Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2012

Registration No. 333-180366

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 1 to

Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933



The ServiceMaster Company*
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
  8741
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  36-3858106
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

860 Ridge Lake Boulevard,
Memphis, Tennessee 38120
(901) 597-1400

(Address, including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices)

Greerson G. McMullen, Esq.
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Government Affairs & Secretary
The ServiceMaster Company
860 Ridge Lake Boulevard,
Memphis, Tennessee 38120
(901) 597-1400

(Name, Address, including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

With a copy to:
Peter J. Loughran, Esq.

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 909-6000


*
Information regarding additional registrants is contained in the Table of Additional Registrants on the following page.

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

         If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box o

         If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

         If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o

         If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

         Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) o

         Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer) o



         The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the SEC, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

   


Table of Contents


Table of Additional Registrants

Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter
   
  State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or
Organization
  I.R.S. Employer
Identification
Number
 

Merry Maids Limited Partnership*

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     47-0718233  

MM Maids L.L.C.*

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     06-1668989  

ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc.**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3729225  

ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3729226  

ServiceMaster Holding Corporation**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-4245384  

ServiceMaster Management Corporation**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3837079  

ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership*

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3747477  

SM Clean L.L.C.*

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     06-1668984  

Terminix International, Inc.**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3478839  

The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3478837  

TruGreen Companies L.L.C.**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-4313320  

TruGreen, Inc.**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3734601  

TruGreen Limited Partnership**

  Subsidiary Guarantor   Delaware     36-3734669  

*
The address including zip code and telephone number including area code for this registrant is 3839 Forest Hill-Irene Road, Memphis, Tennessee, 38125; (901) 597-7500.

**
The address including zip code and telephone number including area code for this registrant is 860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee, 38120; (901) 597-1400.

Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not complete this exchange offer or issue these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED APRIL 27, 2012

PROSPECTUS

LOGO

The ServiceMaster Company

Offer to Exchange
$600,000,000 Outstanding 8% Senior Notes due 2020
for
$600,000,000 Registered 8% Senior Notes due 2020

        The ServiceMaster Company is offering to exchange $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its outstanding unregistered 8% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "Old Notes") for a like principal amount of its registered 8% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "New Notes").

        The terms of the New Notes are identical in all material respects to the terms of the Old Notes, except that the New Notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and will not contain restrictions on transfer or provisions relating to additional interest, will bear a different CUSIP number from the Old Notes and will not entitle their holders to registration rights.

        No public market currently exists for the Old Notes or the New Notes.

        The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 25, 2012 (the "Expiration Date") unless we extend the Expiration Date. You should read the section called "The Exchange Offer" for further information on how to exchange your Old Notes for New Notes.

        See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 19 for a discussion of risk factors that you should consider prior to tendering your Old Notes in the exchange offer and risk factors related to ownership of the New Notes.

        Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes where such Old Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, for a period of up to 90 days after the consummation of the exchange offer, we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of Distribution."

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is                  , 2012


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Pages  

Summary

    1  

Risk Factors

    19  

Forward-Looking Statements

    38  

The Exchange Offer

    41  

Use of Proceeds

    49  

Selected Historical Financial Data

    50  

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

    52  

Business

    86  

Management

    98  

Executive Compensation

    101  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

    124  

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

    128  

Description of Other Indebtedness

    131  

Description of Notes

    138  

Exchange Offer; Registration Rights

    202  

Plan of Distribution

    205  

Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

    206  

Certain ERISA Considerations

    207  

Validity of the Notes

    208  

Where You Can Find More Information

    208  

Experts

    208  

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

    F-1  

        You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, the securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom or from whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation of an offer in such jurisdiction. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of this prospectus. Also, you should not assume that there has been no change in the affairs of The ServiceMaster Company and its subsidiaries since the date of this prospectus.

i


Table of Contents


SUMMARY

        This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. You should read the following summary together with the entire prospectus, including the more detailed information regarding our company, the New Notes being issued in the exchange offer and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus. In this prospectus, unless noted or indicated by context, the terms the "Company," "ServiceMaster," "we," "us" and "our" refer to The ServiceMaster Company, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, and the term "Holdings" refers to ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Our Company

        ServiceMaster is a national company serving both residential and commercial customers. Our services include lawn care, termite and pest control, home service contracts, cleaning and disaster restoration, house cleaning, furniture repair and home inspection. As of December 31, 2011, we provided these services through a network of approximately 6,900 company owned, franchised and licensed locations operating primarily under the following leading brands: TruGreen, Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec. Approximately 98 percent of our 2011 operating revenue was generated by sales in the United States. Incorporated in Delaware in 1991, ServiceMaster is the successor to various entities dating back to 1947.

        ServiceMaster is organized into five principal reportable segments: TruGreen, Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Clean, and Other Operations and Headquarters. During 2011, we employed an average of approximately 21,000 company associates, and our franchise network independently employed over 31,000 additional people.

        In the first quarter of 2011, we concluded that TruGreen LandCare, a commercial landscape maintenance business, did not fit within our long-term strategic plans and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. The financial results, as well as the assets and liabilities, of the TruGreen LandCare business are reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented in this prospectus.

Our Services

        The following table shows the percentage of ServiceMaster's consolidated revenue from continuing operations derived from each of ServiceMaster's reportable segments in the years indicated:

Segment
  2011   2010   2009  

TruGreen

    34 %   35 %   35 %

Terminix

    37 %   37 %   37 %

American Home Shield

    22 %   21 %   21 %

ServiceMaster Clean

    4 %   4 %   4 %

Other Operations and Headquarters

    3 %   3 %   3 %

        The TruGreen segment provides lawn, tree and shrub care services primarily under the TruGreen brand name. TruGreen is a leading provider of lawn, tree and shrub care services in the United States, serving both residential and commercial customers. Of the TruGreen segment's 2011 operating revenue, 55 percent was generated from residential weed control and fertilization

 

1


Table of Contents

services, while expanded lawn services (such as aeration and grub control) (19 percent), commercial weed control and fertilization services (15 percent), and tree and shrub services (11 percent) accounted for the remainder.

        As of December 31, 2011, TruGreen provided these services in 48 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 200 company owned locations and 35 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, TruGreen also provided lawn care services through a subsidiary in Canada and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Japan and the United Kingdom.

        The Terminix segment provides termite and pest control services and distributes pest control products primarily under the Terminix brand name. Terminix is a leading provider of termite and pest control services in the United States, serving both residential and commercial customers. Of the Terminix segment's 2011 operating revenue, 38 percent and 17 percent were generated from residential and commercial pest control services, respectively, and 37 percent and 3 percent were generated from residential and commercial termite control services, respectively (with the remainder from other services).

        As of December 31, 2011, Terminix provided these services in 47 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 300 company owned locations and 100 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Terminix also provided termite and pest control services through subsidiaries in Mexico and Honduras and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Japan, China, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Central America, the Caribbean and the Middle East. Terminix has formed a joint venture to enter the Indian pest market.

        The American Home Shield segment provides home service contracts for household systems and appliances primarily under the American Home Shield brand name. American Home Shield is a leading provider of home service contracts for household systems and appliances in the United States. It provides residential customers with contracts to repair or replace electrical, plumbing, central heating and central air conditioning systems, water heaters and other covered household systems and appliances and services those contracts through independent repair contractors. In 2011, 68 percent of the home service contracts written by American Home Shield were derived from existing contract renewals, while 18 percent and 14 percent were derived from sales made in conjunction with existing home resale transactions and direct-to-consumer sales, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, American Home Shield issued and administered home service contracts in 49 states and the District of Columbia and had no international operations.

        The ServiceMaster Clean segment provides residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning services primarily under the ServiceMaster and ServiceMaster Clean brand names, on-site furniture repair and restoration services primarily under the Furniture Medic brand name and home inspection services primarily under the AmeriSpec brand name. Of the ServiceMaster Clean segment's 2011 operating revenue, 52 percent was generated from domestic royalty fees, while international (19 percent), product sales (12 percent), janitorial national accounts (9 percent), lead generation fees (3 percent), AmeriSpec (2 percent), Furniture Medic (2 percent) and new license sales (1 percent) accounted for the remainder.

        ServiceMaster Clean.    ServiceMaster Clean is a leading franchisor in the residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning field in the United States. As of December 31, 2011,

 

2


Table of Contents

ServiceMaster Clean provided these services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 2,975 franchised outlets. ServiceMaster Clean also has operations in Canada and Honduras. As of December 31, 2011, ServiceMaster Clean, through franchises, provided disaster restoration and cleaning services in Canada, the United Kingdom and Spain and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in India, Lebanon, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Japan and Southeast Asia.

        Furniture Medic.    Furniture Medic is a leading provider of on-site furniture repair and restoration services in the United States serving residential customers. As of December 31, 2011, Furniture Medic provided these services in 42 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 215 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Furniture Medic also provided on-site furniture repair and restoration services through franchisees in Canada and the United Kingdom and had licensing arrangements to provide these services in Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

        AmeriSpec.    AmeriSpec is a leading provider of home inspection services in the United States serving residential customers. As of December 31, 2011, AmeriSpec provided these services in 44 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 220 franchised outlets. AmeriSpec also provided home inspection services through franchisees in Canada.

        The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes the Merry Maids business unit, The ServiceMaster Acceptance Company Limited Partnership ("SMAC") and ServiceMaster's corporate headquarters functions.

        Merry Maids.    Merry Maids is a leading provider of home cleaning services in the United States. As of December 31, 2011, these services were provided in 49 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 70 company owned locations and 400 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Merry Maids, through franchises, also provided home cleaning services in Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.

        SMAC.    SMAC provides financing to franchisees of the Company through commercial loans for franchise fees and royalties, equipment and vehicle purchases and working capital needs and to consumer customers of Terminix through retail installment sales contracts. Commercial loans are typically for a term of one to seven years and are generally secured by the assets of the franchisee and other collateral. On December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of commercial loans was $35.8 million with a bad debt reserve for commercial loans of $2.5 million. SMAC wrote off $0.6 million in commercial loans in 2011. Retail installment sales contracts are typically for a term of 12 months and are unsecured. On December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of retail installment sales contracts was $19.1 million. In the event a customer fails to make payments under a retail installment sales contract for 120 days after the due date, Terminix purchases the installment contract from SMAC.

        Headquarters functions.    The Business Support Center, headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, administers payroll, benefits, risk management, travel and certain procurement services for our internal operations. Various administrative support departments also provide personnel, communications, marketing, government and public relations, administrative, accounting, financial, tax, human resources and legal services.

        Our corporate headquarters are located at 860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee, 38120. Our telephone number is (901) 597-1400.

 

3


Table of Contents

Ownership and Organizational Structure

        On July 24, 2007 (the "Closing Date"), ServiceMaster was acquired pursuant to a merger transaction (the "Merger"), and, immediately following the completion of the Merger, all of the outstanding common stock of Holdings, the ultimate parent company of ServiceMaster, was owned by investment funds sponsored by, or affiliated with, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC ("CD&R"), Citigroup Private Equity LP ("Citigroup"), BAS Capital Funding Corporation ("BAS") and JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. ("JPMorgan"). On September 30, 2010, Citigroup transferred the management responsibility for certain investment funds that owned shares of common stock of Holdings to StepStone Group LLC ("StepStone") and its proprietary interests in such investment funds to Lexington Partners Advisors LP. As of December 22, 2011, Holdings purchased from BAS 7.5 million shares of capital stock of Holdings. Affiliates of BAS continued to hold 10 million shares of Holdings until March 30, 2012 when an affiliate of BAS sold 7.5 million shares to Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P. ("Ridgemont" and, together with CD&R, StepStone, JPMorgan, Citigroup Capital Partners II Employee Master Fund, L.P., an affiliate of Citigroup, and BACSVM-A, L.P., an affiliate of BAS, the "Equity Sponsors").

        The following chart illustrates our current ownership and organizational structure:

GRAPHIC


(1)
Borrower under Credit Facilities (as defined below) and issuer of the Old Notes, New Notes, the 10.75% senior notes due 2015 (the "2015 Notes") and the Continuing Notes (as defined in "Description of Other Indebtedness"). The 2015 Notes and the Continuing Notes are described under "Description of Other Indebtedness."

 

4


Table of Contents

(2)
Certain domestic subsidiaries of ServiceMaster are borrowers under a senior secured revolving credit facility entered into by ServiceMaster on July 24, 2007, as amended (the "Revolving Credit Facility" and, together with the Term Facilities, as defined under "Description of Other Indebtedness—Term Facilities," the "Credit Facilities"). Each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of ServiceMaster (other than any subsidiary that is a subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary, foreign subsidiary holding company, an unrestricted subsidiary, a subsidiary below a materiality threshold specified under the Credit Facilities, a receivables financing subsidiary or a subsidiary subject to regulation as an insurance, home warranty, service contract or similar company (or any subsidiary thereof)) currently guarantees ServiceMaster's obligations under the Credit Facilities and certain related interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements with lenders or their affiliates. The Credit Facilities and guarantees thereof are secured as described under "Description of Other Indebtedness—Credit Facilities." CDRSVM Holding, Inc., ServiceMaster's direct parent, also currently guarantees ServiceMaster's obligations under the Credit Facilities.

(3)
The New Notes will be guaranteed by each domestic subsidiary of ServiceMaster that guarantees ServiceMaster's indebtedness under the Credit Facilities and that is a Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiary or that guarantees Capital Markets Securities (each as defined under "Description of Notes"). See "Description of Notes." These subsidiaries also guarantee the Old Notes and the 2015 Notes. See "Description of Other Indebtedness—2015 Notes."

 

5


Table of Contents


Summary of the Terms of the Exchange Offer

The Notes

  In February 2012, the Company sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act, $600 million aggregate principal amount of its 8% senior notes due 2020. The initial purchasers for the Old Notes were J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Natixis Securities America LLC (collectively, the "Initial Purchasers"). When we use the term "Old Notes" in this prospectus, we mean the 8% Senior Notes due 2020 that were privately placed with the Initial Purchasers in February 2012, and were not registered with the SEC.

 

When we use the term "New Notes" in this prospectus, we mean the 8% Senior Notes due 2020 registered with the SEC and offered hereby in exchange for the Old Notes. When we use the term "Notes" in this prospectus, the related discussion applies to both the Old Notes and the New Notes.

 

The terms of the New Notes are identical in all material respects to the terms of the Old Notes, except that the New Notes are registered under the Securities Act and will not be subject to restrictions on transfer, will bear a different CUSIP and ISIN number than the Old Notes, will not entitle their holders to registration rights and will be subject to terms relating to book-entry procedures and administrative terms relating to transfers that differ from those of the Old Notes.

 

The CUSIP numbers for the Old Notes are 81760N AL3 (Rule 144A) and U8151C AC4 (Regulation S). The ISIN numbers for the Old Notes are US81760NAL38 (Rule 144A), and USU8151CAC48 (Regulation S). The CUSIP number for the New Notes is 81760N AN9 and the ISIN number for the New Notes is US81760NAN93.

The Exchange Offer

 

You may exchange Old Notes for a like principal amount of New Notes. The consummation of the exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum or maximum aggregate principal amount of Old Notes being tendered for exchange.

Resale of New Notes

 

We believe the New Notes that will be issued in the exchange offer may be resold by most investors without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, subject to certain conditions. You should read the discussions under the headings "The Exchange Offer" for further information regarding the exchange offer and resale of the New Notes.

 

6


Table of Contents

Registration Rights Agreement         

 

We have undertaken the exchange offer pursuant to the terms of the exchange and registration rights agreements we entered into with the Initial Purchasers on February 13, 2012 and February 16, 2012 (together, the "Registration Rights Agreement"). Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, we agreed to use our commercially reasonable efforts to consummate an exchange offer for the Old Notes pursuant to an effective registration statement or to cause resales of the Old Notes to be registered. We have filed this registration statement to meet our obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement. If we fail to satisfy our obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement and a Registration Default occurs, the interest rate on the Registrable Securities will be increased by (i) 0.25 percent per annum for the first 90-day period beginning on the day immediately following such Registration Default and (ii) an additional 0.25 percent per annum with respect to each subsequent 90-day period, in each case until and including the date such Registration Default ends, up to a maximum increase of 0.50 percent per annum. See "Exchange Offer; Registration Rights."

Consequences of Failure to Exchange the Old Notes

 

You will continue to hold Old Notes that remain subject to their existing transfer restrictions if:

 

you do not tender your Old Notes; or

 

you tender your Old Notes and they are not accepted for exchange.

 

We will have no obligation to register the Old Notes after we consummate the exchange offer. See "The Exchange Offer—Terms of the Exchange Offer; Period for Tendering Old Notes."

Expiration Date

 

The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on May 25, 2012 (the "Expiration Date"), unless we extend it, in which case Expiration Date means the latest date and time to which the exchange offer is extended.

Interest on the New Notes

 

The New Notes will accrue interest from the most recent date to which interest has been paid or provided for on the Old Notes or, if no interest has been paid on the Old Notes, from February 13, 2012.

 

7


Table of Contents

Conditions to the Exchange Offer

 

The exchange offer is subject to several customary conditions. We will not be required to accept for exchange, or to issue New Notes in exchange for, any Old Notes, and we may terminate or amend the exchange offer if we determine in our reasonable judgment at any time before the Expiration Date that the exchange offer would violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC. The foregoing conditions are for our sole benefit and may be waived by us at any time. In addition, we will not accept for exchange any Old Notes tendered, and no New Notes will be issued in exchange for any such Old Notes, if at any time any stop order is threatened or in effect with respect to:

 

the registration statement of which this prospectus constitutes a part; or

 

the qualification of the indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, governing the Notes under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the "Trust Indenture Act").

 

See "The Exchange Offer—Conditions to the Exchange Offer." We reserve the right to terminate or amend the exchange offer at any time prior to the Expiration Date upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events.

Procedures for Tendering Old Notes

 

If you wish to accept the exchange offer, you must tender your Old Notes and do the following on or prior to the Expiration Date, unless you follow the procedures described under "The Exchange Offer—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."

 

if Old Notes are tendered in accordance with the book-entry procedures described under "The Exchange Offer—Book-Entry Transfer," transmit an Agent's Message to the Exchange Agent through the Automated Tender Offer Program ("ATOP") of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), or

 

transmit a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, or a facsimile copy thereof, to the Exchange Agent, including all other documents required by the letter of transmittal.

 

See "The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering Old Notes."

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

 

If you wish to tender your Old Notes, but cannot properly do so prior to the Expiration Date, you may tender your Old Notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures set forth under "The Exchange Offer—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."

 

8


Table of Contents

Withdrawal Rights

 

Tenders of Old Notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date. To withdraw a tender of Old Notes, a notice of withdrawal must be actually received by the Exchange Agent at its address set forth in "The Exchange Offer—Exchange Agent" prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date. See "The Exchange Offer—Withdrawal Rights."

Acceptance of Old Notes and Delivery of New Notes

 

Except in some circumstances, any and all Old Notes that are validly tendered in the exchange offer prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date will be accepted for exchange. The New Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer will be delivered promptly after the Expiration Date. See "The Exchange Offer—Acceptance of Old Notes for Exchange; Delivery of New Notes."

Certain U.S. Federal Tax Considerations

 

We believe that the exchange of the Old Notes for the New Notes will not constitute a taxable exchange for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations."

Exchange Agent                          

 

Wilmington Trust, National Association is serving as the Exchange Agent (the "Exchange Agent").

 

9


Table of Contents


Summary of the Terms of the Notes

        The terms of the New Notes offered in the exchange offer are identical in all material respects to the Old Notes, except that the New Notes:

        The following summary contains basic information about the New Notes and the guarantees thereof and is not intended to be complete. For a more complete understanding of the New Notes and the guarantees, please refer to the section entitled "Description of Notes" in this prospectus.

Issuer

  The ServiceMaster Company.

Notes offered

 

$600 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Notes due 2020.

Maturity

 

The Notes will mature on February 15, 2020.

Interest payment dates

 

February 15 and August 15, commencing August 15, 2012. Interest on the Notes accrues from February 13, 2012.

Optional redemption

 

We may redeem some or all of the Notes at any time on or after February 15, 2015 at the redemption prices set forth in this prospectus, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. On or prior to February 15, 2015, we may also apply funds equal to the proceeds from one or more equity offerings to redeem up to 35 percent of the Notes at the redemption price set forth in this prospectus, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. In addition, at any time prior to February 15, 2015, we may redeem some or all of the Notes at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount plus the applicable "make-whole" premium set forth in this prospectus and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. See "Description of Notes—Redemption—Optional Redemption."

Offer to repurchase

 

If we experience a change of control (as defined in "Description of Notes"), we must offer to repurchase all of the Notes (unless otherwise redeemed) at a price equal to 101 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. See "Description of Notes—Change of Control."

 

10


Table of Contents

 

If we sell assets under certain circumstances, we must use the proceeds to make an offer to purchase Notes at a price equal to 100 percent of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. See "Description of Notes—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Sales of Assets and Subsidiary Stock."

Guarantees

 

The Notes will be guaranteed, jointly and severally, irrevocably and fully and unconditionally, on a senior unsecured basis, by each domestic subsidiary of ServiceMaster that guarantees our indebtedness under the Credit Facilities and that is a Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiary (each as defined under "Description of Notes") or that guarantees capital markets securities with an outstanding principal amount over $150.0 million. These entities also guarantee our outstanding 2015 Notes. These guarantees are subject to termination and release under specified circumstances without the consent of holders of the Notes. See "Description of Notes—Subsidiary Guarantees."

 

For the year ended December 31, 2011, our subsidiaries that guarantee the Notes represented approximately 77 percent of our operating revenue and 96 percent of our operating income. Our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Notes, including our non-U.S. subsidiaries and our subsidiaries subject to regulation as insurance, home warranty or service contract companies (including the American Home Shield companies), represent a significant portion of our operations. These non-guarantor subsidiaries currently do not guarantee borrowings under the Credit Facilities or the 2015 Notes. See Note 20 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus, for condensed consolidating statements of operations, financial position and cash flows that present separately the financial information for our subsidiaries that do not guarantee our indebtedness.

Ranking

 

The Notes are our unsecured senior indebtedness and rank:

 

equal in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of ServiceMaster;

 

senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated obligations of ServiceMaster; and

 

effectively subordinated to all secured indebtedness of that guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

 

11


Table of Contents

 

The guarantee of each guarantor is a senior unsecured obligation of that guarantor and ranks:

 

equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of that guarantor;

 

senior in right of payment to all existing and future guarantor subordinated obligations; and

 

effectively subordinated to all secured indebtedness of that guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

 

As of December 31, 2011:

 

we had $3.876 billion of total long-term debt outstanding, substantially all of which would have ranked equal in right of payment with the Notes;

 

of our total long-term debt outstanding, $2.531 billion was represented by secured indebtedness outstanding under our Credit Facilities, to which the Notes are effectively subordinated, and we had $442.5 million of additional commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility available to us, all of which would be secured if borrowed; and

 

our non-guarantor subsidiaries had approximately $147.6 million of total debt and capital leases, excluding trade payables and other obligations, all of which are structurally senior to the Notes.

Covenants

 

The indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:

 

incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares;

 

pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions, or make investments;

 

create restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make payments to us;

 

enter into certain transactions with our affiliates;

 

transfer or sell assets;

 

create certain liens;

 

merge, consolidate, or sell all or substantially all of our assets; and

 

designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries.

 

12


Table of Contents

 

Most of these covenants will cease to apply for so long as the Notes have investment grade ratings from both Moody's Investment Service, Inc. ("Moody's") and Standard & Poor's ("S&P"). These covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications, which are described under "Description of Notes—Certain Covenants" and "Description of Notes—Merger and Consolidation."


Risk Factors

        In evaluating an investment in the Notes, prospective investors should carefully consider, along with the other information included in this prospectus, the specific factors set forth under "Risk Factors."


Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

        Our consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Successor period from July 25, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2007 to July 24, 2007 are as follows:

 
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
  Successor(a)   Predecessor(a)  
 
  Year ended December 31,    
   
Period from
Jan. 1, 2007 to
Jul. 24, 2007
 
 
  Period from
Jul. 25, 2007 to
Dec. 31, 2007
 
 
  2011   2010   2009   2008  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

    1.41     1.10     (b )   (c )   (d )   5.41  

(a)
Although ServiceMaster continued as the same legal entity after the Merger, the accompanying ratio calculation is presented for two periods: Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the period preceding the Merger and the period succeeding the Merger, respectively.

(b)
For purposes of the ratio calculation, the deficiency in our earnings to achieve a one-to-one ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $3.1 million. For purposes of calculating our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2009, fixed charges were $299.3 million.

(c)
For purposes of the ratio calculation, the deficiency in our earnings to achieve a one-to-one ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $170.2 million. For purposes of calculating our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2008, fixed charges were $347.1 million.

(d)
For purposes of the ratio calculation, the deficiency in our earnings to achieve a one-to-one ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the Successor period from July 25, 2007 to December 31, 2007 was $145.1 million. For purposes of calculating our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the period from July 25, 2007 to December 31, 2007, fixed charges were $177.8 million.

 

13


Table of Contents


Summary Consolidated Financial and Operating Data

        The summary historical financial and operating data as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 set forth below are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical financial and operating data as of December 31, 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes not included in this prospectus. The summary historical financial and operating data are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        In the first quarter of 2011, we concluded that the TruGreen LandCare business did not fit within our long-term strategic plans and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. The financial results, as well as the assets and liabilities, of the TruGreen LandCare business are reported in discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 
  Year ended December 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating results:

                   

Operating revenue

  $ 3,205,872   $ 3,127,394   $ 2,977,885  

Operating income(1)

    375,460     306,692     243,834  

Percentage of operating revenue

    11.7 %   9.8 %   8.2 %

Non-operating expense(2)

    263,711     278,308     246,896  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes(1)(3)

    43,912     10,945     (9,204 )
               

Income (Loss) from continuing operations(1)(2)(3)

    67,837     17,439     6,142  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(4)

    (27,016 )   (31,998 )   7,353  
               

Net income (loss)(1)(2)(3)(4)

  $ 40,821   $ (14,559 ) $ 13,495  
               

Other financial data:

                   

Capital expenditures

  $ 96,540   $ 134,234   $ 56,004  

Adjusted EBITDA(5)

    586,482     523,124     497,766  

Comparable Operating Performance(5)

    594,813     532,104     505,315  

Ratio of total debt to Adjusted EBITDA(5)

    6.61x     7.55x     7.99x  

Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense(5)

    2.15x     1.82x     1.66x  

Financial position (as of period end):

                   

Total assets

  $ 7,146,823   $ 7,098,090   $ 7,146,389  

Total liabilities

    5,898,904     5,910,563     5,960,058  

Total long-term debt outstanding

    3,875,870     3,948,487     3,974,944  

Total shareholder's equity(1)(2)(3)(4)

    1,247,919     1,187,527     1,186,331  

(1)
The 2011, 2010 and 2009 results include restructuring charges of $8.2 million, $11.4 million and $26.7 million, respectively, as described in Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

In 2011 and 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. These charges are included in the results of continuing operations. There were no

 

14


Table of Contents

    similar impairment charges included in continuing operations in 2010. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further details.

(2)
The 2009 results include a $46.1 million ($29.6 million, net of tax) gain on extinguishment of debt related to the completion of open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the Company's 2015 Notes.

(3)
In the third and fourth quarters of 2009, the Company recorded a reduction in income tax expense of $12.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, related to changes in state tax rates used to measure deferred taxes.

(4)
In 2011, in conjunction with the decision to dispose of TruGreen LandCare, a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $34.2 million was recorded to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale of TruGreen LandCare in 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss on sale of $6.2 million. In 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges associated with the goodwill and trade name at its TruGreen LandCare business in the amount of $46.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. These charges are classified within the financial statement caption "(loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes."

(5)
The Company uses Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance to facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period. Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are supplemental measures of the Company's performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are not measurements of the Company's financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as alternatives to net cash provided by operating activities or any other measures of the Company's cash flow or liquidity. "Adjusted EBITDA" means net income (loss) before: income (loss) from discontinued operations; provision (benefit) for income taxes; other expense; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; interest expense; interest and net investment income; and depreciation and amortization expense; as well as adding back interest and net investment income, residual value guarantee charge and non-cash trade name impairment. "Comparable Operating Performance" is calculated by adding back to Adjusted EBITDA an amount equal to the non-cash stock based compensation expense and non-cash effects on Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the application of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger.

        The Company believes Adjusted EBITDA facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting net interest income and expense), taxation and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense), which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance. In addition, the Company excludes residual value guarantee charges that do not result in additional cash payments to exit the facility at the end of the lease term. The Company uses Comparable Operating Performance as a supplemental measure to assess the Company's performance because it excludes non-cash stock based compensation expense and non-cash effects on Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the application of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger. The Company presents Comparable Operating Performance because it believes that it is useful for investors, analysts and other interested parties in their analysis of the Company's operating results.

        Charges relating to stock based compensation expense and the impact of purchase accounting are non-cash and the exclusion of the impact of these items from Comparable

 

15


Table of Contents

Operating Performance allows investors to understand the current period results of operations of the business on a comparable basis with previous periods and, secondarily, gives the investors added insight into cash earnings available to service the Company's debt. We believe this to be of particular importance to the Company's public investors, which are debt holders. The Company also believes that the exclusion of the purchase accounting and non-cash stock based compensation expense may provide an additional means for comparing the Company's performance to the performance of other companies by eliminating the impact of differently structured equity-based, long-term incentive plans (although care must be taken in making any such comparison, as there may be inconsistencies among companies in the manner of computing similarly titled financial measures).

        Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled financial measures of other companies due to the potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

        Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analyzing the Company's results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

 

16


Table of Contents

        The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income to Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance for the periods presented.

 
  For the year ended December 31,  
(Dollars in thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating income(a)

  $ 375,460   $ 306,692   $ 243,834  

Depreciation and amortization expense

    163,436     196,625     214,792  
               

EBITDA

    538,896     503,317     458,626  

Interest and net investment income(b)

    10,886     9,358     7,079  

Residual value guarantee charge(c)

        10,449     5,461  

Non-cash trade name impairment(d)

    36,700         26,600  
               

Adjusted EBITDA

    586,482     523,124     497,766  

Non-cash stock based compensation expense

    8,412     9,352     8,097  

Non-cash credits attributable to purchase accounting(e)

    (81 )   (372 )   (548 )
               

Comparable Operating Performance

  $ 594,813   $ 532,104   $ 505,315  
               

Memo: Items included in Comparable Operating Performance:

                   

Restructuring and Merger-related charges(f)

  $ 8,162   $ 11,448   $ 26,682  
               

Management and consulting fees(g)

  $ 7,500   $ 7,500   $ 7,500  
               

Memo: Items excluded from Comparable Operating Performance

                   

Comparable operating performance of discontinued operations (h)

  $ (3,064 ) $ 7,862   $ 23,747  
               

(a)
Presented below is a reconciliation of operating income to net (loss) income.

 
  For the year ended December 31,  
(Dollars in thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating income

  $ 375,460   $ 306,692   $ 243,834  

Non-operating expense (Income):

                   

Interest expense

    273,123     286,933     299,333  

Interest and net investment income

    (10,886 )   (9,358 )   (7,079 )

Loss (Gain) on extinguishment of debt

    774         (46,106 )

Other expense

    700     733     748  
               

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

    111,749     28,384     (3,062 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    43,912     10,945     (9,204 )
               

Income from continuing operations

    67,837     17,439     6,142  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

    (27,016 )   (31,998 )   7,353  
               

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 40,821   $ (14,559 ) $ 13,495  
               
(b)
Interest and net investment income is primarily comprised of investment income and realized gain (loss) on our American Home Shield segment investment portfolio. Cash, short-term and long-term marketable securities associated with regulatory requirements in connection with American Home Shield and for other purposes totaled $226.2 million as of December 31, 2011. American Home Shield interest and net investment income was $9.8 million, $6.2 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The balance of interest and net investment income primarily relates to (i) investment income (loss) from our employee deferred compensation trust (for which there is a corresponding and offsetting

 

17


Table of Contents

    change in compensation expense within (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes) and (ii) interest income on other cash balances.

(c)
Represents non-cash residual value guarantee charges recorded in 2010 and 2009 related to a synthetic lease for operating properties, which expired in July 2010. There were no similar charges in 2011.

(d)
Represents pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million recorded in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. There were no similar impairment charges included in continuing operations in 2010. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further information.

(e)
The Merger was accounted for using purchase accounting. This adjustment represents the aggregate, non-cash adjustments (other than amortization and depreciation) attributable to the application of purchase accounting.

(f)
Represents restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters, Merger related charges and other restructuring costs.

(g)
Represents management and consulting fees payable to certain related parties. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further information on management and consulting fees.

(h)
The table included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Segment Review—Discontinued Operations" presents reconciliations of operating (loss) income to EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance for the periods presented.

 

18


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

        Investing in the Notes involves a high degree of risk. Before you make your investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information contained in this prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Risk Related to Our Business and Our Industry

Adverse credit and financial market events and conditions could, among other things, impede access to or increase the cost of financing or cause our commercial customers to incur liquidity issues that could lead to some of our services being cancelled or result in reduced revenues and lower operating income, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Adverse developments in the credit and financial markets, including due to the recent downgrade of the U.S. long-term sovereign credit rating and the European debt crisis, as well as unstable consumer sentiment and high unemployment, continue to challenge the U.S. and global financial and credit markets and overall economies. These developments have had a significant material adverse impact on a number of financial institutions and have limited access to capital and credit for many companies. Disruptions in credit or financial markets could, among other things, lead to impairment charges, make it more difficult for us to obtain, or increase our cost of obtaining, financing for our operations or investments or to refinance our debt, cause our lenders to depart from prior credit industry practice and not give technical or other waivers under Term Facilities and the Revolving Credit Facility, to the extent we may seek them in the future, thereby causing us to be in default under one or more of the Credit Facilities. These disruptions also could cause our commercial customers to encounter liquidity issues that could lead to some of our services being cancelled or reduced, or that could result in an increase in the time it takes our customers to pay us, or that could lead to a decrease in pricing for our services and products, any of which could adversely affect our accounts receivable, among other things, and, in turn, increase our working capital needs. Volatile swings in the commercial real estate segment could also impact the demand for our services as landlords cut back on services provided to their tenants.

        Although we are not currently experiencing any limitation of access to the Credit Facilities and are not aware of any issues currently impacting the ability of the lenders under them to honor their commitments to extend credit, there is no assurance that the U.S. and global credit crisis will not adversely affect our ability to borrow under the Credit Facilities in the future. Liquidity or capital problems at one or more of the lenders on the Revolving Credit Facility could reduce or eliminate the amount available for us to draw under such facility. Our access to additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

        There can be no assurance that adverse developments in the credit and financial markets, along with other economic uncertainties, will not get worse over time. Adverse developments in the credit and financial markets and economic uncertainties make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. The continuance of the current uncertain economic conditions or further deterioration of such conditions could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

19


Table of Contents

Further weakening in general economic conditions, especially as they may affect home sales, unemployment or consumer confidence or spending levels, may adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        A substantial portion of our results of operations is dependent upon spending by consumers. Deterioration in general economic conditions and consumer confidence could affect the demand for our services. Consumer spending and confidence tend to decline during times of declining economic conditions, and there can be no assurance that consumer spending or confidence will materially improve. A worsening of macroeconomic indicators, including weak home sales, higher home foreclosures, declining consumer confidence or rising unemployment rates, could adversely affect consumer spending levels, reduce the demand for our services and adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These factors could also negatively impact the timing or the ultimate collection of accounts receivable, which would adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Weather conditions and seasonality affect the demand for our services and our results of operations and cash flows.

        The demand for our services and our results of operations are affected by weather conditions, including, without limitation, potential impacts, if any, from climate change, known and unknown, and by the seasonal nature of our lawn care services, termite and pest control services, home inspection services and disaster restoration services. For example, in geographies that do not have a year-round growing season, the demand for our lawn care services decreases during the winter months. Adverse weather conditions (e.g., droughts, severe storms and significant rain or snow fall), whether created by climate change factors or otherwise, can adversely impact the timing of product or service delivery and/or demand for lawn care services, and cooler temperatures can impede the development of the termite swarm and lead to lower demand for our termite control services. Severe winter storms can also impact our home cleaning business if we cannot travel to service locations due to hazardous road conditions. In addition, extreme temperatures can lead to an increase in service requests related to household systems and appliances in our American Home Shield business, resulting in higher claim frequency and costs and lower profitability thereby adversely impacting our results of operations and cash flows.

Availability of our raw materials and increases in raw material prices, fuel prices and other operating costs could adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Our financial performance is affected by the level of our operating expenses, such as fuel, fertilizer, chemicals, raw materials, wages and salaries, employee benefits, health care, vehicle, self-insurance costs and other insurance premiums as well as various regulatory compliance costs, all of which may be subject to inflationary pressures. In particular, our financial performance is adversely affected by increases in these operating costs. In recent years, fuel prices have fluctuated widely, and previous increases in fuel prices increased our costs of operating vehicles and equipment. We cannot predict what effect the recent global events could have on fuel prices, but it is possible that such events could lead to reduced fuel supplies, resulting in higher fuel prices. With respect to fuel, our fleet, which consumes approximately 21 million gallons annually, has been negatively impacted by significant increases in fuel prices in the past and could be negatively impacted in the future. Although we hedge a significant portion of our fuel costs, we do not hedge all of those costs. A 10 percent change in fuel prices would result in a change of approximately $6.5 million in the Company's annual fuel cost before considering the impact of fuel swap contracts. Based upon current Department of Energy fuel price forecasts, as well as the hedges the Company has executed to date for 2012, the Company has projected that fuel prices will increase

20


Table of Contents

our fuel costs by $10 million to $15 million for 2012 compared to 2011. Fuel price increases can also result in increases in the cost of fertilizer, chemicals and other materials used in our business. We cannot predict the extent to which we may experience future increases in costs of fuel, fertilizer, chemicals, raw materials, wages, employee benefits, healthcare, vehicles, insurance and other operating costs. To the extent such costs increase, we may be prevented, in whole or in part, from passing these cost increases through to our existing and prospective customers, and the rates we pay to our subcontractors and suppliers may increase, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not successfully implement our business strategies, including achieving our growth objectives.

        We may not be able to fully implement our business strategies or realize, in whole or in part within the time frames anticipated, the anticipated benefits of our various growth initiatives. Our various business strategies and initiatives, including our productivity and customer retention initiatives, are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we may incur certain costs to achieve efficiency improvements in our business. Even if these efficiency improvement initiatives are undertaken, we may not fully achieve our expected cost savings and efficiency improvements or these initiatives could adversely impact our customer retention and/or our operations. In addition, our strategies to enhance talent management and transfer best practices across our businesses may not produce the efficiencies and productivity levels we seek and may present unforeseen challenges. Also, our business strategy may change from time to time. As a result, we may not be able to achieve our expected results of operations and cash flows.

Our market segments are highly competitive. Competition could reduce our share of the market segments served by us and adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        We operate in highly competitive market segments. Changes in the source and intensity of competition in the market segments served by us impact the demand for our services and may also result in additional pricing pressures. The relatively low capital cost of entry to certain of our business categories has led to strong competitive market segments, including competition from regional and local owner operated companies. Regional and local competitors operating in a limited geographic area may have lower labor, benefits and overhead costs. The principal methods of competition in our businesses include name recognition, quality and speed of service, pricing, customer satisfaction and reputation. No assurance can be given that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors and that the competitive pressures that we face will not result in reduced market segment share, reduced pricing or adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not be able to attract and retain qualified key executives or transition smoothly to new leadership, which could hurt the Company and its businesses and inhibit our ability to operate and grow successfully.

        The execution of our business strategy and our financial performance will continue to depend in significant part on our executive management team and other key management personnel and the smooth transition of new senior leadership. As a result of a more aggressive strategic plan, we have decided to enhance many of our senior management positions, including the hiring of Thomas J. Coba as President, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic & AmeriSpec, Roger A. Cregg as Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer and Charles M. Fallon as President, Terminix, as well as moving Thomas G. Brackett to a new position as President,

21


Table of Contents

TruGreen. Our future success depends in large part on our success in utilizing current, experienced senior leadership and transitioning responsibilities to, and implementing the goals and objectives of, our new business unit executives. In addition, any inability to attract in a timely manner qualified key executives, retain our leadership team and recruit other important personnel could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Public perceptions that our products and services are not environmentally friendly or safe may adversely impact the demand for our services.

        In providing our services, we use, among other things, fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides. Public perception that our products and services are not environmentally friendly or safe or are harmful to humans or animals, whether justified or not, or our improper application of these chemicals, could reduce demand for our services, increase regulation or government restrictions or actions, result in fines or penalties, impair our reputation, involve us in litigation, damage our brand names and otherwise have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Changes in our services or products could impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Our financial performance is affected by changes in the services and products we offer our customers. For example, when Terminix transitioned from offering primarily bait termite services to providing both liquid and bait termite services, this transition required the purchase of additional equipment and additional training. The bait and termite service lines also have different price points (for both the initial treatment and for renewals), different ongoing service obligations and different revenue recognition policies. An unsuccessful rollout or adjustment of our new services or products could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Laws and government regulations applicable to our businesses could increase our legal and regulatory expenses, risks and impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Our businesses are subject to significant international, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations include laws relating to consumer protection, wage and hour requirements, franchising, the employment of immigrants, labor relations, permitting and licensing, workers' safety, the environment, insurance and home service contracts, employee benefits, marketing (including, without limitation, telemarketing or green marketing) and advertising, the application of fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides and other chemicals, noise and air pollution from power equipment and water management techniques. In particular, we anticipate that various international, federal, state, provincial and local governing bodies may propose additional legislation and regulation that may be detrimental to our business or may substantially increase our operating costs, including legislation relating to the Employee Free Choice Act; environmental regulations related to water quality, water use, chemical use, climate change, equipment efficiency standards, refrigerant use and other environmental matters; other consumer protection laws or regulations; or "do-not-knock," "do-not-mail," "do-not-leave" or other marketing regulations. It is difficult to predict the future impact of the broad and expanding legislative and regulatory requirements affecting our businesses and changes to such requirements may adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if we were to fail to comply with any applicable law or regulation, we could be subject to substantial fines or damages, be involved in litigation, suffer losses to our reputation or suffer the loss of licenses or incur penalties that may affect how

22


Table of Contents

our business is operated, which, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        The enactment of new federal or state legislation or the promulgation of new regulations or interpretations at any level of government may also expose the Company to potential new liabilities or costs, or may require the Company to modify its business model or business practices. At this time, the Company does not expect any such changes in law or regulation to have a material effect on its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, in March 2010, comprehensive health care reform legislation was enacted in the U.S. which, among other things, includes guaranteed coverage requirements, including for dependents up to age 26; eliminates pre-existing condition exclusions and annual and lifetime maximum limits; restricts the extent to which policies can be rescinded; and requires employers to provide employees with insurance coverage that meets minimum eligibility and coverage requirements. The legislation imposes implementation effective dates that began in 2010. Due to the breadth and complexity of the health reform legislation, the current lack of implementing regulations and interpretive guidance, the phased-in nature of the implementation and pending court challenges, it is difficult to predict the overall impact of the health reform legislation on our business over the coming years. However, new requirements to provide additional health insurance benefits to our employees would likely increase our expenses, and any such increases could be significant enough to materially impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Additional or new regulations promulgated by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may also require the Company to modify its business model or business practices.

Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including laws pertaining to the use of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, could result in significant costs that adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        International, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to environmental, health and safety matters affect us in several ways. In the United States, products containing pesticides generally must be registered with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and similar state agencies before they can be sold or applied. The failure to obtain or the cancellation of any such registration, or the withdrawal from the market place of such pesticides, could have an adverse effect on our business, the severity of which would depend on the products involved, whether other products could be substituted and whether our competitors were similarly affected. The pesticides we use are manufactured by independent third parties and are evaluated by the EPA as part of its ongoing exposure risk assessment. The EPA may decide that a pesticide we use will be limited or will not be re-registered for use in the United States. We cannot predict the outcome or the severity of the effect of the EPA's continuing evaluations.

        In addition, the use of certain pesticides, herbicides and fertilizer products is regulated by various international, federal, state, provincial and local environmental and public health agencies. These regulations may require that only certified or professional users apply the product or that certain products only be used on certain types of locations. These laws may also require users to post notices on properties at which products have been or will be applied, may require notification to individuals in the vicinity that products will be applied in the future or may restrict or ban the use of certain products. Although we strive to comply with such regulations and have processes in place designed to achieve compliance, given our dispersed locations, distributed operations and numerous employees, we can give no assurance that we can prevent violations of these or other regulations from occurring. Even if we are able to comply with all such regulations and obtain all necessary registrations and licenses, we cannot assure you that the pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers or other products we apply, or the manner in which we apply them, will not be alleged to cause

23


Table of Contents

injury to the environment, to people or to animals, or that such products will not be banned in certain circumstances. The costs of compliance, non-compliance, remediation, combating unfavorable public perceptions or defending products liability lawsuits could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        International, federal, state, provincial and local agencies regulate the disposal, handling and storage of waste, discharges from our facilities and the investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites. We could incur significant costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, fines, penalties and civil or criminal sanctions and claims by third parties for property damage and personal injury, as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, these laws and regulations. If there is a significant change in the facts or circumstances surrounding the assumptions upon which we operate, or if we are found to violate applicable environmental and public health laws and regulations, it could have a material adverse impact on future environmental capital expenditures and other environmental expenses and on our reputation, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required to comply with environmental laws and regulations, including requirements that may be adopted or imposed in the future.

        International, federal, state, provincial and local agencies that regulate environmental matters may change environmental laws, regulations or standards, including imposing new regulations with respect to climate change matters. Changes in any of these or other laws, regulations or standards could materially adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

If we fail to protect the security of personal information about our customers, we could be subject to interruption of our business operations, private litigation, reputational damage and costly penalties.

        We rely on, among other things, commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer information, such as payment card and personal information. The systems currently used for transmission and approval of payment card transactions, and the technology utilized in payment cards themselves, all of which can put payment card data at risk, are central to meeting standards set by the payment card industry ("PCI"). The Company is evaluating and updating its systems and protocols to establish compliance with these industry standards as they currently exist, and going forward will continue to evaluate its systems and protocols in a continued effort to comply with industry standards, as such standards may change from time to time in the future. Activities by third parties, advances in computer and software capabilities and encryption technology, new tools and discoveries and other events or developments may facilitate or result in a compromise or breach of our systems. Any compromises, breaches or errors in application related to our systems or failures to comply with standards set by the PCI could cause damage to our reputation and interruptions in our operations, including our customers' ability to pay for our services and products by credit card or their willingness to purchase our services and products and could result in a violation of applicable laws, regulations, orders, industry standards or agreements and subject us to costs, penalties and liabilities which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Our business process outsourcing initiatives have increased our reliance on third party contractors and may expose our business to harm upon the termination or disruption of our third party contractor relationships.

        Our strategy to increase profitability, in part, by reducing our costs of operations includes the implementation of certain business process outsourcing initiatives. As a result, our future operations are expected to significantly rely on third party vendors to provide certain services that we

24


Table of Contents

previously performed internally. Any disruption, termination or substandard performance of these outsourced services, including possible breaches by third party vendors of their agreements with us, could adversely affect our brands, customer relationships, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Also, to the extent a third party outsourcing provider relationship is terminated, there is a risk that we may not be able to enter into a similar agreement with an alternate provider in a timely manner or on terms that we consider favorable, and even if we find an alternate provider, or choose to insource such services, there are significant risks associated with any transitioning activities. We expect to phase out a significant portion of our use of information technology services provided by International Business Machines Corporation by the end of 2013. In the event a third party outsourcing relationship is terminated and we are unable to replace it, there is a risk that we may not have the capabilities to perform these services internally, resulting in a disruption to our business, which could adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights that are material to our business.

        Our ability to compete effectively depends in part on our rights to service marks, trademarks, trade names and other intellectual property rights we own or license, particularly our registered brand names, ServiceMaster, Terminix, TruGreen, Merry Maids, ServiceMaster Clean, American Home Shield, AmeriSpec and Furniture Medic. We have not sought to register or protect every one of our marks either in the United States or in every country in which they are or may be used. Furthermore, because of the differences in foreign trademark, patent and other intellectual property or proprietary rights laws, we may not receive the same protection in other countries as we would in the United States. If we are unable to protect our proprietary information and brand names, we could suffer a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights and protect our proprietary information, or to defend against claims by third parties that our products, services or activities infringe their intellectual property rights. Any litigation or claims brought by or against us could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. A successful claim of trademark, patent or other intellectual property infringement against us, or any other successful challenge to the use of our intellectual property, could subject us to damages or prevent us from operating our business in the manner in which we have in the past, including preventing us from providing certain services under our recognized brand names, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Disruptions or security failures in our information technology systems could create liability for us and/or limit our ability to effectively monitor, operate and control our operations and adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        Our information technology systems facilitate our ability to monitor, operate and control our operations. Changes or modifications to our information technology systems could cause disruption to our operations or cause challenges with respect to our compliance with laws, regulations or other applicable standards. For example, delays, higher than expected costs or unsuccessful implementation of new information technology systems could adversely impact our operations. In addition, any disruption in or failure of our information technology systems to operate as expected could, depending on the magnitude of the problem, adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows, including by limiting our capacity to monitor, operate and control our operations effectively. Failures of our information technology systems could also

25


Table of Contents

lead to violations of privacy laws, regulations, trade guidelines or practices related to our customers and employees. If our disaster recovery plans do not work as anticipated, or if the third party vendors to which we have outsourced certain information technology, contact center or other services fail to fulfill their obligations to us, our operations may be adversely impacted and any of these circumstances could adversely impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Future acquisitions could impact our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        We plan to continue to pursue opportunities to expand through selective acquisitions. Our ability to make acquisitions at reasonable prices and to integrate acquired businesses is an important factor in our future growth. We cannot ensure that we will be able to manage or integrate acquired businesses successfully and/or retain customers of the acquired businesses. Any inability on our part to consolidate and manage growth from acquired businesses could have an adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows and there can be no assurance that any acquisition that we make will provide us with the benefits that were anticipated when entering into such acquisition. The process of integrating an acquired business may create unforeseen difficulties and expenses, including the diversion of resources needed to integrate new businesses, technologies, products, personnel or systems; the inability to retain employees, customers and suppliers; the assumption of actual or contingent liabilities (including those relating to the environment); failure to effectively and timely adopt and adhere to our internal control processes and other policies; write-offs or impairment charges relating to goodwill and other intangible assets; unanticipated liabilities relating to acquired businesses; and potential expense associated with litigation with sellers of such businesses.

We are subject to various restrictive covenants that could adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        From time to time, we enter into noncompetition agreements or other restrictive covenants (e.g., exclusivity, take or pay and non-solicitation), including in connection with business dispositions or strategic contracts, that restrict us from entering into lines of business or operating in certain geographic areas into which we may desire to expand our business. We also are subject to various non-solicitation and no-hire covenants that may restrict our ability to solicit potential customers or employees. To the extent that such restrictive covenants prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities, or if we fail to comply with them, our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain trained workers and third party contractors.

        Our future success and financial performance depend substantially on our ability to attract, retain and train workers and attract and retain third party contractors and ensure third party contractor compliance with our policies and standards. Our ability to conduct our operations is in part impacted by our ability to increase our labor force, including on a seasonal basis, which may be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including immigration reform or lack thereof, which may negatively impact the number of foreign nationals available to engage in seasonal employment. In the event of a labor shortage, we could experience difficulty in delivering our services in a high-quality or timely manner and could be forced to increase wages in order to attract and retain employees, which would result in higher operating costs and reduced profitability.

26


Table of Contents

We may be required to recognize additional impairment charges.

        We have significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets, such as trade names, and have incurred impairment charges in the past with respect to goodwill and intangible assets, as well as in connection with our disposition activities. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, goodwill and intangible assets that are not amortized are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test annually, or more frequently if there are indicators of impairment, including:

        For example, in 2011 we recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen's trade name as a result of our annual impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets. Additionally, as a result of the decision to sell TruGreen LandCare, we recorded a $34.2 million impairment charge ($21.0 million, net of tax) in the first quarter of 2011 to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale, a $6.2 million loss on sale ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded in loss from discontinued operations, net of tax. In the second quarter of 2010, we recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $46.9 million, of which $43.0 million was related to the remaining goodwill at TruGreen LandCare and $3.9 million related to TruGreen LandCare's trade name. In 2009, we recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $28.0 million (of which $1.4 million was related to the trade name of TruGreen LandCare) to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of our annual impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets. Based upon future economic and financial market conditions, the operating performance of our reporting units and other factors, including those listed above, future impairment charges could be incurred. All impairments related to TruGreen LandCare are recorded in (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

Our franchisees could take actions that could harm our business.

        Our franchisees are contractually obligated to operate their businesses in accordance with the standards set forth in our agreements with them. Each franchising brand also provides training and support to franchisees. However, franchisees are independent third parties that we do not control, and the franchisees own, operate and oversee the daily operations of their businesses. As a result, the ultimate success of any franchise operation rests with the franchisee. If franchisees do not successfully operate their businesses in a manner consistent with required standards, royalty payments to us will be adversely affected and a brand's image and reputation could be harmed, which in turn could adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, our relationship with our franchisees could become strained if we impose new standards or assert more rigorous enforcement practices of the required standards. It is also possible that creditors, or other claimants, of a franchisee, could, in the event such creditors and claimants cannot collect from our franchisee or otherwise, attempt to make claims against us under

27


Table of Contents

various legal theories. These claims could have a material adverse impact on our reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Changes in accounting, securities and other rules or interpretations could adversely impact our financial position and results of operations.

        Changes in accounting, securities and other rules applicable to our business, including proposed revisions to the rules related to accounting for leases and reserves for, and disclosures relating to, legal contingencies, could (i) affect our reported results of operations and financial position, (ii) potentially decrease the comparability of our financial statements to others within our industry and (iii) increase our liability exposure.

Risk Factors Related to the Notes

We have substantial indebtedness and may incur substantial additional indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to obtain financing in the future, react to changes in our business and satisfy our obligations.

        As of December 31, 2011, we had $3.876 billion of consolidated indebtedness, and, after effectiveness on February 13, 2012 of the Extension Amendment dated as of January 30, 2012 (the "Extension Amendment") and the Increase Supplement dated as of January 30, 2012 (the "Increase Supplement"), we have available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, $324.2 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014 and $265.2 million from July 25, 2014 through January 31, 2017. Our substantial debt could have important consequences to holders of our debt and other stakeholders in the Company. Because of our substantial debt:

28


Table of Contents

Despite our indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt, including secured debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial indebtedness.

        We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional debt in the future. The terms of the indentures governing our debt securities do not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. After effectiveness on February 13, 2012 of the Extension Amendment and the Increase Supplement, we have available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, $324.2 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014 and $265.2 million from July 25, 2014 through January 31, 2017. The Credit Facilities permit additional borrowings beyond those commitments under certain circumstances. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks we face would increase, and we may not be able to meet all of our debt obligations.

Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to pay interest and principal on our debt, including the Notes, and our ability to refinance all or a portion of our debt or obtain additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control.

        As a holding company, we have no independent operations or material assets other than our ownership of equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we depend on our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us so that we may pay our obligations and expenses, including satisfying our obligations under our debt, including the Notes. Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under, our debt, including the Notes, depends on the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions and dividends to us, which, in turn, depends on their results of operations, cash flows, cash requirements and financial position, general business conditions and any legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to which they may be subject, many of which may be beyond our control, and as described under "—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry" above.

        The payment of ordinary and extraordinary dividends by our subsidiaries that are regulated as insurance, home service, or similar companies is subject to applicable state law limitations. If we cannot receive sufficient distributions from our subsidiaries, we may not be able to meet our obligations to fund general corporate expenses or service our debt obligations. Our insurance subsidiaries and home services and similar subsidiaries (through which we conduct our American Home Shield business) are subject to significant regulatory restrictions under the laws and regulations of the states in which they operate. Among other things, such laws and regulations require certain such subsidiaries to maintain minimum capital and net worth requirements and may limit the amount of ordinary and extraordinary dividends and other payments that these subsidiaries can pay to us. For example, certain states prohibit payment by these subsidiaries to the Company of dividends in excess of 10 percent of their capital as of the most recent year end, as determined in accordance with prescribed insurance accounting practices in those states. Of the $226.2 million as of December 31, 2011, which we identify as being potentially unavailable to be paid to the Company by its subsidiaries, approximately $183.3 million is held by our home services and insurance subsidiaries and is subject to these regulatory limitations on the payment of funds to us. Such limitations will be in effect through the end of 2012, at which time new limitations will be calculated based on regulatory capital levels as of December 31, 2012. The remainder of the $226.2 million, or $42.9 million, is related to amounts that the Company's management does not consider readily available to be used to service the Company's indebtedness due, among other reasons, to the Company's cash management practices and working capital needs at various subsidiaries.

29


Table of Contents

        If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek to obtain additional equity capital or restructure our debt. In the future, our cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on and principal of our debt, and such alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.

        The Revolving Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on January 31, 2017, and the Term Facilities will mature on July 24, 2014. The 2015 Notes will mature on July 15, 2015, and the Notes will mature on February 15, 2020. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our debt or obtain additional financing, particularly because of our high levels of debt. It is our understanding that a significant amount of global indebtedness related to the leveraged buy-out boom will mature between 2012 and 2015, when significant portions of our debt are scheduled to mature. There is no assurance that the debt markets will be able to absorb all of the potential refinancing during that time period. Moreover, in 2008 and 2009, the global credit markets suffered a significant contraction, including the failure of some large financial institutions. This resulted in a significant decline in the credit markets and the overall availability of credit. Market disruptions, such as those experienced in 2008 and 2009, as well as our significant debt levels, may increase our cost of borrowing or adversely affect our ability to refinance our obligations as they become due. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness or access additional credit, or if short-term or long-term borrowing costs dramatically increase, our ability to finance current operations and meet our short-term and long-term obligations could be adversely affected. If we cannot refinance our debt, we could face substantial liquidity problems, causing us to become bankrupt or insolvent, and we might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We cannot assure you we will be able to consummate those sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be, whether the proceeds that we realize will be adequate to meet our debt service obligations when due or whether we would receive fair value for such assets.

        If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and holders of the 2015 Notes and the Notes could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable, the lenders under the Credit Facilities could terminate their commitments to loan money, our secured lenders could foreclose against the assets securing their borrowings and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. All of these events could result in your losing your investment in the Notes.

Increases in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could reduce our profitability.

        A significant portion of our outstanding debt, including debt under the Credit Facilities, bears interest at variable rates. As a result, increases in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could materially reduce our profitability and cash flows. As of December 31, 2011, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately an $11.0 million change in the annual interest expense on our Term Facilities after considering the impact of the interest rate swaps into which we have entered. Assuming all revolving loans were fully drawn as of December 31, 2011, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $4.4 million change in annual interest expense on our Revolving Credit Facility. Our Term Facilities are scheduled to mature in July 2014, and we will need to refinance such debt prior to such date. Refinancing the Term Facilities at current market interest rates would result in an increase to the current rate, and therefore lead to higher interest expense.

        We are also exposed to increases in interest rates with respect to our arrangement enabling us to transfer an interest in certain receivables to unrelated third parties. Assuming all available amounts were transferred under this arrangement, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $0.5 million change in annual interest expense with respect to

30


Table of Contents

this arrangement. We are also exposed to increases in interest rates with respect to our floating rate operating leases, and a one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $0.3 million change in annual rent expense with respect to such operating leases. The impact of increases in interest rates could be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial debt and floating rate operating leases.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business and adversely affect the holders of the Notes.

        The Credit Facilities contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to:

        The indentures governing the 2015 Notes and the Notes also contain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to:

        The restrictions in the indentures governing the 2015 Notes and the Notes, the Credit Facilities and the instruments governing our other debt may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business and may make it difficult for us to execute our business strategy successfully or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional restrictive

31


Table of Contents

covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance our debt, at maturity or otherwise, on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

        Our ability to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in the Credit Facilities, the indentures governing the 2015 Notes and the Notes and the instruments governing our other debt may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditions beyond our control including credit or capital market disruptions. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default that would permit the applicable lenders or noteholders, as the case may be, to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we are unable to repay debt, lenders having secured obligations, such as the lenders under the Credit Facilities, could proceed against the collateral securing the debt. In any such case, we may be unable to borrow under the Credit Facilities and may not be able to repay the amounts due under the Credit Facilities or our other outstanding indebtedness, including the Notes. This could have serious consequences to our financial position and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent.

The Notes are unsecured and effectively subordinated to the rights of our and the guarantors' existing and future secured creditors to the extent of the value of our and our guarantors' assets.

        The indenture governing the Notes permits us to incur a significant amount of secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under the Credit Facilities. Indebtedness under the Credit Facilities is secured by substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of ServiceMaster and the guarantors under the Credit Facilities, subject to certain exceptions. The Notes are unsecured and therefore do not have the benefit of such collateral. Accordingly, the Notes are effectively subordinated to all such secured indebtedness. If an event of default occurs under the Credit Facilities, the senior secured lenders will have a prior right to our assets securing the Credit Facilities, to the exclusion of the holders of the Notes, even if we are in default under the Notes. In that event, our assets would first be used to repay indebtedness and other obligations secured by them (including amounts outstanding under the Credit Facilities), resulting in all or a portion of our assets being unavailable to satisfy the claims of the holders of the Notes and other unsecured indebtedness, including, without limitation, the 2015 Notes. Therefore, in the event of any distribution or payment of our assets in any foreclosure, dissolution, winding-up, liquidation, reorganization or other bankruptcy proceeding, holders of Notes will participate in our remaining assets ratably with all holders of our unsecured indebtedness that is deemed to be of the same class as such Notes, and potentially with all of our other general creditors, based upon the respective amounts owed to each holder or creditor. Further, if the lenders foreclose and sell the pledged interests in any subsidiary guarantor under the Notes, then that guarantor will be released from its guarantee of the Notes automatically and immediately upon the sale. In any of the foregoing events, we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient assets to pay amounts due on the Notes. As a result, holders of Notes may receive less, ratably, than holders of secured indebtedness.

        As of December 31, 2011, approximately $2.531 billion of our indebtedness was secured. We also have commitments for additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, $324.2 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014 and $265.2 million from July 25, 2014 through January 31, 2017, all of which would be secured if borrowed.

The Notes are structurally subordinated to the debt of our non-guarantor subsidiaries.

        The Notes are not guaranteed by any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, any subsidiary subject to regulation as an insurance, home warranty, service contract or similar company, or certain other subsidiaries. Payments on the Notes are required to be made only by us and the subsidiary

32


Table of Contents

guarantors. Accordingly, claims of holders of the Notes will be structurally subordinated to the claims of creditors of these non-guarantor subsidiaries, including trade creditors. All obligations of our non-guarantor subsidiaries, including trade payables, will have to be satisfied before any of the assets of such subsidiaries would be available for distribution, upon liquidation or otherwise, to us or a guarantor of the Notes. Our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Notes, including our non-U.S. subsidiaries and our subsidiaries subject to regulation as insurance, home warranty and service contract companies (including the American Home Shield companies), represent a significant portion of our operations and assets. As of December 31, 2011, our non-guarantor subsidiaries had approximately $147.6 million of total debt and capital leases, excluding trade payables and other obligations, all of which would have been structurally senior to the Notes.

If the lenders under the Credit Facilities release the guarantors under the credit agreement, those guarantors will be released from their guarantees of the Notes.

        The lenders under the Credit Facilities have the discretion to release the guarantees under the credit agreements. If a subsidiary guarantor is released from all of its obligations under the Credit Facilities or any other successor credit facility that may be then outstanding, then such subsidiary guarantor will automatically and unconditionally be released from its obligation under its guarantee of the Notes. See "Description of Notes—Subsidiary Guarantees." You will not have a claim as a creditor against any subsidiary that is no longer a guarantor of the Notes, and the indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, whether secured or unsecured, of those subsidiaries will effectively be senior to claims of noteholders.

If we or our subsidiaries default on our and their obligations to pay our and their indebtedness, we may not be able to make payments on the Notes.

        Any default under the agreements governing our or our subsidiaries' indebtedness, including a default under the Credit Facilities that is not waived by the required lenders, and the remedies sought by the holders of such indebtedness could make us unable to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Notes when due and substantially decrease the market value of the Notes.

        If we or our subsidiaries are unable to generate sufficient cash flow and are otherwise unable to obtain funds necessary to meet required payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness, or if we or they otherwise fail to comply with the various covenants in the instruments governing our or their indebtedness (including covenants in the Credit Facilities, the indenture governing the 2015 Notes and the indenture governing the Notes), we or they could be in default under the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the event of such default, the holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under the Credit Facilities could elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, cease making further loans and institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets, which could further result in a cross default or cross acceleration of our debt issued under other instruments, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. If amounts outstanding under the Credit Facilities, the 2015 Notes, our other outstanding debt securities or other debt of our subsidiaries are accelerated, all our subsidiaries' debt and liabilities would be payable from our subsidiaries' assets, prior to any distributions of our subsidiaries' assets to pay interest and principal on the Notes, and we might not be able to repay or make any payments on the Notes.

We may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offers required by the indenture governing the Notes.

        If we experience specified changes of control, we are required to make an offer to purchase all of the outstanding Notes (unless otherwise redeemed) at a price equal to 101 percent of the

33


Table of Contents

principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase. The occurrence of specified events that would constitute a change of control will constitute a default under the Credit Facilities and would trigger an obligation to repay the 2015 Notes. In addition, agreements governing our other indebtedness may limit or prohibit the purchase of the Notes by us in the event of a change of control, unless and until such time as the indebtedness under such agreements is repaid in full or we have made an offer to repay all such indebtedness and repaid in full all lenders who accept such an offer. As a result, following a change of control event, we may not be able to repurchase Notes unless we first repay all indebtedness outstanding under such agreements (or make an offer to do so and repay all lenders who accept such an offer), or obtain a waiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit us to repurchase the Notes. We may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver of that type. Any requirement to offer to repurchase outstanding Notes may therefore require us to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, our failure to purchase the Notes after a change of control in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the Notes would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the Notes, which in turn would result in a default under the Credit Facilities.

        Our inability to repay the indebtedness under the Credit Facilities would also constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the Notes, which could have materially adverse consequences to us and to the holders of the Notes. In the event of a change of control, we cannot assure you that we would have sufficient assets to satisfy all of our obligations under the Credit Facilities and our other outstanding indebtedness. Our future indebtedness may also require such indebtedness to be repurchased upon a change of control.

Certain corporate events may not trigger a change of control event, in which case we will not be required to redeem the Notes.

        The indenture governing the Notes permits us to engage in certain important corporate events, such as leveraged recapitalizations, that would increase indebtedness but would not constitute a "change of control." If we effected a leveraged recapitalization or other such non-change of control transaction that resulted in an increase in indebtedness, our ability to make payments on the Notes would be adversely affected. However, we would not be required to redeem the Notes, and you might be required to continue to hold your Notes, despite our decreased ability to meet our obligations under the Notes.

        The definition of "change of control" contained in the indenture includes a disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase "all or substantially all", there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, in certain circumstances there may be a degree of uncertainty as to whether a particular transaction would involve a disposition of "all or substantially all" of our assets. As a result, it may be unclear as to whether a change of control has occurred and whether we are required to make an offer to repurchase the Notes.

Federal and state fraudulent transfer laws may permit a court to void the Notes and/or the guarantees, and if that occurs, you may not receive any payments on the Notes.

        Federal and state fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes may apply to the issuance of the Notes and the incurrence of the guarantees of the Notes. Under federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, which may vary from state to state, the Notes or the guarantees thereof could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if the Company or any of the guarantors, as applicable, (a) issued the Notes or incurred the guarantee with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (b) received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for either issuing the Notes or

34


Table of Contents

incurring the guarantee and, in the case of (b) only, one of the following is also true at the time thereof:

        As a general matter, value is given for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or a valid antecedent debt is satisfied. A court would likely find that a guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for its guarantee to the extent such guarantor did not obtain a reasonably equivalent benefit from the issuance of the Notes.

        We cannot be certain as to the standards a court would use to determine whether or not the Company or any of the guarantors were insolvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, whether the Notes or the guarantees would be subordinated to the Company's or any of the guarantors' other debt. In general, however, a court would deem an entity insolvent if:

        If a court were to find that the issuance of the Notes or the incurrence of a guarantee was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void the payment obligations under the Notes or that guarantee, could subordinate the Notes or that guarantee to presently existing and future indebtedness of the Company or of the related guarantor or could require the holders of the Notes to repay any amounts received with respect to that guarantee. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, you may not receive any repayment on the Notes.

        The indenture governing the Notes contains a "savings clause" intended to limit each subsidiary guarantor's liability under its guarantee to the maximum amount that it could incur without causing the guarantee to be a fraudulent transfer under applicable law. There can be no assurance that this provision will be upheld as intended.

Certain restrictive covenants in the indenture governing the Notes will not apply during any time that such Notes achieve investment grade ratings.

        Most of the restrictive covenants in the indenture governing the Notes will not apply during any time that the Notes achieve investment grade ratings from Moody's and S&P and no default or event of default has occurred. If these restrictive covenants cease to apply, we may take actions, such as incur additional debt or make certain dividends or distributions, which would otherwise be prohibited under the indenture. Ratings are given by these rating agencies based upon analyses that include many subjective factors. The Notes may not achieve investment grade ratings, and the

35


Table of Contents

investment grade ratings, if granted, may not reflect all of the factors that would be important to holders of the Notes.

We cannot assure you that an active trading market will develop for the Notes.

        We cannot give you any assurance as to the development or liquidity of any market for the Notes. We do not intend to apply for listing of the Notes on any securities exchange or for quotation of the Notes through any national securities association. Even if an active trading market for the Notes does develop, you may not be able to sell your Notes at a particular time, if at all, or you may not be able to obtain the price you desire for your Notes. Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial fluctuations in the price of securities. The trading price of the Notes will depend on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our credit rating, the interest of securities dealers in making a market for the Notes, the price of any other securities we issue, and our performance, prospects, results of operations and financial position, as well as the performance of other companies in our industry. The liquidity of, and trading market for, the Notes may also be adversely affected by general declines in the market or by declines in the market for similar securities. Such declines may adversely affect such liquidity and trading markets independent of our financial performance and prospects.

