UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.                )

  Filed by the Registrant ý

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Investment Technology Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

Table of Contents

Investment Technology Group, Inc.
380 Madison Avenue,
New York, New York 10017



Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held May 12, 2009



To the Stockholders of Investment Technology Group, Inc.:

        Investment Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("ITG" or the "company"), will hold its annual meeting of stockholders at ITG's principal executive offices at 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017, on Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. (local time), and any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the following purposes:

        Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on March 16, 2009 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. Only holders of record of ITG® common stock at the close of business on March 16, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available during normal business hours at our principal executive offices located at 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017 for a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting for examination by any ITG stockholder for purposes germane to the annual meeting.

        In accordance with the new rules approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing the proxy materials to you over the Internet. We believe that this will allow us to lower the cost and environmental impact of our annual meeting. As a result, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on or about March 30, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 16, 2009. We also provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com beginning on March 25, 2009. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail but would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice or on page 5 of this proxy statement.

        Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the proposed slate of directors, FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditors for the 2009 fiscal year, FOR the approval of an increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan and FOR the approval of an increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote your shares by following the instructions included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that was mailed to you. The proxies of stockholders who attend the meeting in person may be withdrawn and such stockholders may vote personally at the meeting.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC
    P. Mats Goebels
Secretary

New York, New York
March 25, 2009


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page

THE ANNUAL MEETING

  3
 

Date, Time and Place of the Annual Meeting

  3
 

Matters to Be Considered at the Annual Meeting

  3
 

Voting at the Annual Meeting; Record Date; Quorum

  3
 

Proxies

  4
 

Treatment of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions at the Annual Meeting

  5
 

Annual Report to Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Committee Charters

  5

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  5
 

Nominees to Board of Directors

  6
 

Executive Officers and Certain Significant Employees

  8

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  10
 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  10
 

Executive Compensation

  21
   

Summary Compensation Table

  21
   

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

  24
   

Options Exercised and Stock Vested for 2008 for Named Executive Officers

  27
   

Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

  28
   

Outstanding Equity Awards for Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2008

  29
   

Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements

  31
 

Director Compensation

  38

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  41
 

Board Meetings and Committees

  41
 

The Compensation Committee

  42
 

Code of Ethics

  43
 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

  43
 

NYSE Certification

  43

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  44

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

  44

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGERS

  45

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

  46

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  46

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

  47

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  48
 

Fees to our Independent Auditor

  48
 

Pre-approval of Services by the Independent Auditor

  48

PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES RESERVED AND AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

  49

PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES RESERVED AND AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 2007 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

  52

CONTACTING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  60

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

  60

OTHER MATTERS; STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF ITG

  62

APPENDIX A—AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

  A-1

APPENDIX B—AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

  B-1

2


Table of Contents


THE ANNUAL MEETING

Date, Time and Place of the Annual Meeting

        We will hold the annual meeting at 1:00 p.m. (eastern daylight time), on Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at our principal executive offices at 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017.


Matters to Be Considered at the Annual Meeting

        We will hold the annual meeting for the following purposes:


Voting at the Annual Meeting; Record Date; Quorum

        On March 16, 2009, the record date for the annual meeting, there were 43,365,180 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Please note the following:

3


Table of Contents


Proxies

        We are furnishing you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of our board of directors for use at the annual meeting. Proxies which are properly completed and received and not subsequently revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting. These proxies will be voted in accordance with the directions specified thereon, and otherwise in accordance with the judgment of the persons designated as proxies. In the case of written proxies, if no directions are indicated on a properly executed proxy, such proxy will be voted in favor of the proposals.

        If any other matters are properly presented at the annual meeting for consideration, the persons named in the forms of proxy and acting thereunder generally will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, proxies voting against a specific proposal may not be used by the persons named in the proxies to vote for adjournment of the meeting for the purpose of giving management additional time to solicit votes to approve such proposal.

        The grant of a proxy does not preclude you from attending the annual meeting and voting in person. You may revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted. Proxies may be revoked by:

        In the case of proxies related to shares held under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan, such revocation or later-dated proxy must be received no later than May 4, 2009. Attendance at the annual meeting will not enable you to revoke a previously delivered proxy with respect to shares held under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

        Attendance at the annual meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy. You must vote at the annual meeting to revoke a previously delivered proxy not otherwise revoked in accordance with the procedures below.

        Any written notice of revocation must be delivered via mail to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717, or Investment Technology Group, Inc., 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Secretary, no later than May 11, 2009. Any subsequent proxy must be delivered via the Internet or via telephone no later than May 11, 2009.

        We will bear all expenses of our solicitation of proxies for the annual meeting. In addition to solicitation by use of the mails, our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies from stockholders. Solicitation may take place in person or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication. Such directors, officers and employees will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation. Arrangements may be made with brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding of proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners of our common stock held of record by such brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries. We will reimburse such brokerage houses, custodians,

4


Table of Contents


nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in doing so. We have retained The Altman Group to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of approximately $7,500 plus reasonable expenses.


Treatment of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions at the Annual Meeting

        All shares of our common stock represented by properly completed proxies received prior to or at the annual meeting and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. In the case of written proxies, if no instructions are indicated on a properly executed returned proxy, such proxies will be voted FOR the approval of each of the matters set forth on the proxy card. It is not expected that any matter other than those referred to herein will be brought before the stockholders at the annual meeting. However, if other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such matters, unless authority to do so is withheld in the proxy.

        An automated system administered by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate votes cast by proxy via the Internet. Broadridge will also tabulate votes cast by proxy via mail, telephone and in person at the annual meeting. Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers who are the beneficial owners of such shares are prohibited from giving a proxy to vote such customers' shares with respect to any proposal in the absence of specific instructions from such customers. Broker non-votes, withheld votes and abstentions, tabulated separately, will be included in the determination of the number of shares present at the annual meeting and whether a quorum is present. Broker non-votes and withheld votes will not be counted in determining whether a nominee is elected. Broker non-votes will not be counted in determining whether our appointment of independent auditors is ratified, whether the increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan is approved, whether the increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan is approved, or whether any other management or stockholder proposal is approved, but with respect to these proposals, abstentions have the effect of a vote against such proposals.


Annual Report to Stockholders, Proxy Statement, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Committee Charters

        Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and this Proxy Statement are available through our website at http://investor.itg.com, under Investor Relations and SEC Filings and at www.proxyvote.com. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which govern our directors, officers and employees, and the charters for each of our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee are available on our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/guidelines.php. You may also obtain a copy of such documents by writing to: Investment Technology Group, Inc., 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017, Attn: Investor Relations.


ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        The number of directors to be elected at the annual meeting has been fixed at eight by our board of directors. Such directors will be elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

        Each nominee listed below has been nominated for election by the nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors and has consented to serve as a director if elected. In the event that any nominee shall be unable to serve as a director (which is not now anticipated), proxies will be voted for substitute nominees recommended by the board of directors or the board of

5


Table of Contents


directors may elect to reduce the number of directors. All of the nominees for election as a director are presently members of the board of directors.

        The board of directors has determined that Messrs. Burdett, Dodds, Jones, King, O'Hara and Steck and Ms. O'Hara are "independent" within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Ms. O'Hara and Mr. O'Hara are not related. Our board of directors' policies for determining director independence are available on our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/director_independence.php.

        Ms. O'Hara has been our chairman since May 2007.


Nominees to Board of Directors

        The following information is submitted concerning the nominees for election as directors.

Name
  Age   Position

J. William Burdett

    69   Director

Christopher V. Dodds

    49   Director

Robert C. Gasser

    44   Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Timothy L. Jones

    53   Director

Robert L. King

    58   Director

Kevin J.P. O'Hara

    47   Director

Maureen O'Hara

    55   Chairman

Brian J. Steck

    62   Director

        J. William Burdett has been a director since July 2001 and was a non-executive director of ITG Australia Ltd., a subsidiary of ITG from December 2006 until April 2007. In 2006, Mr. Burdett joined the board of IRESS Market Technology Ltd., a leading provider of market data, financial planning and order routing services to the equities markets in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. From 1988 until March 2001, Mr. Burdett was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Burdett Buckeridge Young Group ("BBY"), which is comprised of the two Australian broker/dealer companies: BBY and Australian Clearing Services. From 1970 until 1987, Mr. Burdett was a partner and director of A.C. Goode & Co., one of the largest stock-brokering/investment banking companies in Australia. Mr. Burdett was a non-executive director of BBY and ITG Australia Ltd. from November 2000 through November 2002.

        Christopher V. Dodds has been a director since June 2008. Mr. Dodds currently serves as a Senior Advisor at Carlyle Group, a private equity firm. Mr. Dodds also serves on the Board of Directors at Charles Schwab Bank, Baron Capital Inc., and Cost Plus Inc. From 1986 to 2007, Mr. Dodds held several positions at the Charles Schwab Corporation ("Schwab"). Most recently, from 1999 to 2007, Mr. Dodds served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Schwab, responsible for managing the company's financial affairs during periods of growth, retrenchment, and profitability. Before being named Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Dodds held several key positions at Schwab including Corporate Controller and Corporate Treasurer. Prior to his experience at Schwab, Mr. Dodds served as a financial analyst for several firms including American Hawaii Cruises, Exxon Company USA, and the Gulf Oil Corporation.

        Robert C. Gasser has been a director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the company since October 4, 2006. Mr. Gasser was Chief Executive Officer of NYFIX, Inc. ("NYFIX"), a global electronic trade execution firm, from November 2005 to September 2006. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Gasser served as Chief Executive Officer of NYFIX Millennium LLC, a subsidiary of NYFIX, and President of NYFIX Transaction Services Inc. and NYFIX Clearing Corporation. Mr. Gasser was Head of U.S. Equity Trading at JP Morgan from 1999 to 2001.

6


Table of Contents

        Timothy L. Jones has been a director since March 2005. Since October 2007, Mr. Jones has been Chief Executive Officer and director of the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority, a non-departmental public body of the Department for Work and Pensions within the United Kingdom government. From December 2002 to January 2005, Mr. Jones was the Chief Executive Officer of Simpay Limited, a mobile phone payment system company. In November 2004, Mr. Jones joined the Board of Groves Malthouse Management Limited, a real estate management company. Mr. Jones co-founded Purseus, a company developing a new architecture for correspondent banking, and was Chief Executive Officer of Purseus from April 2000 to November 2002. Prior to that, for 17 years, Mr. Jones was at National Westminster Bank PLC where he held various positions in the Operations, Information Technology Strategy and Policy, Mondex, Electronic Markets and Retail Banking Services divisions, eventually becoming a Managing Director in 1996 and Chief Executive of the retail banking division in 1999.

        Robert L. King has been a director since June 1994. From July 2005 to November 2008, Mr. King was the Chief Executive Officer of Click Sales, Inc., an online retailer of digital download products. From October 2001 through May 2004, Mr. King was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Requisite Technology, Inc., which helps companies to create, organize, and manage product and service information for efficient web-based finding, buying, and selling. Mr. King is currently a Director of Office Source. Mr. King was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Corporate Express, Inc., a distributor of office and computer supplies, from 1998 to 2001. Mr. King has also been a director of Corporate Express, Inc. and served as the President and Chief Operating Officer of Corporate Express, Inc. from 1993 until 1998. Prior to 1993, Mr. King was employed by FoxMeyer Corporation, a distributor of health and pharmaceutical products, where he was Chief Executive Officer from 1989 to 1993, President from 1988 to 1993, and Chief Operating Officer from 1988 to 1989.

        Kevin J.P. O'Hara has been a director since January 2007. Currently, Mr. O'Hara is Chairman of the Kevin J.P. O'Hara Family Foundation, a charitable trust, and sits on the boards of trustees of several charities. He is also a principal of KJPOH Enterprises, LLC, a capital market consulting firm, and serves as an advisor to Quadriserv, Inc., a provider of technology and business model innovation to the securities lending industry. From May 2006 to July 2007, Mr. O'Hara served as the Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Strategy Officer of CBOT Holdings, Inc. Previously, he served as Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Archipelago Holdings, Inc. from 1999 to 2006 and served as Executive Vice President and Co-General Counsel of NYSE Group, Inc. in 2006. Prior to joining Archipelago, Mr. O'Hara worked in Romania and Lithuania from 1995 to 1999 on the development of legal, regulatory and technology infrastructure of emerging capital markets. Prior to his international experience, Mr. O'Hara worked in the Division of Enforcement of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C., as Senior Counsel from 1994 to 1995 and as Staff Attorney from 1991 to 1993. In 1993, Mr. O'Hara served as Special Assistant United States Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice. From 1988 to 1991, he practiced corporate and commercial litigation at the Chicago law firm of Ross & Hardies, now McGuire Woods Ross & Hardies.

        Maureen O'Hara has been a director since January 2003 and chairman since May 2007. She served as lead director from January 2005 until her appointment as chairman in May 2007. Ms. O'Hara is the Robert W. Purcell Professor of Finance at the Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University. She holds degrees from the University of Illinois (B.S. Economics) and Northwestern University (M.S. Economics and Ph.D. Finance). Ms. O'Hara serves on the Board of Directors of NewStar Financial Inc. Ms. O'Hara joined the faculty at Cornell in 1979. She has had visiting appointments at UCLA, the London Business School, the University of New South Wales, Cambridge University, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Ms. O'Hara's research focuses on issues in market microstructure, and she is the author of numerous journal articles as well as the book Market Microstructure Theory (Blackwell: 1995). In addition, Ms. O'Hara publishes widely on a broad range of topics in finance, including banking, law and finance, and experimental economics. She has

7


Table of Contents


served as President of the Western Finance Association and recently served as President of the American Finance Association.

        Brian J. Steck has been a director since September 2004. Mr. Steck is currently President and Director of St. Andrews Financial Corp., a private financial and investment company and he has served as an advisor to Harris Bank since 2005. Mr. Steck also serves as a director of Dundee Precious Metals Inc. and CMA (Canadian Medical Association) Holdings Inc. Mr. Steck was Chairman and CEO of Nesbitt Burns Inc. and its subsidiaries from 1990 until his retirement in 1999. He was also Vice-Chairman of the Bank of Montreal, responsible for wealth management and investment banking from 1992 to 1999. Mr. Steck is past Chairman of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada, the Canadian Securities Institute, the Canadian District of the Securities Industry Association of America, and past Governor of the Toronto Stock Exchange.


Executive Officers and Certain Significant Employees

        The executive officers of our company are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our board of directors. Other than Mr. Gasser, for whom information is provided above, the following sets forth information as to the other executive officers and certain significant employees of our company, each of whom are also members of the company's executive committee. Except for Messrs. Goldstein and Wright, the individuals noted below are executive officers of the company.

Name
  Age   Position

Ian Domowitz

    57   Managing Director

P. Mats Goebels

    42   Managing Director, General Counsel and Secretary

Peter A. Goldstein

    45   Managing Director and Global Head of Human Resources

Christopher J. Heckman

    48   Managing Director

David L. Meitz

    45   Managing Director

Howard C. Naphtali

    55   Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

David Stevens

    42   Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Europe

Nicholas Thadaney

    40   Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Canada

J. Mark Wright

    49   Managing Director and Global Head of Product Management

        Ian Domowitz is a Managing Director responsible for our networking and analytical and research products. He joined ITG in April 2001. Mr. Domowitz was the Mary Jean and Frank P. Smeal Professor of Finance at Pennsylvania State University from June 1998 to April 2001, and a Professor at Northwestern University from September 1982 to May 1998.

        P. Mats Goebels is a Managing Director, and General Counsel and Secretary. He joined our company in 1998 and is responsible for all legal and regulatory matters. Mr. Goebels was a corporate attorney at the New York offices of Sullivan & Cromwell from 1995 to 1998, and of Weil, Gotshal & Manges from 1991 to 1995. Mr. Goebels is a managing member of Sunrise Associates LLC.

        Peter A. Goldstein is a Managing Director and Global Head of Human Resources. Prior to joining ITG in September 2007, Mr. Goldstein was the Global Head of Human Resources for RREEF, the Alternative Investments Division of Deutsche Bank. Mr. Goldstein began his career in 1987 at Laventhol & Horwath and subsequently spent nine years in human resources at JPMorgan, both in the United States and abroad.

        Christopher J. Heckman is a Managing Director responsible for U.S. sales and trading. He joined our company in January 1991 as a sales trader and became manager of institutional sales and trading in January 1997. Prior to joining ITG, Mr. Heckman worked in the program trading area at Salomon Brothers.

8


Table of Contents

        David L. Meitz is a Managing Director responsible for Software Development, Technology and Trading Support Services, and Information Security/Business Continuity. He joined our company in July 2002 from Reuters America, Inc. ("Reuters") where he held the position of Executive Vice President since 1995. Mr. Meitz previously held technology and customer service management positions at Citibank, N.A. and Quotron Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reuters.

        Howard C. Naphtali is a Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer. He joined our company in April 1997 and was appointed as Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer in 2000. From 1988 to 1997, Mr. Naphtali worked for Reuters where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as well as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Quotron Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reuters.

        David Stevens is a Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of ITG's European business. Mr. Stevens joined ITG as director of sales for Europe in 2005 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer of ITG Europe in 2007. Prior to joining ITG in 2005, Mr. Stevens was a Managing Director at JP Morgan, heading up pan-European sales globally. Mr. Stevens also spent six years at Goldman Sachs during which time he was an Executive Director.

        Nicholas Thadaney is a Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of ITG Canada. Mr. Thadaney joined ITG as director of sales for Canada in 2000 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer of ITG Canada in 2005. Prior to joining ITG, Mr. Thadaney was Vice President and Head of Business Development & International Equities at T.D. Securities. He has also held positions at C.T. Securities and First Canada Securities International.

