ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

401 City Avenue, Suite 809

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Our Shareholders:

NOTICE IS HERBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Entercom Communications Corp. (the “Company”) will be held at the Crowne Plaza Philadelphia Main Line Hotel, 4100 Presidential Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19131 on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. (the “Annual Meeting”), for the following purposes:

1.                                       To elect two Class A Directors each for a one year term expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting;

2.                                       To elect five Directors, in addition to Class A Directors, each for a one year term expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting;

3.                                       To consider the approval of an amendment of the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan to permit the Company to offer a one-time exchange of certain options outstanding under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan for restricted stock units;

4.                                       To consider the approval of two amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to Opt-Out of certain anti-takeover provisions of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law;

5.                                       To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009; and

6.                                       To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and/or any adjournments thereof.

If you were a shareholder of record of our Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, or Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the close of business on March 13, 2009, you may vote at the Annual Meeting.

In the event a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting and such meeting is adjourned to a later date at least fifteen (15) days after the initial date of the Annual Meeting, then those shareholders who attend the adjourned meeting shall nevertheless constitute a quorum for the purpose of acting upon the matters to be considered.

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania

March    , 2009

Please promptly complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card

whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.

ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

401 City Avenue, Suite 809

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 12, 2009

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Entercom Communications Corp. will be held at the Crowne Plaza Philadelphia Main Line Hotel, 4100 Presidential Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19131 on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT

Our Board of Directors has sent you this proxy statement to solicit your vote at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).  We will pay all expenses incurred in connection with this proxy solicitation.  In addition to mailing this proxy statement to you, we have hired Georgeson Shareholder to be our proxy solicitation agent for a fee of approximately $6,500 plus expenses.  We also may make solicitations by telephone, facsimile or other forms of communication. Brokers, banks and other nominees who hold our stock for other beneficial owners will be reimbursed by us for their expenses related to forwarding our proxy materials to the beneficial owners.  In this proxy statement we summarize information that we are required to provide to you under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. This proxy statement is designed to assist you in voting your shares.  The proxy materials are first being mailed on or about March     , 2009 to all shareholders of record of our Class A and Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the close of business as of March 13, 2009.  Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this proxy statement to Entercom Communications Corp., “Entercom,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, refer to Entercom Communications Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL

Important Notice Regarding The Availability Of Proxy Materials For The Shareholder Meeting To Be Held on May 12, 2009.  The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.entercom.com.  Click on the “Investors” Tab and select “Proxy Material.”

PROPOSALS

At the Annual Meeting, our shareholders will be asked to vote upon the following Proposals:

·                                          Proposal 1:  Election of Class A Directors.  Our Board of Directors has nominated the following two persons to stand for election as Class A Directors with one year terms expiring at the 2009 Annual Meeting: David J. Berkman and Daniel E. Gold.

·                                          Proposal 2:  Election of Directors Other Than Class A Directors.  Our Board of Directors has nominated the following five persons to stand for election as Directors with one year terms expiring at the 2009 Annual Meeting:  Joseph M. Field, David J. Field, John C. Donlevie, Robert S. Wiesenthal and Michael J. Wolf.

—                                         Proposal 3:  Approval of an amendment of the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan.  Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors has approved and is submitting to the shareholders of the Company for their approval an amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan to permit a one-time option exchange program pursuant to which the Company will offer to exchange certain options outstanding under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan for restricted stock units.

—                                         Proposals 4 and 5:  Approval of two amendments to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation.  Upon the recommendation of the Nominating / Corporate Governance Committee, our Board of Directors has approved and is submitting to the shareholders of the Company for their approval an amendment to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation to opt out of two anti-takeover provisions of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law relating to: (a) Control Transactions; and (b) Business Combinations.

·                                          Proposal 6:  Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.  The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009 and is proposing that the shareholders ratify such selection.

1

INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING

If you are a shareholder of record of our Class A Common Stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2009, you may vote your shares:

·                                          By Proxy:  You can vote by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it to us by mail in the envelope provided.  The instructions for voting are contained on the enclosed proxy card.  The individuals named on the card are your proxies.  They will vote your shares as you indicate.  If you sign your card without indicating how you wish to vote, all of your shares will be voted:

®                                  FOR all of the nominees of our Board of Directors as Class A Directors;

®                                   FOR all of the nominees of our Board of Directors as Directors other than Class A Directors;

®                                   FOR the approval of an amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan;

®                                   FOR the approval of each of the two amendments to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation;

®                                   FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009; and

®                                   At the discretion of your proxies on any other matter that may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting; or

·                                          In Person:  You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

If you are a shareholder of record of our Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2009, you may vote your shares:

·                                          By Proxy:  You can vote by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it to us by mail in the envelope provided.  The instructions for voting are contained on the enclosed proxy card.  The individuals named on the card are your proxies.  They will vote your shares as you indicate.  If you sign your card without indicating how you wish to vote, all of your shares will be voted:

®                                  FOR all of the nominees of our Board of Directors as Directors other than Class A Directors;

®                                   FOR the approval of an amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan;

®                                   FOR the approval of each of the two amendments to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation;

®                                   FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009; and

®                                   At the discretion of your proxies on any other matter that may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting; or

·                                          In Person:  You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted at the meeting if you: (i) send a written notice of revocation dated after the proxy date to our Corporate Secretary; (ii) send our Corporate Secretary a later dated proxy for the same shares of Common Stock; or (iii) attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

The address for our Corporate Secretary is Entercom Communications Corp., 401 City Avenue, Suite 809, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004, Attention:  John C. Donlevie, Secretary.

VOTING SECURITIES

Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Charter”) provide that each share of Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote and that each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes, except: (i) any share of Class B Common Stock not voted by either Joseph M. Field or David J. Field, in their own right or pursuant to a proxy, is entitled to one vote; (ii) the holders of Class A Common Stock, voting as a single class, are entitled to elect two Class A Directors; (iii) each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to one vote with respect to certain “Going Private Transactions” (as defined in the Charter); and (iv) as required by law.  Therefore:

·                                          Shareholders of our Class A Common Stock at the close of business on March 13, 2009, will be entitled to vote on Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

·                                          Shareholders of our Class B Common Stock at the close of business on March 13, 2009 will only be entitled to vote on Proposals 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

At the close of business on March 13, 2009, there were                  outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, which include                  shares that are either unvested restricted stock or vested but deferred shares of restricted stock (neither of which has the right to vote).  As a result, as of the close of business on March 13, 2009, there were                  shares of our

2

outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  In addition, at the close of business on March 13, 2009 there were                  outstanding shares of our Class B Common Stock and no outstanding shares of our Class C Common Stock.  Each share of Class B Common Stock voted by Joseph M. Field or David J. Field with respect to any proposal other than Proposal 1 is entitled to ten votes.  Holders of our Class C Common Stock, of which there are none, would not be entitled to vote on these proposals.

INFORMATION ABOUT QUORUM AND REQUIRED VOTES

The presence in person or by proxy of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast on a particular matter or proposal to be acted upon at the meeting shall constitute a quorum for the purposes of consideration and action on the matter or proposal.  Assuming a quorum is present, votes on the proposals will be tallied as follows:

·                                          Proposal 1:  Election of Class A Directors.  The two persons nominated as Class A Directors receiving the most votes from shares of Class A Common Stock will be elected.

·                                          Proposal 2:  Election of Directors Other Than Class A Directors.  The five persons nominated as Directors other than Class A Directors receiving the most votes from all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be elected.

·                                          Proposal 3:  Approval of amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan.  The approval of an amendment and restatement of the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan requires the affirmative vote from a majority of the votes of all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock that are present in person or by proxy and are voting on such proposal.

·                                          Proposals 4 & 5:  Approval of two amendments to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation.  The approval of each amendment to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote from a majority of the votes of all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock that are present in person or by proxy and are voting on such proposal.

·                                          Proposal 6:  Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.  The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009 requires the affirmative vote from a majority of the votes of all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock that are present in person or by proxy and are voting on such proposal.

In the event a quorum is not present at the meeting and such meeting is adjourned to a later date at least fifteen (15) days after the initial date of the meeting, then those shareholders who attend the adjourned meeting shall nevertheless constitute a quorum for the purpose of acting upon the matters to be considered.

Unless otherwise required by our Bylaws or by applicable law, approval of any other matter properly presented for a vote at the meeting will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by all holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock present in person or by proxy; provided that if any shareholders are entitled to vote thereon as a class, such approval will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote as a class who are present in person or by proxy.

Shares of our common stock represented by proxies that are marked “withhold authority” or are marked “abstain,” or which constitute broker non-votes will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum.  Broker non-votes occur when a nominee holding shares of our common stock for a beneficial owner has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and such nominee does not possess or choose to exercise discretionary authority with respect thereto. With respect to any matter to be decided by a plurality (such as the election of Directors) or a majority of the votes cast at the meeting, proxies marked “withhold authority” or marked “abstain,” or which constitute broker non-votes will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast at the meeting and will have no effect on the outcome of such vote.

INFORMATION TO RELY UPON WHEN CASTING YOUR VOTE

You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement.  We have not authorized anyone to give any information or to make any representations in connection with this proxy solicitation other than those contained in this proxy statement.  You should not rely on any information or representation not contained in this proxy statement.  You should not infer under any circumstances that because of the delivery to you of this proxy statement there has not been a change in the facts set forth in this proxy statement or in our affairs since the date of this proxy statement.  This proxy statement does not

3

constitute a solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which the solicitation is not authorized or in which the person making the solicitation is not qualified to do so or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make a solicitation.

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement and the accompanying material may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events.  You can identify these forward-looking statements by our use of words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continues,” “expects,” “intends,” “likely,” “may,” “opportunity,” “plans,” “potential,” “project,” “will,” and similar expressions, whether in the negative or the affirmative. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those forecasted or anticipated in such forward-looking statements.

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date of this proxy statement.  We undertake no obligation to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revisions to these statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

4

PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF CLASS A DIRECTORS

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

Two Class A Directors will be elected at the 2009 Annual Meeting to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting.  The two nominees of our Board of Directors are David J. Berkman and Daniel E. Gold.  Both David J. Berkman and Daniel E. Gold are incumbent Class A Directors.  These nominees have consented to serve if elected, but should any nominee be unavailable to serve, your proxy will vote for the substitute nominee recommended by our Board of Directors.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ NOMINEES FOR CLASS A DIRECTORS

·              David J. Berkman - Director.  David J. Berkman (age 47) has served as one of our Directors since the consummation of our initial public offering in January 1999.  Since January 2000, Mr. Berkman has served as the Managing Partner of Liberty Associated Partners, LP, a venture capital firm primarily engaged in the telecommunications, media and internet market segments.  He also serves on the boards of directors of Internet Capital Group, Inc., Current Communications Group, LLC and Jingle Networks, Inc.  Civically, Mr. Berkman serves on the board of overseers of the University Of Pennsylvania School Of Engineering, and on the Board of Trustees of The Franklin Institute.  Mr. Berkman has a B.S. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

·              Daniel E. Gold - Director.  Daniel E. Gold (age 73) has served as one of our Directors since May 2003.  Since January 1997, Mr. Gold has served as President and CEO of Leonard Whitcup, Inc., a music publisher.  During his career, Mr. Gold has served as Chairman and Director of Dynamic Broadband, Inc., CEO of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), President and Director of Century Communications Inc., President of Knight Ridder Broadcasting, Inc., and President of Comcast Cable, Inc. He also served as a Vice President and General Manager of CBS and Post-Newsweek Stations’ radio and television stations in Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, PA, and Hartford, CT.  Mr. Gold also served as General Counsel of Westinghouse Broadcasting Company (Group W).  Mr. Gold had been a member of the boards of directors of the National Association of Broadcasters, the National Cable Television Association, the Television Bureau of Advertising and C-SPAN.  Mr. Gold has a B.A. from Stanford University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed above.