A lowering or withdrawal of the ratings or outlook assigned to our debt securities by rating agencies may increase our future borrowing costs and reduce our access to capital.

        Our debt currently has a non-investment grade rating, and any rating or outlook assigned could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in that rating agency's judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating or outlook, such as adverse changes to our business, so warrant. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings or outlook will generally affect the market value of the Notes. Credit ratings are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell the Notes. Additionally, credit ratings may not reflect the potential effect of risks relating to the structure or marketing of the Notes. Any future lowering of our ratings or outlook likely would make it more difficult or more expensive for us to obtain additional debt financing. If any credit rating or outlook initially assigned to the Notes is subsequently lowered or withdrawn for any reason, you may not be able to resell your Notes without a substantial discount.

Risks Related to Not Participating in the Exchange Offer

You may have difficulty selling the Old Notes that you do not exchange.

        If you do not exchange your Old Notes for the New Notes offered in the exchange offer, your Old Notes will continue to be subject to significant restrictions on transfer. Those transfer restrictions are described in the Indenture and arose because the Old Notes were originally issued under exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

        The Old Notes may not be offered, sold or otherwise transferred, except in compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act or in a transaction not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act, and in compliance with applicable state securities laws. The Company did not register the Old Notes under the Securities Act, and it does not intend to do so. If you do not exchange your Old Notes, your ability to sell those Notes will be significantly limited.

        If a large number of outstanding Old Notes are exchanged for New Notes issued in the exchange offer, it may be more difficult for you to sell your unexchanged Old Notes due to the limited amounts of Old Notes that would remain outstanding following the exchange offer.

36


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Relationship with the Equity Sponsors

We are indirectly owned and controlled by the Equity Sponsors, and their interests as equity holders may conflict with the interests of holders of our debt.

        We are indirectly owned and controlled by the Equity Sponsors, who have the ability to control our policies and operations. The directors appointed by affiliates of the Equity Sponsors are able to make decisions affecting our capital structure, including decisions to issue or repurchase capital stock, pay dividends and incur or repurchase debt. The interests of the Equity Sponsors may not in all cases be aligned with the interests of the holders of our debt. For example, if we encounter financial difficulties or are unable to pay our debts as they mature, the interests of our Equity Sponsors might conflict with the interests of holders of our debt. In addition, our Equity Sponsors may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investments, even though such transactions might involve risks to our business or the holders of our debt. Furthermore, the Equity Sponsors may in the future own businesses that directly or indirectly compete with us. One or more of the Equity Sponsors also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

37


Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This prospectus contains forward-looking statements and cautionary statements. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "shall," "should," "would," "could," "seeks," "aims," "projects," "is optimistic," "intends," "plans," "estimates," "anticipates" or other comparable terms. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this prospectus and include, without limitation, statements regarding our intentions, beliefs, assumptions or current expectations concerning, among other things, financial position; results of operations; cash flows; prospects; the sharing of best practices and talent across our businesses; growth strategies and/or expectations; expanding our commercial services; expansion opportunities in domestic and international territories; our estimates of market segment size and segment share; expectations for enhancing American Home Shield's ability to interact with customers through its new CRM system; projections for increases in existing home re-sales in 2012; capital expenditures and requirements; estimates for phasing out certain IT Services from IBM and projections for expenditures to IBM in 2012 and 2013; customer retention; the continuation of acquisitions; fuel prices; impairment charges related to goodwill and intangible assets; estimates of future amortization expense for intangible assets; attraction and retention of key personnel; the impact of interest rate hedges and fuel swaps; the cost savings from restructurings and reorganizations and expected charges related to such restructurings and reorganizations; the impact on the amount of unrecognized tax benefits resulting from pending tax settlements and expiration of statutes of limitations; the valuation of marketable securities; estimates of accruals for self-insured claims related to workers' compensation, auto and general liability risks; estimates of accruals for home service contract claims; estimates of future payments under operating and capital leases; estimates for increases in healthcare costs; the outcome (by judgment or settlement) and costs of legal or administrative proceedings, including, without limitation, collective, representative or class action litigation; post-closing purchase price adjustments, including, without limitation, items related to working capital and potential indemnification claims associated with the TruGreen LandCare disposition; our ability to renegotiate or extend our $50.0 million receivable securitization arrangement; and the impact of prevailing economic conditions.

        Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which may be beyond our control. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or outcomes and that actual performance and outcomes, including, without limitation, our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the market segments in which we operate, may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and the development of the market segments in which we operate, are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. A number of important factors, including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties discussed in "Risk Factors" in this prospectus, could cause actual results and outcomes to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Additional factors that could cause actual results and outcomes to differ from those reflected in forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

38


Table of Contents

39


Table of Contents

        Other risks, uncertainties and factors, including those discussed under "Risk Factors," could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make. You should read carefully the factors described in the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus to better understand the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business and underlying any forward-looking statements.

        We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

40


Table of Contents


THE EXCHANGE OFFER

        Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, we agreed to prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act with respect to a proposed offer to the holders of the Old Notes to issue and deliver to such holders of Old Notes, in exchange for their Old Notes, a like aggregate principal amount of New Notes that are identical in all material respects to the Old Notes, except for provisions relating to registration rights and the transfer restrictions relating to the Old Notes, and except for certain related differences described below. See "Exchange Offer; Registration Rights."

Terms of the Exchange Offer; Period for Tendering Old Notes

        This prospectus and the accompanying letter of transmittal contain the terms and conditions of the exchange offer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions included in this prospectus and in the accompanying letter of transmittal, which together constitute the exchange offer, we will accept for exchange Old Notes which are properly tendered on or prior to the Expiration Date, unless you have previously withdrawn them.

        When you tender Old Notes as provided below, our acceptance of the Old Notes will constitute a binding agreement between you and us upon the terms and subject to the conditions in this prospectus and in the accompanying letter of transmittal. In tendering Old Notes, you should also note the following important information:

41


Table of Contents

        You should note the following important rules concerning the exchange offer:

42


Table of Contents

Procedures for Tendering Old Notes

        If you, as a holder of any Old Notes, wish to tender your Old Notes for exchange in the exchange offer, you must, except as described under "—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures," transmit the following on or prior to the Expiration Date to the Exchange Agent:

        In addition,

        The term "Agent's Message" means a message, transmitted through ATOP by DTC to, and received by, the Exchange Agent and forming a part of a Book-Entry Confirmation, that states that DTC has received an express acknowledgement that the tendering holder has received and agrees to be bound by the letter of transmittal or, in the case of an Agent's Message relating to guaranteed delivery, that such holder has received and further agrees to be bound by the notice of guaranteed delivery, and that we may enforce the letter of transmittal, and the notice of guaranteed delivery, as the case may be, against such holder.

        The method of delivery of Old Notes, letters of transmittal, notices of guaranteed delivery and all other required documentation, including delivery of Old Notes through DTC and transmission of Agent's Messages through DTC's ATOP, is at your election and risk. Delivery will be deemed made only when all required documentation is actually received by the Exchange Agent. Delivery of documents or instructions to DTC does not constitute delivery to the Exchange Agent. If delivery is by mail, we recommend that registered mail, properly insured, with return receipt requested, be used. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to assure timely delivery to the Exchange Agent. Holders tendering Old Notes or transmitting Agent's Messages through DTC's ATOP must allow sufficient time for completion of ATOP procedures during DTC's normal business hours. No Old Notes, Agent's Messages, letters of transmittal, notices of guaranteed delivery or any other required documentation should be sent to us.

        Signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the case may be, must be guaranteed unless the Old Notes being surrendered for exchange are tendered:

43


Table of Contents

        If signatures on a letter of transmittal or a notice of withdrawal, as the case may be, are required to be guaranteed, the guarantees must be by an Eligible Institution.

        If the letter of transmittal is signed by a person or persons other than the registered holder or holders of Old Notes, the Old Notes must be endorsed or accompanied by appropriate powers of attorney, in either case signed exactly as the name or names of the registered holder or holders appear on the Old Notes and with the signatures guaranteed.

        If the letter of transmittal or any Old Notes or powers of attorney are signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers or corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, the person should so indicate when signing and, unless waived by us, proper evidence satisfactory to us of such person's authority to so act must be submitted.

Acceptance of Old Notes for Exchange; Delivery of New Notes

        Once all of the conditions to the exchange offer are satisfied or waived, we will accept all Old Notes properly tendered and not properly withdrawn, and will issue the New Notes promptly after The Expiration Date. See "—Conditions to the Exchange Offer" below. For purposes of the exchange offer, our giving of oral or written notice of acceptance to the Exchange Agent will be considered our acceptance of the tendered Old Notes.

        In all cases, we will issue New Notes in exchange for Old Notes that are accepted for exchange only after timely receipt by the Exchange Agent of:

        If we do not accept any tendered Old Notes for any reason included in the terms and conditions of the exchange offer, if you submit certificates representing Old Notes in a greater principal amount than you wish to exchange or if you properly withdraw tendered Old Notes in accordance with the procedures described under "—Withdrawal Rights," we will return any unaccepted, non-exchanged or properly withdrawn Old Notes, as the case may be, without expense to the tendering holder. In the case of Old Notes tendered by book-entry transfer into the Exchange Agent's account at DTC using the book-entry transfer procedures described below, unaccepted, non-exchanged or properly withdrawn Old Notes will be credited to an account maintained with DTC. We will return the Old Notes or have them credited to the DTC account, as applicable, promptly after the expiration or termination of the exchange offer.

Book-Entry Transfer

        The Exchange Agent will make a request to establish an account with respect to the Old Notes at DTC for purposes of the exchange offer promptly after the date of this prospectus. Any financial institution that is a participant in DTC's systems, including Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V., as operator of the Euroclear System ("Euroclear"), or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme ("Clearstream") may make book-entry delivery of Old Notes by causing DTC to transfer Old Notes into the Exchange Agent's account at DTC in accordance with DTC's ATOP procedures for transfer. However, the exchange for the Old Notes so tendered will only be made after timely confirmation of book-entry transfer of Old Notes into the Exchange Agent's account, and timely receipt by the Exchange Agent of an Agent's Message and all other documents required by the letter of transmittal. Only participants in DTC may deliver Old Notes by book-entry transfer.

        Although delivery of Old Notes may be effected through book-entry transfer into the Exchange Agent's account at DTC, the letter of transmittal, or a facsimile copy thereof, properly completed

44


Table of Contents

and duly executed, with any required signature guarantees, or an Agent's Message, with all other required documentation, must in any case be transmitted to and received by the Exchange Agent at its address listed under "—Exchange Agent" on or prior to the Expiration Date, or you must comply with the guaranteed delivery procedures described below under "—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."

        If your Old Notes are held through DTC, you must complete the accompanying form called "Instructions to Registered Holder and/or Book-Entry Participant," which will instruct the DTC participant through whom you hold your Old Notes of your intention to tender your Old Notes or not tender your Old Notes. Please note that delivery of documents or instructions to DTC does not constitute delivery to the Exchange Agent and we will not be able to accept your tender of Old Notes until the Exchange Agent actually receives from DTC the information and documentation described under "—Acceptance of Old Notes for Exchange; Delivery of New Notes."

Guaranteed Delivery Procedures

        If you are a registered holder of Old Notes and you want to tender your Old Notes but the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed prior to the Expiration Date, your Old Notes are not immediately available or time will not permit your Old Notes to reach the Exchange Agent before the Expiration Date, a tender may be effected if:

Withdrawal Rights

        You can withdraw your tender of Old Notes at any time on or prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the Expiration Date.

        For a withdrawal to be effective, a written notice of withdrawal must be actually received by the Exchange Agent prior to such time, properly transmitted either through DTC's ATOP or to the Exchange Agent at the address listed below under "—Exchange Agent." Any notice of withdrawal must:

45


Table of Contents

        Please note that all questions as to the validity, form, eligibility and time of receipt of notices of withdrawal will be determined by us, and our determination shall be final and binding on all parties. Any Old Notes so withdrawn will be considered not to have been validly tendered for exchange for purposes of the exchange offer. New Notes will not be issued in exchange for such withdrawn Old Notes unless the Old Notes so withdrawn are validly re-tendered.

        If you have properly withdrawn Old Notes and wish to re-tender them, you may do so by following one of the procedures described under "—Procedures for Tendering Old Notes" above at any time on or prior to the Expiration Date.

Conditions to the Exchange Offer

        Notwithstanding any other provisions of the exchange offer, we will not be required to accept for exchange, or to issue New Notes in exchange for, any Old Notes and may terminate or amend the exchange offer, if we determine in our reasonable judgment at any time before the Expiration Date that the exchange offer would violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC.

        The foregoing conditions are for our sole benefit and may be waived by us regardless of the circumstances giving rise to that condition. Our failure at any time to exercise the foregoing rights shall not be considered a waiver by us of that right. The rights described in the prior paragraph are ongoing rights which we may assert at any time and from time to time.

        In addition, we will not accept for exchange any Old Notes tendered, and no New Notes will be issued in exchange for any such Old Notes, if at any time any stop order is threatened or in effect with respect to the registration statement of which this prospectus constitutes a part or the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act.

46


Table of Contents

        We reserve the right to terminate or amend the exchange offer at any time prior to the Expiration Date upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing events.

Exchange Agent

        Wilmington Trust, National Association has been appointed as the Exchange Agent for the exchange offer. All executed letters of transmittal, notices of guaranteed delivery, notices of withdrawal and any other required documentation should be directed to the Exchange Agent at the address set forth below. Requests for additional copies of this prospectus or of the letter of transmittal and requests for notices of guaranteed delivery should be directed to the Exchange Agent, addressed as follows:


Deliver To:

By mail, hand or overnight courier:   By facsimile:   For information or confirmation
by telephone:

Wilmington Trust, National Association
c/o Wilmington Trust Company
Corporate Capital Markets
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-1626

 

(302) 636-4139

 

Sam Hamed
(302) 636-6181

        Delivery to an address other than the address of the Exchange Agent as listed above or transmission of instructions via facsimile other than as listed above does not constitute a valid delivery.

Fees and Expenses

        The principal solicitation is being made by mail; however, additional solicitation may be made by telephone or in person by our officers, regular employees and affiliates. We will not pay any additional compensation to any of our officers and employees who engage in soliciting tenders. We will not make any payment to brokers, dealers or others soliciting acceptances of the exchange offer. However, we will pay the Exchange Agent reasonable and customary fees (including attorney fees and expenses) for its services and will reimburse it for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the exchange offer.

        The estimated cash expenses to be incurred in connection with the exchange offer, including legal, accounting, SEC filing, printing and Exchange Agent expenses, will be paid by us and are estimated in the aggregate to be approximately $500,000.

Transfer Taxes

        Holders who tender their Old Notes for exchange will not be obligated to pay any transfer taxes in connection therewith, except that holders who instruct us to register New Notes in the name of, or request that Old Notes not tendered or not accepted in the exchange offer be returned to, a person other than the registered tendering holder will be responsible for the payment of any applicable transfer tax.

Resale of the New Notes

        Under existing interpretations of the staff of the SEC contained in several no-action letters to third parties, the New Notes would in general be freely transferable by holders thereof (other than affiliates of us) after the exchange offer without further registration under the Securities Act (subject

47


Table of Contents

to certain representations required to be made by each holder of Old Notes participating in the exchange offer, as set forth below). The relevant no-action letters include the Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation letter, which was made available by the SEC on May 13, 1988, the Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated letter, which was made available by the SEC on June 5, 1991, the K-111 Communications Corporation letter, which was made available by the SEC on May 14, 1993, and the Shearman & Sterling letter, which was made available by the SEC on July 2, 1993.

        However, any purchaser of Old Notes who is an "affiliate" of ours or who intends to participate in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing the New Notes:

        By executing, or otherwise becoming bound by, the letter of transmittal, you will represent to us that:

        We have not sought, and do not intend to seek, a no-action letter from the SEC with respect to the effects of the exchange offer, and there can be no assurance that the SEC staff would make a similar determination with respect to the New Notes as it has made in previous no-action letters.

        In addition, in connection with any resales of those Old Notes, each participating broker-dealer receiving New Notes for its own account in exchange for Old Notes, where such Old Notes were acquired by such exchanging dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must represent that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of such New Notes. We have agreed that for a period of up to 90 days after the exchange offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of Distribution."

        The SEC has taken the position in the Shearman & Sterling no-action letter, which it made available on July 2, 1993, that broker-dealers may fulfill their prospectus delivery requirements with respect to the New Notes, other than a resale of an unsold allotment from the original sale of the Old Notes, by delivery of the prospectus contained in the exchange offer registration statement.

48


Table of Contents


USE OF PROCEEDS

        The exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under the Registration Rights Agreements we entered into in connection with the private offering of the Old Notes. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the New Notes under the exchange offer. In consideration for issuing the New Notes as contemplated by this prospectus, we will receive Old Notes in like principal amounts, the terms of which are identical in all material respects to the New Notes, subject to limited exceptions. Old Notes surrendered in exchange for New Notes will be retired and canceled and cannot be reissued. Accordingly, the issuance of the New Notes will not result in any increase in our indebtedness.

        We used the net proceeds from the offering of the Old Notes, together with the available cash, to redeem $600 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes at a redemption price equal to 105.375 percent of the principal amount of the 2015 Notes redeemed, and to pay related fees and expenses. The 2015 Notes mature on July 15, 2015 and bear interest at a rate of 10.75 percent per annum.

49


Table of Contents


SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

        The selected historical financial data as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 set forth below are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical data as of December 31, 2009, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, as of December 31, 2007 and for the period from July 25, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (Successor) and the period from January 1, 2007 through July 24, 2007 (Predecessor) are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes not included in this prospectus. The selected historical financial data are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        In the first quarter of 2011, we concluded that the TruGreen LandCare business did not fit within our long-term strategic plans and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. The financial results, as well as the assets and liabilities, of the TruGreen LandCare business are reported in discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 
  Successor(1)   Predecessor(1)  
 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,    
   
 
 
  Jul. 25, 2007 to
Dec. 31, 2007
  Jan. 1, 2007 to
Jul. 24, 2007
 
(In thousands, except per share data)
  2011   2010   2009   2008  

Operating results:

                                     

Operating revenue

  $ 3,205,872   $ 3,127,394   $ 2,977,885   $ 2,995,126   $ 1,252,617   $ 1,692,236  

Operating income(2)

    375,460     306,692     243,834     187,562     36,529     141,851  

Percentage of operating revenue

    11.7 %   9.8 %   8.2 %   6.3 %   2.9 %   8.4 %

Non-operating expense(3)

    263,711     278,308     246,896     357,796     181,602     2,983  

Provision (benefit) for income taxes(2)(4)

    43,912     10,945     (9,204 )   (50,753 )   (50,995 )   50,734  
                           

Income (Loss) from continuing operations(2)(3)(4)

    67,837     17,439     6,142     (119,481 )   (94,078 )   88,134  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(5)

    (27,016 )   (31,998 )   7,353     (6,918 )   (29,442 )   (3,610 )
                           

Net income (loss)(2)(3)(4)(5)

    40,821     (14,559 )   13,495     (126,399 )   (123,520 )   84,524  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                        3,423  
                           

Net income (loss) attributable to ServiceMaster(2)(3)(4)(5)

  $ 40,821   $ (14,559 ) $ 13,495   $ (126,399 ) $ (123,520 ) $ 81,101  
                           

Cash dividends per share

  $   $   $   $   $   $ 0.24  

Financial position (as of period end):

                                     

Total assets

  $ 7,146,823   $ 7,098,090   $ 7,146,389   $ 7,493,627   $ 7,591,060        

Total liabilities

    5,898,904     5,910,563     5,960,058     6,361,268     6,287,526        

Total long-term debt outstanding

    3,875,870     3,948,487     3,974,944     4,266,092     4,130,811        

Total shareholder's equity(2)(3)(4)(5)

    1,247,919     1,187,527     1,186,331     1,132,359     1,303,534        

(1)
Although ServiceMaster continued as the same legal entity after the Merger, the accompanying selected financial data for 2007 is presented for two periods: Predecessor and Successor, which relate to the period preceding the Merger and the period succeeding the Merger, respectively.

(2)
The 2011, 2010 and 2009 results include restructuring charges of $8.2 million, $11.4 million and $26.7 million, respectively, as described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The 2008 results include restructuring charges of $12.2 million. These charges included transition fees, employee severance and retention costs, consulting and other costs related to the information technology outsourcing initiative; adjustments to lease termination reserves, employee retention and severance costs, consulting and other costs related to prior restructuring initiatives; and severance, retention, legal fees and other costs associated with the Merger.

50


Table of Contents

(3)
The 2009 results include a $46.1 million ($29.6 million, net of tax) gain on extinguishment of debt related to the completion of open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the Company's 2015 Notes.

(4)
In the third and fourth quarters of 2009, the Company recorded a reduction in income tax expense of $12.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively, related to changes in state tax rates used to measure deferred taxes. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a reduction in income tax benefit of $8.3 million resulting from the establishment of a valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets for which the realization in future years is not more likely than not.

(5)
In 2011, in conjunction with the decision to dispose of TruGreen LandCare, a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $34.2 million was recorded to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale of TruGreen LandCare in 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss on sale of $6.2 million. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges associated with the goodwill and trade name at its TruGreen LandCare business in the amount of $46.9 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. These charges are classified within the financial statement caption "(loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes."

The Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $6.3 million and $18.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Successor period from July 25, 2007 to December 31, 2007, respectively, related to the long-lived assets (other than goodwill) at its InStar business in connection with the decision to sell the InStar business. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company also recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge associated with the goodwill at its InStar business in the amount of $12.9 million. These charges are classified within the financial statement caption "(loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes."

51


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following information should be read in conjunction with "Selected Historical Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in "Risk Factors" and "Forward-Looking Statements."

Results of Operations

        In the first quarter of 2011, ServiceMaster concluded that TruGreen LandCare did not fit within the long-term strategic plans of the Company and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. As a result of the decision to sell this business, a $34.2 million impairment charge ($21.0 million, net of tax) was recorded in loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the first quarter of 2011 to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale, a $6.2 million loss on sale ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded. The loss on the disposition of the TruGreen LandCare business continues to be subject to certain post-closing adjustments and disputes, and such adjustments could be significant to the sale price. The financial results, as well as the assets and liabilities, of the TruGreen LandCare business are reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented in this prospectus.

        The Company reported operating revenue of $3.206 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011, $3.127 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $2.978 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009. The operating revenue changes from year to year were driven by the results of our business units as described under "—Segment Review."

        Operating income was $375.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, $306.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $243.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Income from continuing operations before income taxes was $111.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Loss from continuing operations before income taxes was $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in income from continuing operations before income taxes for 2011 compared to 2010 and

52


Table of Contents

2010 compared to 2009 of $83.4 million and $31.4 million, respectively, primarily reflect the net effect of year over year changes in the following items:

(In thousands)
  2011
Compared
to 2010
  2010
Compared
to 2009
 

Segment results(1)

  $ 59,423   $ 11,555  

Depreciation and amortization expense(2)

    33,189     18,167  

Interest expense(3)

    13,810     12,400  

Residual value guarantee charges(4)

    10,449     (4,988 )

Restructuring and Merger related charges(5)

    3,286     15,234  

Non-cash trade name impairments(6)

    (36,700 )   26,600  

Loss/gain on extinguishment of debt(7)

    (774 )   (46,106 )

Other

    682     (1,416 )
           

  $ 83,365   $ 31,446  
           

(1)
Represents an improvement in income from continuing operations before income taxes, as adjusted for the specific items included in the table above. Includes an increase in key executive transition charges, reflecting the net effect of (i) $6.6 million recorded in the year ended December 31, 2011, which include recruiting costs and signing bonuses related to the hiring in 2011 of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and President of ServiceMaster Clean and Merry Maids and separation charges related to the resignations of our former CFO and the former Presidents of Merry Maids and TruGreen and (ii) $5.5 million recorded in the year ended December 31, 2010, which include separation charges related to the retirement of our former CEO. Also includes the reversal, in 2009, of a reserve of $4.4 million for cash awards related to a long-term incentive plan as certain performance measures under the plan were not achieved. There was no similar reversal in 2010 or 2011.

(2)
Consists primarily of decreased amortization of intangible assets as a result of certain finite lived intangible assets recorded in connection with the Merger being fully amortized, offset, in part, by increased depreciation of property and equipment as a result of property additions.

(3)
For 2011 compared to 2010, represents a decrease in interest expense as a result of decreases in our weighted average interest rate. For 2010 compared to 2009, represents a decrease in interest expense as a result of decreases in our weighted average interest rate and average long-term debt balances.

(4)
Represents non-cash residual value guarantee charges of $10.4 million and $5.5 million recorded in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to a synthetic lease for operating properties, which expired in July 2010. There was no similar charge in the year ended December 31, 2011.

(5)
Represents the net decrease in restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters, Merger related charges and other restructuring costs.

(6)
Represents pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million recorded in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing

53


Table of Contents

(7)
For 2011 compared to 2010, represents the loss on extinguishment of debt recorded in the year ended December 31, 2011 related to the purchase of $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes from Holdings. For 2010 compared to 2009, represents the gain on extinguishment of debt recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the completion of open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes. There were no open market or other purchases of 2015 Notes by the Company in the year ended December 31, 2010.

        The Company has historically hedged a significant portion of its annual fuel consumption of approximately 21 million gallons. Fuel costs, after the impacts of the hedges and after adjusting for the impact of year over year changes in the number of gallons used, increased $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 and decreased $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Based upon current Department of Energy fuel price forecasts, as well as the hedges the Company has executed to date for 2012, the Company projects that fuel prices will increase our fuel costs by $10 million to $15 million for 2012 compared to 2011.

        After adjusting for the impact of year over year changes in the number of covered employees, health care and related costs increased $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 and decreased $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. We expect to incur incremental aggregate health care costs in 2012 as compared to 2011 as a result of continued inflation in the cost of health care services and due to certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

        The Company has entered into multiple interest rate swap agreements as further discussed in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Changes in interest rates, after the impact of the interest rate swap agreements, improved the Company's non-operating expenses by approximately $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 and $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009 by virtue of the effect on floating rate debt, offset, in part, by the negative effect on investment income.

        The Company reported cost of services rendered and products sold of $1.814 billion for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $1.777 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a percentage of revenue, these costs decreased to 56.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 56.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. Residual value guarantee charges of $9.2 million related to synthetic leases were recorded in 2010 at TruGreen for which there was no similar charge in 2011 and contributed 29 basis points ("bps") to the improvement in cost of services rendered and products sold as a percentage of revenue. The remaining 9 bps increase as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects an increase in fuel and fertilizer prices and contract claims costs, offset, in part, by a reduction in termite damage claims expense, the favorable impact of acquiring assets in connection with exiting certain fleet leases and cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives.

        The Company reported cost of services rendered and products sold of $1.777 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $1.691 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of revenue, these costs for the year ended December 31, 2010 were comparable to the year ended December 31, 2009 at 56.8 percent. Residual value guarantee charges of $9.2 million and $4.7 million related to synthetic leases were recorded in 2010 and 2009,

54


Table of Contents

respectively, at TruGreen and negatively impacted the change in cost of services rendered and products sold as a percentage of revenue by 14 bps. The remaining change as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects an increase in incentive compensation expense, contract claims costs at American Home Shield and product distribution revenue at Terminix, which has lower margins than termite or pest revenue, offset, in part, by the favorable impact of acquiring assets in connection with exiting certain fleet leases and a reduction in fuel and fertilizer prices and health care costs.

        The Company reported selling and administrative expenses of $880.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $896.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a percentage of revenue, these costs decreased to 27.5 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 from 28.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. Key executive transition charges of $6.6 million and $5.5 million were incurred in 2011 and 2010, respectively, which negatively impacted the change in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue by 4 bps. The remaining 114 bps improvement as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects a reduction in sales and marketing expense, legal related expense and spending in the Company's centers of excellence, offset, in part, by an increase in technology related costs driven by our new CRM system at American Home Shield and for PCI standards compliance purposes.

        The Company reported selling and administrative expenses of $896.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $830.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of revenue, these costs increased to 28.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 27.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. Key executive transition charges of $5.5 million were incurred in 2010, which negatively impacted the change in selling and administrative expenses as of percentage of revenue by 18 bps. The remaining 52 bps decline as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects an increase in spending in the Company's headquarters functions to enhance capabilities in our centers of excellence and on initiatives designed to improve the performance of our operating segments and incentive compensation expense.

        Amortization expense was $91.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, $136.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $158.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in 2011 and 2010 is a result of certain finite lived intangible assets recorded in connection with the Merger being fully amortized.

        Non-operating expense totaled $263.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, $278.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $246.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in 2011 compared to 2010 is primarily due to a $13.8 million decrease in interest expense as a result of a decrease in our weighted average interest rate. The increase in 2010 compared to 2009 includes the impact of a $46.1 million gain on extinguishment of debt recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009, which did not recur in 2010, offset, in part, by a $12.4 million decrease in interest expense, primarily resulting from decreases in our weighted average interest rate and average long-term debt balances, and a $2.3 million increase in interest

55


Table of Contents

and net investment income. Interest and net investment income was comprised of the following for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Realized gains(1)

  $ 9,972   $ 6,418   $ 7,830  

Impairments of securities(2)

    (195 )   (174 )   (5,854 )

Deferred compensation trust(3)

    (49 )   1,200     1,964  

Other(4)

    1,158     1,914     3,139  
               

Interest and net investment income

  $ 10,886   $ 9,358   $ 7,079  
               

(1)
Represents the net investment gains and the interest and dividend income realized on the American Home Shield investment portfolio.

(2)
Represents other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments in the American Home Shield investment portfolio.

(3)
Represents investment (loss) income resulting from a change in the market value of investments within an employee deferred compensation trust (for which there is a corresponding and offsetting change in compensation expense within income from continuing operations before income taxes).

(4)
Represents interest income on other cash balances.

        The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations was a provision of 39.3 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to a provision of 38.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 and a benefit of 300.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes a reduction to income tax expense resulting from the resolution of examinations by taxing authorities and the lapsing of statutes of limitations. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes a tax benefit resulting from a change in the state tax rates used to measure deferred taxes which more than offset state and foreign tax expense.

        The Company incurred restructuring charges of $8.2 million, $11.4 million and $26.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Restructuring charges were comprised of the following:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

TruGreen reorganization and restructuring(1)

  $ 1,115   $ 6,922   $ 8,717  

Information technology outsourcing(2)

            9,861  

Terminix branch optimization(3)

    3,560     2,352     3,219  

Centers of excellence initiative(4)

    3,416          

Merger related charges(5)

        1,208     2,321  

Other(6)

    71     966     2,564  
               

Total restructuring charges

  $ 8,162   $ 11,448   $ 26,682  
               

(1)
Represents restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations. For the year ended December 31, 2011 these charges included severance and lease termination costs of $0.8 million and

56


Table of Contents

(2)
On December 11, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") pursuant to which IBM provides information technology operations and applications development services to the Company. These services were phased in during the first half of 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, these charges included transition fees paid to IBM of $7.6 million, employee retention and severance costs of $1.3 million and consulting and other costs of $1.0 million.

(3)
Represents restructuring charges related to a branch optimization project. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included severance and lease termination costs of $0.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these charges were comprised of lease termination costs. For the year ended December 31, 2009, these charges included lease termination costs of $2.9 million and severance costs of $0.3 million.

(4)
Represents restructuring charges related to an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included consulting and severance costs of $1.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

(5)
Included severance, retention, legal fees and other costs associated with the Merger.

(6)
For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included reserve adjustments. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these charges included reserve adjustments of $0.6 million and severance and retention of $0.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2009 these charges related to previous restructuring initiatives and included adjustments to lease termination reserves of $0.3 million, employee retention and severance costs of $0.6 million and consulting and other costs of $1.7 million.

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of its trade names as a result of its annual impairment testing of indefinite lived intangible assets. There were no similar impairment charges recorded in continuing operations in 2010. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further details.

57


Table of Contents

Key Performance Indicators

        The table below presents selected operating metrics related to customer counts and customer retention for the three largest profit businesses in the Company. These measures are presented on a rolling, twelve month basis in order to avoid seasonal anomalies.

 
  Key Performance
Indicators
as of December 31,
 
 
  2011   2010   2009  

TruGreen—

                   

(Reduction) Growth in Full Program Accounts

    (5.3 )%   (1.7 )%   0.7 %

Customer Retention Rate

    66.7 %   66.0 %   68.1 %

Terminix—

                   

Growth (Reduction) in Pest Control Customers

    6.4 %   3.6 %   (0.9 )%

Pest Control Customer Retention Rate

    80.6 %   79.9 %   78.5 %

(Reduction) Growth in Termite Customers

    (1.0 )%   0.3 %   (1.5 )%

Termite Customer Retention Rate

    86.1 %   86.0 %   85.7 %

American Home Shield—

                   

Growth in Home Service Contracts

    1.6 %   0.1 %   0.1 %

Customer Retention Rate(1)

    75.1 %   73.0 %   72.2 %

(1)
During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company changed its calculation methodology of Customer Retention Rate for American Home Shield to be consistent with the calculation methodology for TruGreen and Terminix. The Customer Retention Rate for American Home Shield has been adjusted to reflect the 2011 calculation methodology for all periods presented.

Segment Review

        The following business segment reviews should be read in conjunction with the required footnote disclosures presented in the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This disclosure provides a reconciliation of segment operating income to income from continuing operations before income taxes, with net non-operating expenses as the only reconciling item.

        The Company uses Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance to facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period. Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are supplemental measures of the Company's performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are not measurements of the Company's financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP or as alternatives to net cash provided by operating activities or any other measures of the Company's cash flow or liquidity. "Adjusted EBITDA" means net income (loss) before: income (loss) from discontinued operations; provision (benefit) for income taxes; other expense; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; interest expense; interest and net investment income; and depreciation and amortization expense; as well as adding back interest and net investment income, residual value guarantee charge and non-cash trade name impairment. "Comparable Operating Performance" is calculated by adding back to Adjusted EBITDA an amount equal to the non-cash stock based compensation expense and non-cash effects on Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the application of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger.

58


Table of Contents

        The Company believes Adjusted EBITDA facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting net interest income and expense), taxation and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense), which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance. In addition, the Company excludes residual value guarantee charges that do not result in additional cash payments to exit the facility at the end of the lease term. The Company uses Comparable Operating Performance as a supplemental measure to assess the Company's performance because it excludes non-cash stock based compensation expense and non-cash effects on Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the application of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger. The Company presents Comparable Operating Performance because it believes that it is useful for investors, analysts and other interested parties in their analysis of the Company's operating results.

        Charges relating to stock based compensation expense and the impact of purchase accounting are non-cash and the exclusion of the impact of these items from Comparable Operating Performance allows investors to understand the current period results of operations of the business on a comparable basis with previous periods and, secondarily, gives the investors added insight into cash earnings available to service the Company's debt. We believe this to be of particular importance to the Company's public investors, which are debt holders. The Company also believes that the exclusion of the purchase accounting and non-cash stock based compensation expense may provide an additional means for comparing the Company's performance to the performance of other companies by eliminating the impact of differently structured equity based, long-term incentive plans (although care must be taken in making any such comparison, as there may be inconsistencies among companies in the manner of computing similarly titled financial measures).

        Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled financial measures of other companies due to the potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

        Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analyzing the Company's results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

59


Table of Contents

        Operating Revenues and Comparable Operating Performance by operating segment are as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating Revenue:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 1,100,741   $ 1,096,667   $ 1,048,936  

Terminix

    1,193,075     1,157,346     1,089,072  

American Home Shield

    686,737     656,572     630,251  

ServiceMaster Clean

    138,691     132,132     125,614  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    86,628     84,677     84,012  
               

Total Operating Revenue

  $ 3,205,872   $ 3,127,394   $ 2,977,885  
               

Comparable Operating Performance:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 207,916   $ 187,550   $ 178,646  

Terminix

    295,925     267,338     247,182  

American Home Shield

    131,977     116,736     113,738  

ServiceMaster Clean

    63,982     63,691     59,431  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    (104,987 )   (103,211 )   (93,682 )
               

Total Comparable Operating Performance

  $ 594,813   $ 532,104   $ 505,315  
               

Memo: Items included in Comparable Operating Performance

                   

Restructuring charges(1)

  $ 8,162   $ 11,448   $ 26,682  
               

Management and consulting fees(2)

  $ 7,500   $ 7,500   $ 7,500  
               

Memo: Items excluded from Comparable Operating Performance

                   

Comparable Operating Performance of discontinued operations

  $ (3,064 ) $ 7,862   $ 23,747  
               

(1)
Represents restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and initiatives to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters, Merger related charges and other restructuring costs.

(2)
Represents management and consulting fees payable to certain related parties. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further information on management and consulting fees.

60


Table of Contents

        The following table presents reconciliations of operating income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance for the periods presented.

(in thousands)
  TruGreen   Terminix   American
Home
Shield
  ServiceMaster
Clean
  Other
Operations
and
Headquarters
  Total  

Year Ended Dec. 31, 2011

                                     

Operating income (loss)(1)

  $ 129,324   $ 220,622   $ 94,869   $ 57,674   $ (127,029 ) $ 375,460  

Depreciation and amortization expense

    41,929     75,347     27,331     6,150     12,679     163,436  
                           

EBITDA

    171,253     295,969     122,200     63,824     (114,350 )   538,896  

Interest and net investment income(2)

            9,777     158     951     10,886  

Non-cash trade name impairment(3)

    36,700                     36,700  
                           

Adjusted EBITDA

    207,953     295,969     131,977     63,982     (113,399 )   586,482  

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

                    8,412     8,412  

Non-cash credits attributable to purchase accounting(4)

    (37 )   (44 )               (81 )
                           

Comparable Operating Performance

  $ 207,916   $ 295,925   $ 131,977   $ 63,982   $ (104,987 ) $ 594,813  
                           

Memo: Items included in Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Restructuring charges(5)

  $ 1,115   $ 3,560   $   $ 36   $ 3,451   $ 8,162  
                           

Management and consulting fees(6)

  $   $   $   $   $ 7,500   $ 7,500  
                           

Memo: Items excluded from Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Comparable Operating Performance of discontinued operations(7)

  $   $   $   $   $ (3,064 ) $ (3,064 )
                           

Year Ended Dec. 31, 2010

                                     

Operating income (loss)(1)

  $ 112,312   $ 199,750   $ 68,380   $ 55,450   $ (129,200 ) $ 306,692  

Depreciation and amortization expense

    66,069     67,761     42,259     7,106     13,430     196,625  
                           

EBITDA

    178,381     267,511     110,639     62,556     (115,770 )   503,317  

Interest and net investment income(2)

            6,243     153     2,962     9,358  

Residual value guarantee charge(8)

    9,222             982     245     10,449  
                           

Adjusted EBITDA

    187,603     267,511     116,882     63,691     (112,563 )   523,124  

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

                    9,352     9,352  

Non-cash credits attributable to purchase accounting(4)

    (53 )   (173 )   (146 )           (372 )
                           

Comparable Operating Performance

  $ 187,550   $ 267,338   $ 116,736   $ 63,691   $ (103,211 ) $ 532,104  
                           

Memo: Items included in Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Restructuring charges (credits)(5)

  $ 6,922   $ 3,491   $ (127 ) $ 71   $ 1,091   $ 11,448  
                           

Management and consulting fees(6)

  $   $   $   $   $ 7,500   $ 7,500  
                           

Memo: Items excluded from Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Comparable Operating Performance of discontinued operations(7)

  $   $   $   $   $ 7,862   $ 7,862  
                           

61


Table of Contents

(in thousands)
  TruGreen   Terminix   American
Home
Shield
  ServiceMaster
Clean
  Other
Operations
and
Headquarters
  Total  

Year Ended Dec. 31, 2009

                                     

Operating income (loss)(1)

  $ 64,897   $ 184,131   $ 70,253   $ 50,456   $ (125,903 ) $ 243,834  

Depreciation and amortization expense

    87,726     63,277     41,728     8,243     13,818     214,792  
                           

EBITDA

    152,623     247,408     111,981     58,699     (112,085 )   458,626  

Interest and net investment income(2)

            1,976     144     4,959     7,079  

Residual value guarantee charge(8)

    4,726             588     147     5,461  

Non-cash trade name impairment(3)

    21,400                 5,200     26,600  
                           

Adjusted EBITDA

    178,749     247,408     113,957     59,431     (101,779 )   497,766  

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense

                    8,097     8,097  

Non-cash credits attributable to purchase accounting(4)

    (103 )   (226 )   (219 )           (548 )
                           

Comparable Operating Performance

  $ 178,646   $ 247,182   $ 113,738   $ 59,431   $ (93,682 )   505,315  
                           

Memo: Items included in Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Restructuring charges(5)

  $ 8,717   $ 3,390   $ 147   $   $ 14,428   $ 26,682  
                           

Management and consulting fees(6)

  $   $   $   $   $ 7,500   $ 7,500  
                           

Memo: Items excluded from Comparable Operating Performance

                                     

Comparable Operating Performance of discontinued operations(7)

  $   $   $   $   $ 23,747   $ 23,747  
                           

(1)
Presented below is a reconciliation of total segment operating income to net income (loss).

 
  Year Ended December 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Total Segment Operating Income

  $ 375,460   $ 306,692   $ 243,834  

Non-operating Expense (Income):

                   

Interest expense

    273,123     286,933     299,333  

Interest and net investment income

    (10,886 )   (9,358 )   (7,079 )

Loss (Gain) on extinguishment of debt

    774         (46,106 )

Other expense

    700     733     748  
               

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

    111,749     28,384     (3,062 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    43,912     10,945     (9,204 )
               

Income from Continuing Operations

    67,837     17,439     6,142  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

    (27,016 )   (31,998 )   7,353  
               

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 40,821   $ (14,559 ) $ 13,495  
               
(2)
Interest and net investment income is primarily comprised of investment income and realized gain (loss) on our American Home Shield segment investment portfolio. Cash, short-term and long-term marketable securities associated with regulatory requirements in connection with American Home Shield and for other purposes totaled $226.2 million as of December 31, 2011. American Home Shield interest and net investment income was $9.8 million, $6.2 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The balance of interest and net investment income primarily relates to (i) investment income (loss) from our employee deferred compensation trust (for which there is a corresponding and offsetting change in compensation expense within (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes) and (ii) interest income on other cash balances.

(3)
Represents pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million recorded in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. There were no similar

62


Table of Contents

(4)
The Merger was accounted for using purchase accounting. This adjustment represents the aggregate, non-cash adjustments (other than amortization and depreciation) attributable to the application of purchase accounting.

(5)
Represents restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters, Merger related charges and other restructuring costs.

(6)
Represents management and consulting fees payable to certain related parties. See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further information on management and consulting fees.

(7)
The table included in "Discontinued Operations" below presents reconciliations of operating (loss) income, the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP, to EBITDA and Comparable Operating Performance for the periods presented.

(8)
Represents non-cash residual value guarantee charges recorded in 2010 and 2009 related to a synthetic lease for operating properties, which expired in July 2010. There were no similar charges in 2011.

        The TruGreen segment, which provides lawn, tree and shrub care services, reported a 0.4 percent increase in operating revenue, a 15.1 percent increase in operating income and a 10.9 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. Revenue from core lawn service customers, which was 55 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2011, was comparable to 2010, reflecting a 4.3 percent increase in the average application price, offset, by a 4.8 percent decline in average customer counts. Absolute customer counts as of December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 declined 5.3 percent, which was driven by a decrease in new unit sales, primarily in our neighborhood selling channel, offset, in part, by a 70 bps increase in the customer retention rate. TruGreen is redefining its sales channel mix by shifting focus away from the neighborhood sales channel. The segment's operating revenue results also reflect a $5.7 million increase in other expanded services. TruGreen is continuing its efforts to reduce customer cancellations by focusing on the overall quality of service delivery, including more consistent application of service standards, an improved recovery program for problem lawns, the reduction of lawn specialist turnover and the continued improvement of overall communication with customers.

        TruGreen's operating income for the year ended December 31, 2011 included a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $36.7 million to reduce the carrying value of trade names to their estimated fair value as further discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. There were no similar charges in 2010. TruGreen's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 18.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 17.1 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. TruGreen's Comparable Operating Performance included restructuring charges of $1.1 million and $6.9 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additionally, key executive transition charges of $1.0 million were incurred in 2011, which included separation charges related to the resignation of the former President of TruGreen in the second quarter of 2011. The net reduction in these charges contributed 44 bps to the increase in the segment's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue. The remaining 136 bps increase primarily reflects a reduction in sales and marketing expense driven by the reduced focus on the neighborhood sales channel and cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives, offset, in part, by an increase in fuel and fertilizer prices.

        The TruGreen segment reported a 4.6 percent increase in revenue, a 73.1 percent increase in operating income and a 5.0 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year

63


Table of Contents

ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Revenue from core lawn service customers, which was 55 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010 increased 3.5 percent compared to 2010, reflecting a 1.8 percent increase in the average application price and a 1.6 percent increase in average customer counts. Absolute customer counts as of December 31, 2010 compared to 2009 declined 1.7 percent, which was driven by a 210 bps reduction in the customer retention rate, offset, in part, by an increase in new unit sales generated in the neighborhood selling channel. The segment's revenue results also reflect a $27.5 million increase in other expanded services.

        TruGreen's operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009 included a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $21.4 million to reduce the carrying value of trade names to their estimated fair value as further discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. There were no similar charges in 2010. TruGreen's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 17.1 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 17.0 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. TruGreen's Comparable Operating Performance included restructuring charges of $6.9 million and $8.7 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net reduction in these charges contributed 20 bps to the increase in the segment's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue. The remaining 10 bps decline primarily reflects an increase in sales and marketing expense, incentive compensation expense and costs related to our ongoing initiatives to transform our branch operations and to improve customer service, offset, in part, by a reduction in fuel and fertilizer prices and health care costs.

        The Terminix segment, which provides termite and pest control services and distributes pest control products, reported a 3.1 percent increase in operating revenue, a 10.4 percent increase in operating income and a 10.7 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. Pest control revenue, which was 55 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2011, increased 5.3 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, reflecting a 6.4 percent increase in customer counts, a 1.1 percent increase in the average annual account value, and a $6.0 million increase in other services, including bed bug and other pest services. The increase in pest control customer counts was driven by an increase in new unit sales and acquisitions and a 70 bps increase in the customer retention rate. Termite revenue, including new unit sales and renewals, was 40.5 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2011 and increased 0.5 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily reflecting a 2.2 percent increase in average price of new units and renewals, offset, in part, by a 2.6 percent decline in new unit sales and a 1.0 percent decline in renewal customer counts. For 2011, termite renewal revenue comprised 55 percent of total termite revenue, while the remainder consisted of termite completion new unit sales. The decline in termite renewal customer counts was driven by a decrease in new units, offset, in part, by a 10 bps increase in the customer retention rate.

        Terminix's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 24.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 23.1 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. Terminix's Comparable Operating Performance included restructuring charges of $3.6 million and $3.5 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. The 170 basis point increase in Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects a reduction in incentive compensation expense, legal related expense, termite damage claims expense, the favorable impact of acquiring assets in connection with exiting certain fleet leases and other cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives, offset, in part by an increase in sales and marketing expense and fuel prices.

        The Terminix segment reported a 6.3 percent increase in operating revenue, an 8.5 percent increase in operating income and an 8.2 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance

64


Table of Contents

for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Pest control revenue, which was 54 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010, increased 5.2 percent in 2010 compared to 2009, reflecting a 3.6 percent increase in customer counts, a 0.3 percent increase in the average annual account value and a $10.4 million increase in other services, including bed bug and other pest services. The increase in pest control customer counts was driven by an increase in new unit sales and acquisitions and a 140 bps improvement in the customer retention rate. Termite revenue, including new unit sales and renewals, was 41.5 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010 and increased 3.1 percent in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily reflecting a 2.0 percent increase in average price of new units and renewals, a 7.9 percent increase in new unit sales and a 0.3 percent increase in renewal customer counts. For 2010, termite renewal revenue comprised 55 percent of total termite revenue, while the remainder consisted of termite completion new unit sales. The increase in termite renewal customer counts was driven by an increase in new units and acquisitions and a 30 bps improvement in the customer retention rate. Product distribution revenue, which has lower margins than termite or pest revenue and accounted for less than five percent of total segment operating revenue, increased $23.2 million. In August 2010, Terminix acquired the assets of Antimite Termite and Pest Control, a company with annual revenues of approximately $30 million.

        Terminix's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 23.1 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 22.7 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. Terminix's Comparable Operating performance included restructuring charges of $3.5 million and $3.4 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 40 bps increase in Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects a reduction in fuel prices, health care costs, termite damage claims expense and sales and marketing expense, the favorable impact of acquiring assets in connection with exiting certain fleet leases and other cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives, offset, in part, by an increase in incentive compensation expense, legal related expense and increases in product distribution revenue, which has lower margins than pest or termite revenue.

        The American Home Shield segment, which provides home service contracts to consumers that cover heating, ventilation, air conditioning, plumbing and other systems and appliances, reported a 4.6 percent increase in operating revenue, a 38.7 percent increase in operating income and a 13.1 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. The revenue results reflect a 4.0 percent increase in average price on home service contracts written and a 1.6 percent increase in customer counts. The increase in average price was driven, in part, by the introduction of new product options in our direct-to-consumer channel. The increase in customer counts was driven by a 210 bps increase in the customer retention rate, offset, in part, by a decrease in new unit sales. American Home Shield's sales in the real estate channel were negatively impacted by softness in the home resale market and elimination of the government housing incentive program, which was extended through the first quarter of 2011. This decline was offset, in part, by growth in consumer sales.

        American Home Shield's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 19.2 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 17.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. American Home Shield's Comparable Operating performance included interest and net investment income from the American Home Shield investment portfolio of $9.8 million and $6.2 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, which contributed 47 bps to the increase in the segment's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue. The remaining 93 basis point increase primarily reflects a reduction in legal related expense and cost

65


Table of Contents

reductions realized through ongoing initiatives, offset, in part, by an increase in contract claims costs and technology related costs driven by our new CRM system and other ongoing initiatives.

        The American Home Shield segment reported a 4.2 percent increase in operating revenue, a 2.7 percent decrease in operating income and a 2.6 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. The revenue results reflect a 2.9 percent increase in average price on home service contracts written and a 2.8 percent increase in average customer counts. Absolute customer counts as of December 31, 2010 were comparable to 2009, reflecting a 3.8 percent decline in new unit sales, offset by an 80 bps improvement in the customer retention rate. American Home Shield's sales in the real estate channel were negatively impacted by softness in the home resale market, offset, in part, by growth in consumer sales.

        American Home Shield's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue decreased to 17.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 18.0 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. American Home Shield's Comparable Operating performance included interest and net investment income from the American Home Shield investment portfolio of $6.2 million and $2.0 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, which contributed 64 bps to the increase in the segment's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue. The remaining 84 bps decrease primarily reflects an increase in contract claims costs, offset, in part, by cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives.

        The ServiceMaster Clean segment, which provides residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning services through franchises primarily under the ServiceMaster and ServiceMaster Clean brand names, on-site furniture repair and restoration services primarily under the Furniture Medic brand name and home inspection services primarily under the AmeriSpec brand name, reported a 5.0 percent increase in operating revenue, a 4.0 percent increase in operating income and a 0.5 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. Domestic royalty fees, which were 54 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2011, increased 6.4 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, driven by increases in disaster restoration services. Revenue from janitorial national accounts, which was 9 percent of the segment's revenue in 2011, increased 32.4 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, driven by strong sales activity. Sales of products to franchisees, which were 12 percent of the segment's revenue in 2011, decreased 8.4 percent in 2011 compared to 2010.

        ServiceMaster Clean's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue decreased to 46.1 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 48.2 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. Key executive transition charges of $0.4 million were incurred in 2011, which represented a signing bonus related to the hiring of the new President of ServiceMaster Clean and Merry Maids. These charges negatively impacted the change in the segment's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue by 30 bps. The remaining 180 basis point reduction primarily reflects an increase in support services, sales and marketing expense, technology and other costs, all driven by ongoing initiatives to increase share primarily in the commercial, fire remediation and janitorial market segments.

        The ServiceMaster Clean segment reported a 5.2 percent increase in operating revenue, a 9.9 percent increase in operating income and a 7.2 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Domestic royalty fees, which were 53 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010, decreased 0.3 percent in 2010 compared to 2009, driven by reductions in disaster restoration services. Revenue from janitorial national accounts, which was 7 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010, increased

66


Table of Contents

46.8 percent in 2010 compared to 2009, driven by strong sales activity. Sales of products to franchisees, which were 14 percent of the segment's operating revenue in 2010, increased 8.3 percent in 2010 compared to 2009.

        ServiceMaster Clean's Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 48.2 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 47.3 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. The 90 bps increase in Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue primarily reflects cost reductions realized through ongoing initiatives.

        This segment includes the operations of Merry Maids, SMAC and the Company's headquarters functions. The segment reported a 2.3 percent increase in operating revenue, a 1.7 percent improvement in operating loss and a 1.7 percent improvement in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010.

        Merry Maids, which accounted for 93.5 percent of the segment's operating revenue for 2011, reported a 3.0 percent increase in operating revenue, a 7.0 percent increase in operating income and a 1.9 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 2010. Revenue from company owned branches, which was 75 percent of Merry Maids' revenue in 2011, increased 0.7 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, driven by a 1.7 percent increase in the average service price, offset, in part, by a 0.3 percent decline in average customer counts. Absolute customer counts as of December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 declined 3.6 percent driven by the sale of certain company owned branches to existing and new franchisees in the fourth quarter of 2011, offset, in part, by a 630 bps increase in the customer retention rate. Royalty fees, which were 19 percent of Merry Maids' revenue in 2011, increased 6.3 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily driven by market expansion.

        Merry Maids' Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue decreased to 25.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 26.2 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010. Key executive transition charges of $0.6 million were incurred in 2011, which included separation charges related to the resignation of the former President of Merry Maids in the first quarter of 2011. These charges negatively impacted the change in Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue by 72 bps. The remaining 42 bps increase reflects the gain resulting from the sale of certain branches, offset, in part, by an increase in sales and marketing expense, fuel costs and incentive compensation expense.

        The Comparable Operating Performance of SMAC and the Company's headquarters functions declined $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. The segment's Comparable Operating Performance included restructuring charges of $3.5 million and $1.1 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, and interest and net investment income of $1.0 million and $1.8 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additionally, key executive transition charges of (i) $4.7 million were incurred in 2011, which included recruiting costs and signing bonuses related to the hiring of our new CEO and CFO and separation charges related to the resignation or our former CFO and (ii) $5.0 million were incurred in 2010, which included separation charges related to the retirement of our former CEO on March 31, 2011. The remaining $0.7 million increase in Comparable Operating Performance primarily reflects a reduction in spending in the Company's centers of excellence, as well as favorable claims trends in our automobile, general liability and workers' compensation program, which may or may not continue, ($1.8 million), offset, in part, by an increase in technology related costs for PCI standards compliance purposes ($5.1 million) and incentive compensation expense ($3.7 million).

67


Table of Contents

        The segment reported comparable operating revenue, a 2.6 percent increase in operating loss and a 10.2 percent decrease in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009.

        Merry Maids, which accounted for 92.9 percent of the segment's operating revenue for 2010, reported a 0.8 percent increase in operating revenue, a 100.3 percent increase in operating income and a 15.2 percent increase in Comparable Operating Performance for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 2009. Revenue from company owned branches, which was 77 percent of Merry Maids' revenue in 2010, was comparable to 2009, reflecting a 1.3 percent increase in average customer counts, offset, in part, by a reduction in service frequency. Absolute customer counts as of December 31, 2010 compared to 2009 declined 2.9 percent driven by a decrease in new unit sales, offset, in part, by a 150 bps increase in the customer retention rate. The average service price in 2010 was comparable to 2009. Royalty fees, which were 18 percent of Merry Maids' revenue in 2010, increased 1.7 percent in 2010 compared to 2009, primarily driven by market expansion.

        Merry Maid's operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009 included a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $5.2 million to reduce the carrying value of trade names to their estimated fair value as further discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. There were no similar charges in 2010. Merry Maids' Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue increased to 26.2 percent for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 23.0 percent for the year ended December 31, 2009. The 320 bps increase in Comparable Operating Performance as a percentage of revenue reflects production labor efficiencies, a reduction in legal related expense, sales and marketing expense, incentive compensation expense and healthcare costs, offset, in part, by an increase in other overhead and support costs.

        The Comparable Operating Performance of SMAC and the Company's headquarters functions declined $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The segment's Comparable Operating Performance included restructuring charges of $1.1 million and $14.4 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively, and interest and net investment income of $1.8 million and $3.0 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additionally, key executive transition charges of $5.0 million were incurred in 2010, which included separation charges related to the retirement of our former CEO on March 31, 2011. The remaining $19.4 million decrease in Comparable Operating Performance primarily reflects increased provisions for incentive compensation ($5.1 million), due primarily to the reversal, in 2009, of a $4.4 million reserve for cash awards related to a long-term incentive plan as certain performance measures under the plan were not achieved, and increases in spending in the Company's headquarters functions to enhance capabilities in our centers of excellence and on initiatives designed to improve the performance of our operating segments.

        In the first quarter of 2011, ServiceMaster concluded that TruGreen LandCare did not fit within the long-term strategic plans of the Company and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to sell TruGreen LandCare, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. As a result of the decision to sell this business, a $34.2 million impairment charge ($21.0 million, net of tax) was recorded in loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the first quarter of 2011 to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale, a $6.2 million loss on sale ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded. The loss on the disposition of the TruGreen LandCare business continues to be

68


Table of Contents

subject to certain post-closing adjustments and disputes, and such adjustments could be significant to the sale price.

        In 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $46.9 million ($28.7 million, net of tax) and $1.4 million ($0.9 million, net of tax), respectively, associated with the goodwill and trade name at TruGreen LandCare in (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

        The components of (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating (loss) income(1)

  $ (40,620 ) $ (49,971 ) $ 11,468  

(Benefit) provision for income taxes(1)

    (15,461 )   (17,973 )   4,115  
               

Operating (loss) income, net of income taxes(1)

    (25,159 )   (31,998 )   7,353  

Loss on sale, net of income taxes

    (1,857 )        
               

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(1)

  $ (27,016 ) $ (31,998 ) $ 7,353  
               

Operating (loss) income(1)

  $ (40,620 ) $ (49,971 ) $ 11,468  

Interest expense

    16     46     44  

Depreciation and amortization expense

    3,509     11,524     11,486  
               

EBITDA

    (37,095 )   (38,401 )   22,998  

Non-cash goodwill and trade name impairment

    34,185     46,884     1,400  
               

Adjusted EBITDA

    (2,910 )   8,483     24,398  

Non-cash credits attributable to purchase accounting

    (154 )   (621 )   (651 )
               

Comparable Operating Performance

  $ (3,064 ) $ 7,862   $ 23,747  
               

(1)
During 2011, a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $34.2 million ($21.0 million, net of tax) was recorded to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Also includes goodwill and trade name impairments of $46.9 million ($28.7 million, net of tax) and $1.4 million ($0.9 million, net of tax) in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Financial Position and Liquidity

        Net cash provided from operating activities from continuing operations increased $72.5 million to $295.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $222.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        Net cash provided from operating activities in 2011 was comprised of $334.4 million in earnings adjusted for non-cash charges, offset, in part, by $7.5 million in cash payments related to restructuring charges and a $31.9 million increase in cash required for working capital. For the year ended December 31, 2011 working capital requirements were adversely impacted by a reduction in reserve levels under certain self-insurance programs and unrecognized tax benefits.

69


Table of Contents

        Net cash provided from operating activities in 2010 was comprised of $253.8 million in earnings adjusted for non-cash charges, offset, in part, by $10.8 in cash payments related to restructuring charges and a $20.5 million increase in cash required for working capital. For the year ended December 31, 2010 working capital requirements were adversely impacted by growth in accounts receivable balances, due in part to unfavorable collection trends partially attributable to increases in revenue in service lines with longer than average collection terms. Also adversely impacting working capital requirements was a reduction in reserve levels under certain self-insurance programs. Working capital requirements were favorably impacted by a change in the timing of payments to our vendors and increased accruals for incentive compensation.

        Net cash used for investing activities from continuing operations was $135.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $175.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        Capital expenditures decreased to $96.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $134.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and included vehicle purchases of $48.5 million, recurring capital needs and information technology projects. The Company anticipates that capital expenditures, excluding vehicle fleet purchases, for the full year 2012 will range from $85.0 million to $95.0 million, reflecting recurring needs and the continuation of investments in information systems and productivity enhancing operating systems. Although the Company has been purchasing vehicles in recent years, we expect to fulfill our ongoing vehicle fleet needs through vehicle capital leases; therefore, the Company's capital requirement for fleet vehicles for the full year 2012 is not expected to exceed $5.0 million. The Company has no additional material capital commitments at this time.

        Proceeds from sales of equipment and other assets increased to $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 and included $2.2 million of proceeds from the sale of Merry Maids company owned branches to existing and new franchisees. The Company may sell additional Merry Maids company owned branches to existing or new franchisees in the future.

        Cash payments for acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2011 totaled $44.4 million, compared with $57.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Consideration paid for tuck-in acquisitions consisted of cash payments and debt payable to sellers. The Company expects to continue its tuck-in acquisition program at Terminix, TruGreen and Merry Maids.

        Cash flows from notes receivable, financial investments and securities decreased to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $20.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The cash flows from notes receivable, financial investments and securities for the year ended December 31, 2010 included the return of the Company's investment in previously leased real estate facilities of $22.0 million.

        Net cash used for financing activities from continuing operations was $102.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $46.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company borrowed $4.0 million under other financing arrangements, purchased from Holdings $65.0 million face value of 2015 Notes, as further discussed in "Liquidity," and made scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $40.9 million. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company borrowed and repaid $5.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility, borrowed $10.0 million under other financing arrangements, made scheduled principal payments of long-term debt of $43.8 million and made repayments of $12.5 million in connection with purchases of properties previously under lease.

70


Table of Contents

        The Company is highly leveraged, and a substantial portion of the Company's liquidity needs is due to service requirements on indebtedness incurred in connection with the Merger, some of which has been refinanced, and from funding the Company's operations, working capital and capital expenditures. The agreements governing the Term Facilities, the 2015 Notes, the Notes, and the Revolving Credit Facility contain certain covenants that limit or restrict the incurrence of additional indebtedness, debt repurchases, liens, sales of assets, certain payments (including dividends) and transactions with affiliates, subject to certain exceptions. At December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the covenants under these agreements that were in effect on such date.

        Cash and short and long-term marketable securities totaled $471.4 million as of December 31, 2011, compared with $393.3 million as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, $226.2 million and $242.2 million, respectively, of the cash and short and long-term marketable securities balances are associated with regulatory requirements at American Home Shield and for other purposes. Such amounts are identified as being potentially unavailable to be paid to the Company by its subsidiaries. American Home Shield's investment portfolio has been invested in a combination of high quality, short duration fixed income securities and equities. The Company closely monitors the performance of the investments. From time to time, the Company reviews the statutory reserve requirements to which its regulated entities are subject and any changes to such requirements. These reviews may result in identifying current reserve levels above or below minimum statutory reserve requirements, in which case the Company may adjust its reserves. The reviews may also identify opportunities to satisfy certain regulatory reserve requirements through alternate financial vehicles.

        A portion of the Company's vehicle fleet and some equipment are leased through month-to-month operating leases, cancelable at the Company's option. There are residual value guarantees by the Company (ranging from 70 percent to 84 percent of the estimated terminal value at the inception of the lease depending on the agreement) relative to these vehicles and equipment, which historically have not resulted in significant net payments to the lessors. The fair value of the assets under all of the fleet and equipment leases is expected to substantially mitigate the Company's guarantee obligations under the agreements. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's residual value guarantees related to the leased assets totaled $32.2 million for which the Company has recorded as a liability the estimated fair value of these guarantees of $0.7 million in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

        Under the terms of its fuel swap contracts, the Company is required to post collateral in the event that the fair value of the contracts exceeds a certain agreed upon liability level and in other circumstances required by the counterparty. As of December 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of the Company's fuel swap contracts was a net liability of $0.7 million, and the Company had posted $3.8 million in letters of credit as collateral under its fuel hedging program, none of which were issued under the Company's Revolving Credit Facility. The continued use of letters of credit for this purpose could limit the Company's ability to post letters of credit for other purposes and could limit the Company's borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility. However, the Company does not expect the fair value of its outstanding fuel swap contracts to materially impact its financial position or liquidity.

        The Company's ongoing liquidity needs are expected to be funded by cash on hand, net cash provided by operating activities and, as required, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. We expect that cash provided from operations and available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility will provide sufficient funds to operate our business, make expected capital expenditures and meet our liquidity requirements for the following 12 months, including payment of interest and principal

71


Table of Contents

on our debt. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had $442.5 million of remaining capacity available under the Revolving Credit Facility.

        On February 2, 2011, ServiceMaster entered into an amendment to its Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for senior secured revolving loans and stand-by and other letters of credit. Prior to the amendment, the facility was scheduled to mature on July 24, 2013 and provided for maximum borrowing capacity of $500.0 million with outstanding letters of credit limited to $75.0 million. The Company desired to extend the maturity date of the facility by one year, and as an inducement for such extension, offered to allow any lenders in the syndicate group that were willing to extend the maturity date by one year a 20 percent reduction of such lender's loan commitment. As a result of the amendment, the Company had available borrowing capacity under its amended Revolving Credit Facility of $442.5 million through July 24, 2013 and $229.6 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014.

        On January 30, 2012, ServiceMaster entered into the Extension Amendment and the Increase Supplement to its Revolving Credit Facility. After effectiveness on February 13, 2012 of the Extension Amendment and the Increase Supplement, we have available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, $324.2 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014 and $265.2 million from July 25, 2014 through January 31, 2017. The Company will continue to have access to letters of credit up to $75.0 million through January 31, 2017.

        During the first quarter of 2009, the Company completed open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $41.0 million. The debt acquired by the Company has been retired, and the Company has discontinued the payment of interest. The Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $46.1 million in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to these retirements.

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company purchased $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes from Holdings for a cost of $68.0 million, which included payment of accrued interest of $3.0 million. The debt acquired by the Company has been retired, and the Company has discontinued the payment of interest. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $0.8 million in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 for write-offs of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the extinguished debt.

        In February 2012, the Company sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, $600 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes. The Old Notes will mature on February 15, 2020 and bear interest at a rate of 8 percent per annum. The Old Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The Company used $600 million of the proceeds of the sale of the Old Notes, together with available cash, to redeem $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 2015 Notes.

        After giving effect to the 2009 open market purchases and retirement of 2015 Notes by the Company, the 2011 purchase and retirement of 2015 Notes from Holdings and the redemption of $600 million aggregate principal amount of 2015 Notes with proceeds from the Old Notes offering, $396 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes remains outstanding.

        The Company has an accounts receivable securitization arrangement under which TruGreen and Terminix may sell certain eligible trade accounts receivable to ServiceMaster Funding Company LLC ("Funding"), the Company's wholly owned, bankruptcy remote subsidiary, which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Funding, in turn, may transfer, on a revolving basis, an undivided percentage ownership interest of up to $50.0 million in the pool of accounts receivable to one or both of the unrelated purchasers who are parties to the accounts receivable

72


Table of Contents

securitization arrangement ("Purchasers"). The amount of the eligible receivables varies during the year based on seasonality of the businesses and could, at times, limit the amount available to the Company from the sale of these interests. As of December 31, 2011, the amount of eligible receivables was approximately $31.1 million.

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no transfers of interests in the pool of trade accounts receivable to Purchasers under this arrangement. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $10.0 million outstanding under the arrangement and, as of December 31, 2011 had $21.1 million of remaining capacity available under the accounts receivable securitization arrangement.

        The accounts receivable securitization arrangement is a 364-day facility that is renewable annually at the option of Funding, with a final termination date of July 17, 2012. Only one of the Purchasers is required to purchase interests under the arrangement. As part of the annual renewal of the facility, which occurred on July 26, 2011, this Purchaser agreed to continue its participation in the arrangement through July 17, 2012. Unless the arrangement is renegotiated or extended prior to its expiration, all obligations under the accounts receivable securitization arrangement must be repaid by July 17, 2012.

        As a holding company, we depend on our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us so that we may pay our obligations and expenses, including our debt service obligations. The ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions and dividends to us depends on their operating results, cash requirements and financial condition and general business conditions. Our insurance subsidiaries and home services and similar subsidiaries (through which we conduct our American Home Shield business) are subject to significant regulatory restrictions under the laws and regulations of the states in which they operate. Among other things, such laws and regulations require certain such subsidiaries to maintain minimum capital and net worth requirements and may limit the amount of ordinary and extraordinary dividends and other payments that these subsidiaries can pay to us. For example, certain states prohibit payment by these subsidiaries to the Company of dividends in excess of 10 percent of their capital as of the most recent year end, as determined in accordance with prescribed insurance accounting practices in those states. Of the $226.2 million as of December 31, 2011, which we identify as being potentially unavailable to be paid to the Company by its subsidiaries, approximately $183.3 million is held by our home services and insurance subsidiaries and is subject to these regulatory limitations on the payment of funds to us. Such limitations were in effect throughout 2011, and similar limitations are expected to be in effect through 2012. The remainder of the $226.2 million, or $42.9 million, is related to amounts that the Company's management does not consider readily available to be used to service the Company's indebtedness due, among other reasons, to the Company's cash management practices and working capital needs at various subsidiaries.

        We consider undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011, to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no U.S. income taxes have been provided thereon. As of December 31, 2011, the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $24.1 million. We have not, nor do we anticipate the need to, repatriate funds to the United States to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business, including liquidity needs associated with our domestic debt service requirements.

73


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the Company's contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011. See discussion above in this "Liquidity" section for information on our issuance of the Notes and redemption of the 2015 Notes, which is not reflected in the table below.