        J. Mark Wright is a Managing Director and the Global Head of Product Management. He joined ITG in 1992 as Vice President of Software Development and has held several roles at ITG since then, including manager of the software development organization for ITG and Chief Information Officer of the company.

9


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

        Our compensation committee reviews and approves the compensation policies, plans and programs for (among others) our "named executive officers," which for 2008 include (i) our chief executive officer, (ii) our chief financial officer, (iii) our three most highly compensated executive officers (other than our chief executive officer and chief financial officer) who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2008 and (iv) one of our highly compensated officers who terminated his employment with the company in December 2008.


Compensation Philosophy

        Attracting and retaining exceptional individuals who share our firm's vision and passion is essential to the success of our company. By placing equal importance on skill set and mind set, we find and foster effective leaders who in turn seek to improve company performance.

        Our executive compensation programs have four key objectives:

To achieve these objectives, we have implemented an executive compensation program that is based on the following principal components of ongoing compensation:


Description of ITG's Executive Compensation Programs

        New executive compensation program.    As we reported in last year's proxy statement, the compensation committee engaged McLagan as its independent compensation consultant in December 2007 and directed them to begin an executive compensation study. The purpose of the study was to develop a new executive compensation program for the company for 2008.

        McLagan conducted interviews with compensation committee members and management, reviewed information about the company and its long-range plans, gathered market data on its executive positions, and assessed the competitive practices of peer companies. By May 5, 2008, the compensation committee, after an extensive review process, had approved McLagan's recommended design for the executive compensation program, which we describe below.

10


Table of Contents

        Our executive compensation program continues to be performance-based.    Our new program rewards our named executive officers for financial and business results that benefit our stockholders. The main elements of the compensation program continue to consist of base salary, annual incentive bonus, and long-term equity incentive awards. The size of the total incentive award received by our chief executive officer and each other named executive officer is directly related to company and individual performance results for the year and is designed to deliver an increasing financial benefit to our stockholders each year.

        How our new incentive compensation program works.    At its meeting on March 17, 2008, the compensation committee determined maximum incentive compensation amounts payable to the named executive officers subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, including our chief executive officer and Messrs. Heckman, Domowitz and Huck, under the company's Amended and Restated Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan (the "Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan") that was approved by the company's stockholders at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders. Specifically, for the 2008 performance period, the compensation committee established an incentive pool for such named executive officers based on 7.5% of the company's pre-tax income (as adjusted for certain non-recurring items), with 35% of the pool allocated to the chief executive officer and 16.25% of the pool allocated to each of the other named executive officers subject to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The compensation committee retained the discretion to pay awards under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan to such named executive officers in an amount less than the maximum permissible payment as determined by achievement of the company's adjusted pre-tax income. For the 2008 performance period, the compensation committee exercised negative discretion when determining actual awards as set forth below.

        The compensation committee approved the actual incentive payments for the 2008 performance period for the named executive officers (within the established maximum amounts under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan) based in large part on an incentive program recommended by McLagan for key executive officers. The purpose of the program is to assist the compensation committee in making its compensation decisions with respect to the chief executive officer and his direct reports. Under this program, the compensation committee establishes formulaic guidelines in the beginning of each year, based on a percentage of the company's pre-bonus, pre-tax income for such year above a threshold amount. As with the Section 162(m) incentive pool described above, the committee uses a pre-tax income metric because it believes that it appropriately measures performance and is consistent with the metric used by several other companies that have these types of programs. These formulaic guidelines generate a dollar amount that serves as a reference point for the compensation committee when it finalizes the aggregate amount of total direct compensation for the year for such key executives. The compensation committee expects to increase the threshold amount for each succeeding year in order to provide an increasing benefit to the company's stockholders. While the compensation committee uses these guidelines to determine the aggregate amount of base salary and incentive compensation to pay the key executive officers for the year, the committee retains the discretion to pay less or more than the amounts generated by the guidelines, within the established maximum amounts under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan. In approving the actual incentive payments, the compensation committee also compared the named executive officers' total direct compensation to market ranges as presented by McLagan, conducted a performance assessment for each named executive officer and also took into account company and individual performance, in each case, as more fully described below.

        The incentive award for the 2008 performance period was paid in the form of cash and an equity incentive award under our Equity Deferral Award Program (the "EDA Program"), which is a subplan under our 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan and further described below.

        Description of our mandatory equity deferral program, the EDA Program.    The purpose of the EDA Program is to provide an additional incentive to selected members of senior management and key employees to increase the success of the company, by substituting stock units for a portion of the

11


Table of Contents


variable incentive compensation to be earned by such persons. The stock units represent an equity interest in the company to be acquired and held under the EDA Program on a long-term, tax-deferred basis. The EDA Program is mandatory; the executive does not elect the amount of incentive compensation that is to be paid in cash and the amount of incentive compensation that is to be paid in equity.

        Under the EDA Program, each eligible participant (including each of our named executive officers) is granted a number of basic stock units on the date the year-end cash bonus would otherwise be paid to the participant equal to (i) the amount by which the participant's variable compensation is reduced as determined by the compensation committee, divided by (ii) the fair market value of a share of the company's common stock on the date of grant. In determining the variable compensation reduction for the 2008 performance year, the compensation committee considered a pre-specified formula recommended by McLagan based on a range of total direct compensation. For the named executive officers (except for Mr. Gasser), the percentage of total direct compensation that was reduced ranged from approximately 34% to 39%. Taking into account the EDA Program reduction and the equity awards granted to Mr. Gasser in 2008 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Gasser's total direct compensation was effectively reduced by approximately 47%. While the pre-specified formula is an important reference point for the compensation committee, it retains the discretion to pay a different amount in cash and equity.

        In addition, each participant will be granted (within the established maximum amounts under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan as described above) an additional number of matching stock units on the date of grant equal to 20% of the number of basic stock units granted. Basic stock units vest in equal annual installments on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, if the participant remains continuously employed by the company on each applicable vesting date, and will be settled in shares of our common stock within 30 days after each applicable vesting date. Matching stock units will vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant, if the participant remains continuously employed by the company through such vesting date, and will be settled in shares of our common stock within 30 days after the date on which such matching stock units vest.

        The EDA Program also provides the compensation committee with the discretion to grant stock options instead of stock units. The compensation committee may also determine, in its sole discretion, to award a bonus in the form of stock units or other forms of equity to any participant at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as the compensation committee deems appropriate.

        No awards were granted under the EDA Program in 2008.

        Base salary.    The base salaries of the named executive officers for 2008, which are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table below, represent a lesser component of an executive officer's total compensation package consistent with our objective to emphasize pay-for-performance and long-term incentives. Base salary levels are established based on a number of factors including: competitive market data, the position's complexity and level of responsibility and the assessment of the executive's performance. The compensation committee did not adjust the base salaries of our named executive officers in 2008 based on a review of these factors and their determination that the base salaries of our named executive officers are competitive.

        Elimination of our voluntary equity deferral program, Amended and Restated Investment Technology Group, Inc. Stock Unit Award Program Subplan (the "SUA Program"), effective January 1, 2009.    Under our SUA Program, each participant in the program (including the named executive officers other than Mr. Haynes) could irrevocably elect, on an annual basis, to forgo the receipt of a portion of their 2008 total cash compensation and receive units representing shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis with a fair market value equal to 120% of the forgone compensation. The compensation that is deferred is deducted from the executive's annual cash incentive compensation, which for the first half of the year, was estimated and pre-paid on a semi-annual basis. The matching units that represent the additional 20% of the forgone compensation vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided

12


Table of Contents


the participant remains employed by the company through such date. The remaining units representing the foregone compensation are vested as of the grant date. All vested units are delivered in shares of ITG common stock on the third anniversary of the date of grant. (Prior to the amendment of the SUA Program in April 2006, participation was mandatory and participants received common stock with a fair market value equal to 130% of forgone compensation. The matching units that represent the additional 30% of the forgone compensation vest and are settled as follows: half of the matching stock units vest and are settled on the third anniversary of the grant date and the other half vest and are settled on the sixth anniversary of the grant date. The remaining units representing the foregone compensation are vested as of the grant date and half are settled on the third anniversary of the grant date and the other half are settled on the sixth anniversary of the grant date.) The three year vesting schedule is consistent with the vesting schedule of the majority of our other equity-based awards that were previously granted by the company. The 20% match and three year vesting schedule are also consistent with the terms offered by several companies that have these types of programs.

        Effective January 1, 2009, we amended the SUA Program. The amendment freezes the SUA Program, such that it shall not apply to compensation earned for any calendar year after 2008. In addition, the amendment provided participants with a special transition election with respect to cessation of participation in the SUA Program for bonus payments for calendar year 2008 that were due after December 31, 2008 and on or before March 15, 2009. We decided to implement these amendments in light of the adoption of our new executive compensation program described above. Specifically, we believe that the EDA Program, as described above, achieves similar objectives to our SUA Program. In particular, the EDA Program encourages our executives to align their economic interests with those of our stockholders by providing a vehicle for investing a portion of compensation in our stock. It also promotes executive retention because of the vesting terms.

        Equity awards granted outside of the SUA Program and EDA Program.    As we reported in previous years' proxy statements, in 2006, we granted to our named executive officers stock options that vest based on continued employment with the company for three years from the grant date and restricted share awards that vest based on the achievement of pre-established performance objectives. The restricted share awards vest, in whole or in part, three years after their grant date if our cumulative three year pre-tax income (as adjusted by the compensation committee for certain non-recurring items) meets or exceeds certain thresholds and the grantee has been continuously employed by us through such date. On January 1, 2009, our executives vested in 100% of their performance-based restricted share awards that were granted in 2006. This vesting percentage was based on the achievement of $540,467,000 in pre-tax operating income (adjusted to reflect certain investment gains/losses, severance and restructuring costs and certain write-downs of capitalized costs pertaining to discontinued non-core products) over the 2006-2008 three-year period, which was 114% of the performance target of $473,300,000. These results were certified by the compensation committee. Mr. Haynes also received, in 2006, a restricted share award that vests based on continued employment with the company for three years from the grant date to better align his total pay within internal pay equity levels and market rates.

        Prior to the 2008 performance year, we granted stock options and restricted share awards to reward our executives for absolute growth in our stock price and our multi-year operational performance tied to financial growth objectives. We determined the amount of stock option and restricted share awards granted so that, assuming our performance targets are achieved, the executive would recognize equal value as of the date of grant from each type of award. Prior to 2007, we had generally granted options and restricted share awards in the middle of the year. In 2007, the compensation committee determined that such grants should instead be made early in the subsequent fiscal year when the prior year's annual cash incentive compensation is paid. This change in timing allowed us to better evaluate the amount of equity awards to be issued to ensure that such amount, combined with all other compensation for the prior year, is aligned with our compensation objectives. Accordingly, although we did not grant any non-SUA Program equity awards to our named executive

13


Table of Contents


officers in 2007, in early 2008, the compensation committee granted stock options that vest after three years of continued employment with the company and restricted share awards that vest based on the achievement of performance objectives over a two year performance period. In determining the size of each named executive officer's award in early 2008, the compensation committee considered a number of factors, including (i) the company's challenging multi-year targets, (ii) relative grant levels among the company's other executive officers, (iii) the levels of grants that the executive received in prior years and (iv) competitive total compensation levels.

        Pursuant to his employment agreement (described below), in March 2008, Mr. Gasser received a restricted stock unit award of 19,503 units (which represent shares of our common stock on a one for one basis) with a grant date value equal to $925,000. This restricted stock unit award was subject to performance-based vesting criteria through December 31, 2008, with the first $925,000 of any amount earned by Mr. Gasser under the maximum amounts established by the compensation committee under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan (that is, the Section 162(m) pool based on 7.5% of the company's adjusted pre-tax income) as described above allocated to the restricted stock unit award. As a result of the achievement of such performance criteria through December 31, 2008, 6,501 units vested on January 31, 2009 and the remaining units will vest in two equal installments on January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011, respectively if Mr. Gasser remains employed through the applicable vesting date. In addition, and also pursuant to his employment agreement, in January 2008, Mr. Gasser was granted a nonqualified stock option to purchase a number of shares of the company's common stock equal to a Black-Scholes value for the option of $925,000. One-third of this option became exercisable on January 2, 2009 and the remainder becomes exercisable in two equal annual installments on January 2, 2010 and January 2, 2011, respectively, provided Mr. Gasser has remained continuously employed by the company on such dates.

        Share Retention Program.    We do not impose stock ownership requirements on our executive officers. Instead, we require executive officers to retain a portion of the shares received upon exercise of options granted after March 2003 (when the compensation committee approved this program). The company expects that this requirement further aligns the interests of senior management with the interests of stockholders and lessens any appearance of an incentive for management to seek to cause unsustainable short-term increases in our stock price. Under this retention program, each executive officer may not sell more than 50% of the number of "Net Shares" acquired upon the exercise of stock options for three years following the date of option exercise, regardless of whether the individual remains in our employ (except as described below). "Net Shares" is defined as the shares received upon exercise of an option after payment of any taxes and exercise price. (The executive officer is not obligated to retain the shares actually acquired pursuant to the option exercise, so long as the executive retains a number of shares from his or her other ITG stock holdings equal to the number of Net Shares.) In the event of a change in control, termination due to death or permanent disability or involuntarily not-for-cause termination, the trading restrictions lapse immediately because the objectives of the share retention program no longer apply in these circumstances.

        Executive perquisites.    It is our policy not to provide executive perquisites and special benefits unless they are reasonable and business-related. Perquisites for each named executive officer totaled less than the disclosure threshold of $10,000.

        Retirement benefits.    Our named executive officers, other than Mr. Haynes, are eligible to participate in our tax-qualified Retirement Savings Plans on the same basis as all other U.S.-based full-time employees. We do not maintain any supplemental executive retirement plans. Mr. Haynes participates in ITG Europe's Retirement Plan on the same basis as all other employees of such affiliate.

        Severance and change-in-control agreements.    The company maintains change-in-control agreements for all named executive officers. Mr. Gasser is eligible for change-in-control benefits pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement described below. All other named executive officers are eligible for

14


Table of Contents


change-in-control benefits that were approved by the compensation committee after extensive discussion, competitive research, and financial modeling. They are designed to achieve the following objectives:

        The compensation committee believes that in the absence of these change-in-control agreements, the company would be vulnerable to competitive raiding of key executive talent. The compensation committee also believes that these agreements balance the important stockholder objectives of retaining an effective and motivated executive team and minimizing costs in the event of a change in control.

        To receive these severance benefits, the affected executive must sign a release that waives his or her right to bring suit against us or our successor for wrongful discharge or any other employment-related matters. The agreements (which are described in greater detail below under the heading Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements) were intended by the compensation committee to provide benefits that reflect industry practices and include the following:

        Mr. Gasser's severance and change-in-control benefits were set as a result of negotiations as described below under the heading Employment Arrangements and Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements. On August 4, 2008, the compensation committee approved an amendment to Mr. Gasser's employment agreement that, among other things, made Mr. Gasser's change-in-control benefits substantially consistent with those described above.

        In addition, under pre-existing agreements, all unvested equity awards vest immediately upon a change in control, with performance-based awards vesting at the 100% level.

        ITG has no plans or agreements in place regarding executive severance benefits upon a termination that is unrelated to a change in control, with the exception of the ones described below in the Employment Arrangements and Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements sections. In the event of the termination of a named executive officer not covered by an employment arrangement, severance benefits (if any) are negotiated as deemed necessary or advisable by the compensation committee.

        Employment arrangements.    On September 15, 2006, Mr. Gasser entered into an employment agreement with us and he began employment as our President and Chief Executive Officer on October

15


Table of Contents


4, 2006. In connection with our search for a new chief executive officer, the compensation committee, in consultation with the search committee, an executive search firm and outside counsel, determined that it needed to offer Mr. Gasser a market competitive compensation package to join us which, of necessity, needed to include a meaningful incentive to forgo certain compensation opportunities offered by his prior employer. Therefore, the compensation committee formulated and structured the compensation package based on survey data, our historical compensation practices and packages in place for our prior chief executive officer and executive officers generally. It also took into account Mr. Gasser's level of experience in his prior position. Based on the foregoing considerations, the compensation committee developed a compensation package generally consisting of three elements: (i) a base salary, (ii) a guaranteed cash bonus for 2006 and cash bonuses for 2007 and 2008 tied to our attainment of pre-tax operating income objectives, and (iii) stock-based incentive awards that were granted in 2006 (representing awards for 2006 and 2007) and 2008. The compensation committee determined the level for each element of compensation based on its current practices for executives generally and its long-standing philosophy in providing market competitive compensation. It also structured the bonuses in a manner that it believed could reflect the contributions that Mr. Gasser could make to our results. The severance and change-in-control provisions of Mr. Gasser's employment agreement were generally consistent with the provisions included in our standard change-in-control agreements in place for our other executive officers, except that Mr. Gasser could voluntarily resign for any reason or no reason within the thirty day window following the six-month anniversary of a change in control and receive severance benefits. This provision was provided to reflect the unique position of a former chief executive officer of a public company that is acquired.