PROPOSAL 2

ELECTION OF OTHER DIRECTORS

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

Five other Directors will be elected at the 2009 Annual Meeting to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting.  The five nominees are Joseph M. Field, David J. Field, John C. Donlevie, Robert S. Wiesenthal and Michael J. Wolf.  Each of the nominees is an incumbent director.  These nominees have consented to serve if elected, but should any nominee be unavailable to serve, your proxy will vote for the substitute nominee recommended by our Board of Directors.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ NOMINEES FOR OTHER DIRECTORS

·              Joseph M. Field - Chairman & Director.  Joseph M. Field (age 77) founded Entercom in 1968 and has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors since our inception.  Mr. Field served as our Chief Executive Officer from our inception until 2002 and as our President from our inception until 1998. Before entering the broadcasting business, he practiced law for 14 years in New York (including service as an Assistant United States Attorney) and Philadelphia. Mr. Field served on the board of directors of the National Association of Broadcasters for the years 1992 through 1996.  Mr. Field currently serves on the boards of directors of the Broadcasters’ Foundation, the Philadelphia Orchestra Association, The Mary Louise Curtis Bok Foundation, the Settlement Music School, the American Interfaith Institute, the National Liberty Museum, the Philadelphia Chamber Music Society, the Joseph and Marie Field Foundation and the Joseph and Marie Field Family Environmental Foundation.  In addition, he serves on the Advisory Board of the University of Pennsylvania’s Field Center for

5

Children’s Policy, Practice & Research.  Mr. Field has a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, an L.L.B. from Yale Law School and a D.M from the Curtis Institute of Music. Mr. Field is the father of David J. Field.

·              David J. Field - President and Chief Executive Officer.  David J. Field (age 46) has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 2002, our President since 1998, and one of our Directors since 1995.  Mr. Field is our Principal Executive Officer.  He also served as our Chief Operating Officer from 1996 to 2002 and Chief Financial Officer from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Field joined us in 1987 and served as our Director of Finance and Corporate Development from 1987 to 1988, Vice President-Finance and Corporate Development from 1988 to 1992, Vice President-Operations and Chief Financial Officer from 1992 to 1995 and Senior Vice-President-Operations and Chief Financial Officer from 1995 to 1996. Prior to joining us, he was an investment banker with Goldman, Sachs & Co.  Mr. Field served as Chairman of the Radio Board of the National Association of Broadcasters from 2005 to 2007.  Mr. Field also currently serves on the boards of directors of the Ad Council, the Radio Advertising Bureau, the Philadelphia Zoo and The Wilderness Society. He has a B.A. from Amherst College and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.  Mr. Field was named the 2006 Radio Executive of the Year by Radio Ink Magazine and was also recognized as one of the best CEOs in America by Institutional Investor Magazine in 2006 and 2007.  Mr. Field is the son of Joseph M. Field.

·              John C. Donlevie - Executive Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel.  John C. Donlevie (age 62) has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and one of our Directors since 1989, our Secretary since 1998 and was our Vice President-Legal and Administrative from 1984 to 1989. Prior to joining us in 1984, Mr. Donlevie practiced law for 11 years, most recently as Corporate Counsel of Ecolaire Incorporated in Malvern, Pennsylvania. He has a B.S. in Engineering from Drexel University and a J.D. from Temple University School of Law.  Mr. Donlevie is a member of the board of directors of the Joseph and Marie Field Foundation and is a member of the Board of Managers of Broadcasters Traffic Consortium, LLC.

·              Robert S. Wiesenthal - Director.  Robert S. Wiesenthal (age 42) has served as one of our Directors since April 2004.  Since January 2002, Mr. Wiesenthal has been serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sony Corporation of America.  In addition, since July 2005, Mr. Wiesenthal has been serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer, Sony Entertainment.  Prior to joining Sony Corporation of America, Mr. Wiesenthal was Managing Director at Credit Suisse First Boston from 1999 to 2000, a member of its Media Group from 1993 to 1999 and a member of its Mergers and Acquisition Group from 1986 to 1993.  Mr. Wiesenthal presently serves on the boards of directors of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc (MGM), Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications and Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC.  Mr. Wiesenthal has a B.A. from the University of Rochester.

·              Michael J. Wolf - Director.  Michael J. Wolf (age 47) has served as one of our Directors since February 2008.  Since March 2007, Mr. Wolf has been serving as president of Farallon Point Inc., a strategic advisory provider.  From October 2005 to February 2007, Mr. Wolf was the President and Chief Operating Officer of MTV Networks, Inc. (“MTVN”). Prior to assuming this role at MTVN, Mr. Wolf was a Senior Director at McKinsey & Company and Global Leader of its Media, Entertainment and Information Practice from 2001 to 2005.  Previously, Mr. Wolf was a Senior Partner, member of the board of directors and leader of the Media and Entertainment Group at Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. which he joined in 1989.  Mr. Wolf serves as a board member of the Educational Broadcasting Corporation.  Mr. Wolf has a B.A. from Columbia University.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed above.

6

PROPOSAL 3

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE

ENTERCOM EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), has determined that it would be in the best interest of the Company to implement a stock option exchange program (the “Option Exchange Program”).  On February 10, 2009, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Committee, approved an amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) to permit the Option Exchange Program, subject to shareholder approval.  The Board believes that the Option Exchange Program, if approved by shareholders, will benefit the Company by: (i) reducing overhang and decreasing the potential shareholder dilution; (ii) restoring incentive to key employees; (iii) making it easier to meet industry standards and shareholder expectations for linking compensation with performance; and (iv) generally maximizing the alignment of employee and director interests with the Company’s shareholders.

Under the Option Exchange Program, the Company will offer Company employees and non-employee directors a one-time opportunity to exchange all of their outstanding stock options, with exercise prices equal to or greater than $11.80 per share (“Eligible Options”), for a lesser number of shares of restricted Class A Common stock of the Company (“New Shares”).  The New Shares would be granted promptly following the expiration of a tender offer to be made to holders of Eligible Options (“Eligible Holders”).  All New Shares will be granted under the Plan.  The exchange ratio under the Option Exchange Program will as follows:

In order to effect the Option Exchange Program, the Company will offer to holders of Eligible Options, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in certain “tender offer” documents and related materials to be filed with the SEC and distributed to all holders of Eligible Options (the “Offer to Exchange”).

The $11.80 per share price represents the Company’s fifty-two week closing high as of February 28, 2009.  The exercise prices of all Eligible Options range between $12.31 and $52.05.

The following are summaries of: (i) the amendment to the Plan; (ii) the Option Exchange Program; and (ii) the Plan as amended.  The statements made herein concerning terms and provisions of the Plan are summaries and do not purport to be a complete recitation of the Plan provisions.  Such statements are qualified by express reference to the Plan.  A copy of the Plan, as amended, is attached hereto as Appendix A and is incorporated by reference herein.

PLAN AMENDMENT

Background.  NYSE rule 303A(8) defines “repricing” to include “canceling an option at a time when its strike price exceeds the fair market value of the underlying stock, in exchange for another option [or] restricted stock.”  Under NYSE rules, an equity compensation plan that does not contain a provision that specifically permits repricing of options is considered as prohibiting repricing.  The Plan does not expressly permit repricing, accordingly the Plan is deemed under NYSE Rules to prohibit repricing.

The Amendment.  In order to permit the Company to implement the Option Exchange Program, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Committee, approved an amendment to the Plan.  The Amendment to the Plan is as follows:

21(f)       One-time Option Exchange Program.  The Company may affect a one-time option exchange program (the “Option Exchange Program”), to be commenced at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, pursuant to which the Company may offer such option holders under the Plan, as the Compensation Committee may determine, a one-time opportunity for such option holders to voluntarily exchange all (but not less than all) of their outstanding stock options at a ratio of: (i) for options with a strike price of $30 per share or more - one (1) restricted stock unit for each 4.5 eligible options surrendered; and (ii) for options with a strike price of equal to or greater than $11.80 per share but less than

7

$30 per share – one (1) restricted stock unit for each 2.25 eligible options surrendered.  All Options surrendered in connection with the Option Exchange Program shall not be available for re-issuance under the Plan.  All restricted stock units issued under this Option Exchange Program shall not count against the 3,000,000 share restricted stock sub-limit set forth in Section 3(a) of the Plan.

THE OPTION EXCHANGE PROGRAM

Overview.  Under the Option Exchange Program, the Company will offer holders of options issued pursuant to the Plan a one-time opportunity to exchange all (but not less than all) of their outstanding Eligible Options for a lesser number of New Shares.  The New Shares would be granted following the expiration of a tender offer to be made to the Eligible Holders.  The exchange ratio under the Option Exchange Program will be at a ratio of: (i) for options with a strike price of $30 per share or greater - one (1) restricted stock unit for each 4.5 eligible options surrendered; and (ii) for options with a strike price of equal to or greater than $11.80 per share but less than $30 per share — one (1) restricted stock unit for each 2.25 eligible options surrendered.  All Eligible Options surrendered in connection with the Option Exchange Program will not be available for issuance under the Plan.  All restricted stock units issued under this Option Exchange Program shall not count against the 3,000,000 share restricted stock sub-limit set forth in Section 3(a) of the Plan.

Process.  In order to effect the Option Exchange Program, the Company will commence an offer to Eligible Holders, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in certain “tender offer” documents and related materials to be filed with the SEC and distributed to all holders of Eligible Options.  While the Company intends to make the Offer to Exchange prior to the May 12, 2009 annual meeting, such offer will be conditioned upon the shareholders approval of the amendment to the Plan to permit the Option Exchange Program.  Each Eligible Holder will be given at least twenty (20) business days to decide whether to surrender all of their Eligible Options in exchange for New Shares.  If the Proposal to approve the amendment to the Plan to permit the Option Exchange Program is not approved by the shareholders of the Company, the Option Exchange Program will not be consummated.  Even if approved by the shareholders, the Board will retain the authority, in its sole discretion, to terminate, modify or postpone the Option Exchange Program at any time prior to the closing date thereof.