(In millions)
  Total   Less than
1 Yr
  1 - 3 Yrs   3 - 5 Yrs   More than
5 Yrs
 

Principal repayments*

  $ 3,938.7   $ 47.7   $ 2,532.0   $ 1,001.9   $ 357.1  

Capital leases

    12.2     4.1     5.4     2.6     0.1  

Estimated interest payments(1)

    1,080.2     227.4     385.9     169.7     297.2  

Non-cancelable operating leases(2)

    143.8     42.6     56.0     24.4     20.8  

Purchase obligations:

                               

Supply agreements and other(3)

    115.3     76.7     24.6     14.0      

Outsourcing agreements(4)

    133.6     52.1     39.0     20.7     21.8  

Other long-term liabilities:*

                               

Insurance claims

    154.8     73.1     28.8     10.7     42.2  

Discontinued Operations

    2.6     0.6     0.7     0.2     1.1  

Other, including deferred compensation trust(2)

    10.8     0.2     1.5     1.5     7.6  
                       

Total Amount

  $ 5,592.0   $ 524.5   $ 3,073.9   $ 1,245.7   $ 747.9  
                       

*
These items are reported in our consolidated statements of financial position.

(1)
These amounts represent future interest payments related to the Company's existing debt obligations based on fixed and variable interest rates and principal maturities specified in the associated debt agreements. Payments related to variable debt are based on applicable rates at December 31, 2011 plus the specified margin in the associated debt agreements for each period presented as of December 31, 2011. The estimated debt balance (including capital leases) as of each fiscal year end from 2012 through 2016 is $3.899 billion, $3.849 billion, $1.362 billion, $359.3 million, and $357.2 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rate (including interest rate swaps) on the estimated debt balances at each fiscal year end from 2012 through 2016 is expected to be 6.0 percent, 6.0 percent, 9.8 percent, 7.3 percent, and 7.3 percent, respectively. See Note 12 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for the terms and maturities of existing debt obligations.

(2)
A portion of the Company's vehicle fleet and some equipment are leased through operating leases. The lease terms are non-cancelable for the first twelve month term, and then are month-to-month, cancelable at the Company's option. The amounts in non-cancelable operating leases exclude all prospective cancelable payments under these agreements. There are residual value guarantees by the Company (ranging from 70 percent to 84 percent of the estimated terminal value at the inception of the lease depending on the agreement) relative to these vehicles and equipment, which historically have not resulted in significant net payments to the lessors. The fair value of the assets under all of the fleet and equipment leases is expected to substantially mitigate the Company's guarantee obligations under the agreements. As of December 31, 2011, the Company's residual value guarantees related to the leased assets totaled $32.2 million for which the Company has recorded as a liability the estimated fair value of these guarantees of $0.7 million in its consolidated statements of financial position. This liability has been included in Other long-term liabilities above.

(3)
These obligations include commitments for various products and services including, among other things, inventory purchases, telecommunications services, marketing and advertising services and other professional services. Arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased,

74


Table of Contents

(4)
Outsourcing agreements include commitments for the purchase of certain outsourced services from third party vendors (see further discussion of the Company's agreement with IBM below). Because the services provided through these agreements are integral to the operations of the Company and due to termination provisions contained in these agreements, the Company has concluded that it is appropriate to include the total anticipated costs over the expected term of the agreements in the table above.

On December 11, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with IBM pursuant to which IBM provides information technology operations and applications development services (collectively, the "IT Services") to the Company. ServiceMaster pays IBM for the IT Services under the agreement through a combination of fixed and variable charges, with variable charges fluctuating based on the Company's actual need for IT Services. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company paid IBM $37.2 million for the IT Services. The Company expects to phase out a significant portion of its use of IT Services from IBM by the end of 2013, but does not expect its costs for IT Services to increase materially. The figures in the table above reflect expected spend with IBM of $32.5 million for 2012 and $14.5 million for 2013 as the IT Services are reduced. On March 27, 2012, the Company and IBM entered into an amendment (the "IBM Amendment") to the information technology outsourcing services agreement, modifying the terms pursuant to which IBM provides information technology operations and applications development services to the Company and its subsidiaries. The IBM Amendment facilitates the expected phase-out through 2013 of a significant portion of the services now provided to the Company by IBM.

The terms and provisions of the IBM Amendment (i) remove the Company's existing minimum revenue commitment to IBM; (ii) extend from 24 months to 36 months the availability of termination assistance from IBM for application development and maintenance services; (iii) allow the Company to terminate the Agreement related to network, infrastructure and end-user services for convenience upon 60 days' notice with no termination fees; (iv) significantly reduce termination fees for disaster recovery services; and (v) eliminate termination fees for application development services if the Company terminates such services after September 2013. The terms of the IBM Amendment do not alter the financial estimates set forth in the contractual obligations and commitments table above.

        Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authority. Accordingly, $9.0 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. See the discussion of income taxes in Note 5 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

        As further described above in this "Liquidity" section, the Company sold $600 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes in February 2012. The Company used $600 million of the proceeds of the sale of the Old Notes, together with available cash, to redeem $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 2015 Notes. The following table presents the Company's contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2011 as if the sale of the Notes and the redemption of the 2015 Notes had occurred on December 31, 2011, and includes

75


Table of Contents

the payment, as scheduled, of the regular interest payment due in January 2012 for the redeemed 2015 Notes. This pro forma presentation impacts the Principal repayments, Estimated interest payments and Total Amount rows only. No other changes have been made from the information presented in the contractual obligations table above.

(In millions)
  Total   Less than
1 Yr
  1 - 3 Yrs   3 - 5 Yrs   More than
5 Yrs
 

Principal repayments

  $ 3,938.7   $ 47.7   $ 2,532.0   $ 401.9   $ 957.1  

Capital leases

    12.2     4.1     5.4     2.6     0.1  

Estimated interest payments

    1,238.5     219.2     352.9     201.2     465.2  

Non-cancelable operating leases

    143.8     42.6     56.0     24.4     20.8  

Purchase obligations:

                               

Supply agreements and other

    115.3     76.7     24.6     14.0      

Outsourcing agreements

    133.6     52.1     39.0     20.7     21.8  

Other long-term liabilities:

                               

Insurance claims

    154.8     73.1     28.8     10.7     42.2  

Discontinued Operations

    2.6     0.6     0.7     0.2     1.1  

Other, including deferred compensation trust

    10.8     0.2     1.5     1.5     7.6  
                       

Total Amount

  $ 5,750.3   $ 516.3   $ 3,040.9   $ 677.2   $ 1,515.9  
                       

        Receivables increased from prior year levels, reflecting an increase in home service contracts written at American Home Shield.

        There is seasonality in the lawn care operations. In the winter and spring, this business sells a series of lawn applications to customers, which are rendered primarily in March through October. On an ongoing basis, these direct and incremental selling expenses which relate to successful sales will be deferred and recognized over the production season and are not deferred beyond the calendar year-end. In addition, the Company will continue to capitalize sales commissions and other direct contract acquisition costs relating to termite baiting, termite inspection and protection contracts and pest contracts, as well as home service contracts. These costs vary with and are directly related to a new sale, and will be amortized over the life of the related contract.

        Current deferred tax assets increased from prior year levels, reflecting the reclassification of certain net operating losses from long-term to current, a decrease in the amount of prepaid items deductible for income tax purposes and an increase to the amount of accrued expenses not deductible for income tax purposes.

        Property and equipment increased from prior year levels, reflecting vehicle purchases, recurring capital needs and information technology projects.

        Goodwill increased from prior year levels as a result of tuck-in acquisitions at TruGreen and Terminix.

        Intangibles decreased from prior year levels due to amortization expense and a recorded trade name impairment.

        Debt issue costs decreased from prior year levels due to amortization expense being recorded.

        The increase in accounts payable reflects a change in the timing of payments to vendors.

76


Table of Contents

        Accrued self-insurance claims and related expenses decreased from prior year levels, reflecting a reduction in required reserve levels under certain of our self-insurance programs and a decrease in accruals for home service contract claims in the American Home Shield business.

        Other accrued liabilities decreased from prior year levels, reflecting a reduction in reserve levels for unrecognized tax benefits.

        Deferred revenue increased from prior year levels, reflecting an increase in home service contracts written at American Home Shield.

        Long-term debt decreased from prior year levels, reflecting the purchase from Holdings of $65.0 million face value of 2015 Notes, as discussed in "Liquidity", and scheduled principal payments.

        Non-current deferred tax liabilities increased from prior year levels, reflecting the reclassification of certain net operating losses from long-term to current, the loss for tax purposes on the sale of TruGreen LandCare exceeding the loss on the sale and impairment for financial reporting purposes and tax deductible depreciation and amortization exceeding depreciation and amortization expense for financial reporting purposes, offset, in part, by the nondeductible trade name impairment.

        Other long-term obligations, primarily self-insured claims, decreased from prior year levels, reflecting decreases in the fair value liability recorded for interest rate swap contracts and reductions in required reserve levels under certain of our self-insurance programs.

        Total shareholder's equity was $1.248 billion as of December 31, 2011 compared to $1.188 billion as of December 31, 2010.

        The assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations have been classified in a separate caption on our consolidated statements of financial position.

        As part of the TruGreen LandCare sale agreement, the Company guaranteed obligations to third parties with respect to bonds (primarily performance type). At the present time, the Company does not believe it is probable that the buyers will default on their obligations subject to guarantee. The fair value of the Company's obligations related to these guarantees is not significant and no liability has been recorded. See Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for more information on the Company's guarantees.

        The Company has off-balance sheet arrangements in the form of guarantees as discussed in Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions required under GAAP which may differ from actual results. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to revenue recognition; the allowance for uncollectible receivables; accruals for self-insured retention limits related to medical, workers' compensation, auto and general liability insurance claims; accruals for home service contracts and termite damage claims; the possible outcome of outstanding litigation and other disputes; accruals for income tax liabilities as well as deferred tax accounts; the deferral and amortization of customer acquisition costs; useful lives for depreciation and amortization expense; the valuation of marketable securities; and the valuation of tangible and intangible assets. In 2011,

77


Table of Contents

there have been no changes in the significant areas that require estimates or in the underlying methodologies used in determining the amounts of these associated estimates.

        The allowance for receivables is developed based on several factors including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience and specific account analyses that project the ultimate collectability of the outstanding balances. As such, these factors may change over time causing the reserve level to vary.

        The Company carries insurance policies on insurable risks at levels which it believes to be appropriate, including workers' compensation, auto and general liability risks. The Company purchases insurance from third party insurance carriers. These policies typically incorporate significant deductibles or self-insured retentions. The Company is responsible for all claims that fall within the retention limits. In determining the Company's accrual for self-insured claims, the Company uses historical claims experience to establish both the current year accrual and the underlying provision for future losses. This actuarially determined provision and related accrual include both known claims, as well as incurred but not reported claims. The Company adjusts its estimate of accrued self-insured claims when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in health care costs, accident frequency and claim severity.

        Accruals for home service contract claims in the American Home Shield business are made based on the Company's claims experience and actuarial projections. Termite damage claim accruals are recorded based on both the historical rates of claims incurred within a contract year and the cost per claim. Current activity could differ causing a change in estimates. The Company has certain liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings. The Company accrues for these liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Any resulting adjustments, which could be material, are recorded in the period identified.

        The Company records deferred income tax balances based on the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes. The Company records its deferred tax items based on the estimated value of the tax basis. The Company adjusts tax estimates when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in tax laws, relevant court decisions, results of tax authority reviews and statutes of limitations. The Company records a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

        Revenues from lawn care and pest control services, as well as liquid and fumigation termite applications, are recognized as the services are provided. The Company eradicates termites through the use of non-baiting methods (e.g., fumigation or liquid treatments) and baiting systems. Termite services using baiting systems, termite inspection and protection contracts, as well as home service contracts, are frequently sold through annual contracts for a one-time, upfront payment. Direct costs of these contracts (service costs for termite contracts and claim costs for home service contracts) are expensed as incurred. The Company recognizes revenue over the life of these contracts in proportion to the expected direct costs. Those costs bear a direct relationship to the fulfillment of the Company's obligations under the contracts and are representative of the relative value provided to the customer (proportional performance method). The Company regularly reviews its estimates of direct costs for its termite bait and home service contracts and adjusts the estimates when appropriate.

        The Company has franchise agreements in its TruGreen, Terminix, ServiceMaster Clean, AmeriSpec, Furniture Medic and Merry Maids businesses. Franchise revenue (which in the aggregate represents approximately 4 percent of annual consolidated revenue from continuing operations) consists principally of continuing monthly fees based upon the franchisee's customer

78


Table of Contents

level revenue. Monthly fee revenue is recognized when the related customer level revenue is earned by the franchisee and collectability is reasonably assured. Franchise revenue also includes initial fees resulting from the sale of a franchise. These fees are fixed and are recognized as revenue when collectability is reasonably assured and all material services or conditions relating to the sale have been substantially performed.

        Customer acquisition costs, which are incremental and direct costs of obtaining a customer, are deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in proportion to revenue recognized. These costs include sales commissions and direct selling costs which can be shown to have resulted in a successful sale.

        Fixed assets and intangible assets with finite lives are depreciated and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. These lives are based on the Company's previous experience for similar assets, potential market obsolescence and other industry and business data. As required by accounting standards for the impairment or disposal of long- lived assets, the Company's long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets (other than goodwill), are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the carrying value is no longer recoverable based upon the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. Changes in the estimated useful lives or in the asset values could cause the Company to adjust its book value or future expense accordingly.

        As required under accounting standards for goodwill and other intangibles, goodwill is not subject to amortization, and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized until their useful lives are determined to no longer be indefinite. Goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-8, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment," in the fourth quarter of 2011. This ASU gives entities the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not greater than its carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would not be required. For the 2011 annual goodwill impairment review performed as of October 1, 2011, the Company performed qualitative assessments on the Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean reporting units. Based on these assessments, the Company determined that, more likely than not, the fair values of Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean were greater than their respective carrying amounts. As a result, the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed for Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean in 2011.

        As permitted under accounting standards for goodwill and other intangibles prior to the adoption of ASU 2011-08, the Company carried forward a reporting unit's valuation from the most recent valuation under the following conditions: the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit have not changed significantly since the most recent fair value calculation, the most recent fair value calculation resulted in an amount that exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting unit by a substantial margin and, based on the facts and circumstances of events that have occurred since the last fair value determination, the likelihood that a current fair value calculation would result in an impairment would be remote. For the 2010 annual goodwill impairment review performed as of October 1, 2010, the Company carried forward the valuations of the Terminix and ServiceMaster Clean reporting units completed as of October 1, 2009. The Company did not carry forward the valuations for any trade names for the 2011 or 2010 annual trade name impairment reviews. For the

79


Table of Contents

2009 annual goodwill and trade name impairment reviews performed as of October 1, 2009, the Company did not carry forward the valuations of any reporting units or trade names.

        Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of each of the Company's reporting units to its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow ("DCF") analysis, a market based comparable approach and a market based transaction approach. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates, terminal growth rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market based comparable approach and relevant transaction multiples for the market based transaction approach. The cash flows employed in the DCF analyses are based on the Company's most recent budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company's estimates, which are based on assumed growth rates. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units. In addition, the market based comparable and transaction approaches utilize comparable company public trading values, comparable company historical results, research analyst estimates and, where available, values observed in private market transactions. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with its goodwill carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. In other words, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

        The impairment test for other intangible assets not subject to amortization involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The estimates of fair value of intangible assets not subject to amortization are determined using a DCF valuation analysis. The DCF methodology used to value trade names is known as the relief from royalty method and entails identifying the hypothetical cash flows generated by an assumed royalty rate that a third party would pay to license the trade names and discounting them back to the valuation date. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the selection of appropriate discount rates and hypothetical royalty rates, estimating the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows attributable to the hypothetical royalty rates and identification of appropriate terminal growth rate assumptions. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets.

        Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets, primarily the Company's trade names, are assessed annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances. The Company's 2011, 2010 and 2009 annual impairment analyses, which were performed as of October 1 of each year, did not result in any goodwill impairments. However, as of the 2011 annual impairment analysis, the following reporting

80


Table of Contents

unit had an estimated fair value that the Company has determined, from both a quantitative and a qualitative perspective, was not significantly in excess of its carrying value:

(In millions)
  Goodwill
Balance
  Fair Value as a
Percent
of Carrying Value
 

TruGreen

  $ 1,202.0     110 %

        For the TruGreen reporting unit, the revenue growth assumption and the margin expansion assumption had the most significant influence on the estimation of fair value. The revenue growth assumption was based primarily on expected sales growth to commercial customers along with improved retention of existing commercial and residential customers. The key uncertainties in the revenue growth assumption include the impact of the various marketing and selling initiatives being undertaken by TruGreen to increase its presence in the commercial lawn care sector. The margin expansion assumption was based primarily on the achievement of improved operational efficiencies through standardization and centralization of selected operating activities and cost efficiencies as a result of projected revenue growth. The key uncertainty in the margin expansion assumption is TruGreen's ability to achieve the forecasted revenue growth while also improving operational efficiencies around costs and expenses.

        The Company's annual trade name impairment analyses, which were performed as of October 1 of each year, resulted in pre-tax non-cash impairments of $36.7 million and $26.6 million in 2011 and 2009, respectively. The Company's 2010 trade name impairment analysis did not result in any impairment. The impairment charges by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, as well as the remaining value of the trade names not subject to amortization by business segment as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

(In thousands)
  TruGreen   Terminix   American
Home
Shield
  ServiceMaster
Clean
  Other
Operations &
Headquarters(1)
  Total  

Balance at Dec. 31, 2008

  $ 783,600   $ 875,100   $ 140,400   $ 152,600   $ 445,100   $ 2,396,800  

2009 Impairment

    (21,400 )               (5,200 )   (26,600 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2009 and 2010

    762,200     875,100     140,400     152,600     439,900     2,370,200  

2011 Impairment

    (36,700 )                   (36,700 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2011

  $ 725,500   $ 875,100   $ 140,400   $ 152,600   $ 439,900   $ 2,333,500  
                           

(1)
The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes Merry Maids.

        The impairment charge in 2011 was primarily attributable to the use of higher discount rates in the DCF valuation analyses as compared to the discount rates used in the 2010 impairment analyses. Although the projected future growth in cash flows in 2011 were slightly higher than in the 2010 valuation, the increase in the discount rates more than offset the improved cash flows. The increase in the discount rates is primarily attributable to changes in market conditions which indicated a lower risk tolerance in 2011 as compared to 2010. This lower risk tolerance is exhibited through the marketplace's desire for higher returns in order to accept market risk. The aggregate impairment charge in 2009 was primarily attributable to the use of lower projected future cash flows related to the hypothetical royalty rates utilized in the DCF valuation analyses as compared to the projected future cash flows used in the 2008 impairment analysis. Although the Company projected future growth in cash flows, such growth was lower than that estimated at the time the trade names

81


Table of Contents

were tested for impairment in 2008. The terminal growth rates used in the analyses for the October 1, 2011, 2010 and 2009 impairment tests were the same and in line with historical U.S. gross domestic product growth rates. Had the Company used a discount rate in assessing the impairment of its trade names that was 1 percent higher across all business segments (holding all other assumptions unchanged), the Company would have recorded an additional impairment charge of approximately $114.8 million in 2011.

        As a result of the trade name impairment taken in 2011, the carrying value of the TruGreen trade name was adjusted to its estimated fair value as of October 1, 2011. Further, the October 1, 2011 estimated fair value of the trade name at the ServiceMaster Clean business segment was not significantly in excess of its carrying value. Consequently, any further decline in the estimated fair values of these trade names will result in additional trade name impairments. It is possible that such impairments, if required, could be material and may need to be recorded prior to the fourth quarter of 2012 (i.e., during an interim period) if the Company's results of operations or other factors require such assets to be tested for impairment at an interim date.

        The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company has entered into specific financial arrangements in the normal course of business to manage certain market risks, with a policy of matching positions and limiting the terms of contracts to relatively short durations.

        The Company has historically hedged a significant portion of its annual fuel consumption of approximately 21 million gallons. The Company has also hedged the interest payments on a portion of its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swap agreements. All of the Company's fuel swap contracts and interest rate swap contracts are classified as cash flow hedges, and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

        See Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a summary of newly issued accounting statements and positions applicable to the Company.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

        The economy and its impact on discretionary consumer spending, labor wages, fuel prices, fertilizer and other material costs, home re-sales, unemployment rates, insurance costs and medical costs could have a material adverse impact on future results of operations.

        The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company has entered into specific financial arrangements, primarily interest rate swaps and fuel hedges, in the normal course of business to manage certain market risks, with a policy of matching positions and limiting the terms of contracts to relatively short durations. The effect of derivative financial instrument transactions could have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

        The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company pays a fixed rate of interest on the stated notional amount and the Company receives a floating rate of interest (based on one month or three month LIBOR) on the stated notional amount. Therefore, during the term of the swap agreements, the effective interest rate on the portion of the term loans under the Term Facilities equal to the stated notional amount is fixed at the stated rate in the interest rate swap agreements plus the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011). The changes in interest rate swap agreements in effect for

82


Table of Contents

the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, as well as the cumulative interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

(In thousands)
  Notional
Amount
  Weighted
Average
Fixed
Rate(1)
 

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2008

  $ 1,430,000     3.89 %

Entered into effect

           

Expired

           
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2009

    1,430,000     3.89 %

Entered into effect

    530,000        

Expired

    (530,000 )      
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2010

    1,430,000     3.68 %

Entered into effect

    450,000        

Expired

    (450,000 )      
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2011

  $ 1,430,000     2.84 %
           

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011).

        Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Trade Date   Effective Date   Expiration Date   Notional
Amount
  Weighted
Average
Fixed
Rate(1)
  Floating Rate
February 15, 2008     March 3, 2008   March 3, 2012   $ 250,000     3.48 % Three month LIBOR
September 15, 2008     October 1, 2008   October 1, 2012     200,000     3.53 % One month LIBOR
April 20, 2009     September 1, 2011 (2) August 1, 2013     530,000     1.51 % One month LIBOR
June 10, 2010     March, 3, 2011   March 1 ,2013     100,000     1.77 % One month LIBOR
June 10, 2010     September 1, 2011   September 1, 2013     50,000     2.25 % One month LIBOR
June 15, 2010     March 3, 2011   March 1, 2013     150,000     1.66 % One month LIBOR
June 15, 2010     September 1, 2011   September 1, 2013     150,000     2.21 % One month LIBOR

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011).

(2)
In August 2011, the Company amended the terms of a $530.0 million interest rate swap agreement entered into in April 2009. In connection with the amendment, which became effective as of September 1, 2011, the expiration date of the agreement was extended from August 2012 to August 2013 and the fixed rate on the agreement was lowered from 2.55 percent to 1.51 percent.

        In accordance with accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, these interest rate swap agreements are classified as cash flow hedges, and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of the changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in other comprehensive loss.

83


Table of Contents

        The Company believes its exposure to interest rate fluctuations, when viewed on both a gross and net basis, is material to its overall results of operations. A significant portion of our outstanding debt, including debt under the Credit Facilities, bears interest at variable rates. As a result, increases in interest rates, whether because of an increase in market interest rates or a decrease in our creditworthiness, would increase the cost of servicing our debt and could adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows. As of December 31, 2011, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately an $11.0 million change in the annual interest expense on our Term Facilities after considering the impact of the interest rate swaps into which we had entered. Assuming all revolving loans were fully drawn, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $4.4 million change in annual interest expense on our Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011. We are also exposed to increases in interest rates with respect to our arrangement enabling us to transfer an interest in certain receivables to unrelated third parties. Assuming all available amounts were transferred under this arrangement, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $0.5 million change in annual interest expense with respect to this arrangement as of December 31, 2011. Additionally, we are exposed to increases in interest rates with respect to our floating rate operating leases, and a one percentage point change in interest rates would result in approximately a $0.3 million change in annual rent expense with respect to such operating leases as of December 31, 2011. The Company's exposure to interest rate fluctuations has not changed significantly since December 31, 2010. The impact of increases in interest rates could be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial debt and floating rate operating leases.

        The following table summarizes information about the Company's debt as of December 31, 2011 (after considering the effect of the interest rate swap agreements), including the principal cash payments and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates based on applicable rates at December 31, 2011.

 
  Expected Year of Maturity    
 
As of December 31, 2011
  2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter   Total   Fair Value  
 
  ($ in millions)
   
 

Debt:

                                                 

Fixed rate

  $ 15.3   $ 9.9   $ 1,439.2   $ 1,002.4   $ 2.1   $ 357.2   $ 2,826.1   $ 2,713.0  

Average interest rate

    7.6 %   8.7 %   4.8 %   10.7 %   8.2 %   7.3 %   7.2 %      

Variable rate

  $ 36.5   $ 40.5   $ 1,047.8   $   $   $   $ 1,124.8   $ 1,075.2  

Average interest rate

    2.5 %   2.7 %   2.8 %   N/A     N/A     N/A     2.8 %      

Interest Rate Swaps:

                                                 

Receive variable/pay fixed

  $ 450.0   $ 980.0                                      

Average pay rate(1)

    3.5 %   1.7 %                                    

Average receive rate(1)

    0.5 %   0.3 %                                    

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.5 percent as of December 31, 2011).

        In February 2012, the Company issued $600 million of its 2020 Notes at 8 percent and has used, or will use, the proceeds of such offering, together with available cash, to redeem $600 million of its 10.75 percent 2015 Notes, which is not reflected in the table above. The following table summarizes information about the Company's debt as of December 31, 2011 as if the issuance of the 2020 Notes and the redemption of the 2015 Notes had occurred on December 31, 2011 (after considering the effect of the interest rate swap agreements), including the principal payments and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates based on applicable rates at December 31, 2011. For purposes of this pro forma table, the fair value of the 2020 Notes is assumed to be equal to their face value. This pro forma presentation impacts the expected year of

84


Table of Contents

maturity for a portion of the Company's fixed rate debt, the average interest rate on fixed rate debt for certain years of maturity and the fair value of fixed rate debt. No other changes have been made from the information presented in the debt and interest rate table above.

 
  Expected Year of Maturity    
 
As of December 31, 2011
  2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   Thereafter   Total   Fair Value  
 
  ($ in millions)
   
 

Debt:

                                                 

Fixed rate

  $ 15.3   $ 9.9   $ 1,439.2   $ 402.4   $ 2.1   $ 957.2   $ 2,826.1   $ 2,692.0  

Average interest rate

    7.6 %   8.7 %   4.8 %   10.7 %   8.2 %   7.7 %   6.7 %      

Variable rate

  $ 36.5   $ 40.5   $ 1,047.8   $   $   $   $ 1,124.8   $ 1,075.2  

Average interest rate

    2.5 %   2.7 %   2.8 %   N/A     N/A     N/A     2.8 %      

Interest Rate Swaps:

                                                 

Receive variable/pay fixed

  $ 450.0   $ 980.0                                      

Average pay rate(1)

    3.5 %   1.7 %                                    

Average receive rate(1)

    0.5 %   0.3 %                                    

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.5 percent as of December 31, 2011).

Fuel Price Risk

        The Company is exposed to market risk for changes in fuel prices through the consumption of fuel by its vehicle fleet in the delivery of services to its customers. The Company uses approximately 21 million gallons of fuel on an annual basis. A ten percent change in fuel prices would result in a change of approximately $6.5 million in the Company's annual fuel costs as of December 31, 2011 before considering the impact of fuel swap contracts. The Company's exposure to changes in fuel prices has not changed significantly since December 31, 2010.

        The Company uses fuel swap contracts to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had fuel swap contracts to pay fixed prices for fuel with an aggregate notional amount of $45.5 million, maturing through 2012. The estimated fair value of these contracts as of December 31, 2011 was a net liability of $0.7 million. These fuel swap contracts provide a fixed price for approximately 65 percent of the Company's estimated fuel usage for 2012.

85


Table of Contents


BUSINESS

Company Overview

        ServiceMaster is a national company serving both residential and commercial customers. Our services include lawn care, termite and pest control, home service contracts, cleaning and disaster restoration, house cleaning, furniture repair and home inspection. As of December 31, 2011, we provided these services through a network of approximately 6,900 company owned, franchised and licensed locations operating primarily under the following leading brands: TruGreen, Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec. Approximately 98 percent of our 2011 operating revenue was generated by sales in the United States. Incorporated in Delaware in 1991, ServiceMaster is the successor to various entities dating back to 1947.

        ServiceMaster is organized into five principal reportable segments: TruGreen, Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Clean, and Other Operations and Headquarters. The financial information for each operating segment for 2011, 2010 and 2009 is contained in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. During 2011, we employed an average of approximately 21,000 company associates, and our franchise network independently employed over 31,000 additional people.

        In the first quarter of 2011, we concluded that TruGreen LandCare, a commercial landscape maintenance business, did not fit within our long-term strategic plans and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. The financial results, as well as the assets and liabilities, of the TruGreen LandCare business are reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented in this prospectus.

        On the Closing Date, ServiceMaster was acquired pursuant the Merger, and, immediately following the completion of the Merger, all of the outstanding common stock of Holdings, the ultimate parent company of ServiceMaster, was owned by investment funds sponsored by, or affiliated with, CD&R, Citigroup, BAS and JPMorgan. On September 30, 2010, Citigroup transferred the management responsibility for certain investment funds that own shares of common stock of Holdings to StepStone and its proprietary interests in such investment funds to Lexington Partners Advisors LP. As of December 22, 2011, Holdings purchased from BAS 7.5 million shares of capital stock of Holdings. Affiliates of BAS continue to hold 10 million shares of Holdings. For information with respect to the ownership of common stock of Holdings by Equity Sponsors and related funds, see "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."

Services

        The following table shows the percentage of ServiceMaster's consolidated revenue from continuing operations derived from each of ServiceMaster's reportable segments in the years indicated:

Segment
  2011   2010   2009  

TruGreen

    34 %   35 %   35 %

Terminix

    37 %   37 %   37 %

American Home Shield

    22 %   21 %   21 %

ServiceMaster Clean

    4 %   4 %   4 %

Other Operations and Headquarters

    3 %   3 %   3 %

86


Table of Contents

        The TruGreen segment provides lawn, tree and shrub care services primarily under the TruGreen brand name. TruGreen is a leading provider of lawn, tree and shrub care services in the United States, serving both residential and commercial customers. Of the TruGreen segment's 2011 operating revenue, 55 percent was generated from residential weed control and fertilization services, while expanded lawn services (such as aeration and grub control) (19 percent), commercial weed control and fertilization services (15 percent), and tree and shrub services (11 percent) accounted for the remainder.

        As of December 31, 2011, TruGreen provided these services in 48 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 200 company owned locations and 35 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, TruGreen also provided lawn care services through a subsidiary in Canada and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Japan and the United Kingdom.

        The TruGreen business is seasonal in nature. In the winter and spring, this business sells to customers a series of lawn applications, which are rendered primarily in March through October. Weather conditions such as droughts, severe winter storms and snowfall, whether created by climate change factors or otherwise, can adversely impact the timing of product or service delivery and/or demand for lawn care services and may result in a decrease in revenues or an increase in costs.

        The Terminix segment provides termite and pest control services and distributes pest control products primarily under the Terminix brand name. Terminix is a leading provider of termite and pest control services in the United States, serving both residential and commercial customers. Of the Terminix segment's 2011 operating revenue, 38 percent and 17 percent were generated from residential and commercial pest control services, respectively, and 37 percent and 3 percent were generated from residential and commercial termite control services, respectively (with the remainder from other services).

        As of December 31, 2011, Terminix provided these services in 47 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 300 company owned locations and 100 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Terminix also provided termite and pest control services through subsidiaries in Mexico and Honduras and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Japan, China, South Korea, Southeast Asia, Central America, the Caribbean and the Middle East. Terminix has formed a joint venture to enter the Indian pest market.

        The Terminix business is seasonal in nature. The termite swarm season, which typically occurs in early spring, but varies in timing and intensity by region depending on climate and other factors, leads to the highest demand for termite control services and, therefore, the highest level of revenues. Similarly, increased pest activity in the warmer months generally leads to the highest demand for pest control services and, therefore, the highest level of revenues.

        The American Home Shield segment provides home service contracts for household systems and appliances primarily under the American Home Shield brand name. American Home Shield is a leading provider of home service contracts for household systems and appliances in the United States. It provides residential customers with contracts to repair or replace electrical, plumbing, central heating and central air conditioning systems, water heaters and other covered household systems and appliances and services those contracts through independent repair contractors. In

87


Table of Contents

2011, 68 percent of the home service contracts written by American Home Shield were derived from existing contract renewals, while 18 percent and 14 percent were derived from sales made in conjunction with existing home resale transactions and direct-to-consumer sales, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, American Home Shield issued and administered home service contracts in 49 states and the District of Columbia and had no international operations.

        Weather conditions such as extreme temperatures can lead to an increase in service requests related to household systems and appliances, resulting in higher claim costs and lower profitability, thereby adversely impacting results of operations and cash flows.

        The ServiceMaster Clean segment provides residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning services primarily under the ServiceMaster and ServiceMaster Clean brand names, on-site furniture repair and restoration services primarily under the Furniture Medic brand name and home inspection services primarily under the AmeriSpec brand name. Of the ServiceMaster Clean segment's 2011 operating revenue, 52 percent was generated from domestic royalty fees, while international (19 percent), product sales (12 percent), janitorial national accounts (9 percent), lead generation fees (3 percent), AmeriSpec (2 percent), Furniture Medic (2 percent) and new license sales (1 percent) accounted for the remainder.

        ServiceMaster Clean.    ServiceMaster Clean is a leading franchisor in the residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning field in the United States. As of December 31, 2011, ServiceMaster Clean provided these services in all 50 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 2,975 franchised outlets. ServiceMaster Clean also has operations in Canada and Honduras. As of December 31, 2011, ServiceMaster Clean, through franchises, provided disaster restoration and cleaning services in Canada, the United Kingdom and Spain and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in India, Lebanon, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Japan and Southeast Asia.

        Furniture Medic.    Furniture Medic is a leading provider of on-site furniture repair and restoration services in the United States serving residential customers. As of December 31, 2011, Furniture Medic provided these services in 42 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 215 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Furniture Medic also provided on-site furniture repair and restoration services through franchisees in Canada and the United Kingdom and had licensing arrangements to provide these services in Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

        AmeriSpec.    AmeriSpec is a leading provider of home inspection services in the United States serving residential customers. As of December 31, 2011, AmeriSpec provided these services in 44 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 220 franchised outlets. AmeriSpec also provided home inspection services through franchisees in Canada.

        The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes the Merry Maids business unit, The ServiceMaster Acceptance Company Limited Partnership ("SMAC") and ServiceMaster's corporate headquarters functions.

        Merry Maids.    Merry Maids is a leading provider of home cleaning services in the United States. As of December 31, 2011, these services were provided in 49 states and the District of Columbia through approximately 70 company owned locations and 400 franchised outlets. As of December 31, 2011, Merry Maids, through franchises, also provided home cleaning services in Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom and had licensing arrangements whereby licensees provided these services in Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia.

88


Table of Contents

        SMAC.    SMAC provides financing to franchisees of the Company through commercial loans for franchise fees and royalties, equipment and vehicle purchases and working capital needs and to consumer customers of Terminix through retail installment sales contracts. Commercial loans are typically for a term of one to seven years and are generally secured by the assets of the franchisee and other collateral. On December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of commercial loans was $35.8 million with a bad debt reserve for commercial loans of $2.5 million. SMAC wrote off $0.6 million in commercial loans in 2011. Retail installment sales contracts are typically for a term of 12 months and are unsecured. On December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of retail installment sales contracts was $19.1 million. In the event a customer fails to make payments under a retail installment sales contract for 120 days after the due date, Terminix purchases the installment contract from SMAC.

        Headquarters functions.    The Business Support Center, headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, administers payroll, benefits, risk management, travel and certain procurement services for our internal operations. Various administrative support departments also provide personnel, communications, marketing, government and public relations, administrative, accounting, financial, tax, human resources and legal services.

Strengths

        We believe our company has the following competitive strengths:

        Leading market segment positions and iconic brands.    We believe that TruGreen, Terminix and American Home Shield, which collectively contributed 93 percent of our operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011, each holds a leading position in its respective business segment. Measured by operating revenue, TruGreen is approximately 4.9 times larger than its nearest competitor, and Terminix is approximately 1.2 times larger than its nearest competitor. American Home Shield is approximately 3.8 times larger than its nearest competitor, as measured by the gross premium of home service contracts written. We believe that, based on our understanding of our competitors and their operations, American Home Shield is one of the few nationwide providers of home service contracts in the United States with both national sales and technical services networks. We believe this provides a significant competitive advantage by enabling American Home Shield to educate real estate professionals, financial institutions and insurance agencies about the benefits of home service contracts. We also believe that our size and scale improve our purchasing power, route density, marketing and operating efficiencies compared to smaller local and regional competitors.

        More focused portfolio.    We believe that our portfolio realignment actions since 2007 allow us to use our competitive advantages within our core competencies more effectively and better position us for growth. Our 2011 disposition of TruGreen LandCare enhanced TruGreen's ability to grow commercial revenues and resulted in a service portfolio more focused on our core businesses. With the formation of the ServiceMaster Clean & Merry Maids franchise group in 2011, we created a platform that is better equipped to utilize best practices across franchise brands within that group. By divesting InStar, a provider of disaster response, restoration and reconstruction services, in 2008, we shed a non-strategic asset with less predictable revenue performance and eliminated unnecessary market confusion with ServiceMaster Clean's disaster restoration business.

89


Table of Contents

        Committed and experienced senior leadership.    Our senior management team has a long track record of producing profitable growth in a wide variety of industries and economic conditions. Many of our senior managers own equity in our organization, and their incentive compensation is tied to key performance metrics. Our compensation structure is designed to incentivize our senior management team to drive the long-term success of our business.

90


Table of Contents

        Strong cash flow profile.    Our company has historically generated significant operating cash flow. Our average Adjusted EBITDA for the last three years was $536 million, and our average capital expenditures over the same period were $96 million. We have been able to manage our working capital needs, principally through lower inventory requirements and increased customer prepayment initiatives in several of our businesses.

Strategy

        Our strategy is focused on the following strategic priorities:

91


Table of Contents

        Talent Management.    We intend to continue our focus on developing and retaining key associates to best align our business to the needs of our customer base. We are implementing this strategy through four key initiatives:

        Best practice transfer and execution excellence.    In recent years, we have employed a strategy of accelerating the transfer of best practices across our businesses, investing in technology and mobility solutions, centralizing support functions and reducing layers of management, along with other business unit specific initiatives. We believe there are appreciable opportunities for further improvement across and within each of our businesses, including further utilizing the competitive advantages of our centralized support center to take advantage of combined capabilities and scale.

Industry and Competition

        We compete in the residential and commercial services industry, focusing on lawn care, termite and pest control, home service contracts, cleaning and disaster restoration, house cleaning, furniture repair and home inspection. We target market segments that meet our criteria for size, growth and profit potential. While we compete with a broad range of competitors in each discrete segment, we do not believe that any of our competitors provides all of the services we provide in all of the market segments we serve. We believe that our widely recognized brands, size, geographic footprint and reputation for service quality provide us with significant competitive advantages in reaching both residential and commercial customers. All of the primary segments in which we operate are highly fragmented, and we believe they are characterized by attractive industry conditions.

        According to a study by NorthStar Partners, the U.S. professional lawn services segment specializing in lawn treatments was estimated at $6.7 billion in revenue in 2011. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Consumer Expenditures' 2010 consumer expenditure interview survey, approximately 14 percent of survey respondents outsourced lawn or gardening services. According to Packaged Facts, the lawn care segment has decreased at a 1.8 percent CAGR over the 2007-2011 period but is projected to grow at a 2.2 percent CAGR over the 2011-2016 period.

        Based on the study conducted by NorthStar Partners, we estimate that our share of the U.S. lawn care services segment is approximately 16 percent based upon TruGreen's operating revenue (including royalties and franchise fees from franchisees) of $1.1 billion in 2010. Competition in the segment for outsourced professional lawn care services comes mainly from local and independently owned firms. Scotts LawnService, a segment of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, which we believe

92


Table of Contents

is our next largest competitor in the outsourced professional lawn care services segment, generated approximately $224 million of revenues in their fiscal 2010. Based on publicly available information for 2010, we estimate TruGreen is approximately 4.9 times larger than this competitor.

        A 2010 study on the U.S. pest control industry conducted by Specialty Products Consultants, LLC estimates that the U.S. professional termite and pest control services segment generated $6.3 billion in revenue. The termite and pest control services segment is generally characterized by high customer retention rates and, according to the National Pest Management Association's 2010 survey, 60 percent of U.S. households currently use or have used a professional exterminator in their homes. We estimate that Terminix's U.S. market segment share for the termite and pest control services we provide is approximately 22 percent, based on total operating revenue for Terminix's services (including revenue generated by our franchisees) of approximately $1.4 billion in 2010, of which $1.2 billion in operating revenue was reported by Terminix for services we provided in 2010.

        Competition in the segment for professional termite and pest control services comes primarily from regional and local, independently operated firms, Orkin, Inc., a subsidiary of Rollins, Inc., and Ecolab, Inc., both of which compete nationally. We estimate that the top three providers (including Terminix) comprised approximately 45 percent of the professional termite and pest control services segment in 2010. The remaining portion of the professional termite and pest control services segment is highly fragmented with numerous privately-held, local termite and pest control service providers.

        According to Warranty Week, a newsletter for warranty management professionals, the U.S. home warranty segment (including structural home warranties, which is a business in which we do not compete) was approximately $1.5 billion in 2009, as measured by the annual value of premiums paid by consumers. One of the primary drivers of new home service contracts is the number of existing homes sold in the United States, since a home service product is often recommended by a real estate sales professional or offered by the seller of a home in conjunction with a real estate transaction. According to the National Association of Realtors, existing home re-sales in units increased by 1.7 percent in 2011 and are currently projected to increase by 4.7 percent in 2012 and 5.2 percent in 2013. Approximately 22 percent of the operating revenue of American Home Shield in 2011 was tied directly to existing home resales.

        Competition for home service contracts that cover systems and appliances comes mainly from regional providers. Several competitors are expected to initiate expansion efforts into additional states. According to Warranty Week data, American Home Shield and The First American Corporation are the two largest participants in the U.S. home warranty segment, based on gross premiums paid in 2009, with American Home Shield having 41 percent market segment share and The First American Corporation having 11 percent market segment share. Based on this information, American Home Shield is approximately 3.7 times larger than this competitor.

        Most emergency response work results from extreme weather environments and natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, mudslides, tornadoes and earthquakes. Firms in this segment also respond to non-weather related emergency situations for residential and commercial customers, such as fires and flooding. Critical factors in the selection of an emergency response firm are the firm's reputation, relationships with insurers, available resources, proper insurance and

93


Table of Contents

credentials, timeliness, and responsiveness. The segment is highly fragmented, and key competitors of our ServiceMaster Clean business include ServPro Industries, Inc., Belfor, a subsidiary of Belfor Europe GmbH, and BMS CAT, Inc.

        Competition in the market segment for home cleaning services comes mainly from local, independently owned firms, from homeowners who clean their own homes and from a few national companies such as The Maids International, Inc., Molly Maid, Inc. and The Cleaning Authority, LLC.

Marketing and Distribution

        ServiceMaster markets its services primarily through the internet, direct mail, television and radio advertising, print advertisements, door-to-door solicitation, telemarketing and yellow pages advertisements. Additionally, American Home Shield and Terminix, in certain jurisdictions, market their services through various participants in the residential real estate market place, such as real estate brokerages, financial institutions and insurance agencies and, for American Home Shield, an internal sales organization that supports these distribution channels.

Service Marks, Trademarks and Trade Names

        ServiceMaster holds various service marks, trademarks and trade names, such as ServiceMaster, Terminix, TruGreen, Merry Maids, ServiceMaster Clean, American Home Shield, AmeriSpec and Furniture Medic, that it deems particularly important to the advertising activities conducted by each of its reportable segments as well as the franchising activities conducted by certain reportable segments. As of December 31, 2011, ServiceMaster had marks that were protected by registration (either by direct registration or by treaty) in the United States and 81 other countries.

Franchises

        Franchises are important to the TruGreen, Terminix, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, AmeriSpec and Furniture Medic businesses. Total franchise fees (initial and recurring) represented 4.0 percent, 3.9 percent and 4.1 percent of consolidated revenue from continuing operations in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Related franchise operating expenses were 2.0 percent, 1.8 percent and 2.0 percent of consolidated operating expenses in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total franchise related profits comprised 15.2 percent, 23.1 percent and 27.4 percent of consolidated operating income in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We evaluate the performance of our franchise businesses based primarily on operating profit before corporate general and administrative expenses and amortization of intangible assets. Franchise agreements entered into in the course of these businesses are generally for a term of five to ten years. The majority of these franchise agreements are renewed prior to expiration. The majority of international licenses are for ten-year terms.

Major Customers

        ServiceMaster has no single customer that accounts for more than ten percent of its consolidated operating revenue. Additionally, no operating segment has a single customer that accounts for more than ten percent of its operating revenue. None of ServiceMaster's operating segments is dependent on a single customer or a few customers, the loss of which would have a material adverse effect on the segment.

94


Table of Contents

Regulatory Compliance

        ServiceMaster's operating segments are subject to various international, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations, compliance with which increases ServiceMaster's operating costs, limits or restricts the services provided by ServiceMaster's operating segments or the methods by which ServiceMaster's operating segments offer, sell and fulfill those services or conduct their respective businesses, or subjects ServiceMaster and its operating segments to the possibility of regulatory actions or proceedings. Noncompliance with these laws and regulations can subject ServiceMaster to fines or various forms of civil or criminal prosecution, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        These international, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations include laws relating to consumer protection, wage and hour, deceptive trade practices, permitting and licensing, real estate settlements, workers' safety, tax, healthcare reforms, franchise related issues, collective bargaining and other labor matters, environmental and employee benefits. The TruGreen and Terminix businesses must also meet certain Department of Transportation and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration requirements with respect to some types of vehicles in their fleets. American Home Shield is regulated in certain states by the applicable state insurance regulatory authority and by the Real Estate Commission in Texas. TruGreen and Terminix are regulated by federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations which are enforced by Departments of Agriculture, Pest Control Boards, Departments of Environmental Conservation and similar government entities. ServiceMaster Clean uses products containing ingredients regulated by the EPA and is subject to licensing and certification requirements for applying disinfectants, sanitizers and other EPA registered products in certain states. AmeriSpec is regulated by various state and local home inspection laws and regulations.

        ServiceMaster is subject to international, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations designed to protect consumers, including laws governing consumer privacy and fraud, the collection and use of consumer data, telemarketing and other forms of solicitation.

        The telemarketing rules adopted by the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the Federal Telemarketing Sales Rule issued by the Federal Trade Commission govern ServiceMaster's telephone sales practices. In addition, some states and local governing bodies have adopted laws and regulations targeted at direct telephone sales and "do-not-knock," "do-not-mail" and "do-not-leave" activities. The implementation of these marketing regulations requires TruGreen, and, to a lesser extent, ServiceMaster's other operating segments, to rely more extensively on other marketing methods and channels. In addition, if ServiceMaster were to fail to comply with any applicable law or regulation, ServiceMaster could be subject to substantial fines or damages, be involved in litigation, suffer losses to its reputation and its business or suffer the loss of licenses or penalties that may affect how the business is operated, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

        TruGreen, Terminix, ServiceMaster Clean, AmeriSpec, Furniture Medic and Merry Maids are subject to various international, federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations governing franchise sales, marketing and licensing and franchise trade practices generally, including applicable rules and regulations of the Federal Trade Commission. These laws and regulations

95


Table of Contents

generally require disclosure of business information in connection with the sale and licensing of franchises. Certain state regulations also affect the ability of the franchisor to revoke or refuse to renew a franchise. ServiceMaster seeks to comply with regulatory requirements and deal with franchisees and licensees in good faith. From time to time, ServiceMaster and one or more franchisees may become involved in a dispute regarding the franchise relationship, including payment of royalties or fees, location of branches, advertising, purchase of products by franchisees, non-competition covenants, compliance with ServiceMaster standards and franchise renewal criteria. There can be no assurance that compliance problems will not be encountered from time to time or that material disputes with one or more franchisees will not arise.

        ServiceMaster's operating segments are subject to various international, federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding environmental, health and safety matters. Compliance with such laws increases ServiceMaster's operating costs, limits or restricts the services provided by ServiceMaster's operating segments or the methods by which they offer, sell and fulfill those services or conduct their respective businesses, or subjects ServiceMaster and its operating segments to the possibility of regulatory or private actions or proceedings. Terminix and TruGreen are regulated under many federal and state environmental laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA" or "Superfund"), the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act of 1972, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1947, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Clean Air Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the Clean Water Act of 1977, each as amended. ServiceMaster cannot predict the effect of possible future environmental laws on its operations. During 2011, there were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities, and there are no material expenditures anticipated for 2012 or 2013 related to such facilities.

Insurance

        We maintain insurance coverage that we believe is appropriate for our business, including workers' compensation, auto liability, general liability, umbrella and property insurance. In addition, we provide various insurance coverages, including deductible reimbursement policies, to our business units through our wholly owned captive insurance company, which is domiciled in Vermont.

Employees

        The average number of persons employed by ServiceMaster during 2011 was approximately 21,000. Due to the seasonal nature of some of the Company's businesses, employee headcount can fluctuate during the course of a year, reaching approximately 25,000 during peak service periods.

Properties

        The headquarters for TruGreen and Terminix, along with the corporate headquarters, are located in leased premises at 860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee. The headquarters for American Home Shield are located in leased premises at 889 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee. The headquarters for ServiceMaster Clean, AmeriSpec, Furniture Medic, Merry Maids and a training facility are located in owned premises at 3839 Forest Hill Irene Road, Memphis, Tennessee. In addition, ServiceMaster leases space for a call center located at 6399 Shelby View Drive, Memphis, Tennessee; offices located at 850 and 855 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis,

96


Table of Contents

Tennessee; a training facility located at 1650 Shelby Oaks Drive North, Memphis, Tennessee; and a warehouse located at 1575 Two Place, Memphis, Tennessee.

        ServiceMaster and its operating companies own and lease a variety of facilities, principally in the United States, for branch and service center operations and for office, storage, call center and data processing space. The following chart identifies the number of owned and leased facilities used by each of its operating segments and Merry Maids as of December 31, 2011. ServiceMaster believes that these facilities, when considered with the corporate headquarters, call center facility, offices, training facilities and warehouse described above, are suitable and adequate to support the current needs of its business.

Operating Company
  Owned
Facilities
  Leased
Facilities
 

TruGreen

    36     245  

Terminix

    24     398  

American Home Shield

    1     4  

ServiceMaster Clean

        8  

Merry Maids

        74  

Legal Proceedings

        In the ordinary course of conducting business activities, the Company and its subsidiaries become involved in judicial, administrative and regulatory proceedings involving both private parties and governmental authorities. These proceedings include, on an individual, collective, representative and class action basis, regulatory, insured and uninsured employment, general and commercial liability, wage and hour and environmental proceedings. The Company has entered into settlement agreements in certain cases, including with respect to putative collective and class actions, which are subject to court approval. As previously reported, American Home Shield Corporation was sued in a putative class action on May 26, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama by Abigail Rudd, et al., and is alleged to have violated Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act in connection with certain payments made to real estate agencies. On December 8, 2011, the court granted final approval of a settlement to resolve this matter. The settlement will be implemented during the first two quarters of 2012, and the settlement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. If one or more of the Company's settlements are not finally approved, the Company could have additional or different exposure, which could be material. At this time, the Company does not expect any of these proceedings to have a material effect on its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, the Company can give no assurance that the results of any such proceedings will not materially affect its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

97


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT

Directors

        Our board of directors (the "Board") is comprised of two members. Biographical information for each director follows, including information regarding the qualifications, skills and attributes that led the Board to conclude that the directors should continue serving as directors.

Name
  Age   Principal Occupation   Director
Since
 

Kenneth A. Giuriceo

    38   Financial Officer, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC     2007  

David H. Wasserman

    45   Financial Officer, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC     2007  

        Kenneth A. Giuriceo joined CD&R in 2003. Prior to joining CD&R, Mr. Giuriceo worked in the principal investment area of Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Giuriceo serves on the boards of directors of Emergency Medical Services Corporation and Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. Mr. Giuriceo's extensive knowledge of the capital markets and his experience with other consumer-oriented service businesses give him beneficial insight into the Company's capital and liquidity needs, in addition to its challenges, opportunities and operations.

        David H. Wasserman joined CD&R in 1998. Prior to joining CD&R, Mr. Wasserman worked in the principal investment area at Goldman, Sachs & Co. and as a management consultant at both Monitor Company and Fidelity Capital. Mr. Wasserman serves on the boards of directors of Univar Inc., Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. and Culligan Ltd. and formerly served on the boards of directors of Covansys Corporation, Kinko's, Inc. and ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Limited. Mr. Wasserman's extensive knowledge of the capital markets, experience as a management consultant and experience as a director of other consumer-oriented service businesses with nationwide locations that are similar to ServiceMaster's business structure give him beneficial insight into the Company's capital and liquidity needs, in addition to its challenges, opportunities and operations.

Executive Officers

        The names and ages of the executive officers of ServiceMaster as of April 26, 2012, together with certain biographical information, are as follows:

 
Name
  Age   Present Positions   First
Became
an Officer
 
 

Harry J. Mullany III

    54   Chief Executive Officer     2011  
 

Thomas G. Brackett

    45   President, TruGreen     1997  
 

Thomas J. Coba

    55   President, ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic & AmeriSpec     2011  
 

David J. Crawford

    54   President & Chief Operating Officer, American Home Shield     2005  
 

Roger A. Cregg

    56   Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer     2011  
 

Charles M. Fallon

    49   President, Terminix     2011  
 

Greerson G. McMullen

    49   Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Government Affairs & Secretary     2007  
 

Jed L. Norden

    61   Senior Vice President-Human Resources     2008  

        Harry J. Mullany III has served as CEO of ServiceMaster since March 2011. Mr. Mullany's employment with ServiceMaster commenced in February 2011, as he initially served in a transitional role to enable the smooth transfer of executive responsibilities from ServiceMaster's former CEO until he assumed the title and role of CEO. From February 2010 until November 2010, he served as

98


Table of Contents

executive vice president of Walmart U.S., a national retailer, and as president of its northern division; from 2006 until January 2010, Mr. Mullany was a senior vice president of Walmart U.S. and president of its northeast division.

        Thomas G. Brackett has served as President of TruGreen since December 2011. From December 2006 until December 2011, Mr. Brackett served as President & Chief Operating Officer of Terminix.

        Thomas J. Coba has served as President of ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids, Furniture Medic and AmeriSpec since November 2011. From 2004 until November 2011, Mr. Coba was Chief Operations Officer of Subway Restaurants, a global restaurant brand and the operating company of Franchise World Headquarters, LLC.

        David J. Crawford has served as President & Chief Operating Officer of American Home Shield since March 2006. Mr. Crawford served as Senior Vice President, Sales of American Home Shield from January 2005 until February 2006.

        Roger A. Cregg has served as Senior Vice President & CFO since August 2011. Mr. Cregg was employed until May 2011 by PulteGroup, Inc., a holding company whose subsidiaries engage in homebuilding, mortgage banking, mortgage financing and related activities, serving as its CFO since 1998 and as an Executive Vice President since 2003. Mr. Cregg currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Comerica Incorporated, a commercial bank holding company.

        Charles M. Fallon has served as President of Terminix since December 2011. From 2006 through 2010, Mr. Fallon was President, North America of Burger King Holdings, Inc., a global fast food restaurant chain.

        Greerson G. McMullen has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of ServiceMaster since August 2007. He has served as Secretary of ServiceMaster since November 2007 and was given the title for its Government Affairs function in March 2010. From October 2005 until May 2007, Mr. McMullen worked at CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a hotel real estate investment trust, where he served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

        Jed L. Norden has served as Senior Vice President-Human Resources of ServiceMaster since June 2008. From January 2004 until May 2008, Mr. Norden worked at Retail Ventures, Inc., a footwear and fashion retailer, where he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer; Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Real Estate, Information Technology, Logistics and Construction; and Executive Vice President, Human Resources.

Corporate Governance

        Under our amended and restated by-laws, the Board will consist of two directors, which number may be modified from time to time by resolution of the Board, but in no event may the number of directors be less than one. Any vacancies or newly created directorships may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director. Any such vacancy or newly created directorship may also be filled at any time by vote of the stockholders. Each director (whenever elected) shall hold office until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. The Board is responsible for reviewing the qualifications of nominees for membership on the Board. Consideration of Board candidates typically involves a series of internal discussions and review of information concerning candidates.

99


Table of Contents

        The Board does not have any committees, including an audit committee because the Company is not a listed issuer under SEC rules and is not required to have such.

        Though not formally considered by our Board because our common stock is not registered with the SEC or traded on any national securities exchange, based upon the listing standards of the NYSE, the national securities exchange upon which our common stock was traded prior to the Merger, we do not believe that either of our directors would be considered "independent" because of their relationships with CD&R.

100


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

        This section describes the material elements of our 2011 executive compensation program and the principles underlying our executive compensation policies and decisions. In addition, in this section we provide information regarding the compensation paid to each individual who served in the capacity as CEO or CFO during 2011 and the three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the CEO and CFO) who were serving as such as of the end of our most recent fiscal year (collectively referred to as our Named Executive Officers ("NEOs")).

101


Table of Contents

        Our compensation plans for executive officers (including the NEOs) are designed to:

        To meet these objectives, our executive compensation program for 2011 consisted of the following:

        Each of these elements, discussed in more detail below, plays an integral role in our balancing of executive rewards over short and long-term periods and our ability to attract and retain key executives. We believe the design of our executive compensation program creates alignment between performance achieved and compensation awarded, and motivates achievement of both annual goals and sustainable long-term performance.

        The Company's Board establishes the compensation of our CEO. Historically, in determining the CEO's compensation, the Board considers the following factors: (i) the operating and financial performance of the Company, (ii) the competitive market data provided by Aon Hewitt, our external compensation consultant, as presented to the Board by our Senior Vice President, Human Resources, (iii) the Board's assessment of the CEO's individual performance, and (iv) the prevailing economic conditions. The CEO recommends to our Board compensation for the Company's other executive officers based on his assessment of each executive officer's area of responsibility, individual and business unit performance, overall contribution, the competitive market data provided by Aon Hewitt and prevailing economic conditions. The Board approves the compensation arrangements for each executive officer.

        We believe that our executive compensation program must be attractive to compete in the market for executive talent and must support our growth strategy. As a result of this focus, we rely on competitive pay practices and individual and business performance in determining the

102


Table of Contents

compensation of our executives. In making these determinations, we also consider historical individual compensation levels, historical company payout levels for annual cash incentives and the current privately held ownership structure of the Company. The executive compensation program and underlying philosophy are reviewed at least annually to determine what, if any, modifications should be considered.

        As part of our review of competitive pay practices, we engaged Aon Hewitt in 2011 to conduct a total market review to determine whether executive officer total compensation opportunities were competitive. Companies used for the executive compensation pay comparison included a broad group of companies similar in size to ServiceMaster. In consultation with Aon Hewitt, we developed a comparison group (the "Peer Group") consisting of 70 diversified or service, retail and manufacturing companies with revenues ranging from approximately one-third to two and one-half times our revenues. The decision to set that range was made on Aon Hewitt's recommendation due to our diversified business model and the comparability of compensation levels within that particular revenue range. Aon Hewitt performed a regression analysis to statistically adjust estimated market values to reflect our revenue size. Companies in the Peer Group may change on a year-to-year basis as a result of the availability of the companies' compensation data in surveys conducted by Aon Hewitt. We continually review the Peer Group and may from time-to-time adjust the companies comprising the group to better reflect competitors in our industry, companies with similar business models and companies that compete in our labor markets for talent. For 2011, the Peer Group consisted of the following companies:

Abercrombie & Fitch Co.   The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.   Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.
ACCO Brands Corporation   Fiserv, Inc.   OfficeMax Incorporated
Alberto Culver Company   Flowserve Corporation   The Pantry, Inc.
Andersen Corporation   Furniture Brands International, Inc.   PetSmart, Inc.
Anixter International Inc.   Hallmark Cards, Inc.   PVH Corp.
Ann Inc.   Hanesbrands Inc.   Pier 1 Imports, Inc.
AptarGroup, Inc.   Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.   Pitney Bowes Inc.
AutoZone, Inc.   Hasbro, Inc.   RadioShack Corporation
Avery Dennison Corporation   Henkel Corporation   Ross Stores, Inc.
Big Lots, Inc.   Herbalife Ltd.   S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Blockbuster Inc.   IMS Health Incorporated   The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
Brink's Home Security Holdings, Inc.   Iron Mountain Incorporated   The Sherwin Williams Company
CDW Corporation   Jarden Corporation   Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.   Kohler Co.   Solo Cup Company
Church & Dwight Company   L'Oreal USA, Inc.   Steelcase Inc.
The Clorox Company   Leggett & Platt, Incorporated   Tiffany & Co.
Darden Restaurants, Inc.   Lennox International Inc.   The Timberland Company
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.   Luxottica Group S.p.A.   Tupperware Brands Corporation
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation   Masco Corporation   Unisys Corporation
Dunkin' Brands Group, Inc.   Mattel, Inc.   UTI Worldwide Inc.
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.   Mead Johnson Nutrition Company   V.F. Corporation
Energizer Holdings, Inc.   Mohawk Industries, Inc.   Williams Sonoma, Inc.
Equifax Inc.   Newell Rubbermaid Inc.    
Essilor of America, Inc.   The Nielsen Company    

        In determining 2011 executive compensation, we relied on the Peer Group data provided by Aon Hewitt in 2011 and adjusted it to mirror general market merit increases, as identified in market salary increase surveys sponsored by compensation consulting organizations. We then evaluated base pay and annual bonuses for our executives as discussed below. Differences in total compensation generally reflect the tenure, relevant experience, expertise and performance of the individual executive officer within his role.

103


Table of Contents

        Base salaries for executive officers are reviewed annually by the Board during our merit review process at the beginning of each year. To determine base salaries for executive officers, we first review market data and target base salaries at the market median of the Peer Group. The base salary for each NEO is then determined by adjusting the amount according to the NEO's experience relative to industry peers, time in his position, individual performance, future potential and leadership qualities. In 2011, when a detailed review was performed, the base salary of Mr. Spainhour was at 95 percent of the median of the Peer Group, the base salary for Mr. Steve Martin in the position of CFO was below the median of the Peer Group, the base salary for Mr. Brackett as the President of Terminix was also below the median of the Peer Group and the base salary for Mr. David Martin as our Controller was within competitive ranges of the median of the Peer Group. Base salaries were increased for each NEO who was an employee in April 2011 based on the Board's assessment of the individual's contribution to the sustained success of the Company (except for Mr. Mullany whose salary was set in February 2011 as part of his hiring). The Board may also review and adjust base salaries in situations where an individual takes on additional duties, such as Mr. Brackett leading both the TruGreen and Terminix businesses for a significant period in 2011. The salary increases for these NEOs in 2011 ranged from 2.0 percent to 35.9 percent. Base salaries for the newly hired CEO, CFO and business unit presidents were set at levels that were competitive with market segment salaries and recognized the skills and experience of each officer.

        The following table sets forth information regarding the 2011 base salaries for our NEOs.

Named Executive Officer
  Aggregate
Increase %
  Base
Salary
 

Harry J. Mullany(1)

    N/A   $ 1,000,000  

J. Patrick Spainhour(2)

    N/A   $ 985,000  

Roger A. Cregg(1)

    N/A   $ 600,000  

David W. Martin(3)

    3.0 % $ 300,000  

Steven J. Martin(2)

    2.0 % $ 408,000  

Thomas G. Brackett(4)

    35.9 % $ 530,000  

Thomas J. Coba(1)

    N/A   $ 425,000  

Charles M. Fallon(1)

    N/A   $ 500,000  

(1)
Salaries provided for in the offer of employment for each of the NEOs hired during 2011.

(2)
Messrs. Spainhour and Steven Martin were no longer employed by the company as of December, 31, 2011. The amounts shown reflect their base salary as of their departure dates (March 31, 2011 and May 15, 2011, respectively).

(3)
Mr. David Martin also received an additional $70,000 in base salary for his service as the interim CFO.

(4)
Mr. Brackett received a salary increase of 15.4 percent on May 1, 2011 to recognize his leadership of both the Terminix and TruGreen businesses following the departure of the former President of TruGreen in May 2011. His salary was further increased by 11.1 percent on August 1, 2011 to more closely align his salary with market levels for a business unit president. He received an additional salary adjustment of 6.0 percent on December 1, 2011 to recognize his appointment as president of TruGreen and to appropriately align his salary relative to another newly hired business unit president.

104


Table of Contents

        The Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP"), our annual cash incentive program, is designed to reward the achievement of specific pre-set financial results measured over the fiscal year. Each participant is assigned an annual incentive target expressed as a percentage of base salary. For the NEOs, these targets ranged from 50 percent to 100 percent of base salary. Mr. David Martin has been assigned an annual target bonus of 50 percent in his capacity as Senior Vice President and Controller of the Company, but was assigned a target bonus of 65 percent during the period he served as interim CFO. He was guaranteed a minimum incremental bonus under the ABP of $50,000 above his calculated bonus as Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. The actual awards are calculated based on year-end salary.

        To encourage our executive officers to focus on short-term Company (and, where applicable, business unit) goals and financial performance, incentives under the ABP are based on the performance of the Company with respect to the following measures at both a corporate consolidated and, where applicable, a business unit level:

        These performance measures were selected as the most appropriate measures upon which to determine annual bonuses because they are the primary metrics that management and the Equity Sponsors use to measure the performance of the Company for purposes unrelated to compensation. All of the opportunity for payment under the ABP to our NEOs is based on these performance measures.

        In addition to the performance measures discussed above, payments under the ABP were also subject to the achievement of a minimum level of performance ("Gate") on a fourth financial measure. The Gate is calculated by adjusting prior year ACOP to add back depreciation and amortization (excluding depreciation and amortization related to assets established or re-valued as a result of the Merger). In order to achieve any payment under the ABP, the Gate had to be achieved at the corporate consolidated and, where applicable, business unit levels. For 2011, the Gates applicable to our NEOs were $274.6 million and $560.5 million at the Terminix and corporate consolidated levels, respectively.

        For executive officers holding positions within corporate headquarters functions, such as the CEO and CFO positions, ABP payments are based 100 percent on overall Company performance. For executive officers in charge of a business unit, payments are based on both Company and business unit performance.

105


Table of Contents

        Performance targets are established by the Board toward the beginning of each year and are based on expected performance in accordance with the Company's and, where applicable, the business unit's approved business plan for the year. In the event the Company and, where applicable, the business unit achieve the performance targets, payout under the ABP would be 100 percent of a specified percentage of the executive's base salary. In the event the Company and, where applicable, the business unit do not achieve the performance targets, a lesser bonus may be earned if the Company and, where applicable, the business unit meet or exceed the threshold amounts for the performance targets, which are generally equal to the previous year's results achieved for the applicable performance measure. In the event the Company exceeds the performance targets, the amount of the bonus will increase accordingly. There is no maximum payout under the ABP on the theory that we pay for performance and our executives should receive additional compensation when we exceed our performance goals. The components and weightings of the performance measures are reviewed and determined annually by the Board to reflect Company strategy.

        The tables below provide information regarding the 2011 ABP for our participating NEOs, including the performance goals and the weight assigned to each, the thresholds required for minimum payout, and the payout as a percentage of the target bonus if the threshold or target performance is met. The performance goals and relative weightings reflect the Board's objective of ensuring that a substantial amount of each NEO's total compensation is tied to Company and, where applicable, business unit performance.

2011 ABP Weighting, Threshold and Target Performance Goals

Participating NEO(1)
  Organizational
Weighting
  Performance
Weighting
  Threshold
($ in 000s)
  Target
($ in 000s)
  % of Target
Performance
for
Threshold
Payout
  % Payout
With
Threshold
Performance
 

Harry J. Mullany

  100% ServiceMaster   50% ServiceMaster ACOP   $ 465,573   $ 509,788     91.3 %   48.0 %

Roger A. Cregg

      30% ServiceMaster Revenue   $ 3,127,394   $ 3,272,275     95.6 %   73.4 %

David W. Martin

      20% ServiceMaster Cash Flow   $ 442,380   $ 465,658     95.0 %   70.0 %

Thomas G. Brackett(2)

  20% ServiceMaster   20% ServiceMaster ACOP   $ 465,573   $ 509,788     91.3 %   48.0 %

  80% Terminix   35% Terminix ACOP   $ 239,021   $ 256,650     93.1 %   58.8 %

      35% Terminix Revenue   $ 1,157,346   $ 1,213,376     95.4 %   72.3 %

      10% Terminix Cash Flow   $ 242,585   $ 244,785     99.1 %   94.6 %

(1)
Due to their departures before July 1, 2011, Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin were not eligible for 2011 ABP payments. Messrs. Fallon and Coba were not eligible for a payout under the ABP provision requiring employment prior to the beginning of the fourth quarter.

(2)
Mr. Brackett transferred business units from Terminix to TruGreen on December 5, 2011 and as such was measured based on the results of Terminix for all of 2011.

        The "% of Target Performance for Threshold Payout" is equal to threshold performance (which is generally equal to the prior year's actual performance) divided by the current year's target goal. The payout levels for performance between threshold and target are based on a 6:1 ratio—for every one percent of achievement above threshold performance levels, the plan pays out six additional percentage points of the targeted payout. The Board has found the 6:1 ratio to be an effective motivator to improve over the prior year's results. The payout scale above target is a 4:1 ratio—for every one percent of achievement above target, the plan pays an additional four percentage points of the targeted payout. The payout scale below target is based on a somewhat higher ratio to underscore the importance of achieving target performance and to provide a more significant penalty for every percentage point performance is below target. The payout scale above target increases from a 4:1 ratio to a 6:1 ratio for all performance measures if the plan's ACOP target is achieved for those NEOs whose bonus is based on the consolidated Company performance. The payout scale above target increases from a 4:1 ratio to a 6:1 ratio for all business unit performance

106


Table of Contents

measures if the plan's business unit revenue target is achieved for those NEOs who are in charge of a business unit. Increasing the above target payout scale for these components is intended to emphasize the importance of achieving the corporate ACOP and the business unit revenue components.

        The 2011 ABP target payout opportunity for each participating NEO (see table below) was based on our review of Peer Group data and the importance of the NEO's position relative to the overall financial success of the Company. The following table sets forth information regarding the 2011 performance under the ABP, including the percentage of performance target attained and the percentage of target bonus earned. Due to their departures before July 1, 2011, Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin were not eligible for 2011 ABP payments. Messrs. Fallon and Coba were not eligible for a payout under the 2011ABP provision requiring employment prior to the beginning of the fourth quarter.