        On August 6, 2008, the company and Mr. Gasser entered into an amended and restated employment agreement. In reviewing the peer group market data for chief executive officer compensation provided by McLagan as described below, the compensation committee determined that the peer group median for CEO compensation was significantly higher than the total compensation achievable pursuant to Mr. Gasser's original employment agreement. In accordance with its long-standing philosophy of providing market competitive compensation to executives generally, the compensation committee decided to revisit Mr. Gasser's compensation package and instructed McLagan to prepare a proposal that would include performance targets that were more challenging and better aligned to the proposed peer group. Taking into account McLagan's review and the company's and Mr. Gasser's performance over the last two years, the committee amended his original employment agreement to provide that Mr. Gasser's annual performance bonus for 2008 be based on the company's attainment of performance objectives established by the compensation committee pursuant to the terms of the company's Pay-for-Performance Incentive Plan, as described above, instead of being based on the attainment of the previously agreed to performance objectives relating to pre-tax operating income targets. In addition, Mr. Gasser agreed to give up his right to severance benefits if he resigns for any reason or no reason during the seventh month following a change in control. Instead, Mr. Gasser, like our other senior executives, would be entitled to severance after a change of control of the company equal to two times (instead of one times under his original employment agreement) the sum of (A) his annual base salary prior to his date of termination or the date of change in control (whichever is higher) and (B) the average annual bonus paid or payable to Mr. Gasser with respect to the three calendar years preceding the calendar year of his termination (for purposes of the foregoing calculation only, Mr. Gasser's bonus with respect to the 2006 calendar year will be deemed to be $1,575,000). The compensation committee determined that this amendment reflects better pay practices.

        Upon joining the company on March 16, 2001, Mr. Domowitz received an offer letter which provides for the severance benefits described in Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements below.

        Separation Agreement with Anthony J. Huck.    On December 18, 2008, the company and Mr. Huck entered into a separation agreement pursuant to which we mutually agreed that, effective December 15, 2008, Mr. Huck's employment with the company terminated and Mr. Huck resigned from all of his positions with the company. In consideration for Mr. Huck's execution and non-revocation of the

16


Table of Contents


separation agreement and agreement to certain restrictive covenants, the company agreed to pay Mr. Huck a separation payment of $2,108,000 to be paid in installments over the 9-month period following the separation date. Mr. Huck also received a lump-sum payment of $765,000 in satisfaction of his 2008 bonus. In addition, Mr. Huck will continue to be covered under the company's group health plan for one year or, if earlier, until Mr. Huck commences full-time employment at another firm. All outstanding (i) stock unit awards under the company's SUA Program, (ii) restricted share units and (iii) stock options held by Mr. Huck that, in each case, were not vested and exercisable (to the extent applicable) as of the separation date were forfeited and automatically terminated on the separation date. All stock options that were vested as of the separation date were amended to remain exercisable until their original expiration date, August 1, 2010. Shares subject to stock unit awards granted to Mr. Huck under the SUA Program that were vested as of the separation date will be issued to Mr. Huck in accordance with the terms of the SUA Program.

        Separation Agreement with Alasdair Haynes.    On February 12, 2009, the company and Mr. Haynes entered into a separation agreement pursuant to which they mutually agreed that, effective May 6, 2009, Mr. Haynes' employment with the company will terminate and Mr. Haynes, on or before such time, will resign from all of his positions with the company. In consideration for Mr. Haynes' execution of the agreement and agreement to certain restrictive covenants, Mr. Haynes will continue to receive his current base salary and medical and pension benefits until May 6, 2009. In addition, Mr. Haynes receive separation payments totaling £1,328,800. Mr. Haynes also received restricted stock units on March 13, 2009 with a value of £389,000 which will vest over a 3-year period, subject to Mr. Haynes's compliance with a three-year employee nonsolicit restriction. Starting on May 6, 2009, Mr. Haynes will continue to be covered under the company's group health plan for 9 months or, if earlier, until Mr. Haynes commences full-time employment at another firm. In addition, the company will continue to make pension payments on behalf of Mr. Haynes at the rate of 15% of his base salary for 9 months after May 6, 2009. All outstanding unvested restricted stock units (other than the March 13, 2009 award) and stock options held by Mr. Haynes that, in each case, are not vested and exercisable as of May 6, 2009, will be forfeited and automatically terminated on that date. All stock options that will be vested as of May 6, 2009 were amended to remain exercisable until their original expiration date, August 1, 2010.


Compensation Decision Factors and Compensation Determination—How and Why the Compensation Committee Determined our Named Executive Officers' Compensation for 2008

        After the compensation committee calculated the results of the formulaic guidelines we described above, it determined the total incentive award for each named executive officer for 2008, within the established maximum amounts under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan as described above. This process involved not only a consideration of the results of the formulaic guidelines but also the review of market compensation data, the completion of a performance assessment for each named executive officer and the review of other factors such as internal pay equity and prior years' compensation, in each case, as further described below.

        Market data review.    McLagan provided compensation market data to the compensation committee for each named executive officer's position. To help in analyzing the market data, McLagan established a total direct compensation market range for each named executive officer position. The sources of the data include survey data for comparable industry positions and proxy disclosures by companies included in our peer group. McLagan screened the survey data to confirm that the information is appropriate given our size, type and mix of businesses, and the industries where we compete for executive talent.

17


Table of Contents

        The market ranges helped the compensation committee in assessing the competitive placement of our named executive officers' total direct compensation for 2008. The compensation committee's assessment of the placement of each named executive officer's compensation relative to market range considers the scope, complexity, and responsibility of the executive's position in relation to positions in the sources of data. The compensation committee exercised its judgment in interpreting the market ranges provided by McLagan. A named executive officer's actual positioning relative to that market range is a result of the compensation committee's assessment of the company and individual performance factors we describe below.

        It is important to understand that the compensation market data and ranges provide only a reference point for the compensation committee. Depending upon company, business, and individual performance results, a named executive officer's total direct compensation may be within, below or above the market range for that position. The market data and ranges do not, by themselves, determine a named executive officer's total direct compensation.

        Our peer group.    In selecting the companies for our peer group, the compensation committee considered the following factors, among others: business focus; industry; size; capital structure and growth; whether the company competes against us for executive talent; compensation philosophy; and business and financial performance. The peer group used for 2008 compensation purposes is as follows: CME Group, Inc., eSpeed, Inc. (now BGC Partners, Inc.), GFI Group Inc., IntercontinentalExchange Inc., Knight Capital Group Inc., MarketAxess Holdings, Inc., NASDAQ Stock Market, NYFIX Inc., NYMEX Holdings Inc., NYSE Euronext, Options Xpress Holdings Inc. and Tradestation Group Inc.

        Although no single company included in the peer group is exactly comparable to ITG in every respect, the compensation committee uses the peer group to validate the range of competitive pay. With McLagan's help, the compensation committee will regularly review the composition of the peer group and may make changes to it in the future in response to such factors as changes in the mix of the company's business segments or major changes in the capital structure or business makeup of a peer company.

        Performance assessment.    At the beginning of each year, our board of directors approves performance measures and objectives for the company and our chief executive officer approves the performance measures and objectives for each of his direct reports (including each named executive officer). In determining the actual compensation paid to each named executive officer within the established maximum amounts under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan as described above, the compensation committee completes a final annual performance assessment for our chief executive officer and reviews with the chief executive officer his assessment of each named executive officer annually in January and February following the performance year. While the chief executive officer's evaluation carries significant weight, the compensation committee reaches its own independent viewpoint on each named executive officer's performance and makes its compensation decisions accordingly.

        Factors used by the compensation committee in assessing the performance of our chief executive officer.    The compensation committee uses a detailed assessment in evaluating the performance of our chief executive officer. Among other factors, this assessment covers: key financial and business accomplishments for 2008; stockholder measures, such as total revenue, earnings per share, adjusted return on equity, pre-tax income and total stockholder return; and balance sheet strength. The assessment also includes our progress in: improving key business metrics; implementing strategic initiatives; investments in technology and new business initiatives; and improving the strength of our control and operating environments. The compensation committee also considers our chief executive officer's leadership achievements in areas such as workforce engagement, talent management and retention. The compensation committee determined Mr. Gasser's impact on these metrics to be significant, particularly given the general economic environment.

18


Table of Contents

        Factors used by the compensation committee in assessing the performance of the other named executive officers.    Just as the compensation committee assesses the performance of our chief executive officer, our chief executive officer assesses the performance of each other named executive officer. The chief executive officer evaluated the performance of each named executive officer on many of the same factors we described for the chief executive officer because these factors are important to the company's short-term and long-term objectives and reflect the functions over which the executives have responsibility. Such factors include, among others: contribution to the achievement of company financial performance, such as pre-tax income and revenue; improvement in business metrics such as client growth and retention; achievement of business objectives; the development of new products and solutions for our clients; improvement in controls and efficiencies in our operating environment; and achievement in leadership in areas such as workforce engagement, talent management and retention. Our chief executive officer discusses his evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer with the compensation committee. This is done on both a preliminary and final basis. The compensation committee agenda allows ample time for the committee to question and discuss each named executive officer's performance with our chief executive officer.

        Other factors considered.    In addition to the formulaic guidelines, compensation market data and the performance assessment considered by the compensation committee in setting compensation levels, the compensation committee considers such additional factors as:

        No one factor, by itself, is material to the compensation committee's assessment of a named executive officer's performance and the committee considers many different factors in assessing the performance of each named executive officer. The compensation committee does not use a rigid set of rules for determining the relative importance of these factors. The compensation committee may emphasize or weigh performance factors differently for each named executive officer.


Impact of Regulatory Requirements

        In making executive compensation decisions, the compensation committee is mindful of the impact of regulatory requirements on those decisions. In particular, regulatory requirements affect the compensation committee's decisions in the following ways:

19


Table of Contents

20


Table of Contents


Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table sets forth the compensation for 2006, 2007 and 2008 paid or awarded to, or earned by, our named executive officers (except for Mr. Heckman who was not a named executive officer in 2007 and Mr. Domowitz who was not a named executive officer in 2006).

Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary
($)(1)
  Bonus
($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards
($)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(1)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total
($)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
  (f)
  (g)
  (h)
  (i)
 

Robert C. Gasser,

    2008     750,000 (7)       805,735     691,854     1,772,500     6,900     4,026,989  
 

President and Chief

    2007     750,000 (7)       449,596     385,073     1,575,000     18,000     3,177,669  
 

Executive Officer

    2006     250,000 (7)   520,000     115,156     92,901             978,057  

Howard C. Naphtali,

   
2008
   
500,000
   
1,202,502
   
269,220
   
221,562
   
   
16,100
   
2,209,384
 
 

Managing Director and

    2007     500,000         231,685     156,074     1,416,511     27,000     2,331,270  
 

Chief Financial Officer

    2006     500,000         152,115     428,596     1,201,245     30,800     2,312,756  

Christopher J. Heckman,

   
2008
   
500,000
   
   
244,408
   
185,619
   
1,152,502
   
16,100
   
2,098,629
 
 

Managing Director

    2007                              

    2006     500,000         105,198     394,878     1,112,320     30,800     2,143,196  

Alasdair Haynes,

   
2008
   
324,205
   
928,618
   
336,668
   
237,622
   
   
48,631
   
1,875,744
 
 

former Managing Director

    2007     350,298     1,561,326     262,397     66,280         45,539     2,285,840  
 

and Chief Executive Officer

    2006     322,106     1,058,347     205,985     149,201         39,338     1,774,977  
 

of ITG International(6)

                                                 

Ian Domowitz,

   
2008
   
500,000
   
   
239,509
   
188,735
   
952,502
   
16,100
   
1,896,846
 
 

Managing Director

    2007     500,000     1,200,000     177,306     66,658         233,897     2,177,861  

    2006                              

Anthony J. Huck,

   
2008
   
500,000
   
1,200,000

(8)
 
182,241
   
185,619
   
   
2,144,248

(9)
 
4,212,108
 
 

former Managing Director

    2007     500,000         189,009     122,356     1,450,000     27,000     2,288,365  

    2006     500,000         106,668     394,878     1,112,320     30,800     2,144,666  

(1)
The amounts shown in columns (c), (d) and (g) include salary, bonus and non-equity incentive plan compensation, if any, forgone at the election of the named executive officers in favor of receiving stock units under the SUA Program. Under the SUA Program, the named executive officers were granted units (including matching units as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above) representing our common stock with a fair market value on the grant date equal to 120% to 130% of the forgone compensation. In 2008, such fair market value was 120%. For more information relating to the units granted during 2008 under the SUA Program, see the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the narrative discussion following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The amounts shown do not include any amounts that are mandatorily deferred under the EDA Program.

(2)
The amounts shown in column (e) are the amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of restricted share awards (including the matching units granted under our SUA Program) awarded to each of the named executive officers, as determined pursuant to FAS 123R, but modified to eliminate any reduction in the grant date fair value of the awards for the possibility of service-based forfeiture. Except as noted in the immediately preceding sentence, the fair value of the awards was determined using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in footnote 2 to the company's financial statements included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference. The amounts shown include amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of awards granted in prior years. See the

21


Table of Contents

(3)
The amounts shown in column (f) are the amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of stock options awarded to each of the named executive officers, as determined pursuant to FAS 123R, but modified to eliminate any reduction in the grant date fair value of such grants for the possibility of service-based forfeiture. Except as noted in the immediately preceding sentence, the fair value of the awards was determined using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in footnote 2 to the company's financial statements included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference. The amounts shown include amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of awards granted in prior years. See the narrative discussion following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for more information about awards granted in 2008.

(4)
The amounts shown in column (g) were earned under our Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and the narrative discussion following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for more information about these awards.

(5)
Except as specifically noted below, the amount of (or incremental cost to the company with respect to) any of the elements of compensation included in column (h) did not exceed (x) in the case of any personal benefit or perquisite, $25,000, or (y) in the case of any other element of compensation, $10,000.
Name
  Company
Contributions
to Defined
Contribution Plans
 

Robert C. Gasser

  $ 6,900 *

Howard C. Naphtali

  $ 16,100 *

Christopher J. Heckman

  $ 16,100 *

Alasdair Haynes

  $ 48,631 **

Anthony J. Huck

  $ 16,100 *

Ian Domowitz

  $ 16,100 *
(6)
Mr. Haynes' base salary, bonus and retirement contribution was converted from GBP to USD at the following exchange rates: (a) for the 2008 amount, 0.5398 GBP:1 USD, which exchange rate represents the average rate of exchange during the 2008 fiscal year, (b) for the 2007 amount, 0.4966 GBP:1 USD, which exchange rate represents the average rate of exchange during the 2007 fiscal year and (c) for the 2006 amount, 0.5433 GPB:1 USD, which exchange rate represents the average rate of exchange during the 2006 fiscal year.

22


Table of Contents

(7)
Mr. Gasser joined the company in October 2006. Pursuant to his amended and restated employment agreement with the company, dated as of August 6, 2008, (a) for 2008 and 2007, Mr. Gasser received a base salary of $750,000 and (b) for the period from October 4, 2006 through December 31, 2006, Mr. Gasser received an aggregate base salary of $250,000.

(8)
Pursuant to Mr. Huck's separation agreement, dated as of December 18, 2008, Mr. Huck received $765,000 in satisfaction of his 2008 bonus. The remaining amount had been paid as a mid-year bonus in July of 2008.

(9)
Pursuant to Mr. Huck's separation agreement, dated as of December 18, 2008, Mr. Huck has or will receive $2,128,148 in separation payments, $2,108,000 of which represents the separation payment and $20,148 of which represents coverage under the company's group health plan.

23


Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

        The table set forth below lists each grant or award made in 2008 to any of the named executive officers under any of the company's equity and non-equity incentive plans.

 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
   
   
   
 
 
   
  Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/SH)
   
 
 
   
  Grant
Date
Fair
Value
($)(4)
 
Name
  Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
  (f)
  (g)
  (h)
  (i)
  (j)
  (k)
  (l)
 

Robert C. Gasser

    3/17/08
1/2/08
   
   
    5,287,888
   
   
   
   
   
60,340
   
47.25
   
925,000
 

    3/14/08                             2,295 *           103,367  

    3/14/08                             459             20,673  

    3/24/08                     19,503     19,503                 925,000  

    7/16/08                             5,243 *           147,000  

    7/16/08                             1,049             29,400  

Howard C. Naphtali

   
3/14/08
3/14/08
   

   

   

   
1,943
   
5,828
   
7,771
   

   

24,323
   

45.04
   
350,000
350,000
 

    3/14/08                             2,794 *           125,829  

    3/14/08                             559             25,166  

    7/16/08                             4,012 *           112,491  

    7/16/08                             802             22,498  

Christopher J. Heckman

   
3/17/08
3/14/08
   

   

   
2,455,091
   

1,665
   

4,996
   

6,661
   

   

   

   

300,000
 

    3/14/08                                 20,848     45.04     300,000  

    3/14/08                             1,745 *           78,578  

    3/14/08                             349             15,716  

    7/16/08                             3,518 *           98,655  

    7/16/08                             704             19,731  

Alasdair Haynes(5)

   
1/1/08
1/1/08
   

   

   

   
2,086
   
6,257
   
8,342
   

   

25,709
   

47.59
   
396,990
396,990
 

Ian Domowitz

   
3/17/08
   
   
   
2,455,091
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

    1/1/08                 1,314     3,940     5,254                 250,000  

    1/1/08                                 16,190     47.59     250,000  

    7/16/08                             3,335 *           93,500  

    7/16/08                             667             18,700  

Anthony J. Huck(6)

   
3/17/08
3/14/08
   

   

   
2,455,091
   

1,665
   

4,996
   

6,661
   

   

   

   

300,000
 

    3/14/08                                 20,848     45.04     300,000  

    3/14/08                             1,771 *           79,784  

    3/14/08                             354             15,957  

    7/16/08                             4,083 *           114,500  

    7/16/08                             817             22,900  

(1)
These awards relate to the 2008 performance period and were granted as part of the Section 162(m) incentive pool and pursuant to the terms of the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. Any payment made in satisfaction of these awards was subject to the named executive officer's continued employment with the company during such period (except in limited circumstances) and the achievement by the company of the adjusted pre-tax income objective described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis as pre-established by, and subject to certification by, the compensation committee. The maximum level of award listed above is the maximum amount permitted to be paid in respect of

24


Table of Contents

(2)
The amounts shown in columns (f) through (h) are the number of shares of stock that will vest for the named executive officers, other than Mr. Gasser, for the 2008-2009 performance period if our two-year cumulative pre-tax income, as adjusted by the compensation committee for certain non-recurring items, meets or exceeds certain performance targets (provided the executive remains employed for the performance period). Column (f) shows the number of shares that would be earned if a threshold of 25% of the two-year cumulative pre-tax income objective is achieved. Column (g) shows the number of shares that would be earned if 75% of the two-year cumulative pre-tax income objective is achieved for the named executive officers. Column (h) shows the number of shares that would be earned if 100% or more of the two-year cumulative pre-tax income objective is achieved for the named executive officers. For Mr. Gasser, columns (g) and (h) show the number of shares that vested December 31, 2008 based on the company's achievement of the pre-tax income approved by the compensation committee under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan.


