earnings attributable to non-controlling interest totaled $1.3
million. Reeves provided open hole and cased hole logging services to the oil and gas industry
with operations in Canada, the United States, Australia, Africa, Europe and the Middle East.
Intangible assets acquired relate entirely to intellectual property.
(b) On May 21, 2004, the Trust acquired land drilling assets, located in Venezuela and the Middle
East, from GlobalSantaFe Corporation (GlobalSantaFe). Intangible assets acquired relate to
non-competition agreements and customer contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reeves |
|
|
GlobalSantaFe |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net assets acquired at assigned values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
23,000 |
(1) |
|
$ |
12,463 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
35,523 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
106,900 |
|
|
|
33,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,038 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
41,730 |
|
|
|
296,655 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
339,932 |
|
Goodwill (no tax basis) |
|
|
118,531 |
|
|
|
103,956 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
222,617 |
|
Non-controlling interest in earnings
of intervening period |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
(37,732 |
) |
|
|
(9,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,452 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
253,727 |
|
|
$ |
436,492 |
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
691,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
253,727 |
|
|
$ |
436,492 |
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
691,956 |
|
|
(1) Includes cash of $12,142
Precision Drilling Trust
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per unit/share amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,437.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,269.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,028.5 |
|
|
$ |
915.2 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
688.2 |
|
|
|
641.8 |
|
|
|
566.3 |
|
|
|
544.2 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
78.1 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Reorganization costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating earnings |
|
|
595.3 |
|
|
|
465.4 |
|
|
|
331.3 |
|
|
|
252.4 |
|
Interest, net |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Premium on redemption of bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
Earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
587.7 |
|
|
|
293.2 |
|
|
|
289.9 |
|
|
|
219.9 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
572.5 |
|
|
|
220.8 |
|
|
|
188.1 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
1,409.8 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
1,630.6 |
|
|
|
247.4 |
|
|
|
180.5 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit), beginning of year |
|
|
(303.3 |
) |
|
|
1,041.7 |
|
|
|
794.3 |
|
|
|
613.8 |
|
Adjustment on cash purchase of employee
stock options, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification from contributed surplus
on cash buy-out of employee stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of disposal proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,851.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares of
dissenting shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared |
|
|
(471.5 |
) |
|
|
(70.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit), end of year |
|
$ |
(195.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(303.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1,041.7 |
|
|
$ |
794.3 |
|
|
Earnings per unit/share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic ($) |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
Diluted ($) |
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
Earnings per unit/share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic ($) |
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
13.22 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
Diluted ($) |
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
Precision Drilling Trust
ADDITIONAL SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Stated in millions of Canadian dollars, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per unit/share amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Return on sales % (1) |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Return on assets % (2) |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Return on equity % (3) |
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
166.5 |
|
|
$ |
152.8 |
|
|
$ |
557.3 |
|
|
$ |
249.0 |
|
Current ratio |
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
PP&E and intangibles |
|
$ |
1,108.0 |
|
|
$ |
944.4 |
|
|
$ |
898.1 |
|
|
$ |
887.7 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,761.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,718.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,852.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,932.0 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
140.9 |
|
|
$ |
96.8 |
|
|
$ |
718.9 |
|
|
$ |
399.4 |
|
Unitholders equity |
|
$ |
1,217.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,074.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,321.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,745.3 |
|
Long-term debt to long-term debt plus equity |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
Interest coverage (4) |
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Net capital expenditures from continuing
operations excluding business acquisitions |
|
$ |
233.7 |
|
|
$ |
140.1 |
|
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
|
$ |
84.9 |
|
EBITDA (5) |
|
$ |
668.5 |
|
|
$ |
536.9 |
|
|
$ |
406.1 |
|
|
$ |
330.6 |
|
EBITDA % of revenue |
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
Operating earnings |
|
$ |
595.3 |
|
|
$ |
465.4 |
|
|
$ |
331.3 |
|
|
$ |
252.4 |
|
Operating earnings % of revenue |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
Cash flow from continuing operations |
|
$ |
609.7 |
|
|
$ |
206.0 |
|
|
$ |
286.4 |
|
|
$ |
200.9 |
|
Cash flow from continuing operations per unit/share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
Book value per unit/share (6) |
|
$ |
9.68 |
|
|
$ |
8.57 |
|
|
$ |
19.10 |
|
|
$ |
15.91 |
|
Price earnings ratio (7) |
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Basic
weighted average units/shares outstanding (000s) |
|
|
125,545 |
|
|
|
123,304 |
|
|
|
115,654 |
|
|
|
108,860 |
|
|
(1) Return on sales was calculated by dividing earnings from continuing operations by total
revenues.
(2) Return on assets was calculated by dividing net earnings by quarter average total assets.
(3) Return on equity was calculated by dividing net earnings by quarter average total
unitholders equity.
(4) Interest coverage was calculated by dividing operating earnings by net interest expense.
(5) Earnings before net interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-controlling interest,
premium on redemption of bonds, gain/loss on disposal of investments and discontinued operations.