Outstanding Options Eligible For The Option Exchange Program.  As of February 26, 2009, options to purchase approximately 3,324,955 shares of Class A common stock were outstanding under the Plan.  Approximately 2,224,830 of these options, with exercise prices ranging from $12.31 to $52.05, would be eligible for exchange under the Option Exchange Program.  There are approximately 207 holders of Eligible Options.  The following table shows the number of Eligible Options outstanding by price range as of February 26, 2009:

Effect on Equity.  If all of the Eligible Options outstanding as of February 26, 2009 were exchanged for New Shares: (i) the total number of options outstanding under the Plan would decrease from approximately 3.3 million to approximately 1.1 million; and (ii) the total number of restricted stock units outstanding under the Plan would increase from approximately 1.4 million to approximately 2.1 million.

All Eligible Options surrendered in connection with the Option Exchange Program will not be available for issuance under the Plan.  New RSUs granted under the Plan will not count against the 3,000,000 share restricted stock sub-limit set forth in Section 3(a) of the Plan.  Accordingly, assuming all eligible options were surrendered, such sublimit will be effectively increased to 3,750,216 shares of restricted stock / RSUs.

While the Option Exchange Program will not increase the number of shares available for future issuance under the Plan, the Option Exchange Program is expected to reduce the number of shares subject to outstanding options.  For example, if all Eligible Options were surrendered in the Option Exchange Program: (i) the Company would issue approximately 750,216

8

New Shares; (ii) the Company would have approximately 1,474,614 fewer shares of common stock subject to outstanding awards (i.e., options and restricted stock); and (iii) the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan would not change.  The actual net reduction in options outstanding and options outstanding as a percentage of total shares outstanding will depend on a variety of factors, including the level of participation in the Option Exchange Program and any forfeitures or new grants under the Plans.

The Exchange Ratio.  Holders will be permitted to surrender Eligible Options at an exchange ratio which is a function of the strike price of each Eligible Option.  Specifically, the ratios are: (i) for options with a strike price of $30 per share or more - one (1) restricted stock unit for each 4.5 eligible options surrendered; and (ii) for options with a strike price of equal to or greater than $11.80 per share but less than $30 per share — one (1) restricted stock unit for each 2.25 eligible options surrendered.  The number of New Shares to be received by each participant in the Exchange Offer will be rounded (up or down) to the nearest whole number.

Election To Participate.   Under the Option Exchange Program, holders of Eligible Options will be given a one-time opportunity to exchange all (but not less than all) of their Eligible Options for a lesser number of New Shares at the Exchange Ratio.  Participation in the Option Exchange Program will be voluntary.  Holders of Eligible Options will not be permitted to exchange only a portion of their Eligible Options for New Shares.  Voting in favor of this Proposal at the annual meeting does not constitute an election to participate in the Option Exchange Program.

Terms And Conditions Of The New Shares.  The New Shares will be granted under the Plan promptly following the end of the Offer to Exchange and will be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.  The New Shares will be unvested at the time of grant, regardless of the vesting schedule of the Eligible Options.  The New Shares will vest over four years as follows: (i) 50% two years after the grant date; (i) 25% three years after the grant date; and (i) the remaining 25% four years after the grant date.  If the employment of a holder of New Shares is terminated (other than as a result of death), such New Shares will not continue to vest and will be forfeited.  In the case of a non-employee director, if such director’s services to the Company is terminated (other than as a result of death), such New Shares will not continue to vest and will be forfeited.  Other restrictions regarding the New Shares and the vesting thereof will be set forth in the Offer to Exchange and grant instrument to be issued as of the grant date thereof.

Accounting Treatment.  Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (as revised in 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS 123R, modification accounting for stock-based compensation will apply to an exchange of share-based awards.  The Company will recognize additional share-based compensation expense since, at the time the Company first makes the Offer to Exchange, the fair value of the New Shares is anticipated to be greater than the fair value of the surrendered Eligible Options.  This difference in fair value will be recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the New Shares.  Based upon the Company’s current Class A common stock price (as reported on the NYSE) and assuming that there is no material change in the variables used to determine the fair value of the surrendered Eligible Options, the Company expects to recognize $0.3 million in share-based compensation expense as a result of the Option Exchange Program.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.  As a general rule, a recipient of restricted stock / restricted stock units will not recognize taxable income until such time as the restricted stock / restricted stock unit is transferable by the participant or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for federal tax purposes, whichever occurs earlier.  When the  restricted stock / restricted stock unit is either transferable or is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at that time.  The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount.  Accordingly, a participant in the Option Exchange Program will generally recognize taxable income as the restricted stock units vest.

Potential Modifications Of Terms To Comply With Governmental Or Other Requirements.  The terms of the Option Exchange Program will be described in an Offer to Exchange which will be filed with the SEC. It is possible that the SEC will require material modification of the terms of the Option Exchange Program. Consequently, the Company may be required to alter the terms of the Option Exchange Program to comply with SEC comments.  The Company also reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to suspend, modify or terminate the Option Exchange Program at any time for any reason prior to the Closing Date.

SUMMARY OF PLAN

Overview.  The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain our employees, employees of our subsidiaries (including employees who are Named Executive Officers or Directors) and to provide incentives to our non-employee Directors and certain advisors and consultants who perform services for us and our subsidiaries.  The Plan provides for grants of: (i) options intended to qualify as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code; (ii) “nonqualified stock

9

options” that are not intended to so qualify (“NQSOs”); (iii) restricted stock; / restricted stock units; and (iv) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).

Shares.  As of February 26, 2009, an aggregate of 7.9 million shares of Class A Common Stock are authorized for issuance under the Plan, of which 1.6 million remain available for issuance.  The Plan initially authorized 8.5 million shares, plus an additional 1,500,000 shares per year (effective each January 1).  For January 1, 2007 and 2008, our Board of Directors determined that no additional shares would be added to the Plan, while for January 1, 2006 and 2009 the additional shares were added to the Plan.  In addition, as a result of the Company’s 2006 Option Exchange Program (pursuant to which options surrendered net of restricted stock issued were not available for reissuance) the number of shares that can be issued under the Plan was effectively reduced by 3.6 million.  Accordingly, the follow table shows the shares that have been authorized issuance under the Plan:

Only shares of Class A Common Stock may be issued under the Plan.  The number of shares for which ISOs may be issued under the Plan may not exceed 1,850,000 shares, subject to adjustment, and the number of shares of restricted stock/ restricted stock units that may be issued under the Plan may not exceed 3,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan.  If and to the extent grants awarded under the Plan expire or are terminated for any reason without being exercised, the shares of Class A Common Stock subject to such grant will again be available for purposes of the Plan.  Since New Shares to be issued under the Plan will not count against the restricted stock / restricted stock units sublimit, upon approval of the amendment to the Plan, such sublimit would effectively be increased by the number of New Shares issued under the Option Exchange Program.

Administration of the Plan.  The Plan is administered and interpreted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors.  The Committee shall consist of two or more persons who may be “outside directors” as defined under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and related Treasury regulations and “non-employee directors” as defined under Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Subject to ratification or approval by the Board (if the Board retains such right) the Committee shall have the sole authority to: (i) determine the individuals to whom grants shall be made under the Plan; (ii) determine the type, size and terms of the grants to be made to each such individual; (iii) determine the time when grants will be made and the commencement and duration of any applicable exercise or restriction period, including the criteria for exercisability and the acceleration of exercisability; and (iv) deal with any other matters arising under the Plan.

Eligibility for Participation.  The following are eligible to be participants in the Plan (“Participants”): (i) all employees of us and our subsidiaries (“Employees”), including Employees who are officers or members of the Board; (ii) members of the Board who are not Employees (“Non-Employee Directors”); and (iii) those consultants and advisors who perform services for us or any of our subsidiaries (“Key Advisors”) if the Key Advisors are natural persons rendering bona fide services and such services are not in connection with the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction.  The aggregate number of shares of our stock that may be granted to any individual during any calendar year may not exceed 925,000 shares.

Options.  The exercise price of any ISO granted under the Plan will not be less than the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of an ISO granted to an employee who owns more than 10% of the Common Stock may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of an NQSO may be greater than, equal to or less than the fair market value of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the date of grant.  The Committee will determine the term of each option; provided, however, that the exercise period may not exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the exercise period of an ISO granted to an employee who owns more than 10% of the Common Stock may not exceed five years from the date of grant.  The Participant may pay the exercise price: (i) in cash; (ii) with the approval of the Committee, by delivering shares of Common Stock owned by the Participant and having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the exercise price; or (iii) by such other method as the Committee approves.  The Participant may instruct us to deliver the shares of Common Stock due upon the exercise to a designated broker instead of to the Participant.

10

Restricted Stock / Restricted Stock Units.  The Committee may issue restricted stock / restricted stock units pursuant to the Plan.  Restricted stock / restricted stock units may be issued for consideration or for no consideration, as the Committee determines.  The number of shares of restricted stock / restricted stock units granted to each Participant shall be determined by the Committee (subject to the maximum limitations).  Grants of restricted stock / restricted stock units will be made subject to such performance requirements, vesting provisions, transfer restrictions or other restrictions and conditions as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion.

Stock Appreciation Rights.  The Committee may grant SARs alone or in tandem with any stock option pursuant to the Plan.  The base price of an SAR will be either: (i) the exercise price of any related stock option; or (ii) if no related stock option, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of the SAR.  The value of an SAR is the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of exercise of the SAR exceeds the base amount of the SAR.  The Committee shall determine whether the appreciation in an SAR shall be paid in the form of cash, shares of our stock, or a combination of the two, in such proportion as the Committee deems appropriate.  To the extent a Participant exercises a tandem SAR, the related option shall terminate. Similarly, upon exercise of a stock option, the related or tandem SAR, if any, shall terminate.

Amendment and Termination of the Plan.  The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time; provided, however, that the Board shall not amend the Plan without shareholder approval if: (i) such approval is required in order for Incentive Stock Options granted or to be granted under the Plan to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code; or (ii) such approval is required in order to exempt compensation under the Plan from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Code.  No additional Grants shall be made under the Plan after January 20, 2015 or such earlier date as may be determined by the Board.  The Plan may be extended by the Board with the approval of the shareholders.

Adjustment Provisions.  If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of our stock outstanding by reason of: (i) a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split, or combination or exchange of shares; (ii) a merger, reorganization or consolidation in which we are the surviving corporation; (iii) a reclassification or change in par value; or (iv) any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting our stock outstanding without our receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of our stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or our payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the maximum number of shares of our stock available for Grants, the maximum number of shares of our stock that any individual participating in the Plan may be granted in any year, the number of shares covered by outstanding Grants, the kind of shares issued under the Plan, and the price per share of such Grants may be appropriately adjusted by the Committee.