(3)
(*)  The number of shares subject to the restricted stock units shown in column (i) for Messrs. Gasser, Naphtali, Heckman, Domowitz and Huck were granted under the SUA Program. 83.33% of the stock units are at all times fully vested and non-forfeitable and 16.67% of the stock units vest and become non-forfeitable on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided the participant is continuously employed by ITG through such time. The SUA awards marked with an asterisk represent the 83.33% and reflect the units issued in lieu of the compensation foregone and the value of such units is included as salary, bonus or non-equity incentive plan compensation in the Summary Compensation Table as described above; those awards without an asterisk represent the 16.67% and reflect the matching units representing the additional 20% of the foregone compensation and the value of such units is also included in the stock awards column of the Summary Compensation Table. For more information relating to the units granted during 2008 under the SUA Program, see the narrative discussion following this Table.

(4)
Reflects the full grant date fair value of the awards as determined pursuant to FAS 123R. The fair value of the awards was determined using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in footnote 2 to the company's financial statements included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference.

(5)
Pursuant to Mr. Haynes' separation agreement, dated as of February 12, 2009, all outstanding unvested restricted stock units (other than the March 13, 2009 award) and stock options held by Mr. Haynes that, in each case, are not vested and exercisable as of May 6, 2009, will be forfeited and automatically terminated on that date.

(6)
Pursuant to Mr. Huck's separation agreement, dated as of December 18, 2008, all of Mr. Huck's outstanding (i) stock unit awards under the SUA Program, (ii) restricted share units and (iii) stock options held by Mr. Huck that, in each case, were not vested and exercisable (to the extent applicable) as of the December 15, 2008 separation date, were forfeited and automatically terminated on the separation date. Shares subject to stock unit awards granted to Mr. Huck

25


Table of Contents


Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan

        For each named executive officer (other than Messrs. Naphtali and Haynes), during the first quarter of 2008, the compensation committee specified an award under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan and performance objectives upon which payment of the award would be conditioned. Although the compensation committee has no discretion to increase the amounts of awards previously established under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan, the plan permits the compensation committee to reduce the amount of or cancel final awards, in view of business strategy, performance of comparable organizations, economic and business conditions, personal performance of the participant, or otherwise. The compensation committee may also provide that income of a business unit may be adjusted downward to reflect specified charges, expenses, and other amounts, or adjust or modify awards and performance objectives in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events, in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or other circumstances, or specify performance periods for awards less than one year. If a participant ceases to be employed due to death, disability, or retirement (including early retirement with the approval of the compensation committee), the compensation committee will determine the amount payable as a final award achieved or resulting from the portion of the performance year completed at the date employment ceased (which may be a pro rata payment of the final award, determined at the end of the performance year), except that no payout shall be made if it is duplicative of severance payments. If a participant's employment terminates during a performance year for any other reason, no final award will be paid to the participant under the Pay-For-Performance Incentive Plan. During the first quarter of 2009, the compensation committee determined the extent to which awards have been earned and performance objectives achieved, and the amounts therefore payable to each named executive officer.


SUA Program

        Under our SUA Program, each named executive officer could elect, on an annual basis, to forgo the receipt of a portion of their total cash compensation (15% of total cash compensation between $200,000 and $300,000 and 20% of total cash compensation over $300,000) and receive units representing our common stock with a fair market value equal to 120% of such forgone compensation. The matching units that represent the additional 20% of the forgone compensation vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, provided the participant remains employed by the company through such date. The remaining units representing the foregone compensation are vested as of the grant date. All vested units are delivered in shares of ITG common stock on the third anniversary of the grant. Upon settlement of each SUA award, the executive receives dividend equivalents, if any, accrued with respect to such award.

        The number of units granted under the SUA Program in 2008 was determined based upon the amount of compensation deferred divided by the closing price per share of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date.

        For 2008, Mr. Gasser elected to forgo $250,367 of cash compensation and received 9,045 stock units; Mr. Naphtali elected to forgo $238,320 and received 8,167 stock units; Mr. Heckman elected to forego $177,233 and received 6,316 stock units; Mr. Domowitz elected to forgo $93,500 and received 4,001 stock units and Mr. Huck elected to forego $194,284 and received 7,026 stock units. All stock units are subject to the vesting and delivery schedules described above.

26


Table of Contents


Awards made pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

        In 2008, we granted stock options and performance-based restricted share awards to the named executive officers. The options vest based on the passage of time three years after their grant date, if the executive has been continuously employed by us through such date. A percentage between 0% and 100% of the performance-based restricted share awards vest based on performance over a two-year performance period, provided the executive has remained continuously employed by the company through such date, based on the amount of the company's "Cumulative Two Year Pre-Tax Operating Income" (as defined below) determined in accordance with a schedule between 0% for performance below threshold, 25% for threshold performance, and increasing by 25% for each succeeding threshold, up to a maximum of 100%. In the event the amount of Cumulative Two Year Pre-Tax Operating Income is between two of the thresholds, the percentage of the award that will vest and become exercisable will be determined by multiplying (A) 25% by (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of the actual Cumulative Two Year Pre-Tax Operating Income over the next lowest vesting threshold and the denominator of which is the excess of the next higher vesting threshold over the next lower vesting threshold and adding the product to the percentage corresponding to the next lowest vesting threshold. To the extent the award does not vest and become exercisable at the end of the performance period, the award will be forfeited. In addition, in the event of termination of the executive's employment with the company for any reason prior to the end of the performance period, the award shall be forfeited. All dividends received in connection with the award are subject to the vesting schedule described above. For purposes of these awards, (i) "Cumulative Two Year Pre-Tax Operating Income" means the company's "Pre-Tax Operating Income" for the performance period, and (ii)"Pre-Tax Operating Income" means the consolidated pre-tax income of the company and its subsidiaries, computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, (A) prior to reduction for income taxes and (B) excluding one time gains, nonrecurring restructuring charges and nonrecurring non-cash charges (including impairment of good will).


Options Exercised and Stock Vested for 2008 for Named Executive Officers

 
  Option Awards    
   
 
 
  Stock Awards  
 
  Number of Shares
Acquired Upon
Exercise
(#)
   
 
Name
  Value Realized Upon
Exercise
($)(1)
  Number of Shares
Acquired Upon Vesting
(#)(2)(3)
  Value Realized Upon
Vesting ($)(4)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
 

Robert C. Gasser

            17,955     540,168  

Howard C. Naphtali

            18,014     757,632  

Christopher J. Heckman

    20,025     677,764     11,462     458,412  

Alasdair Haynes

            7,000     333,130  

Ian Domowitz

            10,568     423,686  

Anthony J. Huck

    47,525     1,339,730     12,001     473,249  

(1)
Values based on the weighted average sales price of shares sold upon exercise of options on the date of exercise or, to the extent the shares acquired upon exercise were not sold, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the day immediately preceding the receipt of shares by the named executive officer, minus the exercise price of the option, times the number of shares shown for the named executive officer in column (b).

(2)
The amounts shown in column (d) represent the vesting of stock units granted under the SUA Program in prior years, awards that vested immediately upon grant under the SUA Program during 2008 and restricted shares units that vested in 2008.

27


Table of Contents

(3)
As more fully described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the units (including the vested units representing foregone compensation) are not delivered in shares of ITG common stock until the third anniversary or the sixth anniversary of the grant date. We believe that these settlement provisions of the SUA Program align our executives' economic interests with those of our stockholders, by providing a vehicle for investing a portion of compensation in our stock.

(4)
Values based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the vesting date of the underlying shares, or the last trading day immediately prior to the vesting date to the extent the vesting date was not a trading date. Values realized upon vesting for which receipt has been deferred as described under "SUA Program" in the narrative following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table are as follows: Mr. Gasser $250,367; Mr. Naphtali: $238,320; Mr. Heckman: $177,233, Mr. Domowitz: $93,500, Mr. Huck $194,284.


Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

Name
  Executive
contributions in last
FY ($)(1)
  Aggregate earnings
in last FY ($)(2)
  Aggregate withdrawals /
distributions ($)(3)
  Aggregate balance at
last FYE ($)(4)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
 

Robert C. Gasser

    250,367     (278,348 )       352,859  

Howard C. Naphtali

    238,320     (755,590 )   (144,780 )   805,914  

Christopher J. Heckman

    177,233     (672,882 )   (144,145 )   717,272  

Alasdair Haynes

                 

Ian Domowitz

    93,500     (623,108 )   (148,894 )   585,028  

Anthony J. Huck

    194,284     (732,957 )   (136,762 )   783,220  

(1)
The amounts shown in column (b) are included in columns (c), (d) and (g) of the Summary Compensation Table and the units representing such deferred compensation are included in column (i) (denoted by an "*") of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table and column (d) of the Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table.

(2)
The amounts shown in column (c) represent (i) for units representing deferred compensation granted under our SUA Program in 2008, the difference in the fair market value of such units on December 31, 2008 as compared to the fair market value of such units on the applicable grant date, (ii) for units representing deferred compensation granted under our SUA Program prior to 2008 and not settled in 2008, the difference in the fair market value of such units on December 31, 2008 as compared to the fair market value of such units on December 31, 2007 and (iii) for units representing deferred compensation granted under our SUA Program prior to 2008 and settled in 2008, the difference in the fair market value of such units on the date of settlement as compared to the fair market value of such units on December 31, 2007. Fair market values are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the dates referenced above.

(3)
The amounts shown in column (d) represent the fair market value of the shares of ITG common stock representing deferred compensation delivered to each named executive officer during 2008 pursuant to our SUA Program. Fair market values are based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the dates that the underlying shares were delivered.

(4)
The amounts shown in column (e) represent the fair market value of the shares of ITG common stock representing deferred compensation held by each named executive officer under the SUA Program as of December 31, 2008.

        For a description of the material factors of the SUA Program, see the description under "SUA Program" following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.

28


Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards for Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2008

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Stock Awards  
 
  Option Awards  
 
   
  Market
value of
nonvested
shares or
units of
Stock held
that have
not
vested
($)
   
  Incentive
Plans:
Market
or payout
value of
nonvested
shares,
units or
other
rights
held ($)
 
Name
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plans:
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
Options (#)
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Expiration
Date
  Number
of shares
or units of
Stock held
that have
not
vested
(#)
  Incentive
Plans:
Number of
nonvested
shares, units
or other
rights
held
(#)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
  (f)
  (g)
  (h)
  (i)
  (j)
 

Robert C. Gasser

                        10,416 (a)   236,652          

    46,570 (1)   23,286 (2)       44.22     10/4/2011                  

                        540 (c)   12,279          

                        534 (d)   12,134          

                        528 (e)   11,993          

        60,340 (3)       47.25     1/2/2013                  

                        459 (w)   10,428          

                        19,503 (b)   443,108          

                        1,049 (x)   23,833          

Howard C. Naphtali

   

   

   

   

   

   
265

(f)
 
6,021
   

   

 

                        254 (g)   5,763          

                        369 (h)   8,380          

                        304 (i)   6,907          

                        409 (j)   9,295          

                        358 (k)   8,134          

                        248 (l)   5,635          

                        394 (m)   8,952          

                        325 (n)   7,384          

                        241 (o)   5,469          

                        860 (p)   19,532          

                        291 (q)   6,611          

                        305 (r)   6,918          

                        359 (s)   8,149          

                        313 (t)   7,113          

                        332 (c)   7,550          

                        352 (d)   8,004          

                        389 (e)   8,829          

                        4,800 (aa)   109,056          

                                         

    47,525 (4)           12.50     5/21/09                  

    27,000 (5)           25.38     8/1/10                  

        12,800 (6)       45.30     8/31/11                  

                                7,771 (bb)   176,557  

        24,323 (7)       45.04     3/14/13                  

                        559 (w)   12,700          

                        802 (x)   18,221          

Christopher J. Heckman

   

   

   

   

   

   
264

(f)
 
5,990
   

   

 

                        252 (g)   5,733          

                        385 (h)   8,747          

                        287 (i)   6,526          

                        406 (j)   9,224          

                        296 (l)   6,720          

                        361 (m)   8,202          

                        311 (n)   7,066          

                        230 (o)   5,226          

                        650 (p)   14,766          

                        243 (q)   5,514          

                        269 (r)   6,111          

                        296 (s)   6,726          

                        392 (t)   8,913          

                        361 (c)   8,203        
 

29


Table of Contents

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Stock Awards  
 
  Option Awards  
 
   
  Market
value of
nonvested
shares or
units of
Stock held
that have
not
vested
($)
   
  Incentive
Plans:
Market
or payout
value of
nonvested
shares,
units or
other
rights
held ($)
 
Name
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plans:
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
unearned
Options (#)
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Expiration
Date
  Number
of shares
or units of
Stock held
that have
not
vested
(#)
  Incentive
Plans:
Number of
nonvested
shares, units
or other
rights
held
(#)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
  (f)
  (g)
  (h)
  (i)
  (j)
 

                        359 (d)   8,149          

                        361 (e)   8,203          

    16,000 (5)           25.38     8/1/10     4,800 (aa)   109,056          

        12,800 (6)       45.30     8/31/11                  

                                6,661 (bb)   151,338  

        20,848 (7)       45.04     3/14/13                  

                        349 (w)   7,929          

                        704 (x)   15,995          

Alasdair Haynes

   

   

   

   

   
   
4,300

(aa)
 
97,696
   

   

 

    21,500 (5)           25.38     8/1/10                      

                        10,000 (cc)   227,200          

        10,800 (6)       45.30     8/31/11                  

                                8,342 (bb)   189,530  

        25,709 (8)       47.59     1/1/13                  

Ian Domowitz

   

   

   

   

   

   
116

(f)
 
2,636
   

   

 

                        131 (g)   2,976          

                        504 (h)   11,451          

                        217 (i)   4,934          

                        307 (j)   6,965          

                        271 (k)   6,146          

                        333 (l)   7,566          

                        358 (m)   8,140          

                        311 (n)   7,066          

                        230 (o)   5,234          

                        699 (p)   15,882          

                        243 (q)   5,514          

                        152 (r)   3,453          

                        191 (s)   4,338          

                        278 (t)   6,312          

                        183 (c)   4,156          

                        204 (u)   4,624          

                        201 (k)   4,560          

                        722 (v)   16,396          

                        4,300 (aa)   97,696          

    21,500 (5)           25.38     8/1/10                  

        10,800 (6)       45.30     8/31/11                  

                                5,254 (bb)   119,371  

        16,190 (8)       47.59     1/1/13                  

                        667 (x)   15,154          

Anthony J. Huck

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

 

    16,000 (5)           25.38     8/1/10                
 

Footnotes (1)–(8): The options disclosed in columns (b) and (c) became or become, to the extent the named executive officer remains employed through the applicable vesting date, fully exercisable on the following dates: (1) half of this amount vested on 10/4/2007 and the other half vested on 10/4/2008; (2) 10/4/2009; (3) one-third vested on 1/2/2009 and an additional one-third will vest on each of 1/2/2010 and 1/2/2011; (4) 1/1/2007; (5) 8/1/2008; (6) 8/31/2009; (7) 3/14/2011; and (8) 1/1/2011.

Footnote (a): These units, which represent the remainder of Mr. Gasser's performance-based restricted stock unit award granted in 2006, were earned on September 30, 2007 and will vest on October 4, 2009 if Mr. Gasser remains employed through such date. The market value of the award was determined

30


Table of Contents


using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Footnote (b): These units, which represent Mr. Gasser's performance-based restricted stock unit award granted in 2008, were earned on December 31, 2008. On January 31, 2009, 6,501 units vested and the remaining units will vest in equal installments on January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011 if Mr. Gasser remains employed through the applicable vesting date. The market value of the award was determined using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Footnotes (c)–(x): The restricted stock units held by the named executive officers pursuant to the SUA Program, and the corresponding market value, are disclosed in columns (g) and (h) and vest in full on the following dates provided the named executive officer remains employed through the applicable vesting date: (c) 4/16/2010; (d) 8/15/2010; (e) 11/15/2010; (f) 7/15/2009; (g) 10/15/2009; (h) 1/15/2010; (i) 4/15/2010; (j) 7/15/2010; (k) 10/15/2010; (l) 1/15/2011; (m) 4/15/2011; (n) 7/15/2011; (o) 10/14/2011; (p) 1/17/2012; (q) 4/17/2009; (r) 7/17/2009; (s) 10/16/2009; (t) 1/16/2010; (u) 7/13/2010; (v) 12/31/2010; (w) 3/14/2011 and (x) 7/16/2011. The market value of the awards was determined using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Footnotes (aa): These performance-based restricted share awards were earned as of December 31, 2008 and vested January 1, 2009. The market value of the awards was determined using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Footnote (bb): These performance-based restricted stock unit awards vest on January 31, 2010 provided the performance criteria is met as of December 31, 2009. The amounts shown represent the number of unearned unvested restricted stock units that would be earned assuming the two-year cumulative pre-tax operating income objective is achieved at the 100% performance level. The executive must remain employed through the performance period in order for the award to vest. The market value of the award was determined using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008). Historically, the performance-based restricted stock unit awards granted to our executives have included a three-year cumulative pre-tax operating income objective. However, in setting the award granted in early 2008 and related to the 2007 compensation year, we used a two-year cumulative pre-tax operating income objective because no equity grants were made to the executive officers in 2007.