EBITDA is not a recognized measure under Canadian GAAP. Management believes that in addition to
net earnings, EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure as it provides an indication of the results
generated by the Trusts principal business activities prior to consideration of how those
activities are financed or how the results are taxed in various jurisdictions and prior to the
impact of depreciation and amortization. Investors should be cautioned, however, that EBITDA
should not be construed as an alternative to net earnings determined in accordance with GAAP as
an indicator of Precisions performance. Precisions method of calculating EBITDA may differ from
other companies and, accordingly, EBITDA may not be comparable to measures used by other
companies.
(6) Book value per unit/share was calculated by dividing unitholders equity by units/shares
outstanding.
(7) Year end closing price divided by basic earnings per unit/share.
Precision Drilling Trust
UNITHOLDER INFORMATION
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTINGS
Units of Precision Drilling Trust are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading
symbol PD.UN and on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol PDS.
VOTING RIGHTS
Unitholders receive one vote for each Trust unit or Precision Drilling Limited Partnership
Class B limited partnership unit held.
TRUST UNIT TRADING PROFILE
Toronto (TSX: PD.UN)
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006:
High: $43.40, Low: $24.40
Volume Traded: 173,386,554
New York (NYSE: PDS)
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006:
High: US$38.20, Low: US$21.46
Volume Traded: 195,284,300
ACCOUNT QUESTIONS
As a Precision Drilling Trust unitholder or as a holder of Class B limited partnership units of
Precision Drilling Limited Partnership which are exchangeable on a one for one basis with units of
the Trust, you are invited to take advantage of unitholder services or to request more information
about Precision.
Precisions Transfer Agent can help you with a variety of unitholder related services, including:
|
|
Transfer of trust units to another person |
You can call Precisions Transfer Agent toll free at:
1-800-564-6253
You can write to our Transfer Agent at:
Computershare Trust Company of Canada
100 University Avenue, 9th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1
Or you can email our Transfer Agent at:
service@computershare.com
Unitholders of record who receive more than one copy of this annual report can contact our Transfer
Agent and arrange to have their accounts consolidated. Unitholders who own Precision Drilling Trust
units through a brokerage firm can contact their broker to request consolidation of their accounts.
QUARTERLY
UPDATES
If you would like to receive interim reports but are not a registered unitholder, please write
or call Precision with your name and address. To receive news releases by fax, please forward your
fax number to Precision.
ONLINE INFORMATION
To receive Precisions news releases by email, or to view this annual report online, please
visit Precisions website at www.precisiondrilling.com and refer to the Investor Relations section.
PUBLISHED INFORMATION
If you wish to receive copies of the 2006 Annual Information Form as filed with the Canadian
securities commissions and as filed under Form 40-F with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, or additional copies of this annual report, please contact:
Vice President, Corporate Services and Corporate Secretary
Precision Drilling Corporation
4200, 150 6th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 3Y7
Telephone: 403-716-4500
Facsimile: 403-264-0251
ESTIMATED INTERIM RELEASE DATES
2007 First Quarter April 25, 2007
2007 Second Quarter July 26, 2007
2007 Third Quarter October 25, 2007
Precision Drilling Trust
CORPORATE INFORMATION
HEAD OFFICE
Precision Drilling Trust
4200, 150 - 6th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 3Y7
Telephone: 403-716-4500
Facsimile: 403-264-0251
Email: info@precisiondrilling.com
www.precisiondrilling.com
TRUSTEES
Robert J.S. Gibson
Patrick M. Murray
H. Garth Wiggins
See pages 26 and 27 for biographies
DIRECTORS
W.C. (Mickey) Dunn
Brian A. Felesky, CM, Q.C.
Robert J.S. Gibson
Allen R. Hagerman
Stephen J.J. Letwin
Patrick M. Murray
Frederick W. Pheasey
Robert L. Phillips
Hank B. Swartout
H. Garth Wiggins
See pages 26 and 27 for biographies
OFFICERS
Hank B. Swartout
Executive Chairman
Gene C. Stahl
President and Chief Operating Officer
Doug J. Strong
Chief Financial Officer
Darren J. Ruhr
Vice President, Corporate Services
and Corporate Secretary
SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Ron Berg
Senior Vice President, Operations
Completion and Production Services
Doug Evasiuk
Vice President, Marketing
John Jacobsen
Senior Vice President, Operations
Contract Drilling Services, Canada
Rolly Marks
Vice President, Operations
Dwayne Peters
Senior Vice President, Operations
Contract Drilling Services, United States
Steve James
Vice President, Health, Safety and Environment
Dion Kostiuk
Vice President, Human Resources
Len Gambles
Chief Accounting Officer
Terry Sakamoto
Vice President Finance, Operations
Wane Stickland
Vice President, Finance
Carmen Marshall
In-House Counsel
LEAD BANK
Royal Bank of Canada
Calgary, Alberta
AUDITORS
KPMG LLP
Calgary, Alberta
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Computershare Trust Company of Canada
Calgary, Alberta
TRANSFER POINT
Computershare Trust Company NA
Denver, Colorado