Change of Control.  Upon a Change of Control, unless the Committee determines otherwise: (i) each Grantee with outstanding Grants shall receive written notice of such Change of Control: (ii) all outstanding Options and SARs shall automatically accelerate and become fully exercisable; and (iii) the restrictions and conditions on all outstanding restricted stock shall immediately lapse.  Upon a Change of Control where we are not the surviving corporation (or survive only as a subsidiary of another corporation), unless the Committee determines otherwise, all outstanding Options and SARs that are not exercised shall be assumed by, or replaced with comparable options and rights by, the surviving corporation.

A change of control is defined as: (i) any “person” becoming a “beneficial owner” of securities of us representing more than 50% of all votes required to elect a majority of the Board, provided that a Change of Control shall not be deemed to occur as a result of a change of ownership resulting from the death of a shareholder; (ii) the consummation by us of: (a) a merger or consolidation where our shareholders will not own more than 50% of all votes required to elect a majority of the board of directors of the surviving corporation, or (b) the consummation of an agreement providing for the sale or disposition by us of all or substantially all of our assets; (iii) a liquidation or dissolution of us; or (iv) any person completing a tender offer or exchange offer for shares representing more than 50% of all votes required to elect a majority of our Board.

Section 162(m).  Under Section 162(m) of the Code, we may be precluded from claiming a federal income tax deduction for total remuneration in excess of $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer or to any of the other four most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer) in any one year.  Total remuneration would include amounts received upon the exercise of stock options or SARs granted under the Plan and the value of shares received when the shares of restricted stock became transferable (or such other time when income is recognized). An exception exists, however, for “performance-based compensation,” which meets certain requirements.  The Plan allows for “performance-based compensation” to Section 162(m) participants.

Other Effects Of Option Exchange Programs.  Other than the estimated $0.3 million in additional share-based compensation expense (assuming full participation in the Option Exchange Program) and the effect on our capitalization described above, we do not anticipate that the Option Exchange Program will have a material impact on our financial statements or results of operations.  You should consider this proposal together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis

11

of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the notes related thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which accompanies this Proxy Statement, and which portions of our Annual Report are incorporated herein by reference.

Market Value of Class A Common Stock.  On February 26, 2009, the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was $1.08.

Existing Options Under Plan / New Plan Benefits For Option Exchange Program

(1)                                 The dollar value of Restricted Stock Units to be granted is computed based upon the closing price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock of $1.08 as of the close of business on February 26, 2009.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the amendment to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan.

12

PROPOSALS 4 & 5

APPROVAL OF

AMENDMENTS TO ENTERCOM ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

On February 10, 2009, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, approved an amendment to the Entercom Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles”), subject to shareholder approval.  The following is a summary of the two components of the amendment to the Articles (the “Charter Amendments”), which components must be separately considered for approval.  Specifically, the Amendments effect an “opt out” of certain anti-takeover provisions of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law relating to: (a) Control Transactions; and (b) Business Combinations.

The text of the proposed Charter Amendments are as follows:

Add a new Article TWENTY FIRST that reads as follows:

TWENTY FIRST: Applicability of Pennsylvania’s Anti-Takeover Provisions.

(a)                                 The Control Transaction Provisions contained in Sections 2541 to 2548 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

(b)                                 The Business Combination provisions contained in Sections 2551 to 2556 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law of 1988, as it may be amended, shall not be applicable to the Corporation.

While the text of the Charter Amendments is contained in one new Article TWENTYFIRST, in accordance with Securities Exchange Act Rule 14a-4(a)(3), shareholders will have an opportunity to vote separately on each of the two components of the Charter Amendments.  Either one, both or neither of the proposed amendments may be approved by the shareholders.  In the event that only one (and not both) of Proposals 4 and 5 is approved by our shareholders, the adopted proposal will be designated as Article Twenty First sub-clause (a) and there will be no sub-clause (b).

PROPOSAL 4 - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

Subchapter E of Chapter 25 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law (the “PABCL”) generally provides that, upon the occurrence of a “Control Transaction” with respect to a Pennsylvania registered corporation, such as the Company, the shareholders of the corporation who object to the transaction have the right to receive payment in cash for the “fair value” of their voting shares.  The “fair value” is determined as of the date on which the control transaction occurred, and is to take into account all relevant factors including any control premium.

A “control transaction” is defined generally as the acquisition by a person or group of persons acting in concert of 20% or more of the voting power represented by the voting shares of the corporation.  Shares issued by the corporation directly to a person or group in a transaction that is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, however, do not count in determining whether that person or group has reached the 20% voting power threshold.  The PABCL applies to any “control transaction” regardless of whether the “control transaction” was approved in advance by the corporation’s board of directors and regardless of the price or other terms being offered in the transaction.

The PABCL gives a company and its shareholders the right to elect not to have the Control Transaction provisions of the PABCL apply to future “control transactions” involving that company.  In order for such provisions to become inapplicable to future “control transactions,” the board of directors must approve and recommend to the company’s shareholders an amendment to its articles of incorporation specifying that the Control Transaction provisions of the PABCL will no longer apply and the shareholders of the company must approve the amendment in accordance with the requirements of Pennsylvania law and the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the company.

On February 10, 2009, our Board of Directors approved the Charter Amendments to our Articles of Incorporation, subpart (a) of which is to opt out of the Control Transaction provisions of the PABCL.  The Board of Directors recommends that our shareholders approve such amendment.  Under the provisions of applicable law and the Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting is required to approve this portion of the Charter Amendment.

13

In making its recommendation, our Board of Directors considered, among other things, that:

PROPOSAL 5 - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

Subchapter F of Chapter 25 of the PABCL generally provides for a delay of five years and imposes certain conditions upon a “Business Combination” between an “interested shareholder” and the corporation.  The Business Combination provisions of the PABCL apply to Pennsylvania registered corporations, such as the Company.  A “business combination” is defined broadly to include a merger, share exchange, sale of assets and various transactions utilizing a corporation’s assets for purchase price amortization or refinancing purposes.  For purposes of this provision, an “interested shareholder” is defined generally as the beneficial owner of at least 20% of a corporation’s voting shares (subject to multiple exclusions).  The PABCL does not apply to any “business combination” that was approved in advance by the corporation’s board of directors prior to the acquiring party’s becoming an interested shareholder.

The PABCL gives a company and its shareholders the right to elect not to have the Business Combination provisions of the PABCL apply to a future “business combination” involving that company.  In order for such provisions to become inapplicable to a future “business combination,” (prior to the person becoming an “interested shareholder”) the board of directors must approve and recommend to the company’s shareholders an amendment to its articles of incorporation specifying that the Business Combination provisions of the PABCL will no longer apply and the shareholders of the company must approve the amendment in accordance with the requirements of Pennsylvania law and the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the company.  Such amendment, however, is not effective until eighteen (18) months following the shareholders’ approval.

On February 10, 2009, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to opt out of the Business Combination provisions of the PABCL and recommended that our shareholders approve such amendment.  Under the provisions of applicable law and the Articles of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting is required to approve this portion of the Charter Amendment.

14

In making its recommendation, our Board of Directors considered, among other things, that:

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of Proposal 4 & 5.

15

PROPOSAL 6

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009 and is proposing that the shareholders ratify such selection.  Although ratification is not required by law, the Audit Committee believes that our shareholders should be given an opportunity to express their views on the subject.  SEC Rule 10A-3(b)2 requires that the audit committee “must be directly responsible for the appointment . . . of any registered public accounting firm.”  Since the Audit Committee cannot abdicate this authority to the shareholders, the ratification of the selection is not binding.  Any failure of the shareholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm would, however, be considered by the Audit Committee in determining whether to continue the engagement of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

INFORMATION CONCERNING INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since June 2002.  Our Audit Committee has appointed PwC to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.  It is anticipated that a representative of PwC will attend the annual meeting.  Such representative will have an opportunity to make a statement, if he or she desires, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions of shareholders.

Principal Accounting Firm Fees And Expenses.  The following table sets forth the aggregate fees and expenses billed to us by PwC, our principal accounting firm, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

(1)                                The professional services rendered for 2008 and 2007 included: (i) the audit of our annual financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting; and (ii) reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.  Amounts include the reimbursement of expenses incurred by our accounting firm in connection with their performance of such professional services.

(2)                                 Represents consulting services relating to new accounting pronouncements and existing accounting guidance.

(3)                                 Represents services relating to an acquired entity’s audited financial statements.

(4)                                 A subscription service for PwC’s accounting guidance.

Utilization of De Minimus Approval Exemption.  Zero percent of the Principal Accounting Firm Fees listed above were approved under the approval provisions of Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-K.

Pre-Approval Policies.  The Audit Committee maintains policies and procedures for the pre-approval of work performed by the independent auditors in that under the amended and restated Audit Committee Charter, all auditor engagements must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2009.

16

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Presently, there are seven members on our Board of Directors, including each of the nominees named herein.  Four of the seven Directors are neither our officers nor employees.  Our Board of Directors met nine times in 2008.  Our Board of Directors has adopted certain standing committees including: (i) an Audit Committee; (ii) a Compensation Committee; (iii) a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee; and (iv) an Executive Committee.

Director Independence.

In accordance with the commentary to Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, our Board of Directors has adopted certain categorical standards to assist it in making determinations of independence (the “Independence Standards”).  A copy of the Independence Standards is posted on the Corporate Governance page of our website located at www.entercom.com.  Our Board of Directors has determined that each of David J. Berkman, Daniel E. Gold, Robert S. Wiesenthal and Michael J. Wolf meet the Independence Standards and each is therefore an “independent director” as defined by Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.  We have not made any charitable contributions to any charitable organization in which a Director serves as an executive officer where, within the preceding three years, contributions in any single year exceeded the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

Committees of our Board of Directors.

·                                          Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee consists of Daniel E. Gold, Chairman, David J. Berkman and Michael J. Wolf.  The Audit Committee met five times in 2008.  A copy of the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter is posted on the Corporate Governance page of our website located at www.entercom.com.  Each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined in Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.  No audit committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public companies.

Audit Committee Financial Expert.  Our Board of Directors has determined that Daniel E. Gold is an Audit Committee Financial Expert.  Mr. Gold is “independent” as such term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act.

·                                          Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee consists of David J. Berkman, Chairman, Daniel E. Gold and Robert S. Wiesenthal.  The Compensation Committee met twice in 2008.  A copy of the Amended and Restated Compensation Committee Charter is posted on the Corporate Governance page of our website located at www.entercom.com.  Each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as defined in Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.