Footnote (cc): Mr. Haynes' time-based restricted share award vested on 1/3/2009. The market value of the award was determined using a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).


Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements

        On May 9, 2006, the compensation committee authorized the entry into change-in-control agreements with the following named executive officers: Messrs. Naphtali, Heckman, Haynes, Domowitz and Huck. On November 26, 2007, the compensation committee ratified amendments to these change-in-control agreements to reflect certain modifications necessary to comply with the requirements of section 409A of the Code. Each change-in-control agreement provides for the payment of benefits if the executive's employment is terminated within eighteen months following a change in control, either by the company not for cause (and not due to the executive's death or disability) or by the executive for good reason. In addition, if the executive's employment is terminated by the company other than for cause within six months prior to the date of a change in control and it is reasonably demonstrated that the termination arose in connection with, or in anticipation of, the change in control, the benefits set forth below will be paid to the executive.

31


Table of Contents

        "Good reason" is defined to include (i) a material reduction in the executive's primary functional authorities, duties or responsibilities (other than any such reduction resulting merely from an acquisition of the company and its existence as a subsidiary or division of another entity); (ii) relocation of the executive's principal job location of more than 35 miles; (iii) material reductions in the executive's base salary or participation in annual incentive compensation plans, other than certain across the board reductions; and (iv) a material breach of the change-in-control agreement by the company (including the company decreasing the executive's base salary and target annual cash incentives by more than 10%).

        "Cause" is defined to include (i) the executive's willful failure to substantially perform his duties with the company (other than any as a result of the executive's disability); (ii) the executive's gross negligence in the performance of his duties which results in material financial harm to the company; (iii) the executive's conviction of, or guilty plea, to any felony or any other crime involving the personal enrichment of the executive at the expense of the company; (iv) the executive's willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise; or (v) the executive's willful material violation of any provision of the company's code of conduct.

        "Change in control" is deemed to occur (i) if any person, other than the company or a person related to the company, is or becomes the beneficial owner of 35% percent or more of the total voting power of all the then-outstanding voting securities; (ii) if a majority of the members of the company's incumbent board of directors cease to be board members; (iii) upon consummation of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, or reorganization of the company or similar transaction affecting the capital structure of the company; (iv) upon consummation of the sale by the company of all or substantially all of the company's assets; or (v) if the stockholders of the company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the company.

        The benefits payable are base salary, together with unused accrued vacation, through the date of termination, pro-rata target annual bonus for the year of termination, and two times the sum of the executive's annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the date of termination or the date of the change in control, whichever is higher, plus the average of the executive's annual bonuses for the three years immediately preceding the year of termination of employment. Such amounts are payable in a lump sum within ten business days after the date of termination of employment. In addition, the company will continue to provide the executive and his or her dependents with health benefits and will pay to the executive an amount in cash equal to the premium cost that the company would have paid to maintain disability and life insurance coverage for the executive and his or her dependents for up to two years following the date of termination. If any payment under a change in control agreement is subject to an excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the amounts payable will be reduced to a level at which no amount is subject to the excise tax, provided that no reduction will be made if the net after-tax benefit, taking into account income, employment and excise taxes, to which the executive would otherwise be entitled without the reduction would be greater than the net after-tax benefit to the executive resulting from receipt of the payments with such reduction. However, in this case, the executive will be responsible for all excise tax payments. In the event of a dispute under a change-in-control agreement, the company will reimburse the executive for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred in the dispute if the executive prevails on any material claim or defense in the dispute.

        The following table sets forth the estimated total payments, as well as each component of compensation outlined above or in the footnotes to the table below and taken into account in determining the total amounts payable in connection with a change in control, that would have been due to each of the named executive officers had a change in control and a qualifying termination of

32


Table of Contents


employment occurred on December 31, 2008, assuming a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Name
  Total Cash
Severance
  Value of Additional
Welfare Benefits(1)
  Acceleration of
Vesting of Stock
Options, Restricted
Share Awards
(including "Unearned"
Performance-Based
Awards) and SUA
Awards(2)
  Acceleration
of Vesting of
"Earned"
Performance-Based
Restricted Share
Awards(2)(3)
  Total Change
in Control
Payments
 

Howard C. Naphtali

  $ 4,049,518   $ 40,676   $ 352,124   $ 109,056   $ 4,551,374  

Christopher J. Heckman

  $ 3,702,197   $ 40,676   $ 305,279   $ 109,056   $ 4,157,208  

Alasdair Haynes

  $ 3,386,553   $ 11,644   $ 416,730   $ 97,696   $ 3,912,623  

Ian Domowitz

  $ 3,386,057   $ 27,537   $ 262,874   $ 97,696   $ 3,774,164  

(1)
Value of additional benefits assumes benefits will be provided for a full two years, is based on current costs and does not assume increased value for future price increases or ITG providing for executive without the benefit of group rates.

(2)
Under the terms of the applicable award agreements, stock options, restricted share awards and restricted SUA awards vest upon a change in control. (These stock option and restricted SUA awards also vest upon the executive's death or disability and the restricted SUA awards vest upon the executive's retirement, which is defined as the executive's termination of employment at age 65 or after the executive has reached age 55 and has at least 10 years of service with the company.) The amounts in this column reflect the spread value of options (which for 2008 was zero), the face value of restricted share (including SUA) awards and payout of performance awards, not already earned, at 100% levels.

(3)
The amounts in this column reflect the face value of the performance-based restricted share awards that were earned on December 31, 2008 and vested on January 1, 2009.

        In the event that a change in control occurred on December 31, 2008 and there was no subsequent qualifying termination of employment, the total change in control payment for each named executive officer would be the amounts set forth in "Acceleration of Vesting of Stock Options, Restricted Share Awards (including "Unearned" Performance-Based Awards) and SUA Awards" and "Acceleration of Vesting of "Earned" Performance-Based Restricted Share Awards."

        On September 15, 2006, Mr. Gasser entered into an employment agreement with the company to serve as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the company. Effective August 6, 2008, this agreement was amended and restated. The agreement provides that the term of Mr. Gasser's employment will begin on October 4, 2006 and end on December 31, 2009, with automatic one-year extensions, unless terminated earlier by either party upon 90 days written notice. The agreement provides that if his employment with the company is terminated by the company without cause (as defined below), if he terminates employment with the company for good reason, or if the company elects not to renew the agreement, in each case, prior to a change in control (as defined below) of the company, the company will pay to Mr. Gasser an amount equal to Mr. Gasser's base salary payable through his termination date and a pro-rated portion of the bonus compensation Mr. Gasser would have actually earned for the calendar year in which his date of termination occurs (to be paid as and when bonuses are payable to other executives for that year). The company will also pay to Mr. Gasser an amount equal to the sum of (i) Mr. Gasser's base salary at the rate then in effect on the date of his termination and (ii) an amount equal to the average annual bonus paid or payable to Mr. Gasser with respect to the three calendar years preceding the calendar year of his termination. The portion of this amount equal to two times the dollar limit in effect under section 401(a)(17) of the Code (currently

33


Table of Contents

$245,000) for the year in which Mr. Gasser's termination occurs will be paid in installments over the 12-month period following his date of termination. The remaining amount will be paid in a lump sum within thirty (30) days following his date of termination. For purposes of the foregoing calculation, Mr. Gasser's bonus with respect to the 2006 calendar year will be deemed to be $1,575,000. All outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Gasser that are not vested as of his date of termination, will continue to vest as if he had remained employed by the company through the first anniversary of his date of termination. Only performance objectives for outstanding equity awards granted, and performance periods that began, before January 2, 2009 will be deemed satisfied as of his termination date. All outstanding options held by Mr. Gasser that are vested as of the termination date will remain exercisable until the earlier of the first anniversary of Mr. Gasser's date of termination or the expiration of the option term in accordance with the terms of the company's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Long-term Incentive Plan (which was merged into the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan on May 8, 2007) or the company's 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as applicable, or any successor plan thereto. Any outstanding options that vest during the one-year period following his termination date will remain exercisable until the earlier of the one-year period following the applicable vesting date or the expiration of the option term. The company will also continue to maintain and provide to Mr. Gasser and his dependants continued medical coverage at the level in effect on his date of termination for one year after his date of termination.

        The following table sets forth the estimated total payments, as well as each component of compensation outlined above and taken into account in determining the total amounts payable that would have been due to Mr. Gasser had a qualifying termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008, assuming a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Name
  Total Cash
Severance
  Value of
Additional
Welfare
Benefits(1)
  Continued
Vesting
of Stock
Options and
Restricted
Share Awards(2)
  Total
Severance
Payments
 

Robert C. Gasser

  $ 4,002,500   $ 20,528   $ 384,355   $ 4,407,383  

(1)
Value of additional benefits is based on current costs and does not assume increased value for future price increases or ITG providing such additional benefits without the benefit of group rates.

(2)
This amount reflects the spread value of options (which for 2008 was zero) and the face value of restricted share awards vesting during 2009.

        The agreement further provides that if Mr. Gasser's employment is terminated by the company without cause, by Mr. Gasser for good reason, or if the company elects not to renew the agreement, in each case, within eighteen months following a change in control of the company, the company will pay to Mr. Gasser severance benefits that are substantially consistent to the benefits payable to the named executive officers pursuant to the change-in-control agreements as described above. Specifically, if Mr. Gasser's employment is terminated by the company without cause (and not due to his death or permanent disability), by Mr. Gasser for good reason, or the company elects not to renew the agreement, in each case, on or within eighteen (18) months after a change in control of the company, Mr. Gasser will be entitled to the following severance payments and benefits: (i) an amount equal to Mr. Gasser's base salary payable through his termination date in accordance with the company's standard payroll practices and a pro-rated portion of the bonus compensation Mr. Gasser would have actually earned for the calendar year in which his date of termination occurs (to be paid as and when bonuses are payable to other executives for that year); and (ii) an amount (to be paid in a lump sum within ten (10) days following the date of termination) equal to two times the sum of (A) his annual base salary prior to his date of termination or the date of change in control (whichever is higher) and

34


Table of Contents


(B) the average annual bonus paid or payable to Mr. Gasser with respect to the three calendar years preceding the calendar year of his termination (for purposes of the foregoing calculation only, Mr. Gasser's bonus with respect to the 2006 calendar year will be deemed to be $1,575,000). Mr. Gasser will also receive continued health, dental, and vision insurance coverage and a monthly cash payment equal to the premium cost that the Company would have paid to maintain disability and life insurance coverage until the earlier of the end of the two-year period following Mr. Gasser's date of termination or the date on which Mr. Gasser is eligible to receive substantially comparable benefits through subsequent employment. Mr. Gasser is also entitled to the benefits set forth in this paragraph if his employment is terminated by the company (other than for cause) within six months prior to the date of a change in control and such termination arose in connection with the change in control.

        The agreement provides that if any payment, coverage or benefit provided to him is subject to the excise tax under section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Gasser will have the amounts payable to him and benefits he will receive reduced so that no amounts he would receive would be subject to the excise tax under section 4999 of the Code if such reduction would result in him receiving a greater amount on an after-tax basis than if no reduction had occurred.

        The following table sets forth the estimated total payments, as well as each component of compensation outlined above and taken into account in determining the total amounts payable in connection with a change in control, that would have been due to Mr. Gasser had a change in control and a qualifying termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008, assuming a per share value of the company's common stock of $22.72 (which was the closing price per share on December 31, 2008).

Name
  Total Cash
Severance
  Value of
Additional
Welfare
Benefits(1)
  Acceleration
of Vesting
of Stock
Options and
SUA Awards(2)
  Acceleration
of Vesting
of "Earned"
Performance-Based
Restricted
Share Awards(2)(3)
  Total
Change in
Control
Payments
 

Robert C. Gasser

  $ 6,327,500   $ 41,056   $ 70,669   $ 679,760   $ 7,118,985  

(1)
Value of additional benefits assumes benefits will be provided for a full two years, is based on current costs and does not assume increased value for future price increases or ITG providing for executive without the benefit of group rates.

(2)
Under the terms of the applicable award agreements, stock options, restricted share awards and restricted SUA awards vest upon a change in control. (These awards also vest upon the executive's death or disability and the restricted SUA awards vest upon the executive's retirement, which is defined as the executive's termination of employment at age 65 or after the executive has reached age 55 and has at least 10 years of service with the company.) The amounts in this column reflect the spread value of options (which for 2008 was zero) and the face value of SUA awards.

(3)
The amounts in this column reflect the face value of the performance-based restricted share awards that (a) were granted in 2006 and earned on September 30, 2007, the remainder of which will vest on October 4, 2009 and (b) were granted in 2008, and earned on December 31, 2008, the remainder of which will vest in equal installments on January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011.

        In the event that a change in control occurred on December 31, 2008 and there was no subsequent qualifying termination of employment, the total change-in-control payment for Mr. Gasser would be the amount set forth in "Acceleration of Vesting of Stock Options and SUA Awards" and "Acceleration of Vesting of "Earned" Performance-Based Restricted Share Awards."

35


Table of Contents

        All severance benefits are conditioned on Mr. Gasser's execution and non-revocation of a release.

        If Mr. Gasser's employment is terminated on account of his death, permanent disability, voluntary resignation other than for good reason or by the company for cause, Mr. Gasser will be entitled to receive only his base salary through his date of termination, reimbursement of all reimbursable expenses incurred by him prior to such termination, and all other accrued, but unpaid benefits under the company's benefit plans and programs. In addition, if Mr. Gasser's employment is terminated on account of his death or permanent disability, all outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Gasser as of the date of termination will become fully vested and exercisable (and any performance objectives applicable to awards will be deemed satisfied as of the date of termination) in accordance with the terms of the company's Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Long-term Incentive Plan (which was merged into the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan on May 8, 2007) or the company's 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan, as applicable, or any successor plan thereto.

        The agreement provides that during the term of Mr. Gasser's employment with the company, and for the one-year period after Mr. Gasser's termination of employment, Mr. Gasser can not (i) compete with the company, (ii) solicit in any way the employees of the company to terminate their employment, or (iii) solicit in any way the customers, suppliers, clients, brokers, licensees or other business relations of the company to cease doing business with the company.

        Prior to a change in control, "good reason" is defined to include (i) the material diminution of Mr. Gasser's duties, responsibilities, powers or authorities; (ii) the removal of Mr. Gasser from his office as Chief Executive Officer; (iii) the failure to obtain a written assumption of the employment agreement by any person acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of the company; (iv) a material reduction by the company of Mr. Gasser's salary, (v) the company does not renew the term of the agreement; (vi) material breach by the company of its obligations under the terms of the agreement or (vii) relocation of Mr. Gasser's principal place of business to a location more than fifty (50) miles from its current location. On or after a change in control, "good reason" means, (i) (A) the removal of Mr. Gasser from his office as Chief Executive Officer, or (B) a material reduction of his primary functional authorities, duties, or responsibilities as President and Chief Executive Officer of the company from those in effect immediately prior to the change in control or the assignment of duties to him inconsistent with those of President and Chief Executive Officer of the company; (ii) the company's requiring Mr. Gasser to be based at a location in excess of fifty (50) miles from the location of his principal job location or office immediately prior to the change in control; (iii) a material reduction of Mr. Gasser's salary unless such reduction applies on substantially the same percentage basis to all company employees generally; (iv) a material reduction in Mr. Gasser's participation in any of the company's annual incentive compensation plans in which he participates prior to the change in control unless such reduction applies to all plan participants generally; (v) the failure of the company to obtain the assumption of the obligations contained herein by any successor; (vi) material breach by the company of its obligations under the terms of the agreement (including the company decreasing the executive's base salary and target annual cash incentives by more than 10%); or (vii) the company does not renew the term of the agreement.

        "cause" is defined to include (i) Mr. Gasser's willful failure to substantially perform his duties with the company; (ii) gross negligence in the performance of Mr. Gasser's duties which results in material financial harm to the company; (iii) Mr. Gasser's conviction of, or guilty plea to, any crime involving his personal enrichment at the expense of the company, or any felony; (iv) Mr. Gasser's willful engagement in conduct that is demonstrably and materially injurious to the company, monetarily or otherwise; or (v) Mr. Gasser's willful violation of any material provision of the company's code of conduct.

        "change in control" is deemed to occur (i) if any person, other than the company or a person related to the company, is or becomes the beneficial owner of 35% percent or more of the total voting

36


Table of Contents


power of all the then-outstanding voting securities; (ii) if a majority of the members of the company's incumbent board of directors cease to be board members; (iii) upon consummation of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, or reorganization of the company or similar transaction affecting the capital structure of the company; (iv) upon consummation of the sale by the company of all or substantially all of the company's assets; or (v) if the stockholders of the company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the company.