2011 ABP Performance

Participating NEO
  Target
% of
Salary
  % of
ServiceMaster
Target ACOP
Attained
  % of
ServiceMaster
Target Revenue
Attained
  % of
ServiceMaster
Target Cash
Flow Attained
  Business
Unit
  % of
Business
Unit
Target
ACOP
Attained
  % of
Business
Unit
Target
Revenue
Attained
  % of
Business
Unit
Target
Cash
Flow
Attained
  % of
Target
Bonus
Earned
 

Harry J. Mullany

    100.0 %   102.4 %   98.0 %   103.9 % Corporate     N/A     N/A     N/A     108.1 %

Roger A. Cregg

    70.0 %   102.4 %   98.0 %   103.9 % Corporate     N/A     N/A     N/A     108.1 %

David W. Martin(1)

    50.0 %   102.4 %   98.0 %   103.9 % Corporate     N/A     N/A     N/A     108.1 %

Thomas G. Brackett(2)

    65.0 %   102.4 %   N/A     N/A   Terminix     104.2 %   98.3 %   102.6 %   106.3 %

(1)
During the year, Mr. David Martin was appointed to the role of interim CFO, as of April 29, 2011. In connection with such appointment he received, in addition to his base salary, an additional $10,000 per month, with a guaranteed minimum of $70,000 total, during his tenure in this interim role through August 28, 2011. Mr. David Martin also received an increase in his bonus target under the 2011 ABP to 65 percent from 50 percent of his base salary during his tenure in this interim role, with a guaranteed minimum incremental bonus award of $50,000.

(2)
Mr. Brackett transitioned from leading Terminix to TruGreen on December 5, 2011 and as such was measured on the results of Terminix for all of 2011.

2011 ABP Payments

        The following table sets forth information regarding the ABP payments to the participating NEOs.

Participating NEO
  % of Salary
Paid at Target
Performance
  Base
Salary
  Actual % of
Target Achieved
  Total
Bonus Award
 

Harry J. Mullany(1)

    100.0 % $ 1,000,000     108.1 % $ 927,338  

Roger A. Cregg(1)

    70.0 % $ 600,000     108.1 % $ 155,544  

David W. Martin(2)

    50.0 % $ 300,000     108.1 % $ 212,216  

Thomas G. Brackett

    65.0 % $ 530,000     106.3 % $ 366,238  

(1)
Messrs. Mullany and Cregg joined the company during 2011 and as such received a pro-rated total bonus award based on the number of days employed by the Company during 2011. Although not applicable due to the Company's performance in 2011, Messrs. Mullany and Cregg were guaranteed minimum bonuses under the ABP of $500,000 and $71,918, respectively. Both Messrs. Mullany and Cregg earned bonuses for 2011 that exceeded their guaranteed bonuses. The guaranteed portion of the 2011 ABP payments for these officers are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Bonus" column.

107


Table of Contents

(2)
During the year, Mr. David Martin was appointed to the role of interim CFO, as of April 29, 2011. In connection with such appointment he received, in addition to his base salary, an additional $10,000 per month, with a guaranteed minimum of $70,000 total, during his tenure through August 28, 2011. Mr. David Martin also received an increase in his bonus target under the 2011 ABP to 65 percent from 50 percent of his base salary during his tenure in this interim role, with a guaranteed minimum incremental bonus award of $50,000.

        For 2011, the Board approved discretionary bonuses for Messrs. Mullany and Brackett. Mr. Mullany received a discretionary bonus of $172,662 for his strategic and operational leadership from his hire date in February. As CEO, Mr. Mullany developed and implemented a strategic planning process for the Company, created a vision and mission for the Company, built a leadership team that is highly engaged and has overseen the Company when it produced the highest level of increase in EBIT in the Company's recent history. The Board approved a discretionary bonus of $200,000 for Mr. Brackett to recognize his leadership of both the Terminix and TruGreen businesses beginning in May 2011 following the departure of the former President of TruGreen to early December 2011 when he was appointed the President of TruGreen and Mr. Fallon was hired and appointed as President of Terminix. These discretionary bonuses were in addition to the payments under the ABP described above. These bonuses are included in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Bonus" Column.

        The Company has included sign-on bonuses for newly hired executives as a part of the new hire compensation offer. The sign-on bonus is generally intended to compensate the executive for the lost value of existing compensation arrangements at the executive's prior employer or as otherwise negotiated. The sign-on bonus also is used to provide a compensation offer that differentiates our offer of employment and serves to attract the executive who frequently has other available opportunities. The Company paid sign-on bonuses to Messrs. Mullany, Cregg, Coba and Fallon as part of their new hire offers. These sign-on bonuses were paid in cash amounts of $1,750,000 for Mr. Mullany, $100,000 for Mr. Cregg and $400,000 for Mr. Coba. In lieu of a cash sign-on bonus, Mr. Fallon received a RSU award with a grant date fair value of $100,000, with such RSUs vesting one-third per year on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The sign-on bonus for Mr. Mullany was subject to repayment provisions if Mr. Mullany voluntarily terminated his employment without good reason prior to February 22, 2012. The sign-on bonus for Mr. Cregg is subject to a prorata repayment provision if he terminates employment from the Company prior to the first anniversary of his hire date. The sign-on bonus for Mr. Coba is subject to a prorata repayment provision if he terminates employment with the Company prior to the second anniversary of his hiring date.

        Our long-term equity incentive plan is designed to retain key executives and to align the interests of our executives with the achievement of sustainable long-term growth and performance. For 2011, our NEOs participated in the MSIP.

        The MSIP provides certain key employees of ServiceMaster (including all of our NEOs) with the opportunity to invest in shares of Holdings' common stock, receive RSUs and to receive options to purchase shares of Holdings' common stock. For each share of common stock or DSU acquired by an NEO, Holdings granted such NEO up to four matching options to purchase shares of Holdings'

108


Table of Contents

common stock, except in the case of Mr. Mullany, where Holdings granted five matching options. In addition, Mr. Mullany also received RSUs valued at one-half the aggregate purchase price of the shares purchased and Superperformance Options equal to one-tenth the number of additional matching options granted. Superperformance Options will vest (i) before a public offering if the fair market value of the common stock, as determined by the Holdings' Compensation Committee, is at least $25 per share, and (ii) after a public offering if the closing price of the common stock on the principal exchange on which it is traded equals or exceeds $25 per share for 20 consecutive trading days. Holdings has also awarded RSUs to both newly hired executives and longer tenured NEOs. Unlike equity awards at publicly traded companies, these investment opportunities are not available to the general public and present an employment reward opportunity as well as subjecting the executive officer to liquidity risks and transfer restrictions. Generally, our policy has been to provide this opportunity to invest and receive options at one time only, either shortly after the closing of the acquisition of ServiceMaster in 2007 or upon hire or promotion, if later. We do not typically supplement the NEOs stock awards with subsequent annual stock option awards. Holdings could, however, decide, from time to time, to grant additional equity awards to certain key employees, including our NEOs, in order to recognize outstanding performance or otherwise as Holdings may determine is in the best interest of the Company, such as Holdings did in 2011 for equity awards granted to Messrs. Brackett and David Martin (see below). The MSIP investment opportunities provided to any executive officer or the executive officers as a group are entirely at the discretion of Holdings. Although the investment opportunities and grants of stock options and RSUs are made to our executive officers by Holdings rather than by the Company, they are an integral part of the total rewards package provided to the executive officers. The costs of these transactions are borne by the Company and are reflected in our financial statements.

        We believe that the opportunity to purchase shares and to receive options to purchase shares of Holdings' stock and grants of RSUs encourages our executive officers to focus on our long-term performance, thereby aligning their interests with the interests of Holdings' stockholders. The purchase of shares under the MSIP allows executive officers to increase their stake in the Company's performance by putting their own financial resources at risk. Additionally, through stock option and RSU grants, the executive officers are encouraged to focus on sustained increases in stockholder value. Specifically, we believe the granting of stock options and RSUs assists the Company to:

        Consistent with our historical practices, Messrs. Mullany, Cregg, Fallon and Coba purchased shares and were awarded both stock options and RSUs in conjunction with their offer of employment and subsequent beginning of service with the Company. Each of our NEOs accepted the offer to purchase Holdings' shares of common stock and has already purchased shares and received a grant of options to purchase additional shares. Each participating NEO purchased shares for cash.

        Pursuant to the terms of his offer of employment, Mr. Mullany was granted matching options at a rate of five options per share purchased as a result of negotiations during the hiring process and the matching options were considered important to the Company's ability to hire Mr. Mullany, given that he had other employment opportunities available. Mr. Mullany was also awarded RSUs and Superperformance options based on his initial purchase of shares. Mr. Mullany was also provided the opportunity to elect to purchase additional shares valued up to $1,100,000 in aggregate on the first and second anniversaries of his hire date (February 22, 2012 and February 22, 2013) and

109


Table of Contents

receive five matching stock options for each share purchased, RSUs valued at one-half the aggregate purchase price of any additional shares purchased, and Superperformance Options equal to one-tenth the number of additional matching options granted. In addition, pursuant to the terms of his offer of employment, Mr. Coba has been provided an opportunity to purchase shares valued up to $1 million and receive four matching options for each share purchased for a period of up to one year from his date of hire, but no later than the date of a public offering. In 2011, Mr. Coba purchased $300,000 worth of shares leaving him with a remaining opportunity to purchase shares valued up to $700,000.

        In 2011, Holdings granted additional equity awards to Messrs. Brackett and David Martin to recognize their increased responsibilities during 2011. Mr. David Martin was awarded 20,000 stock options in May 2011 to recognize his appointment as the interim CFO. These options vest ratably over a four year period and were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Holdings' common stock on the date of grant. The fair market value of Holdings' common stock is determined by Holdings' Compensation Committee based on its review of valuation reports prepared by third party consultants, the performance of ServiceMaster and other market factors. Mr. Brackett received an award of 20,000 performance based RSUs in August 2011 to recognize his leadership of both Terminix and TruGreen. These RSUs will vest as follows: (i) up to 10,000 units will vest on December 31, 2012, and (ii) up to 10,000 units will vest on December 31, 2013 based on Holdings' Compensation Committee's subjective assessment of Mr. Brackett's achievement of certain qualitative performance conditions in 2012 and 2013. No specific performance goals were established for Mr. Brackett's performance based RSUs. Due to the discretionary nature of these performance based RSUs, a grant date fair value is not reflected in the executive compensation tables (Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End) below for 2011 and will be reflected for Mr. Brackett in the year the performance based RSUs are earned, if at all.

        Shares purchased by Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin were repurchased by Holdings in 2011 subsequent to their departures from the Company, consistent with the MSIP and the stock subscription agreement entered into at the time of purchase. Additionally, Mr. Spainhour exercised 450,000 stock options following his retirement. Those shares were also subsequently repurchased by Holdings in 2011 at the fair market value ($11 per share) on the date of repurchase.

        Employees, including the NEOs, are generally eligible to participate in the ServiceMaster Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan (the "PSRP"). The PSRP is a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan. The Company provides for a matching contribution in the PSRP where employees receive a dollar-for-dollar match on the first one percent of their contributions, and then a $0.50-per-dollar match on the next two percent to six percent contributed. We also maintain the ServiceMaster Deferred Compensation Plan (the "DCP"), which is a non-qualified supplemental retirement plan designed to afford certain highly compensated employees (including the NEOs, executive officers and certain other employees) the opportunity to defer additional amounts of compensation on a pre-tax basis, over and above the amounts allowed under the PSRP. The DCP permits these employees to defer their obligation to pay taxes on certain elements of the compensation that they are entitled to receive. All deferred amounts under the DCP are subject to earnings or losses based on the investments selected by the individual participants. The Company believes that provision of the DCP is important as a recruitment and retention tool as many, if not all, of the companies with which the Company competes for executive talent provide a similar plan to their senior employees and the cost to the Company of providing this benefit is minimal. The Company provides no match for employee contributions under the DCP.

110


Table of Contents

        We offer a variety of health and welfare programs to all eligible employees, including the NEOs. The NEOs are eligible for the same health and welfare benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of the Company's employees, including medical and dental care coverage, life insurance coverage and short and long-term disability.

        The Company limits the use of perquisites as a method of compensation and provides executive officers with only those perquisites that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our compensation goal of enabling the Company to attract and retain superior executives for key positions. The perquisites provided to our NEOs are memberships in social and professional clubs and, for Messrs Mullany and Fallon, commuting expenses. Expenses associated with relocation of newly hired executives (including income tax gross-ups on taxable relocation expense reimbursements) are paid to certain executives pursuant to our relocation policy and are based on standard market practices for executive level relocations.

        Mr. Mullany is also provided with personal use of Company aircraft and certain spousal travel. We have established a policy regarding our CEO's personal use of the Company aircraft (the "Aircraft Policy"). The Aircraft Policy provides that the CEO shall reimburse the Company for personal use of the Company aircraft exceeding 50 hours annually. Any amount so reimbursed to the Company shall be applied to reduce the executive's taxable income arising from the personal use. In addition to the personal usage allowed under the Aircraft Policy, Mr. Mullany is also eligible to receive up to $85,000 per year in each of 2011 and 2012 to reimburse commuting expenses pending his relocation. Mr. Mullany may utilize commercial flights, private charter service or the Company aircraft for his commuting travel. To the extent Mr. Mullany utilizes commercial flights or a private charter, the actual amount paid by the Company on his behalf is applied toward his maximum commuting benefit of $85,000 per annum. If Mr. Mullany utilizes the Company aircraft for commuting purposes, the amount applied toward his annual commuting benefit is calculated under the income imputation rules established by the IRS for personal use of company aircraft. These rules require the cost of each flight to be estimated by applying published IRS per mile rates based on the size of the aircraft to the total miles flown. Mr. Mullany did not exceed his $85,000 maximum commuting benefit in 2011, calculated in accordance with IRS income imputation rules. This method of calculation has been affirmed by the Board.

        The Company generally executes an offer of employment prior to the time an executive joins the Company, which describes the basic terms of the executive's employment, including his or her start date, starting salary and ABP bonus target and any signing bonus or equity awards granted at the commencement of his or her employment. The terms of the executive's employment are thereafter based on sustained good performance rather than contractual terms, and the Company's policies will apply as warranted. During 2011, the Company and Messrs. Cregg, Fallon and Coba executed employment letters memorializing the terms of their offers of employment.

        Under certain circumstances, the Company recognizes that special arrangements with respect to an executive's employment may be necessary or desirable. In 2011, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Mullany setting forth the terms of his employment as CEO of ServiceMaster. In addition, in connection with Mr. Fallon's hire, the Company and Mr. Fallon entered into a severance agreement setting forth certain severance benefits to be received by Mr. Fallon upon a qualifying termination of employment. Please see the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and the Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control section for a description of the agreements with Messrs. Mullany and Fallon.

111


Table of Contents

        Holdings entered into a retirement agreement on September 8, 2010 with Mr. Spainhour in conjunction with the announcement of his plan to retire from the Company. This agreement is described below under "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control." In connection with Mr. Spainhour's retirement, Holdings extended the option exercise period on 525,000 options from three months to three years following his departure date. This extension of the option exercise period was considered a stock option modification and resulted in additional stock compensation expense of $546,684 in 2010. In addition, during 2011, Mr. Steve Martin received severance benefits in connection with his departure from the Company. Please see "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" for further information regarding the benefits that Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin are entitled to in connection with their respective departures.

        All of the other NEOs, except Mr. Mullany and Mr. Fallon, as discussed elsewhere, are covered under ServiceMaster's standard policy or practice as in effect at the time employment is terminated. The terms of these post-termination arrangements are described in detail below under "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."

2011 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary ($)   Bonus ($)   Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
  Total ($)  

Harry J. Mullany

    2011     856,482 (4)   2,422,662 (5)   950,004     3,614,120     427,338     161,140     8,431,746  

Chief Executive Officer

                                                 

J. Patrick Spainhour

    2011     246,250 (6)   0     0     0     0     739,007     985,257  

Former Chief Executive Officer

    2010     976,250     0     0     546,684     666,648     83,938     2,273,520  

    2009     950,000     0     0     0     628,865     45,527     1,624,392  

Roger A. Cregg

    2011     206,250 (4)   171,918 (7)   825,000     1,316,362     83,626     23,135     2,626,291  

Chief Financial Officer

                                                 

David W. Martin

    2011     367,800 (8)   50,000 (9)   0     72,400     162,216     257     652,673  

Former interim Chief Financial Officer; SVP, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer

                                                 

Steven J. Martin

    2011     151,001 (6)   0     0     0     0     620,670     771,671  

Former Chief Financial Officer

    2010     364,583     0     600,000     0     175,968     8,113     1,148,664  

    2009     350,000     0     0     0     150,596     8,575     509,171  

Thomas G. Brackett

    2011     450,833     200,000 (10)   0     0     366,238     8,832     1,025,903  

President—TruGreen

                                                 

Thomas J. Coba

    2011     40,246 (4)   400,000 (11)   660,000     585,803     0     24     1,686,073  

President—ServiceMaster Clean, Merry Maids

                                                 

Charles M. Fallon

    2011     37,879 (4)   0     759,990     2,148,000     0     19     2,945,888  

President—Terminix

                                                 

(1)
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs awarded. The assumptions used in the valuation of RSU awards are disclosed in the Stock Based Compensation footnote in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

(2)
The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options awarded, including the Superperformance Options awarded to Mr. Mullany. The assumptions used in the valuation of option awards are disclosed in the Stock Based Compensation footnote to the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition, for the Superperformance Options, the likelihood of achieving the market condition required for vesting was included in the determination of the grant date fair value of the options. Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, the vesting condition related to the Superperformance Options is considered a market condition and not a performance condition. Accordingly, there is no grant date fair value in excess of the amount reflected in the table above that could be calculated and disclosed based on achievement of the market condition.

(3)
Amounts in this column for 2011 are detailed in the All Other Compensation (2011) table below.

112


Table of Contents

(4)
This salary figure reflects the actual partial year salary paid during 2011 from the NEO's hiring date through the end of the year. The hiring dates of the NEO's hired in 2011 were as follows: Mr. Mullany—February 22, 2011; Mr. Cregg—August 29, 2011; Mr. Coba—November 28, 2011; Mr. Fallon—December 5, 2011.

(5)
This amount represents a sign-on bonus of $1,750,000 paid at the commencement of Mr. Mullany's service with the Company, the guaranteed portion of his ABP bonus of $500,000 and a discretionary bonus of $172,662. Mr. Mullany earned an ABP bonus for 2011 that exceeded his guaranteed bonus. The remainder of his ABP bonus earned for 2011 is reported in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of this table.

(6)
The salaries presented for Messrs. Spainhour and Steven Martin are the actual salaries paid through their departure dates of March 31, 2011 and May 15, 2011, respectively.

(7)
This amount represents a sign-on bonus of $100,000 paid at the commencement of Mr. Cregg's service with the Company and his guaranteed annual ABP bonus of $71,918 that was provided under the terms of his offer letter. Mr. Cregg earned an ABP bonus for 2011 that exceeded his guaranteed ABP bonus. The remainder of his ABP bonus earned for 2011 is reported in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of this table.

(8)
Mr. David Martin's salary includes an additional $70,000 allowance as additional salary for his service as the interim CFO.

(9)
This amount represents Mr. David Martin's guaranteed ABP bonus for his service as the interim CFO.

(10)
Mr. Brackett's 2011 bonus represents a discretionary bonus paid to Mr. Brackett for his leadership as President of both the TruGreen and Terminix businesses for a substantial portion of the year.

(11)
This amount represents a sign-on bonus of $400,000 paid at the commencement of Mr. Coba's service with the Company.

All Other Compensation (2011)

Named Executive Officer
  Perquisites and
Other Personal
Benefits ($)
  Company Paid
Life Insurance
Premiums ($)
  Company
Contributions
to PSRP ($)(1)
  Separation
Payment ($)
  Tax
Payment(s)
($)(2)
  Total ($)  

Harry J. Mullany

    148,939 (3)   220     8,575     0     3,406     161,140  

J. Patrick Spainhour

    0     257     0     738,750 (4)   0     739,007  

Roger A. Cregg

    16,074 (5)   88     500     0     6,473     23,135  

David W. Martin

    0     257     0     0     0     257  

Steven J. Martin

    0     94     5,140     615,436 (6)   0     620,670  

Thomas G. Brackett

    0     257     8,575     0     0     8,832  

Thomas J. Coba

    0     24     0     0     0     24  

Charles M. Fallon

    0     19     0     0     0     19  

(1)
The PSRP is the Company's tax-qualified retirement savings plan.

(2)
Tax payments related to moving expenses were paid to Messrs. Mullany and Cregg.

(3)
Mr. Mullany's perquisites include personal use of the corporate aircraft ($68,130), reimbursement of personal air transportation costs ($31,415), personal ground transportation costs (5,409), Company provided membership fees ($1,133) for one business and social dining club, Company-paid moving expenses ($10,895) related to his hiring, Company provided auto allowance ($13,125), reimbursement of expenses related to the continuation of his benefits through COBRA ($10,982) and reimbursement of legal expenses related to the review of his employment agreement ($7,850). The incremental cost of the use of the Company aircraft included in the table above is calculated based on the variable operating costs to ServiceMaster, including fuel costs, mileage, trip-related maintenance, universal weather monitoring costs, on-board catering, lamp/ramp fees and other miscellaneous variable costs based on occupied seat hours. Fixed costs, which do not change based on usage, such as pilot salaries, the lease costs of the Company aircraft and the cost of maintenance not related to trips are excluded. The compensation for personal use of the Company aircraft calculated based on the variable operating costs incurred is typically greater than the amount calculated under the income imputation rules established by the IRS for personal use of company aircraft.

113


Table of Contents

(4)
This amount represents separation payments to Mr. Spainhour and is discussed in "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control."

(5)
The amount listed reflects Company-paid moving expenses ($15,686) and Company provided membership fees ($388) for one business and social dining club for Mr. Cregg.

(6)
This amount represents separation payments to Mr. Steve Martin and is discussed in "—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control." The amount includes $15,692 for accrued vacation paid with severance.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards (2011)

        The amounts listed in the table below in the column entitled Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the potential 2011 earnings under the ABP, which is a non-equity incentive plan. The threshold amount is the minimum earned amount if threshold performance is attained for all performance measures. There is no maximum in this plan. The NEOs with Company-wide responsibilities earned payouts for 2011 under our ABP equal to 108.1 percent of the target payout. Mr. Brackett earned a payout under the ABP equal to 106.3 percent of his target payout. Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin were not eligible for a payout under the 2011 ABP as they departed the Company prior to July 1, 2011. Messrs. Fallon and Coba were not eligible for a payout under the ABP provision requiring employment prior to the beginning of the fourth quarter. Additional information is discussed under the heading, Annual Bonus Plan, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above.

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(3)
   
   
 
 
   
   
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
(#)(2)
   
   
 
 
   
   
  Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Sh)(4)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(5)
 
Named Executive Officer
  Grant Date   Approval
Date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)(1)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Harry J. Mullany

  N/A   N/A     600,121     1,000,000   None                                        

  2/22/2011   2/16/2011                                   86,364     0     0     950,004  

  2/22/2011   2/16/2011                                   0     863,635   $ 11.00     3,397,347  

  2/22/2011   2/16/2011                   N/A     86,364   N/A     0     0   $ 11.00     216,773  

J. Patrick Spainhour

  N/A   N/A     591,120     985,000   None                                        

Roger A. Cregg

  N/A   N/A     252,051     420,000   None                                        

  8/29/2011   8/12/2011                                   75,000     0     N/A     825,000  

  9/27/2011   9/27/2011                                   0     363,636   $ 11.00     1,316,362  

David W. Martin

  N/A   N/A     90,018     150,000   None                                        

  9/27/2011   9/27/2011                                   0     20,000   $ 11.00     72,400  

Steven J. Martin

  N/A   N/A     156,032     260,000   None                                        

Thomas G. Brackett

  N/A   N/A     223,688     344,500   None                                        

Thomas J. Coba

  11/28/2011   11/14/2011                                   60,000     0     N/A     660,000  

  12/16/2011   12/16/2011                                   0     109,088   $ 11.00     585,803  

Charles M. Fallon

  12/5/2011   11/30/2011                                   69,090     0     N/A     759,990  

  12/16/2011   12/16/2011                                   0     400,000   $ 11.00     2,148,000  

(1)
Represents Superperformance Options granted as a component of the new hire offer to Mr. Mullany. These options will vest (i) before a public offering if the fair market value of the common stock, as determined by the Holdings' Compensation Committee, is at least $25 per share, and (ii) after a public offering if the closing price of the common stock on the principle exchange on which it is traded equals or exceeds $25 per share for 20 consecutive trading days.

(2)
Represents RSU awards granted as a component of the new hire offer to Messrs. Mullany, Cregg, Coba and Fallon. These units will vest at a rate of one-third per year on each of the first three anniversaries of their grant dates.

(3)
Represents the number of stock options granted as a component of the new hire offer to Messrs. Mullany, Cregg, Coba and Fallon. The stock option award for Mr. David Martin was in recognition of his leadership as the interim CFO during 2011. Options listed in this column become exercisable on the basis of passage of time and continued employment over a four-year period, with one-fourth becoming exercisable on each anniversary following the date of grant.

(4)
The exercise price was based on the fair market value of the options on the date of grant, as established by Holdings' Compensation Committee.

(5)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU and stock option awards detailed in the prior columns. The assumptions used in the valuation of both RSU and stock option awards are disclosed in the Stock Based Compensation footnote in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition, for the Superperformance Options, the likelihood of achieving the market condition required for vesting was included in the determination of the grant date fair value of the options.

114


Table of Contents

        Holdings entered into a retirement agreement with Mr. Spainhour on September 8, 2010. Mr. Spainhour's retirement agreement provided for severance benefits equal to two times his highest annual base salary and highest annual target bonus upon his retirement. The agreement also extended the period of time to exercise his vested non-matching stock options (a total of 525,000 options) from three months to three years following his retirement. After his retirement, Holdings repurchased 300,000 shares from Mr. Spainhour. This represents all of Mr. Spainhour's shares of his original investment in Holdings. Additionally, Mr. Spainhour exercised 450,000 stock options following his retirement. Those shares were also subsequently repurchased by Holdings in 2011 at the fair market value ($11 per share) on the date of repurchase. The Company will continue medical, prescription drug and life insurance for Mr. Spainhour and his dependents until his 65th birthday, May 2, 2015, with expenses shared in the same proportion as prior to his retirement.

        Mr. Spainhour's severance benefits were subject to his signing a general release and observing covenants not to compete, solicit nor disclose confidential information.

        On February 22, 2011, ServiceMaster announced that Harry J. Mullany III had been elected to serve as CEO of ServiceMaster, succeeding Mr. Spainhour, effective March 31, 2011. Mr. Mullany's employment with ServiceMaster commenced on February 22, 2011 pursuant to an employment agreement with Holdings, dated February 16, 2011. From February 22, 2011 through March 30, 2011, Mr. Mullany served in a transitional role to enable the smooth transfer of executive responsibilities from Mr. Spainhour to Mr. Mullany. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Mullany receives an annual base salary of $1 million, and a target annual incentive bonus opportunity of 100 percent of his base salary, each prorated for 2011 to reflect the period during which he was employed by the Company in 2011. Additionally, for the 2011 performance year, Mr. Mullany was guaranteed a minimum annual bonus of $500,000 and received a signing bonus of $1.75 million.

        Mr. Mullany's employment agreement provides for severance benefits as described below under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

        In connection with his commencement of employment, Mr. Mullany purchased $1.9 million of common stock of Holdings at a price of $11 per share. At his discretion, Mr. Mullany may elect to purchase up to an aggregate of $1.1 million of additional common stock of Holdings at its then-current fair market value over the next two years. In connection with his initial and subsequent equity investments, Mr. Mullany will be (or, in the case of his initial investment, has been) awarded RSUs and nonqualified stock options under the MSIP. He will receive (or, in the case of his initial investment, has received) RSUs worth half the aggregate fair market value, as determined under the MSIP, of his initial and subsequent investments, and these RSUs will vest at a rate of one-third per year on each of the first three anniversaries of their grant dates. Additionally, for each share of common stock he purchases in his initial and subsequent investments, he will receive (or, in the case of his initial investment, has received) nonqualified stock options to purchase five shares at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of the option grant ("Matching Options"). The Matching Options vest at a rate of one-fourth per year on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date. Finally, for each ten Matching Options that Mr. Mullany is awarded, he will also be awarded (or, in the case of his initial investment, has been awarded) one Superperformance Option with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of the option grant. Based on Mr. Mullany's initial equity investment, he acquired 172,727 shares of Holdings common stock and was granted 86,364 RSUs, 863,635 Matching Options, and 86,364 Superperformance Options.

115


Table of Contents

        Should Mr. Mullany's employment terminate for cause, all vested and unvested options will be canceled, along with all unvested RSUs. In the case of Mr. Mullany's termination other than for cause and other than by reason of his death or disability, unvested options and RSUs will be canceled. Upon termination by reason of death or disability, Mr. Mullany's unvested Matching Options will fully vest, and any unvested Superperformance Options will be canceled. In addition, if the death or disability occurs prior to his RSUs having fully vested, a pro rata portion of the RSUs that would have vested in the year of termination will vest. Mr. Mullany will retain the right to exercise any vested options for up to 12 months following termination for death, disability, or retirement, and for 90 days following termination for all other reasons (except for termination for cause).

        Mr. Mullany's employment agreement also entitles him to an automobile allowance of $15,000 per year and commuting expenses up to $85,000 for 2011 and 2012.

        Mr. Mullany's employment agreement is for a term of three years, commencing on February 22, 2011, subject to automatic one-year renewals thereafter, absent termination notice by either party. A failure by Holdings to renew the agreement will constitute a termination of Mr. Mullany's employment without cause for purposes of his severance benefits.

        At the time Messrs. Cregg, Fallon and Coba were hired ServiceMaster provided each with an offer letter that set forth his initial base salary and initial annual target bonus opportunity under our ABP, with the actual payouts under the ABP subject to the satisfaction of performance targets established by the Board each year. In addition, Mr. Cregg's offer letter provided that he would be guaranteed a minimum ABP bonus for 2011 and 2012 of at least 50 percent of his target bonus, with the 2011 bonus being prorated for his service time with the Company in 2011. Base salary, target annual bonus and all other compensation are subject to approval each year by the Board. In addition, the offer letters provided that each would be offered a grant of stock options to be made in connection with their purchase of Holdings' common stock. Messrs. Cregg, Fallon and Coba received such grants of options in 2011 as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Messrs. Cregg, Fallon and Coba received 75,000, 60,000 and 60,000 RSUs, respectively, as a part of their offer of employment. Additionally, cash sign-on bonuses of $100,000 for Mr. Cregg and $400,000 for Mr. Coba were provided in their offer letters. Mr. Fallon's offer letter provided for a grant of RSUs with a grant date fair value equal to $100,000 and Mr. Fallon received 9,090 RSUs during 2011 in satisfaction of this provision. As an inducement for Mr. Fallon to join the Company, we agreed to provide him with a commuting allowance of $100,000 during his first year of employment and $50,000 for his second year.

        The Company has provided for additional discretionary bonuses for Messrs. Fallon and Brackett. These bonuses are of identical design and are intended to foster greater collaboration and synergy between the Terminix and TruGreen businesses. These discretionary bonuses provide for a payment of up to $100,000 for 2012 and $100,000 for 2013 to each of Messrs. Fallon and Brackett, with the actual amounts earned determined in the sole discretion of Holdings' Compensation Committee. These bonus payouts, if any, will be made at the same time as payments under the ABP for 2012 and 2013. Additionally, Messrs. Fallon and Brackett may elect to receive stock option awards in lieu of cash, with up to 15,000 options to be issuable for 2012 and up to 10,000 options to be issuable for 2013. The number of options may be prorated based on Holdings' Compensation Committee's assessment of their performance.

        The Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Fallon upon his hire, the details of which are described below under Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

116


Table of Contents

        Stock options were awarded to Mr. David Martin to recognize his service as interim CFO prior to the hire of Mr. Cregg. Messrs. Mullany, Cregg, Fallon and Coba were awarded stock options as an integral part of their new hire offer. These stock option awards were granted at a level equal to four times the number of shares they purchased, except in Mr. Mullany's case as he received five times the number of shares purchased and Mr. Mullany also received RSUs and Superperformance Options based on his initial purchase of shares. Messrs. Cregg, Fallon and Coba received RSUs as part of their new hire compensation. Mr. Brackett received an award of performance based RSUs to recognize his leadership of TruGreen and Terminix during 2011. All stock options and RSUs currently held by the NEOs are shown in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End (2011) table below with the exception of the performance based RSUs awarded to Mr. Brackett. No specific performance goals were established for Mr. Brackett's performance based RSUs. Instead, the performance based RSUs awarded to Mr. Brackett vest over a period of two years based on Holdings' Compensation Committee's subjective assessment of Mr. Brackett's achievement of certain qualitative performance conditions in 2012 and 2013. Due to the discretionary nature of the vesting requirements of these awards, they have not been in included in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End (2011) table.

        The MSIP and an employee stock option agreement govern each option award and provide, among other things, that the options vest in equal installments over the first four years of the ten-year option term. Mr. Mullany's Superperformance Options will vest (i) before a public offering if the fair market value of the common stock, as determined by the Holdings' Compensation Committee, is at least $25 per share, and (ii) after a public offering if the closing price of the common stock on the principle exchange on which it is traded equals or exceeds $25 per share for 20 consecutive trading days. Prior to the exercise of an option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. The MSIP and an RSU award agreement govern each RSU award and provide, among other things, that the RSUs vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years. Holders of RSUs have no rights as a stockholder, including voting rights. Holders of RSUs are; however, entitled to dividend equivalents if a dividend is declared on Holdings common stock. For more information on the MSIP, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Plan above. See Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control below for information regarding the cancellation or acceleration of vesting of stock options and RSUs upon certain terminations of employment or a change in control.

117


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End (2011)

 
   
  Option Awards   Stock Awards(1)  
Named Executive Officer
  Grant Date   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable(2)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable(2)
  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)(3)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Market Value
of Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(4)
 

Harry J. Mullany

  2/22/2011     0     863,635         $ 11.00     2/22/2021              

  2/22/2011     0           86,364   $ 11.00     2/22/2021              

  2/22/2011                                   86,364     1,209,096  

J. Patrick Spainhour

  12/19/2007     525,000     0         $ 10.00     12/19/2017              

Roger A. Cregg

  8/29/2011                                   75,000     1,050,000  

  9/27/2011     0     363,636         $ 11.00     9/27/2021              

David W. Martin

  12/19/2007     155,000     0         $ 10.00     12/19/2017              

  9/24/2010                                   26,666     373,324  

  9/27/2011     0     20,000         $ 11.00     9/27/2021              

Steven J. Martin

  N/A                                            

Thomas G. Brackett

  12/19/2007     425,000     0         $ 10.00     12/19/2017              

  9/24/2010                                   43,333     606,662  

Thomas J. Coba

  11/28/2011                                   60,000     840,000  

  12/16/2011     0     109,088         $ 11.00     12/16/2021              

Charles M. Fallon

  12/5/2011                                   69,090     967,260  

  12/16/2011     0     400,000         $ 11.00     12/16/2021              

(1)
Represents RSUs to be settled in stock under the MSIP. RSUs become vested and will settle on the basis of passage of time and continued employment over a three-year period, with one-third becoming vested on each anniversary following the grant date.

(2)
Represents options to purchase shares of Holdings' common stock granted under the MSIP. Options become exercisable on the basis of passage of time and continued employment over a four-year period, with one-fourth becoming exercisable on each anniversary following the grant date.

(3)
Represents Superperformance Options to purchase shares of Holdings' common stock granted under the MSIP. These options will vest before a public offering if the fair market value of the common stock as determined by the Holdings' Compensation Committee is at least $25 per share, and after a public offering if the closing price of the common stock on the principle exchange on which it is traded equals or exceeds $25 per share for 20 consecutive trading days.

(4)
Fair market value as of December 31, 2011 of $14 per share was determined by Holdings' Compensation Committee.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested (2011)

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Named Executive Officer
  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
  Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
  Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
 

Harry J. Mullany

    0     0     0     0  

J. Patrick Spainhour

    450,000     450,000     0     0  

Roger A. Cregg

    0     0     0     0  

David W. Martin

    0     0     13,334 (1)   146,674  

Steven J. Martin

    0     0     0     0  

Thomas G. Brackett

    0     0     21,667 (1)   238,337  

Thomas J. Coba

    0     0     0     0  

Charles M. Fallon

    0     0     0     0  

(1)
Reflects the vesting of RSUs in 2011. Messrs. David Martin and Brackett elected to surrender a portion of the shares that settled upon vesting of the RSUs to satisfy tax withholding obligations, resulting in net shares of 9,808 and 15,937, respectively.

118


Table of Contents

        The table below sets forth information regarding the NEO's deferred compensation.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation (2011)

Named Executive Officer
  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
  Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)(1)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions ($)
  Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)(2)
 

Harry J. Mullany

    0     0     0     0     0  

J. Patrick Spainhour

    0     0     0     0     0  

Roger A. Cregg

    0     0     0     0     0  

David W. Martin

    0     0     1,680     0     7,840  

Steven J. Martin(3)

    0     0     5,450     (85,240 )   21,949  

Thomas G. Brackett

    0     0     28,212     0     131,656  

Thomas J. Coba

    0     0     0     0     0  

Charles M. Fallon

    0     0     0     0     0  

(1)
The amounts in this column do not represent above market or preferential earnings, and therefore are not included in the Summary Compensation Table. For Messrs. David Martin and Brackett, the amounts in this column represent the increase in the value of their DSUs in 2011.

(2)
Messrs. David Martin and Brackett elected to allocate a portion of their eligible deferred compensation to invest in 560 and 9,404 DSUs, respectively, in 2007. The amounts in this column for Messrs. David Martin and Brackett represent the value of these DSUs.

(3)
Mr. Steve Martin received a partial distribution of his deferred compensation balance following his termination consistent with his distribution election.

        The DCP is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan designed to afford certain highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer up to 75 percent of their compensation on a pre-tax basis. Deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of investments selected by the participants in the DCP. The Company, in its sole discretion, may make matching contributions, based on the amounts that are deferred by employees pursuant to the DCP. The Company chose not to make matching contributions for 2011. Distributions are paid at the time elected by the participant in accordance with the DCP.

        The DCP is not currently funded by the Company, and participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from the Company to pay the amounts due under the DCP. All plan assets are held in trust and are considered general assets of the Company. When such payments are due, the cash will be distributed from the DCP's trust.

        Participants in the 2007 offering under the MSIP were permitted to allocate eligible deferred compensation under the DCP to purchase DSUs, which represent the right to receive a share of Holdings common stock on the first to occur of (i) the participant's termination of employment, (ii) a fixed date selected by the participant or (iii) a change in control of Holdings. DSUs were acquired for $10 each. Messrs. Brackett and David Martin were the only NEOs who elected to allocate a portion of their eligible deferred compensation to purchase DSUs.

119


Table of Contents

        Unless modified by separate agreement, upon a termination by the Company for cause, by the executive without good reason, or upon death or disability, we have no obligation to pay any prospective amounts or provide any benefits to our NEOs. Our obligations will consist of those obligations accrued at the date of termination, including payment of earned salary, vacation, reimbursement of expenses and obligations that may otherwise be payable in the event of death or disability. For this purpose, "cause" means a material breach by the executive of the duties and responsibilities of the executive (other than as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness) that is demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive's part, committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company and not remedied in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; or the commission by the executive of a felony or misdemeanor involving any act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty or any other intentional misconduct by the executive that materially and adversely affects the business affairs or reputation of the Company.

        Mr. Spainhour's retirement agreement provided for severance benefits equal to two times his highest annual base salary (a total of $1,970,000) and highest annual target bonus (a total of $1,970,000) upon his retirement. The severance benefits are payable over a two year period following Mr. Spainhour's retirement. The agreement also extended the period of time to exercise his vested non-matching stock options (a total of 525,000 options) from three months to three years following his retirement. After his retirement, Holdings repurchased 300,000 shares from Mr. Spainhour. Additionally, Mr. Spainhour exercised 450,000 stock options following his retirement. Those shares were also subsequently repurchased by Holdings in 2011 at the fair market value ($11 per share) on the date of repurchase. The Company will continue medical, prescription drug and life insurance for Mr. Spainhour and his dependents until his 65th birthday, May 2, 2015, with expenses shared in the same proportion as prior to his retirement for an estimated cost of $22,000. Mr. Spainhour's severance benefits were subject to his signing a general release and observing covenants not to compete, solicit, nor disclose confidential information.

        Mr. Mullany's employment agreement provides for severance benefits that if the Company were to terminate Mr. Mullany's employment without cause or Mr. Mullany terminates his employment for good reason, he would receive (i) continued payment of his monthly base salary for 24 months following the date of termination; (ii) continuation of health and certain other benefits for two years; (iii) the annual bonus earned for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination to the extent not previously paid; (iv) a prorated bonus through his date of termination; and (v) an amount equal to two times his average annual bonus paid or payable to Mr. Mullany with respect to the two fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination or, if Mr. Mullany has not received an annual bonus for either or both of those fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination, such average to be calculated using his target annual bonus for such year or years, as applicable. Payments of Mr. Mullany's severance benefits are subject to Mr. Mullany's signing a general release of claims. Mr. Mullany is also subject to covenants not to compete, solicit nor disclose confidential information for two years following termination. Upon Mr. Mullany's retirement, death or disability, the Company shall pay to Mr. Mullany (or his executors or legal representatives) the annual bonus earned for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination to the extent not previously paid; plus a prorated bonus through his date of termination.

        Mr. Steve Martin entered into a severance agreement with the Company that provided for a total severance benefit of $1,035,621, payable in 12 monthly installments that commenced on May 31, 2011. Mr. Steve Martin's severance benefits were subject to his signing a general release and observing covenants not to compete, solicit nor disclose confidential information.

120


Table of Contents

        The Company entered into a severance agreement with Mr. Fallon upon his hire that provides that if the Company were to terminate Mr. Fallon's employment without cause or Mr. Fallon terminates his employment for good reason, he would receive (i) continued payment of his monthly base salary for 12 months following the date of termination; (ii) the annual bonus earned for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination to the extent not previously paid; (iii) if his date of termination is after June 30 of a fiscal year, a prorated bonus through his date of termination; and (iv) an amount equal to the annual bonus paid or payable to Mr. Fallon with respect to the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination or, if Mr. Fallon has not received an annual bonus for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination, his target annual bonus for such year. Upon Mr. Fallon's retirement, death or disability, the Company shall pay to Mr. Fallon (or his executors or legal representatives) the annual bonus earned for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination to the extent not previously paid; plus if his date of termination is after June 30 of a fiscal year, a prorated bonus through his date of termination.

        Other than the employment agreements with Messrs. Mullany and Fallon, the Company does not currently offer employment agreements or change in control agreements to newly hired executive officers. The Board periodically reassesses the need to offer these types of arrangements and may decide to do so in the future. As officers who report directly to our CEO, Messrs. Cregg, Coba and Brackett are eligible to receive severance if terminated without cause. Under ServiceMaster's practice in effect as of December 31, 2011, in the event of such termination, an amount equal to one times base salary plus target bonus for the year of termination, and, if termination occurs after June 30 of a year, a prorated portion of the bonus earned under the ABP, would be payable to the terminated executive at the same time as annual bonuses are paid to other executives for the applicable year. Mr. David Martin, as a member of senior management, would be eligible for the same severance benefits as stated above.

        If an executive's employment is terminated by the Company for cause before there is a public offering of Holdings' common shares, all options (vested and unvested) and RSUs are immediately cancelled and Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors have the right to purchase shares owned by the executive at the lower of fair market value or the original cost of the shares to the executive.

        If an executive's employment is terminated by the Company without cause before there is a public offering of Holdings' common shares, all unvested options and RSUs immediately terminate and Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors have the right to repurchase shares owned by the executive at fair market value. If Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors choose not to exercise their repurchase rights following an involuntary termination without cause, the executive may require Holdings to repurchase the executive's shares at fair market value. Upon such a termination, the executive may exercise vested options before the first to occur of (i) the three month anniversary of the executive's termination of employment or (ii) the expiration of the options' normal term, after which date such options are cancelled. The executive's right to require Holdings to repurchase shares at the then fair market value does not extend to shares obtained through the exercise of options. Mr. Spainhour exercised stock options following his retirement.

        If an executive voluntarily terminates his employment for any reason before there is a public offering of Holdings' common shares, all unvested options and RSUs immediately terminate and Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors have the right to purchase shares owned by the executive at the then fair market value. Upon such a termination, the executive may exercise vested options before the first to occur of (i) the three month anniversary of the executive's termination of employment (one-year anniversary in the case of retirement) and (ii) the expiration of the options' normal term, after which date such options are cancelled. If the executive's voluntary termination is

121


Table of Contents

because of the executive's retirement and if Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors choose not to exercise their repurchase rights, the executive may require Holdings to repurchase purchased shares at fair market value. The executive's right to require Holdings to repurchase shares at fair market value does not extend to shares obtained through the exercise of options. See discussion above under Severance Benefits for NEOs for a discussion of the treatment of Mr. Spainhour's options following his retirement. During 2011, shares were repurchased from Messrs. Spainhour and Steve Martin subsequent to their respective departures. The shares Mr. Spainhour acquired pursuant to the stock option exercise were later repurchased by the Company following a specified holding period.

        If an executive's employment terminates by reason of death or disability before there is a public offering of the shares, Holdings and certain Equity Sponsors have the right to purchase the shares at fair market value and the executive (or his/her heirs) may require Holdings to repurchase the executive's shares at fair market value. Upon such termination, unvested options will vest and all options will remain exercisable until the first to occur of (i) the one-year anniversary of the executive's date of termination or (ii) the expiration of the options' normal term, after which date such options are cancelled. RSUs shall vest as to the number of RSUs that would have vested on the next anniversary of the grant date (assuming the executive's employment had continued through such anniversary) multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed since (x) the grant date, if the termination due to death or disability occurs on or prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, or (y) the most recent prior anniversary of the grant date, if the special termination (i.e., death or disability) occurs after the first anniversary of the grant date, and the denominator of which is 365.

        The stock option agreements provide that the vesting of options to purchase shares of Holdings common stock will be accelerated if Holdings experiences a change in control (as defined in the MSIP), unless Holdings' Board of Directors reasonably determines in good faith that options with substantially equivalent or better terms are substituted for the existing options. Upon a change in control, all RSUs shall become vested. A change in control means:

        Notwithstanding the forgoing, an initial public offering of Holdings common stock shall not constitute a change in control.

        The Holdings' Board of Directors also has the discretion to accelerate the vesting of options or RSUs at any time and from time to time.

        The following table sets forth information regarding the value of payments and other benefits payable by the Company to each of the NEOs employed by the Company as of December 31, 2011 in the event of death, disability, qualifying termination or change in control. The amounts shown do not include payments of compensation that have previously been deferred as disclosed

122


Table of Contents

under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation (2011) table. Except as otherwise noted below, the amounts shown assume termination or change in control effective as of December 31, 2011 and a fair market value of Holdings common stock on December 31, 2011 of $14 per share, as determined by Holdings' Compensation Committee.

Potential Payments Upon Death, Disability, Qualifying Termination or Change in Control (2011)

Named Executive Officer
  Event   Base Salary and
Target Bonus
($)(1)
  Payment of
Current
Year Bonus
($)(2)
  Acceleration of
Vesting of
Stock Options
($)(3)
  Acceleration of
Vesting of
RSUs
($)(3)
  Health &
Welfare
($)
  Total
Payments
($)
 

Harry J. Mullany

  Death     0     357,534     2,590,905     344,512     0     3,292,951  

  Disability     0     427,338     2,590,905     344,512     0     3,362,755  

  Qualifying Termination     4,000,000     427,338     0     0     21,710     4,449,048  

  Change in Control     0     0     2,849,997     1,209,096     0     4,059,093  

Roger A. Cregg

  Death     0     143,835     1,090,908     118,902     0     1,353,645  

  Disability     0     155,544     1,090,908     118,902     0     1,365,354  

  Qualifying Termination     1,020,000     155,544     0     0     0     1,175,544  

  Change in Control     0     0     1,090,908     1,050,000     0     2,140,908  

David W. Martin

  Death     0     200,000     60,000     50,120     0     310,120  

  Disability     0     212,216     60,000     50,120     0     322,336  

  Qualifying Termination     450,000     212,216     0     0     0     662,216  

  Change in Control     0     0     60,000     373,324     0     433,324  

Thomas G. Brackett

  Death     0     344,500     0     81,438     0     425,938  

  Disability     0     366,238     0     81,438     0     447,676  

  Qualifying Termination     874,500     366,238     0     0     0     1,240,738  

  Change in Control     0     0     0     886,662     0     886,662  

Thomas J. Coba

  Death     0     0     327,264     25,312     0     352,576  

  Disability     0     0     327,264     25,312     0     352,576  

  Qualifying Termination     701,250     0     0     0     0     701,250  

  Change in Control     0     0     327,264     840,000     0     1,167,264  

Charles M. Fallon

  Death     0     0     1,200,000     22,960     0     1,222,960  

  Disability     0     0     1,200,000     22,960     0     1,222,960  

  Qualifying Termination     825,000     0     0     0     0     825,000  

  Change in Control     0     0     1,200,000     967,260     0     2,167,260  

(1)
Calculations are based upon the terms previously discussed under Severance Benefits for NEOs.

(2)
Because termination is assumed to occur on the last day of the performance period for the 2011 ABP, amounts shown for Disability and Qualifying Termination are the same as those reflected in the 2011 ABP Payments Table, except for Mr. Mullany who received the $500,000 guaranteed portion of his ABP payment prior to year-end. The amounts are payable upon an involuntary termination without cause (and for Messrs. Mullany and Fallon upon voluntary termination for good reason). The amounts shown for Death reflect ABP payments at the NEOs target award percentage.

(3)
As noted above in the section entitled MSIP, upon a change in control, death or disability, all or portions of unvested stock options and RSUs become vested and exercisable. The values in the table were based on a value of $14 per share at December 31, 2011, and option exercise prices of $10 and $11, as applicable.

        Our directors are principals of CD&R, which is party to a consulting agreement with the Company and Holdings, pursuant to which CD&R provides Holdings and its subsidiaries with financial advisory and management consulting services in exchange for a fee. For a discussion of this agreement and other agreements between the Company, Holdings and the Equity Sponsors, see "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions." The Company does not currently separately compensate our directors for their service on our Board.

        No member of the Company's Board was at any time during 2011 an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries nor is any such person a former officer of the Company or any of our subsidiaries. The CEO recommends to the Board the compensation for the Company's other executive officers based on his assessment of each executive officer's individual responsibility, individual and business unit performance, overall contribution, the competitive market data provided by Aon Hewitt (as presented to the Board by our Senior Vice President of Human Resources) and prevailing economic conditions. Our directors are principals of CD&R. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" for a discussion of agreements between ServiceMaster and the Equity Sponsors and their affiliates.

123


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        CDRSVM Holding, Inc., whose address is 860 Ridge Lake Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, owns all of the outstanding common stock of ServiceMaster. CDRSVM Investment Holding, Inc. owns all of the outstanding common stock of CDRSVM Holding, Inc. Investment funds associated with or designated by the Equity Sponsors, together with certain of our executives and other key employees, own all of the common stock of Holdings.

        The following table sets forth information as of April 26, 2012 with respect to the ownership of the common stock of Holdings by:

        The amounts and percentages of shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person's ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person's percentage. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.

124


Table of Contents

        Except as otherwise indicated in these footnotes, each of the beneficial owners listed has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated shares of common stock. Addresses for the Equity Sponsors are set forth in the footnotes to the table.

Name of Beneficial Owner
  Number of
Shares Owned
  Percent of
Class (%)
 

Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P. and related funds(1)

    90,610,000     65.73  

StepStone Group LLC managed funds(2)

    19,840,774     14.39  

JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc.(3)

    10,000,000     7.25  

Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P.(4)

    7,500,000     5.44  

Kenneth A. Giuriceo(5)

    0     0  

David H. Wasserman(5)

    0     0  

Harry J. Mullany III(6)

    424,095     *  

J. Patrick Spainhour(6)

    525,000     *  

Roger A. Cregg

    90,909     *  

David W. Martin(6)

    204,808     *  

Steven J. Martin

    0     0  

Thomas G. Brackett(6)

    490,937     *  

Charles M. Fallon

    100,000     *  

Thomas J. Coba

    27,272     *  

All current directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)(6)(7)

    1,962,343     1.41  

*
Less than one percent.

(1)
Represents the following shares: (i) 60,000,000 shares of common stock held by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., whose general partner is CD&R Associates VII, Ltd., whose sole stockholder is CD&R Associates VII, L.P., whose general partner is CD&R Investment Associates VII, Ltd.; (ii) 14,682,792 shares of common stock held by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P., whose general partner is CD&R Associates VII (Co-Investment), Ltd., whose sole stockholder is CD&R Associates VII, L.P., whose general partner is CD&R Investment Associates VII, Ltd.; (iii) 10,500,000 shares of common stock held by CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P., whose general partner is CDR SVM Co-Investor GP Limited, whose sole stockholder is Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P.; (iv) 5,000,000 shares of common stock held by CDR SVM Co-Investor No. 2 L.P., whose general partner is CDR SVM Co-Investor No. 2 GP Limited, whose sole stockholder is Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P.; and (v) 427,208 shares of common stock held by CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P., whose general partner is CD&R Parallel Fund Associates VII, Ltd. CD&R Investment Associates VII, Ltd. and CD&R Parallel Fund Associates VII, Ltd. are each managed by a three person board of directors, and all board action relating to the voting or disposition of these shares requires approval of a majority of the applicable board. Joseph L. Rice, III, Donald J. Gogel and Kevin J. Conway, as the directors of each of CD&R Investment Associates VII, Ltd. and CD&R Parallel Fund Associates VII, Ltd., may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares shown as beneficially owned by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Fund VII, L.P., Clayton Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P., CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P., CDR SVM Co-Investor No. 2 L.P. and CD&Rice Parallel Fund VII, L.P.. Such persons disclaim such beneficial ownership.

Each of CD&R Associates VII, Ltd., CD&R Associates VII, L.P. and CD&R Investment Associates VII, Ltd. expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., as well as of the shares held by each of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P., CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P., CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P. and CDR SVM Co-Investor No. 2 L.P. Each of CDR SVM Co-Investor GP Limited and CDR SVM No. 2 GP Limited expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by each of CDR

125


Table of Contents

(2)
Represents shares held by 2007 Co-Investment Portfolio L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Cayman Holding, L.P., and StepStone Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC. The address for each of 2007 Co-Investment Portfolio L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Cayman Holding, L.P., and StepStone Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC, is c/o StepStone Group LLC, 4350 LaJolla Village Drive, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92122.

(3)
JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. is an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co. The address for JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. is 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

(4)
Represents shares held by Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P. The address for Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P. is c/o Ridgemont Partners Management, LLC, 150 North College Street, Suite 2500, Charlotte, NC 28202. Ridgemont Secondary Management I, L.P. is the sole general partner of Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P. and may therefore be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares, and its address is c/o Ridgemont Partners Management, LLC, 150 North College Street, Suite 2500, Charlotte, NC 28202. Ridgemont Secondary Management I, LLC is the sole general partner of Ridgemont Secondary Management I, L.P. and may therefore also be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares, and its address is c/o Ridgemont Partners Management, LLC, 150 North College Street, Suite 2500, Charlotte, NC 28202. A majority of the following members of Ridgemont Secondary Management I, LLC have the authority to vote or dispose of the shares held by Ridgemont Partners Secondary Fund I, L.P.: J. Travis Hain, Walker L. Poole, Robert H. Sheridan, III, Robert L. Edwards, Jr., John A. Shimp and George E. Morgan, III. The address for each of the members of Ridgemont Secondary Management I, LLC is c/o Ridgemont Partners Management, LLC, 150 North College Street, Suite 2500, Charlotte, NC 28202. Ridgemont Secondary Management I, L.P., Ridgemont Secondary Management I, LLC and each of the members of Ridgemont Secondary Management I, LLC disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein, if any.

(5)
Does not include common stock held by investment funds associated with or designated by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC. Messrs. Giuriceo and Wasserman are directors of The ServiceMaster Company and Holdings and executives of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC. They disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by investment funds associated with or designated by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC. The address for Messrs. Giuriceo and Wasserman is 375 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10152.

(6)
Includes shares which the current and former executive officers have the right to acquire prior to June 25, 2012 through the exercise of stock options as follows: Mr. Mullany, 215,909 shares; Mr. Spainhour, 525,000 shares; Mr. David Martin, 155,000 shares; and Mr. Brackett, 425,000

126


Table of Contents

(7)
All employees of the Company as a group held 2,234,893 shares of common stock and DSUs as of December 31, 2011, constituting 1.62 percent of the total ownership of Holdings.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

        The following table contains information, as of December 31, 2011, about the amount of shares in Holdings, our indirect parent company, to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options granted under the MSIP.

Plan Category
  Number of
Securities to
be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights(1)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities reflected in
first column)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

    10,327,459   $ 10.24     2,032,648  

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

             

Total

    10,327,459   $ 10.24     2,032,648  

(1)
The figures in this column reflect stock options and 703,785 RSUs granted to officers pursuant to the MSIP. For a description of the MSIP, please refer to "Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The RSU figures above reflect the 20,000 performance based RSUs granted to Mr. Brackett in 2011.

127


Table of Contents


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

        Our Board has approved policies and procedures with respect to the review and approval of certain transactions between ServiceMaster and a "Related Person" (a "Related Person Transaction"), which we refer to as our "Related Person Transaction Policy." Pursuant to the terms of the Related Person Transaction Policy, the Board must review and decide whether to approve or ratify any Related Person Transaction. Any Related Person Transaction is required to be reported to our legal department and the legal department will determine whether it should be submitted to the Board for consideration.

        For the purposes of the Related Person Transaction Policy, a "Related Person Transaction" is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which ServiceMaster (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect interest.

        A "Related Person" as defined in the Related Person Transaction Policy, means any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of ServiceMaster's last fiscal year was, a director or executive officer of ServiceMaster or a nominee to become a director of ServiceMaster; any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of ServiceMaster's or its parent or affiliate's common stock; any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, including any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of the director, executive officer, nominee or more than five percent beneficial owner, and any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such director, executive officer, nominee or more than five percent beneficial owner; and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is a general partner or, for other ownership interests, a limited partner or other owner in which such person has a beneficial ownership interest of ten percent or more.

Stockholders Agreement

        Holdings has entered into a stockholders agreement, as amended (the "Stockholders Agreement"), with investment funds associated with or designated by the Equity Sponsors. The Stockholders Agreement contains agreements that entitle investment funds associated with certain of the Equity Sponsors to elect (or cause to be elected) all of Holdings' directors. The directors include three designees of investment funds associated with CD&R (one of whom shall serve as the chairman and each of whom is entitled to three votes) and one designee of investment funds associated with Citigroup (now a designee of StepStone), subject to adjustment in the case investment funds associated with or designated by certain of the Equity Sponsors sell more than a specified amount of their shareholdings in Holdings. The Stockholders Agreement provides for our CEO to be a director of Holdings, as well as his successor as CEO, subject to the approval of the Holdings board and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P. (the "Lead Investor"). The Stockholders Agreement grants to investment funds associated with the Equity Sponsors special governance rights, including rights of approval over certain corporate and other transactions and the right, without any liability, to pursue investment opportunities in businesses that directly or indirectly compete with the Company's businesses. The Stockholders Agreement also gives investment funds associated with the Equity Sponsors preemptive rights with respect to certain issuances of equity securities of Holdings and its subsidiaries, including ServiceMaster, subject to certain exceptions, and contains restrictions on the transfer of shares of Holdings, as well as tag-along rights and rights of first offer.

128


Table of Contents

Registration Rights Agreement

        Holdings has entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with investment funds associated with or designated by certain of the Equity Sponsors. The Registration Rights Agreement grants to certain of these investment funds the right, in the case of the Lead Investor at any time and in the case of the other certain Equity Sponsors at least 18 months following the initial public offering of Holdings common stock, to cause Holdings, at its own expense, to use its best efforts to register such securities held by the investment funds for public resale, subject to certain limitations. In the event Holdings registers any of its common stock following its initial public offering, these investment funds also have the right to require Holdings to use its best efforts to include shares of common stock of Holdings held by them, subject to certain limitations, including as determined by the underwriters. The Registration Rights Agreement also provides for Holdings to indemnify the investment funds party to that agreement and their affiliates in connection with the registration of Holdings' securities.

Consulting Agreements

        In connection with the Merger and the related transactions, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with CD&R under which CD&R provided the Company with on-going consulting and management advisory services. The annual management fee payable under the consulting agreement with CD&R is $6.25 million. Under this agreement, the Company recorded management fees in each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $6.25 million. The consulting agreement also provides that CD&R may receive additional fees in connection with certain subsequent financing and acquisition or disposition transactions. The consulting agreement will terminate on July 24, 2017, unless terminated earlier at CD&R's election.

        In addition, in August 2009, the Company entered into consulting agreements with Citigroup, BAS and JPMorgan, each of which is an Equity Sponsor or an affiliate of an Equity Sponsor. Under the consulting agreements, Citigroup, BAS and JPMorgan each provide the Company with on-going consulting and management advisory services through June 30, 2016 or the earlier termination of the existing consulting agreement between the Company and CD&R. We understand that on September 30, 2010, Citigroup transferred the management responsibility for certain investment funds that own shares of common stock of Holdings to StepStone and Lexington Partners Advisors LP. We understand that Citigroup also assigned its obligations and rights under its consulting agreement to StepStone, and beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, the consulting fee otherwise payable to Citigroup became payable to StepStone. The Company paid annual management fees of $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.25 million to StepStone, BAS and JPMorgan, respectively. The Company recorded consulting fees related to these agreements in each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $1.25 million. As of December 22, 2011, Holdings purchased from BAS 7.5 million shares of capital stock of Holdings. Effective January 1, 2012, the annual management fee payable to BAS was reduced to $0.25 million.

Indemnification Agreements

        Holdings and ServiceMaster have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of the Equity Sponsors and Holdings stockholders affiliated with certain of the Equity Sponsors, pursuant to which Holdings and ServiceMaster will indemnify those Equity Sponsors, the Holdings stockholders affiliated with those Equity Sponsors and their respective affiliates, directors, officers, partners, members, employees, agents, representatives and controlling persons, against certain liabilities arising out of performance of the consulting agreements described above under "Consulting Agreements" and certain other claims and liabilities, including liabilities arising out of financing arrangements and securities offerings.

129


Table of Contents

Debt Purchases

        In 2008 and 2009, Holdings completed open market purchases totaling $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $21.4 million. On December 21, 2011, the Company purchased from Holdings and retired $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for an aggregate purchase price of $68.0 million, which included payment of accrued interest of $3.0 million. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest expense of $6.8 million, $7.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to 2015 Notes held by Holdings. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid interest to Holdings in the amount of $10.0 million, $7.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively. Interest accrued by the Company and payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2010 amounted to $3.2 million. As a result of the purchase of the 2015 Notes from Holdings, the Company did not have interest payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2011.

Financing Arrangements with Related Parties

        Affiliates of JPMorgan (which is one of the Equity Sponsors) have provided investment banking and commercial banking services to us for which they have received customary fees and commissions. In addition, these parties have acted as agents and lenders to us under our Credit Facilities and as initial purchasers for the Old Notes, for which they have received customary fees, commissions, expenses and/or other compensation. The Company entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with an affiliate of JPMorgan in connection with the issuance of the Old Notes.

130


Table of Contents


DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

Term Facilities

        In connection with the Merger, we entered into a credit agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, with respect to the Term Facilities, with Citibank, N.A. as administrative agent, collateral agent and letter of credit facility issuing bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and a syndicate of lenders party thereto from time to time. The following is a brief description of the principal terms of the term loan credit agreement and related documents governing the Term Facilities.

        The Term Facilities consist of a $2.650 billion senior secured term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility"), the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the transactions in connection with the Merger, including the refinancing of certain existing indebtedness. The term loan credit agreement also provides for a pre-funded synthetic letter of credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150 million (the "L/C Facility" and, together with the Term Loan Facility, the "Term Facilities"). As of December 31, 2011, we had $2.531 billion in term loan borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, $130.3 million in proceeds of the L/C Facility on deposit and available for letters of credit on terms and conditions set forth in the term loan credit agreement, and $19.7 million in face amount of undrawn letters of credit outstanding under the L/C Facility.

        The Term Facilities mature July 24, 2014 and the Term Loan Facility thereunder amortizes in nominal quarterly installments equal to $6.6 million until the maturity date.

        Subject to certain exceptions, the Term Loan Facility is subject to mandatory prepayment in amount equal to:

        The ServiceMaster Company is the borrower under the Term Loan Facility. CDRSVM Holding, Inc., the direct parent of ServiceMaster, and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of ServiceMaster (other than any subsidiary that is a foreign subsidiary holding company, a subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary, an unrestricted subsidiary, any subsidiary below a certain materiality threshold, a receivables financing subsidiary, a subsidiary subject to regulation as an insurance, home warranty, service contract or similar company (or any subsidiary thereof) and certain other specified subsidiaries) have guaranteed ServiceMaster's obligations under the Term Loan Facility. The Term Loan Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured by substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of ServiceMaster and the guarantors (including pledges of (1) a $100 million intercompany promissory note made by The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership in favor of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership and (2) all the capital stock of all direct domestic subsidiaries (other than foreign subsidiary holding companies, which are deemed to be foreign subsidiaries) owned by ServiceMaster or any guarantor and of up to 65 percent of the capital stock of each direct foreign subsidiary owned by ServiceMaster or any guarantor), subject to certain exceptions, including but not limited to exceptions for equity interests, indebtedness or other obligations of subsidiaries, real estate or any other assets if the granting of a

131


Table of Contents

security interest therein would require that the notes described under "—Continuing Notes" below be secured. The Term Loan Facility is secured on a pari passu basis with the security interests created in the same collateral securing the Revolving Credit Facility.

        The interest rates applicable to the loans under the Term Loan Facility are based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to either, at the borrower's option, (i) an adjusted London inter-bank offered rate plus a borrowing margin, or (ii) an alternate base rate plus a borrowing margin. As of December 31, 2011, borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bore interest at a rate of 2.80 percent.

        ServiceMaster pays (1) letter of credit participation fees on the full amount of the L/C Facility plus fronting fees for the letter of credit issuing bank and (2) other customary fees in respect of the Term Facilities.

        The agreement governing the Term Loan Facilities contains a number of negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of ServiceMaster and its restricted subsidiaries to:

        The agreement governing the Term Loan Facilities also contains certain affirmative covenants, including financial and other reporting requirements.

        The agreement governing the Term Loan Facilities provides for customary events of default, including non-payment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, material inaccuracy of representations or warranties, specified cross payment default and cross acceleration to other material indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, certain ERISA events, material invalidity of guarantees or security interests, material judgments and change of control.

132


Table of Contents

Revolving Credit Facility

        In connection with the Merger, we also entered into a revolving credit agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility, with Citibank, N.A. as administrative agent, revolving collateral agent and issuing bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent and a syndicate of lenders party thereto from time to time. The following is a brief description of the principal terms of the revolving credit agreement and related documents governing the Revolving Credit Facility.

        The Revolving Credit Facility provides for senior secured revolving loans up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of $500 million. Up to $75 million of the Revolving Credit Facility is available for the issuance of stand-by and commercial letters of credit. Amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility may be borrowed in certain designated foreign currencies up to a principal amount not to exceed $50 million, and revolving credit loans to foreign subsidiary borrowers may not exceed $50 million. On February 2, 2011, ServiceMaster entered into an amendment to its Revolving Credit Facility to provide lenders with the option to extend the maturity date of their revolving commitments by one year. To induce lenders to elect to extend the maturity of their revolving commitments ServiceMaster provided electing lenders with the option to reduce their commitments by 20 percent. As a result of the amendment, ServiceMaster currently has available borrowing capacity under the amended facility of $442.5 million through July 24, 2013 and of $229.6 million through July 24, 2014. ServiceMaster will continue to have access to letters of credit up to $75.0 million through July 24, 2014.

        As of December 31, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility.

        On January 30, 2012, ServiceMaster entered into an amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility Amendment"). The Revolving Credit Facility Amendment became effective as of February 13, 2012. Prior to the Revolving Credit Facility Amendment, the Company had available borrowing capacity of approximately $442 million through July 24, 2013 and had approximately $229 million of available borrowing capacity from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014. The Company also had access to letters of credit up to $75 million through July 24, 2014. The Revolving Credit Facility Amendment extends the maturity date of a portion of the facility until January 31, 2017. On January 30, 2012, the Company also entered into an increase supplement to its Revolving Credit Facility (the "Increase Supplement"). The Increase Supplement became effective as of February 13, 2012. The Increase Supplement increases borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility by approximately $5.2 million. As a result of the Revolving Credit Facility Amendment and the Increase Supplement, the Company will have available borrowing capacity under its amended revolving credit facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, will have $324.2 million of available borrowing capacity from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014, and will have $265.2 million of available borrowing capacity from July 24, 2014 through January 31, 2017. As a result of the Revolving Credit Facility Amendment, the Company will continue to have access to letters of credit of up to $75 million through January 31, 2017.

        The final maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility is July 24, 2014. If the amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility becomes effective, the final maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility will be January 31, 2017. The Revolving Credit Facility is not subject to mandatory prepayment.

133


Table of Contents

        ServiceMaster and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries are the domestic borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. One or more foreign subsidiaries of ServiceMaster may become borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility on the terms and conditions in the revolving credit agreement. The direct parent of each domestic borrower and each domestic subsidiary of ServiceMaster (other than any subsidiary that is a foreign subsidiary holding company, a subsidiary that is a subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary, an unrestricted subsidiary, any subsidiary below a certain materiality threshold, a receivables financing subsidiary, a subsidiary subject to regulation as an insurance, home warranty, service contract or similar company (or any subsidiary thereof) and certain other specified subsidiaries) have guaranteed the domestic borrowers' obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility. With respect to any non-U.S. borrower, certain non-U.S. subsidiaries may be required to provide a guarantee of its borrowings (subject to certain limitations), and such borrowings shall be guaranteed by the U.S. guarantors. The Revolving Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured by the same collateral securing the Term Loan Facility, on a pari passu basis with the security interests created in the same collateral securing the Term Loan Facility. If any non-U.S. borrower is included, certain assets of such non-U.S. borrower and related non-U.S. subsidiary guarantors may be similarly pledged to the extent such pledge may be obtained without material cost or expense, and subject to legal and certain other limitations.