The Compensation Committee conducts a general review of our compensation plans to ensure that they meet corporate objectives, including review and approval of all compensation paid to our executive officers.  The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee also include administering and interpreting our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan, including selecting the officers, employees and other qualified recipients who will be granted awards under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan.  A narrative description of our Committee’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive and director compensation is contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee Interlocks And Insider Participation.  None of the members of the Compensation Committee was at any time one of our officers or employees.  None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as members of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

·                                          Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.  The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee consists of Michael J. Wolf, Chairman, David J. Berkman and Robert S. Wiesenthal.  The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee met once in 2008.  A copy of the Amended and Restated Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter is posted on the Corporate Governance page of our website located at www.entercom.com.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the recommendation of criteria for selection of Board members and assisting our Board of Directors in identifying candidates.  The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders.  Shareholders should submit any such recommendations to our Corporate Secretary.  In addition, shareholders may make their own director nominations in

17

accordance with the procedures for Shareholder Director Nominations described in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Shareholder Proposals For 2010 Annual Meeting.”

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has not established any specific minimum qualifications that the Committee believes must be met by a Committee-recommended nominee for a position on our Board of Directors.  While the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has not established any specific qualities or skills that the Committee believes are necessary for one or more of our Directors to possess, the Committee may consider the following criteria in recommending candidates for election to our Board of Directors: (i) experience in corporate management, such as serving or having served as an officer of a publicly-held company; (ii) experience in the media, communication and/or radio broadcasting industries; (iii) experience as a board member of another publicly-held company; (iv) academic expertise in the media, communication and/or radio broadcasting industries or in specific areas of our operations; and (v) financial experience necessary to assist in meeting our corporate governance requirements.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee identifies prospective candidates for recommendation to our Board of Directors upon recommendations from other Directors, management and our shareholders.  In addition, the Committee has in the past retained the services of a professional search firm to identify prospective candidates.  The Committee does not have a formal review policy for prospective Committee-recommended nominees.

Each of the nominees was elected by the shareholders at the previous annual meeting of shareholders.

·                                          Executive Committee.  The Executive Committee consists of Joseph M. Field, Chairman, David J. Field and David J. Berkman.  The Executive Committee did not meet in 2008.  The Executive Committee has the authority to approve, upon unanimous consent of such committee, acquisitions and expenditures for certain radio and radio related synergistic investments subject to pre-defined size limits.

Director Meeting Attendance.

·                                          Committee and Board Meetings.  Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of both our Board of Directors and the meetings of the committee(s) on which such director served during 2008.

·                                          Annual Shareholders’ Meetings.  We do not maintain a policy regarding director attendance at the Annual Meeting of shareholders.  At the 2008 Annual Meeting of shareholders, all but one of the Directors elected at such meeting were present.

Non-Management Directors

·                                          Meetings.  Our non-management Directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions.  At these meetings, one Director presides.  The role of presiding Director rotates among the chairpersons of the following committees of our Board of Directors, in the following order: (i) Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, (ii) Compensation Committee, and (iii) Audit Committee; provided that, if any such chairperson is absent, then such absent Director is skipped in the rotation and the next chairperson in the foregoing order serves as the presiding Director at such meeting.

·                                          Communications With Non-Management Directors.  We have established a process for interested parties to make their concerns known to the non-management Directors.  See below under “Communications With Directors.”

Communications With Directors

We have established a mechanism to facilitate the ability of interested parties to make their concerns known to our Board of Directors, our non-management Directors or any other group or specific individual director(s).  Specifically, any interested party desiring to so communicate can either: (i) Send an email to “d i r e c t o r s” followed by the extension “@ e n t e r c o m . c o m”.  In order to enable spam filtering, only email with the subject line: “ETM Board Message” will be read; or (ii) Send a letter to Entercom Communications Corp., 401 City Avenue, Suite 809, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004, Attn: Director Communication.  Each correspondence sent in the foregoing manner (other than mail regarding matters that are not in the province of our Board of Directors) is distributed in print form to our Directors or such other sub-group thereof as may be specified by the sender.

18

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The table below sets forth certain information regarding those persons currently serving as our Named Executive Officers. Biographical information on David J. Field, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Joseph M. Field, our Chairman, and John C. Donlevie, our Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, is included above in the section entitled “Board of Directors’ Nominees For Other Directors.”

19

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

2008 Transactions.

During 2008 there were no, and there are no currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, which would be required to be disclosed herein pursuant to Item 401(b) of regulation S-K.

Policies And Procedures For Review, Approval, Or Ratification.

Our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, adopted a Related Party Transactions Policy.  This policy provides that Interested Transactions with Related Parties, as those defined in the policy, are subject to approval or ratification.

For purposes of the policy:

·                                          an “Interested Transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) in which: (i) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $100,000 in any calendar year; (ii) we are a participant; and (iii) any Related Party has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10 percent beneficial owner of another entity).

·                                          a “Related Party” is any: (i) person who is or was (since the beginning of the last fiscal year for which we have filed a Form 10-K and proxy statement, even if they do not presently serve in that role) an executive officer, director or nominee for election as a director; (ii) beneficial owner of greater than 5 percent of our common stock; or (iii) immediate family members of any of the foregoing. Immediate family member include a person’s spouse, parents, stepparents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, and brothers- and sisters-in-law and anyone not falling into one of the foregoing categories who resides in such person’s home (other than a tenant or employee).

Under this policy, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the material facts relating to all Interested Transactions that require the Committee’s approval and either approves or disapproves of our entry into the Interested Transaction, subject to certain exceptions. If advance Committee approval of an Interested Transaction is not feasible, then the Interested Transaction shall be considered and, if the Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified at the Committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.  In determining whether to approve or ratify an Interested Transaction, the Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the Interested Transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms generally available from an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the Related Person’s interest in the transaction.

Standing Pre-Approval for Certain Interested Transactions.

Under the policy, certain transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Committee, even if the aggregate amount involved will exceed $100,000.  These transactions include:

·                                          Employment of executive officers;

·                                          Director compensation;

·                                          Certain transactions with other companies;

·                                          Certain charitable contributions;

·                                          Transactions where all shareholders receive proportional benefits; and

·                                          Transactions involving competitive bids.

20

COMPENSATION INFORMATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW.  The Compensation Committee (or the “Committee”) of our Board of Directors consists of David J. Berkman, Chairman, Daniel E. Gold and Robert S. Wiesenthal.  Our Committee is responsible for managing and annually reviewing all annual bonus, long-term incentive compensation, equity compensation, employee pension and welfare benefit plans.  For executive officers, our Committee evaluates performance and determines compensation policies and levels.  Our Committee’s duties are memorialized in its charter, which is available on our website at www.entercom.com.

Our executive officer compensation programs are comprised of the following elements: (i) base salary; (ii) incentive compensation including (a) annual discretionary incentive bonuses of both cash and equity; (b) incentive compensation contemplated under employment agreements, and (c) compensation pursuant to the Entercom Annual Incentive Plan; and (iii) other compensation such as employee benefit plans including our 401(K) plan, employee stock purchase plan, deferred compensation plan, health insurance and life/disability insurance.  Our executive officer compensation programs are designed to motivate our executive officers and management employees to attain financial, operational and strategic objectives.  These programs generally provide incentives to achieve both annual and longer-term objectives.  In making compensation determinations, we assess both the performance of our business and our executives relative to those objectives.

Our compensation policy has been to provide competitive compensation while also seeking to align the financial goals of our executives and management with those of our shareholders.  To ensure that pay is competitive, we regularly compare our pay practices with those of our competitors and the general competitive market for executive talent.  We also consider the performance of our business as compared to the performance of our competitors.

PROCESS.  Our Committee meets on a regularly scheduled basis at least two times per year (as required under its charter) and typically more frequently as our Committee deems necessary or desirable.  Members of our Committee also discuss compensation matters with our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and among themselves informally throughout the year.  This informal process facilitates the on-going monitoring of the appropriateness of our executive compensation packages and serves to prepare our Committee members for the formal meetings so that definitive compensation decisions can be more easily made at such meetings.

Although no formal process for compensation determination is prescribed in our Committee’s charter or otherwise, an informal process has evolved.  While our Committee is involved in compensation considerations throughout the year, the process for annual compensation changes and incentive compensation grants typically includes a management report and recommendation.  Specifically, following the end of each year, our Chief Executive Officer presents a report to our Committee which highlights our performance as a company as well as the performance of our Chief Executive Officer during the preceding year.  Our Chief Executive Officer then provides our Committee with a recommendation for: (i) Chief Executive Officer compensation; (ii) senior management compensation; and (iii) a level of authority for our Chief Executive Officer to make annual equity compensation grants to other management and key employees.

The process for compensation determination also involves our Committee’s consideration of peer compensation levels.  While our Committee does not have a policy regarding benchmarking, our Committee does consider peer compensation when establishing our compensation levels.

Our Committee also receives a report which details compensation previously earned by senior management in prior years.

Once it receives and considers the various pieces of information, reports and presentations described above, our Committee then meets without management present to consider the appropriate level of compensation.  Our Committee sets the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer as well as the other named executive officers.

Finally, in prior years our Committee from time to time has utilized and relied upon the analysis and recommendations of independent compensation consultants.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION.

Base Salary.  In setting base salaries for our Named Executive Officers, our Committee generally considers the experience of the individual, the scope and complexity of the position, our size and the compensation paid by our competitors.  In particular,

21

we attempt to set base salaries at levels that are competitive in the industry and in relation to the particular job function of the executive officer.

The annual base salary is intended to reward the executive officer for the day-to-day demands, complexities and difficulties of such officer’s job. The objective is to set base salaries at levels that we and the applicable executive officer believe are fair, given the job functions and their individual performance and experience in relation to those job functions.  We attempt to provide annual base salaries that will help to retain the executives and discourage them from seeking or accepting other employment opportunities.

We are party to an employment agreement with each of our Named Executive Officers, other than Eugene D. Levin.  Specifically, we have employment agreements with: (i) David J. Field, Chief Executive Officer; (ii) Joseph M. Field, Chairman; (iii) Stephen F. Fisher, Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer; and (iv) John C. Donlevie, Executive Vice President and General Counsel.  Each of these agreements provides for a contractual level of base salary.  For calendar year 2009, each of our name executive officers agreed to freeze the level of their base salary and waived any contractual increase due in 2009.

Incentive Compensation.  Our Committee has historically utilized two forms of incentive compensation: cash and equity awards.  The cash component is designed to convey an immediate recognition of services performed by the recipient, while the equity component is tied to vesting requirements and is designed to not only compensate for past service but to also motivate and retain the recipient.

·                                        Cash Bonus Awards.  All of our Named Executive Officers (to the extent they are not already entitled to receive a bonus under their respective employment agreements) are eligible to receive bonuses which are determined after a review of our overall performance as well as the individual performance of each such executive officer.  For 2008, each Named Executive Officer (other than Joseph M. Field) received a discretionary cash bonus as described in the Summary Compensation Table and below in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Named Executive Officer Compensation.”