        The company presented Mr. Domowitz with an offer letter on March 16, 2001. Pursuant to the terms of the offer letter, if Mr. Domowitz's employment is terminated for any reason and the company elects to prohibit Mr. Domowitz, for a period of twelve months after he leaves the company, from engaging in any business, or any business in competition with the business carried on by the company, then the company will continue to pay Mr. Domowitz his then current base salary and bonus during the twelve-month period immediately following his termination of employment. The following table sets forth the estimated total payments that would have been due to Mr. Domowitz had a qualifying termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008.

Name
  Total Cash
Severance
  Total
Severance
Payments
 

Ian Domowitz

  $ 1,452,502   $ 1,452,502  

        As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Haynes and ITG Europe were parties to an employment agreement, dated November 17, 1998. The agreement continues until either Mr. Haynes or ITG Europe gives at least twelve months written notice to terminate the agreement or when Mr. Haynes reaches age 65. In addition, ITG Europe may terminate the agreement, without further obligation to Mr. Haynes, if he (i) breaches the agreement, (ii) is guilty of dishonesty, gross misconduct or willful neglect in the performance of his responsibilities, (iii) becomes bankrupt or makes any formal arrangement or composition with his creditors, (iv) is convicted of a criminal offense which adversely affects ITG Europe, (v) is guilty of any conduct that brings ITG Europe or affiliates of ITG Europe into disrepute, (vi) through his own default, ceases to be a director of ITG Europe or is otherwise prohibited or disqualified from serving as a director or (vii) is unable to perform his duties as a result of disability. If ITG Europe terminates the agreement without twelve months' notice for any other reason, then Mr. Haynes would be entitled to severance, payable in a lump sum, in the amount of his salary plus the cost to ITG of providing any benefits (including any bonus) which Mr. Haynes would have received for the remainder of the twelve month notice period. The aforementioned provisions were superceded by the Separation Agreement dated as of February 12, 2009 between the company and Mr. Haynes and further described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

        The following table sets forth the estimated total payments, as well as each component of compensation outlined above and taken into account in determining the total amounts payable that

37


Table of Contents


would have been due to Mr. Haynes had a qualifying termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2008.

Name
  Total Cash
Severance
  Value of
Additional
Welfare
Benefits(1)
  Total
Severance
Payments
 

Alasdair Haynes

  $ 1,519,133   $ 5,822   $ 1,524,955  

(1)
Value of additional benefits is based on current costs and does not assume increased value for future price increases or ITG providing for executive without the benefit of group rates.


Director Compensation

        Each of our non-employee directors, other than our chairman, receives an annual retainer of $60,000, payable in quarterly installments. Our chairman received an annual retainer of $90,000 until August 2008. In August 2008, the compensation committee approved an increase in the chairman's retainer and since August 2008, our chairman receives an annual retainer of $160,000, payable in quarterly installments. Under our Amended and Restated Directors' Retainer Fee Subplan, adopted in 2002, the annual retainer fee is payable, at the election of each director, either in (i) cash, (ii) ITG common stock with a value equal to the retainer fee on the grant date, or (iii) under a deferred compensation plan which provides deferred share units with a value equal to the retainer fee on the grant date which convert to freely sellable shares when the director retires from our board of directors. Directors who are our employees are not compensated for serving as directors.

        Each non-employee director also receives fees of $1,000 for attendance at each regular meeting of the board of directors and $2,000 for any special board meetings. Board committee chair annual retainers are $9,000 for the audit committee chair, $7,000 for the compensation committee chair, and $5,000 for all other board committee chairs. All committee members receive $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of a committee of the board of directors. Directors of the company are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses.

        Under our Amended and Restated Directors' Equity Subplan adopted in January 2006, we will grant newly appointed non-employee directors stock options valued at $100,000 and restricted stock unit awards valued at $100,000 at, or near, the time of appointment to the board of directors. In addition, non-employee directors will be granted stock options valued at $36,000 and restricted stock units valued at $36,000 annually, on the forty-fifth day following each of our annual meetings of stockholders. These options are granted with an exercise price per share equal to 100% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. Such options expire at the earliest of (1) five years after the date of grant, (2) 12 months after death, disability or retirement after reaching age 65, and (3) 60 days after an optionee ceases to serve as a director for reasons other than death, disability or such retirement. Options and restricted stock units vest and, in the case of options, become exercisable, in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. Vesting accelerates upon a change in control of the company or if the director ceases to serve as a non-employee director due to his or her death or disability. Only directors who are not our employees are eligible to participate in this plan.

        Each director may participate in our Charitable Gifts Matching Program pursuant to which we match 100% of the charitable contributions made by such directors up to a maximum dollar amount of $2,000 per person per year.

        The board of directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for our nonemployee directors effective January 1, 2006 in order to more closely align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Under the guidelines, non-employee directors are required to beneficially own shares of

38


Table of Contents


our common stock and company restricted share units (both vested and unvested) having an aggregate value of at least three times the annual cash retainer of the individual director. Stock ownership must be achieved by each director by January 1, 2009 or, in the case of directors first elected or appointed to the board of directors after January 1, 2006, within three years after the director's first election or appointment to the board.

        To ensure achievement of the ownership goals, directors who have not yet attained the required level of ownership must elect to receive at least one-half of the director's annual cash retainer in the form of common stock or deferred share units until such time as the stock ownership levels have been satisfied.

        The following table sets forth the total director compensation in 2008 (including for William I Jacobs who retired on March 18, 2008), as well as each component of compensation outlined above.

Name
  Fees earned or
paid in cash
($)(1)(2)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)(4)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)(4)
  Total
($)
 
(a)
  (b)
  (c)
  (d)
  (e)
 

J. William Burdett

    78,000     30,418     39,083     147,501  

Christopher V. Dodds

    35,967     18,007     18,329     72,303  

Timothy L. Jones

    82,000     30,418     53,263     165,681  

Robert L. King

    86,250     30,418     39,083     155,751  

Maureen O'Hara

    150,808     30,418     39,083     220,309  

Kevin J.P. O'Hara

    80,000     51,765     51,651     183,416  

Brian J. Steck

    73,000     30,418     39,083     142,501  

William I Jacobs(3)

    48,000     39,754     23,870     111,624  

(1)
The amounts shown in column (b) include the annual retainer and attendance fees earned by each director. The following directors elected to receive their annual retainer in deferred ITG common stock: Ms. O'Hara and Messrs. Jones and O'Hara.

(2)
The amounts shown in columns (c) and (d) are the amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of restricted share awards and options awarded to each of the directors, as determined pursuant to FAS 123R, but modified to eliminate any reduction in the grant date fair value of the awards for the possibility of service-based forfeiture. Except as noted in the immediately preceding sentence, the fair value of the option awards and stock awards for 2008 was determined using the valuation methodology and assumptions set forth in footnote 2 to the company's financial statements included in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference. The amounts shown include amounts recognized in the company's financial statements for 2008 in respect of awards granted in prior years.

(3)
On March 18, 2008, Mr. Jacobs retired from our board of directors. In consideration of Mr. Jacobs' approximately 14 years of dedication and service to ITG, the board of directors decided to accelerate the vesting of all of Mr. Jacobs' outstanding equity awards and pay his retainer fee through the second quarter of 2008, which, when combined, approximated $115,000.

39


Table of Contents

(4)
The following chart shows the annual option and restricted stock units granted to each of the directors during 2008 and any deferred share units received as payment of the annual retainer fee, together with the fair value of such awards:
Name
  Grant
Date
  Number of
Options(a)
  Number of
Units(a)
  Fair Value
at date
of grant
 

J. William Burdett

    6/20/08     2,831       $ 36,000  

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

Christopher V. Dodds

   
6/13/08
   
7,508
   
 
$

100,000
 

    6/17/08         2,641   $ 100,000  

Timothy L. Jones

   
6/20/08
   
2,831
   
 
$

36,000
 

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

    1/7/08         304 (b) $ 15,000  

    4/1/08         311 (b) $ 15,000  

    7/1/08         454 (b) $ 15,000  

    10/1/08         496 (b) $ 15,000  

Robert L. King

   
6/20/08
   
2,831
   
 
$

36,000
 

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

Maureen O'Hara

   
6/20/08
   
2,831
   
 
$

36,000
 

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

    1/7/08         456 (b) $ 22,500  

    4/1/08         467 (b) $ 22,500  

    7/1/08         680 (b) $ 22,500  

    10/1/08         1,696 (b) $ 51,308  

Kevin J.P. O'Hara

   
6/20/08
   
2,831
   
 
$

36,000
 

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

    1/7/08         304 (b) $ 15,000  

    4/1/08         311 (b) $ 15,000  

    7/1/08         454 (b) $ 15,000  

    10/1/08         496 (b) $ 15,000  

Brian J. Steck

   
6/20/08
   
2,831
   
 
$

36,000
 

    6/20/08         960   $ 36,000  

William I Jacobs

   
3/18/08

(c)
 
5,841
   
 
$

84,813
 

    3/18/08 (c)       1,354   $ 62,961  

40


Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Meetings and Committees

        Our board of directors held five regular meetings and two special meetings during 2008. Each member of the board of directors attended, during their term of office, at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board of directors. Board members are expected to attend our annual stockholders' meetings. At our 2008 annual stockholders' meeting, all members of the board of directors and nominees for election to the board were present. Our non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions without any management directors present. Our chairman, Ms. O'Hara, presided over such executive sessions in 2008. Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a technology committee. Each committee of the board of directors is authorized to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties and any expenses in connection with such advice or assistance will be borne by the company.

        The current audit committee members are Mr. King (Chairman), Mr. Dodds, Mr. Jones and Ms. O'Hara. The audit committee is appointed by the board to be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of ITG's independent auditor and for assisting the board in oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the company, (2) the compliance by the company with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditors' qualifications and independence and (4) the performance of the company's internal audit function and independent auditors. These functions are described more fully under Report of the Audit Committee below. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. King, Chairman of the audit committee, is a "financial expert" as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. During 2008, there were six meetings of the audit committee. Each director serving as a member of the audit committee during 2008 attended at least 75% of such meetings that took place while such member was on the committee.

        The current compensation committee members are Ms. O'Hara (Chairman), Mr. Burdett, Mr. O'Hara and Mr. Steck. As determined by the board, all four directors meet the independence requirements of the NYSE, Section 162(m) of the Code, as amended, and Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, no compensation committee member is either a current or former employee of the company. The compensation committee is appointed by the board to discharge its responsibilities relating to compensation of our directors and executive officers. The compensation committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating the director and executive officer compensation plans, policies and programs as further described below. During 2008, there were nine meetings of the compensation committee. Each director serving as a member of the compensation committee during 2008, except for Mr. Steck due to an illness, attended at least 75% of such meetings that took place while such member was on the committee.

        The current nominating and corporate governance committee members are Mr. King (Chairman), Mr. Burdett, Ms. O'Hara and Mr. Steck. The nominating and corporate governance committee is appointed by the board (1) to identify individuals qualified to become board members, and to select, or to recommend that the board select, the director nominees for the next annual meeting of stockholders; (2) to develop and recommend to the board the corporate governance guidelines applicable to the company; (3) to oversee a review by the board of its performance and the performance of its committees and of management's performance; and (4) to recommend to the board director nominees for each committee, including the nominating and corporate governance committee.

        The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. In evaluating candidates, the committee considers the attributes of the candidate (including skills, experience, international versus domestic background, diversity, age, and legal and regulatory requirements) and the needs of the board, and will review all candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation. Stockholders who wish to submit nominees

41


Table of Contents


for director consideration by the nominating and corporate governance committee may do so by submitting such nominees' names in writing, in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by our by-laws, to Investment Technology Group, Inc., Attn: Secretary, 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017. During 2008, there were two meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee. All committee members were in attendance at such meetings, except for Mr. Steck who, due to an illness, did not attend one meeting. The nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a charter, which is posted in the "Corporate Governance" section of our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/nominating_charter.php.

        The current technology committee members are Mr. Jones (Chairman), Mr. King and Mr. O'Hara. The technology committee members are appointed by the board to review and assess the development of our technology and to advise the board and management on matters involving our technology and the acquisition of technology. During 2008, there were two meetings of the technology committee. All committee members were in attendance at such meetings.


The Compensation Committee

        The compensation committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating our director and executive officer compensation plans, policies and programs. Members of the compensation committee are appointed by the board, on the recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The compensation committee members may be removed and replaced by the board.

        The compensation committee operates under a charter, which is posted in the "Corporate Governance" section of our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/compensation_charter.php.

        The compensation committee's authority and responsibilities include the following:

42


Table of Contents

        The company's executives prepared agendas for each meeting in consultation with the compensation committee's chairperson. Compensation committee members generally received agendas and discussion materials in advance.

        In December 2007, the compensation committee engaged McLagan as a compensation consultant. The compensation committee retains the sole ability to hire and fire the consultant and considers the consultant to be independent. At the direction of the company, services provided by McLagan included top management peer group analysis, review of compensation philosophy, competitive compensation benchmarking of executive officer positions, industry research on competitive design of compensation and employment programs, presentation and analysis of compensation design alternatives and other technical advice. The consultants did not provide recommendations on compensation decisions for individual executive officers.

        At the compensation committee's request, from time to time members of management attend portions of compensation committee meetings. During 2008, they included the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Global Head of Human Resources. On an annual basis, the Chief Executive Officer presents a summary of his performance appraisal of each member of our executive committee, along with his compensation recommendations.

        At each compensation committee meeting, the compensation committee had the opportunity to call for an executive session. No members of management, consultants or other outsiders attended executive sessions, except, in some circumstances, McLagan. Among other topics, discussions and decisions regarding Chief Executive Officer compensation took place during these executive sessions.

        The compensation committee took the following key actions at its meetings in 2008:


Code of Ethics

        Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing the conduct of our directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/conduct_ethics.php. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website within two business days following the date of any such amendment or waiver.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        During 2008, the members of the compensation committee were Maureen O'Hara (Chairperson), J. William Burdett, Kevin J.P. O'Hara and Brian J. Steck. The compensation committee was, and continues to be, comprised entirely of independent directors.


NYSE Certification

        The chief executive officer of ITG made an unqualified certification to the NYSE with respect to the firm's compliance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards in June of 2008.

43


Table of Contents


REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act that might incorporate future filings, including this proxy statement, in whole or in part, the following report of the compensation committee on executive compensation shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

        The compensation committee has discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and approved its inclusion in this proxy statement and through incorporation by reference in the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee

Maureen O'Hara, Chairperson
J. William Burdett
Kevin J.P. O'Hara
Brian J. Steck


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        In 2007, the board adopted a written policy on Procedures for the Review of Related Person Transactions. Under this policy, each director, director nominee and executive officer of the company is required to notify the company's General Counsel in writing of any direct or indirect material interest that such person or an immediate family member has in a Related Person Transaction (as defined below). The General Counsel shall submit to the audit committee (or any designated member) the Related Person Transaction for review and the audit committee (or any designated member) shall approve or disapprove the Related Person Transaction.

        A "Related Person Transaction" means any transaction (1) which is currently proposed, or has been in effect at any time since the beginning of the company's most recent fiscal year in which the company was or is to be a participant, (2) the amount of which exceeds $120,000 and (3) in which a related person (as defined in the policy and which includes a director, director nominee or executive officer of the company or any of their immediate family members) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The types of transactions that are covered by this policy include: legal, investment banking, consulting, or management services provided to the company by a related person or a business entity with which the related person is affiliated; sales, purchases and leases of real or personal property between the company and a related person or a business entity with which a related person is affiliated; contributions by the company to a civic or charitable organization for which a related person serves as an executive officer; or indebtedness or guarantees of indebtedness involving the company and a related person or a business entity with which the related person is affiliated.

        The standards to be applied pursuant to this policy in determining approval include whether the Related Person Transaction is fair and reasonable to the company and consistent with the best interests of the company, the business purpose of the transaction, whether the transaction is entered into on an arms-length basis on terms fair to the company and whether such a transaction would violate any provisions of the company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. All Related Person Transactions are required to be disclosed to the audit committee of the company's board of directors and any material Related Person Transaction is required to be disclosed to the full board of directors.

44


Table of Contents


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGERS

        The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 2, 2009 (unless otherwise indicated), regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by (1) each director, (2) each named executive officer, (3) all directors and executive officers as a group and (4) each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common stock. For the purpose of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have "beneficial ownership" of any shares which such person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days after March 2, 2009, but such shares are not deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote and subject to applicable community property and similar statutes, each person listed as the beneficial owner of the shares possesses sole voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares. The mailing address of the parties listed below is our principal business address unless otherwise indicated.

Directors
  Shares of ITG Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percentage
of ITG
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned

Robert C. Gasser. 

    127,486   (1)(2)(3)(6)   *

J. William Burdett

    32,801   (1)(3)   *

Christopher V. Dodds

    7,641   (3)   *

Timothy L. Jones

    41,213   (1)(3)(5)   *

Robert L. King

    11,534   (1)(3)   *

Kevin J.P. O'Hara

    12,647   (1)(3)(5)   *

Maureen O'Hara

    45,650   (1)(3)(5)   *

Brian J. Steck

    41,203   (1)(3)(5)   *

Named Executive Officers (Other than Mr. Gasser)

             

Ian Domowitz

    71,624   (1)(2)   *

Alasdair Haynes

    34,937   (1)   *

Anthony J. Huck

    65,241   (1)(2)(4)(7)   *

Howard C. Naphtali

    190,757   (1)(2)(4)   *

Christopher J. Heckman

    82,069   (1)(2)(4)   *

All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)

    832,056   (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)   1.9%

5% stockholders

             
 

Third Avenue Management LLC(8)

    2,637,172   (9)   6.0%

*
Less than 1%.