        The interest rates applicable to the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility are based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to either, at the borrower's option, (i) an adjusted London inter-bank offered rate (or, in the case of loans made in Euros, an adjusted Euro inter-bank offered rate) plus a borrowing margin or (ii) an alternate base rate plus a borrowing margin. As of December 31, 2011, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate of 2.80 percent.

        The borrowers pay customary fees in respect of the Revolving Credit Facility, including a commitment fee on the unutilized portion thereof.

        The agreement governing the Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of negative covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the ability of ServiceMaster and its material restricted subsidiaries to:

134


Table of Contents

        The agreement governing the Revolving Credit Facility also contains certain affirmative covenants, including financial and other reporting requirements.

        The agreement governing the Revolving Credit Facility provides for customary events of default, including non-payment of principal, interest or fees, violation of covenants, material inaccuracy of representations or warranties, cross default to other material indebtedness, certain bankruptcy events, certain ERISA events, material invalidity of guarantees or security interests, material judgments and change of control.

Receivables Facility

        We have an arrangement enabling us to sell, on a revolving basis, certain receivables to unrelated third party purchasers. The agreement is a 364-day facility that is renewable at the option of the receivables financing subsidiary of ServiceMaster, with a final termination date of July 17, 2012. Subject to eligibility requirements, we may sell up to $50 million of our receivables to these purchasers. The amount of the eligible receivables varies during the year based on seasonality of our business that will at times limit the amount available to us. As of December 31, 2011, the amount outstanding under this facility was $10.0 million.

Continuing Notes

        As of December 31, 2011, ServiceMaster had outstanding approximately $282.1 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes issued prior to the Merger, consisting of approximately $153.2 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.45% notes due August 15, 2027, $67.5 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.10% notes due March 1, 2018 and $61.4 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.25% notes due March 1, 2038 (collectively, the "Continuing Notes").

        The Continuing Notes rank pari passu with all other unsubordinated indebtedness of ServiceMaster.

        ServiceMaster may redeem the Continuing Notes of any series, upon not less than 30 or more than 60 days prior written notice, at any time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100 percent of their principal amount or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments (as defined) thereon discounted to the redemption date, on a semi-annual basis, at the treasury yield (as defined in the indenture governing such notes) plus 20 basis points, together with all accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.

        The indenture governing the Continuing Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit ServiceMaster's and ServiceMaster's significant subsidiaries' (as defined in the indenture governing such notes) ability to create certain liens, enter into certain sale and lease back transactions, and, with respect to ServiceMaster, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets.

135


Table of Contents

        The indenture governing the Continuing Notes provides for customary events of default including non-payment of principal or interest, failure to comply with covenants, and certain bankruptcy or insolvency events.

2015 Notes

        In connection with the completion of the Merger, Acquisition Co. entered into a $1,150.0 million senior unsecured interim loan facility ("Interim Loan Facility"). The rights and obligations of Acquisition Co. under the Interim Loan Facility were assumed by ServiceMaster on July 24, 2007, the closing date of the Merger.

        The Interim Loan Facility matured on July 24, 2008. On the maturity date, outstanding amounts under the Interim Loan Facility were converted on a one to one basis into 2015 Notes. The 2015 Notes were issued pursuant to a refinancing indenture, dated July 24, 2008, among ServiceMaster, the subsidiary guarantors of the 2015 Notes, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as successor by merger to Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee. In connection with the issuance of 2015 Notes, ServiceMaster entered into the Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which ServiceMaster filed with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the resale of the 2015 Notes, which was declared effective on January 16, 2009. ServiceMaster deregistered the 2015 Notes in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement relating to the 2015 Notes, and the effectiveness of the registration statement was terminated on November 19, 2009.

        The 2015 Notes are senior unsecured obligations of ours and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including the notes offered hereby. The 2015 Notes are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries on a senior unsecured basis. The subsidiary guarantees are general unsecured senior obligations of the subsidiary guarantors and rank equally in right of payment with all of the existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of our guarantor subsidiaries, including their guarantees of the notes offered hereby. The 2015 Notes are effectively junior to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

        During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company completed open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $41.0 million. The notes acquired by the Company have been retired. The Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $46.1 million in its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to these retirements. During 2010 and 2011, no further open market purchases of 2015 Notes were made.

        In addition, as of December 31, 2011, Holdings had completed open market purchases totaling $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $21.4 million. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest expense of $6.8 million, $7.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to 2015 Notes held by Holdings. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid interest to Holdings in the amount of $10.0 million, $7.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively. Interest accrued by the Company and payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2010 amounted to $3.2 million. On December 21, 2011, ServiceMaster purchased from Holdings $65 million in face amount of the 2015 Notes, for an aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $68 million, which notes have been retired. As a

136


Table of Contents

result of the purchase of the 2015 Notes from Holdings, the Company did not have interest payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2011.

        ServiceMaster may redeem the 2015 Notes, in whole or in part, at its option, at any time after July 15, 2011, at the applicable redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 2015 Notes, together with all accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.

        In the first quarter of 2012, ServiceMaster used the proceeds from the sale of the Old Notes, together with available cash, to redeem $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes.

        The indenture governing the 2015 Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of ServiceMaster and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the indenture governing such notes) to:

        The indenture governing the 2015 Notes provides for customary events of default including non-payment of principal or interest, failure to comply with covenants, and certain bankruptcy or insolvency events.

137


Table of Contents


DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

General

        The old 8% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "Old Notes") were issued and the new 8% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "New Notes") are to be issued under the indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, as amended by the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, and the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 16, 2012 (collectively, the "Indenture"), among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time parties thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"). The terms of the New Notes will be substantially identical to the terms of the Old Notes except that the New Notes will be registered under the Securities Act and will not contain restrictions on transfer or provisions relating to additional interest, will bear a different CUSIP number from the Old Notes, and will not entitle their holders to registration rights. The New Notes will otherwise be treated as the Old Notes for the purposes of the Indenture.

        The Indenture and the Notes contain provisions that define your rights and govern the obligations of the Company under the Notes. Copies of the Indenture and the form of the Notes have been filed as exhibits to the Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 14, 2012 and February 16, 2012. Copies of the Indenture and the Notes will be made available to prospective purchasers of the Notes upon request, as set forth under "Where You Can Find More Information."

        The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Indenture and the Notes. It does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, all the provisions of the Indenture and the Notes, including the definitions of certain terms therein and (in the case of the Indenture) those terms to be made a part thereof by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. The term "Company" and the other capitalized terms defined in "—Certain Definitions" below are used in this "Description of Notes" as so defined. Any reference to a "Holder" or a "Noteholder" in this "Description of Notes" refers to the Holders of the Old Notes, or the New Notes, as applicable. The Old Notes and the New Notes, are each considered collectively to be a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including, without limitations, for the purposes of waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. In this Description of Notes, any reference to (i) "Notes" refers collectively to the Old Notes and the New Notes, unless the context otherwise requires, and (ii) a "series" of Notes refers to the Old Notes and the New Notes collectively, as applicable.

Brief Description of the Notes

        The Notes are:

138


Table of Contents

Brief Description of the Subsidiary Guarantees

        The Subsidiary Guarantees of each Subsidiary Guarantor in respect of the Notes are:

Principal, Maturity and Interest

        The Notes will mature on February 15, 2020. Each Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum from February 13, 2012, or from the most recent date to which interest has been paid or provided for. Interest will be payable semi-annually in cash to Holders of record at the close of business on the February 1 or August 1 immediately preceding the interest payment date on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing August 15, 2012. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

        An aggregate principal amount of $600,000,000 of Notes is currently outstanding. Additional securities may be issued under the Indenture in one or more series from time to time ("Additional Notes"), subject to the limitations set forth under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness," which will vote as a class with the Notes (except as otherwise provided herein) and otherwise be treated as Notes for purposes of the Indenture. The Indenture permits the Company to designate the maturity date, interest rate and optional redemption provisions applicable to each series of Additional Notes, which may differ from the maturity date, interest rate and optional redemption provisions applicable to the Notes issued on the Issue Date. Additional Notes that differ with respect to maturity date, interest rate or optional redemption provisions from the Notes issued on the Issue Date will constitute a different series of Notes from such initial Notes. Additional Notes that have the same maturity date, interest rate and optional redemption provisions as the Notes issued on the Issue Date will be treated as the same series as such initial Notes unless otherwise designated by the Company. The Company similarly will be entitled to vary the application of certain other provisions to any series of Additional Notes.

        Principal of (and premium, if any) and interest on the Notes are payable, and the Notes may be exchanged or transferred, at the office or agency of the Company maintained for such purposes (which initially shall be the corporate trust office of the Trustee), except that, at the option of the Company, payment of interest may be made by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the account designated to the Company by the Person entitled thereto or by check mailed to the address of the Person entitled thereto as such address appears in the Note Register.

        The New Notes will be issued in the form of Global Notes that will be deposited upon issuance with the Trustee as custodian for The Depository Trust Company, and purchasers of Notes will not receive or be entitled to receive physical, certificated Notes (except in the very limited circumstances described herein). The Notes will be issued only in fully registered form, without

139


Table of Contents

coupons. The Notes will be issued only in minimum denominations of $2,000 (the "Minimum Denomination") and any integral multiple of $1,000 in excess thereof.

Redemption

        The Notes are redeemable, at the Company's option, at any time prior to maturity at varying redemption prices in accordance with the applicable provisions set forth below.

        The Notes are redeemable, at the Company's option, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time on and after February 15, 2015 and prior to maturity at the applicable redemption price set forth below. Such redemption may be made upon notice mailed by first-class mail to each Holder's registered address, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the date of redemption (the "Redemption Date"). The Company may provide in such notice that payment of the redemption price and the performance of the Company's obligations with respect to such redemption may be performed by another Person. Any such redemption and notice may, in the Company's discretion, be subject to the satisfaction of one or more conditions precedent, including but not limited to the occurrence of a Change of Control. The Notes are so redeemable at the following redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the relevant Redemption Date (subject to the right of Holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), if redeemed during the 12-month period commencing on February 15 of the years set forth below:

Redemption Period
  Price  

2015

    106.000 %

2016

    104.000 %

2017

    102.000 %

2018 and thereafter

    100.000 %

        In addition, the Indenture provides that at any time and from time to time on or prior to February 15, 2015, the Company at its option may redeem Notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Notes (including the principal amount of any Additional Notes of the same series), with funds in an equal aggregate amount (the "Redemption Amount") not exceeding the aggregate proceeds of one or more Equity Offerings (as defined below), at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount thereof) of 108%, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the Redemption Date (subject to the right of Holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date); provided, however, that if Notes are redeemed, an aggregate principal amount of Notes equal to at least 50% of the original aggregate principal amount of Notes (including the principal amount of any Additional Notes of the same series) must remain outstanding immediately after each such redemption of Notes.

        "Equity Offering" means a sale of Capital Stock (x) that is a sale of Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock), or (y) proceeds of which in an amount equal to or exceeding the Redemption Amount are contributed to the equity capital of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries. Such redemption may be made upon notice mailed by first-class mail to each Holder's registered address, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the Redemption Date (but in no event more than 180 days after the completion of the related Equity Offering). The Company may provide in such notice that payment of the redemption price and performance of the Company's obligations with respect to such redemption may be performed by another Person. Any such notice may be given prior to the completion of the related Equity Offering, and any such redemption or notice may, at the Company's discretion, be subject to the satisfaction of one or

140


Table of Contents

more conditions precedent, including but not limited to the completion of the related Equity Offering.

        At any time prior to February 15, 2015, the Notes may also be redeemed in whole or in part, at the Company's option, at a price (the "Redemption Price") equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to, the Redemption Date (subject to the right of Holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date). Such redemption may be made upon notice mailed by first class mail to each Holder's registered address, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the Redemption Date. The Company may provide in such notice that payment of the Redemption Price and performance of the Company's obligations with respect to such redemption may be performed by another Person. Any such redemption or notice may, at the Company's discretion, be subject to the satisfaction of one or more conditions precedent, including but not limited to the occurrence of a Change of Control.

        "Applicable Premium" means, with respect to a Note at any Redemption Date, the greater of (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of such Note and (ii) the excess of (A) the present value at such Redemption Date of (1) the redemption price of such Note on February 15, 2015 (such redemption price being that described in the second paragraph of this "—Optional Redemption" section) plus (2) all required remaining scheduled interest payments due on such Note through such date (excluding accrued and unpaid interest to the Redemption Date), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over (B) the principal amount of such Note on such Redemption Date, as calculated by the Company or on behalf of the Company by such Person as the Company shall designate; provided that such calculation shall not be a duty or obligation of the Trustee.

        "Treasury Rate" means, with respect to a Redemption Date, the yield to maturity at the time of computation of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15(519) that has become publicly available at least two Business Days prior to such Redemption Date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer published, any publicly available source of similar market data)) most nearly equal to the period from such Redemption Date to February 15, 2015; provided, however, that if the period from the Redemption Date to such date is not equal to the constant maturity of a United States Treasury security for which a weekly average yield is given, the Treasury Rate shall be obtained by linear interpolation (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth of a year) from the weekly average yields of United States Treasury securities for which such yields are given, except that if the period from the Redemption Date to such date is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year shall be used.

        In the case of any partial redemption, selection of the Notes for redemption will be made by the Trustee on a pro rata basis, by lot or by such other method as the Trustee in its sole discretion shall deem to be fair and appropriate, although no Note of the Minimum Denomination in original principal amount or less will be redeemed in part. If any Note is to be redeemed in part only, the notice of redemption relating to such Note shall state the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. A new Note in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof will be issued in the name of the Holder thereof upon cancellation of the original Note.

141


Table of Contents

Subsidiary Guarantees

        The Notes will be guaranteed by certain of the Company's Domestic Subsidiaries that also guarantee the Senior Credit Facilities. The Notes will not be guaranteed by any of the Company's non-U.S. Subsidiaries, any Subsidiary of the Company subject to regulation as an insurance, home warranty, service contract or similar company, or certain other Subsidiaries of the Company.

        The Company will cause each Domestic Subsidiary that guarantees (x) payment of any Indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor under any Credit Facility and that is a Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiary or (y) Capital Markets Securities, to execute and deliver to the Trustee within 30 days a supplemental indenture or other instrument pursuant to which such Domestic Subsidiary will guarantee payment of the Notes, whereupon such Domestic Subsidiary will become a Subsidiary Guarantor for all purposes under the Indenture. In addition, the Company may cause any Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor so to guarantee payment of the Notes and become a Subsidiary Guarantor.

        Each Subsidiary Guarantor, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, jointly and severally, irrevocably and fully and unconditionally Guarantees, on an unsecured senior basis, the punctual payment when due, whether at Stated Maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all monetary obligations of the Company under the Indenture and the Notes, whether for principal of or interest on the Notes, expenses, indemnification or otherwise (all such obligations guaranteed by such Subsidiary Guarantors being herein called the "Subsidiary Guaranteed Obligations"). Such Subsidiary Guarantor agrees to pay, in addition to the amount stated above, any and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) incurred by the Trustee or the Holders in enforcing any rights under its Subsidiary Guarantee.

        The obligations of each Subsidiary Guarantor will be limited to the maximum amount, as will, after giving effect to all other contingent and fixed liabilities of such Subsidiary Guarantor (including but not limited to any Guarantee by it of any Credit Facility Indebtedness) and after giving effect to any collections from or payments made by or on behalf of any other Subsidiary Guarantor in respect of the obligations of such other Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guarantee or pursuant to its contribution obligations under the Indenture, result in the obligations of such Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subsidiary Guarantee not constituting a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer under applicable law, or being void or unenforceable under any law relating to insolvency of debtors.

        Each such Subsidiary Guarantee is a continuing Guarantee and shall (i) remain in full force and effect until payment in full of the principal amount of all outstanding Notes (whether by payment at maturity, purchase, redemption, defeasance, retirement or other acquisition) and all other Subsidiary Guaranteed Obligations of the relevant Subsidiary Guarantor then due and owing unless earlier terminated as described below, (ii) be binding upon such Subsidiary Guarantor and (iii) inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Trustee, the Holders and their permitted successors, transferees and assigns.

        Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, any Subsidiary Guarantor will automatically and unconditionally be released from all obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee, and such Subsidiary Guarantee shall thereupon terminate and be discharged and of no further force or effect, (i) concurrently with any direct or indirect sale or disposition (by merger or otherwise) of any Subsidiary Guarantor or any interest therein in accordance with the terms of the Indenture (including the covenants described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Sales of Assets and Subsidiary Stock" and "—Merger and Consolidation") by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, following which such Subsidiary Guarantor is no longer a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, (ii) at any time that such Subsidiary Guarantor is released from all of its obligations under all of its Guarantees of payment of any Indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor under

142


Table of Contents

Credit Facilities and Capital Markets Securities (it being understood that a release subject to contingent reinstatement is still a release, and that if any such Guarantee is so reinstated, such Subsidiary Guarantee shall also be reinstated to the extent that such Subsidiary Guarantor would then be required to provide a Subsidiary Guarantee pursuant to the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Future Subsidiary Guarantors"), (iii) upon the merger or consolidation of any Subsidiary Guarantor with and into the Company or another Subsidiary Guarantor that is the surviving Person in such merger or consolidation, or upon the liquidation of such Subsidiary Guarantor following the transfer of all of its assets to the Company or another Subsidiary Guarantor, (iv) concurrently with any Subsidiary Guarantor becoming an Unrestricted Subsidiary, (v) during the Suspension Period, upon the merger or consolidation of any Subsidiary Guarantor with and into another Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor with such other Subsidiary being the surviving Person in such merger or consolidation, or upon liquidation of such Subsidiary Guarantor following the transfer of all of its assets to a Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor, (vi) upon legal or covenant defeasance of the Company's obligations, or satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture, or (vii) subject to customary contingent reinstatement provisions, upon payment in full of the aggregate principal amount of all Notes then outstanding and all other Subsidiary Guaranteed Obligations then due and owing. In addition, the Company will have the right, upon 30 days' notice to the Trustee, to cause any Subsidiary Guarantor that has not guaranteed payment of any Indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor under Credit Facilities or Capital Markets Securities to be unconditionally released from all obligations under its Subsidiary Guarantee, and such Subsidiary Guarantee shall thereupon terminate and be discharged and of no further force or effect. Upon any such occurrence specified in this paragraph, the Trustee shall execute any documents reasonably requested by the Company in order to evidence such release, discharge and termination in respect of such Subsidiary Guarantee.

        Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary Guarantor shall be required to make a notation on the Notes to reflect any Subsidiary Guarantee or any release, termination or discharge thereof.

Ranking

        The indebtedness evidenced by the Notes (a) is unsecured Senior Indebtedness of the Company, (b) ranks pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future Senior Indebtedness of the Company, and (c) is senior in right of payment to all existing and future Subordinated Obligations of the Company. The Notes are also effectively subordinated to all secured Indebtedness of the Company to the extent of the value of the assets securing such Indebtedness, and to all Indebtedness and other liabilities (including Trade Payables) of its Subsidiaries (other than Subsidiaries that are or become Subsidiary Guarantors pursuant to the provisions described above under "—Subsidiary Guarantees").

        Each Subsidiary Guarantee (a) is unsecured Senior Indebtedness of the applicable Subsidiary Guarantor, (b) ranks pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future Senior Indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor and (c) is senior in right of payment to all existing and future Guarantor Subordinated Obligations of such Subsidiary Guarantor. Such Subsidiary Guarantee is also effectively subordinated to all secured Indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor to the extent of the value of the assets securing such Indebtedness, and to all Indebtedness and other liabilities (including Trade Payables) of the Subsidiaries of such Subsidiary Guarantor (other than any Subsidiaries that are or become Subsidiary Guarantors pursuant to the provisions described above under "—Subsidiary Guarantees").

        All of the operations of the Company are conducted through its Subsidiaries. Claims of creditors of such Subsidiaries, including trade creditors, and claims of preferred shareholders (if any) of such Subsidiaries will have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of such Subsidiaries over the claims of creditors of the Company, including holders of the Notes, unless

143


Table of Contents

such Subsidiary is a Subsidiary Guarantor with respect to the Notes. The Notes, therefore, are effectively subordinated to creditors (including trade creditors) and preferred shareholders (if any) of Subsidiaries of the Company (other than Subsidiaries that become Subsidiary Guarantors with respect to the Notes). In addition, certain of the operations of a Subsidiary Guarantor may be conducted through Subsidiaries thereof that are not also Subsidiary Guarantors. Claims of creditors of such Subsidiaries, including trade creditors, and claims of preferred shareholders (if any) of such Subsidiaries will have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of such Subsidiaries over the claims of creditors of such Subsidiary Guarantor, including claims under its Subsidiary Guarantee of the Notes. Such Subsidiary Guarantee, therefore, are effectively subordinated to creditors (including trade creditors) and preferred shareholders (if any) of any such Subsidiaries. Although the Indenture limits the incurrence of Indebtedness (including preferred stock) by certain of the Company's Subsidiaries, such limitation is subject to a number of significant qualifications.

Change of Control

        Upon the occurrence after the Issue Date of a Change of Control (as defined below), each Holder of Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of such Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase (subject to the right of Holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date); provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to repurchase Notes pursuant to this covenant in the event that it has exercised its right to redeem all of the Notes as described under "—Redemption—Optional Redemption."

        The term "Change of Control" means:

144


Table of Contents

        In the event that, at the time of such Change of Control, the terms of any Credit Facility Indebtedness constituting Designated Senior Indebtedness restrict or prohibit the repurchase of the Notes pursuant to this covenant, then prior to the mailing of the notice to Holders provided for in the immediately following paragraph but in any event not later than 30 days following the date the Company obtains actual knowledge of any Change of Control (unless the Company has exercised its right to redeem all the Notes as described under "—Redemption—Optional Redemption"), the Company shall, or shall cause one or more of its Subsidiaries to, (i) repay in full all such Credit Facility Indebtedness subject to such terms or offer to repay in full all such Credit Facility Indebtedness and repay the Credit Facility Indebtedness of each lender who has accepted such offer or (ii) obtain the requisite consent under the agreements governing such Credit Facility Indebtedness to permit the repurchase of the Notes as provided for in the immediately following paragraph. The Company shall first comply with the provisions of the immediately preceding sentence before it shall be required to repurchase Notes pursuant to the provisions described below. The Company's failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph or the provisions of the immediately following paragraph shall constitute an Event of Default described in clause (iv) and not in clause (ii) under "—Defaults" below.

        Unless the Company has exercised its right to redeem all the Notes as described under "—Redemption—Optional Redemption," the Company shall, not later than 30 days following the date the Company obtains actual knowledge of any Change of Control having occurred, mail a notice (a "Change of Control Offer") to each Holder with a copy to the Trustee stating: (1) that a Change of Control has occurred or may occur and that such Holder has, or upon such occurrence will have, the right to require the Company to purchase such Holder's Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase (subject to the right of Holders of record on a record date to receive interest on the relevant interest payment date); (2) the repurchase date (which shall be no earlier than 30 days nor later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed); (3) the instructions determined by the Company, consistent with this covenant, that a Holder must follow in order to have its Notes purchased; and (4) if such notice is mailed prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control, that such offer is conditioned on the occurrence of such Change of Control. No Note will be repurchased in part if less than the Minimum Denomination in original principal amount of such Note would be left outstanding.

        The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a Change of Control if a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Company and purchases all Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer.

        The Company will comply, to the extent applicable, with the requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any other securities laws or regulations in connection with the repurchase of Notes pursuant to this covenant. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with provisions of this covenant, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under this covenant by virtue thereof.

        The Company has no present plans to engage in a transaction involving a Change of Control, although it is possible that the Company could decide to do so in the future. Subject to the limitations discussed below, the Company could, in the future, enter into certain transactions, including acquisitions, refinancings or recapitalizations, that would not constitute a Change of Control under the Indenture, but that could increase the amount of Indebtedness outstanding at such time or otherwise affect the Company's capital structure or credit ratings. Restrictions on the ability of the Company to Incur additional Indebtedness are contained in the covenants described

145


Table of Contents

under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness" and "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Liens." Such restrictions can only be waived with the consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding. Except for the limitations contained in such covenants, however, the Indenture does not contain any covenants or provisions that may afford Holders protection in the event of a highly leveraged transaction.

        Agreements governing other Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary may contain prohibitions of certain events that would constitute a Change of Control or require such Indebtedness to be repurchased or repaid upon a Change of Control. Agreements governing other Indebtedness of the Company may prohibit the Company from repurchasing the Notes upon a Change of Control unless the Indebtedness governed by such agreements has been repurchased or repaid (or an offer made to effect such repurchase or repayment has been made and the Indebtedness of those creditors accepting such offer has been repurchased or repaid) and/or other specified requirements have been met. Moreover, the exercise by the Holders of their right to require the Company to repurchase the Notes could cause a default under such agreements, even if the Change of Control itself does not, due to the financial effect of such repurchase on the Company and its Subsidiaries. Finally, the Company's ability to pay cash to the Holders upon a repurchase may be limited by the Company's then existing financial resources. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available when necessary to make any required repurchases. The provisions under the Indenture relating to the Company's obligation to make an offer to purchase the Notes as a result of a Change of Control may be waived or modified with the written consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes. As described above under "—Optional Redemption," the Company also has the right to redeem the Notes at specified prices, in whole or in part, upon a Change of Control or otherwise.

        The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating to the sale or other transfer of "all or substantially all" of the assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries. Although there is a developing body of case law interpreting the phrase "substantially all," there is no precise definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, in certain circumstances there may be a degree of uncertainty in ascertaining whether a particular transaction would involve a disposition of "all or substantially all" of the assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, and therefore it may be unclear as to whether a Change of Control has occurred and whether the Holders of the Notes have the right to require the Company to repurchase such Notes.

Certain Covenants

        The Indenture contains covenants including, among others, the covenants as described below.

        Limitation on Indebtedness.    The Indenture provides as follows:

146


Table of Contents

147


Table of Contents

148


Table of Contents

149


Table of Contents

        Limitation on Restricted Payments.    The Indenture provides as follows:

150


Table of Contents

        As of December 31, 2011, the amount available under clause (E) above was approximately $500 million.

151


Table of Contents

152


Table of Contents

provided, that (A) in the case of clauses (i)(y), (iii), (vi), (ix) and (xi)(B), the net amount of any such Permitted Payment shall be included in subsequent calculations of the amount of Restricted Payments, (B) in all cases other than pursuant to clause (A) immediately above, the net amount of any such Permitted Payment shall be excluded in subsequent calculations of the amount of Restricted Payments and (C) solely with respect to clause (vii), no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing at the time of any such Permitted Payment after giving effect thereto. The Company, in its sole discretion, may classify any Investment or other Restricted Payment as being made in part under one of the provisions of this covenant (or in the case of any Investment, the clauses of Permitted Investments) and in part under one or more other such provisions (or, as applicable, clauses).

153


Table of Contents

        Limitation on Restrictions on Distributions from Restricted Subsidiaries.    The Indenture provides that the Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, create or otherwise cause to exist or become effective any consensual encumbrance or restriction on the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to (i) pay dividends or make any other distributions on its Capital Stock or pay any Indebtedness or other obligations owed to the Company, (ii) make any loans or advances to the Company or (iii) transfer any of its property or assets to the Company (provided that dividend or liquidation priority between classes of Capital Stock, or subordination of any obligation (including the application of any remedy bars thereto) to any other obligation, will not be deemed to constitute such an encumbrance or restriction), except any encumbrance or restriction:

154


Table of Contents

        Limitation on Sales of Assets and Subsidiary Stock.    The Indenture provides as follows:

155


Table of Contents

provided, however, that in connection with any prepayment, repayment or purchase of Indebtedness pursuant to clause (A)(x) or (B) above, the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary will retire such Indebtedness and will cause the related loan commitment (if any) to be permanently reduced in an amount equal to the principal amount so prepaid, repaid or purchased.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this covenant, the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries shall not be required to apply any Net Available Cash or equivalent amount in accordance with this covenant except to the extent that the aggregate Net Available Cash from all Asset Dispositions or equivalent amount that is not applied in accordance with this covenant exceeds $50.0 million. If the aggregate principal amount of Notes and/or other Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary validly tendered and not withdrawn (or otherwise subject to purchase, redemption or repayment) in connection with an offer pursuant to clause (B) above exceeds the Excess Proceeds, the Excess Proceeds will be apportioned between such Notes and such other Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, with the portion of the Excess Proceeds payable in respect of such Notes to equal the lesser of (x) the Excess Proceeds amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the outstanding principal amount of such Notes and the denominator of which is the sum of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes and the outstanding principal amount of the relevant other Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, and (y) the aggregate principal amount of Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn.

        For the purposes of clause (ii) of paragraph (a) above, the following are deemed to be cash: (1) Temporary Cash Investments and Cash Equivalents, (2) the assumption of Indebtedness of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock of the Company) or any Restricted Subsidiary and the release of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary from all liability on payment of the principal amount of such Indebtedness in connection with such Asset Disposition, (3) Indebtedness of any

156


Table of Contents

Restricted Subsidiary that is no longer a Restricted Subsidiary as a result of such Asset Disposition, to the extent that the Company and each other Restricted Subsidiary are released from any Guarantee of payment of the principal amount of such Indebtedness in connection with such Asset Disposition, (4) securities received by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary from the transferee that are converted by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into cash within 180 days, (5) consideration consisting of Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, (6) Additional Assets and (7) any Designated Noncash Consideration received by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in an Asset Disposition having an aggregate Fair Market Value, taken together with all other Designated Noncash Consideration received pursuant to this clause, not to exceed an aggregate amount at any time outstanding equal to the greater of $125.0 million and 10.0% of Consolidated Tangible Assets (with the Fair Market Value of each item of Designated Noncash Consideration being measured at the time received and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value).

157


Table of Contents

        Limitation on Transactions with Affiliates.    The Indenture provides as follows:

158


Table of Contents

        Limitation on Liens.    The Indenture provides that the Company shall not, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly, create or permit to exist any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) on any of its property or assets (including Capital Stock of any other Person), whether owned on the date of the Indenture or thereafter acquired, securing any Indebtedness (the "Initial Lien"), unless contemporaneously therewith effective provision is made to secure the Indebtedness due under the Indenture and the Notes or, in respect of Liens on any Restricted Subsidiary's property or assets, any Subsidiary Guarantee of such Restricted Subsidiary, equally and ratably with (or on a senior basis to, in the case of Subordinated Obligations or Guarantor Subordinated Obligations) such obligation for so long as such obligation is so secured by such Initial Lien. Any such Lien thereby created in favor of the Notes or any such Subsidiary Guarantee will be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged upon (i) the release and discharge of the Initial Lien to which it relates, (ii) in the case of any such Lien in favor of any such Subsidiary Guarantee, upon the termination and discharge of such Subsidiary Guarantee in accordance with the terms of the Indenture or (iii) any sale, exchange or transfer (other than a transfer constituting a transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company that is governed by the provisions of the covenant described under "—Merger and Consolidation" below) to any Person not an Affiliate of the Company of the property or assets secured by such Initial Lien, or of all of the Capital Stock held by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in, or all or substantially all the assets of, any Restricted Subsidiary creating such Initial Lien.

        Future Subsidiary Guarantors.    As set forth more particularly under "—Subsidiary Guarantees," the Indenture provides that the Company will cause each Domestic Subsidiary that guarantees (x) payment of any Indebtedness of the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor under any Credit Facility and that is a Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiary or (y) Capital Markets Securities, to execute and deliver to the Trustee within 30 days a supplemental indenture or other instrument pursuant to which such Domestic Subsidiary will guarantee payment of the Notes, whereupon such Domestic Subsidiary will become a Subsidiary Guarantor for all purposes under

159


Table of Contents

the Indenture. In addition, the Company may cause any Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor so to guarantee payment of the Notes and become a Subsidiary Guarantor. Subsidiary Guarantees will be subject to release and discharge under certain circumstances prior to payment in full of the Notes. See "—Subsidiary Guarantees."

        SEC Reports.    The Indenture provides that, notwithstanding that the Company may not be required to be or remain subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Company will file with the SEC (unless such filing is not permitted under the Exchange Act or by the SEC), so long as the Notes are outstanding, the annual reports, information, documents and other reports that the Company is required to file with the SEC pursuant to such Section 13(a) or 15(d) or would be so required to file if the Company were so subject. The Company will also, within 15 days after the date on which the Company was so required to file or would be so required to file if the Company were so subject, transmit by mail to all Holders, as their names and addresses appear in the Note Register, and to the Trustee (or make available on a Company website) copies of any such information, documents and reports (without exhibits) so required to be filed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any audited or reviewed financial statements or information required to be included in any such filing are not reasonably available on a timely basis as a result of the Company's accountants not being "independent" (as defined pursuant to the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder), the Company may, in lieu of making such filing or transmitting or making available the information, documents and reports so required to be filed, elect to make a filing on an alternative form or transmit or make available unaudited or unreviewed financial statements or information substantially similar to such required audited or reviewed financial statements or information, provided that (a) the Company shall in any event be required to make such filing and so transmit or make available such audited or reviewed financial statements or information no later than the first anniversary of the date on which the same was otherwise required pursuant to the preceding provisions of this paragraph (such initial date, the "Reporting Date") and (b) if the Company makes such an election and such filing has not been made, or such information, documents and reports have not been transmitted or made available, as the case may be, within 90 days after such Reporting Date, liquidated damages will accrue on the Notes at a rate of 0.50% per annum from the date that is 90 days after such Reporting Date to the earlier of (x) the date on which such filing has been made, or such information, documents and reports have been transmitted or made available, as the case may be, and (y) the first anniversary of such Reporting Date (provided that not more than 0.50% per annum in liquidated damages shall be payable for any period regardless of the number of such elections by the Company). The Company will be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this paragraph if any Parent files and provides reports, documents and information of the types otherwise so required, in each case within the applicable time periods, and the Company is not required to file such reports, documents and information separately under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC (after giving effect to any exemptive relief) because of the filings by such Parent. The Company also will comply with the provisions of TIA § 314(a).

Merger and Consolidation

        The Indenture provides that the Company will not consolidate with or merge with or into, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all its assets to, any Person, unless:

160


Table of Contents

        Any Indebtedness that becomes an obligation of the Company (or, if applicable, the Successor Company with respect thereto) or any Restricted Subsidiary (or that is deemed to be Incurred by any Restricted Subsidiary that becomes a Restricted Subsidiary) as a result of any such transaction undertaken in compliance with this covenant, and any Refinancing Indebtedness with respect thereto, shall be deemed to have been Incurred in compliance with the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness."

        Upon any transaction involving the Company in accordance with this covenant in which the Company is not the Successor Company, the Successor Company will succeed to, and be substituted for, and may exercise every right and power of, the Company under the Indenture, and thereafter the predecessor Company shall be relieved of all obligations and covenants under the Indenture, except that the predecessor Company in the case of a lease of all or substantially all its assets shall not be released from the obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Notes.

        Clauses (ii) and (iii) of the first paragraph of this covenant will not apply to any transaction in which the Company consolidates or merges with or into or transfers all or substantially all its properties and assets to (x) an Affiliate incorporated or organized for the purpose of reincorporating or reorganizing the Company in another jurisdiction or changing its legal structure to a corporation or other entity or (y) a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company so long as all assets of the Company and the Restricted Subsidiaries immediately prior to such transaction (other than Capital Stock of such Restricted Subsidiary) are owned by such Restricted Subsidiary and its Restricted Subsidiaries immediately after the consummation thereof. The first paragraph of this covenant will not apply to any transaction in which any Restricted Subsidiary consolidates with, merges into or transfers all or part of its assets to the Company.

161


Table of Contents

Suspension of Covenants on Achievement of Investment Grade Rating

        If on any day following the Issue Date (a) the Notes have Investment Grade Ratings from both Rating Agencies, and (b) no Default has occurred and is continuing under the Indenture, then, beginning on that day subject to the provisions of the following paragraph, the covenants described under the following captions in this "Description of Notes" section of this prospectus (collectively, the "Suspended Covenants") will be suspended:

        During any period that the foregoing covenants have been suspended, the Board of Directors may not designate any of its Subsidiaries as Unrestricted Subsidiaries unless such designation would have complied with the covenant described under "—Limitation on Restricted Payments" as if such covenant would have been in effect during such period.

        If on any subsequent date one or both of the Rating Agencies downgrade the ratings assigned to the Notes below an Investment Grade Rating, the foregoing covenants will be reinstated as of and from the date of such rating decline (any such date, a "Reversion Date"). The period of time between the suspension of covenants as set forth above and the Reversion Date is referred to as the "Suspension Period." Upon such reinstatement, all Indebtedness Incurred during the Suspension Period will be deemed to have been Incurred under the exception provided by clause (b)(3) of "—Limitation on Indebtedness." With respect to Restricted Payments made after any such reinstatement, the amount of Restricted Payments will be calculated as if the covenant described under "—Limitation on Restricted Payments" had been in effect prior to, but not during, the Suspension Period. For purposes of the covenant described under "—Limitation on Sales of Assets and Subsidiary Stock," upon the occurrence of a Reversion Date, the amount of Excess Proceeds not applied in accordance with such covenant will be deemed to be reset to zero. The Subsidiary Guarantees of the Subsidiary Guarantors will be suspended during the Suspension Period.

        During the Suspension Period, any reference in the definitions of "Permitted Liens" and "Unrestricted Subsidiary" to the covenant described under "—Limitation on Indebtedness" or any provision thereof shall be construed as if such covenant were in effect during the Suspension Period.

        Notwithstanding that the Suspended Covenants may be reinstated, no Default or Event of Default will be deemed to have occurred as a result of any actions taken by the Company or any Subsidiary (including for the avoidance of doubt any failure to comply with the Suspended Covenants) or other events that occurred during any Suspension Period (or upon termination of the Suspension Period or after that time based solely on events that occurred during the Suspension Period), and the Company and any Subsidiary will be permitted, without causing a Default or Event of Default or breach of any kind under the Indenture, to honor, comply with or otherwise perform any contractual commitments or obligations entered into during a Suspension Period following a Reversion Date and to consummate the transactions contemplated thereby.

162


Table of Contents

        There can be no assurance that the Notes will ever achieve or maintain Investment Grade Ratings.

Defaults

        An Event of Default is defined in the Indenture as:

163


Table of Contents

        The foregoing will constitute Events of Default whatever the reason for any such Event of Default and whether it is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body.

        However, a Default under clause (iv), (v) or (vi) will not constitute an Event of Default until the Trustee or the Holders of at least 30% in principal amount of the outstanding Notes notify the Company in writing of the Default and the Company does not cure such Default within the time specified in such clause after receipt of such notice. Such notice must specify the Default, demand that it be remedied and state that such notice is a "Notice of Default." When a Default or an Event of Default is cured, it ceases.

        If an Event of Default (other than a Default relating to certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company) occurs and is continuing under the Indenture, the Trustee by written notice to the Company, or the Holders of at least 30% in principal amount of the outstanding Notes by written notice to the Company and the Trustee, in either case specifying in such notice the respective Event of Default and that such notice is a "notice of acceleration," may declare the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all the Notes to be due and payable. Upon the effectiveness of such a declaration, such principal and interest will be due and payable immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Event of Default relating to certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company occurs and is continuing, the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all the outstanding Notes will become immediately due and payable without any declaration or other act on the part of the Trustee or any Holders. Under certain circumstances, the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Notes may rescind any such acceleration with respect to the Notes and its consequences.

        Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties of the Trustee, in case an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any of the Holders unless such Holders have offered to the Trustee security or indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense. Except to enforce the right to receive payment of principal, premium (if any) or interest when due, no Holder may pursue any remedy with respect to the Indenture or the Notes unless (i) such Holder has previously given the Trustee written notice that an Event of Default is continuing, (ii) Holders of at least 30% in principal amount of the outstanding Notes have requested the Trustee in writing to pursue the remedy, (iii) such Holder or Holders have offered to the Trustee security or indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it against any loss, liability or expense, (iv) the Trustee has not complied with such request within 60 days after the receipt of the request and the offer of security or indemnity and (v) the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Notes have not given the Trustee a direction inconsistent with such request within such 60-day period. Subject to certain restrictions, the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes shall have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the Trustee or of exercising any trust or power conferred on the Trustee. The Trustee, however, may refuse to follow any direction that conflicts with law or the Indenture or that the Trustee determines is unduly prejudicial to the rights of any other Holder or that would involve the Trustee in personal liability; provided, however, that the Trustee may take any other action deemed proper by the Trustee that is not inconsistent with such direction. Prior to taking any action under the Indenture, the Trustee will be entitled to indemnification satisfactory to it in its sole discretion against all losses and expenses caused by taking or not taking such action.

        The Indenture provides that if a Default occurs and is continuing and is known to the Trustee, the Trustee must mail to each Holder notice of the Default within 90 days after it occurs. Except in the case of a Default in the payment of principal of, or premium (if any) or interest on, any Note, the

164


Table of Contents

Trustee may withhold notice if and so long as the board of directors, the executive committee or a trust committee of Responsible Officers of the Trustee in good faith determines that withholding notice is in the interests of the Noteholders. In addition, the Company is required to deliver to the Trustee, within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, a certificate indicating whether the signers thereof know of any Default occurring during the previous year. The Company also is required to deliver to the Trustee, within 30 days after the occurrence thereof, written notice of any event that would constitute certain Defaults, their status and what action the Company is taking or proposes to take in respect thereof.

Amendments and Waivers

        Without the consent of any Holder of any Notes, the Company, the Trustee and (as applicable) any Subsidiary Guarantor may amend or supplement the Indenture or the Notes to cure any ambiguity, mistake, omission, defect or inconsistency, to provide for the assumption by a successor of the obligations of the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor under the Indenture, to provide for uncertificated Notes in addition to or in place of certificated Notes, to add Guarantees with respect to the Notes, to secure the Notes, to evidence a successor Trustee, to confirm and evidence the release, termination or discharge of any Guarantee or Lien with respect to or securing the Notes when such release, termination or discharge is provided for under the Indenture, to add to the covenants of the Company for the benefit of the Holders or to surrender any right or power conferred upon the Company, to provide for or confirm the issuance of Additional Notes or Exchange Notes, to conform the text of the Indenture, the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee to any provision of this "Description of Notes," to increase the minimum denomination of Notes to equal the dollar-equivalent of €1,000 rounded up to the nearest $1,000 (including for purposes of redemption or repurchase of any Note in part), to make any change that does not materially adversely affect the rights of any Holder under the Notes or the Indenture, or to comply with any requirement of the SEC in connection with the qualification of the Indenture under the TIA or otherwise.

        Subject to certain exceptions, the Indenture or the Notes may be amended or supplemented with the consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding (including consents obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for Notes) and any Default or Event of Default or compliance by the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor with any provision of the Indenture, the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee may be waived with the consent of the Holders of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes then outstanding (including consents obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for Notes); provided that (x) if any such amendment or waiver will only affect one series of Notes (or less than all series of Notes) then outstanding under the Indenture, then only the consent of the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes of such series then outstanding (including, in each case, consents obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for Notes) shall be required and (y) if any such amendment or waiver by its terms will affect a series of Notes in a manner different and materially adverse relative to the manner such amendment or waiver affects other series of Notes, then the consent of the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes of such series then outstanding (including, in each case, consents obtained in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer for Notes) shall be required. However, without the consent of each Holder affected, an amendment or waiver may not (i) reduce the principal amount of the Notes whose Holders must consent to an amendment or waiver; (ii) reduce the rate of or extend the time for payment of interest on any Note; (iii) reduce the principal of or extend the Stated Maturity of any Note; (iv) reduce the premium payable upon the redemption of any Note, or change the date on which any Note may be redeemed as described under "—Redemption—Optional Redemption" above; (v) make any Note payable in money other than that stated in such Note; (vi) impair the right of any Holder to receive payment of principal of and

165


Table of Contents

interest on such Holder's Notes on or after the due dates therefor or to institute suit for the enforcement of any such payment on or with respect to such Holder's Notes; or (vii) make any change in the amendment or waiver provisions described in this sentence.

        The consent of the Noteholders is not necessary under the Indenture to approve the particular form of any proposed amendment, supplement or waiver. It is sufficient if such consent approves the substance thereof. Until an amendment, supplement or waiver becomes effective, a consent to it by a Noteholder is a continuing consent by such Noteholder and every subsequent Holder of all or part of the related Note. Any such Noteholder or subsequent Holder may revoke such consent as to its Note by written notice to the Trustee or the Company, received thereby before the date on which the Company certifies to the Trustee that the Holders of the requisite principal amount of Notes have consented to such amendment, supplement or waiver. After an amendment, supplement or waiver that requires consent of Noteholders under the Indenture becomes effective, the Company is required to mail to Noteholders, with a copy to the Trustee, a notice briefly describing such amendment, supplement or waiver. However, the failure of the Company to mail such notice to all Noteholders, or any defect therein, will not impair or affect the validity of any supplemental indenture or the effectiveness of any amendment, supplement or waiver.

Defeasance

        The Company at any time may terminate all obligations of the Company under the Notes and the Indenture ("legal defeasance"), except for certain obligations, including those relating to the defeasance trust and obligations to register the transfer or exchange of the Notes, to replace mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Notes and to maintain a registrar and paying agent in respect of the Notes.

        The Company at any time may terminate its obligations under certain covenants under the Indenture, including the covenants described under "—Certain Covenants" and "—Change of Control," the operation of the default provisions relating to such covenants described under "—Defaults" above, the operation of the cross acceleration provision, the bankruptcy provisions with respect to Subsidiaries and the judgment default provision described under "—Defaults" above, and the limitations contained in clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) under "—Merger and Consolidation" above ("covenant defeasance"). If the Company exercises its legal defeasance option or its covenant defeasance option, each Subsidiary Guarantor will be released from all of its obligations with respect to its Subsidiary Guarantee.

        The Company may exercise its legal defeasance option notwithstanding its prior exercise of its covenant defeasance option. If the Company exercises its legal defeasance option, payment of the Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default with respect thereto. If the Company exercises its covenant defeasance option, payment of the Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default specified in clause (iv), (v) (as it relates to the covenants described under "—Certain Covenants" above), (vi), (vii), (viii) (but only with respect to events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of a Subsidiary), (ix) or (x) under "—Defaults" above or because of the failure of the Company to comply with clause (iii), (iv) or (v) under "—Merger and Consolidation" above.

        Either defeasance option may be exercised to any redemption date or to the maturity date for the Notes. In order to exercise either defeasance option, the Company must irrevocably deposit or cause to be deposited in trust (the "defeasance trust") with the Trustee money or U.S. Government Obligations, or a combination thereof, sufficient (without reinvestment) to pay principal of, and premium (if any) and interest on, the Notes to redemption or maturity, as the case may be (provided that if such redemption is made pursuant to the provisions described in the fifth paragraph under "Optional Redemption," (x) the amount of money or U.S. Government Obligations,

166


Table of Contents

or a combination thereof, that the Company must irrevocably deposit or cause to be deposited will be determined using an assumed Applicable Premium calculated as of the date of such deposit, as calculated by the Company, and (y) the Company must irrevocably deposit or cause to be deposited additional money in trust on the redemption date as necessary to pay the Applicable Premium as determined on such date), and must comply with certain other conditions, including delivery to the Trustee of an Opinion of Counsel to the effect that holders of the Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for Federal income tax purposes as a result of such deposit and defeasance and will be subject to Federal income tax on the same amount and in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such deposit and defeasance had not occurred (and, in the case of legal defeasance only, such Opinion of Counsel (x) must be based on a ruling of the Internal Revenue Service or other change in applicable Federal income tax law since the Issue Date and (y) need not be delivered if all Notes not theretofore delivered to the Trustee for cancellation have become due and payable, will become due and payable at their Stated Maturity within one year, or have been or are to be called for redemption within one year under arrangements reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee for the giving of notice of redemption by the Trustee in the name, and at the expense, of the Company).

Satisfaction and Discharge

        The Indenture shall be discharged and shall cease to be of further effect (except as to surviving rights of registration of transfer or exchange of the Notes, as expressly provided for in the Indenture) as to all outstanding Notes when (i) either (a) all Notes previously authenticated and delivered (other than certain lost, stolen or destroyed Notes, and certain Notes for which provision for payment was previously made and thereafter the funds have been released to the Company) have been cancelled or delivered to the Trustee for cancellation or (b) all Notes not previously cancelled or delivered to the Trustee for cancellation (1) have become due and payable, (2) will become due and payable at their Stated Maturity within one year or (3) have been or are to be called for redemption within one year under arrangements reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee for the giving of notice of redemption by the Trustee in the name, and at the expense, of the Company; (ii) the Company has irrevocably deposited or caused to be deposited with the Trustee money, U.S. Government Obligations or a combination thereof, sufficient (without reinvestment) to pay and discharge the entire Indebtedness on the Notes not previously cancelled or delivered to the Trustee for cancellation, for principal, premium, if any, and interest to the date of such deposit (in the case of Notes that have become due and payable), or to the Stated Maturity or redemption date, as the case may be (provided that if such redemption is made pursuant to the provisions described in the fifth paragraph under "Redemption—Optional Redemption," (x) the amount of money or U.S. Government Obligations, or a combination thereof, that the Company must irrevocably deposit or cause to be deposited shall be determined using an assumed Applicable Premium calculated as of the date of such deposit, as calculated by the Company, and (y) the Company must irrevocably deposit or cause to be deposited additional money in trust on the redemption date as necessary to pay the Applicable Premium as determined on such date); (iii) the Company has paid or caused to be paid all other sums then payable under the Indenture by the Company; and (iv) the Company has delivered to the Trustee an Officer's Certificate of the Company and an Opinion of Counsel each to the effect that all conditions precedent under the "Satisfaction and Discharge" section of the Indenture relating to the satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture have been complied with, provided that any such counsel may rely on any Officer's Certificate as to matters of fact (including as to compliance with the foregoing clauses (i), (ii) and (iii)).

No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees, Incorporators and Stockholders

        No director, officer, employee, incorporator or stockholder of the Company, the Issuer, any Subsidiary Guarantor or any Subsidiary of any thereof shall have any liability for any obligation of

167


Table of Contents

the Company, the Issuer or any Subsidiary Guarantor under the Indenture, the Notes or any Subsidiary Guarantee, or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, any such obligation or its creation. Each Noteholder, by accepting the Notes, waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the Notes.

Concerning the Trustee

        Wilmington Trust, National Association is the Trustee under the Indenture and is appointed by the Company as initial Registrar and Paying Agent with regard to the Notes.

        The Indenture provides that, except during the continuance of an Event of Default, the Trustee will perform only such duties as are set forth specifically in the Indenture. During the existence of an Event of Default, the Trustee will exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it under the Indenture, and use the same degree of care and skill in its exercise, as a prudent person would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of such person's own affairs.

        The Indenture and the TIA impose certain limitations on the rights of the Trustee, should it become a creditor of the Company, to obtain payment of claims in certain cases or to realize on certain property received by it in respect of any such claims, as security or otherwise. The Trustee is permitted to engage in other transactions; provided, that if it acquires any conflicting interest as described in the TIA, it must eliminate such conflict, apply to the SEC for permission to continue as Trustee with such conflict or resign.

Transfer and Exchange

        A Noteholder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the Indenture. Upon any transfer or exchange, the Registrar and the Trustee may require such Noteholder, among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents, and the Company may require such Noteholder to pay any taxes or other governmental charges required by law or permitted by the Indenture. The Company is not required to transfer or exchange any Note selected for redemption or purchase or to transfer or exchange any Note for a period of 15 Business Days prior to the day of the mailing of the notice of redemption or purchase. No service charge will be made for any registration of transfer or exchange of the Notes, but the Company may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any transfer tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange. The Notes will be issued in registered form and the registered holder of a Note will be treated as the owner of such Note for all purposes.

Governing Law

        The Indenture and the Notes are governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

Certain Definitions

        "2007 Transactions" means "Transactions" as defined in the Permanent Notes Indenture.

        "Acquired Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of a Person (i) existing at the time such Person becomes a Subsidiary or (ii) assumed in connection with the acquisition of assets from such Person, in each case other than Indebtedness Incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such Person becoming a Subsidiary or such acquisition. Acquired Indebtedness shall be deemed to be Incurred on the date of the related acquisition of assets from any Person or the date the acquired Person becomes a Subsidiary.

        "Additional Assets" means (i) any property or assets that replace the property or assets that are the subject of an Asset Disposition; (ii) any property or assets (other than Indebtedness and

168


Table of Contents

Capital Stock) used or to be used by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary or otherwise useful in a Related Business (including any capital expenditures on any property or assets already so used); (iii) the Capital Stock of a Person that is engaged in a Related Business and becomes a Restricted Subsidiary as a result of the acquisition of such Capital Stock by the Company or another Restricted Subsidiary; or (iv) Capital Stock of any Person that at such time is a Restricted Subsidiary acquired from a third party.

        "Affiliate" of any specified Person means any other Person, directly or indirectly, controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such specified Person. For the purposes of this definition, "control" when used with respect to any Person means the power to direct the management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise; and the terms "controlling" and "controlled" have meanings correlative to the foregoing.

        "Asset Disposition" means any sale, lease, transfer or other disposition of shares of Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary (other than directors' qualifying shares, or (in the case of a Foreign Subsidiary) to the extent required by applicable law), property or other assets (each referred to for the purposes of this definition as a "disposition") by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (including any disposition by means of a merger, consolidation or similar transaction), other than (i) a disposition to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, (ii) a disposition in the ordinary course of business, (iii) a disposition of Cash Equivalents, Investment Grade Securities or Temporary Cash Investments, (iv) the sale or discount (with or without recourse, and on customary or commercially reasonable terms) of accounts receivable or notes receivable arising in the ordinary course of business, or the conversion or exchange of accounts receivable for notes receivable, (v) any Restricted Payment Transaction, (vi) a disposition that is governed by the provisions described under "—Merger and Consolidation," (vii) any Financing Disposition, (viii) any "fee in lieu" or other disposition of assets to any governmental authority or agency that continue in use by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, so long as the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may obtain title to such assets upon reasonable notice by paying a nominal fee, (ix) any exchange of property pursuant to or intended to qualify under Section 1031 (or any successor section) of the Code, or any exchange of equipment to be leased, rented or otherwise used in a Related Business, (x) any financing transaction with respect to property built or acquired by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary after the Issue Date, including without limitation any sale/leaseback transaction or asset securitization, (xi) any disposition arising from foreclosure, condemnation or similar action with respect to any property or other assets, or exercise of termination rights under any lease, license, concession or other agreement, or pursuant to buy/sell arrangements under any joint venture or similar agreement or arrangement, (xii) any disposition of Capital Stock, Indebtedness or other securities of an Unrestricted Subsidiary, (xiii) a disposition of Capital Stock of a Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to an agreement or other obligation with or to a Person (other than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary) from whom such Restricted Subsidiary was acquired, or from whom such Restricted Subsidiary acquired its business and assets (having been newly formed in connection with such acquisition), entered into in connection with such acquisition, (xiv) a disposition of not more than 5% of the outstanding Capital Stock of a Foreign Subsidiary that has been approved by the Board of Directors, (xv) any disposition or series of related dispositions for aggregate consideration not to exceed $30.0 million, (xvi) any Exempt Sale and Leaseback Transaction, or (xvii) the abandonment or other disposition of patents, trademarks or other intellectual property that are, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, no longer economically practicable to maintain or useful in the conduct of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole.

        "Board of Directors" means, for any Person, the board of directors or other governing body of such Person or, if such Person does not have such a board of directors or other governing body

169


Table of Contents

and is owned or managed by a single entity, the board of directors or other governing body of such entity, or, in either case, any committee thereof duly authorized to act on behalf of such board of directors or other governing body. Unless otherwise provided, "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Company.

        "Business Day" means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banking institutions are authorized or required by law to close in New York City (or any other city in which a Paying Agent maintains its office).

        "Capital Markets Securities" means bonds, debentures, notes or other similar debt securities of the Company or any Subsidiary Guarantor (other than the Notes) with an aggregate principal amount outstanding in excess of $150.0 million.

        "Capital Stock" of any Person means any and all shares of, rights to purchase, warrants or options for, or other equivalents of or interests in (however designated) equity of such Person, including any Preferred Stock, but excluding any debt securities convertible into such equity.

        "Capitalized Lease Obligation" means an obligation that is required to be classified and accounted for as a capitalized lease for financial reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. The Stated Maturity of any Capitalized Lease Obligation shall be the date of the last payment of rent or any other amount due under the related lease.

        "Captive Insurance Subsidiary" means any of (a) Steward Insurance Company, a Vermont corporation, and any successor in interest thereto, so long as such Person either (x) satisfies the requirements of clause (c) below or (y) does not enter into any new insurance policies after the Issue Date insuring risks of any Persons other than the Company and its Subsidiaries, (b) any Subsidiary of any Captive Insurance Subsidiary referred to in clause (a) above and (c) any Subsidiary of the Company that is subject to regulation as an insurance company (or any Subsidiary thereof).

        "Cash Equivalents" means any of the following: (a) money, (b) securities issued or fully guaranteed or insured by the United States of America or a member state of The European Union or any agency or instrumentality of any thereof, (c) time deposits, certificates of deposit or bankers' acceptances of (i) any lender under a Senior Credit Agreement or any affiliate thereof or (ii) any commercial bank having capital and surplus in excess of $500,000,000 (or the foreign currency equivalent thereof as of the date of such investment) and the commercial paper of the holding company of which is rated at least A-2 or the equivalent thereof by S&P or at least P-2 or the equivalent thereof by Moody's (or if at such time neither is issuing ratings, then a comparable rating of another nationally recognized rating agency), (d) repurchase obligations with a term of not more than seven days for underlying securities of the types described in clauses (b) and (c) above entered into with any financial institution meeting the qualifications specified in clause (c) above, (e) money market instruments, commercial paper or other short-term obligations rated at least A-2 or the equivalent thereof by S&P or at least P-2 or the equivalent thereof by Moody's (or if at such time neither is issuing ratings, then a comparable rating of another nationally recognized rating agency), (f) investments in money market funds subject to the risk limiting conditions of Rule 2a-7 or any successor rule of the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended and (g) investments similar to any of the foregoing denominated in foreign currencies approved by the Board of Directors.

        "CD&R" means Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC and any successor in interest thereto, or any successor to CD&R's investment management business.

        "CD&R Investors" means, collectively, (i) Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P., or any successor in interest thereto, (ii) Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P., or any successor in interest thereto, (iii) CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P., or any successor in interest thereto, (iv) CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P., or any successor in interest thereto, and (v) any Affiliate of any CD&R Investor.

170


Table of Contents

        "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

        "Commodities Agreement" means, in respect of a Person, any commodity futures contract, forward contract, option or similar agreement or arrangement (including derivative agreements or arrangements), as to which such Person is a party or beneficiary.

        "Company" means The ServiceMaster Company, a Delaware corporation, and any successor in interest thereto.

        "Consolidated Coverage Ratio" as of any date of determination means the ratio of (i) the aggregate amount of Consolidated EBITDA for the period of the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters ending prior to the date of such determination for which consolidated financial statements of the Company are available to (ii) Consolidated Interest Expense for such four fiscal quarters; provided, that

171


Table of Contents

        For purposes of this definition, whenever pro forma effect is to be given to any Sale, Purchase or other transaction, or the amount of income or earnings relating thereto and the amount of Consolidated Interest Expense associated with any Indebtedness Incurred or repaid, repurchased, redeemed, defeased or otherwise acquired, retired or discharged in connection therewith, the pro forma calculations in respect thereof (including without limitation in respect of anticipated cost savings or synergies relating to any such Sale, Purchase or other transaction) shall be as determined in good faith by the Chief Financial Officer or an authorized Officer of the Company. If any Indebtedness bears a floating rate of interest and is being given pro forma effect, the interest expense on such Indebtedness shall be calculated as if the rate in effect on the date of determination had been the applicable rate for the entire period (taking into account any Interest Rate Agreement applicable to such Indebtedness). If any Indebtedness bears, at the option of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, a rate of interest based on a prime or similar rate, a eurocurrency interbank offered rate or other fixed or floating rate, and such Indebtedness is being given pro forma effect, the interest expense on such Indebtedness shall be calculated by applying such optional rate as the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary may designate. If any Indebtedness that is being given pro forma effect was Incurred under a revolving credit facility, the interest expense on such Indebtedness shall be computed based upon the average daily balance of such Indebtedness during the applicable period. Interest on a Capitalized Lease Obligation shall be deemed to accrue at an interest rate determined in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting officer of the Company to be the rate of interest implicit in such Capitalized Lease Obligation in accordance with GAAP.

        "Consolidated EBITDA" means, for any period, the Consolidated Net Income for such period, plus the following to the extent deducted in calculating such Consolidated Net Income, without duplication: (i) provision for all taxes (whether or not paid, estimated or accrued) based on income, profits or capital (including penalties and interest, if any), (ii) Consolidated Interest Expense, all items excluded from the definition of Consolidated Interest Expense pursuant to clause (iii) thereof (other than Special Purpose Financing Expense), any Special Purpose Financing Fees, and (for purposes of the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio) any Special Purpose Financing Expense, (iii) depreciation, amortization (including but not limited to amortization of goodwill and intangibles and amortization and write-off of financing costs) and all other non-cash charges or non-cash losses, (iv) any expenses or charges related to any Equity Offering, Investment or Indebtedness permitted by the Indenture (whether or not consummated or incurred, and including any offering or

172


Table of Contents

sale of Capital Stock to the extent the proceeds thereof were intended to be contributed to the equity capital of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries), (v) the amount of any minority interest expense, (vi) any management, monitoring, consulting and advisory fees and related expenses paid to any of CD&R or any of its Affiliates, (vii) interest and investment income, (viii) the amount of net cost savings projected by the Company in good faith to be realized as a result of actions taken or to be taken (calculated on a pro forma basis as though such cost savings had been realized on the first day of such period), net of the amount of actual benefits realized during such period from such actions; provided that (x) such cost savings are reasonably identifiable and factually supportable, (y) such actions have been taken or are to be taken within 12 months after the date of determination to take such action and (z) the aggregate amount of cost savings added pursuant to this clause (viii) shall not exceed $35.0 million for any four consecutive quarter period (which adjustments may be incremental to (but not duplicative of) pro forma adjustments made pursuant to the proviso to the definition of "Consolidated Coverage Ratio" or "Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio"), (ix) the amount of loss on any Financing Disposition, and (x) any costs or expenses pursuant to any management or employee stock option or other equity related plan, program or arrangement, or other benefit plan, program or arrangement, or any stock subscription or shareholder agreement, to the extent funded with cash proceeds contributed to the capital of the Company or an issuance of Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock) and excluded from the calculation set forth in clause (a)(3) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments."

        "Consolidated Interest Expense" means, for any period, (i) the total interest expense of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries to the extent deducted in calculating Consolidated Net Income, net of any interest income of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, including without limitation any such interest expense consisting of (a) interest expense attributable to Capitalized Lease Obligations, (b) amortization of debt discount, (c) interest in respect of Indebtedness of any other Person that has been Guaranteed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, but only to the extent that such interest is actually paid by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, (d) non-cash interest expense, (e) the interest portion of any deferred payment obligation and (f) commissions, discounts and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and bankers' acceptance financing, plus (ii) Preferred Stock dividends paid in cash in respect of Disqualified Stock of the Company held by Persons other than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, minus (iii) to the extent otherwise included in such interest expense referred to in clause (i) above, amortization or write-off of financing costs, Special Purpose Financing Expense, accretion or accrual of discounted liabilities not constituting Indebtedness, expense resulting from discounting of Indebtedness in conjunction with recapitalization or purchase accounting, and any "additional interest" in respect of registration rights arrangements for any securities (including the Notes), in each case under clauses (i) through (iii) as determined on a Consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided, that gross interest expense shall be determined after giving effect to any net payments made or received by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries with respect to Interest Rate Agreements.

        "Consolidated Net Income" means, for any period, the net income (loss) of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, determined on a Consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in respect of Preferred Stock dividends; provided, that there shall not be included in such Consolidated Net Income:

173


Table of Contents

174


Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the purpose of clause (a)(3)(A) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments" only, there shall be excluded from Consolidated Net Income, without duplication, any income consisting of dividends, repayments of loans or advances or other transfers of assets from Unrestricted Subsidiaries to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, and any income consisting of return of capital, repayment or other proceeds from dispositions or repayments of Investments consisting of Restricted Payments, in each case to the extent such income would be included in Consolidated Net Income and such related dividends, repayments, transfers, return of capital or other proceeds are applied by the Company to increase the amount of Restricted Payments permitted under such covenant pursuant to clause (a)(3)(C) or (D) thereof.

        "Consolidated Tangible Assets" means, as of any date of determination, the total assets less the sum of the goodwill, net, and other intangible assets, net, in each case reflected on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries as at the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter of the Company for which such a balance sheet is available, determined on a Consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP (and, in the case of any determination relating to any Incurrence of Indebtedness or any Investment, on a pro forma basis including any property or assets being acquired in connection therewith).

        "Consolidated Total Indebtedness" means, at the date of determination thereof, an amount equal to (1) the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Indebtedness of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of such date consisting of (without duplication) Indebtedness for borrowed money (including Purchase Money Obligations and unreimbursed outstanding drawn amounts under funded letters of credit), Capitalized Lease Obligations and debt obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, determined on a Consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP (excluding items eliminated in Consolidation, and for the avoidance of doubt, excluding Hedging Obligations), minus (2) the amount of Unrestricted Cash held by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries as of the end of the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters ending prior to the date of such determination for which consolidated financial statements of the Company are available.

175


Table of Contents

        "Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio" means, as of any date of determination, the ratio of (x) Consolidated Total Indebtedness as at such date (after giving effect to any Incurrence or Discharge of Indebtedness on such date) to (y) the aggregate amount of Consolidated EBITDA for the period of the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters ending prior to the date of such determination for which consolidated financial statements of the Company are available, provided, that:

        For purposes of this definition, whenever pro forma effect is to be given to any Sale, Purchase or other transaction, or the amount of income or earnings relating thereto, the pro forma calculations in respect thereof (including without limitation in respect of anticipated cost savings or synergies relating to any such Sale, Purchase or other transaction) shall be as determined in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting Officer of the Company.

        "Consolidation" means the consolidation of the accounts of each of the Restricted Subsidiaries with those of the Company in accordance with GAAP; provided that "Consolidation" will not include consolidation of the accounts of any Unrestricted Subsidiary, but the interest of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in any Unrestricted Subsidiary will be accounted for as an investment. The term "Consolidated" has a correlative meaning.

        "Contingent Obligation" means, with respect to any Person, any obligation of such Person guaranteeing any obligation that does not constitute Indebtedness (a "primary obligation") of any other Person (the "primary obligor") in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, including any obligation of such Person, whether or not contingent, (1) to purchase any such primary obligation or any property constituting direct or indirect security therefor, (2) to advance or supply funds (a) for the purchase or payment of any such primary obligation, or (b) to maintain working capital or equity capital of the primary obligor or otherwise to maintain the net worth or solvency of the primary obligor, or (3) to purchase property, securities or services primarily for the purpose of assuring the owner of any such primary obligation of the ability of the primary obligor to make payment of such primary obligation against loss in respect thereof.

        "Continuing Notes" means the Company's 7.45% Notes due August 15, 2027 and 7.25% Notes due March 1, 2038, in each case issued under the Existing Notes Indenture.

176


Table of Contents

        "Contribution Amounts" means the aggregate amount of capital contributions applied by the Company to permit the Incurrence of Contribution Indebtedness pursuant to clause (b)(xi) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness."

        "Contribution Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in an aggregate principal amount not greater than twice the aggregate amount of cash contributions (other than Excluded Contributions) made to the capital of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary after the Reference Date (whether through the issuance or sale of Capital Stock or otherwise); provided that such Contribution Indebtedness (a) is incurred within 180 days after the making of the related cash contribution and (b) is so designated as Contribution Indebtedness pursuant to an Officer's Certificate on the date of Incurrence thereof.

        "Credit Facilities" means one or more of (i) the Senior Term Facility, (ii) the Senior Revolving Credit Facility and (iii) any other facilities or arrangements designated by the Company, in each case with one or more banks or other lenders or institutions providing for revolving credit loans, term loans, receivables financings (including without limitation through the sale of receivables to such institutions or to special purpose entities formed to borrow from such institutions against such receivables or the creation of any Liens in respect of such receivables in favor of such institutions), letters of credit or other Indebtedness, in each case, including all agreements, instruments and documents executed and delivered pursuant to or in connection with any of the foregoing, including but not limited to any notes and letters of credit issued pursuant thereto and any guarantee and collateral agreement, patent and trademark security agreement, mortgages or letter of credit applications and other guarantees, pledge agreements, security agreements and collateral documents, in each case as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time, or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid, increased or extended from time to time (whether in whole or in part, whether with the original banks, lenders or institutions or other banks, lenders or institutions or otherwise, and whether provided under any original Credit Facility or one or more other credit agreements, indentures, financing agreements or other Credit Facilities or otherwise). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "Credit Facility" shall include any agreement (i) changing the maturity of any Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or contemplated thereby, (ii) adding Subsidiaries as additional borrowers or guarantors thereunder, (iii) increasing the amount of Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or available to be borrowed thereunder or (iv) otherwise altering the terms and conditions thereof.

        "Credit Facility Indebtedness" means any and all amounts, whether outstanding on the Issue Date or thereafter incurred, payable under or in respect of any Credit Facility, including without limitation any principal, premium, interest (including interest accruing on or after the filing of any petition in bankruptcy or for reorganization relating to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary whether or not a claim for post-filing interest is allowed in such proceedings), fees, charges, expenses, reimbursement obligations, guarantees, other monetary obligations of any nature and all other amounts payable thereunder or in respect thereof.

        "Currency Agreement" means, in respect of a Person, any foreign exchange contract, currency swap agreement or other similar agreement or arrangements (including derivative agreements or arrangements), as to which such Person is a party or a beneficiary.

        "Default" means any event or condition that is, or after notice or passage of time or both would be, an Event of Default.

        "Designated Noncash Consideration" means the Fair Market Value of noncash consideration received by the Company or one of its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with an Asset Disposition that is so designated as Designated Noncash Consideration pursuant to an Officer's Certificate, setting forth the basis of such valuation.

177


Table of Contents

        "Designated Preferred Stock" means Preferred Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock) or any Parent that is issued for cash (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) and is so designated as Designated Preferred Stock, pursuant to an Officer's Certificate of the Company.

        "Designated Senior Indebtedness" means with respect to a Person (i) the Credit Facility Indebtedness under or in respect of the Senior Credit Facilities and (ii) any other Senior Indebtedness of such Person that, at the date of determination, has an aggregate principal amount equal to or under which, at the date of determination, the holders thereof are committed to lend up to, at least $25.0 million and is specifically designated by such Person in an agreement or instrument evidencing or governing such Senior Indebtedness as "Designated Senior Indebtedness" for purposes of the Indenture.

        "Disinterested Directors" means, with respect to any Affiliate Transaction, one or more members of the Board of Directors of the Company, or one or more members of the Board of Directors of a Parent, having no material direct or indirect financial interest in or with respect to such Affiliate Transaction. A member of any such Board of Directors shall not be deemed to have such a financial interest by reason of such member's holding Capital Stock of the Company or any Parent or any options, warrants or other rights in respect of such Capital Stock.

        "Disqualified Stock" means, with respect to any Person, any Capital Stock (other than Management Stock) that by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is convertible or for which it is exchangeable or exercisable) or upon the happening of any event (other than following the occurrence of a Change of Control or other similar event described under such terms as a "change of control," or an Asset Disposition) (i) matures or is mandatorily redeemable pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or otherwise, (ii) is convertible or exchangeable for Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock or (iii) is redeemable at the option of the holder thereof (other than following the occurrence of a Change of Control or other similar event described under such terms as a "change of control," or an Asset Disposition), in whole or in part, in each case on or prior to the final Stated Maturity of the Notes; provided that Capital Stock issued to any employee benefit plan, or by any such plan to any employees of the Company or any Subsidiary, shall not constitute Disqualified Stock solely because it may be required to be repurchased or otherwise acquired or retired in order to satisfy applicable statutory or regulatory obligations.

        "Domestic Subsidiary" means any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company other than a Foreign Subsidiary.

        "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        "Excluded Contribution" means Net Cash Proceeds, or the Fair Market Value of property or assets, received by the Company as capital contributions to the Company after the Reference Date or from the issuance or sale (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary) of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock or Designated Preferred Stock) of the Company, in each case to the extent designated as an Excluded Contribution pursuant to an Officer's Certificate of the Company and not previously included in the calculation set forth in clause (a)(3)(B)(x) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments" for purposes of determining whether a Restricted Payment may be made.

        "Exempt Sale and Leaseback Transaction" means any Sale and Leaseback Transaction (a) in which the sale or transfer of property occurs within 90 days of the acquisition of such property by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (b) that involves property with a book value of $15.0 million or less and is not part of a series of related Sale and Leaseback Transactions involving property with an aggregate value in excess of such amount and entered into with a single Person or group of Persons. For purposes of the foregoing, "Sale and Leaseback Transaction" means any arrangement with any Person providing for the leasing by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of

178


Table of Contents

real or personal property that has been or is to be sold or transferred by the Company or any such Subsidiary to such Person or to any other Person to whom funds have been or are to be advanced by such Person on the security of such property or rental obligations of the Company or such Subsidiary.

        "Existing Notes Indenture" means the Indenture between The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership, as issuer, and ServiceMaster Limited Partnership, as guarantor, and the Existing Notes Trustee, dated as of August 15, 1997, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, between The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership, as issuer, and ServiceMaster Limited Partnership, as guarantor, and the Existing Notes Trustee, dated as of August 15, 1997, the Second Supplemental Indenture thereto, between the Company, as successor by merger to The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership and ServiceMaster Limited Partnership, and the Existing Notes Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1998, the Third Supplemental Indenture thereto, between the Company and the Existing Notes Trustee, dated as of March 2, 1998 and the Fourth Supplemental Indenture, between the Company and the Existing Notes Trustee, dated as of August 10, 1999. For purposes of this definition, "Existing Notes Trustee" means The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor to Harris Trust and Savings Bank as trustee under the Existing Notes Indenture.

        "Fair Market Value" means, with respect to any asset or property, the fair market value of such asset or property as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors, whose determination will be conclusive.

        "Financing Disposition" means any sale, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of, or creation or incurrence of any Lien on, property or assets (a) by the Company or any Subsidiary thereof to or in favor of any Special Purpose Entity, or by any Special Purpose Subsidiary, in each case in connection with the Incurrence by a Special Purpose Entity of Indebtedness, or obligations to make payments to the obligor on Indebtedness, which may be secured by a Lien in respect of such property or assets or (b) by the Company or any Subsidiary thereof to or in favor of any Special Purpose Entity that is not a Special Purpose Subsidiary.

        "Fixed GAAP Date" means the Reference Date, provided that at any time after the Issue Date, the Company may by written notice to the Trustee elect to change the Fixed GAAP Date to be the date specified in such notice, and upon such notice, the Fixed GAAP Date shall be such date for all periods beginning on and after the date specified in such notice.

        "Fixed GAAP Terms" means (a) the definitions of the terms "Capitalized Lease Obligation," "Consolidated Coverage Ratio," "Consolidated EBITDA," "Consolidated Interest Expense," "Consolidated Net Income," "Consolidated Tangible Assets," "Consolidated Total Indebtedness," "Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio," "Consolidation," "Foreign Borrowing Base," "Inventory" and "Receivables," (b) all defined terms in the Indenture to the extent used in or relating to any of the foregoing definitions, and all ratios and computations based on any of the foregoing definitions, and (c) any other term or provision of the Indenture or the Notes that, at the Company's election, may be specified by the Company by written notice to the Trustee from time to time.

        "Foreign Borrowing Base" means the sum of (1) 80% of the book value of Inventory of Foreign Subsidiaries, (2) 85% of the book value of Receivables of Foreign Subsidiaries, and (3) cash, Cash Equivalents and Temporary Cash Investments of Foreign Subsidiaries (in each case, determined as of the end of the most recently ended fiscal month of the Company for which internal consolidated financial statements of the Company are available, and, in the case of any determination relating to any Incurrence of Indebtedness, on a pro forma basis including (x) any property or assets of a type described above acquired since the end of such fiscal month and (y) any property or assets of a type described above being acquired in connection therewith).

179


Table of Contents

        "Foreign Subsidiary" means (a) any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company that is not organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof or the District of Columbia and any Restricted Subsidiary of such Foreign Subsidiary and (b) any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company that has no material assets other than securities or Indebtedness of one or more Foreign Subsidiaries (or Subsidiaries thereof), and intellectual property relating to such Foreign Subsidiaries (or Subsidiaries thereof) and other assets relating to an ownership interest in any such securities, Indebtedness, intellectual property or Subsidiaries.

        "GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America as in effect on the Fixed GAAP Date (for purposes of the Fixed GAAP Terms) and as in effect from time to time (for all other purposes of the Indenture), including those set forth in the opinions and pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and statements and pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board or in such other statements by such other entity as approved by a significant segment of the accounting profession, and subject to the following: If at any time the SEC permits or requires U.S.-domiciled companies subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act to use IFRS in lieu of GAAP for financial reporting purposes, the Company may elect by written notice to the Trustee to so use IFRS in lieu of GAAP and, upon any such notice, references herein to GAAP shall thereafter be construed to mean (a) for periods beginning on and after the date specified in such notice, IFRS as in effect on the date specified in such notice (for purposes of the Fixed GAAP Terms) and as in effect from time to time (for all other purposes of the Indenture) and (b) for prior periods, GAAP as defined in the first sentence of this definition. All ratios and computations based on GAAP contained in the Indenture shall be computed in conformity with GAAP.

        "Guarantee" means any obligation, contingent or otherwise, of any Person directly or indirectly guaranteeing any Indebtedness or other obligation of any other Person; provided that the term "Guarantee" shall not include endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary course of business. The term "Guarantee" used as a verb has a corresponding meaning.

        "Guarantor Subordinated Obligations" means, with respect to a Subsidiary Guarantor, any Indebtedness of such Subsidiary Guarantor (whether outstanding on the Issue Date or thereafter Incurred) that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the obligations of such Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subsidiary Guarantee pursuant to a written agreement.

        "Hedging Obligations" of any Person means the obligations of such Person pursuant to any Interest Rate Agreement, Currency Agreement or Commodities Agreement.

        "Holder" or "Noteholder" means the Person in whose name a Note is registered in the Note Register.

        "Holding" means CDRSVM Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor in interest thereto.

        "Holding Parent" means ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor in interest thereto.

        "Home Warranty Subsidiary" means any of (a) American Home Shield Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and any successor in interest thereto, (b) any Subsidiary of any Home Warranty Subsidiary referred to in clause (a) above and (c) any Subsidiary of the Company that is subject to regulation as a home warranty, service contract, or similar company (or any Subsidiary thereof).

        "IFRS" means International Financial Reporting Standards and applicable accounting requirements set by the International Accounting Standards Board or any successor thereto (or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Accounting Principles Board of the American Institute of

180


Table of Contents

Certified Public Accountants, or any successor to either such Board, or the SEC, as the case may be), as in effect from time to time.

        "Incur" means issue, assume, enter into any Guarantee of, incur or otherwise become liable for; and the terms "Incurs," "Incurred" and "Incurrence" shall have a correlative meaning; provided, that any Indebtedness or Capital Stock of a Person existing at the time such Person becomes a Subsidiary (whether by merger, consolidation, acquisition or otherwise) shall be deemed to be Incurred by such Subsidiary at the time it becomes a Subsidiary. Accrual of interest, the accretion of accreted value, the payment of interest in the form of additional Indebtedness, and the payment of dividends on Capital Stock constituting Indebtedness in the form of additional shares of the same class of Capital Stock, will not be deemed to be an Incurrence of Indebtedness. Any Indebtedness issued at a discount (including Indebtedness on which interest is payable through the issuance of additional Indebtedness) shall be deemed Incurred at the time of original issuance of the Indebtedness at the initial accreted amount thereof.

        "Indebtedness" means, with respect to any Person on any date of determination (without duplication):

181


Table of Contents

provided that Indebtedness shall not include Contingent Obligations Incurred in the ordinary course of business.

        The amount of Indebtedness of any Person at any date shall be determined as set forth above or otherwise provided in the Indenture, or otherwise shall equal the amount thereof that would appear as a liability on a balance sheet of such Person (excluding any notes thereto) prepared in accordance with GAAP.

        "Interest Rate Agreement" means, with respect to any Person, any interest rate protection agreement, future agreement, option agreement, swap agreement, cap agreement, collar agreement, hedge agreement or other similar agreement or arrangement (including derivative agreements or arrangements), as to which such Person is party or a beneficiary.

        "Inventory" means goods held for sale, lease or use by a Person in the ordinary course of business, net of any reserve for goods that have been segregated by such Person to be returned to the applicable vendor for credit, as determined in accordance with GAAP.

        "Investment" in any Person by any other Person means any direct or indirect advance, loan or other extension of credit (other than to customers, dealers, licensees, franchisees, suppliers, consultants, directors, officers or employees of any Person in the ordinary course of business) or capital contribution (by means of any transfer of cash or other property to others or any payment for property or services for the account or use of others) to, or any purchase or acquisition of Capital Stock, Indebtedness or other similar instruments issued by, such Person. For purposes of the definition of "Unrestricted Subsidiary" and the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments" only, (i) "Investment" shall include the portion (proportionate to the Company's equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the Fair Market Value of the net assets of any Subsidiary of the Company at the time that such Subsidiary is designated an Unrestricted Subsidiary, provided that upon a redesignation of such Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary, the Company shall be deemed to continue to have a permanent "Investment" in an Unrestricted Subsidiary in an amount (if positive) equal to (x) the Company's "Investment" in such Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation less (y) the portion (proportionate to the Company's equity interest in such Subsidiary) of the Fair Market Value of the net assets of such Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation, (ii) any property transferred to or from an Unrestricted Subsidiary shall be valued at its fair market value (as determined in good faith by the Company) at the time of such transfer and (iii) for purposes of clause (3)(C) of paragraph (a) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments," the amount resulting from the redesignation of any Unrestricted Subsidiary as a Restricted Subsidiary shall be the Fair Market Value of the Investment in such Unrestricted Subsidiary at the time of such redesignation (excluding the amount of such Investment then outstanding pursuant to clause (xv) or (xviii) of the definition of the term "Permitted Investments" or clause (vii) or (xii) of paragraph (b) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments"). Guarantees shall not be deemed to be Investments. The amount of any Investment outstanding at any time shall be the original cost of such Investment, reduced (at the Company's option) by any dividend, distribution, interest payment, return of capital, repayment or other amount or value received in respect of such Investment; provided, that to the extent that the amount of Restricted Payments outstanding at any time pursuant to paragraph (a) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments" is so reduced by any portion of any such amount or value that would otherwise be included in the calculation of Consolidated Net Income, such portion of such amount

182


Table of Contents

or value shall not be so included for purposes of calculating the amount of Restricted Payments that may be made pursuant to paragraph (a) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments."

        "Investment Grade Rating" means a rating of Baa3 or better by Moody's and BBB- or better by S&P (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization), or an equivalent rating by any other Rating Agency.

        "Investment Grade Securities" means (i) securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by the United States government or any agency or instrumentality thereof (other than Cash Equivalents); (ii) debt securities or debt instruments with an Investment Grade Rating, but excluding any debt securities or instruments constituting loans or advances among the Company and its Subsidiaries; (iii) investments in any fund that invests exclusively in investments of the type described in clauses (i) and (ii), which fund may also hold immaterial amounts of cash pending investment or distribution; and (iv) corresponding instruments in countries other than the United States customarily utilized for high quality investments.

        "Investment Holding" means CDRSVM Investment Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor in interest thereto.

        "Investors" means (i) the CD&R Investors, BACSVM-A, L.P., Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., 2007 Co-Investment Portfolio, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II 2007 Citigroup Investment, L.P.), Citigroup Capital Partners II Employee Master Fund, L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P.), StepStone Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P.), StepStone Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC (formerly known as CPE Co Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC) and JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. (formerly known as J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation), (ii) any Person that acquired Voting Stock of Holding on or prior to the Reference Date and any Affiliate of such Person, and (iii) any of their respective legal successors.

        "Issue Date" means February 13, 2012.

        "Liabilities" means, collectively, any and all claims, obligations, liabilities, causes of action, actions, suits, proceedings, investigations, judgments, decrees, losses, damages, fees, costs and expenses (including without limitation interest, penalties and fees and disbursements of attorneys, accountants, investment bankers and other professional advisors), in each case whether incurred, arising or existing with respect to third parties or otherwise at any time or from time to time.

        "Lien" means any mortgage, pledge, security interest, encumbrance, lien or charge of any kind (including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement or lease in the nature thereof).

        "Management Advances" means (1) loans or advances made to directors, officers, employees or consultants of any Parent, the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (x) in respect of travel, entertainment or moving-related expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business, (y) in respect of moving-related expenses incurred in connection with any closing or consolidation of any facility, or (z) in the ordinary course of business and (in the case of this clause (z)) not exceeding $10.0 million in the aggregate outstanding at any time, (2) promissory notes of Management Investors acquired in connection with the issuance of Management Stock to such Management Investors, (3) Management Guarantees, or (4) other Guarantees of borrowings by Management Investors in connection with the purchase of Management Stock, which Guarantees are permitted under the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness."

        "Management Agreements" means, collectively, (i) the Stock Subscription Agreements, each dated as of the Reference Date, between Holding Parent and each of the Investors party thereto,

183


Table of Contents

(ii) the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among Holding Parent, the Company and CD&R, (iii) the Consulting Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2009 and amended as of December 22, 2011, among Holding Parent, the Company and BAS Capital Funding Corporation, (iv) the Consulting Agreements, each dated as of August 13, 2009, among Holding Parent, the Company and each of (a) StepStone Group LLC (successor, by assignment, to Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC) and (b) JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. (formerly known as J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation), (v) the Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among Holding Parent and the Company and CD&R and each CD&R Investor, (vi) the Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreements, each dated as of March 19, 2010, among Holding Parent and the Company and each of (a) BAS Capital Funding Corporation, Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., BACSVM-A, L.P. and affiliates thereof, (b) 2007 Co-Investment Portfolio, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II 2007 Citigroup Investment, L.P.), Citigroup Capital Partners II Employee Master Fund, L.P., StepStone Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P.), StepStone Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P. (formerly known as Citigroup Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P.) and StepStone Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC (formerly known as CPE Co Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC) and (c) JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. (formerly known as J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation), or Affiliates thereof, respectively, (vii) the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of the Reference Date, among Holding Parent and the Investors party thereto and any other Person party thereto from time to time, (viii) the Stockholders Agreement, dated as of the Reference Date and amended as of December 22, 2011, by and among Holding Parent and the Investors party thereto and any other Person party thereto from time to time and (ix) any other agreement primarily providing for indemnification and/or contribution for the benefit of any Permitted Holder in respect of Liabilities resulting from, arising out of or in connection with, based upon or relating to (a) any management consulting, financial advisory, financing, underwriting or placement services or other investment banking activities, (b) any offering of securities or other financing activity or arrangement of or by any Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or (c) any action or failure to act of or by any Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (or any of their respective predecessors); in each case in clauses (i) through (ix) as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and of the Indenture.

        "Management Guarantees" means guarantees (x) of up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $25.0 million of borrowings by Management Investors in connection with their purchase of Management Stock or (y) made on behalf of, or in respect of loans or advances made to, directors, officers, employees or consultants of any Parent, the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (1) in respect of travel, entertainment and moving-related expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business, or (2) in the ordinary course of business and (in the case of this clause (2)) not exceeding $10.0 million in the aggregate outstanding at any time.

        "Management Indebtedness" means Indebtedness Incurred to any Management Investor to finance the repurchase or other acquisition of Capital Stock of the Company or any Parent (including any options, warrants or other rights in respect thereof) from any Management Investor, which repurchase or other acquisition of Capital Stock is permitted by the covenant described under "—Limitation on Restricted Payments."

        "Management Investors" means the officers, directors, employees and other members of the management of any Parent, the Company or any of their respective Subsidiaries, or family members or relatives thereof (provided that, solely for purposes of the definition of "Permitted Holders," such relatives shall include only those Persons who are or become Management Investors in connection with estate planning for or inheritance from other Management Investors, as determined in good faith by the Company, which determination shall be conclusive), or trusts,

184


Table of Contents

partnerships or limited liability companies for the benefit of any of the foregoing, or any of their heirs, executors, successors and legal representatives, who at any date beneficially own or have the right to acquire, directly or indirectly, Capital Stock of the Company or any Parent.

        "Management Stock" means Capital Stock of the Company or any Parent (including any options, warrants or other rights in respect thereof) held by any of the Management Investors.

        "Material Subsidiary" means any Restricted Subsidiary, other than one or more Restricted Subsidiaries designated by the Company that individually and in the aggregate (if considered a single Person) do not constitute a Significant Subsidiary.

        "Moody's" means Moody's Investors Service, Inc., and its successors.

        "Net Available Cash" from an Asset Disposition means an amount equal to the cash payments received (including any cash payments received by way of deferred payment of principal pursuant to a note or installment receivable or otherwise, but only as and when received, but excluding any other consideration received in the form of assumption by the acquiring Person of Indebtedness or other obligations relating to the properties or assets that are the subject of such Asset Disposition or received in any other non-cash form) therefrom, in each case net of (i) all legal, title and recording tax expenses, commissions and other fees and expenses incurred, and all Federal, state, provincial, foreign and local taxes required to be paid or to be accrued as a liability under GAAP, as a consequence of such Asset Disposition (including as a consequence of any transfer of funds in connection with the application thereof in accordance with the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Sales of Assets and Subsidiary Stock"), (ii) all payments made, and all installment payments required to be made, on any Indebtedness (x) that is secured by any assets subject to such Asset Disposition, in accordance with the terms of any Lien upon such assets, or (y) that must by its terms, or in order to obtain a necessary consent to such Asset Disposition, or by applicable law, be repaid out of the proceeds from such Asset Disposition, including but not limited to any payments required to be made to increase borrowing availability under any revolving credit facility, (iii) all distributions and other payments required to be made to minority interest holders in Subsidiaries or joint ventures as a result of such Asset Disposition, or to any other Person (other than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary) owning a beneficial interest in the assets disposed of in such Asset Disposition, (iv) any liabilities or obligations associated with the assets disposed of in such Asset Disposition and retained, indemnified or insured by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary after such Asset Disposition, including without limitation pension and other post-employment benefit liabilities, liabilities related to environmental matters, and liabilities relating to any indemnification obligations associated with such Asset Disposition, and (v) the amount of any purchase price or similar adjustment (x) claimed by any Person to be owed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, until such time as such claim shall have been settled or otherwise finally resolved, or (y) paid or payable by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, in either case in respect of such Asset Disposition.

        "Net Cash Proceeds," with respect to any issuance or sale of any securities of, or the Incurrence of Indebtedness by, the Company or any Subsidiary by the Company or any Subsidiary, or any capital contribution, means the cash proceeds of such issuance, sale, contribution or Incurrence net of attorneys' fees, accountants' fees, underwriters' or placement agents' fees, discounts or commissions and brokerage, consultant and other fees actually incurred in connection with such issuance, sale, contribution or Incurrence and net of taxes paid or payable as a result thereof.

        "Obligations" means, with respect to any Indebtedness, any principal, premium (if any), interest (including interest accruing on or after the filing of any petition in bankruptcy or for reorganization relating to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary whether or not a claim for post-filing interest is allowed in such proceedings), fees, charges, expenses, reimbursement obligations, Guarantees

185


Table of Contents

of such Indebtedness (or of Obligations in respect thereof), other monetary obligations of any nature and all other amounts payable thereunder or in respect thereof.

        "Officer" means, with respect to the Company or any other obligor upon the Notes, the Chairman of the Board, the President, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, any Vice President, the Controller, the Treasurer or the Secretary (a) of such Person or (b) if such Person is owned or managed by a single entity, of such entity (or any other individual designated as an "Officer" for the purposes of the Indenture by the Board of Directors).

        "Officer's Certificate" means, with respect to the Company or any other obligor upon the Notes, a certificate signed by one Officer of such Person.

        "Opinion of Counsel" means a written opinion from legal counsel who is reasonably acceptable to the Trustee. The counsel may be an employee of or counsel to the Company or the Trustee.

        "Parent" means any of Holding Parent, Holding, Investment Holding, and any Other Parent and any other Person that is a Subsidiary of Holding Parent, Holding, Investment Holding, or any Other Parent and of which the Company is a Subsidiary. As used herein, "Other Parent" means a Person of which the Company becomes a Subsidiary after the Issue Date, provided that either (x) immediately after the Company first becomes a Subsidiary of such Person, more than 50% of the Voting Stock of such Person shall be held by one or more Persons that held more than 50% of the Voting Stock of a Parent of the Company immediately prior to the Company first becoming such Subsidiary or (y) such Person shall be deemed not to be an Other Parent for the purpose of determining whether a Change of Control shall have occurred by reason of the Company first becoming a Subsidiary of such Person.

        "Parent Expenses" means (i) costs (including all professional fees and expenses) incurred by any Parent in connection with maintaining its existence or in connection with its reporting obligations under, or in connection with compliance with, applicable laws or applicable rules of any governmental, regulatory or self-regulatory body or stock exchange, the Indenture or any other agreement or instrument relating to Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, including in respect of any reports filed with respect to the Securities Act, the Exchange Act or the respective rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, (ii) expenses incurred by any Parent in connection with the acquisition, development, maintenance, ownership, prosecution, protection and defense of its intellectual property and associated rights (including but not limited to trademarks, service marks, trade names, trade dress, patents, copyrights and similar rights, including registrations and registration or renewal applications in respect thereof; inventions, processes, designs, formulae, trade secrets, know-how, confidential information, computer software, data and documentation, and any other intellectual property rights; and licenses of any of the foregoing) to the extent such intellectual property and associated rights relate to the business or businesses of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, (iii) indemnification obligations of any Parent owing to directors, officers, employees or other Persons under its charter or bylaws or pursuant to written agreements with or for the benefit of any such Person, or obligations in respect of director and officer insurance (including premiums therefor), (iv) other administrative and operational expenses of any Parent incurred in the ordinary course of business, and (v) fees and expenses incurred by any Parent in connection with any offering of Capital Stock or Indebtedness, (w) which offering is not completed, or (x) where the net proceeds of such offering are intended to be received by or contributed or loaned to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, or (y) in a prorated amount of such expenses in proportion to the amount of such net proceeds intended to be so received, contributed or loaned, or (z) otherwise on an interim basis prior to completion of such offering so long as any Parent shall cause the amount of such expenses to be repaid to the Company or the relevant Restricted Subsidiary out of the proceeds of such offering promptly if completed.

186


Table of Contents

        "Permanent Notes" means the Company's 10.75%/11.50% Senior Toggle Notes due July 15, 2015 issued under the Permanent Notes Indenture.

        "Permanent Notes Indenture" means the Indenture, dated as of July 24, 2008, among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors from time to time parties thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association (as successor by merger to Wilmington Trust FSB), as trustee, as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time.

        "Permitted Holder" means any of the following: (i) any of the Investors or Management Investors, and any of their respective Affiliates; (ii) any investment fund or vehicle managed or sponsored by CD&R, BACSVM-A, L.P., Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., StepStone Group LLC (as successor to Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, formerly known as Citigroup Private Equity LP), JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. (formerly known as J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation) or any Affiliate thereof, and any Affiliate of or successor to any such investment fund or vehicle; (iii) any limited or general partners of, or other investors in, any Investor, BACSVM-A, L.P., Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., StepStone Group LLC (as successor to Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, formerly known as Citigroup Private Equity LP), JPMorgan Chase Funding Inc. (formerly known as J.P. Morgan Ventures Corporation) or any Affiliate thereof, or any such investment fund or vehicle (as to any such limited partner or other investor, solely to the extent of any Capital Stock of the Company or any Parent actually received by way of dividend or distribution from any such Investor, Affiliate, or investment fund or vehicle); and (iv) any Person acting in the capacity of an underwriter in connection with a public or private offering of Capital Stock of any Parent or the Company. In addition, any "person" (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) whose status as a "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) constitutes or results in a Change of Control in respect of which a Change of Control Offer is made in accordance with the requirements of the Indenture, together with its Affiliates, shall thereafter constitute Permitted Holders.

        "Permitted Investment" means an Investment by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary in, or consisting of, any of the following:

187


Table of Contents

188


Table of Contents

        If any Investment pursuant to clause (xv) or (xviii) above, or clause (vii) of paragraph (b) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments," as applicable, is made in any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary and such Person thereafter (A) becomes a Restricted Subsidiary or (B) is merged or consolidated into, or transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary, then such Investment shall thereafter be deemed to have been made pursuant to clause (i) or (ii) above, respectively, and not to clause (xv) or (xviii) above or to clause (vii) of paragraph (b) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitations on Restricted Payments," as applicable (and, in the case of the foregoing clause (A), for so long as such Person continues to be a Restricted Subsidiary unless and until such Person is merged or consolidated into or transfers or conveys all or substantially all its assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary).

        "Permitted Liens" means:

189


Table of Contents

190


Table of Contents

        For purposes of determining compliance with this definition, (x) a Lien need not be incurred solely by reference to one category of Permitted Liens described in this definition but may be incurred under any combination of such categories (including in part under one such category and in part under any other such category) and (y) in the event that a Lien (or any portion thereof) meets the criteria of one or more of such categories of Permitted Liens, the Company shall, in its sole discretion, classify or reclassify such Lien (or any portion thereof) in any manner that complies with this definition.

        "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, limited liability company, trust, unincorporated organization, government or any agency or political subdivision thereof or any other entity.

        "Preferred Stock" as applied to the Capital Stock of any corporation means Capital Stock of any class or classes (however designated) that by its terms is preferred as to the payment of dividends, or as to the distribution of assets upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation or dissolution of such corporation, over shares of Capital Stock of any other class of such corporation.

        "Purchase Money Obligations" means any Indebtedness Incurred to finance or refinance the acquisition, leasing, construction or improvement of property (real or personal) or assets, and whether acquired through the direct acquisition of such property or assets or the acquisition of the Capital Stock of any Person owning such property or assets, or otherwise.

191


Table of Contents

        "Rating Agency" means Moody's or S&P or, if Moody's or S&P or both shall not make a rating on the Notes publicly available, a nationally recognized statistical rating agency or agencies, as the case may be, selected by the Company which shall be substituted for Moody's or S&P or both, as the case may be.

        "Receivable" means a right to receive payment pursuant to an arrangement with another Person pursuant to which such other Person is obligated to pay, as determined in accordance with GAAP.

        "Reference Date" means July 24, 2007.

        "refinance" means refinance, refund, replace, renew, repay, modify, restate, defer, substitute, supplement, reissue, resell or extend (including pursuant to any defeasance or discharge mechanism); and the terms "refinances," "refinanced" and "refinancing" as used for any purpose in the Indenture shall have a correlative meaning.

        "Refinancing Indebtedness" means Indebtedness that is Incurred to refinance any Indebtedness existing on the date of the Indenture or Incurred in compliance with the Indenture (including Indebtedness of the Company that refinances Indebtedness of any Restricted Subsidiary (to the extent permitted in the Indenture) and Indebtedness of any Restricted Subsidiary that refinances Indebtedness of another Restricted Subsidiary) including Indebtedness that refinances Refinancing Indebtedness; provided, that (1)(x) if the Indebtedness being refinanced is Subordinated Obligations or Guarantor Subordinated Obligations, the Refinancing Indebtedness has a final Stated Maturity at the time such Refinancing Indebtedness is Incurred that is equal to or greater than the final Stated Maturity of the Indebtedness being refinanced (or if shorter, the Notes) or (y) if the Indebtedness being refinanced is Continuing Notes, the Refinancing Indebtedness has a final Stated Maturity at the time such Refinancing Indebtedness is Incurred that is equal to or greater than the final Stated Maturity of the Indebtedness being refinanced (or if shorter, the Notes) and, if such Refinancing Indebtedness is Guaranteed by any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, each such Guarantee shall be subordinated to the prior payment in full of the Notes on terms consistent with those for senior subordinated debt securities issued by companies sponsored by CD&R or otherwise customary (in each case, determined in good faith by the Company), (2) such Refinancing Indebtedness is Incurred in an aggregate principal amount (or if issued with original issue discount, an aggregate issue price) that is equal to or less than the sum of (x) the aggregate principal amount (or if issued with original issue discount, the aggregate accreted value) then outstanding of the Indebtedness being refinanced, plus (y) fees, underwriting discounts, premiums and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with such Refinancing Indebtedness and (3) Refinancing Indebtedness shall not include (x) Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary that is not a Subsidiary Guarantor that refinances Indebtedness of the Company or a Subsidiary Guarantor that could not have been initially Incurred by such Restricted Subsidiary pursuant to the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness" or (y) Indebtedness of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary that refinances Indebtedness of an Unrestricted Subsidiary.

        "Related Business" means those businesses in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is engaged on the date of the Indenture, or that are similar, related, complementary, incidental or ancillary thereto or extensions, developments or expansions thereof.

        "Related Taxes" means (x) any taxes, charges or assessments, including but not limited to sales, use, transfer, rental, ad valorem, value-added, stamp, property, consumption, franchise, license, capital, net worth, gross receipts, excise, occupancy, intangibles or similar taxes, charges or assessments (other than federal, state or local taxes measured by income and federal, state or local withholding imposed by any government or other taxing authority on payments made by any Parent other than to another Parent), required to be paid by any Parent by virtue of its being incorporated or having Capital Stock outstanding (but not by virtue of owning stock or other equity

192


Table of Contents

interests of any corporation or other entity other than the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent), or being a holding company parent of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent or receiving dividends from or other distributions in respect of the Capital Stock of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent, or having guaranteed any obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, or having made any payment in respect of any of the items for which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is permitted to make payments to any Parent pursuant to the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments," or acquiring, developing, maintaining, owning, prosecuting, protecting or defending its intellectual property and associated rights (including but not limited to receiving or paying royalties for the use thereof) relating to the business or businesses of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, (y) any taxes attributable to any taxable period (or portion thereof) ending on or prior to the Reference Date, or to any Parent's receipt of (or entitlement to) any payment in connection with the 2007 Transactions, including any payment received after the Reference Date pursuant to any agreement related to the 2007 Transactions or (z) any other federal, state, foreign, provincial or local taxes measured by income for which any Parent is liable up to an amount not to exceed, with respect to federal taxes, the amount of any such taxes that the Company and its Subsidiaries would have been required to pay on a separate company basis, or on a consolidated basis as if the Company had filed a consolidated return on behalf of an affiliated group (as defined in Section 1504 of the Code) of which it were the common parent, or with respect to state and local taxes, the amount of any such taxes that the Company and its Subsidiaries would have been required to pay on a separate company basis, or on a consolidated, combined, unitary or affiliated basis as if the Company had filed a consolidated, combined, unitary or affiliated return on behalf of an affiliated group (as defined in the applicable state or local tax laws for filing such return) consisting only of the Company and its Subsidiaries. Taxes include all interest, penalties and additions related thereto.

        "Responsible Officer" when used with respect to the Trustee means the chairman or vice-chairman of the board of directors, the chairman or vice-chairman of the executive committee of the board of directors, the president, any vice president or assistant vice president, the secretary, any assistant secretary, the treasurer, any assistant treasurer, the cashier, any assistant cashier, any trust officer or assistant trust officer, the controller and any assistant controller or any other officer of the Trustee customarily performing functions similar to those performed by any of the above designated officers and also means, with respect to a particular corporate trust matter, any other officer to whom such matter is referred because of his knowledge of and familiarity with the particular subject.

        "Restricted Payment Transaction" means any Restricted Payment permitted pursuant to the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments," any Permitted Payment, any Permitted Investment, or any transaction specifically excluded from the definition of the term "Restricted Payment" (including pursuant to the exception contained in clause (i) and the parenthetical exclusions contained in clauses (ii) and (iii) of such definition).

        "Restricted Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary of the Company other than an Unrestricted Subsidiary.

        "SEC" means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

        "Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

        "Senior Credit Agreements" means, collectively, the Senior Term Agreement and the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement.

        "Senior Credit Facilities" means, collectively, the Senior Term Facility and the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.

193


Table of Contents

        "Senior Indebtedness" means any Indebtedness of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary other than, in the case of the Company, Subordinated Obligations and, in the case of any Subsidiary Guarantor, Guarantor Subordinated Obligations.

        "Senior Revolving Credit Agreement" means the Credit Agreement, dated as of the Reference Date, among the Company, certain Subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, the lenders party thereto from time to time, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, as such agreement may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid, increased or extended from time to time (whether in whole or in part, whether with the original administrative agent and lenders or other agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether provided under the original Senior Revolving Credit Agreement or one or more other credit agreements or otherwise, unless such agreement, instrument or document expressly provides that it is not intended to be and is not a Senior Revolving Credit Agreement hereunder). Any reference to the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement hereunder shall be deemed a reference to each Senior Revolving Credit Agreement then in existence.

        "Senior Revolving Credit Facility" means the collective reference to the Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, any Loan Documents (as defined therein), any notes and letters of credit issued pursuant thereto and any guarantee and collateral agreement, patent and trademark security agreement, mortgages, letter of credit applications and other guarantees, pledge agreements, security agreements and collateral documents, and other instruments and documents, executed and delivered pursuant to or in connection with any of the foregoing, in each case as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time, or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid, increased or extended from time to time (whether in whole or in part, whether with the original agent and lenders or other agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether provided under the original Senior Revolving Credit Agreement or one or more other credit agreements, indentures (including the Indenture) or financing agreements or otherwise, unless such agreement, instrument or document expressly provides that it is not intended to be and is not a Senior Revolving Credit Facility hereunder). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "Senior Revolving Credit Facility" shall include any agreement (i) changing the maturity of any Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or contemplated thereby, (ii) adding Subsidiaries of the Company as additional borrowers or guarantors thereunder, (iii) increasing the amount of Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or available to be borrowed thereunder or (iv) otherwise altering the terms and conditions thereof.

        "Senior Term Agreement" means the Credit Agreement, dated as of the Reference Date, among the Company, the lenders party thereto from time to time, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, as such agreement may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid, increased or extended from time to time (whether in whole or in part, whether with the original administrative agent and lenders or other agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether provided under the original Senior Term Agreement or one or more other credit agreements or otherwise, unless such agreement, instrument or document expressly provides that it is not intended to be and is not a Senior Term Agreement hereunder). Any reference to the Senior Term Agreement hereunder shall be deemed a reference to each Senior Term Agreement then in existence.

        "Senior Term Facility" means the collective reference to the Senior Term Agreement, any Loan Documents (as defined therein), any notes and letters of credit issued pursuant thereto and any guarantee and collateral agreement, patent and trademark security agreement, mortgages, letter of credit applications and other guarantees, pledge agreements, security agreements and collateral documents, and other instruments and documents, executed and delivered pursuant to or in

194


Table of Contents

connection with any of the foregoing, in each case as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time, or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid, increased or extended from time to time (whether in whole or in part, whether with the original agent and lenders or other agents and lenders or otherwise, and whether provided under the original Senior Term Agreement or one or more other credit agreements, indentures (including the Indenture) or financing agreements or otherwise, unless such agreement, instrument or document expressly provides that it is not intended to be and is not a Senior Term Facility hereunder). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term "Senior Term Facility" shall include any agreement (i) changing the maturity of any Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or contemplated thereby, (ii) adding Subsidiaries of the Company as additional borrowers or guarantors thereunder, (iii) increasing the amount of Indebtedness Incurred thereunder or available to be borrowed thereunder or (iv) otherwise altering the terms and conditions thereof.

        "Significant Subsidiary" means any Restricted Subsidiary that would be a "significant subsidiary" of the Company within the meaning of Rule 1-02 under Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC, as such Regulation is in effect on the Issue Date.

        "Special Purpose Entity" means (x) any Special Purpose Subsidiary or (y) any other Person that is engaged in the business of acquiring, selling, collecting, financing or refinancing Receivables, accounts (as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in any jurisdiction from time to time), other accounts and/or other receivables, and/or related assets.

        "Special Purpose Financing" means any financing or refinancing of assets consisting of or including Receivables of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary that have been transferred to a Special Purpose Entity or made subject to a Lien in a Financing Disposition.

        "Special Purpose Financing Expense" means for any period, (a) the aggregate interest expense for such period on any Indebtedness of any Special Purpose Subsidiary that is a Restricted Subsidiary, which Indebtedness is not recourse to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary that is not a Special Purpose Subsidiary (other than with respect to Special Purpose Financing Undertakings), and (b) Special Purpose Financing Fees.

        "Special Purpose Financing Fees" means distributions or payments made directly or by means of discounts with respect to any participation interest issued or sold in connection with, and other fees paid to a Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary in connection with, any Special Purpose Financing.

        "Special Purpose Financing Undertakings" means representations, warranties, covenants, indemnities, guarantees of performance and (subject to clause (y) of the proviso below) other agreements and undertakings entered into or provided by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries that the Company determines in good faith (which determination shall be conclusive) are customary or otherwise necessary or advisable in connection with a Special Purpose Financing or a Financing Disposition; provided that (x) it is understood that Special Purpose Financing Undertakings may consist of or include (i) reimbursement and other obligations in respect of notes, letters of credit, surety bonds and similar instruments provided for credit enhancement purposes or (ii) Hedging Obligations, or other obligations relating to Interest Rate Agreements, Currency Agreements or Commodities Agreements entered into by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary, in respect of any Special Purpose Financing or Financing Disposition, and (y) subject to the preceding clause (x), any such other agreements and undertakings shall not include any Guarantee of Indebtedness of a Special Purpose Subsidiary by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary that is not a Special Purpose Subsidiary.

        "Special Purpose Subsidiary" means a Subsidiary of the Company that (a) is engaged solely in (x) the business of acquiring, selling, collecting, financing or refinancing Receivables, accounts (as

195


Table of Contents

defined in the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in any jurisdiction from time to time) and other accounts and receivables (including any thereof constituting or evidenced by chattel paper, instruments or general intangibles), all proceeds thereof and all rights (contractual and other), collateral and other assets relating thereto, and (y) any business or activities incidental or related to such business, and (b) is designated as a "Special Purpose Subsidiary" by the Company.

        "S&P" means Standard & Poor's Ratings Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and its successors.

        "Stated Maturity" means, with respect to any Indebtedness, the date specified in such Indebtedness as the fixed date on which the payment of principal of such Indebtedness is due and payable, including pursuant to any mandatory redemption provision (but excluding any provision providing for the repurchase or repayment of such Indebtedness at the option of the holder thereof upon the happening of any contingency).

        "Subordinated Obligations" means any Indebtedness of the Company (whether outstanding on the Issue Date or thereafter Incurred) that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes pursuant to a written agreement.

        "Subsidiary" of any Person means any corporation, association, partnership or other business entity of which more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of Capital Stock or other equity interests (including partnership interests) entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or trustees thereof is at the time owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by (i) such Person or (ii) one or more Subsidiaries of such Person.

        "Subsidiary Guarantee" means any guarantee of the Notes that may from time to time be entered into by a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company on the Issue Date or after the Issue Date pursuant to the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Future Subsidiary Guarantors."

        "Subsidiary Guarantor" means any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company that enters into a Subsidiary Guarantee.

        "Successor Company" shall have the meaning assigned thereto in clause (i) under "—Merger and Consolidation."

        "Tax Sharing Agreement" means the Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of the Reference Date, among the Company, Holding, Investment Holding and Holding Parent, as the same may be amended, supplemented, waived or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and of the Indenture.

        "Temporary Cash Investments" means any of the following: (i) any investment in (x) direct obligations of the United States of America, a member state of The European Union or any country in whose currency funds are being held pending their application in the making of an investment or capital expenditure by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in that country or with such funds, or any agency or instrumentality of any thereof or obligations Guaranteed by the United States of America or a member state of The European Union or any country in whose currency funds are being held pending their application in the making of an investment or capital expenditure by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary in that country or with such funds, or any agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing, or obligations guaranteed by any of the foregoing or (y) direct obligations of any foreign country recognized by the United States of America rated at least "A" by S&P or "A-1" by Moody's (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization or, if no rating of S&P or Moody's then exists, the equivalent of such rating by any nationally recognized rating organization), (ii) overnight bank deposits, and investments in time deposit accounts, certificates of deposit, bankers' acceptances and money market deposits (or, with

196


Table of Contents

respect to foreign banks, similar instruments) maturing not more than one year after the date of acquisition thereof issued by (x) any bank or other institutional lender under a Credit Facility or any affiliate thereof or (y) a bank or trust company that is organized under the laws of the United States of America, any state thereof or any foreign country recognized by the United States of America having capital and surplus aggregating in excess of $250.0 million (or the foreign currency equivalent thereof) and whose long term debt is rated at least "A" by S&P or "A-1" by Moody's (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization or, if no rating of S&P or Moody's then exists, the equivalent of such rating by any nationally recognized rating organization) at the time such Investment is made, (iii) repurchase obligations for underlying securities or instruments of the types described in clause (i) or (ii) above entered into with a bank meeting the qualifications described in clause (ii) above, (iv) Investments in commercial paper, maturing not more than 24 months after the date of acquisition, issued by a Person (other than that of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries), with a rating at the time as of which any Investment therein is made of "P-2" (or higher) according to Moody's or "A-2" (or higher) according to S&P (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization or, if no rating of S&P or Moody's then exists, the equivalent of such rating by any nationally recognized rating organization), (v) Investments in securities maturing not more than 24 months after the date of acquisition issued or fully guaranteed by any state, commonwealth or territory of the United States of America, or by any political subdivision or taxing authority thereof, and rated at least "BBB-" by S&P or "Baa3" by Moody's (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization or, if no rating of S&P or Moody's then exists, the equivalent of such rating by any nationally recognized rating organization), (vi) Indebtedness or Preferred Stock (other than of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) having a rating of "A" or higher by S&P or "A2" or higher by Moody's (or, in either case, the equivalent of such rating by such organization or, if no rating of S&P or Moody's then exists, the equivalent of such rating by any nationally recognized rating organization), (vii) investment funds investing 95% of their assets in securities of the type described in clauses (i)-(vi) above (which funds may also hold reasonable amounts of cash pending investment and/or distribution), (viii) any money market deposit accounts issued or offered by a domestic commercial bank or a commercial bank organized and located in a country recognized by the United States of America, in each case, having capital and surplus in excess of $250.0 million (or the foreign currency equivalent thereof), or investments in money market funds subject to the risk limiting conditions of Rule 2a-7 (or any successor rule) of the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and (ix) similar investments approved by the Board of Directors in the ordinary course of business.

        "TIA" means the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. §§ 77aaa-7bbbb) as in effect on the date of the Indenture, except as otherwise provided therein.

        "Trade Payables" means, with respect to any Person, any accounts payable or any indebtedness or monetary obligation to trade creditors created, assumed or guaranteed by such Person arising in the ordinary course of business in connection with the acquisition of goods or services.

        "Transactions" means, collectively, any or all of the following (whether or not consummated): (i) the entry into the Indenture, and the offer and issuance of the Notes, (ii) the use of the proceeds thereof, including any repayment of Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with proceeds from the offering of the Notes and (iii) all other transactions relating to any of the foregoing (including payment of fees and expenses related to any of the foregoing).

        "Trustee" means the party named as such in the Indenture until a successor replaces it and, thereafter, means the successor.

        "Unrestricted Cash" means cash, Cash Equivalents and Temporary Cash Investments, other than (i) as disclosed in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as a line item on the

197


Table of Contents

balance sheet as "restricted cash" and (ii) cash, Cash Equivalents and Temporary Cash Investments of a Captive Insurance Company or Home Warranty Subsidiary to the extent such cash, Cash Equivalents and Temporary Cash Investments are not permitted by applicable law or regulation to be dividended, distributed or otherwise transferred to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary that is not either a Captive Insurance Company or a Home Warranty Subsidiary.

        "Unrestricted Subsidiary" means (i) any Subsidiary of the Company that at the time of determination is an Unrestricted Subsidiary, as designated by the Board of Directors in the manner provided below, and (ii) any Subsidiary of an Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Board of Directors may designate any Subsidiary of the Company (including any newly acquired or newly formed Subsidiary of the Company) to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary unless such Subsidiary or any of its Subsidiaries owns any Capital Stock or Indebtedness of, or owns or holds any Lien on any property of, the Company or any other Restricted Subsidiary of the Company that is not a Subsidiary of the Subsidiary to be so designated; provided, that (A) such designation was made at or prior to the Issue Date, or (B) the Subsidiary to be so designated has total consolidated assets of $1,000 or less or (C) if such Subsidiary has consolidated assets greater than $1,000, then either such designation would be permitted under the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Restricted Payments" or if such covenant is not then in effect, would be permitted if such covenant were then in effect. The Board of Directors may designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary; provided, that immediately after giving effect to such designation (x) the Company could Incur at least $1.00 of additional Indebtedness under paragraph (a) in the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness" or (y) the Consolidated Coverage Ratio would be greater than it was immediately prior to giving effect to such designation or (z) such Subsidiary shall be a Special Purpose Subsidiary with no Indebtedness outstanding other than Indebtedness that can be Incurred (and upon such designation shall be deemed to be Incurred and outstanding) pursuant to paragraph (b) of the covenant described under "—Certain Covenants—Limitation on Indebtedness." Any such designation by the Board of Directors shall be evidenced to the Trustee by promptly filing with the Trustee a copy of the resolution of the Company's Board of Directors giving effect to such designation and an Officer's Certificate of the Company certifying that such designation complied with the foregoing provisions.

        "U.S. Government Obligation" means (x) any security that is (i) a direct obligation of the United States of America for the payment of which the full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged or (ii) an obligation of a Person controlled or supervised by and acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States of America the payment of which is unconditionally guaranteed as a full faith and credit obligation by the United States of America, which, in either case under the preceding clause (i) or (ii) is not callable or redeemable at the option of the issuer thereof, and (y) any depositary receipt issued by a bank (as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act) as custodian with respect to any U.S. Government Obligation that is specified in clause (x) above and held by such bank for the account of the holder of such depositary receipt, or with respect to any specific payment of principal of or interest on any U.S. Government Obligation that is so specified and held, provided that (except as required by law) such custodian is not authorized to make any deduction from the amount payable to the holder of such depositary receipt from any amount received by the custodian in respect of the U.S. Government Obligation or the specific payment of principal or interest evidenced by such depositary receipt.

        "Voting Stock" of an entity means all classes of Capital Stock of such entity then outstanding and normally entitled to vote in the election of directors or all interests in such entity with the ability to control the management or actions of such entity.

        "Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiary" means as to any Person, any Domestic Subsidiary of such Person that is a Material Subsidiary of such Person, and of which such Person owns, directly or indirectly through one or more Wholly Owned Domestic Subsidiaries, all of the Capital Stock of such Domestic Subsidiary.

198


Table of Contents

Book Entry, Delivery and Form

        The New Notes to be issued in exchange for Old Notes will be issued in the form of one or more registered notes in global form, without interest coupons, which we refer to as the global notes.

        Upon issuance, each of the global notes will be deposited with the Trustee as custodian for DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Ownership of beneficial interests in each global note will be limited to persons who have accounts with DTC, which we refer to as DTC participants, or persons who hold beneficial interests through DTC participants.

        We expect that under procedures established by DTC:

        Beneficial interests in the global notes may not be exchanged for notes in physical, certificated form except in the limited circumstances described below.

        Beneficial interests in one global note of a series may generally be exchanged for interests in another global note of the same series.

        A beneficial interest in a global note that is transferred to a person who takes delivery through another global note will, upon transfer, become subject to any transfer restrictions and other procedures applicable to beneficial interests in the other global note.

        All interests in the global notes will be subject to the operations and procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream. We provide the following summaries of those operations and procedures solely for the convenience of investors. The operations and procedures of each settlement system are controlled by that settlement system and may be changed at any time. Neither the Company nor the Trustee are responsible for those operations or procedures.

        DTC has advised us that it is:

        DTC was created to hold securities for its participants and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between its participants through electronic book-entry changes to the accounts of its participants. DTC's participants include securities brokers and dealers,

199


Table of Contents

including the Initial Purchasers; banks and trust companies; clearing corporations and other organizations. Indirect access to DTC's system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies; these indirect participants clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a DTC participant, either directly or indirectly. Investors who are not DTC participants may beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only through DTC participants or indirect participants in DTC.

        So long as DTC's nominee is the registered owner of a global note, that nominee will be considered the sole owner or holder of the Notes represented by that global note for all purposes under the Indenture.

        Except as provided below, owners of beneficial interests in a global note:

        As a result, each investor who owns a beneficial interest in a global note must rely on the procedures of DTC to exercise any rights of a holder of Notes under the Indenture (and, if the investor is not a participant or an indirect participant in DTC, on the procedures of the DTC participant through which the investor owns its interest).

        Payments of principal, premium (if any) and interest with respect to the Notes represented by a global note will be made by the paying agent to DTC's nominee as the registered holder of the global note. Neither we nor the Trustee will have any responsibility or liability for the payment of amounts to owners of beneficial interests in a global note, for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of those interests by DTC, or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records of DTC relating to those interests.

        Payments by participants and indirect participants in DTC to the owners of beneficial interests in a global note will be governed by standing instructions and customary industry practice and will be the responsibility of those participants or indirect participants and DTC.

        Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected under DTC's procedures and will be settled in same-day funds. Transfers between participants in Euroclear or Clearstream will be effected in the ordinary way under the rules and operating procedures of those systems.

        Cross market transfers between DTC participants, on the one hand, and Euroclear or Clearstream participants, on the other hand, will be effected within DTC through the DTC participants that are acting as depositaries for Euroclear and Clearstream. To deliver or receive an interest in a global note held in a Euroclear or Clearstream account, an investor must send transfer instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, under the rules and procedures of that system and within the established deadlines of that system. If the transaction meets its settlement requirements, Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will send instructions to its DTC depositary to take action to effect final settlement by delivering or receiving interests in the relevant global notes in DTC, and making or receiving payment under normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear and Clearstream participants may not deliver instructions directly to the DTC depositaries that are acting for Euroclear or Clearstream.

        Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or Clearstream participant that purchases an interest in a global note from a DTC participant will be credited on the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream immediately following the DTC settlement date. Cash

200


Table of Contents

received in Euroclear or Clearstream from the sale of an interest in a global note to a DTC participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream cash account as of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream following the DTC settlement date.

        DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have agreed to the above procedures to facilitate transfers of interests in the global notes among participants in those settlement systems. However, the settlement systems are not obligated to perform these procedures and may discontinue or change these procedures at any time. Neither we nor the Trustee will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their participants or indirect participants of their obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.

        Notes in physical, certificated form will be issued and delivered to each person that DTC identifies as a beneficial owner of the related Notes only if:

201


Table of Contents


EXCHANGE OFFER; REGISTRATION RIGHTS

        In connection with the issuance of the Old Notes, we entered into the Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which we agreed, for the benefit of the holders of the Notes, to use our commercially reasonable efforts:

        We further agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to commence the exchange offer promptly after the registration statement has become effective, hold the offer open for the period required by applicable law (including pursuant to any applicable interpretation by the staff of the SEC), but in any event for at least 10 business days, and exchange the New Notes for all Old Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn before the expiration of the exchange offer.

        Under existing SEC interpretations contained in several no action letters to third parties, the New Notes will in general be freely transferable by holders thereof (other than affiliates of the Company) after the exchange offer without further registration under the Securities Act (subject to certain representations required to be made by each holder of Old Notes participating in the exchange offer, as set forth below). However, any purchaser of Old Notes who is an "affiliate" of the Company or who intends to participate in the exchange offer for the purpose of distributing the New Notes (1) will not be able to rely on such SEC interpretations, (2) will not be able to tender its Old Notes in the exchange offer and (3) must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any sale or transfer of the Old Notes unless such sale or transfer is made pursuant to an exemption from such requirements. In addition, in connection with any resales of New Notes, broker dealers receiving New Notes in the exchange offer will be subject to a prospectus delivery requirement with respect to resales of those New Notes. The SEC has taken the position that such broker dealers may fulfill their prospectus delivery requirements with respect to the New Notes (other than a resale of an unsold allotment from the original sale of the Old Notes) by delivery of the prospectus contained in the registration statement. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we are required to allow broker dealers to use the prospectus contained in the registration statement in connection with the resale of such New Notes for a period of 90 days after the consummation of the exchange offer. Each beneficial holder of Old Notes who wishes to exchange such Old Notes for New Notes in the exchange offer will be required to represent (1) that any New Notes to be received by it will be acquired in the ordinary course of its business, (2) that at the time of the commencement of the exchange offer it has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate in the distribution (within the meaning of the Securities Act) of the New Notes, (3) that it is not an affiliate of ours, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, (4) if it is not a broker dealer, that it is not engaged in, and does not intend to engage in, the distribution of New Notes, (5) if it is a broker dealer, it will receive the New Notes for its own account in exchange for the Old Notes acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities and that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of New Notes, and (6) that it is not acting on behalf of any person who could not truthfully make the foregoing representations.

202


Table of Contents

        However, if:

we have agreed to use our commercially reasonable efforts to file, as promptly as reasonably practicable, one or more registration statements under the Securities Act relating to a shelf registration (the "Shelf Registration Statement"), of the Old Notes or New Notes, as the case may be, for resale by holders or, in the case of clause (3), of the Old Notes held by the Initial Purchasers for resale by the Initial Purchasers (the "Resale Registration"), and will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Shelf Registration Statement to become effective within 90 days following the date on which the obligation to file the Shelf Registration Statement arises. We will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Shelf Registration Statement to remain effective until the earlier of 365 days following the effective date of such registration statement or such shorter period that will terminate when all the securities covered by the Shelf Registration Statement have been sold pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement or are distributed to the public pursuant to Rule 144 or, after the 90th day following the effectiveness of the Shelf Registration Statement, would be eligible to be sold by a Person that is not an "affiliate" (as defined in Rule 144) of us pursuant to Rule 144 without volume or manner of sale restrictions. Under certain circumstances, we may suspend the availability of the Shelf Registration Statement for certain periods of time.

        We will, in the event of the Resale Registration, provide to the holder or holders of the applicable Old Notes copies of the prospectus that is a part of the Shelf Registration Statement, notify such holder or holders when the Resale Registration for the applicable Old Notes has become effective and take certain other actions as are required to permit unrestricted resales of the applicable Notes. A holder of Old Notes that sells such Old Notes pursuant to the Resale Registration generally would be required to be named as a selling securityholder in the prospectus related to the Shelf Registration Statement and to deliver a prospectus to purchasers, will be subject to certain of the civil liability provisions under the Securities Act in connection with such sales and will be bound by the provisions of the Registration Rights Agreement that are applicable to such a holder (including certain indemnification obligations). In addition, each such holder of Old Notes will be required, among other things, to deliver information to be used in connection with the Shelf Registration Statement within the time periods set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement in order to benefit from the provisions regarding additional interest set forth below.

        In the event that:

203


Table of Contents

        For purposes of the foregoing, "Transfer Restricted Notes" means the Old Notes; provided, however, that a note shall cease to be a Transfer Restricted Note when (i) a Shelf Registration Statement registering such note under the Securities Act has been declared or becomes effective and such note has been sold or otherwise transferred by the holder thereof pursuant to and in a manner contemplated by such effective Shelf Registration Statement; (ii) such Old Note is sold pursuant to Rule 144 under circumstances in which any legend borne by such Old Note relating to restrictions on transferability thereof, under the Securities Act or otherwise, is removed or deemed removed by the Company or pursuant to the indenture; (iii) on or following the earliest date that is no less than 545 days after the date of the indenture for the Notes and on which such Note would be saleable (if it were held by a non-affiliate) pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act without restrictions on volume or manner of sale; (iv) such Old Note has been exchanged for a registered exchange security pursuant to an exchange offer registration statement filed by the Company; or (v) such Old Note shall cease to be outstanding.

        The Old Notes which are not tendered in the exchange offer will remain outstanding and will be subject to all the terms and conditions specified in the Indenture, including transfer restrictions, but will not be entitled to any further registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement.

        The Old Notes and the New Notes will be considered collectively to be a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase.

204


Table of Contents


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

        Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New Notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with the resale of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes, where such Old Notes were acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that for a period of up to 90 days after the exchange offer is consummated, we will make this prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to any broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale.

        We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of New Notes by broker-dealers. New Notes received by broker-dealers for their own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time to time, in one or more transactions, through the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of options on the New Notes or a combination of such methods of resale, at prevailing market prices at the time of resale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or, alternatively, to or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in the form of commissions or concessions from any such broker-dealer or the purchasers of any such New Notes. Any broker-dealer that resells New Notes that were received by it for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such New Notes may be deemed to be an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any profit on any such resale of New Notes and any commission or concessions received by any such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that, by acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.

        We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to the exchange offer, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, brokerage commissions and applicable transfer taxes, and will indemnify certain Holders of the Notes (including any broker-dealers) against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

        Based on interpretations by the Staff of the SEC as set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties (including Exxon Capital Holdings Corporation (available May 13, 1988), Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (available June 5, 1991), K-111 Communications Corporation (available May 14, 1993) and Shearman & Sterling (available July 2, 1993)), we believe that the New Notes issued pursuant to the exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by any holder of such New Notes, other than any such holder that is a broker-dealer or an "affiliate" of us within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act, without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, provided that:

        We have not sought and do not intend to seek a no-action letter from the SEC, with respect to the effects of the exchange offer, and there can be no assurance that the Staff would make a similar determination with respect to the New Notes as it has in such no-action letters.

205


Table of Contents


MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

        The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the exchange offer (as described under the heading "The Exchange Offer"). This discussion is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated or proposed thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, or to different interpretation. This discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to specific Holders (as defined below) in light of their particular circumstances or to Holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law (such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities or other Holders that generally mark their securities to market for U.S. federal income tax purposes, tax-exempt entities, retirement plans, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, certain former citizens or residents of the United States, Holders that hold a Note as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion or other integrated transaction or U.S. Holders that have a "functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar). This discussion does not address any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax considerations or any U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax considerations. As used in this discussion, the term "Holder" means a beneficial owner of a Note.

        The exchange of an Old Note for a New Note pursuant to the exchange offer will not be treated as a sale or exchange of such Old Note by a Holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, a Holder of an Old Note will not recognize any gain or loss upon the exchange of such Old Note for a New Note pursuant to the exchange offer. Such Holder's holding period for such New Note will include the holding period for such Old Note, and such Holder's adjusted tax basis in such New Note will be the same as such Holder's adjusted tax basis in such Old Note. There will be no U.S. federal income tax consequences to a Holder of an Old Note that does not participate in the exchange offer.

        INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AND NON-U.S. INCOME AND OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE EXCHANGE OFFER IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

206


Table of Contents


CERTAIN ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

        The following is a summary of certain considerations associated with the exchange of Old Notes for New Notes by employee benefit plans that are subject to Title I of ERISA, plans, individual retirement accounts and other arrangements that are subject to Section 4975 of the Code ("ERISA Plans") or provisions under any federal, state, local, non-U.S. or other laws or regulations that are similar to such provisions of ERISA or the Code (collectively, "Similar Laws"), and entities whose underlying assets are considered to include "plan assets" of any such plan, account or arrangement (each arrangement or ERISA Plan, a "Plan").

Prohibited transaction issues

        Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code prohibit ERISA Plans from engaging in specified transactions involving plan assets with persons or entities who are "parties in interest," within the meaning of ERISA, or "disqualified persons," within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code, unless an exemption is available. A party in interest or disqualified person who engages in a non-exempt prohibited transaction may be subject to excise taxes and other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Code. In addition, the fiduciary of the ERISA Plan that engages in such a non-exempt prohibited transaction may be subject to penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Code. The acquisition, exchange or holding of Notes by an ERISA Plan with respect to which the Issuer or the Guarantors are considered a party in interest or a disqualified person may constitute or result in a direct or indirect prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA and/or Section 4975 of the Code, unless the investment is acquired, exchanged and is held in accordance with an applicable statutory, class or individual prohibited transaction exemption.

        Employee benefit plans that are governmental plans (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA), certain church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) or ERISA) and foreign plans (as described in Section 4(b)(4) of ERISA) are not subject to these "prohibited transaction" rules of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, but may be subject to similar rules under any federal, state, local, non-U.S. or other laws or regulations that are similar to such provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code.

        Because of the foregoing, the Notes should not be purchased, exchanged or held by any person investing "plan assets" of any Plan, unless such purchase, exchange and holding will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction under ERISA and the Code or similar violation of any applicable Similar Laws.

Representation

        Accordingly, by exchange of a Note each holder, or in the case of a transfer of the Note, subsequent transferee will be deemed to have represented and warranted that either (a) no portion of the assets used by such holder or transferee to acquire, exchange or hold the Notes constitutes assets of any Plan or (b) the acquisition, exchange and holding, as applicable, of the Notes by such holder or transferee will not constitute a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or similar violation under any applicable Similar Laws.

        The foregoing discussion is general in nature and is not intended to be all-inclusive. Due to the complexity of these rules and the penalties that may be imposed upon persons involved in non-exempt prohibited transactions, it is particularly important that fiduciaries, or other persons considering purchasing or exchanging the Notes (and holding the Notes) on behalf of, or with the assets of, any Plan, consult with their counsel regarding the potential applicability of ERISA, Section 4975 of the Code and any Similar Laws to such investment and whether an exemption would be applicable to the purchase and holding of the Notes.

207


Table of Contents


VALIDITY OF THE NOTES

        Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, New York will pass upon the validity of the New Notes and the guarantees. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP will rely upon the opinions of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. as to certain matters of Delaware law. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP has in the past provided, and continues to provide, legal services to CD&R and its affiliates. Franci J. Blassberg, Esq., a member of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, is married to Joseph L. Rice, III, who is the Chairman of CD&R.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        In connection with the exchange offer, we have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act relating to the New Notes to be issued in the exchange offer. As permitted by SEC rules, this prospectus omits information included in the registration statement. For a more complete understanding of the exchange offer, you should refer to the registration statement, including its exhibits.

        Following effectiveness of the registration statement relating to the exchange offer, we will be required to file annual reports, information, documents and other reports with the SEC. The Indenture requires us to transmit to the holders of the Notes and the Trustee the annual reports, information, documents and reports that we are required to file with the SEC under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 15 days after the date on which we are required to file or would be required to file if we were so subject.

        The public may read and copy any reports or other information that we file with the SEC. Such filings are available to the public over the internet at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. The SEC's website is included in this prospectus as an inactive textual reference only. You may also read and copy any document that we file with the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain a copy of the exchange offer's registration statement and other information that we file with the SEC at no cost by calling us or writing to us at the following address:

The Service Master Company
860 Ridge Lake Boulevard,
Memphis, Tennessee 38120
Attn: General Counsel
(901) 597-1400

        In order to obtain timely delivery of such materials, you must request documents from us no later than five business days before you make your investment decision or at the latest by May 18, 2012.


EXPERTS

        The consolidated statements of financial position of ServiceMaster and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and the related financial statement schedule included in this prospectus and registration statement have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration statement, which reports express an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Such consolidated financial statements are so included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

208


Table of Contents


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

   

Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

  F-3

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

  F-4

Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008

  F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

  F-6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-7

F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of
The ServiceMaster Company
Memphis, Tennessee

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of The ServiceMaster Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The ServiceMaster Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
March 6, 2012

F-2


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands)

 
  Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating Revenue

  $ 3,205,872   $ 3,127,394   $ 2,977,885  

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                   

Cost of services rendered and products sold

    1,813,706     1,777,304     1,691,251  

Selling and administrative expenses

    880,492     895,950     830,747  

Amortization expense

    91,352     136,000     158,771  

Trade name impairment

    36,700         26,600  

Restructuring charges

    8,162     11,448     26,682  
               

Total operating costs and expenses

    2,830,412     2,820,702     2,734,051  
               

Operating Income

    375,460     306,692     243,834  

Non-operating Expense (Income)

                   

Interest expense

    273,123     286,933     299,333  

Interest and net investment income

    (10,886 )   (9,358 )   (7,079 )

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

    774         (46,106 )

Other expense

    700     733     748  
               

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

    111,749     28,384     (3,062 )

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    43,912     10,945     (9,204 )
               

Income from Continuing Operations

    67,837     17,439     6,142  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

    (27,016 )   (31,998 )   7,353  
               

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 40,821   $ (14,559 ) $ 13,495  
               

   

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

(In thousands, except share data)

As of December 31,
  2011   2010  

Assets:

             

Current Assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 328,930   $ 252,698  

Marketable securities

    12,026     30,406  

Receivables, less allowances of $20,362 and $16,709, respectively

    374,200     352,094  

Inventories

    59,643     54,732  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

    38,295     40,864  

Deferred customer acquisition costs

    30,403     34,377  

Deferred taxes

    90,609     11,558  

Assets of discontinued operations

    17     51,004  
           

Total Current Assets

    934,123     827,733  
           

Property and Equipment:

             

At cost

    541,817     440,049  

Less: accumulated depreciation

    (235,058 )   (173,151 )
           

Net Property and Equipment

    306,759     266,898  
           

Other Assets:

             

Goodwill

    3,161,980     3,125,293  

Intangible assets, primarily trade names, service marks and trademarks, net

    2,543,539     2,653,511  

Notes receivable

    23,322     22,550  

Long-term marketable securities

    130,456     110,177  

Other assets

    8,846     7,164  

Debt issuance costs

    37,798     52,366  

Assets of discontinued operations

        32,398  
           

Total Assets

  $ 7,146,823   $ 7,098,090  
           

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity:

             

Current Liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

  $ 81,641   $ 72,645  

Accrued liabilities:

             

Payroll and related expenses

    85,346     85,647  

Self-insured claims and related expenses

    73,071     81,278  

Accrued interest payable

    67,011     69,645  

Other

    70,103     83,114  

Deferred revenue

    473,242     449,647  

Liabilities of discontinued operations

    805     16,300  

Current portion of long-term debt

    51,838     49,412  
           

Total Current Liabilities

    903,057     907,688  
           

Long-Term Debt

    3,824,032     3,899,075  

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

             

Deferred taxes

    1,036,693     934,971  

Liabilities of discontinued operations

    2,070     4,848  

Other long-term obligations, primarily self-insured claims

    133,052     163,981  
           

Total Other Long-Term Liabilities

    1,171,815     1,103,800  
           

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 9)

             

Shareholder's Equity:

             

Common stock $0.01 par value, authorized 1,000 shares; issued 1,000 shares

         

Additional paid-in capital

    1,464,293     1,455,881  

Retained deficit

    (210,162 )   (250,983 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

    (6,212 )   (17,371 )
           

Total Shareholder's Equity

    1,247,919     1,187,527  
           

Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

  $ 7,146,823   $ 7,098,090  
           

   

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity

(In thousands)

 
  Common
Stock
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total Equity  

Balance December 31, 2008

  $   $ 1,438,432   $ (249,919 ) $ (56,154 ) $ 1,132,359  
                       

Net income

                13,495           13,495  

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                               

Net unrealized gain on securities

                      4,598     4,598  

Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments          

                      22,744     22,744  

Foreign currency translation

                      5,038     5,038  
                       

Total comprehensive income

                13,495     32,380     45,875  

Stock-based employee compensation—contribution from Holdings

          8,097                 8,097  
                       

Balance December 31, 2009

  $   $ 1,446,529   $ (236,424 ) $ (23,774 ) $ 1,186,331  
                       

Net loss

                (14,559 )         (14,559 )

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                               

Net unrealized gain on securities

                      1,583     1,583  

Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments          

                      2,634     2,634  

Foreign currency translation

                      2,186     2,186  
                       

Total comprehensive (loss) income

                (14,559 )   6,403     (8,156 )

Stock-based employee compensation—contribution from Holdings

          9,352                 9,352  
                       

Balance December 31, 2010

  $   $ 1,455,881   $ (250,983 ) $ (17,371 ) $ 1,187,527  
                       

Net income

                40,821           40,821  

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

                               

Net unrealized loss on securities

                      (695 )   (695 )

Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments          

                      13,314     13,314  

Foreign currency translation

                      (1,460 )   (1,460 )
                       

Total comprehensive income

                40,821     11,159     51,980  

Stock-based employee compensation—contribution from Holdings

          8,412                 8,412  
                       

Balance December 31, 2011

  $   $ 1,464,293   $ (210,162 ) $ (6,212 ) $ 1,247,919  
                       

   

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5


Table of Contents


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 
  Year Ended December 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  $ 252,698   $ 255,356   $ 407,347  

Cash Flows from Operating Activities from Continuing Operations:

                   

Net Income (Loss)

    40,821     (14,559 )   13,495  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided from operating activities:

                   

Loss (income) from discontinued operations

    27,016     31,998     (7,353 )

Depreciation expense

    72,084     60,625     56,021  

Amortization expense

    91,352     136,000     158,771  

Amortization of debt issuance costs

    14,061     14,503     14,639  

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

    774         (46,106 )

Deferred income tax provision (benefit)

    35,048     4,455     (19,106 )

Stock-based compensation expense

    8,412     9,352     8,097  

Trade name impairment

    36,700         26,600  

Restructuring charges

    8,162     11,448     26,682  

Cash payments related to restructuring charges

    (7,530 )   (10,789 )   (23,601 )

Change in working capital, net of acquisitions:

                   

Current income taxes

    (2,856 )   (6,757 )   10,245  

Receivables

    (22,992 )   (32,914 )   (13,300 )

Inventories and other current assets

    1,538     (238 )   1,375  

Accounts payable

    2,581     11,899     (17,936 )

Deferred revenue

    22,134     (1,928 )   4,186  

Accrued liabilities

    (33,642 )   2,427     (35,382 )

Other, net

    1,338     7,022     11,005  
               

Net Cash Provided from Operating Activities from Continuing Operations

    295,001     222,544     168,332  
               

Cash Flows from Investing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                   

Property additions

    (96,540 )   (134,234 )   (56,004 )

Sale of equipment and other assets

    4,605     1,355     1,654  

Acquisition of The ServiceMaster Company

    (35 )   (2,245 )   (1,695 )

Other business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

    (44,365 )   (57,941 )   (32,647 )

Purchase of other intangibles

    (1,900 )   (2,500 )    

Notes receivable, financial investments and securities, net

    3,009     20,427     6,151  
               

Net Cash Used for Investing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (135,226 )   (175,138 )   (82,541 )
               

Cash Flows from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                   

Borrowings of debt

    4,000     15,000      

Payments of debt

    (105,905 )   (61,333 )   (252,885 )

Debt issuance costs paid

    (267 )   (30 )   (426 )
               

Net Cash Used for Financing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (102,172 )   (46,363 )   (253,311 )
               

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:

                   

Cash (used for) provided from operating activities

    (5,888 )   6,776     21,426  

Cash provided from (used for) investing activities:

                   

Proceeds from sale of businesses

    26,134          

Other investing activities

    (1,617 )   (10,477 )   (5,897 )
               

Net Cash Provided from (Used for) Discontinued Operations

    18,629     (3,701 )   15,529  
               

Cash Increase (Decrease) During the Period

    76,232     (2,658 )   (151,991 )
               

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $ 328,930   $ 252,698   $ 255,356  
               

   

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies

        The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of ServiceMaster and its majority-owned subsidiary partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations. All consolidated ServiceMaster subsidiaries are wholly owned. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

        Summary:    The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions required under GAAP which may differ from actual results. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate to revenue recognition; the allowance for uncollectible receivables; accruals for self-insured retention limits related to medical, workers' compensation, auto and general liability insurance claims; accruals for home service contracts and termite damage claims; the possible outcome of outstanding litigation and other disputes; accruals for income tax liabilities as well as deferred tax accounts; the deferral and amortization of customer acquisition costs; useful lives for depreciation and amortization expense; the valuation of marketable securities; and the valuation of tangible and intangible assets. In 2011, there have been no changes in the significant areas that require estimates or in the underlying methodologies used in determining the amounts of these associated estimates.