Our Committee has significant flexibility in awarding cash bonuses.  The decision to increase or decrease cash bonuses from year to year is generally based on a variety of factors that our Committee deems appropriate, including our overall performance, the individual executive’s performance, the business environment which existed during the year and any extraordinary events that arose during the course of the year.  We believe this flexibility and our history of appropriately rewarding performance provide a strong incentive to our executive officers to perform in a manner that will allow us to achieve our corporate objectives.

·                                        Equity Compensation.  To promote our long-term objectives, the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan permits awards to our employees, employees of our subsidiaries, non-employee directors and certain advisors and consultants who are in a position to make a significant contribution to our long-term success.  Such equity awards are permitted to be made in the form of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock / restricted stock unit awards.

In order to ensure that our equity compensation grants achieve the desired effect of serving as long term incentive compensation our Committee generally utilizes the following vesting schedules:  (i) restricted stock grants typically vest: 50% - two years from the grant date; 25% - three years from the grant date and the remaining 25% - four years from the grant date; and (ii) option grants typically vest 25% per year over four years.

The number of shares available for issuance under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan increases by 1.5 million shares, or a lesser number as may be determined by our Board of Directors, on January 1st each year.  Our Board of Directors elected to forego the January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008 automatic annual increases of 1.5 million shares under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan.  On January 1, 2009, the number of available shares under the Plan automatically increased by 1.5 million shares.

·                                        Entercom Annual Incentive Plan.

On February 19, 2008, our Board of Directors approved the Entercom Annual Incentive Plan (the “AI Plan”), subject to shareholder approval.  Our shareholders approved the AI plan at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.  The purpose of the AI Plan is to provide designated employees with the opportunity to receive cash incentive awards.  We believe that the AI Plan enhances the incentive for participants to contribute materially to our growth, thereby benefiting us and our shareholders.  All of our employees are eligible to participate in the AI Plan.  Subject to the limitations in the AI Plan, the Committee determines the amount of any award under the AI Plan.  The Committee has the authority to adjust the amount of any award to take into account such factors as it may deem relevant.  The maximum cash award that may be earned for any

22

fiscal year by any individual is $3,000,000.  The Committee may also determine whether an award is to qualify as performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.

To the extent necessary to comply with Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code, no later than ninety (90) days following the commencement of any fiscal year in question or any other designated fiscal period or period of service (or such other time as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee: (i) designates one or more Section 162(m) Participants; (ii) selects the Performance Criteria applicable to the Performance Period; (iii) establishes the various Performance Targets and amounts which may be earned for such Performance Period; and (iv) specifies the relationship between the Performance Criteria and the Performance Targets and the amounts which may be earned by each Section 162(m) Participant for such Performance Period.

For purposes of the AI Plan, the term “Performance Criteria” means the following business criteria with respect to us, any subsidiary or any division or operating unit of us: (i) net income, (ii) pre- or after-tax income (loss), (iii) operating income (loss), (iv) fixed expenses, (v) cash flow, (vi) earnings per share, (vii) return on equity, (viii) return on invested capital or assets, (ix) cost reductions or savings, (x) funds from operations, (xi) funds from operations per share, (xii) appreciation in the fair market value of our stock, (xiii) revenue, (xiv) net revenue, (xv) market share, (xvi) cash available for distribution, (xvii) cash available for distribution per share, (xviii) total shareholder return, (xix) return on invested capital, (xx) economic value added, (xxi) improvement in cash flow (before or after tax), (xxii) successful capital raises, (xxiii) confidential business unit objectives, (xxiv) free cash flow, (xxv) free cash flow per share, (xxvi) adjusted free cash flow, (xxvii) adjusted free cash flow per share, (xxviii) broadcast cash flow, (xxix) adjusted broadcast cash flow, and (xxx) earnings before any one or more of the following items: interest, taxes, depreciation or amortization; each as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and/or subject to such adjustments as may be specified by the Committee.  The preceding criteria may also be evaluated, where appropriate: (a) on a same-station basis; (b) on the basis of growth in any of these criteria; (c) on a comparison basis with a peer group; and/or (d) as a percentage of revenue.

Determination of Compensation.  In order to determine the cash and equity incentive compensation for our senior executive officers (including David J. Field, our Chief Executive Officer), our Committee considered a number of factors including those detailed below.

(i)                                     Our Committee considered our operating performance versus our 2008 business plan.  In this regard, our Committee recognized that while a number of the plan objectives were not achieved, the 2008 advertising environment was far weaker than expected, which created a more difficult marketplace.  Specifically, our 2008 business plan was based upon an assumption of flat industry revenue growth compared to an estimated (as of January 15, 2009) actual industry revenue decline of 9.2%.  In this context the Committee noted that our estimated (as of January 15, 2009) revenue decline of 8.0%, exceeded the general industry’s performance.

(ii)                                  Further, in considering our operating performance versus our 2008 business plan, our Committee noted that while we experienced negative same station net revenue growth, our performance exceeded a peer group of public company radio station operators.  Specifically, our same-station revenue decreased by 4% for the September 30, 2009 year-to-date period compared to an estimated weighted average decrease of 6% for selected peers over the same period.  The peer group included: CBS Radio, Clear Channel, Citadel Broadcasting Corporation, Cox Radio, Inc., Cumulus Media, Inc., Emmis Communications Corp. and Radio One, Inc.

(iii)                               Our Committee considered that for 2008 our stock performance failed to exceed that of the peer group identified in the 2008 CEO Goals and Objectives.  Specifically, the total shareholder return of our common stock was a decline of 87% compared to a decline of 76% for a peer group of publicly traded radio broadcast companies.  This group includes: Cox Radio, Inc., Emmis Communications Corp., Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and Cumulus Media, Inc.

(iv)                              Our Committee considered that our Free Cash Flow Per Share increased to $2.56 in 2008 from $2.38 in 2007.  While this represents a 7.6% increase from 2007, it was less than the Free Cash Flow Per Share goal of $2.62 per share.  We calculate Free Cash Flow as operating income: (a) plus depreciation and amortization, non-cash compensation expense (which is otherwise included in station operating expenses and corporate general and administrative expenses), loss on impairment and income from discontinued operations before depreciation and amortization expense and income taxes; and (b) less net interest expense (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), gains (loss) on sale of assets, taxes paid (refunded) and capital expenditures.  To calculate Free Cash Flow Per Share, we divide Free Cash Flow by Weighted Average Shares - Diluted.

(v)                                 Our Committee considered that for 2008, we were able to maintain compliance with the financial covenants contained in our credit facility.  Specifically, as of December 31, 2008 our Leverage Ratio (as defined in our Credit Facility) was estimated to be 5.2X while our Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in our Credit Facility) was estimated to be

23

3.7X.  Under our Credit Facility, our Leverage Ratio must not exceed 6.0X and our Interest Coverage Ratio must not be less than 2.0X.

(vi)                              Our Committee considered our capital structure management in light of the difficult economic conditions during 2008.  Specifically, we reduced our total indebtedness by $140 million which reduced our Leverage Ratio from 5.6X at the beginning of 2008 to an estimated 5.2X as of the end of 2008.  The Committee also noted the Company’s repurchase of $67 million of high yield debt at a significant discount to face value.

(vii)                           Our Committee considered our initiatives to enhance shareholder value including: (a) our share repurchases of 2 million shares of stock; and (b) our dividends paid during 2008 of $0.58 per share.

(viii)                        Our Committee considered our efforts towards further digital growth including enhancements to content, sales and infrastructure / technology platforms.  The Committee noted that digital revenues increased significantly during 2008.  In addition, during 2008, the Company entered into agreements which enabled iPhone and Blackberry streaming of Company radio stations.  Further, our Committee considered our 2008 initiatives to enhance www.weei.com including site development efforts and the increased staffing of key personnel.

(ix)                                Our Committee considered actions taken towards the enhancement of future growth through: (a) business development efforts and training; (b) new and enhanced brands (including two internally developed syndicated programs and the syndication of the WEEI sports network); (c) leadership and people by means of increased training and key hires; and (d) industry initiatives and leadership.

·                                        2008 Annual Determination - Entercom Annual Incentive Plan.  In accordance with the Entercom Annual Incentive Plan, the Committee adopted a “Section 162(m) Compliance Document” so that compensation provided under such Plan for 2008 will be considered “performance-based compensation” and tax deductible by Entercom.  The Committee determined that for purposes of the 2008 incentive cash compensation under the Plan, fixed expense growth, revenue growth, return on invested capital and free cash flow per share would be the performance measures.  The Committee also established a target (the “Target”) with respect to such performance measures (with regard to the combined performance of the Company and its subsidiaries, after eliminations).  Specifically, the Target for 2008 was the satisfaction of at least two of the following criteria (the “Criteria”) computed in a manner consistent with past practice:

1.                                       Fixed expense growth of less than 2% over 2007 (computed on a same-station basis).

2.                                       Revenue growth greater than national industry growth over 2007 as measured by the Radio Advertising Bureau (the “RAB”) (computed for Entercom on a same-station basis).

3.                                       Return on invested capital greater than 4% .

4.                                       Free cash flow per share growth of greater than 5% over 2007.

If in 2008 any two of the Criteria for the above performance measures are satisfied, the Target shall have been met and the Company shall make an incentive payment of up to $3,000,000 to David J. Field, subject to the negative discretion of the Committee to reduce such payments.  [As described below, for 2008, the Committee did reduce the amount of such incentive payment to David J. Field to $450,000.]

For 2008, the Committee determined that at least three of the four Criteria had been satisfied and that the Target had been met.  Specifically, the Committee found that:

1.                                       Fixed expenses declined by 3.7%, thus satisfying the Criteria.

2.                                       Return on invested capital was 4.6%, thus satisfying the Criteria.

3.                                       Free cash flow per share growth was 7.6%, thus satisfying the Criteria.

The Committee noted that information was not yet available from the RAB to confirm whether the Criteria which required “Revenue growth greater than national industry growth over 2007 as measured by the Radio Advertising Bureau,” had been satisfied.  The Committee noted, however, that as of September 30, 2008, the Company’s revenue growth for the year-to-date 2008 period over the year-to-date 2007 period was greater than national industry’s growth as measured by the RAB (computed for the Company on a same-station basis).

·                                        Determination of CEO Incentive Compensation.  In addition to the factors detailed above, at the beginning of calendar year 2008, our Committee identified certain goals and objectives relating to the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, David J. Field.  Specifically, for 2008 our Committee identified a number of goals and objectives as follows:

24

-  50% of Mr. Field’s bonus was to be based upon our actual performance with respect to the following metrics:

~                 Achieving our 2008 business plan

~                 Exceeding peer group operating performance with respect to: market share; and same-station revenue growth.

~                 Exceeding peer group stock performance.

~                 Achieving 2008 Free Cash Flow Per Share goal (exclusive of extraordinary events).

~                 Maintaining compliance with our credit facility financial covenants

For purposes of the same-station revenue growth analysis we considered a peer group of public companies engaged in the business of operating radio stations.  This group includes: CBS Radio, Clear Channel, Citadel Broadcasting Corporation, Cox Radio, Inc., Cumulus Media, Inc., Emmis Communications Corp. and Radio One, Inc.