(1)
Beneficial ownership includes stock options that are exercisable at March 2, 2009, or within 60 days thereafter, as follows: Mr. Gasser: 66,683; Mr. Burdett: 14,447; Mr. Jones: 31,682; Mr. King: 8,306; Mr. O'Hara: 4,967; Ms. O'Hara: 14,447; Mr. Steck: 32,870; Mr. Domowitz: 21,500; Mr. Haynes: 21,500; Mr. Huck: 16,000; Mr. Naphtali: 74,525; Mr. Heckman: 16,000; and all directors and executive officers as a group: 376,685.

(2)
Beneficial ownership includes stock unit awards, as follows: Mr. Gasser: 18,660; Mr. Domowitz: 30,600; Mr. Heckman: 33,519; Mr. Huck: 29,972; Mr. Naphtali: 37,802.

(3)
Beneficial ownership includes time-based restricted share unit awards, as follows: Mr. Gasser: 23,418; Mr. Burdett: 1,776; Mr. Dodds: 2,641; Mr. Jones: 1,776; Mr. King: 1,776; Mr. O'Hara: 3,053; Ms. O'Hara: 1,776; Mr. Steck: 1,776.

(4)
Beneficial ownership includes shares held in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as follows: Mr. Heckman: 12,866; Mr. Huck: 258; Mr. Naphtali: 23.

45


Table of Contents

(5)
Beneficial ownership includes deferred share units as follows: Mr. Jones: 6,959; Mr. O'Hara: 3,579; Ms. O'Hara: 9,192; Mr. Steck: 2,761.

(6)
Beneficial ownership includes 400 shares of common stock held in UTMA custodial accounts on behalf of Mr. Gasser's children.

(7)
Mr. Huck shares investment power with respect to 8,341 shares of common stock.

(8)
The address of Third Avenue Management LLC is 622 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10017.

(9)
Information regarding the number of shares beneficially owned is as of December 31, 2008 and was derived from a Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2009 by Third Avenue Management LLC in its capacity as an investment adviser. Third Avenue Management has sole power to vote, or to direct the vote of, 2,595,897 shares of our common stock and has sole power to dispose of, or direct the disposition of, 2,637,172 shares of our common stock. The percentage of the outstanding class is calculated based on outstanding shares at March 2, 2009.


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2008 with respect to the shares of common stock that may be issued to our employees and directors under our existing equity compensation plans.

Plan Category
  Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options
  Weighted
Average
Grant Price
of
Outstanding
Restricted
Share Awards
  Weighted
Average
Grant Price
of Stock Unit
Awards
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Grants
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans(b)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(a)

    2,293,624   $ 32.18   $ 44.63   $ 30.55     1,980,988  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

                     
 

Total

    2,293,624   $ 32.18   $ 44.63   $ 30.55     1,980,988  

(a)
Consists of the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (including its subplans) and the ITG Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ITG ESPP").

(b)
Shares remaining available for future issuance under the various plans include (i) 1,954,534 securities to be issued pursuant to the 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (including its subplans) and (ii) 26,454 securities to be issued pursuant to the ITG ESPP.


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock and other equity securities of our company. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, all persons subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) otherwise filed the required reports with respect to 2008 on a timely basis.

46


Table of Contents


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

        Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act that might incorporate future filings, including this proxy statement, in whole or in part, the following report of the audit committee included herein shall not be incorporated by reference into any such filings.

        At the time of this report, the audit committee of ITG's board of directors was composed of four non-employee directors. The board of directors determined during 2008 that each of those directors satisfied independence requirements, financial literacy and other criteria established by NYSE listing standards. Our audit committee charter is available on our website at http://www.itg.com/investors/committee_charters.php. This charter complies with requirements imposed upon audit committees under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and under the NYSE listing standards.

        The audit committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of ITG's independent auditor and for assisting the board in oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the company, (2) the compliance by the company with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of the company's internal audit function and independent auditors. Management has the primary responsibility for ITG's consolidated financial statements and the reporting process, including the internal control systems. ITG's independent auditors are responsible for auditing the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those consolidated audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        KPMG LLP ("KPMG") served as ITG's independent auditor for 2008, and the audit committee has recommended that KPMG be elected in that capacity for 2009. See Ratification of Selection of Independent Auditors.

        The audit committee has considered whether the provision of certain limited non-audit functions provided by KPMG is compatible with maintaining KPMG's independence and concluded that performing such functions does not affect KPMG's independence in performing its function as auditor of ITG. It is the audit committee's policy for the full audit committee to review, in advance, the proposed provision of non-audit services by KPMG.

        The audit committee has reviewed and discussed with management ITG's audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. It has also discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, The Auditor's Communication with Those Charged with Governance. The audit committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG's communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG its independence. As the result of such review and discussions, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in ITG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Audit Committee

Robert L. King, Chairman
Christopher V. Dodds
Timothy L. Jones
Maureen O'Hara

47


Table of Contents


RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        KPMG was our independent auditor for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. On March 9, 2009, KPMG was appointed by the audit committee to serve as our independent auditor for 2009.

        The ratification of the appointment of KPMG is being submitted to the stockholders at the annual meeting. If such appointment is not ratified, the board of directors will consider the appointment of other accountants.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent auditor for the 2009 fiscal year.

        A representative of KPMG, the independent auditor who audited our consolidated financial statements for 2008, is expected to be present at the annual meeting to respond to appropriate questions of stockholders and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires.


Fees to our Independent Auditor

        The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and fees billed for audit-related services, tax services and all other services rendered by KPMG for such periods.

 
  2008   2007  
 
  (Dollars in thousands)
 

Audit fees(1)

    1,876   $ 1,801  

Audit-related fees

         

Tax fees(2)

    61     80  

All other fees

         
           
 

Total

  $ 1,937   $ 1,881  
           


Pre-approval of Services by the Independent Auditor

        The audit committee has adopted a policy for pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services by our independent auditor. The audit committee will consider annually and, if appropriate, approve the provision of audit services by its independent auditor and consider and, if appropriate, pre-approve the provision of certain defined audit and non-audit services. The audit committee will also consider on a case-by-case basis and, if appropriate, approve specific engagements that are not otherwise pre-approved.

        Any proposed engagement that does not fit within the definition of a pre-approved service may be presented to the audit committee for consideration at its next regular meeting or, if earlier consideration is required, to the audit committee or one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any specific approval of services at its next regular meeting. The audit committee will regularly review summary reports detailing all services being provided to ITG by its independent auditor.

48


Table of Contents


PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES RESERVED AND
AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

        The company currently maintains the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"), which was originally adopted by our board of directors in November 1997. On November 4, 2008, our board of directors approved an increase of 600,000 shares in the total number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP, subject to stockholder approval. Our board of directors has directed that the proposal to increase the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP be submitted to our stockholders for their approval at the annual meeting.

        The ESPP currently has 598,313 shares reserved and available for issuance to our employees participating in the ESPP. As of March 16, 2009, 22 shares of our common stock were remaining for issuance under the ESPP. If the stockholders do not approve the increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP at the annual meeting, no shares of our common stock will be purchased at the end of the February 1, 2009 offering period and any payroll contributions made during the February 1, 2009 offering period will be refunded to participants without interest. Our board of directors believes that our ability to attract, retain and motivate top quality employees is material to our success and is enhanced by our ability to offer our employees the opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in us. Accordingly, our board of directors believes that the availability of an additional 600,000 shares under the ESPP will ensure that we can continue to achieve our compensation strategy. Stockholder approval of the increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the ESPP is necessary in order for the ESPP to meet the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and to comply with the listing maintenance standards of the NYSE.

        The material terms of the ESPP are summarized below. A copy of the full text of the ESPP is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A. This summary of the ESPP is not intended to be a complete description of the ESPP and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the ESPP to which reference is made.

Material Features of the ESPP

General

        The ESPP allows full-time employees of our company to purchase shares of our common stock at a 15% discount through automatic post-tax payroll deductions. The purpose of the ESPP is to provide participating employees with the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the company. These ownership interests are designed to provide an incentive for participants to help increase our success and provide an opportunity to share in that success as we continue to shape the future of trading.


Administration

        The ESPP is administered by a committee of officers from our company (the "Administrator") who are appointed by our board of directors to interpret the terms and provisions of the ESPP. The Administrator has full authority to (i) adopt, amend, suspend, waive, and rescind rules and regulations under the ESPP, (ii) appoint agents to administer the ESPP, (iii) correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the ESPP, (iv) construe and interpret the ESPP and its rules and regulations, (v) furnish any required information, and (vi) make all other decisions and determinations under the ESPP.

49


Table of Contents


Shares Available for Issuance

        The ESPP currently authorizes the issuance of 598,313 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustments in certain circumstances described below. If approved by the stockholders at the annual meeting, the ESPP will authorize the issuance of 1,198,313 shares of common stock (i.e., an increase of 600,000 shares).


Adjustments to the Limit of Available Shares

        The maximum number and kind of shares of our common stock reserved and available under the ESPP will be proportionately adjusted, as determined by our board of directors, in the event of any extraordinary dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event affecting shares of our common stock.


Eligibility

        Each of our employees who are regularly scheduled to work more than 20 hours per week and for more than five months per calendar year will be eligible to participate in the ESPP. Under the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, an employee who owns 5% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock is not eligible to participate. For purposes of determining who is a 5% owner, attribution of ownership rules apply, and shares of stock subject to outstanding options are taken into account.


Offering Period

        Under the ESPP, there will be a series of consecutive offering periods. Each offering period will begin at six-month intervals on each February 1 and August 1 and last for six months, ending on July 31 or January 31, as the case may be.


Participation

        Each eligible employee who elects to participate in an offering period will be granted an option to purchase shares of our common stock on the first day of the offering period. The option will automatically be exercised on the last trading day of the offering period, which is the purchase date, based on the employee's accumulated contributions to the ESPP. The purchase price of each share of our common stock under the ESPP will be equal to 85% of the lesser of the closing sales price of our common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or the closing sales price of our stock on the last trading day of the offering period. Participants will generally be permitted to allocate up to 10% of their compensation to purchase shares of our common stock under the ESPP.


Cessation of Participation

        A participant may elect to increase, decrease or discontinue payroll contributions for future offering periods only. Although a participant may not elect to increase or decrease payroll contributions during a given offering period, a participant may elect to withdraw all (but not less than all) of the participant's payroll contributions for a given offering period. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise, a participant who elects to cease participation in the ESPP for a particular offering period will be disqualified from participating in the next offering period. Participation ends automatically upon termination of employment or if the participant ceases to be an eligible employee.

50


Table of Contents


Maximum Number of Shares Purchasable

        On the purchase date, a participant will purchase the maximum number of shares (including fractional shares) purchasable by the participant's accumulated payroll contributions. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be purchased by a participant in a given offering period may not exceed the number derived by dividing $12,500 by the closing sale price of one share of our common stock on the first trading day of the offering period.


Amendment and Termination

        Our board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the ESPP at any time without the consent of our stockholders or participants. However, any such action will be subject to the approval of our stockholders within one year after such board action if such stockholder approval is required by any federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any automated quotation system or stock exchange on which shares of our common stock may then be quoted or listed, or if such stockholder approval is necessary in order for the ESPP to continue to meet the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.


Awards Granted Under the ESPP

        It is currently not possible to predict the number of employees who will elect to participate in the ESPP after the annual meeting.

        The last sales price of a share of our common stock on March 16, 2009 was $23.13 per share.


Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The following is a brief description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to grants that may be awarded under the ESPP to U.S. participants. The ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The ESPP is not intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code and is not subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. This description of the federal income tax consequences of the ESPP is not a complete description. There may be different tax consequences under certain circumstances, and there may be federal gift and estate tax consequences and state, local and foreign tax consequences. All affected individuals should consult their own advisors regarding their own situation. This discussion is intended for the information of the stockholders considering how to vote at the annual meeting and not as tax guidance to individuals who will participate in the ESPP.

        Under the Internal Revenue Code as currently in effect, a participant in the ESPP will not be deemed to have recognized income, nor will the company be entitled to a deduction, upon the participant's purchase of our common stock under the ESPP. Instead, a participant will recognize income when he or she sells or otherwise disposes of our common stock or upon his or her death.

        If a participant sells our common stock purchased under the ESPP more than two years after the date on which the option to purchase our common stock was granted and more than one year after the purchase of our common stock (the holding period), a portion of the participant's gain will be ordinary income and a portion will be capital gain. The participant will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates on the excess of the value of our common stock when the option was granted (on the first day of the offering period) over the purchase price, or, if less, the entire gain on the sale. The participant will have additional capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the proceeds of the sale and the participant's basis in our common stock (the purchase price plus any ordinary income realized). The capital gain rate will depend on how long our common stock is held by the participant. The

51


Table of Contents


company will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to a sale by a participant after the holding period.

        If a participant sells our common stock before the expiration of the holding period, the participant generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates to the extent that the value of our common stock, when purchased, exceeded the purchase price. The company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The participant will have additional capital gain or loss on the difference between the proceeds of the sale and the participant's basis in our common stock (the purchase price plus any ordinary income realized). The capital gain rate will depend on how long our common stock is held by the participant.

        The estate of a participant who dies while holding our common stock purchased under the ESPP will recognize ordinary income in the year of the participant's death in an amount equal to the excess of the value of our common stock when the option was granted over the purchase price, or, if less, the amount by which the fair market value of our common stock on the date of death exceeds the purchase price.


Vote Required for Approval

        The proposal to approve an increase in the number of shares of our common stock reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. Any abstentions will have the effect of votes against the proposal. Any broker non-votes will not have any effect on the proposal.

The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the proposal to approve an increase in the number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP.


PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF SHARES RESERVED AND
AVAILABLE FOR ISSUANCE UNDER THE INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
2007 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

        The company currently maintains the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the "2007 Plan"), which originally became effective on May 8, 2007 upon approval by the stockholders of the company. On March 9, 2009, our board of directors approved an increase in the total number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan of 1,625,000 such that the total number of shares authorized under the 2007 Plan shall be 6,811,208 shares; subject to the limitation that 50,000 shares of the foregoing increase will be used solely to grant options under the 2007 Plan. The amendment and restatement of the 2007 Plan to increase the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan was approved by our board of directors, subject to stockholder approval. Our board of directors has directed that the proposal to increase the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan be submitted to our stockholders for their approval at the annual meeting.

        The 2007 Plan currently has 5,186,208 shares reserved and available for issuance to our employees, and our non-employee directors, participating in the 2007 Plan. As of March 16, 2009, there were 1,008,498 shares of our common stock remaining available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. As of March 16, 2009, the company had 927,937 stock options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $32.65 and a weighted average remaining term of 2.08 years, and 2,174,960 restricted share and stock unit awards outstanding. No new awards were, or are anticipated to be, granted under the 2007 Plan between March 16, 2009 and the annual meeting, except for grants of 10,196 stock unit awards recently made and grants of up to 25,000 awards (assuming a per share value of the company's common stock of $23.13 (which was the closing price per share on March 16, 2009)) for new hire, retention, and recognition purposes. If the stockholders do not approve the amendment and

52


Table of Contents

restatement of the 2007 Plan to increase the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan at the annual meeting, the amendment and restatement of the Plan will not be effective, the increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance will not occur and the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan will remain the same. Our board of directors believes that the 2007 Plan will further the company's compensation strategy. The company's ability to attract, retain and motivate top quality employees and non-employee directors is material to the company's success. Our board of directors believes that the interests of the company and its stockholders will be advanced if the company can offer its employees and non-employee directors the opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interests in the company by receiving awards under the 2007 Plan. Accordingly, our board of directors believes that the availability of an additional 1,625,000 shares under the 2007 Plan will ensure that we can continue to achieve our compensation strategy. Stockholder approval of the amendment and restatement of the 2007 Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan is necessary (i) in order to meet the NYSE listing requirements, (ii) so that compensation attributable to grants and bonus awards under the 2007 Plan may qualify for an exemption from the $1 million deduction limit under section 162(m) of the Code (see discussion of "Federal Income Tax Consequences" below), and (iii) in order for incentive stock options to meet the requirements of the Code.

        The material terms of the 2007 Plan are summarized below. A copy of the full text of the 2007 Plan is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B. This summary of the 2007 Plan is not intended to be a complete description of the 2007 Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the 2007 Plan to which reference is made.

Material Features of the 2007 Plan

General

        The 2007 Plan provides that grants may be made in any of the following forms: (i) ISOs, (ii) NQSOs (together with ISOs, "options"), (iii) stock units, (iv) stock, (v) dividend equivalents and (vi) SARS and other stock-based awards. If and to the extent options and SARs granted under the 2007 Plan terminate, expire or are cancelled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without being exercised or if any stock units, stock, or other stock-based awards are forfeited or terminated, or otherwise not paid in full, the shares subject to such grants will become available again for purposes of the 2007 Plan. Shares of our common stock surrendered in payment of the exercise price of an option will also be available for re-issuance under the 2007 Plan. To the extent grants under the 2007 Plan are paid in cash, and not in shares of our common stock, any shares previously subject to such grants will become available again for purposes of the 2007 Plan.

        The 2007 Plan provides that the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which grants may be made to any individual during any calendar year is 1 million shares, subject to adjustment as described below. A grantee may not accrue dividend equivalents and dividends on performance-based grants during any calendar year in excess of $1 million. All grants under the 2007 Plan will be expressed in shares of our common stock. Stockholder approval of this Proposal will also constitute a reapproval of the foregoing 1 million share limitation and $1 million limitation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code. The share limitation will assure that any deductions to which we would otherwise be entitled, either upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2007 Plan with an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value per share of our common stock on the grant date or upon the subsequent sale of the shares purchased under those options, will not be subject to the $1 million limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per covered executive officer imposed under section 162(m). In addition, shares, stock units, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards issued under the 2007 Plan may qualify as performance-based compensation that is not subject to the section 162(m) limitation, if the issuance of those shares, stock units, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards is approved by the

53


Table of Contents


compensation committee and the vesting is tied to the attainment of the corporate performance objectives discussed below in the section entitled "Qualified Performance-Based Compensation".


Administration

        The 2007 Plan will be administered and interpreted by the compensation committee, or such other committee of non-employee directors appointed by our board of directors to administer the 2007 Plan.

        The compensation committee may:


Eligibility for Participation

        All of our employees as well as all of our non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants under the 2007 Plan. As of February 28, 2009, approximately 1,341 employees and seven (7) non-employee directors were eligible to receive grants under the 2007 Plan. The compensation committee is authorized to select the persons to receive grants from among those eligible and to determine the number of shares of our common stock that are subject to each grant.


Types of Awards

        Options.    The compensation committee may:

54


Table of Contents

        Stock.    The compensation committee may:

        Stock Units.    The compensation committee may:

55


Table of Contents

        Dividend Equivalents.    The compensation committee may:

        SARs and Other Stock-Based Awards.    The compensation committee may:

56


Table of Contents


Qualified Performance-Based Compensation

        The compensation committee:


Deferrals

        The compensation committee may:


Adjustment Provisions

        If there is any change in the number or kind of shares of our common stock by reason of a stock dividend, spinoff, recapitalization, stock split, or combination or exchange of shares, by reason of a merger, reorganization or consolidation, by reason of a reclassification or change in par value or by reason of any other extraordinary or unusual event affecting the outstanding shares of our common stock as a class without the company's receipt of consideration, or if the value of outstanding shares of our common stock is substantially reduced as a result of a spinoff or the company's payment of an extraordinary dividend or distribution, the number of shares of our common stock available for grants, the limit on the number of shares of our common stock any individual may receive pursuant to grants in any year, the number of shares covered by outstanding grants, the kind of shares to be issued under the 2007 Plan, and the price per share or the applicable market value of such grants will be appropriately adjusted by the compensation committee to reflect any increase or decrease in the number or kind of issued shares of our common stock in order to preclude, to the extent practicable, the enlargement or dilution of the rights and benefits under such grants. Any fractional shares resulting from such adjustment will be eliminated.

57


Table of Contents


Change in Control

        In the event of a change in control, the compensation committee may take any of the following actions with respect to any or all outstanding grants under the 2007 Plan, without the consent of the grantee:


Transferability of Grants

        Only the grantee may exercise rights under a grant during the grantee's lifetime. A grantee may not transfer those rights except by will or the laws of descent and distribution; provided, however, that a grantee may transfer a grant other than an ISO pursuant to a domestic relations order. The compensation committee may also provide, in a grant agreement, that a grantee may transfer NQSOs to his or her family members, or one or more trusts or other entities for the benefit of or owned by such family members, consistent with applicable securities laws, according to such terms as the compensation committee may determine.


Grantees Outside the United States

        If any individual who receives a grant under the 2007 Plan is subject to taxation in a country other than the United States, the compensation committee may make the grant on such terms and conditions as the compensation committee determines appropriate to comply with the laws of the applicable country.


No Repricing of Options

        Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, or exchange of shares), the terms of outstanding awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Options or SARs or cancel outstanding Options or SARS in exchange for cash, other awards or Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs without stockholder approval.

58


Table of Contents


Amendment and Termination of the 2007 Plan

        The board of directors may amend or terminate the 2007 Plan at any time, subject to stockholder approval if such approval is required under any applicable laws or stock exchange requirements. The 2007 Plan will terminate on May 7, 2017, unless the 2007 Plan is terminated earlier by the board of directors or is extended by the board of directors with stockholder consent.


Grants Under the 2007 Plan

        Grants under the 2007 Plan are discretionary, so it is not currently possible to predict the number of shares of our common stock that will be granted or who will receive grants under the 2007 Plan after the annual meeting. The last sales price of our common stock on March 16, 2009, was $23.13 per share.


Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences

        The federal income tax consequences of grants under the 2007 Plan will depend on the type of grant. The following description provides only a general description of the application of federal income tax laws to grants under the 2007 Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of stockholders considering how to vote at the annual meeting and not as tax guidance to grantees, as the consequences may vary with the types of grants made, the identity of the grantees and the method of payment or settlement. The summary does not address the effects of other federal taxes (including possible "golden parachute" excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local, or foreign tax laws.

        From the grantees' standpoint, as a general rule, ordinary income will be recognized at the time of delivery of shares of our common stock or payment of cash under the 2007 Plan. Future appreciation on shares of our common stock held beyond the ordinary income recognition event will be taxable as capital gain when the shares of our common stock are sold. The tax rate applicable to capital gain will depend upon how long the grantee holds the shares. We, as a general rule, will be entitled to a tax deduction that corresponds in time and amount to the ordinary income recognized by the grantee, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to capital gain income recognized by the grantee.

        Exceptions to these general rules arise under the following circumstances:

        If shares of our common stock, when delivered, are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture by reason of any employment or performance-related condition, ordinary income taxation and our tax deduction will be delayed until the risk of forfeiture lapses, unless the grantee makes a special election to accelerate taxation under Section 83(b) of the Code.

        If an employee exercises a stock option that qualifies as an ISO, no ordinary income will be recognized, and we will not be entitled to any tax deduction, if shares of our common stock acquired upon exercise of the stock option are held until the later of (A) one year from the date of exercise and (B) two years from the date of grant. However, if the employee disposes of the shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before satisfying both holding period requirements, the employee will recognize ordinary income to the extent of the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise (or the amount realized on the disposition, if less) and the exercise price, and we will be entitled to a tax deduction in that amount. The gain, if any, in excess of the amount recognized as ordinary income will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending upon the length of time the employee held the shares before the disposition.

        A grant may be subject to a 20% tax, in addition to ordinary income tax, at the time the grant becomes vested, plus interest, if the grant constitutes deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code and the requirements of Section 409A of the Code are not satisfied.

59


Table of Contents

        Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a publicly held corporation's tax deduction for compensation paid to its chief executive officer or any of its four other most highly compensated officers in excess of $1 million in any year. Qualified performance-based compensation is excluded from the $1 million deductibility limit, and therefore remains fully deductible by the corporation that pays it. We intend that options and SARs granted under the 2007 Plan will be qualified performance-based compensation. Stock units, stock awards, dividend equivalents, and other stock-based awards granted under the 2007 Plan will be designated as qualified performance-based compensation if the compensation committee conditions such grants on the achievement of specific performance goals in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code.

        We have the right to require that grantees pay to us an amount necessary for us to satisfy our federal, state or local tax withholding obligations with respect to grants. We may withhold from other amounts payable to a grantee an amount necessary to satisfy these obligations. The compensation committee may permit a grantee to satisfy our withholding obligation with respect to grants paid in shares of our common stock by having shares withheld, at the time the grants become taxable, provided that the number of shares withheld does not exceed the individual's minimum applicable withholding tax rate for federal, state and local tax liabilities.


Vote Required for Approval

        The proposal to approve an increase in the number of shares of our common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. Any abstentions will have the effect of votes against the proposal. Any broker non-votes will not have any effect on the proposal.

The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the proposal to approve an increase in the number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.


CONTACTING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        You, or any interested party, may communicate with our board of directors, including our non-management directors and the chairman of the audit committee, by sending a letter to the ITG Board of Directors, P.O. Box 3481, Grand Central Station, New York, New York 10163. Any complaints or concerns relating to ITG's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to the chairman of the audit committee. Other concerns will be referred to the chairman of the board with a copy to the chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee. Any complaints or concerns may be reported anonymously and confidentially. ITG strictly prohibits any retaliation for reporting a possible violation of law, ethics, or firm policy regardless of whom the report concerns.


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        As required by law, we file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These reports, proxy statements and other information contain additional information about our company. You can inspect and copy these materials at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information about the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet Site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding companies that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC's Internet address is http://www.sec.gov. You can also inspect these materials of our company at the offices of the NYSE, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005 and on our website at http://investor.itg.com under SEC Filings.

        The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" information into this proxy statement, which means that we can disclose important information by referring you to another document filed

60


Table of Contents


separately with the SEC. Information incorporated by reference is considered part of this proxy statement, except to the extent that the information is superseded by information in this proxy statement.

        This proxy statement incorporates by reference the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (SEC file number 001-32722). We also incorporate by reference the information contained in all other documents that we file with the SEC after the date of this proxy statement and before the annual meeting. The information contained in any of these documents will be considered part of this proxy statement from the date these documents are filed.

        Any statement contained in this proxy statement or in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this proxy statement to the extent that a statement contained herein or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy statement.

        If you are one of our stockholders and would like to receive a copy of any document referred to in this proxy statement, you should call or write to Investment Technology Group, Inc., 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10017, Attention: Investor Relations (telephone: (800) 991-4484). In order to ensure timely delivery of the documents prior to the annual meeting, you should make any such request not later than May 4, 2009.

        You should rely only on the information contained in (or incorporated by reference into) this proxy statement. We have not authorized anyone to give any information different from the information contained in (or incorporated by reference into) this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated March 25, 2009. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any later date, and the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders shall not mean otherwise.

61


Table of Contents


OTHER MATTERS; STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF ITG

        As of the date of this proxy statement, our board of directors knows of no matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting, other than as described in this proxy statement. If any other matters shall properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof and shall be voted upon, the enclosed proxies will be deemed to confer discretionary authority on the individuals named as proxies therein to vote the shares represented by such proxies as to any such matters. The persons named as proxies intend to vote or not vote in accordance with the recommendation of our board of directors and management.

        Stockholders who, in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed by us in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting must submit their proposals to our Secretary on or before November 25, 2009. As the rules of the SEC make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion.

        In accordance with our by-laws, in order to be properly brought before the 2010 Annual Meeting, a stockholder's notice of the matter the stockholder wishes to present must be delivered to Investment Technology Group, Inc., 380 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York, 10017, Attention: Secretary, not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of this year's annual meeting. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder pursuant to these provisions of our by-laws (and not pursuant to the SEC's Rule 14a-8) must be received no earlier than January 12, 2010 and no later than February 11, 2010.

    By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

GRAPHIC
    P. Mats Goebels
Secretary

62


Table of Contents


Appendix A

INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

        1.    Purpose.    The purpose of this Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") of Investment Technology Group, Inc. (the "Company") is to encourage stock ownership by employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries (as defined below) and thereby provide employees with an incentive to contribute to the profitability and success of the Company, and to provide a benefit that will assist the Company in competing to attract and retain employees of high quality. The Plan, which is intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" meeting the requirements of Section 423 of the Code, is for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

        2.    Definitions.    For purposes of the Plan, in addition to the terms defined in Section 1, terms are defined as set forth below:

A-1


Table of Contents

        3.    Administration.    

A-2


Table of Contents

        5.    Enrollment and Contributions.    

The Company will notify an employee of the date as of which he or she is eligible to initially enroll in the Plan, and will make available to each eligible employee the necessary enrollment forms.

A-3


Table of Contents

        6.    Purchases of Stock.    

A-4


Table of Contents

        7.    Withdrawal or Transfer of Shares, Disqualification, and Account Distribution Upon Termination.    

A-5


Table of Contents

        8.    General.    

A-6


Table of Contents

        9.    General Provisions.    

A-7


Table of Contents

A-8


Table of Contents


Appendix B

INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.

2007 OMNIBUS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

Amended and Restated Effective May 12, 2009, Subject to Approval By the Company's Stockholders

        1.    Purpose    

        The purpose of the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is to provide (i) designated employees of Investment Technology Group, Inc. (the "Company") and its subsidiaries, and (ii) non-employee members of the board of directors of the Company with the opportunity to receive grants of stock options, stock units, stock awards, dividend equivalents and other stock-based awards. The Company believes that the Plan will encourage the participants to contribute materially to the growth of the Company, thereby benefiting the Company's stockholders, and will align the economic interests of the participants with those of the stockholders. The Plan was originally effective on May 8, 2007 upon approval by the stockholders of the Company. This amendment and restatement will be effective May 12, 2009 if approved by the Company's stockholders as of such date.

        The Investment Technology Group, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan"), the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option and Long-term Incentive Plan (the "1994 Plan"), the Amended and Restated Investment Technology Group, Inc. Stock Unit Award Program Subplan (the "SUA Subplan"), the Amended and Restated Investment Technology Group, Inc. Directors' Retainer Fee Subplan (the "Directors' Retainer Fee Subplan"), and the Amended and Restated Investment Technology Group, Inc. Directors' Equity Subplan (the "Directors' Equity Subplan", and collectively with the SUA Subplan and the Directors' Retainer Fee Subplan, the "Subplans") were merged with and into this Plan as of May 8, 2007. No additional grants will be made thereafter under the Director Plan and the 1994 Plan. Outstanding grants under the Director Plan, the 1994 Plan and the Subplans as of May 8, 2007 will continue in effect according to their terms as in effect on May 8, 2007 (subject to such amendments as the Committee (as defined below) determines appropriate, consistent with the terms of the Director Plan, the 1994 Plan or the Subplans, as applicable), and the shares with respect to such outstanding grants will be issued or transferred under this Plan. After May 8, 2007, the Subplans shall continue in effect as subplans of the Plan and grants and/or deferrals may continue to be made under the Subplans with shares associated with such grants and/or deferrals being issued under this Plan.

        2.    Definitions    

        Whenever used in this Plan, the following terms will have the respective meanings set forth below:

B-1


Table of Contents

B-2


Table of Contents

B-3


Table of Contents

        3.    Administration    

        4.    Grants    

        5.    Shares Subject to the Plan    

B-4


Table of Contents

        6.    Eligibility for Participation    

        7.    Options    

B-5


Table of Contents

B-6


Table of Contents

        8.    Stock Units    

        9.    Stock Awards    

B-7


Table of Contents

        10.    Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Stock-Based Awards    

B-8


Table of Contents

        11.    Dividend Equivalents    

        12.    Qualified Performance-Based Compensation    

B-9


Table of Contents

        13.    Deferrals    

        The Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer receipt of the payment of cash (including dividend equivalents) or the delivery of shares that would otherwise be due to the Participant in connection with any Grant. The Committee shall establish rules and procedures for any such deferrals, consistent with applicable requirements of section 409A of the Code.

        14.    Withholding of Taxes    

B-10


Table of Contents

        15.    Transferability of Grants    

        16.    Consequences of a Change in Control    

B-11


Table of Contents

        17.    Requirements for Issuance of Shares    

        No Company Stock shall be issued in connection with any Grant hereunder unless and until all legal requirements applicable to the issuance of such Company Stock have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee shall have the right to condition any Grant made to any Participant hereunder on such Participant's undertaking in writing to comply with such restrictions on his or her subsequent disposition of such shares of Company Stock as the Committee shall deem necessary or advisable, and certificates representing such shares may be legended to reflect any such restrictions. Certificates representing shares of Company Stock issued under the Plan will be subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as may be required by applicable laws, regulations and interpretations, including any requirement that a legend be placed thereon. Except as determined under Section 9(a), no Participant shall have any right as a shareholder with respect to Company Stock covered by a Grant until shares have been issued to the Participant.

        18.    Amendment and Termination of the Plan    

        19.    Miscellaneous    

B-12


Table of Contents

B-13


THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature (Joint Owners) Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Date INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. IVSTT1 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on May 11, 2009, except proxies submitted for shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 4, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Investment Technology Group, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time, on May 11, 2009, except proxies submitted for shares held in the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 4, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Investment Technology Group, Inc. c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. 380 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10017 To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. For Against Abstain 2. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent auditors for the 2009 fiscal year. 3. Approval of an increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For All Withhold All For All Except Vote on Directors 01) J. William Burdett 02) Christopher V. Dodds 03) Robert C. Gasser 04) Timothy L. Jones Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 through 4. 05) Robert L. King 06) Kevin J.P. O’Hara 07) Maureen O’Hara 08) Brian J. Steck 1. Election of Directors: Nominees: Vote on Proposals Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Proxy Statement, and hereby revokes all previously granted proxies. Please sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. 4. Approval of an increase in the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the Investment Technology Group, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. B A Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. Yes No

 


Address Changes/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. The stockholder signing on the reverse of this proxy card appoints each of Robert C. Gasser, Howard C. Naphtali and P. Mats Goebels as proxies with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and to vote all shares of Common Stock of Investment Technology Group, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on March 16, 2009 or which the undersigned would otherwise be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2009, and any adjournment thereof, upon all matters that may properly come before the meeting. All shares votable by the undersigned will be voted by the proxies named above in the manner specified on the reverse side of this card, and such proxies are authorized to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. If this proxy relates to shares held in the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, then, when properly executed, it shall constitute instructions to the plan trustee to vote in the manner directed herein. Proxy — INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 12, 2009: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com. Your vote must be received prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and no later than May 11, 2009. However, if this proxy relates to shares held by you in the Investment Technology Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, your vote must be received by May 4, 2009 to enable the trustee of the plan to vote in the manner directed by you. Attendance at the annual meeting will not enable you to revoke a previously delivered proxy with respect to shares held under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan. (Continued and to be voted on reverse side.) IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.