        The allowance for receivables is developed based on several factors including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience and specific account analyses that project the ultimate collectability of the outstanding balances. As such, these factors may change over time causing the reserve level to vary.

        The Company carries insurance policies on insurable risks at levels which it believes to be appropriate, including workers' compensation, auto and general liability risks. The Company purchases insurance from third-party insurance carriers. These policies typically incorporate significant deductibles or self-insured retentions. The Company is responsible for all claims that fall within the retention limits. In determining the Company's accrual for self-insured claims, the Company uses historical claims experience to establish both the current year accrual and the underlying provision for future losses. This actuarially determined provision and related accrual include both known claims, as well as incurred but not reported claims. The Company adjusts its estimate of accrued self-insured claims when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in health care costs, accident frequency and claim severity.

        Accruals for home service contract claims in the American Home Shield business are made based on the Company's claims experience and actuarial projections. Termite damage claim accruals are recorded based on both the historical rates of claims incurred within a contract year and the cost per claim. Current activity could differ causing a change in estimates. The Company has certain liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings. The Company accrues for these liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. Any resulting adjustments, which could be material, are recorded in the period identified.

        The Company records deferred income tax balances based on the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes. The Company records its deferred tax items based on the estimated value of the tax basis. The Company adjusts tax estimates when required to reflect changes based on factors such as changes in tax laws, relevant court decisions, results of tax authority reviews and statutes of limitations. The Company records a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from

F-7


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

        Revenue:    Revenues from lawn care and pest control services, as well as liquid and fumigation termite applications, are recognized as the services are provided. The Company eradicates termites through the use of non-baiting methods (e.g., fumigation or liquid treatments) and baiting systems. Termite services using baiting systems, termite inspection and protection contracts, as well as home service contracts, are frequently sold through annual contracts for a one-time, upfront payment. Direct costs of these contracts (service costs for termite contracts and claim costs for home service contracts) are expensed as incurred. The Company recognizes revenue over the life of these contracts in proportion to the expected direct costs. Those costs bear a direct relationship to the fulfillment of the Company's obligations under the contracts and are representative of the relative value provided to the customer (proportional performance method). The Company regularly reviews its estimates of direct costs for its termite bait and home service contracts and adjusts the estimates when appropriate.

        The Company has franchise agreements in its TruGreen, Terminix, ServiceMaster Clean, AmeriSpec, Furniture Medic and Merry Maids businesses. Franchise revenue (which in the aggregate represents approximately four percent of annual consolidated revenue from continuing operations) consists principally of continuing monthly fees based upon the franchisee's customer level revenue. Monthly fee revenue is recognized when the related customer level revenue is earned by the franchisee and collectability is reasonably assured. Franchise revenue also includes initial fees resulting from the sale of a franchise. These fees are fixed and are recognized as revenue when collectability is reasonably assured and all material services or conditions relating to the sale have been substantially performed. Total profits from the franchised operations were $74.1 million, $70.9 million and $66.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Consolidated operating income from continuing operations was $375.5 million, $306.7 million and $243.8 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company evaluates the performance of its franchise businesses based primarily on operating profit before corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense and amortization of intangible assets. The portion of total franchise fee income related to initial fees received from the sale of a franchise was immaterial to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods.

        Revenues are presented net of sales taxes collected and remitted to government taxing authorities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        The Company had $473.2 million and $449.6 million of deferred revenue as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Deferred revenue consists primarily of payments received for annual contracts relating to home service contracts, termite baiting, termite inspection, pest control and lawn care services.

        Deferred Customer Acquisition Costs:    Customer acquisition costs, which are incremental and direct costs of obtaining a customer, are deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in proportion to revenue recognized. These costs include sales commissions and direct selling costs which can be shown to have resulted in a successful sale. Deferred customer acquisition costs amounted to $30.4 million and $34.4 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

F-8


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Interim Reporting:    TruGreen has significant seasonality in its business. In the winter and spring, this business sells a series of lawn applications to customers which are rendered primarily in March through October (the production season). This business incurs incremental selling expenses at the beginning of the year that directly relate to successful sales for which the revenues are recognized in later quarters. On an interim basis, TruGreen defers these incremental selling expenses, pre-season advertising costs and annual repairs and maintenance procedures that are performed primarily in the first quarter. These costs are deferred and recognized in proportion to the contract revenue over the production season and are not deferred beyond the calendar year-end. Other business segments of the Company also defer, on an interim basis, advertising costs incurred early in the year. These pre-season costs are deferred and recognized approximately in proportion to revenue over the balance of the year and are not deferred beyond the calendar year-end.

        Advertising:    As discussed in the "Interim Reporting" note above, certain pre-season advertising costs are deferred and recognized approximately in proportion to the revenue over the year. Certain other advertising costs are expensed when the advertising occurs. The cost of direct-response advertising at Terminix and TruGreen, consisting primarily of direct-mail promotions, is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefits. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $155.1 million, $152.5 million and $149.8 million, respectively.

        Inventory:    Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost (primarily on a weighted average cost basis) or market. The Company's inventory primarily consists of finished goods to be used on the customers' premises or sold to franchisees.

        Property and equipment consist of the following:

 
  Balance as of
December 31,
   
 
  Estimated
Useful
Lives
(Years)
(In millions)
  2011   2010

Land

  $ 22.9   $ 22.9   N/A

Buildings and improvements

    76.0     75.8   10 - 40

Technology and communications

    207.0     152.4   3 - 7

Machinery, production equipment and vehicles

    216.7     170.2   3 - 9

Office equipment, furniture and fixtures

    19.2     18.7   5 - 7
             

    541.8     440.0    

Less accumulated depreciation

    (235.0 )   (173.1 )  
             

Net property and equipment

  $ 306.8   $ 266.9    
             

        Depreciation of property and equipment, including depreciation of assets held under capital leases, was $72.1 million, $60.6 million and $56.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        Intangible assets consisted primarily of goodwill in the amount of $3.162 billion and $3.125 billion, indefinite-lived trade names in the amount of $2.334 billion and $2.370 billion, and

F-9


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

other intangible assets in the amount of $210.0 million and $283.3 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        Fixed assets and intangible assets with finite lives are depreciated and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. These lives are based on the Company's previous experience for similar assets, potential market obsolescence and other industry and business data. As required by accounting standards for the impairment or disposal of long- lived assets, the Company's long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets (other than goodwill), are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the carrying value is no longer recoverable based upon the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. Changes in the estimated useful lives or in the asset values could cause the Company to adjust its book value or future expense accordingly.

        As required under accounting standards for goodwill and other intangibles, goodwill is not subject to amortization, and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized until their useful lives are determined to no longer be indefinite. Goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-8, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment," in the fourth quarter of 2011. This ASU gives entities the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not greater than its carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would not be required. For the 2011 annual goodwill impairment review performed as of October 1, 2011, the Company performed qualitative assessments on the Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean reporting units. Based on these assessments, the Company determined that, more likely than not, the fair values of Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean were greater than their respective carrying amounts. As a result, the two-step goodwill impairment test was not performed for Terminix, American Home Shield and ServiceMaster Clean in 2011.

        As permitted under accounting standards for goodwill and other intangibles prior to the adoption of ASU 2011-08, the Company carried forward a reporting unit's valuation from the most recent valuation under the following conditions: the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit have not changed significantly since the most recent fair value calculation, the most recent fair value calculation resulted in an amount that exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting unit by a substantial margin and, based on the facts and circumstances of events that have occurred since the last fair value determination, the likelihood that a current fair value calculation would result in an impairment would be remote. For the 2010 annual goodwill impairment review performed as of October 1, 2010, the Company carried forward the valuations of the Terminix and ServiceMaster Clean reporting units completed as of October 1, 2009. The Company did not carry forward the valuations for any trade names for the 2011 or 2010 annual trade name impairment reviews. For the 2009 annual goodwill and trade name impairment reviews performed as of October 1, 2009, the Company did not carry forward the valuations of any reporting units or trade names.

        Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of each of the Company's reporting units to its carrying

F-10


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of a DCF analysis, a market-based comparable approach and a market-based transaction approach. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates, terminal growth rates, the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based comparable approach and relevant transaction multiples for the market-based transaction approach. The cash flows employed in the DCF analyses are based on the Company's most recent budget and, for years beyond the budget, the Company's estimates, which are based on assumed growth rates. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risks inherent in the future cash flows of the respective reporting units. In addition, the market-based comparable and transaction approaches utilize comparable company public trading values, comparable company historical results, research analyst estimates and, where available, values observed in private market transactions. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with its goodwill carrying amount to measure the amount of impairment, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. In other words, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

        The impairment test for other intangible assets not subject to amortization involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The estimates of fair value of intangible assets not subject to amortization are determined using a DCF valuation analysis. The DCF methodology used to value trade names is known as the relief from royalty method and entails identifying the hypothetical cash flows generated by an assumed royalty rate that a third party would pay to license the trade names and discounting them back to the valuation date. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis include the selection of appropriate discount rates and hypothetical royalty rates, estimating the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows attributable to the hypothetical royalty rates and identification of appropriate terminal growth rate assumptions. The discount rates used in the DCF analyses are intended to reflect the risk inherent in the projected future cash flows generated by the respective intangible assets.

        Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, primarily the Company's trade names, are assessed annually for impairment during the fourth quarter or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances. The Company's 2011, 2010 and 2009 annual impairment analyses, which were performed as of October 1 of each year, did not result in any goodwill impairments. The Company's annual trade name impairment analyses, which were performed as of October 1 of each year, resulted in pre-tax non-cash impairments of $36.7 million and $26.6 million in 2011 and 2009, respectively. The Company's 2010 trade name impairment

F-11


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

analysis did not result in any impairment. The impairment charges by business segment for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, as well as the remaining value of the trade names not subject to amortization by business segment as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

(In thousands)
  TruGreen   Terminix   American
Home
Shield
  ServiceMaster
Clean
  Other
Operations &
Headquarters(1)
  Total  

Balance at Dec. 31, 2008

  $ 783,600   $ 875,100   $ 140,400   $ 152,600   $ 445,100   $ 2,396,800  

2009 Impairment

    (21,400 )               (5,200 )   (26,600 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2009 and 2010

    762,200     875,100     140,400     152,600     439,900     2,370,200  

2011 Impairment

    (36,700 )                   (36,700 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2011

  $ 725,500   $ 875,100   $ 140,400   $ 152,600   $ 439,900   $ 2,333,500  
                           

(1)
The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes Merry Maids.

        The impairment charge in 2011 was primarily attributable to the use of higher discount rates in the DCF valuation analyses as compared to the discount rates used in the 2010 impairment analyses. Although the projected future growth in cash flows in 2011 were slightly higher than in the 2010 valuation, the increase in the discount rates more than offset the improved cash flows. The increase in the discount rates is primarily attributable to changes in market conditions which indicated a lower risk tolerance in 2011 as compared to 2010. This lower risk tolerance is exhibited through the marketplace's desire for higher returns in order to accept market risk. The aggregate impairment charge in 2009 was primarily attributable to the use of lower projected future cash flows related to the hypothetical royalty rates utilized in the DCF valuation analyses as compared to the projected future cash flows used in the 2008 impairment analysis. Although the Company projected future growth in cash flows, such growth was lower than that estimated at the time the trade names were tested for impairment in 2008. The terminal growth rates used in the analyses for the October 1, 2011, 2010 and 2009 impairment tests were the same and in line with historical U.S. gross domestic product growth rates. Had the Company used a discount rate in assessing the impairment of its trade names that was one percent higher across all business segments (holding all other assumptions unchanged), the Company would have recorded an additional impairment charge of approximately $114.8 million in 2011.

        As a result of the trade name impairment taken in 2011, the carrying value of the TruGreen trade name was adjusted to its estimated fair value as of October 1, 2011. Further, the October 1, 2011 estimated fair value of the trade name at the ServiceMaster Clean business segment was not significantly in excess of its carrying value. Consequently, any further decline in the estimated fair values of these trade names will result in additional trade name impairments. It is possible that such impairments, if required, could be material and may need to be recorded prior to the fourth quarter of 2012 (i.e., during an interim period) if the Company's results of operations or other factors require such assets to be tested for impairment at an interim date.

F-12


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Credit Risk:    See Note 19 for information relating to the fair value of financial instruments.

        Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to financial and credit risk, consist principally of investments and receivables. Investments consist primarily of publicly traded debt and common equity securities. The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of investments to determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the value of the investments from factors such as deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer or the market(s) in which it competes. The majority of the Company's receivables have little concentration of credit risk due to the large number of customers with relatively small balances and their dispersion across geographical areas. The Company maintains an allowance for losses based upon the expected collectability of receivables.

        Income Taxes:    The Company is included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return of Holdings. State and local returns are filed both on a separate company basis and on a combined unitary basis with Holdings. Current and deferred income taxes are provided for on a separate company basis. The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company's financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income taxes are provided to reflect the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

        The Company records a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax return. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to its uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

        Stock-Based Compensation:    The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under accounting standards for share based payments, which require that stock options, restricted stock units and share grants be measured at fair value and this value is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

        In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2009-13, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements," which amends the multiple-element arrangement guidance under ASC 605, "Revenue Recognition." This standard amends the criteria for separating consideration received for products or services in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This standard establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, eliminates the residual method of allocation, and requires that total arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this standard significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This standard is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (calendar year 2011). The Company adopted the required provisions of this standard during the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

F-13


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS." This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to develop converged guidance on how to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP; however, it expands existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments, many of which eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 (calendar year 2012). The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income," to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and require that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, "Comprehensive Income," to effectively defer the changes from ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments will be temporary to allow the Board time to redeliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (calendar year 2012) and must be applied retrospectively to all periods upon adoption. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard will change the presentation of its consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment," which gives entities testing goodwill for impairment the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of a reporting unit in Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not greater than its carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would not be required. Otherwise, further testing would be needed. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 (calendar year 2012). Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of this standard during the fourth quarter of 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Acquisition of ServiceMaster

        On the Closing Date, ServiceMaster was acquired pursuant to the Merger, and, immediately following the completion of the Merger, all of the outstanding common stock of Holdings, the ultimate parent company of ServiceMaster, was owned by investment funds sponsored by, or affiliated with, the Equity Sponsors.

F-14


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2. Acquisition of ServiceMaster (Continued)

        Equity contributions totaling $1.431 billion, together with (i) borrowings under a then new $1.150 billion senior unsecured interim loan facility, (the "Interim Loan Facility"), (ii) borrowings under a then new $2.650 billion senior secured term loan facility, and (iii) cash on hand at ServiceMaster, were used, among other things, to finance the aggregate Merger consideration, to make payments in satisfaction of other equity-based interests in ServiceMaster under the Merger agreement, to settle existing interest rate swaps, to redeem or provide for the repayment of certain of the Company's existing indebtedness and to pay related transaction fees and expenses. In addition, letters of credit issued under a new $150.0 million pre-funded letter of credit facility were used to replace and/or secure letters of credit previously issued under a ServiceMaster credit facility that was terminated as of the Closing Date. On the Closing Date, the Company also entered into, but did not then draw under, the Revolving Credit Facility.

        In connection with the Merger and the related transactions (the "Transactions"), ServiceMaster retired certain of its existing indebtedness, including ServiceMaster's $179.0 million, 7.875 percent notes due August 15, 2009 (the "2009 Notes"). On the Closing Date, the 2009 Notes were called for redemption and they were redeemed on August 29, 2007. Additionally, the Company utilized a portion of the proceeds from the Term Facilities to repay at maturity ServiceMaster's $49.2 million, 6.95 percent notes due August 15, 2007 (the "2007 Notes").

        The Interim Loan Facility matured on July 24, 2008. On the maturity date, outstanding amounts under the Interim Loan Facility were converted on a one-to-one basis into the 2015 Notes. The 2015 Notes were issued pursuant to a refinancing indenture. In connection with the issuance of the 2015 Notes, ServiceMaster entered into the Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which ServiceMaster filed with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the resale of the 2015 Notes, which was declared effective on January 16, 2009. ServiceMaster deregistered the 2015 Notes in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, and the effectiveness of the registration statement was terminated on November 19, 2009. See Note 12 for a description of the Company's indebtedness.

        Upon consummation of the Merger, ServiceMaster de-listed its shares of common stock from the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") and deregistered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The last day of trading of ServiceMaster common stock on the NYSE was July 24, 2007.

Note 3. Business Segment Reporting

        The business of the Company is conducted through five reportable segments: TruGreen, Terminix, American Home Shield, ServiceMaster Clean and Other Operations and Headquarters.

        In accordance with accounting standards for segments, the Company's reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different services. The TruGreen segment provides residential and commercial lawn care services. The Terminix segment provides termite and pest control services to residential and commercial customers. The American Home Shield segment provides home service contracts to consumers that cover heating, ventilation, air conditioning, plumbing and other home systems and appliances. The ServiceMaster Clean segment provides residential and commercial disaster restoration and cleaning services primarily under the ServiceMaster and ServiceMaster Clean brand names, on-site furniture repair and restoration services primarily under the Furniture Medic brand name and home inspection services primarily under the AmeriSpec brand name. The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes the franchised and

F-15


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3. Business Segment Reporting (Continued)

Company-owned operations of Merry Maids, which provides house cleaning services. The Other Operations and Headquarters segment also includes SMAC, our financing subsidiary exclusively dedicated to providing financing to our franchisees and retail customers of our operating units, and the Company's headquarters operations, which provide various technology, marketing, finance, legal and other support services to the business units.

        Information regarding the accounting policies used by the Company is described in Note 1. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from customers and franchisees in the United States with less than two percent generated in foreign markets. Operating expenses of the business units consist primarily of direct costs. Identifiable assets are those used in carrying out the operations of the business unit and include intangible assets directly related to its operations.

        Segment information for continuing operations is presented below:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating Revenue:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 1,100,741   $ 1,096,667   $ 1,048,936  

Terminix

    1,193,075     1,157,346     1,089,072  

American Home Shield

    686,737     656,572     630,251  

ServiceMaster Clean

    138,691     132,132     125,614  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    86,628     84,677     84,012  
               

Total Operating Revenue

  $ 3,205,872   $ 3,127,394   $ 2,977,885  
               

Operating Income (Loss):(1)(2)(3)

                   

TruGreen

  $ 129,324   $ 112,312   $ 64,897  

Terminix

    220,622     199,750     184,131  

American Home Shield

    94,869     68,380     70,253  

ServiceMaster Clean

    57,674     55,450     50,456  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    (127,029 )   (129,200 )   (125,903 )
               

Total Operating Income

  $ 375,460   $ 306,692   $ 243,834  
               

Identifiable Assets:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 2,087,055   $ 2,103,341   $ 2,108,908  

Terminix

    2,601,869     2,615,388     2,584,937  

American Home Shield

    954,599     956,089     977,217  

ServiceMaster Clean

    370,526     385,287     388,847  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    1,132,757     954,583     950,593  
               

Total Identifiable Assets(4)

  $ 7,146,806   $ 7,014,688   $ 7,010,502  
               

F-16


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3. Business Segment Reporting (Continued)

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Depreciation & Amortization Expense:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 41,929   $ 66,069   $ 87,726  

Terminix

    75,347     67,761     63,277  

American Home Shield

    27,331     42,259     41,728  

ServiceMaster Clean

    6,150     7,106     8,243  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    12,679     13,430     13,818  
               

Total Depreciation & Amortization Expense(5)

  $ 163,436   $ 196,625   $ 214,792  
               

Capital Expenditures:

                   

TruGreen

  $ 44,714   $ 49,014   $ 28,792  

Terminix

    23,457     32,380     17,728  

American Home Shield

    17,529     8,031     1,820  

ServiceMaster Clean

    935     435     232  

Other Operations and Headquarters

    9,905     44,374     7,432  
               

Total Capital Expenditures

  $ 96,540   $ 134,234   $ 56,004  
               

(1)
Presented below is a reconciliation of segment operating income to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Total Segment Operating Income

  $ 375,460   $ 306,692   $ 243,834  

Non-operating Expense (Income):

                   

Interest expense

    273,123     286,933     299,333  

Interest and net investment income

    (10,886 )   (9,358 )   (7,079 )

Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt

    774         (46,106 )

Other expense

    700     733     748  
               

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

  $ 111,749   $ 28,384   $ (3,062 )
               
(2)
As described in Note 1, includes pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million recorded in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2009, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. There were no similar impairment charges included in continuing operations in 2010. See Note 1 for a summary of the trade name impairment charges by segment.

(3)
Includes restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters, Merger related charges and other

F-17


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3. Business Segment Reporting (Continued)

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Restructuring charges (credits):

                   

TruGreen

  $ 1,115   $ 6,922   $ 8,717  

Terminix

    3,560     3,491     3,390  

American Home Shield

        (127 )   147  

ServiceMaster Clean

    36     71      

Other Operations and Headquarters

    3,451     1,091     14,428  
               

Total restructuring charges

  $ 8,162   $ 11,448   $ 26,682  
               
(4)
Assets of discontinued operations are not included in the business segment table.

(5)
There are no adjustments necessary to reconcile total depreciation and amortization as presented in the business segment table to the consolidated totals. Amortization of debt issue costs is not included in the business segment table.

        The Other Operations and Headquarters segment includes the operations of Merry Maids, as well as the Company's headquarters function. The Merry Maids operations reported revenue of $81.0 million, $78.6 million and $78.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Merry Maids operations reported operating income of $18.0 million, $16.9 million and $8.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        See Note 4 for information relating to segment goodwill.

Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

        In accordance with applicable accounting standards, goodwill and intangible assets that are not amortized are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. As described in Note 1, the 2011 and 2009 results include pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $36.7 million and $26.6 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. There were no similar impairment charges included in continuing operations in 2010.

        During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the increase in goodwill and other intangible assets related primarily to tuck-in acquisitions completed throughout the period by Terminix, TruGreen and Merry Maids.

F-18


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Continued)

        The table below summarizes the goodwill balances by segment for continuing operations:

(In thousands)
  TruGreen   Terminix   American
Home
Shield
  ServiceMaster
Clean
  Other
Operations &
Headquarters
  Total  

Balance at Dec. 31, 2009

  $ 1,178,436   $ 1,361,698   $ 348,010   $ 135,713   $ 51,996   $ 3,075,853  

Acquisitions

    12,655     36,287             1,214     50,156  

Other(1)

    (20 )   (571 )   (227 )   181     (79 )   (716 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2010

    1,191,071     1,397,414     347,783     135,894     53,131     3,125,293  

Acquisitions

    11,682     27,789                 39,471  

Other(1)

    (831 )   (685 )   (210 )   (217 )   (841 )   (2,784 )
                           

Balance at Dec. 31, 2011

  $ 1,201,922   $ 1,424,518   $ 347,573   $ 135,677   $ 52,290   $ 3,161,980  
                           

(1)
Reflects the impact of the amortization of tax deductible goodwill and foreign exchange rate changes. For 2011, the amount shown in the Other Operations & Headquarters column also reflects $0.8 million related to the sale of certain Merry Maids company-owned branches to existing and new franchisees.

        There were no accumulated impairment losses as of December 31, 2011.

        The table below summarizes the other intangible asset balances for continuing operations:

 
  December 31, 2011   December 31, 2010  
(In thousands)
  Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net   Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net  

Trade names(1)

  $ 2,333,500   $   $ 2,333,500   $ 2,370,200   $   $ 2,370,200  

Customer relationships

    683,324     (539,638 )   143,686     668,649     (464,056 )   204,593  

Franchise agreements

    88,000     (42,406 )   45,594     88,000     (35,272 )   52,728  

Other

    58,471     (37,712 )   20,759     55,024     (29,034 )   25,990  
                           

Total

  $ 3,163,295   $ (619,756 ) $ 2,543,539   $ 3,181,873   $ (528,362 ) $ 2,653,511  
                           

(1)
Not subject to amortization.

        Amortization expense of $91.4 million, $136.0 million and $158.8 million was recorded in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the existing intangible assets, the Company anticipates amortization expense of $63.5 million, $50.1 million, $43.0 million, $23.4 million and $5.0 million in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.

F-19


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5. Income Taxes

        As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $9.0 million, $13.7 million and $15.4 million, respectively, of tax benefits primarily reflected in state tax returns that have not been recognized for financial reporting purposes ("unrecognized tax benefits"). At December 31, 2011 and 2010, $9.0 million and $13.7 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In millions)
  2011   2010   2009  

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

  $ 13.7   $ 15.4   $ 14.2  

Increases in tax positions for prior years

    1.1     0.3     3.3  

Decreases in tax positions for prior years

    (2.1 )   (1.9 )   (3.3 )

Increases in tax positions for current year

    1.1     1.0     2.6  

Lapse in statute of limitations

    (4.8 )   (1.1 )   (1.4 )
               

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

  $ 9.0   $ 13.7   $ 15.4  
               

        Up to $1.6 million of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits could be recognized within the next 12 months. As of December 31, 2010, the Company believed that it was reasonably possible that a decrease of up to $8.0 million in unrecognized tax benefits would have occurred during the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2011 unrecognized tax benefits actually decreased by $6.9 million as a result of the closing of certain federal and state audits and the expiration of statutes of limitation.

        The Company files consolidated and separate income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has been audited by the United States Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") through its year ended December 31, 2009, and is no longer subject to state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001.

        In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to review by domestic and foreign taxing authorities. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company participates in the IRS's Compliance Assurance Process whereby its U.S. federal income tax returns are reviewed by the IRS both prior to and after their filing. The U.S. federal income tax returns filed by the Company through the year ended December 31, 2009 have been audited by the IRS. In the third quarter of 2010, the IRS completed the audits of the Company's tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2009 with no adjustments or additional payments. The Company's tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2010 are under audit, which is expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2012. The IRS commenced examinations of the Company's U.S. federal income tax returns for 2011 in the first quarter of 2011. The examination is anticipated to be completed by the second quarter of 2013. Eight state tax authorities are in the process of auditing state income tax returns of various subsidiaries.

F-20


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The Company's policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties related to its tax positions within the tax provision. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company reversed interest expense of $1.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, through the tax provision. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized interest expense of $0.6 million through the tax provision. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company reversed penalties of $0.3 million through the tax provision. No tax penalties were recorded through the provision during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had accrued for the payment of interest and penalties of $1.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

        The components of our income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

U.S. 

    108,603     22,877     (10,579 )

Foreign

    3,146     5,507     7,517  
               

Total

    111,749     28,384     (3,062 )
               

        The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate for continuing operations is as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
 
  2011   2010   2009  

Tax at U.S. federal statutory rate

    35.0 %   35.0 %   35.0 %

State and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit

    1.8     0.4     187.3  

Tax credits

    (2.3 )   (9.2 )   56.1  

Permanent items

    1.5     9.2     16.4  

Unremitted foreign earnings

        4.5     41.4  

Other, including foreign rate differences and reserves

    3.3     (1.3 )   (35.6 )
               

Effective rate

    39.3 %   38.6 %   300.6 %
               

        In the effective tax rate reconciliation above, the state rate benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily the result of a change in the state tax rates used to measure deferred taxes.

        The effective tax rate for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was a tax benefit of 42.3 percent, 35.9 percent and 35.9 percent, respectively.

F-21


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5. Income Taxes (Continued)

        Income tax expense from continuing operations is as follows:

 
  2011  
(In thousands)
  Current   Deferred   Total  

U.S. federal

  $ 2,103   $ 39,946   $ 42,049  

Foreign

    3,284     (3,984 )   (700 )

State and local

    3,477     (914 )   2,563  
               

  $ 8,864   $ 35,048   $ 43,912  
               

 
 
2010
 
 
  Current   Deferred   Total  

U.S. federal

  $ 574   $ 8,446   $ 9,020  

Foreign

    1,847     259     2,106  

State and local

    4,069     (4,250 )   (181 )
               

  $ 6,490   $ 4,455   $ 10,945  
               

 
 
2009
 
 
  Current   Deferred   Total  

U.S. federal

  $ (6,708 )   3,589   $ (3,119 )

Foreign

    2,356     629     2,985  

State and local

    14,254     (23,324 )   (9,070 )
               

  $ 9,902   $ (19,106 ) $ (9,204 )
               

        Deferred income tax expense results from timing differences in the recognition of income and expense for income tax and financial reporting purposes. Deferred income tax balances reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The deferred tax asset primarily reflects the impact of future tax deductions related to the Company's accruals and certain net operating loss carryforwards. The deferred tax liability is primarily attributable to the basis differences related to intangible assets. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2011 was $6.3 million. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2011 was a decrease of $9.2 million and was primarily attributable to the reduction of net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes related to the dissolution of certain subsidiaries.

F-22


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5. Income Taxes (Continued)

        Significant components of the Company's deferred tax balances are as follows:

 
  December 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010  

Deferred tax assets (liabilities):

             

Current:

             

Prepaid expenses

  $ (14,240 ) $ (21,182 )

Receivables allowances

    13,343     12,446  

Accrued insurance expenses

    8,231     5,245  

Current reserves

    5,398     5,986  

Accrued expenses and other

    27,337     9,091  

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

    50,540      

Less valuation allowance

        (28 )
           

Total current asset

    90,609     11,558  
           

Long-Term:

             

Intangible assets(1)

    (1,061,604 )   (1,043,910 )

Accrued insurance expenses

    4,640     5,770  

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

    102,558     141,706  

Other long-term obligations

    (76,011 )   (23,128 )

Less valuation allowance

    (6,276 )   (15,409 )
           

Total long-term liability

    (1,036,693 )   (934,971 )
           

Net deferred tax liability

  $ (946,084 ) $ (923,413 )
           

(1)
The deferred tax liability relates primarily to the difference in the tax versus book basis of intangible assets. The majority of this liability will not actually be paid unless certain business units of the Company are sold.

        As of December 31, 2011, the Company had deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, of $137.7 million for federal and state net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards which expire at various dates up to 2031. The Company also had deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, of $9.1 million for federal and state credit carryforwards which expire at various dates up to 2031.

        The Company has historically determined that the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries will be repatriated to the U.S. There was no net deferred tax liability recorded as of December 31, 2010, related to such undistributed earnings due to the existence of available foreign tax credits. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company reorganized certain foreign subsidiaries in conjunction with its international growth initiatives and evaluated its liquidity requirements in the U.S. and the capital requirements of its foreign subsidiaries. Based on these factors, the Company has determined that undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries will no longer be repatriated. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded deferred taxes for U.S. income or foreign withholding taxes on the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. This amount becomes taxable upon a repatriation of assets from the subsidiary or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiary. The amount of such undistributed earnings totaled $22.0 million as of December 31, 2011 and any tax liability is

F-23


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5. Income Taxes (Continued)

expected to be offset by available foreign tax credits. Determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred income tax liability on this temporary difference is not practicable due to the complexities of the hypothetical calculation.

Note 6. Acquisitions

        Acquisitions have been accounted for using the acquisition method and, accordingly, the results of operations of the acquired businesses have been included in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements since their dates of acquisition. The assets and liabilities of these businesses were recorded in the financial statements at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates.

Current Year

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company completed several lawn care and pest control and termite acquisitions for a total net purchase price of $57.1 million. Related to these acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $39.5 million and other intangibles of $16.2 million.

Prior Years

        During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company completed several lawn care and pest control and termite acquisitions, along with several Merry Maids' franchise acquisitions, for a total net purchase price of $70.9 million and $35.7 million, respectively. Related to these acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of $50.2 million and $28.8 million and other intangibles of $17.6 million and $9.1 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Cash Flow Information for Acquisitions

        Supplemental cash flow information regarding the Company's acquisitions, excluding the Merger, is as follows:

 
  Year Ended December 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Purchase price (including liabilities assumed)

  $ 58,844   $ 73,142   $ 37,722  

Less liabilities assumed

    (1,700 )   (2,243 )   (2,070 )
               

Net purchase price

  $ 57,144   $ 70,899   $ 35,652  
               

Net cash paid for acquisitions

  $ 44,365   $ 57,941   $ 32,647  

Seller financed debt

    12,779     12,958     3,005  
               

Payment for acquisitions

  $ 57,144   $ 70,899   $ 35,652  
               

Note 7. Discontinued Operations

        In the first quarter of 2011, ServiceMaster concluded that TruGreen LandCare did not fit within the long-term strategic plans of the Company and committed to a plan to sell the business. On April 21, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to sell the TruGreen LandCare business, and the disposition was effective as of April 30, 2011. As a result of the decision to sell this business, a $34.2 million impairment charge ($21.0 million, net of tax) was recorded in loss

F-24


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7. Discontinued Operations (Continued)

from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the first quarter of 2011 to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale, a $6.2 million loss on sale ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded. The loss on the disposition of the TruGreen LandCare business continues to be subject to certain post-closing adjustments and disputes, and such adjustments could be significant to the sale price.

        The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities for TruGreen LandCare are presented below.

As of December 31,
  2011   2010  

Assets:

             

Receivables, net

  $   $ 27,732  

Inventories and other current assets

        23,245  
           

Total Current Assets

        50,977  
           

Net property and equipment

        22,498  

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

        9,899  
           

Total Assets

  $   $ 83,374  
           

Liabilities:

             

Current liabilities

  $ 268   $ 15,496  

Long-term liabilities

        1,952  
           

Total Liabilities

  $ 268   $ 17,448  
           

        In 2010 and 2009 the Company recorded pre-tax non-cash impairment charges of $46.9 million ($28.7 million, net of tax) and $1.4 million ($0.9 million, net of tax), respectively, associated with the goodwill and trade name at its TruGreen LandCare business in (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

F-25


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7. Discontinued Operations (Continued)

Financial Information for Discontinued Operations

        (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for all periods presented includes the operating results of TruGreen LandCare and the other previously sold businesses. The operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Operating Results:

                   

Operating revenue

  $ 75,765   $ 238,508   $ 262,258  

Operating (loss) income(1)

   
(40,620

)
 
(49,971

)
 
11,468
 

(Benefit) provision for income taxes(1)

    (15,461 )   (17,973 )   4,115  
               

Operating (loss) income, net of income taxes(1)

    (25,159 )   (31,998 )   7,353  

Loss on sale, net of income taxes

    (1,857 )        
               

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(1)

  $ (27,016 ) $ (31,998 ) $ 7,353  
               

(1)
During 2011, a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $34.2 million ($21.0 million, net of tax) was recorded to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Also includes goodwill and trade name impairments of $46.9 million ($28.7 million, net of tax) and $1.4 million ($0.9 million, net of tax) in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

        The table below summarizes the activity during the year ended December 31, 2011 for the remaining liabilities from operations that were discontinued in years prior to 2011. The remaining obligations primarily relate to long-term self-insurance claims. The Company believes that the remaining reserves continue to be adequate and reasonable.

(In thousands)
  Balance at
Dec. 31, 2010
  Cash
Payments
or Other
  Expense/
(Income)
  Balance at
Dec. 31, 2011
 

Remaining liabilities of discontinued operations:

                         

ARS/AMS

  $ 219   $ 35   $ (26 ) $ 228  

LandCare Construction

    656     (612 )   (44 )    

LandCare utility line clearing business

    771     (771 )        

Certified Systems, Inc. and other

    1,905     (50 )   245     2,100  

InStar

    149     31     99     279  
                   

Total liabilities of discontinued operations

  $ 3,700   $ (1,367 ) $ 274   $ 2,607  
                   

F-26


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8. Restructuring Charges

        The Company incurred restructuring charges of $8.2 million ($5.0 million, net of tax), $11.4 million ($7.0 million, net of tax) and $26.7 million ($16.4 million, net of tax) for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Restructuring charges were comprised of the following:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

TruGreen reorganization and restructuring(1)

  $ 1,115   $ 6,922   $ 8,717  

Information technology outsourcing(2)

            9,861  

Terminix branch optimization(3)

    3,560     2,352     3,219  

Centers of excellence initiative(4)

    3,416          

Merger related charges(5)

        1,208     2,321  

Other(6)

    71     966     2,564  
               

Total restructuring charges

  $ 8,162   $ 11,448   $ 26,682  
               

(1)
Represents restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations. For the year ended December 31, 2011 these charges included severance and lease termination costs of $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, these charges included consulting fees of $4.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively and severance, lease termination and other costs of $2.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

(2)
On December 11, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with IBM pursuant to which IBM provides information technology operations and applications development services to the Company. These services were phased in during the first half of 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, these charges included transition fees paid to IBM of $7.6 million, employee retention and severance costs of $1.3 million and consulting and other costs of $1.0 million.

(3)
Represents restructuring charges related to a branch optimization project. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included severance and lease termination costs of $0.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these charges were comprised of lease termination costs. For the year ended December 31, 2009, these charges included lease termination costs of $2.9 million and severance costs of $0.3 million.

(4)
Represents restructuring charges related to an initiative to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence. For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included consulting and severance costs of $1.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

(5)
Included severance, retention, legal fees and other costs associated with the Merger.

(6)
For the year ended December 31, 2011, these charges included reserve adjustments. For the year ended December 31, 2010, these charges included reserve adjustments of $0.6 million and severance and retention of $0.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2009 these charges related to previous restructuring initiatives and

F-27


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8. Restructuring Charges (Continued)

(In thousands)
  Accrued
Restructuring
Charges
 

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  $ 7,437  

Costs incurred

    11,448  

Costs paid or otherwise settled

    (15,343 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2010

    3,542  

Costs incurred

    8,162  

Costs paid or otherwise settled

    (7,814 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $ 3,890  
       

F-28


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

(In thousands)
  Accrued
Self-insured
Claims
 

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  $ 130,932  

Provision for self-insured claims(1)

    31,378  

Cash payments

    (40,618 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 121,692  

Provision for self-insured claims(1)

    26,052  

Cash payments

    (39,662 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $ 108,082  
       

(1)
For the years ending December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, provisions for uninsured claims of $1.8 million, $5.7 million and $6.7 million, respectively, are included in (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        Accruals for home service contract claims in the American Home Shield business are made based on the Company's claims experience and actuarial projections. Termite damage claim accruals are recorded based on both the historical rates of claims incurred within a contract year and the cost per claim. Current activity could differ causing a change in estimates. The Company has certain liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues for these liabilities when it is probable that future costs will be incurred and

F-29


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

such costs can be reasonably estimated. Any resulting adjustments, which could be material, are recorded in the period the adjustments are identified.

        The Company has guarantees on certain bonds issued on behalf of divested companies associated with TruGreen LandCare, primarily performance type bonds. The maximum payments the Company could be required to make if the buyer of the divested companies is unable to fulfill their obligations is approximately $11.9 million as of December 31, 2011. The TruGreen LandCare purchase agreement requires that the buyer replace the bonds at the bond's expiration date. Substantially all of the bonds are scheduled to expire prior to 2015, but may be extended depending on the completion of the related projects. The fair value of the Company's obligations related to these guarantees is not significant and no liability has been recorded.

        In the ordinary course of conducting business activities, the Company and its subsidiaries become involved in judicial, administrative and regulatory proceedings involving both private parties and governmental authorities. These proceedings include, on an individual, collective, representative and class action basis, regulatory, insured and uninsured employment, general and commercial liability, wage and hour and environmental proceedings. The Company has entered into settlement agreements in certain cases, including with respect to putative collective and class actions, which are subject to court approval. If one or more of the Company's settlements are not finally approved, the Company could have additional or different exposure, which could be material. At this time, the Company does not expect any of these proceedings to have a material effect on its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, the Company can give no assurance that the results of any such proceedings will not materially affect its reputation, business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

        In connection with the Merger and the related transactions, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with CD&R under which CD&R provided the Company with on-going consulting and management advisory services. The annual management fee payable under the consulting agreement with CD&R is $6.25 million. Under this agreement, the Company recorded management fees in each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $6.25 million, which is included in Selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The consulting agreement also provides that CD&R may receive additional fees in connection with certain subsequent financing and acquisition or disposition transactions. The consulting agreement will terminate on July 24, 2017, unless terminated earlier at CD&R's election.

        In addition, in August 2009, the Company entered into consulting agreements with Citigroup, BAS and JPMorgan, each of which is an Equity Sponsor or an affiliate of an Equity Sponsor. Under the consulting agreements, Citigroup, BAS and JPMorgan each provide the Company with on-going consulting and management advisory services through June 30, 2016 or the earlier termination of the existing consulting agreement between the Company and CD&R. On September 30, 2010, Citigroup transferred the management responsibility for certain investment funds that own shares of common stock of Holdings to StepStone and Lexington Partners Advisors LP. Citigroup also assigned its obligations and rights under its consulting agreement to StepStone, and beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, the consulting fee otherwise payable to Citigroup became payable to StepStone. The Company paid annual management fees of $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.25 million to StepStone, BAS and JPMorgan, respectively. The Company recorded consulting

F-30


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

fees related to these agreements in each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $1.25 million, which is included in Selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 22, 2011, Holdings purchased from BAS 7.5 million shares of capital stock of Holdings. Effective January 1, 2012, the annual management fee payable to BAS was reduced to $0.25 million.

        In 2008 and 2009, Holdings completed open market purchases totaling $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $21.4 million. On December 21, 2011, the Company purchased from Holdings and retired $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for an aggregate purchase price of $68.0 million, which included payment of accrued interest of $3.0 million. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest expense of $6.8 million, $7.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, related to 2015 Notes held by Holdings. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid interest to Holdings in the amount of $10.0 million, $7.0 million and $6.5 million, respectively. Interest accrued by the Company and payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2010 amounted to $3.2 million. As a result of the purchase of the 2015 Notes from Holdings, the Company did not have interest payable to Holdings as of December 31, 2011.

Note 11. Employee Benefit Plans

        Effective January 2, 2007, the Company approved a long-term incentive plan (the "LTIP") designed to reward certain employees based on the accumulated three-year Company financial performance against pre-tax income and revenue goals. Pursuant to the LTIP, the awards would be paid out in cash at the end of a three-year performance period, if certain performance measures were achieved. The costs of the awards were recognized over the performance period and were included in selling and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During 2009, the Company determined that the three year financial performance measures had not been achieved and reversed reserves related to the Plan in the amount of $4.4 million. The LTIP was terminated as of December 31, 2009.

        Discretionary contributions to qualified profit sharing and non-qualified deferred compensation plans were made in the amount of $15.7 million, $13.9 million and $12.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

F-31


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12. Long-Term Debt

        Long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is summarized in the following table:

(In thousands)
  2011   2010  

Senior secured term loan facility maturing in 2014

  $ 2,530,750   $ 2,557,250  

10.75% senior notes maturing in 2015

    996,000     1,061,000  

Revolving credit facility maturing in 2017

         

7.10% notes maturing in 2018(1)

    67,474     65,549  

7.45% notes maturing in 2027(1)

    153,225     150,555  

7.25% notes maturing in 2038(1)

    61,441     60,633  

Other

    66,980     53,500  

Less current portion

    (51,838 )   (49,412 )
           

Total long-term debt

  $ 3,824,032   $ 3,899,075  
           

(1)
The increase in the balance from 2010 to 2011 reflects the amortization of fair value adjustments related to purchase accounting, which increases the effective interest rate from the coupon rates shown above.

        In connection with the completion of the Transactions, the Company entered into (i) the senior secured term loan facility, (ii) the Interim Loan Facility, (iii) the Revolving Credit Facility and (iv) a new synthetic letter of credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. Additionally, the Company repaid certain of its existing indebtedness, including the 2009 Notes. The 2009 Notes were called for redemption on the Closing Date and were redeemed on August 29, 2007. Additionally, the Company utilized a portion of the proceeds from the Term Facilities described and defined below to repay at maturity the 2007 Notes. The debt issuance costs related to the Merger have been capitalized and these costs are being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the underlying debt instruments.

Term Facilities

        On the Closing Date, in connection with the completion of the Merger, ServiceMaster became obligated under the Term Facilities. The Term Facilities consist of (i) the senior secured term loan facility ("Term Loan Facility") providing for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $2.65 billion and (ii) a pre-funded synthetic letter of credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had issued $130.3 million of letters of credit, resulting in unused commitments under the synthetic letter of credit facility of $19.7 million.

        The Term Loan Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured by substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of ServiceMaster and certain of our domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain subsidiaries subject to regulatory requirements in various states, ("Guarantors"), including pledges of all the capital stock of all direct domestic subsidiaries (other than foreign subsidiary holding companies, which are deemed to be foreign subsidiaries) owned by ServiceMaster or any Guarantor and of up to 65% of the capital stock of each direct foreign subsidiary owned by ServiceMaster or any Guarantor. The Term Loan Facility security interests are subject to certain exceptions, including, but not limited to, exceptions for (i) equity interests, (ii) indebtedness or other obligations of subsidiaries, (iii) real estate or (iv) any other assets, if the granting of a security interest therein would require that any notes issued under ServiceMaster's indenture dated as of

F-32


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

August 15, 1997 be secured. The Term Loan Facility is secured on a pari passu basis with the security interests created in the same collateral securing the Revolving Credit Facility.

        The Term Facilities will mature on July 24, 2014. The interest rates applicable to the loans under the Term Facilities are based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to either, at ServiceMaster's option, (i) an adjusted London inter-bank offered rate (adjusted for maximum reserves), plus a borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011) or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus a borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011). The borrowing margin, in each case, will be adjusted from time to time based on the Consolidated Secured Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Facilities agreement) for the previous fiscal quarter.

        The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company pays a fixed rate of interest on the stated notional amount and the Company receives a floating rate of interest (based on one month or three month LIBOR) on the stated notional amount. Therefore, during the term of the swap agreements, the effective interest rate on the portion of the term loans equal to the stated notional amount is fixed at the stated rate in the interest rate swap agreements plus the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011). The changes in interest rate swap agreements in effect for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, as well as the cumulative interest rate swaps outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

(In thousands)
  Notional
Amount
  Weighted
Average Fixed
Rate(1)
 

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2008

  $ 1,430,000     3.89 %

Entered into effect

           

Expired

           
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2009

    1,430,000     3.89 %

Entered into effect

    530,000        

Expired

    (530,000 )      
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2010

    1,430,000     3.68 %

Entered into effect

    450,000        

Expired

    (450,000 )      
           

Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2011

  $ 1,430,000     2.84 %
           

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011).

F-33


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

        Interest rate swap agreements in effect as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Trade Date   Effective
Date
  Expiration
Date
  Notional
Amount
  Weighted
Average
Fixed
Rate(1)
  Floating
Rate
  February 15, 2008     March 3, 2008   March 3, 2012   $ 250,000     3.48 % Three month LIBOR
  September 15, 2008     October 1, 2008   October 1, 2012     200,000     3.53 % One month LIBOR
  April 20, 2009     September 1, 2011 (2) August 1, 2013     530,000     1.51 % One month LIBOR
  June 10, 2010     March, 3, 2011   March 1 ,2013     100,000     1.77 % One month LIBOR
  June 10, 2010     September 1, 2011   September 1, 2013     50,000     2.25 % One month LIBOR
  June 15, 2010     March 3, 2011   March 1, 2013     150,000     1.66 % One month LIBOR
  June 15, 2010     September 1, 2011   September 1, 2013     150,000     2.21 % One month LIBOR

(1)
Before the application of the incremental borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011).

(2)
In August 2011, the Company amended the terms of a $530.0 million interest rate swap agreement entered into in April 2009. In connection with the amendment, which became effective as of September 1, 2011, the expiration date of the agreement was extended from August 2012 to August 2013 and the fixed rate on the agreement was lowered from 2.55 percent to 1.51 percent.

        In accordance with accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and as further described in Note 19, these interest rate swap agreements are classified as cash flow hedges, and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of the changes in fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

10.75% Senior Notes and 8% Senior Notes

        On the Closing Date, in connection with the completion of the Merger, ServiceMaster became obligated under the Interim Loan Facility. The Interim Loan Facility matured on July 24, 2008. On the maturity date, outstanding amounts under the Interim Loan Facility were converted on a one to one basis into 2015 Notes. The 2015 Notes were issued pursuant to a refinancing indenture. In connection with the issuance of 2015 Notes, ServiceMaster entered into the Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which ServiceMaster filed with the SEC a registration statement with respect to the resale of the 2015 Notes, which was declared effective on January 16, 2009. ServiceMaster deregistered the 2015 Notes in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, and the effectiveness of the registration statement was terminated on November 19, 2009.

        During the first quarter of 2009, the Company completed open market purchases of $89.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes for a cost of $41.0 million. The debt acquired by the Company has been retired, and the Company has discontinued the payment of interest. The Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $46.1 million in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to these retirements.

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company purchased $65.0 million in face value of the 2015 Notes from Holdings for a cost of $68.0 million, which included payment of accrued interest of $3.0 million. The debt acquired by the Company has been retired, and the Company has discontinued the payment of interest. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of

F-34


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

$0.8 million in its Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 for write-offs of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the extinguished debt.

        In February 2012, the Company sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes. The 2020 Notes will mature on February 15, 2020 and bear interest at a rate of 8 percent per annum. The 2020 Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company. The Company used $400 million of the proceeds of the sale of the 2020 Notes, together with available cash, to redeem $400 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 2015 Notes in February 2012 and intends to use the remainder of such proceeds, together with available cash, to redeem an additional $200 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes in March 2012.

        After giving effect to the 2009 open market purchases and retirement of 2015 Notes by the Company, the 2011 purchase and retirement of 2015 Notes from Holdings and the redemption of $600 million aggregate principal amount of 2015 Notes with proceeds from the 2020 Notes offering, $396 million aggregate principal amount of the 2015 Notes will remain outstanding.

        The 2015 Notes and 2020 Notes are senior unsecured obligations of ours and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness. The 2015 Notes and 2020 Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors. The subsidiary guarantees are general unsecured senior obligations of the subsidiary guarantors and rank equally in right of payment with all of the existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of our non-guarantor subsidiaries. The 2015 Notes and 2020 Notes are effectively junior to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.

Revolving Credit Facility

        On the Closing Date, in connection with the completion of the Merger, ServiceMaster became obligated under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for senior secured revolving loans and stand-by and other letters of credit. The Revolving Credit Facility limits outstanding letters of credit to $75.0 million. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no revolving loans or letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had $442.5 million of remaining capacity available under the Revolving Credit Facility.

        On February 2, 2011, ServiceMaster entered into an amendment to its Revolving Credit Facility. Prior to the amendment, the facility was scheduled to mature on July 24, 2013 and provided for maximum borrowing capacity of $500.0 million with outstanding letters of credit limited to $75.0 million. The Company desired to extend the maturity date of the facility by one year, and as an inducement for such extension offered to allow any lenders in the syndicate group that were willing to extend the maturity date by one year a 20 percent reduction of such lender's loan commitment. As a result of the amendment, the Company had available borrowing capacity under its amended Revolving Credit Facility of $442.5 million through July 24, 2013 and $229.6 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014.

        On January 30, 2012, ServiceMaster entered into the Extension Amendment and the Increase Supplement to its Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for senior secured revolving loans and

F-35


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12. Long-Term Debt (Continued)

stand-by and other letters of credit. After effectiveness on February 13, 2012 of the Extension Amendment and the Increase Supplement, we have available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility of $447.7 million through July 24, 2013, $324.2 million from July 25, 2013 through July 24, 2014 and $265.2 million from July 25, 2014 through January 31, 2017. The Company will continue to have access to letters of credit up to $75.0 million through January 31, 2017.

        The Revolving Credit Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured by the same collateral securing the Term Loan Facility, on a pari passu basis with the security interests created in the same collateral securing the Term Loan Facility.

        The interest rates applicable to the loans under the Revolving Credit Facility will be based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to either, at the borrower's option, (1) an adjusted London inter-bank offered rate (adjusted for maximum reserves), plus a borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011) or (2) an alternate base rate, plus a borrowing margin (2.50 percent as of December 31, 2011). The borrowing margin, in each case, will be adjusted from time to time based on the Consolidated Secured Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement) for the previous fiscal quarter.

        The agreements governing the Term Facilities, the 2015 Notes, the 2020 Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility contain certain covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict the incurrence of additional indebtedness, liens, sales of assets, certain payments (including dividends) and transactions with affiliates, subject to certain exceptions. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under these agreements at December 31, 2011.

        As of December 31, 2011, future scheduled long-term debt payments are $51.8 million, $50.4 million, $2.487 billion, $1.002 billion and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The scheduled long-term debt payments in 2012 include the repayment of $10.0 million transferred under the Company's accounts receivable securitization arrangement, as described in Note 14.

Note 13. Cash and Marketable Securities

        Cash, money market funds and certificates of deposits, with maturities of three months or less when purchased, are included in Cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company's investments consist primarily of domestic publicly traded debt and certificates of deposit ("Debt securities") and common equity securities ("Equity securities"). The amortized cost, fair value and gross unrealized gains and losses of the Company's short- and long-term investments in debt and equity securities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

(In thousands)
  Amortized Cost   Gross Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  

Available-for-sale and trading securities, December 31, 2011:

                         

Debt securities

  $ 95,135   $ 5,795   $ (68 ) $ 100,862  

Equity securities

    40,558     2,953     (1,891 )   41,620  
                   

Total securities

  $ 135,693   $ 8,748   $ (1,959 ) $ 142,482  
                   

F-36


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13. Cash and Marketable Securities (Continued)

 

(In thousands)
  Amortized Cost   Gross Unrealized
Gains
  Gross Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  

Available-for-sale and trading securities, December 31, 2010:

                         

Debt securities

  $ 96,594   $ 4,622   $ (283 ) $ 100,933  

Equity securities

    36,363     4,999     (1,712 )   39,650  
                   

Total securities

  $ 132,957   $ 9,621   $ (1,995 ) $ 140,583  
                   

        The portion of unrealized losses which had been in a loss position for more than one year was $1.7 million and $0.1 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The aggregate fair value of the investments with unrealized losses was $13.6 million and $18.5 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, $226.2 million and $242.2 million, respectively, of the cash and short- and long-term marketable securities balance are associated with regulatory requirements at American Home Shield and for other purposes. Such amounts are identified as being potentially unavailable to be paid to the Company by its subsidiaries. American Home Shield's investment portfolio has been invested in a combination of high quality, short duration fixed income securities and equities.

        Gains and losses on sales of investments, as determined on a specific identification basis, are included in investment income in the period they are realized. The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of investments to determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the value of the investments from factors such as deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer or the market(s) in which the issuer competes.

        The table below summarizes proceeds, gross realized gains and gross realized losses, each resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities and impairment charges due to other than temporary declines in the value of certain investments.

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Proceeds from sales of securities

  $ 45,065   $ 20,071   $ 35,141  

Gross realized gains, pre-tax

   
6,065
   
2,326
   
3,882
 

Gross realized gains, net of tax

    3,714     1,418     2,385  

Gross realized losses, pre-tax

   
(249

)
 
(207

)
 
(1,492

)

Gross realized losses, net of tax

    (153 )   (126 )   (917 )

Impairment charges, pre-tax

   
(195

)
 
(174

)
 
(5,854

)

Impairment charges, net of tax

    (119 )   (106 )   (3,596 )

Note 14. Receivable Sales

        The Company has an accounts receivable securitization arrangement under which TruGreen and Terminix may sell certain eligible trade accounts receivable to Funding, the Company's wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes. Funding, in turn, may transfer, on a revolving basis, an undivided percentage ownership interest of

F-37


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14. Receivable Sales (Continued)

up to $50.0 million in the pool of accounts receivable to the Purchasers. The amount of the eligible receivables varies during the year based on seasonality of the businesses and could, at times, limit the amount available to the Company from the sale of these interests. As of December 31, 2011, the amount of eligible receivables was approximately $31.1 million.

        During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were no transfers of interests in the pool of trade accounts receivables to Purchasers under this arrangement. As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $10.0 million outstanding under the arrangement and, as of December 31, 2011, had $21.1 million of remaining capacity available under the accounts receivable securitization arrangement.

        The accounts receivable securitization arrangement is a 364-day facility that is renewable annually at the option of Funding, with a final termination date of July 17, 2012. Only one of the Purchasers is required to purchase interests under the arrangement. As part of the annual renewal of the facility, which occurred on July 26, 2011, this Purchaser agreed to continue its participation in the arrangement through July 17, 2012.

        The Company has recorded its obligation to repay the Purchasers for its interest in the pool of receivables within current portion of long-term debt on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. The interest rates applicable to the Company's obligation are based on a fluctuating rate of interest measured based on the Purchaser's pooled commercial paper rate (0.26 percent at December 31, 2011). In addition, the Company pays usage fees on its obligations and commitment fees on undrawn amounts committed by the Purchasers. Unless the arrangement is renegotiated or extended prior to its expiration, all obligations under the accounts receivable securitization arrangement must be repaid by July 17, 2012.

Note 15. Comprehensive Income

        Comprehensive income (loss), which primarily includes net income (loss), unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments and the effect of foreign currency translation is disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity.

F-38


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 15. Comprehensive Income (Continued)

The following table summarizes the activity in other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects.

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities:

                   

Unrealized gains(1)

  $ 3,092   $ 2,808   $ 2,416  

Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses realized(2)

    (3,787 )   (1,225 )   2,182  
               

Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities

    (695 )   1,583     4,598  
               

Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:

                   

Unrealized losses(3)

    (3,419 )   (24,901 )   (24,636 )

Reclassification adjustment for net losses realized(4)

    16,733     27,535     47,380  
               

Net unrealized gains on derivative instruments

    13,314     2,634     22,744  

Foreign currency translation

    (1,460 )   2,186     5,038  
               

Other comprehensive income

  $ 11,159   $ 6,403   $ 32,380  
               

(1)
Net of tax effect of $(2.1) million in 2011, $(1.3) million in 2010 and $(1.4) million in 2009.

(2)
Net of tax effect of $2.2 million in 2011, $0.7 million in 2010 and $(1.3) million in 2009.

(3)
Net of tax effect of $1.4 million in 2011, $14.4 million in 2010 and $13.8 million in 2009.

(4)
Net of tax effect of $(9.1) million in 2011, $(15.5) million in 2010 and ($28.6) million in 2009.

        Accumulated other comprehensive loss included the following components as of December 31:

(In thousands)
  2011   2010  

Net unrealized gains on securities, net of tax

  $ 4,330   $ 5,026  

Net unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net of tax

    (14,268 )   (27,582 )

Foreign currency translation

    3,726     5,185  
           

Total

  $ (6,212 ) $ (17,371 )
           

Note 16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

        In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the caption "Cash and cash equivalents" includes investments in short-term, highly-liquid securities having a maturity of three months or less

F-39


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information (Continued)

when purchased. Supplemental information relating to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is presented in the following table:

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
(In thousands)
  2011   2010   2009  

Cash paid for or (received from):

                   

Interest expense

  $ 252,284   $ 268,693   $ 301,527  

Interest and dividend income

    (4,888 )   (5,331 )   (6,621 )

Income taxes, net of refunds

    11,677     13,353     824  

        The Company acquired $10.1 million of property and equipment by entering into capital leases in 2011, which has been excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as a non-cash investing activity. There were no similar transactions in 2009 or 2010.

Note 17. Capital Stock

        Effective July 24, 2007 upon completion of the Merger, the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company was amended to provide for the authorization of 1,000 shares of common stock to replace the previously authorized, issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the Merger, CDRSVM Holding, Inc. holds 1,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which represents all of the authorized and issued common stock. The Company has no other classes of capital stock, authorized or issued.

Note 18. Stock-Based Compensation

        The board of directors and stockholders of Holdings have adopted the Amended and Restated ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the "MSIP"). The MSIP provides for the sale of shares and deferred share units ("DSUs") of Holdings stock to ServiceMaster's executives, officers and other employees and to Holdings' directors as well as the grant of both restricted stock units ("RSUs") and options to purchase shares of Holdings to those individuals. DSUs represent a right to receive a share of common stock in the future. The board of directors of Holdings, or a committee designated by it, selects the ServiceMaster executives, officers and employees and the Holdings' directors eligible to participate in the MSIP and determines the specific number of shares to be offered or options to be granted to an individual. A maximum of 14,595,000 shares of Holdings stock is authorized for issuance under the MSIP. Holdings currently intends to satisfy any need for shares of common stock of Holdings associated with the settlement of DSUs, vesting of RSUs or exercise of options issued under the MSIP through those new shares available for issuance or any shares repurchased, forfeited or surrendered from participants in the MSIP.

        All option grants under the MSIP have been, and will be, non-qualified options with a per-share exercise price no less than the fair market value of one share of Holdings stock on the grant date. Any stock options granted will generally have a term of ten years and vesting will be subject to an employee's continued employment. The board of directors of Holdings, or a committee designated by it, may accelerate the vesting of an option at any time. In addition, vesting of options will be accelerated if Holdings experiences a change in control (as defined in the MSIP) unless options with substantially equivalent terms and economic value are substituted for existing options in place of accelerated vesting. Vesting of options will also be accelerated in the event of an employee's death or disability (as defined in the MSIP). Upon a termination for cause (as defined in the MSIP),

F-40


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 18. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

all options held by an employee are immediately cancelled. Following a termination without cause, vested options will generally remain exercisable through the earliest of the expiration of their term or three months following termination of employment (one year in the case of death, disability or retirement at normal retirement age). Unless sooner terminated by the board of directors of Holdings, the MSIP will remain in effect until November 20, 2017.

        In 2011, 2010 and 2009, Holdings completed various equity offerings to certain executives, officers and employees of ServiceMaster pursuant to the MSIP. The shares sold and options granted in connection with these equity offerings are subject to and governed by the terms of the MSIP. In connection with these offerings, Holdings sold a total of 495,538, 97,200 and 234,500 shares of common stock in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, at a purchase price of $11.00 per share in 2011 and $10.00 per share in 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, Holdings granted ServiceMaster's executives, officers and employees options to purchase 2,280,391, 284,400 and 906,000 shares of Holdings common stock in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, at an exercise price of $11.00 per share for options issued in 2011 and $10.00 per share for options issued in 2010 and 2009, respectively. These options are subject to and governed by the terms of the MSIP. The per share purchase price and exercise price was based on the determination by the compensation committee of Holdings of the fair market value of the common stock of Holdings as of the purchase/grant dates.

        All options, except for 86,364 options granted to our CEO in 2011 ("Superperformance Options"), granted to date will vest in four equal annual installments, subject to an employee's continued employment. The four-year vesting period is the requisite service period over which compensation cost will be recognized on a straight-line basis for all grants. The Superperformance Options granted in 2011 will vest immediately in the event that the stock price of Holdings reaches a targeted level. All options issued are accounted for as equity-classified awards. The non-cash stock-based compensation expense associated with the MSIP is pushed down from Holdings and recorded in the financial statements of ServiceMaster.

        The value of each option award was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that incorporates the assumptions noted in the following table. For options granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009, the expected volatilities were based on the historical and implied volatilities of the publicly traded stock of a group of companies comparable to ServiceMaster. The expected life represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and was calculated using the simplified method as outlined by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 107 and 110. The risk-free interest rates were based on the U.S. Treasury securities with terms similar to the expected lives of the options as of the grant dates.

 
  Year Ended Dec. 31,  
Assumption
  2011   2010   2009  

Expected volatility

    31.0% - 50.3 %   31.7% - 34.3 %   38.5% - 46.9 %

Expected dividend yield

    0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %

Expected life (in years)

    6.3     6.3     6.3  

Risk-free interest rate

    1.07% - 2.65 %   1.77% - 2.63 %   2.56% - 2.92 %

        The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the options granted during 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $4.31, $3.65 and $4.36 per option, respectively. The Company has applied a forfeiture assumption of 8.50 percent per annum in the recognition of the expense related to these options, with the exception of the options held by the Company's CEO for which the Company has applied a forfeiture rate of zero.

F-41


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 18. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        A summary of option activity under the MSIP as of December 31, 2011, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

 
  Stock
Options
  Weighted
Avg.
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 

Total outstanding, December 31, 2010

    9,601,683   $ 10.00        

Granted to employees

    2,280,391   $ 11.00        

Exercised

    (500,000 ) $ 10.00        

Forfeited

    (976,225 ) $ 10.00        

Expired

    (782,175 ) $ 10.00        
               

Total outstanding, December 31, 2011

    9,623,674   $ 10.24     6.6  
               

Total exercisable, December 31, 2011

    6,783,358   $ 10.00     5.6  
               

        Holdings granted ServiceMaster's executives, officers and employees 350,454 and 735,000 RSUs in 2011 and 2010, respectively, with grant date fair values of $11.00 and $10.00 per unit, respectively, which was equivalent to the then current fair value of Holdings' common stock. Holdings' Compensation Committee determined the fair market value of Holdings common stock as of December 31, 2011 was $14 per share. No RSUs were granted in 2009. All RSUs, with the exception of the performance-based RSUs discussed below, will vest in three equal annual installments, subject to an employee's continued employment. During 2011, the Company issued 20,000 RSUs with vesting subject to certain performance conditions to the president of TruGreen. These performance-based RSUs will vest as follows: (i) up to 10,000 units will vest on December 31, 2012, and (ii) up to 10,000 units will vest on December 31, 2013 based on the Holdings' Compensation Committee's evaluation of the achievement of certain qualitative performance conditions, in its sole discretion, by the TruGreen president. The performance-based RSUs do not meet the criteria required under ASC 718 for the establishment of a grant date. As a result, the performance-based RSUs are not included in the total outstanding RSUs as of December 31, 2011. Upon vesting, each RSU will be converted into one share of Holdings' common stock.

        A summary of RSU activity under the MSIP as of December 31, 2011, and changes during the year then ended is presented below:

 
  RSUs   Weighted Avg.
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Total outstanding, December 31, 2010

    735,000   $ 10.00  

Granted to employees

    350,454   $ 11.00  

Vested

    (176,669 ) $ 10.00  

Forfeited

    (225,000 ) $ 10.00  
           

Total outstanding, December 31, 2011

    683,785   $ 10.51  
           

        During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $8.4 million ($5.2 million, net of tax), $9.4 million ($5.7 million, net of tax) and $8.1 million ($5.0 million, net of tax), respectively. As of December 31, 2011, there was

F-42


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 18. Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

$15.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and RSUs granted by Holdings under the MSIP. These remaining costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.

        In September 2010, ServiceMaster announced the retirement of its former CEO with a retirement date of March 31, 2011. On September 8, 2010, in connection with the CEO's retirement announcement, Holdings extended the option period on the former CEO's vested standalone options to three years following his departure date. This extension of the option period is considered a stock option modification resulting in additional stock compensation expense of $0.5 million, which was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2010.

Note 19. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The period end carrying amounts of receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The period end carrying amounts of long-term notes receivable approximate fair value as the effective interest rates for these instruments are comparable to market rates at period end. The period end carrying amounts of current and long-term marketable securities also approximate fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported net-of-tax as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, or, for certain unrealized losses, reported in interest and net investment income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations if the decline in value is other than temporary. The carrying amount of total debt was $3.876 billion and $3.949 billion and the estimated fair value was $3.788 billion and $3.958 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The fair values of the Company's financial instruments reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value estimates presented in this report are based on information available to the Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

        The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the market and income approaches. For investments in marketable securities, deferred compensation trust assets and derivative contracts, which are carried at their fair values, the Company's fair value estimates incorporate quoted market prices, other observable inputs (for example, forward interest rates) and unobservable inputs (for example, forward commodity prices) at the balance sheet date.

        Interest rate swap contracts are valued using forward interest rate curves obtained from third party market data providers. The fair value of each contract is the sum of the expected future settlements between the contract counterparties, discounted to present value. The expected future settlements are determined by comparing the contract interest rate to the expected forward interest rate as of each settlement date and applying the difference between the two rates to the notional amount of debt in the interest rate swap contracts. See Note 12 for a summary of the Company's interest rate swap contracts.

        Fuel swap contracts are valued using forward fuel price curves obtained from third party market data providers. The fair value of each contract is the sum of expected future settlements between contract counterparties, discounted to present value. The expected future settlements are determined by comparing the contract fuel price to the expected forward fuel price as of each settlement date and applying the difference between the contract and expected prices to the notional gallons in the fuel swap contracts.

F-43


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 19. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments that are recorded at fair value for the periods presented are as follows:

 
   
  As of December 31, 2011    
   
 
 
   
   
  Estimated Fair Value Measurements    
   
 
 
   
   
  As of
December 31, 2010
 
 
   
   
  Quoted
Prices In
Active
Markets
(Level 1)
  Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   
 
 
   
   
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
(In thousands)
  Balance Sheet
Locations
  Carrying
Value
  Carrying
Value
  Estimated
Fair Value
 

Financial Assets:

                                         

Deferred compensation trust assets

  Long-term marketable securities   $ 10,834   $ 10,834   $   $   $ 10,859   $ 10,859  

Investments in marketable securities

  Marketable securities and long-term marketable securities     131,648     52,358     79,290         129,724     129,724  

Fuel swap contracts:

                                         

Current

  Prepaid expenses and other assets     548             548     5,813     5,813  

Noncurrent

  Other assets                     836     836  
                               

Total financial assets

      $ 143,030   $ 63,192   $ 79,290   $ 548   $ 147,232   $ 147,232  
                               

Financial Liabilities:

                                         

Fuel swap contracts:

                                         

Current

  Other accrued liabilities   $ 1,281   $   $   $ 1,281   $   $  

Interest rate swap contracts

  Other long-term liabilities     23,467         23,467         50,085     50,085  
                               

Total financial liabilities

      $ 24,748   $   $ 23,467   $ 1,281   $ 50,085   $ 50,085  
                               

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair values of financial instruments valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is presented as follows:

(In thousands)
  Fuel Swap
Contract
Assets (Liabilities)
 

Balance as of December 31, 2009

  $ 6,916  

Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized):

       

Included in earnings(1)

    6,015  

Included in other comprehensive income

    (267 )

Settlements, net

    (6,015 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2010

  $ 6,649  

Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized):

       

Included in earnings(1)

    10,010  

Included in other comprehensive income

    (7,382 )

Settlements, net

    (10,010 )
       

Balance as of December 31, 2011

  $ (733 )
       

(1)
Gains (losses) included in earnings are reported in cost of services rendered and products sold.

F-44


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 19. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage risks associated with changes in fuel prices and interest rates. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In designating its derivative financial instruments as hedging instruments under accounting standards for derivative instruments, the Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives to forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the projected changes in cash flows of the associated forecasted transactions. All of the Company's designated hedging instruments are classified as cash flow hedges.

        The Company has historically hedged a significant portion of its annual fuel consumption of approximately 21 million gallons. The Company has also hedged the interest payments on a portion of its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swap agreements. All of the Company's fuel swap contracts and interest rate swap contracts are classified as cash flow hedges, and, as such, the hedging instruments are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as either an asset or liability at fair value, with the effective portion of changes in the fair value attributable to the hedged risks recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Any change in the fair value of the hedging instrument resulting from ineffectiveness, as defined by accounting standards, is recognized in current period earnings. Cash flows related to fuel and interest rate derivatives are classified as operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

        The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is presented as follows:

 
   
  Effective Portion of
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
into Income
   
 
  Effective Portion of
(Loss) Gain Recognized in
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
   
(In thousands)                     
   
Derivatives designated as
Cash Flow Hedge
Relationships
  Location of Gain (Loss)
included in Income
  Year ended December 31, 2011
Fuel swap contracts   $ (7,382 ) $ 9,739   Cost of services rendered and products sold
          $ 271   Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of income tax
Interest rate swap contracts   $ 28,340   $ (37,613 ) Interest expense

 
   
  Effective Portion of
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
into Income
   
 
  Effective Portion of
(Loss) Gain Recognized in
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
   
Derivatives designated as
Cash Flow Hedge
Relationships
  Location of Gain (Loss)
included in Income
  Year ended December 31, 2010
Fuel swap contracts   $ (267 ) $ 5,316   Cost of services rendered and products sold
          $ 699   Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of income tax
Interest rate swap contracts   $ 4,035   $ (48,970 ) Interest expense

F-45


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 19. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        Ineffective portions of derivative instruments designated in accordance with accounting standards as cash flow hedge relationships were insignificant during the year ended December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had fuel swap contracts to pay fixed prices for fuel with an aggregate notional amount of $45.5 million, maturing through 2012. Under the terms of its fuel swap contracts, the Company is required to post collateral in the event that the fair value of the contracts exceeds a certain agreed upon liability level and in other circumstances required by the counterparty. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had posted $3.8 million in letters of credit as collateral under its fuel hedging program, none of which were posted under the Company's Revolving Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had interest rate swap contracts to pay fixed rates for interest on long-term debt with an aggregate notional amount of $1.430 billion, maturing through 2013.

        The effective portion of the gain or loss on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedging instruments is recorded in other comprehensive loss. These amounts are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged forecasted debt interest settlement or the fuel settlement affects earnings. The amount expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months includes unrealized gains and losses related to open fuel hedges and interest rate swaps. Specifically, as the underlying forecasted transactions occur during the next 12 months, the hedging gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be recognized in earnings is a loss of $14.1 million, net of tax, as of December 31, 2011. The amounts that are ultimately reclassified into earnings will be based on actual interest rates and fuel prices at the time the positions are settled and may differ materially from the amount noted above.

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries

        The following condensed consolidating financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared pursuant to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. These condensed consolidating financial statements have been prepared from the Company's financial information on the same basis of accounting as the Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill and other intangible assets have been allocated to all of the subsidiaries of the Company based on management's estimates.

        The payment obligations of the Company under the 2015 Notes and the 2020 Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Guarantors. Each of the Guarantors is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company, and all guarantees are full and unconditional. All other subsidiaries of the Company, either directly or indirectly owned, do not guarantee the 2015 Notes or the 2020 Notes ("Non-Guarantors"). A Guarantor will be released from its obligations under its guarantee under certain customary circumstances, including, (i) the sale or disposition of the Guarantor, (ii) the release of the Guarantor from all of its obligations under all guarantees related to any indebtedness of the Company, (iii) the merger or consolidation of the Guarantor as specified in the indenture governing the 2015 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be, (iv) the Guarantor becomes an unrestricted subsidiary under the indenture governing the 2015 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be, (v) the defeasance of the Company's obligations under the indenture governing the 2015 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be, or (vi) the payment in full of the principal amount of the 2015 Notes or the 2020 Notes, as the case may be.

F-46


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Operating Revenue

  $   $ 2,452,731   $ 811,446   $ (58,305 ) $ 3,205,872  

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                               

Cost of services rendered and products sold

        1,483,220     388,201     (57,715 )   1,813,706  

Selling and administrative expenses

    9,186     499,101     372,630     (425 )   880,492  

Amortization expense

    222     67,443     23,687         91,352  

Trade name impairment

        36,700             36,700  

Restructuring charges

    35     4,678     3,449         8,162  
                       

Total operating costs and expenses

    9,443     2,091,142     787,967     (58,140 )   2,830,412  
                       

Operating (Loss) Income

    (9,443 )   361,589     23,479     (165 )   375,460  

Non-operating Expense (Income):

                               

Interest expense (income)

    189,677     89,819     (6,373 )       273,123  

Interest and net investment loss (income)

    2,969     3,491     (17,346 )       (10,886 )

Loss on extinguishment of debt

    774                 774  

Other expense

            700         700  
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

    (202,863 )   268,279     46,498     (165 )   111,749  

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

    (76,622 )   18,720     101,814         43,912  
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations

    (126,241 )   249,559     (55,316 )   (165 )   67,837  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

        19,497     (46,678 )   165     (27,016 )

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (net of tax)

    167,062     (111,863 )       (55,199 )    
                       

Net Income (Loss)

  $ 40,821   $ 157,193   $ (101,994 ) $ (55,199 ) $ 40,821  
                       

F-47


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)


THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Operating Revenue

  $   $ 2,405,822   $ 777,219   $ (55,647 ) $ 3,127,394  

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                               

Cost of services rendered and products sold

        1,461,057     371,293     (55,046 )   1,777,304  

Selling and administrative expenses

    9,577     516,349     370,208     (184 )   895,950  

Amortization expense

    222     99,918     35,860         136,000  

Restructuring charges (credits)

    1,208     10,484     (244 )       11,448  
                       

Total operating costs and expenses

    11,007     2,087,808     777,117     (55,230 )   2,820,702  
                       

Operating (Loss) Income

    (11,007 )   318,014     102     (417 )   306,692  

Non-operating Expense (Income):

                               

Interest expense

    196,647     76,258     14,028         286,933  

Interest and net investment loss (income)

    1,628     3,596     (14,582 )       (9,358 )

Other expense

            733         733  
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

    (209,282 )   238,160     (77 )   (417 )   28,384  

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

    (73,163 )   25,134     58,974         10,945  
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations

    (136,119 )   213,026     (59,051 )   (417 )   17,439  

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

        17,868     (50,283 )   417     (31,998 )

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (net of tax)

    121,560     (117,729 )       (3,831 )    
                       

Net (Loss) Income

  $ (14,559 ) $ 113,165   $ (109,334 ) $ (3,831 ) $ (14,559 )
                       

F-48


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)


THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Operating Revenue

  $   $ 2,284,625   $ 765,609   $ (72,349 ) $ 2,977,885  

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                               

Cost of services rendered and products sold

        1,419,278     343,011     (71,038 )   1,691,251  

Selling and administrative expenses

    9,582     505,945     315,220         830,747  

Amortization expense

    222     122,643     35,906         158,771  

Trade name impairment

        21,400     5,200         26,600  

Restructuring charges

    2,321     12,107     12,254         26,682  
                       

Total operating costs and expenses

    12,125     2,081,373     711,591     (71,038 )   2,734,051  
                       

Operating (Loss) Income

    (12,125 )   203,252     54,018     (1,311 )   243,834  

Non-operating Expense (Income):

                               

Interest expense (income)

    288,514     (3,414 )   14,233         299,333  

Interest and net investment loss (income)

    938     5,555     (13,572 )       (7,079 )

Gain on extinguishment of debt

    (46,106 )               (46,106 )

Other expense

            748         748  
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

    (255,471 )   201,111     52,609     (1,311 )   (3,062 )

(Benefit) provision for income taxes

    (107,346 )   32,445     65,697         (9,204 )
                       

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations

    (148,125 )   168,666     (13,088 )   (1,311 )   6,142  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

        (4,186 )   10,228     1,311     7,353  

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries (net of tax)

    161,620     (12,716 )       (148,904 )    
                       

Net Income

  $ 13,495   $ 151,764   $ (2,860 ) $ (148,904 ) $ 13,495  
                       

F-49


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Position

As of December 31, 2011

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Assets

                               

Current Assets:

                               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 232,382   $ 13,751   $ 82,797   $   $ 328,930  

Marketable securities

            12,026         12,026  

Receivables

    1,202     108,486     452,149     (187,637 )   374,200  

Inventories

        57,219     2,424         59,643  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

    5,629     12,742     20,218     (294 )   38,295  

Deferred customer acquisition costs

        13,838     16,565         30,403  

Deferred taxes

    39,221     47,218     4,170         90,609  

Assets of discontinued operations

        7     10         17  
                       

Total Current Assets

    278,434     253,261     590,359     (187,931 )   934,123  
                       

Property and Equipment:

                               

At cost

        377,900     163,917         541,817  

Less: accumulated depreciation

        (164,689 )   (70,369 )       (235,058 )
                       

Net property and equipment

        213,211     93,548         306,759  
                       

Other Assets:

                               

Goodwill

        2,796,789     365,191         3,161,980  

Intangible assets, primarily trade names, service marks and trademarks, net

        1,804,619     738,920         2,543,539  

Notes receivable

    1,997,157     82     31,187     (2,005,104 )   23,322  

Long-term marketable securities

    10,834         119,622         130,456  

Investments in and advances to subsidiaries

    2,890,634     872,451         (3,763,085 )    

Other assets

    51,871     3,838     3,926     (50,789 )   8,846  

Debt issuance costs

    37,708         90         37,798  
                       

Total Assets

  $ 5,266,638   $ 5,944,251   $ 1,942,843   $ (6,006,909 ) $ 7,146,823  
                       

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

                               

Current Liabilities:

                               

Accounts payable

  $ 192   $ 46,378   $ 35,071   $   $ 81,641  

Accrued liabilities:

                               

Payroll and related expenses

    1,659     40,608     43,079         85,346  

Self-insured claims and related expenses

        20,400     52,671         73,071  

Accrued interest payable

    67,000     260     45     (294 )   67,011  

Other

    2,919     31,760     35,424         70,103  

Deferred revenue

        142,918     330,324         473,242  

Liabilities of discontinued operations

        279     526         805  

Current portion of long-term debt

    108,428     14,258     116,789     (187,637 )   51,838  
                       

Total Current Liabilities

    180,198     296,861     613,929     (187,931 )   903,057  
                       

Long-Term Debt

    3,782,391     2,015,961     30,784     (2,005,104 )   3,824,032  

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

                               

Deferred taxes

        808,830     278,652     (50,789 )   1,036,693  

Intercompany payable

    12,309         310,011     (322,320 )    

Liabilities of discontinued operations

            2,070         2,070  

Other long-term obligations, primarily self-insured claims

    43,821     220     89,011         133,052  
                       

Total Other Long-Term Liabilities

    56,130     809,050     679,744     (373,109 )   1,171,815  
                       

Shareholder's Equity

    1,247,919     2,822,379     618,386     (3,440,765 )   1,247,919  
                       

Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

  $ 5,266,638   $ 5,944,251   $ 1,942,843   $ (6,006,909 ) $ 7,146,823  
                       

F-50


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Position

As of December 31, 2010

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Assets

                               

Current Assets:

                               

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 132,168   $ 16,900   $ 103,630   $   $ 252,698  

Marketable securities

            30,406         30,406  

Receivables

    1,229     109,680     414,370     (173,185 )   352,094  

Inventories

        52,139     2,593         54,732  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

    10,129     12,583     18,152         40,864  

Deferred customer acquisition costs

        15,163     19,214         34,377  

Deferred taxes

        12,808     391     (1,641 )   11,558  

Assets of discontinued operations

            51,004         51,004  
                       

Total Current Assets

    143,526     219,273     639,760     (174,826 )   827,733  
                       

Property and Equipment:

                               

At cost

        307,468     132,581         440,049  

Less: accumulated depreciation

        (118,614 )   (54,537 )       (173,151 )
                       

Net property and equipment

        188,854     78,044         266,898  
                       

Other Assets:

                               

Goodwill

        2,760,512     364,781         3,125,293  

Intangible assets, primarily trade names, service marks and trademarks, net

        1,895,059     758,452         2,653,511  

Notes receivable

    1,990,383     231     30,269     (1,998,333 )   22,550  

Long-term marketable securities

    10,859         99,318         110,177  

Investments in and advances to subsidiaries

    3,299,019     913,502         (4,212,521 )    

Other assets

    98,425     4,164     882     (96,307 )   7,164  

Debt issuance costs

    52,366                 52,366  

Assets of discontinued operations

            32,398         32,398  
                       

Total Assets

  $ 5,594,578   $ 5,981,595   $ 2,003,904   $ (6,481,987 ) $ 7,098,090  
                       

Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

                               

Current Liabilities:

                               

Accounts payable

  $ 272   $ 46,187   $ 26,186   $   $ 72,645  

Accrued liabilities:

                               

Payroll and related expenses

    1,608     45,031     39,008         85,647  

Self-insured claims and related expenses

        20,430     60,848         81,278  

Accrued interest payable

    69,613     259     (227 )       69,645  

Other

    7,427     37,273     40,055     (1,641 )   83,114  

Deferred revenue

        134,817     314,830         449,647  

Liabilities of discontinued operations

        150     16,150         16,300  

Current portion of long-term debt

    103,654     13,093     105,850     (173,185 )   49,412  
                       

Total Current Liabilities

    182,574     297,240     602,700     (174,826 )   907,688  
                       

Long-Term Debt

    3,868,474     1,699,589     329,345     (1,998,333 )   3,899,075  

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

                               

Deferred taxes

        753,945     277,333     (96,307 )   934,971  

Intercompany payable

    287,220         183,617     (470,837 )    

Liabilities of discontinued operations

            4,848         4,848  

Other long-term obligations

    68,783     535     94,663         163,981  
                       

Total Other Long-Term Liabilities

    356,003     754,480     560,461     (567,144 )   1,103,800  
                       

Shareholder's Equity

    1,187,527     3,230,286     511,398     (3,741,684 )   1,187,527  
                       

Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity

  $ 5,594,578   $ 5,981,595   $ 2,003,904   $ (6,481,987 ) $ 7,098,090  
                       

F-51


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2011

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  $ 132,168   $ 16,900   $ 103,630   $   $ 252,698  
                       

Net Cash Provided from (Used for) Operating Activities from Continuing Operations

    476,575     565,023     (29,251 )   (717,346 )   295,001  
                       

Cash Flows from Investing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Property additions

        (68,189 )   (28,351 )       (96,540 )

Sale of equipment and other assets

        4,433     172         4,605  

Acquisition of The ServiceMaster Company

    (35 )               (35 )

Other business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

        (43,316 )   (1,049 )       (44,365 )

Purchase of other intangibles

        (1,900 )           (1,900 )

Notes receivable, financial investments and securities, net

        633     2,376         3,009  
                       

Net Cash Used for Investing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (35 )   (108,339 )   (26,852 )       (135,226 )
                       

Cash Flows from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Borrowings of debt

            4,000         4,000  

Payments of debt

    (91,500 )   (13,119 )   (1,286 )       (105,905 )

Shareholders' dividends

        (573,412 )   (143,934 )   717,346      

Debt issuance costs paid

    (267 )               (267 )

Net intercompany advances

    (284,559 )   100,224     184,335          
                       

Net Cash (Used for) Provided from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (376,326 )   (486,307 )   43,115     717,346     (102,172 )
                       

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:

                               

Cash provided from (used for) operating activities

        340     (6,228 )       (5,888 )

Cash provided from (used for) investing investing activities:

                               

Proceeds from sale of business

        26,134             26,134  

Other investing activities

            (1,617 )       (1,617 )
                       

Net Cash Provided from (Used for) Discontinued Operations

        26,474     (7,845 )       18,629  
                       

Cash Increase (Decrease) During the Period

    100,214     (3,149 )   (20,833 )       76,232  
                       

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $ 232,382   $ 13,751   $ 82,797   $   $ 328,930  
                       

F-52


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  $ 124,674   $ 17,689   $ 112,993   $   $ 255,356  
                       

Net Cash Provided from (Used for) Operating Activities from Continuing Operations

    296,963     460,679     (62,561 )   (472,537 )   222,544  
                       

Cash Flows from Investing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Property additions

        (82,594 )   (51,640 )       (134,234 )

Sale of equipment and other assets

        1,003     352         1,355  

Acquisition of The ServiceMaster Company

    (2,245 )               (2,245 )

Other business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

        (57,724 )   (217 )       (57,941 )

Purchase of other intangibles

        (2,500 )           (2,500 )

Notes receivable, financial investments and securities, net

    22,012         (1,585 )       20,427  
                       

Net Cash Provided from (Used for) Investing Activities from Continuing Operations

    19,767     (141,815 )   (53,090 )       (175,138 )
                       

Cash Flows from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Borrowings of debt

    5,000         10,000         15,000  

Payments of debt

    (32,250 )   (15,325 )   (13,758 )       (61,333 )

Shareholders' dividends

        (413,197 )   (59,340 )   472,537      

Debt issuance costs paid

            (30 )       (30 )

Net intercompany advances

    (281,986 )   108,869     173,117          
                       

Net Cash (Used for) Provided from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (309,236 )   (319,653 )   109,989     472,537     (46,363 )
                       

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:

                               

Cash provided from operating activities

            6,776         6,776  

Cash used for investing investing activities

            (10,477 )       (10,477 )
                       

Net Cash Used for Discontinued Operations

            (3,701 )       (3,701 )
                       

Cash Increase (Decrease) During the Period

    7,494     (789 )   (9,363 )       (2,658 )
                       

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $ 132,168   $ 16,900   $ 103,630   $   $ 252,698  
                       

F-53


Table of Contents


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 20. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of The ServiceMaster Company and Subsidiaries (Continued)

THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

(In thousands)

 
  The
ServiceMaster
Company
  Guarantors   Non-
Guarantors
  Eliminations   Consolidated  

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

  $ 300,362   $ 13,865   $ 93,120   $   $ 407,347  
                       

Net Cash Provided from Operating Activities from Continuing Operations

    252,927     424,092     16,772     (525,459 )   168,332  
                       

Cash Flows from Investing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Property additions

        (47,708 )   (8,296 )       (56,004 )

Sale of equipment and other assets

        1,536     118         1,654  

Acquisition of The ServiceMaster Company

    (1,695 )               (1,695 )

Other business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

        (32,647 )           (32,647 )

Notes receivable, financial investments and securities, net

            6,151         6,151  
                       

Net Cash Used for Investing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (1,695 )   (78,819 )   (2,027 )       (82,541 )
                       

Cash Flows from Financing Activities from Continuing Operations:

                               

Borrowings of debt

                     

Payments of debt

    (233,260 )   (17,127 )   (2,498 )         (252,885 )

Shareholders' dividends

        (426,359 )   (99,100 )   525,459      

Debt issuance costs paid

    (426 )               (426 )

Net intercompany advances

    (193,234 )   102,037     91,197          
                       

Net Cash Used for Financing Activities from Continuing Operations

    (426,920 )   (341,449 )   (10,401 )   525,459     (253,311 )
                       

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:

                               

Cash provided from operating activities

            21,426         21,426  

Cash used for investing activities

            (5,897 )       (5,897 )
                       

Net Cash Provided from Discontinued Operations

            15,529         15,529  
                       

Cash (Decrease) Increase During the Period

    (175,688 )   3,824     19,873         (151,991 )
                       

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $ 124,674   $ 17,689   $ 112,993   $   $ 255,356  
                       

F-54


Table of Contents

Quarterly Operating Results (Unaudited)

        Quarterly operating results for the last two years in revenue, gross profit, (loss) income from continuing operations, (loss) income from discontinued operations and net (loss) income are shown in the table below. As discussed in the "Interim Reporting" section in the Significant Accounting Policies, for interim accounting purposes, TruGreen and other business segments of the Company incur pre-season advertising costs. In addition, TruGreen incurs costs related to annual repairs and maintenance procedures that are performed in the first quarter. These costs are deferred and recognized as expense in proportion to revenue over the balance of the year. Full year results are not affected.

 
  2011  
(in thousands)
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year  

Operating Revenue

  $ 614,671   $ 967,440   $ 930,920   $ 692,841   $ 3,205,872  

Gross Profit

    244,102     446,806     413,164     288,094     1,392,166  

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations(1)(2)

    (25,295 )   60,562     47,215     (14,645 )   67,837  

(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations, net of income taxes(3)

    (21,101 )   (3,842 )   (1,487 )   (586 )   (27,016 )

Net (Loss) Income(1)(2)(3)

    (46,396 )   56,720     45,728     (15,231 )   40,821  

 

 
  2010  
(in thousands)
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year  

Operating Revenue

  $ 580,608   $ 939,599   $ 918,982   $ 688,205   $ 3,127,394  

Gross Profit

    226,129     426,323     413,640     283,998     1,350,090  

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations(1)

    (34,455 )   43,388     8,341     165     17,439  

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of income taxes(4)

    1,795     (30,944 )   (3,051 )   202     (31,998 )

Net (Loss) Income(1)(4)

    (32,660 )   12,444     5,290     367     (14,559 )

(1)
The results include restructuring charges related to a reorganization of field leadership and a restructuring of branch operations at TruGreen, a branch optimization project at Terminix, information technology outsourcing and initiatives to enhance capabilities and reduce costs in our centers of excellence at Other Operations and Headquarters and other restructuring costs. The table below summarizes the pre-tax and after-tax restructuring charges, by quarter, for 2010 and 2011.

 
  2011  
(in thousands)
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year  

Pre-tax

  $ (2,589 ) $ (94 ) $ (1,593 ) $ (3,886 ) $ (8,162 )

After-tax

  $ (1,584 ) $ (59 ) $ (976 ) $ (2,372 ) $ (4,991 )

 

 
  2010  
(in thousands)
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year  

Pre-tax

  $ (3,353 ) $ (4,080 ) $ (1,563 ) $ (2,452 ) $ (11,448 )

After-tax

  $ (2,064 ) $ (2,525 ) $ (962 ) $ (1,473 ) $ (7,024 )

F-55


Table of Contents

(2)
During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $36.7 million ($22.4 million, net of tax) to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen's trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

(3)
During the first quarter of 2011, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $34.2 million ($21.0 million, net of tax) to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's assets to their estimated fair value less cost to sell in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Upon completion of the sale, a $6.2 million loss on sale ($1.9 million, net of tax) was recorded. The loss on the disposition of the TruGreen LandCare business continues to be subject to certain post-closing adjustments and disputes, and such adjustments could be significant to the sale price.

(4)
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $46.9 million ($28.7 million, net of tax) to reduce the carrying value of TruGreen LandCare's goodwill and trade names as a result of the Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

F-56


Table of Contents

$600,000,000

LOGO

8% Senior Notes due 2020



Offer to Exchange

$600,000,000 Outstanding 8% Senior Notes due 2020

for

$600,000,000 Registered 8% Senior Notes due 2020

PROSPECTUS

              , 2012



DEALER PROSPECTUS DELIVERY OBLIGATION

        Until         , 2012, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.



   


Table of Contents


PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS

ITEM 20.    INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Each of The ServiceMaster Company, ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, ServiceMaster Management Corporation, Terminix International, Inc. and TruGreen, Inc. is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.

        Section 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, or the "DGCL," permits a Delaware corporation to include a provision in its certificate of incorporation eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. This provision, however, may not eliminate or limit a director's liability (1) for breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (2) for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (3) under Section 174 of the DGCL, or (4) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

        Section 145(a) of the DGCL provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the person's conduct was unlawful.

        Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.

        Section 145(c) of the DGCL provides that to the extent that a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 145 of the DGCL, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith.

        Section 145(e) of the DGCL provides that expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred by an officer or director of the corporation in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative

II-1


Table of Contents

action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation as authorized in Section 145 of the DGCL. Such expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred by former directors and officers or other persons serving at the request of the corporation as directors, officers, employees or agents of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as the corporation deems appropriate.

        Section 145(g) of the DGCL specifically allows a Delaware corporation to purchase liability insurance on behalf of its directors and officers and to insure against potential liability of such directors and officers regardless of whether the corporation would have the power to indemnify such directors and officers under Section 145 of the DGCL.

        ServiceMaster's amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the personal liability of our directors and officers for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholder for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for the following:

        Article Eight of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation ("Article Eight") provides that no person shall have any liability of any kind by reason of a Relevant Loss (as defined below) caused in whole or in part by any act or failure to act which occurred while such person was an officer or director of the Company except: (i) obligations arising under the express terms of any written contract to which such person is a party; (ii) the obligation to return to the Company an amount up to the value actually realized by such person by stealing or by any other action which constitutes a criminal felony; (iii) any liability imposed by contract or applicable law which is founded on, arises from or is related to activities by such person (or such person's agents or affiliates) which are in competition with any business of the Company or any of its affiliates; and (iv) any other liability from which it shall not be possible to exempt such person under applicable law either as constituted on the date on which our amended and restated certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware (the "Filing Date") or at any time thereafter. The term "Relevant Loss" designates and includes any loss, damage or expense of any kind (i) experienced for any reason by the Company or by any entity controlled by the Company; (ii) which any person may experience by reason of any purchase (or failure to purchase), maintenance of an interest in, sale (or failure to sell) or failure to obtain payment of any amount due on any note, debenture, preferred stock, common stock or other security issued or issuable by the Company or (iii) which shall otherwise be caused in whole or in part by or arise in connection with (or would not have occurred but for) such person's service as a director or officer of the Company. In addition, Article Eight provides that every director of the Company shall be exempt (except to the extent expressly set forth therein) from any personal liability to the Company or any of the Company's stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director of the Company to the fullest extent permitted by (i) Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL as constituted on the

II-2


Table of Contents

Filing Date or (ii) any provision of the law of the State of Delaware as constituted at any time after December 11, 1991.

        Except as otherwise provided in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, Article Nine of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation ("Article Nine") provides that the Company shall indemnify any person against, and shall reimburse such person, for any amount which such person shall pay to satisfy, settle or otherwise deal with, any attempt to impose any liability or obligation of any kind upon such person if such attempt or such liability or obligation or both shall arise in connection with or by reason of, or would not have arisen but for, Covered Service (defined below) by such person (or any agreement by such person to serve as a director or officer of the Company or to provide other Covered Service) including, but not limited to: (i) any claim resulting from any loss, injury, damage, harm or other disadvantage which the Company, any affiliate, any employee plan or any person who acquires, holds, or disposes of any interest in any security issued by the Company suffers or is alleged to have suffered; (ii) any claim resulting from any act or failure to act by any person which is (or is alleged to be) beyond the scope of his or her authority, contrary to instructions or orders or contrary to his or her duties or applicable law; and (iii) any attempt by any governmental authority or other person to impose any fine or penalty or to obtain any other recovery by reason of any actual or alleged breach of any law or other governmental requirement.

        The term "Covered Service" designates and includes: (a) service as a director or officer of the Company; (b) service by a person while he or she is an officer or director of the Company (i) as an agent or representative of the Company, (ii) in any other capacity with the Company, (iii) as a director, officer, employee, agent or representative of, or in any other capacity with, any affiliate, (iv) in any capacity with any Employee Plan (as defined therein), and (v) in any other capacity in which such person shall have been asked to serve by the Company's Board of Directors or Chief Executive Officer; (c) any services which constituted "Covered Service" under the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Limited Partnership; and (d) any other service of any kind by any person with any organization or entity of any kind (whether or not affiliated with the Company) which shall be designated in writing as Covered Service by a majority of the members of the Company's Board of Directors or by the Company's Chief Executive Officer. Service is deemed to constitute "Covered Service" if it is so designated by the terms in the preceding sentence regardless of whether it shall have been performed prior to, at, or after the time Article Nine became part of the Company's amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Any person is entitled to rely upon any written confirmation provided by the Company's Chief Executive Officer or by the Company's Board of Directors that service by such person in any capacity specified in such confirmation will constitute Covered Service and to rely upon the protection afforded by Article Nine in connection with such service.

        Except to the extent the Company shall otherwise expressly agree in writing, the Company is not obligated under Article Nine to reimburse any person for or otherwise indemnify any person against: (a) any obligation the person may have under any written contract except to the extent such obligation arises by reason of any action taken by such person to satisfy, settle or otherwise deal with any claim against which such person is entitled to indemnification from the Company under Article Nine or otherwise; (b) any income taxes payable by reason of salary, bonus or other income or gain actually realized by such person in connection with any Covered Service; (c) any liability imposed by contract or applicable law which is founded on, arises from or is related to activities by such person (or such person's agents or affiliates) which are in competition with any business of the Company or any of its affiliates; and (d) any obligation to pay an amount up to the value personally realized by such person by stealing or by any other action which constitutes a criminal felony. Except as otherwise provided in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Company is not obligated under Article Nine to indemnify any person in

II-3


Table of Contents

connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company.

        Article Nine provides that each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of the Company, agreed to serve as a director or officer of the Company or is or was providing any other Covered Service, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director or officer of the Company or in any other Covered Service position, shall, except as otherwise provided therein, be indemnified and held harmless by the Company to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware law against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines, excise taxes or penalties arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act as amended from time to time and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Company or to provide any other Covered Service and shall inure to the heirs, executors and administrators of such person.

        Article Nine provides that the Company shall reimburse any Covered Person (defined below) for any payment made by such person for any legal fees or other expenses reasonably incurred by such person in order to investigate, evaluate, defend against, pay in full, settle or otherwise deal with (i) any Covered Claim (defined below) or (ii) any development or state of facts which could give rise to a Covered Claim.

        The term "Covered Claim" designates and includes: (i) any action, suit, or proceeding (whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative) in connection with which any person shall be entitled to any payment or indemnification under or by reason of Article Nine and (ii) any other attempt to impose any liability or obligation upon any person in connection with which the corporation shall be obligated to provide any payment or indemnification under or by reason of Article Nine.

        Each of the following shall be deemed a "Covered Person" for purposes of Article Nine: (a) any person who served or shall serve at any time as a director or officer of the corporation and (b) any other person who provided or shall provide Covered Service at any time. In the event any particular Covered Person shall become incapacitated or die, then (a) the corporation shall become obligated to provide indemnification and payments to each person to whom responsibility for any Covered Claim shall pass by reason of such incapacity or death to the same extent the corporation would have been obligated to provide indemnification any payments to the Covered Person if such incapacity or death had not occurred and (b) each person to whom the Covered Person's rights shall pass by reason of such incapacity or death (i) shall be entitled to enforce all rights arising under or by reason of Article Nine to the same extent to which the Covered Person could have enforced such rights if such incapacity or death had not occurred and (ii) shall also be deemed to be a "Covered Person" for purposes of Article Nine.

        Article Nine also provides that any officer of the Company or any member of its Board of Directors shall have the right and power to execute on behalf of the Company any written contract with any other person providing indemnification or other protection to such other person in connection with service by such other person as a director or officer of the Company or in connection with any other Covered Service by such person, and any such contract shall be legal, valid and binding upon the Company and shall be enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms to the maximum extent permitted by Article Nine or by applicable law, if it shall be approved by a majority of the members of the Company's Board of Directors exclusive of the person to whom indemnification is provided by such contract. The rights of any person under any particular contract made in accordance with the provisions of the preceding sentence shall not be impaired or eliminated (i) by reason of the fact that all or any one or more of the members of the

II-4


Table of Contents

Company's Board of Directors who approved such contracts shall be parties to contracts affording them similar protection (regardless of when those other contracts shall have been approved or signed) or shall otherwise have been provided with protection similar to that provided in the particular contract or shall be subject to the same claims against which the particular contract is intended to protect or (ii) for any other reason whatsoever. It is expressly intended that each person with whom the Company shall enter into a written contract to provide indemnification or other protection in connection with such person's service as an officer or director of the Company or in connection with other Covered Service by such person shall be entitled to rely upon (and shall conclusively be presumed to have relied upon) the rights which such contract purports to provide to such person. No separate written contract shall, however, be necessary in order for any person to obtain any indemnification or payment to which Article Nine purports to entitle such person, and any Covered Person who has no separate contract of any kind with the Company shall be entitled to receive all indemnification, payments and other benefits which the provisions of Article Nine purport to provide to such Covered Person.

        The certificate of incorporation and/or bylaws of each of The ServiceMaster Company, ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, ServiceMaster Management Corporation, Terminix International, Inc. and TruGreen, Inc. provide that each of such corporations shall indemnify its directors to the maximum extent permitted by the DGCL.

Each of MM Maids L.L.C., SM Clean L.L.C. and TruGreen Companies L.L.C. is organized as a limited liability company under the laws of the state of Delaware.

        Section 18-108 of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del. C. § 18-101, et seq.) (the "Delaware LLC Act") provides that, subject to such standards and restrictions, if any, as are set forth in its limited liability company agreement, a limited liability company may, and shall have the power to, indemnify and hold harmless any member or manager or other person from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever.

        Section 18-406 of the Delaware LLC Act provides that a member, manager or liquidating trustee of a limited liability company shall be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the records of the limited liability company and upon information, opinions, reports or statements presented by another manager, member or liquidating trustee, an officer or employee of the limited liability company, or committees of the limited liability company, members or managers, or by any other person as to matters the member, manager or liquidating trustees reasonably believes are within such other person's professional or expert competence, including information, opinions, reports or statements as to the value and amount of the assets, liabilities, profits or losses of the limited liability company, or the value and amount of assets or reserves or contracts, agreements or other undertakings that would be sufficient to pay claims and obligations of the limited liability company or to make reasonable provision to pay such claims and obligations, or any other facts pertinent to the existence and amount of assets from which distributions to members or creditors might properly be paid.

        Section 18-1101(d) of the Delaware LLC Act provides that unless otherwise provided in a limited liability company agreement, a member or manager or other person shall not be liable to a limited liability company or to another member or manager or to another person that is a party to or is otherwise bound by a limited liability company agreement for breach of fiduciary duty for the member's or manager's or other person's good faith reliance on the provisions of the limited liability company agreement. The limited liability company agreements of MM Maids L.L.C., SM Clean L.L.C. and TruGreen Companies L.L.C. do not contain specific provisions that override Section 18-1101(d) of the Delaware LLC Act.

II-5


Table of Contents

        Section 18-1101(e) of the Delaware LLC Act permits a limited liability company agreement to limit or eliminate any and all liabilities for breach of contract and breach of duties (including fiduciary duties) of a member, manager or other person to a limited liability company or to another member or manager or to another person that is a party to or is otherwise bound by a limited liability company agreement. However, under Section 18-1101(e) of the Delaware LLC Act, a limited liability company agreement may not limit or eliminate liability for any act or omission that constitutes a bad faith violation of the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The limited liability company agreements of MM Maids L.L.C., SM Clean L.L.C. and TruGreen Companies L.L.C. do not contain specific provisions that limit or eliminate liabilities for breach of contract and breach of duties (including fiduciary duties) of a member, manager or other person as permitted by Section 18-1101(e) of the Delaware LLC Act.

        MM Maids L.L.C. and SM Clean L.L.C. each have operating agreements which provide that the company will indemnify each person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he, she or it is or was serving at the request of the company as an officer of the company against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually incurred by him, her or it in connection with such proceeding if he, she or it acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his, her or its conduct was unlawful.

        TruGreen Companies L.L.C. has an operating agreement that provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, officers of the company shall be entitled to indemnification from the company for any costs, losses, liabilities and damages paid or accrued by such officer in connection with the business of the company.

Each of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and TruGreen Limited Partnership is organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the state of Delaware.

        Section 17-108 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (6 Del. C. § 17-101, et seq.) (the "Delaware LP Act") provides that, subject to such standards and restrictions, if any, as are set forth in its partnership agreement, a limited partnership may, and shall have the power to, indemnify and hold harmless any partner or other person from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever.

        Section 17-407(a) of the Delaware LP Act provides that a limited partner or liquidating trustee of a limited partnership shall be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the records of the limited partnership and upon information, opinions, reports or statements presented by a general partner of the limited partnership, an officer or employee of a general partner of the limited partnership, another liquidating trustee, or committees of the limited partnership, limited partners or partners, or by any other person as to matters the limited partner or liquidating trustee reasonably believes are within such other person's professional or expert competence, including information, opinions, reports or statements as to the value and amount of the assets, liabilities, profits or losses of the limited partnership, or the value and amount of assets or reserves or contracts, agreements or other undertakings that would be sufficient to pay claims and obligations of the limited partnership or to make reasonable provision to pay such claims and obligations, or any other facts pertinent to the existence and amount of assets from which distributions to partners or creditors might properly be paid.

II-6


Table of Contents

        Section 17-407(c) of the Delaware LP Act provides that general partner of a limited partnership that is not a limited liability limited partnership shall be fully protected from liability to the limited partnership, its partners or other persons party to or otherwise bound by the partnership agreement in relying in good faith upon the records of the limited partnership and upon information, opinions, reports or statements presented by another general partner of the limited partnership, an officer or employee of the limited partnership, a liquidating trustee, or committees of the limited partnership, limited partners or partners, or by any other person as to matters the general partner reasonably believes are within such other person's professional or expert competence, including information, opinions, reports or statements as to the value and amount of the assets, liabilities, profits or losses of the limited partnership, or the value and amount of assets or reserves or contracts, agreements or other undertakings that would be sufficient to pay claims and obligations of the limited partnership or to make reasonable provision to pay such claims and obligations, or any other facts pertinent to the existence and amount of assets from which distributions to partners or creditors might properly be paid.

        Section 17-1101(e) of the Delaware LP Act provides that, unless otherwise provided in a partnership agreement, a partner or other person shall not be liable to a limited partnership or to another partner or to another person that is a party to or is otherwise bound by a partnership agreement for breach of fiduciary duty for the partner's or other person's good faith reliance on the provisions of the partnership agreement. The partnership agreements of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and TruGreen Limited Partnership do not contain specific provisions that override Section 17-1101(e) of the Delaware LP Act. The partnership agreements of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and TruGreen Limited Partnership limit the liabilities of the general partner, its affiliates and their directors, officers, partners, employees and agents.

        Section 17-1101(f) of the Delaware LP Act provides that a partnership agreement may provide for the limitation or elimination of any and all liabilities for breach of contract and breach of duties (including fiduciary duties) of a partner or other person to a limited partnership or to another partner or to an other person that is a party to or is otherwise bound by a partnership agreement. However, under Section 17-1101(f) of the Delaware LP Act, a partnership agreement may not limit or eliminate liability for any act or omission that constitutes a bad faith violation of the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

        The Agreement of Limited Partnership of each of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership and TruGreen Limited Partnership states that the partnership shall indemnify and hold harmless the general partner, its affiliates and their directors, officers, partners, employees and agents against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities (joint and several), expenses (including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings (civil, criminal, administrative or investigative), in which he, she or it may be involved, or threatened to be involved, as a party or otherwise by reason of his, her or its relationship with the partnership, which relate to or arise out of the partnership or its property, business or affairs, regardless of whether he, she or it continues to have a relationship with the partnership at the time any such liability or expense is paid or incurred, if (a) he, she or it acted in good faith and in a manner he, she or it in good faith believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the partnership, and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his, her or its conduct was unlawful, and (b) his, her or its conduct did not constitute gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct.

II-7


Table of Contents

        The Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership states that the partnership shall indemnify and hold harmless the general partner, its affiliates and their directors, officers, partners, employees and agents against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities (joint and several), expenses (including legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings (civil, criminal, administrative or investigative), in which he, she or it may be involved, or threatened to be involved, as a party or otherwise by reason of any actions or failure to act by such person relating in any way to the partnership or arising out of the partnership or its property, business or affairs, regardless of whether such person continues to have a relationship with the partnership at the time any such liability or expense is paid or incurred, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner it in good faith believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the partnership, and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe its conduct was unlawful.

Indemnification Agreements

        Holdings and ServiceMaster have entered into indemnification agreements with certain of the Equity Sponsors and Holdings' stockholders affiliated with certain of the Equity Sponsors, pursuant to which Holdings and ServiceMaster will indemnify those Equity Sponsors, the Holdings' stockholders affiliated with those Equity Sponsors and their respective affiliates, directors, officers, partners, members, employees, agents, representatives, and controlling persons, against certain liabilities arising out of performance of the consulting agreements with such Equity Sponsors and certain other claims and liabilities, including liabilities arising out of financing arrangements and securities offerings.

Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance

        Holdings has obtained directors' and officers' liability insurance which insures against certain liabilities that directors and officers of Holdings and its subsidiaries, including ServiceMaster and its subsidiaries, may, in such capacities, incur.

II-8


Table of Contents

ITEM 21.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

        (a)   Exhibits.

        The following exhibits are included as exhibits to this Registration Statement.


Exhibit List

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, amended as of July 24, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2007 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2007 8-K"))
        
  3.2   Amended and Restated By-Laws, amended as of July 24, 2007, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  3.3   Certificate of Limited Partnership of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated October 22, 2008 (File No. 333-154648 (the "S-1"))
        
  3.4 # Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  3.5   Certificate of Formation of MM Maids L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the S-1.
        
  3.6   Operating Agreement of MM Maids L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the S-1.
        
  3.7   Certificate of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the S-1.
        
  3.8   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the S-1.
        
  3.9   Certificate of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to the S-1.
        
  3.10   Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to the S-1.
        
  3.11   Articles of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to the S-1.
        
  3.12   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the S-1.
        
  3.13   Certificate of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Management Corporation, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the S-1.
        
  3.14   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Management Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to the S-1.
        
  3.15 # Certificate of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  3.16 # Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, as amended.

II-9


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.17   Certificate of Formation of SM Clean L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to the S-1.
        
  3.18   Operating Agreement of SM Clean L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.20 to the S-1.
        
  3.19   Certificate of Incorporation of Terminix International, Inc., as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.21 to the S-1.
        
  3.20   Bylaws of Terminix International, Inc., as amended, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.22 to the S-1.
        
  3.21   Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23 to the S-1.
        
  3.22 # Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership.
        
  3.23   Certificate of Formation of TruGreen Companies L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.25 to the S-1.
        
  3.24   Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of TruGreen Companies L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.26 to the S-1.
        
  3.25   Certificate of Incorporation of TruGreen, Inc., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.27 to the S-1.
        
  3.26   Bylaws of TruGreen, Inc., are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.28 to the S-1.
        
  3.27   Certificate of Limited Partnership of TruGreen Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.31 to the S-1.
        
  3.28 # Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of TruGreen Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  4.1   Indenture dated as of August 15, 1997 between The ServiceMaster Company (the "Company") (as successor to ServiceMaster Limited Partnership and The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership) and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-32167 (the "1997 S-3")).
        
  4.2   First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 15, 1997 between the Company (as successor to ServiceMaster Limited Partnership and The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership) and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.3   Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 1998 between the Company and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 1998 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.4   Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 1998 between the Company and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 1998 (File No. 001-14762 (the "1998 8-K")).

II-10


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  4.5   Form of 7.45% Note due August 14, 2027 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 1997 S-3.
  4.6   Form of 7.10% Note due March 1, 2018 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the 1998 8-K.
        
  4.7   Form of 7.25% Note due March 1, 2038 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 1998 8-K.
        
  4.8   Indenture, dated July 24, 2008, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time parties thereto and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.9   Form of 10.75%/11.50% Senior Toggle Note due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.8 hereto)
        
  4.10   First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 13, 2008, among TruGreen LandCare, the Company, each existing Subsidiary Guarantor under the Indenture and Wilmington Trust FSB is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-154648 (the "2009 S-1"))
        
  4.11   Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2012 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2012 8-K")).
        
  4.12   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  4.13   Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 13, 2012, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the initial purchasers, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  4.14   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 16, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.15   Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 16, 2012, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the initial purchasers, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.16   Form of 8% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.11 hereto).
        
  5.1 # Opinion of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.
        
  5.2 # Opinion of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
 
   

II-11


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.1   Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, among CDRSVM Acquisition Co., Inc., certain other Loan Parties (as defined therein), the lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (in such capacity, the "Term Loan Administrative Agent") and collateral agent (in such capacity, the "Term Loan Collateral Agent") and letter of credit facility issuing bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.2   Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, between CDRSVM Acquisition Co., Inc. and the Company is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.3   Term Loan Amendment Letter, dated as of July 30, 2007, among the Company, the Commitment Letter Lenders and Joint Lead Arrangers (each as defined therein) parties thereto, and the other parties thereto is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.4   Term Loan Assumption Agreement dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.5   Term Loan Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare, L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.6   Term Loan Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen Companies L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.7   Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and the other Granting Parties (as defined therein), in favor of the Term Loan Administrative Agent and the Term Loan Collateral Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.8   Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, in favor of the Term Loan Collateral Agent and Term Loan Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.9   Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, among the Company, certain other Loan Parties (as defined therein), the lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (in such capacity, the "Revolving Administrative Agent"), collateral agent (in such capacity, the "Revolving Collateral Agent") and issuing bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.10   Revolving Credit Assumption Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.11   Revolving Credit Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare, L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
 
   

II-12


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.12   Revolving Credit Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen Companies L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.13   Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2011, among the Company, certain other loan parties, the lenders thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.14   Extension Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2012, among the Company, certain other loan parties, the lenders thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  10.15   Increase Supplement, dated as of January 30, 2012, between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as increasing lender, and the Company is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  10.16   Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, between the Revolving Administrative Agent and Revolving Collateral Agent and the Term Loan Administrative Agent and Term Loan Collateral Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.17   Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and the other Granting Parties (as defined therein), in favor of the Revolving Collateral Agent and the Revolving Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.18   Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, in favor of the Revolving Collateral Agent and Revolving Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.19   Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among the Company; ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"); and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2009 10-K")).
        
  10.20   Form of Consulting Agreement entered into among the Company; Holdings; Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC (assigned to StepStone Group LLC in 2010); BAS Capital Funding Corporation; and JPMorgan Chase is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.21   Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2011, by and between the Company and Holdings is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.22   Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated December 22, 2011, by and among the Company, Holdings and BAS Capital Funding Corporation is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
 
   

II-13


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.23   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among the Company; Holdings; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P.; CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P.; CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC; and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Holdings, L.P is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.24   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., BAS Capital Funding Corporation, BACSVM, L.P., Banc of America Strategic Investments Corporation, Banc of America Capital Management V, L.P., BACM I GP, LLC and BA Equity Co-Invest GP LLC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.25   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and Citigroup Capital Partners II 2007 Citigroup Investment, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Employee Master Fund, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P., CPE Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC and Citigroup Private Equity LP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.26   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and JP Morgan Chase Funding, Inc is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.27 * Annual Bonus Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the April 16, 2003 Proxy Statement relating to the Company's 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 21, 2003 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.28 * ServiceMaster Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 14, 2005 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.29 * Employment Agreement dated August 16, 2006, effective as of June 30, 2006, between the Company and J. Patrick Spainhour is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2006 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.30 * Letter Agreement with J. Patrick Spainhour, executed on September 8, 2010, related to calculation of Mr. Spainhour's benefits upon retirement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.31 * Employment Agreement dated as of February 16, 2011, by and between Harry J. Mullany III and Holdings is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2011 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2011 8-K")).
        
  10.32 * Amended and Restated Offer of Employment letter, dated March 24, 2010, between the Company and Steve Donly is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.33 * Separation Agreement and General Release entered into on April 29, 2011, between the Company and Steven J. Martin is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
 
   

II-14


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.34 * Offer Letter dated April 29, 2011, between the Company and David W. Martin related to his appointment as the Company's Interim Chief Financial Officer is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.35 * Separation Agreement and General Release entered into on May 16, 2011, between the Company and Stephen M. Donly is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.36 * Employment Offer Letter executed on August 15, 2011, between the Company and Roger A. Cregg related to his appointment as the Company's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.37 * Employment Offer Letter dated November 3, 2011 and supplemental letter dated November 22, 2011, between the Company and Thomas J. Coba related to his appointment as the President of ServiceMaster Clean and Merry Maids is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2011 10-K")).
        
  10.38 * Employment Offer Letter dated November 15, 2011 and the letter of clarification dated December 1, 2011, between the Company and Charles M. Fallon related to his appointment as the President of Terminix is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.39 * Thomas G. Bracket compensation letter dated December 2, 2011 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.40 * Severance Agreement dated as of December 5, 2011, between the Company and Charles M. Fallon is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.41 * Amended and Restated ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended as of February 16, 2011 (the "MSIP"), is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.42 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2007 10-K")).
        
  10.43 * Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.44 * Form of Employee Deferred Share Unit Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.45 * Form of Participation Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.46 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement under the MSIP related to stock option exercises is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
 
   

II-15


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.47 * Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.48 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.49 * Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.50 * Form of Employee (Superperformance) Stock Option Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.51 * Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.52 * Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2011, for performance based RSUs awarded to Thomas G. Brackett is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.53   First Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated November 1, 2010, by and between ServiceMaster Consumer Services, L.P., and International Business Machines Corporation including the First Amended and Restated Transaction Document No. 1 thereunder and all related exhibits and schedules (portions omitted pursuant to registrant's request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No 001-14762).
        
  10.54   Purchase Agreement among TruGreen Companies L.L.C. and Commercial Finance Services 110-A, LLC and, solely for purposes of complying with its obligations under Section 8.5 and Section 13.17, The ServiceMaster Company, dated as of April 21, 2011, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.55   Trademark License Agreement between TruGreen Companies L.L.C. and TruGreen LandCare L.L.C., dated as of April 21, 2011, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.56   Sixth Amendment dated March 27, 2012 between ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership and International Business Machines Corporation amending the First Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement and the related First Amended and Restated Transaction Document No. 1, both dated November 1, 2010.
        
  12.1   Statement regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 12 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  21.1   List of Subsidiaries, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  23.1   Consent of Deloitte &Touche LLP.
        
  23.2   Consent of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
        
  23.3   Consent of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. (included in Exhibit 5.2).
        
  23.4 # Consent of NorthStar Partners

II-16


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  23.5 # Consent of Warranty Week
        
  25.1 # Form T-1 Statement of Eligibility of Wilmington Trust, National Association.
        
  99.1   Form of Letter of Transmittal.
        
  99.2 # Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
        
  99.3 # Form of Letter to Nominee.
        
  99.4 # Form of Letter to Clients.
        
  99.5 # Instruction to Registered Holder or DTC Participant From Beneficial Owner.
        
  101.INS # XBRL Instance Document
        
  101.SCH # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
        
  101.CAL # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
        
  101.DEF # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
        
  101.LAB # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
        
  101.PRE # XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase

*
Indicates management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

#
Previously filed

II-17


Table of Contents

(b)
Financial Statement Schedule


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
The ServiceMaster Company
Memphis, Tennessee

        We have audited the consolidated statements of financial position of The ServiceMaster Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, and the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, and have issued our reports thereon dated March 6, 2012 such consolidated financial statements and reports are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
March 6, 2012

II-18


Table of Contents


SCHEDULE II
THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)

 
  Balance at
Beginning of
Period
  Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Deductions(1)   Balance at
End of
Period
 

AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2011

                         

Continuing Operations—

                         

Allowance for doubtful accounts

                         

Accounts receivable

  $ 14,380   $ 39,081   $ 35,566   $ 17,895  

Notes receivable

    2,329     519     381     2,467  

Income tax valuation allowance

    15,437     48     9,209     6,276  

AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010

                         

Continuing Operations—

                         

Allowance for doubtful accounts

                         

Accounts receivable

  $ 15,827   $ 52,045   $ 53,492   $ 14,380  

Notes receivable

    2,251     923     845     2,329  

Income tax valuation allowance

    15,479     48     90     15,437  

AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2009

                         

Continuing Operations—

                         

Allowance for doubtful accounts

                         

Accounts receivable

  $ 15,956   $ 41,423   $ 41,552   $ 15,827  

Notes receivable

    1,810     640     199     2,251  

Income tax valuation allowance

    16,874     822     2,217     15,479  

(1)
Deductions in the allowance for doubtful accounts for accounts and notes receivable reflect write-offs of uncollectible accounts. Deductions for the income tax valuation allowance in 2011 are primarily attributable to the reduction of net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes related to the dissolution of certain subsidiaries. Deductions for the income tax valuation allowance in other years are attributable to realization of deferred tax assets.

II-19


Table of Contents

ITEM 22.    UNDERTAKINGS

        The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

II-20


Table of Contents

II-21


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, The ServiceMaster Company has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY

 

 

By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

        Name:   Roger A. Cregg
        Title:   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Harry J. Mullany III
  Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

Roger A. Cregg

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/   *

David W. Martin

 

Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/   *

David H. Wasserman

 

Director

/s/   *

Kenneth A. Giuriceo

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-22


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Merry Maids Limited Partnership has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    MERRY MAIDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

By:

 

MM MAIDS L.L.C., general partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas J. Coba
  President
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Charles E. Daniel

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-23


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, MM Maids L.L.C. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    MM MAIDS L.L.C.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas J. Coba
  President
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Charles E. Daniel

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-24


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SERVICEMASTER CONSUMER SERVICES, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

David W. Martin
  President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

Roger A. Cregg

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/   *

Mark W. Peterson

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-25


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SERVICEMASTER CONSUMER SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

By:

 

SERVICEMASTER CONSUMER SERVICES, INC., general partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

David W. Martin
  President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

Roger A. Cregg

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/   *

Mark W. Peterson

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-26


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, ServiceMaster Holding Corporation has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SERVICEMASTER HOLDING CORPORATION

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

David W. Martin
  President
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/   *

D. Shannon Sparks

 

Director

/s/   *

Mark W. Peterson

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-27


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, ServiceMaster Management Corporation has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

David W. Martin
  President
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer)

/s/   *

D. Shannon Sparks

 

Director

/s/   *

Mark W. Peterson

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SERVICEMASTER RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

By:

 

SM CLEAN L.L.C., general partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas J. Coba
  President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Charles E. Daniel

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-29


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, SM Clean L.L.C. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    SM CLEAN L.L.C.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas J. Coba
  President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Charles E. Daniel

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG

as Attorney-in-Fact

 

 

II-30


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Terminix International, Inc. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Charles M. Fallon
  President and Chief Operating Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Theodore A. Schulz

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG


 

 
    as Attorney-in-Fact
   

II-31


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

By:

 

TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
general partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Charles M. Fallon
  President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Theodore A. Schulz

 

Vice President—Finance and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG


 

 
    as Attorney-in-Fact
   

II-32


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, TruGreen Companies L.L.C. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    TRUGREEN COMPANIES L.L.C.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

David W. Martin
  President
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG


 

 
    as Attorney-in-Fact
   

II-33


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, TruGreen, Inc. has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    TRUGREEN, INC.

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas G. Brackett
  President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Michelle M. Frymire

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/   *

David W. Martin

 

Director

/s/   *

Thomas E. Courtney

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG


 

 
    as Attorney-in-Fact
   

II-34


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, TruGreen Limited Partnership has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, on April 27, 2012.

    TRUGREEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

By:

 

TRUGREEN, INC., general partner

 

 

By:

 

/s/ GREERSON G. MCMULLEN

        Name:   Greerson G. McMullen
        Title:   Senior Vice President

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed on April 27, 2012 by the following persons in the capacities indicated.

Signature
 
Title

 

 

 

 

 
/s/   *

Thomas G. Brackett
  President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   *

Michelle M. Frymire

 

Vice President—Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/   *

David W. Martin

 

Director

/s/   *

Thomas E. Courtney

 

Director

*By:

 

/s/ ROGER A. CREGG


 

 
    as Attorney-in-Fact
   

II-35


Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit List

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.1   Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, amended as of July 24, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2007 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2007 8-K"))
        
  3.2   Amended and Restated By-Laws, amended as of July 24, 2007, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  3.3   Certificate of Limited Partnership of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated October 22, 2008 (File No. 333-154648 (the "S-1"))
        
  3.4 # Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Merry Maids Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  3.5   Certificate of Formation of MM Maids L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to the S-1.
        
  3.6   Operating Agreement of MM Maids L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 to the S-1.
        
  3.7   Certificate of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to the S-1.
        
  3.8   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Consumer Services, Inc., are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to the S-1.
        
  3.9   Certificate of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 to the S-1.
        
  3.10   Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.12 to the S-1.
        
  3.11   Articles of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13 to the S-1.
        
  3.12   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Holding Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.14 to the S-1.
        
  3.13   Certificate of Incorporation of ServiceMaster Management Corporation, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the S-1.
        
  3.14   Bylaws of ServiceMaster Management Corporation, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.16 to the S-1.
        
  3.15 # Certificate of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  3.16 # Agreement of Limited Partnership of ServiceMaster Residential/Commercial Services Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  3.17   Certificate of Formation of SM Clean L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.19 to the S-1.
 
   

II-36


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  3.18   Operating Agreement of SM Clean L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.20 to the S-1.
        
  3.19   Certificate of Incorporation of Terminix International, Inc., as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.21 to the S-1.
        
  3.20   Bylaws of Terminix International, Inc., as amended, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.22 to the S-1.
        
  3.21   Certificate of Limited Partnership of The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23 to the S-1.
        
  3.22 # Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership.
        
  3.23   Certificate of Formation of TruGreen Companies L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.25 to the S-1.
        
  3.24   Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of TruGreen Companies L.L.C., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.26 to the S-1.
        
  3.25   Certificate of Incorporation of TruGreen, Inc., is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.27 to the S-1.
        
  3.26   Bylaws of TruGreen, Inc., are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.28 to the S-1.
        
  3.27   Certificate of Limited Partnership of TruGreen Limited Partnership, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.31 to the S-1.
        
  3.28 # Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of TruGreen Limited Partnership, as amended.
        
  4.1   Indenture dated as of August 15, 1997 between The ServiceMaster Company (the "Company") (as successor to ServiceMaster Limited Partnership and The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership) and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-32167 (the "1997 S-3")).
        
  4.2   First Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 15, 1997 between the Company (as successor to ServiceMaster Limited Partnership and The ServiceMaster Company Limited Partnership) and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.3   Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1, 1998 between the Company and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 1998 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.4   Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 1998 between the Company and the Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 1998 (File No. 001-14762 (the "1998 8-K")).
        
  4.5   Form of 7.45% Note due August 14, 2027 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 1997 S-3.
 
   

II-37


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  4.6   Form of 7.10% Note due March 1, 2018 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the 1998 8-K.
        
  4.7   Form of 7.25% Note due March 1, 2038 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 1998 8-K.
        
  4.8   Indenture, dated July 24, 2008, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time parties thereto and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 24, 2008 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.9   Form of 10.75%/11.50% Senior Toggle Note due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.8 hereto)
        
  4.10   First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 13, 2008, among TruGreen LandCare, the Company, each existing Subsidiary Guarantor under the Indenture and Wilmington Trust FSB is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-154648 (the "2009 S-1"))
        
  4.11   Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 14, 2012 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2012 8-K")).
        
  4.12   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  4.13   Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 13, 2012, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the initial purchasers, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  4.14   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 16, 2012, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.15   Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 16, 2012, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the initial purchasers, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  4.16   Form of 8% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.11 hereto).
        
  5.1 # Opinion of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP.
        
  5.2 # Opinion of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
        
  10.1   Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, among CDRSVM Acquisition Co., Inc., certain other Loan Parties (as defined therein), the lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (in such capacity, the "Term Loan Administrative Agent") and collateral agent (in such capacity, the "Term Loan Collateral Agent") and letter of credit facility issuing bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 2007 8-K.

II-38


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.2   Term Loan Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, between CDRSVM Acquisition Co., Inc. and the Company is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.3   Term Loan Amendment Letter, dated as of July 30, 2007, among the Company, the Commitment Letter Lenders and Joint Lead Arrangers (each as defined therein) parties thereto, and the other parties thereto is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.4   Term Loan Assumption Agreement dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.5   Term Loan Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare, L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.6   Term Loan Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen Companies L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.7   Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and the other Granting Parties (as defined therein), in favor of the Term Loan Administrative Agent and the Term Loan Collateral Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.8   Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, in favor of the Term Loan Collateral Agent and Term Loan Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.9   Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, among the Company, certain other Loan Parties (as defined therein), the lenders party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (in such capacity, the "Revolving Administrative Agent"), collateral agent (in such capacity, the "Revolving Collateral Agent") and issuing bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.10   Revolving Credit Assumption Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.11   Revolving Credit Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen LandCare, L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.12   Revolving Credit Supplemental Agreement, dated as of August 13, 2008, made by TruGreen Companies L.L.C. in favor of CitiBank, N.A. is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant's 2009 S-1.
        
  10.13   Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2011, among the Company, certain other loan parties, the lenders thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).

II-39


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.14   Extension Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2012, among the Company, certain other loan parties, the lenders thereto and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  10.15   Increase Supplement, dated as of January 30, 2012, between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as increasing lender, and the Company is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2012 8-K.
        
  10.16   Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, between the Revolving Administrative Agent and Revolving Collateral Agent and the Term Loan Administrative Agent and Term Loan Collateral Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.17   Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and the other Granting Parties (as defined therein), in favor of the Revolving Collateral Agent and the Revolving Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.18   Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007, made by the Company and ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership, in favor of the Revolving Collateral Agent and Revolving Administrative Agent is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the 2007 8-K.
        
  10.19   Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among the Company; ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"); and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2009 10-K")).
        
  10.20   Form of Consulting Agreement entered into among the Company; Holdings; Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC (assigned to StepStone Group LLC in 2010); BAS Capital Funding Corporation; and JPMorgan Chase is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.21   Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2011, by and between the Company and Holdings is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.22   Amendment to Consulting Agreement, dated December 22, 2011, by and among the Company, Holdings and BAS Capital Funding Corporation is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 23, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.23   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2009, among the Company; Holdings; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII, L.P.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VII (Co-Investment), L.P.; CDR SVM Co-Investor L.P.; CD&R Parallel Fund VII, L.P.; Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC; and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Holdings, L.P is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the 2009 10-K.
 
   

II-40


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.24   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and Banc of America Capital Investors V, L.P., BAS Capital Funding Corporation, BACSVM, L.P., Banc of America Strategic Investments Corporation, Banc of America Capital Management V, L.P., BACM I GP, LLC and BA Equity Co-Invest GP LLC is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.25   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and Citigroup Capital Partners II 2007 Citigroup Investment, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Employee Master Fund, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Onshore, L.P., Citigroup Capital Partners II Cayman Holdings, L.P., CPE Co-Investment (ServiceMaster) LLC and Citigroup Private Equity LP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.26   Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 19, 2010, among the Company and Holdings and JP Morgan Chase Funding, Inc is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.27 * Annual Bonus Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the April 16, 2003 Proxy Statement relating to the Company's 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held May 21, 2003 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.28 * ServiceMaster Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 14, 2005 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.29 * Employment Agreement dated August 16, 2006, effective as of June 30, 2006, between the Company and J. Patrick Spainhour is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2006 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.30 * Letter Agreement with J. Patrick Spainhour, executed on September 8, 2010, related to calculation of Mr. Spainhour's benefits upon retirement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.31 * Employment Agreement dated as of February 16, 2011, by and between Harry J. Mullany III and Holdings is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 22, 2011 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2011 8-K")).
        
  10.32 * Amended and Restated Offer of Employment letter, dated March 24, 2010, between the Company and Steve Donly is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the 2009 10-K.
        
  10.33 * Separation Agreement and General Release entered into on April 29, 2011, between the Company and Steven J. Martin is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.34 * Offer Letter dated April 29, 2011, between the Company and David W. Martin related to his appointment as the Company's Interim Chief Financial Officer is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
 
   

II-41


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.35 * Separation Agreement and General Release entered into on May 16, 2011, between the Company and Stephen M. Donly is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
  10.36 * Employment Offer Letter executed on August 15, 2011, between the Company and Roger A. Cregg related to his appointment as the Company's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.37 * Employment Offer Letter dated November 3, 2011 and supplemental letter dated November 22, 2011, between the Company and Thomas J. Coba related to his appointment as the President of ServiceMaster Clean and Merry Maids is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2011 10-K")).
        
  10.38 * Employment Offer Letter dated November 15, 2011 and the letter of clarification dated December 1, 2011, between the Company and Charles M. Fallon related to his appointment as the President of Terminix is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.39 * Thomas G. Bracket compensation letter dated December 2, 2011 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.40 * Severance Agreement dated as of December 5, 2011, between the Company and Charles M. Fallon is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.41 * Amended and Restated ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended as of February 16, 2011 (the "MSIP"), is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.42 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 001-14762 (the "2007 10-K")).
        
  10.43 * Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.44 * Form of Employee Deferred Share Unit Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.45 * Form of Participation Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the 2007 10-K.
        
  10.46 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement under the MSIP related to stock option exercises is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.47 * Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the MSIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.48 * Form of Employee Stock Subscription Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 2011 8-K.
 
   

II-42


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
  10.49 * Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.50 * Form of Employee (Superperformance) Stock Option Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.51 * Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement for Harry J. Mullany III is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the 2011 8-K.
        
  10.52 * Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2011, for performance based RSUs awarded to Thomas G. Brackett is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the 2011 10-K.
        
  10.53   First Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement, dated November 1, 2010, by and between ServiceMaster Consumer Services, L.P., and International Business Machines Corporation including the First Amended and Restated Transaction Document No. 1 thereunder and all related exhibits and schedules (portions omitted pursuant to registrant's request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No 001-14762).
        
  10.54   Purchase Agreement among TruGreen Companies L.L.C. and Commercial Finance Services 110-A, LLC and, solely for purposes of complying with its obligations under Section 8.5 and Section 13.17, The ServiceMaster Company, dated as of April 21, 2011, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2012 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.55   Trademark License Agreement between TruGreen Companies L.L.C. and TruGreen LandCare L.L.C., dated as of April 21, 2011, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 27, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  10.56   Sixth Amendment dated March 27, 2012 between ServiceMaster Consumer Services Limited Partnership and International Business Machines Corporation amending the First Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement and the related First Amended and Restated Transaction Document No. 1, both dated November 1, 2010.
        
  12.1   Statement regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 12 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  21.1   List of Subsidiaries, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (File No. 001-14762).
        
  23.1   Consent of Deloitte &Touche LLP.
        
  23.2   Consent of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
        
  23.3   Consent of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. (included in Exhibit 5.2).
        
  23.4 # Consent of NorthStar Partners
        
  23.5 # Consent of Warranty Week
        
  25.1 # Form T-1 Statement of Eligibility of Wilmington Trust, National Association.

II-43


Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number
  Description
        
  99.1   Form of Letter of Transmittal.
        
  99.2 # Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery.
        
  99.3 # Form of Letter to Nominee.
        
  99.4 # Form of Letter to Clients.
        
  99.5 # Instruction to Registered Holder or DTC Participant From Beneficial Owner.
        
  101.INS # XBRL Instance Document
        
  101.SCH # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
        
  101.CAL # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
        
  101.DEF # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
        
  101.LAB # XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
        
  101.PRE # XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase

*
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

#
Previously filed

II-44