For purposes of the stock performance analysis we considered a peer group of public companies whose principal business is the operation of radio stations.  This group includes: Cox Radio, Inc., Emmis Communications Corp., Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and Cumulus Media, Inc.

-  15% of Mr. Field’s bonus was to be based upon enhancing shareholder value through: (i) acquisitions, divestitures, and station exchanges; (ii) monetizing non-strategic assets; and (iii) capital structure management.

-  35% of Mr. Field’s bonus was to be based upon the enhancement of future growth potential through operational initiatives and improvements, with particular attention to: (i) digital platforms; (ii) business development capabilities; (iii) new and enhanced brands; (iv) leadership / people; and (v) industry initiatives and leadership.

In order to assist our Committee in determining the level of Mr. Field’s incentive compensation for 2008, our Committee met with Mr. Field to review his performance in light of such goals and objectives.  In conducting such a review, our Committee considered the specific target levels against our actual results and Mr. Field’s performance.  Many of these considerations are discussed above under “Determination of Incentive Compensation.”

It is worth noting that our Committee did not adopt, nor did it employ, any objective quantifiable standards.  Instead, the analysis was based upon a subjective consideration of the relevant factors identified for consideration in 2008.  For example, the Committee identified achieving the 2008 free cash flow per share goal of $2.62 as a component to be considered.  In considering this metric, the Committee noted that our Free Cash Flow Per Share increased to $2.56 in 2008 from $2.38 in 2007.  While this represents a 7.6% increase from 2007, it was less than the Free Cash Flow Per Share goal.  The Committee, however, viewed this increase positively given the difficult 2008 economic conditions.

In addition, the Committee noted that for the third consecutive year, Mr. Field was named by Institutional Investor magazine as among “The Best CEOs in the Country” and was the top CEO recognized in the category of Radio and TV Broadcasting.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Field was eligible for a bonus of up to $870,895 (representing 110% of his base salary).  Pursuant to the Entercom Annual Incentive Plan, Mr. Field was eligible for a bonus of up to $3,000,000.  In awarding Mr. Field a bonus of $450,000, the Committee noted that the bonus represented approximately 51.7% of his contractual bonus potential and 15.0% of the bonus potential under the Entercom Annual Incentive Plan.

Other Compensation.  Our Committee has provided for a number of additional elements of benefit based compensation.  These components are designed to accomplish a variety of objectives including: (i) maximizing the full benefit under applicable tax regulations (e.g., our 401(K) and employee stock purchase plan); (ii) providing for the health and welfare of our employees and their families (e.g., our employee benefit plans); (iii) conveying a level of security in the context of any possible change of control (e.g. our general severance policy as well as any employee specific agreed upon severance or change of control agreements); and (iv) providing executives with an appropriate level of perquisites (e.g. our aircraft usage policy and car allowances).

-  Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  We maintain an Employee Stock Purchase Plan which is generally available to all of our full-time employees.  Executive officer participation in these plans is on the same basis as our other employees.  Under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees are permitted to participate in the purchase of stock through a plan administrator four times a year at a 15% discount to the NYSE market price.  All of our Named Executive Officers other than David F. Field and Joseph M. Field participate in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  Effective as of March 31, 2009, the employee stock purchase plan will expire.

25

-  401(K) Plan.  We maintain a 401(K) Plan which is generally available to all of our full-time employees.  Executive officer participation in this plan is on the same basis as our other employees.  Our 401(K) Plan previously included a matching component with contributions vesting 20% per year for each year of service, such that after five years an employee is 100% vested in our matching contributions.  Effective as of October 16, 2008, we suspended indefinitely our matching contributions under our 401((k) Plan.  All of our Named Executive Officers participated in our 401(K) Plan.

-  Deferred Compensation Plans.  We maintain deferred compensation plans for our non-employee directors as well as our management employees.  Under each plan, participants are permitted to defer a portion of their income for specific time periods.  Our obligations under such plans are unsecured.  Under our management employee deferred compensation plan, we had matched employees’ contributions of up to 4% of an employee’s compensation at a rate of fifty cents on the dollar with such matching contributions vesting 20% per year for each year of service, such that after five years of service an employee is 100% vested in our matching contributions.  Effective as of October 16, 2008, we suspended indefinitely our matching contributions under our Deferred Compensation Plan.  All of our Named Executive Officers other than David F. Field and Joseph M. Field participate in our Deferred Compensation Plan.

-  Employee Benefit Plans.  We have a number of benefit plans which are applicable to all of our full time employees.  These benefits include Medical Insurance, Dental Plan, Voluntary Short-Term Disability Insurance, Long-Term Disability Plan, Life Insurance and Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance Plans, MEDEX Travel Assist Program, and a Voluntary Vision Insurance Plan.  All of our executive officers participate in these plans on the same basis as our other employees except that we pay such medical insurance premiums in full.

-  Severance and Change-of-Control Benefits.  We have a severance policy which is applicable to all of our employees.  Under this policy, full-time employees are eligible for up to fifteen weeks severance (subject to certain requirements).  John C. Donlevie and Eugene D. Levin are eligible to participate in our severance policy.  Our employment agreements with David J. Field, Joseph M. Field and Stephen F. Fisher govern severance for such officers.  In addition, each of these three agreements contains provisions which are effective upon a change of control.  The applicable severance and change of control provisions for each such officer is described below.

-  Personal Aircraft Usage.  We have an interest in two aircraft through a fractional ownership program which operates the aircraft under the FAA Commercial Part 135 Rules.  As permitted by the aircraft operator, we permit our Chairman, CEO/President and other executive officers approved by our CEO/President to use the aircraft for personal use, subject to the terms of our Aircraft Usage Policy.  Under this policy, our executives must pay directly to the aircraft operator (for our account) all usage and other incremental charges relating to any such flight(s).  While the usage of the aircraft is by definition a perquisite, as it is not generally available to all of our employees, there is no associated dollar value of compensation since the executives each pay the aircraft operator (for our account) an amount at least equal to our incremental cost for each flight.

-  Car Allowance.  Each of our Named Executive Officers is provided with either a car allowance or use of a company-owned vehicle.

TAX ISSUES RELATING TO EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.  Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes limitations upon the federal income tax deductibility of certain compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of our other four most highly compensated executive officers (excluding our Chief Financial Officer).  Under these limitations, we may deduct such compensation only to the extent that during any year the compensation paid to any such officer does not exceed $1,000,000 or meets certain specified conditions (such as certain performance-based compensation that has been approved by our shareholders).  While our Board desires to maximize our tax deductions, some elements of executive compensation may not be tax deductible, and our compensation plans and policies may be modified if our Committee determines that such action is in the best interest of us and our shareholders, even if such action may result in some loss of deductibility.  An aggregate of approximately $0.8 million in compensation expense in 2008 was over the Section 162(m) limits and therefore not deductible for tax purposes.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENTS / GUIDELINES.  The Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by our Board encourage directors to purchase shares of our stock.  Our Board, however, recognizes that the number of shares of our stock owned by any director is a personal decision, and our Board determined not to adopt a policy requiring ownership by Directors of a minimum number of our shares.  Similarly, we do not have a requirement relating to Named Executive Officer ownership of our shares.

26

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

David J. Field, President and Chief Executive Officer.  Our Principal Executive Officer is David J. Field.  Mr. Field serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement dated August 2, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement has an initial term of three years with automatic one year extensions following the initial term unless either party provides prior notice of non-extension.  Mr. Field’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $760,000, subject to annual increase based upon the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, and for an annual performance-based bonus of up to 110% of his annual base salary.  Mr. Field’s salary for the year 2008 was $775,862.  In addition, Mr. Field receives certain other benefits as provided from time to time to our senior executive officers as described above.

·                                          Incentive Compensation.  In recognition of his services during 2008, and in light of the considerations described above and the terms of his employment agreement, on February 10, 2009, our Committee awarded Mr. Field: (i) an equity award of 37,500 restricted stock units which vest over four years in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement; (ii) options to purchase 140,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $1.34 per share which vest in four equal annual installments beginning on February 10, 2010; and (iii) a discretionary cash bonus of $450,000.  In addition, on February 10, 2009, an aggregate of 110,000 shares of restricted stock units which were subject to vesting on the achievement of specified stock market prices for our Class A Common Stock were modified to provide for time vesting over two years.

·                                          Termination / Severance Compensation.  If Mr. Field’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in his agreement) or he resigns for good reason (as defined in his agreement) prior to the execution of a binding agreement which would result in a change in control if consummated or more than two years following a change in control, subject to his execution of a release of claims against us, all of Mr. Field’s outstanding equity compensation awards that vest on the basis of our performance shall become fully vested and we shall pay him a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the greater of: (i) the sum of two years’ annual base salary and two times the highest annual bonus paid during the preceding three year period, or (ii) the sum of the base salary and annual bonuses that would otherwise have been payable through the end of the then current term of the agreement.  If such termination occurs following the execution of a binding agreement which would result in a change in control if consummated or prior to two years following a change in control, subject to his execution of a release of claims against us, all of Mr. Field’s outstanding equity compensation awards shall become fully vested, and we shall pay him a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the sum of three years’ annual base salary and three times the highest annual bonus paid to him during the preceding three year period.  We shall also pay his COBRA premiums for continued health coverage, to the extent he elects such coverage, for a period of up to 18 months.  Additionally, should any of these payments become subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, we shall make an additional payment in an amount sufficient to place Mr. Field in the same after-tax position as if the excise tax had not applied.

Furthermore, in the event that David J. Field dies or becomes disabled, then all of Mr. Field’s outstanding equity compensation awards that vest on the basis of our performance shall become fully vested and we shall pay him (or his estate, if applicable) a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the sum of two years’ annual base salary and two times the highest annual bonus paid during the preceding three year period, and we shall also pay his COBRA premiums for continued health coverage, to the extent he elects such coverage, for a period of up to 18 months.

Finally, Mr. Field’s agreement also provides that in the event of a change in control (as defined in the agreement) all of Mr. Field’s then outstanding equity compensation awards shall become fully vested and exercisable.

Joseph M. Field, Chairman of the Company.  Joseph M. Field serves as our Chairman pursuant to an employment agreement dated August 2, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement provides that for so long as Mr. Field serves as the Chairman of our Board of Directors, he shall receive an annual retainer in an amount equal to three times the annual retainer payable to non-employee members of the Board of Directors, as in effect from time to time.  This annual retainer shall be payable either in cash or in restricted stock units which vest over the one year period following the date of grant.  For 2008, Mr. Field received $105,000 in base compensation.  Additionally, we shall grant him annual equity compensation awards of the same type and for an underlying number of shares equal to three times the number of shares underlying the awards granted to each non-employee member of the Board of Directors pursuant to our non-employee director compensation policies as in effect from time to time.  Accordingly, in 2008 Mr. Field received an equity award of 6,000 restricted stock units which vest over four years and options to purchase 3,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.78 per share which vest in four equal annual installments.  Under this employment agreement, Mr. Field will also receive certain other benefits as provided from time to

27

time to our senior executive officers.  Further, Mr. Field and his spouse are also entitled to medical insurance coverage for the duration of their respective lives.

·                                          Incentive Compensation.  Mr. Field did not receive any incentive compensation for 2008.

·                                          Termination / Severance Compensation.  If Mr. Field ceases to serve as Chairman of our Board of Directors for any reason other than a removal from his position as Chairman of the Board for cause (as defined in the agreement), all of his outstanding equity awards and rights shall become vested, exercisable and payable with respect to all of the equity subject thereto.  In the event that Mr. Field dies or becomes disabled, he shall be deemed to have completed his then current term on the Board of Directors and we shall pay him or his estate a lump sum payment equal to his then current annual retainer.  In addition, upon his termination of employment for any reason, we shall provide for continued medical insurance coverage for him and his spouse for the duration of their respective lives.  Finally, Mr. Field’s agreement provides that in the event that any payments made pursuant to the agreement become subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, we agree to make an additional payment to Mr. Field in an amount equal to two-thirds of the amount required to fully compensate him for the additional tax obligations arising under Section 280(g) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Stephen F. Fisher, Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer.  Our Principal Financial Officer is Stephen F. Fisher.  Mr. Fisher serves as our Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an employment agreement dated December 19, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement has an initial term of approximately three years (through February 28, 2011) with automatic one year extensions following the initial term unless either party provides at least 120 days prior notice of non-renewal.  Mr. Fisher’s salary for the year 2008 was $533,333.  The agreement provides for an annual cash bonus of up to $400,000 with respect to 2008, with a CPI-U adjustment for subsequent years during the term.  In addition, Mr. Fisher is eligible to participate in our benefit plans generally available to our officers as described above.

·                                          Incentive Compensation.  In recognition of his services during 2008, and in light of the considerations described above and the terms of his employment agreement, on February 10, 2009, our Committee awarded Mr. Fisher: (i) a discretionary equity award of 35,000 restricted stock units which vest over two years and options to purchase 80,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $1.34 per share which vest in four equal annual installments beginning on February 10, 2010; and (ii) a discretionary cash bonus of $275,000.

·                                          Termination / Severance Compensation.  Mr. Fisher’s employment agreement may be terminated by either party.  Specifically, Mr. Fisher may terminate the agreement for any reason effective on or after August 31, 2009 upon 120 days prior written notice.  We may terminate Mr. Fisher’s employment for cause or at our convenience.  In the event of termination by us for cause, our obligations under the agreement cease.  In the event of a termination by us without cause, we must pay Mr. Fisher a one-time bonus of $400,000, plus an amount equal to the annual bonus paid in the immediately preceding year prorated from January 1 through the termination date.  In addition, we must continue to pay the salary and auto allowance for a specified period.  Further, all grants of options and restricted stock made through the effective date of termination continue to vest through February 28, 2011 and such options may be exercised for a specified period.

John C. Donlevie, Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel.  John C. Donlevie serves as our Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel pursuant to an employment agreement dated December 23, 1998.  Mr. Donlevie’s salary for the year 2008 was $330,597.  In addition, Mr. Donlevie is eligible to participate in our benefit plans generally available to our senior executive officers as described above.

·                                          Incentive Compensation.  In recognition of his services during 2008, and in light of the considerations described above, on February 10, 2009, our Committee awarded Mr. Donlevie: (i) a discretionary equity award of options to purchase 25,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $1.34 per share which vest in four equal annual installments beginning on February 10, 2010; and (ii) a discretionary cash bonus of $97,500.  In addition, on February 10, 2009, an aggregate of 20,000 shares of restricted stock units which were subject to vesting on the achievement of specified stock market prices for our Class A Common Stock were modified to provide for time vesting over two years.

Eugene D. Levin, Vice President, Treasurer and Controller.  Eugene D. Levin serves as our Vice President, Treasurer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer.  Mr. Levin’s salary for the year 2008 was $191,835.  In addition, Mr. Levin is eligible to participate in our benefit plans generally available to our officers as described above.

·                                          Incentive Compensation.  In recognition of his services during 2008, and in light of the considerations described above, on February 10, 2009, our Committee awarded Mr. Levin: (i) a discretionary equity award of options to purchase 15,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price $1.34 per share which vest in four equal annual installments beginning on February 10, 2010; and (ii) a discretionary cash bonus of $25,000.

28

EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid to or earned by our Chief Executive Officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) for services rendered during 2008, 2007 and 2006:

(1)                                 Please refer to a discussion of the assumptions used in the valuation of awards and options in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included with the filing of: (i) the 2008 Form 10K filed on February 26, 2008; (ii) the 2007 Form 10K filed on February 22, 2008; and (iii) the 2006 Form 10K on February 28, 2007.

(2)                                 All other compensation includes: (i) medical insurance premiums of $22,404, $22,575 and $19,291 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; and (ii) contributions by the Company under a 401K plan of $6,900, $6,600 and $6,600 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(3)                                 All other compensation includes: (i) medical insurance premiums of $17,396, $17,188 and $14,979 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; (ii) $14,400 as an automobile allowance in each of 2008, 2007 and 2006; and (iii) contributions by the Company under a 401K plan of $6,600 for each of 2007 and 2006

(4)                                 All other compensation includes: (i) medical insurance premiums of $17,396, $17,395 and $17,747 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; (ii) $18,000 as an automobile allowance in each of 2008, 2007 and 2006; and (iii) contributions by the Company under a 401K plan of $6,078, $6,600 and $6,600 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(5)                                 All other compensation includes: (i) medical insurance premiums of $22,404, $22,575 and $19,291 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; (ii) $8,588, $3,400 and $8,460 for the personal use of a Company provided automobile for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; and (iii) contributions by the Company under a 401K plan of $4,600, $6,600 and $6,600 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively

(6)                                 All other compensation includes: (i) medical insurance premiums of $17,396, $17,395 and $14,979 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively; (ii) $4,013 and $4,013 for the personal use of a Company provided automobile for 2007 and 2006, respectively; and (iii) contributions by the Company under a 401K plan of $5,680 and $5,505 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.

29

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation equity awards granted to each of our Named Executive Officers during 2008:

30

NARRATIVE DISCLOSURES

Employment Agreements

David J. Field.  Mr. Field serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to an employment agreement dated August 2, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement has an initial term of three years with automatic one year extensions following the initial term unless either party provides prior notice of non-extension.  This agreement provides for an annual base salary, subject to annual increase based upon the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers, and for an annual performance-based bonus potential of up to 110% of his annual base salary.  Mr. Field’s base salary for 2008 was $775,862.  In addition, Mr. Field’s agreement provides for annual grants of 37,500 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan which will vest at a rate of 50% of the total number of shares subject to the grant on the second anniversary of the date of grant and 25% of the total number of shares subject to the grant on each subsequent anniversary of the date of grant.  Under this agreement, Mr. Field will also receive certain other benefits as provided from time to time to our senior executive officers.  Mr. Field’s employment agreement contains provisions which apply in the event of a termination or change of control.  See below under the heading “Termination Or Change-In-Control Payments.”

Joseph M. Field.  Mr. Field serves as our Chairman pursuant to an employment agreement dated August 2, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement provides that for so long as Mr. Field serves as the Chairman of our Board of Directors, he shall receive an annual retainer in an amount equal to three times the annual retainer payable to non-employee members of the Board of Directors, as in effect from time to time.  This annual retainer shall be payable either in cash or in restricted stock units which vest over the one year period following the date of grant.  Additionally, we shall grant him annual equity compensation awards of the same type and for an underlying number of shares equal to three times the number of shares underlying the awards granted to each non-employee member of the Board of Directors pursuant to our non-employee director compensation policies as in effect from time to time.  Under this employment agreement, Mr. Field will also receive certain other benefits as provided from time to time to our senior Executive Officers.  Mr. Field’s employment agreement contains provisions which apply in the event of a termination or change of control.  See below under the heading “Termination Or Change-In-Control Payments.”

Stephen F. Fisher.  Mr. Fisher serves as our Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to an employment agreement dated December 19, 2007, which agreement was amended on December 15, 2008 to conform to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.  This agreement has an initial term of approximately three years (through February 28, 2011) with automatic one year extensions following the initial term unless either party provides at least 120 days prior notice of non-renewal.  This agreement provides for an annual base salary, subject to annual increase based upon the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers.  Mr. Fisher’s base salary for 2008 was $533,333.  The Agreement provides for an annual cash bonus of up to $400,000 with respect to 2008, with a CPI-U adjustment for subsequent years during the term.  Mr. Fisher’s employment agreement contains provisions which apply in the event of a termination or change of control.  See below under the heading “Termination Or Change-In-Control Payments.”

John C. Donlevie.  On December 23, 1998, we entered into an employment agreement with John C. Donlevie pursuant to which Mr. Donlevie serves as our Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel.  Pursuant to this employment agreement, Mr. Donlevie’s salary for the year 2008 was $330,597.  The Board of Directors may approve additional salary, bonuses, equity awards, fees, or other compensation.  The employment agreement provides that Mr. Donlevie’s employment may be terminated at will by either party: (i) immediately, if good cause for termination exists; or (ii) upon thirty (30) days notice in the absence of good cause.

31

2008 Equity Awards

On January 8, 2008, pursuant to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan, we granted restricted stock units to David J. Field (37,500 shares), John C. Donlevie (12,500 shares) and Eugene D. Levin (3,500 shares).  Such restricted stock unit grants vest over 4 years as follows: (i) 50% - two years from the grant date; (ii) 25% - three years from the grant date; and (iii) the remaining 25% - four years from the grant date.  In addition, on January 8, 2008, pursuant to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan we granted options to purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock, at an exercise price of $11.31 per share, to John C. Donlevie (6,250 options) and Eugene D. Levin (1,750 options).  Such option grants vest at a rate of 25% per year over four years.

On February 29, 2008, pursuant to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan and his employment agreement, we granted Stephen F. Fisher 130,000 restricted stock units which vest one-third per year over three years.

On March 7, 2008, pursuant to the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan, we granted Joseph M. Field: (i) options to purchase 3,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock, at an exercise price of $11.78 per share, which vest at a rate of 25% per year over four years; and (ii) 6,000 restricted stock units which vest over four years as follows: (a) 50% - two years from the grant date; (b) 25% - three years from the grant date; and (c) the remaining 25% - four years from the grant date.

All of the above described grants of restricted stock include the non-preferential right to receive a dividend equivalent amount upon vesting equal to the accumulated dividends payable on such shares while such shares were unvested.

32

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS TABLE

The following table provides summary information concerning outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2008 for each of our Named Executive Officers: